MO-6615_27296_CA_FPR_20160518_FreeProductRecoveryReport

May 18, 2016
Mr. Brett Morris
NCDEQ - Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Waste Management -UST Section
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Tele: 704-663-1699
Subject: Free Product Recovery Report
Former Integris Metals Facility
527 Atando Avenue
Charlotte, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Morris:
via FedEx
ERM NC, Inc.
15720 Brixham Hill Avenue,
Suite 120
Charlotte, NC 28277
Tele:704-541-8345
Fax:[phone]
On behalf of J.T. Ryerson & Son, Inc. (Ryerson), ERM NC, Inc. (ERM) would like to
submit the enclosed Free Product Recovery Report for the above referenced facility.
An electronic copy (on CD) is attached to back cover of the report. The report
summarizes free product recovery activities at the site and provides an update to the
sensitive receptor survey.
If you have any questions, please contact us at 704-541-8345.
Sincerely,
j* &T/(k "-
Michael Pressley, P.G.
Project Manager
enclosures
cc: Mr. Mark Silver - Ryerson
Rick Tarravechia, P.G., RSM
Partner in Charge

J.T. Ryerson & Son, Inc.
Free Product Recovery Report
May 2016
Former Integris Metals Facility
527 Atando Avenue
Charlotte, North Carolina
Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world
- -- _�
ERM

Site Information
Site Identification
Date of Report: May 18, 2016
Facility I.D. None Incident Number 27296 Site Risk/Priority Risk Intermediate
Site Name: Former Inteeris Metals
Site Street Address: 527 Atando Avenue
City/Town: Charlotte Zip Code: 28206
County: Mecklenburg
Description of Geographical Data Point (e.g., diesel fill port): Fuel Oil #2 UST
Location Method (GPS, topographical map, other): Site reconnaissance and website
Latitude: 35.25785 Longitude:-80.816810 (Source Area Location)
Information about Contacts Associated With the Leaking UST System
UST Owner:
Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc.
Address:
227 W. Monroe Street, Chicago, IL
Tel:
[phone]
UST Operator:
Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc
Address:
227 W. Monroe Street, Chicago, IL
Tel:
[phone]
Property Owner:
Advantage Machinery Services
Address:
1407 Highway 601 South, Yadkinville, NC 27055
Tel:
[phone]
Property Occupant: Sunbelt -Turret Steel
Address:
527 Atando Avenue, Charlotte, NC 28206
Tel:
[phone]
Consultant/Contractor: ERM NC, Inc.
Address:
15720 Brixham Hill Avenue, Suite 120, Charlotte, NC 28277
Tel:
[phone]
Information about Release
Date Discovered: November 13, 2002
Estimated Quantity of Release: Unknown
Cause of Release: Unknown
Source of Release (Dispenser/Piping/UST): UST
Sizes and contents of UST system(s) from which the release occurred: 12,000 gallon Fuel Oil UST
Certification
I, Rick Tarravechia a Professional Engineer icensed Geolo i (circle one) for ERM NC, Inc.,
do certify that the information contained in this report is correct and accurate to the best of my
knowledge. (Affix Seal and Signature)
CA
01.
SEAL = ?
ERM NC, Inc. is licensed to practice geology and engineering in North Carolina. The certification
number of the company or corporation is C-470.
ERM NC, Inc. 1 Free Product Recovery Report - Atando Ave.docx

Free Product Recovery - Status and Conclusions
Historically, the majority of the free product recovery performed at the site has been
accomplished using manual bailing methods, due to the non-volatile nature of the heating
oil. An Aggressive fluid Vapor Recovery (AFVR) event was conducted on March 9, 2004
utilizing monitor well MW-1 and recovery well RW-1 for extraction points.
Approximately 0.5 gallons of vapor -phase petroleum hydrocarbons and 1.5 gallons of
product were recovered during the AFVR event. Due to the low volume of product
recovered using AFVR, hand bailing was chosen as a removal method from that point
forward. Free product recovery events and dates are documented in Table B-8.
Free product recovery activities took place from January 2003 to December 2004,
recovering approximately six gallons of free product. Recovery activities were ceased
when the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (now called
Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ)) stopped directing work for intermediate
risk sites due to UST Trust Fund reimbursement issues. Ryerson, the successor to Integris
Metals, requested that ERM gauge wells MW-1 and RW-1 in November 2014 to check the
status of free product. MW-1 was found to have 0.55 feet of product while RW-1 did not
contain any free product. Based the presence of free product in MW-1, ERM commenced
free product removal activities again, which included a combination of hand bailing
followed by the installation of a passive skimmer (from February 2014 to February 2016)
and then the use of absorbent socks from March 2016 through May 2016. Free product
recovered during this time period is less than a quarter gallon and has been stored in a
sealed container at the site.
The majority of free product measurements since February 2014 have indicated only a
sheen (less than 0.01 feet). Free product has not been measured in MW-1 since February
2016. ERM will continue to gauge RW-1 and MW-1 for free product. If free product does
not return to either well, ERM plans to conduct a site -wide groundwater sampling event
and undertaking the activities necessary to obtain site closure. Information from those
activities will be presented in a separate report.
Sensitive Receptor Survey Update
The 2003 Limited Site Assessment (LSA) did not identify water supply wells within the
search radius. On May 10, 2016, ERM updated the survey of sensitive receptors within
a 1,500-foot radius of the release area. A reconnaissance of surrounding area properties
and a review of the Mecklenburg County Well Information System
(http://meckmal2.mecklenburgcountync.gov/WIS 3/index.html) confirmed that there
are still no water supply wells in the area. Surrounding area properties are supplied
with municipal water by the Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities Department (CMUD).
ERM NC, Inc. 2 Free Product Recovery Report - Atando Ave.docx

An intermittent stream is located approximately 250 feet west of the source area, on the
west side of the railroad tracks. This intermittent creek runs parallel to the railroad,
towards the southeast, and then veers to the southwest.
A single-family residential neighborhood is still present to the west, with the closest
residence located approximately 300 feet to the west of the source area. The remaining
surrounding area properties are industrial and commercial in nature.
Based on ERM's recent survey, no significant changes have been identified for sensitive
receptors within a 1,500-foot radius of the source area.
ERM NC, Inc. 3 Free Product Recovery Report - Atando Ave.docx

Figures

kX
Legend
Site
IN
.. :•�+ , Di
Sri , __ ■/TRi _ n•
.. •r III•. i ,,� 1
71. .
a
• � __�•*■ • � � +hem I� •` frl' - -@
141,
AP iA' aft
A tsrtdo Junction ^� e
I ' i .�
Y � , • �-t� � Sugar �i r"tisr�ek Ch • ..t�
z CHARLOTTE—
ALr� is
■.
or-
14 lip
75a
A
Y 7`� auto io„'
Socy
y-
y,
..............
...::........
ERM
1 . SCALE: AS SHOWN DRAWN:
.•
�'-• . p f,. Basemap Copyright:® 2013 Natonal Geographic Society, i-abed.
■•
FIGURE 1
Site Location Map
Integris Metals
527 Atando Avenue
Charlotte, North Carolina

s
Atand
� MW-5 ! -
r�
UST-1
-TRW-1 j
r! �
txpianatton r,
Monitor Well Location ;
•r
Recovery Well_-,
O Shallow Well ,.
d Deep Well
r
UST f - R � - ,; •,+ � �. ..��.;.w � L v a,..` r
' '•.
i. -
Site 0.4
z•'Ir
,�a Y
Building
Paved - — ' ,
a
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
r
r
I
- r• .
:...........
ERM
SCALE AS SHOWN DRAWN AFreeman DATE 5/9/2019
0 25 50
Feet
Mecklenburg County.
arg County: 2015 Aerial, Site Features, Property lines
FIGURE 2
Site Plan
Integris Metals
527 Atando Avenue
Charlotte, North Carolina

