Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMO-6615_27296_CA_FPR_20160518_FreeProductRecoveryReportMay 18, 2016 Mr. Brett Morris NCDEQ - Mooresville Regional Office Division of Waste Management -UST Section 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 Tele: 704-663-1699 Subject: Free Product Recovery Report Former Integris Metals Facility 527 Atando Avenue Charlotte, North Carolina Dear Mr. Morris: via FedEx ERM NC, Inc. 15720 Brixham Hill Avenue, Suite 120 Charlotte, NC 28277 Tele:704-541-8345 Fax:704-624-7928 On behalf of J.T. Ryerson & Son, Inc. (Ryerson), ERM NC, Inc. (ERM) would like to submit the enclosed Free Product Recovery Report for the above referenced facility. An electronic copy (on CD) is attached to back cover of the report. The report summarizes free product recovery activities at the site and provides an update to the sensitive receptor survey. If you have any questions, please contact us at 704-541-8345. Sincerely, j* &T/(k "- Michael Pressley, P.G. Project Manager enclosures cc: Mr. Mark Silver - Ryerson Rick Tarravechia, P.G., RSM Partner in Charge J.T. Ryerson & Son, Inc. Free Product Recovery Report May 2016 Former Integris Metals Facility 527 Atando Avenue Charlotte, North Carolina Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world - -- _� ERM Site Information Site Identification Date of Report: May 18, 2016 Facility I.D. None Incident Number 27296 Site Risk/Priority Risk Intermediate Site Name: Former Inteeris Metals Site Street Address: 527 Atando Avenue City/Town: Charlotte Zip Code: 28206 County: Mecklenburg Description of Geographical Data Point (e.g., diesel fill port): Fuel Oil #2 UST Location Method (GPS, topographical map, other): Site reconnaissance and website Latitude: 35.25785 Longitude:-80.816810 (Source Area Location) Information about Contacts Associated With the Leaking UST System UST Owner: Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc. Address: 227 W. Monroe Street, Chicago, IL Tel: (312) 292-5000 UST Operator: Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc Address: 227 W. Monroe Street, Chicago, IL Tel: (312) 292-5000 Property Owner: Advantage Machinery Services Address: 1407 Highway 601 South, Yadkinville, NC 27055 Tel: (336) 463-4700 Property Occupant: Sunbelt -Turret Steel Address: 527 Atando Avenue, Charlotte, NC 28206 Tel: (704) 342-4321 Consultant/Contractor: ERM NC, Inc. Address: 15720 Brixham Hill Avenue, Suite 120, Charlotte, NC 28277 Tel: (704) 541-8345 Information about Release Date Discovered: November 13, 2002 Estimated Quantity of Release: Unknown Cause of Release: Unknown Source of Release (Dispenser/Piping/UST): UST Sizes and contents of UST system(s) from which the release occurred: 12,000 gallon Fuel Oil UST Certification I, Rick Tarravechia a Professional Engineer icensed Geolo i (circle one) for ERM NC, Inc., do certify that the information contained in this report is correct and accurate to the best of my knowledge. (Affix Seal and Signature) CA 01. SEAL = ? ERM NC, Inc. is licensed to practice geology and engineering in North Carolina. The certification number of the company or corporation is C-470. ERM NC, Inc. 1 Free Product Recovery Report - Atando Ave.docx Free Product Recovery - Status and Conclusions Historically, the majority of the free product recovery performed at the site has been accomplished using manual bailing methods, due to the non-volatile nature of the heating oil. An Aggressive fluid Vapor Recovery (AFVR) event was conducted on March 9, 2004 utilizing monitor well MW-1 and recovery well RW-1 for extraction points. Approximately 0.5 gallons of vapor -phase petroleum hydrocarbons and 1.5 gallons of product were recovered during the AFVR event. Due to the low volume of product recovered using AFVR, hand bailing was chosen as a removal method from that point forward. Free product recovery events and dates are documented in Table B-8. Free product recovery activities took place from January 2003 to December 2004, recovering approximately six gallons of free product. Recovery activities were ceased when the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (now called Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ)) stopped directing work for intermediate risk sites due to UST Trust Fund reimbursement issues. Ryerson, the successor to Integris Metals, requested that ERM gauge wells MW-1 and RW-1 in November 2014 to check the status of free product. MW-1 was found to have 0.55 feet of product while RW-1 did not contain any free product. Based the presence of free product in MW-1, ERM commenced free product removal activities again, which included a combination of hand bailing followed by the installation of a passive skimmer (from February 2014 to February 2016) and then the use of absorbent socks from March 2016 through May 2016. Free product recovered during this time period is less than a quarter gallon and has been stored in a sealed container at the site. The majority of free product measurements since February 2014 have indicated only a sheen (less than 0.01 feet). Free product has not been measured in MW-1 since February 2016. ERM will continue to gauge RW-1 and MW-1 for free product. If free product does not return to either well, ERM plans to conduct a site -wide groundwater sampling event and undertaking the activities necessary to obtain site closure. Information from those activities will be presented in a separate report. Sensitive Receptor Survey Update The 2003 Limited Site Assessment (LSA) did not identify water supply wells within the search radius. On May 10, 2016, ERM updated the survey of sensitive receptors within a 1,500-foot radius of the release area. A reconnaissance of surrounding area properties and a review of the Mecklenburg County Well Information System (http://meckmal2.mecklenburgcountync.gov/WIS 3/index.html) confirmed that there are still no water supply wells in the area. Surrounding area properties are supplied with municipal water by the Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities Department (CMUD). ERM NC, Inc. 2 Free Product Recovery Report - Atando Ave.docx An intermittent stream is located approximately 250 feet west of the source area, on the west side of the railroad tracks. This intermittent creek runs parallel to the railroad, towards the southeast, and then veers to the southwest. A single-family residential neighborhood is still present to the west, with the closest residence located approximately 300 feet to the west of the source area. The remaining surrounding area properties are industrial and commercial in nature. Based on ERM's recent survey, no significant changes have been identified for sensitive receptors within a 1,500-foot radius of the source area. ERM NC, Inc. 3 Free Product Recovery Report - Atando Ave.docx Figures kX Legend Site IN .. :•�+ , Di Sri , __ ■/TRi _ n• .. •r III•. i ,,� 1 71. . a • � __�•*■ • � � +hem I� •` frl' - -@ 141, AP iA' aft A tsrtdo Junction ^� e I ' i .� Y � , • �-t� � Sugar �i r"tisr�ek Ch • ..t� z CHARLOTTE— ALr� is ■. or- 14 lip 75a A Y 7`� auto io„' Socy y- y, .............. ...::........ ERM 1 . SCALE: AS SHOWN DRAWN: .• �'-• . p f,. Basemap Copyright:® 2013 Natonal Geographic Society, i-abed. ■• FIGURE 1 Site Location Map Integris Metals 527 Atando Avenue Charlotte, North Carolina s Atand � MW-5 ! - r� UST-1 -TRW-1 j r! � txpianatton r, Monitor Well Location ; •r Recovery Well_-, O Shallow Well ,. d Deep Well r UST f - R � - ,; •,+ � �. ..