22007 EMP Rev.1_South Tryon Commercial (BPN 22007-18-060)_20190327

Environmental Management Plan
South Tryon Commercial
Charlotte, North Carolina
Brownfields Project No. 22007-18-060
Revised March 26, 2019
H&H Job No. RMR-006
#C-1269 Engineering
#C-245 Geology

CONTENTS
Completed EMP Template Form

Tables

Table 1 Summary of Soil Analytical Data
Table 2 Summary of Groundwater Analytical Data
Table 3 Summary of Soil Vapor Analytical Data

Figures

Figure 1 Site Location Map
Figure 2 Site and Surrounding Area Map
Figure 3 Sample Location Map

Appendices

Appendix A Current Redevelopment Site Plan
Appendix B Grading Plan and Cut-Fill Analysis
Appendix C Construction Schedule

1 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM 
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 

This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in 
the North Carolina Brownfields Program at the direction of a Brownfields project manager. 

The EMP is a typical requirement of a Brownfields Agreement (BFA).  Its purpose is to clarify 
actions to be taken during the demolition and construction at Brownfields properties in an 
effort to avoid delays in the event of the discovery of new contamination sources or other 
environmental conditions.  The EMP provides a means to document redevelopment plans and 
environmental data for each applicable environmental medium to inform regulatory‐compliant 
decision‐making at the site.  As much detail as possible should be included in the EMP, 
including contingency planning for unknowns.  Consult your project manager if you have 
questions. 

Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all 
pertinent attachments, see checklist below, to their Brownfields project manager prior to any 
earthmoving or other development‐related activities that have the potential to disturb soil at 
the Brownfields Property, including demolition.  For the resultant EMP to be valid for use, it 
must be completed, reviewed by the program, signed by all parties working on the project, 
and approved by the Brownfields project manager.  Failure to comply with the requirements of 
the EMP could jeopardize project eligibility, or in the event of a completed agreement, be 
cause for a reopener   

So that the EMP provides value in protecting brownfields eligibility and public health, the 
preparer shall ensure that the following steps have been completed prior to submitting the 
EMP for review.  Any EMP prepared without completing these steps is premature.   

☒ Site sampling and assessment that meets Brownfields’ objectives is complete and has 
been reviewed and approved by the Brownfields Project Manager. 

☒ Specific redevelopment plans, even if conceptual, have been developed for the project, 
submitted and reviewed by the Brownfields Project Manager. 

2 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
Please submit, along with the completed EMP form, the following attachments, as relevant 
and applicable to the proposed redevelopment:      

☒ A set of redevelopment plans, including architectural/engineering plans, if available; if 
not conceptual plans may suffice if updated when detailed plans are drafted. 

☒ A figure overlaying redevelopment plans on a map of the extent of contamination for 
each media. 

☒ Site grading plans that include a cut and fill analysis. 

☒ A figure showing the proposed location and depth of impacted soil that would remain 
on site after construction grading. 

☐ Any necessary permits for redevelopment (i.e. demolition, etc.). 

☒ A detailed construction schedule that includes timing and phases of construction. 

☒ Tabulated data summaries for each impacted media (i.e. soil, groundwater, soil gas, 
etc.) applicable to the proposed redevelopment. 

☒ Figures with the sampling locations and contamination extents for each impacted media 
applicable to the proposed redevelopment. 

☐ A full final grade sampling and analysis plan, if the redevelopment plan is final. 

☐ If known, information about each proposed potential borrow soil source, such as aerial 
photos, historic site maps, historic Sanborn maps, a site history, necessary for 
brownfields approval. 

☐ Information and, analytical data if required, for quarries, or other borrow sources, 
detailing the type of material proposed for importation to the Brownfields Property. 

☐ A work plan for the sampling and analysis of soil to be brought onto the Brownfields 
Property.  Refer to Issue Resolution 15 in Brownfields Program Guidelines. 

☐ A map of the Brownfields Property showing the location of soils proposed for export 
and sampling data from those areas. 

☒ If a Vapor Mitigation System is required by the Brownfields Program, the Vapor 
Intrusion Mitigation System (VIMS) plan will be signed and sealed by a NC Professional 
Engineer.  The VIMS Plan may also be submitted under separate cover. 

3 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
GENERAL INFORMATION 

Date: 2/27/2019 Revision Date (if applicable): 3/26/2019 

Brownfields Assigned Project Name: South Tryon Commercial 

Brownfields Project Number: 22007‐18‐060 

Brownfields Property Address: 340 W. Tremont Street, Charlotte 

Brownfields Property Area (acres): approximately 2.4 acres  
Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit?.......................☐ Yes   ☒ No 
If yes enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text. 
Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit….……..☐ Yes   ☒ No 
If yes, enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text. 

COMMUNICATIONS 

A copy of this EMP shall be distributed to all the parties below as well as any contractors or site workers 
that may be exposed to site vapors, soil, groundwater, and/or surface water.  Additionally, a copy of the 
EMP shall be maintained at the Brownfields Property during redevelopment activities.  NOTE, THE EMP 
DOES NOT TAKE THE PLACE OF A SITE‐SPECIFIC HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN. 

Prospective Developer (PD): RRPV South Tryon Charlotte, LP   
Contact Person: Mr. Ashley Saulpaugh  
Phone Numbers:   Office: 704‐377‐6730 Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text.   
Email: [e-mail]   

Contractor for PD: Choate Construction   
Contact Person: David Behr 
Phone Numbers:   Office: 704‐602‐7255 Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text.   
Email: [e-mail]    

Environmental Consultant: Hart & Hickman, PC    
Contact Person: Ralph McGee 
Phone Numbers:   Office: 704‐887‐4621 Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text.   
Email: [e-mail]  

Brownfields Program Project Manager:  Bill Schmithorst 
Phone Numbers:   Office: 919‐707‐8159 Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text.   
Email: [e-mail]   

Other DEQ Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch, 

4 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste):  
Click or tap here to enter text. 

NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM   

Written advance Notification Times to Brownfields Project Manager: Check each box to accept 
minimum advance notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsite task: 

On‐site assessment or remedial activities:……………………………………….…… 10 days Prior        ☒ 

Construction or grading start:……………………………………….………………………. 10 days Prior       ☒

Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously 
unknown contamination: ……………………………….……………………………………. Within 48 hours   ☒

Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood or soil erosion control measures in 
area of contamination, ventilation of work zones):…………….……….……… Within 48 hours  ☒ 

Installation of mitigation systems:………………………….………………….……….. 10 days Prior         ☐

Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to implement redevelopment 
activities: (as applicable): ……………………….…………………………………………..… Within 30 days     ☒ 

REDEVELOPMENT PLANS 

1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply): 
☐Residential  ☐Recreational  ☐Institutional  ☒Commercial  ☒Office  ☒Retail  ☐Industrial 
☒Other specify: 
Open space and parking 

2) Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth‐moving activities 
at the site: 
☒ Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps) 
☐ Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel lines, utility 
lines, etc. 
☐ Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors 

3) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (MANDATORY: attach detailed plans or conceptual plans, if 
detailed plans are not available. EMP review without such information would be premature): 
  Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building 
slabs/pavement, grading plans and planned construction of new structures:  
A Site location map is provided as Figure 1 and the Site and surrounding area are shown in Figure 

5 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
2.  Redevelopment plans include construction of one approximate 17,400 square foot (sq ft) 
single story building (Building AB), and one approximate 43,700 sq ft 3‐story building (Building C; 
approximately 14,600 sq ft footprint) and associated parking areas and open spaces.  The 
intended future uses of the proposed buildings include commercial businesses, retail businesses, 
and offices with associated parking areas and common areas.  A copy of the current 
redevelopment plan is included in Appendix A.  A copy of the proposed grading plan with cut‐fill 
analysis is provided as Appendix B.  

4) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?: 
   ☐ Yes  ☒ No ☐ Unknown  
☐ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with 
applicable legal requirements, including without limitation those related to lead and asbestos 
abatement that are administered by the Health Hazards Control Unit within the Division of Public 
Health of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services.  If available, please 
provide a copy of your demolition permit.  

5) Are sediment and erosion control measures required by federal, state, or local regulations? 
  ☒ Yes    ☐ No    ☐ Unknown  
☒  If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with 
applicable legal requirements.  If soil disturbance is necessary to install sediment and erosion 
control measures, they may not begin until this EMP is approved.  

6) Which category of risk‐based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the 
Brownfields Agreement?  Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall 
be cited in the Brownfields Agreement for comparison purposes. 
☐ Residential   ☒ Non‐Residential or Industrial/Commercial 

7) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule): 
a) Construction start date: 4/2/2019 

b) Anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):  
Approximately 7 months 
A detailed construction schedule is provided as Appendix C. 

c) Additional phases planned? ☐ Yes  ☐ No   
  If yes, specify the start date and/or activities if known:  
Start Date:  Click or tap to enter a date. 
    Planned Activity: 
Click or tap here to enter text. 

Start Date:  Click or tap to enter a date. 
    Planned Activity: 
Click or tap here to enter text. 

6 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date. 
    Planned Activity: 
Click or tap here to enter text. 

d) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: 11/1/2019

CONTAMINATED MEDIA 

1) Contaminated Media on the Brownfields Property 
Part 1. Soil:……………………………………….……………. ☐  Yes   ☒ No   ☐ Suspected   
Part 2. Groundwater:.……………………….……..……. ☒  Yes   ☐ No   ☐ Suspected   
Part 3. Surface Water:.……………...……..…………… ☐  Yes   ☒ No   ☐ Suspected   
Part 4. Sediment:.……………...……..…………………… ☐  Yes   ☒ No   ☐ Suspected   
Part 5. Soil Vapor:…..…………...……..…………………. ☐  Yes   ☒ No   ☐ Suspected   
Part 6. Sub‐Slab Soil Vapor:……...……..…………….. ☐  Yes   ☐ No   ☐ Suspected 
Part 7. Indoor Air:...……..…………………………………. ☐  Yes   ☐ No   ☐ Suspected 

2) For the Area of Proposed Redevelopment on the Brownfields Property, attach tabulated data 
summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with sample locations.  

PART 1. Soil – Please fill out the information below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate 
using known areas of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan.  Provide a figure 
overlaying new construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations.

1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list general groups of contaminants): 
Multiple soil sampling events have been completed at the Brownfields property.  A tabular 
summary of available soil analytical data from each sampling event in comparison to the 
February 2018 North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous 
Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) is included as Table 1.  Soil 
sample locations are shown in Figure 3.  A brief summary of the results is provided below.    

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)  
Assessment activities conducted on the Brownfields property have identified low levels of VOCs 
at concentrations below DEQ IHSB Industrial/Commercial PSRGs.  

Semi‐Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs) 
Assessment activities conducted on the Brownfields property have identified low levels of SVOCs 
at concentrations below DEQ IHSB Industrial/Commercial PSRGs.  

7 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) 
Assessment activities conducted on the Brownfields property did not identify PCBs at 
concentrations above laboratory method detection limits. 

Metals  
Assessment activities conducted on the Brownfields property have identified low levels of metals 
at concentrations below DEQ IHSB Industrial/Commercial PSRGs.  In addition, the metals 
concentrations are within the expected range for naturally occurring levels and are therefore 
considered background.   

Organochlorine Pesticides (OCPs) 
Assessment activities conducted on the Brownfields property did not identify OCPs at 
concentrations above laboratory method detection limits. 

2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet): 
Not applicable 

3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet): 
Up to 104,000 sq ft (i.e., entire site will be graded for leveling prior to construction) 

4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet): 
Proposed grading activities are expected to include excavations of up to approximately 6 ft 
below ground surface (bgs) in various portions of the Brownfields property to reach final 
proposed grade elevations.  Construction of building footers, foundations and utility installations 
may require additional excavations of up to 3 to 5 ft bgs.  A grading plan and cut/fill analysis for 
the proposed redevelopment is provided as Appendix C. 

5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan): 
Up to approximately 1,800 cubic yards of soil are planned to be excavated and re‐used on‐Site as 
beneficial fill during grading activities.   

6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants:             
None anticipated at this time 

7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable:   
None anticipated at this time. 

Part 1.A. MANAGING ONSITE SOIL 
If soil is anticipated to be excavated from the Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields 
Property, or otherwise disturbed during site grading or other redevelopment activities, please 
provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are 

8 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
acceptable, if only preliminary data available).   

1) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION:  
a) Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the North Carolina Hazardous 
Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31‐261.35?....................................... ☐Yes   ☒No 
☐ If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes 
generating the waste (include pertinent analytical results as needed). 
Click or tap here to enter text. 

☐ If yes, do the soils exceed the “Contained‐Out” levels in Attachment 1 of the 
North Carolina Contained‐In Policy?................................................. ☐ Yes   ☐ No 

b) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS 
THE CONTAINED‐OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA 
CONTAINED‐IN POLICY THE SOIL MAY NOT BE RE‐USED ON SITE AND MUST BE 
DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND 
REGULATIONS.     
c)  Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE?.................................... ☐ Yes   ☒ No 
☐ If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results). 
☐ Ignitability  Click or tap here to enter text.               
☐ Corrosivity Click or tap here to enter text. 
☐ Reactivity Click or tap here to enter text. 
☐ Toxicity Click or tap here to enter text. 
☐ TCLP results Click or tap here to enter text. 
☐ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual 
hazardous constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory 
TCLP standard)   
Click or tap here to enter text. 

☒ If no, explain rationale:  
Soil analytical data does not indicate detections capable of exceeding toxicity 
characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) criteria using the Rule of 20. 

d) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE 
SOIL MAY NOT BE RE‐USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE 
WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS. 

2) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in 
place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite): 
      ☐ Preliminary Health‐Based Residential SRGs  

9 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
      ☒ Preliminary Health‐Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs  
           ☒ Division of Waste Management Risk Calculator (For Brownfields Properties Only) 
    ☐ Site‐specific risk‐based cleanup level. Please provide details of methods used for 
determination/explanation.  
Click or tap here to enter text. 

Additional comments:  
Click or tap here to enter text. 

3) If known impacted soil is proposed to be reused within the Brownfields Property Boundary, 
please check the measures that will be utilized to ensure safe placement and documentation of 
same.   Please attach a proposed location diagram/site map.        
☒ Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields Project Manager 
☒ Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil on site map 
to Brownfields Project Manager once known 
☐ Geotextile to mark depth of fill material.  
Provide description of material:  
Click or tap here to enter text. 

☒ Manage soil under impervious cap ☒  or clean fill ☒  
☒ Describe cap or fill:  
Should potentially impacted soil be encountered during redevelopment, the potentially 
impacted soil will be placed in areas that will be beneath impervious surfaces (asphalt 
pavement, sidewalks, access roads, buildings, etc.) or a minimum of 2 ft of clean fill upon 
completion of redevelopment activities.  