upper,ASDu
s
Explanation ght
Radii lstrial
Creeks Streams
Site
Parcels
F'n�s
Building q�
C yw
Paved �o
mom°
Other �' S
f�
Water Quality Buffers
2y
100 Foot �F
c�
35 Foot
30 Foot
Zoning Designation
mad
- 1-2
R-17MF
R-22MF
R-5
j:,_-ti-
i f
Kennedy St
3
moo° 0000 { �vo U
waneAv �.
OO MM
r
Heavy
industrial
5�
ne��Jy
G°c
i
i a
Q
a 'r
°
o Y:. N
r
9
N
0 150 300
t
Feet
Basemap Mecklenburg County.
p� Mecklenburg County: 2015Aerial, Site Features, Properly lines
7a
FIGURE 3
ERM NC, Inc. Sensitive Receptor & Zoning Map
ERM Integris Metals
Faye 527 Atando Avenue
SCALE: AS SHOWN DRAWN: AFreeman DATE: S/17/2O'O Charlotte, North Carolina
T.1SharrtlelRICKIRyemon-Integrls Mel lslA� ndo Ave1GIS1MXD1AtandolFlg3.m,d

Tables

TABLE B-8 FREE PRODUCT RECOVERY RESULTS
Date: 18-May-16 Incident Number and Name: Integris Metals - 27296
Free Product Recovery Method Bailer/Passive Skimmer/Sock/AFVR Facility ID#: NA
Method of Measurement: Bailer/I Interface probe
Product
Amount of
Casing
Thickness
Product
Product
Depth to Water
Date of
Diameter
Before
Thickness After
Recovered
from Top of
Well ID
Product Type
Recovery
(inches)
Recovery (ft.)
Recovery (ft.)
(gallons)
Casing (ft.)
Comments
MW-1
Fuel Oil
1/3/03
2
0.05
0.00
<0.25
21.32
Bailer
1/22/03
2
0.02
0.00
<0.25
16.23
Bailer
3/10/03
2
0.04
0.00
<0.25
14.07
Bailer
3/25/03
2
0.00
0.00
<0.25
12.99
Bailer
4/4/03
2
0.03
0.00
<0.25
12.68
Bailer
5/30/03
2
0.01
0.00
<0.25
11.01
Bailer
6/27/03
2
0.02
0.00
<0.25
11.24
Bailer
7/17/03
2
0.01
0.00
<0.25
11.71
Bailer
8/26/03
2
0.01
0.00
<0.25
11.15
Bailer
9/2/03
2
0.01
0.00
<0.25
12.18
Bailer
11/14/03
2
0.01
0.00
<0.25
15.23
Bailer
11/24/03
2
0.01
0.00
<0.25
15.10
Bailer
12/19/03
2
0.04
0.00
<0.25
14.74
Bailer
1/29/04
2
0.05
0.00
<0.25
15.05
Bailer
3/9/04
2
0.00
0.00
<0.25
13.19
AFVR
4/8/04
2
0.04
0.00
<0.25
13.07
Bailer
5/10 to 5/19/04
Source Removal:
UST and 416
tons of contaminated
soil removed
to depth of 17
feet.
5/24/04
2
0.08
0.00
0.20
13.22
Bailer
6/23/04
2
0.07
0.00
<0.25
15.00
Bailer
7/28/04
2
0.05
0.00
<0.25
15.75
Bailer
8/27/04
2
0.12
0.00
0.25
15.52
Bailer
10/5/04
2
0.05
0.00
<0.25
14.14
Bailer
11/1/04
2
0.10
0.00
0.25
14.67
Bailer
12/2/04
2
0.03
0.00
<0.25
14.53
Bailer
11/17/13
2
0.55
0.00
<0.25
17.89
Bailer
2/5/14
2
0.67
0.00
<0.25
15.34
Passive Skmr
2/17/14
2
<0.01
0.00
<0.25
14.55
Passive Skmr
2/27/14
2
<0.01
0.00
<0.25
14.01
Passive Skmr
3/27/14
2
<0.01
0.00
<0.25
13.60
Passive Skmr
8/6/14
2
<0.01
0.00
<0.25
14.45
Passive Skmr
4/10/15
2
<0.01
0.00
<0.25
14.01
Passive Skmr
5/27/15
2
0.01
0.00
<0.25
14.76
Passive Skmr
7/28/15
2
0.08
0.00
<0.25
17.72
Passive Skmr
1/28/16
2
0.19
0.00
0.00
12.92
Passive Skmr
2/18/16
2
0.13
0.00
0.00
13.22
Passive Skmr
3/25/16
2
<0.01
0.00
0.00
13.01
Sock
3/31/16
2
<0.01
0.00
0.00
12.91
Sock
4/14/16
2
<0.01
0.00
0.00
13.40
Sock
5/5/16
2
<0.01
0.00
0.00
13.66
Sock
RW-1
Fuel Oil
11/24/03
4
0.05
0
0.25
15.20
Bailer
12/19/03
4
0.15
0
0.25
15.32
Bailer
1/29/04
4
0.42
0
0.25
15.56
Bailer
3/9/04
4
0.05
0
2.00
13.32
AFVR
4/8/04
4
0.15
0
0.25
13.29
Bailer
5/10 to 5/19/04
Source Removal:
UST and 416
tons of contaminated
soil removed
to depth of 17
feet.
5/24/04
4
0.17
0
0.30
13.43
Bailer
6/23/04
4
0.23
0
0.30
15.38
Bailer
7/28/04
4
0.27
0
0.30
15.46
Bailer
8/27/04
4
0.29
0
0.30
15.75
Bailer
10/5/04
4
0.15
0
0.30
13.87
Bailer
11/1/04
4
0.17
0
0.30
14.91
Bailer
12/2/04
4
0.03
0
<0.25
14.74
Bailer
2/27/14
4
<0.01
0
0.00
14.00
---
5/27/15
4
0.01
0
0.00
14.68
---
7/28/15
4
0.01
0
0.00
17.31
---
1/28/15
4
<0.01
0
0.00
13.41
---
2/28/16
4
<0.01
0
0.00
13.49
---
3/31/16
4
<0.01
0
0.00
13.23
---
4/14/16
4
<0.01
0
0.00
13.27
---
5/5/16
4
<0.01
0
0.00
13.66
Total Gallons Recovered to Date: Approximately 6.25 gallons

Appendix A
Site Specific Health & Safety Plan
(HASP)

LEVEL 2 WARN
HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN
GMS Project # 0231146
This Level 2 Work Activity Risk Assessment (WARN) Health & Safety Plan (HASP) is intended to provide health and safety guidelines for project field work
meeting ONE OR MORE OF the following criteria:
• Some likelihood of physical and/or chemical hazard exposure (e.g., sampling)
• Number of job tasks is five or greater
• Use of subcontractors
• Fieldwork is being performed on an active or abandoned mining site
• "High -hazard" work to be performed, including but not limited to:
o Excavations and trenching
o Confined Spaces
o Hot Work
o Subsurface Clearance (must complete and attach Subsurface Clearance Project Plan)
o Hazardous Energy Control Operations
o Work at heights
o Overhead Utilities/Proximity Hazards
o Lifting Operations
o Construction
o Decommissioning, Decontamination and Demolition (DDD) Operations
o Injection Well Operations
If NONE of the above applies, an e-mail or Level 1 HASP template may be used. For more complex sites with significant client health and safety
requirements, the project team may consider use of a long -form Level 3 WARN HASP.
This HASP should be developed with input from the project team, and reviewed with all ERM project personnel (including subcontractors). A signed copy of
the HASP must be maintained at the project site during work and in the project files.
H&S Team review is required for the Level 2 WARN HASP. This HASP must be reviewed by the Project Manager and Partner -in -Charge (PIC) and updated
as warranted to address changes in scope, hazards present, project personnel, etc. At a minimum, HASPs must be reviewed annually or if the scope of work
changes. Updated HASPs should also be sent to the H&S Team and PIC for approval.
Page 1 of 17 Form Revision 3/8/2013

