22054 2100 S Tryon Street EMP_18-060 20190117

CONTENTS

Completed EMP Form

Tables

Table 1 Summary of Soil Analytical Data
Table 2 Summary of Groundwater Analytical Data
Table 3 Summary of Soil Gas Analytical Data
Figures
Figure 1 Site Location Map
Figure 2 Site Map
Figure 3 Groundwater Potentiometric Map
Figure 4 Estimated Extent of Soil Gas Exceedances Map

Appendices
Appendix A Preliminary Redevelopment Plan
Appendix B Preliminary Grading Plan
Appendix C Historical Data Summary

1
EMP Version 2, June 2018
NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in
the North Carolina Brownfields Program at the direction of a Brownfields project manager.

The EMP is a typical requirement of a Brownfields Agreement (BFA). Its purpose is to clarify
actions to be taken during the demolition and construction at Brownfields properties in an
effort to avoid delays in the event of the discovery of new contamination sources or other
environmental conditions. The EMP provides a means to document redevelopment plans and
environmental data for each applicable environmental medium to inform regulatory-compliant
decision-making at the site. As much detail as possible should be included in the EMP,
including contingency planning for unknowns. Consult your project manager if you have
questions.

Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all
pertinent attachments, see checklist below, to their Brownfields project manager prior to any
earthmoving or other development-related activities that have the potential to disturb soil at
the Brownfields Property, including demolition. For the resultant EMP to be valid for use, it
must be completed, reviewed by the program, signed by all parties working on the project,
and approved by the Brownfields project manager. Failure to comply with the requirements of
the EMP could jeopardize project eligibility, or in the event of a completed agreement, be
cause for a reopener

So that the EMP provides value in protecting brownfields eligibility and public health, the
preparer shall ensure that the following steps have been completed prior to submitting the
EMP for review. Any EMP prepared without completing these steps is premature.

☒ Site sampling and assessment that meets Brownfields’ objectives is complete and has
been reviewed and approved by the Brownfields Project Manager.

☒ Specific redevelopment plans, even if conceptual, have been developed for the project,
submitted and reviewed by the Brownfields Project Manager.

2
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Please submit, along with the completed EMP form, the following attachments, as relevant
and applicable to the proposed redevelopment:

☒ A set of redevelopment plans, including architectural/engineering plans, if available; if
not conceptual plans may suffice if updated when detailed plans are drafted.

☒ A figure overlaying redevelopment plans on a map of the extent of contamination for
each media.

☒ Site grading plans that include a cut and fill analysis.

☒ A figure showing the proposed location and depth of impacted soil that would remain
on site after construction grading.

☐ Any necessary permits for redevelopment (i.e. demolition, etc.).

☒ A detailed construction schedule that includes timing and phases of construction.

☒ Tabulated data summaries for each impacted media (i.e. soil, groundwater, soil gas,
etc.) applicable to the proposed redevelopment.

☒ Figures with the sampling locations and contamination extents for each impacted media
applicable to the proposed redevelopment.

☐ A full final grade sampling and analysis plan, if the redevelopment plan is final.

☐ If known, information about each proposed potential borrow soil source, such as aerial
photos, historic site maps, historic Sanborn maps, a site history, necessary for
brownfields approval.

☐ Information and, analytical data if required, for quarries, or other borrow sources,
detailing the type of material proposed for importation to the Brownfields Property.

☒ A work plan for the sampling and analysis of soil to be brought onto the Brownfields
Property. Refer to Issue Resolution 15 in Brownfields Program Guidelines.

☐ A map of the Brownfields Property showing the location of soils proposed for export
and sampling data from those areas.

☒ If a Vapor Mitigation System is required by the Brownfields Program, the Vapor
Intrusion Mitigation System (VIMS) plan will be signed and sealed by a NC Professional
Engineer. The VIMS Plan may also be submitted under separate cover.

3
EMP Version 2, June 2018
GENERAL INFORMATION

Date: 11/6/2018 Revision Date (if applicable): Click or tap to enter a date.

Brownfields Assigned Project Name: 2100 S. Tryon Street

Brownfields Project Number: 22054-18-060

Brownfields Property Address: 2100 S. Tryon Street, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County

Brownfields Property Area (acres): 2.82
Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit?.......................☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text.
Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit….……..☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes, enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text.

COMMUNICATIONS

A copy of this EMP shall be distributed to all the parties below as well as any contractors or site workers
that may be exposed to site vapors, soil, groundwater, and/or surface water. Additionally, a copy of the
EMP shall be maintained at the Brownfields Property during redevelopment activities. NOTE, THE EMP
DOES NOT TAKE THE PLACE OF A SITE-SPECIFIC HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN.

Prospective Developer (PD): VV 2100 Development, LLC
Contact Person: Doug Stephan
Phone Numbers: Office: [phone] Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text.
Email: [e-mail]

Contractor for PD: Not Applicable
Contact Person: Click or tap here to enter text.
Phone Numbers: Office: Click or tap here to enter text. Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text.
Email: Click or tap here to enter text.

Environmental Consultant: Hart & Hickman, PC
Contact Person: Matt Ingalls
Phone Numbers: Office: [phone] Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text.
Email: [e-mail]

Brownfields Program Project Manager: Bill Schmithorst, PG
Phone Numbers: Office: [phone] Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text.
Email: [e-mail]

Other DEQ Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch,

4
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste):
Not Applicable

NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM

Written advance Notification Times to Brownfields Project Manager: Check each box to accept
minimum advance notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsite task:

On-site assessment or remedial activities:……………………………………….…… 10 days Prior ☒

Construction or grading start:……………………………………….………………………. 10 days Prior ☒

Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously
unknown contamination: ……………………………….……………………………………. Within 48 hours ☒

Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood or soil erosion control measures in
area of contamination, ventilation of work zones):…………….……….……… Within 48 hours ☒

Installation of mitigation systems:………………………….………………….……….. 10 days Prior ☒

Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to implement redevelopment
activities: (as applicable): ……………………….…………………………………………..… Within 30 days ☒

REDEVELOPMENT PLANS

1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply):
☐Residential ☐Recreational ☐Institutional ☒Commercial ☒Office ☒Retail ☐Industrial
☒Other specify:
Parking deck, restaurant, and/or open space.

2) Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth-moving activities
at the site:
☒ Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps)
☒ Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel lines, utility
lines, etc.
☐ Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors

3) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (MANDATORY: attach detailed plans or conceptual plans, if
detailed plans are not available. EMP review without such information would be premature):
Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building
slabs/pavement, grading plans and planned construction of new structures:
VV 2100 Development, LLC plans to redevelop the subject Site with one approximately 83,000

5
EMP Version 2, June 2018
square ft four-story building containing commercial, office, and retail space and one
approximately 2,100 square ft one-story building containing retail. Preliminary Site Plans are
included in Appendix A.

4) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?:
☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
☐ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements, including without limitation those related to lead and asbestos
abatement that are administered by the Health Hazards Control Unit within the Division of Public
Health of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services. If available, please
provide a copy of your demolition permit.

5) Are sediment and erosion control measures required by federal, state, or local regulations?
☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
☒ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements. If soil disturbance is necessary to install sediment and erosion
control measures, they may not begin until this EMP is approved.

6) Which category of risk-based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the
Brownfields Agreement? Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall
be cited in the Brownfields Agreement for comparison purposes.
☐ Residential ☒ Non-Residential or Industrial/Commercial

7) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule):
a) Construction start date: 1/7/2019

b) Anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):
Site grading and soil import is anticipated to begin in January 2019. Foundation work is
anticipated to begin in February 2019. The anticipated date of occupancy of the new
buildings is August 2020.

c) Additional phases planned? ☐ Yes ☐ No
If yes, specify the start date and/or activities if known:
Start Date: Phased construction is not anticipated at this time.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.

Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.

Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.

6
EMP Version 2, June 2018

d) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: 8/31/2020

CONTAMINATED MEDIA

1) Contaminated Media on the Brownfields Property
Part 1. Soil:……………………………………….……………. ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected
Part 2. Groundwater:.……………………….……..……. ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected
Part 3. Surface Water:.……………...……..…………… ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 4. Sediment:.……………...……..…………………… ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 5. Soil Vapor:…..…………...……..…………………. ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected
Part 6. Sub-Slab Soil Vapor:……...……..…………….. ☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Suspected
Part 7. Indoor Air:...……..…………………………………. ☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Suspected

2) For the Area of Proposed Redevelopment on the Brownfields Property, attach tabulated data
summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with sample locations.

PART 1. Soil – Please fill out the information below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate
using known areas of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan. Provide a figure
overlaying new construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations.

