21034_EMP_1300 S Tryon St Final 20180405

1
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in the
North Carolina Brownfields Program at the direction of a project manager for the program.
Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all
pertinent attachments to their project manager prior to any site earthmoving or other
development related activities. For the resultant EMP to be valid for use, it must be completed,
reviewed by the program, and signed by all signers at the bottom. Consult your project
manager if you have questions.

GENERAL INFORMATION

Date: 4/5/2018

Brownfields Assigned Project Name: 1300 South Tryon Street

Brownfields Project Number: 21034-17-060

Brownfields Property Address: 1300 South Tryon Street, Charlotte, North Carolina

Brownfields Property Area (acres): 0.34 acres

Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit? ☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes enter Permit No.: Click here to enter text.

Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit? ☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes, enter Permit No.: Click here to enter text.

COMMUNICATIONS

Prospective Developer (PD): CBG Real Estate, LLC
Phone Numbers: Office: 919-834-2720…..Mobile:
Email: [e-mail]
Primary PD Contact: Mr. Niall Hanley
Phone Numbers: Office: 919-834-2720 Mobile: Click here to enter text.
Email:
Environmental Consultant: ECS Southeast, LLP – John Stewart
Phone Numbers: Office: 336-856-7150…..Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Brownfields Program Project Manager: Bill Schmithorst
Office: NCDWM Brownfields Program - Raleigh
2
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
Email: [e-mail]

Other DENR Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch,
Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste): N/A

NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM

Advance Notification Times to Brownfields Project Manager: Check each box to accept minimum
notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsite task:
On-site assessment or remedial activities: Within 10 days ☒
Construction or grading start: Within 10 days ☒
Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously
unknown contamination: Within 48 hours ☒
Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood, or soil erosion control
measures in area of contamination, venting of explosive environments):
Within 48 hours ☒
Installation of mitigation systems: Within 10 days ☒
Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to implement
redevelopment activities: (as applicable): Within 30 days ☒

REDEVELOPMENT PLANS

1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply):
☒ Residential ☒ Recreational ☐ Institutional ☒ Commercial ☒ Office ☒Retail ☐ Industrial
☒ Other specify: Open Space and Parking. Note that retail/commercial uses include restaurant, bar,
brewery, beer garden, and tap room. Phase I of PD’s redevelopment plans do not include any
redevelopment for residential use. Any future residential use/redevelopment will occur in
compliance with the Brownfields Agreement’s Land Use Restrictions.

2) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (attach conceptual or detailed plans as available):
a) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
b) Do plans include removal of building foundation slab(s) or pavement:
☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
c) Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building
slabs/pavement and other structures: PD’s Phase I redevelopment plans are to remove the
existing building and slab and to redevelop the property with commercial and retail
components, including a restaurant/beer garden (See Exhibit A Site Plan).

3) Which category of risk-based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the
Brownfields Agreement?
3
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
☒ Residential ☐ Non-residential or Industrial/Commercial

Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall be cited in the Brownfields
Agreement for comparison purposes.

4) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule):
a) Phase I start date and anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):
4/15/2018
PD anticipates that Phase I redevelopment will take between approximately 8-12 months.

b) If applicable, Phase 2 start date and anticipated duration (specify activities during each
phase): Phase 2 redevelopment plans have not yet been determined but may include multi-
family residential, recreational, commercial, office, retail, open space, and/or parking. Any
residential use/redevelopment will occur in compliance with the Brownfields Agreement’s
Land Use Restrictions.

c) Additional phases planned? If yes, specify activities if known:
☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Not in the foreseeable future ☒Decision pending
d) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: 3/1/2019

CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Contaminated Media (attach tabulated data summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with
sample locations):
Part 1. Soil: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected
Part 2. Groundwater: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected
Part 3. Surface Water: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 4. Sediment: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 5. Soil Vapor: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected
Part 6. Sub-Slab Soil Vapor: ☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Suspected
Part 7. Indoor Air: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected

PART 1. SOIL – Please fill out the information below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate
using known areas of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan. Provide a figure
overlaying new construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations.

1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list specific compounds): No soil contamination has
been identified. Soil sampling identified what could be naturally occurring arsenic concentrations
(ranging from 2.5 to 4.1 mg/kg) above residential and non-residential PSRGs. Soil sampling results
are shown on Table 1, and the sampling locations are depicted on Figure 1.
4
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet): N/A. Only naturally occuring arsenic
concentrations have been detected in soils at 0-5 feet bgs.
3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet): 6,300 sq ft
4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet): 2 feet for footings and 5 feet for utilities (See Exhibit B –
Grading Plan)
5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan): up to 100 cy. Soil
will be used on site to supplement import if suitable.
6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants: No
excavated soil is anticipated to be impacted by contaminants.
7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable: Currently,
no off-site disposal of contaminated soils is anticipated. PD may seek to dispose of soils off-site in
accordance with applicable regulations.
IMPORTED FILL SOIL

1) Will fill soil be imported to the site? ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported? Up to 300 cy
3) If yes, what is the depth of fill soil to be used at the property? 5 feet to backfill utility trenches, if
needed and at grade to level site. Soil excavated from footings will be used onsite if suitable.
If a range of depths, please list the range.