Administrative Information
Site Name and Location Sunbelt Turret Steel (former Ryerson facility), 527 Atando Avenue, Charlotte, NC
This document has been
Client Contact and Phone Bobby Owens 312-292-5058
Project Name Atando Avenue Free Product Recovery
developed for the sole use of
ERM staff. Subcontractors and
other project participants must
Health & Safety Plan Date 2-4-14
Revision Number and Date
Field Work Start Date 2-6-13
Anticipated Field Work End Date 9-1-14
develop their own HASP.
This document is valid for a
Project Manager (responsible for implementing the site
Partner In Charge (responsible for overall site health and safety performance
maximum time period of one
health and safety program on this project)
on this project).
year after initial completion.
Michael Pressley
Rick Tarravechia
This document must be
reviewed if the scope of work or
nature of site hazards changes
Field Safety Officer (responsible for all health & safety
Additional ERM personnel on site
and updated as warranted.
activities, recordkee in and delegation of duties to an
p g g Y
Michael Pressley
other project team members)
All on -site personnel must be
appropriately trained and
Ryan Mayete
qualified for the planned scope
of work to be performed.
H&S Team Review
Review Date
Signature
2-4-2014
Donald Hall
Site Setting
Site:
Include relevant background
The subject property is four acres in size and contains 103,940 square feet of building footprints (Figure 3-1). The subject property is four
information regarding the site,
acres in size and contains 103,940 square feet of building footprint. The office building area is located in a building in the central portion of
such as location, size, type of
the property. A warehouse is located in an adjoined building to the south and the primary steel storage and cutting area is located in an
facility, topography, weather,
adjoined building to the north. The warehouse and steel processing buildings are constructed with concrete floors, steel framing, and a
infrastructure, security,
combination of steel, cement block and brick siding. The office building is finished with carpet and 12-inch tile flooring, sheet rock walls,
previous site use, etc. Describe
and tile ceilings. Areas of the property not covered in buildings are either concrete, asphalt, or gravel covered
nature and extent of any
soil/air/water/groundwater
A petroleum release, associated with a 6,000-gallon fuel oil underground storage tank (UST), was discovered in 2002. Petroleum -
contamination.
impacted soils were subsequently removed and free product was discovered on the water table. ERM understands that free product
recovery efforts were made and in 2003, less than 1/4- inch of product was present. No further action has taken place since that time.
Describe any other aspects of
the site that may potentially
affect the health, safety, or
Free product is located in the warehouse building which is in the southern portion of the property. The warehouse is generally empty and
security of on -site personnel.
not used during regular site opertions. On November 7, 2013 ERM mobilized to the subject property to gauge monitor well MW-1 and
recovery well RW-1 for the presence of free product. Monitor well MW-1 was found to contain 0.55 feet of product. No product was
measured in the adjacent recovery well.
Page 2 of 17 Form Revision 3/8/2013

Project Background and Scope
ERM Scope of Work: ERM will install a passive skimmer for deployment inside monitor well MW-1. Passive skimmers utilize a
of Work
hydrophobic filter and canister to collect free product only. Once the canister is filled, the skimmer is removed from the well and contents
are emptied into a drum (or other suitable container) for storage until proper disposal. The rate of product removal is dependent upon
Include list of tasks to be
the quantity of free product present, the viscosity of the product, and the formation that contains the product. Initially, frequent site visits
completed by ERM personnel
will be required to determine the rate of removal (or canister filling). The product will be placed in sealable 55-gallon drum or other
during this project, and a
container suitable for used oil, properly labeled, and stored on -site in a location agreeable with site management. .
separate list of tasks to be
completed by any
subcontractors at the site.
Weekly / Monthly Free Product Check/Removal. For the first month of skimmer deployment, ERM will visit the site once per week to
determine the rate of canister filling. Based on the results of the first month, it is anticipated that the site visit schedule may be relaxed to
A site -specific Job Hazard
once per month. For budgetary purposes, nine free product checks spread -out over six months, will be performed under this proposal.
Analysis (JHA) must be
This schedule may change based on the actual rate at which the passive skimmer absorbs free product.
completed for each task to be
performed. Subcontractors
must provide their own HASP.
Subcontractors must provide
JHAs for each task they will
Subcontractor(s) Scope of Work: No subcontractors will be used for this scope of work.
perform for ERM review.
JHA template and
reference/example JHAs for
more common tasks can be
found at:
Americas H&S Paqe - JHAs
Subcontractor(s) to be used: Has subcontractor been approved (PICS or other local approval)?
❑ Y ❑ N
❑ Y ❑ N
❑ Y ❑ N
❑ Y ❑ N
❑ Y ❑ N
Site/Project General Information
Site Type (check all applicable boxes)
* Complete and attach the
❑ Remote Site* ❑ Inactive Facility* ❑ Hazardous waste release site (HAZWOPER)
appropriate Risk Assessment
❑ Railroad ® Industrial ❑ Residential
checklist.
❑ Unsecured ❑ Coastal / Offshore (on or ❑ Other (specify)
near water)
Page 3 of 17 Form Revision 3/8/2013

Safe Work Practices
Place a checkmark by
applicable site hazards.
Adequate control measures for
all checked hazards must be
included in site -specific JHAs,
which should be attached to the
HASP
** High hazard work requiring
H&S team coordination
(additional control measures
required beyond JHA)
*** Permit -required high hazard
work, requiring safety team
coordination and ERM or
equivalent client -required
permit to be completed
More detailed guidance on
specific safety topics can be
found in the Health & Safety
Guidance Documents Section
on the Americas Safety Page on
Minerva.
Main Site Hazards (check all applicable boxes)
❑ Natural Hazards (Plants, ® Organic Chemicals
Insects Animals)
❑ Journey Management ❑ Overexertion / Fatigue
❑
Compressed Gas
❑
Work at Heights > feet
(1.2 m)**
❑
Use of Blasting Materials
or Explosives**
® Slip/Trip/Fall
❑
Scaffold Use
❑
Excavations and
Trenching**
❑
Control of Hazardous
Energy***
® Hazard Communication
❑ Chemical mixing and
injection
❑ Travel to Medium/High
Risk Locations**
❑ Other (specify)
❑ Asbestos
❑ Extreme Weather
❑ Confined Space Entry-
❑
Forklift and Industrial Truck
Use**
❑
Portable Ladders
❑
All -Terrain Vehicle
❑ Working on or over water
® Medical Services and First
Aid
❑ Unexploded Ordinance /
Munitions and Explosives
of Concern (UXO/MEC)**
❑ Drum Handling
❑ Other(specify)
❑ Inorganic Chemicals
❑ Line Breaking**
❑ High Noise (>85 dBA)
❑ Hand/Portable Power
Tools
❑ ASTs/USTs
❑
Scissor Lift / Cherry Picker
Use*
❑
Welding or Hot Work***
❑
Helicopter Transportation
❑ Working in or near surface
waters (lakes/rivers)
❑ Airborne Contaminants
❑ Personal Protective
Equipment (PPE)
❑ Protection by Armed
Security Forces**
❑ Other(specify)
❑
Material Handling
Equipment in Use*
❑
Extended Shifts
(>14 hrs + driving)
❑
Respirable Particles
❑
Non -Ionizing Radiation
❑
Buried/Overhead Utilities
and Subsurface
Clearance-
®
Ergonomics / Manual
Lifting
❑
Construction —
Su rface/U nderg round
Mines
❑
Underwater Diving**
❑ Critical Lifting***
❑ Respiratory Protection
❑ Non -Standard Shifts
(e.g., night work)
❑ Other(specify)
Page 4 of 17 Form Revision 3/8/2013