1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list general groups of contaminants):
A former gas station with auto service operations was developed in the northeastern portion of
the Site in 1957 and operated until the 1970s. The gas station operated six underground storage
tanks (USTs) that were removed in the late 1990s. Four former gasoline USTs were present
within a single basin located in the northeastern portion of the Site. Additionally, one former
heating oil UST and one former waste oil UST were present in two separate basins in the
northeastern portion of the Site. Multiple soil assessment events have been conducted at the
Brownfields Property. A brief summary of the soil assessment results is provided below.

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH)
During UST closure activities, gasoline-range TPH (TPH-GRO) was reported in soil samples
collected from the gasoline tank basin at concentrations up to 1,400 mg/kg. Additionally, diesel-
range TPH (TPH-DRO) was reported in soil samples collected from the former heating oil tank
basin at concentrations up to 1,000 mg/kg.

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Laboratory analytical results have indicated the presence of naphthalene (up to 63 mg/kg) at
concentrations above the Industrial/Commercial PSRG in the vicinity of the former gasoline tank
basin. Additionally, during a 1998 assessment, the non-petroleum compound trichloroethylene
7
EMP Version 2, June 2018
(TCE; up to 6.9 mg/kg) was reported in one boring located in the vicinity of the former gasoline
tank basin at concentrations above the Industrial/Commercial PSRG. Please note that
subsequent assessments did not confirm the presence of TCE in Site soil. Multiple low-level
petroleum-related VOCs have been detected in the vicinity of the former tank basins, but at
concentrations below Industrial/Commercial PSRGs.
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs)
Laboratory analytical results have indicated the presence of low-level SVOCs at the Site, but at
concentrations below the Industrial/Commercial PSRGs.
Metals
Laboratory analytical results have identified chromium (total; up to 69 mg/kg) at concentrations
exceeding the Industrial/Commercial PSRG in the vicinity of the former waste oil tank product
line. Please note that speciated chromium analysis was not performed during the waste oil
tank assessment activities. Low-level hexavalent chromium has been detected in shallow soil
across the Site at estimated concentrations above the Residential PSRGs, but below the
Industrial/Commercial PSRGs. H&H did not identify obvious former activities at the Site
associated with hexavalent chromium use. Elevated arsenic concentrations have been
detected across the Brownfields Property at concentrations above the Industrial/Commercial
PSRG, but within published background ranges for North Carolina soils.
2)Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet):
Residual petroleum impacts at the Site have been reported at depths of up to 15 ft below ground
surface (bgs) in the vicinity of the former gasoline UST basin. TCE was reported during the 1998
assessment at depths of up to 20 ft bgs in the vicinity of the former gasoline UST basin (depth of
sample likely influenced by groundwater). Elevated chromium (total) concentrations were
reported from a depth of up to 4 ft bgs from beneath the former waste oil tank product line.
Elevated arsenic concentrations have been detected across the Site at depths ranging from 0.5 ft
to 2 ft bgs.
3)Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet):
An area of approximately 122,840 square feet (the entire Brownfields Property) will be graded to
level the property prior to importing fill and to implement positive drainage flow across the Site.
4)Depths of soil to be excavated (feet):
No soil will be excavated during Site grading activities for the purpose of changing the grade
because this is a soil import-site.
5)Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan):
No soil is anticipated to be excavated as this is a soil-import site. A grading plan is included in
Appendix A.
6)Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants:
Not Applicable

8
EMP Version 2, June 2018
7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable:
Not Applicable

Part 1.A. MANAGING ONSITE SOIL
If soil is anticipated to be excavated from the Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields
Property, or otherwise disturbed during site grading or other redevelopment activities, please
provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are
acceptable, if only preliminary data available).

1) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION:
a) Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the North Carolina Hazardous
Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31-261.35?....................................... ☐Yes ☒No
☐ If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes
generating the waste (include pertinent analytical results as needed).
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ If yes, do the soils exceed the “Contained-Out” levels in Attachment 1 of the
North Carolina Contained-In Policy?................................................. ☐ Yes ☐ No

b) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS
THE CONTAINED-OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA
CONTAINED-IN POLICY THE SOIL MAY NOT BE RE-USED ON SITE AND MUST BE
DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND
REGULATIONS.
c) Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE?.................................... ☐ Yes ☒ No
☐ If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results).
☐ Ignitability Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Corrosivity Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Reactivity Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Toxicity Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ TCLP results Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual
hazardous constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory
TCLP standard)
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ If no, explain rationale:
Soil analytical data does not indicate detections capable of exceeding toxicity
characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) criteria using the Rule of 20.

9
EMP Version 2, June 2018

d) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE
SOIL MAY NOT BE RE-USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE
WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.

2) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in
place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite):
☐ Preliminary Health-Based Residential SRGs
☒ Preliminary Health-Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs
☒ Division of Waste Management Risk Calculator (For Brownfields Properties Only)
☐ Site-specific risk-based cleanup level. Please provide details of methods used for
determination/explanation.
Click or tap here to enter text.

Additional comments:
Currently, redevelopment of the Site is intended for commercial purposes only. Although not
anticipated, should the Site be redeveloped for residential use in the future, Residential PSRGs
will be used for soil disposition decisions.

3) If known impacted soil is proposed to be reused within the Brownfields Property Boundary,
please check the measures that will be utilized to ensure safe placement and documentation of
same. Please attach a proposed location diagram/site map.
☒ Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields Project Manager
☐ Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil on site map
to Brownfields Project Manager once known
☐ Geotextile to mark depth of fill material.
Provide description of material:
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ Manage soil under impervious cap ☒ or clean fill ☒
☒ Describe cap or fill:
Clean imported fill will be used to raise the grade at the Site by up to six feet. Potential
impacted soil (if encountered) may also be placed below the proposed buildings and/or
asphalt paved parking lot.

☒ Confer with NC BF Project Manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re-recorded if
actions are Post-Recordation).
☐ GPS the location and provide site map with final location.
☐ Other. Please provide a description of the measure:

Click or tap here to enter text.

10
EMP Version 2, June 2018
4) Please describe the following action(s) to be taken during and following excavation and
management of site soils:
Management of fugitive dust from site
☒ Yes, describe the method will include:
Significant areas of contaminated soil are not expected to be encountered or disturbed
during Site redevelopment activities based upon soil sampling data and the preliminary
grading plan. The grading contractor will consider conditions such as wind speed, wind
direction, and moisture content of soil during soil grading and stockpiling activities to
minimize dust generation. In the unlikely event that contaminated soil is encountered
during Site redevelopment that requires excavation, particular attention will be paid by
contractors to implement dust control measures as needed based on Site and atmospheric
conditions (i.e. by controlled water application, hydro-seeding, and/or mulch, stone, or
plastic cover). Potentially impacted soil will be managed as described below.

☐ No, explain rationale:
Click or tap here to enter text.

Field Screening of site soil
☒ Yes, describe the field screening method, frequency of field screening, person conducting
field screening:
During soil disturbance at the Site, the workers or contractors will observe soils for
evidence of potential significantly impacted soil. Evidence of potential significantly
impacted soil includes a distinct unnatural color, strong odor, or filled or previously
disposed materials of concerns (i.e. chemicals, tanks, drums, etc.). Should the above be
noted during Site work, the contractor will contact the project environmental engineer to
observe the suspect condition. If the project environmental engineer confirms that the
material may be impacted, then the procedures below will be implemented. In addition,
the environmental engineer will contact the DEQ Brownfields project manager within two
business days to advise that person of the condition.

☐ No, explain rationale:
Click or tap here to enter text.

