7401_Pitt_MSWLF_Northern_Southern_MSWLF_OldDocuments_1995Agreement_FID1286517_20190315

7401 Com -Batch No.
T

ColUtrUNTYPE. 1CT (check all that a
1 to this audit-va . same Pest number
Lined
LCID
YW
Transfer
Compost
SLAS
Y
COUNT: Pttt
MSWLF
PERMET NO : 74=01
Closed
HRW
white
Incin
T&P
FIRM
MSWLF
x
oods
..
FILE VV COMPLIANCE
CDLF
TireT&P/
Tire
Industrial
DEMO
SDTF
Collection
Monofill
Landfill
Date of Audit:Jan. 262006
Date of Last Audit Feb. 11. 2005
FACILITY NAME AND ADDRESS:
Pitt County Landfill
1717 West Fifth Street
Greenville, NC 27834
FACILITY CONTACT NAME AND PHONE NUMBER:
Phil Dickerson, Pitt Co. Engineer [phone]
FACILITY CONTACT ADDRESS (IF DIFFERENT):
Same
AUDIT PARTICIPANTS:
Chuck Boyette, Solid Waste Section
Jackie Moore, Pitt Co.
STATUS OF PERMIT:
Closed
PURPOSE OF AUDIT:
Comprehensive audit
NOTICE OF VIOLATIONS) (citation and explanation):
None
4g8788�0',
� P
2006 2,n
sift
You are hereby advised that, pursuant to N.C.G.S. 130A-22, an administrative penalty of up to $5,000 per day may be assessed for each
violation of the Solid Waste Statute or Regulations. If the violation(s) noted here continue, you may be subject to enforcement actions
including penalties, injunction from operation of a solid waste management facility or a solid waste collection service and any such further
relief as may be necessary to achieve compliance with the North Carolina Solid Waste Management Act and Rules.
STATUS OF PAST NOTED VIOLATIONS (List all noted last audit):
N/A
AREAS OF CONCERN AND COMMENTS:
There was one area that was not draining as it should due to a built up of weeds.
Ple contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this audit report.
4- (signature) Phone: [phone]
Region Representative
Distribution orieinal signed copy to facility — signed copy to compliance officer — e-mail or copy to super
Delivered on: Feb.1. 2006 by
hand delivery I a I US Mail I I Certified No. fI
Cc: John Crowder, Eastern Area Supervisor
Mark Poindexter, Branch Head, Raleigh Central Office

1�
NCDENR
Norx'rM Cnnouw. OEPMTMEl1T of
EWRONMENT AND NAruRAL RE-AURCEs
r. euised�ll8/2003 2 S0 PM
FACIL. ' — CQ PLIAN AUDIT REPQRT
..
..:.D><v><s><an of �Yastenagement::.` :`
Sol><d ateecion
C0dAJN!
TYr'E. (check all that a
` 1. to this.
audit vt th same
Perm>tt dumber
Lined
LCID
YW
Transfer
Compost
SLAB
....
CCtUNTY Pltt.......:
MswLF
.........
..
PERMCT NO:...?4-Q1.:
Closed
Intw
white
Incin
T&P
FIRM
MS WLF
x
goods
FILE TYPF .....COMPLIANC1=
CDLF
TireT&P/
Tire
Industrial
DEMO
SDTF
Collection
Monofill
Landfill
. .......... ...._......... ...._.................................... .........:.::....:...._.
Date of Audit:Feb. 11. 2005.
Date of Last Audit:Jan. 11, 2005
FACILITY NAME AND ADDRESS:
Pitt County Landfill
1717 West Fifth Street
Greenville, NC 27834
FACILITY CONTACT NAME AND PHONE NUMBER:
Phil Dickerson, Pitt Co. Engineer [phone]
FACILITY CONTACT ADDRESS (IF DIFFERENT):
Same
AUDIT PARTICIPANTS:
Chuck Boyette, Solid Waste Section
STATUS OF PERMIT:
Closed
PURPOSE OF AUDIT:
Follow up audit
NOTICE OF VIOLATIONS) (citation and explanation):
None
You are hereby advised that, pursuant to N.C.G.S. 130A-22, an administrative penalty of up to $5,000 per day may be assessed for each
violation of the Solid Waste Statute or Regulations. If the violation(s) noted here continue, you may be subject to enforcement actions
including penalties, injunction from operation of a solid waste management facility or a solid waste collection service and any such further
relief as may be necessary to achieve compliance with the North Carolina Solid Waste Management Act and Rules.
STATUS OF PAST NOTED VIOLATIONS (List all noted last audit):
N/A
OTHER COMMENTS /SUGGESTIONS:
The repair of the leachate break out has been repaired within30 days as requested !
Plea e contact me if have any questions or concerns regarding this audit report.
i
(signature) Phone: [phone]
Regiona R resentative
Distribution: original sinned copy to facility — signed copy to compliance officer — e-mail or copy to super
Delivered on: Feb,14. 2005 by
hand delivery I a I US Mail I I Certified No. U
Cc: John Crowder, Eastern Area Supervisor
Mark Poindexter, Branch Head, Raleigh Central Office

NCDENR
NORrM CAROIMA DEPARiMEM Of
ENVIRONMENT MO NQURAI R680URCE9
:C i
:.: ; ;k47::
9..:
/.....
i..: .�..,.........:L..:: .......................................:.....:....................:.................:.....:......:...:...
Lined
LCID
YW
Transfer
Compost
SLAS
u�
MSWLF
P,l
Closed
HHW
White
Incin
TBcP
FIRM
MSWLF
%
goods
.............
l E T I E �111f11'�i 1YCiE.,:
CDLF
Tire T&P /
Tire
Industrial
DEMO
SDTF
Collection
Monofill
Landfill
... :z
Date of Audit:Jan.11. 2005. Date of Last Audit: ay 7. 2004
FACILITY NAME AND ADDRESS:
Pitt County Landfill
1717 West Fifth Street
Greenville, NC 27834
FACILITY CONTACT NAME AND PHONE NUMBER:
Phil Dickerson, Pitt Co. Engineer [phone]
FACILITY CONTACT ADDRESS (IF DIFFERENT):
Same
AUDIT PARTICIPANTS:
Chuck Boyette, Solid Waste Section
STATUS OF PERMIT:
Closed
PURPOSE OF AUDIT:
Compliance audit
NOTICE OF VIOLATIONS) (citation and explanation):
None
You are hereby advised that, pursuant to N.C.G.S. 130A-22, an administrative penalty of up to $5,000 per day may be assessed for each
violation of the Solid Waste Statute or Regulations. If the violation(s) noted here continue, you may be subject to enforcement actions
including penalties, injunction from operation of a solid waste management facility or a solid waste collection service and any such further
relief as may be necessary to achieve compliance with the North Carolina Solid Waste Management Act an
STATUS OF PAST NOTED VIOLATIONS (List all noted last audit):
N/A
OTHER COMMENTS /SUGGESTIONS:
There is a small area with a leachate break out on the side of the closed cell, please rep within 30 days w
Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this audit report.
/'Zg- v
h,
(signature) Phone: [phone]
Regiona-7 4presentative
Delivered on : Jan. 18, 2005 by
hand delivery I x I US Mail I I Certified No. LJ
Cc: John Crowder, Eastern Area Supervisor
Mark Poindexter, Branch Head, Raleigh Central Office

1�
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RL•OUROEE
:..... �::..............
:".^,�.; ::ni::+.• .:
.::::::::..:.::.::::::.>:.;r.:::'.:;;::>,:;.;:::':
':. .:: ::>: •.i •':: .: l:i
!!;i.
.:':.:ry':
a;:;: a;.:;::!
{:..: ,'i'':: ' .' ,
.j,.:...
:::;;?iy':y'+.::ii
a ?: •......:.
{..i
i....
ii•:'•:;:
.:.. ...:: ..a...n....,..
• }. :i • . :; ..
V. 5.:..'S..:.7�s.
•:i;::>:::::::.:::ii::ii:
::.
i. y.....
j: is .. • .
>. .. (
.......
......:.............................:.............n....:..................... .
Lined
LCID
YW
Transfer
Compost
SLAS
.....:. � ....... .:
""""" ""
MS WLF
Closed
HHW
White
Inein
T&P
>:"EllVll`i"Ct
M S WLF
x
nods
7SDTF
CDLF
Tire T&P /
Tire
industrial
DEMO
1=1�. �t31�11F�1 N�,�
Collection
Monofill
Landfill
Date of Audit:Mav 7, 2003.
Date of Last Audit: Jan 8. 2003
FACILITY NAME AND ADDRESS:
Pitt County Landfill
1717 West Fifth Street
Greenville, NC 27834
FACILITY CONTACT NAME AND PHONE NUMBER:
Phil Dickerson, Pitt Co. Engineer [phone]
FACILITY CONTACT ADDRESS (IF DIFFERENT):
Same
AUDIT PARTICIPANTS:
Chuck Boyette, Solid Waste Section
STATUS OF PERMIT:
Closed
PURPOSE OF AUDIT:
Follow up audit
NOTICE OF VIOLATIONS) (citation and explanation):
None
You are hereby advised that, pursuant to N.C.G.S. 130A-22, an administrative penalty of up to $5,000 per day may be assessed for each
violation of the Solid Waste Statute or Regulations. If the violation(s) noted here continue, you may be subject to enforcement actions
including penalties, injunction from operation of a solid waste management facility or a solid waste collection service and any such further
relief as may be necessary to achieve compliance with the North Carolina Solid Waste Management Act and Rules.
STATUS OF PAST NOTED VIOLATIONS (List all noted last audit):
N/A
OTHER COMMENTS /SUGGESTIONS:
Repairs have been made to the two areas of concern noted on comments on my Jan. audit H
Please tact me if you have an u�# estions or concerns regarding this audit report.
i & (signature) Phone: [phone]
Regional Repr sentative
Distribution: original signed copy to facility — signed copy to compliance officer — e-mail or copy to super
Delivered on : May 12, 2003 by
hand delivery I x I US Mail I I Certified No. L J
Cc: Mark Fry, Eastern Area Supervisor
Mark Poindexter, Branch Head, Raleigh Central Office

NCDENR
NORM CAROLINA DEPARTIAENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RWOURCE9
........`•'........:.....•.......... Y*:4i?i'"3Sii:
:-i:::: i::•: »::
�:: .::-.:•.::::::.:
)l4iiii:N•:
•:::�}iM}iiiiii: '•: :::::
»i-.: :•:::::::-.:
i::. :::: iii :i:::::::::::::::::::
Lined
LCID
YW
Transfer
Compost
SLAS,,�
MSWLF
Closed
HINV
White
Incin
TBcP
FIRM
MS WLF
x
Dods
�L '�`� .010� {
CDLF
Tire T&P /
Tire
Industrial
DEMO
SDTF
Collection
Monofill
Landfill
::: ""
Date of Audit:May 24.2002.
Date of Last Audit: April 16, 2002
FACILITY NAME AND ADDRESS:
Pitt County Landfill
1717 West Fifth Street
Greenville, NC 27834
FACILITY CONTACT NAME AND PHONE NUMBER:
Phil Dickerson, Pitt Co. Engineer [phone]
FACILITY CONTACT ADDRESS (IF DIFFERENT):
Same
AUDIT PARTICIPANTS:
Chuck Boyette, Solid Waste Section
STATUS OF PERMIT:
Closed
PURPOSE OF AUDIT:
Follow-up audit
NOTICE OF VIOLATIONS) (citation and explanation):
None
You are hereby advised that, pursuant to N.C.G.S. 130A-22, an administrative penalty of up to $5,000 per day may be assessed for each
violation of the Solid Waste Statute or Regulations. If the violation(s) noted here continue, you may be subject to enforcement actions
including penalties, injunction from operation of a solid waste management facility or a solid waste collection service and any such further
relief as may be necessary to achieve compliance with the North Carolina Solid Waste Management Act and Rules.
STATUS OF PAST NOTED VIOLATIONS (List all noted last audit):
N/A
OTHER COMMENTS /SUGGESTIONS:
The area with potential for leachate to leave the site has been repaired !
Ple ntact me if you have apy questions or concerns regarding this audit report.
(signature) Phone: [phone]
Regional R resentative
Distribution: original signed copy to facility — signed copy to compliance officer — e-mail or copy to super
Delivered on: 5/28/02 by
hand delivery i s I US Mail I I Certified No. 1 1
Cc: Mark Fry, Eastern Area Supervisor
'011 ratl-" Raleigh Central Office

�t1 �:'
NCDENR
*X" CAWX.1" DMMARTMCRr 0/
owno"mrw ANO maumv. RLOuRczs
( ( y���y +J#
:':''..'.'.':�'.'...:',:F:isi:'•,rk{l+?V.L/;;:is�1i::l%::...
� .j, �.y�
':':.:::6i/::;:k';:;1,:;,,,r7fF�...fYfa...�v,.:.k
....a�f
�. L11�tp
y': ....................................
<::i:: ::::::::i::3:isi::::::::: :::: :::<:::<:: ::j::; ::;:;:;:::: :::::::: '::::::::::+:: ::::i::::i:::::::%::'%:::::::::::::';%:::i::::::i::;::::::?:::::`:::
Lined
LCID
YW
Transfer
Compost
SLAS}
' .
MSWLF
:?
Closed
HEiW
White
Incin
T&P
FIRM
M SWLF
x
goods
�a �3
TE `-eA%Y
CDLF
Tire T&P /
Tire
Ind�utrial
DEMO
SDTFE
Collection
Monofill
Landfill
Date of Audit: April 16.2002. Date of Last Audit: 1995
FACILITY NAME AND ADDRESS:
Pitt County Landfill
1717 West Fifth Street
Greenville, NC 27834
FACILITY CONTACT NAME AND PHONE NUMBER:
Phil Dickerson, Pitt Co. Engineer [phone]
FACILITY CONTACT ADDRESS (IF DIFFERENT):
Same
AUDIT PARTICIPANTS:
Chuck Boyette, Solid Waste Section
STATUS OF PERMIT:
Closed
PURPOSE OF AUDIT:
Annual audit
NOTICE OF VIOLATIONS) (citation and explanation):
None
You are hereby advised that, pursuant to N.C.G.S. 130A-22, an administrative penalty of up to $5,000 per day may be assessed for each
violation of the Solid Waste Statute or Regulations. if the violation(s) noted here continue, you may be subject to enforcement actions
including penalties, injunction from operation of a solid waste management facility or a solid waste collection service and any such further
relief as may be necessary to achieve compliance with the North Carolina Solid Waste Management Act and Rules.
STATUS OF PAST NOTED VIOLATIONS (List all noted last audit):
N/A
OTHER COMMENTS /SUGGESTIONS:
There appears to be an area with potential for leachate to leave the site near the road going up the hill , please repair within
30 days!
Pleausexontact me if ou have any questions or concerns regarding this audit report.
(signature) Phone. [phone]
Region epresentative
Distribution: original signed copy to facility — signed copy to compliance officer — e-mail or copy to super
Delivered on : 4/22/02 by hand delivery a US Mail Certified No. Ll

NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Division of Solid Haste Mkt
So Lid Haste Section
SOLID HASTE HANA[EIENT FACILITY EVALIIATION REPORT (/
Type of Facility Inn AI ''' Permit * / D r tY_�
Name of Foci Lity. l� • ' ' Location ' R . IW0
Date of Last Evaluation ); 2 � f 2/ —
I. Permit Conditions FoLLared LefYes No N/A
A. Specific Condition(s) Violated
II. Operational Requirements Followedy` Yes No
15A N.C. Admin. Code 13B Section
A. Specific Violation(s) by mmtier and letter.
III. other Violations of Rule or Law.
IV. Evaluator's Caaments ,So
V. Continiation Page Required?? Yes 4/'�No Receiving Signnturez-'J
.Z
Evaluation Date '"""';" A' — � Solid Haste Section
DEHM 3793 (Part I White: Facility Part II Canary: Central
Solid Haste Section (Review 7/94)
f
Regional office)

Repose: G.S. 130A-294 requires that an evaluation program be established for the
operation of solid waste management facilities on a statewide basis. The
Solid Waste Management Aat and Solid Waste Management lames codified at
15A NCAC 13B list requirements which must be followed by solid waste
facilities.
Instructions: Solid Waste Section personnel shall ccoplete the evaluation form each
time they conduct official evaluations. The form shall be signed by
the person(s) receiving the report.
Distribution: Part I mite: facility cony
Part II Canary: Raleigh central office file cojpy
Part III Pink: Regional office file copy
Disposition: This form may be retained in accordance with the Record. Retention and
Disposition Schedule of the Solid Waste Section, Solid Waste Management
Division of the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources.

BROOKS, PIERCE, MCLENDON, HUMPHREY & LEONARD, L.L.P.
ATTORNEYS AND GOLNSELL.ORS AT LAW
L.P. MCLENDON, JR.
JEFFREY E. OLEYNIK
HUBERT HUMPHREY
MARK DAVIDSON
2000 RENAISSANCE PLAZA
EDGAR B. FISHER. JR.
MELISSA H. WEAVER
W. ERWIN FULLER, JR.
JAMES R. SAINTSING
POST OFFIOE BOX 23000
JAMES T. WILLIAMS, JR.
JOHN W. ORMAND III
WADE H. HARGROVE
M. DANIEL MCGINN
R08ERT J. KING III
V. RANDALL TINSLEY
GREENSBORO, NORTH GAROLINA 27420
MICHAEL D. MEEKER
JOHN R. ARCHAMBAULT
WILLIAM G. MCNAIRY
S. KYLE WOOSLEY
TELEPHONE: (9I0) 373-8850
EDWARD C. WINSLOW III
CATHERINE THOMAS MCGEE
HOWARD L. WILLIAMS
WILLIAM C. SCOTT
TELEX: 574301
GEORGE W. HOUSE
ANNE C. BRENNAN
WILLIAM P. H. CARY
DANIEL M. SROKA
REID L PHILLIPS
FORREST W. CAMPBELL JR.
FACSIMILE: [phone]
ROBERT A. SINGER
ELLEN P. HAMRICK
JOHN H. SMALL
MARCUS W. TRATHEN
RANDALL A. UNDERWOOD
ALLISON M. GRIMM
February 27, 1995
S. LEIGH RODENBOUGH IV
JEAN C. BROOKS
WILLIAM G. ROSS, JR,
JAMES C. ADAMS, II
MARK J. PRAK
ELIZABETH S. BREWINGTON
WILLIAM A. DAVIS, II
JOHN K. EASON
JILL R. WILSON
WAYNE A. LOGAN
MARC D. BISHOP
H. ARTHUR BOLICK II
JIM W. PHILLIPS. JR.
NATASHA RATH MARCUS
MACK SPERLING
Dexter R. Matthews
Chief
Solid Waste Section
Division of Solid Waste Management
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
Re: Pitt County Landfill
Dear Mr. Matthews:
AUBREY L. BROOKS (1872-1958)
W. H. HOLDERNESS (1904-1965)
L P. MCLENDON (1890-1968)
KENNETH M. BRIM (1898.1974)
C. T. LEONARD, JR. (1929-1983)
CLAUDE C. PIERCE (1913-1988)
THORNTON H. BROOKS (1912-1988)
OF COUNSEL
G. NEIL DANIELS
OFFICES ALSO IN
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
AND
WASHINGTON, D.C.
WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL
[phone]
As you know, Pitt County and the State are parties to an
Administrative Agreement on Consent, dated January 17, 1995, that
requires the County to submit a plan for investigating groundwater
contamination at the Pitt County Landfill. In addition, the County
has received a January 19, 1995 letter from Phil Prete directing
the County to conduct air quality tests, and a December 27, 1994
letter from Mark Poindexter directing the County to conduct
additional groundwater sampling for the northern portion of the
Landfill.
The County has been discussing
directives in a -manner that is bot
public health and the environment.
County's consultant, Pete Moncla
Associates, the County proposes
activities:
h
how best to comply with these
efficient and protective of
After consulting with the
of Groundwater Management
the following sequence of
1. the County will conduct air testing around MW-2 and P-15,
as requested in Mr. Prete's January 19, 1995 letter;
2. the County will conduct an initial round of sampling at
the northern unit, as contemplated in Mr. Poindexter's
December 27, 1994 letter; and

A - -1`7 , J 11 1 .
U 0 4 09
aN

Dexter R. Matthews
February 27, 1995
Page 2
3. Based on the information obtained as a result of steps 1
and 2, the County will submit the Plan called for by the
AAC.
The County believes that pursuing these steps in this order
will protect the health of employees taking the water samples,
prevent duplicative groundwater testing, and allow for the
submission of an AAC Plan that will require minimal revisions. We,
and Pete Moncla, would like to meet with representatives of the
Division as soon as possible to discuss these steps. I would
appreciate your contacting me at your earliest convenience so that
we can schedule our meeting.
Thank you for your continued assistance in this matter.
WGR/rmw
cc: Philip Prete
Mark Poindexter
Nancy Scott, Esq.
Pamela Weaver Best, Esq.
Alfred Moncla
Sincerely,
William G. Ross, Jr.
R.
Cli
1995
10 Re
So1dWVed
aste
Secfion

LP. MCLENDON JR
rIJ BER- :-!U'-1V11REY
C'J GA%i 'J HE4. JR
J ER Ry '.N... n,.. .
W.:i4WIN . _F, JR
J MS T. 1'+ A-A:.IS JR.
M DANIEL MC JINN
M ICHAEL D MEEKER
JOi`N L. 51;"-'—'T
WILLIAM G. M:NAIRY
EDWARD C W!NSLOW Ill
HOWARD L WILLIAMS
GEORGE W HOUSE
WILLIAM P. H. CARY
REID L PH ILLIPS
ROBERT A. SINGER
JOHN H. SMALL
RANDALLA.UNDERWOOD
S. LEIGH RODENBOUGH IV
WILLIAM G. ROSS. JR.
JILL R. WILSON
MARC D. BISHOP
MACK SPERLING
BRoo;is, PIERcE, McLENDON, HumPHRF_' ;�a�U �:^•= `-�
JE�FREY E. OLEYNIK ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW AUBREY L BROOKS (1872.19581
W. H. HOL.:&74-SS (1904.1965)
i•A"A DAV'DSON
L P. MCL=NOON (1890-19681
F":LISSA H. WEAVER
20110 RENAISSANCE PLAZA
KENNETH W ERIM (1698.1974)
114ES R. SAINTSING
C. T LEON.RC. JR (1929-1983)
C BRENNAN
PUS': Or FILE BOY 28000
CL.UGE C. PIERCE i)
JC HN ,,. ORMAND III
THORNTON H. BROOKS (t9;2 19�2 19 198B)
V. RANDALL TINSLEY
CiAROLINA 27420
J.^,tiN R. ARCHAMBAULT
GREENSBORO, NORTH
ES H. JEFFRIES IV
OF COUNSEL
ROBERT J. KING III
TELEPHONE: [phone]
G. NEIL DANIELS
DANIEL M. SROKA
S. KYLE WOOSLEY
TELEX 574301
RALEIGH OFFICE
CATHERINE THOMAS MCGEE
FORREST W. CAMPBELL JR.
JEFFREY K. PERALDO
FACSIMILE: [phone]
SUITE 280 HILLSBOROUGH PLACE
WI SCO
WILLIAM C. SCOTT
225 HILLSBOROUGH STREET
LEA P.
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27603
AWSON M. GRIMM
(919)
(919) 8
FACSIMILE (919) 32-7662
JEAN C. BROOKS
MARY ANN MULLIN
JAMES C ADAMS. II
WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL
ELIZABETH S. BREWINGTON
JOHN K. EASON
January 26, 1995
[phone]
Elizabeth M. Powell, Esq.
Smith Helms Mulliss & Moore, L.L.P.
Post Office Box 27525
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Re: Groundwater Investigation at Pitt County Landfill
Dear Beth.
In your letter of January 12, you asked me to advise you of the status of this matter and of
the County"s position regarding the investigation of the area of MW-2. The purpose of this letter is
to give you the information you requested.
On Monday, January 9, 1995, the Pitt County Board of County Commissioners approved an
Administrative Agreement on Consent between the County and the State Division of Solid Waste
Management. The agreement calls for the County to perform an investigation of the existence,
nature and extent of groundwater and surface water contamination at the Landfill. With the
exception of one revised but substantially similar paragraph (i.e., Section X), the agreement is the
sarne one the County approved and sent to the State in April, 1994. The appropriate State officials
also have signed the agreement. A copy of the executed agreement is enclosed.
An important focus of the investigation will be the condition of the groundwater in the
vicinity of the cell that holds the pesticides and pesticide -contaminated materials from the 1979
Coastal Chemical fire. As you know, Monitoring Well 2 is the Landfill monitoring well that is
closest to the Coastal Chemical cell. It was the presence of contaminants in MW-2 that first
triggered the County's and State's concerns about a possible groundwater problem.
Additional testing seems to support the reasonableness of the County's concerns about the
Coastal Chemical pesticides and pesticide -containing materials as a potential source of t}:!e
c: Aitarninants that have been found. As Coastal Chemical's inventory of disposed n.<1 erials
indicates, the amount of pesticides and pesticide -containing materials that were placed in Lie coil

Elizabeth M. Powell, Esq.
January 26, 1995
Page 2
in the Landfill was quite large. Now, pesticides are being found in the monitoring well nearest the
Coastal Chemical cell. (At the State -Coastal Chemical -County meeting in September, 1994, the
County provided this information to the company.)
The County's view is that the information now available makes it appropriate and in the
public's interest for the groundwater investigation to move ahead. The State shares that view, and
encouraged the County to proceed. Consequently, on January 9, the County approved the agreement
that provides for the investigation.
It is also the County's view that, with the company's materials being a potential source of
groundwater contamination at the Landfill, Coastal Chemical a. d other parties who in 1979 solicited
the County to allow placement of those materials in the lanafill ought in fairness to participate in
and contribute to the investigation effort. Coastal Chemical's involvement in the investigation will
help insure that the study addresses the issues that the company has raised about the current state
of knowledge concerning the source, nature and extent of contamination.
Participation and contribution can be accomplished without admission of liability or waiver
of defense. Pitt County invites Coastal Chemical to sign the agreement, and to help design, oversee
and pay for the investigation. Because of deadlines in the agreement, the County needs to know
quickly whether Coastal will participate and contribute. Please advise the County of the company's
position on that subject on or before February 6, 1995.
Thank you for your and the company's attention to this matter.
Sincerely yours,
r
William G. Ross, Jr.
WGRjr/plb
Enclosure
cc: Pamela Weaver Best, Esq.
Nancy Scott, Esq.
Phillip Prete

State of North Carolina
MICHAEL F. EASLEY Department of AlStiCe
ATTORNEY GENERAL F. 0. BOX 620
RALEIGIi
27G(T2-0(3'29
REPLY TO:
Nancy E. Scott
Environmental Division
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
January 18, 1995
Pamela Weaver Best
Associate County Attorney
Pitt County Legal Department
1717 West Fifth Street
Greenville, North Carolina 27834
Re: Administrative Agreement on Consent
Groundwater Assessment at Pitt County Landfill
Dear Ms. Best:
Enclosed for your records is a fully executed original Administrative Agreement on
Consent for the Groundwater Assessment at the Pitt County sanitary landfill.
I understand that you will send me a copy of the minutes of the January 9, 1995,
Commissioner' meeting, at which entry of the Agreement was authorized, as soon as the
minutes have been prepared.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
NES:gg
Enclosure
C.C. Phil Prete
Central Files
Sincerely yours,
IV' i.,4e
N cy E. Sdott
Assistant Attorney General
An Equal Opportunity / Affinnative Action Employer
��

NORTH :: 1 \ : DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT,
HEALTH AND NATURAL
RES01MCES
DIVISION OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
SOLID WASTE SECTION
COUNTY1 )ADMINISTRATIVE I ON CONSENT
COUNTYIN RE:PITT )DOCKET
LANDFILLSANITARY
I. Jurisdiction
This Administrative Agreement On Consent is entered pursuant to the North Carolina
Solid Waste Management Act, N.C.G.S. 130A, Article 9, and Rules, codified at 15A NCAC
13B. Dexter R. Matthews, Chief of the Solid Waste Section, Division of Solid Waste
Management ("The Division"), has been delegated the authority to implement the Solid Waste
Management Program under the Act and Rules.
This Consent Agreement is entered for the limited purpose of investigating
contamination of the ground water and possible contamination of surface water in the vicinity
of the sanitary landfill owned and maintained by Pitt County, North Carolina. This
Agreement is entered without prejudice to any further study or remedial activity which may be
necessary at this site.

`a
III. Stipulation of Facts
Based upon information available at the effective date of this Consent Agreement, the
following facts are stipulated for the purposes of this Consent Agreement:
A. Pitt County owns and operates a sanitary landfill located off S.R. 1203 just west
of Greenville City limits.
B. Pitt County has operated the landfill under an Order of Approval beginning in
June, 1974. After the RCRA legislation became effective Pitt County has operated a sanitary
landfill permitted to receive solid, non -hazardous waste for disposal under Solid Waste Permit
#74-01.
C. Elevated levels of inorganic constituents and indicator parameters from a
previous sampling event performed by the County's sampling contractor, indicated the
possibility of contamination in on -site monitoring wells. This prompted the Solid Waste
Section to split samples with the sampling contractor on September 5, 1991 and perform
organic and inorganic analysis on the samples. Groundwater monitoring analytical results
from that sampling event revealed the presence of semi -volatile and volatile organic
compounds, as well as, inorganic constituents in the monitoring wells. Subsequent sampling
events have confirmed the presence of inorganic and organic constituents that exceed the N.C.
Ground Water Standards.
D. As of the effective date of this Consent Agreement, the nature and extent of
ground -water contamination in the vicinity of the Pitt County Sanitary Landfill has not been
clearly determined.

3
NUIEFSTOTIRMUM
A. 15A NCAC 13B .0503(2)(d)(i) adopts by reference 15A NCAC 2L,
Classifications And Water Quality Standards Applicable To The Groundwaters Of North
Carolina.
B. 15A NCAC 13B .0503(2)(c)(i) states that "A (landfill) site shall not cause a
discharge of pollutants into waters of the state that is in violation of the requirements of the
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), under Section 402 of the Clean
Water Act, as amended". Rule 15A NCAC 13B .0503(2)(c)(iii) states that "a site shall not
cause non -point source pollution of waters of the state that violates assigned water quality
standards".
C. 15A NCAC 13B .0601(a) states that "The Division shall require a solid waste
management facility to provide such ground -water monitoring capability as the Division
determines to be necessary to detect the effects of the facility on ground -water in the area".
D. 15A NCAC 13B .0602(a) states that "The Division shall require a solid waste
management facility to provide such surface water monitoring capability as the Division
determines to be necessary to detect the effects of the facility on surface water in the area".
E. 15A NCAC 13B .0201(d) states that "All solid waste management facilities
shall be operated in conformity with these Rules and in such a manner as to prevent the
creation of a nuisance, insanitary conditions, or potential public health hazard".
Based upon the facts and applicable law, the Division has determined, for purposes of

4
this Consent Agreement only, the following:
A. Analyses of samples of ground water taken at the landfill since 1991 indicate
contravention of ground water standards for various inorganic and organic constituents.
B. An investigation of ground -water conditions in the vicinity of the landfill is
necessary to identify any plume of contamination, the direction and rate of movement of the
plume, and to determine the type, concentration, source and extent of contamination.
C. An investigation of surface water conditions in the vicinity of the site is
necessary to determine the type, concentration, source and movement of surface water
contamination, if any.
D. An investigation is necessary to determine the ground -water discharge points
and the effect of contaminated ground -water discharge on the streams.
E. An investigation of the ground and surface water receptors in the general area
of the landfill is necessary to determine the potential impact of ground and surface water
contamination on the public health.
The Division has determined that this Agreement will promote the protection of public
health and the environment and is in the public interest. The provisions of this Administrative
Agreement shall henceforth govern the actions of Pitt County. Therefore, in an effort to
determine the status of ground and surface water quality at and in the vicinity of its landfill
property, Pitt County agrees to perform the following actions:
A. Within sixty (60) calendar days of execution of this Agreement, Pitt County

5
shall develop and submit a plan for a ground and surface water quality investigation which,
upon approval by the Division, will constitute the approved assessment plan. The plan shall
be prepared by a licensed professional geologist with experience in assessment and remediation
of ground water contamination. The professional geologist shall consult with the Solid Waste
Section about the landfill site prior to developing the assessment plan. The objective of the
assessment plan shall be to determine the following:
(a) The nature and concentration of the contamination in the ground and surface
waters.
(b) The horizontal and vertical extent of contamination ("the plume") and the
direction and rate of migration of the plume in the ground water.
(c) The source(s) of contamination detected in ground and surface water.
(d) Potential ground and surface water receptors that could be affected by migration
of the contamination.
(e) The effect of the contaminated ground water discharge into nearby streams.
The assessment plan to be submitted shall contain a detailed plan for the initial
phase of the investigation and a strategy and timetable for accomplishing the
overall goals of the water quality assessment.
The assessment plan must specify:
1. The procedures and methods necessary to fully determine flow direction
and rate of movement of the ground water.
2. The methods and techniques to be used in defining the horizontal and

0
vertical extent of the ground water contaminant plume.
3. The proposed number, location and depth of plume assessment wells.
The proposal shall include a discussion of the reasons for the location and
depth of each plume assessment monitoring well.
4. A ground and surface water sampling plan prepared in accordance with
5. A ground and surface water analysis plan which specifies parameters to be
tested for in the plume assessment wells and surface water samples,
including detectable levels and appropriate test methods. Additionally, a
description of chain -of -custody and the laboratory's quality control and
quality assurance procedures shall be included. In implementing the plan,
analytical results must be submitted to the Division within 45-calendar
days of sample collection and must specify collection date and well
numbers (with a corresponding map of the wells).
6. Evaluation procedures, including any use of previously gathered ground
water quality data.
7. The methods necessary to calculate the effect of the ground water
discharge into nearby streams.
8. The location of the nearest downstream surface water intake in the
watershed, and the location of all ground water wells within at least one
half mile of the landfill site.

9. A schedule for implementation of the work described in the assessment
plan.
B. The Division shall review the submitted plan, approve it, or request more
information or amendment, as it deems necessary. The approved plan constitutes the
assessment plan which Pitt County shall implement.
C. Any request for modification of the assessment plan must be submitted in
writing to the Division and approved by the Division.
D. If the Division determines that any submission of data or evaluation or report
made pursuant to the approved assessment plan is inadequate, it will notify Pitt County and
submit suggested corrections. If the parties cannot agree, they will proceed in accordance with
the provisions of the "Dispute Resolution" Section of this Consent Agreement.
E. All work performed pursuant to the assessment plan shall be performed under
the supervision of a licensed professional geologist.
F. Pitt County shall submit to the Division periodic reports summarizing work
completed in the approved assessment plan.
G. Within sixty (60) days of satisfactory completion of all elements of the
assessment plan, Pitt County shall submit a final report including any proposals for further
actions as may be recommended by the County and its consultants. The Division shall review
the report and may request more information or amendment as it deems necessary.
At the request of the Division, the County shall allow split or duplicate samples to be

N.
taken by the Division, of any samples collected by the County pursuant to the implementation
of this Consent Agreement. The County shall notify the Division not less than ten (10) days in
advance of any sample collection activity.
The Division shall also allow split or duplicate samples to be taken by the County of
any samples collected by the Division during the period of performance of work associated
with this Consent Agreement. The Division shall notify the County not less than ten (10) days
in advance of any sample collection activity.
The Division shall have the authority to enter and freely move about all property at
the Site at all reasonable times for the purposes of, inter alia: inspecting non -privileged
records, operating logs, and contracts related to work under this Consent Agreement:
reviewing the progress of the County in carrying out the terms of this Consent Agreement;
conducting such tests as the Division deems necessary; and verifying the data submitted to the
Division by the County. The County shall permit authorized Division personnel to inspect and
copy all non -privileged records, files, photographs, documents, and other writings including
all sampling and monitoring data, in any way pertaining to work undertaken pursuant to this
Consent Agreement. Documents subject to the attorney -client privilege or attorney work
product doctrine are not subject to inspection and copying.
VIII. Delay i
If any event occurs which causes delay in the achievement of the requirements of this
Consent Agreement, Pitt County shall have the burden of showing that the delay was caused
by circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the County, which could not have been

9
overcome by due diligence. Pitt County shall promptly notify the Division's Primary Contact
orally and shall, within seven (7) calendar days of oral notification to the Division, notify the
Division in writing of the anticipated length and cause of the delay, and the timetable by which
the County intends to implement these measures. If the parties can agree that the delay has
been or will be caused by circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the County, the time
for performance hereunder shall be extended for a period equal to the delay resulting from
such circumstances. Pitt County shall adopt all reasonable measures to avoid or minimize
delay. Failure of the County to comply with the notice requirements of this paragraph shall
render this paragraph void and constitute a waiver of the County's rights to request a waiver of
the requirements of this Consent Agreement. Increased costs of performance of the terms of
this Consent Agreement or changed economic circumstances shall not be considered
circumstances beyond the control of Pitt County.
In the event that the Division and Pitt County cannot agree that any delay in the
achievement of the requirements of this Consent Agreement, including the failure to submit
any report or document, has been or will be caused by circumstances beyond the reasonable
control of the County, the dispute shall be resolved in accordance with the provision of the
"Dispute Resolution" Section of this Consent Agreement.
IX. Dispute Resolution
If Pitt County objects to any notice of deficiency or decision made pursuant to this
Consent Agreement by the Division, Pitt County shall notify the Division in writing of its
objections within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of the decision. The Division and Pitt

0
overcome by due diligence. Pitt County shall promptly notify the Division's Primary Contact
orally and shall, within seven (7) calendar days of oral notification to the Division, notify the
Division in writing of the anticipated length and cause of the delay, and the timetable by which
the County intends to implement these measures. If the parties can agree that the delay has
been or will be caused by circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the County, the time
for performance hereunder shall be extended for a period equal to the delay resulting from
such circumstances. Pitt County shall adopt all reasonable measures to avoid or minimize
delay. Failure of the County to comply with the notice requirements of this paragraph shall
render this paragraph void and constitute a waiver of the County's rights to request a waiver of
the requirements of this Consent Agreement. Increased costs of performance of the terms of
this Consent Agreement or changed economic circumstances shall not be considered
circumstances beyond the control of Pitt County.
In the event that the Division and Pitt County cannot agree that any delay in the
achievement of the requirements of this Consent Agreement, including the failure to submit
any report or document, has been or will be caused by circumstances beyond the reasonable
control of the County, the dispute shall be resolved in accordance with the provision of the
"Dispute Resolution" Section of this Consent Agreement.
If Pitt County objects to any notice of deficiency or decision made pursuant to this
Consent Agreement by the Division, Pitt County shall notify the Division in writing of its
objections within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of the decision. The Division and Pitt

10
County then have an additional fourteen (14) calendar days from receipt by the Division of the
notification of objection to reach agreement. If agreement cannot be reached on any issue
within this fourteen (14) calendar day period, the Division shall immediately provide a written
statement of its decision to Pitt County.
Thereafter, if the Division and Pitt County cannot agree, the Division reserves its
rights to pursue.enforcement action against Pitt County. The County reserves the right to
respond to such enforcement action.
In performing a ground and surface water quality investigation pursuant to this
Administrative Agreement on Consent, Pitt County denies any liability for damages, including
investigation and remediation costs, related to environmental contamination. This Agreement
is entered without prejudice to the County with respect to any determination concerning any
further investigation and remediation, and without any commitment on the part of the County
to perform any such further activity. It is also entered without prejudice to any claim which
the County may have against any party with respect to: (a) any contamination at and near the
landfill, (b) the investigation and remediation and (c) related costs.
XI. Notice
Any and all written notices to be made pursuant to Sections VI, VII, VHL and IX of
this Consent Agreement shall be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, or by hand

11
delivery, addressed to the respective primary contact as designated in this Consent Agreement.
The names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the designated primary contacts for
the Division and the County are stated below. Any change in the primary contact person
during the course of the investigation covered under this Consent Agreement, shall be
communicated in writing to the other party immediately.

12
The primary contact for the Division:
Mark Poindexter, Hydrogeologist
Division of Solid Waste Management
Department of Environment, Health,
and Natural Resources
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Telephone: [phone]
For Pitt County:
Phillip G. Dickerson, Engineer
Pitt County Office Building
1717 West Fifth Street
Greenville, North Carolina 27834
Telephone: [phone]
This Agreement On Consent is entered into on the 441 day of JAAU01995.
The Division Of Solid Waste Management, North Carolina Department Of Environment,
Hea
lth, & Na al Resources,
i/7 9se06 4 -'/-
Dexter R. Matthews, Chief Solid Waste Section
Division of Solid Waste Management
Date
Pitt County, Dr. Ed B. Bright, Chairman, authorized to sign for Pitt County by county
commissioners per minutes of meeting, attached.
By: G=U �T ) q S—
Chairman, Pitt County Board of Commissioners Date
Attest: C%
Clerk to the Board Date

CHARLOTTE
MAILING ADDRESS
POST OFFICE BOX 31247
CHARLOTTE, N.C. 28231
STREET ADDRESS
227 NORTH TRYON STREET
CHARLOTTE, N. C. 28202
TELEPHONE [phone]
FACSIMILE 704/334-8467
VIA TELEFA%
SMITH HELMS MULLISS & MOORE, L. L. P.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
MAILING ADDRESS STREET ADDRESS
POST OFFICE BOX 27525 316 WEST EDENTON STREET
RALEIGH, N.C. 27611 RALEIGH. N.C. 27603
TELEPHONE [phone]
- FACSIMILE 919/628-7938
January 12, 1995
William G. Ross, Jr., Esquire
Brooks, Pierce, McLendon,
Humphrey & Leonard
Post Office Drawer U
Greensboro, North Carolina 27402
Re: County Landfill
Dear Bill:
GREENSBORO
MAILING ADDRESS
POST OFFICE BOX 21927
G R E ENSBORO, N.C. 27420
STREET ADDRESS
SUITE 1400
300 NORTH GREENE STREET
GREENSBORO, N.C. 27401
TELEPHONE [phone]
FACSIMILE 910/379-9558
Writer's Direct Dial
[phone]
Once again, I am being kept informed of the status of this
matter through newspaper articles. My client faxed me a copy of
the first of the Greenville newspaper articles that stated that
Pitt County will be moving forward to perform the groundwater
survey. I was most concerned to see that Pitt County continues to
point to Coastal Chemical as the source of the problem,
particularly in light of my request that such accusations cease in
my September 21, 1993 letter. In addition, I was shocked to see
that Pitt County estimates that the investigation is expected to
cost $100,000. I understand that in additional stories in the
paper and on TV, Pitt County officials have stated that Superfund
money may be sought at this site and that continued references have
been made to Coastal Chemical's responsibility.
As you know, Coastal Chemical performed substa,itial researc ,
both into Pitt County's files and independently, following our
meeting with the Division of Solid Waste Management and determined
that there is not sufficient evidence to tie the contamination
detected at the landfill to Coastal Chemical's waste. In our last
conversation, I informed you of this position, but stated that
Coastal is still very interested in staying involved in this
investigation and wanted to know what action Pitt County would
take. You indicated that you would contact me once you spoke to
your client. I received no further information on this matter
until I received a call from my client yesterday and a copies of
the newspaper articles.
Needless to say, Coastal Chemical is very concerned about Pitt
County's failure to provide Coastal with information about this

William G. Ross, Jr., Esquire
January 12, 1995
Page 2
investigation. We have sent repeated letters requesting to be kept
up to date or to be provided information and are repeatedly the
last to receive such information. I have attached some of our
correspondence for your review. I believe that it is only logical
that if Pitt County may, at some point, look to Coastal Chemical to
assist in funding this investigation, we should at least be kept
informed and allowed input into the process. As I have discussed
with you a number of times, we have serious concerns about the work
performed by Pitt County's chosen consultant, Groundwater
Management, Inc. Not only do our consultants question the work
already performed, but, as noted in previous correspondence, the
proposal that we were provided for additional investigative work in
the area of MW-2 was lacking in information that would be standard
in the industry for such a hydrogeological investigation. At your
request, we provided comments to that proposal, which, apparently
were disregarded in constructing and sampling the piezometers.
Coastal Chemical again requests that it be allowed an opportunity
to provide input into the choice of the consulting firm to conduct
such investigation and input into the scope of work to be
performed.
Further, until it is established that Coastal Chemical is the
source of the contaminants in MW-2, Pitt County must cease
publication of such allegations to the public. Coastal Chemical
has information which calls this conclusion into question.
Therefore, until such conclusion can be confirmed, Pitt County
officials must not make such statements to the press.
Please contact me to advise me of the status of this matter
and Pitt County's position regarding the investigation of the area
of MW-2 as soon as possible. I appreciate your attention to this
matter.
Very truly yours,
SMITH HELMS MULLISS & MOORE
Elizabeth M. Powell
EMP:tr
cc: Mr. Alan Rimer, BB&L
Mr. James•Pearce, Coastal Chemical
Mr. Phil Prete, DSWM
Ms. Pamela Best, Pitt County Attorney
Mr. Phil Dickerson, Pitt County Engineer

U
SMITH HELMS MULLISS & MOORE, L. L. P.
CHARLOTTE
MAILING ADDRESS
POST OFFICE BOX 31247
CHARLOTTE. N.C. 28231
STREET ADDRESS
227 NORTH TRYON STREET
CHARLOTTE. N.C. 28202
TELEPHONE [phone]
FACSIMILE 704,1334-8447
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
GREENSBORO
MAILING ADDRESS
MAILING AOORESS STREET AOORESS
POST OFFICE BOX 21927
POST OFFICE BOX 27525 316 WEST EDENTON STREET
OREENSBORG, N.C. 27420
RALEIGM. N.C. 27611 RALEIGM, N.C. 27603
STREET ADDRESS
TELEPHONE 919/75S-8700
SUITE IAO0
FACSIMILE 919/62 B-7938
3
00 NORTH GREENE STREETGREENSBORO,
N. C. 27401
TELEPHONE [phone]
FACSIMILE 910/379-9538
September 23, 1994
Writer's Direct Dial
[phone]
VIA FACSIMILE
[phone]
William G. Ross, Jr., Esq.
Brooks, Pierce, McLendon,
Humphrey & Leonard
225 Hillsborough Street, Suite 280
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Re: Pitt County Landfill
Dear Bill:
We are attempting to obtain all the information that we can
about the landfill and the Coastal Chemical cell, so that we can
evaluate the proposals put forth by DSWM and Pitt County in the
meeting on Wednesday. In that regard, I would appreciate an
opportunity to review all of Pitt County's landfill records. I
will be in that area of the state early next week and will be
able to stop by County's offices to review the records. Please
let me know who I need to contact to set this up.
In the meantime, Al Rimer is reviewing the technical
information that you and the DSWM personnel provided to Coastal
in the meeting. We intend to contact both you and Mark
Pointdexter by October 3, 1994 with an update on the status of
our discussions.
Please contact me as soon as possible regarding access to
Pitt County's records. Thank you for your cooperation.
Very truly yours,
SMITH HELMS MULLISS & MOORE, L.L.P.
Elizabeth M. Powell
EMP/tr
SH M:1S690 1

�f
SMITH HELMS MULLISS & MOORE, L. L. P.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
CHARLOTTE
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
t MAILING ADDRESS
' POST OFFICE BOX 31247
MAILING ADDRESS CET ADDRESS
CHARLOTTE, N.C. 26231
POST OFFICE B314OX 27523 316 WEST EDENTON STREET
RALEIGH, N.C. 27611 RALEIGH, N.C. 27603
STREET ADDRESS
227 NORTH TRYON STREET
CHARLOTTE, N.C. 26202
TELEPHONE [phone]
FACSIMILE 919/626-7938-7936
TELEPHONE [phone]
FACSIMILE 704/334-6467
December 8, 1993
Mr. William G. Ross, Jr.
Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, L.L.P.
P.O. Box 26000
Greensboro, N. C. 27420
Re: Pitt County Landfill
Dear Bill:
GREENSBORO
MAILING ADDRESS
POST OFFICE BOX 21927
GREENSBORO, N.C. 27420
STREET ADDRESS
SUITE 1400
300 NORTH GRCENC STREET
GREENSBORO. N.C. 27401
TELEPHONE [phone]
FACSIMILE 910/379-9556
On behalf of our client, Coastal Chemical, we have reviewed
the groundwater investigation proposal prepared by Groundwater
Management Associates, Inc. (GMA) for the area of Monitoring Well
-112 at the Pitt County landfill. Coastal Chemical's technical
consultant, Al Rimer of Blasland & Bouck Engineers, P.C.,
reviewed the GMA proposal and we have incorporated his comments
into this letter.
Regarding the work plan proposed by GMA, we find the
proposal to be incomplete and ambiguous. Basically, GMA has
proposed to install two wells. We are confused about the goals
of the GMA proposal. We assume, based on the August 3, 1993
letter from the NCDEHNR-Solid Waste Section to Pitt County, that
Pitt County has instructed GMA to determine the "nature and
extent of contamination" in the area of MW-2. In its proposal,
GMA has given no indication of the basis for its decision to
install two wells or for the proposed locations of these wells.
What, if any, scientific information GMA used as a basis for its
well locations is not apparent from a review of the proposal. No
surface elevations are discernible, groundwater flow directions
are not noted, little is done to define the specific location of
the wells, and no discussion is provided to validate the selected
well depth of 25 feet. We assume at least some of this
information is available due to the number of wells already
located at the landfill. While this information may have been
available to GMA, no reference was made to such data in the
proposal. In order for our consultants to properly review the
selected well locations, and because we are primarily interested
in the proximity of the proposed wells to the cell containing
Coastal Chemical's material, we will need a more detailed map
indicating the existing and proposed well locations and other
information noted above, before we can provide any opinion
regarding the GMA proposal. We would also suggest that

Mr. William G. Ross, Jr.
December 8, 1993
Page 2 .
additional research or investigation be performed. before the
wells are installed to ensure that the wells provide data that
will assist Pitt -County in determining the source of contaminants
in MW-2. We would further suggest that GMA's basis for
concluding that these wells will provide such information be
discussed in_a revised GMA proposal.
During this entire sampling effort, we are particularly
concerned about maintaining the integrity of the cell containing
Coastal's waste. From the information you provided to our office
regarding the location of MW-2, we can not determine whether MW-2
has violated the integrity of the cell. If you or your client
have any more information about the location of MW-2 and its
proximate location to the cell containing Coastal's wastes, we
would appreciate receiving such information. GMA's proposal
provides us no assurance that the proposed wells will maintain
the integrity of the existing Coastal cell.
Mr. Rimer has raised a pertinent question about the well
sampling performed to date. The sampling results provided to our
office fail to indicate the performance of any QA/QC procedures
since no sampling protocol has been provided to our office to
establish the credibility of the sampling to date. In addition
to calling into question the results of past sampling, the lack
of such QA/QC procedures should be considered by GMA in
developing its investigation strategy. We request that any
additional sampling information for MW-2 be provided for our
review, and request that sampling protocols, including proper
QA/QC methods be included by GMA in their revised investigation
work plan.
On another issue, Coastal Chemical remains concerned about
Pitt County's apparent assumption that the contaminants detected
in MW-2 are caused by the materials from the Coastal Chemical
fire. As you know, the materials disposed of at the landfill by
Coastal Chemical, under the State's direction, were pesticides
and building materials that resulted from a catastrophic fire.
No solvents, petroleum or materials containing solvents or
petroleum were disposed of in the cell. If such materials had
been present at the Coastal Chemical facility, they would have
been the first materials consumed by the fire since such
materials are highly volatile and this was a very intense fire.
Therefore, there is very little chance that, if any such
materials did exist, they survived the fire.
The only materials disposed of in the cell were pesticides,
herbicides and the burned remains of Coastal Chemical's building.
We attach hereto a copy of the inventory of all pesticides and
herbicides disposed of in the cell. Based on our consultant's

Mr. William G. Ross, Jr.
December 8, 1993
Page 3
review of the sampling results from MW-2, we do not believe that
the contaminants detected in that well are emanating from Coastal
Chemical's cell. It has been suggested that the presence of
sulphur containing compounds supports Pitt County's assumption
that the contaminants are from Coastal Chemical's cell. While
sulfates could have been contained in Coastal Chemical materials,
they are also present in many other wastes commonly found in
landfills. Therefore, unless Pitt County has additional
information to establish that the contamination in MW-2 comes
from Coastal Chemical's cell, we continue to maintain that such a
connection has not been established.
We look forward to receiving an expanded work plan for
review. As before, we appreciate prior notice before any work is
performed at the landfill regarding investigation in the area of
the Coastal Chemical cell or MW-2. Do not hesitate to contact me
with any questions or comments.
very truly yours,
SMITH HELMS MULLISS & MOORE, L.L.P.
E'KP : lm Elizabeth M. Powell

SMITH HELMS MULLISS & MOORE
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
CHARLOTTE OFFICE
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
MAILING ADDRESS
POST OFFICE BOX 31247
CHARLOTTE, N.C. 26231
MAILING ADDRESS STREET ADDRESS
POST OFFICE BOX 27S2S 316 WEST EDENTON STREET
STREET ADDRESS
RALEIGH. N.C. 27611 RALEIGH. N.C. 27603
227 NORTH TRYON STREET
CHARLOTTE. N.C. 28202
TELEPHONE [phone]
TELECOPIER 919/820-7938
TELEPHONE [phone]
TELECOPIER 704/334-8467
September 21, 1993
William G. Ross, Jr., Esquire
Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard
Suite 2000
230 N. Elm Street
Post Office Drawer U
Greensboro, North Carolina 27402
Re: County Landfill
Dear Bill:
GREENSBORO OFFICE
MAILING ADDRESS
POST OFFICE BOX 21927
GREENSBORO.N.C.27420
STREET ADDRESS
SUITE 1400
300 NORTH GREENE STREET
GREENSBORO. N.C. 27401
TELEPHONE [phone]
TELECOPIER 919,1379-9338
As I informed you in our telephone conversation, we are
representing Coastal Chemical Corporation of Greenville, North
Carolina, in responding to the letter they received from your
client, Pitt County, regarding its landfill. In particular, the
State has requested that Pitt County investigate groundwater
contamination indicated in Monitoring Well No. 2 at the Pitt
County Landfill. In its letter, Pitt County informs Coastal
Chemical that it intends to hold it liable for the cost of
investigating and remediating any groundwater contamination
emanating from the cell in which Coastal Chemical, pursuant to
state emergency order, placed waste materials from its 1979 fire.
Coastal Chemical certainly intends to cooperate with Pitt
County in determining the source of the contamination at its
landfill. To this end, we would appreciate you keeping us
informed as this investigation progresses.. In particular, we
would appreciate being allowed to participate in any
investigation which takes place at the property. Please inform
me, in advance, of any site investigation that is to be performed
so that we can have Coastal Chemical's environmental consultant,
Alan Rimer, of Blasland, Bouck & Lee, present to observe and
participate in the investigation.
In addition, I would appreciate any information you have
regarding the location and construction of Monitoring Well No. 2.
It is my understanding from our conversation that it is a newly
constructed well. Therefore, it would be a great assistance to
us if we knew where, in the landfill, this monitoring well was
constructed, the type of well used, and the depth of the screen,
as well as any other information available.