Chemical Products Used or
Stored Onsite
❑
Alconox or Liquinox*
❑
Calibration gas (Methane)
❑
Isopropyl Alcohol*
For each chemical product
❑
Hydrochloric acid (HCI)*
❑
Calibration gas (Isobutylene)
❑
Household bleach (NaOCI)*
identified, a Safety Data Sheet
❑
❑
❑
(SDS) or Chemical Safety Data
Nitric acid (HNO3)*
Calibration gas (Pentane)
Sulfuric acid (H2SO4)*
Card (CSDC) must be attached
to this HASP.
❑
Sodium hydroxide (NaOH)*
❑
Calibration gas (4-gas mixture)
❑
Hexane
❑
Calibration gas (zero air)
SDS/CSDS for many common
❑
❑
❑
chemicals may be found on the
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Americas Safety Page on
Minerva.
*NOTE: Eyewash solution must be readily available
on ALL project sites where materials
are used or stored that pose a risk of
getting
into the eyes from splashes / airborne
dust/debris, etc., including sample preservatives.
The eyewash unit — stationary
or portable — must be large enough to provide at least 15 minutes of eye flushing.
Chemicals of Concern
In the section to the right,
❑
Friable Asbestos
❑
alpha-Napthylamine
❑
Methyl chromoethyl ether
check any chemicals present
❑
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
❑
bis-Chloromethyl ether
❑
beta-Napthylamine
onsite in any media (air, soil,
"No
❑
Benzidine
❑
4-Aminodiphenyl
❑
Ethyleneimine
water), or check ERM
exposure to these".
❑
beta-Propiolactone
❑
2-Acetylaminoflourene
❑
4-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
These chemicals include OSHA-
❑
N-Nitrosomethylamine
❑
Vinyl chloride
❑
Inorganic arsenic
regulated potential
occupational carcinogens (29
❑
Lead
❑
Chromium (VI)
❑
Cadmium
CFR 1910.1003-1910.1016) as
well as those chemicals for
❑enzene
B
❑
Coke oven emissions
❑
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
which OSHA has established
❑
Acrylonitrile
❑
Ethylene oxide
❑
Formaldehyde
specific respiratory protection
❑
Methylenedianiline
❑
1,3-Butadiene
❑
Methylene
requirements (29 CFR 1910.134)
chloride
If any of these chemicals are
❑
4-Nitrobiphenyl
present on site, contact your
❑
No ERM exposure to these
safety team member for
guidance. Then, describe
additional protective measures
Additional measures to be taken based on associated chemical hazard(s):
to be taken for boxes checked.
Page 5 of 17 Form Revision 3/8/2013

The following section must be filled out completely for all chemicals (suspected or confirmed) present in site media
(soil, air, water). Attach an SDS for each chemical.
Primary Hazards of the
Material (explosive,
flammable, corrosive,
Highest Reported
IDLH Level
toxic, volatile,
Respirator
Concentration
Exposure Limit
(specify
radioactive,
Symptoms and
Ionization
Respirator
Cartridge
Materials Present or
(specify units and
(specify
ppm or
biohazard, oxidizer, or
Effects of Acute
Potential
Cartridge
Replacement
Suspected at Site
sample medium)
ppm or mg/m')
mg/m')
other)
Exposure
(eV)
Type
Schedule
Irritation to nose,
throat, lungs and
respiratroy tract.
PEL =
Central nervous
REL = 100
system effects may
Fuel Oil
Free product in MW-1.
TLV =
unknown
Inhalation, ingestion,
include headache,
NA
Organic
2X Daily
contact
dizziness, loss of
Vapor
Other=
balance and
Skin Hazard ®
coordination,
unconsciousness,
coma, respiratory
failure and death
PEL =
REL =
TLV =
Other=
Skin Hazard ❑
PEL =
REL =
TLV =
Other=
Skin Hazard ❑
PEL =
REL =
TLV =
Other=
Skin Hazard ❑
PEL =
REL =
TLV =
Other=
Skin Hazard ❑
PEL =
REL =
TLV =
Other=
Skin Hazard ❑
Page 6 of 17 Form Revision 3/8/2013

FOR ADDITIONAL CHEMICALS, USE THE LEVEL 2 HASP CHEMICALS TABLE ATTACHMENT.
PEL = OSHA Permissible Exposure Limit - http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show document?p table=STANDARDS&p id=9992
REL = NIOSH Recommended Exposure Limit - http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npq/default.html
TLV = ACGIH Threshold Limit Value (Contact your Division H&S Leader for additional information on these values).
IDLH = Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health - http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npq/default.html
Levels of Personal Protective
Equipment (PPE) Required for
Task Description
Level
of PPE
each Task
A
B
C
D
Install passive skimmer
❑
❑
❑
Primary hazard control strategies,
including elimination/avoidance,
Bail Free Product
❑
❑
❑
engineering controls, and/or
administrative controls, must be
documented for all tasks on task -
specific JHAs, to be included as an
❑
❑
❑
❑
attachment to this HASP. PPE is
El
❑
❑
El
considered as the "last line of
❑
❑
❑
❑
Signature of the H&S Team on
Page 1 of this document signifies
El
❑
❑
ElAssessment.
certification of PPE Hazard
❑
❑
❑
❑
Page 7 of 17 Form Revision 3/8/2013

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) based on
identified tasks to be performed, as outlined in
Scope of Work.
Req = Required PPE for one or more tasks to be
performed; required on site at all times. PPE
specific to each task must be outlined in detail
on task -specific JHAs.
NA = Not applicable to this project
PPE
Req
NA
PPE
Req
NA
Steel Toe Boots
®
❑
Hard Hat
®
❑
Long Sleeve Shirt & Long Pants
®
❑
Safety Glasses w/ side shields
®
❑
Outer Disposable Boots
❑
®
Chemical/impact-resistant Goggles
❑
Tyvek Suit
❑
®
Poly -Coated Tyvek
❑
Fully Encapsulated Chemical Suit
❑
®
Full -Face Respirator
❑
Hearing Protection
❑
®
Half -Face Respirator
❑
Leather Gloves
®
❑
Inner Chemical Gloves
®
❑
Outer Chemical Gloves
❑
®
Other (specify) High visibility safety vest
®
❑
Training, Medical Surveillance, and Safety
Supplies
Req = Requirements are based on specific tasks
performed in the field and the type of
environments, chemicals or hazards
encountered.
NA =Not applicable to this project
*Provides specialized training over -and -above the
40-hour HAZWOPER training necessary to serve as
an on -site manager supervising employees engaged
in work covered by the HAZWOPER standard at 29
CFR 1910.120
**Physical examination requirements should be
discussed with WorkCare well in advance of the
start of work to allow adequate time to schedule
examination requirements.
Training
Req
NA
Medical Surveillance*"
Req
NA
40-hr HAZWOPER; current 8-hr refresher
®
❑
Medical Clearance
®
❑
8 Hour HAZWOPER Supervisor*
❑
®
Respirator Clearance and Fit Test
®
❑
Current CPR and First Aid
®
❑
Blood Lead and ZPP
®
❑
MSHA 40-hr New Miner and current 8-hr
refresher
❑
®
Other (specify)
El
El
ERM Field Safety Officer (FSO)
®
❑
Other (specify)
❑
❑
DDD Practice FSO/DM
❑
®
Supplies
Req
NA
Subsurface Clearance (SSC)
❑
®
First Aid Kit
®
❑
EPA Hazardous Waste
El
®
Eyewash Solution (capable of 15 minutes of
eye flushing)®
El
Hazmat/Dangerous Goods Shipping
❑
®
Air Horn
❑
International Traveler
❑
®
Decontamination Supplies
®
❑
Other (specify):
❑
❑
Fire Extinguisher
®
❑
Other (specify):
❑
❑
Potable Water
®
❑
Other (specify):
❑
❑
Toilets
❑
Other (specify):
❑
❑
Other (specify):
❑
❑
Page 8 of 17 Form Revision 3/8/2013