Soil Sample Collection
☐ Yes, describe the sampling method (e.g., in-situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.):
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ No, explain rationale:
Collection of additional soil samples is not anticipated based on results of previous Site
assessment activities. If significant soil impact is encountered during grading and/or
installation or removal of utilities, excavation will proceed only as far as needed to allow
grading and/or construction of the utility to continue and/or only as far as needed to
allow alternate corrective measures described below. Suspect significantly impacted soil
excavated during grading and/or utility line installation or removal may be stockpiled and

11
EMP Version 2, June 2018
covered in a secure area to allow construction to progress. Suspect impacted soil will be
underlain by and covered with minimum 10-mil plastic sheeting. At least one
representative sample of the soil will be collected for analysis of total VOCs, SVOCs, and
RCRA metals plus hexavalent chromium. If the results of analysis of the sample indicate
that the soil could potentially exceed toxicity characteristic hazardous waste criteria, then
the soil will also be analyzed by TCLP for those compounds that could exceed the toxicity
characteristic hazardous waste criteria. Impacted soil will be handled in the manner
described below based upon the laboratory analyses:
i. If no organic compounds are detected in a sample (other than which are
attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts) and metals are below
Industrial/Commercial PSRGs or are consistent with Site-specific background levels, then
the soil will be deemed suitable for use as on-Site fill or as off-Site fill. The proposed
location(s) for off-Site placement of soil (other than a permitted facility) along with the
receiving facility’s written approval for acceptance of the soil will be provided to DEQ for
approval prior to taking the soil off-Site.
ii. If detectable levels of compounds are found which do not exceed the DEQ IHSB
Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (other than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory
artifacts or which are consistent with background levels for metals) and the TCLP
concentrations are below hazardous waste criteria, then the soil may be used on-Site as
fill without conditions.
iii. If detectable levels of compounds are found which exceed the DEQ IHSB
Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (other than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory
artifacts or which are consistent with background levels for metals) and the TCLP
concentrations are below hazardous waste criteria, then the soil, with DEQ’s written
approval, may be used on-Site as fill below an impervious surface (i.e. parking lot or
building foundation), or at least 2 ft of compacted clean soil. If the impacted soil with
concentrations above Industrial/Commercial PSRGs is moved to an on-Site location, its
location and depth will be documented, covered with a geotextile fabric so that its
location can be identified if encountered in the future, and its location will be provided to
DEQ in an updated survey plat.
iv. Impacted soil may be transported to a permitted facility such as a landfill provided
that the soil is accepted at the disposal facility. If soil is transported to a permitted
facility, the permitted facility’s written approval to dispose of soil from the Site will be
included with the final redevelopment summary report. In the unlikely event that the
sample data indicates concentrations above TCLP hazardous waste criteria, then the soil
must be transported off-Site to a permitted disposal facility that can accept or treat
hazardous waste.

If soil samples are collected for analysis, please check the applicable chemical analytes:
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270

12
EMP Version 2, June 2018
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium
and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
EPA Methods 6020/7471
☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text.
☒ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Hexavalent Chromium (EPA Method 7199)

☒ Check to confirm that stockpiling of known or suspected impacted soils will be conducted
in accordance with Figure 1 of this EMP. Stockpile methodology should provide erosion
control, prohibiting contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil,
and preventing contaminated runoff. Explain any variances or provide additional details as
needed:

☐ Final grade sampling of exposed native soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or
permanent hardscape). Select chemical analyses for final grade samples with check boxes
below (Check all that apply):
☐ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☐ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☐ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.): Click or tap here to enter text.

Please provide a scope of work for final grade sampling, including a diagram of soil
sampling locations, number of samples to be collected, and brief sampling methodology.
Samples should be collected from 0-2 ft below ground surface, with the exception of VOCs
which should be taken from 1-2 ft below ground surface. Alternatively, a work plan for
final grade sampling may be submitted under separate cover.
Click or tap here to enter text.
Click or tap here to enter text.

13
EMP Version 2, June 2018

☒ If final grade sampling was NOT selected please explain rationale:
No final grade sampling is necessary because import soil will be tested prior to import to
the Brownfields Property; Site soil has already been assessed; and most of the Site will be
covered with clean fill, pavement, and/or buildings.

Part 1.B. IMPORTED FILL SOIL

NO SOIL MAY BE BROUGHT ONTO THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL
FROM THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. According to the Brownfields IR 15, “Documenting
imported soil (by sampling, analysis, and reporting in accordance with review and written
approval in advance by the Brownfields Program), will safeguard the liability protections provided
by the brownfields agreement and is in the best interest of the prospective developer/property
owner.”

Requirements for importing fill:

1) Will fill soil be imported to the site?................................................ ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown

2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported?
Approximately 10,000 cubic yards

3) If yes, what is the anticipated depth that fill soil will be placed at the property? (If a range
of depths, please list the range.)
Fill soil will be used to raise the grade across the Brownfields Property to heights between two ft
and six ft above current grade.

4) Provide the source of fill, including: location, site history, nearby environmental concerns,
etc. Attach aerial photos, maps, historic Sanborn maps and a borrow source site history:
The source of fill has not been determined at this time. However, when a proposed source of fill
has been identified, the procedures outlined below will be followed.

5) PRIOR TO ITS PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, provide a plan to analyze fill
soil to demonstrate that it meets acceptable standards applicable to the site and can be
approved for use at the Brownfields property.
To demonstrate that imported soil is suitable for use at commercial property, the fill soil will be
sampled and approved by DEQ Brownfields prior to being brought to the Site. A sampling plan
will be developed and submitted for DEQ Brownfields review under separate cover. DEQ
approval of the sampling plan and analytical results is required prior to bringing soil on Site. Soil
will be considered suitable for use at the Site if it does not contain compound concentrations
above Industrial/Commercial PSRGs or Site-specific background levels for metals.

6) Please check the applicable chemical analytes for fill soil samples. (Check all that apply):
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260

14
EMP Version 2, June 2018
☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): EPA Methods 6020/7471
☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text.
☒ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.): Hexavalent Chromium (EPA Method 7199)

7) The scope of work for import fill sampling may be provided below or in a Work Plan
submitted separately for DEQ review and approval. Attach specific location maps for in-situ
borrow sites. If using a quarry, provide information on the type of material to be brought
onto the Brownfields Property.
A sampling plan will be developed and submitted for DEQ Brownfields review under separate
cover. DEQ Brownfields approval of the sampling plan and analytical results is required prior to
bringing soil on Site.

Part 1.C. EXPORTED SOIL

NO SOIL MAY LEAVE THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE
BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. FAILURE TO OBTAIN APPROVAL MAY VIOLATE A BROWNFIELDS
AGREEMENT CAUSING A REOPENER OR JEOPARDIZING ELIGIBILITY IN THE PROGRAM,
ENDANGERING LIABILITY PROTECTIONS AND MAKING SAID ACTION POSSIBLY SUBJECT TO
ENFORCEMENT. JUSTIFICATIONS PROVIDED BELOW MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PROGRAM IN
WRITING PRIOR TO COMPLETING TRANSPORT ACTIVITIES. Please refer to Brownfields IR 15 for
additional details.

1) If export from a Brownfields Property is anticipated, please provide details regarding the
proposed export actions. Volume of exported soil, depths, location from which soil will
be excavated on site, related sampling results, etc. Provide a site map with locations of
export and sampling results included.
Based on review of the proposed cut/fill plan, export soil is not anticipated at this time. Should
soil need to be exported from the Brownfields property during redevelopment, a sampling plan
will be developed and submitted to DEQ Brownfields for review and approval once the volume of
soil for export is known.

DEQ approval of the sampling plan and analytical results will be obtained prior to transporting
export soil from the Site. Based on analytical results of soil samples collected from the export
soil, the soil will be transported off-Site to a suitable location. The PD will notify DEQ

15
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Brownfields of the location receiving the export soil. If not a permitted facility, DEQ Brownfields
approval and written approval from the receiving facility will be obtained prior to transporting
the soil off-Site.

2) To what type of facility will the export Brownfields soil be sent?
☒ Subtitle D/Municipal Solid Waste Landfill (analytical program to be determined by
landfill)
☒ Permitted but Unlined Landfill (i.e. LCID, C&D, etc.) Analytical program to be
determined by the accepting Landfill;
☒ Landfarm or other treatment facility
☒ Use as fill at another suitable Brownfields Property – determination that a
site is suitable will require, at a minimum, that similar concentrations of the same or
similar contaminants already exist at both sites, use of impacted soil will not increase
the potential for risk to human health and the environment at the receiving Brownfields
property, and that a record of the acceptance of such soil from the property owner of
the receiving site is provided to Brownfields. Please provide additional details below.
☒ Use as Beneficial Fill off-site at a non-Brownfields Property - Please provide
documentation of approval from the property owner for receipt of fill material. This will
also require approval by the DEQ Solid Waste Section. Additional information is
provided in IR 15. Please provide additional details below.

3) Additional Details: (if transfer of soil to another property is requested above, please provide
details related to the proposed plans).
The environmental professional will contact DEQ Brownfields to obtain DEQ Brownfields and
DEQ Solid Waste approval prior to exporting soil to a non-Brownfields property.

Part 1.D. MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES

☐ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill
(Preferred)

☒ Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is not a
hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they
were removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original
depth from which it was excavated.

☒ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport,
and/or degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants?
☐ If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials:
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ If no, include rationale here:

16
EMP Version 2, June 2018
The potential for vapor intrusion associated with future Site buildings will be managed through a
Vapor Intrusion Mitigation System (VIMS) Plan that will be submitted to DEQ for approval under
separate cover prior to construction of the proposed Site buildings.

Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches:
Although not anticipated, in the event contaminated soil and/or vapors are encountered in utility
trenches during redevelopment activities, the trench will be evacuated, and appropriate safety
screening of the vapors will be performed to protect workers. If results indicate further action is
warranted in response to vapors to protect workers, appropriate engineering controls (such as use of
industrial fans) will be implemented.

The contractor and workers will observe soil for potential impacts during utility installation activities.
Evidence of potential significant impacted soil includes a distinct unnatural color, strong odor, or filled
or previously disposed materials of concerns (i.e. chemicals, tanks, drums, etc.). Should the above be
noted during utility work, the contractor will contact the environmental professional to observe the
suspect condition and screen the soil using a photo-ionization detector (PID) or similar vapor field
screening instrument. If the environmental professional confirms that the material may be impacted,
then the procedures outlined in Part 1.A. above will be implemented. In addition, the environmental
professional will contact the DEQ Brownfields project manager within two business days to advise
that person of the condition.

PART 2. GROUNDWATER – Please fill out the information below.

1) What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property?
The depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property ranges from approximately 12 ft bgs in
the southern portion of the Site to approximately 20 ft bgs in the northern portion of the Site.
2) Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ☐onsite ☐offsite ☒both or ☐unknown
sources? Describe source(s):
Previous groundwater assessment activities have indicated the presence of petroleum-related
compounds at concentrations above the North Carolina 2L Groundwater Quality Standards (2L
Standards) in the northern portion of the Site in the vicinity of the former gas station and in the
southern portion of the Site associated with the south adjacent off-Site gas station. Additionally,
chlorinated VOCs including tetrachloroethylene (PCE), 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA), and
chloroform have been detected in groundwater at the Site at concentrations exceeding 2L
Standards. The source of the chlorinated VOCs is unknown; however, the Site is located in an
historically industrial corridor of Charlotte and chlorinated VOC impacts have been documented
on several nearby upgradient properties.

3) What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property?
Groundwater flow at the Site is generally towards the northwest.

4) Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities?
☐Yes ☒No

17
EMP Version 2, June 2018
If yes, describe these activities:
Click or tap here to enter text.
Regardless of the answer; in the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered during redevelopment activities (even if no is checked above), list activities for contingent management of groundwater (e.g., dewatering of groundwater from excavations or foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary sewer, NPDES permit, or sampling procedures).
Based on the anticipated depth to groundwater, groundwater is not anticipated to be
encountered during proposed redevelopment activities. Although not anticipated, if
groundwater suspected to be impacted (based on strong odor, unnatural color, sheen, etc.) is
encountered during Site work, the contractor will contact the environmental professional to
observe the suspect condition. If the environmental professional determines that the
excavation likely contains impacted groundwater, then appropriate worker safety measures will
be undertaken to manage groundwater that gathers in an open excavation within an area
determined to be impacted during construction activities. The accumulated water will be
allowed to evaporate (if feasible), tested and disposed off-Site (if impacted), or used for dust
control at the Site (with Brownfields prior approval). In addition, the environmental
professional will contact the DEQ Brownfields project manager within 48 hours regarding the
condition.

5) Are monitoring wells currently present on the Brownfields Property?.................☐Yes ☒No
If yes, are any monitoring wells routinely monitored through DEQ or other
agencies?..................................................................................................................☐Yes ☐No

6) Please check methods to be utilized in the management of known and previously
unidentified wells.
☒ Abandonment of site monitoring wells in accordance with all applicable regulations. It
is the Brownfields Program’s intent to allow proper abandonment of well(s) as
specified in the Brownfields Agreement, except if required for active monitoring
through another section of DEQ or the EPA.
☒ Location of existing monitoring wells marked
☒ Existing monitoring wells protected from disturbance
☒ Newly identified monitoring wells will be marked and protected from further
disturbance until notification to DEQ Brownfields can be made and approval for
abandonment is given.

7) Please provide additional details as needed:

Please note, disturbance of existing site monitoring wells without approval by DEQ is not
permissible. If monitoring wells are damaged and/or destroyed, DEQ may require that the PD
be responsible for replacement of the well.
No existing monitoring wells are present at the Site. Several previously abandoned monitoring wells
are present at the Site associated with previous assessment activities at the former gas station in the
northeast portion of the Site and the off-Site gas station in the far southwestern portion of the Site.

18
EMP Version 2, June 2018

PART 3. SURFACE WATER -Please fill out the information below.
1) Is surface water present at the property? ☐ Yes ☒ No
2) Attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property.
3) Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated? ☐ Yes ☒ No
4) Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment
activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No
5) In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment
activities, or clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of
such events (e.g. flooding, contaminated surface water run-off, stormwater impacts):
If surface water run-off gathers in an open excavation within an area determined to be impacted
during construction activities, appropriate worker safety measures will be undertaken. The
accumulated water will be allowed to evaporate (if feasible), tested and disposed off-Site (if
impacted based on strong odor, unnatural color, sheen, etc.), or used for dust control at the Site
(with Brownfields prior approval). In addition, the environmental professional will contact the
DEQ Brownfields project manager within 48 hours regarding the condition.

PART 4. SEDIMENT – Please fill out the information below.

1) Are sediment sources present on the property? ☐ Yes ☒ No

2) If yes, is sediment at the property known to be contaminated: ☐ Yes ☒ No

3) Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment
activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No

4) Attach a map showing location of known contaminated sediment at the property.

5) In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance):
Click or tap here to enter text.

PART 5. SOIL VAPOR – Please fill out the information below.

1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the following vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in the following media:

19
EMP Version 2, June 2018
IHSB Residential Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor:………..☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
Groundwater:.….☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor:………..☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
Groundwater:…..☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the locations of soil vapor contaminants that exceed site
screening levels.
3) If applicable, at what depth(s) is soil vapor known to be contaminated?

4) Will workers encounter contaminated soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities?
☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown
5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities
(trenches, manways, basements or other subsurface work,) list activities for management
of such contact:
In the unlikely event contaminated soil vapors are encountered during future redevelopment
activities, the area will be evacuated, and appropriate safety screening of the vapors will be
performed. If results indicate further action is warranted, appropriate engineering controls (such
as use of industrial fans) will be implemented.

PART 6. SUB-SLAB SOIL VAPOR – Please fill out the information below if existing buildings or
foundations will be retained in the redevelopment.
1) Are sub-slab soil vapor data available for the Brownfields Property? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
2) If data indicate that sub-slab soil vapor concentrations exceed screening levels, attach a map
showing the location of these exceedances.
3) At what depth(s) is sub-slab soil vapor known to be contaminated? ☐0-6 inches ☐Other, please
describe:
Click or tap here to enter text.

4) Will workers encounter contaminated sub-slab soil vapor during planned redevelopment
activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact
In the unlikely event contaminated soil vapors are encountered during future redevelopment
Laboratory analytical results indicate the presence of several petroleum-related compounds in soil
vapor at concentrations exceeding the DEQ Division of Waste Management (DWM) Non-Residential
Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs) in the northeastern portion of the Site in the area of the former gas
station. The soil gas sample collected in the northeastern portion of the Site was collected from a
depth of approximately 15 ft bgs.

20
EMP Version 2, June 2018
activities, the area will be evacuated, and appropriate safety screening of the vapors will be
performed. If results indicate further action is warranted, appropriate engineering controls (such
as use of industrial fans) will be implemented.

PART 7. INDOOR AIR – Please fill out the information below.

1) Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the location(s) where indoor air contaminants exceed site screening levels.
3) If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk-based screening levels will
not be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated
indoor air during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
4) In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact:

VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM – Please fill out the information below.
Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system (VIMS) proposed for this Brownfields Property?
☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
If yes, ☐ VIMS Plan Attached or ☒ VIMS Plan to be submitted separately
If submitted separately provide date:
A VIMS Plan will be submitted to DEQ for approval under separate cover prior to construction of
the proposed Site buildings.

VIMS Plan shall be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer

If no, please provide a brief rationale as to why no vapor mitigation plan is warranted:
Click or tap here to enter text.

In the unlikely event there is evidence of potential indoor air issues (i.e. unusual odors) during future
redevelopment activities, the area will be evacuated, and appropriate safety screening of the indoor
air will be performed. If warranted, safety screening procedures will include periodically screening
indoor air for volatile organic vapors with a calibrated photoionization detector. If results indicate
further action is warranted, appropriate engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be
implemented.