William G. Ross, Jr., Esquire
September 21, 1993
Page 2 .
As previously stated, Coastal Chemical certainly intends to
cooperate with Pitt County in this effort. However, we have
reviewed the March 1993 sampling data from Monitoring Well No. 2
and believe it fails,to indicate the presence of pesticides or
any other constituents which are related to pesticides or any
other waste that was placed in the landfill by Coastal Chemical.
At this time, we are aware of no evidence which clearly indicates
that the contamination in this well is emanating from the cell
containing Coastal Chemical's fire waste. For that reason,
Coastal Chemical is very concerned by the characterization of
Coastal Chemical as the source of the contamination in Pitt
County's news release. Until the source of the contamination is
more accurately identified, we would appreciate Pitt County not
giving the impression to the public, through press releases or
otherwise, that the Coastal Chemical waste is the source of the
contamination. As you know, given the variety of waste deposited
in a landfill, multiple other sources could be the source of the
type of constituents detected in Monitoring Well No. 2.
Again, I look forward to working with you cooperatively in
this matter, and expect to hear from you soon regarding the next
round of sampling or next phase in the investigation. Thank you
for your attention in this matter. Please call me if you have
any questions.
EMP:lm
cc: Mr. Alan
Mr. James
James L.
Rimer
Pearce
Gale, Esquire
Very truly yours,
SMITH HELMS MULLISS & MOORE
�,,
f 2,��a
Elizabeth M. Powell

(2fZ
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Division of Solid Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY EVALUATION REPORT
Type of Facility 7'ii Permit 71Caun
Name of Faci I ityT Location—J A
Date of Last Evaluation
I- Permit conditions Followed
A. specific Coodition(s) Vi
Yes No N/A
II. Operational Requirements Followed Yes No
15A N-C. Admin. Code 13B Section
A. Specific Viatation(s) by number and letter.
o Y
III. other Violations of Rule or
IV. Evaluator's Comments xll)'('-'/y
V. Continuation Page Required?
Yes No Receiving Si
Evaluation Date /
Solid Waste Section
':
DEHNR 3793 (Part I White: Facility Part II Canary: Centrak'Off - fice ..Part III Pink: kegi"L Office)
Solid Waste Section (Review 7/94)

Purpose: G.S. 130A-294 requires that an evaluation program be established for the
operation of solid waste management facilities on a statewide basis. The
Solid Waste Management Act and Solid Waste Management Rules codified at
15A NCAC 13B list requirements which must be followed 'by solid waste
facilities.
Instxucticns: Solid Waste Section personnel shall complete the evaluation form each
time they conduct official evaluations. The form shall be signed by
the person(s) receiving the report.
Distribution: Part I White: facility copy
Part II Canary: Raleigh central office file copy
Part III Pink: Regional office file copy
Disposition: This form may be retained in accordance with the Recon3 Retention and
Disposition Schedule of the Solid Waste Section, Solid Waste Management
Division of the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources.
t.=

Liquid
Lasso - 3500 - 5 gal-
17,500
3,600
gal.
gal.
Mocap - 720 - 5 gal.
Dusunit - Dy Syston - 400 - 5 gal-
2,000
gal.
4 - 2 600 - 2 gal.
1,200
gal.
Lannate - 72 - 5 gal.
360
375
gal.
gal.
Vydate - 75 - 5 gal.
60
gal.
Nudrin - 60 gal.
8
gal.
Paraquat - 8 gal.
5
gal.
Parathion -5 gal.
FuradaN L - 380 x 4 gal.
1,520
gal.
Disyston - 50 gal.
50
gal.
Granular
Mocap + 60 X 21 - 30 pound bags
37,800
37,800
lb.
lb.
Mocap 60 X 21 - 30 pound bags
Counter 500 case 60 pound bags
30,000
lb.
Ddrspnit - Dysyston 1500 pounds
1,500
3,500
lb.
gal.
Dual 700 - 5 gallons
DyNap 1500 5 gallons
7,500
gal.
Vernam 5-600 5 gallons
2,500
2,800
gal.
gal.
700-800 cases 4 - 1 gallon
750
gal-
Tillum - 150 - 5 gallons
500-600 case 4 x 1 gallon
2,000
gal.
Tillum - Dyfonate 125 - 5 gallons
625
600
gal-
gal.
600 gallons
Alanap - 300 - 5 gallons
1,500
gal.
PreFar - 100-150 - 5 gallons
500
800
gal-
gal.
200-300 Case 4 x 1 gallon
75
gal.gal.
Pre -Merge - 15 - 5 gallons
1125 25
Azodrin - 25 5 gallons
Diazinon 4-E 26 Cases 4 x 1 gallon
9 al.
Diazinon 50W 10 Cases 24 x 1 pound
AD
2,700
lb.
lb.
75 cases 36 x 1 pounds
75 cases 12 x 4 pounds
3,600
lb.
Carbamate 350 Case 30 pounds
10,500
7,200
lb.
lb.
Enide 50 W 150 Case 12 x 4 pounds
22,500
lb.
Primatal 450 - 50 pound bags
4,800
lb.
80 cases 60 pounds
400
lb.
100-125 4 x 1 pounds
1,000
gal.
200 5 gallon cans
Sutan 800 - 5 gallon cans
4,000
gal.
Weedone 638 400 - 5 gallons
2,000
1,800
gal.
gal.
300 cases 6 x 1 gallons
Weedone SK-32 200 cases 6 x 1 gallons
1,200
gal.
Weedone 2,4,5-T 10 cases 6 x 1 gallons
60
gal.
Thimet 100 pounds
100
lb.
Vernam 50 pound bag
50
100
lb.
gal.
Ortho Fly Killer D 100 gallons
72
lb.
Mesural (Bird Repel.) 3 cases 24 x 1 pounds
60
gal.
Round -Up 15 cases 4 x 1 gallons
Termite 200 cases/60 pounds
12,000
lb.
Sevin Sprayalte 100 cases/40 pounds
4,000
lb.

Paarlan 50 cases 6 x 1
Paarlan 400 cases 12 x 1
Surflan 327 cases 6 x 1 gal.
Surflan 300 5 gal.
Surflan Powder 100 cases 6 x 5 pounds
Baalan 25 cases 6 x 1
Baalan 25 5 gallons
Sercor 15 cases 30 # each
Lorox 100 cases 30 # each
Lexone 10 cases 30 # each
Benlate 75 cases 6 x 2 unds
Prencip 500 cases 2 x 2opounds
AAtrex 500 cases 2 x 211 pounds
Griffin Atrazine 500 cases 2 x 211
Shell Atrazine 200 cases 2 x 211
AAtrex 80W 10 cases 50 # each
50W 50 cases 50 # each

07/28/94
Reference Files System
Product Data Report
Identification Number: 264-37 Case Barcode: 009991
Product Name: WEEDONE 638 BROADLEAF HERBICIDE
Case Type: R Federal Registration
Company: 264 RHONE-POULENC AG COMPANY
Product Manager: 23 Joanne I. Miller
Product Status: A Active
Formulation Code: 12 Emulsifiable Concentrate
Toxicity Category: 1 Danger
Cancel/Transfer Reason:
RCRA Classification: Not Available
Label
Date:
94/02
Registration
Date:
06/03/52
Cancellation
Date:
Stocks
Date:
Transf rred: No
Sus;nded: No
Use Categories
--------------
Pest Categories
---------------
Terrestrial Food Crop:
Yes
Non -Pest:
Yes
Terrestrial Feed Crop:
Yes
Disinfectant:
No
Terrestrial Non -Food Crop:
Yes
Fungal:
No
Aquatic Food Crop:
No
Invertebrate:
No
Aquatic Non -Food Outdoor:
No
Nematodal:
No
Aquatic Non -Food Residential:
No
Plant:
Yes
Aquatic Non -Food Industrial:
Yes
Vertebrate:
No
Greenhouse Food Crop:
Yes
Greenhouse Non -Food Crop:
No
Miscellaneous Flags
Forestry:
No
-------------------
Residential Outdoor:
No
Indoor Food:
No
Restricted Use:
No
Indoor Non -Food:
No
Conditional Use:
No
Indoor Residential:
No
Reregistration:
No
Indoor Medical:
No
Child Resistant Packaging:
No
Special Review:
No

07/28/94 REFERENCE FILES SYSTEM PAGE 1 .
Product Formulation Data
264-37 WEEDONE 638 BROADLEAF HERBICIDE
PC CODE PERCENT CHEMICAL NAME
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
30001 13.8000 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid
30053 24.5000 Butoxyethyl 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetate

07/28/94 REFERENCE FILES SYSTEM PAGE 1
Product Formulation Data
264-37 WEEDONE 638 BROADLEAF HERBICIDE
PC Code: 30001 Percent: 13.8000
GDE Status Flag: N Restricted Flag: N
CAS No. 1 CAS No. 2 CAS No. 3 Caswell No.
--------------------------------------
94-75-7 315
NAME SEQ
TYPE NO. CHEMICAL NAME
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
001 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid
R 001 CAS Reg. No. 94-75-7
S 001 2,4-D
T 001 Weed - Broom (Use 3 code nos. 012301, 013803 and 030001)

07/28/94
REFERENCE FILES SYSTEM PAGE 1
Product Formulation Data
264-37 WEEDONE 638 BROADLEAF HERBICIDE
PC Code:
30053
Percent: 24.5000
GDE
Status
Flag: N Restricted Flag: N
CAS No.
1 CAS No. 2 CAS No. 3 Caswell No.
--------------------
------------------
1929-73-3 315AI
NAME
SEQ
TYPE
NO.
CHEMICAL NAME
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
001
Butoxyethyl 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetate
R
001
CAS Reg. No. 1929-73-3
S
001
Acetic acid, (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)-, 2-butoxyethyl ester
S
002
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, butoxyethanol ester
S
003
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, ethylene glycol butyl ether ester
S
004
(2,4-Dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid butoxyethyl ester
S
005
(2,4-Dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid, 2-butoxyethyl ester
r
S
006
Butoxyethanol ester of 2,4-D
S
007
Butoxyethyl (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetate
S
008
2,4-D, butoxyethyl ester
S
009
2,4-D, butoxyethanol ester
S
O10
2,4-D, 2-butoxyethyl ester
S
O11
2,4-D,BEE
S
012
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, 2-butoxyethyl ester
T
001
Aqua-Kleen
T
002
Bladex-B
T
003
Brush killer 64
T
004
Planotox
T
005
Weedone LV 4

07/28/94
Reference Files System
Identification Number:
Product Data Report
264-10
Product Name: WEEDONE BK 32
Case Type: R Federal Registration
Company: 264 RHONE-POULENC AG COMPANY
Product Manager: 23 Joanne I. Miller
Product Status: C Cancelled
Formulation Code: 12 Emulsifiable Concentrate
Toxicity Category: 3 Caution
Cancel/Transfer Reason: 07 IFR Docket
RCRA Classification: Not Available
Label
Date:
75/01
Registration
Date:
01/13/49
Cancellation
Date:
11/28/84
Stocks
Date:
Transferred: No
Suspended: No
Use Categories
--------------
Case Barcode: 903796
Pest Categories
---------------
Terrestrial Food Crop:
No
Non -Pest:
No
Terrestrial Feed Crop:
No
Disinfectant:
No
Terrestrial Non -Food Crop:
No
Fungal:
No
Aquatic Food Crop:
No
Invertebrate:
No
Aquatic Non -Food Outdoor:
No
Nematodal:
No
Aquatic Non -Food Residential:
No
Plant:
No
Aquatic Non -Food Industrial:
No
Vertebrate:
No
Greenhouse Food Crop:
No
Greenhouse Non -Food Crop:
No
Miscellaneous Flags
Forestry:
No
-------------------
Residential Outdoor:
No
Indoor Food:
No
Restricted Use:
No
Indoor Non -Food:
No
Conditional Use:
No
Indoor Residential:
No
Reregistration:
No
Indoor Medical:
No
Child Resistant Packaging:
No
Special Review:
No

07/28/94 REFERENCE FILES SYSTEM PAGE 1
Product Formulation Data
264-10 WEEDONE BK 32
PC CODE
PERCENT
CHEMICAL NAME
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
30053
22.8000
Butoxyethyl
2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetate
82053
11.0000
Butoxyethyl
2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetate

07/28/94
REFERENCE FILES SYSTEM PAGE 1
Product Formulation Data
264-10 WEEDONE BK 32
PC Code:
30053
Percent: 22.8000
GDE
Status
Flag: N Restricted Flag: N
CAS No.
1 CAS No. 2 CAS No. 3 Caswell No.
--------------------
------------------
1929-73-3 315AI
NAME
SEQ
TYPE
NO.
CHEMICAL NAME
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
001
Butoxyethyl 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetate
R
001
CAS Reg. No. 1929-73-3
S
001
Acetic acid, (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)-, 2-butoxyethyl ester
S
002
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, butoxyethanol ester
S
003
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, ethylene glycol butyl ether ester
S
004
(2,4-Dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid butoxyethyl ester
S
005
(2,4-Dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid, 2-butoxyethyl ester
S
006
Butoxyethanol ester of 2,4-D
S
007
Butoxyethyl (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetate
S
008
2,4-D, butoxyethyl ester
S
009
2,4-D, butoxyethanol ester
S
O10
2,4-D, 2-butoxyethyl ester
S
O11
2,4-D,BEE
S
012
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, 2-butoxyethyl ester
T
001
Aqua-Kleen
T
002
Bladex-B
T
003
Brush killer 64
T
004
Planotox
T
005
Weedone LV 4

07/28/94
REFERENCE FILES SYSTEM
PAGE 1
Product Formulation Data
264-9 WEEDONE 2,4,5-T
PC Code: 82053
Percent: 59.1000
GDE Status
Flag: N Restricted Flag: N
CAS No.
1 CAS No. 2 CAS No. 3
---------
Caswell No.
-----------
------------------
2545-59-7
881N
NAME SEQ
TYPE NO.
CHEMICAL NAME
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
001
Butoxyethyl 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetate
R 001
CAS Reg. No. 2545-59-7
S 001
Butoxyethanol 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetate
S 002
2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyacetic acid, butoxyethanol
ester
S 003
2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyacetic acid, 2-butoxyethyl
ester

SEP-15-1994 13:30 FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE TO B9103?e1001 P.02
N.C. Dept. of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Laboratory Services
State Laboratory of Public Health
P.O. Box 28047, Raleigh, N.C. 27611
Environmental Sciences Analysis Report
Name of Owner. Patient P/77-
or Supply:
Address: /.2C.)
County:
Report To: .L ,' K
Address:
Date Collected: / - a.?7- 73
Collected by: ! • �O..S�
Analysis Desired: Pe3r.,CI.Vex /j z—ze/C..'a $
If
A4 w- o�
[' 7
Date Received - - •3 Date Reported
Date Extracted *fZW('r1tS- i St. i E
� � W Date Analyzed � - .
as.y3 Reported By:
-DEKNE Form 2364 Revised (9-89)
Laboratory
3658E

Fi=of Human Resource
9114 services • SAb"LE ANALYSES
7�
% Ralugh. 27611
Number . .. Feld Sample N �-ti
l' Slcs pi- Site Loculon 0
x� By L. �'� 1Dp /o o Date Cou=cd 4 —_R'T' Ir..3 Time - 3 J
of Samplr.
vironsctentl Concenttatc (;onments
Orouadwaw (1) ._ Solid (5) w'•
Sudaee Water (2) liquid (6)
Soll (3) Sludge (7)
`. Ocher (4) _ Other (8) .Sn /, t . S!
INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Extrambles Total
Parameter Results mg/1
Manic --
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
arameter Results nig/1
Parameter Re.ulea mg/1
Arsenic
Barium
v Cadmium
Chloride
Chromium
V Copper
Fluoride
Iron
" Lead
Manganese
rMcrcury
Nitrate .
Selenium
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Parameter
&T:GC/MS _... EDB
41d.B/N Esc• .._ PCB,&
OX _ Petroleum
Endrin
.._ Lindww
Parsaw"
(F) Cabroao Co arjo/100m1s
04) Colifocta ColodeN100ta1s
Pacaamctcr
—&-" Silver
"Sulfates
Zinc
•::fPh
Conductivity
TDS
TOC
Laborsuny of Public Hcalth
P. O. Uos 28047
306 N. V/Unkinston Strccc
Results mg/1
s_ a
Results tag/1 , Parameter Results mg/I
—.. Methozychlor
Tozaphcne
2.4•D
2.4.5-TP wvw)
KADIOCHEM1STRY •
Parameter Raulta PCi/1
Groa Alpha
— Gross Bata
slved Dam
Reported -
sited Date Aitalyzed
Lab Number 01.5902 SEP 2 9 9 3
Re IWJ
••••J•w. wens (Ravinr 7M)

SEo-15-1994 13:32 FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE TO 89103781001 P.05
sle:a 9-7-7- y3
STATE LABORATCRY OF PUBLIC WEALTH
• O1vISION OF HEALTH SERVICES. M.C. OEPARThF-NT OF,HUmM RES"MS
P.O. Box Z8047 - 306 X. WILMINGTON• ST.• RALE10j, X.C. 21611
6tr.ANiC 0CMIC4I AKALTSIS
Ii.1J i/ . f_ Z �I J. I- OIL A(/l l— L/ A4r
PURGEAbLF C:P F NoS
—
W NO
E
`-`OL
FTELo i i (
I t
� I [o
I •.
CO'SPmwa
erone thane
TYPE ( !
UNITS I a/1 vo/tro I 40/1 a/Iry
I I
I
I ae/1 uo/ko
I
( ((
I o/1 o/Iro /1 o/Ira
I
I ! )
vo e/ka
I
=ethane
I
I
I
:hiorodi ftuorctretha
I
I
I
ivl chloride
aroethane
-Went chloride
clloroftuorosethah*
ene 1,1-diehtoro
I
I
ane. 1 t-diehloro-
-trans-dichlaroethene
I I
I
I
ant. 1 2-diellcri- .Aija
I I
I
I
(
I
lne t.l i-triclloro..
I I I
I
I
I
I
xntetra0loride I'
-rdicnicr�rsthane I to 00I
I
I
I
I
I
pane t, Z-di ch 1 ora- :iesi Ie5nI
-t-ans-diellor=r=ae..* 1
I
I
I
I
I
�tonx:�ter►e I
I
I
I
I
I
., 17 I
I
I
I
I
I
ane 1 1 2-trichlern- 14e I
I
1
I
I
•c:s-d�c�;orcercoene I10 1
1
I
i
I
i
�lcroeL?vl vinyl e:.1e- I II
:s`cn I I
( 1
I
I
i
I 1
I
I
I
ane 1 1,2 2-teer�entors.. i i I
I (
I
1
I
?re tetraelloro_ 1f
I
I
I
I
ieae I
I I I
i
I
I
iraoenZene , ei j
I I I
I
I
I
t
•1bentene 0147
I
i I I
LA --I I
I
I
JB
(
I 1
S 1 J La
I
one •sea10
unone
cndisulfide I
I I
t 1
t
zanone I
I I
1
I
thVI-2-Icnunone a 1
tole I
t acetate I
tenes Fir •S o I
I 1
I
I I (
I
I I I
I
I I I
r o I
I I I
•I I
I
-- I
•—
I
bL 1
I
�sC.
1tC.ui1 value js irnovn to be less than value given.
A-tuai va1ue•is knam to be greater Lhan value given.
trial was analyzed for but not detec-ted. The nutter is the rinfm6-n Detection limit.
analyzed.
Tentative iCentification.
21 I= list of Priority Pollutants.
bocl¢ar, rivund pprr�rn4- in bla nk '
Sivasion of HeaLth Services
3068-0 (4/96 Laboratory)
L

STATE LABORATORY Of PUBLIC HEALTH
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES. N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
P.O. 80X 28047 - 306 N. WILMINGTON. ST.. RALEIGH, N.C. 27611
AW--&urr MONT&Al AVAI VSTS
6ASP/XEUTRAL AND ACID
EXTRACTABL
COMPOUND
;LU;N
a
/1 /k
1 /k
/1 a/k
/1 /k
/t a/k
nitrosodimeth amine
s 2-chloroeth 1 other
to henol .000l
enol
3-4ichlorobenzenc.
4-dichloroben
-dichlorobenzene
s(2-chlorviswrcpY1)ether
xachlorpethane
nit i-n 1 ine
trobenzene
horone
nit henol
4-dimeth 1 phenol
s 2-chlorcethoz methane
4-dichlo henol o
2 4-trichlorcbenzene
:hthalen
xachlorobutadiene
chloro4n-,cresol
xachl cl tadiene
6-tri lorophenol
)rona hthalene
bnsphthlene
m th 1 phth4late
5-dinitrotoluene
anachthene
4-dinit henol
b so
4 dinitrotoluene
,Iit henol
0 0
jorene
.hloM2henylphenylethter
nth 1 phthalate
Ski n i tro-o-cresol
O
Shen la:nine
101,330
3benzene
)rapopWylphenylether
cachloroben one
itachlorophenol
3nant rene
:hracene
t 1 Ifthalate
joranthene
M-D L
- Estimated value, ffs.01S01L
Actual value is known to be less than value given.
- Actual value is known to be greater than value given.
- Material was analyzed for but not detected. The number
Not analyzed.
Tentative identification.
On NROC List of Priority Pollutants.
'.. VZV-!A con of KCaUk SeAViCeh
; 3068-0 (4196 Labohatoxy)
is the Minimum Detection Limit. M Z L.

THE FOLLOWING PEOPLE ATTENDED THE MEETING ON FEBRUARY 20, 1979,
AT THE WINTERVILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT WITH REFERENCE TO FIRE AT
COASTAL CHEMICALS FIRE:
W. A. Williams -
N. C. Division of Health Servic
Larry D. Perry ? -
N. C. Department of Agriculture
E. Blaney Parker -
N. C. Department of Agriculture
4. Reginald Gray -
Pitt County Manager
D. W. Spivey -
Area Civil Preparedness
./Robert Ehinger -
Pitt County Health Department
✓Glen Cannon -
Greenville Police Dept.
✓Senness Allen -
Greenville Fire Dept.
Bill Morris -
Div. of Health Services
Mike Bell -
Division Health Services
Willie Pate -
Pitt County Health Department
,-"Rick Gilstrap -
Pitt County Memorial Hospital
/Buck Sitterson -
Pitt County Memorial Hospital
Barry Adams -
NC Division Environmental Mgt.
Lee Daniel -
NC Division Environmental Mgt.
Bill Jeter -
NC Division Environmental Mgt.
,/Stuart Savage -
The Daily Reflector
J. C. Whitehurst, Jr. -
Coastal Chemical Corp.
J. B. Starr -
Monsanto Company
Don Yates -
Monsanto Company
W. F. Bulow -
Division of Environmental Mgt.
C. V. White -
Winterville Fire Dept.
/Wayne Nobles -
Pitt County Sheriff's Dept.
William Buffaloe -
N. C. Department of Agriculture

ROAD NO.
LENGTH
DESCRIPTION
ESTIMATED COST
1209
0.4
Grade, drain; base, and pave from SR 1200 to deadend.
$23.600.00
Property Owners' participation $8,400.00. Total
project cost $32.000.00
1245
1.9
Widen 16' pavement to 20'. regrade roadway and surface
19,500.00
from NC 121 to SR 1247. Additional funds needed for
resurfacing to complete W. 0. 2220121.
1517
1.4
Clear right of way of encroachments and widen roadway
38,400.00
section from NC903 to SR 1519.
Spot Stabilization for soil roads
45.000.00
Reserve for Overruns and Contingencies
8,091.00
TOTAL
$528,661.00
ffffffffff
Mr. Otis Potter presented a status report on the 1978-79 programmed projects. He also
presented a map marking the top ten improvement priorities for the 1979-80 proposed programs.
f ffffffffR
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
Margaret "�' Roberts, Clerk
Pitt County Board of Commissioners
OFFICE OF THE PITT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
GREENVILLE. NORTH CAROLINA
FEBRUARY 21, 1979
The Pitt County Board of Commissioners met in an emergency meeting on Wednesday, February
21, 1979. at 5:15 P. M. in the Law Library of the Pitt County Courthouse, with the following members
present:
R. L. Martin, Chairman
Ed N. Warren, Vice Chairman
B. Alton Gardner
Charles P. Gaskins
Bruce Strickland
Burney L. Tucker
W. W. Speight, County Attorney
H. R. Cray, County Manager
Margaret M. Roberts, Clerk to Board
OTHERS PRESENT FOR MEETING WERE:
0. W. Strickland - N. C. Division of Health Services
David Kelly - N. C. Department of Crime Control and Public Safety
Bill Buffalos - N. C. Department of Agriculture
Bill Morris - Division of Health Service, Solid Waste Division
Bill Jeter - N. C. Division of Environmental Management
Dr. Robert Ehinger, Director - Pitt County Health Department
Willie Pate, Director - Environmental Health, Pitt County Health Department
David W. Spivey - Area A. Civil Defense Coordinator
Leroy James - Agriculture Extension Service Director
Gaylon Ambrose - Assistant Agriculture Extension Chairman
Sam Uzzell - Agriculture Extension Service
J. C. Whitehurst, Jr. - Coastal Chemical Corporation
Larry M. Lamb - Coastal Chemical Corporation
Bobby Joyner - Pitt County Fire Marshal and Civil Preparedness Director
Don Davenport - Administrative Assistant to thin County Manager
REPRESENTATIVES OF THE NEWS MEDIA PRESENT WERE:
Jerry Alligood - The News and Observer
Stuart Savage - The Daily Reflector
WNCT-TV Channel 9 - Greenville, N. C.
WITN-TV Channel 7 - Washington, N. C.
WCTI -TV - Channel 12 - New Bern, N. C.

Chairman Martin stated that the purpose of the special called emergency meeting was to
consider the disposition of the solid waste, which resulted from a fire at the Coastal Chemical
Corporation Plant.
Mr. 0. W. Strickland, Director of the Division of Health Services, Solid Waste Control,
requested the Board's permission to use the County Landfill on the Allen Road to dispose of the
residue left over from the Coastal Chemical Fire. Be said It would require from one half( to
three fourths (314) of land to dispose of the solid waste left from the fire. He said that the
material would be buried from ten to fourteen feet deep; four feet above the highest water table
in a pit lined on the bottom and all sides with a six inch layer of lime. Be said the lime would
neutralise any chemical residue. He said the plan calls for three test wells to be installed around
the area to monitor the water quality, and stated that all facets of the State Government are in
agreement with the proposal to dispose of the contaminated waste. He said that to dispose of this
waste would be an expensive and difficult job.
He also suggested that an agreement should be made with the people concerned about leaving
the site in proper condition after disposing of the solid waste.
Chairman Martin asked Mr. Strickland if that portion of the landfill could be used again
in the area where the contaminated material will be dumped. Mr. Strickland stated that the material
would be placed beside the same burn and filled so it did not interfere with the present plan at
the County Landfill.
UPON NOTION by Ed N. Warren and seconded by Charles P. Gaskins, the Pitt County Board of
Commissioners gave approval for the solid waste of the Coastal Chemical Corporation's fire to
be disposed of in the County Landfill located on the Allen Road as recommended by the State Agencies
involved, and for the county to aid in any way they can in order to help get the residue disposed
of properly.
The Board requested Mr. 0. W. Strickland of the Division of Health Services to submit
a letter and plan of approval to use the landfill.
RRRRfffRR Rf
Mr. David Kelly, Assistant Secretary of the Department of Crime Control and Public Safety,
advised the Board that he doubted that there would be any state money available to defray any of
the expenses of the clean up operation from the Coastal Chemical Fire. He said that since the
contamination problem was on private land, that Coastal Chemical Corporation would be responsible
for any cost involved 1n disposing of the waste.
UPON MOTION by Ed N. Warren and seconded by Charles P. Gaskins, the Pitt County Board
of Commissioners unanimously requested Mr. Kelly to investigate the possibility of receiving some
financial relief in disposing of the chemicals and residue from the Coastal Chemical Fire and
adopted the following resolution requesting State Financial Assistance in the disposal of toxic
solid waste resulting from the fire destroying Coastal Chemical Corporation.
RESOLUTION REQUESTING STATE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE IN THE DISPOSAL OF TOXIC SOLID WASTE
RESULTING FROM THE FIRE DESTROYING COASTAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION.
This being a "PUBLIC HEALTH HAZARD" involving the safety of the citizens of Pitt County,
which requires urgent and immediate attention, and the County is without funds to handle this
emergency.
It is hereby directed to be forwarded to the Secretary of Crime Control and Public Safety.
fRRtffff Rf
Mr. William Buffalos of the North Carolina Department of Agriculture Pesticide Division,
informed the Board that the contaminated water is now contained in dyked areas at the site and
presents a greater disposal problem than the solids. He said that the liquids can not be disposed
of in the county landfill, and that they are now treating the water to make It more alkaline. He
said that a decision on what to do with the liquids would be made after the solid residue has been
disposed of.
Mr. Buffalos Informed the Board that three options are being considered for disposing
of the contaminated run-off. He said that the most expensive option would be to pump the material
from the contained areas into a transport vehicle, make a slush of it and haul It away for disposal.
The SECOND option, he explained, would be to get the material down in concentration and spread it
over suitable waste land so that it will degenerate naturally. The THIRD and least likely possibility
would be to deteriorate the chemical in the water to the point that they could slowly release what
we have into the natural streams in the area.
Mr. Buffalos stated that the ditches are being dug around the dyked areas to carry any
rain water away from the contained areas holding the contaminated run off, indicating that additional
water coming into the dyked areas would mean more liquid to be disposed of.

Mr. Buffaloe expressed to the Commissioners that the County Fire Marshal, Bobby Joyner, did
everything he could to avoid excessive water on the site in order to control the fire. It was also
noted that the State would be furnishing a pipe to be placed under the highway for water run off
:ind that the work would be performed by the Department of Transportation personnel.
Chairman Martin asked the Health officials present if they were satisfied with the way the
situation was being handled regarding the health problems that the fire may have caused.
Willie Pate, Chief Environmental Agent, stated that he is in agreement with the Division of
Health Services plan.
Dr. Robert Ehinger reported that the cooperation has been excellent from the State and
local officials in dealing with the problems created by the fire. He said that he felt that every-
thing was safe at this time, and the biggest problem at this time was in disposing of the material.
Mr. J. C. WhItehurst, Owner of Coastal Chemical Corporation, told the Board that he would
appreciate any help that he could get from the County in disposing of the waste.
H. R. Cray, County Manager, stated that the County would provide one piece of equipment on
the site, but the company would be responsible for additional special handling cost.
The County Manager also stated that Don Davenport, Administrative Assistant to the County
Manager, would be the coordinator for the county in disposing of the material.
The Board adopted the following resolution Commending Bobby Joyner, the Pitt County Fire
Marshal, and to all the various Fire Departments, Rescue Squads, Law Enforcement Agencies, and
State Officials, for the efficient manner in which the fire, the evacuation, and the disposal of
the waste has been handled.
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION FOR A JOB WELL DONE DURING THE EMERGENCY OF THE COASTAL CHEMICAL
FIRE.
UPON MOTION by Charles P. Gaskins and seconded by B. Alton Gardner, and by unanimous vote,
the Board adopted the following Resolution:
The Pitt County Board of Commissioners hereby expresses its appreciation to all the Local
and State Agencies that rendered valuable and unselfish assistance in the recent Coastal Chemical
Corporation Fire, and especially wishes to thank and commend all of the Volunteer Fire Departments,
the Pitt County Fire Marshal, Bobby Joyner; the Pitt County Sheriff's Department, and all other
participating fire departments, including the City of Greenville's Fire Department and the Fire
Departments outside of Pitt County, and the Greenville Police Department for their prompt and able
response to the alarm.
The Board of Commissioners also hereby expresses its appreciation to the following local
and state agencies for their valuable assistance during this critical time and for the help rendered
in preventing the emergency from becoming a disaster:
The North Carolina Highway Patrol, News Media, Eating Establishments who contributed food,
Greenville and Pitt County School Systems, Gas and Oil Companies who supplied fuel for the fire
trucks, North Carolina Department of Agriculture, North Carolina State University , Rescue Squads,
Salvation Amy, Red Cross, Volunteers at Evacuation Shelters, Pitt County Health Department, North
Carolina Division of Health Services, North Carolina Department of Natural and Economic Resources,
Environmental Management Division, Wildlife Resources Commission, The Soil Conservation Service,
the North Carolina Department of Crime Control and Public Safety, the Pitt County Manager, the Seymour
Johnson Air Force Base, East Carolina University Students who helped, Churches and Religious Organi-
sations in the County, Greenville Utilities Commission, the Greenville Jaycees, and any others who
participated.
w RRRR}}R}R
Chairman Martin expressed his appreciation to the State and Local Officials for assistance
they had given during the crisis.
There being no further business, the meeting was recessed until Friday, February 23,
1979. in the Law Library of the Pitt County Courthouse for the purpose of requesting the Board of
Elections to call a referendum on Liquor by the Drink.
�?GLtwn t.�t Y1i . �'�.t.t�•
Margare M. Roberts, Clerk
Pitt County Board of Commissioners

r J�
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
cs e. HUNT. JR. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCE
•ovte�o•
AH T. MORROW. M.0- M.P.M. Division of Health Services
acri.nAmy
EASTERN REGIONAL OFFICE
404 ST. ANDREWS STREET
GREENVILLE. N.C. 27834
Telephone [phone]
February 21, 1979
,"Pitt County Cormissioners
—'elff County Manager
Greenville, NC 27834
Dear' irs:
In order to expeditiously resolve the health and environmental hazards
created by the Coastal Chemical Company (Evans Street Extension) warehouse
fire, we petition your approval of the use of the Pitt County Landfill
(S.R. 1276 off S.R. 1203) to bury the solid waste portion of the fire
residue.
The proposed operation shall. be carried out under strict supervision
and according to a detailed plan of the Solid Waste Branch of the N.C. Division
of Health Services and the N.C. Pesticide Disposal Committee of the N.C.
Pesticide Board.
Residues from the approximately 40 pesticides burned will be chemically
detoxified to the extent possible and buried in a specially prepared cell
approximately 3/4 acre in size.
Land burial experience with similar residues from other warehouse fires
in Forth Carolina give us confidence that this is our best approach and under
the precautions to be taken we do not anticipate any adverse effects to the
citizens of Pitt County.
Sincerely yours,
William B. Buffalo
Coordinator N.C. Pesticide
Emergency Reaction Team
N.C. Pesticides Board

41DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN .\&OURCES
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
RALEIG H
February 23, 1979
Hr. E. F.eginald Grey, County YA=ger
Pitt Co=ty Courthouse, Box A
Greenville, :forth Carolina 27834
Dear Yr. Gray,
It is always nice to e+isit with you and your beard. I do hope that so= -
day we rnn meet v-iti:out having a problem to discuss. I vant to thank you and
your board for your permission to let the solid residue fro= the Coastal Chexi-
cal fire be pjaced in the county sanitary landfill.
Th-iz agency has discussed the disposal site and method of disposal v-ith
representatives of the Bnviro-'—ntal Protection AFency, the local health depart -
rent, Nortz Carolina Departsent of Agriculture - Pesticide Division, and the
wa.shingtcn Office of 'natural Resources and Co..�unity :.zveloprent. :'Nile we 20
Wt asree th-st the site is ideal, %.,a do agree that it is the best method for
the disposal of the solid residue available to use at this t=-e. Our c;perience
at the Fe.—.ville fire in 1971 and the monitorinn that has been carried out since
that waste was landfilled, gives us added confidence that ve are providing a
mthod of disl osal that urill protect the public health and the cavircr-ent. A
copy of the land -filling zeth.od is enclosed ;or your information.
Representatives of this.office vrill be on site to see that the plan is-
folloved. I F= sstiino Hr. Jim 'iulliga.n of the Nashingtou Office of Natural
Resc::rces s..d C„t✓unity -Development to sign a copy of the landfill plan rnd
retura to this Office as yell as a COPY to you for y
our
Thanks again for your cooperation rith a very difficult proble_.
Sincerely,
Cf Strickland, Asslstant Nesd

� ` i '•nay ��/'�' �� � t µ }3r:•� •-'r ��:.
March 1, 1979
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mr. H. Vance Holt, Acting Coordinator
Enforcement Emergency Response
SIONED4y Jim Mulligan, Regional Supervisor
GANWashington Regional Office
FROM: _.�— Bill Jeter, Hydrologist
Support Coordinator
Washington Regional Office
SUBJECT: Disposal of debris resulting from the fire at
Coastal Chemical Company
Pitt County
The fire on the night of 18-19 February which destroyed the office -
warehouse building at the Coastal Chemical Company facility, located approxi-
mately one and a half miles youth of Greenville, resulted in contar..inated
debris estimated at one thousand cubic yards. The alternatives for the
disposal of this volume of solid waste are limited. Representatives of the
North Carolina Departments of Agriculture, Human Resources, and Natural Resources
and Cofnmunity Development, the Pitt County Health Department, and the Environ-
mental Protection Agency agreed that landfillirg was the best available alternative.
The best available si'es fcr disposal in the area were .the Voice of America
Site at Bell Arthur, v'ico was used for the disposal of debris from the Royster
Company of Farmville fire in 1971, and the Pitt County Landfill on Allen Road
(S.R. 1203). The consensus of the conferees was that although -the VOA Site was
superior for disposal weather conditions had rendered it inaccessible. While
the er.gine,:ring plans for the Allen Road site indicated the subsurface conditions
were less Iavorable than the VOA Site, a field investigation showed that the
pervieability of the clayey subsurface was in fact quite adequate for the purpose
of disposal of the contaminated solid waste.
A plan for the design and operation for the disposal of the contaminated
solid waste (see attached letter and diagram) was formulated by representatives
of the Department of Human Resources and the Department of Natural Resources
and Community Development. The agreement to the plan by this office was based
on (1) the subsurface iithology, (2) the depth to the water (3) the six
i 9he5 thiz lino Ij_ne r, and (4) the unJeistan ing that tho enlia was,* wac te
consist of building rubble L.soil from the fire site, and er,pt roduct containers.
_ M ' "___ �• o� s�� mrsa

f ~' March�1, 1979 w
The plan and a request for use of the Allen Road Site were presented to and
F•. adopted by the Pitt County Board.of Commissioners.
�1+' •As with many plans, the transition from the drawing board to the imple-
mentation reveals a number of problems. Primary among the problems which
arose during. the implementation of the disposal plan were, in chronological
c_- order: (1) the mainteance of the integrity of the lime liner, (2) the
condition and con--ents of containers, 3) a misunderstanding of the components
!' of "solid residue," and (4) the effects of the weather.
The emplacement of a six -inches -thick lime liner in the bottom and on the
sides of a diked landfill cell is an inprecise operation. Uniformity of
thickness is almost impossible to achieve; therefore, every effort was made to
insure that the minimum thickness was six inches. The operation of a thirty-
two -ton compactor equipped with approximately four -inches -high triangular studs
on its wheels over the lime liner precludes the maintenance of the integrity of
the liner. In attempt to rectify this problem and absorb residual water in some
of the debris, a lime layer was placed within the beds of the trucks transporting
the debris.
Y
With arrival of the first debris at the landfill site, it became evident that
the integrity of a number of the containers was relatively unaffected by the
r � fire and/or loading operations. An undetermined number of plastic jugs arrived
�' full ofi product with only the label damaged or missing. A number of five -gallon
steel cons containing varying amoun s o product arrived in a similar condition,
Requests by representatives of the Department of.l'uman Resources and the Depart-
ment of Natural Resoruces and Community Development supervising the landfilling
operations for greater effort in rupturing the product containers at the fire
site greatly reduced this problem.
A third problem arose when a misunderstanding as to the composition of "solid
J f1 residue" was discovered. It was not the understanding of this office that
' l approximately thirty-eight tons of untreated, granulated "Mocap" and "Mocap
�( plus" were to be placed in the landfill. A conference between representatives of
the Department of Agriculture, Department of Human Resources, and the Department
of Natural Resources a-i� Co=unity Development modified the operations plan to
have the granulated -. ld -t placed in one area of the landfill cell and interla_yerr
and encapsulated :ii .n lime.
The greatest of all the problems which arose during implementation of the
landfilling plan was the rain. The snow of the eighteenth had brought the soils
in 'che rrea to maximum saturation. This in itself presented prcDle^s in p•re;ara-
tic., of the landfill cell and access to it, but the rains that occurred at the
v.eek's end made implementation of the operations plan impossible. The lime
liner and the irterlayering and encapsulating of the granulated products both
pr,..!:,r.-d a slurry. In order to produce as dry a material as possible, greater
quantities of lime were added both in the bed and covering debris in the trucks.
The increased quantity of lime necessitated increasing the length of the lan�fill
cell. In addition to the size of the cell, provisions for controlling surface
runoff were made in the form of dikes, ditches, and impoundments (see attache::
fill== L. :ie}ez
Enclosure
�. 'lt,. :•f'e-,.. _-;+'_- .n_,.: . .- �LJ�i`s''-.:i'� s_.::�•s-.�>-" - - - ice":'% _ .�tn

ss- TM Mr �` H. Vance Holt I ",
Page 3 Memo
March 1, 1979 _
�f :'•:°* diagPam). The construction of a Swale and dike between the landfill cell and
the toe of the completed landfill cell to the east, diverted runoff toward
=•x an existing drainage way. To the western side of the cell, a dike was
{Y� constructed from the existing north dike southwestward to an existing swale
above the existing hesterr, Canal, thereby intercepting and diverting runoff
�• :�..; from approximately five acres. The existing West6rn Canal was cross -diked to create
three impoundments with a capacity of approximately one acre foot. The adequacy
of the runoff controls was demonstrated durinn the weekend of 24-25 February when
three inches of rain fell. Considering that the runoff from approximately eight
acres had to be controlled, an estimated 0.2 acre feet was impounded while an
estimated 1.8 acre feet was diverted.
The rains also added to the problems at the fire site, for on the morning
of 26 February it was necessary to construct a diked area adjacent to the south or
open end of the cell to accommodate eighteen loads of slurry. The cell and diked
area have not been capped in an attempt to "dry" the "solid waste" prior to
completing the landfilling operations. Also plans have not been formulated as
yet for the disposal of the impounded water.on the site.
The success of the containment of the contained materials within the landfill
cell wil-1 be dependent on the amount of water than can be removed by evaporation.
The cell design after capping should minimize infiltration; the plan for collection
and diversion of runoff from and adjacent to the cell should minimize infiltration
from this quarter, Therefore, the amount of water contained within the cell will
be the key minimizing the possibility of seepage along the toe of the cell. If
the slurry in the diked area and the waste presently in the cell can be "Dried",
then seepage should not occur,
The expertise and cooperation of all the personnel fro^1 the various agencies and
companies involved has been demonstrated on m,-•ny occasions during this operation.
The most exemplery and commendable expertise and cooperation were shown at the
landfill site by the personnel from the contractor, the Lewis Compa;.y of Bethel,
Bil_1 Morris and Fred Woed of the Department of Human Resources - Solid Waste and
Vector Control Brar=n. :.id persornel from the Pitt County agencies.
cc: Mr. If. Reginald Gray
Mr. 0. W. Strickland
Mr. Lee Caniel ✓
WU:Iit
Enclosure
T

mod' 4�
J n
a
0
JAMES A. GRAHAM
COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE
WILLIAM G. PARHAM. JR.
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
OFFICE OF CONSUMER SERVICES.
WILLIAM A. WILDER. JR.
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
PESTICIDE AND PLANT PROTECTION DIVIESION
P. O. BOX 27647
RALEIGH. N. C. 27611
PESTICIDE SECTION— [phone]
PLANT PROTECTION SECTION— [phone]
ALFRED S. ELDER. DIRECTOR
Mr. David S. Crump
Special Deputy Attorney General
Department of Justice
Corner of Fayetteville and Morgan Sts.
Raleigh, NC 27611
Dear Mr. Crump:
October 16, 1979-
On February 19-20, 1979, a fire destroyed the office -warehouse building
at the Coastal Chemical Corporation near Greenville, North Carolina.
The fire.:resulted in pesticide contaminated debris estimated at one
thousand cubic yards.
The Pesticide Emergency Reaction Team, established in 1974 and involving
those state agencies concerned with potential pesticide problems during
such an emergency,was activated and arrived in Greenville in the after-
noon of February 19th. During the next eleven da;s the Team members _
served as on -scene advisors to coordinate in cooperation with Mr. J. C.
Whitehurst, Jr., owner, the extensive cleanup operation carried out by
Coastal Chemical Corporation.
Cleanup was complicated by a ten inch (plus) snow on the ground at the
time of the fire and by heavy rainfall which followed. Efforts to contain
and detoxify approximately one million gallons of water used to fight the
fire were initiated at once. Had the cleanup of contaminated debris not
been initiated expeditiously, the subsequent runoff from rainfall and
melting snow would have resulted in considerable contamination of the
nearby canal, Fork Swamp East Branch, Swift Creek and the Neuse River
below Greenville. If such had been the =73 , significant adverse effects
on the environment would have been likely.
Throughout the postfire operations the Emergency Reaction Team advised
Mr. Whitehurst as to the steps they felt were necessary for cleaning up
the resulting contamination. Coastal Chemical Corporation cooperated with
the Team and provided the funds required to implement recommended cleanup
anal disposal procedures. Again, we feel that the cleanup actions taken by

Mr. David S. Crump
Page 2
October 16, 1979
Coastal Chemical Corporation were necessary and proper for the protection
of the environment. Ncnetheless, a question has since been raised as to
whether or not Mr. Whitehurst was legally responsible for paying the
cleanup costs. We have been advised that a decision on Mr. Whitehurst's
insurance claims is being held up pending resolution of this question.
in an effort to determine the extent of Mr.-Whitehurst's legal responsi-
bilities, our staff has reviewed the North Carolina Pesticide Law of 1971,
the Federal Insecticide, F:irgicide, and Rodenticide Act, as amended (FIFRA),
and respective regulations. For your. convenience, we have marked and
enclosed sections which we believe speak to this subject. We would request
that you provide us your interpretation at your earliest opportunity.
Please do not hesitate to contact us if we can be of any assistance to you.
WBB:bhg
Enclosures
0
Sincerely,
William B. Buffaloe
Pesticide Administrator

REPORT ON DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE
FROM COASTAL CHEMICAL FIRE
By: Billy W. Morris, District Sanitarian
Solid Waste Management Unit
Solid Waste & Vector Control Branch
The Pitt County Landfill on Allen Road (S.R. 1203) was chosen for the
disposal of solid material remaining from the Coastal Chemical Company fire
of February 19, 1979. This site was chosen because it is within close
proximity of the fire site and provided us with a reasonable haul distance.
More importantly, the site consisted of highly impermeable clay material that
provides protection for the ground water in the area. Also the access road
formerly used by Pitt County to the site was in good condition and would
require only a minimum amount of improvement.
A meeting was arranged for February 23 to present a disposal plan and
ask permission of the Pitt County Commissioners for use of their site. T►;e
plan had previously been discussed and agreed upon by all State, County,
and Federal agencies involved in the fire clear. -up. The Board of Corn—missioners
accepted the plan and gave unanimous approval for use of the site. They also
offered their Rex 350 Trash Compactor and operator to assist in the disposal
project.
The Department of Transportation, Highway Division made the necessary
improvements & the access road on February 22, 1979. This included reriovir,a
snow and mud and applying sand.
After estimating the amount of waste to be disposed of, a disposal plan
(copy attached) was drawn. This consisted of a cell 60' x 100' and approxi-
mately 5' deep. The cell was constructed of on -site clay using a TD-2.0 bulldozer.
The cell walls and floor were then lined with 6" of lime. E. R. Lewis Con-
struction Company of Bethel, N. C. was contracted by Coastal Chemical Company
to do the cell construction.
Disposal operations were begun on Friday, February 23,and continued through
the weekend until completion on Monday, February 26. Some 4 to 5 ir.cFes of
rain fell during this period of time. This along with the already i•.et site
conditions made landfilling very difficult.
The waste was hauled in tandem dump trucks operated by E. R. Le%,,is Con-
struction Company. Coastal Chemical also used two of their single axle dump
trucks. 4'e a:ere forced to remove the tailgates from all the trucks in order
to dump the material. The bulky steel that was part of the building frame
could not be dumped any other r;ay.. These steel girders also caused problems
for the landfill equipment. The windshield of the Rex Trashmaster .:as broken
when the wheel threw a piece of steel up in an attempt to compact the waste.
Fortunately the operator escaped without injury. In my opinion, the steel
should not have been disposed of in the landfill. It should have been salvaged
by a metal recycling firm.
TrrF','yR""�...r� .... .-...--.-w. �.. �. •.r• •,r^.+r..,"M•.i,.�".^.'r;f��. ... r.-s+tf�w.na'r,:�+�e�.�a.s.'.'r+•-.-�••r�l"'�..�-p-w+.�..,��.�. . , --•y: .--�: t�

Report on Disposal of Solid Waste
from Coastal Chemical Fire
Page 2
After hauling was completed on Monday, February 26, it was far too
wet to apply the final cover to the cell. Vie were unable to cet a piece
of equipment on top to compact and cover. We were also unsuccessful in
attempting to apply a plastic cover on the cell. This was primarily
because of the jagged, bulky steel waste that we were unable to compact.
We then decided to reinforce the cell dikes with more clay and allow the
site to dry before applying the final cover at a later date.
.Another problem encountered at the landfill site was that of liquid
waste. This liquid waste was the result of washing the truck bodies and
landfilling equipment at the site. We were forced to dam several thousand
gallons of contaminated water that later had to be treated. The equipment
should have been washed at the burn site where an impoundment of contaminated
water was already established.
We were not able to begin application of the final cover on the cell
until March 28. Even then it was necessary to pump off several hundred gallons
of contaminated liquid before any cover material could be applied. This
liquid was put in the impoundment at the plant site.
The cell was still so wet that we had to use a Drott 35 hydraulic shovel
to place cover material on the cell. We were unable to obtain good cor'.pac-
tion using,this method and some settling has taken place. We will have to
go back to the site in the near future to compact and grade the top to
facilitate surface water runoff. We will also need to apply topsoil and
establish a good growth of vegetation to prevent erosion.

/7
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Nancy W. Smith, Regional Manager
July 25, 1994
Mr. Phil Dickerson, P.E.
Pitt County Engineering
1717 W. Fifth Street
Greenville, NC 27858
Dear Mr. Dickerson:
A&14
OIL
�EHNR
Enclosed is the facility evaluation report generated as the result
of the July 20, 1994, inspection of the Pitt County Landfill. You
and H.C. Kinsaul were present during the evaluation.
Please note and address the violations in Section II on the form as
soon as possible. The training and record keeping requirements
should be completed within 30 days of receipt of this letter.
You should be informed that this office has particular concern for
the lack of apparent suitable cover material that is available to
effectively operate this site. A review of past evaluation reports
reflects that this has been a chronic violation. It is imperative
that this issue be addressed immediately.
Please contact me if there are questions regarding this letter or
landfill evaluation.
Sincerely,
�? w4
Bill W. Morris
Waste Management Specialist
Solid Waste Section
Washington Regional Office
sle
cc: Phil Prete
Terry Dover
Central Files, Pitt County -Corr.
1424 Carolina Avenue, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/10% post -consumer paper

NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL.RESOURCES'
Division of Solid Haste Management
Solid Haste Section
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY EVALUATION REPORT
C ? ©/o2U
Type of Faci l i ty��4 / Per i t a 0, Ca+�tY
Name of Faci l i ty Gn/ I /+ Location ' d • 12
Date of Last Evaluation
I. Permit conditions Followed es No N/A
A. Specific Condition(s) Violated
II. Operational Requirements Followed Yes
15A N.C. Admin. Code 13B Section I /c 4-2 41
A. Specific Violations) by number and letter.
-
62
Are�s wA1:0 ° 1,1/;// AlOt
H,o.���s ..•�, tih�l 6� d , w;�
12-
Covere l.✓'" c: �rrrcin
III. other Violations of Rule or Law ��Nf
IV. Evaluator's Comments Isu ialld G'um- Me-'ye"ia! ' );- �1%'T�d (6%'2S C 11.'r ,-Iul
V. Continuation Page Required! Z- T No Receiving Sigreture
Evaluation Date - o2a - Solid Haste Section
DEHNR 3793 (Part I White: Facility Part II Canary: Centrat—offipi Part WI Pink: Regional Office)
Solid Waste Section (Review 7/94)

Puxpose., G.S. 130A-294 requires that an evaluation program be established for the
operation of solid waste management facilities on a statewide basis. The
Solid Waste Manaqement Act and Solid Waste Management Males codified at
15A NCAC 13B list requirements which mist be followed by solid waste
facilities.
Instru--tions: Solid Waste Section personnel shall camplete the evaluation form each
time they conduct official evaluations. The form shall be signed by
the person(s) receiving the report.
DistributicAn: Part I Mute: facility copy
Part 11 Canary: Rale,14i central office file copy
Part M Pink: Regional office file copy
Disposition: This form may be retained in accordance with the Record Retention
Disposition Schedule of the Solid Waste Section, Solid Waste Managemen,
Division of the Department of Errvirorunent, Health and Natural Resource.1-f-M.

- J1G1
FACIiJTY EVALUATION REPORT
'` bWTINQATION PAGE
I. Permit conditions) Violated:
A. Specific Corditions) Violated
II. Operational Requirements Followed
Permit
Evaluation Date it
A. Specific Violations) by natrer and letter.
-
_._ 1,
A,'a
III. Other Violations of Rules or Law
IV. Evaluator's Consents
DEW 3M (Part I White: Facility Part II Canary: Central Office Part III Pint: Regional Office)
Solid Waste Section (Review 7194)

Purpose: G.S. 130A-294 requires that an evaluation program be established for the
operation of solid waste management facilities on a statewide basis. The
Solid Waste Management Act and Solid Waste Management Rules codified at
15A NCAC 13B list requirements which must be followed by solid waste
facilities.
Solid Waste Section personnel shall ccuplete the evaluation form each
time they conduct official evaluations. The form shall be signed by
the person(s) receiving the report.
Part I mite: facility copy
Part II Canary: Raleigh central office file copy
Part III Pink: Regional office file copy
Disposition: This form may be retard in accordance with the Record Retention and
Disposition Schedule of the Solid Waste Section, Solid Waste Management
Division of the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources.

NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES' �P TE SF
Division of Solid Haste Management
Solid Haste Section
SOLID HASTE MANAIMENT FACILITY EVALUATION REPORT OCT ^ O 199�
Type of Faci it i ty Permit # I " 01 Canty
Name of Facitity'8 2/ t/'1',' , � l Location
Date of Last Evaluation © "-
I. Permit Conditions Followed %Yes No N/A
A. Specific Conditions)
LJO WASTE MANA
kyVTEVff_Lf REGIONAL OFF= "
II. Operational Requirements Followed Yes try No
15A N.C. Actin. Code 13B Section ' 10_s'%5"
A. Specific Violations) by number and letter.
� C/ �!'� ej {,..- ., �1 l � �.3s.� //V��''j]C:'_� !!C� �Lr i'f� fr`;�._ � i� � .CJt"ii+i,Gi ���-��•+�,�.f'
. j
�:> f's%i`)�' ��f✓�=: t` le l' F� :��C�N i� s..�;: `fy .:/-��! !/l,' 1 �!'e � '�9 f%s� y'li
III. Other Violations of Rule or Law
IV. Evaluator's Comments�
V. Continuation Page Required? 1— Yes No Receiving Signature
Evaluation Date �f� �� _ '}`j Solid Haste Section
DEHNR 3793 (Part I White: Facility Part II Canary: Central Office Part II Pink: Regional Office)
Solid Haste Section (Review 7/94)

Purpose: G.S. 130A-294 requires that an evaluation program be established for the
operation of solid waste management facilities on a statewide basis. The
Solid Waste Management Act and Solid Waste Management Rules codified at
15A NCAC 13B list requirements which must be followed by solid waste
facilities.
Instructions: Solid Waste Section personnel shall complete the evaluation form each
time they conduct official evaluations. The form shall be signed by
the person(s) receiving the report.
Distribution: on: Part I White: facility copy
Part II Canary: Raleigh central office file copy
Part III Pink: Regional office file copy
Disposition: This form may be retained in accordance with the Record Retention and
Disposition Schedule of the Solid Waste Section, Solid Waste Management
Division of the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources.

FACILITY EVALUATION REPORT
CdkTINUATION PAGE
Permit
Evaluation Date
I. Permit Condition(s) Violated:
A. Specific ConditionCs) Violated
11. operational. Requirements FoLLawad SOLID WASTE MANAGEN"T'
V:AyETTEVItLE REGIONAL OFFICE
A. Specific ViotationCs) by nuid)er and Letter.
Ill. Other Violations of Rules or
IV. Evaluator's Caments
DEW 3793 (Part I Wte: Facility Part II Canary: Central Office Part Ill Pink: Regionall. Office)
Solid Waste Section (Review 7/%)

Purpose: G.S. 130A-294 requires that an evaluation program be established for the
operation of solid waste management facilities on a statewide basis. The
Solid Waste Management Act and Solid Waste Management Rules codified at
15A NCAC 13B list requirements which must be followed by solid waste
facilities.
Solid Waste Section personnel shall ccuplete the evaluation form each
time they conduct official evaluations. The form shall be signed by
the person(s) receiving the report.
Part I mite: facility ccpy
Part II (mazy: Raleigh central office file copy
Part III Pink: Regional office file espy
Disposition: This form may be retained in accordance with the Record Retention and
Disposition Schedule of the Solid Waste Section, Solid Waste Management
Division of the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources.

NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Division of Solid Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY EVALUATION REPORT
Type of Facility Permit # Count
Name of Facility Locat
Date of Last Evaluation
I. Permit Conditions Followed Yes No N/A
A. Specific Condition(s) Violated
II. Operational Requirements Followed Yes No
15A N.C. Admin. Code 13B Section , "1
A. Specific Violation(s) by saber and letter.
III. Other Violations of Rule or Law
IV. Evaluator's Caments
V. Continuation Page Required? -Yes No Receiving Signature
Solid Waste Section
Evaluation Date :'i
DEHNR 3793 (Part I White: Facility Part II Canary: central Office Part Ill Pink: Regional Office)
Solid Waste Section (Review 7/94)

Repose: G.S."130A-294 requires that an evaluation program be established for the
operation of solid waste management facilities on a statewide basis. The
Solid Waste Management Act and Solid Waste Management Rules codified at
15A NCKC 13B list requirements which must be followed by solid waste
facilities.
Irstructicns: Solid Waste Section personnel shall Clete the evaluation form each
time they conduct official evaluations. The form shall be signed by
the person(s) receiving the report.
Di stri b ti cn: Part I mite: facility copy
Part II Canary: Raleigh central office file copy
Part III Pink: Regional office file copy
Disposition: This form may be retained in accordance with the Record Retention and
Disposition Schedule of the Solid Waste Section, Solid Waste Management
Division of the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources.

NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Division of Solid Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
SOLID WASTE HJUAGOENT FACILITY EVAUIRTION REPORT
Type of Facility r., Permit # Caff" Name of Facitity Location
Date of Last Evatuation
-D
I. Permit Conditions Followed Yes No N/A
A. Specific Condition(s)
II. Operational Recpjiremwits Followed Yes No
15A N.C. Admin. Code 13B Section
�'j A. Specific Viotation(s) by number and letter.
_5
Ill. other Violations of Rule or Law
IV. Evaluator's Comments
e I
V. Continuation Page Required? Yes No Receiving Signature
Evaluation Date Solid Waste Section
DEM 3793 (Part I White: Facility Part 11 canary: Central. Office,/ Part III Pink:,,eiegionaL office)
Solid Waste Section (Review 7Y94)

Purpose: G.S. 130A-294 requires that an evaluation program be established for the
operation of solid waste management facilities on a statewide basis. The
Solid Waste Management Act and Solid Waste Management Rules codified at
15A NCAC 13B list requirements which moist be followed by solid waste
facilities.
Solid Waste Section personnel shall ocuplete the evaluation form each
time they conduct official evaluations. The form shall be signed by
the person(s) receiving the report.
Distribution: Part I mite: facility copy
Part II Canary: Raleigh central office file copy
Part III Pink: Regional office file copy
Disposition: This form may be retained in accordance with the Record Retention and
Disposition Schedule of the Solid Waste Section, Solid Waste Management
Division of the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources.

(1�7
00 d N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
WEATHER CONDITIONS DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
INSPECTION, FOR SANITARY LANDFILL§�
E OF TE COUNT
Y f.
LO ATI N SIGNATURE OF PERSON(S) RECEIVING REPORT
('
P RMIT NUM
SIR: AN INSPECTION OF YOUR LAND DISPOSAL SITE HAS BEEN MADE THIS DATE AND YOU ARE NOTIFIEpWT-HEVIOLATIONS, IF ANY, MARKED BELOW
WITH A CROSS (X).
(1) PLAN AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Construction plans shall be approved and followed.
— (b) Specified monitoring and reporting requirements shall be met.
(2) SPREADING AND COMPACTING REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Solid waste shall be restricted into the smallest area feasible.
(b) Solid waste shall be compacted as densely as practical into cells.
(3) COVER REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Solid waste shall be covered after each day of operation, with a
compacted layer of at least six inches of suitable cover or as
specified by the division.
— (b) Areas which will not have additional wastes placed on them for
12 months or more shall be covered with a minimum of one foot
of intermediate cover.
— (c) After final termination of disposal operations at the site or a
major part thereof or upon revocation of a permit, the area shall
be covered with at least two feet of suitable compacted earth.
(4) EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
(a) Adequate erosion control measures shall be practiced to pre-
vent silt from leaving the site.
X (b) Adequate erosion control measures shall be p cticed to pre-
vent excessive on -site erosion. C /
(5) DRAINAGE CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Surface water shall be diverted from the operational area.
— (b) Surface water shall not be impounded over or in waste.
— (c) Completed areas shall be adequately sloped to allow surface
water runoff in a controlled manner.
(6) V ETATION REQUIREMENTS
(a) Within six months after final termination of disposal operations
of t e site on a major Dar ereo or upon revocation of a
permit, t e area shall be stabilized with native grasses
— (b) Temporary seeding wi a utl Ize as necessary to stabilize the
site.
(7) WATER PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS
— (a) The separation distance of four (4) feet between waste and
water table shall be maintained unless otherwise specified by
the division in the permit.
— (b) Solid waste shall not be disposed of in water.
(c) Leachate shall be contained on site or properly treated prior to
discharge. An NPDES permit may be required prior to the dis-
charge of leachate to surface waters.
(8) ACCESS AND SECURITY REQUIREMENTS
— (a) The site shall be adequately secured by means of gates, chains,
berms, fences, and other security measures approved by the
division, to prevent unauthorized entry.
— (b) An attendant shall be on duty at the site at all times while it is
open for public use to ensure compliance with operational
requirements.
— (c) The access road to the site shall be of all-weather construction
and maintained in good condition.
— (d) Dust control measures shall be implemented where necessary.
REMARKS:
DATE: "-- ,5_— 9 / NAME:
(9) SIGN REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Signs providing information on dumping procedures, the hours
during which the site is open for public use, the permit number
and other pertinent information shall be posted at the site
entrance.
— (b) Signs shall be posted stating that no hazardous or liquid waste
can be received without written permission from the division.
— (c) Traffic signs or markers shall be provided as necessary to pro-
mote an orderly traffic pattern to and from the discharge area
and to maintain efficient operating conditions.
(10) SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
(a) Open burning of solid waste is prohibited.
— (b) Equipment shall be provided to control accidental fires or
arrangements shall be made with the local fire protection
agency to immediately provide fire -fighting services when
needed.
— (c) Fires that occur at a sanitary landfill shall be reported to the
division within 24 hours and a written notification shall be
submitted within 15 days.
— (d) The removal of solid waste from a sanitary landfill is prohibited
unless the owner/operator approves and the removal is not
performed on the working face.
— (e) Barrels and drums shall not be disposed of unless they are empty
and perforated sufficiently to ensure that no liquid or hazard-
ous waste is contained therein.
(11) WASTE ACCEPTANCE AND DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
— (a) A site shall only accept those solid wastes which it is permitted to
receive.
— (b) No hazardous, liquid, or infectious waste shall be accepted or
disposed of in a sanitary landfill except as may be approved by
the division.
— (c) Spoiled foods, animal carcasses, abattoir waste, hatchery waste,
and other animal waste delivered to the disposal site shall be
covered immediately.
(d) Asbestos waste that is packaged in accordance with 40 CFR 61, as
amended through January 1,1985, may be disposed of separate
and apart from other solid wastes at the bottom of the working
face or in an area not contiguous with other disposal areas, in
either case, in virgin soil. Separate areas shall be clearly marked
sothat asbestos is not exposed by future land -disturbing activi-
ties. The waste shall be covered immediately with soil in a
manner that will not cause airborne conditions. Copies of 40
CFR 61 may be obtained and inspected at the Solid and Hazard-
ous Waste Management Branch, Division of Health Services,
P. O. Box 2091, Raleigh, NC, 27602.
(12) MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Effective vector control measures shall be applied to control
flies, rodents, and other insects or vermin when necessary.
— (b) Appropriate methods such as fencing and diking shall be pro-
vided within the area to confine solid waste subject to be blown
by the wind. At the conclusion of each day of operation, all
windblown material resulting from the operation shall be col-
, lected,and returned to the arga by the ov{ner or operator. ,
Solid and klaiardous WVte Management
DHS 1709 (Revised 4/85)
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch (Review 4/86) (white — Raleigh Office yellow — Facility green — Preparer)

Puurpoge: G.S.130A-294 requires that an inspection program be established for the operation of solid
waste management facilities on a statewide basis. The N.C. Solid Waste Management Rules
codified 10 NCAC 10G, Section .0505 list specific operational requirements which must be
followed by sanitary landfills.
,prepap 41,W: Solid and Hazardous Waste Branch personnel shall complete the inspection form each time
they conduct an.official inspection. The form shall be signed by the person(s) receiving the
report.
DfttMUtlbn: 1. White copy to Raleigh office
2. YQllow copy to facility
3. Preen copy to preparer
i,
Dllsp©g Wn: This form may be destroyed in accordance with Standard 7, Inspection Records, of the
Records Disposition Schedule published by the N.C. Division of Archives and History.
Order additional forms from:
Solid and Hazardous'Waste Management Branch
Division of Health Services
P. O. Box 2091
" Raleigh, NC 27602-2091

WEA HER CONDITIONS N.C. DEPARTMENT
NU
PERMIT NUON OF HEALTH SERVICES RESOURCES �� " NUMBER
INSPECTION FOR SANITARY LANDFILLS
I
\ME OF SITE / COUNTY
LOCA ION SIGNATURE OF PERSON(S) RECEIVING SPORT'
SIR: AN INSPECTION OF YOUR LAND DISPOSAL SITE HAS BEEN MADE THIS DATE AND YOU ARE NOTIFIED OF THE VIOLAftCrIVS;TF"ANy, MARKED BELOW
WITH A CROSS (X).
(1) PLAN AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Construction plans shall be approved and followed.
(b) Specified monitoring and reporting requirements shall be met.
(2) SPREADING AND COMPACTING REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Solid waste shall be restricted into the smallest area feasible.
(b) Solid waste shall be compacted as densely as practical into cells.
(3) COVER REQUIREMENTS
(a) Solid waste shall be covered after each day of operation, with a
compacted layer of at least six inches of suitable cover or as
specified by the division.
(b) Areas which will not have additional wastes placed on them for
12 months or more shall be covered with a minimum of one foot
of intermediate cover.
—(c) After final termination of disposal operations at the site or a
major part thereof or upon revocation of a permit, the area shall
be covered with at least two feet of suitable compacted earth.
(4) EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
(a) Adequate erosion control measures shall be practiced to pre-
vent silt from leaving the site.
— (b) Adequate erosion control measures shall be practiced to pre-
vent excessive on -site erosion.
(5) DRAINAGE CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
(a) Surface water shall be diverted from the operational area.
(b) Surface water shall not be impounded over or in waste.
_ (c) Completed areas shall be adequately sloped to allow surface
water runoff in a controlled manner.
(6) VEGETATION REQUIREMENTS
(a) Within six months after final termination of disposal operations
at the site on a major part thereof or upon revocation of a
permit, the area shall be stabilized with native grasses.
(b) Temporary seeding will be utilized as necessary to stabilize the
site.
(7) WATER PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS
—(a) The separation distance of four (4) feet between waste and
water table shall be maintained unless otherwise specified by
the division in the permit.
(b) Solid waste shall not be disposed of in water.
(c) Leachate shall be contained on site or properly treated prior to
discharge. An NPDES permit may be required prior to the dis-
charge of leachate to surface waters.
(8) ACCESS AND SECURITY REQUIREMENTS
— (a) The site shall be adequately secured by means of gates, chains,
berms, fences, and other security measures approved by the
division, to prevent unauthorized entry.
(b) An attendant shall be on duty at the site at all times while it is
open for public use to ensure compliance with operational
requirements.
(c) The access road to the site shall be of all-weather construction
and maintained in good condition.
(d) Dust control measures shall be implemented where/ necessary.
REMARKS: CiZ� ►A1tr'Z&:�ff— NGPAS
nLOS70. ainr�;�/ ate. S;'f� Much itit.
DATE: �— /3-- NAME:
Solid and Haz dous Waste
(9) SIGN REQUIREMENTS mow' "rC
— (a) Signs providing inf ion on dumping edures, the hours
during which the s e is open for public use, permit number
and other pertin nt igfp`yn t n shall be p ted at the site
entrance. 1IUUf��{ �� C �,
— (b) Signs shall be po ed stating that r10 1-aza dou or liquid waste
can be received Rhout written permission fr m the division.
(c) Traffic signs or ma ers shall be provided as ecessary to pro-
mote an orderly tra c pattern to and�ro he discharge area
and to maintain efficie operating con . ions.
(10) SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
(a) Open burning of solid waste is prohibited.
— (b) Equipment shall be provided to control accidental fires or
arrangements shall be made with the local fire protection
agency to immediately provide fire -fighting services when
needed.
— (c) Fires that occur at a sanitary landfill shall be reported to the
division within 24 hours and a written notification shall be
submitted within 15 days.
_ (d) The removal of solid waste from a sanitary landfill is prohibited
unless the owner/operator approves and the removal is not
performed on the working face.
— (e) Barrels and drums shall not be disposed of unless they are empty
and perforated sufficiently to ensure that no liquid or hazard-
ous waste is contained therein.
(11) WASTE ACCEPTANCE AND DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
(a) A site shall only accept those solid wastes which it is permitted to
receive.
(b) No hazardous, liquid, or infectious waste shall be accepted or
disposed of in a sanitary landfill except as may be approved by
the division.
(c) Spoiled foods, animal carcasses, abattoir waste, hatchery waste,
and other animal waste delivered to the disposal site shall be
covered immediately.
— (d) Asbestos waste that is packaged in accordance with 40 CFR 61, as
amended through January 1,1985, may be disposed of separate
and apart from other solid wastes at the bottom of the working
face or in an area not contiguous with other disposal areas, in
either case, in virgin soil. Separate areas shall be clearly marked
so that asbestos is not exposed by future land -disturbing activi-
ties. The waste shall be covered immediately with soil in a
manner that will not cause airborne conditions. Copies of 40
CFR 61 may be obtained and inspected at the Solid and Hazard-
ous Waste Management Branch, Division of Health Services,
P. O. Box 2091, Raleigh, NC, 27602.
(12) MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS
—(a) Effective vector control measures shall be applied to control
flies, rodents, and other insects or vermin when necessary.
(b) Appropriate methods such as fencing and diking shall be pro-
vided within the area to confine solid waste subject to be blown
by the wind. At the conclusion of each day of operation, all
windblown material resulting from the operation shall be col-
lected and ret rned to the area by the owner or operator.
I r- - -1-- ItJ_/
Branch
r. sl0
9 1991
DHS 1709 (Revised 4/85) 0AY
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch (Review 4/86) (white — Raleigh Office yellow — Facility green — Preparer)

4
Purpose: G.S.130A-294 requires that an inspection program be established for the operation of solid
waste management facilities on a statewide basis. The N.C. Solid Waste Management Rules
codified 10 NCAC 10G, Section .0505 list specific operational requirements which must be
followed by sanitary landfills.
Preparation: Solid.4nd Hazardous Waste Branch personnel shall complete the inspection form each time
they conduct an official inspection. The form shall be signed by the person(s) receiving the
report.
DiStributlon: 1. White copy to Raleigh office
2. Yellow copy to facility
3. Green copy to preparer
Disposition: This form may be destroyed in accordance with Standard 7, Inspection Records, of the
Records Disposition Schedule published by the N.C. Division of Archives and History.
Order additional forms from:
Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Branch
Division of Health Services
P. O. Box 2091
Raleigh, NC 27602-Z091

C 01
WEATHER CONDITIONS
AME OF
C/
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
INSPECTION, FOR SANITARY LANDFILLS ' �J
SIGNATURE OF
r
LVLNC,,REPORT
SIR: AN INSPECTION OF YOUR LAND DISPOSAL SITE HAS BEEN MADE THIS DATE AND YOU ARE NOTIFIED OF THE
WITH A CROSS (X).
(1) PLAN AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Construction plans shall be approved and followed.
(b) Specified monitoring and reporting requirements shall be met.
(2) SPREADING AND COMPACTING REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Solid waste shall be restricted into the smallest area feasible.
(b) Solid waste shall be compacted as densely as practical into cells.
(3) C. R REQUIREMENTS
(a) Solid waste shall be covered after each day of operation, with a
compacted layer of at least six inches of suitable cover or as
specified by the division.
— (b) Areas which will not have additional wastes placed on them for
12 months or more shall be covered with a minimum of one foot
of intermediate cover.
(c) After final termination of disposal operations at the site or a
major part thereof or upon revocation of a permit, the area shall
be covered with at least two feet of suitable compacted earth.
(4) EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
(a) Adequate erosion control measures shall be practiced to pre-
(5) fvent silt from leaving the site.
(b) Adequate erosion control measures shall be practiced to pre-
vent excessive on -site erosion.
AINAGE CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Surface water shall be diverted from the operational area.
— (b) Surface water shall not be impounded over or in waste.
—(c) Completed areas shall be adequately sloped to allow surface
water runoff in a controlled manner.
(6) VEGETATION REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Within six months after final termination of disposal operations
at the site on a major part thereof or upon revocation of a
permit, the area shall be stabilized with native grasses.
— (b) Temporary seeding will be utilized as necessary to stabilize the
site.
(7) WATER PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS
— (a) The separation distance of four (4) feet between waste and
water table shall be maintained unless otherwise specified by
the division in the permit.
— (b) Solid waste shall not be disposed of in water.
— (c) Leachate shall be contained on site or properly treated prior to
discharge. An NPDES permit may be required prior to the dis-
charge of leachate to surface waters.
(8) ACCESS AND SECURITY REQUIREMENTS
— (a) The site shall be adequately secured by means of gates, chains,
berms, fences, and other security measures approved by the
division, to prevent unauthorized entry.
— (b) An attendant shall be on duty at the site at all times while it is
open for public use to ensure compliance with operational
requirements.
— (c) The access road to the site shall be of all-weather construction
and maintained in good condition.
— (d) Dust control measures shall be implemented where necessary.
REMARKS:
DATE: NAME:
Solid and
TIONS, IF ANY, MARKED BELOW
C
(9) SIGN REQUIREMENTS
(a) Signs providing information on dumping proceduris, the hours
during which the site i open for public use, the pe mit number
and other pertinent iriformation shall be. post at the site
entrance. I . -'
(b) Signs shall be posted statingthat no hazarOel s or liquid waste
can be received without written perm* on from the division.
— (c) Traffic signs or markers shall be provided as necessary to pro-
mote an orderly traffic pattern to and from the discharge area
and to maintain efficient operating conditions.
(10) SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Open burning of solid waste is prohibited.
— (b) Equipment shall be provided to control accidental fires or
arrangements shall be made with the local fire protection
agency to immediately provide fire -fighting services when
needed.
—(c) Fires that occur at a sanitary landfill shall be reported to the
division within 24 hours and a written notification shall be
submitted within 15Aays.
— (d) The removal of solid waste from a sanitary landfill is prohibited
unless the owner/operator approves and the removal is not
performed on the working face.
— (e) Barrels and drums shall not be disposed of unless they are empty
and perforated sufficiently to ensure that no liquid or hazard-
ous waste is contained therein.
(11) WASTE ACCEPTANCE AND DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
— (a) A site shall only accept those solid wastes which it is permitted to
receive.
— (b) No hazardous, liquid, or infectious waste shall be accepted or
disposed of in a sanitary landfill except as may be approved by
the division.
— (c) Spoiled foods, animal carcasses, abattoir waste, hatchery waste,
and other animal waste delivered to the disposal site shall be
covered immediately.
_ (d) Asbestos waste that is packaged in accordance with 40 CFR 61, as
amended through January 1,1985, may be disposed of separate
and apart from other solid wastes at the bottom of the working
face or in an area not contiguous with other disposal areas, in
either case, in virgin soil. Separate areas shall be clearly marked
so that asbestos is not exposed by future land -disturbing activi-
ties. The waste shall be covered immediately with soil in a
manner that will not cause airborne conditions. Copies of 40
CFR 61 may be obtained and inspected at the Solid and Hazard-
ous Waste Management Branch, Division of Health Services,
P. O. Box 2091, Raleigh, NC, 27602.
(12) MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Effective vector control measures shall be applied to control
flies, rodents, and other insects or vermin when necessary.
— (b) Appropriate methods such as fencing and diking shall be pro-
vided within the area to confine solid waste subject to be blown
by the wind. At the conclusion of each day of operation, all
windblown material resulting from the operation shall be col-
lected and returned to the area by the owner or operator.
Management Branch
DHS 1709 (Revised 4/85)
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch (Review 4/86) (white — Raleigh Office yellow — Facility green — Preparer)
OCT 9 1990

PUrpt": G.S.130A-294 requires that an inspection program be established for the operation of solid
waste management facilities on a statewide basis. The N.C. Solid Waste Management Rules
codified 10 NCAC 10G, Section .0505 list specific operational requirements which must be
followed by sanitary landfills.
PtepB 4010. Solid and Hazardous Waste Branch personnel shall complete the inspection form each time
they conduct an official inspection. The form shall be signed by the person(s) receiving the
report.
01301bUtIM: 1: White copy to Raleigh office
2. Yellow copy to facility
3. Green copy to preparer
WspOStt M: This form may be destroyed in accordance with Standard 7, Inspection Records, of the
Records Disposition Schedule published by the N.C. Division of Archives and History.
Order additional forms from:
Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Branch
Division of Health Services
P. O. Box 2091
Raleigh, NC 27602-;e091

FATHER cbNDITIONS
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
INSPECTION FOR SANITARY LANDFILLS
7411
_p
PER IT NUMBE
SIR: AN INSPECTION OF -YOUR LAND DISPOSAL SITE HAS BEEN MADE THIS DATE AND YOU ARE NOTIFIED OF THE VIOLATIONS, IF ANY, MARKED BELOW
WITH A CROSS (X).
(1) PLAN AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Construction plans shall be approved and followed.
— (b) Specified monitoring and reporting requirements shall be met.
(2) SPREADING AND COMPACTING REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Solid waste shall be restricted into the smallest area feasible.
_(b) Solid waste shall be compacted as densely as practical into cells.
(3) COVER REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Solid waste shall be covered after each day of operation, with a
compacted layer of at least six inches of suitable cover or as
specified by the division.
— (b) Areas which will not have additional wastes placed on them for
12 months or more shall be covered with a minimum of one foot
of intermediate cover.
(c) After final termination of disposal operations at the site or a
major part thereof or upon revocation of a permit, the area shall
be covered with at least two feet of suitable compacted earth.
(4) EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Adequate erosion control measures shall be practiced to pre-
vent silt from leaving the site.
— (b) Adequate erosion control measures shall be practiced to pre-
vent excessive on -site erosion.
(5) DRAINAGE CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
(a) Surface water shall be diverted from the operational area.
— (b) Surface water shall not be impounded over or in waste.
— (c) Completed areas shall be adequately sloped to allow surface
water runoff in a controlled manner.
(6) VEGETATION REQUIREMENTS
(a) Within six months after final termination of disposal operations
at the site on a major part thereof or upon revocation of a
permit, the area shall be stabilized with native grasses.
(b) Temporary seeding will be utilized as necessary to stabilize the
site.
(7) WATER PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS
(a) The separation distance of four (4) feet between waste and
water table shall be maintained unless otherwise specified by
the division in the permit.
— (b) Solid waste shall not be disposed of in water.
— (c) Leachate shall be contained on site or properly treated prior to
discharge. An NPDES permit may be required prior to the dis-
charge of leachate to surface waters.
(8) ACCESS AND SECURITY REQUIREMENTS
— (a) The site shall be adequately secured by means of gates, chains,
berms, fences, and other security measures approved by the
division, to prevent unauthorized entry.
— (b) An attendant shall be on duty at the site at all times while it is
open for public use to ensure compliance with operational
requirements.
— (c) The access road to the site shall be of all-weather construction
and maintained in good condition.
(d) Dust control measures shall be implemented where necessary.
REMARKS:
DATE: Y NAME:
Solid and Hazarj/6us Waste
(9) SIGN REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Signs providing information on dumping proced ures, the hours
during which the site is open for public use, the permit number
and other pertinent information shall be posted at the site
entrance.
— (b) Signs shall be posted stating that no hazardous or liquid waste
can be received without written permission from the division.
(c) Traffic signs or markers shall be provided as necessary to pro-
mote an orderly traffic pattern to and from the discharge area
and to maintain efficient operating conditions.
(10) SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Open burning of solid waste is prohibited.
— (b) Equipment shall be provided to control accidental fires or
arrangements shall be made with the local fire protection
agency to immediately provide fire -fighting services when
needed.
(c) Fires that occur at a sanitary landfill shall be reported to the
division within 24 hours and a written notification shall be
submitted within 15 days.
(d) The removal of solid waste from a sanitary landfill is prohibited
unless the owner/operator approves and the removal is not
performed on the working face.
(e) Barrels and drums shall not be disposed of unless they are empty
and perforated sufficiently to ensure that no liquid or hazard-
ous waste is contained therein.
(11) WASTE ACCEPTANCE AND DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
— (a) A site shall only accept those solid wastes which it is permitted to
receive.
— (b) No hazardous, liquid, or infectious waste shall be accepted or
disposed of in a sanitary landfill except as may be approved by
the division.
— (c) Spoiled foods, animal carcasses, abattoir waste, hatchery waste,
and other animal waste delivered to the disposal site shall be
covered immediately.
(d) Asbestos waste that is packaged in accordance with 40 CFR 61, as
amended through January 1,1985, may be disposed of separate
and apart from other solid wastes at the bottom of the working
face or in an area not contiguous with other disposal areas, in
either case, in virgin soil. Separate areas shall be clearly marked
so that asbestos is not exposed by future land -disturbing activi-
ties. The waste shall be covered immediately with soil in a
manner that will not cause airborne conditions. Copies of 40
CFR 61 may be obtained and inspected at the Solid and Hazard-
ous Waste Management Branch, Division of Health Services,
P. O. Box 2091, Raleigh, NC, 27602.
(12) MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Effective vector control measures shall be applied to control
flies, rodents, and other insects or vermin when necessary.
(b) Appropriate methods such as fencing and diking shall be pro-
vided within the area to confine solid waste subject to be blown
by the wind. At the conclusion of each day of operation, all
windblown material resulting from the operation shall be col-
lected and returned to the area by the owner or operator.
'�1 51 Ai 10A1]
DHS 1709 (Revised 4/85)
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch (Review 4/86) (white — Raleigh Office yellow — Facility green — Preparer)

Purpose: G.S.13OA-294 requires that an inspection program be established for the operation of solid
waste management facilities on a statewide basis. The N.C. Solid Waste Management Rules
codified 10 NCAC 10G, Section .0505 list specific operational requirements which must be
followed by sanitary landfills.
PrOMOV0n: Solid and Hazardous Waste Branch personnel shall complete the inspection form each time
they conduct an official inspection. The form shall be signed by the person(s) receiving the
report.
Distribution: 1. White copy to Raleigh office
2. Yellow copy to facility
3. Green copy to preparer
Disposition: This form may be destroyed in accordance with Standard 7, inspection Records, of the
Records Disposition Schedule published by the N.C. Division of Archives and History.
Order additional forms from:
Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Branch
Division of Health Services
P. O. Box 2091
Raleigh, NC 27602-2091

/ I 7- _ D
--L / N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
WEATHER CONDITIONS DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES P R IT NUM
INSPECTION, FOR SANITARY LANDFILLS
SIGNA
COUNTY
RECEIVING REPORT
SIR: AN INSPECTION OF YOUR LAND DISPOSAL SITE HAS BEEN MADE THIS DATE AND YOU ARE NOTIFIED OF THE VIOLATIONS, IF ANY, MARKED BELOW
WITH A CROSS (X).
(1) PLAN AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
(a) Construction plans shall be approved and followed.
(b) Specified monitoring and reporting requirements shall be met.
(2) SPREADING AND COMPACTING REQUIREMENTS
(a) Solid waste shall be restricted into the smallest area feasible.
— (b) Solid waste shall be compacted as densely as practical into cells.
(3) 6,OYER REQUIREMENTS
(a) Solid waste shall be covered after each day of operation, with a
compacted layer of at least six inches of suitable cover or as
specified by the division.
— (b) Areas which will not have additional wastes placed on them for
12 months or more shall be covered with a minimum of one foot
of intermediate cover.
(c) After final termination of disposal operations at the site or a
major part thereof or upon revocation of a permit, the area shall
be covered with at least two feet of suitable compacted earth.
(4) EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
(a) Adequate erosion control measures shall be practiced to pre-
vent silt from leaving the site.
(b) Adequate erosion control measures shall be practiced to pre-
vent excessive on -site erosion.
(5) D NAGE CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
(a) Surface water shall be diverted from the operational area.
— (b) Surface water shall not be impounded over or in waste.
—(c) Completed areas shall be adequately sloped to allow surface
water runoff in a controlled manner.
(6) VEGETATION REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Within six months after final termination of disposal operations
at the site on a major part thereof or upon revocation of a
permit, the area shall be stabilized with native grasses.
(b) Temporary seeding will be utilized as necessary to stabilize the
site.
(7) WATER PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS
—(a) The separation distance of four (4) feet between waste and
water table shall be maintained unless otherwise specified by
the division in the permit.
(b) Solid waste shall not be disposed of in water.
(c) Leachate shall be contained on site or properly treated prior to
discharge. An NPDES permit may be required prior to the dis-
charge of leachate to surface waters.
(8) ACCESS AND SECURITY REQUIREMENTS
— (a) The site shall be adequately secured by means of gates, chains,
berms, fences, and other security measures approved by the
division, to prevent unauthorized entry.
— (b) An attendant shall be on duty at the site at all times while it is
open for public use to ensure compliance with operational
requirements.
— (c) The access road to the site shall be of all-weather construction
and maintained in good condition.
— (d) Dust control measures shall be implemented where necqssary.
REMARKS:
DATE: NAME:
DHS 1709 (Revised 4/85)
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch (Review 4/86)
(9) SIGN REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Signs providing information on dumping procedures, the hours
during which the site is open for public use, the permit number
and other pertinent information shall be posted at the site
entrance.
— (b) Signs shall be posted stating that no hazardous or liquid waste
can be received without written permission from the division.
_ (c) Traffic signs or markers shall be provided as necessary to pro-
mote an orderly traffic pattern to and from the discharge area
and to maintain efficient operating conditions.
(10) SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Open burning of solid waste is prohibited.
— (b) Equipment shall be provided to control accidental fires or
arrangements shall be made with the local fire protection
agency to immediately provide fire -fighting services when
needed.
— (c) Fires that occur at a sanitary landfill shall be reported to the
division within 24 hours and a written notification shall be
submitted within 15 days.
— (d) The removal of solid waste from a sanitary landfill is prohibited
unless the owner/operator approves and the removal is not
performed on the working face.
— (e) Barrels and drums shall not be disposed of unless they are empty
and perforated sufficiently to ensure that no liquid or hazard-
ous waste is contained therein.
(11) WASTE ACCEPTANCE AND DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
— (a) A site shall only accept those solid wastes which it is permitted to
receive.
— (b) No hazardous, liquid, or infectious waste shall be accepted or
disposed of in a sanitary landfill except as may be approved by
the division.
— (c) Spoiled foods, animal carcasses, abattoir waste, hatchery waste,
and other animal waste delivered to the disposal site shall be
covered immediately.
(d) Asbestos waste that is packaged in accordance with 40 CFR 61, as
amended through January 1,1985, may be disposed of separate
and apart from other solid wastes at the bottom of the working
face or in an area not contiguous with other disposal areas, in
either case, in virgin soil. Separate areas shall be clearly marked
so that asbestos is not exposed by future land -disturbing activi-
ties. The waste shall be covered immediately with soil in a
manner that will not cause airborne conditions. Copies of 40
CFR 61 may be obtained and inspected at the Solid and Hazard-
ous Waste Management Branch, Division of Health Services,
P. O. Box 2091, Raleigh, NC, 27602.
(12) MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Effective vector control measures shall be applied to control
flies, rodents, and other insects or vermin when necessary.
— (b) Appropriate methods such as fencing and diking shall be pro-
vided within the area to confine solid waste subject to be blown
by the wind. At the conclusion of each day of operation, all
windblown material resulting from the operation shall be col -
le ed and retur./ned to the area jay the owner or operator.
ff / / /_
Waste Manaaemev"ranch
(white — Raleigh Office yellow — Facility green — Preparer) O C i 6

Purpose: G.S.130A-294 requires thatan inspection program be established for the operation of solid
waste management facilities on a statewide basis. The N.C. Solid Waste -Management Rules
codified 10 NCAC 10G, Section .0505 list specific operational requirements which must be
followed by sanitary landfills.
Preparation: Solid and Hazardous Waste Branch personnel shall complete the inspection form each time
they conduct an official inspection. The form shall be signed by the person(s) receiving the
report.
Distribution: 1. White copy to Raleigh office
2. Yellow copy to facility
3. Green copy to preparer
Disposition: This form may be destroyed in accordance with Standard 7, Inspection Records, of the
Records Disposition Schedule published by the N.C. Division of Archives and History.
Order additional forms from:
Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Branch
Division of Health Services
P. O. Box 2091
Raleigh, NC 27602-Z091

I_rD 31
_off
PE MIT NUMBER
s
9 N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
JHEIR CONDITIONS DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
INSPECTION, FOR SANITARY LANDFILLS
A
OF ITE COUNTY
- /_ 4 � �Z
LOCATION //�� 7X?7
S'ON(S) CEIVING REPORT
,,-5. 4. (-3
SIR: AN INSPECTION OF YOUR LAND DISPOSAL SITE HAS BEEN MADE THIS DATE AND YOU ARE NOTIFIED OF THE VIOLATIONS, IF ANY, MARKED BELOW
WITH A CROSS (X). ,'`•
(1) PLAN AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Construction plans shall be approved and followed.
— (b) Specified monitoring and reporting requirements shall be met.
(2) SPREADING AND COMPACTING REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Solid waste shall be restricted into the smallest area feasible.
(b) Solid waste shall be compacted as densely as practical into cells.
(3) O ER REQUIREMENTS
(a) Solid waste shall be covered after each day of operation, with a
compacted layer of at least six inches of suitable cover or as
specified by the division.
(b) Areas which will not have additional wastes placed on them for
12 months or more shall be covered with a minimum of one foot
of intermediate cover.
— (c) After final termination of disposal operations at the site or a
major part thereof or upon revocation of a permit, the area shall
be covered with at least two feet of suitable compacted earth.
(4) EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Adequate erosion control measures shall be practiced to pre-
vent silt from leaving the site.
— (b) Adequate erosion control measures shall be practiced to pre-
vent excessive on -site erosion.
(5) DRAINAGE CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
(a) Surface water shall be diverted from the operational area.
Xb) Surface water shall not be impounded over or in waste.
—(c) Completed areas shall be adequately sloped to allow surface
water runoff in a controlled manner.
(6) VEGETATION REQUIREMENTS
(a) Within six months after final termination of disposal operations
at the site on a major part thereof or upon revocation of a
permit, the area shall be stabilized with native grasses.
(b) Temporary seeding will be utilized as necessary to stabilize the
site.
(7) WATER PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS
—(a) The separation distance of four (4) feet between waste and
water table shall be maintained unless otherwise specified by,,
the division in the permit.
X(b) Solid waste shall not be disposed of in water.C)D " ° )
(c) Leachate shall be contained on site or properly treated prior to
discharge. An NPDES permit may be required prior to the dis-
charge of leachate to surface waters.
(8) ACCESS AND SECURITY REQUIREMENTS
(a) The site shall be adequately secured by means of gates chains
(9) SIGN REQUIREMENTS
(a) Signs providing information on dumping procedures,the hours
during which the site is open for public use, the permit number
and other pertinent information shall be posted at the site
entrance.
— (b) Signs shall be posted stating that no hazardous or liquid waste
can be received without written permission from the division.
— (c) Traffic signs or markers shall be provided as necessary to pro-
mote an orderly traffic pattern to and from the discharge area
and to maintain efficient operating conditions.
(10) SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Open burning of solid waste,is prohibited.
— (b) Equipment shall be provided to control accidental fires or
arrangements shall be made with the local fire protection
agency to immediately provide fire -fighting services when
needed.
— (c) Fires that occur at a sanitary landfill shall be reported to the
division within 24 hours and a written notification shall be
submitted within 15 days.
— (d) The removal of solid waste from a sanitary landfill is prohibited
unless the owner/operator approves and the removal is not
performed on the working face.
— (e) Barrels and drums shall not be disposed of unless they are empty
and perforated sufficiently to ensure that no liquid or hazard-
ous waste is contained therein.
(11) WASTE ACCEPTANCE AND DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
— (a) A site shall only accept those solid wastes which it is permitted to
receive.
— (b) No hazardous, liquid, or infectious waste shall be accepted or
disposed of in a sanitary landfill except as may be approved by
the division.
— (c) Spoiled foods, animal carcasses, abattoir waste, hatchery waste,
and other animal waste delivered to the disposal site shall be
covered immediately.
(d) Asbestos waste that is packaged in accordance with 40 CFR 61, as
amended through January 1,1985, may be disposed of separate
and apart from other solid wastes at the bottom of the working
face or in an area not contiguous with other disposal areas, in
either case, in virgin soil. Separate areas shall be clearly marked
so that asbestos is not exposed by future land -disturbing activi-
ties. The waste shall be covered immediately with soil in a
manner that will not cause airborne conditions. Copies of 40
CFR 61 may be obtained and inspected at the Solid and Hazard-
ous Waste Management Branch, Division of Health Services,
P. O. Box 2091, Raleigh, NC, 27602.
berms, fences, and other security measures approved by the (12) MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS
division, to prevent unauthorized entry. _ (a) Effective vector control measures shall be applied to control
— (b) An attendant shall be on duty at the site at all times while it is flies, rodents, and other insects or vermin when necessary.
open for public use to ensure compliance with operational _ (b) Appropriate methods such as fencing and diking shall be pro -
requirements. vided within the area to confine solid waste subject to be blown
(c) The access road to the site shall be of all-weather construction by the wind. At the conclusion of each day of operation, all
and maintained in good condition. windblown material resulting from the operation shall be col -
KS) Dust control measures shall be implemented where necessary. lected and returned to the area by the owner or operator.
REMAR r S/ t %
wa 1Pr „
. t Ti,, J. _ J _I L— _J-__ _.r ,-)n_ — 1/_ _ --I—
f PwA A-5t b-e 005J �rv�3 �Ncre �r;c1<rj /liCeGG� un/
DATE: _ T NAME 1
Solid and HazardoRtwaste Managemen rJhch
DHS 1709 (Revised 4/85)
Solid /&y�Hazardous Waste Management Branch (Review, 4�/86)
�( / ' / �? / i`.GN� .g C45' /N an// !'� F/ a/S
/
(white —,�/ �Ralei h f� }-
d& ]k'C.7�1� . Q 1
yellow — Facility ` een
/ Cr) r ;L. C z_ . ,
— Preparer)
6 �
/V'_
J�%E?} Fy
,

Purpose: G.S.130A-294requires that an inspection program be established for the operation of solid
waste management facilities on a statewide basis. The N.C. Solid Waste Management Rules
codified 10 NCAC 10G, Section .0505 list specific operational requirements which must be
followed by sanitary landfills.
Preparation: Solid and Hazardous Waste Branch personnel shall complete the inspection form each time
they conduct an official inspection. The form shall be signed by the person(s) receiving the
report.
Distribution: 1. White copy to Raleigh office
2. Yellow copy to facility
3. Green copy to preparer
Disposition: This form may be destroyed in accordance with Standard 7, Inspection Records, of the
Records Disposition Schedule published by the N.C. Division of Archives and History.
Order additional forms from:
Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Branch
Division of Health Services
P. O. Box 2091
Raleigh, NC 27602-Z091

- A.. - /' J;., 1,4 14
WEAy ER CON I ONS
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
INSPECTION, FOR SANITARY LANDFILLS
7�-o
- i
PER IT NUMBER
WITH A CROSS (X).
(1) PLAN AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Construction plans shall be approved and followed.
(b) Specified monitoring and reporting requirements shall be met.
(2) SPREADING AND COMPACTING REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Solid waste shall be restricted into the smallest area feasible.
(b) Solid waste shall be compacted as densely as practical into cells.
(3) COVER REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Solid waste shall be covered after each day of operation, with a
compacted layer of at least six inches of suitable cover or as
specified by the division.
(b) Areas which will not have additional wastes placed on them for
12 months or more shall be covered with a minimum of one foot
of intermediate cover.
— (c) After final termination of disposal operations at the site or a
major part thereof or upon revocation of a permit, the area shall
be covered with at least two feet of suitable compacted earth.
(4) EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
(a) Adequate erosion control measures shall be practiced to pre-
vent silt from leaving the site.
(b) Adequate erosion control mea res shall be racticed to pre-
vent excessive on -site erosiort��b�S
pl DRAINAGE CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
(a) Surface water shall be diverted from the operational area.
— (b) Surface water shall not be impounded over or in waste.
— (c) Completed areas shall be adequately sloped to allow surface
water runoff in a controlled manner.
(6) VEGETATION REQUIREMENTS
(a) Within six months after final termination of disposal operations
at the site on a major part thereof or upon revocation of a
permit, the area shall be stabilized with native grasses.
(b) Temporary seeding will be utilized as necessary to stabilize the
site.
(7) WATER PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS
— (a) The separation distance of four (4) feet between waste and
water table shall be maintained unless otherwise specified by
the division in the permit.
— (b) Solid waste shall not be disposed of in water.
— (c) Leachate shall be contained on site or properly treated prior to
discharge. An NPDES permit may be required prior to the dis-
charge of leachate to surface waters.
(8) ACCESS AND SECURITY REQUIREMENTS
— (a) The site shall be adequately secured by means of gates, chains,
berms, fences, and other security measures approved by the
division, to prevent unauthorized entry.
— (b) An attendant shall be on duty at the site at all times while it is
open for public use to ensure compliance with operational
requirements.
(c) The access road to the site shall be of all-weather construction
and maintained in good condition.
(d) Dustcontrolmeasures shall be implemented where necessary.
`
REMARKS: 'OA'0 '0�"A L_ !"' K —
(9) SIGN REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Signs providing information on dumping procedures, the hours
during which the site is open for public use, the permit number
and other pertinent information shall be posted at the site
entrance.
— (b) Signs shall be posted stating that no hazardous or liquid waste
can be received without written permission from the division.
— (c) Traffic signs or markers shall be provided as necessary to pro-
mote an orderly traffic pattern to and from the discharge area
and to maintain efficient operating conditions.
(10) SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
(a) Open burning of solid waste is prohibited.
— (b) Equipment shall be provided to control accidental fires or
arrangements shall be made with the local fire protection
agency to immediately provide fire -fighting services when
needed.
— (c) Fires that occur at a sanitary landfill shall be reported to the
division within 24 hours and a written notification shall be
submitted within 15 days.
_ (d) The removal of solid waste from a sanitary landfill is prohibited
unless the owner/operator approves and the removal is not
performed on the working face.
— (e) Barrels and drums shall not be disposed of unless they are empty
and perforated sufficiently to ensure that no liquid or hazard-
ous waste is contained therein.
(11) WASTE ACCEPTANCE AND DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
— (a) A site shall only accept those solid wastes which it is permitted to
receive.
(b) No hazardous, liquid, or infectious waste shall be accepted or
disposed of in a sanitary landfill except as may be approved by
the division.
— (c) Spoiled foods, animal carcasses, abattoir waste, hatchery waste,
and other animal waste delivered to the disposal site shall be
covered immediately.
— (d) Asbestos waste that is packaged in accordance with 40 CFR 61, as
amended through January 1,1985, may be disposed of separate
and apart from other solid wastes at the bottom of the working
face or in an area not contiguous with other disposal areas, in
either case, in virgin soil. Separate areas shall be clearly marked
so that asbestos is not exposed by future land -disturbing activi-
ties. The waste shall be covered immediately with soil in a
manner that will not cause airborne conditions. Copies of 40
CFR 61 may be obtained and inspected at the Solid and Hazard-
ous Waste Management Branch, Division of Health Services,
P. O. Box 2091, Raleigh, NC, 27602.
(12) MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Effective vector control measures shall be applied to control
flies, rodents, and other insects or vermin when necessary.
_ (b) Appropriate methods such as fencing and diking shall be pro-
vided within the area to confine solid waste subject to be blown
by the wind. At the conclusion of each day of operation, all
windblown material resulting from the operation shall be col-
lected nd returned to the area kty the�wner or operator.
s
R►
DATE: 7NAME-
Sari —and Hazard
DHS 1709 (Revised 4/85)
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch (Review 4/86) (white — Raleigh 0/le yellow — Facility een — Preparer)

Purpose: G.S.130A-294 requires that an inspection program be established for?the'operation of solid
waste management facilities on a statewide basis. The N.C. Solid Waste Management Rules
codified 10 NCAC 10G, Section .0505 list specific operational requirements which must be
followed by sanitary landfills.
Preparation: Solid and Hazardous Waste Branch personnel shall complete the inspection form each time
they conduct an official inspection. The form shall be signed by the person(s) receiving the
report.
Distribution: 1. White copy to Raleigh office
2. Yellow copy to facility
3. Green copy to preparer
Disposition: This form may be destroyed in accordance with Standard 7, Inspection Records, of the
Records Disposition Schedule published by the N.C. Division of Archives and History.
Order additional forms from:
Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Branch
Division of Health Services
P. O. Box 2091
Raleigh, NC 27602-Z091

i�� 00 /1 1
WEATHE CONDITIONS
RECE�
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESO CES F�
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVIC PERMIT NUMBER
INSPECTIONFOR SANITARY LAN FILLS
2
'ME OF TE
1,aA Zd
t�"
'175UNTY
P; Y
LOCATION
r
SIGNAWPE OF $).R
REPORT
SIR: AN INSPECTION OF YOUR LAND DISPOSAL SITE HAS BEEN MADE THIS DATE AND YOU ARE NOTIFIED OF THE VIOLATIONS, IF ANY, MARKED BELOW
WITH A CROSS (X).
(1) PLAN AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Construction plans shall be approved and followed.
— (b) Specified monitoring and reporting requirements shall be met.
(2) SPREADING AND COMPACTING REQUIREMENTS
(a) Solid waste shall be restricted into the smallest area feasible.
(b) Solid waste shall be compacted as densely as practical into cells.
(3) COVER REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Solid waste shall be covered after each day of operation, with a
compacted layer of at least six inches of suitable cover or as
specified by the division.
— (b) Areas which will not have additional wastes placed on them for
12 months or more shall be covered with a minimum of one foot
of intermediate cover.
(c) After final termination of disposal operations at the site or a
major part thereof or upon revocation of a permit, the area shall
be covered with at least two feet of suitable compacted earth.
(4) EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
(a) Adequate erosion control measures shall be practiced to pre-
vent silt from leaving the site.
(b) Adequate erosion control measures shall beypracticed to pre-
vent excessive on -site erosion.Cjrf��pf J
DRAINAGE CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
(a) Surface water shall be diverted from the operational area.
(b) Surface water shall not be impounded over or in waste.
_,,
(c) Completed areas shall be adequately sloped to allow surface
water runoff in a controlled manner.
(6) VEGETATION REQUIREMENTS
(a) Within six months after final termination of disposal operations
at the site on a major part thereof or upon revocation of a
permit, the area shall be stabilized with native grasses.
— (b) Temporary seeding will be utilized as necessary to stabilize the
site.
(7) WATER PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS
(a) The separation distance of four (4) feet between waste and
water table shall be maintained unless otherwise specified by
the division in the permit.
(b) Solid waste shall not be disposed of in water.
(c) Leachate shall be contained on site or properly treated prior to
discharge. An NPDES permit may be required prior to the dis-
charge of leachate to surface waters.
(8) ACCESS AND SECURITY REQUIREMENTS
(a) The site shall be adequately secured by means of gates, chains,
berms, fences, and other security measures approved by the
division, to prevent unauthorized entry.
— (b) An attendant shall be on duty at the site at all times while it is
open for public use to ensure compliance with operational
requirements.
(c) The access road to the site shall be of all-weather construction
and maintained in good condition.
— (d) Dust control measures shall be implemented where necessary.
REMARKS:
nL
00 e
DATE: / ys NAME:
Soli
(9) SIGN REQUIREMENTS
(a) Signs providing information on dumping procedures, the hours
during which the site is open for public use, the permit number
and other pertinent information shall be posted at the site
entrance.
— (b) Signs shall be posted stating that no hazardous or liquid waste
can be received without written permission from the division.
— (c) Traffic signs or markers shall be provided as necessary to pro-
mote an orderly traffic pattern to and from the discharge area
and to maintain efficient operating conditions.
(10) SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Open burning of solid waste is prohibited.
— (b) Equipment shall be provided to control accidental fires or
arrangements shall be made with the local fire protection
agency to immediately provide fire -fighting services when
needed.
— (c) Fires that occur at a sanitary landfill shall be reported to the
division within 24 hours and a written notification shall be
submitted within 15 days.
— (d) The removal of solid waste from a sanitary landfill is prohibited
unless the owner/operator approves and the removal is not
performed on the working face.
— (e) Barrels and drums shall not be disposed of unless they are empty
and perforated sufficiently to ensure that no liquid or hazard-
ous waste is contained therein.
(11) WASTE ACCEPTANCE AND DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
—(a) A site shall only accept those solid wastes which it is permitted to
receive.
— (b) No hazardous, liquid, or infectious waste shall be accepted or
disposed of in a sanitary landfill except as may be approved by
the division.
— (c) Spoiled foods, animal carcasses, abattoir waste, hatchery waste,
and other animal waste delivered to the disposal site shall be
covered immediately.
(d) Asbestos waste that is packaged in accordance with 40 CFR 61, as
amended through January 1,1985, may be disposed of separate
and apart from other solid wastes at the bottom of the working
face or in an area not contiguous with other disposal areas, in
either case, in virgin soil. Separate arly marked
so that asbestos is not exposed $I g activi-
ties. The waste shall be c ed 11 h ll in a
manner that will not cau irborne conditions. Copi `�f 40
CFR 61 maybe obtained d inspected at the Solid and H 4rd-
ous Waste Manageme ranch, Division of Health Ser '�,es,
P. O. Box 2091, Raleig C, 27602. 11!
(12) MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREME S Jul- W
— (a) Effective vector contro easures shall be applied to co of
flies, rodents, and other sects or vermin when necessar .
— (b) Appropriate methods su as f ncing and diking shall ro-
vided within the area to co d waste subje [own
by the wind. At the conclus 4e ion, all
windblown material resulting fr all be col-
lected and returned to the area h- t or operator.
Waste Management
DHS 1709 (Revised 4/85)
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch (Review 4/86) (white — Raleigh Off a yellow — Facility green — Preparer)