Monitoring Equipment: All monitoring equipment on site must be calibrated per manufacturer specifications (including
daily bump tests) and results
recorded. Under stable site conditions, measurements
must be made in the breathing zone
at least
once every 30 minutes.
Instrument (Check all required)
Task
Instrument Reading
Action Guideline
Comments
❑ Combustible gas indicator
❑ 1
0 to 10% LEL
Monitor. Evacuate if confined
model:
❑ 2
space.
❑ 3
10 to 25% LEL
Potential fire or explosion
❑ 4
hazard.
❑ 5
>25% LEL
Fire/explosion hazard.
Evacuate site.
❑ Oxygen meter model:
❑ 1
>23.5% Oxygen
Fire hazard. Evacuate site.
❑ 2
23.5 to 19.5% Oxygen
Normal oxygen levels.
3
❑❑
4
o
<19.5 /o Oxygen
Oxygen deficient conditions.
❑ 5
Evacuate site.
❑ Radiation survey meter
❑ 1
Normal background
Proceed with normal
operations.
Annual exposure not to exceed 1250 mrem per quarter.
model:
❑ 2
Background reading must be taken in area known to be free of
❑Three
times background
Notify Radiation Safety
radiation sources.
3
Officer.
❑ 4
❑ 5
>Three times background
Radiological hazard.
Evacuate site.
❑ Photoionization detector
Level "D" is acceptable up to
The action level for upgrading the level of protection is typically
model:
the action level. For response
one-half of the lowest published exposure limit identified for the
Any response below
above established
potential COCs at the site. For COCs with extremely low
❑ 11.7 eV ® 10.6 eV
_50_
ppm, sustained for 1 minute
background level(s),
exposure limits (e.g., < 5 ppm), contact your Division H&S Leader
❑ 10.2 eV ❑ 9.8 eV
appropriate level PPE
or for guidance on action levels.
requirements must be met.
❑ eV
Respirator selection should be based on the Assigned Protection
Level "C" is acceptable as
50 ppm to _100
appropriate.
Factor (APF) and the Maximum Use Concentration (MUC). To
❑ 1
ppm, sustained for 1 minute
determine the appropriate respirator selection, the following
2
contaminant information must be known:
Level A-D PPE Requirements
❑ 3
• Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) or other published
Stop work. Tasks requiring
❑ 4
Level B or Level A PPE are
Exposure Limit note that the lowest published exposure
p ( p p
levels)
not anticipated during this
guideline should be used to establish action
❑ 5
project. If Level B or Level A
• Short-term Exposure Limit
Greater than ppm
PPE is needed, as determined
• Ceiling Limit
_100
above background, sustained
by the FSO and/or the PM,
Peak Limit
for 1 minute
the Division H&S Leader will
• Any other exposure limit for the hazardous substance
be notified and the HASP will
be revised.
Contact your Division H&S Leader or Project Health and Safety
Consultant for assistance in defining the APF and MUC, as
necessary, as well as any time upgrading of respiratory protection
is required based on established action levels.
Page 9 of 17 Form Revision 3/8/2013

Instrument (Check all required)
Task
Instrument Reading
Action Guideline
Comments
❑ Flame ionization detector
Level "D" is acceptable up to
The action level for upgrading the level of protection is one-half of
model:
Any response above
the action level. For response
the lowest published exposure limit identified for the potential
background to ppm
above established
COCs at the site.
above background, sustained
background level(s),
for 1 minute
appropriate level PPE
Respirator selection should be based on the Assigned Protection
requirements must be met.
Factor (APF) and the Maximum Use Concentration (MUC). To
ppm above
Level "C" is acceptable as
determine the appropriate respirator selection, the following
❑ 1
background to ppm
appropriate.
contaminant information must be known:
❑ 2
above background, sustained
0 Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) or other published
❑ 3
for 1 minute
Exposure Limit
work. Tasks requiring
❑Stop
4
0 Short-term Exposure Limit
❑
Level B or Level A PPE are
0 Ceiling Limit
5
not anticipated during this
0 Peak Limit
Greater than ppm
project. If Level B or Level A
9 Any other exposure limit for the hazardous substance
above background, sustained
PPE is needed, as determined
for 1 minute
by the FSO and/or the Project
Contact your Division H&S Leader or Project Health and Safety
Health and Safety Consultant,
Consultant for assistance in defining the APF and MUC, as
the Division H&S Leader will
necessary.
be notified and the HASP will
be revised.
❑ Detector tube models:
❑ 1
Specify:
Specify:
❑ 2
❑ 3
❑ 4
❑ 5
❑ Other (specify):
❑ 1
Specify:
Specify:
❑ 2
❑ 3
❑ 4
❑ 5
Page 10 of 17 Form Revision 3/8/2013

Work Zones
Exclusion Zone: The immediate area of MW-1/RW-1
If exclusion zones are
necessary because of
chemical and/or
equipment hazards.
Describe the set-up of
these zones. Include
landmarks, dimensions as
Contamination Reduction Zone: Within 50 feet of MW-1.
necessary, equipment vs.
personnel
decontamination zones
Support Zone: Pre -determined area next to support vehicles
Site Access/Control
Access Control Procedures: The site is an active industrial facility. The building can only be entered by permission of Sunbelt-Turrett
personnel.
Describe procedures for
limiting unauthorized
entry to the work zone(s).
Are there any security
requirements?
Decontamination
Personnel: No personal decontamination is anticipated. Hands, arms and face shall be cleaned after leaving exclusion zone and before eating
Procedures
or drinking
Describe procedures for
decontamination of
personnel and equipment.
Equipment: A dedicated passive skimmer will not be decontaminated between uses. Plastic sheeting will be laid onto the adjacent concrete to
prevent contamination of the ground surface.
Page 11 of 17 Form Revision 3/8/2013