21
EMP Version 2, June 2018
CONTINGENCY PLAN – encountering unknown tanks, drums, or other waste materials

In this section please provide actions that will be taken to identify or manage unknown
potential new sources of contamination. During redevelopment activities, it is not uncommon
that unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, or other waste materials are encountered.
Notification to DEQ Brownfields Project Manager, UST Section, Fire Department, and/or other
officials, as necessary and appropriate, is required when new potential source(s) of
contamination are discovered. These Notification Requirements were outlined on Page 1 of this
EMP.

Should potentially impacted materials be identified that are inconsistent with known site
impacts, the DEQ Brownfields Project Manager will be notified and a sampling plan will be
prepared based on the EMP requirements and site-specific factors. Samples will generally be
collected to document the location of the potential impacts.

Check the following chemical analysis that are to be conducted on newly identified releases:
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and
silver)
EPA Methods 6020/7471

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ Other Constituents & Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.)
Please note, if field observations indicate the need for additional analyses, they should
be conducted, even if not listed here.
Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 7199

Please provide details on the proposed methods of managing the following commonly
encountered issues during redevelopment of Brownfields Properties.
During construction activities, contractors may encounter unknown sub-surface environmental
conditions (i.e. tanks, drums, or waste materials) that if encountered, will require proper
management. Prior to beginning Site work, H&H will attend a pre-construction kick-off meeting
with the PD and the redevelopment contractors to discuss the DEQ approved EMP and various
scenarios when it would be appropriate and necessary to notify H&H of the discovery of unknown
subsurface features or potentially impacted media at the Site. In the event that such conditions are
encountered during Site redevelopment activities, the environmental actions noted below will be
used to direct environmental actions to be taken during these activities and sampling data for
potentially impacted soil and the disposition of impacted soil will be provided to DEQ when the data

22
EMP Version 2, June 2018
becomes available.

Underground Storage Tanks:
In the event UST or impacts associated with a UST release are discovered at the Site during
redevelopment activities, the UST and/or UST related impacts will be addressed through the
Brownfields Program.

If the UST contains residual fluids, the fluids will be removed, sampled for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA
metals, and transported off-Site for disposal at a suitable facility based on the laboratory analytical
results. Impacted soil will be managed in accordance with Part 1.A. above.

Sub-Grade Feature/Pit:
If a sub-grade feature or pit is encountered and does not require removal for geotechnical or
construction purposes, it will be filled with soil or suitable fill and construction will proceed. Where
appropriate, the bottom may be penetrated before back filling to prevent fluid accumulation. If the
pit has waste in it, the waste may be set aside in a secure area and will be sampled for waste
disposal purposes for TCLP VOCs, TCLP SVOCs, and TCLP metals and disposed off-Site at a permitted
facility or the waste will be managed in accordance with Part 1.A. above, whichever is most
applicable based on the type of waste present. If the pit must be removed and the observed waste
characteristics indicate the concrete may potentially be contaminated to a significant degree, the
concrete will be sampled and analyzed by methods specified by the disposal facility.

Buried Waste Material:
If excavation into buried wastes or significantly impacted soils occurs, the contractor is instructed to
stop work in that location and notify the environmental professional. The environmental
professional will review the materials and collect samples if warranted. In this event, confirmation
sampling will be conducted at representative locations in the base and the sidewalls of the
excavation after the waste or significantly impacted soil is removed. The confirmation samples will
be analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, and the RCRA metals plus hexavalent chromium. Areas of suspected
contaminated soil that remain at the Site after excavation is complete above the DEQ
Industrial/Commercial PSRGs will be managed pursuant to this plan and incorporated into the
Brownfields plat.

Re-Use of Impacted Soils On-Site:
Please refer to Part 1.A. above.

If unknown, impacted soil is identified on-site, management on-site can be considered after the
project team provides the necessary information, outlined in Part 1.A. Item 11, for Brownfields
Project Manager approval prior to final placement on-site.

If other potential contingency plans are pertinent, please provide other details or scenarios as
needed below:
Click or tap here to enter text.

23
EMP Version 2, June 2018

POST-REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING

☒ Check this box to acknowledge that a Redevelopment Summary Report will be required for the
project. If the project duration is longer than one year, an annual update is required and will be
due by January 31 of each year, or 30 days after each one-year anniversary of the effective date of
this EMP (as agreed upon with the Project Manager). These reports will be required for as long as
physical redevelopment of the Brownfields Property continues, except that the final
Redevelopment Summary Report will be submitted within 90 days after completion of
redevelopment. Based on the estimated construction schedule, the first Redevelopment Summary
Report is anticipated to be submitted on Click or tap to enter a date.

The Redevelopment Summary Report shall include environment-related activities since the last
report, with a summary and drawings, that describes:
1. actions taken on the Brownfields Property;
2. soil grading and cut and fill actions;
3. methodology(ies) employed for field screening, sampling and laboratory analysis of
environmental media;
4. stockpiling, containerizing, decontaminating, treating, handling, laboratory analysis and
ultimate disposition of any soil, groundwater or other materials suspected or confirmed
to be contaminated with regulated substances; and
5. removal of any contaminated soil, water or other contaminated materials (for example,
concrete, demolition debris) from the Brownfields Property (copies of all legally required
manifests shall be included).

☒ Check box to acknowledge consent to provide a NC licensed P.G. or P.E. sealed, Redevelopment
Summary Report in compliance with the site’s Brownfields Agreement.