Purpose: G.S.130A-294 requires that an inspection program be established for the operation of solid
waste management facilities on a statewide basis. The N.C. Solid Waste Management Rules
codified 10 NCAC 10G, Section .0505 list specific operational requirements which must be
followed by sanitary landfills.
Preparation: Solid and Hazardous Waste Branch personnel shall complete the inspection form each time
they conduct an official inspection. The form shall be signed by the person(s) receiving the
report.
Distribution: 1. White copy to Raleigh office
2. Yellow copy to facility
3. Green copy to preparer
Disposition: This form may be destroyed in accordance with Standard 7, Inspection Records, of the
Records Disposition Schedule published by the N.C. Division of Archives and History.
Order additional forms from:
Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Branch
Division of Health Services
P. O. Box 2091
Raleigh, NC 27602-Z091

'/-/ y -e 4e
► n 7�1
—
'of� \, N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES,, r , 0
WEATHER CONDITIONS i DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES .�'� '��� PERMIT NUMBER
INSPECTION, FOR SANITARY LANDFILL'i
�i
Nr . s�ET /n r i n , //
LOCATION I S,F� A E PER � RECEhVIN�c,� RT
SIR: AN INSPECTION OF YOUR LAND DISPOSAL SITE HAS BEEN MADE THIS DATE AND YOU ARE NOTIFIED OF THE VIOLATIONS, IF ANY, MARKED BELOW
WITH A CROSS (X).
(1) PLAN AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Construction plans shall be approved and followed.
— (b) Specified monitoring and reporting requirements shall be met.
(2) SPREADING AND COMPACTING REQUIREMENTS
(a) Solid waste shall be restricted into the smallest area feasible.
(b) Solid waste shall be compacted as densely as practical into cells.
(3) CCIVREQUIREMENTS
(a) Solid waste shall be covered after each day of operation, with a
compacted layer of at least six inches of suitable cover or as
specified by the division.
(b) Areas which will not have additional wastes placed on them for
12 months or more shall be covered with a minimum of one foot
of intermediate cover.
(c) After final termination of disposal operations at the site or a
major part thereof or upon revocation of a permit, the area shall
be covered with at least two feet of suitable compacted earth.
(4) EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
(a) Adequate erosion control measures shall be practiced to pre-
vent silt from leaving the site.
(b) Adequate erosion control measures shall be practiced to pre-
vent excessive on -site erosion.
(,,1 DRAINAGE CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Surface water shall be diverted from the operational area.
— (b) Surface water shall not be impounded over or in waste.
— (c) Completed areas shall be adequately sloped to allow surface
water runoff in a controlled manner.
(6) VEGETATION REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Within six months after final termination of disposal operations
at the site on a major part thereof or upon revocation of a
permit, the area shall be stabilized with native grasses.
— (b) Temporary seeding will be utilized as necessary to stabilize the
site.
(7) WATER PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS
— (a) The separation distance of four (4) feet between waste and
water table shall be maintained unless otherwise specified by
the division in the permit.
(b) Solid waste shall not be disposed of in water.
— (c) Leachate shall be contained on site or properly treated prior to
discharge. An NPDES permit may be required prior to the dis-
charge of leachate to surface waters.
(8) ACCESS AND SECURITY REQUIREMENTS
— (a) The site shall be adequately secured by means of gates, chains,
berms, fences, and other security measures approved by the
division, to prevent unauthorized entry.
— (b) An attendant shall be on duty at the site at all times while it is
open for public use to ensure compliance with operational
requirements.
— (c) The access road to the site shall be of all-weather construction
and maintained in good condition.
— (d) Dust control measureAshall be implemented where necessary.
REMARKS
/_ ,
DATE: / tNAME:
r L—`
and Hazardods Waste
(9) SIGN REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Signs providing information on dumping procedures,the hours
during which the site is open for public use, the permit number
and other pertinent information shall be posted at the site
entrance.
— (b) Signs shall be posted stating that no hazardous or liquid waste
can be received without written permission from the division.
— (c) Traffic signs or markers shall be provided as necessary to pro-
mote an orderly traffic pattern to and from the discharge area
and to maintain efficient operating conditions.
(10) SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Open burning of solid waste is prohibited.
— (b) Equipment shall be provided to control accidental fires or
arrangements shall be made with the local fire protection
agency to immediately provide fire -fighting services when
needed.
— (c) Fires that occur at a sanitary landfill shall be reported to the
division within 24 hours and a written notification shall be
submitted within 15 days.
— (d) The removal of solid waste from a sanitary landfill is prohibited
unless the owner/operator approves and the removal is not
performed on the working face.
— (e) Barrels and drums shall not be disposed of unless they are empty
and perforated sufficiently to ensure that no liquid or hazard-
ous waste is contained therein.
(11) WASTE ACCEPTANCE AND DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
— (a) A site shall only accept those solid wastes which it is permitted to
receive.
— (b) No hazardous, liquid, or infectious waste shall be accepted or
disposed of in a sanitary landfill except as may be approved by
the division.
— (c) Spoiled foods, animal carcasses, abattoir waste, hatchery waste,
and other animal waste delivered to the disposal site shall be
covered immediately.
(d) Asbestos waste that is packaged in accordance with 40 CFR 61, as
amended through January 1,1985, may be disposed of separate
and apart from other solid wastes at the bottom of the working
face or in an area not contiguous with other disposal areas, in
either case, in virgin soil. Separate areas shall be clearly marked
so that asbestos is not exposed by future land -disturbing activi-
ties. The waste shall be covered immediately with soil in a
manner that will not cause airborne conditions. Copies of 40
CFR 61 may be obtained and inspected at the Solid and Hazard-
ous Waste Management Branch, Division of Health Services,
P. O. Box 2091, Raleigh, NC, 27602.
(12) MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Effective vector control measures shall be applied to control
flies, rodents, and other insects or vermin when necessary.
(b) Appropriate methods such as fencing and diking shall be pro-
vided within the area to confine solid waste subject to be blown
by the wind. At the conclusion of each day of operation, all
windblown material resulting from the operation shall be col-
lected ansl returned to the area by the owner or operator.
DHS 1709 (Revised 4/85)
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch (Review 4/86) (white — Raleig O ce yellow — Facility green — Preparer)

Purpose: G.S.130A-294 requires that an inspection program be established for the operation of solid
waste management facilities on a statewide basis. The N.C. Solid Waste Management Rules
codified 10 NCAC 10G, Section .0505 list specific operational requirements which must be
followed by sanitary landfills.
Preparation: Solid and Hazardous Waste Branch personnel shall complete the inspection form each time
they conduct an official inspection. The form shall be signed by the person(s) receiving the
report.
Distribution: 1. White copy to Raleigh office
2. Yellow copy to facility
3. Green copy to preparer
U15poSitio, This -form maybe destroyed in accordance with Standard 7, Inspection Records, of the
Records Disposition Schedule published by the N.C. Division. of Archives and History.
Order additional forms from:
Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Branch
Division of Health Services
P. O. Box 2091
Raleigh, NC 27602-Z091

WEATHER CONDITIONS
NAME
N
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES ---
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES �, 3 4PERMITMBER
INSPECTION- FOR SANITARY LANDFILLS
,,rye COUNTY��`'.
p'7'// - - S WASTE/
//
SIGNATURE OF PERSON(S) RECEIVING REPORT
SIR: AN INSPECTION OF YOUR LAND DISPOSAL SITE HAS BEEN MADE THIS DATtAND YOU ARE NOTIFIED OF THE VIOLATIONS, IF ANY, MARKED BELOW
WITH A CROSS (X).
(1) PLAN AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Construction plans shall be approved and followed.
— (b) Specified monitoring and reporting requirements shall be met.
(2) SPREADING AND COMPACTING REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Solid waste shall be restricted into the smallest area feasible.
_(b) Solid waste shall be compacted as densely as practical into cells.
(3) COVER REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Solid waste shall be covered after each day of operation, with a
compacted layer of at least six inches of suitable cover or as
specified by the division.
— (b) Areas which will not have additional wastes placed on them for
12 months or more shall be covered with a minimum of one foot
of intermediate cover.
— (c) After final termination of disposal operations at the site or a
major part thereof or upon revocation of a permit, the area shall
be covered with at least two feet of suitable compacted earth.
(4) EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Adequate erosion control measures shall be practiced to pre-
vent silt from leaving the site.
(b) Adequate erosion control measures shall be practiced to pre-
vent excessive on -site erosion.
DRAINAGE CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
(a) Surface water shall be diverted from the operational area.
— (b) Surface water shall not be impounded over or in waste.
— (c) Completed areas shall be adequately sloped to allow surface
water runoff in a controlled manner.
(6) VEGETATION REQUIREMENTS
(a) Within six months after final termination of disposal operations
at the site on a major part thereof or upon revocation of a
permit, the area shall be stabilized with native grasses.
(b) Temporary seeding will be utilized as necessary to stabilize the
site.
(7) WATER PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS
— (a) The separation distance of four (4) feet between waste and
water table shall be maintained unless otherwise specified by
the division in the permit.
— (b) Solid waste shall not be disposed of in water.
— (c) Leachate shall be contained on site or properly treated prior to
discharge. An NPDES permit may be required prior to the dis-
charge of leachate to surface waters.
(8) ACCESS AND SECURITY REQUIREMENTS
— (a) The site shall be adequately secured by means of gates, chains,
berms, fences, and other security measures approved by the
division, to prevent unauthorized entry.
— (b) An attendant shall be on duty at the site at all times while it is
open for public use to ensure compliance with operational
requirements.
(c) The access road to the site shall be of all-weather construction
and maintained in good condition.
(d) Dust control measures shall be implemented where necessary.
REMARKS
DATE: //9 _ ly 7 NAME:
(9) SIGN REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Signs providing information on dumping procedures, the hours
during which the site is open for public use, the permit number
and other pertinent information shall be posted at the site
entrance.
— (b) Signs shall be posted stating that no hazardous or liquid waste
can be received without written permission from the division.
— (c) Traffic signs or markers shall be provided as necessary to pro-
mote an orderly traffic pattern to and from the discharge area
and to maintain efficient operating conditions.
(10) SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Open burning of solid waste is prohibited.
(b) Equipment shall be provided to control accidental fires or
arrangements shall be made with the local fire protection
agency to immediately provide fire -fighting services when
needed.
— (c) Fires that occur at a sanitary landfill shall be reported to the
division within 24 hours and a written notification shall be
submitted within 15 days.
_ (d) The removal of solid waste from a sanitary landfill is prohibited
unless the owner/operator approves and the removal is not
performed on the working face.
— (e) Barrels and drums shall not be disposed of unless they are empty
and perforated sufficiently to ensure that no liquid or hazard-
ous waste is contained therein.
(11) WASTE ACCEPTANCE AND DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
(a) A site shall only accept those solid wastes which it is permitted to
receive.
— (b) No hazardous, liquid, or infectious waste shall be accepted or
disposed of in a sanitary landfill except as may be approved by
the division.
— (c) Spoiled foods, animal carcasses, abattoir waste, hatchery waste,
and other animal waste delivered to the disposal site shall be
covered immediately.
— (d) Asbestos waste that is packaged in accordance with 40 CFR 61, as
amended through January 1,1985, may be disposed of separate
and apart from other solid wastes at the bottom of the working
face or in an area not contiguous with other disposal areas, in
either case, in virgin soil. Separate areas shall be clearly marked
so that asbestos is not exposed by future land -disturbing activi-
ties. The waste shall be covered immediately with soil in a
manner that will not cause airborne conditions. Copies of 40
CFR 61 may be obtained and inspected at the Solid and Hazard-
ous Waste Management Branch, Division of Health Services,
P. O. Box 2091, Raleigh, NC, 27602.
(12) MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Effective vector control measures shall be applied to control
flies, rodents, and other insects or vermin when necessary.
— (b) Appropriate methods such as fencing and diking shall be pro-
vided within the area to confine solid waste subject to be blown
by the wind. At the conclusion of each day of operation, all
windblown material resulting from the operation shall be col-
lected and returned to the area by the owner or operator.
F /i'
Solid and Hazard s Waste Management
DHS 1709 (Revised 4/85)/ r �a' • ��"
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch (Review 4/86) (white — Raleigh Office yellow — Facility green — Preparer)

Purpose: G.S.130A-294 requires that an inspection program be established for the operation of solid
waste management facilities on a statewide basis. The N.C. Solid Waste Management Rules
codified 10 NCAC 10G, Section .0505 list specific operational requirements which must be
followed by sanitary landfills.
Preparation: Solid and Hazardous Waste Branch personnel shall complete the inspection form each time
they conduct an official inspection. The form shall be signed by the person(s) receiving the
report.
Distribution: 1. White copy to Raleigh office
2. Yellow copy to facility
3. Green copy to preparer
Disposition: This form may be destroyed in accordance with Standard 7, Inspection Records, of the
Records Disposition Schedule published by the N.C. Division of Archives and History.
Order additional forms from:
Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Branch
Division of Health Services
P. O. Box 2091
Raleigh, NC 27602-A91
A r � VA'
irV4� Yi

N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES___,_--
WEATHEk CONDITIONS DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES ~'Gi )/ ;''wERMIT NUM R
INSPECTION, FOR SANITARY LAND6>��'-
4
t;
23 )Dal
LOCATION / �% f SIGNATURE O /�(SON(S) RECEIVII� PORT
SIR: AN INSPECTION OF YOUR LAND DISPOSAL SITE HAS BEEN MADE THIS DATE AND YOU ARE NOTIFIED -OF THE VIOLATIONS, IF ANY, MARKED BELOW
WITH A CROSS (X).
(1) PLAN AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
_ (a) Construction plans shall be approved and followed.
— (b) Specified monitoring and reporting requirements shall be met.
(2) SPREADING AND COMPACTING REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Solid waste shall be restricted into the smallest area feasible.
(b) Solid waste shall be compacted as densely as practical into cells.
(3) COVER REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Solid waste shall be covered after each day of operation, with a
compacted layer of at least six inches of suitable cover or as
specified by the division.
(b) Areas which will not have additional wastes placed on them for
12 months or more shall be covered with a minimum of one foot
of intermediate cover.
— (c) After final termination of disposal operations at the site or a
major part thereof or upon revocation of a permit, the area shall
be covered with at least two feet of suitable compacted earth.
(4) EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Adequate erosion control measures shall be practiced to pre-
vent silt from leaving the site.
(b) Adequate erosion control measures shall be practiced to pre-
vent excessive on -site erosion.
(5) DRAINAGE CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Surface water shall be diverted from the operational area.
— (b) Surface water shall not be impounded over or in waste.
— (c) Completed areas shall be adequately sloped to allow surface
water runoff in a controlled manner.
(6) VEGETATION REQUIREMENTS
(a) Within six months after final termination of disposal operations
at the site on a major part thereof or upon revocation of a
permit, the area shall be stabilized with native grasses.
(b) Temporary seeding will be utilized as necessary to stabilize the
site.
(7) WATER PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS
(a) The separation distance of four (4) feet between waste and
water table shall be maintained unless otherwise specified by
the division in the permit.
— (b) Solid waste shall not be disposed of in water.
— (c) Leachate shall be contained on site or properly treated prior to
discharge. An NPDES permit may be required prior to the dis-
charge of leachate to surface waters.
(8) ACCESS AND SECURITY REQUIREMENTS
— (a) The site shall be adequately secured by means of gates, chains,
berms, fences, and other security measures approved by the
division, to prevent unauthorized entry.
— (b) An attendant shall be on duty at the site at all times while it is
open for public use to ensure compliance with operational
requirements.
— (c) The access road to the site shall be of all-weather construction
and maintained in good condition.
— (d) Dust control 7(� j
meea_ures shall be implemented where necessary.
�f• / DEAA ADVC• IAA 19 moJ jou <
DATE: I—CIV
NAME:
So I and
(9) SIGN REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Signs providing information on dumping procedures, the hours
during which the site is open for public use, the permit number
and other pertinent information shall be posted at the site
entrance.
— (b) Signs shall be posted stating that no hazardous or liquid waste
can be received without written permission from the division.
(c) Traffic signs or markers shall be provided as necessary to pro-
mote an orderly traffic pattern to and from the discharge area
and to maintain efficient operating conditions.
(10) SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
(a) Open burning of solid waste is prohibited.
— (b) Equipment shall be provided to control accidental fires or
arrangements shall be made with the local fire protection
agency to immediately provide fire -fighting services when
needed.
— (c) Fires that occur at a sanitary landfill shall be reported to the
division within 24 hours and a written notification shall be
submitted within 15 days.
_ (d) The removal of solid waste from a sanitary landfill is prohibited
unless the owner/operator approves and the removal is not
performed on the working face.
_(e) Barrels and drumsshall not be disposed of unless they are empty
and perforated sufficiently to ensure that no liquid or hazard-
ous waste is contained therein.
(11) WASTE ACCEPTANCE AND DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
— (a) A site shall only accept those solid wastes which it is permitted to
receive.
— (b) No hazardous, liquid, or infectious waste shall be accepted or
disposed of in a sanitary landfill except as may be approved by
the division.
— (c) Spoiled foods, animal carcasses, abattoir waste, hatchery waste,
and other animal waste delivered to the disposal site shall be
covered immediately.
— (d) Asbestos waste that is packaged in accordance with 40 CFR 61, as
amended through January 1,1985, may be disposed of separate
and apart from other solid wastes at the bottom of the working
face or in an area not contiguous with other disposal areas, in
either case, in virgin soil. Separate areas shall be clearly marked
so that asbestos is not exposed by future land -disturbing activi-
ties. The waste shall be covered immediately with soil in a
manner that will not cause airborne conditions. Copies of 40
CFR 61 may be obtained and inspected at the Solid and Hazard-
ous Waste Management Branch, Division of Health Services,
P. O. Box 2091, Raleigh, NC, 27602.
(12) MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS
(a) Effective vector control measures shall be applied to control
flies, rodents, and other insects or vermin when necessary.
(b) Appropriate methods such as fencing and diking shall be pro-
vided within the area to confine solid waste subject to be blown
by the wind. At the conclusion of each day of operation, all
windblown material resulting from the operation shall be
col-lected and returned to the area by the owner or operator.
Waste Manal—ertlfent Bra
DHS 1709 (Revised 4/85)
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch (Review 4/86) (white — Raleigh ffice yellow — Facility green — Preparer)

Purpose: G.S.130A-294 requires that an inspection program be established for the operation of solid
waste management facilities on a statewide basis. The N:C. Solid Waste Management Rules
codified 10 NCAC 10G, Section .0505 list specific operational requirements which must be
followed by sanitary landfills.
Preparation: Solid and Hazardous Waste Branch personnel shall complete the inspection form each time
they conduct an official inspection. The form shall be signed by the person(s) receiving the
report.
Distribution: 1. White copy to Raleigh office
2. Yellow copy to facility
3. Green copy to preparer
Disposition: This form may be destroyed in accordance with Standard 7, Inspection Records, of the
Records Disposition Schedule published by the N.C. Division of Archives and History.
Order additional forms from:
Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Branch
Division of Health Services
P. O. Box 2091
Raleigh, NC 27602-Z091

/! i� N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURC El
WEATHER CONDITIONS DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES Its�,
INSPECTION FOR SANITARY LANDFIL �
Jim
.ME OF SITE /
LOCATION SIGNATURE OF PERSO �CEIVI
TE
AS
T.o.
PERMIT NUMBER
SIR: AN INSPECTION OF YOUR LAND DISPOSAL SITE HAS BEEN MADE THIS DATE AND YOU ARE NOTIFIED OF THE VIOLATIONS, IF ANY, MARKED BELOW
WITH A CROSS (X).
(1) PLAN AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
-- (a) Construction plans shall be approved and followed.
__(b) Specified monitoring and reporting requirements shall be met.
(2) SPREADING AND COMPACTING REQUIREMENTS
(a) Solid waste shall be restricted into the smallest area feasible.
(b) Solid waste shall be compacted as densely as practical into cells.
(3) COVER REQUIREMENTS
(a) Solid waste shall be covered after each day of operation, with a
compacted layer of at least six inches of suitable cover or as
specified by the division.
—.._ (b) Areas which will not have additional wastes placed on them for
12 months or more shall be covered with a minimum of one foot
of intermediate cover.
__— (c) After final termination of disposal operations at the site or a
major part thereof or upon revocation of a permit, the area shall
be covered with at least two feet of suitable compacted earth.
(4) EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
_ (a) Adequate erosion control measures shall be practiced to pre -
Vent silt from leaving the site.
# (b) Adequate erosion control measures shall be practiced to pre-
' \ vent excessive on -site erosion.
(5) DRAINAGE CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
(a) Surface water shall be diverted from the operational area.
(b) Surface water shall not be impounded over or in waste.
_ (c) Completed areas shall be adequately sloped to allow surface
water runoff in a controlled manner.
(6) VEGETATION REQUIREMENTS
—. (a) Within six months after final termination of disposal operations
at the site on a major part thereof or upon revocation of a
permit, the area shall be stabilized with native grasses.
— (b) Temporary seeding will be utilized as necessary to stabilize the
site.
(7) WATER PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS
(a) The separation distance of four (4) feet between waste and
water table shall be maintained unless otherwise specified by
the division in the permit.
(b) Solid waste shall not be disposed of in water.
(c) Leachate shall be contained on site or properly treated prior to
discharge. An NPDES permit may be required prior to the dis-
charge of leachate to surface waters.
(8) ACCESS AND SECURITY REQUIREMENTS
(a) The site shall be adequately secured by means of gates, chains,
berms, fences, and other security measures approved by the
division, to prevent unauthorized entry.
(b) An attendant shall be on duty at the site at all times while it is
open for public use to ensure compliance with operational
requirements.
(c) The access road to the site shall be of all-weather construction
and maintained in good condition.
(d) Dust control measures shall be implemented where necessary.
REMARKS.
(9) SIGN REQUIREMENTS
(a) Signs providing information on dumping procedures, the hours
during which the site is open for public use, the permit number
and other pertinent information shall be posted at the site
entrance.
— (b) Signs shall be posted stating that no hazardous or liquid waste
can be received without written permission from the division.
(c) Traffic signs or markers shall be provided as necessary to pro-
mote an orderly traffic pattern to and from the discharge area
and to maintain efficient operating conditions.
(10) SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Open burning of solid waste is prohibited.
—(b) Equipment shall be provided to control accidental fires or
arrangements shall be made with the local fire protection
agency to immediately provide fire -fighting services when
needed.
(c) Fires that occur at a sanitary landfill shall be reported to the
division within 24 hours and a written notification shall be
submitted within 15 days.
(d) The removal of solid waste from a sanitary landfill is prohibited
unless the owner/operator approves and the removal is not
performed on the working face.
(e) Barrels and drums shall not be disposed of unless they are empty
and perforated sufficiently to ensure that no liquid or hazard-
ous waste is contained therein.
(11) WASTE ACCEPTANCE AND DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
— (a) A site shall only accept those solid wastes which it is permitted to
receive.
— (b) No hazardous, liquid, or infectious waste shall be accepted or
disposed of in a sanitary landfill except as may be approved by
the division.
— (c) Spoiled foods, animal carcasses, abattoir waste, hatchery waste,
and other animal waste delivered to the disposal site shall be
covered immediately.
(d) Asbestos waste that is packaged in accordance with 40 CFR 61, as
amended through January 1,1985, may be disposed of separate
and apart from other solid wastes at the bottom of the working
face or in an area not contiguous with other disposal areas, in
either case, in virgin soil. Separate areas shall be clearly marked
so that asbestos is not exposed by future land -disturbing activi-
ties. The waste shall be covered immediately with soil in a
mannerthat will not cause airborne conditions. Copies of 40
CFR 61 may be obtained and inspected at the Solid and Hazard-
ous Waste Management Branch, Division of Health Services,
P. O. Box 2091, Raleigh, NC, 27602.
(12) MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS
(a) Effective vector control measures shall be applied to control
flies, rodents, and other insects or vermin when necessary.
(b) Appropriate methods such as fencing and diking shall be pro-
vided within the area to confine solid waste subject to be blown
by the wind. At the conclusion of each day of operation, all
windblown material resulting from the operation shall be col-
lected and ret rued to the area by the owner or operator.
DATE: NAME:
Solid and Hazard ds Waste Managem4 n ranch
I /
DHS 1709 (Revised 4/85)
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch (Review 4/86) (white — Raleigh Office yellow —Facility green — Preparer)

f i
0.
Purpose: G.S.+130A-294 requires that an inspection program be established for the operation of solid
waste management facilities on a statewide basis. The N.C. Solid Waste Management Rules
codified 10 NCAC 10G, Section .0505 list specific operational requirements which must be
followed by sanitary landfills.
Preparation: Solid and Hazardous Waste Branch personnel shall complete the inspection form each time
they conduct an official inspection. The form shall be signed by the person(s) receiving the
report.
Distribution: 1. White copy to Raleigh office
2. Yellow copy to facility
3. Green copy to preparer
Disposition: This form may be destroyed in accordance with Standard 7, Inspection Records, of the
Records Disposition Schedule published by the N.C. Division of Archives and History.
Order additional forms from:
Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Branch
Division of Health Services
P. O. Box 2091
Raleigh, NC 27602-Z091

14
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
WEAT ER. CONDITIONS DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
INSPECTION FOR SANITARY LANDFILLS
OF
COU
SIGNATU E OF ERSON(S) RECEIVING
A-eV
PERMIT N MBER
SIR: AN INSPECTION OF YOUR LAND DISPOSAL SITE HAS BEEN MADE THIS DATE AND YOU ARE NOTIFIED OF THE VIOLATIONS, IF ANY, MARKED BELOW
WITH A CROSS (X).
(1) PLAN AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Construction plans shall be approved and followed.
(b) Specified monitoring and reporting requirements shall be met.
(2) SPREADING AND COMPACTING REQUIREMENTS
(a) Solid waste shall be restricted into the smallest area feasible.
_(b) Solid waste shall be compacted as densely as practical into cells.
(3) C VER REQUIREMENTS
(a) Solid waste shall be covered after each day of operation, with a
compacted layer of at least six inches of suitable cover or as
specified by the division.
— (b) Areas which will not have additional wastes placed on them for
12 months or more shall be covered with a minimum of one foot
of intermediate cover.
(c) After final termination of disposal operations at the site or a
major part thereof or upon revocation of a permit, the area shall
be covered with at least two feet of suitable compacted earth.
(4) EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
(a) Adequate erosion control measures shall be practiced to pre-
vent silt from leaving the site.
— (b) Adequate erosion control measures shall be practiced to pre-
vent excessive on -site erosion.
p) DRAINAGE CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
(a) Surface water shall be diverted from the operational area.
(b) Surface water shall not be impounded over or in waste.
'c) Completed areas shall be adequately sloped to allow surface
water runoff in a controlled manner.
(6) VEGETATION REQUIREMENTS
(a) Within six months after final termination of disposal operations
at the site on a major part thereof or upon revocation of a
permit, the area shall be stabilized with native grasses.
(b) Temporary seeding will be utilized as necessary to stabilize the
site.
(7) WATER PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS
(a) The separation distance of four (4) feet between waste
water table shall be maintained unless otherwise specifi
the division in the permit.
(b) Solid waste shall not be disposed of in water.
(c) Leachate shall be contained on site or properly treated p t
discharge. An NPDES permit may be required prior,to th c-
charge of leachate to surface waters.
t
(8) ACCESS AND SECURITY REQUIREMENTS
— (a) The site shall be adequately secured by means of gates, chains,
berms, fences, and other security measures approved by the
division, to prevent unauthorized entry.
— (b) An attendant shall be on duty at the site at all times while it is
open for public use to ensure compliance with operational
requirements.
— (c) The access road to the site shall be of all-weather construction
and maintained in good condition.
— (d uusst control measures shall be implemented where p9ressary.
REMA1,10 L(/5�� Al&— s Z2 .k
(9) SIGN REQUIREMENTS
(a) Signs providing information on dumping procedures, the hours
during which the site is open for public use, the permit number
and other pertinent information shall be posted at the site
entrance.
(b) Signs shall be posted stating that no hazardous or liquid waste
can be received without written permission from the division.
— (c) Traffic signs or markers shall be provided as necessary to pro-
mote an orderly traffic pattern to and from the discharge area
and to maintain efficient operating conditions.
(10) SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Open burning of solid waste is prohibited.
—(b) Equipment shall be provided to control accidental fires or
arrangements shall be made with the local fire protection
agency to immediately provide fire -fighting services when
needed.
— (c) Fires that occur at a sanitary landfill shall be reported to the
division within 24 hours and a written notification shall be
submitted within 15 days.
(d) The removal of solid waste from a sanitary landfill is prohibited
unless the owner/operator approves and the removal k not
performed on the working face.
(e) Barrels and drumsshall not be disposed of unless they are empty
and perforated sufficiently to ensure that ne iiquid or hazard-
ous waste is contained therein.
(11) WASTE ACCEPTANCE AND DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
(a) A site shall only accept those solid wastes which it is permitted tc
receive.
— (b) No hazardous, liquid, or infectious waste shall be accepted of
disposed of in a sanitary landfill except as may be approved b)
the divisiov.
— (c) Spoiled foods, animal carcasses, abattoir waste, hatchery waste.
and other animal waste delivered to the disposal site shall be
covered immediately.
GLI v ) Asbestos waste that is packaged in accordance with 40 CFR 61, a!
amended through January 1,1985, may be disposed of separate
t 4-. d apart from other solid wastes at the bottom of the workin€
?€ a or in an area not contiguous with other disposal areas, it
a9i er case, in virgin soil. Separate areas shall be clearly market
Iry so hat asbestos is not exposed by future land -disturbing activi
. The waste shall be covered immediately with soil in a
nner that will not cause airborne conditions. Copies of 4(
FIR 61 may be obtained and inspected at the Solid and Hazard
Dy �AST�p0 ous Waste Management Branch, Division of Health Services
P. O. Box 2091, Raleigh, NC, 27602.
(12) MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Effective vector control measures shall be applied to contro
flies, rodents, and other insects or vermin when necessary.
— (b) Appropriate methods such as fencing and diking shall be pro
vided within the area to confine solid waste subject to be blowr
by the wind. At the conclusion of each day of operation, al
windblown material resulting from the operation shall be col
lected and returned to the area by the owner or operator.
.?� CikPS `i e _3_s
DATE: �� — NAME:
and Hazard Waste Manageme
DHS t'09 (Revised 4/85) // f
Solid h Hazardous Waste Management Branch (Review 4/86) (white — Raleigh Tice yellow — Facility green — Preparer)

Purpose: G.S.130A-294 requires that an inspection program be established for the operation of solid
waste management facilities on a statewide basis. The N.C. Solid Waste Management (Rules
codified 10 NCAC 10G, Section .0505 list specific operational requirements which must be
followed by sanitary landfills.
Preparation: Solid and Hazardous Waste Branch personnel shall complete the inspection form each time
they conduct an official inspection. The form shall be signed by the person(s) receiving the
report.
Distribution: 1. White copy to Raleigh office
2. Yellow copy to facility
3. Green copy to preparer
Disposition: This form may be destroyed in accordance with Standard 7, Inspection Records, of the
Records Disposition Schedule published by the N.C. Division of Archives and History.
Order additional forms from:
Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Branch
Division of Health Services
P. O. Box 2091
Raleigh, NC 27602-2091
0

N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
AT ER CONDITIONS DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
INSPECTION FOR SANITARY LANDFILLS
%E OF SITE
fl-TT be, tir3 e�i icy
LOCATION
SX 03
COUNTY
T
SIGNATURE,OF PERSON(S) RECEIVING REPORT
�-'C;
PERMFT NUMBfR
SIR: AN INSPECTION OF YOUR LAND DISPOSAL SITE HAS BEEN MADE THIS DATE AND YOU ARE NOTIFIED OF THE VIOLATIONS, IF ANY, MARKED BELOW
WITH A CROSS (X).
(1) PLAN AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Construction plans shall be approved and followed.
— (b) Specified monitoring and reporting requirements shall be met.
(2) SPREADING AND COMPACTING REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Solid waste shall be restricted into the smallest area feasible.
(b) Solid waste shall be compacted as densely as practical into cells.
(3) CQVER REQUIREMENTS
(a) Solid waste shall be covered after each day of operation, with a
compacted layer of at least six inches of suitable cover or as
specified by the division.
(b) Areas which will not have additional wastes placed on them for
12 months or more shall be covered with a minimum of one foot
of intermediate cover.
(c) After final termination of disposal operations at the site or a
major part thereof or upon revocation of a permit, the area shall
be covered with at least two feet of suitable compacted earth.
(4) EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
(a) Adequate erosion control measures shall be practiced to pre-
vent silt from leaving the site.
(b) Adequate erosion control measures shall be practiced to pre-
vent excessive on -site erosion.
(5) DRAINAGE CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
(a) Surface water shalt be diverted from the operational area.
(b) Surface water shall not be impounded over or in waste.
—(c) Completed areas shall be adequately sloped to allow surface
water runoff in a controlled manner.
(6) VEGETATION REQUIREMENTS
(a) Within six months after final termination of disposal operations
at the site on a major part thereof or upon revocation of a
permit, the area shall be stabilized with native grasses.
(b) Temporary seeding will be utilized as necessary to stabilize the
site.
(7) WATER PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS
— (a) The separation distance of four (4) feet between waste and
water table shall be maintained unless otherwise specified by
the division in the permit.
— (b) Solid waste shall not be disposed of in water.
— (c) Leachate shall be contained on site or properly treated prior to
discharge. An NPDES permit may be required prior to the dis-
charge of leachate to surface waters.
(8) ACCESS AND SECURITY REQUIREMENTS
— (a) The site shall be adequately secured by means of gates, chains,
berms, fences, and other security measures approved by the
division, to prevent unauthorized entry.
(b) An attendant shall be on duty at the site at all times while it is
open for public use to ensure compliance with operational
requirements.
— (c) The access road to the site shall be of all-weather construction
and maintained in good condition.
— (d) Dust control measures shall be implemented where ary.
REMARKS: . � Yu�� v� l� �"o" C N ,=OiJr1. neces 4
DATE: M NAME:
(9) SIGN REQUIREMENTS
(a) Signs providing information on dumping procedures, the hours
during which the site is open for public use, the permit number
and other pertinent information shall be posted at the site
entrance.
(b) Signs shall be posted stating that no hazardous or liquid waste
can be received without written permission from the division.
(c) Traffic signs or markers shall be provided as necessary to pro-
mote an orderly traffic pattern to and from the discharge area
and to maintain efficient operating conditions.
(10) SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Open burning of solid waste is prohibited.
— (b) Equipment shall be provided to control accidental fires or
arrangernents shall be made with the local fire protection
agency to immediately provide fire -fighting services when
needed.
(c) Fires that occur at a sanitary landfill shall be reported to the
division within 24 hours and a written notification shall be
submitted within 15 days.
(d) The removal of solid waste from a sanitary landfill is prohibited
unless the owner/operator approves and the removal it not
performed on the working face.
(e) Barrels and drums shall not be disposed of unless they are empty
and perforated sufficiently to ensure that no liquid or hazard-
ous waste is contained therein.
(11) WASTE ACCEPTANCE AND DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
(a) A site shall only accept those solid wastes which it is permitted to
receive.
— (b) No hazardous, liquid, or infectious waste shall be accepted or
disposed of in a sanitary landfill except as may be approved by
the divisior..
— (c) Spoiled foods, animal carcasses, abattoir waste, hatchery waste,
and other animal waste delivered to the disposal site shall be
covered immediately.
(d) Asbestos waste that is packaged in accordance with 40 CFR 61, as
amended through January 1,1985, may be disposed of separate
and apart from other solid wastes at the bottom of the working
face or in an area not contiguous with other disposal areas, in
either case, in virgin soil. Separate areas shall be clearly marked
so that asbestos is not exposed by future land -disturbing activi-
ties. The waste shall be covered immediately with soil in a
manner that will not cause airborne conditions. Copies of 40
CFR 61 may be obtained and inspected at the Solid and Hazard-
ous Waste Management Branch, Division of Health Services,
P. O. Box 2091, Raleigh, NC, 27602.
(12) MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS
(a) Effective vector control measures shall be applied to control
flies, rodents, and other insects or vermin when necessary.
(b) Appropriate methods such as fencing and diking shall be pro-
vided within the area to confine solid waste subject to be blown
by the wind. At the conclusion of each day of operation, all
windblown material resulting from the operation shall be col-
lected and returned to the area by the owner or operator.
lid and Hazardous Waste Management
DHS 1709 (Revised 4/85)
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch (Review 4/86) (white — Raleigh Office yellow — Facility green — Preparer)
ae �
II IAI
Z
h4 .
Gs wq�E MA�P�

Purpose: G.S.130A-294 requires that an inspection program be established for the operation of solid
waste management facilities on a statewide basis. The N.C. Solid Waste Management Rules
codified 10 NCAC 10G, Section .0505 list specific operational requirements which must be
followed by sanitary landfills.
Preparation: Solid and Hazardous Waste Branch personnel shall complete the inspection form each time
they conduct an official inspection. The form shall be signed by the person(s) receiving the
report.
Distribution: 1. White copy to Raleigh office
2. Yellow copy to facility
3. Green copy to preparer
Disposition: This form may be destroyed in accordance with Standard 7, Inspection Records, of the
Records Disposition Schedule published by the N.C. Division of Archives and History.
Order additional forms from:
Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Branch
Division of Health Services
P. O. Box 2091
Raleigh, NC 27602-Z091
.,
i

l,Jrlupvf 11Jt7
Weather Conditions
Cv
Site
Location
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
INSPECTION FORM FOR SANITARY LANDFILLS
gnature o
Per, �- Number y
FES 18 I'85 m;
o =
County
Person(s) Receiving Report
SIR: An inspection of your land disposal site has been made this date and you are
notified of the violations, if any, marked below with a cross-
1. PLAN REQUIREMENTS 6. ACCESS
Site plan approved Attendant on duty
Construction plans approved Access controls
Plans being followed All weather road
2. SPREADING & COMPACTING Dust controlled
Waste restricted to the
smallest area practicable
Waste properly compacted
o,V :5/e/1C- C� CA1D ac G u
3. COVER REQUIREMENTS
Six inches daily cover
Two foot final cover
One foot intermediate cover
4. DRAINAGE CONTROLLED
On -site erosion
Off -site siltation
Erosion control devices
Seeding of completed areas
Temporary seeding
5. WATER PROTECTION
Off -site leaching
Waste placed in water
Surface water impounded
Monitoring wells installed
DATE -2 - /j-
BURNING
Evidence of burning
Fire control equipment available
8. SPECIAI. WASTES
Spoiled food, animal carcasses,
abattoir waste, hatchery waste,
etc., covered immediately
9. UNAUTHORIZED WASTES ACCEPTED WITHOUT
WRITTEN PERMISSION
Type
10. VECTOR CONTROL
Effective control measures
11. MISCELLANEOUS
Blowing material controlled
Proper signs posted
Solid & Hazardous Wad Management Branch
DHS FORM 1709 (7/82)
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch

Weather Conditions N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
INSPECTION FORM FOR SANITARY LANDFILLS
r -
- 6,1
Permit Number
Name of Site County
,z 0 _3
Location Signature of Person(s) Receiving Report
SIR: An inspection of your land disposal site has been made this date and you are
notified of the violations, if any, marked below with a cross (X).
1. PLAN REQUIREMENTS 6. ACCESS
Site plan approved Attendant on duty
Construction plans approved Access controls
Plans being followed All weather road
Dust controlled
2. SPREADING & COMPACTING
Waste restricted to the
BURNING
smallest area practicable
Evidence of burning
Waste properly compacted
Fire control equipment available
3. COVER REQUIREMENTS
8.
SPECIAI. WASTES
Six inches daily cover
Spoiled food, animal carcasses,
Two foot final cover
abattoir waste, hatchery waste,
etc., covered immediately
One foot intermediate cover
9•
UNAUTHORIZED WASTES ACCEPTED WITHOUT
4. DRAINAGE CONTROLLED
WRITTEN PERMISSION
On -site erosion
Type
Off -site siltation
Erosion control devices
Seeding of completed areas
10.
VECTOR CONTROL
Temporary seeding
Effective control measures
5. WATER PROTECTION
11.
MISCELLANEOUS
Off -site leaching
Blowing material controlled
Waste placed in water
Surface water impounded
Proper signs posted
Monitoring wells installed
REMARKS: €' C : %J��t7`�
'� /
/ci�O �r ���' E G6�ez_W ar+L "L
rc
DATE NAME
Solid &
Hazardous Waste nagement Branch
DHS FORM 1709 (7/82)
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch

f
Weather Conditions
-� r r
Name of Site
Location
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
INSPECTION FORM FOR SANITARY LANDFILLS
F; i� if-
r
Permit Number
County
ture of Person(s) Receiving Report
SIR: An inspection of your land disposal site has been made this date and you are
notified of the violations, if any, marked below with a cross (X).
1. PLAN REQUIREMENTS 6. ACCESS
Site plan approved Attendant on duty ;
Construction plans approved Access controls
Plans being followed All weather ro AM 27 LO84'
2. SPREADING & COMPACTING Host rontrolle 9
Waste restricted to the
smallest area practicable
Waste properly compacted
3. COVER REQUIREMENTS
Six inches daily cover
Two foot final cover
One foot intermediate cover
4. DRAINAGE CONTROLLED
On -site erosion
Off -site siltation
Erosion control devices
Seeding of completed areas
Temporary seeding
5. WATER PROTECTION
Off -site leaching
Waste placed in water
Surface water impounded
Monitoring wells installed
BURNING k'AM MA�W-
Evidence of burning
Fire control equipment available
8. SPECIAL WASTES
Spoiled food, animal carcasses,
abattoir waste, hatchery waste,
etc., covered immediately
9. UNAUTHORIZED WASTES ACCEPTED WITHOUT
WRITTEN PERMISSION
Type
10. VECTOR CONTROL
Effective control measures
11. MISCELLANEOUS
Blowing material controlled
Proper signs posted -
REMARKS: --Pxa / GdU('f 7 fQ;Mryinq f>/y �rJ!' !I � �'/°�C Sotr -11a� ,�•�
r
dvrts/P aria czCf'� A�afj�+w�r'r�c�c �c� C�c1ef e
i t A, U r PPIl'AA / it G(/� fd u8 c..�tSl� ' 1c1/f�3 j ST�iIL � .Jo fL� 7i lrautPr ��
DATE - 1y NAME
r
�s t :� r r Solid & Hazardous Wast agement Branch
/ r ,/ a
wmS` P
DHS FORM 17'09 (7)82) i
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch

jai-) T)
Weather Conditions N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
INSPECTION FORM FOR SANITARY LANDFILLS
- / 7 1 "o
Name of Site
J_ :7 -V--�-V -
Permit Number
County
Location Signdture' o Pers�n�s)' Receiving Report
SIR: An inspection of your land disposal site has been made this date and you are
notified of the violations, if any, marked below with a cross (X).
1. PLAN REQUIREMENTS 6. ACCESS
Site plan approved Attendant on duty CEIVFD
Construction plans approved Access controls ^09 y
a
Plans being followed All weather.roaJUL 5 (� 9 m
2. SPREADING & COMPACTING Dust controlled y �,
Waste restricted to the 7. BURNING oG�wgSTE MP�Pv
smallest area practicable Evidence of burning
_ X Waste properly compacted Fire control equipment available
�l 3. COVER REQUIREMENTS
Six inches daily cover
Two foot final cover
One foot intermediate cover
4. DRAINAGE CONTROLLED
On -site erosion
Off -site siltation
Erosion control devices
Seeding of completed areas
Temporary seeding
5. WATER PROTECTION
Off -site leaching
_ Waste placed in water
Surface water impounded
Monitoring wells installed
DATE
8. SPECIAL WASTES
Spoiled food, animal carcasses,
abattoir waste, hatchery waste,
etc., covered immediately
9. UNAUTHORIZED WASTES ACCEPTED WITHOUT
WRITTEN PERMISSION
Type
10. VECTOR CONTROL
Effective control measures
11. MISCELLANEOUS
Blowing material controlled
Proper signs posted
DHS FORM 1709 (7/82)
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch

IN
Bather Conditions N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES Permi-t Number
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
INSPECTION FORM FOR SANITARY LANDFILLS
74
Name 'of'Site `''" " ' County
tz'caeibn Signature'of Person(s) ceiving
1
SIR: An inspection of your land disposal site has been made this date and you are
notified of the violations, if any, marked below with a cross (X).
1. PLAN REQUIREMENTS 6. ACCESS
�ECEIVF®
Site plan approved Attendant on duty
Construction plans approved Access controls a
Plans being followed All weather road APR 2 lam O°
2. SPREADING & COMPACTING Dust controlledOOG Vk�
Waste restricted to the 7. BURNING s WASTE MP%
smallest area practicable
Waste properly compacted
3. COVER REQUIREMENTS
Six inches daily cover
Two foot final_ cover
One foot intermediate cover
4. DRAINAGE CONTROLLED
On -site erosion
Off -site siltation
Erosion control devices
Seeding of completed areas
Temporary seeding
5. WATER PROTECTION
Off -site leaching
Waste placed in water
Surface water impounded
Monitoring wells installed
REMARKS:
Evidence of burning
Fire control equipment available
8. SPECIAL WASTES
Spoiled food, animal carcasses,
abattoir waste, hatchery waste,
etc., covered immediately
9. UNAUTHORIZED WASTES ACCEPTED WITHOUT
WRITTEN PERMISSION
Type
10. VECTOR CONTROL
Effective control measures
11. MISCELLANEOUS
Blowing material controlled
Proper signs posted
DATE �- NAME ' /I /2 � / UPI �/Jd�
Sol az douszWade'- gent Branch
DHS FORM 1709 (7/82)
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch

Weather Conditions
ame of. Site
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
INSPECTION FORM FOR SANITARY LANDFILLS
ME
Permit Number
County
Location Sig at re of Person(s)Receiving Report
SIR: An inspection of your land disposal site has been made this date and you are
notified of the violations, if any, marked below with a cross (X)
1. PLAN REQUIREMENTS 6. ACCESS
Site plan approved Attendant on duty
Construction plans approved Access controls
Plans being followed All weather road
2. SPREADING & COMPACTING Dust controlled
Waste restricted to the
smallest area practicable
Waste properly compacted
U3. COVER REQUIREMENTS
Six inches daily cover
Two foot final cover
One foot intermediate cover
4. DRAINAGE CONTROLLED
On -site erosion
Off -site siltation
Erosion control devices
Seeding of completed areas
Temporary seeding
5. WATER PROTECTION
Off -site leaching
Waste placed in water
Surface water impounded
Monitoring wells installed
REMARKS: '�>_.� (? /�,, 44 J(
7. BURNING
Evidence of burning
Fire control equipment available
8. SPECIAL WASTES
Spoiled food, animal carcasses,
abattoir waste, hatchery waste,
etc., covered immediately
9. UNAUTHORIZED WASTES ACCEPTED WITHOUT
WRITTEN PERMISSION
Type
10. VECTOR CONTROL
Effective control measures
11. MISCELLANEOUS
Blowing material controlled
Proper signs posted
DATE NAME
SolM & Haz fdous Waste lfiuiajiemenranch
DHS FORM 1709 (7/82)
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch

"Ift

Weather Conditions
Neof Site
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
DIVISION OF i7ALTH SERVICES
INSPECTION FORM FOR SANITARY LANDFILLS
f
eimit Number
County
r
J,� d �• ( 1 � :. {y ,.,' �;'!'`�, 4 f'" .fir , t.
Loc t fo�i Signature of Person(s) Receiving Report
SIR: An inspection of your land disposal site has been made this date and you are
notified of the violations, if any, marked below with a cross (X).
1. PLAN REQUIREMENTS 6. ACCESS
Site plan approved Attendant on duty
Construction plans approved Access controls
Plans being followed All weather road
Dust controlled
2. SPREADING & COMPACTING
Waste restricted to the
smallest area practicable
Waste properly compacted
3. COVER REQUIREMENTS
Six inches daily cover
Two foot final cover
One foot intermediate cover
7. BURNING
Evidence of burning
Fire control equipment available
8. SPECIAL WASTES
Spoiled food, animal carcasses,
abattoir waste, hatchery waste,
etc., covered immediately
9. UNAUTHORIZED WASTES ACCEPTED WITHOUT
4. DRAINAGE CONTROLLED WRITTEN PERMISSION
On -site erosion
Type
Off -site siltation
Erosion control devices
Seeding of completed areas
Temporary seeding 10. VECTOR CONTROL
Effective control measures
5. WATER PROTECTION
Off -site leaching 11. MISCELLANEOUS
Waste placed in water Blowing material controlled
Surface water impounded Proper signs posted
Monitoring wells installed
REMARKS:
i
r ; I
r� e
J•• l
DATE' NAME
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch
DHS FORM 1709 (7/82)
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch

AUS 8 198y
•

.� r 1 - 79.
Weather Conditions N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES Ir Permit Number
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
INSPECTION FORM FOR SANITARY LANDFILLS
A 7q - rn
ZZ
Name of Site
County
`on
Location
S gn tore of s) Receiving Report
SIR: An inspection of your land disposal
site has been made this date and you are
notified of the violations, if any,
;narked below with a cross (X).
1. PLAN REQUIREMENTS
6. ACCESS
Site plan approved
_ Attendant on duty
Construction plans approved
Access controls
Plans being followed
All weather road
2. SPREADING & COMPACTING
Dust controlled
Waste restricted to the
;. BURNING
smallest area practicable
_ Evidence of burning
Waste properly compacted
Fire control equipment available
3. COVER REQUIREMENTS
8, SPECIAL WASTES
Six inches daily cover
Spoiled mood, animal. carcasses,
Two foot final cover
abattoir waste, hatchery waste,
One foot intermediate cover
etc., covered immediately
4. DRAINAGE CONTROLLED
9. UNAUTHORIZED WASTES ACCEPTED WITHOUT
WRITTEN PEMAISSION
On -site erosion
.
Type
Off -site siltation
Erosion control devices
Seeding of completed areas
Temporary seeding
10. VECTOR CONTROL
_ Effective control measures
5. WATER PROTECTION
Off -site leaching
11. MISCELLANEOUS
Blowing, material controlled
Waste placed in water
Surface water impounded
Proper signs posted
Monitoring wells installed
REMARKS:
DATE / f7 " S-3 NAME
Solid & Hazarods Waste Management Branch
DHS FORM 1709 (7/82)
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch

E B -2 0 04

Weather Conditions
Name of Site
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
DIVISION OF FEALTH SERVICES
INSPECTION FORM FOR SANITARY LANDFILLS
J
Permit Number
ZIL
ty
Location J Signature'of Person(s) Receiving Report
SIR: An inspection of your land disposal site has been made this date and you are
notified of the violations, if any, marked below with a cross (X).
1. PLAN REQUIREMENTS 6. ACCESS
Site plan approved Attendant on duty
Construction plans approved Access,,controls
Plans being followed All weather road
2. SPREADING & COMPACTING
Waste restricted to the
smallest area practicable
Waste properly compacted
3. COVER REQUIREMENTS
Six inches daily cover
Two foot final cover
One foot intermediate cover
4. DRAINAGE CONTROLLED
On -site erosion
Off -site siltation
Erosion control devices
Seeding of completed areas
Temporary seeding
5. WATER PROTECTION
Off -site leaching
Waste placed in water
Surface water impounded
Monitoring wells installed
Dust controlled
7. BURNING
Evidence of burning
Fire control equipment available
8. SPECIAL WASTES
Spoiled food, animal carcasses,
abattoir waste, hatchery waste,
etc., covered immediately
9. UNAUTHORIZED WASTES ACCEPTED WITHOUT
WRITTEN PERMISSION
Type
10. VECTOR CONTROL
Effective control measures
11. MISCELLANEOUS
Blowing material controlled
Proper signs posted
REMARKS: -
DATE 1. t
NAME
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch
DHS FORM 1709 (7/82)
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch

Weather Conditions N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
DIVISION OF i'EALTH SERVICES
Permit Number
INSPECTION FORM FOR SANITARY LANDFILLS
Name of Site County
Location Signature of Person(s) Receiving Report
SIR: An inspection of your land disposal site has been made this date and you are
notified of the violations, if any, marked below with a cross (X).
1. PLAN REQUIREMENTS 6. ACCESS
Site plan approved Attendant on duty
Construction plans approved Access controls
i.
Plans being followed All weather road
2. SPREADING & COMPACTING Dust controlled
Waste restricted to the
smallest area practicable
Waste properly compacted
j 3. COVER REQUIREMENTS
Six inches daily cover
Two foot final cover
One foot intermediate cover
4. DRAINAGE CONTROLLED
On -site erosion
Off -site siltation
Erosion control devices
Seeding of completed areas
Temporary seeding
5. WATER PROTECTION
Off -site leaching
Waste placed in water
Surface water impounded
Monitoring wells installed
REMARKS:
7. BURNING
Evidence of burning
Fire control equipment available
8. SPECIAL WASTES
Spoiled food, animal carcasses,
abattoir waste, hatchery waste,
etc., covered immediately
9. UNAUTHORIZED WASTES ACCEPTED WITHOUT
WRITTEN PERMISSION
Type
10. VECTOR CONTROL
Effective control measures
11. MISCELLANEOUS
Blowing material controlled
Proper signs posted
DATE NAME
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch
DHS FORM 1709 (7/82)
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch

j r
ame of Site
Location
.----,.
Weather Conditions
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
Inspection Form for Sanitary Landfills
0A
Permit Number
117
County
Signature of Person s Receiving Report
SIR: An inspection of your land disposal
site has been made this date and you are
notified of the violations, if any,
marked
below with a cross M .
1. PLAN REQUIREMENTS
6.
ACCESS
Site Plan Approved
Attendant on Duty
Operational Plans Approved
Access Controls (Gate, Chains)
Plans Being Followed
All Weather Road
2. SPREADING & COMPACTING
Dust Controlled
Waste Restricted to the
7.
BURNING
Smallest Area Practicable
Evidence of Burning
Waste Properly Compacted
Fire Control Equipment Available
Proper Slope on Working Face
g,
SPECIAL WASTES
3. C•VER REQUIREMENTS
Spoiled Food Properly Handled
Six Inches Daily Cover
Animal Carcasses, Abattoir Waste,
Two Foot Final Cover
Hatchery Waste, Etc., Properly
Handled
One Foot Intermediate Cover
9.
HAZARDOUS WASTES ACCEPTED WITHOUT
4. DRAINAGE CONTROLLED
WRITTEN PERMISSION
On -Site Erosion
Type
Off -Site Siltation
10.
VECTOR CONTROL
Erosion Control Devices
Effective Rat Control
Seeding of Completed Areas
Effective Fly Control
Temporary Seeding
Other Vector(s) Controlled
5. WATER PROTECTION
11.
MISCELLANEOUS
Evidence of Leaching
Blowing Material Controlled
Waste Placed in Water
Directional Signs
Surface Water Impounded
Operational Signs (Procedures,
Monitoring Wells Installed
Hours, Etc.)
i REMARKS:
DATE�-: , NAME
DHSIFORM 1709 (11/79)
SolAd & Hazardous Waste Management Branch
Solid-& Hazardous Waste- nagement Branch
Division of -'Health Services

AUG 30 1962co

%(' ,
r, >
t
ame of Site
Location
Weather Cjohditio't(s ,
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
Inspection Form for Sanitary Landfills
Signature o
r r
Permit Number
erson s Rec
County
SIR:
An inspection of your land disposal
site has been made this date and you are
notified of the violations, if any,
marked below with a cross (X).
1.
PLAN REQUIREMENTS
6. ACCESS
Site Plan Approved
Attendant on Duty
Operational Plans Approved
Access Controls (Gate, Chains)
Plans Being Followed
All Weather Road
2.
SPR6DING & COMPACTING
Dust Controlled
Waste Re.stricted to the
7. BURNING
Smallest Area Practicable
Evidence of Burning
IX"Waste Properly Compacted
Fire Control Equipment Available
Proper Slope on Working Face
g. SPECIAL WASTES
-3.
COVER REQUIREMENTS
Spoiled Food Properly Handled
i_ Six Inches Daily Cover
Animal Carcasses, Abattoir Waste,
Two Foot Final Cover
Hatchery Waste, Etc., Properly
Handled
One Foot Intermediate Cover
9. HAZARDOUS WASTES ACCEPTED WITHOUT
4.
DRAINAGE CONTROLLED
WRITTEN PERMISSION
On -Site Erosion
Type
Off -Site Siltation
10. VECTOR CONTROL
Erosion Control Devices
Effective Rat Control
Seeding of Completed Areas
,—
Effective Fly Control
Temporary Seeding
Other Vector(s) Controlled
5.
WATER PROTECTION
11. MISCELLANEOUS
;N/ Evidence of Leaching
��r° Blowing Material Controlled
Waste Placed in Water
-,`�- Directional Signs
Surface Water Impounded
,—
Operational Signs (Procedures,
t Monitoring Wells Installed
Hours, Etc.)
REMARKS:
DATE _ • • 4:.
NAME _t
Solid & Ha
DHS FORM 1709 (11/79) Division o
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch
rdous-Waste Management Branch
Health Services

57-
11
13 r le- �,.