Emergency Response Planning
In the pre -work briefing and daily
tailgate safety meetings, all
onsite employees will be trained
in the provisions of emergency
response planning, site
communication systems, and
site evacuation routes. Note that
clients may have their own
procedures which may need to
be followed.
Signal a site emergency or
medical emergency with three
blasts of a loud horn (car horn,
fog horn, or similar device).
To complete this section, attach
a hospital route map to the
HASP.
ALL WORK -RELATED INCIDENTS MUST BE REPORTED. FOR ALL MEDICAL EMERGENCIES, CALL 911 OR THE LOCAL
EMERGENCY NUMBER.
For ALL non -emergency incidents resulting in injury or illness, you must:
• Give appropriate first aid care to the injured or ill individual and secure the scene.
• Immediately notify the Project Manager and/or Partner -in -Charge.
• Immediately call WorkCare Incident Intervention at [phone] (available 24 hours/7 days per week) (US only).
• Clients may have their own procedures which we may need to follow.
• Enter the event into the ECS within 24 hours.
In the event of an emergency that necessitates evacuation of the work task area or the site as a whole, the following
procedures shall occur:
• The ERM FSO will contact all nearby personnel using the onsite communications system to advise of the emergency.
• Personnel will proceed along site roads to a safe distance upwind from the hazard source.
• Personnel will remain in that area until the site safety contact or other authorized individual provides further instruction.
In the event of a severe spill or leak, site personnel will follow the procedures listed below:
• Evacuate the affected area and relocate personnel to an upwind location.
• Inform the ERM FSO, an ERM office, and a site representative immediately.
• Locate the source of the spill or leak, and stop the source if it is safe to do so and appropriately trained personnel are onsite to
do so.
• Begin containment and recovery of spilled or leaked materials.
• Notify appropriate local, state, and federal agencies after obtaining client consent to do so.
In the event of severe weather, site personnel will follow the procedures listed below:
• Site work shall not be conducted during severe weather, including high winds and lightning.
• In the event of severe weather, stop work, lower any equipment (drill rigs), and evacuate the affected area.
Page 12 of 17 Form Revision 3/8/2013

lient Specific Emergency Response
In the event of an emergency, client
specific emergency response
procedures may take precedent over
ERM established procedures.
While engaging in field related
activities on an active client site,
measures they have in place to signal
either emergency response or
evacuation need to be reviewed and
documented.
Once completed, this summary, along
with evacuation map(s), should be
discussed with all visitors,
subcontractors and others subject to
HASP review upon site visit.
Contributing factors initiating emergency response (process, material, weather)
Injuries
Lights and/or sounds associated with evacuation
NA
Drill requirements for contractors on -site
NA
Initial and alternative muster points
NA
Map associated with evacuation
NA
Specific evacuation procedures
NA
How does contractor account for all site visitors
NA
PPE and Spill Kit requirements (if emergency response is spill related)
NA
Emergency Contacts
Name
Location
Phone
Cell Phone
Hospital (attach map)
Carolinas Medical
1000 Blythe Blvd, Charlotte,
704-355-2000
Center
NC
Police
Charlotte Meck PD
Charlotte
911
Fire
Charlotte Meck FD
Charlotte
911
Project Manager
Michael Pressley
Charlotte, NC
704-541-8345
704-641-9458
Field Manager (if not PM)
Ryan Mayette
Charlotte, NC
7014-541-8345
919-920-5616
Field Safety Officer (if not PM)
Division H&S Contact
Millard Griffin
Atlanta, GA
678-486-2728
678-294-8658
Alternate H&S Contact
Don Hall
Charlotte, NC
704-541-8345
704-724-3727
Americas Region H&S Contact
Mark Hickey
Denver, CO
720-200-7172
720-625-2869
Incident Intervention (US Only)
WorkCare
NA
888-449-7787
NA
SSC Experienced Person
Subcontractor Safety Contact(s)
Client Site Contact
Jerry Webb
527 Atando Avenue
800-951-4140
Page 13 of 17 Form Revision 3/8/2013

Acknowledgement
1 have read, understood, and agree with the information set forth in this Health & Safety Plan, and will follow
guidance in the plan and in the ERM North America Health and Safety manual. I understand the training and
medical monitoring requirements for conducting activities covered by this WARN HASP and have met these
requirements.
ERM has prepared this plan solely for the purpose of protecting the health and safety of ERM employees.
Subcontractors, visitors, and others at the site are required to follow provisions in this document at a
minimum, but must refer to their organization's health and safety program for their protection.
Printed Name
Signature
Organization
Date
Approval Signatures
Signatures in this section indicate the signing employee will
comply with and enforce this WARN HASP, as well as
procedures and guidelines established in the ERM NA H&S.
Signatures in this section also indicate that any
subcontractors performing work under contract to ERM have
met the minimum safety standards in the ERM Subcontractor
Prequalification Process.
Project Manager
Date:
Partner in Charge
Date:
Page 14 of 17 Form Revision 3/8/2013

Check all appropriate ❑ Site -specific JHAs for all tasks (including
documents to be attached to subcontractors)
this HASP.
❑ SDS/CSDC for all chemicals brought to site and all
chemicals suspected/confirmed in site media
❑ SSC Project Plan
® Map of Route to Hospital/Emergency Services
❑ High -Hazard Work Procedures:
Type:
❑ High -Hazard Work Permits:
Type(s):
® Facility site map(s)
❑ Tailgate Safety Meeting Forms
❑ Air Monitoring and Equipment Calibration Forms
❑ SOS (See -Own -Share) Field Cards
❑ Emergency Drill Forms
❑ OFP Contractor Leaflet
❑ Risk Assessment Checklists
❑ Health & Safety Guidance Documents:
List:
❑ Client specific requirements
❑ Travel Risk Assessment (TRA)
❑ PLAN Risk Assessment
❑ Field Audit Forms
❑ PM H&S Checklist
® Vehicle Safety Checklist
❑ IH Sampling Data Sheet
❑ Other (specify):
❑ Other (specify):
See It - Own It - Share It
Stop Work Authority
It means that:
It is ERM policy that all ERM and ERM Subcontractor employees
• We know that we have a responsibility to look out for each
have the authority, without fear of reprimand or retaliation to:
other, to intervene when necessary, to be proactive and to
• Immediately stop any work activity that presents a danger to
help keep safety issues from becoming problems.
the site team or the public.
• We also look out for ourselves. If we recognize that a situation
• Get involved, question and rectify any situation or work
is unsafe, we are expected to stop what we're doing, reassess
activity that is identified as not being in compliance with the
the situation and consult with others if necessary before
HASP or with broader ERM health and safety policies.
proceeding safely.
• Report any unsafe acts or conditions to supervision or,
• We assign no blame to anyone who raises safety issues.
preferably, intervene to safely correct such acts or conditions
• We strive to learn lessons from the large and small events that
themselves.
are part of our daily experience.
Page 15 of 17 Form Revision 3/8/2013

Revision Log
Date
By
I s
2/11/2013
S Perkins / M Griffin
Merged standard / intrusive L2 formats into single document. Revisions to include full
HAZWOPER compliance, DDD practice applicability, and user feedback.
5/2013
M. Griffin
Added additional user feedback.
Page 16 of 17 Form Revision 3/8/2013

ATTACHMENTS
Page 17 of 17 Form Revision 3/8/2013

527 Atando Ave, Charlotte, NC 28206 to Carolinas Medical Center - Google Maps Page 1 of 2
Directions to Carolinas Medical Center
Google
1000 Blythe Blvd, Charlotte, NC 28203
5.6 mi about 13 mins
r
,a JPtl
Berry yd 4W
x1
a
r
❑enra X
<�;
n Creek Park y
La
Satie Sr Ata7 • 3
Nvskins
,park
49 N Tryon st
Historic Eas Tway
J
Rosedale .• Park
rrs�<
°aF
Alarrrarion
21
Nni7.3
�j F
4 C7 s�
�4 Charles
Avenue Park
[}r 21
2P
nA. r
�y ti l4G
o
Di ery.r'`: Nc
Place
Charlotte
21
E
C] v Country Club
—. —
El
74
Central
Ave
hest Blvd �
Q E] �� xr• w
�
c •.�
Centraf Ave Independence'��� ��
c •# Cl
Park c
`
4� . $
a 74
Park
a '�
��rr
of Ovens xz
°F
f7
y Audiiorium
F°s� '�a
w lcog
21 Ag
v 15
C
a Grayson Mpr1r
1 im
°4. Park
z
s�
P
,_.
o NPemorit
J2014 Google - ry I tlet8©2014 Google -
L q
r
https:Hmaps.google.com/maps?f=d&source=s d&saddr=527+Atando+Ave,+Charlotte,+NC... 2/4/2014