��.;.w � L v a,..` r ' '•. i. - Site 0.4 z•'Ir ,�a Y Building Paved - — ' , a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r r I - r• . :........... ERM SCALE AS SHOWN DRAWN AFreeman DATE 5/9/2019 0 25 50 Feet Mecklenburg County. arg County: 2015 Aerial, Site Features, Property lines FIGURE 2 Site Plan Integris Metals 527 Atando Avenue Charlotte, North Carolina upper,ASDu s Explanation ght Radii lstrial Creeks Streams Site Parcels F'n�s Building q� C yw Paved �o mom° Other �' S f� Water Quality Buffers 2y 100 Foot �F c� 35 Foot 30 Foot Zoning Designation mad - 1-2 R-17MF R-22MF R-5 j:,_-ti- i f Kennedy St 3 moo° 0000 { �vo U waneAv �. OO MM r Heavy industrial 5� ne��Jy G°c i i a Q a 'r ° o Y:. N r 9 N 0 150 300 t Feet Basemap Mecklenburg County. p� Mecklenburg County: 2015Aerial, Site Features, Properly lines 7a FIGURE 3 ERM NC, Inc. Sensitive Receptor & Zoning Map ERM Integris Metals Faye 527 Atando Avenue SCALE: AS SHOWN DRAWN: AFreeman DATE: S/17/2O'O Charlotte, North Carolina T.1SharrtlelRICKIRyemon-Integrls Mel lslA� ndo Ave1GIS1MXD1AtandolFlg3.m,d Tables TABLE B-8 FREE PRODUCT RECOVERY RESULTS Date: 18-May-16 Incident Number and Name: Integris Metals - 27296 Free Product Recovery Method Bailer/Passive Skimmer/Sock/AFVR Facility ID#: NA Method of Measurement: Bailer/I Interface probe Product Amount of Casing Thickness Product Product Depth to Water Date of Diameter Before Thickness After Recovered from Top of Well ID Product Type Recovery (inches) Recovery (ft.) Recovery (ft.) (gallons) Casing (ft.) Comments MW-1 Fuel Oil 1/3/03 2 0.05 0.00 <0.25 21.32 Bailer 1/22/03 2 0.02 0.00 <0.25 16.23 Bailer 3/10/03 2 0.04 0.00 <0.25 14.07 Bailer 3/25/03 2 0.00 0.00 <0.25 12.99 Bailer 4/4/03 2 0.03 0.00 <0.25 12.68 Bailer 5/30/03 2 0.01 0.00 <0.25 11.01 Bailer 6/27/03 2 0.02 0.00 <0.25 11.24 Bailer 7/17/03 2 0.01 0.00 <0.25 11.71 Bailer 8/26/03 2 0.01 0.00 <0.25 11.15 Bailer 9/2/03 2 0.01 0.00 <0.25 12.18 Bailer 11/14/03 2 0.01 0.00 <0.25 15.23 Bailer 11/24/03 2 0.01 0.00 <0.25 15.10 Bailer 12/19/03 2 0.04 0.00 <0.25 14.74 Bailer 1/29/04 2 0.05 0.00 <0.25 15.05 Bailer 3/9/04 2 0.00 0.00 <0.25 13.19 AFVR 4/8/04 2 0.04 0.00 <0.25 13.07 Bailer 5/10 to 5/19/04 Source Removal: UST and 416 tons of contaminated soil removed to depth of 17 feet. 5/24/04 2 0.08 0.00 0.20 13.22 Bailer 6/23/04 2 0.07 0.00 <0.25 15.00 Bailer 7/28/04 2 0.05 0.00 <0.25 15.75 Bailer 8/27/04 2 0.12 0.00 0.25 15.52 Bailer 10/5/04 2 0.05 0.00 <0.25 14.14 Bailer 11/1/04 2 0.10 0.00 0.25 14.67 Bailer 12/2/04 2 0.03 0.00 <0.25 14.53 Bailer 11/17/13 2 0.55 0.00 <0.25 17.89 Bailer 2/5/14 2 0.67 0.00 <0.25 15.34 Passive Skmr 2/17/14 2 <0.01 0.00 <0.25 14.55 Passive Skmr 2/27/14 2 <0.01 0.00 <0.25 14.01 Passive Skmr 3/27/14 2 <0.01 0.00 <0.25 13.60 Passive Skmr 8/6/14 2 <0.01 0.00 <0.25 14.45 Passive Skmr 4/10/15 2 <0.01 0.00 <0.25 14.01 Passive Skmr 5/27/15 2 0.01 0.00 <0.25 14.76 Passive Skmr 7/28/15 2 0.08 0.00 <0.25 17.72 Passive Skmr 1/28/16 2 0.19 0.00 0.00 12.92 Passive Skmr 2/18/16 2 0.13 0.00 0.00 13.22 Passive Skmr 3/25/16 2 <0.01 0.00 0.00 13.01 Sock 3/31/16 2 <0.01 0.00 0.00 12.91 Sock 4/14/16 2 <0.01 0.00 0.00 13.40 Sock 5/5/16 2 <0.01 0.00 0.00 13.66 Sock RW-1 Fuel Oil 11/24/03 4 0.05 0 0.25 15.20 Bailer 12/19/03 4 0.15 0 0.25 15.32 Bailer 1/29/04 4 0.42 0 0.25 15.56 Bailer 3/9/04 4 0.05 0 2.00 13.32 AFVR 4/8/04 4 0.15 0 0.25 13.29 Bailer 5/10 to 5/19/04 Source Removal: UST and 416 tons of contaminated soil removed to depth of 17 feet. 5/24/04 4 0.17 0 0.30 13.43 Bailer 6/23/04 4 0.23 0 0.30 15.38 Bailer 7/28/04 4 0.27 0 0.30 15.46 Bailer 8/27/04 4 0.29 0 0.30 15.75 Bailer 10/5/04 4 0.15 0 0.30 13.87 Bailer 11/1/04 4 0.17 0 0.30 14.91 Bailer 12/2/04 4 0.03 0 <0.25 14.74 Bailer 2/27/14 4 <0.01 0 0.00 14.00 --- 5/27/15 4 0.01 0 0.00 14.68 --- 7/28/15 4 0.01 0 0.00 17.31 --- 1/28/15 4 <0.01 0 0.00 13.41 --- 2/28/16 4 <0.01 0 0.00 13.49 --- 3/31/16 4 <0.01 0 0.00 13.23 --- 4/14/16 4 <0.01 0 0.00 13.27 --- 5/5/16 4 <0.01 0 0.00 13.66 Total Gallons Recovered to Date: Approximately 6.25 gallons Appendix A Site Specific Health & Safety Plan (HASP) LEVEL 2 WARN HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN GMS Project # 0231146 This Level 2 Work Activity Risk Assessment (WARN) Health & Safety Plan (HASP) is intended to provide health and safety guidelines for project field work meeting ONE OR MORE OF the following criteria: • Some likelihood of physical and/or chemical hazard exposure (e.g., sampling) • Number of job tasks is five or greater • Use of subcontractors • Fieldwork is being performed on an active or abandoned mining site • "High -hazard" work to be performed, including but not limited to: o Excavations and trenching o Confined Spaces o Hot Work o Subsurface Clearance (must complete and attach Subsurface Clearance Project Plan) o Hazardous Energy Control Operations o Work at heights o Overhead Utilities/Proximity Hazards o Lifting Operations o Construction o Decommissioning, Decontamination and Demolition (DDD) Operations o Injection Well Operations If NONE of the above applies, an e-mail or Level 1 HASP template may be used. For more complex sites with significant client health and safety requirements, the project team may consider use of a long -form Level 3 WARN HASP. This HASP should be developed with input from the project team, and reviewed with all ERM project personnel (including subcontractors). A signed copy of the HASP must be maintained at the project site during work and in the project files. H&S Team review is required for the Level 2 WARN HASP. This HASP must be reviewed by the Project Manager and Partner -in -Charge (PIC) and updated as warranted to address changes in scope, hazards present, project personnel, etc. At a minimum, HASPs must be reviewed annually or if the scope of work changes. Updated HASPs should also be sent to the H&S Team and PIC for approval. Page 1 of 17 Form Revision 3/8/2013 Administrative Information Site Name and Location Sunbelt Turret Steel (former Ryerson facility), 527 Atando Avenue, Charlotte, NC This document has been Client Contact and Phone Bobby Owens 312-292-5058 Project Name Atando Avenue Free Product Recovery developed for the sole use of ERM staff. Subcontractors and other project participants must Health & Safety Plan Date 2-4-14 Revision Number and Date Field Work Start Date 2-6-13 Anticipated Field Work End Date 9-1-14 develop their own HASP. This document is valid for a Project Manager (responsible for implementing the site Partner In Charge (responsible for overall site health and safety performance maximum time period of one health and safety program on this project) on this project). year after initial completion. Michael Pressley Rick Tarravechia This document must be reviewed if the scope of work or nature of site hazards changes Field Safety Officer (responsible for all health & safety Additional ERM personnel on site and updated as warranted. activities, recordkee in and delegation of duties to an p g g Y Michael Pressley other project team members) All on -site personnel must be appropriately trained and Ryan Mayete qualified for the planned scope of work to be performed. H&S Team Review Review Date Signature 2-4-2014 Donald Hall Site Setting Site: Include relevant background