N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
Inspection Form for Sanitary Landfills
Permit Numbdr
Name or Site y ' �� -' " -- ° County
Location' Signature of Person s Receiving Report
tions
SIR: An inspection of your land disposal
site has been made this date and you are
notified of the violations, if .any,
marked
below with a cross (X).
1. PLAN REQUIREMENTS
6.
ACCESS
Site Plan Approved
Attendant on Duty
Operational Plans Approved
Access Controls (Gate, Chains)
Plans Being Followed
All Weather Road
2. SPREADING & COMPACTING
Dust Controlled
Waste Re.stricted to the
7.
BURNING
-° Smallest Area Practicable
Evidence of Burning
Waste Properly Compacted
Fire Control Equipment Available
Proper Slope on Working Face
g.
SPECIAL WASTES
3. CIOVER REQUIREMENTS
Spoiled Food Properly Handled
_ Six Inches Daily Cover
Animal Carcasses, Abattoir Waste,
Two Foot Final Cover
Hatchery Waste, Etc., Properly
Handled
One Foot Intermediate Cover
9•
HAZARDOUS WASTES ACCEPTED WITHOUT
4. DRAINAGE CONTROLLED
WRITTEN PERMISSION
On -Site Erosion
Type
Off -Site Siltation
10.
VECTOR CONTROL
Erosion Control Devices
Effective Rat Control
{ Seeding of Completed Areas
Effective Fly Control
Temporary Seeding
Other Vector(s) Controlled
5. WATER PROTECTION
11.
MISCELLANEOUS
Evidence of Leaching
Blowing Material Controlled
Waste Placed in Water
Directional Signs
Surface Water Impounded
Operational Signs (Procedures,
Monitoring Wells Installed
Hours, Etc.)
1 REMARKS:
DATE LL' ;` c'
NAME ,, ��' ,'} ✓� t ��, ,r';!L
Sol-idzardous-WaAe Man,
DHS FORM 1709 (11/79) Division of Health Services
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch
t Branch

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT
NCDENR September 10, 1998
Mr. Philip G. Dickerson
,AMES B. NLNT,R- Pitt County Engineer I
GOVERNOR Pitt County Office Building
1717 West Fifth Street
Greenville, N.C. 27834
WAYNE MCDEVITT Re: Semiannual Water Quality Sampling Requirements for the Northern
SECRETARY Portion of the Pitt County Landfill (Permit #74-01).
Dear Mr. Dickerson,
WILLIAM L. MEYER
DIRECTOR According to our telephone conversation yesterday I have attached two
letters that may help clarify the sampling requirements for the northern portion
of the closed Pitt County landfill. The December 27, 1994 letter specifies the
sampling points and analyses. This letter also explains that the semiannual
sampling events for the northern portion of the facility can be conducted
simultaneously with the southern Subtitle D cell to prevent duplication of
samples. Subsequent letters have modified the required analytical methods.
The April 8, 1997 letter discusses the installation of five new wells to the
monitoring system to 1) acquire data on both the vertical and horizontal ground
water flow, 2) to determine the continuity of the "gray clay" layer beneath the
site and 3) establish true upgradient monitoring stations for the northern portion
of the landfill. With the additions to the monitoring system the Section did not
see the need to continue collecting samples on a routine basis from monitoring
points P-14, P-15, P-25, P-26, MW-2A and MW2B because of their proximity to
waste. After the initial data was collected on the above items 1-3, the Section
did not require samples to be taken from the two new deeper upgradient wells.
Additionally, MW-2 was abandoned.
In summary, the following monitoring points should be sampled on a
semiannual basis for the northern portion of the landfill (this is not meant to
exclude previously approved monitoring requirements for the southern portion):
MW-1, MW-3, P-1, P-2, P-4, P-5, P-6, P-7, P-9, P-13, P-16, P-21, P-23, the two
new upgradient shallow wells and the new downgradient well nested with P-13.
Pre -approved surface water locations should also be sampled. Potentiometric
data should be collected on all wells at the site during each sampling episode and
a potentiometric map submitted with each semiannual data package.
401 OBERLIN ROAD, SUITE 150, RALEIQH, NC 27605
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -50q RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

If the County desires to drop or add monitoring points to the semiannual sampling
routine, please submit proposals to the Solid Waste Section for evaluation and approval. If you
have any questions or comments, please call me at 919-733-0692, extension 261.
Sincerely,
Mark Poindexter, Hydrogeologist
Groundwater Compliance Unit
Solid Waste Section
c: Philip Prete
Terry Dover
Bobby Nelms
Central file
C:\WPDOCS\COUNTIES\PIT n74-01 #2.SAM

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources / • r•
Division of Solid Waste Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
William L. Meyer, Director
December 27,1994
Mr. Phil Dickerson
Pitt County Engineer
1717 West Fifth Street
Greenville, N.C. 27834
10�13 2pI'1
Re: Establishing a Monitoring System and Initiating a Semi-annual Sampling Plan for the Closed Unit at the
Pitt County Landfill ( Permit # 74-01).
Dear Mr. Dickerson,
Based on information obtained during the transition plan investigation the groundwater monitoring
system for the closed unit does not allow for adequate monitoring of the curflcial aquifer. The newly Installed
wells, as part of the transition plan, will provide a more accurate representation of water quality in this zone. After
review of the data from the new wells and existing monitoring wells the following is necessary to further
characterize the site:
• Establish a numbering system which includes the new wells.
• Sample the following wells semi-annually to establish an upgradient and a downgradient water quality
baseline for comparative purposes: MW-I, MW2, MW-3, P-1, P-2, P-4, P-5, P-6, P-7, P-9, P-13, P-14, P-15,
P-16, P-21, P-23, P-25, P-26. Reflnement of the monitoring system may be warranted at a later date
when the hydrogeologic environment is better understood.
• Coordinate closed cell sampling events with the active cell sampling events to eliminate repetitive sampling
of wells along the railroad track.
• Analyze the samples utilizing EPA methods 507, 531.1 and for the constituents on the attached lists.
• Notify the Section two weeks prior to any sampling events so arrangements can be made to split samples
with the County's sampling contractor.
If you have any questions concerning these matters, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely, _ A
Mark Poindexter, Hydrogeologist
Solid Waste Section
cc: Phil Prate
Billy Morris
Bobby Lutfy
file
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 1 o% post -consumer paper

INORGANIC CONSTITUENTS
Parameter
Certification
by
DEM
PQL in ppb
(1)
Antimony
Metals,
Group
II
- low
30
level
(2)
Arsenic
Metals,
Group
I
- low
10
level
(3)
Barium
Barium
(20)
500
(4)
Beryllium
Metals,
Group
I
- low
2
level
(5)
Cadmium
Metals,
Group
I
- low
1
level
(6)
Chromium
Metals,
Group
I
- low
lc
level
(7)
Cobalt
Metals,
Group
I
- low
10
level
(8)
Copper
Metals,
Group
I
-
200
regular
level
(9)
Lead
Metals,
Group
I
- low
10
level
(10)
Nickel
Metals,
Group
I
-
50
regular
level
(11)
Selenium
Metals,
Group
I
- low
20
level
(12)
Silver
Metals,
Group
II
- low
10
level
(13)
Thallium
Metals,
Group
II
- low
10
level
(14)
Vanadium
Metals,
Group
I
- low
40
level
(15)
Zinc
Metals,
Group
I
-
50
regular
level
The data shall be reported at the specified Practical Quantitation Limit (PQL).
in addition to sampling for the constituents referenced above, all sampling
should also include field testing of pH, temperature, and specific conductivity.
No filtering of samples is allowed. The 3030C preparation method for metals
analysis is not allowed.

ORGANIC I PQL ORGANIC
CONSTITUENT (UG/L) CONSTITUENT PQL
(UG/I
(16) ACETONE 100 (40) T-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
(17) ACRYLONITRILE 10
200 (41) ETHYLBENZENE
:18) BENZENE 5
5 (42) METHYL BUTYL KETONE
.19)BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 50
5 (43) METHYL BROMIDE
20) BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 10
5 (44) METHYL CHLORIDE
21) BROMOFORM 10
5 (45) METHYLENE BROMIDE
22) CARBON DISULFIDE 10
100 (46) METHYLENE CHLORIDE
23) CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 10
10 (47) MEK; 2-BUTANONE
24) CHLOROBENZENE 100
5 (48) METHYL IODIDE
15) CHLOROETHANE 10
10 (49) METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
!6) CHLOROFORM 5 (50) STYRENE 110
0
!7) CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE 1
5 (51) 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
18) DBCP 5
25 (52) 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 5
9) ETHYLENE DIBROMIDE 5 (53) TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
0) O-DICHLOROBENZENE 5
5 (54) TOLUENE
1) P-DICHLOROBENZENE 5
5 (55) I,1,1, TRICHLOROETHANE
2) T-1,4-DICHLORO-2- 5
BUTENE 100 (56) 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
3) I,1-DICHLOROETHANE 5
5 (57) TRlCHLOROETHYLENE
1) ETHYLENE DICHLORIDE 5
5 (58) CFC-11
i) VINYLIDENE CHLORIDE 5
5 (59) 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 15
5 (60) VINYL ACETATE
T-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 50
5 (61) VINYL CHLORIDE
PROPYLENE DICHLORIDE 10
5 (62) XYLENES
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10 5
ALSO KNOWN AS: (21)-TRIBROMOMETHANE, (25)-ETHYL CHLORIDE, (26)-TRICHLOROMETHANE,
(27)-DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE,(28)-1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE, (29)-1,2-DIBROMOETHANE,
(30)-1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE, (31)-1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE, (33)-ETHYLIDENE CHLORIDE,
(34)-1,2-DICHLOROETHANE, (35)-1,1-DICHLOROETHENE (ETHYLENE), (36)-CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE,
(37)-TRANS-I,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE, (38)-1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE, (42)-2-HEXANONE, (43)-BROMOMETHANE,
(44)-CHLOROMETHANE, (45)-DIBRObIOMETHANE, (46)-DICHLOROMETHANE, (47)-METHYL ETHYL KETONE,
(48)-IODOMETHANE, FORT :METHYL-2-PENTANONE, (53)-TETRACHLOROETHENE, PERCHLOROETHYLENE,
(55)-METHYLCHLOROFORM, (57)-TRICHLOROETHENE, (58)-TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE

P
wr
rt
_
c
e ?
♦
_
c
1
`✓
v�o
11
_
1
1
1
l
p •• A
C Q S R'
.L n.
w
CD
l
(J f~ \
mIE
tov
w ti c°
of
CR
Rn
i C•l'
- n i•n
� o
n 6 n S E C
c
i
H SNRIIMDVIIV

7401 Permit1994 -Batch No.
lqqq
off CDunlFy/ r40� C �19o1i994

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, LTNMA
Health and Natural Resources 4 • •
Division of Solid Waste Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor E H N
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
William L. Meyer, Director
December 27, 1994
Mr. Alfred M. Moncla
Groundwater Management Associates, Inc.
101-E Woodwinds Industrial Court
Cary, North Carolina 27511
RE: (Revised) Water Quality Monitoring Plan For The Active
Southern Unit Of The Pitt County Landfill (Permit # 74-01)
Dear Mr. Moncla,
The Solid Waste Section has reviewed the above referenced document
submitted to our office December 6, 1994. While overall the
Monitoring Plan is good, there are several changes and additions
that the Section feels are necessary.
Well P-16 is proposed as a background well between the closed
landfill unit and the active landfill unit. This well appears to
serve this purpose if there is sufficient water to provide a
representative water quality sample at all seasons of the year.
There is some concern about this since well P-16 only has a three
foot well screen and about four feet of water in the well. The
Section is approving the use of this well for detection monitoring
with the understanding that if the well is not able to provide a
representative sample then the well will need to be replaced or
supplemented with a deeper monitoring well.
An additional background monitoring well is needed to monitor
background water quality for the site. Well P-4 should be added to
the detection monitoring system to serve this purpose.
The Solid Waste Section feels that additional downgradient wells
are needed to effectively monitor the active unit. Well P-12
should be added to the detection monitoring system. A deeper
monitoring well should be established to create a well cluster at
location P-20. The deeper well should screen the first substantial
sand unit that is deeper than the existing shallow well P-20.
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Page 2
A five foot well screen is proposed for well P-28. If the
stratigraphy is such that a five foot screen is necessary to
isolate the uppermost water bearing sand unit then the well may be
constructed as proposed. Generally the Section prefers well
screens of 10 to 15 feet for shallow monitoring wells. Therefore
a well screen of greater than the proposed five feet should be used
if the hydrogeologic conditions allow for the use of a longer
screen.
Several of the wells to be included in the detection monitoring
system have screen lengths less than ten feet. If at anytime
there is an insufficient water column in any of these wells to
provide a representative water quality sample, then the wells will
need to be replaced or supplemented with additional wells.
To summarize, the groundwater detection monitoring system being
approved by the Solid Waste Section is to include wells P-4, P-12,
P-16, P-20, P-20 deep, P-28, and MW-6.
The Water Quality Monitoring Plan proposes to base the groundwater
flow equipotential map only on wells in the detection monitoring
system. Since other wells are located in the vicinity of the
active cell that would provide a more detailed equipotential map
potentiometric data should also be collected from these other
wells. Potentiometric data should be collected from the following
wells in addition to the wells in the groundwater detection
monitoring system approved above: P-1, P-5, P-6, P-11, P-14, P-17,
P-18, P-19, and P-21.
Table 8 and Appendix V reference method 6010 for analysis of
several metals for which this is a method that is not approved by
the Solid Waste Section. The June 24, 1994, memo to landfill
owners and operators references low level certification methods are
to be used to analyze most of the Appendix I metals, including:
Beryllium, Chromium, Cobalt, Silver, and Vanadium. Therefore
graphite furnace methods must be used to do the analysis for these
metals (in addition to the other metals requiring low level
certification methods). Based upon our records the Chemical and
Environmental Technology Laboratory is not certified at this time
for low level metals analysis for Beryllium, Cobalt, or Vanadium.
All wells installed must meet the N.C. Well Construction Standards,
15A NCAC 2C.

Page 3
The Solid Waste Section gives conditional approval of the Water
Quality Monitoring Plan according to the comments and conditions
referenced in this letter. you may proceed with the installation
of the additional monitoring wells (P-28 and P-20deep) and with the
groundwater and surface water quality monitoring according to the
se
schedule in the Water Quality Monitoring0692iflyou have any ontact the
questions
Solid Waste Section at (919) 73
regarding this letter.
Sincerely,
M"M
Bobby Lutfy
Hydrogeologist
Solid Waste Section
cc: Bill Sessoms
Bill Morris
Phil Dickerson

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, LTN?FA
Health and Natural Resources • •
Division of Solid Waste Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary E:) E H N F=1
William L. Meyer, Director
December 27,1994
Mr. Phil Dickerson
Pitt County Engineer
1717 West Fifth Street
Greenville, N.C. 27834
Re: Establishing a Monitoring 5yetem and Initiating a Semi-annual 5ampling Plan for the Closed Unit at the
Pitt County Landfill ( Permit # 74-01).
Dear Mr. Dickerson,
Based on information obtained during the transition plan investigation the groundwater monitoring
system for the closed unit does not allow for adequate monitoring of the surficial aquifer. The newly installed
wells, as part of the transition plan, will provide a more accurate representation of water quality in this zone. After
review of the data from the new wells and existing monitoring wells the following is necessary to further
characterize the site:
• Establish a numbering system which includes the new wells.
• 5ample the following wells semi-annually to establish an upgradient and a downgradient water quality
baseline for comparative purposes: MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, P-1, P-2, P-4, P-5, P-6, P-7, P-9, P-13, P-14, P-15,
P-16, P-21, P-23, P-25, P-26. Refinement of the monitoring system may be warranted at a later date
when the hydrogeologic environment is better understood.
• Coordinate closed cell sampling events with the active cell sampling events to eliminate repetitive sampling
of wells along the railroad track.
• Analyze the samples utilizing EPA methods 507, 531.1 and for the constituents on the attached lists.
• Notify the Section two weeks prior to any sampling events so arrangements can be made to split samples
with the County's sampling contractor.
If you have any questions concerning these matters, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Mark Poindexter, Hydrogeologist
Solid Waste 5ection
cc: Phil Prete
Billy Morris
Bobby Lutfy
file
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

INORGANIC CONSTITUENTS
Parameter
Certification
by
DEM
PQL in ppb
(1)
Antimony
Metals,
Group
II
- low
30
level
(2)
Arsenic
Metals,
Group
I
- low
10
level
(3)
Barium
Barium
(20)
500
(4)
Beryllium
Metals,
Group
I
- low
2
level
(5)
Cadmium
Metals,
Group
I
- low
1
level
(6)
Chromium
Metals,
Group
I
- low
10
level
(7)
Cobalt
Metals,
Group
I
- low
10
level
(8)
Copper
Metals,
Group
I
-
200
regular
level
(9)
Lead
Metals,
Group
I
- low
10
level
(10)
Nickel
Metals,
Group
I
-
50
regular
level
(11)
Selenium
Metals,
Group
I
- low
20
level
(12)
Silver
Metals,
Group
II
- low
10
level
(13)
Thallium
Metals,
Group
II
- low
10
level
(14)
Vanadium
Metals,
Group
I
- low
40
level
(15)
Zinc
Metals,
Group
I
-
50
regular
level
The data shall be reported at the specified Practical Quantitation Limit (PQL).
In addition to sampling for the constituents referenced above, all sampling
should also include field testing of pH, temperature, and specific conductivity.
No filtering of samples is allowed. The 3030C preparation method for metals
analysis is not allowed.

ORGANIC PQL ORGANIC PQL
CONSTITUENT (UG/L) I CONSTITUENT (UGII
(16) ACETONE
100 1 (40) T-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
10
(17) ACRYLONITRILE
200
(41) ETHYLBENZENE
5
(18) BENZENE
5
(42) lvlETHYL BUTYL KETONE
50
(19) BROMOCHLOROMETI-UNE
5
(43) METHYL BROMIDE
10
(20) BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
5
(44) METHYL CHLORIDE
10
(21) BROMOFORM
5
(45) METHYLENE BROMIDE
10
(22) CARBON DISULFIDE
100
(46) METHYLENE CHLORIDE
10
(23) CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
10
(47) MEK; 2-BUTANONE
100
(24) CHLOROBENZENE
5
(48) METHYL IODIDE
10 II,
(25) CHLOROETHANE
10
I (49) METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
100
(26) CHLOROFORM
5
I (50) STYRENE
I 10
(27) CHLORODIBROb,10'vfETH:\NE
5
(51) 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
5
(28) DBCP
25
I (52) 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
I 5
(29) ETHYLENE DIBROMIDE
5
(53) TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
I 5
(30) 0-DICHLOROBENZENE
5
(54) TOLUENE
( 5
(31) P-DICHLOROBENZENE
5
(55) 1,1,1,-TRICHLOROETH.-�-NE
I 5
(32) T-1,4-DICHLORO-2-BUTENE
100
I (56) 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
I 5
(33) 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
5
I (57) TRICHLORO ETHYLENE
I 5
(34) ETHYLENE DICHLORIDE
5
(58) CFC-11
I 5
(35) VINYLIDENE CHLORIDE
5
(59) 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
15
(36) CIS- 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
5
(60) VINYL ACETATE
I 50
(37) T-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
5
(61) VINYL CHLORIDE
I 10
(38) PROPYLENE DICHLORIDE
5
(62) XYLENES
( 5
(39) CIS- 1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
10
ALSO KNOWN AS: (21)-TRIBROMOMETHAiNE, (25)-ETHYL CHLORIDE, (26)-TRICHLOROMETHANE,
(27)-DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE,(28)-1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE, (29)-1,2-DIBROMOETHANE,
(30)-1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE, (31)-1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE, (33)-ETHYLIDENE CHLORIDE,
(34)-1,2-DICHLOROETHANE, (35)-1,1-DICHLOROETHENE (ETHYLENE), (36)-CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE,
(37)-TRAMS-I,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE, (38)-1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE, (42)-2-HEXANONE, (43)-BROMOMETHANE,
(44)-CHLORONIETHANE, (45)-DIBROMOMETHANE, (46)-DICHLOROMETHANE, (47)-METHYL ETHYL KETONE,
(43)-IODOMETHANE, (49)-4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE, (53)-TETRACHLOROETHENE, PERCHLOROETHYLENE,
(55)-NIETHYLCHLOROFORM, (57)-TRICHLOROETHENE, (58)-TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE

PITT COUNTY
co4ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
1717 WEST FIFTH STREET
GREENVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 27834
4th ::' CAQo` TELEPHONE (919) 830fi3M
December 19, 1994
Mr. Jim Barber
Solid Waste Management
225 Green Street, Suite 601
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301
Subject: Temporary Solid Waste Loading Facility
at the Pitt County Landfill
Dear Sir:
SOLID WASTE
BUILDING INSPEC IONS
DEC 21 1"4
SOLID ARi E mANAGEWENt
FAYETTEVILLE RE00NAL OFFICa
Thank you for returning my call on Friday, December 16, 1994,
and discussing our proposed temporary solid waste loading facility
at the Pitt County Landfill. Enclosed is a drawing showing plan
and section views of the structure we propose to construct and use
until our permanent Transfer Station is operable. Also enclosed is
a drawing showing the location of both temporary and permanent
facilities on the Pitt County Landfill site. Please note the force
main crossing the northern part of the landfill.
If additional information is needed, please call us. Your
immediate attention and approval concerning the temporary facility
is respectfully requested.
JTW\pmk
Enclosures
ver t
v u ,
�
hn T. Weaver, Jr
vironmental Engi
Recycled Paper

TEMPORARY SOLID WASTE
LOADING FACILITY AT THE
PITT COUNTY LANDFILL
b
W)
SLOPE TO 50'
GRADE
PLAN VIEW IDEC 21
TIPPING I LOADING
CONC SLAB
COMPACTED FILL-)
GRADE LEVEL
NTS
MANAG&AEW
fAy,ETTlt\hLL . F, RFOjONAL OFFICE
BENT PLATE CAP
2" x 8" TREATED TIMBERS
G" x G" TREATED TIMBERS
1 4' D.C.
TRUCK WAITING
CONC. SLAB
CONC
1.
SECTION A -A
NTS
DECEM13ER 19,1994
EWH

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
;WA
Health and Natural Resources g4j
•
Division of Solid Waste Management
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor E5 E" N F1
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
William L. Meyer, Director
Memorandum
Date: November 7, 1994
To: Dexter Matthews
Pat Williams
Interested Parties
From: Bill SessorP_s /
Solid Waste Section
Re: Response letter for Governor Hunt
Attached are the following:
• Response letter for Governor Hunt's office
• Copy of letter from the Section to Pitt County
The letter from Pitt County to Governor Hunt was for informational purposes only and does
not request any specific or general action. Assistance was needed only in the event the issue
could not be resolved (last paragraph, last sentence).
The Section has met with members of the Pitt County Engineering and Administrative staff
and the Pitt County attorney. During these meetings the general issue of the status and closure
of the existing landfill was resolved. A summary of the meeting discussions can be found in
the attached letter.
As such, the Governor's response letter reflects the nature of the Pitt County letter and
subsequent events.
CASESSOMS\INACTIVETIMMEMO.1
P.O, Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 1 o% post -consumer paper

November 1994
Ed B. Bright
Chairman, Pitt County Commissioners
1717 West Fifth Street
Greenville, North Carolina 27834
Dear Mr. Bright,
Thank you for your letter regarding the Pitt County Municipal Solid Waste Landfill. I
share your concerns regarding the efforts of Pitt County in planning for anticipated
solid waste management needs.
It is my understanding that Pitt County has held subsequent meetings with the
Division of Solid Waste Management to address your concerns. I have been
informed that Pitt County and the Division have reached an understanding with
regards to the issue of your current landfill and with your future waste disposal
needs.
Please feel free to call upon me should you need any assistance in the future. My
warmest personal regards.
C:\SESSOMS\INACTIVE\PITT\G OV-RESP.1

71/- 0 C 4Q,,4
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Nancy W. Smith, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF LAND
LAND QUALITY
October 31,
A4-v
C)EHNF�
F
RESOURCEfk
S'' ...'. i.
SECTION
1994 %ion
lf);yp,grr MANACA VENT
LETTER OF APPROVAL WITH MODIFICAT1Q919TFVILLL pLGIC?NAL 101`1 K,5
County of Pitt
ATTN: Mr. Phil Dickerson, County Engineer
1717 W. Fifth Street
Greenville, North Carolina 27834
RE: Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan
Pitt County Landfill Borrow
near Greenville - Pitt County
Date Received: October 17, 1994
Responsible Party: County of Pitt
Dear Mr. Dickerson:
This office has completed its review of the erosion and
sedimentation control plan for the referenced project. The
project is the excavation of landfill capping material affecting
45 acres of field adjacent to the landfill. Based upon the
information provided, we find the plan to be acceptable and
hereby issue this LETTER OF APPROVAL with the following
modifications.
1. The slope of the excavation areas must be at an angle
which can be recovered by vegetative cover.
2. If a pond is to be left, it must have an average depth
of 4 feet at seasonal low. This is to prevent the pond
from becoming foul, noxious or odious.
The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act requires the
owner/de•reloper to use appropriate methods for the protection of
adjoining natural resources and properties, both during and after
construction, from the effects of accelerated erosion. This
program is performance oriented. It is your responsibility to
understand and comply with the requirements of the Act.
1424 Carolina Avenue, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

County of Pitt
ATTN: Mr. Phil Dickerson, County Engineer
October 31, 1994
Page 2
The following minimal mandatory standards of the Act are
hereby made a part of the approved plan:
-- a copy of the latest approved soil erosion and control
plan must be on file at the job site;
a buffer zone, sufficient to restrain sedimentation, must
be maintained between the land -disturbing activity and
any adjacent property or watercourse;
-- new or affected slopes must be at an angle that can be
retained by vegetative cover and exposed slopes must be
provided with a ground cover sufficient to restrain
erosion within 30 working days of completion of any phase
(rough or final) of grading (RYE GRASS IS NOT in the
approved seeding specifications nor is it an ACCEPTABLE
substitute for the providing of a ground cover); and
a permanent ground cover, sufficient to restrain erosion,
must be provided within the shorter of 30 working or 120
calendar days after completion of construction or
development.
Be advised that unannounced periodic inspections of the
project will be made to ensure compliance with the approved plan
and the program requirements. If the plan and/or its
implementation is determined to be inadequate, this office may
require that it be revised to comply with state law. Failure to
comply with the approved plan or with any requirements of this
program or to affect areas in other than to those designated to
be affected in the approved plan, could result in a civil penalty
assessment of up to $500 per day for each day the site is out of
compliance against the financially responsible party (County of
Pitt).
In recognizing the desirability of early coordination of
sedimentation control, we believe it would be beneficial for you
and your contractor to arrange a pre -construction conference to
discuss the requirements of the approved erosion and sedimen-
tation control plan. It would be appreciated if you would
contact this office to let me know the date of construction
start-up and the date of the pre -construction conference.

County of Pitt
ATTN: Mr. Phil Dickerson, County Engineer
October 31, 1994
Page 3
The land -disturbing activity described in this plan may
require approval or permitting from other Federal, State or local
agencies. These could include the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
under Article 404 jurisdiction, the Division of Environmental
Management under water quality regulations (contact Bill Moore,
919-946-6481), county, city or town agencies under other local
ordinances, or other approvals that may be required. This
approval cannot supersede any other approval or permit.
Please be advised that all land -disturbing activities
affecting 5 acres or more are required to have a NPDES permit.
Contact Mr. Bill Mills, Division of Environmental Management -
Stormwater Group, at [phone] for more information. We
have enclosed information regarding NPDES permit requirements.
Sincerely,f-
Patrick H. McClain, P.E.
Assistant Regional Engineer
PHM:jt
Enclosures
cc: Bill Morris, Division of Solid Waste Management
Terry Dover, Division of Solid Waste Management
ce'rf"l Its

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Nancy W. Smith, Regional Manager
October 10, 1994
Mr. Phil Dickerson, P.E.
Pitt County Engineering Department
1717 West Fifth Street
Greenville, NC 27834
/ %IL
[DEHNF1
RE: Landfill Closure - Pitt County Landfill
Permit No. 74-01
Dear Phil:
A recent review of my records confirms that the area north of the
railroad of the Pitt County Landfill was checked for closure
compliance on September 24, 1991. This area was in compliance with
closure requirements found in Section .0501 of the N.C. Solid Waste
Management Rules that were in effect at that time. Numerous test
holes were bored and checked to confirm the final cover depth.
The site was inspected again on October 6, 1994 and was found to be
in satisfactory condition with a good vegetative cover in place
over most areas. There are a couple of areas where some
maintenance needs to be performed. This is a normal occurrence and
was discussed with John Weaver and H.C. Kinsaul of your staff.
Please contact me if I can be of any further assistance concerning
this matter.
Sincerely,
Bill . Morris
Waste Management Specialist
Solid Waste Section
s le
cc: Terry Dover
:x 1 Prete ;Pitt Co. Permit #74-01
1424 Carolina Avenue, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, XT7?FA
Health and Natural Resources • •
Division of Solid Waste Management
-" James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor p � H N 1�
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
William L. Meyer, Director
October 10, 1994
Phil Dickerson, PE
County Engineer
Pitt County Engineering Department
1717 West Fifth Street
Greenville, North Carolina 27834
Re: Pitt County Municipal Solid Waste Landfill
Permit Number 74-01
Mr. Dickerson:
This letter summarizes the items discussed and agreed upon during meetings between Pitt
County and the Division of Solid Waste Management, Solid Waste Section (Section) held
September 20, 1994.
Closure of Existing Landfill Unit
The existing landfill unit north of the Norfolk Southern railroad tracks stopped receiving waste
on or before October 9, 1991 and has a cover consisting of a minimum of 2-feet of compacted
soil. This unit has been preliminarily inspected and appears to comply with Solid Waste
Management closure requirements.
Therefore, this unit is deemed closed in accordance with North Carolina Solid Waste
Management Rules, 15A NCAC 13B .0510, and Solid Waste Permit Number 74-01, subject
to the following conditions and requirements.
1. Two (2) feet of suitable compacted earth final cover shall be documented and
maintained.
2. Permanent erosion control measures shall be employed as necessary to prevent erosion
and silt from moving off site and to prevent on site erosion.
3. Drainage control measures shall be employed as necessary to prevent impoundment of
surface water over waste.
4. Vegetative stabilization shall be employed with native grasses.
5. Measure shall be employed to contain leachate on site or leachate shall be properly
discharged off site.
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

6. The above measure shall be installed or employed on or before October 24, 1994.
7. Pitt County shall contact the Regional Waste Management Specialist, Mr. Bill Morris,
at [phone], on or before October 24, 1994, to conduct an inspection of this
unit for compliance with the above conditions.
8. Upon successful inspection by the Section's representative, Pitt County will provide
written notification and certification to the Section that the unit complies with the
closure conditions.
9. Documentation of the above shall be submitted in a format to allow incorporation into
the Transition Plan previously submitted to the Section and currently under review and
revision.
All disposal sites, either operating or closed, are subject to the applicable explosive gas
requirements, surface water requirements, and ground water requirements, of the Solid Waste
Management Rules.
Facility Transition Plan and Application for Transfer Facility
The landfill unit south of the Norfolk Southern railroad tracks continued to receive waste after
October 9, 1993. As such, this facility is subject to the Transition Plan and Closure
Requirements of 15A NCAC 13B .1617(d). The Transition Plan shall be revised to document
the closed status of the north unit and shall reflect plans for ongoing operations and eventual
closure of the south unit.
It is the Section's understanding that the south unit will close upon reaching current permitted
capacity and that Pitt County will submit plans for constructing and operating a transfer facility
for continuing waste management activities. If the proposed transfer facility is to be located
within the boundary of the currently permitted facility, the plans for the transfer facility should
be included in the Transition Plan revisions.
In view of the limited remaining capacity at the current facility, the Section will expedite the
review of Transition Plan revisions and Transfer Facility submittals. Early submittal of Transfer
Facility plans and review documents will help facilitate the Section's review.
The Section contact for revisions and review of the Transition Plan is Ms. Susan Wright at
[phone]. The Section contact for review of transfer facilities is Mr. Jim Barber at (910)
486-1191. Mr. Barber can also assist with general engineering requirements of the Transition
Plan revisions.
Water Quality Assessment
Section staff and representatives of Pitt County and Coastal Chemical Corporation met to
discuss the need for water quality assessment at the Pitt County facility. Pitt County and
Coastal Chemical Corporation requested additional time to review site data and to meet with
each other before responding to the Section's request for assessment.

Specific post closure water quality monitoring requirements shall be determined after
completion of the Section's ongoing investigation.
The Section contact for water quality assessment requirements is Mr. Mark Poindexter at
[phone].
Should you have any questions or if we can provide any other assistance, please do not
hesitate to contact the above noted Section contacts or the Raleigh Central Office.
Respectfully yours,
V
mes C. Coffey
pervisor, Permitting Branch
copy: Billy Morris - DSWM
Mark Poindexter - DSWM
Susan Wright - DSWM
Jim Barber - DSWM
CASESSOMSTROJECTSWIMPITT.1

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, LTRMA
Health and Natural Resources • •
Division of Solid Waste Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor p � H N F1
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
William L. Meyer, Director
September 23, 1994
Phil G. Dickerson, P.E.
Pitt County Engineering Department
1717 West Fifth Street
Greenville, NC 27834
RE: Permanent Methane Monitoring Plan, Pitt County
Landfill Transition Plan, Permit No. 74-01
Mr. Dickerson:
In accordance with 15A NCAC 13B .1626(4), owners or operators of all municipal solid
waste landfill (MSWLF) units must implement a permanent methane monitoring program on
or before October 9, 1994. The permanent methane monitoring plan in the referenced
transition plan includes the frequency of testing, test procedure, and a response plan for
situations in which methane gas levels are exceeded, in addition to, proposed well locations,
depth, and construction.
In accordance with North Carolina General Statute § 130A-294 and North Carolina Solid
Waste Management Rules, 15A NCAC 13B .1603(d)(2)(B), partial transition plan approval of
the Methane Gas Control paragraphs of Section 6 is hereby approved. This partial approval
is valid only until such time as the full transition plan is approved by the Division of Solid
Waste Management.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Susan Wright at (919)
733-0692.
Thank you,
Susan J. Wrig t
Environmental Engineer
Approved:
Ci�v►..ta, C�
es C. Coffey
upervisor, Permitting Branch
Solid Waste Section
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

cc: Kramer Jackson - Pitt County Manager
Billy Morris - DSWM
Terry Dover - DSWM
C:\WRIGHT\PROJECTS\PITT\GASLET.2

tt
zo l9 �° l � a lJl�si� �c �Gz.r,, ei7�
'I
�rn
t
�j
ALAI .44
rt
00,41.5Mt C A,.,, ((,4
busto..d &.iok ; LLer tm
kep,
Ca.t c7iQ do..cw
/le- :3!t-
I/I.7,�'b /lz6
U4 4q3-oa76
4—�
L:c
C�
57
-7 33 C4 S Z
s0�'G �4s �c Sec /`o�tlC�• (�"�•«-/ \�j��� �� �a — �� $�
i, ��� 733 —Ob 9Z

;: _ a gi`� y jr.,
DER -I �I�JH HINGTOWNC Fa1
va
Cy
• l 14
I'� $ CO
js
..t012
- ; ., p p.� •mod ��II
1 ,k4
•• 4 ���W� fly:, '.� . ^� ` 41 ��A
F
f'
i y 4
Mp'sP�af �
*ay..
r yy,arry �.;
• - 11 + 4y I J'Ir I,Jb ws �� ,TSB' r.
4' n
4 M R
�' Fr, �C'"�Y M1t�"�r K cr Sa��•�n; 4 W
I
Q J
wit l'M tra
ey B r S � 19 A_ _ a Q 49 a �. .� �' 6C � '� G rr ' . � «� � 4 Yam •
16

lob �� `
. .
w � nIN Hit

Prff COUNTY
co4h� ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
1717 WEST FIFTH STREET
�k.GREENVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 27834
GAa0 TELEPHONE (919) &W63M
September 6, 1994
N. C. Dept. of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Solid Waste Management
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Attention: Susan J. Wright
Environmental Engineer
Subject: Pitt County Landfill Transition Plan
Methane Gas Monitoring
Permit No. 74-01
SOLID WASTE
BUILDING INSPECTIONS
Dear Ms. Wright:
In accordance with your request by letter dated August 11,
1994, we have revised the Methane Gas Control paragraphs of
SECTION 6 of the Pitt County Landfill Transition Plan. Please
remove page OP9 and substitute the attached pages OP9, OP9A, and
OP9B. Please insert the attached Methane Gas Monitoring Well
Detail at the end of SECTION 6.
If additional information is needed, please advise us.
JTW\pmk
Enclosures
4Your very truly,
i
J hn T. Weaver, Jr.
E vironmental Engineer
Recycled Paper

Cover Material:
OP9
1/
Daily cover at the Pitt County Landfill will consist of
fabric cover approved by the Division. At least once a week, all
exposed waste will be covered with at least six (6) inches of
earthen material. Areas which will not receive additional waste
for twelve months or more shall be temporarily covered with at
least one foot of soil cover. Areas which will receive no
additional waste shall be covered within 180 days with final
cover as shown on the plans. Daily, intermediate, and final
cover shall at all times be graded as not to hold water, and
depressions shall be filled as they appear.
Methane Gas Control:
The intent of the methane gas monitoring program is to: (1)
ensure that the concentration of methane as generated by the
landfill does not exceed 25% of the lower explosive limit (LEL)
for methane in any facility structure and to (2) ensure that the
concentration of methane gas does not exceed the lower explosive
limit (LEL) for methane at the landfill property boundary.
In order to fulfill the requirement of (1) above, seven (7)
DICON 800H methane gas detectors will be installed within the
structures on the landfill property. Detectors will be located
in toilets, tool room, office, service garage and storage areas.
Detectors will be installed high on the walls in landfill
structures since methane is lighter than air and will rise to the
top of the space if present. Detectors will sound an alarm if
the concentration of methane in the detection chamber reaches 25%
of lower explosive limit. Gas detectors will not be installed in
landfill structures which are on foundation blocks above the
ground with the crawl space not enclosed. If the concentration
of methane exceeds 25% of the lower explosive limit (LEL) in any
landfill structure, the landfill operator will take the action
described at the end of this section.
In order to accomplish the intent of (2) above, permanent
gas monitoring wells will be constructed at locations shown on
enclosure (3) at approximate 500 foot intervals except where
perimeter drainage ditches are present. It is anticipated that
any methane gas reaching a perimeter ditch will be dissipated
into the air at the slope.
Each gas monitoring well will consist of a 6 inch minimum
diameter bore hole down to the level of groundwater. A 111
slotted PVC pipe casing will be installed in the bore hole with
the bottom end plugged and the upper end fitted with a bentonite
seal around the casing at grade level. A gravel pack filter will
surround the 1" casing for its entire length below the bentonite
seal. The casing will be slotted for its entire length within
the gravel pack. The upper end of the casing will be capped 34"
above grade and will be protected by a steel outer casing with
hinged cover and locking hasp. The outer protective steel casing
will be set in a cast -in -place concrete cap at grade level above

the bentonite seal. The concrete
thick and 24 inches diameter with
protective casing. A schematic of
is shown on enclosure (9). A more
at the end of this section.
OP9A
cap will be approximately 1211
top sloping away from the
a proposed gas monitoring well
detailed diagram is attached
Readings will be taken quarterly at the gas monitoring
locations with a Gastechtor Model 1939 surveyor. The instrument
is a dual range hydrocarbon surveyor for 0-100% lower explosive
limit (LEL) and 0-100% methane by volume. Indications of the
instrument are displayed on a meter, visible through a window on
the top face of the instrument case. On LEL, the meter reads gas
concentration 0-100% LEL where 100o LEL represents the minimum
concentration of gas in air below which propagation of flame does
not occur when placed in contact with an ignition source. The
alarm on the instrument will sound if the reading rises above 20%
LEL.
The Gastechtor Model 1939 surveyor is calibrated by allowing
the instrument to warm up for about 5 minutes to stabilize. With
the upper half of the case removed and inverted for access to the
COARSE ZERO potentiometer and LEL SPAN potentiometer, turn COARSE
ZERO potentiometer to bring meter reading to zero. For LEL range
calibration, insert sample inlet tube into a vessel of known
calibrating gas. Observe meter and note highest reading. If
reading is incorrect, adjust LEL SPAN potentiometer to give
desired reading.
Readings will be taken at gas monitoring locations by
unlocking cap on outer protective casing, removing PVC casing
cap, inserting sample inlet tube in PVC casing, and observing LEL
scale on instrument.
Quarterly readings at gas monitoring locations will be
recorded if any indication is observed on the LEL scale. If the
concentration of methane gas exceeds the lower explosive limit
for methane at the landfill property boundary or if the
concentration of methane exceeds 25% of the lower explosive limit
(LEL) in any landfill structure, the landfill operator must:
1) Immediately take all necessary steps to protect human
health including:
a) Notify the Division of Solid Waste Management
b) Notify affected property owners and/or tenants im-
mediately in person or by telephone and follow up
with written notification by registered mail.
c) Evacuate any structures if necessary.
2) Prepare and implement a remediation plan within sixty
(60) days, place a copy of the plan in the landfill's
operating record, and notify the Division of Solid Waste
Management that the plan has been implemented.

.... ,.am :.i.-,.v,.....: .,.... ..... ... ,, _ t ... _ . . _ .._..........:.....,.......... ,:.. .,.. s.:.xk..i3-`.iw4iy;lti5'ti".'S.9iX:LS�'.a...
OP9B
The gas monitoring wells will be installed as soon as
practicable upon approval of this procedure. A temporary gas
monitoring plan will be used until the permanent wells can be
installed.

PROTECTIVE STEEL CASINea 8" DIA. OR SO.
36"
I 34"
GRADE LEVEL
12" MIN.
END SLOTTED PIPE
JUST BELOW SEAL
DEPTH TO WATER
TABLE MAY VARY
/vy�
STEEL PIPE CAP OR HINGED COVER
WITH LOCKING HASP
P.V.C. PIPE CAP
REMOVABLE
SENTONITE SEAL
[DIA. SCK40 P.V.C. PIPE
(SLOTTED IN CRAVEL PACK)
1 + P.V.C. PIPE END CAP
CEMENT PLUG AT BOTTOM OF BORE
HOLE
• GROUNDWATER LEVEL
�-- MIN. BORE DIA. - G"
METHANE GAS MONITORING WELL DETAIL
PITT COUNTY LANDFILL TRANSITION PLAN
NOT TO SCALE

co4PITT COUNTY
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
;• 1717 WEST FIFTH STREET
GREENVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 27834
Qrh CAa°` TELEPHONE [phone]
September 1, 1994
James C. Coffey
Supervisor, Permitting Branch
Solid Waste Section
Department of Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Coffey:
SOLID WASTE
BUUAING INSPEMONS
I have received your letter dated August 24, 1994 relating to
the northern portion of the Pitt County Landfill, and have
circulated copies to the Board of Commissioners and the County's
counsel. We believe that the letter is based on incorrect
information.
The second paragraph of your letter states that "the area
north of the railroad tracks that is proposed for a vertical
expansion is a discrete area that is not an existing MSWLF unit"
because the area did not receive solid waste prior to October 9,
1993. This statement is incorrect for at least two reasons.
First, the northern portion of the landfill did receive solid waste
prior to October 9, 1993. We would be happy to provide evidence to
substantiate this fact. In addition, the County takes issue with
the Division's conclusion that the northern portion of the landfill
is a "discrete" area. The railroad track is merely an easement
that does not have the effect of turning the Pitt County Landfill
into two separate facilities. In fact, both the County and the
State have always treated the landfill as a single unit, as is
evidenced by the attached documents. Therefore, the County
believes that it is inappropriate and unfair under such facts and
after such a course of conduct to treat one portion of the landfill
as discrete and separate from another.
The County is very concerned about the Division's August 24
letter, since the State has had possession of the County's
Transition Plan since July 21, 1992, as evidenced by your August
25, 1992 letter, yet never raised any question until August 24,
1994 as to whether vertical expansion was permissible. Because of
the importance and urgency of resolving this point, we would like
to meet with you and other appropriate officials of the Division at
Recycled Paper

James C. Coffey
September 1, 1994
Page 2
your earliest convenience. Please let me know when such a meeting
can be arranged. In view of the deadlines involved, we hope that
the meeting can take place right away.
Sincerely,
Phil G. Dickerson, P.E.
Enclosure
CC: Pamela Weaver Best, Esq.
William G. Ross, Jr., Esq.
Robert J. King, III, Esq.

State of North Carolina'F3;;
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural ResourcesA41j;ij
Division of Solid Waste Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor � � H N
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
William L. Meyer, Director
August 24, 1994
Phil G. Dickerson, P.E.
Pitt County Engineering Department
1717 West Fifth Street
Greenville, NC 27834
RE: Proposed Vertical Expansion, Pitt County
Landfill Transition Plan, Permit No. 74-01
Mr. Dickerson:
The Solid Waste Section (the "Section") has begun a technical review of the Pitt
County Landfill Transition Plan. This involves comparing the requirements of Rule .1617(d)
with the submitted transition plan. A preliminary review of the gas monitoring section of the
operations plan and resulting comments have been sent to you.
After further review of the transition plan and discussions with the Section's Field
Operations Branch, it has been determined that the area proposed for vertical expansion is not
an existing unit. According to 15A NCAC 13B .1602(7), an "existing MSWLF unit" means any
municipal solid waste landfill unit that is receiving solid waste as of October 9, 1993. The
area north of the railroad tracks that is proposed for a vertical expansion is a discrete area that
is not an existing MSWLF unit and therefore this area can not be vertically expanded.
Although Rule .1625(a)(1)(D) allows existing MSWLF units which will reach permitted
capacity prior to October 9, 1996 to apply for a vertical expansion, the existing unit (south of
the railroad tracks) will soon be out of capacity. Pitt County needs to consider other options
for the disposal of their waste. Once Pitt County has decided on an option (continued disposal
or closing), the transition plan must be revised accordingly.
The Solid Waste Section is available to discuss this matter. If you have any questions
or concerns please contact our office at [phone].
Sincerely,
. cc-i"
mes C. Coffey
Supervisor, Permitting Branch
Solid Waste Section
P.O, Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

cc: Kramer Jackson - Pitt County Manager
Billy Morris - DSWM
Terry Dover - DSWM
CA W RIGHT\PROJECTS\PITT\CLOSELET.1

State of North Carolina'T
Department of Environment, LA
Health and Natural Resources / TFA
•
Division of Solid Waste Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor p E H N
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
William L. Meyer, Director
August 11, 1994
Phil G. Dickerson, P.E.
Pitt County Engineering Department
1717 West Fifth Street
Greenville, NC 27834
RE: Permanent Methane Monitoring Plan, Pitt County
Landfill Transition Plan, Permit No. 74-01
Mr. Dickerson:
In accordance with 15A NCAC 13B .1626(4), owners or operators of all municipal solid
waste landfill (MSWLF) units must implement a permanent methane monitoring program on
or before October 9, 1994. Based on its' preliminary review, the Section needs the following
additional information from Pitt County.
1. Detail a response plan. What steps will the landfill operator take if methane
levels exceed 25 percent of the lower explosive limit in structures or the lower
explosive limit at the property boundary?
2. Detail a monitoring procedure that includes calibration and use of the gas
monitor. What gas monitor will be used to read methane levels? How is it
calibrated? How is it used?
3. Detail a test procedure. How will the wells be tested? How will the structures
be tested? Who will do the testing?
4. Explain location of wells. What is the distance between the wells? Why where
those well locations chosen?
5. Explain construction and depth of permanent wells. What is the basic
construction of a permanent well? How deep in to the ground is the well? How
high above the ground does the well protrude?
6. Show diagram of proposed methane monitoring well or probe.
Please submit requested information or revisions to the Section within 30 days in order
to expedite review of the referenced transition plan application. If you have any questions
regarding this matter, please contact me at [phone].
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Sincerely,
4, Jx,
Susan J. Might
Environmental Engineer
cc: Kramer Jackson - Pitt County Manager
Billy Morris - DSWM
Terry Dover - DSWM
CA W RIGHT\PROJ ECTS\PITT\GASLET.1

State of North Carolina �� o
Department of Environment, -X;t
Health and Natural Resources 4 •
Division of Solid Waste Management Ira
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor AdabodobEdw
p E H N F1
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
William L. Meyer, Director
July 8, 1994
Mr. Phil Dickerson
1717 W. Fifth Street
Grrenville, N.C. 27834
RE: Interim Review Of Water Quality Monitoring Transition Plan
Pitt County Landfill, Permit # 74-01
Dear Mr. Dickerson,
There is limited time available for the Solid Waste Section to
review and evaluate the Water Quality Monitoring Plan submitted as
part of the Transition Plan. It is not possible to do a full
technical review of this plan at this time.
Based on the preliminary review of the Pitt County Water Quality
Monitoring Plan, it appears that no monitoring system upgrade has
yet been proposed. While the Solid Waste Section does not object
to the county conducting additional hydrogeologic investigation in
order to design an effective monitoring system, this investigation
should have been done in the preparation for the Transition Plan.
If this investigation has not yet been done, it should be done
immediately. The new Solid Waste Management Rules for MSWLF units
require that the monitoring system be upgraded and the initial
baseline sampling event be conducted and reported to the Solid
Waste Section on or before October 9, 1994.
It is critical that Pitt County submit a Water Quality Monitoring
Plan in time for the Solid Waste Section to give approval and allow
the county time to install the wells and perform the initial
baseline sampling and process the sampling data prior to the
October 9, 1994, deadline. If you have any questions or comments
regarding this letter, please contact the Solid Waste Section at
[phone].
Sincerely,
A 71'7
Bobby Lutfy, Hydrogeologist
Solid Waste Section
cc: Bill Sessoms
Billy Morris
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX 919-71&3605
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

q,/ -
�j rl State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources A[4 • •
Division of Solid Waste Management
James B. Hunt, B.
r � C
Jonathan . Howes,
SecSecretsLary C
April 19, 1994
MEMORANDUM
TO: Landfill Operators
FROM: Dexter R. Matthews, Chief zo/�/
Solid Waste Section
SUBJECT: Recordkeeping Requirements for MSWLFS
This is to remind all MSWLF facility operators that certain
elements of transition plans for existing facilities are included
in required recordkeeping effective April 9, 1994. These elements
and other required records must be kept at the facility and
available for inspection by section personnel.
For your convenience, I am enclosing a list of the record
keeping requirements for MSW Landfills.
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolinr, 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

OPERATING RECORD INCLUDES:
1. Outline of waste screening program for detecting and
preventing disposal of hazardous waste, liquid waste, P.C.B.
waste, and banned items.
2. Records of screening inspections.
3. Outline of training of facility personnel to recognize liquid
waste, hazardous waste, P.C.B. waste and banned items.
4. Waste determination records.
5. Amounts by weight of solid waste received at the facility to
include source of generation.
6. Gas monitoring results and any remediation plans required.
(Recommend written description of monitoring program.)
7. Any demonstration, certification, finding, monitoring,
testing, or analytical data required by rules .1630 through
.1637 of this section. (see attachment)
8. Any monitoring, testing, or analytical data as required by
rule .1627 of this section.
9. Any cost estimates and financial assurance documentation
required by Rule .1628 of this section. (see attachment)
10. Any demonstration that a site located within 5,000 ft. of an
airport used by only piston powered aircraft or within 10,000
ft. of a runway used by turbine powered aircraft does not pose
bird hazard to aircraft as required by rule .1622(1)(C) of
this section.
OTHER REQUIRED RECORDKEEPING
1. Contingency Plan.
2. Records required by 40 CFR 61 (asbestos rules).
3. Scrap Tire Certification Forms (scrap tire collection,
processing and disposal sites).
4. Operation Plan.
5. Leachate Management Plan .1626(12) (sites with leachate
collection system only).