527 Atando Ave, Charlotte, NC 28206 to Carolinas Medical Center - Google Maps
Page 2 of 2
1 527 Atando Ave, Charlotte, NC 28206
1. Head northwest on Atando Ave toward Ware Ave
2. Take the 1 st left onto N Graham St
About 5 mins
3. Continue onto S Graham St
About 1 min
4. Turn right onto S Mint St
5. Take the 1 st left onto W Morehead St
About 4 mins
6. Slight right onto S Kings Dr
ro 7. Take the 1 st right onto Medical Center Dr
8. Turn right onto Blythe Blvd
Destination will be on the left
(g� Carolinas Medical Center
1000 Blythe Blvd, Charlotte, NC 28203
go 0.3 mi
total 0.3 mi
go 2.6 mi
total 2.9 mi
go 0.5 mi
total 3.3 mi
go 0.3 mi
total 3.6 mi
go 1.7 mi
total 5.2 mi
go 0.1 mi
total 5.4 mi
go 433 ft
total 5.5 mi
go 0.2 mi
total 5.6 mi
These directions are for planning purposes only. You may find that construction projects, traffic, weather, or other events may cause
conditions to differ from the map results, and you should plan your route accordingly. You must obey all signs or notices regarding your
route.
Map data ©2014 Google
I Directions weren't right? Please find your route on maps.google.com and click "Report a problem" at the bottom left. I
https:Hmaps.google.com/maps?f=d&source=s d&saddr=527+Atando+Ave,+Charlotte,+NC... 2/4/2014

ERM
0
JHA
Job Hazard Analysis
Project Number:
231146
1 Project / Client Name:
JAtando Avenue FP Recovery/Ryerson, Inc.
Project Manager:
Michael Pressley
I Location:
ICharlotte, NC
Partner -in -Charge:
Rick Tarravechia
Date and Revision Number:
2/4/2014
SPECIFIC TASK:
Drive to site, remove free product
Minimum Required PPE for Entire Task:
0 Hard Hat 17 Safety -Toe Shoes 0 Hearing Protection [IGoggles [IFace Shield ❑ Respirator center type and cartridge type> [IOther (specify):
0 Safety Glasses ❑Z Reflective Vest 0 Gloves Nitrile/cut resistant gloves [IPPE clothing center type here (eg, Tyvek, FRC, long sleeves)> center additional PPE here>
Additional Task -Step Specific PPE:
(as indicated below under Controls)
Level D
Equipment / Tools Required:
PID
Training Required for this Task:
40hr HAZWOPER,
Permits Required for this Task:
None
Forms Associated with This Task:
Daily Tailgate Meeting form, Vehicle Safety Checklist
JHA Developed / Reviewed By:
JHA Review In Field
Name / Job Title:
Name / Job Title:
Name / Job Title:
Field Safety Officer (FSO) to ensure all personnel performing this task have reviewed
JHA and agree to follow it. Site -specific changes to this JHA have been made as
warranted based on this review. FSO Signature/Date:
Michael Pressley, P.G. (Project Manager)
Donald Hall, CSP
T
eps
p elect
Potential Hazards & Consequences
Likelihood
Severity
RISK
lCojdols
to Eliminate or Reduce Risks3
1
Vehicle Operation
1 a
Vehicle collision -injury and property damage
2
3
6
1 a
Driving Alertness, defensive driving and keeping space cushion
2
Remove FP from passive skimmer;
hand bailing additional FP; pouring FP
into container at the wellhead and into
ucori nil ART
2a
Strain arm/hands/back
H&s
1
3
3
12c
2a
Use proper bending and lifting techniques. Move slowly and deliberately.
2b
contact with fuel oil - dermatitis
H&s
5
2
6
2b
Proper PPE, and take care while handling bailer and pouring
2c
Struck by forklift
H&s
3
4
6
Wear high visibility vest and place cones/caution tape around well as needed
JHA FP RecoveryAsx Page 1 of 2 Print Dale: 5/5/2016

Task Steps' Potential Hazards & ConsequenceS2 RISK lControls to Eliminate or Reduce RiskS3
ONE JHA PER TASK. SUBCONTRACTORS MUST PROVIDE THEIR OWN JHAS. JHAS SHOULD BE WRITTEN IN PLAIN LANGUAGE AND SHOULD BE NO MORE THAN 2-3 PAGES IN LENGTH.
INSERT ADDITIONAL ROWS AS NEEDED ABOVE (MUST MANUALLY COPY AND PASTE FORMULA IN COLUMN H). ROW HEIGHTS MAY NEED TO BE MANUALLY EXPANDED TO VIEW ALL TEXT.
LEAVE SEVERAL BLANK OVERSIZED ROWS TO ALLOW HANDWRITTEN FIELD ADDITIONS. CAN ALSO DELETE UNNEEDED ROWS TO FIT PAGE(S).
1. Each task consists of a set of steps. List and number all the steps in the sequence they are performed. Specify the equipment or other details.
2. List potential health & safety hazards and consequences - ONE PER ROW - and select "H&S" from the drop -down list. Then list any potential security, environmental, and/or property loss impacts - ONE PER ROW - and select the corresponding code(s) from the drop -down list. Use
numbers and letters for each hazard/impact listed (1 a, 1 b, etc). Hazards should be described in terms of their specific origin and negative consequences (e.g., instead of "moving equipment', write "injury from getting struck by forklift").
3. Describe the specific actions or procedures that will be implemented to eliminate or reduce each hazard. Be clear, concise, and specific. Use objective, observable, and quantified terms (e.g., instead of "use good body positioning," write "don't bend at waist or reach above head").
Use numbers and letters corresponding to listed hazards.
4. Select the likelihood of occurrence and severity of each hazard, AFTER implementation of the planned control measures (use the Risk Matrix as a guide). The corresponding risk rating will then be automatically calculated [ RISK = Likelihood x Severity].
A risk rating shaded red indicates that work cannot continue without additional control measures and approval of Partner -in -Charge.
WAYS TO ELIMINATE OR REDUCE RISKS (IN ORDER OF PREFERENCE):
ELIMINATE/AVOID --> SUBSTITUTE / MODIFY --> ISOLATE --> ENGINEER / SAFEGUARD --> TRAINING AND PROCEDURES --> WARNING AND ALERT MECHANISMS --> PPE
JHA_FP Reco ry.bsx Page 2 of 2 Print Date: 5/5/2016

Appendix B
Standard Operating Procedures

SOIL SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS
Sonic Drilling/Sampling
Sonic drilling is initiated with a 4-inch outside diameter hollow stem steel sleeve
(HSSS) equipped with a rock shoe. Sonic vibrations at the shoe liquefy material
encountered as the drill rod is pushed with hydraulic pressure. Once the length
of the core has been reached, a larger diameter HSSS (6-inch in this case) is
advanced outside of the inner HSSS to the same depth. The inner core is
removed for soil sample collection. This process repeats with an inner HSSS
advancing the borehole each depth interval.
FIELD LOGGING, FIELD SCREENING AND LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Soil samples will be visually inspected and the physical characteristics logged upon
retrieval of the sample from the soil boring. Soil samples will be screened in the
field using either flame ionization detector (FID) or photo -ionization detector (PID)
equipment and using the headspace screening method. This equipment will be
calibrated by the equipment vendor or field technician prior to use.
The PID/FID should be calibrated against the span gas according to the manual
available with the PID.
When the PID/FID has been calibrated, it is ready to be used for field screening
purposes. Soil samples being screened with the PID/FID should be placed in zip
lock bags immediately after collection and sealed. The soil should be crumbled
within the bag to promote volatilization and then left to sit in a warm, dry
location for 10 minutes prior to obtaining a reading. A reading should be taken
by punching a small hole in the bag or unzipping a corner, placing the tip of the
PID/FID into the bag, sealing the bag with fingers or re -zipping, and recording
the maximum concentration observed. Never place the PID directly into the soil.
The observation time should continue until the readings stabilize or are
consistently below the maximum concentration recorded. Notes should be taken
on the moisture content of the sample as this sometimes results in adverse
readings from the PID.
The PID should be checked every few hours, or following detection of
abnormally high VOC concentrations, against the span gas to check for
unacceptable drift. If the reading is +/-15% of the actual concentration then the
instrument should be recalibrated. Any drift in measurements should be
recorded in field notes. The instrument should be recalibrated at the start of each
day.
ERM 1 APPENDIX B_STANDARD OPERATING
PROCEDURES.DOCX-5/ 17/ 16