☒ Confer with NC BF Project Manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re‐recorded if 
actions are Post‐Recordation).         
☒ GPS the location and provide site map with final location. 
☐ Other. Please provide a description of the measure:  

4) Please describe the following action(s) to be taken during and following excavation and 
management of site soils: 
Management of fugitive dust from site 
☒ Yes, describe the method will include: 
Significant areas of contaminated soil are not expected to be encountered during Site 
redevelopment activities based upon soil sampling data and the grading plan. The grading 
contractor will take into account conditions such as wind speed, wind direction, and 
moisture content of soil during soil grading and stockpiling activities to minimize dust 
generation.  Particular attention will be paid by contractors to implement dust control 
Click or tap here to enter text. 

10 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
measures as needed based on Site and atmospheric conditions (i.e., by controlled water 
application, hydro‐seeding, and/or mulch, stone, or plastic cover).  Potentially impacted soil 
will be managed as described below   

☐ No, explain rationale: 
Click or tap here to enter text. 

Field Screening of site soil 
☒ Yes, describe the field screening method, frequency of field screening, person conducting 
field screening:  
During soil disturbance at the Site, the workers or contractors will observe soils for 
evidence of potential significantly impacted soil.  Evidence of potential significantly 
impacted soil includes a distinct unnatural color, strong odor, or filled or previously 
disposed materials of concerns (i.e., chemicals, tanks, drums, etc.).  Should the above be 
noted during Site work, the contractor will contact the project environmental engineer to 
observe the suspect condition.  If the project environmental engineer confirms that the 
material may be impacted, then the procedures below will be implemented. In addition, 
the environmental engineer will contact the DEQ Brownfields project manager within two 
business days to advise that person of the condition 

☐ No, explain rationale:    
Click or tap here to enter text. 

Soil Sample Collection 
☐ Yes, describe the sampling method (e.g., in‐situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.):  
Click or tap here to enter text. 

☒ No, explain rationale:  
Collection of additional soil samples is not anticipated based on results of previous Site 
assessment activities.  If significant soil impact is encountered during grading and/or 
installation or removal of utilities, excavation will proceed only as far as needed to allow 
grading and/or construction of the utility to continue and/or only as far as needed to 
allow alternate corrective measures described below.  Suspect significantly impacted soil 
excavated during grading and/or utility line installation or removal may be stockpiled and 
covered in a secure area to allow construction to progress.  Suspect impacted soil will be 
underlain by and covered with minimum 10‐mil plastic sheeting.  At least one 
representative sample of the soil will be collected for analysis of total VOCs, SVOCs, and 
RCRA metals.  If the results of analysis of the sample indicate that the soil could 
potentially exceed toxicity characteristic hazardous waste criteria, then the soil will also 
be analyzed by TCLP for those compounds that could exceed the toxicity characteristic 
hazardous waste criteria.  *Please note that total chromium concentrations detected at 
the Site will be considered trivalent chromium as hexavalent chromium detections in Site 
soil appear to be consistent with background levels.  If concentrations of total chromium 

11 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
are detected in a soil sample at concentrations greater than an order of magnitude above 
the highest detected historical concentration (100 mg/kg), that soil sample will be 
submitted for hexavalent chromium analysis.                                                                                  
Impacted soil will be handled in the manner described below based upon the laboratory 
analyses:                                                                                                                                                   
i.       If no organic compounds are detected in a sample (other than which are 
attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts) and metals are below the lowest 
applicable PSRG or are consistent with Site‐specific background levels, then the soil will be 
deemed suitable for use as on‐Site fill or as off‐Site fill.  The proposed location(s) for off‐
Site placement of soil (other than a permitted facility) along with the receiving facility’s 
written approval for acceptance of the soil will be provided to DEQ for approval prior to 
taking the soil off‐Site.                                                                                                                           
ii.       If detectable levels of compounds are found which do not exceed the DEQ IHSB 
Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (other than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory 
artifacts or which are consistent with Site‐specific background levels for metals) and the 
TCLP concentrations are below hazardous waste criteria, then the soil may be used on‐
Site as fill without conditions.                                                                                                              
iii.     If detectable levels of compounds are found which exceed the DEQ IHSB 
Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (other than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory 
artifacts or which are consistent with background levels for metals) and the TCLP 
concentrations are below hazardous waste criteria, then the soil, with DEQ written 
approval, may be used on‐Site as fill below an impervious surface, or at least 2 ft of 
compacted clean soil.  If the impacted soil with concentrations above 
Industrial/Commercial PSRGs is moved to an on‐Site location, its location and depth will 
be documented, and its location will be provided to DEQ.                                                             
iv.     Impacted soil may be transported to a permitted facility such as a landfill provided 
that the soil is accepted at the disposal facility.  If soil is transported to a permitted 
facility, the permitted facility’s written approval or approved waste characterization 
profile to dispose of soil from the Site will be included with the final EMP report.  In the 
unlikely event that the sample data indicates concentrations above TCLP hazardous waste 
criteria, then the soil must be transported off‐site to a permitted disposal facility that can 
accept or treat hazardous waste.                                                                                            
*Please note that should the PD elect to transport export soil to a permitted facility or to 
a DEQ Brownfields pre‐approved receiving facility, soil will be direct loaded onto trucks 
for transport off‐Site.  

If soil samples are collected for analysis, please check the applicable chemical analytes: 
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 
☒ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270 
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium 
and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): 

12 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
EPA Methods 6020/7471

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):  
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):  
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, 
Herbicides, etc.): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): 

☒ Check to confirm that stockpiling of known or suspected impacted soils will be conducted 
in accordance with Figure 1 of this EMP.  Stockpile methodology should provide erosion 
control, prohibiting contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil, 
and preventing contaminated runoff.  Explain any variances or provide additional details as 
needed: 

☒ Final grade sampling of exposed native soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or 
permanent hardscape). Select chemical analyses for final grade samples with check boxes 
below (Check all that apply): 
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 
☒ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270 
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, 
selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): 
EPA Method 6020 and 7471

☒ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):    
EPA Method 8081

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):  
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent 
Chromium, Herbicides, etc.):  

Please provide a scope of work for final grade sampling, including a diagram of soil 
sampling locations, number of samples to be collected, and brief sampling methodology.  
Samples should be collected from 0‐2 ft below ground surface, with the exception of VOCs 
which should be taken from 1‐2 ft below ground surface.  Alternatively, a work plan for 
final grade sampling may be submitted under separate cover. 

Click or tap here to enter text. 

13 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
☒ If final grade sampling was NOT selected please explain rationale: 
Following completion of soil disturbance for future Site development (i.e., after grading 
and utility construction), an environmental professional will be contracted to assess the 
Site for areas that are not covered with clean fill soil, building foundations, sidewalks, or 
asphalt or concrete parking areas and driveways, or other similar impervious areas.  If such 
areas exist, a plan will be prepared for final grade sampling for DEQ Brownfields review 
and approval.  If no such areas exist, documentation will be provided to the DEQ 
Brownfields project manager. 

Part 1.B. IMPORTED FILL SOIL 

NO SOIL MAY BE BROUGHT ONTO THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL 
FROM THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM.  According to the Brownfields IR 15, “Documenting 
imported soil (by sampling, analysis, and reporting in accordance with review and written 
approval in advance by the Brownfields Program), will safeguard the liability protections provided 
by the brownfields agreement and is in the best interest of the prospective developer/property 
owner.” 

Requirements for importing fill: 

1) Will fill soil be imported to the site?................................................ ☒ Yes  ☐ No  ☐ Unknown 

2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported?  
According to the grading plan and cut‐fill analysis, up to approximately 1,202 cubic yards of 
import soil may be needed to balance the Site.  The PD also plans to import limited amounts of 
organic rich topsoil from a reputable landscape material vendor for use in proposed landscaped 
areas.. 

3) If yes, what is the anticipated depth that fill soil will be placed at the property? (If a range 
of depths, please list the range.) 
Select areas at the Site will require up to approximately 6 ft of fill.  Soil from areas of cut will be 
used in planned areas of fill to balance the Site.  The estimated approximately 1,202 cubic yards of 
fill will be placed at the Site for leveling once on‐Site soil has been used.  Therefore, the 
anticipated depth for placement of import fill is unknown at this time.    

4) Provide the source of fill, including: location, site history, nearby environmental concerns, 
etc. Attach aerial photos, maps, historic Sanborn maps and a borrow source site history: 
The source of potential import fill that may be needed is unknown at this time.  DEQ will be 
notified and the procedures outlined below will be implemented prior to transporting soil to the 
Site for use as fill. 

5) PRIOR TO ITS PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, provide a plan to analyze fill 
soil to demonstrate that it meets acceptable standards applicable to the site and can be 
approved for use at the Brownfields property. 

14 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
The PD plans to import limited amounts of organic rich topsoil from a commercial landscape 
material vendor for use in proposed landscaped areas.  The PD does not plan to collect samples 
of landscaping materials prior to placement at the Site.  DEQ Brownfields will be notified of the 
volume of landscaping material needed and the proposed source of the material prior to 
placement in proposed landscaping areas.  A limited volume of import fill for grading and 
construction purposes may be needed during redevelopment.  Please refer to No. 7 below for 
details outlining the proposed plan to demonstrate import soil meets acceptable standards 
applicable to the Site. 

6) Please check the applicable chemical analytes for fill soil samples.  (Check all that apply): 
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 
☒ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270 
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, 
selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): 
EPA Method 6020 and EPA Method 7471

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):    
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):  
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent 
Chromium, Herbicides, etc.):  
Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 7199

7) The scope of work for import fill sampling may be provided below or in a Work Plan 
submitted separately for DEQ review and approval.  Attach specific location maps for in‐situ 
borrow sites.  If using a quarry, provide information on the type of material to be brought 
onto the Brownfields Property. 
The PD will follow the procedures outlined below to demonstrate import soil meets acceptable 
standards applicable to the Site.                                                                                                                        
If the PD plans to import fill material from Vulcan Materials Company quarry located near 
Pineville, NC or from the Martin Marietta quarry located on Beatties Ford Road in Charlotte, NC, 
and the material from these facilities is virgin material, no samples of the import material will be 
collected as adequate analytical data is available in the DEQ Brownfields database to demonstrate 
virgin material from these facilities is suitable for use as structural fill at a Brownfields property.      
If fill soil is obtained from an off‐Site property that is not a known permitted quarry, a sampling 
plan will be developed and submitted for DEQ review.  DEQ approval of the sampling plan and 
analytical results will be obtained prior to transporting import soil to the Site. The specific 
sampling rate will be outlined in the aforementioned sampling plan.  However, if the proposed 
borrow source has not been previously developed (i.e., virgin land), soil samples will be collected 
for laboratory analyses indicated above at a general rate of one per 1,000 cubic yards.  If the 
borrow source property has been previously developed, soil samples will be collected for 

15 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
laboratory analyses indicated above at a general rate of approximately one per 500 cubic yards.  
Fill soil will be considered suitable for use at the Site if it does not contain compound 
concentrations above DEQ IHSB Industrial/Commercial PSRGs or typical metals concentrations 
which are consistent with background levels identified at the Site.   

Part 1.C. EXPORTED SOIL 

NO SOIL MAY LEAVE THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE 
BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM.  FAILURE TO OBTAIN APPROVAL MAY VIOLATE A BROWNFIELDS 
AGREEMENT CAUSING A REOPENER OR JEOPARDIZING ELIGIBILITY IN THE PROGRAM, 
ENDANGERING LIABILITY PROTECTIONS AND MAKING SAID ACTION POSSIBLY SUBJECT TO 
ENFORCEMENT.  JUSTIFICATIONS PROVIDED BELOW MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PROGRAM IN 
WRITING PRIOR TO COMPLETING TRANSPORT ACTIVITIES.  Please refer to Brownfields IR 15 for 
additional details.  

1) If export from a Brownfields Property is anticipated, please provide details regarding the 
proposed export actions.  Volume of exported soil, depths, location from which soil will 
be excavated on site, related sampling results, etc. Provide a site map with locations of 
export and sampling results included. 
Export soil is not anticipated at this time.  Should soil need to be exported from the Brownfields 
property during redevelopment, a sampling plan will be developed and submitted to DEQ 
Brownfields for review and approval once the volume of soil for export is known.  Generally, soil 
samples will be collected from export soil at a rate of 1 sample per every 500 cubic yards of 
export. 

DEQ approval of the sampling plan and analytical results will be obtained prior to transporting 
export soil from the Site.  Based on analytical results of soil samples collected from the export 
soil, the soil will be transported off‐Site to a suitable location.  The PD will notify DEQ 
Brownfields of the location receiving the export soil and DEQ Brownfields approval and written 
approval from the receiving facility will be obtained prior to transporting the soil off‐Site. 

2) To what type of facility will the export Brownfields soil be sent?  
☒ Subtitle D/Municipal Solid Waste Landfill (analytical program to be determined by 
landfill) 
☒ Permitted but Unlined Landfill (i.e. LCID, C&D, etc.) Analytical program to be 
determined by the accepting Landfill;  
☒ Landfarm or other treatment facility  
☒ Use as fill at another suitable Brownfields Property – determination that a 
site is suitable will require, at a minimum, that similar concentrations of the same or 
similar contaminants already exist at both sites, use of impacted soil will not increase 
the potential for risk to human health and the environment at the receiving Brownfields 
property, and that a record of the acceptance of such soil from the property owner of 
the receiving site is provided to Brownfields.  Please provide additional details below.  

16 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
☒ Use as Beneficial Fill off‐site at a non‐Brownfields Property ‐ Please provide 
documentation of approval from the property owner for receipt of fill material.  This will 
also require approval by the DEQ Solid Waste Section.  Additional information is 
provided in IR 15.  Please provide additional details below.  

3) Additional Details: (if transfer of soil to another property is requested above, please provide 
details related to the proposed plans). 
The environmental engineer will contact DEQ Brownfields to obtain DEQ Brownfields and DEQ 
Solid Waste approval prior to exporting soil to a non‐Brownfields property or non‐permitted 
disposal facility.  

Part 1.D. MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES 

☐ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill 
(Preferred) 

☒ Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is not a 
hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they 
were removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original 
depth from which it was excavated. 

☐ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport, 
and/or degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants? 
☐ If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials: 
Click or tap here to enter text. 

☒ If no, include rationale here: 
Results of assessment activities completed at the Site indicate that no soil vapor concentrations 
exceeding risk thresholds for a worker have been identified at the Site. 

Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches:  
Although not anticipated, in the event contaminated soil and/or vapors are encountered in utility 
trenches during redevelopment activities, the trench will be evacuated and appropriate safety 
screening of the vapors will be performed to protect workers.  If results indicate further action is 
warranted in response to vapors to protect workers, appropriate engineering controls (such as use of 
industrial fans) will be implemented.   

The contractor and workers will observe soil for potential impacts during utility installation activities. 
Evidence of potential significant impacted soil includes a distinct unnatural color, strong odor, or filled 
or previously disposed materials of concerns (i.e. chemicals, tanks, drums, etc.).  Should the above be 
noted during utility work, the contractor will contact the project environmental engineer to observe 
the suspect condition.  If the project environmental engineer confirms that the material may be 
impacted, then the procedures outlined Managing On‐Site Soil above will be implemented.  In 

17 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
addition, the environmental engineer will contact the DEQ Brownfields project manager within two 
business days to advise that person of the condition. 

PART 2. GROUNDWATER – Please fill out the information below. 

1) What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property? 
Based on available information, depth to groundwater appears to be approximately 20 to 30 ft 
bgs at the Brownfields property.  

2) Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ☐onsite  ☐offsite   ☐both or ☒unknown 
sources?  Describe source(s):  
Multiple groundwater sampling events have been completed at the Brownfields property.  A 
tabular summary of available groundwater analytical data from each sampling event in 
comparison to the North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC) 2L Groundwater Standards (2L 
Standards) is included as Table 2 and groundwater sample locations are shown in Figure 3.   

Results of groundwater assessment indicated low levels of VOCs tetrachloroethene (PCE), 
trichloroethene (TCE), and OCPs aldrin and dieldrin have been detected in groundwater at 
concentrations above 2L Standards at the Brownfields property. 

3) What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property?  
Based on available information, direction of groundwater flow appears to be to the north‐
northwest.   

4) Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities?    
☐Yes    ☒No  
If yes, describe these activities: 
Click or tap here to enter text. 

Regardless of the answer; in the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered 
during redevelopment activities (even if no is checked above), list activities for contingent 
management of groundwater (e.g., dewatering of groundwater from excavations or 
foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary sewer, NPDES permit, or 
sampling procedures).  
Although not anticipated at this time, appropriate worker safety measures will be undertaken if 
groundwater gathers in an open excavation within an area determined to be impacted during 
construction activities. The accumulated water will be allowed to evaporate/infiltrate to the 
extent time for dissipation does not disrupt the construction schedule.  Should the time needed 
for natural dissipation of accumulated water be deemed inadequate, the water will be tested 
and disposed off‐Site (if impacted), or tested and discharged to the storm sewer (if not 
impacted above DEQ surface water standards) in accordance with applicable municipal and 
State regulations for erosion control and construction stormwater control. 

5) Are monitoring wells currently present on the Brownfields Property?.................☐Yes   ☒No    
If yes, are any monitoring wells routinely monitored through DEQ or other 

18 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
agencies?..................................................................................................................☐Yes   ☒No  

6) Please check methods to be utilized in the management of known and previously 
unidentified wells.   
☐ Abandonment of site monitoring wells in accordance with all applicable regulations.  It 
is the Brownfields Program’s intent to allow proper abandonment of well(s) as 
specified in the Brownfields Agreement, except if required for active monitoring 
through another section of DEQ or the EPA.   
☐ Location of existing monitoring wells marked 
☐ Existing monitoring wells protected from disturbance  
☒ Newly identified monitoring wells will be marked and protected from further 
disturbance until notification to DEQ Brownfields can be made and approval for 
abandonment is given. 

7) Please provide additional details as needed:   

Please note, disturbance of existing site monitoring wells without approval by DEQ is not 
permissible.  If monitoring wells are damaged and/or destroyed, DEQ may require that the PD 
be responsible for replacement of the well.   

PART 3. SURFACE WATER ‐Please fill out the information below. 
1) Is surface water present at the property?  ☐ Yes ☒ No 
2) Attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property. 
3) Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated? ☐ Yes  ☒ No 
4) Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment 
activities?    ☐ Yes  ☒ No 
5) In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment 
activities, or clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of 
such events (e.g. flooding, contaminated surface water run‐off, stormwater impacts): 
If surface water run‐off gathers in an open excavation within an area determined to be impacted 
during construction activities, appropriate worker safety measures will be undertaken.  The 
accumulated water will be allowed to evaporate/infiltrate to the extent time for dissipation does 
not disrupt the construction schedule.  Should the time needed for natural dissipation of 
accumulated water be deemed inadequate, the water will be tested and disposed off‐Site (if 
impacted), or tested and discharged to the storm sewer (if not impacted above DEQ surface 
water standards) in accordance with applicable municipal and State regulations for erosion 
control and construction stormwater control. 

Click or tap here to enter text. 

19 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   

PART 4. SEDIMENT – Please fill out the information below. 

1) Are sediment sources present on the property?  ☐ Yes  ☒ No 

2) If yes, is sediment at the property known to be contaminated: ☐ Yes  ☒ No 

3) Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment 
activities?   ☐ Yes ☒ No 

4) Attach a map showing location of known contaminated sediment at the property. 

5) In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list 
activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance): 
Not Applicable 

PART 5.  SOIL VAPOR – Please fill out the information below. 

1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the 
following vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in the following media: 
IHSB Residential Screening Levels: 
Soil Vapor:………..☒ Yes ☐ No  ☐ Unknown 
Groundwater:.….☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown 
IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels: 
Soil Vapor:………..☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown 
Groundwater:…..☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown 
2) Attach a map showing the locations of soil vapor contaminants that exceed site 
screening levels.  
3) If applicable, at what depth(s) is soil vapor known to be contaminated?  
Soil vapor assessment activities were completed on the Brownfields property within the approximate 
footprint of the proposed commercial buildings.  The results of the assessment identified low levels of 
VOCs at concentrations below DEQ Division of Waste Management (DWM) Vapor Intrusion Non‐
Residential Sub‐Slab and Exterior Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs).  Additionally, results of risk 
evaluation using the February 2018 DEQ Risk Calculator indicate that vapor intrusion is not a 
significant risk for a non‐residential worker.  A tabular summary of soil vapor analytical data in 
comparison to the February 2018 DEQ Vapor Intrusion Non‐Residential SGSLs is included as Table 3 
and soil vapor sample locations are shown in Figure 3. 

At the request of DEQ Brownfields, soil gas vertical profile assessment activities will be completed at 
the Site prior to construction of the proposed Site buildings to further evaluate the potential for 

20 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   

4) Will workers encounter contaminated soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities? 
  ☐ Yes  ☒ No ☐ Unknown 
5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities 
(trenches, manways, basements or other subsurface work,) list activities for management 
of such contact:  
In the unlikely event contaminated soil vapors are encountered during future redevelopment 
activities, the area will be evacuated and appropriate safety screening of the vapors will be 
performed.  If results indicate further actions are warranted, appropriate engineering controls 
(such as use of industrial fans) will be implemented. 

PART 6.  SUB‐SLAB SOIL VAPOR – Please fill out the information below if existing buildings or 
foundations will be retained in the redevelopment. 
1) Are sub‐slab soil vapor data available for the Brownfields Property? ☐ Yes   ☒ No   ☐ Unknown 
2) If data indicate that sub‐slab soil vapor concentrations exceed screening levels, attach a map 
showing the location of these exceedances. 
3) At what depth(s) is sub‐slab soil vapor known to be contaminated? ☐0‐6 inches ☐Other, please 
describe:   

4) Will workers encounter contaminated sub‐slab soil vapor during planned redevelopment 
activities? ☐ Yes   ☒ No   ☐ Unknown 
5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities, list 
activities for management of such contact 
In the unlikely event impacted soil vapors are encountered during future redevelopment 
activities, worker breathing zone will be monitored using a calibrated photoionization detector.  
If results indicate further action is warranted, appropriate engineering controls (such as use of 
industrial fans) will be implemented.   

PART 7. INDOOR AIR – Please fill out the information below. 

1) Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ☐ Yes   ☒ No   ☐ Unknown 
2) Attach a map showing the location(s) where indoor air contaminants exceed site screening levels. 
3) If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk‐based screening levels will 
not be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated 
indoor air during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes   ☐ No   ☐ Unknown 
structural vapor intrusion risks associated with redevelopment at the Site. 

21 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
4) In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list 
activities for management of such contact: 

VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM – Please fill out the information below. 
Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system (VIMS) proposed for this Brownfields Property? 
☒ Yes   ☐ No   ☐ Unknown 
If yes, ☐ VIMS Plan Attached or ☒ VIMS Plan to be submitted separately   
If submitted separately provide date:  
4/15/2019 

VIMS Plan shall be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer 

If no, please provide a brief rationale as to why no vapor mitigation plan is warranted:  

CONTINGENCY PLAN – encountering unknown tanks, drums, or other waste materials 

In this section please provide actions that will be taken to identify or manage unknown 
potential new sources of contamination.   During redevelopment activities, it is not uncommon 
that unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, or other waste materials are encountered.  
Notification to DEQ Brownfields Project Manager, UST Section, Fire Department, and/or other 
officials, as necessary and appropriate, is required when new potential source(s) of 
contamination are discovered.  These Notification Requirements were outlined on Page 1 of this 
EMP.   

Should potentially impacted materials be identified that are inconsistent with known site 
impacts, the DEQ Brownfields Project Manager will be notified and a sampling plan will be 
prepared based on the EMP requirements and site‐specific factors.  Samples will generally be 
collected to document the location of the potential impacts.   

Check the following chemical analysis that are to be conducted on newly identified releases: 
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 
There are no current structures located on the Brownfields property.  In the unlikely event there is 
evidence of potential indoor air issues (i.e., unusual odors) during future redevelopment activities, the 
area will be evacuated and appropriate safety screening of the indoor air will be performed.  If 
warranted, safety screening procedures will include periodically screening indoor air for volatile 
organic vapors with a calibrated photoionization detector.  If results indicate further action is 
warranted, appropriate engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be implemented.  

22 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
☒ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270 
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and 
silver) 
EPA Method 6020/7471 

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):  
Click or tap here to enter text. 

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):  
Click or tap here to enter text. 

☒ Other Constituents & Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.) 
Please note, if field observations indicate the need for additional analyses, they should 
be conducted, even if not listed here.  
Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 7199 

Please provide details on the proposed methods of managing the following commonly 
encountered issues during redevelopment of Brownfields Properties. 
During construction activities, contractors may encounter unknown sub‐surface environmental 
conditions (i.e. tanks, drums, or waste materials) that if encountered, will require proper 
management.  Prior to beginning Site work, the environmental engineer will attend a pre‐
construction kick‐off meeting with the PD and the redevelopment contractors to discuss the DEQ 
approved EMP and various scenarios when it would be appropriate and necessary to notify the 
environmental engineer of the discovery of unknown subsurface features or potentially impacted 
media at the Site. 

In the event that such conditions are encountered during site development activities, the 
environmental actions noted below will be used to direct environmental actions to be taken during 
these activities and sampling data for potentially impacted soil and the disposition of impacted soil 
will be provided to DEQ when the data becomes available. 

Underground Storage Tanks:  
In the event a UST or impacts associated with a UST release are discovered at the Site during 
redevelopment activities, the UST and/or UST related impacts will be addressed through the 
Brownfields Program.  DEQ Brownfields will be notified within 48‐hours of discovery of the UST. 

If a UST is encountered, the UST will be removed, if possible and the UST will be transported off‐Site 
for disposal at a suitable facility. If the UST contains residual fluids, the fluids will be sampled for 
VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals, and transported off‐Site for disposal at a suitable facility based on 
the laboratory analytical results prior to removing the UST from the ground.  If a UST is encountered 
that cannot be removed or does not require removal for geotechnical or construction purposes, it 
may be abandoned in‐place with prior DEQ approval and construction will proceed.  Where 
appropriate, the bottom may be penetrated before abandonment to prevent fluid accumulation.  
Impacted soil in the vicinity of the UST will be managed in accordance with the Managing On‐Site 

23 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
Soil section outlined above in the EMP. 

Sub‐Grade Feature/Pit: 
If a sub‐grade feature or pit is encountered and does not require removal for geotechnical or 
construction purposes, it will be filled with soil or suitable fill and construction will proceed.  Where 
appropriate, the bottom may be penetrated before back filling to prevent fluid accumulation.  If the 
pit has waste in it, the waste may be set aside in a secure area and will be sampled for waste 
disposal purposes for TCLP VOCs, TCLP SVOCs, and TCLP metals and disposed off‐Site at a permitted 
facility or the waste will be managed in accordance with the Managing On‐Site Soil section outlined 
above in the EMP, whichever is most applicable based on the type of waste present.  If the pit must 
be removed and the observed waste characteristics indicate the concrete may potentially be 
contaminated to a significant degree, the concrete will be sampled and analyzed by methods 
specified by the disposal facility.. 

Buried Waste Material: 
If excavation into buried wastes or significantly impacted soils occurs, the contractor is instructed to 
stop work in that location and notify the environmental consultant.  The environmental consultant 
will observe the materials and collect samples for laboratory analysis, if warranted.  In this event, 
confirmation sampling will be conducted at representative locations in the base and the sidewalls of 
the excavation after the waste or significantly impacted soil is removed.  The confirmation samples 
will be analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, and the RCRA metals.  Areas of suspected contaminated soil that 
remain at the Site after excavation is complete above the DEQ Industrial/Commercial PSRGs will be 
managed pursuant to this plan. 

Re‐Use of Impacted Soils On‐Site: 
Please refer to description outlined in the Managing On‐Site Soil section of the EMP above. 

If unknown, impacted soil is identified on‐site, management on‐site can be considered after the 
project team provides the necessary information, outlined in Part 1.A. Item 11, for Brownfields 
Project Manager approval prior to final placement on‐site.  

If other potential contingency plans are pertinent, please provide other details or scenarios as 
needed below: 
Click or tap here to enter text. 

POST‐REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING 

☒  Check this box to acknowledge that a Redevelopment Summary Report will be required for the 
project.  If the project duration is longer than one year, an annual update is required and will be 
due by January 31 of each year, or 30 days after each one‐year anniversary of the effective date of 

24 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
this EMP (as agreed upon with the Project Manager).  These reports will be required for as long as 
physical redevelopment of the Brownfields Property continues, except that the final 
Redevelopment Summary Report will be submitted within 90 days after completion of 
redevelopment.  Based on the estimated construction schedule, the first Redevelopment Summary 
Report is anticipated to be submitted on Click or tap to enter a date.  