Page 2
6. Inspection reports of above ground leachate storage tanks (if
applicable) .1680(C)(5).
7. Inspection reports of underground leachate storage tanks (if
applicable) .1680(D)(5).
8. Records of all monitoring information required by the Permit
.1604 (2) (K) (ii) .

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources • •
Division of Solid Waste Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor p INK
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
William L. Meyer, Director
February 18, 1994
Inspection Checklist For Rules .1630 - .1637
.1631(b)(1) Documentation from the Division of approval for the
design, installation, development, and decommission
of any monitoring well or piezometer.
*.1631(d)(2) A copy of the approved monitoring plan, including
information on the number, spacing, location, and
design of the monitoring wells.
*.1632(a) A copy of the approved ground -water sampling and
analysis plan, including procedures and techniques
for: sample collection, sample preservation and
shipment, analytical procedures, chain of custody,
and quality assurance and quality control.
*.1632(j) For each sampling event, a report that includes all
information from each sampling event, including:
field observations, field data, laboratory data,
statistical analysis, sampling methodologies, QA/QC
data, ground -water flow directions and rates for
each monitoring well, and for each well any
constituents that exceed groundwater standards or
show a statistically significant increase over
background levels.
.1633(c)(1) A notice indicating which constituents have shown
statistically significant changes from background
levels.
.1633(c)(3) A report documenting any demonstration that
statistically significant increases resulted from
error in sampling, analysis, statistical evaluation,
or natural variation in ground -water quality or that
a source other than a MSWLF unit caused the
contamination.
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone 91.Y-733-4996 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 60% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Page 2
.1634(d)(1) A notice identifying the Appendix II constituents
that have been detected.
.1634(d)(2) A report from each sampling event.
.1634(g) A notice if one or more Appendix II constituents are
detected at statistically significant levels above
the approved ground -water protection standards in
any sampling event.
.1634(g)(2) A report documenting .any demonstration that
statistically significant increases resulted from
error in sampling, analysis, statistical evaluation,
or natural variation in ground -water quality or that
a source other than a MSWLF unit caused the
contamination.
.1636(a) Any permit modification necessary to document the
selection of remedy based on the results of the
corrective measures assessment.
.1637(c)(4) Any report justifying alternative (corrective)
measures.
.1637(f) A report documenting that the (corrective action)
remedy has been completed.
NOTE: The need for most of this information is based upon
different stages of ground -water investigation and will not be
required for all facilities. Initially, all facilities will be
responsible for having an approved monitoring plan, .1631(d)(2), an
approved sampling and analysis plan, .1632(a), and reports for each
sampling event, .1632(j). The monitoring plan and sampling and
analysis plan are part of the Transition Plan due by April, 9, 1994.
The initial sampling report is due by October 9, 1994.
* Initially required

FINANCIAL ASSURANCE CHECKLIST
Cost Estimate For Closure [.1628(b)(1)]
Financial Assurance For Closure (one of the following)
- Trust Fund [.1628(e)(1)(A)]
- Surety Bond [.1628(e)(1)(B)]
- Letter of Credit [.1628(e)(1)(C)]
- Insurance [.1628(e)(1)(D)]
- Local Government Financial Test [.1628(e)(1)(F)]
- Capital Reserve Fund [.1628(e)(1)(1)]
Cost Estimate For Post -Closure Care [.1628(c)(1)]
Financial Assurance For Post -Closure Care (one of the following)
- Trust Fund [.1628(e)(1)(A)]
- Surety Bond [.1628(e)(1)(B)]
- Letter of Credit [.1628(e)(1)(C)]
- Insurance [.1628(e)(1)(D)]
- Local Government Financial Test [.1628(e)(1)(F)]
- Capital Reserve Fund [.1628(e)(1)(1)]

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
IT
Division of Solid Waste Management 4 6 •
a
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary E H N 1�
William L. Meyer, Director
January 4, 1994
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REnrTE ED
Mr. Phil Dickerson
Pitt County Engineer
1717 West Fifth Street
Greenville, N.C. 27834
RE: Draft Administrative Agreement On Consent For Review.
Pitt County Landfill (#74-01)
Dear Mr. Dickerson,
I've enclosed the requested administrative agreement on
consent for your review. If I can be of further assistance or if
you have any questions regarding this document, please contact our
office at [phone].
S77J
,,X:::� 11 0,4gl
Dexter R. Matthews, Chief
Solid Waste Section
cc: Mr. Kramer Jackson
Mr. Mark Poindexter
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

7401 Permit1995 - Batch No.
�ju/
i .

JAMES B. HUNT JR.
GOVERNOR
SEAIZ
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA r `j
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P.O. BOX25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
December 13, 1995
Mr. Mark Poindexter, L.G.
Solid Waste Section
Division of Solid Waste Management
NC Dept. Of Environment, Health & Natural Resources
401 Oberlin Road, Suite 150
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Re: Proposed Borrow Pit Adjacent To Pitt County Landfill
Dear Mr. Poindexter:
f
GARLAND B:;GARRETT JP-
SECREqA ' G ,
As we discussed earlier this week, the DOT is in the planning phase of the proposed Greenville
Southwest Loop. This highway will provide a bypass around Greenville, connecting US 264 on
the west side to NC 11 on the south side. The project schedule currently lists right-of-way
acquisition to begin in January 2001 and the construction to be let to contract in October 2002.
The northern terminus of the project alignment is to curve around the west side of the Pitt
County Landfill, located immediately south of the proposed US 264/NC 11 Bypass interchange.
An aerial photograph of this area is attached for your use. My purpose for contacting you was
to notify your office about the project and determine what, if any, impact it might have on the
proposed closure of the landfill.
I appreciate your agreeing to further discuss this matter on January 8. If you need any
additional information prior to the meeting, please do not hesitate contacting Jay King, Project
Environmental Geologist, or me at 250-4088.
Sincerely,
asw-
Gregory A. Smith, L.G.
GeoEnviron mental Supervisor
Geotechnical Unit
cc: Ed Lewis, DOT Planning Engineer

boo� I e;� -
qq-01
Re,', Revise,�t 5amp)il\�j anc0 Ondly5i:5 P1611V
Q,�d Revised Beal+h and 5a(tIY PI Qti
p+-f-- Coua-ly LAVA

Groundwater Management Associates, Inc.
101-E Woodwinds Industrial Court
Cary, North Carolina 27511
[phone] Facsimile [phone]
October 17, 1995
Philip Prete, Head
Field Operations Branch
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Solid Waste Management
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Re: Revised Sampling and Analysis Plan and Revised Health and Safety Plan
Pitt County Landfill
Dear Mr. Prete:
Enclosed are the revised Sampling and Analysis Plan and the revised Health and
Safety Plan for proposed activities at the Pitt County
iesm Portions landfill.
Cha ng andnges to the
text are indentified by bold print in the stapled cop
Analysis Plan that were edited include Sections fo to be used when conducting �g1th 0,
20.0, 22.0, and Tables 2, 6, 7, and 16. A ne
well survey was added to Appendix II.
The Health and Safey Plan was amended by adding Section 5.3 Limited Access.
Please call if you have any questions or comments.
Sincerely,
Groundwater Management Associates, Inc.
41
Alfred M. Moncla, II141. S • , P.G.
Hydrogeologist 4 ► %
cc: Phil Dickerson
Pamela Best
Robert King
kcl\winword\pitt\pp 101795 .doe

Sampling and Analysis Plan
for Limited Field Investigation
Pitt County Landfill
Prepared for
Pitt County
Engineering Department
Greenville, North Carolina
Prepared by
Groundwater Management Associates, Inc.
101-E Woodwinds Industrial Court
Cary, North Carolina 27511
October 17, 1995

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
Introduction.................................................................................1
2.0
Objective....................................................................................1
3.0
Scope of Work.............................................................................1
4.0
Site Description............................................................................2
5.0
Waste Disposal History ...................................................................
2
6.0
Previous Environmental Investigations.................................................2
7.0
Field Quality Assurance Procedures....................................................
3
7.1 Calibration.........................................................................
3
7.2 Quality Control Samples.........................................................3
7.3 Documentation....................................................................4
7.3.1 Field Logbooks.........................................................5
7.3.2 Standardized Forms...................................................6
7.3.3 Sample Labels..........................................................6
7.3.4 Custody Seals..........................................................7
7.3.5 Chain of Custody Form..............................................7
8.0
Site Surveying..............................................................................7
9.0
Survey of Private Water -Supply Wells.................................................7
10.0
Well Development.......................................................................
8
11.0
Well Purging..............................................................................9
12.0
Monitoring Well Sampling.............................................................10
13.0
Surface Water Sampling................................................................11
14.0
On -Site Water -Supply Well Sampling................................................11
15.0
Sampling Locations......................................................................12
16.0
Analytical Methods......................................................................12
17.0
Laboratory Certification.................................................................13
18.0
Equipment Decontamination............................................................13
19.0
Investigation -Derived Waste............................................................14
20.0
Personnel Required......................................................................14
21.0
Coordination with Monitoring of Southern Unit....................................15
22.0
Reporting..................................................................................15

Tables
1. Well Development Procedure
2. Equipment List
3. Well Purging Procedure
4. Monitoring Well Sampling Procedure
5. General Procedures for Sampling
6. Special Sampling for Metals and Cyanide
7. Surface Water Sampling Procedure
8. Water -Supply Well Sampling Procedure
9. Chemical Analyses To Be Performed
10. 40 CFR 258 Appendix I Organic Constituents and Practical Quantitation Limits
11. Metals and Cyanides - Analytical Methods and Practical Quantitation Limits
12. Pesticide Analyses Required by NCSWS - Methods and Practical Quantitation
Limits
13. Other Pesticides and PCB's - Methods and Practical Quantitation Limits
14. Analytical Requirements - Containers, Volumes, Preservatives, and Holding
Times
15. Equipment Decontamination Procedure
16. Decontamination Procedure for HDPE Bailers and Disposable Teflon Bailers
Figures
1. General Location of Site
2. General Map of the Pitt County Landfill Facility
3. Sampling Locations: Monitoring Wells, Surface Water, and Water -Supply Well
Appendices
I. Letter from North Carolina Solid Waste Section, December 27, 1994
II. Standard Forms
III. Calibration Procedures

1.0 INTRODUCTION
Pitt County proposes to collect and analyze groundwater and surface water
samples to further characterize the quality of groundwater and surface water at the
northern unit of the inactive Pitt County municipal solid waste landfill located west of
Allen Road. The North Carolina Solid Waste Section (NCSWS) requested further
characterization of the water quality in the surficial aquifer at the northern unit in a
letter dated December 27, 1994 (Appendix I). An Administrative Agreement on
Consent between Pitt County and the NCSWS for the investigation of the quality of
groundwater and surface water in the vicinity of the landfill was executed on January
18, 1995.
2.0 OBJECTIVE
The data quality objectives of this plan are to characterize the quality of
groundwater and surface water in the vicinity of the northern unit of the landfill.
Groundwater samples will be collected from wells specified by the NCSWS in their
December 27, 1994, letter. Surface water samples will be collected both upgradient
and downgradient of the landfill. A water sample will also be collected from the on -
site, water -supply well. All sampling will be coordinated with the semiannual
monitoring of the southern unit of the landfill. The water samples will be analyzed by
methods required by the NCSWS in their letter dated December 27, 1994, and by other
methods selected by Pitt County. These other methods are chosen to target known or
suspected contaminants based on past analytical results and known waste deposited in
the northern unit. An attempt will be made to locate all private water -supply wells
within one-half mile of the landfill.
3.0 SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of this proposed investigation includes the following activities:
• Collect and analyze surface water samples from 4 locations.
• Collect and analyze groundwater samples from 18 monitoring wells.
• Collect and analyze a water sample from the on -site water -supply well.
• Determine the elevations of 2 wells which have not been surveyed.
• Measure the depth to water in all 18 monitoring wells.
TAF\d: \taf\Pitt\samplan. doc

Sampling and Analysis Plan
Pitt County Landfill
Page 2 of 15
October 17, 1995
• Attempt to locate all private water -supply wells within one-half mile of
landfill.
4.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
The inactive Pitt County municipal solid waste landfill facility occupies
approximately 150 acres west of Allen Road (NCSR 1203) and one mile west of the
City of Greenville (Figures 1 and 2). The east -west trending Norfolk -Southern
Railroad separates the 54-acre northern waste unit from the 25-acre southern waste
unit. A 2.5-acre asbestos waste unit lies east of the southern unit. An office building,
garages, aboveground fuel tanks, scales for weighing trucks, and a water -supply well
are located at the entrance to the landfill, which is at the east end of the facility. A
yard -waste processing area and a tire shredder are located at the southeastern portion of
the landfill.
5.0 WASTE DISPOSAL HISTORY
The Pitt County municipal solid waste landfill began receiving waste at the
eastern end of the northern waste unit in 1974. Additional waste cells were added
towards the west until 1990 when the entire northern unit was closed. The southern
unit received waste from 1990 to 1995. Pitt County is currently capping the southern
unit. The landfill is now used as a receiving station where waste is unloaded and then
loaded onto trailers. The trailers are then hauled to a municipal solid waste landfill in
another County.
6.0 PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS
Pitt County and various regulatory agencies have performed groundwater and
related monitoring at the landfill at different times. Based on one or more sets of
analytical results, the following points are indicated:
Shallow groundwater at the landfill is slightly acidic and contains elevated
concentrations of iron and manganese. Fluoride was detected at elevated
concentrations in the water -supply well.
Contaminants have been detected in shallow groundwater in the northern
portion of the landfill. Contaminants include low concentrations of volatile and
semivolatile organic compounds, low concentrations of 2,4-D (a pesticide),

Sampling and Analysis Plan
Pitt County Landfill
Page 3 of 15
October 17, 1995
arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, and mercury. Tentatively
identified contaminants may include other pesticides.
Subsurface vapors contain volatile organic compounds.
7.0 FIELD QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES
Field Quality Assurance Procedures (FQAP) are implemented to assure that data
collected in the field are representative and valid. The FQAP will include:
instrument calibration
collection of duplicate samples, equipment and field blanks, and use of
trip blanks
documentation of sampling procedure.
7.1 Calibration
All instruments used in the field will be calibrated prior to use. Evidence of
calibration will be documented on the instrument calibration form. The recorded
information will include:
• calibration time and date
• instrument identification number
• calibration standard used
• results of calibration
• calibrator's signature.
Instruments which will be used at the site include a photo -ionization detector, a
flame -ionization detector, an explosimeter, a water multimeter (measures pH,
temperature, and conductivity), and a turbidity meter. Calibration instructions are
attached in Appendix II.
7.2 Quality Control Samples
Duplicate samples, field blanks and equipment blanks will be collected and trip
blanks will be used to determine the quality of the environmental samples collected in
the field.
Duplicate samples are used for the purpose of checking the precision of the
laboratory analyses. A duplicate sample will be collected from the same sampling
interval at the same time. A portion of one sample bottle and then a portion of one

Sampling and Analysis Plan
Pitt County Landfill
Page 4 of 15
October 17, 1995
duplicate bottle will be filled. This procedure is repeated until both bottles are full.
The exception is when collecting water for volatile organic analysis. In this case, the
sample bottles will be first filled completely and then the duplicate bottles will be
filled. Alternately partially filling the sample bottles and duplicate bottles will cause
the loss of volatiles. A minimum of one duplicate will be collected for every day of
sample collection.
An equipment blank will be collected to determine the effectiveness of the
decontamination procedure. This blank is prepared by pouring distilled/deionized
organic -free water over each piece of decontaminated sampling equipment and catching
the rinsate in a stainless steel bowl. The rinsate will then be transferred into the
appropriate sample containers and analyzed for the same parameters as the samples
being collected that day. An equipment blank will be collected for each day of sample
collection. Equipment blanks will not be collected during well development.
A field blank will be collected to determine if there is air -transported
contamination occurring during the sampling. Field blanks consist of the appropriate
sample containers filled with distilled/deionized organic -free water. The caps of the
field blanks are removed during the sample collection at one of the wells, thereby
exposing the field blank to any air -transported contaminants. Extra sample containers
filled with distilled/deionized organic -free water will be available for use in replacing
any water lost from the field blanks during the procedure. The caps are replaced after
completion of the sampling event. The samples will be analyzed for volatile and
semivolatile organic compounds. One field blank will be collected each day of
sampling.
Trip blanks will be used to determine whether samples are contaminated by
volatile organics during transportation of the samples. The trip blanks will accompany
each sample shipment where one or more of the samples are being analyzed for volatile
organics. These blanks are prepared in the laboratory by filling a 40 ml volatile
organic analysis (VOA) bottle with distilled/deionized organic -free water.
7.3 Documentation
Accurate documentation is important for the success of the field sampling
program. Proper documentation includes accurately recording a particular sampling
time, date, location, and depth.

Sampling and Analysis Plan
Pitt County Landfill
Page 5 of 15
October 17, 1995
7.3.1 Field Logbooks
Field logbooks will be used to provide sufficient data and observations to enable
participants and the project manager to reconstruct events that occurred during the
project.
Field logbooks will be permanently bound, the pages will be numbered, and all
entries will be written with permanent ink, signed, and dated. If an error is made in
the notebook, corrections can be made by the person who made the entry. A correction
can be made by crossing out the error with a single line, so as not to obliterate the
original entry, and then entering the correct information. All corrections will be
initialed and dated. The first page of the logbook will be used at the Table of Contents
to facilitate the location of pertinent data. The Table of Contents will be used to record
the page number where important events can be found. The very next page should
begin recording daily events. The first daily event entry will always be the date,
followed by a detailed description of the weather conditions. All of the following
entries will begin with the time that the entry is made. Any space remaining on the last
line of the entry will be lined out to prevent additional information being added in the
future. At the end of the day, any unused space between the last entry and the bottom
of the page will be lined out, signed, and dated, to prevent additional entries being
made at a later date.
Project information to be recorded in the logbook will include:
1. Time when team members, subcontractors, and the client arrive or leave the
site.
2. Names and company affiliation of all people who visit the site
3. Summary of all discussions and agreements made with team members,
subcontractors, and the client
4. Summary of all telephone conversations held in the field
5. Detailed explanations of any deviations from the Field Sampling Plan,
noting who gives authorization, and what paperwork is completed to
document the change
6. Detailed description of any mechanical problems which occur at the site,
noting when and how it occurs, and how it is being addressed
7. Detailed description of any accidents that occur, noting who receives the
injury, how serious the injury is, how the person is treated, and who is
notified
8. General information such as when and how equipment is decontaminated,
and what samples are collected that day.

Sampling and Analysis Plan
Pitt County Landfill
Page 6 of 15
October 17, 1995
Task level information to be recorded in the logbook will include:
1. The level of personal protective equipment being used at the site
2. Sample collection times for all samples being collected
3. Details on when, how, and where equipment is decontaminated, and what is
done with the wastewater
4. The appropriate type and number of standardized forms used each day will
be recorded daily.
7.3.2 Standardized Forms
Standardized forms will be used to record the information that is collected
during field sampling and during the identification of off -site water -supply wells.
These forms will include:
• well development forms
• well purging and sampling forms
• water level measurement forms
• instrument calibration forms
• well survey forms.
Examples of these forms are attached in Appendix III. Each of the forms will
be checked by the project manager for accuracy upon completion. Completed
standardized forms will be kept in the project files identified by specific sampling
events.
7.3.3 Sample Labels
The essential documents for sample identification and transportation to tha
laboratory are the sample label, custody seal, and Chain -of -Custody Form. The
primary objective of the sample label is to link a sample bottle to a sample number,
sampling date and time, and analyses to be performed. The sample label in
combination with the Chain -of -Custody Form is used to inform the laboratory what the
sample is to be analyzed for. The sample label will contain the following information:
• sample number
• sampling time and date
• analyses to be performed
• preservatives used
• sampler's initials
• name of the company collecting the sample, and
• name and address of the laboratory performing the analysis.

Sampling and Analysis Plan
Pitt County Landfill
Page 7 of 15
October 17, 1995
All of the above information except the sampling time and date should be added to the
sample label before going into the field.
7.3.4 Custody Seals
After a sample bottle has been filled and labeled, a custody seal will be signed
and dated and then placed over the bottle cap to assure that the sample is not tampered
with. The custody seal is designed to break when the bottle cap is rotated. The person
who signs their name to the custody seal is responsible for the sample until the time the
sample is signed over to someone else. Custody seals will be placed on coolers also.
7.3.5 Chain of Custody Form
The Chain -of -Custody Form (COC) is the procedure used to document the
responsible individual(s) for a sample from the time the sample is collected to the time
it is analyzed at the laboratory. All of the samples collected at the site will be hand -
delivered to the laboratory. The COC is also used by the laboratory to identify which
analyses to perform on which samples. When the laboratory receives the samples, they
assume custody and responsibility of the samples by signing the COC Form. If there is
any inconsistency, the laboratory will contact the project manager for clarification.
8.0 SITE SURVEYING
The elevations of the well casing and the ground surface to the nearest 0.01 foot
will be determined by a North Carolina Registered Land Surveyor at wells MW2 and
P15. Elevations of these wells were not surveyed previously due to health and safety
hazards detected by the NCSWS in December, 1994. Elevations at other wells and
locations of all the wells have already been determined.
9.0 SURVEY OF PRIVATE WATER -SUPPLY WELLS
All private water -supply wells within one-half mile of the landfill will be
identified by interviewing residents at the properties. A standard form will be
used for each property where a residence is located (Appendix M. Each
residence will be identified on a map using sequential numbers beginning with the
number one. All identification numbers will have either a prefix R, indicating a
residence with no water -supply well, or RW, indicating a residence with a private
well (i.e. R1, R2, RW3, R4, R5).

Sampling and Analysis Plan
Pitt County Landfill
Page 8 of 15
October 17, 1995
10.0 WELL DEVELOPMENT
In order to collect representative samples of formation water from monitoring
wells, well development will be performed to remove silt, and restore the aquifer's
natural hydraulic conductivity and geochemical equilibrium near the well. The
development procedure will consist of collecting an initial water level measurement and
then alternately surging and bailing the well until water from the well stabilizes in pH,
temperature, conductivity, turbidity, and clarity (Table 1; see Table 2 for required
equipment). All wells will be developed one week prior to sampling.
Surging consists of repeatedly raising and lowering a stainless steel surge block
starting at the top of the screened interval and moving downward. This procedure pulls
sediment particles that are finer than the well screen openings into the well. This
procedure allows compaction of the sand pack around the well screen, and should be
performed several times during the development operation to assure that most of the
fine-grained sediment have been removed from the immediate vicinity of the well
screen. Following each surging step, a bottom -filling bailer is used to remove turbid
water and sediment which have accumulated in the well.
Bailers used for well development will be made of high -density polyethylene
and will be kept in 2-mil thick polyethylene bags until immediately prior to use. The
bailers will be disposable and a new bailer will be used to develop each well. The
bailer will be lowered into the well with nylon rope.
Water removed from the wells will be transferred to drums stored temporarily at
the site. Under no conditions will water be added to the well during development.
At regular intervals during the development procedure, a sample of the ,
development water will be collected and analyzed in the field for pH, temperature,
conductivity, and turbidity. The results from these measurements will be recorded on
the Well Development Form (Appendix III). A well is considered adequately
developed when a minimum of three well volumes of water have been removed from
the well, and the pH (± 0.1), temperature (±0.5°C), conductivity (±10%), and
clarity have stabilized, and turbidity measurements fall below 25 NTUs. A well
volume is calculated using the formula:
V = nr21
where V = volume
7C = 3.14
r = radius of the well
= height of the water column

Sampling and Analysis Plan
Pitt County Landfill
Page 9 of 15
October 17, 1995
In silty and clayey formations, it is not always possible to meet the < 25 NTU
turbidity requirement. In this situation, development should continue until the turbidity
of the water has stabilized. Some wells may yield insufficient amounts of water in
order to complete the well development process. If the previously mentioned physical
parameters stabilize quickly, a minimum of three well volumes of water will be
removed to consider the well adequately developed.
Immediately after the completion of well development, the depth to
groundwater will be measured using a water level meter, and recorded. Future
sampling only requires a well to be purged prior to sampling. However, if fine-grained
sediment begins building up inside the well, the well will need to be redeveloped.
11.0 WELL PURGING
The well purging procedure is similar that for well development with the
exception that surging is not performed (Tables 2 and 3). The purpose of well purging
is to remove stagnant water from the well so that a representative water sample can be
collected.
At regular intervals during the purging procedure, a sample of the purge water
is collected for pH, temperature, conductivity, and turbidity measurements. The results
from these measurements are recorded on the Well Purging and Sampling Form
(Appendix III). In the purging procedure, water should be removed from a well until
the pH (±0.1), temperature (±0.5 ° C), conductivity (± 10 %), turbidity (< 25 NTUs),
and clarity have stabilized or until five well volumes have been purged. Turbidity may
not stabilize.
Care will be taken not to over -purge the wells as this may result in dilution of
contaminant concentrations where stratification may exist. High purge rates will be
avoided in order to prevent the volatilization of organic compounds caused by water
cascading into the well. High purge rates can also pull fine-grained sediments into the
well. Water samples containing sediment may exhibit high concentrations of metals
that do not necessarily reflect the actual concentrations of metals dissolved in
groundwater. For slowly recharging wells, the purging procedure described previously
is not practiced because it may take days to complete. Instead, these wells will be
bailed dry (less than 4 inches of water in consecutive bailers), then sampled when there
is a sufficient volume of water in the well to fill the sample bottles.
The depth to groundwater will be measured using a water level probe preceding
well purging, immediately before well sampling, and after well sampling. This
information will be recorded on the Well Purging and Sampling Form (Appendix III).

Sampling and Analysis Plan
Pitt County Landfill
Page 10 of 15
October 17, 1995
12.0 MONITORING WELL SAMPLING
Monitoring wells will be sampled according to Tables 4 and 5. Table 2 lists the
required equipment. Sampling of wells will begin before the static water level has had
time to equilibrate following purging. Bottles for volatile and semivolatile organic
analysis will be filled first. While the 40 ml volatile organic analysis (VOA) bottles are
filled, the distance separating the VOA bottle and the bailer will be limited to 3 inches.
Bottles for analyses of pesticides and PCB's will be filled next. Turbidity will be
measured immediately before and after collection of the metals sample. Bottles for
metals analyses will be filled last and only if the water is clear. If the water is not clear
after sampling for the other parameters, the bottles for the metals analyses will not be
filled at this time. Sediment in the water column will be allowed 23 hours to settle out
at which time bottles for the metals analyses will be filled (Table 6).
Any required preservatives will be added to the sample bottles at the laboratory
prior to sampling. All groundwater samples will remain unfiltered at the time of
sample collection. After a water sample has been collected from a well, exit water
level, pH, temperature, conductivity, and turbidity readings will be measured and
recorded (Appendix III).
The bailer method will be used to collect all groundwater samples. The
closed -top sampling bailer (reusable) will be constructed of Teflon and brought to the
site wrapped in aluminum foil. The bailer will be decontaminated at the laboratory
prior to sampling. The bailer will be lowered down a well using nylon rope, and a
two -foot long, Teflon -coated wire as a leader. This leader will be decontaminated in
the same manner as the sampling bailer. Different equipment will be used for
collecting samples to be analyzed for metals if sediment is allowed to settle overnight.
This equipment will include disposable teflon bailers, nylon rope, and vinyl gloves.
A plastic sheet will be placed around the well for the duration of sample
collection. Care will be taken so that the bailer, leader, and nylon rope do not come
into contact with the ground at any time during the sampling procedure. In the case
where low yielding wells must be allotted extra time to recover during sample
collection and the sampling site is temporarily vacated, the sampling bailer and leader
will be wrapped in a clean section of aluminum foil and placed on an equipment rack at
the well. The nylon rope will be cut and discarded. The equipment rack will be kept
at the sampling site until the sampling procedure is completed later that day.

Sampling and Analysis Plan
Pitt County Landfill
Page 11 of 15
October 17, 1995
13.0 SURFACE WATER SAMPLING
Surface water sampling points located farthest downstream will be collected
first. Sampling will then proceed to points located upstream. This sampling procedure
will assure that any sediment disturbed during sample collection will not contaminate
downstream sampling points.
Surface water samples from the site will be collected from ditches with shallow
water levels. The Dipper Method will be used to collect grab samples of surface water
(Tables 2, 5, and 7) for analyses which require preservatives in the sampling
containers (Table 14). A stainless steel dipper will be used to collect a grab sample
from the top few inches of the ditch water column. This water sample will then be
transferred to a sample bottle already containing the required preservatives. The
sample bottles will not be placed directly into the water of the ditch as this may allow
preservatives already in the bottles to escape into the surface water. Analysis of semi -
volatile organic compounds, chlorinated herbicides, and EPA Method 8080 do not
require preservatives and these sample bottles will be placed directly in the surface
water for filling. The dipper will be decontaminated at the laboratory prior to use and
brought to the site wrapped in aluminum foil.
14.0 ON -SITE WATER -SUPPLY WELL SAMPLING
A water sample will be collected from a spigot of the on -site water -supply well
(Tables 2, 5, and 8). A spigot will be selected that is nearest the wellhead and that
does not contain water that has been treated by a water softener or by chemicals. The
spigot will be opened to produce a steady flow of water. This steady flow of water will
be maintained for a minimum of 15 minutes or until one well volume of water has
been purged (provided that well construction data are available that allow
calculation of one well volume of water). At the end of purging, the flow rate will be
reduced and water from the spigot will be collected and tested for pH, temperature,
conductivity, and turbidity. This information will be recorded on the Well Purging and
Sampling Form. The sample bottles will be filled directly with water flowing from the
spigot. Care will be taken to maintain a steady flow of water from the spigot
throughout sampling in order to lessen the likelihood that particulates will become
dislodged from inside the water line. There is no criteria for the order of filling bottles
from the spigot.
An attempt will be made to locate a well construction record and the
description of sediments at the water -supply well.

Sampling and Analysis Plan
Pitt County Landfill
Page 12 of 15
October 17, 1995
15.0 SAMPLING LOCATIONS
Water samples will be collected from 18 monitoring wells, 4 surface water
locations, and the water -supply well (Figure 3). The NCSWS selected the groundwater
monitoring wells to be sampled (Appendix I).
Sampling locations for surface water are based on the direction of flow of
surface water. The direction of flow of surface water at the landfill is shown by arrows
in Figure 3. Surface water does not enter the landfill except, possibly, at the
southwestern corner of the landfill where the land surface was recently graded. The
upgradient surface water location is labeled SWL Downgradient surface water samples
will be collected at stations SW2 and SW4. A third downgradient surface water sample
will be collected at location SW3 if this ditch contains water. Surface water does not
exit the landfill through ditches or creeks at any other locations.
The water -supply well is located near the entrance to the landfill at the eastern
end of the landfill.
16.0 ANALYTICAL METHODS
Analytical methods were chosen based on past sampling results, known or
suspected waste deposited at the landfill, and guidance from the NCSWS (Appendix I).
Table 9 lists the chemical analyses to be performed on the various samples. Tables 10
through 13 list individual constituents to be analyzed, analytical method numbers, and
suggested practical quantitation limits. Not listed in Tables 10 through 13 are the
individual volatile and semivolatile organic compounds included in the 40 CFR 258
Appendix II analyses.
Water from all monitoring wells being sampled for the first time and all of the
surface water samples will be analyzed only for 40 CFR 258 Appendix I volatile
organic compounds and metals plus cyanides and iron, manganese, and mercury.
Water from wells MW1, MW3, P4, and P16 will be analyzed for the same parameters
even though they were sampled previously. Previous sampling of wells MW1 and
MW3 in 1988 indicated only the presence of estimated values of toluene in both wells.
Well MW 1 also contained an estimated value of the semivolatile compound di-n-
butylphthalate whereas well MW3 did not contain any semivolatile organic compounds.
Samples from wells MW1 and MW3 in 1993 and 1994 contained no detectable volatile
organic compounds. Wells P4 and P16 are monitored as part of the semiannual
monitoring of the southern unit of the landfill and no volatile organic compounds have
been detected in either of these wells.

Sampling and Analysis Plan
Pitt County Landfill
Page 13 of 15
October 17, 1995
Previous water samples from wells P14, P15, P25, and MW2 contained volatile
and semivolatile organic compounds. Water from these wells, and well P26 which is
within 150 feet of wells P25 and MW2, will be analyzed for 40 CFR 258 Appendix II
volatile and semivolatile organic compounds and various pesticides in addition to the
Appendix I volatile organic compounds and metals, cyanides, iron, manganese, and
mercury.
Water from well MW2 will also be analyzed for other pesticides due to its
suspected proximity to possible pesticide waste.
Water from the water -supply well will be analyzed for all parameters listed or
referenced in Table 9.
17.0 LABORATORY CERTIFICATION
Laboratories used to perform the chemical analyses proposed in this workplan
will be certified to analyze the certifiable parameters under Title 15A of the North
Carolina Administrative Code, Subchapter 2H, section 0800.
18.0 EQUIPMENT DECONTAMINATION
Decontamination of equipment will be performed to minimize the potential for
contaminant migration and to assure the collection of representative water samples.
The following well development, purging and sampling equipment will be
decontaminated:
• surge block and rod (stainless steel construction)
• water level meter
• high -density polyethylene bailers
• Teflon bailers
• dippers (stainless steel)
• Teflon leader.
Only the surge block and rod, and the water level meter will need to be
decontaminated at the site. The bailers, dippers, and Teflon leaders are single -use
items which will be decontaminated at the laboratory prior to use. All decontaminated
equipment will be handled by wearing either disposable nitrile or vinyl gloves. When
purging and sampling, nitrile, and not vinyl, gloves will be worn. New nitrile gloves
will be worn at each different sampling location.

Sampling and Analysis Plan
Pitt County Landfill
Page 14 of 15
October 17, 1995
The decontamination procedure for all of the equipment (except for the high -
density polyethylene bailers) will follow that described in Table 14. The high -density
polyethylene bailers are decontaminated commercially by the procedure listed in Table
15. Once a decontaminated piece of equipment has been allowed to air dry, it will be
wrapped in aluminum foil (shiny side facing out) to keep it clean prior to use. For the
water level meter, only the probe will be wrapped.
The dilute acid solutions, acetone, hexane, and rinse water will be used in
Teflon squirt bottles. The drippings of these solutions will be caught in separate plastic
buckets for temporary storage in the decontamination area. The acetone and hexane
drippings will be allowed to volatilize into the air, while the acid solution drippings
will be neutralized using baking soda.
A decontamination line will be set up at various staging areas away from the
wells and surface water sampling points. All equipment decontamination in the field
will take place in these staging areas. All of the water and waste drippings generated
during the decontamination procedure will be transferred to 55-gallon storage drums.
19.0 INVESTIGATION -DERIVED WASTE
All of the waste water derived during the investigation will be contained and
stored temporarily at the site in sealed 55-gallon drums. This waste includes water
generated during well development, well purging, and well sampling. It also includes
the water and rinsate solutions generated during decontamination of the sampling
equipment. The drums will be staged in an area of the landfill which is free from
vehicular traffic.
Disposal of the drums will be dependent on the groundwater sampling results
from the monitoring wells. If necessary, a composite sample from the drums may also
be collected to assure proper drum disposal.
Used disposable items such as tyveks, paper towels, gloves, rope, etc., will be
placed in plastic bags and disposed with other municipal waste by Pitt County.
20.0 PERSONNEL REQUIRED
The well purging and sampling team will consist of four people. Two people
are needed for field testing, sample collection, labeling, and documentation; a third is
needed for health and safety, and quality control; and a fourth is needed for equipment

Sampling and Analysis Plan
Pitt County Landfill
Page 15 of 15
October 17, 1995
decontamination, and managing the waste water drums. Only one person is required
to locate off -site private water -supply wells.
21.0 COORDINATION WITH MONITORING OF SOUTHERN UNIT
The sampling proposed in this plan and the semiannual sampling of the southern
unit of the landfill will be conducted at the same time.
22.0 REPORTING
A report will be generated after receipt of the analytical results. The report
will contain the following items:
• a map of sampling locations
• tables of field -measured parameters including water levels, pH,
temperature, conductivity, and turbidity
• deviations from this workplan
• tables of analytical data
• field methods
• a map of residences surveyed for off -site private water -supply wells
• a summary of off -site water -supply wells.
I

HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN
C
SAMPLING EVENT
PITT COUNTY LANDFILL
PREPARED BY
GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC.
101-E WOODWINDS INDUSTRIAL COURT
CARY, NORTH CAROLINA 27511
OCTOBER 17, 1995
Approved By General Supervisor:
Date:
Approved By Site Health and Safety Supervisor:
Date:

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
Introduction.................................................................................1
2.0
Comprehensive Work Plan ...............................................................2
2.1
Objectives..........................................................................
2
2.2
Tasks................................................................................2
2.2
Other contractors..................................................................2
2.3
Schedule............................................................................2
3.0
Site Characterization and Analysis......................................................
3
3.1
Site Description...................................................................3
3.2
Hazard Recognition...............................................................4
3.3
Pathways of Exposure to Hazardous Substances .............................5
3.3.1 General..................................................................5
3.3.2 Direct Contact..........................................................5
3.3. 3 Water....................................................................
6
3.3.4 Air.......................................................................6
4.0
Site -Specific Measures For Protecting Worker Health And Safety.................6
4.1
General.............................................................................6
4.2
Standard Operating Procedures.................................................7
4.2.1 General..................................................................7
4.2.2 Drilling..................................................................7
4.2.3 Prevention of Ingestion and Absorption of Contaminants .......7
4.2.4 Heat Stress..............................................................8
4.2.5 Cold Stress.............................................................8
4.2.6 Buddy System..........................................................
8
4.2.7 Communications.......................................................
8
4.2.8 Illumination............................................................8
4.3
Personal Protective Equipment Program......................................9
4.3.1 General..................................................................9
4.3.2 Levels of Respiratory Protection for Each Task ..................9
4.3.3 Definition of Levels of Personal Protection .......................10
4.4
Special Activities.................................................................10
4.5
Air Monitoring Program.........................................................11
4.5.1 Available Equipment..................................................11
4.5.2 Calibration..............................................................11
4.5.3 Air Monitoring Equipment to be Used at Site.....................12
4.5.4 Air Monitoring Log...................................................13
5.0
Site Control Program.....................................................................13
5.1
Purpose.............................................................................13
5.2
Work Zones.......................................................................13
5.3
Limited Access....................................................................14
6.0
Decontamination
Procedures.............................................................14
6.1
Purpose.............................................................................14

6.2
General Requirements............................................................14
6.3
Site -Specific Decontamination Procedure.....................................16
6.4
Waste Disposal....................................................................17
6.4.1 Liquids..................................................................17
6.4.2 Solids....................................................................17
7.0 Emergency
Response Plan...............................................................17
7.1
General.............................................................................17
7.2
Emergency Response Contacts..................................................18
7.3
Directions to Hospital............................................................19
7.4
Next of Kin........................................................................19
7.5
Spill Containment Program.....................................................20
7.6
Emergency Equipment...........................................................20
7.7
Evacuation Plan ...................................................................
21
8.0 Required Personnel and Qualifications of Personnel.................................21
8.1
Required Personnel...............................................................21
8.2
Qualifications of Personnel......................................................22
9.0 Health
and Safety Equipment List.......................................................23
10.0 Administration
............................................................................
24
4

Health and Safety Plan
Pitt County Landfill
October 17, 1995
Page 14 of 25
Zone
Site -Specific Area
exclusion zone
minimum of 15 feet around all wells
contamination reduction
zone
area outside of exclusion zone that is 15 feet wide
support zone
all other areas of the landfill
5.3 LIMITED ACCESS
Access to the exclusion zone and the contaminant reduction zone will be
limited to authorized personnel only. Temporary barricades will be constructed
along the outer perimeter of the contaminant reduction zone during field
activities. The barricades will be highly visible and will restrict unauthorized
entry by unqualified personnel.
6.0 DECONTAMINATION PROCEDURES
6.1 PURPOSE
Decontamination is performed to prevent the spread of contaminants to
uncontaminated areas and to protect workers, their families and the environment from
unnecessary exposure to toxic substances. -
6.2 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
Decontamination will be performed in geographical areas that will minimize the
exposure of uncontaminated employees or equipment to contaminated employees or
equipment. Personnel and equipment will be decontaminated within the contamination
reduction zone prior to entering the support zone. No potentially contaminated
equipment, clothing, or decontamination water will be transported from the
contaminant reduction zone to the support zone unless it is properly containerized. The
10/17/95\KCL\winwocd\pitt\hltheaf3.doc

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Solid Waste Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
William L. Meyer, Director
October 4, 1995
Mr. Phil Dickerson
Pitt County Engineer
1717 West Fifth Street
Greenville, N.C. 27834
RE: Transition Plan - Hydrogeologic Evaluation Of Local Area Study
And Water Quality Monitoring Plan For The Pitt County
Landfill (Permit # 74-01)
Dear Mr. Dickerson,
A hydrogeologic review has been completed for the Pitt County
Landfill Transition Plan. Additional information and clarification
is needed on several issues. Please review the following comments
and questions and prepare a revised Transition Plan for the Pitt
County Landfill.
COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS:
LOCAL AREA STUDY:
Each of items (i) through (v) of Rule .1629 (b) (2) (A) need to
be clearly addressed in the Local Area Study.
- (ii) Are there any surface water intakes in the study area?
(v) What are the locations and types of any potential sources
of contamination?
The locations of the survey control benchmarks need to be
shown on one of the Local Area Study Maps. A reference is
made on the bottom of page LS2 to the Topographic Maps showing
benchmarks, however I was not able to locate any benchmarks on
the drawings.
Reference is made in the report to an on -site water supply
well. Is this well still being used? what is the depth and
design of this well? Copies of any chemical analytical data
from this well should be included in the report.
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Phil Dickerson
Pitt County Transition Plan
Page 2
WATER QUALITY MONITORING PLAN:
The type of statistical analyses necessary are to some extent
dependent on the data being evaluated. Statistical analyses
other than parametric ANOVA may therefore be necessary.
- For additional comments on the Revised Water Quality
Monitoring Plan dated December 6, 1994, refer to my letter of
December 27, 1994 to Mr. Alfred Moncla.
SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN (SAP):
The analytical methods proposed in Table 6 of the original SAP
and Table 8 of the revised SAP are not the approved methods
for Beryllium, Chromium, Cobalt, Silver, and Vanadium. These
metals require a low level certification method. Refer to
the memos to MSWLF Owners and Operators dated June 24, 1994
and January 18, 1995. This Table needs to be revised.
The Revised Water Quality Monitoring Plan and Sampling And Analysis
Plan need to be integrated into the Transition Plan so that the
Transition Plan accurately reflects the approved plans.
Should there be any discrepancies between the monitoring plans and
the Solid Waste Management Rules and policies, then the rules and
policies are to take precedence.
INITIAL BASELINE SAMPLING REPORT OF MARCH 7, 1995
Table 5: No data has been presented for effective porosity.
Effective porosity values need to be established and the
ground -water velocity values need to be recalculated using
effective porosity values rather than total porosity values.
- An unapproved analytical method was used for Silver.
- The second page of organic analytical data is missing for
monitoring well P4.

Phil Dickerson
Pitt County Transition Plan
Page 3
BASELINE SAMPLING REPORT OF MARCH 17, 1995:
The drainage problems in the vicinity of well P12 need to be
corrected and the additional two baseline sampling episodes
for this well need to be completed as soon as possible.
The deep well to be nested with well P20 needs to be installed
and sampled.
The last statement of page 6 is misleading. Statistical
analysis can be performed on organic constituents even if the
upgradient well shows no detectable amounts for constituents.
When the additional two sampling events are completed for well
P12, statistical analysis will be necessary for Toluene.
The comment made above regarding the need to establish
effective porosity values and recalculate the ground -water
velocity values also applies to this Baseline Sampling Report.
Appendix I, Well Site Locations And Elevations, is incomplete.
No well elevation data is provided. The number of the
locations does not correspond to the well designations for the
site.
- For some of the analyses, an unapproved method is still being
reported for Silver.
If Pitt County or their consultants have any questions regarding
this memo, they may contact me at [phone], extension 258.
Please provide the necessary revisions as soon as possible so the
Solid Waste Section can complete its review of the Transition Plan.
Sincerely,
� /tl*
Bobby Lutfy, Hydrogeologist
Solid Waste Section
CC: Susan Wright, Solid Waste Section
Bill Morris, SWS - Washington
Alfred Moncla, Groundwater Management Associates

T4 co.
T4 -
BROOKS, PIE$cE, McLENDON, HUMPHREY & LEONARD, L.L.P.
R ATTONEYS AND GOUNSELLO85 AT LAW
L.P. MCLENDON, JR.
JEFFREY E. OLEYNIK
AUBREY L BROOKS (1872-1958)
HUBERT HUMPHREY
MARK DAVIDSON
2000 RENAISSANCE PLAZA
W. H. HOLDERNESS (1904-1965)
L P. MCLENDON (1690-1968)
EDGAR B. FISHER, JR.
W. ERWIN FULLER. JR.
MELISSA H. WEAVER
JAMES R. SAINTSING
KENNETH M. BRIM (1898-1974)
JAMES T. WILLIAMS, JR.
JOHN W. ORMAND III
POST OFFICE BOX 26000
C. T. LEONARD, JR. (1929.1983)
WADE H. HARGROVE
ROBERT J. KING III
CLAUDE C. PIERCE (1913-1988)
Ll. DANIEL MCGINN
V. RANDALL TINSLEY
GREENSBORO, NORTH GAROLINA 27420
THORNTON H. BROOKS (1912-1988)
MICHAEL D. MEEKER
JOHN R. ARCHAMBAULT
WILLIAM G. McNAIRY
S. KYLE WOOSLEY
TELEPHONE: [phone]
OF COUNSEL
EDWARD C. WINSLOW III
CATHERINE THOMAS McGEE
G. NEIL DANIELS
HOWARD L. WILLIAMS
GEORGE W. HOUSE
WILLIAM C. SCOTT
ANNE C. BRENNAN
TELEX: 574301
WILLIAM P. H. CARY
DANIEL M. SROKA
REID L PHILLIPS
FORREST W. CAMPBELL JR.
FACSIMILE: [phone]
OFFICES ALSO IN
ROBERT A. SINGER
ELLEN P. HAMRICK
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA
JOHN H. SMALL
MARCUS W. TRATHEN
AND
RANDALL A. UNDERWOOD
ALLISON M. GRIMM
wASHINGTON, D.C.
S. LEIGH RODEN BOUGH IV
JEAN C. BROOKS
June 2 0 , 19 9 5
WILLIAM G. ROSS, JR.
JAMES C. ADAMS, II
MARK J. PRAK
ELIZABETH S. BREWINGTON
WILLIAM A. DAVIS, II
JOHN K. EASON
WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL
JILL R. WILSON
WAYNE A. LOGAN
MARC D. BISHOP
H. ARTHUR BOLICK II
271-3110
JIM W. PHILLIPS, JR
NATASHA RATH MARCUS
(910)
MACK SPERLING
- VIA REGULAR
MAIL AND FAX NO. 919 f 733-4810
Philip J. Prete
Department of Environment, Health
and Natural Resources
Division of Solid Waste Management
401 Oberlin Road
Suite 150
Raleigh, NC 27605
Re: Pitt County Landfill/air quality sampling
Dear Mr. Prete:
This letter will confirm our telephone conversation of last
week relating to air quality sampling at the Pitt County Landfill.
On May 15, 1995, we sent you a letter describing in general terms
the County's plan for air sampling. Since that letter, both the
State and the County's groundwater consultant have suggested
changes to the May 15 plan. The revised plan is as follows:
1. Sampling will be conducted at P-14, P-15, and MW-2.
2. The County will take the following samples in the vapor
space of each well:
a. one VOC sample (using EPA Method TQ-14);
b. one pesticide sample (using TO-10);
C. five detector tube samples (one each for hydrogen
sulfide; hydrocyanic acid; arsenic and organic
arsenic compounds; mercaptans; and carbon
disulfide) .
In addition, the County will take one pesticide field
blank.
3. The County will take the following samples of the ambient
air in the immediate vicinity of each well:
a. one VOC sample (using TO-14);

Philip J. Prete
June 20, 1995
Page 2
b. one pesticide sample (using TO-4); and
C. five detector tube samples (as per vapor space
samples).
In addition, the County will take one pesticide and one
VOC field blank.
4. The County will submit a monitoring report, with
laboratory analyses, to the State within twenty-eight
days of the completion of sampling.
5. The sampling results will be used to develop a modified
health and safety plan for future groundwater sampling.
The sampling results will also be used to develop a work
plan for additional air sampling, if necessary.
The County's consultant, TRC Environmental Corporation,
expects to begin sampling on June 29. Therefore, we would
appreciate hearing from you soon if you have any objections to this
revised sampling plan.
Thank you for the State's continuing assistance on this.
Sincerely,
T
Robert J`. ing II
RJK/rmw
cc: Pamela weaver Best, Esq.
Stan Sleva
Alfred Moncla
Dave Duncklee

CE0TrA-t F/ LE
P k-rT Curl,
7 y_ O /
c�ouPITT COUNTY
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
1717 WEST FIFTH STREET
GREENVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 27834
Qrh GAa0
TELEPHONE [phone]
MEMORANDUM
TO: MR. JIM BARBER
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT �
225 GREEN STREET, SUITE 601
FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28301
i
FROM: JOHN T. WEAVER, JR.
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER
SUBJECT: PITT COUNTY WASTE HANDL NG FACILITY
DATE: JUNE 14, 1995
SOLID WASTE
BUILDING INSPECTIONS
RECEIVED
JUN 16 1995
SOLI WWASTE MANAGEti4ENT
FAYEM. EVILLE REGIONAL. OFFICE
Enclosed herewith is a copy of a letter dated April 11,
1995, from Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section,
approving our Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan for the
subject property.
This letter completes the list of items you requested to
be furnished before issuing approval of our permanent transfer
facility except a letter stating zoning compliance. Presently, the
City of Greenville has our site plan under review and the matter of
annexation and zoning should be resolved soon.
JTW\pmk
Enclosure
Recycled Paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources ` • •
Division of Solid Waste Management
James B. B. H Jr., Governor p E H N 11 Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
William L. Meyer, Director
June 6, 1995
Mr. Bob King
Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey 8r Leonard
2000 Renaissance Plaza
P.O. Box 26000
Greensboro, NC 27420
By facsimile to 910-378-1001
Re: Pitt County Landfill air sampling
Dear Bob:
We have reviewed the proposed work plan and would like to encourage you to proceed
with the monitoring as soon as possible. The following are discrepancies we have
noted that should be incorporated into this phase.
1. Sampling should be performed within the vapor space of the monitoring wells.
2. In addition to P-15 and MW-2, the sampling should be conducted at P-14.
3. The "health and safety plan for future groundwater sampling" and a proposed work
plan for ambient air monitoring (along the lines of Phase I and II plan from TRC
proposal) should be submitted along with the monitoring report and laboratory report
within the proposed twenty-eight days of sampling. This should not be an additional
burden and will help us begin to get back on track with the schedule that we have
veered away from.
If you have any questions regarding these clarifications, please call me.
Philip J. Prete, Head
Field Operations Branch
cc: Mark Poindexter
Phil Dickerson
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 60% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

-lboKIe+-
�I�o�Jo�eC� AK M6M46PjIIIq �-�- T t7-{-
'L9�NC��r�
COOAHy

r
9
BROOKS, PIERCE, MCLENMN, HUMPHREY & LEONARD, L.L.P.
LP. MCLENOON. JR.
HUBERT HUMPHREY
EDGAR S. FISHER, JR.
W. ERWIN FULLER. JR.
JAMES T. WILLIAMS- JR.
WADE H. HARGROVE
M. DANIEL MCGINN
MICHAEL D. MEEKER
WILLIAM G. MCNAIRY
EDWARD C. WINSLOW III
HOWARD L WILLIAMS
GEORGE W. HOUSE
WILLIAM P. H. CARY
REID L PHILUPS
ROBERT A SINGER
JOHN H. SMALL
RAN DALL A. UNDERWOOD
S. LEIGH ROOENBOUGH IV
WILLIAM G. ROSS. JR.
MARK J. PRAK
WILLIAM A. DAVIS. 11
JILL R. WILSON
MARC O. BISHOP
JIM W. PHILUPS. JR.
MACK SPERLING
ATTORNEYS AND GOUNSELLORS AT LAW
JEFFREY E. OL.EYNIK
AUBREY L BROOKS (1872.1938)
MARK DAVIDSON
PLAZA
W. H. HOLDERNESS (1904.1965)
MELISSA H. WEAVER
2000 RNCE
ENAISSA
L P. MCLENOON (1890-1868)
JAMES R. SAINTSING
KENNETH M. BRIM (1898.1974)
JOHN W. ORMANO III
POST OFFIOE BOX 20000
C. T. LEONARD. JR. (1929-1983)
ROBERT J. KING III
CLAUDE C. PIERCE (1913.1988)
V. RANDALL TINSL.EY
GREENSBORO, NORTH GAROLINA 27420
THORNTON H. BROOKS (1912.1988)
JOHN R. ARCHAMBAULT
S. KYLE
TELEPHONE: [phone]
OF COUNSEL
THOMAS MCGEE
INE THOY
CILLIAM
G. NEIL DANIELS
WILLIAM C. SCOTT
C.
ANNE C. BRENNAN
-
TELEX: 574301
DANIEL M. SROKA
FORREST W. CAMPBELL. JR.
FAOSIMILm [phone]
OFFICES ALSO IN
ELLEN P. HAMRICK
RALEIGM, NORTH CAROUNA
MARCUS W. TRATHEN
AND
ALLISON M. GRIMM
April 20, 1995
WASHINGTON, D.C.
JEAN C. BROOKS
JAMES C. ADAMS. II
ELIZABETH S. BREWINGTON
JOHN K. EASON WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL
WAYNE A. LOGAN
H. ARTHUR BOLICK It [phone]
NATASHA RATH MARCUS
VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS
Philip J. Prete
Head of Field Operations Branch
401 Oberlin Road
Suite 150
Raleigh, NC27605
Dear Mr. Prete:
As part of Pitt County's plan to assess potential
contamination at the Pitt County Landfill, we have recently
received the enclosed proposals for air testing. We would
appreciate your giving Bill Ross or me a call about these.
RJK/rmw
Enclosure
Sincerely,
Robert J. Ki III
APR
1995 -
Received
Solid Was
te'

r
CONFIDENTIAL
Proposal for Air .Monitoring at
Pitt County Landfill
Prepared for
Brooks, Pierce, McLendon
Humphrey & Leonard, L.L.P.
Prepared by
TRC Environmental Corporation
Chapel Hill, NC
April 13, 1995
6340 Quadrangle Drive
Suite 200
Chapel Hill, NC 27514
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
TR
TRC Environmental Corporation