25
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Tables
Table 1Summary of Soil Analytical Data2100 S. Tryon StreetCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. VBG-013Sample IDSB-1SB-1SB-2SB-3SB-4SB-5SB-6SB-7Sample Depth (ft bgs)0.5-2.0 3.0-5.0 0.5-2.0 0.5-2.0 0.5-2.0 0.5-2.0 0.5-2.0 0.5-2.0Sample Date8/21/2018 8/21/2018 8/21/2018 8/21/2018 8/21/2018 8/21/2018 8/21/2018 8/21/2018Unitsmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kg mg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgLocation DescriptionCentral Portion of the SiteFormer Rail SpurSouthern Portion of the VOCs (8260B)sec-Butylbenzene1.4<0.0973 <0.0017 <0.0016 <0.0013 <0.0016 <0.0016 <0.00161,600 23,0004----Ethylbenzene1.09<0.109 <0.0019 <0.0018 <0.0015 <0.0018 <0.0018 <0.00186.12713----Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)2.330.136 J<0.0020 <0.0019 <0.0016 <0.0019 <0.0019 <0.00194102,1002.3----Methylene Chloride<0.174 <0.1820.0074 J 0.0072 J 0.0121 J 0.0116 J<0.0031 <0.0029586500.025----Naphthalene8.642.3<0.0012 <0.0012 <0.00098 <0.0012 <0.0012 <0.00124.1 18 0.39 -- --n-Propylbenzene3.510.34<0.0018 <0.0017 <0.0014 <0.0017 <0.0017 <0.001778051002.6----1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene41.23.78<0.0021 <0.0020 <0.0016 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.00206337012----1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene14.31.08<0.0019 <0.0018 <0.0015 <0.0018 <0.0018 <0.00185632011----p-Isopropyltoluene4.040.268 J<0.0018 <0.0017 <0.0014 <0.0017 <0.0017 <0.0017NSNS1.24----Xylene (Total)11.20.828 J<0.0037 <0.0036 <0.0030 <0.0035 <0.0037 <0.00351205309.9----m&p-Xylene7.870.549 J<0.0037 <0.0036 <0.0030 <0.0035 <0.0037 <0.00351205209.8----o-Xylene3.350.279 J<0.0020 <0.0019 <0.0016 <0.0019 <0.0019 <0.00191405909.8----SVOCs (8270D)----Benzo(a)anthracene<0.0759 <0.0835 <0.08280.127 J<0.0740 <0.07940.0845 J<0.07281.1210.35----Benzo(a)pyrene0.0910 J<0.0862 <0.08560.125 J<0.0764 <0.08200.0795 J<0.07510.11 2.1 0.12-- --Benzo(b)fluoranthene0.0905 J<0.078 <0.07740.168 J<0.0691 <0.07420.106 J<0.06801.1211.2----Benzo(g,h,i)perylene<0.105 <0.115 <0.1140.160 J<0.102 <0.109 <0.0936 <0.100NSNS15,600----Butylbenzylphthalate 0.0874 J<0.0958 <0.0951 <0.0938 <0.0849 <0.0911 <0.0780 <0.0835NSNSNS----Chrysene<0.05480.0668 J<0.05980.116 J<0.0534 <0.05720.0692 J<0.05251102,10036----Fluoranthene<0.0598 <0.0657 <0.06520.177 J<0.0582 <0.06240.120 J<0.05724806,000670----1-Methylnaphthalene1.480.377 J<0.117 <0.115 <0.104 <0.112 <0.0958 <0.10318730.11----2-Methylnaphthalene2.500.733<0.0964 <0.0951 <0.0861 <0.0924 <0.0791 <0.0847486003.1----Naphthalene1.760.567<0.110 <0.108 <0.0982 <0.105 <0.0902 <0.09664.1180.39----4-Nitrophenol0.374 J<0.0808 <0.0801 <0.0790 <0.0716 <0.0768 <0.0657 <0.0704NSNSNS----Pentachlorophenol0.0763 J<0.0821 <0.0815 <0.0804 <0.0728 <0.0781 <0.0668 <0.0716140.0083----Pyrene0.0843 J<0.0767 <0.07610.172 J<0.0679 <0.07290.112 J<0.06683604,500440----RCRA Metals (6020/7471)Arsenic3.391.962.365.651.656.015.005.810.6835.81-184.8Barium53.973.658.570.627.451.284.590.13,100 47,00058050-1,000356Cadmium0.140 J<0.120 <0.1120.151 J<0.102 <0.1090.497 J 0.172 J142003.01.0-104.3Trivalent Chromium**44.718576.321.430.315153.342.423,000 350,000 360,000 7-30065Lead30.812.112.718.413.345.915090.8400800270ND-5016Selenium1.071.160.8240.664 0.575 J1.340.8661.23781,2002.1<0.1-0.80.42Mercury0.0283 B 0.0359 B 0.0691 0.0170 B, J 0.0252 B, J 0.0765 0.0573 B 0.0417 B4.770NS0.03-0.52 0.121Hexavalent Chromium (7199)<0.3260.850 J<0.358 <0.286 <0.3240.458 J0.643 J0.900 J0.316.53.8NSNSNotes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Residential Health Based Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs), February 20182) North Carolina DEQ IHSB Industrial Health Based PSRGs, February 20183) North Carolina DEQ IHSB Protection of Groundwater (POG) PSRGs, February 20184) Range and Mean background values for North Carolina or Southeastern soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Dragun and Chekiri, 2005** = Total Chromium - Hexavalent Chromium = Trivalent ChromiumEPA Method follows parameter in parenthesisVOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds; RCRA = Resource Conservation and Recovery Act; BRL = below laboratory reporting limit; -- = not applicable; NS = not specifiedOnly those compounds detected in at least one sample shown aboveBold indicates concentrations exceeds North Carolina background levels for metals and/or the DEQ IHSB POG PSRGUnderlined indicates concentrations exceeds North Carolina background levels for metals and/or the DEQ IHSB Residential PSRGmg/kg = milligrams per kilogramJ = result is less than the laboratory reporting limit but greater than or equal to the method detection limit. Therefore, the concentration is an approximate valueB = the same analyte found in the associated blankFormer Sunoco Gas StationScreening Criteria Regional Background Metals Mean5IHSB Residential PSRG1IHSB Industrial PSRG2IHSB POG PSRG3Background Metals Range5S:\AAA-Master Projects\Vision Brokerage- VBG\VBG-013 2100 S. Tryon Street\Brownfields\EMP\Tables\Data Tables for EMP11/5/2018Table 1Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 2Summary of Groundwater Analytical Data2100 S. Tryon StreetCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. VBG-013Sample IDTMW-1TMW-2TMW-3DUP-1 (TMW-3)TMW-4Trip BlankLithologySaproliteSaproliteSaproliteSaproliteSaproliteNASample Date8/22/20188/21/20188/21/20188/21/20188/23/20188/23/2018NCAC 2L1Residential GWSL2Non-Residential GWSL3 Unitsµg/Lµg/Lµg/Lµg/Lµg/Lµg/Lµg/Lµg/Lµg/LLocation DescriptionNorthwest Portion of the SiteFormer Sunoco Gas StationSouthern Portion of the SiteNAField FiltrationUnfilteredUnfilteredUnfilteredUnfilteredUnfilteredNA------Turbidity (NTU)7.236.526.236.86.70NA------VOCs (8260B)Acetone11.9J<10 <10 <10 <10 <106,000 4,500,000 19,000,000Bromomethane 0.34J<0.29 <0.29 <0.29 <0.29 <0.29NE 3.5 15Chloromethane 0.19J<0.11<0.11<0.110.13J<0.113522201,2-Dichloroethane0.27J<0.24<0.32<0.24<0.24<0.240.42298Ethylbenzene<0.3060.4<0.3<0.3<0.3<0.360035150Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)1.1<0.21<0.21<0.21<0.21<0.21204,50020,000Naphthalene<0.246.2<0.24<0.24<0.24<0.246351501,2,3-Trichloropropane (TCP)<0.415.1<0.41<0.41<0.41<0.410.0054.519Xylene (Total)<1.031.6<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.050077320m&p-Xylene<0.6630.6<0.66<0.66<0.66<0.6650071300o-Xylene<0.231.0<0.23<0.23<0.23<0.2350098410SVOCs (8270D)1-Methylnaphthalene<2.84.8J<2.8NA<2.8NA 1* NE NE2-Methylnaphthalene<2.89.8J<2.8NA<2.8NA 30 NE NEDi-n-butylphthalate3.0J2.2J<1.2NA<1.2NA NE NE NERCRA Metals (6010)Barium72.8 29.5 45.6 NA 75.8NA 700 -- --Cadmium<0.5 <0.52.7**NA<0.5NA 2 -- --Lead4.3J 2.7J <2.5NA<2.5NA 15 -- --Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Water Resources (DWR) 2L Groundwater Standards, April 20132) North Carolina DEQ Division of Waste Management (DWM) Residential Vapor Intrusion Groundwater Screening Level (GWSL), February 20183) North Carolina DEQ DWM Non-Residential Vapor Intrusion GWSL, February 2018EPA Method number follows parameter in parenthesisVOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs=Semi-VOCs; RCRA = Resource Conservation and Recovery Act; -- = not applicable; NA = not analyzed, NE = not establishedOnly those compounds detected in at least one sample shown aboveUnderlined concentration exceeds DEQ Vapor Intrusion Residential GWSLBold concentration exceeds DEQ 2L Groundwater Standardµg/L = micrograms per liter; J = result is less than the laboratory reporting limit but greater than or equal to the method detection limit. The concentration is a lab calculated approximate value.*= compound is listed on the DEQ Interim Maximum Allowable Concentrations (IMACs) dated April 2013; ** = cadmium was also analyzed by the laboratory by EPA Method 6020Central Portion of the SiteScreening Criteria S:\AAA-Master Projects\Vision Brokerage- VBG\VBG-013 2100 S. Tryon Street\Brownfields\EMP\Tables\Data Tables for EMP11/5/2018Table 2Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 3Summary of Soil Gas Analytical Data2100 S Tryon StreetCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. VBG-013Sample IDSG-1SG-2SG-3SG-DUP (SG-3)SG-4SG-5SG-6SG-7Sample Date8/22/2018 8/22/2018 8/22/2018 8/22/2018 8/22/2018 8/22/2018 8/22/20188/22/2018Screen Depth (ft bgs)7.5-812.5-1312.5-1312.5-138.5-98.5-97.5-84.5-5Unitsµg/m³µg/m³µg/m³µg/m³µg/m³µg/m³µg/m³µg/m³µg/m³µg/m³Location DescriptionCentral Portion of the SiteFormer Rail SpurSouthern Portion of the SiteVOCs (TO-15)Acetone9.4<10,60011.215.135.0 J10.64.2360220,0002,700,000Benzene7.386,6005.84.370.01080.8731.71201,600Bromomethane<0.39<1,990<0.35<0.36<4.0<0.36<0.370.39 J354402-Butanone (MEK)<0.63<3,230<0.57<0.58<6.5<0.58<0.5957.535,000440,000Carbon disulfide56.4<1,92023.025.11954943.220.94,90061,000Carbon tetrachloride<0.73<3,760<0.66<0.68<7.5<0.68<0.691.2 J1602,000Chloroform6.5<1,72014.814.5<3.4<0.310.45 J0.70 J41530Chloromethane<0.27<1,370<0.240.34 J<7.4<0.250.40 J0.766307,900Cyclohexane20.3<3,090<0.55<0.56<6.254.90.83 J1.7 J42,000530,0001, 4-Dichlorobenzene<1.7<8,760<1.6<1.6<17.5<1.6<1.65.6851,100Dichlorodifluoromethane2.3<2,5701.82.0<5.12.11.82.77008,800Ethyl acetate1.5<1,660<0.29<0.30<3.3<0.30<0.313.62,70011,000Ethylbenzene37.6318,00030.124.93945118.74.33704,9004-Ethyltoluene12.498,6008.46.81231592.9 J3.5 JNENEn-Heptane28.4537,00021.112.1127143<0.615.02,80035,000n-Hexane26.6486,00013.75.166.952.61.1 J7.94,90061,000Methylene Chloride13.5<8,2604.6 J4.8 J<16.53.9 J5.6 J4.3 J4,20053,0004-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)<0.89<4,540<0.80<0.82<9.1<0.82<0.831.1 J21,000260,000Naphthalene3.8 J20,100 J3.4 J3.4 J40.6 J3.9 J3.3 J4.821260Propylene71.9<1,2502.63.3<2.570.71.7<0.2478330Styrene<0.59<3,010<0.53<0.54<6.0<0.54<0.55<0.597,00088,000Tetrachloroethene (PCE)443<2,7502.43.41851.8<0.511.42803,500Tetrahydrofuran<0.45<2,290<0.40<0.41<4.6<0.41<0.9718.514,000180,000Toluene1439,07098.61011,5102,26023.721.335,000440,000Trichloroethene<0.44<2,250<0.40<0.41<4.5<0.41<0.41<0.4414180Trichlorofluoromethane18.1<3,2001.1 J0.99 J<6.41.6 J1.0 J2.3NSNS1,2,4- Trimethylbenzene19.3224,00018.114.12873756.314.04205,3001,3,5- Trimethylbenzene6.8134,0006.04.478.81092.43.74205,300m&p- Xylenes106314,00088.084.61,2501,79028.320.07008,800o- Xylene40.44,000 J25.225.841058810.37.07008,800Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Waste Management (DWM) Residential Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs), February 20182) North Carolina DEQ DWM Non-Residential SGSLs, February 2018EPA Method number follows parameter in parenthesisBold concentration exceeds North Carolina DEQ DWM Residential SGSLsBold and Underlined concentration exceeds North Carolina DEQ DWM Residential and Non-Residential SGSLsft bgs = feet below ground surface; NE = not establishedµg/m³ = micrograms per cubic meterOnly those compounds detected in at least one sample shown above, with the exception of trichloroetheneJ = result is less than the laboratory reporting limit but greater than or equal to the method detection limit. The concentration is a lab calculated approximate valueScreening Criteria Non-Residential Soil Gas Screening Level2Residential Soil Gas Screening Level1Former Sunoco Gas StationS:\AAA-Master Projects\Vision Brokerage- VBG\VBG-013 2100 S. Tryon Street\Brownfields\EMP\Tables\Data Tables for EMP11/5/2018Table 3Hart & Hickman, PC