The Redevelopment Summary Report shall include environment‐related activities since the last 
report, with a summary and drawings, that describes:  
1. actions taken on the Brownfields Property;   
2. soil grading and cut and fill actions;  
3. methodology(ies) employed for field screening, sampling and laboratory analysis of 
environmental media;  
4. stockpiling, containerizing, decontaminating, treating, handling, laboratory analysis and 
ultimate disposition of any soil, groundwater or other materials suspected or confirmed 
to be contaminated with regulated substances; and  
5. removal of any contaminated soil, water or other contaminated materials (for example, 
concrete, demolition debris) from the Brownfields Property (copies of all legally required 
manifests shall be included). 

☒ Check box to acknowledge consent to provide a NC licensed P.G. or P.E. sealed, Redevelopment 
Summary Report in compliance with the site’s Brownfields Agreement. 

26 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   

Table 1
Summary of Soil Analytical Data
South Tryon CommercialCharlotte, North Carolina
Brownfields Project No. 22007-18-060H&H Job No. RMR-006
Sample Location
Former UST Dispenser Former UST
Northeast Property Corner
Sample ID DPT-1 DPT-2 DPT-8 SB-1 SB-2 SB-3 SB-4 SB-5 BKG-01 BKG-02
Depth (ft bgs)1-2 8-10 1-2 1-2 0-1 2-3 0-2 0-2 0.5-1.5 0.5-1.5
Sample Date 7/19/2007 7/19/2007 7/19/2007 5/17/2018 5/17/2018 5/17/2018 5/18/2018 5/18/2018 5/17/2018 5/17/2018 Range Mean
Units
VOCs (8260)
Acetone <0.020 <0.031 0.056 0.040 J 0.11 J <0.023 0.054 J 0.076 J 0.062 J 0.051 J NA NA 140,000 ----
Toluene BRL BRL BRL <0.0009 <0.0011 <0.0008 <0.0008 0.0021 J <0.0009 <0.0009 NA NA 9,700
o-Xylene BRL BRL BRL <0.00081 <0.00098 <0.00070 <0.00071 0.00088 J <0.00076 <0.00078 NA NA 5,900 ----
SVOCs (8270)
Benzo[a]anthracene NA NA NA <0.061 <0.058 <0.054 0.056 J 0.064 J 0.083 J 0.12 J NA NA 21 ----
Benzo[a]pyrene NA NA NA <0.072 <0.068 <0.063 <0.059 0.068 J 0.082 J 0.17 J NA NA 2.1 ----
Benzo[b]fluoranthene NA NA NA <0.065 <0.062 <0.057 0.074 J 0.090 J 0.11 J 0.21 NA NA 21 ----
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene NA NA NA <0.100 <0.097 <0.089 <0.084 <0.092 <0.088 0.12 J NA NA NE ----
Benzo[k]fluoranthene NA NA NA <0.072 <0.068 <0.063 <0.059 <0.065 <0.062 0.077 J NA NA 210 ----
Butylbenzylphthalate NA NA NA <0.110 <0.100 <0.097 0.18 J <0.099 <0.095 <0.092 NA NA 1,200
Chrysene NA NA NA <0.072 <0.068 <0.063 <0.059 0.065 J 0.085 J 0.15 J NA NA 2,100 ----
Fluoranthene NA NA NA <0.076 <0.072 <0.067 0.11 J 0.11 J 0.14 J 0.23 NA NA 6,000 ----
Phenanthrene NA NA NA <0.12 <0.11 <0.10 <0.10 <0.11 <0.10 0.13 J NA NA NE ----
Pyrene NA NA NA <0.076 <0.072 <0.067 0.11 J 0.11 J 0.14 J 0.24 NA NA 4,500 ----
PCBs (8082)
NA NA NA ALL BRL ALL BRL ALL BRL NA NA NA NA NA NA ------
RCRA Metals (6010/7471/7196)
Arsenic NA NA NA 1.0 MS-07 1.4 1.1 1.0 2.0 1.4 1.6 0.28 2.6 3.0 0.28 - 2.6 1.43
Barium NA NA NA 13 23 14 52 65 41 56 63 100 47,000 63 - 100 81.5
Cadmium NA NA NA <0.015 <0.014 <0.013 <0.012 0.025 J <0.013 <0.012 <0.013 0.120 J 200 <0.013 - 0.12 0.07
Chromium (Total)NA NA NA 100 99 24 47 53 33 34 3.1 J 34 NE 3.1 - 34 18.6
Chromium (hexavalent)NA NA NA <0.27 DL-03 0.43 J, DL-03 <0.24 DL-03 <0.23 DL-03 0.39 J, DL-03 <0.23 DL-03 0.38 J, DL-03 <0.24 DL-03 0.63 J, DL-03 6.5 <0.24- 0.63 0.44
Chromium (trivalent)NA NA NA 100 98.57 24 47 52.76 33 33.62 0.7 33.37 350,000 0.7-33 26.9
Lead NA NA NA 10 12 7.5 17 32 15 13 5.7 28 800 5.7 - 28 16.9
Mercury NA NA NA 0.064 0.042 0.028 0.032 0.042 0.029 0.025 J 0.009 J 0.033 9.7 0.009 - 0.033 0.021
Selenium NA NA NA <0.065 MS-07 <0.062 0.12 J <0.053 <0.058 <0.056 <0.055 <0.056 <0.051 1,200 ALL BRL --
Silver NA NA NA 0.057 J 0.069 J 0.027 J 0.043 J 0.058 J 0.050 J 0.068 J 0.061 J 0.070 J 1,200 0.061 - 0.070 0.066
OCPs (8081)
NA NA ALL BRL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ------
Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) (February 2018).Only compounds detected in at least one sample are shown.Soil concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses.
Compound concentrations reported to laboratory method detection limits.
VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds; PCBs = polychlorinated biphenyls; RCRA = Resource Conservation and Recovery Act; OCPs = Organochlorine PesticidesNA = Not Analyzed; NE = Not Established; BRL = Below Reporting Limit; ft bgs = feet below the ground surface; -- = Not ApplicableJ = Analyte detected at a level less than the laboratory reporting limit and greater than or equal to the laboratory method detection limit resulting in an laboratory estimated concentration DL-03 = Elevated reporting limit due to matrix; MS-07= Matrix spike recovery is outside of control limits. Analysis is in control based on laboratory fortified blank recovery. Possibility of sample matrix effects that lead to low bias for reported result or non-homogeneous sample aliquot cannot be eliminated.
0-2
5/18/2018
mg/kg
Former Electrical Supply Warehouse Former Motor Freight Station Background Screening CriteriaSB-6/Duplicate Industrial /
Commercial
PSRGs(1)
Site-Specific Background
Metals in Soil
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Ram Realty - RMR\RMR-006 Tryon & Tremont Brownfields Assistance\EMP\Data Tables\EMP Combined Tables (RMR-006)
9/19/2018
Table 1 (Page 1 of 1)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 2Summary of 2007 Groundwater Analytical DataS. Tryon CommercialCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. RMR-006 Sample IDDPT-8DPT-9MW-3 Sample Date7/23/2007 7/24/20078/9/2007 UnitsVOCs (8260B)Acetone16<10 <106,000 4,500,000 19,000,000Chloroform<1.03.22.6708.1361,1-Dichloroethene2.5<1.0<1.035039160Tetrachloroethene<1.0<1.01.60.701248Trichloroethene 2.514113.01.04.4OCPs (8081)Aldrin0.63<0.050 <0.0500.002 *3.2 14Dieldrin0.75 0.15<0.0500.002-- --Endrin Aldehyde 0.32<0.050 <0.050NE-- --RCRA Metals (6010B/7470A)UnfilteredFilteredArsenic<10 <10 NA NA NA10-- --Barium 35 26NA NA NA700-- --Cadmium<1.0 <1.0 NA NA NA2.0-- --Chromium (total)<5.0 <5.0 NA NA NA10-- --Lead<5.0 <5.0 NA NA NA15-- --Mercury <0.20 <0.20 NA NA NA1.0-- --Selenium30 33NA NA NA20-- --Silver<5.0 <5.0 NA NA NA20-- --Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Title 15A NCAC 02L. 0202 Groundwater Quality Standard (April 2013)* DEQ Title 15A NCAC 02L. 0202 Appendix I Interim Maximum Allowable Concentration (April 2018) is used for screening2) DEQ Division of Waste Management (DWM) Vapor Intrusion Groundwater Screening Levels (GWSLs) (February 2018)Bold indicates an exceedance of the Groundwater Standard.Underline indicates an exceedance of the Residential Vapor Intrusion GWSL.Highlight indicates an exceedance of the Non-Residential Vapor Intrusion GWSL.With the exception of metals, only compounds detected in at least one sample are shown.Concentrations are reported in micrograms per liter (µg/L).Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses.Compound concentrations are reported to laboratory reporting limits.VOCs = volatile organic compounds; OCPs = Organochlorine Pesticides; RCRA = Resource Conservation and Recovery ActNA = Not Analyzed; NE = Not Established; -- = Not ApplicableNon-Residential GWSLs25.720NANANAGroundwater Standard(1)<1.0<1.0DPT-27/20/2007<10µg/LResidential GWSLs2S:\AAA-Master Projects\Ram Realty - RMR\RMR-006 Tryon & Tremont Brownfields Assistance\2007 Groundwater Sampling Report\Tables\GW tables11/15/2018Table 2 (Page 1 of 1) Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 3 Summary of Soil Vapor Analytical Data South Tryon CommercialCharlotte, North Carolina Brownfields Project No. 22007-18-060 H&H Job No. RMR-006Sample LocationSample IDVMP-1 VMP-2VMP-4 VMP-5 VMP-6 VMP-7Sample Depth (ft bgs)9.5-10 9.5-109.5-10 9.5-10 9.5-10 9.5-10Sampling Date 05/18/18 05/18/1805/18/18 05/18/18 05/18/18 05/18/18UnitsVOCs (TO-15)Acetone13 J 14 J 11 J 9.9 J 25<6.635 9.2 J220,0002,700,000Benzene8.72130313661775.4 120 1,6002-Butanone (Methyl Ethyl Ketone)1.3 J 1.6 J 1.6 J 1.4 J<0.441.5 J 1.8 J 1.3 J35,000440,000Carbon Disulfide5.9 J 121716327182 3.0 J4,90061,000Carbon Tetrachloride<0.372.44.14.3<0.37 <0.37 <0.371.31602,000Chloroform726928275446290 36041530Cyclohexane<0.49 <0.49 <0.49 <0.49 <0.496.98.5<0.4942,000530,0001,3-Dichlorobenzene2524171525283126NENEDichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)3.2 L-05 2.8 3.4 L-05 2.9<0.433.0 3.8 L-05 2.87008,8001,1-Dichloroethylene<0.31 <0.31<0.31 <0.31 <0.311.6<0.31 <0.311,4007,700Ethanol<6.77.1 J<6.7 <6.7 <6.7 <6.7 <6.7 <6.7NENEEthylbenzene7890110 12091160 170223704,9004-Ethyltoluene<0.604038402036508.4NENEHeptane133531345890110 7.82,80035,000Hexane3.2 J 16 J 10 J 11 J396888 5.7 J4,90061,000Isopropanol0.99 J 3.9 J 1.2 J<0.60 <0.60 <0.60 <0.60 <0.601,40018,000Propene (Propylene)2.3 J<0.34 <0.34 <0.34 <0.3412 J48<0.3421,000260,000Tetrachloroethene6.23.71213843.71.9<0.752803,500Toluene280 380 580 590 580 970 1,100 11035,000440,000Trichloroethene664252536.4708.06.114180Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)3.2 J 2.2 J 6.25.2 2.2 J 2.9 J 4.2 J 2.2 JNENE1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene120 120 100 1004590120254205,3001,3,5-Trimethylbenzene282620201119266.54205,300Vinyl Acetate1.4 J 3.2 J<0.34 <0.34 <0.349.8 J 12 J 1.8 J1,40018,000m&p-Xylene300 320 410 420 320 550 640847008,800o-Xylene96110 140 14094160 190257008,800Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Waste Management (DWM) Residential Sub-slab and Exterior Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs) (February 2018).2) North Carolina DEQ DWM Non-Residential SGSLs (February 2018).Bold indicates concentration exceeds DEQ Residential SGSLs (February 2018).Only compounds detected in at least one sample are shown.Compound concentrations reported to laboratory method detection limits.Analytical method is indicated in parentheses.J = Detected concentration is above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit, resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration.L-05 = Laboratory fortified blank/laboratory control sample recovery is outside of control limits and is biased on the high side.µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter; ft bgs = feet below ground surface; NE = Not EstablishedBuilding Labels correspond to locations shown on Figure 4.µg/m3Residential Soil-Gas Screening Level (1)Non-Residential Soil-Gas Screening Level (2)Building CBuilding BBuilding AVMP-3/DUPLICATE9.5-1005/18/18S:\AAA‐Master Projects\Ram Realty ‐ RMR\RMR‐006 Tryon & Tremont Brownfields Assistance\Report\Tables\Table 2 South Tryon Commercial SV Table6/27/2018Table 3 (Page 1 of 1) Hart & Hickman, PC
TITLE
PROJECT
SITE LOCATION MAP
SOUTH TRYON COMMERICAL
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
DATE:
JOB NO:
REVISION NO:
FIGURE:
06-04-2018 0
1RMR-006
SITE
0 2000 4000
APPROXIMATE
SCALE IN FEET
N
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP
QUADRANGLE
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
CHARLOTTE EAST, NORTH CAROLINA, 1991
REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. RMR-006
DATE: 7-2-18
FIGURE NO. 2
SOUTH TRYON COMMERCIAL
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA MAP
LEGEND
SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
LIMITS OF WEST TREMONT BROWNFIELDS
AGREEMENT
FORMER BUILDING FOOTPRINT
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF FORMER
GASOLINE UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
MOTOR FRE
I
G
H
T