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
Page
1
1.0
.. . .......
INTRODUCTION ...................................
1
APPROACH AND SCHEDULE • ..........
2
2.0
TECHNICAL .........................
•
I Study
3
.................
2.1 Phase ...................
2.2 Phase II Study ..................... . ,
PROJECT MANAGEMENT ..............................
.
3.0
4.0
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE ............................ .
9
PROJECT FUNDING ..........................................
9
5.0
5.1 Labor Hours by Task .............. .
..........
9
5.2 Cost Estimate ...............................
10
5.3 Labor Hours by Task ................ ..................
:.....................
10
5.4 Cost Estimate .................... .
...............
11
APPENDIX A......................................
ii TRC Environmental Corporation
ia�e-ems

PROPOSAL FOR PTIT COUNTY LANDFILL AIR MONITORING
1.0 INTRODUCTION
TRC Environmental Corporation (TRC) is pleased to submit this proposal to Brooks,
Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, L.L. P., (Client) to conduct ambient air monitoring for
pesticides and volatile organic monitoring at a landfill in Pitt County, North Carolina. This
proposal includes five Sections. Section 1.0 includes an introduction to TRC and this proposal.
Section 2.0 presents the technical approach and our proposed schedule. Section 3.0 addresses
TRC's management approach for the project as well as the qualification of the key project staff.
Section 4.0 presents TRC experience in conducting similar or related projects. Project funding
is addressed in Section 5.0. Condensed resumes of the project team are provided in Appendix A.
TRC Environmental Corporation (TRC) is a wholly -owned subsidiary of TRC Companies,
Inc., a $55-million public corporation traded on the New York Stock Exchange. The Company
has distinguished itself among its competitors with over 30 years of relevant experience
understanding environmental and health problems, and a strong technical perspective to define
workable solutions. TRC has emerged as one of the nation's leading environmental consulting
and engineering firms.
With a combined strength of over 750 environmental professionals in 27 offices located
throughout the U.S., the TRC companies provide a diverse industrial, municipal, and
governmental client base with a full range of environmental consulting, engineering, and
technology development services. TRC assists clients in the identification and solution of
complex environmental problems and in establishing and maintaining compliance within the
constantly evolving regulatory framework. For over 30 years, the name TRC has been
synonymous with "quality"; our primary goal is to provide our clients with practical and
economic solutions to protect their business interests while contributing to enhanced
environmental quality and public health and safety.
TRC is a leader in its breadth and depth of air quality engineering and consulting
expertise. TRC's air pollution control services incorporate all technical aspects of facility
permitting, control engineering, regulatory compliance, and air quality analyses and measurement.
The Company's parallel strength in hazardous materials management includes all aspects of
industrial site evaluation, soil and ground water remediation engineering, and human health risk
assessment.
TRC provides state -of -the art science, engineering, and regulatory consulting services in
the areas of hazardous waste management, site investigation, remedial engineering, site clean-up,
design of treatment and disposal facilities, air pollution control, toxic substance control,
environmental health, and risk management and analysis.
2.0 TECHNICAL APPROACH AND SCHEDULE
TRC proposes that this ambient air monitoring project be conducted in two phases. Phase
I is an exploratory or preliminary ambient air monitoring study to assess levels of pesticides and
1 TRC Environmental Corporation
�oee-ss�

PROPOSAL FOR PIT COUNTY LANDFILL AIR MONITORING
If concentration levels are high enough, a Phase II detailed
volatile organic compounds (VOC). would require less rigorous and detailed quality
study would be conducted. The Phase I study
assurance since the project is primarily aimed at assessing Whether or not volatile organics and
pesticides are detected in ambient air at the locations of the water monitoring wells and a
Pe roach selected ambient
downwind landfill boundary site. I been levels
mea II study could to approach
The Phase II
air action levels defined by thequality assurance to produce data that are
study would require much more rigorous and detailed q tY
scientifically defensible. The technical approach for the Phase I and Phase II studies are
described in the following subsections.
2.1 Phase I Study
At the beginning of the study a TRC air quality specialist will conduct a site visitat
C
Pitt County landfill to recommend appropriate the ll
sampling stations for the Phase I study.
wi
then develop a quality assurance project plan that includes a description of the project, sampling o
locations, quality assurance objectives, sampling and analytical procedures, and the approach
quality assurance and quality control to be used for the study. In addition, TRC will Prep
a Health and Safety Plan to be followed during the course of the study. This Phase I study will
include the set-up and operation of three monitoring stations to measure V and Pesticides.
Each station will include a high -volume polyurethane foam (PM sampler for pesticide sampling
and a Summa-passivated canister for VOC sampling. One station will be an upwind background
station and the second station will be located downwind at the perimeter of be ateld �d Oin an at
of expected maximum concentration. A third monitoring
station each of the three monitoring wells while water samples are obtained from each of the wells. A
field blank will also be taken to the field. The field b �trethe same and mannerfilter
�e
pesticides and Summa-passivated canister for VOC) will
field samples (including laboratory analyses) except that ambient air will not be pulled into the
canister or the PUF sampler. TRC is assuming that the sampling of the three wells will be done
sequentially, not simultaneously. TRC is also assuming that the entire water sampling process
for each well will require about two hours and will also require an' sampling for the same time
TRC is assuming that all of the exploratory sampling can be completed in one
period. Moreover,ger than two hours and, as sampling of all three
day. If sampling of each well takes u�o al costs would be incurred. TRC proposesto use the
wells takes more than one day, adds
following test methods:
Pesticides by EPA Method TO-4, sampling by PUF, analyses by GC-ECD
•
VOC by EPA Method TO-14, sampling Y lin b Summa-passivated stainless steel
canisters and analyses by GGMS
A total of 5 VOC samples and 5 pesticide samples plus two field blanks (one VOC field
blank and one pesticide field blank) will be collected and Carl �� or pesticide exF cartridges
dand
and filters will be taken to Triangle Laboratories, North
analysesfilters
by GC-ECD analyses. The canisters will also be taken to Triangle Laboratories for
2 TRC Environmental Corporation
lvsas9

PROPOSAL FOR Prr r COUNTY LANDFILL AIR MONrrORING
S. TRC will conduct the site visit, develop the sampling and QA Plan,
the Health and Safety Plan, and begin analyses by GGM sampling within two weeks of receipt of authorization to
the
proceed. A portable weather station and data logger oacchart recorder will also be set up at one
of the sampling sites to monitor wind speed and duet
Both EPA Method TO-4 and EPn.
A Method TO-14 are, rec°on�ol and quality assuranended F-PA ambient ce
monitoring methods for air toxics and have well-defined quality ro sal to
requirements. TRC has not included summaries or copies of these methods in this P Po
conserve space and meet the required 10 page limit for this proposal.
to use Method TO-4 with a high -volume PUF sampler as opposed to
TRC is proposing uate sensitivity for the short -
Method TO-10 which use slow -volume sampler to ensure adequate proposes to use Method TO-4 for
duration sampling intervals at the monitoring wells. the
upwind and downwind monitoring at the perimeter of the landfill to ensure comparability of
P wells. Method TO-14 is proposed because it can identify
results with those from the monitoring could be
and quantify a wide variety of VOC. TRC believesconcentrationseareow avo d the additional
adequate to satisfy the State and, if measuredand analyses in
sampling of Phase II. However, TRC believes that if results from the sampling typical levels of
Phase I are inconsistent or if measured ambient levels are
cladditional sampling. TRC's Phase
concern or action levels, then the State to or abov
would likely requireand analyses requirement. Within 21
II study is directed at satisfying this additional sampling and analytical
days. of completing the Phase I sampling, TRC will submit a report of the sampling
results to the client.
2.2 phase II Study
Ambient air monitoring for VOC and pesticides will be conducted at one upwind site and
one downwind site. Similar to the Phase I study,
the methods proposed for Phase II are EPA
Method TO-4 for pesticides and EPA Method TO-14 for VOC. P as�, be h conducted over
ever, R One in
six day sampling scheme over a 30 day period is proposed.Sampling,
In addition, unlike the Phase I study
where field operators were on site during
a 24-hour period•
sampling,special automated sampling systems for unattended 24-hour VOC sampling will be
aired as well as autombe
atic timers for the PUF sampler. Also, �� assumes
ob�ectives off this
piing sites appropriate for q
able to locate and lease secure same g p r s arrangements will be necessary and
study. If secure leased sites cannot ti located other security
situation. The recommended 30 day
TRC would submit a separate cost estimate for handlingAu st when temperatures are high and
sampling period should occur during June through gu
research has found that atmospheric pesticide and toxic VOC concentrations are at their highest.
If it is determined that variable wind directions require multiple perimeter receptor sites,
additional costs would be incurred to establish and operate onee d be additional
n A downwind o
sites. Written client authorization to establish additional sites sticide field blanks and 2
VOC samples and 10 pesticide samples plus 5 VOC field blanks, 5 pe
VOC duplicate field samples and 2 duplicate pesticide field samples will be collected and
P les are necessary to calculate overall sampling and analysis
analyzed. The duplicate field samp
TRC EnWronnwntal Corporadon
Iv a-9"

PROPOSAL FOR PITT COUNTY LANDFILL AIR MONITORING
precision. TRC proposes to hire and train a local operator for the Phase II study to collect
samples and ship them to Triangle Laboratories for analyses. In addition, a portable weather
station and recording instrumentation would be established at one of the sampling sites to provide
meteorological information for the sampling period.
Prior to starting the Phase II study, TRC will prepare a comprehensive QA project plan
for submission to the State for review and approval. In addition, a Health and Safety Plan will
also be prepared. If the State requires additional QA/QC controls other than that specified in the
submitted QA project plan, additional costs may be incurred. Client authorization for these
additional expenditures would be required before TRC proceeds. TRC will begin sampling
within two weeks of receipt of an approved QA project plan and client authorization to begin
sampling. Within 21 days of completing the Phase II sampling, TRC will submit a report of the
sampling and analytical results.
TRC has assumed that the purpose of Phase II sampling will be to assess the exposure
of individuals located downwind and off site from the landfill. If Phase I sampling raises
questions about the exposure of individuals working at the landfill, then TRC will provide the
client with a revised plan and cost estimate for Phase H. Work could not begin on Phase II, until
written authorization was received from the client to proceed with the Phase II revisions.
3.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT
TRC's approach to this program will emphasize timeliness, technical quality, close
adherence to budget, and responsiveness of our Project Manager and staff to client's needs. We
recognize that our work may be closely scrutinized by the regulatory community and that
collected data must be accurate and defensible. Our project team also understands the need for
conducting this program in a cost-effective manner.
Figure 3-1 depicts the planned team structure and specific individuals who will be
responsible for the completion of the project. Key staff responsibilities and qualifications are
presented below and in the resumes included in Appendix A.
The project manager for this program will be Mr. Stan Sleva, Principal Scientist and
Senior Project Manager at TRC. Mr. Sleva will be responsible for ensuring that the program is
of the highest quality while meeting budgetary and scheduling constraints. Mr. Sleva will also
serve as the primary point of contact between TRC and the client. He has managed programs
related to virtually all of EPA's test methods including recent draft methods for air toxics. Mr.
Sleva will be responsible for final site selection, equipment specification, routine management
and overview of data evaluation and reporting.
Quality assurance (QA) and technical advice will be provided by Dr. Richard Tropp who
will report directly to Mr. Sleva, remaining independent of field operations. Dr. Tropp is a TRC
principal scientist and QA Manager for the Southeast Region with more than 17 years of
is 4 TRC Environmental Corporation

PROPOSAL FOR PITT COUNTY LANDFILL AIR MONITORING
Figure 3-1. Project Organization.
experience in conducting and managing projects involving ambient air monitoring, quality
assurance and data analysis.
4.0 RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
The following projects are examples of TRC's experience in ambient air monitoring for
VOC and pesticides.
VOC Process Sampling and Analysis Workshop
TRC provided EPA and Region I State agencies with a technical workshop on VOC Process
Sampling and Analysis. This 4-hour workshop included: reasons for samplepurges, hocess to
be sampled; sample containers; sampling equipment; sampling location(s); p
custody; QA/QQ handling; description of analysis; results of analyses; and data analysis and
calculations.
c TRC Environmental Corporation
Iva-9"

vunPOSAL FOR PITT COUNTY LANDFILL AIR MONITORING
Ambient Air Monitoring for a Landfill in New York
an ambient program at a closed landfill in southern locew York. Ambient air
ations were chosen on
TRC conductedperimeter of the landfill. Three cations
monitoring was conducted around the pe
the southern edg
ll, and three locations were chosen on the northern edge. At each
e of the landfill,
location, sampling was done for volatile organics with CMS n os Pe six ,� o � 2samp�g
loca to ASTM Method 701. In addition
ati
hydrogen sulfide according
was conducted at three locations in the town immediate
sulfide only landfill and at a location
north of the landfill. Off -site locations were for hydrogen
1 Branch Development of Protocols for Ambient Air Sampling and
EPA Land Disposal
Monitoring at Hazardous Waste Facilities TSDFs are
The limited data available to describe ambient air have
emissions
efromployed. loyyed. TRC was contracted by
because uniform sampling procedures typically have not be P
EPA's Land Disposal Branch to evaluate state-of-the-art sampling and analysis protocols for use
at TSDFs. After extensive research and analyses,
TRCrecommended protocols for air sampling
emissions rate measurement of trace metals and toxic Organic ainorndand off -site low
c compounds
and for on -site
emanating from TSDF facilities. A comprehensive
culminated with Preparation of a guidance
level measurements was developed. The project and analytical practices for use in the
manual of recommended sampling, monitoring,
management and regulation of hazardous waste facilities.
rl Ambient Air Monitoring, East Bridgewater, Massachusetts Landfill, East
Quarte y
Bridgewater, Massachusetts around the East Bridgewater, MA landfill' TRC
TRC conducted quarterly ambient air monitoring
months at one upwind and two downwind locations.
collected ambient air samples every three SUMMA canisters n accordance with EPA
Samples were collected for volatile organics uas g e c orimeuic detectors. The results of these
Method TO and for hydrogen sulfide using p
Lev
an
analyses
were compared to the appropriate Massachusetts Allowable hAmbi on the
surrounding
local meteorological data to determine the impact the landfill
neighborhoods.
Ambient Air Monitoring Program with Optional Meteorological Monitoringication site in
TRC conducted an ambient air monitoring study around a former coal g
feel Massachusetts. The sampling was designed to determine the nature and extent of
Green s s from five locations in and around the site for
emissions from the site. TRC collected same
s for the following parameters: TSP, PAIL and volatile organics. TRC also collected
three day air toxic data were evaluated in conjunction with the
on
the surrounding
onsite meteorological data. The resulting
data to determine the source of emissions and' heir impact
meteorological
area. Monitoring methods used included EPA Method TO ,
13,
Air Monitoring, Clean Harbors Analytical Services, Bedford, Massachusetts
stud around a hazardous wwast storage faa 'two
TRC conducted an ambient air monitoring Y
determine the nature and extent of emissions from the facility. project
phases, planning and implementation.
6
TRC EnWronnuncal Cosporaoon
Iva-9 9

PROPOSAL FOR PITT COUNTY LANDFILL AIR MONITORING
During the planning stage, TRC prepared a compilation and evaluation of existing data on air
emissions from the facility, an emissions inventory for specific parameters, a design of the
sampling and monitoring study, a monitoring test plan, and a QA/QC Project Plan. These
documents were submitted to the regulatory agency for review and were approved for
implementation of the study.
Designing the monitoring study presented some interesting problems in that the facility was in
an area surrounded by a number of other potential sources of the parameters being monitored.
Placement of the monitors and data requirements were important factors in allowing proper
interpretation of the data produced during the monitoring phase.
TRC conducted monitoring at three locations adjacent to the facility and at two background sites.
A total of 15 sampling events were conducted with measurements of volatile organics, PCBs,
PAHs, and pesticides obtained for each event. The resulting air toxics concentration data were
evaluated in conjunction with the meteorological data to determine the source of emissions and
their impact on the surrounding area. Monitoring methods used included EPA Method T04 for
PCBs and semivolatile organics and EPA Method T02 for pesticides.
Dispersion Modeling Study to Site Ambient Air Monitors During Remediation of the Acton,
Massachusetts Site (W.R. Grace), GZA Remediation, Incorporated, Newton Upper Falls,
Massachusetts
TRC assisted in the development of an ambient air monitoring network to be operated during the
remediation of the W. R. Grace Superfund site in Acton, Massachusetts. TRCs performed the
dispersion modeling of the activities at the site, including soil/sludge handling, processing, curing,
and on -site landfilling. Pollutants modeled included volatile organic compounds, semivolatile
compounds, and particulate matter less than 10 microns (PM10). Refined modeling was
conducted using five years of sequential hourly meteorological data from a nearby recording site.
Both individual and combined source impacts were analyzed for each pollutant for short-term
(i.e., 8-hour and 24-hour) and annual impacts. Results of the modeling were presented in a final
report and included tables of maximum air quality impacts and graphics showing the
concentration isopleths for the time periods of interest. These data were provided to a second
contractor for site selection of the ambient air monitors.
R&D Fenceline Monitoring Program at a Colfax, Louisiana Facility, Laidlaw Environmental
Services, Incorporated, Columbia, South Carolina
For Laidlaw Environmental Services in Colfax, Louisiana, TRC conducted a fenceline monitoring
ambient air monitoring program in the vicinity of an open, thermal treatment RCRA Subpart X
facility handling explosive waste streams. Three monitoring sites plus on -site meteorological data
collection will be developed from this effort. Target compounds will include selected heavy
metals. Goal of program is to reduce or eliminate this compliance requirement.
Ambient Air Quality Study, Salt Lake City, Utah, CONFIDENTIAL CLIENT
TRC conducted a week-long ambient air sampling program in selected work space areas of a
chemical warehouse located in Salt Lake City, Utah. At the time of sampling, the warehouse was
inee-sus 7 TRC Environmental Corporadon

PROPOSAL FOR PPTT COUNTY LANDFILL AIR MONTfORING
being used as a storage facility.
Former tenants of the site, however, manufactured pesticides
and herbicides in the building. Chemicals compounded at the site include: 2,4,5-
trichlorophenoxyacetic acid n-butyl ester (2,3,5-T), 2,"chlorophen-oxyacetic acid ester (2,4- y products of
pentachlorophenol (PCP), and chlordane. Dioxins and furans are > known reare d collect the 1
the manufacture of 2,4,5-T and PCP. Standard Hi -Volume samplers
ambient air samples to quantify airborne levels of dioxins and furans• Thesle collection filter and
medium consisted of two fractions: an 8 by 10 inch Whatman spectro-grade glass
a polyurethane foam (PUF) plug. The filter fractions were also gravimetrically analyzed for total
suspended particulates (TSP).
Ambient Air Quality Study, Northern California, CONFIDENTIAL CLIENT
TRC conducted a six -week ambient air monitoring program in Northern California utilizing EPA
Toxic Organic (TO) Method 4. Samples were collected upwind and downwind of a contaminated
soil remediation process in order to ascertain any aerial migration o contamination
on DDEo c used by
the remediation process. Compounds of concern were DDT,
Meteorological parameters were continuously monitored over the period of the project.
TRC conducted a three-week ambient air monitoring program designed to ascertain the aerial
migration of selected metals as a result of the regenerating of contaminated soils. Parameters
measured by TRC during the project included wind speed, wind direction, arsenic, cadmium, lead
and zinc. ,
Niagara County Refuse Site RVFS Compliance Oversight, Niagara Falls, New York, U.S.
EPA, Region H, New York, New York
TRC provided technical support during the RI/FS at this municipal landfill site to ensure that the
investigation was conducted in accordance with the NCP and the Administrative Order on
Consent. TRC reviewed PRP-generated technical documents, conducted oversight of RI field
the RI
activities, collected and analyzed split samples, and manaag orda s installed and samplen. d ground
investigation, TRC conducted oversight as the PRP co
water monitoring wells, collected surface water and sediment samples, and conducted ambient
air monitoring.
Upon completion of RI field work and receipt of validate split sample ed aRC RI oversight
activitiessubmitted an RI Oversight Summary Report to EPA. Port Plan,
activities and the PRP contractor's conformance to their Work Plan' ProJect Operations
Quality Assurance Project Plan and other EPA guidelines and procedures. TRC independently assessed and provided a general interpretation of site conditions based on the split sample data
and TRC field observations. TRC's recommendations throughout the RI activities resulted in
improved changes to sampling techniques and ensured that the PRP was accurately nd ing the
identified
nature and extent of contamination at the site. TRC reviewed the RI report
ion, and the human health and ecological risk
problems with hydrogeologic data interpretat
assessments. TRC supported EPA is negotiation sessions to resolve these technical issues and
move the project forward. TRC evaluated the FS report and identified deficiencies in the PRP's
Q TRC Environmental Corporation
IVW9"

PROPOSAL FOR PTTT COUNTY LANDFILL AIR MONITORING
proposed remedial alternatives. TRC's comments were incorporated into the revised report, and
as a result, appropriate remedial alternatives were considered the site.
5.0 PROJECT FUNDING
This section provides a cost estimate for Phase I and Phase II.
PHASE I
5.1 Labor Hours by Task
Preparation of Quality Assurance Project Plan
20
8
Initial Site Survey Visit
16
Sampling Equipment Calibration, Checkout
10
Travel to Pitt County Landfill (Rd. Trip, 2 persons)
VOC, Pesticides, and Meteorological Sampling
includes sample delivery to Triangle Labs (2 persons at site)
20
Report Preparation
20
12-
Project Management
15
Technical Support
Total Labor Hours
121
5.2 Cost Estimate
P/T Level
Description
Hourly Rate
Number of Hours Estimated Cost
CAT 3
R. Tropp
$110/hr
8
CAT 4
S. Sleva
$ 94/hr
14
CAT 5 M. White $ 73/hr 36
CAT 5 K. Jones $ 73/hr 48
CAT 7 Technical Support $ 46/hr 15
Total Direct Labor (hours/$) 121 $8,898
$4,833
Sample Analysis
$170
Travel
Equipment Rental $1,320
Other Direct Costs $819
PHASE I Total Estimated Cost and Fee $16,040
9 TRC Environmental Corporation
iva-m

PROPOSAL FOR PITT COUNTY LANDFILL AIR MONITORING
- PHASE II
S 3 Labor Hours by Task
Preparation of Quality Assurance Project Plan
30
TRC Training of Local Site Operator
16
Sampling Equipment Calibration, Checkout
16
Travel to Pitt County Landfill 4 trips
(setup, 2 audits, site closure)
20
VOC, Pesticides, and Meteorological Sampling
includes sample shipment to Triangle Labs
(4 hours per sampling event plus operator training)
36
2 Site Audits for Precision and General QA
16
Site Closure
8
Report Preparation
35
Project Management
12
Technical Support
16
Total Labor Hours 205
SA Cost Estimate
P/T Level Description
Hourly Rate
Number of Hours
Estimated Cost
CAT 3 R. Tropp
$110/hr
15
CAT 4 S. Sleva
$ 94/hr
20
CAT 5 M. White
$ 73/hr
58
CAT 5 K. Jones
$ 73/hr
60
CAT 7 Local Operator
$ 46/hr
36
CAT 7 Technical Support
$ 46/hr
16
Total Direct Labor (hours/$)
205
$14,536
Sample Analysis
$12,871
Travel
$621
Equipment Rental
$3,921
Other Direct Costs
$906
PHASE II Total Estimated Cost and Fee
$39,855
PHASES I and H Total Estimated Cost
$55,895
iaa-M
10
TRC Environmental Corporation

APPENDIX A

STANLEY SLEVA, M.S.
EDUCATION
M.S., Chemistry, Xavier University, 1959
B.S., Chemistry, Kings College, 1954
PROGRAM QUALIFICATIONS
• Program management
• Title V Operating Permits
• Ambient air quality monitoring (Network Design, PSD Monitoring)
• Regulatory analysis and regulations development
• Emissions inventory development
• Quality assurance for air monitoring and emissions inventories
• Trends analysis
EXPERIENCE
Mr. Sleva has over 35 years of experience in the air pollution control field including air quality
monitoring, network design, ambient monitoring guidance for prevention of significant
deterioration (PSD), air pollution control costs, emissions inventory development, operating
permits, air monitoring costs for criteria pollutants and toxic pollutants, and air pollution training.
He currently serves as TRC Project Leader ffonrsev U.S. EPA work Air Forte assignments and has served as
TRC Program Manager for EPA contracts dthe
Recent projects Mr. Sleva is directing or has completed include: (1) preparation of a document
on the Application of EPA's Compendia of Toxic Organic and Inorganic Methods to Ambient
Monitoring at Superfund Sites, and (2) providing of technical support to EPA for Oversight of
(3) technical assistance to EPA in the drafting of the
Toxic and Criteria Pollutant Monitoring, regulations f
preamble and regulations for revisions to the 40 CFR Part 58 air monitoringreg or
A�)� (or
enhanced ozone (Title I of the CAAA) and toxic pollutant monitoring (T' III
analysis of ambient air in Southeast (SE) Chicago for semi -volatile organic compounds,
(5) technical assistance to EPA in the
tio veC ptmer (ANTIC) bulltia board ystemce f and the
Ambient Monitoring Technical Informs
AMTIC Newsletter, (6) CAAA Title V assistance to EPA in the preparation of guidance on the
minimum elements to be contained in operating permit application forms, and completeness
checklists for prototype permit applications, (7) CAAA Title V assistance to EPA in the planning
for and conduct of operating permit workshops, the development of a strategy for general
operating permit programs, and the development of a hypothetical model operating permit fee
demonstration, (8) preparation of a draft preamble and regulations to revise the 40 CFR Part 5
regulations to account for upcoming proposed revisions to the lead national ambient air quality

STANLEY SLEVA, M.S. (Continued)
standard, and preparation of an EPA guidance document for air quality monitoring around lead
point sources, (9) assistance to EPA in the planning for and conduct of EPA's Second Annual
Winter Air Monitoring Meeting, (10) preparation of EPA guidance on the costs to prepare for
and conduct air monitoring (11) technical support for Allegheny County Pennsylvania's Liberty
Borough PM-10 SIP development effort, (12) revisions of EPA's guideline document on the
identification and use of air quality data affected by exceptional events, and (13) preparation of
a special report on quality assurance oversight of EPA's Monitoring and Quality Assurance
Group's air monitoring activities.
As Manager of EPA's National Air Monitoring Station (HAMS) and State and Local Agency
Monitoring Station (SLAMS) program, he developed federal regulations for ambient air
monitoring and data reporting which were promulgated in the Federal Register as 40 CFR Part
58. Mr. Sleva also developed federal guidance on air monitoring network design, instrument
siting, and criteria for the selection of monitoring instruments. He directed EPA's efforts in
preparing the document titled, Ambient Monitoring Guidelines for Prevention of Significant
Deterioration (PSD) and directed EPA's efforts at defining State and local agencies core
programs for ambient air monitoring and participated in EPA 's project to establish an air quality
management manpower model. The model identified air quality management tasks, and the
resources necessary to conduct these tasks. In addition, he served as EPA's Manager of the
Toxic Air Monitoring Station (TAMS) network, the Urban Air Toxic Monitoring Program
(UATMP), and the Nonmethane Organic Compound (NMOC) monitoring program.
As Chief of the Monitoring Section, Monitoring and Reports Branch, OAQPS, EPA, Mr. Sleva
developed and implemented a national air monitoring strategy for the State implementation plan
(SIP) monitoring network of over 1,400 criteria pollutant sites; developed and implemented a
national monitoring strategy for toxic pollutants and managed the toxic pollutant network; and
developed national air monitoring regulations (40 CFR 58) and guidance for SLAMS, NAMS,
and PSD monitoring.
Previously, as Acting Chief of the EPA's Air Pollution Training Institute, Mr. Sleva planned,
directed, and conducted national training programs in air pollution control; developed and
conducted air pollution courses in emissions inventories, air quality management, and atmospheric
and source monitoring for criteria and toxic pollutants; and developed manpower surveys to
determine national air pollution control manpower development and training activities needed in
the public and private sector.
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Air and Waste Management Association
Air and Waste Management Association, Research Triangle Park Chapter
Member EM-3 Ambient Monitoring Committee, Air and Waste Management Association
Past Chairman South Atlantic States (SAS) Section of the AWMA
PUBLICATIONS
Mr. Sleva has authored or coauthored over 50 technical publications and presentations.

RICHARD J. TROPP, Ph.D.
EDUCATION
Ph.D., Physics, The University of Texas at Austin, 1979
B.S., Physics, City College of New York, 1965
TECHNICAL SPECIALTIES
Dr. Tropp has 17 years of experience in:
• Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
• Quality Assurance
• Data Analysis
• Aerosol and Particulate Measurements
• Regulation Development
• Air Pollution Control
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Dr. Tropp has more than 17 years of management and research experience in the areas of
ambient air quality monitoring, data analysis, quality assurance, regulation development, aerosol
and particulate measurements, and air pollution control. His experience includes university
research, management of State agency regulation development and research, andmanageemeent ana
participation in over two dozen ambient air monitoring projects. Dr. Tropp Y
Principal Scientist with TRC and Quality Assurance Manager of its Southeast Region.
As Quality Assurance Manager, he is responsible for all aspects of quality assurance (QA) and
quality control (QC) for a wide variety of projects that include ambient monitoring for air toxics
and criteria pollutants, source testing, site assessments, health effects research, emission inventory
development, regulatory support, data analysis, software and systems development, and QA/QC
program support.
Dr. Tropp's ambient monitoring experience includes methods development and research on
improved methods for sampling air toxics and aerosols; NAMS/SLAMS, PAoMS,monitoring;PSD
monitoring; visibility and particulate monitoring; acid deposition and dry depo
and air toxics monitoring for metals, volatile organic compounds (VOC), and semivolatile organic
compounds (SVOC), including pesticides, PCBs, PAHs, and dioxins.
Dr. Tropp has managed, conducted, or reviewed several recent projects involving ambient air
monitoring for air toxics. These include: (1) QA/QC review of PAH data from an environmental
justice project in southeast Chicago; (2) two related projects for air toxics deposition monitoring
(for PAHs, PCBs, pesticides, and volatile and semivolda �e°U U.S. EPA for whicanics in air and hchel�served a
tion) by
the Canadian Atmospheric Environment Service and
n
principal investigator, audited sampling and laboratory sites in both Canada and the U.S.,
prepared data quality objectives, and developed quality assurance program and project plans; (3)
preparation of a work plan and cost estimate for EPA for a two-phase ambient air monitoring

RICHARD J. TROPP, Ph.D. (Continued)
project at a hazardous waste incinerator, and (4) senior technical advisor for a document on how
to use EPA toxic organic (TO) and inorganic (10) compendia methods for ambient air monitoring
at Superfund sites.
Other ambient monitoring projects that Dr. Tropp has managed or actively participated in include
the following: (1) as program manager, oversees TRC's work in EPA's Clean Air Status and
Trends Network; (2) as a member of a binational Operational Measurements Team, he helped to
prepare a QA Synthesis Report summarizing the methodology and data quality of the Eulerian
Model Evaluation Field Study; (3) as project director, he was responsible for QA auditing of the
Acid MODES field study including audits of sites, operator training, laboratories,
manager,iae
operations, data management, and assessments of data quality; () asprogram
oversaw visibility monitoring for EPA's Eastern Fine Particle and Visibility Network; (5) served
as senior technical advisor for a monitoring project to investigate the spatial and temporal
relationships of PM2.5 to PM10 in an eastern U.S. city in anticipation of developing revised
sampling criteria for a proposed fine particulate standard; (6) helped to prepare a report on how
EPA could improve QA oversight of its ambient air monitoring network; (7) prepared data
quality objectives and conducted training on ambient air monitoring QA/QC for the Republic of
China EPA; and (8) as head of atmospheric sciences research for the Texas Air Control Board
(now the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission), he managed and conducted
research involving particulate and air toxics monitoring, acid deposition, urban visibility, and
ozone meteorology, transport, and trends.
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Air and Waste Management Association (Former Chair, Measurement Division)
American Association for Aerosol Research
American Physical Society
American Association for the Advancement of Science
American Society for Quality Control
North Carolina Quality Assurance Discussion Group
PUBLICATIONS
Dr. Tropp has authored or coauthored over 50 papers and publications covering such topics as
ambient air monitoring, quality assurance, data analysis, regulation development, aerosol
measurements, and visibility.

KENNETH R. JONES
EDUCATION
M.E.M., Natural Resource Economics and Policy, Duke University, 1991
B.S., Environmental Studies, State University of New York College of Environmental Science
and Forestry, 1989
TECHNICAL SPECIALTIES
Mr. Jones has 5 years of experience in:
Air Emission Inventories
Sampling and Analysis of Air, Water, and Soil
Ecological Science
REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE
Air Emission Inventories
Mr. Jones has experience in conducting the many different facets of air emission inventories.
He has conducted emission inventories for army bases for the Department of Defense.
Air Emission Inventory, Army Facilities at Selfridge Air National Guard Base, Mt. Clemens,
Michigan. Responsible for conducting on site investigation of all sources of air emissions for
the base. This included fuel stations, painting operations, pesticide applications, etc. Performed
all emission calculations using AP-42 and writing final report.
Other bases include:
Lexington Army Depot, Lexington, Kentucky
Bluegrass Army Depot, Richmond, Kentucky
Charles M. Price Support Center, Granite Falls, Illinois
Sampling and Analysis of Air, Water, and Soil
Mr. Jones was responsible for writing the air toxics section of EPA document EPA-454/R-93-042
Guidance for Estimating Ambient Air Monitoring Costs for Criteria Pollutants and Selected Air
Toxic Pollutants. This included researching the associated costs of setting up a monitoring site
using the toxic organic (TO) methods and appropriate analyses. Mr. Jones also completed work
on a draft document for EPA titled The Use of EPA's Compendium of Methods for Determining
Toxic Organic and Inorganic Compounds at Superfund Sites. Additionally, Mr. Jones is a system
operator for EPA's electronic bulletin board system (BBS). He maintains the Ambient
Monitoring Technology Information Center (AMTIC) section. The purpose of the board is to

KENNETH R. JONES (Continued)
disseminate information concerning ambient air monitoring to the scientific air monitoring
community.
Mr. Jones also served as a sampling specialist for source testing using EPA test methods. His
testing experience includes electric utilities, hazardous waste incinerators, chemical plants, metals
production, and automotive products.
Mr. Jones has performed soil and water sampling and analysis as part of a team working on a
comprehensive site assessment at a possible groundwater remediation site. He was responsible
for collecting soil and water samples for laboratory analysis and performing field screening
analysis on soil samples using organic volatile analyzers (OVA).
Mr. Jones also conducted a phase II site assessment of underground storage tanks in Lenoir,
North Carolina. He coordinated onsite activities including the placement of soil borings,
collection of soil samples for laboratory analysis, cleanup activities, and production of final
report.
Other Experience
Mr. Jones worked on the Identification and Characterization of Five Missing or Unaccounted for
Area Source Categories document. . He was responsible for developing the section on
catastrophic/accidental releases from rail car, tank truck and industrial accidents.
Mr. Jones was responsible for the evaluation of Title V of the Clean Air Act Amendments of
1990 (CAAA) for the District of Columbia in its efforts to establish an air toxics program. He
compared existing D.C. law to the CAAA in order to determine areas deficient in pollution
coverage. Mr. Jones also analyzed State Implementation Plans (SIPs) and their adherence to
standards set in the CAAA. Mr. Jones was responsible for creating administrative procedures
for implementing Section 112(1) delegation of State air toxic programs. Furthermore, Mr. Jones
helped analyze Section 507 of the CAAA to determine obligations under the Small Business
Assistance Program.
Before coming to TRC, Mr. Jones conducted policy analysis on the North Carolina No Hardened
Structures Law as a recipient of a Bradley Foundation Award. The law was applied to the
estuarine environment and its effects noted As an Environmental Specialist with the North
Carolina Department of Environment Health and Natural Resources (DEHNR), Mr. Jones
analyzed the North Carolina Draft Aquatic Weed Bill and compared it with federal legislation
and other States' aquatic weed laws.
PUBLICATIONS
Mr. Jones has authored or coauthored various technical publications.

M. MONROE WHITE
TECHNICAL SPECIALTIES
Mr. White has 5 years of experience in:
• Air Monitoring Equipment Operation and Maintenance
• EPA Reference Method Laboratory Analysis
• EPA Reference Method Source Sampling
• Test Project Management
REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE
EPA Reference Method Source Sampling. Mr. White has 5 years of experience in source testing
covering EPA Methods 1, 1A, 2, 2A, 2C, 2D, 3, 3A, 4, 5B, 6, 6C, 7, 7A, 8, 10, 10B, 13B, 16,
16A, 17, 18, 20, 21, 23, 25, 25A, 25B, 26, also SW-846 Methods 0010, and 0011. He
participated in a wide range of successful emission and compliance testing projects at over 150
sources. He also has extensive experience with GC-ECD, ELCD, -FID, -FPD, -TCD, and purge -
and -trap analysis for VOCs. In addition, he participated in many CEMS certifications, Subpart
60 and 75 RAA, PST, and RATA tests and numerous CEMS compliance tests. Mr. White
performed Methods 6, 7A, 8 and 18 wet analysis using HPLC-IC.
Test Team Leader, Sewage Digester. Participated in testing conducted on the Primary Digesters
for H2S and methane emissions, utilizing a dilution system.
Test Team Leader, Paper Mills. Participated in the testing for air permitting and internal
engineering purposes at numerous sources for TRS using Method 16 (GC-FPD), and Method 16A
(both wet and CEM methods).
Test Team Leader, Automotive Manufacturer. Participated in emission testing for vendor's
guarantee on a VOC CEMS/thermal oxidizer system for destruction of paint booth emissions.
Test Team Leader, Wood Products. Participated in baseline and follow-up testing for MDI
addition to chipboard process.
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND CALIBRATION
Mr. White is experienced in the operation, repair, maintenance, and calibration of air sampling
equipment.

� q - 0 /
fie. �- I;6,k C0
rjulivl�

0�122
,peR 1995 �'
Rece+red
Solid waste
� • a SeCtitiotl ..
ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC.
1920 Starita Road, Suite J - Charlotte, N.C. 28206 - [phone]
April 13, 1995
Mr. Phil Dickerson
Pitt County Engineer
1717 West Fifth Street
Greenville, North Carolina 27834
Reference: Proposal for Air Quality Testing & Consulting Services
Pitt County Landfill
Greenville, North Carolina
Trigon Proposal No. 046-95-073-P
Dear Mr. Dickerson:
Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. (Trigon) is pleased to provide this proposal in
response to a request from Messrs. Bill Ross and Bob King of Brooks, Pierce, McLendon,
Humphrey & Leonard of Greensboro, North Carolina. This proposal is for air quality testing
and consulting services at the Pitt County Landfill located in Greenville, North Carolina. It is
Trigon's understanding that Pitt County has been requested by the North Carolina Department
of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources (NC DEHNR) to conduct a study of potential
air quality impacts from the landfill. Trigon has conducted numerous air quality analyses and
impact studies. Our staff includes registered Professional Engineers and Geologists (P.E.'s and
P.G.'s), Registered Environmental Managers (REM), Qualified Environmental Professionals
(QEP), environmental scientists, meteorologists, and chemists. In the following sections we
present a scope of work based on information provided in the request for proposal; a schedule
for completing these services; company and project personnel qualifications and experience; and
a detail of fees associated with completing this project.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Pitt County has been working with NC DEHNR to determine the extent and nature of
groundwater contamination at it's
cdmanethylene dib omide in the groundwater
landfill
Greenville,
undw ter
representatives of NC DEHNR discovered
and vapor space of two monitoring wells. NC DEHNR has subsequently requested the County
to conduct air quality tests in the vicinity of three wells.

Mr. Phil Dickerson
April 13, 1995
Page Two
On behalf of Pitt County, the firm of Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard
has requested a proposal from Trigon Engineering to provide services necessary to assist Pitt
County with the NC DEHNR request. The scope of requested work includes the development
of a test plan that will provide for testing of the ambient air in the vicinity of the monitoring
wells and the landfill perimeter; implementation of the test plan in two phases (exploratory and
definitive); and provide a detailed report of the study findings. Constituents to be tested include
volatile organic compounds and pesticides.
PROPOSED WORK SCOPE
Trigon proposes to develop a test plan unique to the Pitt County landfill project. Our
first objective in the study will be -to determine prevalent wind direction by stationing a
meteorological station on site for up to one week to document typical wind direction and wind
speed characteristics. Using this data, Trigon will locate sampling stations at the landfill
perimeter and in the vicinity of three monitoring wells. Based on our experience, twelve
sampling stations will be used in this study. For this proposal, our cost estimates are based on
twelve stations. If, however, the meteorological data and landfill characteristics dictate more
sampling stations, Pitt County will be notified and a revised budget estimate will be provided.
At each sampling station Trigon proposes to perform the ambient air monitoring using
United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Test Methods set forth in
"Compendium of Methods for the Determination of Toxic Organic Compounds in Ambient Air".
Method TO-14 - Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC's) in Ambient Air Using
Summa Passivated Canister Sampling and Gas Chromatographic Analysis - will be used for the
ethylene dibromide and methane sampling. The analytical procedures associated with this
method are gas chromatography / mass spectroscopy (GC/MS) and gas chromatography / flame
ionization detector (GC/FID). Along with ethylene dibromide and methane, the analysis will
include a scan of approximately 45 VOC's.
Sampling and analysis for pesticides will be performed according to Method TO-10 -
Method for the Determination of Organochlorine Pesticides in Ambient Air Using Low Volume
Polyurethane Foam (PUF) Sampling with Gas Chromatography / Electron Capture Detector
(GC/ECD).
Trigon proposes to conduct the exploratory sampling phase to include two days of
sampling in the vicinity of the three monitoring wells and two days of sampling at the landfill
perimeter. Because of the low concentrations anticipated in the ambient air, Trigon will perform
a 4 to 6 hour sampling run at each location during each day of sampling. This will yield a total
of 24 samples for each phase. For the purpose of this proposal, Trigon assumes the same
number of samples will be taken for the definitive phase of sampling.

Mr. Phil Dickerson
April 13, 1995
Page Three
A Test Protocol will be submitted to the NC DEHNR detailing the proposed sampling
strategies and analytical procedures. Trigon has had very good experiences meeting with NC
DEHNR representatives to discuss sampling strategies. We expect that a meeting would be
beneficial for this project also. Mr. Earl G. McCune, REM, QEP, was formerly the Assistant
Chief for Technical Services at NC DEHNR and has achieved success working with regulators
to develop special testing plans. Mr. McCune will serve
as attached.
Director for this project.
His resume' and other staff members participating a
Mr. Richard B. McCain, III is Manager of Trigon's Air Monitoring Division and will
be responsible for the development of the Test Plan. Mr. McCain will also oversee the
implementation of the scope of work. Mr. J.A. Blanton
rivrtiestassociated withanager in the
Air
this
Monitoring Division. Mr. Blanton will be responsible for field ac
project. Mr. Paul R. Jenkins, Jr. is the Quality Assurance and Analytical Services Manager in
the Air Monitoring Division. Mr. Jenkins will be responsible for insuringanalyses
performed according to EPA standards and he will be responsible for the quality assurance and
quality control review of the test results.
PRODUCTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Trigon will provide all mobilization, test equipment, test personnel, laboratory analysis,
and data assimilation. If needed, Trigon will provide a certificate of insurance. Our final
products to Pitt County will be three copies of the
report
ort wil also be provided which details
exploratory sampling phase. Three copies of the fins1 rep
the results of the definitive sampling. These reports will be
results and exatted in ccordeancecalwith
EPA guidelines to include: report certification, summary
of sampling and analytical procedures, field data sheets, analytical data with chain of custody
documentation, and quality assurance/quality control measures. Each set of reports will be
provided within 28 days of completion of field testing.
SCHEDULING AND INVOICING
Trigon will begin the development of the Test Protocol
1 lance, Trigon immediately
will s heduu upon authorization field
by Pitt County. Following review and approval o aPlandfill personnel. Our
sampling activities during mutually convenient dates with Pitt County
test team will arrive on -site one day Prided test schedule will to testing to set up equipment be agreed to y' NC DEif HNR,
participate in a safety orientation. A detailed
Pitt County and Trigon at least two weeks prior to testing.

Mr. Phil Dickerson
April 13, 1995
Page Four
Based on information provided in the request for proposal and the scope of work detailed
in this proposal, Trigon estimates a project budget of $77,240.00. Services will be invoiced on
a time and materials basis according to the attached unit fee schedule. Our estimated budget is
also detailed on the attached pages. Interim invoices may be sent as deemed necessary by
Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. based on work performed to date.
AUTHORIZATION
If this proposal is acceptable, Pitt County may issue a purchase order or execute the
attached Proposal Acceptance Sheet. Verbal authorization is sufficient for scheduling purposes;
however, for insurance purposes, we will require written authorization. Please note our terms
for payment are net thirty (30) days from date of invoice.
QUALIFICATIONS
Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. (Trigon) is a registered professional engineering
firm which provides services in the following disciplines:
• Air Quality Management,
• Environmental Engineering,
• Regulatory Compliance Consulting,
• Geotechnical Engineering,
• Construction Materials Engineering, and
• Roofing Engineering.
Since Trigon was founded in June of 1983, it has grown to over 100 employees with
offices in Greensboro, Charlotte, and Raleigh, North Carolina; Roanoke, Virginia, and
Greenville, South Carolina. Trigon's consulting engineering services have been performed in
approximately 20 states as well as in Canada and Bermuda.
Trigon's professional staff includes many persons who are professionally licensed in
several states. Experience gained with this company and others includes substantial work on
environmental projects for the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), and several state departments of
transportation and air pollution control agencies. However, most of Trigon's collective
experience is with industrial clients.

Mr. Phil Dickerson
April 13, 1995
Page Five
We have a department devoted solely to Air Quality Management Services that is staffed
with personnel combining decades of investigative, consulting, and testing experience. We have
provided consulting and testing services for a full spectrum of project and client types. Trigon's
experience with air quality projects includes:
• state and federal Prevention of
Significant Deterioration (PSD)
permitting,
• air quality dispersion modeling,
• emission inventorying,
• air pollution control engineering,
• stack emissions testing,
• ambient and meteorological monitoring, and
• continuous emission monitoring.
CLOSURE
Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. appreciates this opportunity to respond to your
request. If you have any questions regarding our proposal or require additional information,
please do not hesitate to contact us. We look forward to serving Pitt County.
Sincerely,
TRIGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC.
Zt(� H
Richard B. McCain, III
Manager
Air Monitoring Division
�� �1 • �7�C,t�%`� jai
Earl G. McCune, REMP�
Director
Air Quality Services
RBM/EGM:pkn
File:P465073
cc: Mr. William G. Ross, Jr.
Mr. Robert J. King, III
1, TFR100N

PROJECT BUDGET
Pitt County Landfill
Greenville, North Carolina
Secretary ..............................
$ 5,040.00
Environmental Scientist .......................
. ...........
Senior Environmental Scientist ..............................
$10,900.00
Project Manager ............................ ...................
$5,500.00
Senior Air Quality Analyst .................................
.,,,,....
$ 3,600.00
Per Diem/Mileage .........................
. ...........
$36,200.00
Analytical Services ........................
. .,,.,,,.....
8800_00
Equipment Usage and Rental ...................
.
$77,240.00
11TRIGON

TRIGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC.
Air Quality Management
UNIT FEE SCHEDULE
ENGINEERING SERVICES
1.
Senior Registered Engineer (Principal) .......................
$108.00
2.
Senior Registered Engineer/Geologist ........................
$100.00
3.
Senior Environmental/Air Quality Analyst .....................
$108.00
4.
Air Quality Analyst II/Meteorologist H .......................
$ 80.00
5.
Registered Engineer/Geologist ............................
$ 85.00
6.
Staff Engineer/Geologist/Environmental Analyst .................
$ 65.00
7.
Air Quality Analyst I/Meteorologist I ........................
$ 65.00
8.
Senior Environmental Technician ..........................
$ 55.00
9.
Environmental Technician ...............................
$ 42.00
10.
Draftsperson/Secretary .................................
$ 37.00
11.
Engineering Technician ................................
$ 32.00
12.
Travel, by car, per mile ................................
$ 0.35
13.
Per Diem ...................................... Cost + 15 %
14.
Miscellaneous Equipment, Photographs, etc .................. Cost + 15 %
NOTE: Stationary source (stack -testing), indoor air quality, personnel exposure, and other
special testing quoted on a per job basis.
Computer charges will be calculated on a per project basis.
EFFECTIVE THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1995
NFS4)160.95) --
�7AV,
TRIGON

ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC.
1920 Starita Road, Suite J - Charlotte, N.C. 28206 • [phone]
PROPOSAL ACCEPTANCE SHEET
Description of Services: Air Quality Testing and Consulting Services
Project Name: Pitt County Landfill
Project Location: Greenville, North Carolina
Proposal No. & Date: 046-95-073-P April 13, 1995
PAYMENT TERMS
Net 30 days from Invoice Issue Date. Invoices for completed work will be issued every four
weeks for continuous or extended projects.
FOR PAYMENT OF CHARGES
- Charge Invoice to Account of:
Firm:
Address:
Attention:
PROPOSAL ACCEPTED BY:
Signature & Title Date
PROPERTY OWNER IDENTIFICATION (If other than above)
Name:
Address:
FOR APPROVAL OF CHARGES
If the Invoice is to be mailed for approval to someone other than the account charged, please
indicate below.
Firm:
Address:
Attention:
The proposed scope of work is subject to the "General Conditions" listed on the reverse side of
this sheet.
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Solid Waste Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
William L. Meyer, Director
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 12, 1995
E::�EHNR
TO: Dexter Matthews = FROM: Bill Sessom
RE: Pitt County Chronology - Permit No. 74-01
Date item
7/16/92 Application for vertical expansion submitted. Application prepared by Pitt
County Engineer.
8/25/92 Acknowledgement by Division - receipt of application.
4/21 /93 Letter from Pitt County advising that the landfill is running out of capacity and
request for status report on review.
5/1 1 /93 Initial review letter from Division. Review did not include hydrogeological
review.
8/19/93 Follow up of review letter of 5/11 with hydrogeological review included.
12/10/93 Letter to Pitt County advising them of new rules requiring Transition Plan
submission and draft of technical guidance document for Transition Plans.
Included recommendation that Pitt County incorporated vertical expansion into
Transition Plan.
4/8/94 Transition Plan received w/vertical expansion included. Transition Plan included
vertical expansion of both north and south units.
7/8/94 Interim hydrogeologic review by Bobby Lutfy to Pitt County.
8/1 1 /94 Methane Plan review letter to Pitt County.
8/24/94 Review letter advising Pitt County that additional capacity proposed for the
north portion of the landfill is not allowable. North portion was closed, not
receiving waste as of 10/9/93 and therefore was not an existing unit. Advised
Pitt County that options must be explored for additional capacity and that the
Transition Plan must be revised accordingly.
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

9/1 /94 Letter from Pitt County responding to Division's letter of 8/24. Request for
meeting with Division.
9/6/94 Transition Plan revisions received to the Methane Monitoring Plan.
9/20/94 Meeting between Division and Pitt County concerning capacity and ground
water contamination at the existing landfill. Key points and conclusions reached
at this meeting are as follows:
• Pitt County and the Division agreed it was in the best interest of the
County that the north cell of the landfill was -a-closed unit.
• Pitt County needs documentation that north portion is closed (last waste
prior to 10/3/91) and closure of that portion will be under "old rules".
• Pitt County to submit Transfer Station plans ASAP. Division (Jim Barber)
will expedite review.
• Pitt County will close south portion when capacity under existing permit
is reached. Division (Susan Wright) to expedite review.
9/23/94 Transition Plan partial approval - Methane Monitoring.
9/26/94 Fax from Pitt County attorney to Division's of draft letter to Pitt County - Re:
items discussed and agreed upon during meeting of 9/20.
10/10/94 Letter to Pitt County - Re: items discussed and agreed upon during meeting of
9/20. Division agreed that additional capacity was available and could be used
at the south unit.
12/19/94 Transfer Station plans submitted.
12/27/94 Additional hydrogeological review letter to Pitt County.
1 /23/95 Revised Transition Plan received. Revised plan showed revised vertical
expansion of south cell.
1 /31 /95 Transition Plan Partial Approval - construction and operation of temporary
transfer station.
CASESSOMWROJECTSWIMPITT. 1

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Nancy W. Smith, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF LAND
LAND QUALITY
April 11,
dft m
DEHNR
RESOURCES
SECTION
1995
LETTER OF APPROVAL
County of Pitt
ATTN: Mr. Phillip G. Dickerson, Engineer
1717 West Fifth Street
Greenville, North Carolina 27834
RE: Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan
Waste Handling Facility
Greenville - Pitt County
Date Received: March 31, 1995
Responsible Party: County of Pitt
Dear Mr. Dickerson:
JUN 16 1995
SOLM'WASTE MANAGEMENT
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
This office has completed its review of the erosion and
sedimentation control plan for the referenced project. The
proposed project will affect 17.7 acres by grading for
construction of buildings, roads and drainage at the present
landfill. Based upon the information provided, we find the plan
to be acceptable and hereby issue this LETTER OF APPROVAL.
The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act requires the
owner/developer to use appropriate methods for the protection of
adjoining natural resources and properties, both during and after
construction, from the effects of accelerated erosion. This
program is performance. oriented. It is your responsibility to
understand and comply with the requirements of the Act.
The following minimal mandatory standards of the Act are
hereby made a part of the approved plan:
-- a copy of the latest approved soil erosion and control
plan must be on file at the job site;
-- a buffer zone, sufficient to restrain sedimentation, must
be maintained between the land -disturbing activity and
any adjacent property or watercourse;
1424 Carolina Avenue, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 60% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

County of Pitt
ATTN: Mr. Phillip G. Dickerson, Engineer
April 11, 1995
Page 2
-- new or affected slopes must be at an angle that can be
retained by vegetative cover and exposed slopes must be
provided with a ground cover sufficient to restrain
erosion within 30 working days of completion of any phase
(rough or final) of grading (RYE GRASS IS NOT in the
approved seeding specifications nor is it an ACCEPTABLE
substitute for the providing of a ground cover); and
-- a permanent ground cover, sufficient to restrain erosion,
must be provided within the shorter of 30 working or 120
calendar days after completion of construction or
development.
Be advised that unannounced periodic inspections of the
project will be made to ensure compliance with the approved plan
and the program requirements. If the plan and/or its
implementation is determined to be inadequate, this office may
require that it be revised to comply with state law. Failure to
comply with the approved plan or with any requirements of this
program or to affect areas in other than to those designated to
be affected in the approved plan, could result in a civil penalty
assessment of up to $500 per day for each day the site is out of
compliance against the financially responsible party (County of
Pitt).
In recognizing the desirability of early coordination of
sedimentation control, we believe it would be beneficial for you
and your contractor to arrange a pre -construction conference to
discuss the requirements of the approved erosion and sedimen-
tation control plan. It would be appreciated if you would
contact this office to let me know the date of construction
start-up and the date of the pre -construction conference.
The land -disturbing activity described in this plan may
require approval or permitting from other Federal, State or local
agencies. These could include the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
under Article 404 jurisdiction, the Division of Environmental
Management under water quality regulations (contact Bill Moore,
919-946-6481), county, city or town agencies under other local
ordinances, or other approvals that may be required. This
approval cannot supersede any other approval or permit.