Figures
TITLE
PROJECT
SITE LOCATION MAP
Vacant Property
2100 S. Tryon StreetCharlotte, North Carolina
DATE:
JOB NO:
REVISION NO:
FIGURE:
6/15/2018 0
1VBG-013
SITE
0 2000 4000
APPROXIMATE
SCALE IN FEET
N
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP
QUADRANGLE
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
CHARLOTTE EAST, NORTH CAROLINA 1991
GAS FIRED PRODUCTS(421 WEST TREMONT AVENUE)SOUTH TRYON STREETWEST TREMONT
A
V
E
N
U
E
CAROLINA CORE RECYCLING
(511-567 WEST TREMONT AVENUE)
INNER PEAKS CLIMBING(FORMER DIXIE ELECTRONICS)(2220 SOUTH TRYON STREET)
MARATHON/PETROEXPRESS GAS STATION
K9 PLAYLAND(2139 SOUTH TRYON STREET)
KEG'N'QUE(2135 SOUTH TRYON STREET)
BEST IN TECH
(2123 SOUTH TRYON STREET)
NEONWORKS
(2115 SOUTH TRYON STREET)
ENVIRONMENT SERVICESOF CHARLOTTE(2107 SOUTH TRYON STREET)
FORMER VCC
FORMER TREMONT MUSIC HALL
(400 WEST TREMONT AVENUE)
SOUTH TRYON COMMERCIAL
(2025 SOUTH TRYON STREET)
PRETTY-N-INK
(2030 SOUTH TRYON STREET)
NORTHERNPARCEL
SOUTHERNPARCEL
SIGNS DESIGNED(2119 SOUTH TRYON STREET)
HIBISCUS
(2125 SOUTH TRYON STREET)
MICHEAL GAVON SALON AND
TRANSFORMATIONS
INTERIORS(2131 SOUTH TRYON STREET)
BILLBOARD
FORMER UST BASIN
FORMER SUNOCOGAS STATION
FORMER PUMPISLAND
GRAVEL PARKINGAREA
UST BASIN
FORMER RAIL SPURLOCATION
PROPOSED PARKINGDECK
PROPOSED OFFICE
BLDG
PROPOSED OFFICE
BLDG
SB-4
TMW-1
SG-1
SG-4
SG-2
SG-3
SG-7
SB-2
SB-3
SB-5
SB-6
SB-7
TMW-2
TMW-3
TMW-4
SB-1
SG-5
SG-6
REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. VBG-013
DATE: 9-18-18
FIGURE NO. 2
VACANT PROPERTY
2100 S. TRYON STREET
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
SAMPLE LOCATION MAP
LEGEND
SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
PROPOSED STRUCTURE
POLE-MOUNTED TRANSFORMER
SOIL BORING LOCATION
SOIL GAS POINT LOCATION
TEMPORARY MONITORING WELL
LOCATION
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100Charlotte, North Carolina 28203704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Vision Brokerage- VBG\VBG-013 2100 S. Tryon Street\Phase II ESA\Figures\Site Plan-Phase II.dwg, FIG 2, 9/18/2018 10:29:05 AM, erichardson
GAS FIRED PRODUCTS(421 WEST TREMONT AVENUE)SOUTH TRYON STREETWEST TREMONT
A
V
E
N
U
E
CAROLINA CORE RECYCLING
(511-567 WEST TREMONT AVENUE)
INNER PEAKS CLIMBING(FORMER DIXIE ELECTRONICS)(2220 SOUTH TRYON STREET)
MARATHON/PETROEXPRESS GAS STATION
K9 PLAYLAND(2139 SOUTH TRYON STREET)
KEG'N'QUE(2135 SOUTH TRYON STREET)
BEST IN TECH
(2123 SOUTH TRYON STREET)
NEONWORKS
(2115 SOUTH TRYON STREET)
ENVIRONMENT SERVICESOF CHARLOTTE(2107 SOUTH TRYON STREET)
FORMER VCC
FORMER TREMONT MUSIC HALL
(400 WEST TREMONT AVENUE)
SOUTH TRYON COMMERCIAL
(2025 SOUTH TRYON STREET)
PRETTY-N-INK
(2030 SOUTH TRYON STREET)
NORTHERNPARCEL
SOUTHERNPARCEL
SIGNS DESIGNED(2119 SOUTH TRYON STREET)
HIBISCUS
(2125 SOUTH TRYON STREET)
MICHEAL GAVON SALON AND
TRANSFORMATIONS
INTERIORS(2131 SOUTH TRYON STREET)
BILLBOARD
FORMER UST BASIN
FORMER SUNOCOGAS STATION
FORMER PUMPISLAND
GRAVEL PARKINGAREA
UST BASIN
FORMER RAIL SPURLOCATION
PROPOSED PARKINGDECK
PROPOSED OFFICE
BLDG
PROPOSED OFFICE
BLDG
SB-4
TMW-1
SG-1
SG-4
SG-2
SG-3
SG-7
SB-2
SB-3
SB-5
SB-6
SB-7
TMW-2
TMW-3
TMW-4
SB-1
SG-5
SG-6 74.575.075.576.076.574.575.075.576.076.5
77.077.577.077.5REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. VBG-013
DATE: 9-18-18
FIGURE NO. 3
VACANT PROPERTY
2100 S. TRYON STREET
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
GROUNDWATER POTENTIOMETRIC MAP
LEGEND
SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
PROPOSED STRUCTURE
POLE-MOUNTED TRANSFORMER
SOIL BORING LOCATION
SOIL GAS POINT LOCATION
TEMPORARY MONITORING WELL
LOCATION
GROUNDWATER POTENTIOMETRICELEVATION CONTOUR
ESTIMATED DIRECTION OF
GROUNDWATER FLOW
TEMPORARY MONITORING WELLGROUNDWATER ELEVATION
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100Charlotte, North Carolina 28203704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
NOTE:
GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS WERE GAUGED BY H&H ON8/21/18 AND 8/22/18.
76.5
(76.05)
(77.56)
(76.69)
(74.22)
(76.05)S:\AAA-Master Projects\Vision Brokerage- VBG\VBG-013 2100 S. Tryon Street\Phase II ESA\Figures\Site Plan-Phase II.dwg, FIG 3, 9/18/2018 10:47:58 AM, erichardson
GAS FIRED PRODUCTS(421 WEST TREMONT AVENUE)SOUTH TRYON STREETWEST TREMONT
A
V
E
N
U
E
CAROLINA CORE RECYCLING
(511-567 WEST TREMONT AVENUE)
INNER PEAKS CLIMBING(FORMER DIXIE ELECTRONICS)(2220 SOUTH TRYON STREET)
MARATHON/PETROEXPRESS GAS STATION
K9 PLAYLAND(2139 SOUTH TRYON STREET)
KEG'N'QUE(2135 SOUTH TRYON STREET)
BEST IN TECH
(2123 SOUTH TRYON STREET)
NEONWORKS
(2115 SOUTH TRYON STREET)
ENVIRONMENT SERVICESOF CHARLOTTE(2107 SOUTH TRYON STREET)
FORMER VCC
FORMER TREMONT MUSIC HALL
(400 WEST TREMONT AVENUE)
SOUTH TRYON COMMERCIAL
(2025 SOUTH TRYON STREET)
PRETTY-N-INK
(2030 SOUTH TRYON STREET)
NORTHERNPARCEL
SOUTHERNPARCEL
SIGNS DESIGNED(2119 SOUTH TRYON STREET)
HIBISCUS
(2125 SOUTH TRYON STREET)
MICHEAL GAVON SALON AND
TRANSFORMATIONS
INTERIORS(2131 SOUTH TRYON STREET)
BILLBOARD
FORMER UST BASIN
FORMER SUNOCOGAS STATION
FORMER PUMPISLAND
GRAVEL PARKINGAREA
UST BASIN
FORMER RAIL SPURLOCATION
PROPOSED PARKINGDECK
PROPOSED OFFICE
BLDG
PROPOSED OFFICE
BLDG
SB-4
TMW-1
SG-1
SG-4
SG-2
SG-3
SG-7
SB-2
SB-3
SB-5
SB-6
SB-7
TMW-2
TMW-3
TMW-4
SB-1
SG-5
SG-6
REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. VBG-013
DATE: 9-18-18
FIGURE NO. 4
VACANT PROPERTY
2100 S. TRYON STREET
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
ESTIMATED EXTENT OF SOIL GAS
EXCEEDANCES MAP
LEGEND
SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
PROPOSED STRUCTURE
POLE-MOUNTED TRANSFORMER
SOIL BORING LOCATION
SOIL GAS POINT LOCATION
TEMPORARY MONITORING WELL
LOCATION
ESTIMATED EXTENT OF SOIL GASIMPACTS ABOVE NON-RESIDENTIAL
SCREENING LEVELS
ESTIMATED EXTENT OF SOIL GASIMPACTS ABOVE RESIDENTIAL
SCREENING LEVELS
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100Charlotte, North Carolina 28203704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
NOTE:
ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR SG-1 INDICATED LOW LEVEL
DETECTIONS OF PCE BUT WAS EXCLUDED FROM IMPACTEDSOIL GAS AREA BECAUSE RISK CALCULATIONS INDICATEDAN ACCEPTABLE RISK IN THIS SAMPLE.S:\AAA-Master Projects\Vision Brokerage- VBG\VBG-013 2100 S. Tryon Street\Phase II ESA\Figures\Site Plan-Phase II.dwg, FIG 4, 9/18/2018 10:51:09 AM, erichardson