The subject property is four acres in size and contains 103,940 square feet of building footprints (Figure 3-1). The subject property is four information regarding the site, acres in size and contains 103,940 square feet of building footprint. The office building area is located in a building in the central portion of such as location, size, type of the property. A warehouse is located in an adjoined building to the south and the primary steel storage and cutting area is located in an facility, topography, weather, adjoined building to the north. The warehouse and steel processing buildings are constructed with concrete floors, steel framing, and a infrastructure, security, combination of steel, cement block and brick siding. The office building is finished with carpet and 12-inch tile flooring, sheet rock walls, previous site use, etc. Describe and tile ceilings. Areas of the property not covered in buildings are either concrete, asphalt, or gravel covered nature and extent of any soil/air/water/groundwater A petroleum release, associated with a 6,000-gallon fuel oil underground storage tank (UST), was discovered in 2002. Petroleum - contamination. impacted soils were subsequently removed and free product was discovered on the water table. ERM understands that free product recovery efforts were made and in 2003, less than 1/4- inch of product was present. No further action has taken place since that time. Describe any other aspects of the site that may potentially affect the health, safety, or Free product is located in the warehouse building which is in the southern portion of the property. The warehouse is generally empty and security of on -site personnel. not used during regular site opertions. On November 7, 2013 ERM mobilized to the subject property to gauge monitor well MW-1 and recovery well RW-1 for the presence of free product. Monitor well MW-1 was found to contain 0.55 feet of product. No product was measured in the adjacent recovery well. Page 2 of 17 Form Revision 3/8/2013 Project Background and Scope ERM Scope of Work: ERM will install a passive skimmer for deployment inside monitor well MW-1. Passive skimmers utilize a of Work hydrophobic filter and canister to collect free product only. Once the canister is filled, the skimmer is removed from the well and contents are emptied into a drum (or other suitable container) for storage until proper disposal. The rate of product removal is dependent upon Include list of tasks to be the quantity of free product present, the viscosity of the product, and the formation that contains the product. Initially, frequent site visits completed by ERM personnel will be required to determine the rate of removal (or canister filling). The product will be placed in sealable 55-gallon drum or other during this project, and a container suitable for used oil, properly labeled, and stored on -site in a location agreeable with site management. . separate list of tasks to be completed by any subcontractors at the site. Weekly / Monthly Free Product Check/Removal. For the first month of skimmer deployment, ERM will visit the site once per week to determine the rate of canister filling. Based on the results of the first month, it is anticipated that the site visit schedule may be relaxed to A site -specific Job Hazard once per month. For budgetary purposes, nine free product checks spread -out over six months, will be performed under this proposal. Analysis (JHA) must be This schedule may change based on the actual rate at which the passive skimmer absorbs free product. completed for each task to be performed. Subcontractors must provide their own HASP. Subcontractors must provide JHAs for each task they will Subcontractor(s) Scope of Work: No subcontractors will be used for this scope of work. perform for ERM review. JHA template and reference/example JHAs for more common tasks can be found at: Americas H&S Paqe - JHAs Subcontractor(s) to be used: Has subcontractor been approved (PICS or other local approval)? ❑ Y ❑ N ❑ Y ❑ N ❑ Y ❑ N ❑ Y ❑ N ❑ Y ❑ N Site/Project General Information Site Type (check all applicable boxes) * Complete and attach the ❑ Remote Site* ❑ Inactive Facility* ❑ Hazardous waste release site (HAZWOPER) appropriate Risk Assessment ❑ Railroad ® Industrial ❑ Residential checklist. ❑ Unsecured ❑ Coastal / Offshore (on or ❑ Other (specify) near water) Page 3 of 17 Form Revision 3/8/2013 Safe Work Practices Place a checkmark by applicable site hazards. Adequate control measures for all checked hazards must be included in site -specific JHAs, which should be attached to the HASP ** High hazard work requiring H&S team coordination (additional control measures required beyond JHA) *** Permit -required high hazard work, requiring safety team coordination and ERM or equivalent client -required permit to be completed More detailed guidance on specific safety topics can be found in the Health & Safety Guidance Documents Section on the Americas Safety Page on Minerva. Main Site Hazards (check all applicable boxes) ❑ Natural Hazards (Plants, ® Organic Chemicals Insects Animals) ❑ Journey Management ❑ Overexertion / Fatigue ❑ Compressed Gas ❑ Work at Heights > feet (1.2 m)** ❑ Use of Blasting Materials or Explosives** ® Slip/Trip/Fall ❑ Scaffold Use ❑ Excavations and Trenching** ❑ Control of Hazardous Energy*** ® Hazard Communication ❑ Chemical mixing and injection ❑ Travel to Medium/High Risk Locations** ❑ Other (specify) ❑ Asbestos ❑ Extreme Weather ❑ Confined Space Entry- ❑ Forklift and Industrial Truck Use** ❑ Portable Ladders ❑ All -Terrain Vehicle ❑ Working on or over water ® Medical Services and First Aid ❑ Unexploded Ordinance / Munitions and Explosives of Concern (UXO/MEC)** ❑ Drum Handling ❑ Other(specify) ❑ Inorganic Chemicals ❑ Line Breaking** ❑ High Noise (>85 dBA) ❑ Hand/Portable Power Tools ❑ ASTs/USTs ❑ Scissor Lift / Cherry Picker Use* ❑ Welding or Hot Work*** ❑ Helicopter Transportation ❑ Working in or near surface waters (lakes/rivers) ❑ Airborne Contaminants ❑ Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) ❑ Protection by Armed Security Forces** ❑ Other(specify) ❑ Material Handling Equipment in Use* ❑ Extended Shifts (>14 hrs + driving) ❑ Respirable Particles ❑ Non -Ionizing Radiation ❑ Buried/Overhead Utilities and Subsurface Clearance- ® Ergonomics / Manual Lifting ❑ Construction — Su rface/U nderg round Mines ❑ Underwater Diving** ❑ Critical Lifting*** ❑ Respiratory Protection ❑ Non -Standard Shifts (e.g., night work) ❑ Other(specify) Page 4 of 17 Form Revision 3/8/2013 Chemical Products Used or Stored Onsite ❑ Alconox or Liquinox* ❑ Calibration gas (Methane) ❑ Isopropyl Alcohol* For each chemical product ❑ Hydrochloric acid (HCI)* ❑ Calibration gas (Isobutylene) ❑ Household bleach (NaOCI)* identified, a Safety Data Sheet ❑ ❑ ❑ (SDS) or Chemical Safety Data Nitric acid (HNO3)* Calibration gas (Pentane) Sulfuric acid (H2SO4)* Card (CSDC) must be attached to this HASP. ❑ Sodium hydroxide (NaOH)* ❑ Calibration gas (4-gas mixture) ❑ Hexane ❑ Calibration gas (zero air) SDS/CSDS for many common ❑ ❑ ❑ chemicals may be found on the Other (specify) Other (specify) Other (specify) Americas Safety Page on Minerva. *NOTE: Eyewash solution must be readily available on ALL project sites where materials are used or stored that pose a risk of getting into the eyes from splashes / airborne