S
T
A
T
I
O
N
(1950-1950)
S. TR
Y
O
N
S
T
R
E
E
T
FORMER B&B CONTRACTING
COMPANY
W. TREMON
T

A
V
E
N
U
E
DO
GG
E
T
T

S
TR
E
E
T
NOTES:
1.AERIAL IMAGERY OBTAINED FROM MECKLENBURG COUNTY
GIS (2017).
2.HISTORICAL BUILDING FOOTPRINTS & HISTORICAL USES
OBTAINED FROM AVAILABLE RESOURCES INCLUDING
SANBORN FIRE INSURANCE MAPS, AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY, &
CITY DIRECTORY.
3.UST = UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK
FORMER RESTAURANT
(1949-1959)
FORMER FARM MACHINERY
SALES & SERVICE
(1959-1963)
ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
WAREHOUSE BUILDING C
(1960-1990)
FORMER B&B
CONTRACTING COMPANY
FORMER TERMINIX, INC.
(1969-2014)
EMCI LTD
(2101 S. TRYON STREET)
MULTI-TENANT COMMERCIAL
(307-349 W. TREMONT AVENUE)
GAS FIRED PRODUCTS
(305 DOGGETT STREET)
MULTI-TENANT COMMERCIAL
(1926-2030 S. TRYON STREET)
MULTI-TENANT COMMERCIAL
(1927 S. TRYON STREET)
FORMER AUTO REPAIR SHOP
(1950-1963)
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
FORMER UST DISPENSER
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Ram Realty - RMR\RMR-006 Tryon & Tremont Brownfields Assistance\Figures\Figures060418.dwg, FIG 2, 2/27/2019 3:01:03 PM,SVincent
SB-2
SB-1
SB-3
VMP-3
VMP-2
VMP-1
SB-4
VMP-4
VMP-5
VMP-6
VMP-7
SB-5
SB-6
REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. RMR-006
DATE: 2-11-19
FIGURE NO. 3
SOUTH TRYON COMMERCIAL
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
SAMPLE LOCATION MAP
LEGEND
SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
LIMITS OF BROWNFIELDS AGREEMENT
FORMER BUILDING FOOTPRINT
PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT
PROPOSED PARKING/ PLAZA AREA
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF FORMER
GASOLINE UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK
SOIL BORING LOCATION
SOIL VAPOR SAMPLE LOCATION
MONITORING WELL LOCATION
TEMPORARY MONITORING WELL LOCATION
TEMPORARY MONITORING WELL/ SOIL
BORING LOCATION
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
MOTOR FRE
I
G
H
T

S
T
A
T
I
O
N
(1950-1950)
S. TR
Y
O
N
S
T
R
E
E
T
FORMER B&B CONTRACTING
COMPANY
W.TREMONT A
V
E
N
U
E
DO
GG
E
T
T

S
TR
E
E
T
NOTES:
1. AERIAL IMAGERY OBTAINED FROM MECHLENBURG COUNTY
GIS (2017).
2. SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED ON 5/17/18 AND 5/18/18.
3. SOIL VAPOR SAMPLES COLLECTED ON 5/18/18.
4. TCE = TRICHLOROETHYLENE
BZP = BENZO(A)PYRENE
CF = CHLOROFORM
PCE = TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
μg/L = MICROGRAMS PER LITER
μg/m³ = MICROGRAMS PER CUBIC METER
mg/kg = MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM
NA = NOT ANALYZED
5. J FLAG INDICATES AN ESTIMATED CONCENTRATION
BETWEEN THE LABORATORY REPORTING LIMIT AND THE
METHOD DETECTION LIMIT.
6. NO COMPOUNDS DETECTED ABOVE SCREENING LEVELS IN
SOIL SAMPLES SB-1, SB-2, SB-3, SB-4 AND SB-5.
7. HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER DATA ARE IDENTIFIED IN
PURPLE.
FORMER RESTAURANT
(1949-1959)
FORMER B&B
CONTRACTING COMPANY
FORMER TERMINIX, INC.
(1969-2014)
FORMER AUTO REPAIR SHOP
(1950-1963)
FORMER UST DISPENSER
SOIL VAPOR
VMP-2
TCE 42 μg/m³
CF 69 μg/m³
FORMER FARM MACHINERY
SALES & SERVICE (1959-1963)
ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
WAREHOUSE BUILDING C
(1960-1990)
SAMPLE ID
CONCENTRATIONSCONSTITUENTS
SOIL VAPOR
VMP-2
TCE 42 μg/m³
CF 69 μg/m³
SOIL VAPOR
VMP-1
TCE 66 μg/m³
CF 72 μg/m³
SOIL VAPOR
VMP-3 / DUPLICATE
TCE 52/53 μg/m³
CF 28/27 μg/m³
SOIL VAPOR
VMP-4
TCE 6.4 μg/m³
CF 54 μg/m³
SOIL VAPOR
VMP-5
TCE 70 μg/m³
CF 46 μg/m³
SOIL VAPOR
VMP-6
TCE 8.0 μg/m³
CF 290 μg/m³
SOIL VAPOR
VMP-7
TCE 6.1 μg/m³
CF 360 μg/m³
SOIL
SB-6
BZP 0.17J mg/kg
GROUNDWATER
DPT-08 (7/23/07)
PCE <1.0 μg/L
TCE 2.5 μg/L
DIELDRIN 0.75 μg/LGROUNDWATER
DPT-09 (7/24/07)
PCE <1.0 μg/L
TCE 14 μg/L
DIELDRIN 0.15 μg/LGROUNDWATER
MW-3 (8/9/07)
PCE 1.6 μg/L
TCE 11 μg/L
DIELDRIN <0.050 μg/L
GROUNDWATER
DPT-02 (7/20/07)
PCE <1.0 μg/L
TCE 5.7 μg/L
DIELDRIN NA
GROUNDWATER
DPT-07 (7/20/07)
PCE <1.0 μg/L
TCE <2.0 μg/L
DIELDRIN NA
GROUNDWATER
MW-2 (8/9/07)
PCE <1.0 μg/L
TCE 3.0 μg/L
DIELDRIN <0.050
BUILDING AB
BUILDING C
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Ram Realty - RMR\RMR-006 Tryon & Tremont Brownfields Assistance\Figures\Figures060418.dwg, FIG 3 ALT, 2/27/2019 3:00:42 PM,SVincent

Appendix A

Current Redevelopment Site Plan

WE
S
T

T
R
EM
O
N
T

A
V
E
N
U
E
SOUTH T
R
Y
O
N

S
T
R
E
E
T
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODL
O
D
LOD
L
O
D
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD
LOD
LOD
LOD LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD
LO
D
LOD
LODLODLODF IR E L A N E - NO PAR KING
PROP. PATIO
± 1,000 SF
T
T10
5
8
24
7
4
5
7
PROP. PATIO
± 1,000 SF
PROP. OUTDOOR
AMENITY AREA
± 1,800 SF
PROP. PARKING
STRIPING
PROP. 16' SETBACK FROM EX. B.O.C.LOADI
N
G Z
ONE
PROP. PARKING
STRIPING (TYP)
PROP. PARKING
STRIPING (TYP)PROP. 45°
PAVEMENT
MARKINGS (TYP.)6'R7'R
1'R7'R2'R 4.5'R4.5'R4.5'R2'R
1'R
4.5'R4.5'R
4.5'R4.5'R
4.
5
'
R
5.
9
'
R
12'R 3
.
8
'R
5'R 5'R50'R
4.
5
'
R
9
8
9
PROP. RETAINING
WALL W/ SAFETY RAIL
LIMITS OF NEW CURB
LIMITS OF NEW CURB
PROP. 30" C&G
CONTRACTOR TO SAWCUT
EDGE OF EX. PAVEMENT
FOR SMOOTH TRANSITION
LIMITS OF NEW CURB
PROP. 3 CY
RECYCLE
PROP. MARATHON
RJ-250SC 30 CY
TRASH COMPACTOR
LIMITS OF NEW CURB
LIMITS OF NEW CURB
LIMITS OF NEW CURB
PROP. BOLLARD
MOUNTED ACCESSIBLE
PARKING SIGN (TYP.)
PROP. STOP SIGN &
STOP BAR (TYP.)
PROP. BOLLARD
MOUNTED ACCESSIBLE
PARKING SIGN (TYP.)
PROP. BOLLARD
MOUNTED ACCESSIBLE
PARKING SIGN (TYP.)
PROP. INVERTED
U BIKE RACK (2).
REFER TO DETAIL
PROP. CURB TO MATCH EX. AT
DRIVEWAY LOCATION (TYP.)
PROP. INVERTED
U BIKE RACK (2).
REFER TO DETAIL
LIMITS OF
NEW CURB
PROP. SAWCUT
LINE (TYP.)
PROP. SAWCUT LINE (TYP.)
PROP. SAWCUT
LINE (TYP.)
PROP. SAWCUT
LINE (TYP.)BUILDING A/B
17,375 SF GROSS
(1 STORY)
FFE1= 731.63
PROP.
RETAINING WALL
W/ SAFETY RAIL BUILDING C
14,605 SF GROSS /FLOOR
(3 STORY)
FFE = 730.4
3
1'R
PROP. PLAZA AREA
HARDSCAPE TO BE
SPECIFIED AT A LATER DATE
PROP. 9' CURB
TRANSITION TO FLUSH
PROP. 9' CURB
TRANSITION TO FLUSH
PROP. INVERTED
U BIKE RACK (2).
REFER TO DETAIL
PROP. STEPS
PROP. ADA
RAMP (TYP.)
PROP. BOARD ON BOARD
FENCE TO SCREEN
TRASH/RECYCLE
PROP. FIRST FLOOR
COVERED PATIO.
REF. ARCH.PROP. 16' SETBACK FROM EX. B.O.C.
P
R
O
P
.

1
6
'

S
E
T
B
A
C
K

F
R
O
M

F
U
T
U
R
E
B.
O
.
C
.
P
E
R

R
E
Z
O
N
I
N
G

P
L
A
N

2
0
0
7
-
1
2
4
PROP. FUTURE BACK
OF CURB LINE PER
REZONING PLAN 16'PROP. 8' SW
EASEMENT
PROP. 16' SETBACK FROM EX. B.
O
.
C
.
PROP. INVERTED
U BIKE RACK (2).
REFER TO DETAIL
PROP. BENCH
REFER TO NCDOT
TRAFFIC CONTROL
PLANS FOR WORK
IN NCDOT ROW
PROP. BUILDING
MOUNTED FDC
PROP. BUILDING
MOUNTED FDC
PROP. BUILDING
MOUNTED FDC
17
'24'17'24'9'
8'
9'
17
'9'17'8'8'
9'6.3'10'10
'25'9'9'
9'
1
6
'
8.
5
'8.5'8.5'8.5' PROP. PLANTING STRIP8.3'10'8.5'6'5.2'9'3.5'9'
5.
5
'
5'
5.
4
'
8'9.8'18.5'18.5'24
'17'8'
8'8'8'5'
8'
WIDT
H V
ARI
ES 8' PROP. SW5.3'6'2'
FFE2 = 734.30OHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOH T
50' X 50' SIGHT
DISTANCE TRIANGLE
50' X 50' SIGHT
DISTANCE TRIANGLE
10'X10' CITY OF
CHARLOTTE
PEDESTRIAN
SIGHT TRIANGLE
10'X10' CITY OF
CHARLOTTE
PEDESTRIAN
SIGHT TRIANGLE
OBJ
REVISIONS
REV DATE COMMENT BY
LOCATION OF SITE
FOR
PROJECT No.:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
DATE:
SCALE:
CAD I.D.:
SHEET NUMBER:
SHEET TITLE:
PROJECT:
H:\2017\NCC172144\DRAWINGS\PLAN SETS\CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS\NCC172144SS0.DWG PRINTED BY: DRENCKENS 2.18.19 @ 4:43 PM LAST SAVED BY: DRENCKENS
NCC172144
DR/RB
RH
02/18/2019
CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
335 TREMONT
MIXED USE
BUILDING A/B: 340 W TREMONT AVE.
BUILDING C: 330 W TREMONT AVE.
PID: 121-033-02
KNOW WHAT'S BELOW
ALWAYS CALL 811
BEFORE YOU DIG
It's fast. It's free. It's the law.
TM
1927 S. TRYON STREET, SUITE 310
CHARLOTTE, NC 28203
Phone:[phone]
Fax:[phone]
[e-mail]
NCBELS P-1132TM THE INFORMATION, DESIGN AND CONTENT OF THIS PLAN ARE PROPRIETARY AND SHALL NOT BE COPIED OR USED FOR ANY PURPOSE WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN AUTHORIZATIONFROM BOHLER ENGINEERING. ONLY APPROVED, SIGNED AND SEALED PLANS SHALL BE UTILIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES©NEW ENGLANDUPSTATE NEW YORKNEW YORK, NYPHILADELPHIA, PALEHIGH VALLEY, PABALTIMORE, MDREHOBOTH BEACH, DEWASHINGTON, DCNORTHERN VIRGINIARALEIGH, NCCENTRAL VIRGINIASOUTHERN MARYLANDNORTHERN NEW JERSEYSOUTHEASTERN, PACHARLOTTE, NCBOSTON, MASOUTHERN NEW JERSEYNEW YORK METROTAMPA, FLSOUTH FLORIDADALLAS, TXATLANTA, GAPITTSBURGH, PATMSUSTAINABLE DESIGNLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURESITE CIVIL AND CONSULTING ENGINEERINGLAND SURVEYINGPROGRAM MANAGEMENTPERMITTING SERVICESTRANSPORTATION SERVICES2017 BOHLER ENGINEERING039258
RA
D
D. H U D S O NSEAL
ENGI NE E RPROFESSIO
N
ALNO R T H CAROLI
NA02/18/19
1"=20'
0 2051020
5.ZONING ORDINANCE PROVISIONS
REQUIRED PROPOSED
A.)SETBACKS/BUFFERS/STRIP:BUILDING BUFFER BUILDING BUFFER
FRONT (TRYON) -16 FT FROM BOC N/A 16 FT N/A
SIDE (W TREMONT) - 16 FT (SEE N/A 16 FT N/A
APPROVED
REZONING DOCUMENTS)
REQUIRED/ALLOWED PROPOSED
B.)MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT:
40 FT W/ INCREASED 1' PER 10' SETBACK
C.)PARKING REQUIRED: 70 SPACES15,000 GROSS SF OF EATING, DRINKING, AND +30 SPACES SHARED BETWEEN
ENTERTAINMENT ESTABLISHMENT ADJACENT MULTIFAMILY (EXTRA SPACES AVAILABLE)
1 SPACE / 150 S.F. * 15,000 SF = 100 SPACES TOTAL: 100 SPACES
29,210 GROSS SF OF OFFICE SPACE 0 SPACES
MAX 1 SPACE / 300 SF, MINIMUM = 0
ADJACENT SITE PARKING INFORMATION:
164 UNITS 268 SPACES
MINIMUM = 0, MAXIMUM = 1.6/UNIT = 263 SURFACE PARK = 80 SPACES, GARAGE = 188 SPACES
D.)BIKE PARKING REQUIRED:
LONG TERM: 1/10,000 SF, MIN OF 2 4 SPACES (LOCATED IN THREE30FIVE PARKING DECK)
31250/10,000 = 4 SPACESSHORT TERM: 5% OF AUTO PARKING 12 SPACES (LOCATED IN THREE30FIVE PARKING DECK)
209 SPACES X 5% = 11 SPACES
HANDICAP PARKING REQUIRED: HANDICAP - 76-100 SPACES 4 TOTAL SPACES 5 SPACES
VAN ACCESSIBLE 1 SPACE 2 SPACES