Soil samples retained for laboratory analysis will be analyzed for the compounds
and by the methods specified in Section 3.4.B of the CQAP. Sample collection,
handling, and preservation will be conducted in accordance with accepted
protocol, including chain -of -custody documentation.
Soil Sampling
All soil samples should be described in accordance with the Universal Soil
Classification System and the information recorded on field logs completed for
each location. Any unusual color(s), odor, or the presence/absence of potential
Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) should be noted on the field logs.
Use of clean, disposable nitrile gloves is required at all times when collecting, or
handling samples in order to minimize the potential for cross -contamination and
to protect the sampler against potentially harmful substances. Multiple glove
layers allows for easy removal of the top layer when required.
The sample location and depth should be recorded as accurately as possible,
preferably by surveying to a national coordinate system. Location nomenclature
should lead on to that of the samples obtained from the respective locations.
Where sampling locations are aborted due to hole collapse, shallow refusal,
SSC2.0 observations, etc., these should be recorded as per the above paragraph
but in a manner that does not affect the sequential numbering of successful
sampling locations.
Soil samples should be placed into analysis -appropriate, laboratory -supplied
sample containers. All soil sample containers should be completely filled such
that there is no volatilization headspace that will affect the integrity of the
analytical results. Confirm with the laboratory the minimum volume of soil
required per sample per analysis.
Remove gravel aggregate (unless specifically required), artificial clasts and/or
fauna (e.g. insects or worms) as this affects both sample volume and local
geochemical signatures of your sample).
Volatiles are readily lost from the surface layers of the soil. For this reason,
samples of soil for the evaluation of volatile analytes should not be collected
from the surface layer but from a depth of greater than 2 inches below the
surface.
Field duplicates should be collected as required by the project sampling and
analysis plan although care should be given in duplicate analysis of non -
homogeneous soils.
ERM 2 APPENDIX B_STANDARD OPERATING
PROCEDURES.DOCX-5/ 17/ 16

Samples should be labelled as they are collected in order to avoid later confusion.
Use of indelible marker pens with laboratory -supplied, water -proof labels is
recommended. Ensure sample labels are legible and free of dirt or grime.
It is useful to collect more samples than the proposal might indicate for
laboratory analysis. These can be held by the lab until needed or, if not required,
until disposal. In -transit sample breakage, unexpected concentrations, etc., are
examples of when additional sample volume may be useful.
Any sampling equipment that is not single -use must be decontaminated between
samples.
All sample containers should be clearly labelled with the following:
sample depth;
date collected; and
sampler's name.
The sample containers should then be transferred to a controlled environment
(i.e. a chilled cooler) for sample preservation prior to and during shipment to the
testing laboratory.
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
Monitor Well Construction
All monitor wells were installed in accordance with North Carolina monitor well
construction standards. All wells were completed either flush with the ground
surface inside a protective cast iron well access manhole to protect against
surface water infiltration, or in a steel, stand-up casing. Each well is equipped
with a lockable well cap.
Type II Sonic Drill Installed Monitor Wells
Sonic drilling is initiated with a 4-inch outside diameter HSSS equipped with a
rock shoe. Sonic vibrations at the shoe liquefy material encountered as the drill
rod is pushed with hydraulic pressure. Once the length of the core has been
reached, a larger diameter HSSS (6-inch in this case) is advanced outside of the
inner HSSS to the same depth. The inner core is removed for soil sample
collection. This process repeats with an inner HSSS advancing the borehole each
depth interval. Once the target depth is reached, 2-inch diameter Schedule 40
threaded flush joint PVC pipe is installed within the annular space of the 6-inch
HSSS. Each well is equipped with a section of 0.010-inch slot PVC well screen
ERM 3 APPENDIX B_STANDARD OPERATING
PROCEDURES.DOCX-5/ 17/ 16

with a 0.5-foot PVC sediment trap. Blank PVC casing extends from the top of the
well screen to approximately 0.5-feet below ground level. A clean silica sand
pack was placed around the well screen within the HSSS and the sections of
HSSS are removed as the sand is added to allow sand to pack in the annular
space of the borehole. This continues to a depth of approximately two feet above
the top of the screen. A nominal two -foot thick bentonite seal was placed
immediately above the sand pack. Once the bentonite seal is in place, the HSSS
are removed from the well and the remaining borehole annular space is filled
with a cement/bentonite slurry to with one foot of the ground surface using
tremie pipe for placement. The well is finished with a 2'x2' concrete pad and a
flush -mount 8-inch diameter manhole.
Monitor Well Development/Purging Methods
Following installation, the monitor wells were developed by removing a
minimum of three to five well volumes of water by surging and bailing. For
wells characterized by a slow recharge rate, the wells were pumped/bailed dry
prior to sampling.
GROUND WATER SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS
MONITOR WELLS
Following well development and purging, groundwater samples were collected
from the site monitor wells using the low flow sampling techniques.
Low Flow Sampling Technique
The low -flow sampling technique involves pumping the ground water from the
monitor well at a low flow rate (<250 ml/min) through a flow -through cell
where water quality parameters (pH, oxidation reduction potential, dissolved
oxygen, specific conductivity and temperature) are monitored until they
stabilize, after which a ground water sample is collected for laboratory analysis.
Generally, the water level in the well should be monitored during purging every
3 to 5 minutes, and ideally, the purge rate should equal the well recharge rate so
that there is little or no drawdown in the well. (The water level should stabilize
for the specific purge rate.)
Ground water samples are collected by filling the sample bottles from the
discharge tube. Care is taken so the ground water flows gently down the inside
of the bottle with minimal turbulence.
Ground water elevation data were obtained an electronic depth to water meter.
For each well, all data collected was recorded in a field notebook and copies of
field notes are maintained in a central project file for the site. Copies of field
ERM 4 APPENDIX B_STANDARD OPERATING
PROCEDURES.DOCX-5/ 17/ 16

notes are available upon request. Prior to the initiation of activities at each well,
all sampling personnel put on new, laboratory quality latex or nitrile gloves.
These gloves were replaced as necessary during the well evacuation and
sampling procedure. Prior to the collection of groundwater quality data at each
well, the surface integrity of the well was checked. Problems which could affect
groundwater sample integrity were noted in the field notes.
LABORATORY ANALYSES
Groundwater samples were analyzed for the compounds and by the methods
specified by NCDENR for the compounds of concern at the site. Laboratory
analyses were provided by GCAL. Sample collection, handling, and preservation
were conducted in accordance with accepted protocol, including chain -of -custody
documentation.
SLUG TESTING
Slug tests (rising head) were conducted by placing a pressure transducer in the
bottom of the well and then removing a slug of water from the well using bailers.
Following removal of the slug, the water table recovery is recorded in a
datalogger and the data is transferred to a computer for analysis using
AQTSOLV for Windows software.
ERM 5 APPENDIX B_STANDARD OPERATING
PROCEDURES.DOCX-5/ 17/ 16