dust/debris, etc., including sample preservatives. The eyewash unit — stationary or portable — must be large enough to provide at least 15 minutes of eye flushing. Chemicals of Concern In the section to the right, ❑ Friable Asbestos ❑ alpha-Napthylamine ❑ Methyl chromoethyl ether check any chemicals present ❑ 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ❑ bis-Chloromethyl ether ❑ beta-Napthylamine onsite in any media (air, soil, "No ❑ Benzidine ❑ 4-Aminodiphenyl ❑ Ethyleneimine water), or check ERM exposure to these". ❑ beta-Propiolactone ❑ 2-Acetylaminoflourene ❑ 4-Dimethylaminoazobenzene These chemicals include OSHA- ❑ N-Nitrosomethylamine ❑ Vinyl chloride ❑ Inorganic arsenic regulated potential occupational carcinogens (29 ❑ Lead ❑ Chromium (VI) ❑ Cadmium CFR 1910.1003-1910.1016) as well as those chemicals for ❑enzene B ❑ Coke oven emissions ❑ 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane which OSHA has established ❑ Acrylonitrile ❑ Ethylene oxide ❑ Formaldehyde specific respiratory protection ❑ Methylenedianiline ❑ 1,3-Butadiene ❑ Methylene requirements (29 CFR 1910.134) chloride If any of these chemicals are ❑ 4-Nitrobiphenyl present on site, contact your ❑ No ERM exposure to these safety team member for guidance. Then, describe additional protective measures Additional measures to be taken based on associated chemical hazard(s): to be taken for boxes checked. Page 5 of 17 Form Revision 3/8/2013 The following section must be filled out completely for all chemicals (suspected or confirmed) present in site media (soil, air, water). Attach an SDS for each chemical. Primary Hazards of the Material (explosive, flammable, corrosive, Highest Reported IDLH Level toxic, volatile, Respirator Concentration Exposure Limit (specify radioactive, Symptoms and Ionization Respirator Cartridge Materials Present or (specify units and (specify ppm or biohazard, oxidizer, or Effects of Acute Potential Cartridge Replacement Suspected at Site sample medium) ppm or mg/m') mg/m') other) Exposure (eV) Type Schedule Irritation to nose, throat, lungs and respiratroy tract. PEL = Central nervous REL = 100 system effects may Fuel Oil Free product in MW-1. TLV = unknown Inhalation, ingestion, include headache, NA Organic 2X Daily contact dizziness, loss of Vapor Other= balance and Skin Hazard ® coordination, unconsciousness, coma, respiratory failure and death PEL = REL = TLV = Other= Skin Hazard ❑ PEL = REL = TLV = Other= Skin Hazard ❑ PEL = REL = TLV = Other= Skin Hazard ❑ PEL = REL = TLV = Other= Skin Hazard ❑ PEL = REL = TLV = Other= Skin Hazard ❑ Page 6 of 17 Form Revision 3/8/2013 FOR ADDITIONAL CHEMICALS, USE THE LEVEL 2 HASP CHEMICALS TABLE ATTACHMENT. PEL = OSHA Permissible Exposure Limit - http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show document?p table=STANDARDS&p id=9992 REL = NIOSH Recommended Exposure Limit - http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npq/default.html TLV = ACGIH Threshold Limit Value (Contact your Division H&S Leader for additional information on these values). IDLH = Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health - http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npq/default.html Levels of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Required for Task Description Level of PPE each Task A B C D Install passive skimmer ❑ ❑ ❑ Primary hazard control strategies, including elimination/avoidance, Bail Free Product ❑ ❑ ❑ engineering controls, and/or administrative controls, must be documented for all tasks on task - specific JHAs, to be included as an ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ attachment to this HASP. PPE is El ❑ ❑ El considered as the "last line of ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Signature of the H&S Team on Page 1 of this document signifies El ❑ ❑ ElAssessment. certification of PPE Hazard ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Page 7 of 17 Form Revision 3/8/2013 Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) based on identified tasks to be performed, as outlined in Scope of Work. Req = Required PPE for one or more tasks to be performed; required on site at all times. PPE specific to each task must be outlined in detail on task -specific JHAs. NA = Not applicable to this project PPE Req NA PPE Req NA Steel Toe Boots ® ❑ Hard Hat ® ❑ Long Sleeve Shirt & Long Pants ® ❑ Safety Glasses w/ side shields ® ❑ Outer Disposable Boots ❑ ® Chemical/impact-resistant Goggles ❑ Tyvek Suit ❑ ® Poly -Coated Tyvek ❑ Fully Encapsulated Chemical Suit ❑ ® Full -Face Respirator ❑ Hearing Protection ❑ ® Half -Face Respirator ❑ Leather Gloves ® ❑ Inner Chemical Gloves ® ❑ Outer Chemical Gloves ❑ ® Other (specify) High visibility safety vest ® ❑ Training, Medical Surveillance, and Safety Supplies Req = Requirements are based on specific tasks performed in the field and the type of environments, chemicals or hazards encountered. NA =Not applicable to this project *Provides specialized training over -and -above the 40-hour HAZWOPER training necessary to serve as an on -site manager supervising employees engaged in work covered by the HAZWOPER standard at 29 CFR 1910.120 **Physical examination requirements should be discussed with WorkCare well in advance of the start of work to allow adequate time to schedule examination requirements. Training Req NA Medical Surveillance*" Req NA 40-hr HAZWOPER; current 8-hr refresher ® ❑ Medical Clearance ® ❑ 8 Hour HAZWOPER Supervisor* ❑ ® Respirator Clearance and Fit Test ® ❑ Current CPR and First Aid ® ❑ Blood Lead and ZPP ® ❑ MSHA 40-hr New Miner and current 8-hr refresher ❑ ® Other (specify) El El ERM Field Safety Officer (FSO) ® ❑ Other (specify) ❑ ❑ DDD Practice FSO/DM ❑ ® Supplies Req NA Subsurface Clearance (SSC) ❑ ® First Aid Kit ® ❑ EPA Hazardous Waste El ® Eyewash Solution (capable of 15 minutes of eye flushing)® El Hazmat/Dangerous Goods Shipping ❑ ® Air Horn ❑ International Traveler ❑ ® Decontamination Supplies ® ❑ Other (specify): ❑ ❑ Fire Extinguisher ® ❑ Other (specify): ❑ ❑ Potable Water ® ❑ Other (specify): ❑ ❑ Toilets ❑ Other (specify): ❑ ❑ Other (specify): ❑ ❑ Page 8 of 17 Form Revision 3/8/2013 Monitoring Equipment: All monitoring equipment on site must be calibrated per manufacturer specifications (including daily bump tests) and results recorded. Under stable site conditions, measurements must be made in the breathing zone at least once every 30 minutes. Instrument (Check all required) Task Instrument Reading Action Guideline Comments ❑ Combustible gas indicator ❑ 1 0 to 10% LEL Monitor. Evacuate if confined model: ❑ 2 space. ❑ 3 10 to 25% LEL Potential fire or explosion ❑ 4 hazard. ❑ 5 >25% LEL Fire/explosion hazard. Evacuate site. ❑ Oxygen meter model: ❑ 1 >23.5% Oxygen Fire hazard. Evacuate site. ❑ 2 23.5 to 19.5% Oxygen Normal oxygen levels. 3 ❑❑ 4 o <19.5 /o Oxygen Oxygen deficient conditions. ❑ 5 Evacuate site. ❑ Radiation survey meter ❑ 1 Normal background Proceed with normal operations. Annual exposure not to exceed 1250 mrem per quarter. model: ❑ 2 Background reading must be taken in area known to be free of ❑Three times background Notify Radiation Safety radiation sources. 