Appendix A
Preliminary Redevelopment Plan
2100 SOUTH TRYONSCHEMATIC DESIGN SITE PLAN16VV22007.24.2018-C1.0CHARLOTTE, NCRevisionsNo.Description DatePROJECT # /1435 WEST MOREHEAD STREETSUITE 160CHARLOTTE, NC 28208704.334.1716BEACHAM BUNCE + MANLEY ARCHITECTURE PLLCCOPYRIGHT 2015 BB+M ARCHITECTURE PLLC.WWW.BBM-ARCH.COMLOCATION /DATE /DRAWN /SITE SUMMARY:OWNER: VISION VENTURES OF CAROLINA, LLCPO BOX 36938, CHARLOTTE NC 28236SITE ADDRESS: 2100 S. TRYON STREETPROJECT IS WITHIN CHARLOTTE CITY LIMITSTOTAL PROJECT AREA: 2.823 ACRES (122,970 SF)ZONING: TOD(M)ZONING PETITION: N/ATAX ID: 11906105, 11906107EXISTING LAND USE: VACANTPROPOSED USE: OFFICE AND RETAILESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: FEBRUARY 2020BUILDING HEIGHT (OFFICE BUILDING) = XXBUILDING HEIGHT (RETAIL BUILDING) = XXGROSS FLOOR AREA OF OFFICE BUILDING = 78,557 SQ. FT.GROSS FLOOR AREA OF RETAIL BUILDING = 2,000 SQ. FT.FLOOR AREA RATIOSITE IS WITHIN 1/2 MILE OF TRANSIT STATION, MIN. FAR REQUIRED = 0.50FLOOR AREA OF BUILDINGS FOR FAR CALCULATION= 78,557 SF + 2,000 SF = 80,557 SFFLOOR AREA RATIO = 80,557 SF / 122,970 SF= 0.65REQUIRED SETBACKS AND YARDS:FRONT: 16 FT. FROM BACK OF FUTURE CURB OF SOUTH TRYON STREETFRONT: 16 FT. FROM BACK OF EXISTING CURB OF W. TREMONT AVE.SIDE YARD: ZERO OR 5 FT.REAR YARD: ZERO OR 5 FT.URBAN OPEN SPACE CALCULATION:TOTAL BUILDING GROSS FLOOR AREA = 80,557 SFREQUIRED PRIVATE URBAN SPACE = NONEREQUIRED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AREA = 1 SF /100 SF FLOOR AREAREQUIRED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE = 806 SFTOTAL PUBLIC OPEN SPACE PROVIDED = XXX SFPARKING/BIKE PARKING SUMMARY:MINIMUM PARKING REQUIRED FOR OFFICE/RETAIL USE: NONEMAXIMUM PARKING ALLOWABLE FOR OFFICE/RETAIL USE: 1 SPACE PER 300 SF = 268 SPACESPARKING PROVIDED ON SITE: 218 SPACES (133 REGULAR SPACES + 85 COMPACT SPACES)PARKING PROVIDED ON STREET : 12 SPACESTOTAL PARKING PROVIDED = 230 SPACESACCESSIBLE SPACES PROVIDED: 7 SPACES, 4 OF WHICH ARE VAN ACCESSIBLELOADING SPACE REQUIRED: ONE (1) 10' X 25' LOADING SPACELONG TERM COVERED BIKE PARKING REQUIRED = 1 SPACE PER 10,000 SF = 9 SPACESLONG TERM COVERED BIKE PARKING PROVIDED = 9 SPACESSHORT TERM BIKE PARKING REQUIRED = 5% OF AUTO PARKING = 12 SPACESSHORT TERM BIKE PARKING PROVIDED = 12 SPACES (6 INVERTED U BIKE RACKS)PRELIMINARYNOT FORCONSTRUCTION

Appendix B
Preliminary Grading Plan
2100 SOUTH TRYON GRADING AND PHASE 2EROSION CONTROL PLAN16VV22010.12.2018-C2.1CHARLOTTE, NCRevisionsNo.Description DatePROJECT # /1435 WEST MOREHEAD STREETSUITE 160CHARLOTTE, NC 28208704.334.1716BEACHAM BUNCE + MANLEY ARCHITECTURE PLLCCOPYRIGHT 2015 BB+M ARCHITECTURE PLLC.WWW.BBM-ARCH.COMLOCATION /DATE /DRAWN /Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRIMPERVIOUS AREA SUMMARY:THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE POST CONSTRUCTION STORMWATERORDINANCE (PCSO) WILL BE SATISFIED BY MITIGATION PER SECTION 18-161 (b) (2) OF THEORDINANCE (1-YEAR, 24 HOUR VOLUME CONTROL AND 10-YEAR, 6 HOUR PEAK CONTROL FOR THEENTIRE PROJECT).

Appendix C
Historical Data Summary