STANDARD DIMENSION 8.5 FT x 18.5 FT 24 SPACESSTANDARD DIMENSION 9.0 FT x 17.0 FT 40 SPACES
ACCESSIBLE DIMENSION 8.0 FT x 17.0 FT 6 SPACES
SHARED PARKING VARIES 30 SPACES
E.)OPEN SPACE: :
PUBLIC OPEN SPACE= 1SF/100 GFA OR 104,238 GFA / 100 SF = 1043 SF
1SF/200 SF LOT AREA, WHICHEVER IS GREATER 3,076 SF PROVIDED
6.FLOOR AREA (F.A.R.) REQUIREMENT BUILDING A:8,168 S.F.0.50 MINIMUM BUILDING B: 8,514 S.F.
BUILDING C:43,698 S.F.
TOTAL SITE AREA:104,238 S.F
TOTAL F.A.R.:±0.58
GENERAL NOTES
1. DEVELOPER/APPLICANT:
RAM REALTY ADVISORS
CONTACT: ASHLEY SAULPAUGHEMAIL:[e-mail]
PHONE:[phone]
2. THIS PLAN IS BASED UPON THE FOLLOWING:
THE JOHN R. MCADAMS COMPANY, INC.
"2001 SOUTH TRYON"
PROJECT #: SURS-16203
DATED:04/15/2016
3. EX. SITE INFORMATION
OWNER:2001 SOUTH TRYON LLC
ADDRESS:2035 SOUTH TRYON STREET
CHARLOTTE, NC 28203
PARCEL NUMBER:121103302 AND 12103301
D.B. 27409 P.N. 714
GROSS AREA: ±2.39 ACRES
ZONING: TOD-M
4.EXISTING USE:
VACANT
PROPOSED USE:
MIXED USE
PERMITTED LAND USE:
YES
1" = 20'
SS0
C-302
SITE PLAN
1.NON-STANDARD ITEMS(IE: PAVERS,IRRIGATION
SYSTEMS,ETC.) IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY REQUIRE A
RIGHT-OF-WAY ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE
CHARLOTTE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION/ NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BEFORE
INSTALLATION. FOR CITY OF CHARLOTTE MAINTAINED
STREETS, CONTACT CDOT AT [phone].
2.ANY WORK WITHIN THE CITY'S R/W THAT REQUIRES
CLOSURE OF A SIDEWALK OR TRAVEL LANE MUST BE
APPROVED BY CDOT AND WILL REQUIRE A R/W USE PERMIT
OR R/W LEASE DEPENDING UPON THE PROPOSED
DURATION OF CLOSURE. THESE APPROVALS ARE IN
ADDITION TO SITE APPROVALS AND SHOULD BE
COORDINATED WITH CDOT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT CDOT AT [phone] AT
LEAST 5 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK FOR
IMPACTS LESS THAT 30 DAYS. CONTRACTOR SHALL
CONTACT CDOT AT [phone] AS SOON AS POSSIBLE
FOR IMPACTS GREATER THEN 30 DAYS. EVERY EFFORT
SHALL BE MADE TO CONSTRUCT IMPROVEMENTS WITH
MINIMAL IMPACT TO DRIVERS AND PEDESTRIANS.
CITY OF CHARLOTTE NOTES:

Appendix B
Grading Plan and Cut-Fill Analysis

SSSSSSSSS
S
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSLSLSSSSSS
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
SSWE
S
T

T
R
EM
O
N
T

A
V
E
N
U
E
SOUTH
T
R
Y
O
N

S
T
R
E
E
T
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODL
O
D
LOD
L
O
D
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD
LOD
LOD
LOD LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD
LO
D
LOD
LODLODLODRIDGET
TW
W WWW
W WWWWWWWWWW
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
FFFFFFFFFPROP. SAWCUT
LINE (TYP.)
PROP. SAWCUT LINE (TYP.)
PROP. SAWCUT
LINE (TYP.)
PROP. SAWCUT
LINE (TYP.)BUILDING A/B
17,375 SF GROSS
(1 STORY)
FFE1= 731.63
BUILDING C
14,605 SF GROSS /FLOOR
(3 STORY)
FFE = 730.4
PROP. EXPOSED
FOUNDATION
PROP. BURIED
FOUNDATION
PROP. EXPOSED
FOUNDATION
PROP. EXPOSED
FOUNDATION
W
PROP. EXPOSED
FOUNDATION
PROP. 8' SW
EASEMENT
TRANSITION FROM
EXPOSED TO BURIED
FOUNDATION
FFE2 = 734.30
PROP. INTERNAL
BUILDING STEPPROP. BURIED
FOUNDATION
T
727
73
0
73373072973173273573173273373472
8
729730
730727
728
729729
729730
730
731
732
733
73
4
7
3
1
7
3
2
7
3
5 733734730
729
STM
B6
STM
B1STM
B2
STM
B3
STM
B4
STM
A4
STM
A2
STM
A3
STM
B5
STM
C4
7
3
1
728729
730
729728727726
72
7
729
728RD1
RD3RD5 RD6
RD4
BLD-B
CO1
CO2
BLD-A
CO4
BLD-C
730STM
C1 725724726729G 731.57
G 733.85
FF= 731.63
G 727.55
G 730.03
BW 732.84
TW 731.16
BW 729.84
TW 730.58
BW 726.77
FF= 730.40
FF= 731.63
G 735.31
FF= 730.40
TW 730.40
TW=BW 726.91
BW 727.39
TW 730.25
FF= 734.30
FF= 734.30
BW 728.10
TW 731.52
TW=BW 723.88
TW 726.91
BW 724.15
TW 729.90
BW 727.33
TW 729.90
G 723.97
FF= 730.40
TC 732.53
TC 731.94
TC 731.28
TC 731.43
TC 734.16
G 733.76
TC 733.60
TC 733.28
TC 731.01
TC 730.35
G 730.2+/-
MATCH EX.
TC 732.31
TC 732.69
TC 732.80
TC 732.20
TC 730.72
TC 730.30
TC 730.07
LP - RIM 729.01
TC 730.30
TC 730.30
HP - TC 730.62
TC 730.34
TC 730.05
TC 730.30
TC 729.85
TC 729.66
TC 729.62
TC 729.47
LP - RIM 727.91
TC 728.84
TC 728.86
LP - RIM 728.20
TC 730.40
TC 730.12
TC 730.09
TC 730.62
TC 730.00
TC 730.35
TC 729.89
TC 730.05
TC 729.95
TC 732.95
TC 732.96
TC 731.99
TC 731.98
TC 729.61
TC 727.00
TC 726.51
G 725.0+/-
MATCH EX.
G 727.0+/-
MATCH EX.
G 728.51
G 728.65G 728.80
G 729.09
G 729.09
G 729.09
G 733.91
G 728.49 G 728.39
G 729.35
G 729.35
G 734.16
TC 729.07
TC 728.97
G 729.13
G 728.86
TC 729.17
TC 729.85
TC 728.78
G 729.85
G 729.85
G 727.34
G 727.37G 729.96
G 730.14 G 726.99
G 730.24
G 730.24
TC 723.15
TC 724.09
TC 725.45
TC 726.06G 725.89
G 726.15
FF= 730.40
G 729.89
G 729.67
G 729.24
G 732.27
G 732.65
G 735.08
G 727.98
G 730.22
G 730.14
G 725.79
G 725.67
G 724.3+/-
MATCH EX.
G 724.64
G 724.6+/-
MATCH EX.
TC 726.2+/-
MATCH EX.
G 724.1+/-
MATCH EX.
TC 731.17
G 735.0+/-
MATCH EX.
G 730.25
TC 731.30
TC 725.65
TC 723.85
G 731.48
G 729.59
G 729.22
G 727.39
G 733.73
G 733.56
G 735.21
G 735.8+/-
MATCH EX.
G 735.6+/-
MATCH EX.
G 734.20
G 734.16
TC 734.23
FF= 730.40
G 727.42
G 726.82
FF= 731.63
FF= 731.63
G 733.88
G 731.57
FF= 731.63
FF= 731.63
FF= 731.63
FF= 731.63
BW 724.49
G 726.54
FF= 734.30
FF= 734.30
FF= 734.30
TC 734.16
FF= 734.30
G 735.10
FF= 730.40
FF= 730.40
FF= 730.40
TW 726.61
FF= 730.40G 731.53
G 731.53
TW 730.16
TW 730.19
BW 728.96
TW=BW 729.07
G 729.41 G 728.05
G 727.8+/-
MATCH EX.
G 726.7+/-
MATCH EX.
TW 726.15
TC 729.85
TC 730.22
BW 725.16
G 723.41
G 723.25
G 722.98
G 722.87
TC 723.31
TC 723.54
G 724.88
G 724.59
G 725.2+/-
MATCH EX.
G 725.3+/-
MATCH EX.
G 726.13
FF= 734.30
BW 727.39
BW 724.01
TW 727.39
G 723.55
TW 730.25BW 723.59
TW 727.39
G 734.21
FF= 734.30
G 728.49
G 726.88
G 727.26
G 727.14
G 726.92
G 726.89
G 726.60
G 726.68
G 726.85
G 724.84
TW=BW 729.71
FF= 730.40
G 728.18
FF= 730.40
G 729.42
G 726.69
G 726.93
G 727.06
G 727.08
G 727.23
G 726.6+/-
MATCH EX.
G 726.4+/-
MATCH EX.
G 726.2+/-
MATCH EX.
G 726.3+/-
MATCH EX.
FF= 734.30
TW 734.24
BW 734.09
G 724.79
G 724.65
TW 730.25
BW 723.59
BW 723.61
BW 723.78
TW 727.39
TC 727.01
G 725.41
G 725.41
G 725.90
G 725.86
G 729.42
G 729.52
G 729.52
G 726.40
G 731.51
G 730.51
TC 729.40
G 730.32
G 729.56 G 729.08
TW 729.98
TW 730.33
TW 729.98
BW 727.51
BW 728.21
BW 728.21
G 728.18
FF= 730.40
G 730.34
TW 730.34
BW 726.69
BW 726.06
G 726.08
G 726.64
TW=BW 730.33
TW=BW 729.98
TW=BW 728.15
G 730.15
G 731.00
G 729.87
G 727.84G 727.51
G 727.60
TC 731.08
TC 730.28
TC 730.39
TC 728.13
TC 732.00
TC 733.06
TC 734.13
G 727.95
G 728.08 G 731.51
G 731.57
G 731.53
FF= 734.30
FF= 734.30
FF= 734.30
FF= 734.30
FF= 731.63
G 729.23
G 729.01
G 731.32
G 734.21
FF= 734.30
FF= 731.63
TW 734.00
BW 732.72
G 731.31
G 730.38
G 730.85
BW 726.96
TW 729.90
TW 729.98
BW 727.03
FF= 730.40
FF= 730.40
G 730.18
G 730.20
G 728.96 G 728.03
G 728.16
FF= 730.40FF= 730.40FF= 730.40FF= 730.40
FF= 730.40
FF= 730.40
G 727.21 G 726.84 G 726.19
G 726.92 G 726.31
G 723.9+/-
MATCH EX.
G 724.77
G 724.35
G 724.33
G 724.9+/-
MATCH EX.
REVISIONS
REV DATE COMMENT BY
LOCATION OF SITE
FOR
PROJECT No.:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
DATE:
SCALE:
CAD I.D.:
SHEET NUMBER:
SHEET TITLE:
PROJECT:
H:\2017\NCC172144\DRAWINGS\PLAN SETS\CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS\NCC172144SS0.DWG PRINTED BY: DRENCKENS 2.18.19 @ 4:44 PM LAST SAVED BY: DRENCKENS
NCC172144
DR/RB
RH
02/18/2019
CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
335 TREMONT
MIXED USE
BUILDING A/B: 340 W TREMONT AVE.
BUILDING C: 330 W TREMONT AVE.
PID: 121-033-02
KNOW WHAT'S BELOW
ALWAYS CALL 811
BEFORE YOU DIG
It's fast. It's free. It's the law.
TM
1927 S. TRYON STREET, SUITE 310
CHARLOTTE, NC 28203
Phone:[phone]
Fax:[phone]
[e-mail]
NCBELS P-1132TM THE INFORMATION, DESIGN AND CONTENT OF THIS PLAN ARE PROPRIETARY AND SHALL NOT BE COPIED OR USED FOR ANY PURPOSE WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN AUTHORIZATIONFROM BOHLER ENGINEERING. ONLY APPROVED, SIGNED AND SEALED PLANS SHALL BE UTILIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES©NEW ENGLANDUPSTATE NEW YORKNEW YORK, NYPHILADELPHIA, PALEHIGH VALLEY, PABALTIMORE, MDREHOBOTH BEACH, DEWASHINGTON, DCNORTHERN VIRGINIARALEIGH, NCCENTRAL VIRGINIASOUTHERN MARYLANDNORTHERN NEW JERSEYSOUTHEASTERN, PACHARLOTTE, NCBOSTON, MASOUTHERN NEW JERSEYNEW YORK METROTAMPA, FLSOUTH FLORIDADALLAS, TXATLANTA, GAPITTSBURGH, PATMSUSTAINABLE DESIGNLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURESITE CIVIL AND CONSULTING ENGINEERINGLAND SURVEYINGPROGRAM MANAGEMENTPERMITTING SERVICESTRANSPORTATION SERVICES2017 BOHLER ENGINEERING039258
RA
D
D. H U D S O NSEAL
ENGI NE E RPROFESSIO
N
ALNO R T H CAROLI
NA02/18/19
1" = 20'
SS0
C-401
GRADING PLAN
1"=20'
0 2051020
GRADING NOTES:
1.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DEMOLITION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES INCLUDING REMOVAL OF ANY EXISTING
UTILITIES. UTILITIES ARE TO BE REMOVED TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
2.THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS
SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE,
MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE
CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO
REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE
ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
3. ALL CUT OR FILL SLOPES SHALL BE 3:1 OR FLATTER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
4.PRECAST STRUCTURES MAY BE USED AT CONTRACTORS OPTION.
5.CLASS III RCP (ASTM C76) SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH RUBBER O-RING GASKETS.
6.EXISTING PIPES TO BE CLEANED OUT TO REMOVE ALL SILT AND DEBRIS.
7.EXISTING GRADE CONTOUR INTERVALS SHOWN AT 1'.
8.PROPOSED GRADE CONTOUR INTERVALS SHOWN AT 1' INTERVALS.
9. IF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES TO REMAIN ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS
RESPONSIBILITY TO REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AS NECESSARY TO RETURN IT TO EXISTING
CONDITIONS OR BETTER.
10.ALL STORM PIPE ENTERING STRUCTURES SHALL BE GROUTED TO ASSURE CONNECTION AT STRUCTURE IS
WATERTIGHT.
11. ALL STORM SEWER MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE FLUSH WITH PAVEMENT, AND SHALL HAVE TRAFFIC BEARING
RING & COVERS. MANHOLES IN UNPAVED AREAS SHALL BE 6" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. LIDS SHALL BE LABELED "STORM
SEWER".
12.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADHERE TO ALL TERMS & CONDITIONS AS OUTLINED IN THE EPA OR APPLICABLE STATE
GENERAL N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT FOR STORM WATER DISCHARGE ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND THE
SPECIAL CONDITIONS, SECTION 8, ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE AND STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION.
13. CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST AND/OR CUT EXISTING PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY TO ASSURE A SMOOTH FIT AND
CONTINUOUS GRADE.
14.CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM BUILDINGS FOR ALL NATURAL AND PAVED AREAS.
15.TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION IS TAKEN FROM A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY LAND SURVEYORS. IF THE CONTRACTOR
DOES NOT ACCEPT EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, WITHOUT EXCEPTION, THEN THE CONTRACTOR
SHALL SUPPLY, AT THEIR EXPENSE, A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR TO THE OWNER FOR
REVIEW.
16.ALL UNSURFACED AREAS DISTURBED BY GRADING OPERATION SHALL RECEIVE 4 INCHES OF TOPSOIL. CONTRACTOR
SHALL APPLY STABILIZATION FABRIC TO ALL SLOPES 3H:1V OR STEEPER. CONTRACTOR SHALL STABILIZE DISTURBED
AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF VEGETATION IS OBTAINED.
17.CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING CODE AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAME.
18.ALL STORM STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH UNIFORM POURED MORTAR INVERT FROM INVERT IN TO INVERT OUT.
19. CONTRACTOR TO ADJUST ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES TO PROPOSED GRADE IN ANY AREA OF PROPOSED GRADING.
20.ALL REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPES ARE TO BE CLASS III UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE.
21.ALL ROOF DRAINAGE SHALL BE TIED TO UNDERGROUND PIPING. REFER TO ARCH. PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL INVERT
INFORMATION.
22.FOR CROSSING INFORMATION, SEE UTILITY PLAN.
23.ALL NEW CURB SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A SLOPE TO MATCH ADJACENT PAVEMENT GRADE.LP - RIM XX
TC - XX.XX
WALL ELEVATION LEGEND
GRADE
RETAINING WALL. SEE
DESIGN BY OTHERS FOR
TOP OF WALL AND
FOOTING ELEVATIONS
GRADE
NOTES:
1.THE GRADES SHOWN ON
GRADING PLAN REFER TO
FINISHED GROUND GRADES AT
THE TOP AND BOTTOM OF WALL.
2.GC IS TO REVIEW RETAINING
WALL PLANS VS CIVIL GRADING
PLAN AND NOTIFY THE
ENGINEER OF RECORD IF THERE
ARE ANY QUESTIONS PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTING THE WALL AND
PERFORMING EARTHWORK
OPERATIONS.
TW - XX.XX
BW - XX.XX
CURB ELEVATION LEGEND
Job: Updated 2-18-19
Units: Ft-CY
Mon Feb 18, 2019 18:07:50 Page 1