3 Officer. ❑ 4 ❑ 5 >Three times background Radiological hazard. Evacuate site. ❑ Photoionization detector Level "D" is acceptable up to The action level for upgrading the level of protection is typically model: the action level. For response one-half of the lowest published exposure limit identified for the Any response below above established potential COCs at the site. For COCs with extremely low ❑ 11.7 eV ® 10.6 eV _50_ ppm, sustained for 1 minute background level(s), exposure limits (e.g., < 5 ppm), contact your Division H&S Leader ❑ 10.2 eV ❑ 9.8 eV appropriate level PPE or for guidance on action levels. requirements must be met. ❑ eV Respirator selection should be based on the Assigned Protection Level "C" is acceptable as 50 ppm to _100 appropriate. Factor (APF) and the Maximum Use Concentration (MUC). To ❑ 1 ppm, sustained for 1 minute determine the appropriate respirator selection, the following 2 contaminant information must be known: Level A-D PPE Requirements ❑ 3 • Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) or other published Stop work. Tasks requiring ❑ 4 Level B or Level A PPE are Exposure Limit note that the lowest published exposure p ( p p levels) not anticipated during this guideline should be used to establish action ❑ 5 project. If Level B or Level A • Short-term Exposure Limit Greater than ppm PPE is needed, as determined • Ceiling Limit _100 above background, sustained by the FSO and/or the PM, Peak Limit for 1 minute the Division H&S Leader will • Any other exposure limit for the hazardous substance be notified and the HASP will be revised. Contact your Division H&S Leader or Project Health and Safety Consultant for assistance in defining the APF and MUC, as necessary, as well as any time upgrading of respiratory protection is required based on established action levels. Page 9 of 17 Form Revision 3/8/2013 Instrument (Check all required) Task Instrument Reading Action Guideline Comments ❑ Flame ionization detector Level "D" is acceptable up to The action level for upgrading the level of protection is one-half of model: Any response above the action level. For response the lowest published exposure limit identified for the potential background to ppm above established COCs at the site. above background, sustained background level(s), for 1 minute appropriate level PPE Respirator selection should be based on the Assigned Protection requirements must be met. Factor (APF) and the Maximum Use Concentration (MUC). To ppm above Level "C" is acceptable as determine the appropriate respirator selection, the following ❑ 1 background to ppm appropriate. contaminant information must be known: ❑ 2 above background, sustained 0 Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) or other published ❑ 3 for 1 minute Exposure Limit work. Tasks requiring ❑Stop 4 0 Short-term Exposure Limit ❑ Level B or Level A PPE are 0 Ceiling Limit 5 not anticipated during this 0 Peak Limit Greater than ppm project. If Level B or Level A 9 Any other exposure limit for the hazardous substance above background, sustained PPE is needed, as determined for 1 minute by the FSO and/or the Project Contact your Division H&S Leader or Project Health and Safety Health and Safety Consultant, Consultant for assistance in defining the APF and MUC, as the Division H&S Leader will necessary. be notified and the HASP will be revised. ❑ Detector tube models: ❑ 1 Specify: Specify: ❑ 2 ❑ 3 ❑ 4 ❑ 5 ❑ Other (specify): ❑ 1 Specify: Specify: ❑ 2 ❑ 3 ❑ 4 ❑ 5 Page 10 of 17 Form Revision 3/8/2013 Work Zones Exclusion Zone: The immediate area of MW-1/RW-1 If exclusion zones are necessary because of chemical and/or equipment hazards. Describe the set-up of these zones. Include landmarks, dimensions as Contamination Reduction Zone: Within 50 feet of MW-1. necessary, equipment vs. personnel decontamination zones Support Zone: Pre -determined area next to support vehicles Site Access/Control Access Control Procedures: The site is an active industrial facility. The building can only be entered by permission of Sunbelt-Turrett personnel. Describe procedures for limiting unauthorized entry to the work zone(s). Are there any security requirements? Decontamination Personnel: No personal decontamination is anticipated. Hands, arms and face shall be cleaned after leaving exclusion zone and before eating Procedures or drinking Describe procedures for decontamination of personnel and equipment. Equipment: A dedicated passive skimmer will not be decontaminated between uses. Plastic sheeting will be laid onto the adjacent concrete to prevent contamination of the ground surface. Page 11 of 17 Form Revision 3/8/2013 Emergency Response Planning In the pre -work briefing and daily tailgate safety meetings, all onsite employees will be trained in the provisions of emergency response planning, site communication systems, and site evacuation routes. Note that clients may have their own procedures which may need to be followed. Signal a site emergency or medical emergency with three blasts of a loud horn (car horn, fog horn, or similar device). To complete this section, attach a hospital route map to the HASP. ALL WORK -RELATED INCIDENTS MUST BE REPORTED. FOR ALL MEDICAL EMERGENCIES, CALL 911 OR THE LOCAL EMERGENCY NUMBER. For ALL non -emergency incidents resulting in injury or illness, you must: • Give appropriate first aid care to the injured or ill individual and secure the scene. • Immediately notify the Project Manager and/or Partner -in -Charge. • Immediately call WorkCare Incident Intervention at (888) 449-7787 (available 24 hours/7 days per week) (US only). • Clients may have their own procedures which we may need to follow. • Enter the event into the ECS within 24 hours. In the event of an emergency that necessitates evacuation of the work task area or the site as a whole, the following procedures shall occur: • The ERM FSO will contact all nearby personnel using the onsite communications system to advise of the emergency. • Personnel will proceed along site roads to a safe distance upwind from the hazard source. • Personnel will remain in that area until the site safety contact or other authorized individual provides further instruction. In the event of a severe spill or leak, site personnel will follow the procedures listed below: • Evacuate the affected area and relocate personnel to an upwind location. • Inform the ERM FSO, an ERM office, and a site representative immediately. • Locate the source of the spill or leak, and stop the source if it is safe to do so and appropriately trained personnel are onsite to do so. • Begin containment and recovery of spilled or leaked materials. • Notify appropriate local, state, and federal agencies after obtaining client consent to do so. In the event of severe weather, site personnel will follow the procedures listed below: • Site work shall not be conducted during severe weather, including high winds and lightning. • In the event of severe weather, stop work, lower any equipment (drill rigs), and evacuate the affected area. Page 12 of 17 Form Revision 3/8/2013 lient Specific Emergency Response In the event of an emergency, client specific emergency response procedures may take precedent over ERM established procedures. While engaging in field related activities on an active client site, measures they have in place to signal either emergency response or evacuation need to be reviewed and documented. Once completed, this summary, along with evacuation map(s), should be discussed with all visitors, subcontractors and others subject to