County of Pitt
ATTN: Mr. Phillip G. Dickerson, Engineer
April 11, 1995
Page 3
Please be advised that all land -disturbing activities
affecting 5 acres or more are required to have a NPDES permit.
Contact Mr. Bill Mills, Division of Environmental Management -
Stormwater Group, at [phone] for more information. We
have enclosed information regarding NPDES permit requirements.
Sincerely
Patrick H. McClain, P.E.
Assistant Regional Engineer
PHM:jt
Enclosures
cc: Terry Dover, Division of Solid Waste Management
Bill Morris, Division of Solid Waste Management

MICHAEL F. EASLEY
ATTORNEY GENERAL
State of North Carolina
Department of Justice
P. O. IIOX 629
HALEIGH
27602-0629
February 22, 1995
TO: Phil Prete
Mark Poindexter
Solid Waste Section, DSWM
FROM: Nancy Scott f% S
Assistant Attorney General
RE: Pitt County Landfill
Attached for your records is a copy of the relevant portion of the minutes of the Pitt
County Board of Commissioners for the January 9, 1995 meeting, at which the Board
approved entry of the Consent Agreement for a groundwater investigation at the County
landfill.
The pages from the minutes should be kept with the executed Consent Agreement in
your files.
NES:gg
,tS 1920Z,
Attachments
Central Files 6'
s�/ -,
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer ���

�o PITT COUNTY
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
4;. • 1717 REST FIFTH STREET
GREENVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 27834
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
February 21, 1995
Ms. Nancy E. Scott
Assistant Attorney General
P. 0. Box 629
Raleigh, N. C. 27602-0629
ASSOCIATE COUNTY ATTORNEY
PAM" WEAVER BEST
STAFF ATTORNEY
A WY L COONEY
In re: Administrative Agreement on Consent
Groundwater Assessment at Pitt County Landfill
Dear Ms. Scott:
As you requested, I am enclosing a copy of the minutes of the
January 9, 1995, County Commissioners' meeting, at which entry of
the Agreement was authorized.
Please let me know if you need anything further.
Sincerely,
ame a eaver B st
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Robert J. King, III

State of North Carolina1"r
Department of Environment, VA
Health and Natural Resources Division of Solid Waste Management ,Trj2 1
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
William L. Meyer, Director
January 31, 1995
Phil Dickerson
Pitt County Engineering Department
1717 West Fifth Street
Greenville, North Carolina 27834
RE: Temporary Transfer Station, Pitt County
Landfill Transition Plan, Permit No. 74-01
Mr. Dickerson:
The North Carolina Division of Solid Waste Management, Solid Waste Section (Section)
has reviewed documents and information submitted in the Transition Plan for the above
referenced landfill. In accordance with North Carolina General Statute § 130A-294 and North
Carolina Solid Waste Management Rules, 15A NCAC 13B .1603(d)(2)(B), partial Transition Plan
Approval and continued operation of this landfill is hereby approved.
- This partial transition plan approval is valid only until such time as the Transition Plan is
fully reviewed and approved by the Section. This transition plan approval is for the construction
and operation of the temporary transfer station as shown on Sheets 1-4 of Enclosure (13).
If you have any questions or require any other assistance, please feel free to contact the
Regional Waste Management Specialist, Mr. Bill Morris at [phone], the Eastern Area
Engineer, Mr. Jim Barber at (910) 486-1 191, or this office at [phone].
Sincerely,
. , " /�". 0
Susan J. Wri t
Environmental Engineer
Approved:
. a,., LCa es C. Coffey
pervisor, Permitting ranch
Solid Waste Section
copy: Bill Morris - DSWM
Terry Dover - DSWM
CAWRIGHT\p nECTS\P9A7&!PIgh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources j
•
- Division of Solid Waste Management a --- - M
- James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor p � H N 1�
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
William L. Meyer, Director
January 19, 1995
Mr. Philip Dickerson
County Engineer
Pitt County Engineering Department
1717 West Fifth Street
Greenville, NC 27834
RE: Safety Advisory for Work Activity at the Old Pitt County Landfill
Dear Mr. Dickerson:
This letter is a follow-up to our phone conversation last month regarding recent findings
during a sampling event at the old Pitt County landfill. As I discussed with you on the
phone, Mark Poindexter and Larry Rose from the Groundwater Compliance Unit of the
Solid Waste Section conducted a groundwater investigation at the Pitt County Landfill
site on December 7, 1994. Pierre Lauffer, Safety Officer for the Hazardous Waste
Section accompanied Solid Waste Section Staff for the purposes of evaluating any
potential safety threats from work on this site. Mr. Lauffer sampled for levels of
methane and ethylene dibromide in MW2 and P15. The results of his sampling,
summarized below, provide us with additional concern at the landfill.
WELL
MW2 P-15
METHANE (ppm)
before purge
490 ---
after purge
524 >1000
ETHYLENE DIBROMIDE (ppm)
before purge
4.6 1356
before purge
4.61 1294
after purge
10 1391
While this investigation is very preliminary in nature, the presence of these substances
in the levels measured should be considered a health, particularly to workers that might
be sampling the monitoring wells. Please be advised to take the necessary safety
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

precautions which would include an appropriately selected and fitted respirator for
personnel involved in sampling.
In addition, as we discussed, these findings warrant that additional atmospheric
sampling be conducted at the site as part of the site assessment. :You will be required
to submit to the Section a proposed assessment strategy to be addended to the current
agreement.
The Section appreciates your continued cooperation on characterizing the degree and
extent of contamination at this site. Any questions should be directed to me or Mark
Poindexter at [phone].
Since ,
clip . Prete, Head
Field Operations Branch

LooKle;
PC,,GS��e,;--)fw�- on Coo-5e,4
CRoUtN�wa-}-�R
LaNd-� I I
19Q5

MICHAEL F. EASLEY
ATTORNEY GENERAL
State of North Carolina
Department of Justice
P. o. 130X 629
RALFIGH
27602-O(Q-9
January 18, 1995
Pamela Weaver Best
Associate County Attorney
Pitt County Legal Department
1717 West Fifth Street
Greenville, North Carolina 27834
Re: Administrative Agreement on Consent
Groundwater Assessment at Pitt County Landfill
Dear Ms. Best:
REPLY TO:
Nancy E. Scott
Environmental Division
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Enclosed for your records is a fully executed original Administrative Agreement on
Consent for the Groundwater Assessment at the Pitt County sanitary landfill.
I understand that you will send me a copy of the minutes of the January 9, 1995,
Commissioner' meeting, at which entry of the Agreement was authorized, as soon as the
minutes have been prepared.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
NES:gg
Enclosure
C.C. Phil Prete
l Files
Sincerely yours,
N cy E. Sc'Ott
Assistant Attorney General
An Equal opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
SOLID WASTE SECTION
COUNTY OF PITT )ADMINISTRATIVE AGREEMENT ON CONSENT
IN RE:PITT COUNTY )DOCKET NUMBER 95-SW-01
SANITARY LANDFILL
I. Jurisdiction
This Administrative Agreement On Consent is entered pursuant to the North Carolina
Solid Waste Management Act, N.C.G.S. 130A, Article 9, and Rules, codified at 15A NCAC
13B. Dexter R. Matthews, Chief of the Solid Waste Section, Division of Solid Waste
Management ("The Division"), has been delegated the authority to implement the Solid Waste
Management Program under the Act and Rules.
H. SSlarement of Purpose
This Consent Agreement is entered for the limited purpose of investigating
contamination of the ground water and possible contamination of surface water in the vicinity
of the sanitary landfill owned and maintained by Pitt County, North Carolina. This
Agreement is entered without prejudice to any further study or remedial activity which may be
necessary at this site.

2
III. Stipulation of Facts
Based upon information available at the effective date of this Consent Agreement, the
following facts are stipulated for the purposes of this Consent Agreement:
A. Pitt County owns and operates a sanitary landfill located off S.R. 1203 just west
of Greenville City limits.
B. Pitt County has operated the landfill under an Order of Approval beginning in
June, 1974. After the RCRA legislation became effective Pitt County has operated a sanitary
landfill permitted to receive solid, non -hazardous waste for disposal under Solid Waste Permit
#74-01.
C. Elevated levels of inorganic constituents and indicator parameters from a
previous sampling event performed by the County's sampling contractor, indicated the
possibility of contamination in on -site monitoring wells. This prompted the Solid Waste
Section to split samples with the sampling contractor on September 5, 1991 and perform
organic and inorganic analysis on the samples. Groundwater monitoring analytical results
from that sampling event revealed the presence of semi -volatile and volatile organic
compounds, as well as, inorganic constituents in the monitoring wells. Subsequent sampling
events have confirmed the presence of inorganic and organic constituents that exceed the N.C.
Ground Water Standards.
D. As of the effective date of this Consent Agreement, the nature and extent of
ground -water contamination in the vicinity of the Pitt County Sanitary Landfill has not been
clearly determined.

3
A. 15A NCAC 13B .0503(2)(d)(i) adopts by reference 15A NCAC 2L,
Classifications And Water Quality Standards Applicable To The Groundwaters Of North
Carolina.
B. 15A NCAC 13B .0503(2)(c)(i) states that "A (landfill) site shall not cause a
discharge of pollutants into waters of the state that is in violation of the requirements of the
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), under Section 402 of the Clean
Water Act, as amended". Rule 15A NCAC 13B .0503(2)(c)(iii) states that "a site shall not
cause non -point source pollution of waters of the state that violates assigned water quality
standards".
C. 15A NCAC 13B .0601(a) states that "The Division shall require a solid waste
management facility to provide such ground -water monitoring capability as the Division
determines to be necessary to detect the effects of the facility on ground -water in the area".
D. 15A NCAC 13B .0602(a) states that "The Division shall require a solid waste
management facility to provide such surface water monitoring capability as the Division
determines to be necessary to detect the effects of the facility on surface water in the area".
E. 15A NCAC 13B .0201(d) states that "All solid waste management facilities
shall be operated in conformity with these Rules and in such a manner as to prevent the
creation of a nuisance, insanitary conditions, or potential public health hazard".
Based upon the facts and applicable law, the Division has determined, for purposes of

4
this Consent Agreement only, the following:
A. Analyses of samples of ground water taken at the landfill since 1991 indicate
contravention of ground water standards for various inorganic and organic constituents.
B. An investigation of ground -water conditions in the vicinity of the landfill is
necessary to identify any plume of contamination, the direction and rate of movement of the
plume, and to determine the type, concentration, source and extent of contamination.
C. An investigation of surface water conditions in the vicinity of the site is
necessary to determine the type, concentration, source and movement of surface water
contamination, if any.
D. An investigation is necessary to determine the ground -water discharge points
and the effect of contaminated ground -water discharge on the streams.
E. An investigation of the ground and surface water receptors in the general area
of the landfill is necessary to determine the potential impact of ground and surface water
contamination on the public health.
VI. Scope of Work
The Division has determined that this Agreement will promote the protection of public
health and the environment and is in the public interest. The provisions of this Administrative
Agreement shall henceforth govern the actions of Pitt County. Therefore, in an effort to
determine the status of ground and surface water quality at and in the vicinity of its landfill
property, Pitt County agrees to perform the following actions:
A. Within sixty (60) calendar days of execution of this Agreement, Pitt County

5
shall develop and submit a plan for a ground and surface water quality investigation which,
upon approval by the Division, will constitute the approved assessment plan. The plan shall
be prepared by a licensed professional geologist with experience in assessment and remediation
of ground water contamination. The professional geologist shall consult with the Solid Waste
Section about the landfill site prior to developing the assessment plan. The objective of the
assessment plan shall be to determine the following:
(a) The nature and concentration of the contamination in the ground and surface
waters.
(b) The horizontal and vertical extent of contamination ("the plume") and the
direction and rate of migration of the plume in the ground water.
(c) The source(s) of contamination detected in ground and surface water.
(d) Potential ground and surface water receptors that could be affected by migration
of the contamination.
(e) The effect of the contaminated ground water discharge into nearby streams.
The assessment plan to be submitted shall contain a detailed plan for the initial
phase of the investigation and a strategy and timetable for accomplishing the
overall goals of the water quality assessment.
The assessment plan must specify:
1. The procedures and methods necessary to fully determine flow direction
and rate of movement of the ground water.
2. The methods and techniques to be used in defining the horizontal and

M
vertical extent of the ground water contaminant plume.
3. The proposed number, location and depth of plume assessment wells.
The proposal shall include a discussion of the reasons for the location and
depth of each plume assessment monitoring well.
4. A ground and surface water sampling plan prepared in accordance with
the N.C. Water Quaff, Monitoring Guidance Document for Solid Waste
Facilities.
5. A ground and surface water analysis plan which specifies parameters to be
tested for in the plume assessment wells and surface water samples,
including detectable levels and appropriate test methods. Additionally, a
description of chain -of -custody and the laboratory's quality control and
quality assurance procedures shall be included. In implementing the plan,
analytical results must be submitted to the Division within 45-calendar
days of sample collection and must specify collection date and well
numbers (with a corresponding map of the wells).
6. Evaluation procedures, including any use of previously gathered ground
water quality data.
7. The methods necessary to calculate the effect of the ground water
discharge into nearby streams.
8. The location of the nearest downstream surface water intake in the
watershed, and the location of all ground water wells within at least one
half mile of the landfill site.

9. A schedule for implementation of the work described in the assessment
plan.
B. The Division shall review the submitted plan, approve it, or request more
information or amendment, as it deems necessary. The approved plan constitutes the
assessment plan which Pitt County shall implement.
C. Any request for modification of the assessment plan must be submitted in
writing to the Division and approved by the Division.
D. If the Division determines that any submission of data or evaluation or report
made pursuant to the approved assessment plan is inadequate, it will notify Pitt County and
submit suggested corrections. If the parties cannot agree, they will proceed in accordance with
the provisions of the "Dispute Resolution" Section of this Consent Agreement.
E. All work performed pursuant to the assessment plan shall be performed under
the supervision of a licensed professional geologist.
F. Pitt County shall submit to the Division periodic reports summarizing work
completed in the approved assessment plan.
G. Within sixty (60) days of satisfactory completion of all elements of the
assessment plan, Pitt County shall submit a final report including any proposals for further
actions as may be recommended by the County and its consultants. The Division shall review
the report and may request more information or amendment as it deems necessary.
At the request of the Division, the County shall allow split or duplicate samples to be

0
taken by the Division, of any samples collected by the County pursuant to the implementation
of this Consent Agreement. The County shall notify the Division not less than ten (10) days in
advance of any sample collection activity.
The Division shall also allow split or duplicate samples to be taken by the County of
any samples collected by the Division during the period of performance of work associated
with this Consent Agreement. The Division shall notify the County not less than ten (10) days
in advance of any sample collection activity.
The Division shall have the authority to enter and freely move about all property at
the Site at all reasonable times for the purposes of, inter alia: inspecting non -privileged
records, operating logs, and contracts related to work under this Consent Agreement:
reviewing the progress of the County in carrying out the terms of this Consent Agreement;
conducting such tests as the Division deems necessary; and verifying the data submitted to the
Division by the County. The County shall permit authorized Division personnel to inspect and
copy all non -privileged records, files, photographs, documents, and other writings including
all sampling and monitoring data, in any way pertaining to work undertaken pursuant to this
Consent Agreement. Documents subject to the attorney -client privilege or attorney work
product doctrine are not subject to inspection and copying.
VIII. Delay in Performance
If any event occurs which causes delay in the achievement of the requirements of this
Consent Agreement, Pitt County shall have the burden of showing that the delay was caused
by circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the County, which could not have been

0
overcome by due diligence. Pitt County shall promptly notify the Division's Primary Contact
orally and shall, within seven (7) calendar days of oral notification to the Division, notify the
Division in writing of the anticipated length and cause of the delay, and the timetable by which
the County intends to implement these measures. If the parties can agree that the delay has
been or will be caused by circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the County, the time
for performance hereunder shall be extended for a period equal to the delay resulting from
such circumstances. Pitt County shall adopt all reasonable measures to avoid or minimize
delay. Failure of the County to comply with the notice requirements of this paragraph shall
render this paragraph void and constitute a waiver of the County's rights to request a waiver of
the requirements of this Consent Agreement. Increased costs of performance of the terms of
this Consent Agreement or changed economic circumstances shall not be considered
circumstances beyond the control of Pitt County.
In the event that the Division and Pitt County cannot agree that any delay in the
achievement of the requirements of this Consent Agreement, including the failure to submit
any report or document, has been or will be caused by circumstances beyond the reasonable
control of the County, the dispute shall be resolved in accordance with the provision of the
"Dispute Resolution" Section of this Consent Agreement.
IX. Depute Resolution
If Pitt County objects to any notice of deficiency or decision made pursuant to this
Consent Agreement by the Division, Pitt County shall notify the Division in writing of its
objections within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of the decision. The Division and Pitt

10
County then have an additional fourteen (14) calendar days from receipt by the Division of the
notification of objection to reach agreement. If agreement cannot be reached on any issue
within this fourteen (14) calendar day period, the Division shall immediately provide a written
statement of its decision to Pitt County.
Thereafter, if the Division and Pitt County cannot agree, the Division reserves its
rights to pursue enforcement action against Pitt County. The County reserves the right to
respond to such enforcement action.
In performing a ground and surface water quality investigation pursuant to this
Administrative Agreement on Consent, Pitt County denies any liability for damages, including
investigation and remediation costs, related to environmental contamination. This Agreement
is entered without prejudice to the County with respect to any determination concerning any
further investigation and remediation, and without any commitment on the part of the County
to perform any such further activity. It is also entered without prejudice to any claim which
the County may have against any party with respect to: (a) any contamination at and near the
landfill, (b) the investigation and remediation and (c) related costs.
XI. Notice
Any and all written notices to be made pursuant to Sections VI, VII, VIII, and IX of
this Consent Agreement shall be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, or by hand

11
delivery, addressed to the respective primary contact as designated in this Consent Agreement.
The names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the designated primary contacts for
the Division and the County are stated below. Any change in the primary contact person
during the course of the investigation covered under this Consent Agreement, shall be
communicated in writing to the other party immediately.

12
The primary contact for the Division:
Mark Poindexter, Hydrogeologist
Division of Solid Waste Management
Department of Environment, Health,
and Natural Resources
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Telephone: [phone]
For Pitt County:
Phillip G. Dickerson, Engineer
Pitt County Office Building
1717 West Fifth Street
Greenville, North Carolina 27834
Telephone: [phone]
This Agreement On Consent is entered into on the 114 day of JAW1601995.
The Division Of Solid Waste Management, North Carolina Department Of Environment,
Health, & Natural Resources,
By: a-IZ21�//J ,5-
Dexter R. Matthews, Chief Solid Waste Section Date
Division of Solid Waste Management
Pitt County, Dr. Ed B. Bright, Chairman, authorized to sign for Pitt County by county
commissioners per minutes of meeting, attached.
By:
Chairman, Pitt County Board of Commissioners Date
Attest:
Clerk to the Board Date

tc e / i;47
CHARLOTTE
MAILING ADDRESS
POST OFFICE BOX 31247
CHARLOTTE, N.C. 28231
STREET ADDRESS
227 NORTH TRYON STREET
CHARLOTTE, N.C. 28202
TELEPHONE [phone]
FACSIMILE 704/334-8467
VIA TELEFA$
SMITH HELMS MULLISS & MOORE, L. L. P.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
MAILING ADDRESS
STREET ADDRESS
POST OFFICE BOX 27S2S
316 WEST EDENTON STREET
RALEIGH, N. C. 27611
RALEIGH, N.C. 27603
TELEPHONE 919/7SS-6700
FACSIMILE 919/826-7938
January 12,
1995
William G. Ross, Jr., Esquire
Brooks, Pierce, McLendon,
Humphrey & Leonard
Post Office Drawer U
Greensboro, North Carolina 27402
Re: County Landfill
Dear Bill:
GREENSBORO
MAILING ADDRESS
POST OFFICE BOX 21927
GREENSBORO, N.C. 27420
STREET ADDRESS
SUITE 1400
300 NORTH GREENE STREET
GREENSBORO, N.C. 27401
TELEPHONE 910/376-S200
FACSIMILE 910/379-9558
Writer's Direct Dial
[phone]
Once again, I am being kept informed of the status of this
matter through newspaper articles. My client faxed me a copy of
the first of the Greenville newspaper articles that stated that
Pitt County will be moving forward to perform the groundwater
survey. I was most concerned to see that Pitt County continues to
point to Coastal Chemical as the source of the problem,
particularly in light of my request that such accusations cease in
my September 21, 1993 letter. In addition, I was shocked to see
that Pitt County estimates that the investigation is expected to
cost $100,000. I understand that in additional stories in the
paper and on TV, Pitt County officials have stated that Superfund
money may be sought at this site and that continued references have
been made to Coastal Chemical's responsibility.
As you know, Coastal Chemical performed substar:tial rasearch ,
both into Pitt County's files and independently, following our
meeting with the Division of Solid Waste Management and determined
that there is not sufficient evidence to tie the contamination
detected at the landfill to Coastal Chemical's waste. In our last
conversation, I informed you of this position, but stated that
Coastal is still very interested in staying involved in this
investigation and wanted to know what action Pitt County would
take. You indicated that you would contact me once you spoke to
your client. I received no further information on this matter
until I received a call from my client yesterday and a copies of
the newspaper articles.
Needless to say, Coastal Chemical is very concerned about Pitt
County's failure to provide Coastal with information about this

William G. Ross, Jr., Esquire
January 12, 1995
Page 2
investigation. We have sent repeated letters requesting to be kept
up to date or to be provided information and are repeatedly the
last to receive such information. I have attached some of our
correspondence for your review. I believe that it is only logical
that if Pitt County may, at some point, look to Coastal Chemical to
assist in funding this investigation, we should at least be kept
informed and allowed input into the process. As I have discussed
with you a number of times, we have serious concerns about the work
performed by Pitt County's chosen consultant, Groundwater
Management, Inc. Not only do our consultants question the work
already performed, but, as noted in previous correspondence, the
proposal that we were provided for additional investigative work in
the area of MW-2 was lacking in information that would be standard
in the industry for such a hydrogeological investigation. At your
request, we provided comments to that proposal, which, apparently
were disregarded in constructing and sampling the piezometers.
Coastal Chemical again requests that it be allowed an opportunity
to provide input into the choice of the consulting firm to conduct
such investigation and input into the scope of work to be
performed.
Further, until it is established that Coastal Chemical is the
source of the contaminants in MW-2, Pitt County must cease
publication of such allegations to the public. Coastal Chemical
has information which calls this conclusion into question.
Therefore, until such conclusion can be confirmed, Pitt County
officials must not make such statements to the press.
Please contact me to advise me of the status of this matter
and Pitt County's position regarding the investigation of the area
of MW-2 as soon as possible. I appreciate your attention to this
matter.
Very truly yours,
SMITH HELMS MULLISS & MOORE
Elizabeth M. Powell
EMP:tr
cc: Mr. Alan Rimer, BB&L
Mr. James Pearce, Coastal Chemical
Mr. Phil Prete, DSWM
Ms. Pamela Best, Pitt County Attorney
Mr. Phil Dickerson, Pitt County Engineer

OFFICE OF THE PITT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
GREENVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
JANUARY 9, 1995
The Pitt County Board of Commissioners met in Regular Session at 9:00 a.m. on
Monday, January 9, 1995. The meeting was held in the Commissioners' Auditorium, Pitt
County Office Building, 1717 West Fifth Street, Greenville, North Carolina with the
following being present:
Wilton R. Duke, Chairman
Charles P. Gaskins, Vice Chairman
Ed B. Bright, Commissioner
Kenneth K. Dews, Commissioner
Eugene James, Commissioner
Thomas H. Johnson, Sr., Commissioner
Farney M. Moore, Commissioner
Mark W. Owens, Jr., Commissioner
Jeffrey E. Savage, Commissioner
Also present:
Thomas B. Robinson, Manager
John K. Bulow, Assistant Manager
W. H. Watson, County Attorney
Susan J. Banks, Clerk to Board
i
Chairman Duke called the meeting to order. Commissioner Gaskins gave the
invocation and Commissioner Johnson led in the pledge of allegiance.
Chairman Duke asked for approval of or changes to the agenda. Mr. Robinson
asked to add a meeting for the Board to schedule concerning the convention center
during his administrative report. Ms. Banks asked to have the closed session minutes
of December 5, 1995, December 20, 1995 and October 3, 1994 approved in the closed
session. Mr. Watson asked to withdraw the item on the donation of property to the
Habitat for Humanity until further legal study could be conducted.
UPON MOTION by Commissioner Savage, seconded by Commissioner Gaskins,
the Board voted unanimously to approve the agenda with the requested changes.
Chairman Duke asked for approval of the minutes of December 5, 9, 13, 20, 1994

meetings.
UPON MOTION by Commissioner Gaskins, seconded by Commissioner James,
the Board voted unanimously to approve the minutes of the December 5, 9, 13, 20, 1994
meetings.
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
SOLID WASTE MATTERS
Mr. Phil Dickerson, County Engineer, presented a Consent Agreement for further
testing of the monitoring wells at the landfill. He stated that in 1993 the State required
the County to monitor the wells for mercury and arsenic and the consent agreement
outlines what the responsibilities are for the County. The agreement was reviewed in
April 1994 and sent back to the State. The State responded December 8, 1994. Mr.
Dickerson reported that Bill Watson, County Attorney, Pamela Best, Staff Attorney, as well
as the Assistant Attorney General had all agreed to the wording. Mr. Dickerson said that
he knew there was something of a problem but did not know just how extensive it was.
Commissioner James asked if the County had liability insurance for such problems. Mr.
Watson responded that the County has up to $1 million in insurance but that the County
could also plead sovereign immunity as a government agency. He also said that if the
county could prove that other parties are responsible then they could be made to share
the cost of clean up.
UPON MOTION by Commissioner Dews, seconded by Commissioner Savage,
to approve the consent agreement. Discussion followed. Commissioner Owens called
the question. Commissioner Johnson stated that this should be made clear that this is
a limited situation and only the test will determine how extensive it is. He also said that
the State now knows that the County is not going to assume the responsibility because
the State approved it when the waste was placed in the landfill. Chairman Duke called
for the vote. The Board approved the consent agreement with a unanimous vote.
PROPOSED CABLECASTING OF BOARD MEETINGS
Ms. Susan Moran, Public Information Officer, presented the costs associated with
cablecasting Board meetings on a regular basis. She stated that the initial cost were
budgeted for this fiscal year in anticipation of the Board choosing to go on cable. She
stated that additional meetings and videos on County services would be in addition to
the proposed costs. She stated that the figures were based on 41 board meetings last
year and any additional meetings would be additional costs. Ms. Moran commented that
the County had saved legal fees by hiring a PIO to handle the negotiations on the
franchise agreements with the cable companies. Commissioner Savage supported the
cablecast of the meetings because he felt since the County was collecting franchise fees
then this would be a way to give something back to the citizens for their money. Ms.
E

co�,r PM COUNTY
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
1717 WEST FIFTH STREET
3 �srr.
`. �GREENVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 27834 Qth . CAQO` TELEPHONE (919) &%,aM
January 6, 1995
Department of Health, Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Solid Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Subject: Transition Plan Resubmittal
Pitt County Landfill
Permit No. 74-01
Pitt County
Greenville, North Carolina
Gentlemen:
SOLE) WASTE
BUILDINGINSPEC71ONS
Two copies (2) of a Revised Transition Plan for Pitt County
Landfill are forwarded as a supplement to our initial
"application" to demonstrate compliance with Section .1600 of
Title 15A, Chapter 13B. Please note that our water Quality
Monitoring Plan has been forwarded to you under separate cover.
Please advise us upon your preliminary review if we are to
furnish you additional copies as you require.
Yo ver truly,
4
uh ,
ohn T. Weaver, Jr.
vironmental Enginee
PGD\pmk
Enclosure: -
January 6, 1995
Recycled Paper
P�.

7401 Permitl996 - Batch No.
jq
qq-o I r7yal 1996

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources 4 F.KXA •
Division of Solid Waste Management D
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor 1::�o E H N F1
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
William L. Meyer, Director
October 23, 1996
Mr. Phil Dickerson, P.E.
Pitt County Engineer
Pitt County Engineering Department
1717 W. 5TH Street
Greenville, North Carolina 27834-1696
RE: Revised Closure Schedule for Permit No. 74-01,
Dear Mr. Dickerson:
The Solid Waste Section has reviewed your letter dated 23
September 1996, requesting an extension of time to close the Pitt
County landfill. The Solid Waste Section (the Section) is in
agreement with Pitt County on the time frame outlined in the above
referenced letter and approves of the proposed schedule. If for
some reason items addressed in the 23 Septmeber letter can not be
completed in the proposed time frame; the Section shall be notified
with an explanation provided for the delay, along with a revised
time line. In the interim, Pitt County should maintain the existing
cover and repair any erosion or damage done to the interim cover.
Temporary seeding to promote grass cover should be performed to
minimze on -site erosion and to some extent minimize surface water
infiltration.
Should ou have any questions concerning this letter, please
o tact thi o fice at [phone].
Ji Bar
astern Area Engineer
Solid Waste Section
CC: Jim Coffey Terry Dover
Bill Morris Mark Poindexter
eigh Central File: Permit 74-01 Pitt County
Fayetteville Regional Office
225 Green Street, Suite 601, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

PITT COUNTY
• ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
„+ 1717 W. 5TH ST.
GREENVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA '_'7834-1696
soon WASTE
TELEPHONE: [phone] BLILDING INSPECTIONS
September 23, 1996
Mr. Jim Barber
N. C. Solid Waste Section
NCDEM Regional Office
225 Greene Street, Suite 601
Fayetteville, NC 28301
Re: Revised Schedule
Pitt County Landfill
Dear Jim:
As you are aware, the County has sought bids for the closure of its
MSWLF as required by NC General Statutes for public projects
expected to cost more than $100,000.
various contractors had expressed interest in bidding on this work,
but due to delays required to study the groundwater issues involved
with the cap construction, the letting of bids did not occur until
August. Our engineering consultant has made numerous contacts with
potential bidders but all but one of the contract document holders
decided not to submit a bid at this time. Reasons given for this
lack of interest varied, however; a recurring theme was that
contractors are attempting to complete their existing projects
before winter and do not wish to take on a project of this
magnitude until spring. This makes it likely that a project bid at
this time will be performed at a significantly higher cost than
would be the case if it were bid early in the construction season.
An additional concern is that the weather most conductive to good
moisture control of the fill is over. With the advent of hurricane
season, the ground has become saturated and is likely to stay that
way until spring. working the very plastic clays to be used in the
landfill cap will be difficult or impossible this late in the
construction season.
Finally, the NC Solid Waste Section's concerns regarding potential
normal water flow reversal due to borrow excavation adjacent to the
MSWLF site have not been fully addressed. Our response to your
concerns may involve grading plan modifications which might modify
project cost or the construction sequence or methods.
Recycled Paper

r
Mr. Jim Barber
September 23, 1996
Page 2
The most sensible approach given the above facts is to delay the
landfill closure to obtain good competitive bids and to allow time
to more fully address groundwater concerns. We therefore, request
that the county be granted an extension of time for the MSWLF
closure commensurate with the following project schedule.
Activitv
Assess Groundwater Flow Impacts
Due to Borrow Excavation
Modify Closure Plan - Incorporate
SWS Comments
Let Projects for Bids
Receive Bids
Completion Date
December 15, 1996
January 15, 1997
January 20, 1997
February 20, 1997
Execute Agreement --- - -_ March.-15 1997-------
Notice to Proceed ----- -- April-1,-1997
Complete MSWLF Closure July 1, 1997
The advantages of the above schedule are as follows:
1) The revised schedule allows sufficient time to assess
impacts to groundwater due to proposed borrow excavation
adjacent to the MSWLF site.
2 ) The project would be bid when many qualified contractors
including several with landfill closure experience would
be interested in bidding.
3) Construction would occur at a time of year when it is
generally easiest to control moisture. The cap quality
will likely be better. Dewatering operations will be
minimized.
Please let us know if you concur with our revised construction
schedule.
Sincerely,
Phil Dickerson
County Engineer

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Solid Waste Management
James. B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
William L. Meyer, Director
May 31, 1996
Mr. Phillip G. Dickerson
Pitt County Engineer
Pitt County Office Building
1717 West Fifth Street
Greenville, N.C. 27834
Re: Pitt County's Sanitary Landfill Water Quality Assessment Planning Documents
Submitted by Aquaterra and Area Characterization Report Submitted By Groundwater
Management Associates. (Permit #74-01).
Dear Mr. Dickerson,
The Solid Waste Section (Section) is in receipt of the RI/FS Planning Documents
submitted on behalf of Pitt County (County) by Aquaterra and the Area Characterization Report
submitted on behalf of the County by Groundwater Management Associates, Inc. The Section
notes that the NCP process for conducting the water quality assessment at this facility is not
required by the Section and our review comments do not pertain to those aspects of the selected
NCP process that are outside the domain of the Water Quality Assessment Plan as required by
our agency. After reviewing these documents the following questions and requirements must be
answered or satisfied before or during upcoming field activities.
The following questions shall be answered before initiation of field activities:
1) Referring to page 1-2, section 1.3, does Pitt County (County) have any records of
abandonment for the original monitoring wells (perhaps as many as seven) that were
installed by the Department of Agriculture and monitored in 1981 and 1982 prior to the
placement of waste over the fire residue cell? If so, please provide those records to the
Section prior to beginning field activities. In addition, please provide, if available, a
record of abandonment for the monitoring well #2 that was installed near the fire residue
burial cell in 1986.
2) Clarification is needed on the first page of table 8, second bullet point, second column:
what are IV and III in the parenthesis referring too?
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Comments on the Phase I 'Tasks:
1) Include pesticides in the phase I well. sampling analysis (section 4..1.2.2) and in phase II
surface water and sediment samples (section 4.1.2.3). Please propose a list of pesticides
to be included in the analysis.
2) Comments on section 4.1.2.2 are as follows:.
(a) The installation of the off -site wells should not delay or influence the completion of the
other Phase I tasks. The County should keep the Solid Waste Section informed of the
progress being made on securing permission to install the off -site wells. The Solid Waste
Section requests a carbon copy on all correspondence to the adjacent property owner(s) or
their representatives and that copies of all responses be provided.
(b) The water level monitoring proposed in the work plan should be completed several days
after any precipitation event and/or after the surface and ground water elevations have
reached static conditions.
(c) Conduct the geophysical logging proposed in the phase I tasks over the entire length of
the wells.
(d) Lithologic cross sections shall be prepared/updated with the additional data e.g.
geophysical logs. The cross section(s) should extend to the depth of the reported
production wells in the vicinity of the landfill.
(e) A ground water flow net in plan view and cross section shall be developed. If a sufficient
number of well nests are not available to construct a ground water flow net then
additional wells must be installed where data gaps exist.
3) Please provide information on the location of the two Pitt County Utility Commission
wells which are within the three-mile radius downgrading of the landfill (page 2-2,
second paragraph).
4) It is the Section's understanding that there are one or more production wells (i.e.
irrigation, supply, etc.) in the immediate area of the landfill. The County will be
responsible for providing data on these wells and their impact on the ground water flow
in the vicinity of the Landfill. Specific data on these wells shall include: screened
intervals, pumping rate, duration of pumping (e.g. 12 months per year, 8 months per
year), transmissivity and storativity values for the aquifer being pumped, etc.
5) In selecting the location of additional monitoring wells Pitt County shall consider the
available data including the flow net and ground water velocity.

6) Figure 5 includes two geologic borings in the phase I activities but section 4.1.3.2 states
that there will be three borings. Please provide information on the location of the third
proposed phase I geologic boring. Also, the work proposed in section 4.1.3.2 shall be
completed as part of Phase I.
Comments on the Phase II Tasks:
1) A physical evaluation of the present landfill cap condition and materials shall be added to
the phase II tasks.
2) If the proposed wells don't address the questions concerning ground water flow and
plume dimensions around P-15, additional monitoring well installations in this area will
be necessary.
3) The location of the phase II deeper well associated with MW-2 is proposed to be "
downgradient of MW-2" but " in close enough proximity to MW-2 in order to obtain
information on vertical gradients at the site" (page 4-3). Prior to the phase II installation
of the proposed deeper well, determination of the northern boundary of the fire residue
cell is necessary.
Referring to the Area Characterization Report submitted by Groundwater Management
Associates:
1) Provide a well survey document for the landfill supply well (labeled as PW and WS 1 on
sampling information).
2) Based on previous inquiries by the Section to the County, the Section was unaware of the
number of private wells that are operational in close proximity to the landfill. After
reviewing the Area Characterization Report, the Section is requiring the County to
develop a private well sampling program and submit a copy within the next 30 days to
the Section for review and approval.
If you have any questions about this letter, please contact me at [phone],
extension 261.
Sincerely,
incerely,
C
Mark Poindexter
c: Philip Prete

Billy Morris
Mark Poindexter
Bob Glaser
Nancy Scott
Central file
CAWPDOCS\Pr V401#5.AST

A2 4— 9 6 W E D
PR —
Procter'&Gaanble
T'hc Procter & Gamble Company
Legal Division
1 Procter & Combie Plaza. Cineinnali, Ohio 45202-3313
,,,je brc(;K•bor
S.-mor ( -oli ISCl
April 19, 1996
Phillip G. Dickerson
Pitt County Engineer
1717 West Fifth Street
Greenville, NC 27834
RE: Draft RI/IFS Work Plan
Dear Mr. Dickerson:
phone: [phone]
F,a; (513) 03-7633
Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company
P&G) would like to thank you for the
opportunity to comment on the draft RI/FS Work Plan. P&G offers the following two
comments.
mentioned
Section 1.5.5 Baseline Quality Monitarin Re iwethells a3, 10 12 wellsre 26 7, 18, 19, 20
yet there does not seem on to be any further discuss of P
and 24. Is there any data available as background on these wells?
Section 5.3.3 Evalita ion of Rernedi.l Action Al emative - the Remedial Action
Alternatives will be evaluated by the 9 list groups.
� Parties Manufacturing
ngeequcsts that a
number 10 be added to include Potentially Responsible
c.
if you have any questions on the foregoing, feel free to call me directly at 513-983-6541.
Sincerely,
pn-c.UUr
Jane C. McGregor
cc: Mike King (Greenville Plant)
Steve Disliion
%:/mcbrgjC/pitdrifs.ltr

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, AIFXP*F
Health and Natural Resources • •
Division of Solid Waste Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor p E H N F�
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
William L. Meyer, Director
April 15, 1996
Ms. Cindy Gurley
N.C. Assessment Section
USEPA
345 Courtland Street Northeast
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
Re: Developments in the Pitt County Landfill Assessment (Permit #74-01).
Dear Ms. Gurley,
Thank you for taking the time to discuss the above referenced project today. The
following points serve to recap our conversation:
An agricultural chemical company warehouse located near Greenville, N.C. burned in
early 1979. The burned and damaged remains from the fire scene were deposited in a
discrete cell within the Pitt County Landfill facility.
Groundwater monitoring wells were installed around the cell and were monitored
periodically in the early 1980's. It is my understanding that after reviewing the ground
and surface water data from the site the United States Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) at that time recommended no further action. The monitoring wells were
subsequently destroyed and waste was placed over the cell. The cell was not monitored
until another monitoring well was installed adjacent to the cell in 1986. That monitoring
well yielded only enough sample for Total Organic Halides (TOX) analysis. TOX data
from this well was elevated.
In 1990 the above well was replaced because the contractor sampling the monitoring
wells was reportedly "unable to sample well #2 due to damage to casing". The State of
North Carolina Division of Waste Management, Solid Waste Section (Section) staff and
Pitt County's (County) sampling contractor split sampled the replacement well in 1991.
Volatile organic compounds, semi -volatile organic compounds, inorganic constituents,
and pesticides were detected. Subsequent sampling confirmed the presence of these
constituents.
The Section and the County entered into an Administrative Agreement on Consent for the
purposes of conducting an assessment of the ground and surface water at the County's
landfill facility.
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

The County chose to take the National Contingency Plan (NCP) approach in the
investigation/assessment so as to include potential responsible parties (PRPs) and
preserve any rights of contribution under the Comprehensive Environmental Response
Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) that they may have.
Because of the EPA's past involvement at the site and because this site is on the Region
IV Wastelan Inventory List the Section wanted to keep you apprised of the recent developments.
We will continue to keep you informed of future developments. Because of the NCP-like
approach the County has chosen to address this site, the Section may request your review of the
process and reports in the future.
Once again, thank you for taking the time to answer my questions and discussing the
recent developments at this site. If you have any questions or further comments about this site,
please contact me at [phone], extension 261.
Sincerely,
Mark Poindexter, Hydrogeologist
Groundwater Compliance Unit, Solid Waste Section
Phil Prete
Nancy Scott
Central file
Filename: 74-01 epa.let

ClaxoWellcome
March 22, 1996
Mr. Phillip G. Dickerson
Pitt County Engineer
1717 West Fifth Street
Greenville, NC 27834
Re: Review of the Draft RUNS Work Plan
Pitt County Landfill -Northern Unit
Dear Phil,
itt County
During the February 28, 1996 public meeting regarding to submit written comment orlquestions
ll, the
County's representatives invited those present
about the RI/FS Work Plan or the County's Administrative
ative Agreement � on Inc., reviewed
March 22, 1996. In response to the County's request,
the RI/FS Work Plan and submits the following comments for consideration.
While we understand that Pitt County is under a very tight ti rev.chediew thee as de Plan ined in the
Administrative Agreement on Consent, GW s opportunity
to been brief. We acknowledge that some of our comments
result
CouG y''and its
s late
introduction into this process and our lack of participation on with the State;
consultant during the development process of the ii21Vk 1996,1an. It 9G, forts our understandisubmission of com�1ents
tile A
e County may grant an extension of time to p >ike
by interested parties. If such an extension of time nis granted,
asit down withlyoutand your
o have
the opportunity to provide additional commentsd if possible
consultant to discuss the technical rationale of the Work Plan and our specific comments.
GW's comments on the RVFS Work Plan are as follows:
General Comments
The Wort: Plan's stated objective to "Characterize and determine the lateral and vertical
gulated substances (constituents, concentrations, and
extent of any impacts from re
distributions) to affected media including groundwater, conduct a very broad inveace water, and st gallon of
found on (pg.l-1) appears to indicate the intent a 1-3 and the phased
the Landfill site. Yet, the specific site management strategy (p$• )
approach outlined on (pg. 4-2) would indicate the County's intent to narrowly focus its
efforts on the contamination detected in areas around 1 P 1� on h Mbeen detected in wells
W-2. The information
provided in the Work Plan would indicate that co
Glaxo Wellcome Inc.
InWrw6on US 13 Tclrphonr
NC 11 and US 2G4 919 758 343G
po 0ox 1007
Orrcrvillc
Nurlh Carulina 27034
Dickcmko T::.rcy
r:tic 1 o(a

along the southern, downgradient edge of the southern landfill unit. The County does not
provide a clear rationale for narrowing the focus to the northern edge of the northern unit.
We would suggest the Work Plan narrow the scope of the plan objectives to that required
to investigate the northern unit or the site management strategy be written to investigate all
contamination identified in the northern and southern units.
The objectives stated in the Work Plan do not appear to focus on data collection or what is
truly needed to satisfy risk assessment concerns and the most likely remedial alternatives. It
would appear that the Plan focuses on reviewing existing information, determining the
extent of contamination, and reviewing relevant guidance. A rework of the stated
objectives to provide a stronger foundation for a more cost effective RJ/FS document is
recommended.
We are concerned that the Work Plan appears to leave much of the actual work planning to
be done after the Work Plan is approved. While we understand that some judgment and
discretion is necessary in any assessment, we are also concerned that alleged PRPs only
have the right to comment before the adoption of the Work Plan. Leaving critical technical
decisions to be made later in the discretion of the county or the contractor deprives alleged
PRPs from the opportunity to have input on these decisions, decisions that the county has
said it will expect alleged PRPs to pay for. We think that the Work Plan should provide
more technical detail so that the affected community can have a meaningful opportunity to
comment on the technical aspects of the Work Plan.
Specific Comments
The Plan on (pg. 1-2) states that the facility accepted solid and nonhazardous waste only,
after RCRA legislation became effective. GW suggests the County indicate in the Plan, the
exact date that the County's ordinance went into effect that prohibited the disposal of
hazardous waste in the landfill.
There is an inadequate discussion in the Work Plan of hydraulically upgradient background
groundwater quality. Groundwater contamination has been detected in wells that are along
the northern edge of the northern unit but upgradient of the unit. The contamination in
these wells may be coming from sources hydraulically upgradient of the landfill rather than
from the landfill itself. The County recommends in their Work Plan two wells about 50
feet hydraulically upgradient of contaminated well P14, presumably to monitor background
conditions. These wells are too close to the landfill for their intended purpose, and only
one well is needed. GW would recommend a single well several hundred feet upgradient
(i.e., to the north) of the landfill to monitor background groundwater quality.
The County has proposed some shallow wells near contaminated well MW-2. No clear
rationale has been provided for these wells and most of them appear to be too close to
MW-2 to be of any value in the investigation. If groundwater data are needed for general
characterization GW recommends that an approach such as direct -push technology (e.g.,
GeoprobeS or equivalent) be employed. This approach would be more cost effective.
Di<krr A'.:.,ircy
iris, 2or4
. . . . - c __ 7 7 — - J —4 H

There are discrepancies between well designations and depths in the site inspection (SI)
and in the Work Plan. In Figure 4-1 of the SI, the well designated JvM-04 appears to be
tM
he one designated W-01 in Figure 2 of the Work Plan, and the well designated MVV-01
appears to be the one designated NM-05 in Appendix B, Figure 3, of the Work Plan. The
depths of the four wells as described in the SY do not agree with the depths of the wells
described in the Work Plan. These discrepancies should be resolved to eliminate potential
confusion.
Other than narrowing the list of analytical parameters for new wells, the rationale for the
phasing of the field activities presented on (pg. 4-1) is not clear. A phased approach would
appear to be inappropriate for this project. All wells should be installed in one phase to
minimize mobilization costs.
The proposed soil borings will provide useful information on the subsurface. However, it
appears that they could be done in conjunction with drilling the borehole for a monitoring
well rather than being separate borings. The borehole would be advanced to the top of the
Yorktown confining layer to determine its depth, then backfilled to the appropriate depth
for the monitoring well. Also, any soil boring drilled downgradient of any part of the
landfill should be drilled in a fashion that prevents cross -contamination of shallow horizons
to deeper horizons.
The Work Plan mentions that groundwater fate and transport modeling (pg. 4-4) and a risk
assessment (pg. 4-5) maybe performed and
hoc when thesemmunity elations plan (pg. 4-5) would be performed or
-- PRGs (pg. 5-4) may be developed. The criteria
developed should be defined. In a related matter, on (pg. 5-4) mention is made of "EPA's
Baseline Risk Assessment." It is unclear why EPA would be doing a risk assessment when
the site is not on the NPL-
Page 4-9 of the Plan indicates the County's intent to conduct a federal and state applicable
or relevant and appropriate requirements(ARAR). GW questions the cost effectiveness of
conducting such a review. Since the landfill site is not on the NPL, the need to incur the
expense of such a review would appear to be inappropriate.
There currently is an inadequate definition of the hydrogeology of the deep groundwater
aquifer, with only two wells providing information.eell would appear to beTwo wells exist and a t olrd well is
o close to one
�roposed by the County. However, the new p
of the existing deep wells to add significantly to the County's understanding of the nature
and distribution of the deep groundwater aquip---, Gw wvuld iccommcnd that additional,
more -widely spaced wells be installed.
Based on the available data, groundwater contamination is migrating off the site and
downgradient (i.e., to the northeast) from the vicinity of well P25. However, no wells are
proposed to determine the extent of contamination in this direction.
We recommend that samples obtained near the Pesticide Burial Area be analyzed for
pesticides in addition to those stated in the Plan.
D,ckcr;on/Cs:aeV
Nn r.tON
- r - . +, T N0 W 96-ZZ-ztld�-J

On page 3-3, site ecology is proposed to be evaluated. The Work Plan should be clear on
how ecological threats will truly be evaluated so that superfluous data are not collected.
With regard to the FS, EPA, or State presumptive remedies for municipal landfills should
be considered. The availability of presumptive remedies could significantly reduce the cost
of the FS.
There is no clearly defined sampling strategy for surface water and sediment described in
the Work Plan. The County should provide a detailed description of the program in the
Sampling Plan, to include the number of samples, location, and overall approach to surface
water and sediment sampling including upstream
downstream
analyzed in theocations. The
surface water
should also define in more detailparameters to
and sediment samples.
Neither these comments nor the fact that Glaxo Wellcome has expressed an interest in
working with the County to evaluate the extent of environmental problems at the Allcn
Road landfill is meant, nor should be interpreted as an admission by Glaxo Wellcome that it
is a PRP at this sight or that it has any legal responsibility to pay for or reimburse the
County for any costs associated with the Allen trt may have landfill.
does not mend by its condulcome l t
reserves any and all rights and defenses t y have an
now or in the future to waive any such right or defense.
Please contact me at 919-707-2303, if there are any questions regarding these comments.
Sincerely,
Michael L. Esarey
Director, Environmental Safety-GVL
Dick��etOn/f::•vey
- . 0 : : � i ►aow s6-zz-Zt3d'::�

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources • •
Division of Solid Waste Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor p E H IN-4 F�
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
William L. Meyer, Director
March 20, 1996
CERTIFIED MAIL
Return Receipt Requested
Mr. Phillip G. Dickerson
Pitt County Engineer
Pitt County Office Building
1717 West Fifth Street
Greenville, N.C. 27834
Re: Comments and Questions Generated During the Review of Pitt County's Sanitary
Landfill Draft Water Quality Assessment Work Plan Submitted by Aquaterra. (Permit
- #74-01).
Dear Mr. Dickerson,
The following are comments and questions generated by the Solid Waste Section
(Section) during the review of the above referenced work plan.
1) Can the total depth for the onsite supply well (labeled as PW and WS1 on sampling
information) be determined? Do any construction/completion and boring log records
exist for this well?
2) Referring to page 1-2, section 1.3, does Pitt County (County) have any records of
abandonment for the original monitoring wells (perhaps as many as seven) that were
installed by the Department of Agriculture and monitored in 1981 and 1982 prior to the
placement of waste over the fire residue cell?
3) The Section requests that the results of the private well survey be included in the first
monthly report (page 1-5).
4) For clarification, arsenic has consistently been detected in ground water samples from
MW-2 (page 2-5, second paragraph).
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

5) A minimum of two (2) water quality sampling episodes per year which includes all the
monitoring wells in the approved monitoring system is required by the Section for normal
routine monitoring. This requirement can be satisfied during assessment activities (page
4-2, sections 4.1.2.2 and 4.1.2.3). '
6) If the County decides not to use a CLP laboratory as proposed then a laboratory certified
by the Division of Environmental Management (DEM) for groundwater analysis (15A
NCAC 2H .0800) should be utilized. The DEM certified laboratory is required to
perform water analysis using the approved methods and at the approved levels of
certification for solid waste management facilities. Data from laboratories that do not
have the appropriate certification or did not use specified test methods will be deemed
unacceptable. QA/QC data (test methods, PQL's, surrogate recoveries) should be
included with all sample and blank data.
7) Specifically referring to the first bullet point on page 4-3, further details will be needed
on the "deep" well and its purpose before installation. Generally, it is necessary once the
final locations have been decided to obtain Section approval on the installation or
abandonment of all monitoring wells and piezometers. All future monitoring wells
should be constructed according to the standards set forth in the N. C.A. C., Title 1 SA,
Subchapter 2C Section .0100, Well Construction Standards and the North Carolina
Water Quality Monitoring Guidance Document For Solid Waste Facilities (see Draft
Field Sampling Plan, page 4-10, Section 4.3.1.1).
8) The last sentence in section 4.1.3.2, page 4-3, needs clarification.
9) What are the "other factors" that will be considered to determine the list of analytical
parameters (page 4-8, section 4.3.3.3)?
10) It should be noted that according to the Section's records the original MW-2 installed in
September 1986 near the fire residue cell was only sampled once (9/11/87). It was
reported at that time that MW-2 did not contain enough water for a full analysis. Samples
could not be retrieved from MW-2 during the September 1989 event because of "casing
damage". The Section does not have any record of proper abandonment for this well.
The existing MW-2 was installed 5/31/90. Table 1 and the narrative portion of the plan
should reflect the above information and any additional monitoring well
construction/installation and abandonment data.
11) Title changes are needed on pages 2 and 3 of Table 8. Also from Table 8, if modelling is
not performed, what methods will be utilized to define potential impacts of releases to
underlying soils and groundwater?
12) Once the ground water flow direction has been ascertained it will be necessary in a
subsequent phase to install a monitoring well(s) downgradient of the landfill in zones
beneath the surficial aquifer giving the capability to detect vertical migration of
contaminants and determine potentiometric gradients.

In the future two copies of progress reports and additional assessment phase plans will be
sufficient. If you have any questions about this letter, please contact me at [phone],
extension 261.
Sincerely,
0
Mark Poindexter, Hydrogeologist
Groundwater Compliance Unit, Solid Waste Section
c: Phil Prete
Billy Morris
Nancy Scott
Central file
Filename: 74-01 N4. ast