Volume Report
Subgrade vs. Stripped

Area Volume Comp/Ratio Compact Export Change
Total Cut Fill OnGrade Cut Fill Cut Fill Cut Fill -Import Per .1 Ft
Landscape 16,625 1,154 14,783 688 57 522 1.00 1.15 57 600 -543 71

LD Asphalt 22,491 16,579 5,150 762 676 145 1.00 1.15 676 167 509 96
LD Asphalt 439 264 6 169 2 0 1.00 1.15 2 0 2 2

LD Sub: 22,930 16,843 5,156 931 678 145 678 167 511 98

Pad AB 17,336 1,001 15,414 921 14 782 1.00 1.15 14 899 -885 74
Pad C 13,774 9,633 3,784 357 568 322 1.00 1.15 568 370 198 59

Pad Sub: 31,110 10,634 19,198 1,278 582 1,104 582 1,269 -687 133

Patio 1,165 13 1,150 2 0 166 1.00 1.15 0 191 -191 5

Paving Islands 284 0 279 5 0 6 1.00 1.15 0 7 -7 1
Paving Islands 362 362 0 0 6 0 1.00 1.15 6 0 6 2
Paving Islands 402 402 0 0 32 0 1.00 1.15 32 0 32 2
Paving Islands 107 65 38 4 2 3 1.00 1.15 2 3 -1 0

Paving Sub: 1,155 829 317 9 40 9 40 10 30 5

Sidewalks 14,529 9,385 3,301 1,843 462 115 1.00 1.15 462 132 330 62
Sidewalks 12,154 31 11,883 240 0 567 1.00 1.15 0 652 -652 52

Sidewalks Sub: 26,683 9,416 15,184 2,083 462 682 462 784 -322 114
Regions Total 99,668 38,889 55,788 4,991 1,819 2,628 1,819 3,021 -1,202 426

Plane Slope
Stripping Qtys Area Area Depth Volume
Topsoil 99,668 100,056 0.500 1,853

Plane Slope
Sectional Qtys Area Area Depth Volume
LD Asphalt 22,491 22,520 0.670 559
LD Asphalt 439 440 0.670 11

LD Sub: 22,930 22,960 570

Pad AB 17,336 17,344 0.840 540
Pad C 13,774 13,776 0.840 429

Pad Sub: 31,110 31,120 969

Patio 1,165 1,176 0.330 14

Paving Islands 402 430 0.000 0
Paving Islands 107 112 0.000 0
Paving Islands 284 284 0.000 0
Paving Islands 362 362 0.000 0

Paving Sub: 1,155 1,188 0

Sidewalks 14,529 14,598 0.330 178
Sidewalks 12,154 12,206 0.330 149

Sidewalks Sub: 26,683 26,804 327

Sectional Total 83,043 83,248 1,880
SUMMARY:
Disturbed Area = 2.29 AC
Topsoil @ 6" = 1,853 CY
Cut/Fill = 1,819 CY
Import = 1,202 CY
0 17.5 35Tremont Mixed UseCut/Fill Map