HASP review upon site visit. Contributing factors initiating emergency response (process, material, weather) Injuries Lights and/or sounds associated with evacuation NA Drill requirements for contractors on -site NA Initial and alternative muster points NA Map associated with evacuation NA Specific evacuation procedures NA How does contractor account for all site visitors NA PPE and Spill Kit requirements (if emergency response is spill related) NA Emergency Contacts Name Location Phone Cell Phone Hospital (attach map) Carolinas Medical 1000 Blythe Blvd, Charlotte, 704-355-2000 Center NC Police Charlotte Meck PD Charlotte 911 Fire Charlotte Meck FD Charlotte 911 Project Manager Michael Pressley Charlotte, NC 704-541-8345 704-641-9458 Field Manager (if not PM) Ryan Mayette Charlotte, NC 7014-541-8345 919-920-5616 Field Safety Officer (if not PM) Division H&S Contact Millard Griffin Atlanta, GA 678-486-2728 678-294-8658 Alternate H&S Contact Don Hall Charlotte, NC 704-541-8345 704-724-3727 Americas Region H&S Contact Mark Hickey Denver, CO 720-200-7172 720-625-2869 Incident Intervention (US Only) WorkCare NA 888-449-7787 NA SSC Experienced Person Subcontractor Safety Contact(s) Client Site Contact Jerry Webb 527 Atando Avenue 800-951-4140 Page 13 of 17 Form Revision 3/8/2013 Acknowledgement 1 have read, understood, and agree with the information set forth in this Health & Safety Plan, and will follow guidance in the plan and in the ERM North America Health and Safety manual. I understand the training and medical monitoring requirements for conducting activities covered by this WARN HASP and have met these requirements. ERM has prepared this plan solely for the purpose of protecting the health and safety of ERM employees. Subcontractors, visitors, and others at the site are required to follow provisions in this document at a minimum, but must refer to their organization's health and safety program for their protection. Printed Name Signature Organization Date Approval Signatures Signatures in this section indicate the signing employee will comply with and enforce this WARN HASP, as well as procedures and guidelines established in the ERM NA H&S. Signatures in this section also indicate that any subcontractors performing work under contract to ERM have met the minimum safety standards in the ERM Subcontractor Prequalification Process. Project Manager Date: Partner in Charge Date: Page 14 of 17 Form Revision 3/8/2013 Check all appropriate ❑ Site -specific JHAs for all tasks (including documents to be attached to subcontractors) this HASP. ❑ SDS/CSDC for all chemicals brought to site and all chemicals suspected/confirmed in site media ❑ SSC Project Plan ® Map of Route to Hospital/Emergency Services ❑ High -Hazard Work Procedures: Type: ❑ High -Hazard Work Permits: Type(s): ® Facility site map(s) ❑ Tailgate Safety Meeting Forms ❑ Air Monitoring and Equipment Calibration Forms ❑ SOS (See -Own -Share) Field Cards ❑ Emergency Drill Forms ❑ OFP Contractor Leaflet ❑ Risk Assessment Checklists ❑ Health & Safety Guidance Documents: List: ❑ Client specific requirements ❑ Travel Risk Assessment (TRA) ❑ PLAN Risk Assessment ❑ Field Audit Forms ❑ PM H&S Checklist ® Vehicle Safety Checklist ❑ IH Sampling Data Sheet ❑ Other (specify): ❑ Other (specify): See It - Own It - Share It Stop Work Authority It means that: It is ERM policy that all ERM and ERM Subcontractor employees • We know that we have a responsibility to look out for each have the authority, without fear of reprimand or retaliation to: other, to intervene when necessary, to be proactive and to • Immediately stop any work activity that presents a danger to help keep safety issues from becoming problems. the site team or the public. • We also look out for ourselves. If we recognize that a situation • Get involved, question and rectify any situation or work is unsafe, we are expected to stop what we're doing, reassess activity that is identified as not being in compliance with the the situation and consult with others if necessary before HASP or with broader ERM health and safety policies. proceeding safely. • Report any unsafe acts or conditions to supervision or, • We assign no blame to anyone who raises safety issues. preferably, intervene to safely correct such acts or conditions • We strive to learn lessons from the large and small events that themselves. are part of our daily experience. Page 15 of 17 Form Revision 3/8/2013 Revision Log Date By I s 2/11/2013 S Perkins / M Griffin Merged standard / intrusive L2 formats into single document. Revisions to include full HAZWOPER compliance, DDD practice applicability, and user feedback. 5/2013 M. Griffin Added additional user feedback. Page 16 of 17 Form Revision 3/8/2013 ATTACHMENTS Page 17 of 17 Form Revision 3/8/2013 527 Atando Ave, Charlotte, NC 28206 to Carolinas Medical Center - Google Maps Page 1 of 2 Directions to Carolinas Medical Center Google 1000 Blythe Blvd, Charlotte, NC 28203 5.6 mi about 13 mins r ,a JPtl Berry yd 4W x1 a r ❑enra X <�; n Creek Park y La Satie Sr Ata7 • 3 Nvskins ,park 49 N Tryon st Historic Eas Tway J Rosedale .• Park rrs�< °aF Alarrrarion 21 Nni7.3 �j F 4 C7 s� �4 Charles Avenue Park [}r 21 2P nA. r �y ti l4G o Di ery.r'`: Nc Place Charlotte 21 E C] v Country Club —. — El 74 Central Ave hest Blvd � Q E] �� xr• w � c •.� Centraf Ave Independence'��� �� c •# Cl Park c ` 4� . $ a 74 Park a '� ��rr of Ovens xz °F f7 y Audiiorium F°s� '�a w lcog 21 Ag v 15 C a Grayson Mpr1r 1 im °4. Park z s� P ,_. o NPemorit J2014 Google - ry I tlet8©2014 Google - L q r https:Hmaps.google.com/maps?f=d&source=s d&saddr=527+Atando+Ave,+Charlotte,+NC... 2/4/2014 527 Atando Ave, Charlotte, NC 28206 to Carolinas Medical Center - Google Maps Page 2 of 2 1 527 Atando Ave, Charlotte, NC 28206 1. Head northwest on Atando Ave toward Ware Ave 2. Take the 1 st left onto N Graham St About 5 mins 3. Continue onto S Graham St About 1 min 4. Turn right onto S Mint St 5. Take the 1 st left onto W Morehead St About 4 mins 6. Slight right onto S Kings Dr ro 7. Take the 1 st right onto Medical Center Dr 8. Turn right onto Blythe Blvd Destination will be on the left (g� Carolinas Medical Center 1000 Blythe Blvd, Charlotte, NC 28203 go 0.3 mi total 0.3 mi go 2.6 mi total 2.9 mi go 0.5 mi total 3.3 mi go 0.3 mi total 3.6 mi go 1.7 mi total 5.2 mi go 0.1 mi total 5.4 mi go 433 ft total 5.5 mi go 0.2 mi total 5.6 mi These directions are for planning purposes only. You may find that construction projects, traffic, weather, or other events may cause conditions to differ from the map results, and you should plan your route accordingly. You must obey all signs or notices regarding your route. Map data ©2014 Google I Directions weren't right? Please find your route on maps.google.com and click "Report a problem" at the bottom left. I https:Hmaps.google.com/maps?f=d&source=s d&saddr=527+Atando+Ave,+Charlotte,+NC... 2/4/2014 ERM 0 JHA Job Hazard Analysis Project Number: 231146 1 Project / Client Name: JAtando Avenue FP Recovery/Ryerson, Inc. Project Manager: Michael Pressley I Location: ICharlotte, NC Partner -in -Charge: Rick Tarravechia Date and Revision Number: 2/4/2014 SPECIFIC TASK: Drive to site, remove free product Minimum Required PPE for Entire Task: 0 Hard Hat 17 Safety -Toe Shoes 0 Hearing Protection [IGoggles [IFace Shield ❑ Respirator center type and cartridge type> [IOther (specify): 0 Safety Glasses ❑Z Reflective Vest 0 Gloves Nitrile/cut resistant gloves [IPPE clothing center type here (eg, Tyvek, FRC, long sleeves)> center additional PPE here> Additional Task -Step Specific PPE: (as indicated below under Controls) Level D Equipment / Tools Required: PID Training Required for this Task: 40hr HAZWOPER, Permits Required for this Task: None Forms Associated with This Task: Daily Tailgate Meeting form, Vehicle Safety Checklist JHA Developed / Reviewed By: JHA Review In Field Name / Job Title: Name / Job Title: Name / Job Title: Field Safety Officer (FSO) to ensure all personnel performing this task have reviewed JHA and agree to follow it. Site -specific changes to this JHA have been made as warranted based on this review. FSO Signature/Date: Michael Pressley, P.G. (Project Manager) Donald Hall, CSP T eps p elect Potential Hazards & Consequences Likelihood Severity RISK lCojdols to Eliminate or Reduce Risks3 1 Vehicle Operation 1 a Vehicle collision -injury and property damage 2 3 6 1 a Driving Alertness, defensive driving and keeping space cushion 2 Remove FP from passive skimmer; hand bailing additional FP; pouring FP into container at the wellhead and into ucori nil ART 2a Strain arm/hands/back H&s 1 3 3 12c 2a Use proper bending and lifting techniques. Move slowly and deliberately. 2b contact with fuel oil - dermatitis H&s 5 2 6 2b Proper PPE, and take care while handling bailer and pouring 2c Struck by forklift H&s 3 4 6 Wear high visibility vest and place cones/caution tape around well as needed JHA FP RecoveryAsx Page 1 of 2 Print Dale: 5/5/2016 Task Steps' Potential Hazards & ConsequenceS2 RISK lControls to Eliminate or Reduce RiskS3 ONE JHA PER TASK. SUBCONTRACTORS MUST PROVIDE THEIR OWN JHAS. JHAS SHOULD BE WRITTEN IN PLAIN LANGUAGE AND SHOULD BE NO MORE THAN 2-3 PAGES IN LENGTH. INSERT ADDITIONAL ROWS AS NEEDED ABOVE (MUST MANUALLY COPY AND PASTE FORMULA IN COLUMN H). ROW HEIGHTS MAY NEED TO BE MANUALLY EXPANDED TO VIEW ALL TEXT. LEAVE SEVERAL BLANK OVERSIZED ROWS TO ALLOW HANDWRITTEN FIELD ADDITIONS. CAN ALSO DELETE UNNEEDED ROWS TO FIT PAGE(S). 1. Each task consists of a set of steps. List and number all the steps in the sequence they are performed. Specify the equipment or other details. 2. List potential health & safety hazards and consequences - ONE PER ROW - and select "H&S" from the drop -down list. Then list any potential security, environmental, and/or property loss impacts - ONE PER ROW - and select the corresponding code(s) from the drop -down list. Use numbers and letters for each hazard/impact listed (1 a, 1 b, etc). Hazards should be described in terms of their specific origin and negative consequences (e.g., instead of "moving equipment', write "injury from getting struck by forklift"). 3. Describe the specific actions or procedures that will be implemented to eliminate or reduce each hazard. Be clear, concise, and specific. Use objective, observable, and quantified terms (e.g., instead of "use good body positioning," write "don't bend at waist or reach above head"). Use numbers and letters corresponding to listed hazards. 4. Select the likelihood of occurrence and severity of each hazard, AFTER implementation of the planned control measures (use the Risk Matrix as a guide). The corresponding risk rating will then be automatically calculated [ RISK = Likelihood x Severity]. A risk rating shaded red indicates that work cannot continue without additional control measures and approval of Partner -in -Charge. WAYS TO ELIMINATE OR REDUCE RISKS (IN ORDER OF PREFERENCE): ELIMINATE/AVOID --> SUBSTITUTE / MODIFY --> ISOLATE --> ENGINEER / SAFEGUARD --> TRAINING AND PROCEDURES --> WARNING AND ALERT MECHANISMS --> PPE JHA_FP Reco ry.bsx Page 2 of 2 Print Date: 5/5/2016 Appendix B Standard Operating Procedures SOIL SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS Sonic Drilling/Sampling Sonic drilling is initiated with a 4-inch outside diameter hollow stem steel sleeve (HSSS) equipped with a rock shoe. Sonic vibrations at the shoe liquefy material encountered as the drill rod is pushed with hydraulic pressure. Once the length of the core has been reached, a larger diameter HSSS (6-inch in this case) is advanced outside of the inner HSSS to the same depth. The inner core is removed for soil sample collection. This process repeats with an inner HSSS advancing the borehole each depth interval. FIELD LOGGING, FIELD SCREENING AND LABORATORY ANALYSIS Soil samples will be visually inspected and the physical characteristics logged upon retrieval of the sample from the soil boring. Soil samples will be screened in the field using either flame ionization detector (FID) or photo -ionization detector (PID) equipment and using the headspace screening method. This equipment will be calibrated by the equipment vendor or field technician prior to use. The PID/FID should be calibrated against the span gas according to the manual available with the PID. When the PID/FID has been calibrated, it is ready to be used for field screening purposes. Soil samples being screened with the PID/FID should be placed in zip lock bags immediately after collection and sealed. The soil should be crumbled within the bag to promote volatilization and then left to sit in a warm, dry location for 10 minutes prior to obtaining a reading. A reading should be taken by punching a small hole in the bag or unzipping a corner, placing the tip of the PID/FID into the bag, sealing the bag with fingers or re -zipping, and recording the maximum concentration observed. Never place the PID directly into the soil. The observation time should continue until the readings stabilize or are consistently below the maximum concentration recorded. Notes should be taken on the moisture content of the sample as this sometimes results in adverse readings from the PID. The PID should be checked every few hours, or following detection of abnormally high VOC concentrations, against the span gas to check for unacceptable drift. If the reading is +/-15% of the actual concentration then the instrument should be recalibrated. Any drift in measurements should be recorded in field notes. The instrument should be recalibrated at the start of each day. ERM 1 APPENDIX B_STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES.DOCX-5/ 17/ 16 Soil samples retained for laboratory analysis will be analyzed for the compounds and by the methods specified in Section 3.4.B of the CQAP. Sample collection, handling, and preservation will be conducted in accordance with accepted protocol, including chain -of -custody documentation. Soil Sampling All soil samples should be described in accordance with the Universal Soil Classification System and the information recorded on field logs completed for each location. Any unusual color(s), odor, or the presence/absence of potential Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) should be noted on the field logs. Use of clean, disposable nitrile gloves is required at all times when collecting, or handling samples in order to minimize the potential for cross -contamination and to protect the sampler against potentially harmful substances. Multiple glove layers allows for easy removal of the top layer when required. The sample location and depth should be recorded as accurately as possible, preferably by surveying to a