Appendix C

Construction Schedule
ID Task NameDuration Start Finish Resource Names% Complete1PRECONSTRUCTION125 daysTue 11/13/18Mon 5/6/1924%2Design Kickoff74 daysTue 11/13/18Fri 2/22/199%3Design Kickoff Meeting1 dayTue 11/13/18Tue 11/13/18RAM100%4Internal Design Charrette for Envelope Development1 dayTue 12/4/18Tue 12/4/18BB&M100%5Preliminary Review with Mecklenburg County31 daysFri 1/11/19Fri 2/22/19BB&M3%6Schematic Design42 daysFri 11/16/18Mon 1/14/19100%7Begin SD 1 dayFri 11/16/18Fri 11/16/18BB&M100%8SD Complete0 daysThu 12/20/18Thu 12/20/18BB&M100%9SD Pricing 17 daysFri 12/21/18Mon 1/14/19Choate100%10SD Budget Update to RAM0 daysMon 1/14/19Mon 1/14/19Choate100%25Design Development 63 daysFri 12/21/18Tue 3/19/1951%26Begin DD1 dayFri 12/21/18Fri 12/21/18BB&M100%27DD Check Set1 dayFri 1/11/19Fri 1/11/19BB&M100%28Return DD Check Set w/ Comments1 dayFri 1/18/19Fri 1/18/19Choate100%29DD Complete5 daysMon 2/4/19Fri 2/8/19BB&M100%30Update Pricing for DD Dwgs15 daysMon 2/11/19Fri 3/1/19Choate80%32Upload Dwgs and Fees Paid for Express Review1 dayMon 2/18/19Mon 2/18/19BB&M100%33Express Review for Footings/Foundations/Frame Permit0 daysWed 2/20/19Wed 2/20/19BB&M100%34Footing/Foundation/Frame Permit Review3 daysWed 2/20/19Fri 2/22/19Meck Cty100%36Combine Parcels - PLAT Recorded15 daysMon 2/25/19Fri 3/15/19Bohler5%31DD Budget Update to RAM (Incl. Final Pricing for FF & Frame)0 daysFri 3/1/19Fri 3/1/19Choate0%35Footing/Foundation/Frame Pricing Review5 daysMon 3/4/19Fri 3/8/19RAM0%38Notice to Proceed - Ftg/Fnd/Frame Package0 daysFri 3/8/19Fri 3/8/19RAM0%37Footing/Foundation/Frame Permit Processing and Issuance2 daysMon 3/18/19Tue 3/19/19Meck Cty0%39Construction Drawings Design58 daysMon 2/11/19Wed 5/1/1916%40CD's Begin20 daysMon 2/11/19Fri 3/8/19BB&M60%41CD Check Set1 dayMon 3/11/19Mon 3/11/19BB&M0%42Return CD Check Set w/ Comments1 dayMon 3/18/19Mon 3/18/19Choate0%43100% CD/Full Bldg Permit Construction Set Due9 daysTue 3/19/19Fri 3/29/19BB&M0%44Update Pricing for CD Dwgs15 daysMon 4/1/19Fri 4/19/19Choate0%45Upload Dwgs for Full Bldg Permit0 daysMon 4/1/19Mon 4/1/19BB&M0%46Permit Review and Approval22 daysTue 4/2/19Wed 5/1/19Meck Cty0%47CD/GMP Final Pricing to RAM0 daysFri 4/19/19Fri 4/19/19Choate0%48GMP Pricing Approval5 daysMon 4/22/19Fri 4/26/19RAM0%49Notice to Proceed - Full GMP0 daysFri 4/26/19Fri 4/26/19RAM0%11Site/Civil Design21 daysFri 2/15/19Fri 3/15/1932%13Site Plan Pricing10 daysFri 2/15/19Thu 2/28/19Choate100%12Original Site Plan Approval0 daysFri 2/22/19Fri 2/22/19Bohler100%17Updated Brownfield Agreement Based on New Site Plan15 daysMon 2/25/19Fri 3/15/190%14Sitework Pricing to RAM1 dayFri 3/1/19Fri 3/1/19Choate0%15Sitework Pricing Approval5 daysMon 3/4/19Fri 3/8/19RAM0%16Notice to Proceed - Sitework Scope0 daysFri 3/8/19Fri 3/8/19RAM0%18Subcontractor Awards/Submittals/Procurement41 daysMon 3/11/19Mon 5/6/190%19Sitework Award1 dayMon 3/11/19Mon 3/11/190%21Steel Contractor Award1 dayMon 3/11/19Mon 3/11/190%23Concrete/Masonry Award1 dayMon 3/11/19Mon 3/11/190%20Site Submittals and Approval9 daysTue 3/12/19Fri 3/22/190%PRECONSTRUCTIONDesign KickoffInternal Design Charrette for Envelope DevelopmentPreliminary Review with Mecklenburg CountyDesign Development Return DD Check Set w/ CommentsDD CompleteUpdate Pricing for DD DwgsUpload Dwgs and Fees Paid for Express Review2/20Footing/Foundation/Frame Permit ReviewCombine Parcels - PLAT Recorded3/13/4Footing/Foundation/Frame Pricing Review3/83/18Footing/Foundation/Frame Permit Processing and IssuanceConstruction Drawings DesignCD's Begin3/11CD Check Set3/18Return CD Check Set w/ Comments3/19100% CD/Full Bldg Permit Construction Set Due4/1Update Pricing for CD Dwgs4/14/2Permit Review and Approval4/194/22GMP Pricing Approval4/26Site/Civil DesignSite Plan Pricing2/22Updated Brownfield Agreement Based on New Site Plan3/1Sitework Pricing to RAM3/4Sitework Pricing Approval3/83/11Subcontractor Awards/Submittals/Procurement3/11Sitework Award3/11Steel Contractor Award3/11Concrete/Masonry Award3/12Site Submittals and Approval2/243/33/103/173/243/314/74/144/214/285/55/125/195/266/26/96/166/236/307/77/147/217/288/48/118/188/259/19/89/159/229/2910/610/1310/2010/2711/311/1011/1711/24March 2019April 2019May 2019June 2019July 2019August 2019September 2019October 2019November 2019TREMONT MIXED-USE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT SCHEDULEPage 1Wed 2/27/19
ID Task NameDuration Start Finish Resource Names% Complete22Steel Submittals and Procurement40 daysTue 3/12/19Mon 5/6/190%24Concrete & Masonry Rebar Submittals and Procurement30 daysTue 3/12/19Mon 4/22/190%50CONSTRUCTION181 daysMon 3/25/19Mon 12/2/190%51SITEWORK181 daysMon 3/25/19Mon 12/2/190%52Erosion Control Precon Site Meeting1 dayMon 3/25/19Mon 3/25/190%53Erosion Control 5 daysTue 3/26/19Mon 4/1/190%54Mass Grading/Storm77 daysTue 4/2/19Wed 7/17/190%55Staking/Layout1 dayTue 4/2/19Tue 4/2/190%56Remove Existing Storm Drain (Bldg C Area)4 daysWed 4/3/19Mon 4/8/190%57Strip Topsoil and Haul Off3 daysTue 4/9/19Thu 4/11/190%58Mass Grading / Cut/Fill/Import10 daysFri 4/12/19Thu 4/25/190%59Fine Grading3 daysFri 4/26/19Tue 4/30/190%60Pad Ready Bldg C0 daysWed 5/1/19Wed 5/1/190%63Storm Drainage20 daysThu 5/2/19Wed 5/29/190%61Pad Ready Bldg A/B0 daysFri 5/3/19Fri 5/3/190%62Retaining Walls20 daysThu 6/20/19Wed 7/17/190%64Utilities 97 daysFri 4/26/19Mon 9/9/190%65Sanitary Sewer to MH 2 4 daysFri 4/26/19Wed 5/1/190%66Sanitary Sewer / Water15 daysThu 5/30/19Wed 6/19/190%67Gas / Power40 daysTue 7/16/19Mon 9/9/190%69Curb & Gutter / Asphalt / Site Concrete40 daysTue 10/8/19Mon 12/2/190%70Curb10 daysTue 10/8/19Mon 10/21/190%71Stone Base12 daysTue 10/15/19Wed 10/30/190%73Site Concrete15 daysTue 10/22/19Mon 11/11/190%72Binder5 daysMon 10/28/19Fri 11/1/190%74Final Asphalt Coat / Striping / HC Signage5 daysTue 11/26/19Mon 12/2/190%68Landscaping/ Irrigation15 daysTue 11/5/19Mon 11/25/190%75BUILDING C CONSTRUCTION138 daysWed 5/1/19Mon 11/11/190%76BUILDING C STRUCTURE126 daysWed 5/1/19Thu 10/24/190%77Concrete - Foundations16 daysWed 5/1/19Thu 5/23/190%78Pad Ready0 daysWed 5/1/19Wed 5/1/190%79Layout/Control2 daysThu 5/2/19Fri 5/3/190%80Foundations10 daysFri 5/3/19Thu 5/16/190%81CMU Foundation Walls5 daysFri 5/17/19Thu 5/23/190%82Sub Slab Plumbing/ Electrical7 daysFri 5/24/19Mon 6/3/190%83Sub Slab Plumbing Waste/ S.D.7 daysFri 5/24/19Mon 6/3/190%84Sub Slab Electrical5 daysFri 5/24/19Thu 5/30/190%85CMU15 daysFri 5/24/19Thu 6/13/190%86CMU Stairwells/Elevator Shaft15 daysFri 5/24/19Thu 6/13/190%87Concrete - Slabs36 daysTue 6/4/19Tue 7/23/190%88Ribbon Slab6 daysTue 6/4/19Tue 6/11/190%89Prep5 daysTue 6/4/19Mon 6/10/190%90Pour1 dayTue 6/11/19Tue 6/11/190%91SOD 2nd Floor6 daysMon 7/8/19Mon 7/15/190%92Prep - WWF & MEP Slab Rough5 daysMon 7/8/19Fri 7/12/190%93Pour1 dayMon 7/15/19Mon 7/15/190%94SOD 3rd Floor6 daysTue 7/16/19Tue 7/23/190%3/12Steel Submittals and Procurement3/12Concrete & Masonry Rebar Submittals and Procurement3/253/253/25Erosion Control Precon Site Meeting3/26Erosion Control 4/2Mass Grading/Storm4/2Staking/Layout4/3Remove Existing Storm Drain (Bldg C Area)4/9Strip Topsoil and Haul Off4/12Mass Grading / Cut/Fill/Import4/26Fine Grading5/15/2Storm Drainage5/36/20Retaining Walls4/26Utilities 4/26Sanitary Sewer to MH 2 5/30Sanitary Sewer / Water7/16Gas / Power10/810/8Curb10/15Stone Base10/22Site Concrete10/28Binder11/2611/5Landscaping/ Irrigation5/1BUILDING C CONSTRUCTION5/1BUILDING C STRUCTURE5/1Concrete - Foundations5/15/2Layout/Control5/3Foundations5/17CMU Foundation Walls5/24Sub Slab Plumbing/ Electrical5/24Sub Slab Plumbing Waste/ S.D.5/24Sub Slab Electrical5/24CMU5/24CMU Stairwells/Elevator Shaft6/4Concrete - Slabs6/4Ribbon Slab6/4Prep6/11Pour7/8SOD 2nd Floor7/8Prep - WWF & MEP Slab Rough7/15Pour7/16SOD 3rd Floor2/243/33/103/173/243/314/74/144/214/285/55/125/195/266/26/96/166/236/307/77/147/217/288/48/118/188/259/19/89/159/229/2910/610/1310/2010/2711/311/1011/1711/24March 2019April 2019May 2019June 2019July 2019August 2019September 2019October 2019November 2019TREMONT MIXED-USE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT SCHEDULEPage 2Wed 2/27/19
ID Task NameDuration Start Finish Resource Names% Complete95Prep - WWF & MEP Slab Rough5 daysTue 7/16/19Mon 7/22/190%96Pour1 dayTue 7/23/19Tue 7/23/190%97Structural Steel20 daysTue 6/18/19Mon 7/15/190%98Structural Steel / Decking - 1st Floor7 daysTue 6/18/19Wed 6/26/190%99Structural Steel / Decking - 2nd Floor7 daysThu 6/27/19Fri 7/5/190%100Structural Steel / Decking - 3rd Floor / Roof6 daysMon 7/8/19Mon 7/15/190%101Elevator15 daysThu 9/5/19Wed 9/25/190%102Elevator15 daysThu 9/5/19Wed 9/25/190%103Canopies10 daysFri 10/11/19Thu 10/24/190%104Canopies10 daysFri 10/11/19Thu 10/24/190%118BUILDING C - M/P/E/FP78 daysTue 7/9/19Thu 10/24/190%119Mechanical47 daysTue 7/9/19Wed 9/11/190%120Roof Top Equip. 34 daysTue 7/9/19Fri 8/23/190%121Roof Curbs5 daysTue 7/9/19Mon 7/15/190%122Set RTU's2 daysThu 8/22/19Fri 8/23/190%123Overhead Water / Sanitary Waste & Vent25 daysThu 8/8/19Wed 9/11/190%124Unit Heaters15 daysThu 8/8/19Wed 8/28/190%125Electrical56 daysThu 8/8/19Thu 10/24/190%126Power Distribution - Unit Heaters, RTU's, Convenience Receptacles20 daysThu 8/8/19Wed 9/4/190%127Lighting15 daysFri 10/4/19Thu 10/24/190%105BUILDING C ENVELOPE75 daysTue 7/16/19Mon 10/28/190%106Building Envelope75 daysTue 7/16/19Mon 10/28/190%107Metal Stud Framing / Sheathing / Weather Barrier25 daysTue 7/16/19Mon 8/19/190%108Metal Stud Framing / Sheathing / Weather Barrier25 daysTue 7/16/19Mon 8/19/190%112Brick Veneer / EIFS55 daysTue 7/23/19Mon 10/7/190%113Brick Veneer30 daysTue 7/23/19Mon 9/2/190%114EIFS25 daysTue 9/3/19Mon 10/7/190%109Roofing63 daysThu 8/1/19Mon 10/28/190%110TPO Roofing 5 daysThu 8/1/19Wed 8/7/190%111Gutter/DS5 daysTue 10/22/19Mon 10/28/190%115Storefront25 daysTue 9/17/19Mon 10/21/190%116Storefront Framing20 daysTue 9/17/19Mon 10/14/190%117Storefront Glass20 daysTue 9/24/19Mon 10/21/190%128BUILDING C COMPLETION SCHEDULE10 daysTue 10/29/19Mon 11/11/190%129TCO Inspections5 daysTue 10/29/19Mon 11/4/190%130Core/Shell TCO Inspections5 daysTue 10/29/19Mon 11/4/190%131Punchlist10 daysTue 10/29/19Mon 11/11/190%132Architect/Engineer to Provide to Choate5 daysTue 10/29/19Mon 11/4/190%133Choate/Subcontractors to Complete5 daysTue 11/5/19Mon 11/11/190%134Final Inspections5 daysTue 11/5/19Mon 11/11/190%135Core/Shell Final Inspections5 daysTue 11/5/19Mon 11/11/190%136BUILDING A CONSTRUCTION115 daysFri 5/3/19Fri 10/11/190%137BUILDING A STRUCTURE105 daysFri 5/3/19Fri 9/27/190%138Concrete - Foundations28 daysFri 5/3/19Wed 6/12/190%139Pad Ready0 daysFri 5/3/19Fri 5/3/190%140Layout/Control2 daysFri 5/17/19Mon 5/20/190%7/16Prep - WWF & MEP Slab Rough7/23Pour6/18Structural Steel6/18Structural Steel / Decking - 1st Floor6/27Structural Steel / Decking - 2nd Floor7/8Structural Steel / Decking - 3rd Floor / Roof9/5Elevator9/5Elevator10/11Canopies10/11Canopies7/9BUILDING C - M/P/E/FP7/9Mechanical7/9Roof Top Equip. 7/9Roof Curbs8/22Set RTU's8/8Overhead Water / Sanitary Waste & Vent8/8Unit Heaters8/8Electrical8/8Power Distribution - Unit Heaters, RTU's, Convenience Receptacles10/4Lighting7/16BUILDING C ENVELOPE7/16Building Envelope7/16Metal Stud Framing / Sheathing / Weather Barrier7/16Metal Stud Framing / Sheathing / Weather Barrier7/23Brick Veneer / EIFS7/23Brick Veneer9/3EIFS8/1Roofing8/1TPO Roofing 10/22Gutter/DS9/17Storefront9/17Storefront Framing9/24Storefront Glass10/29BUILDING C COMPLETION SCHEDULE10/29TCO Inspections10/29Core/Shell TCO Inspections10/29Punchlist10/29Architect/Engineer to Provide to Choate11/5Choate/Subcontractors to Complete11/5Final Inspections11/5Core/Shell Final Inspections5/3BUILDING A CONSTRUCTION5/3BUILDING A STRUCTURE5/3Concrete - Foundations5/35/17Layout/Control2/243/33/103/173/243/314/74/144/214/285/55/125/195/266/26/96/166/236/307/77/147/217/288/48/118/188/259/19/89/159/229/2910/610/1310/2010/2711/311/1011/1711/24March 2019April 2019May 2019June 2019July 2019August 2019September 2019October 2019November 2019TREMONT MIXED-USE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT SCHEDULEPage 3Wed 2/27/19
ID Task NameDuration Start Finish Resource Names% Complete141Foundations12 daysMon 5/20/19Tue 6/4/190%142CMU Foundation Walls6 daysWed 6/5/19Wed 6/12/190%143Sub Slab Plumbing/ Electrical7 daysWed 6/5/19Thu 6/13/190%144Sub Slab Plumbing Waste/ S.D.7 daysWed 6/5/19Thu 6/13/190%145Sub Slab Electrical5 daysWed 6/5/19Tue 6/11/190%146Concrete - Slabs8 daysFri 6/14/19Tue 6/25/190%147Ribbon Slab8 daysFri 6/14/19Tue 6/25/190%148Prep6 daysFri 6/14/19Fri 6/21/190%149Pour2 daysMon 6/24/19Tue 6/25/190%150Structural Steel11 daysTue 7/16/19Tue 7/30/190%151Structural Steel Erection 8 daysTue 7/16/19Thu 7/25/190%152Roof Decking 5 daysWed 7/24/19Tue 7/30/190%153Canopies8 daysWed 9/18/19Fri 9/27/190%154Canopies8 daysWed 9/18/19Fri 9/27/190%167BUILDING A - M/P/E/FP43 daysWed 7/24/19Fri 9/20/190%168Mechanical30 daysWed 7/24/19Tue 9/3/190%169Roof Top Equip. 30 daysWed 7/24/19Tue 9/3/190%170Roof Curbs5 daysWed 7/24/19Tue 7/30/190%171Set RTU's2 daysMon 9/2/19Tue 9/3/190%172Overhead Water6 daysMon 8/19/19Mon 8/26/190%173Unit Heaters4 daysMon 8/19/19Thu 8/22/190%174Electrical25 daysMon 8/19/19Fri 9/20/190%175Power Distribution - Unit Heaters, RTU's, Convenience Receptacles10 daysMon 8/19/19Fri 8/30/190%176Lighting10 daysMon 9/9/19Fri 9/20/190%155BUILDING A ENVELOPE38 daysWed 7/31/19Fri 9/20/190%156Building Envelope38 daysWed 7/31/19Fri 9/20/190%157Metal Stud Framing / Sheathing / Weather Barrier20 daysWed 7/31/19Tue 8/27/190%158Metal Stud Framing / Sheathing / Weather Barrier20 daysWed 7/31/19Tue 8/27/190%159Roofing30 daysMon 8/12/19Fri 9/20/190%160TPO Roofing 5 daysMon 8/12/19Fri 8/16/190%161Gutter/DS3 daysWed 9/18/19Fri 9/20/190%162Brick Veneer15 daysWed 8/28/19Tue 9/17/190%163Brick Veneer15 daysWed 8/28/19Tue 9/17/190%164Storefront15 daysWed 8/28/19Tue 9/17/190%165Storefront Framing12 daysWed 8/28/19Thu 9/12/190%166Storefront Glass10 daysWed 9/4/19Tue 9/17/190%177BUILDING A COMPLETION SCHEDULE10 daysMon 9/30/19Fri 10/11/190%178TCO Inspections5 daysMon 9/30/19Fri 10/4/190%179Core/Shell TCO Inspections5 daysMon 9/30/19Fri 10/4/190%180Punchlist10 daysMon 9/30/19Fri 10/11/190%181Architect/Engineer to Provide to Choate5 daysMon 9/30/19Fri 10/4/190%182Choate/Subcontractors to Complete5 daysMon 10/7/19Fri 10/11/190%183Final Inspections5 daysMon 10/7/19Fri 10/11/190%184Core/Shell Final Inspections5 daysMon 10/7/19Fri 10/11/190%5/20Foundations6/5CMU Foundation Walls6/5Sub Slab Plumbing/ Electrical6/5Sub Slab Plumbing Waste/ S.D.6/5Sub Slab Electrical6/14Concrete - Slabs6/14Ribbon Slab6/14Prep6/24Pour7/16Structural Steel7/16Structural Steel Erection 7/24Roof Decking 9/18Canopies9/18Canopies7/24BUILDING A - M/P/E/FP7/24Mechanical7/24Roof Top Equip. 7/24Roof Curbs9/2Set RTU's8/19Overhead Water8/19Unit Heaters8/19Electrical8/19Power Distribution - Unit Heaters, RTU's, Convenience Receptacles9/9Lighting7/31BUILDING A ENVELOPE7/31Building Envelope7/31Metal Stud Framing / Sheathing / Weather Barrier7/31Metal Stud Framing / Sheathing / Weather Barrier8/12Roofing8/12TPO Roofing 9/18Gutter/DS8/28Brick Veneer8/28Brick Veneer8/28Storefront8/28Storefront Framing9/4Storefront Glass9/30BUILDING A COMPLETION SCHEDULE9/30TCO Inspections9/30Core/Shell TCO Inspections9/30Punchlist9/30Architect/Engineer to Provide to Choate10/7Choate/Subcontractors to Complete10/7Final Inspections10/7Core/Shell Final Inspections2/243/33/103/173/243/314/74/144/214/285/55/125/195/266/26/96/166/236/307/77/147/217/288/48/118/188/259/19/89/159/229/2910/610/1310/2010/2711/311/1011/1711/24March 2019April 2019May 2019June 2019July 2019August 2019September 2019October 2019November 2019TREMONT MIXED-USE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT SCHEDULEPage 4Wed 2/27/19