national coordinate system. Location nomenclature should lead on to that of the samples obtained from the respective locations. Where sampling locations are aborted due to hole collapse, shallow refusal, SSC2.0 observations, etc., these should be recorded as per the above paragraph but in a manner that does not affect the sequential numbering of successful sampling locations. Soil samples should be placed into analysis -appropriate, laboratory -supplied sample containers. All soil sample containers should be completely filled such that there is no volatilization headspace that will affect the integrity of the analytical results. Confirm with the laboratory the minimum volume of soil required per sample per analysis. Remove gravel aggregate (unless specifically required), artificial clasts and/or fauna (e.g. insects or worms) as this affects both sample volume and local geochemical signatures of your sample). Volatiles are readily lost from the surface layers of the soil. For this reason, samples of soil for the evaluation of volatile analytes should not be collected from the surface layer but from a depth of greater than 2 inches below the surface. Field duplicates should be collected as required by the project sampling and analysis plan although care should be given in duplicate analysis of non - homogeneous soils. ERM 2 APPENDIX B_STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES.DOCX-5/ 17/ 16 Samples should be labelled as they are collected in order to avoid later confusion. Use of indelible marker pens with laboratory -supplied, water -proof labels is recommended. Ensure sample labels are legible and free of dirt or grime. It is useful to collect more samples than the proposal might indicate for laboratory analysis. These can be held by the lab until needed or, if not required, until disposal. In -transit sample breakage, unexpected concentrations, etc., are examples of when additional sample volume may be useful. Any sampling equipment that is not single -use must be decontaminated between samples. All sample containers should be clearly labelled with the following: sample depth; date collected; and sampler's name. The sample containers should then be transferred to a controlled environment (i.e. a chilled cooler) for sample preservation prior to and during shipment to the testing laboratory. MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION Monitor Well Construction All monitor wells were installed in accordance with North Carolina monitor well construction standards. All wells were completed either flush with the ground surface inside a protective cast iron well access manhole to protect against surface water infiltration, or in a steel, stand-up casing. Each well is equipped with a lockable well cap. Type II Sonic Drill Installed Monitor Wells Sonic drilling is initiated with a 4-inch outside diameter HSSS equipped with a rock shoe. Sonic vibrations at the shoe liquefy material encountered as the drill rod is pushed with hydraulic pressure. Once the length of the core has been reached, a larger diameter HSSS (6-inch in this case) is advanced outside of the inner HSSS to the same depth. The inner core is removed for soil sample collection. This process repeats with an inner HSSS advancing the borehole each depth interval. Once the target depth is reached, 2-inch diameter Schedule 40 threaded flush joint PVC pipe is installed within the annular space of the 6-inch HSSS. Each well is equipped with a section of 0.010-inch slot PVC well screen ERM 3 APPENDIX B_STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES.DOCX-5/ 17/ 16 with a 0.5-foot PVC sediment trap. Blank PVC casing extends from the top of the well screen to approximately 0.5-feet below ground level. A clean silica sand pack was placed around the well screen within the HSSS and the sections of HSSS are removed as the sand is added to allow sand to pack in the annular space of the borehole. This continues to a depth of approximately two feet above the top of the screen. A nominal two -foot thick bentonite seal was placed immediately above the sand pack. Once the bentonite seal is in place, the HSSS are removed from the well and the remaining borehole annular space is filled with a cement/bentonite slurry to with one foot of the ground surface using tremie pipe for placement. The well is finished with a 2'x2' concrete pad and a flush -mount 8-inch diameter manhole. Monitor Well Development/Purging Methods Following installation, the monitor wells were developed by removing a minimum of three to five well volumes of water by surging and bailing. For wells characterized by a slow recharge rate, the wells were pumped/bailed dry prior to sampling. GROUND WATER SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS MONITOR WELLS Following well development and purging, groundwater samples were collected from the site monitor wells using the low flow sampling techniques. Low Flow Sampling Technique The low -flow sampling technique involves pumping the ground water from the monitor well at a low flow rate (<250 ml/min) through a flow -through cell where water quality parameters (pH, oxidation reduction potential, dissolved oxygen, specific conductivity and temperature) are monitored until they stabilize, after which a ground water sample is collected for laboratory analysis. Generally, the water level in the well should be monitored during purging every 3 to 5 minutes, and ideally, the purge rate should equal the well recharge rate so that there is little or no drawdown in the well. (The water level should stabilize for the specific purge rate.) Ground water samples are collected by filling the sample bottles from the discharge tube. Care is taken so the ground water flows gently down the inside of the bottle with minimal turbulence. Ground water elevation data were obtained an electronic depth to water meter. For each well, all data collected was recorded in a field notebook and copies of field notes are maintained in a central project file for the site. Copies of field ERM 4 APPENDIX B_STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES.DOCX-5/ 17/ 16 notes are available upon request. Prior to the initiation of activities at each well, all sampling personnel put on new, laboratory quality latex or nitrile gloves. These gloves were replaced as necessary during the well evacuation and sampling procedure. Prior to the collection of groundwater quality data at each well, the surface integrity of the well was checked. Problems which could affect groundwater sample integrity were noted in the field notes. LABORATORY ANALYSES Groundwater samples were analyzed for the compounds and by the methods specified by NCDENR for the compounds of concern at the site. Laboratory analyses were provided by GCAL. Sample collection, handling, and preservation were conducted in accordance with accepted protocol, including chain -of -custody documentation. SLUG TESTING Slug tests (rising head) were conducted by placing a pressure transducer in the bottom of the well and then removing a slug of water from the well using bailers. Following removal of the slug, the water table recovery is recorded in a datalogger and the data is transferred to a computer for analysis using AQTSOLV for Windows software. ERM 5 APPENDIX B_STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES.DOCX-5/ 17/ 16