4) PRIOR TO ITS PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, provide plan to analyze fill soil to
demonstrate that it meets acceptable standards and can be considered clean for use at the
Brownfields property (Check all that apply):
☐ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☐ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☐ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium (speciated), mercury, lead,
selenium and silver)
☐ Metals –Hazardous Substance List -14 (antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium
(speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, selenium, silver,
thallium, and zinc)
☐ Metals – EPA Priority Pollutant List – 13 (arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium (speciated
according to IHSB protocol), copper, mercury, nickel, lead, antimony, selenium, silver, thallium, and
zinc)
☐ Other Constituents & Analytical Method: Click here to enter text.
☒ Known borrow material (DESCRIBE SOURCE AND ATTACH SAMPLING PROFILE): Martin
Marietta Quarry off Beatties Ford Road in Charlotte, NC or other pre-approved site

5
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
MANAGING ONSITE SOIL

1) If soil in known or suspected areas of contamination is anticipated to be excavated from the
Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields Property,or otherwise disturbed during site
grading or other redevelopment activities, please provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates
areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are acceptable, if only preliminary data
available).

2) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION – Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the
North Carolina Hazardous Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31-261.35? ☐ Yes ☒ No

If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes generating the
waste( include pertinent analytical results as needed).

If yes, do the soils exceed the “Contained-Out” levels in Attachment 1 of the North Carolina
Contained-In Policy? ☐ Yes ☐ No

NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS THE
CONTAINED-OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA CONTAINED-IN POLICY THE
SOIL MAY NOT BE RE-USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DENR
HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.

3) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION – Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE?:
☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results).

☐ Ignitability
☐ Corrosivity
☐ Reactivity
☐ Toxicity
☐ TCLP results
☐ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual hazardous
constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory TCLP standard)

If no, explain rationale: Soil sampling did not identify concentrations capable of exceeding TCLP
criteria using the Rule of 20.

NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE SOIL MAY NOT
BE RE-USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DENR HAZARDOUS WASTE
SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.

4) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in
place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite):
☒ Preliminary Health-Based Residential SRGs 2/1/2018
☒ Preliminary Health-Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs 2/1/2018
☒ Site-specific risk-based cleanup level, or acceptable concentrations determined via
calculated cumulative risk. Enter details of methods used for determination/explanation:
6
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
Metals concentrations may also be considered suitable if they are similar to site-specific
background levels. PD anticipates utilizing Residential PSRGs for Phase I commerical/retail
redevelopment activities. The screening criteria for future redevelopment phases will depend on
proposed future uses and such redevelopment will occur in compliance with the Brownfields
Agreement’s land use restrictions.

5) Check the following action(s) to be taken during excavation and management of said soils:

☒ Manage fugitive dust from site:
☒ Yes ☐ No
If yes, describe method; If no, explain rationale: Water truck spray as necessary to address
visible dust.

☒ Field Screening:
☒ Yes ☐ No
If yes, describe method; If no, explain rationale: During soil disturbance, soils will be observed
for discoloration, odor, or other evidence of potential contamination. Should the above be observed
during site work, the contractor will contact the project environmental professional to observe the
suspect condition. If the project environmental professional confirms that material may be impacted
(by observations or by screening with a PID or organic vapor analyzer), then soil samples will be
collected and analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals as provided in Part 9 (Contingency Plan –
Exhibit C).

☒ Soil Sample Collection:
☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes, describe method (e.g., in-situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.); If no, explain rationale:
See “Final Grade Sampling” section, below. Based on the previous site assessment activities and
grading plans, it is unlikely that soil impacts will be encountered during redevelopment activities, and
no additional soil sampling (other than final grade sampling) is warranted unless unexpected soil
impacts are encountered.
☒ Stockpile impacted soil in accordance with NCDENR IHSB protocol in the current version of
the “Guidelines for Assessment and Cleanup”, and providing erosion control, prohibiting
contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil, and preventing
contaminated runoff. Explain any variances:
Impacted soils could be removed by direct loading onto trucks.
☒ Analyze potentially impacted soil for the following chemical analytes:
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium (speciated), mercury,
lead, selenium and silver)
☐ Metals –Hazardous Substance List -14 (antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium,
chromium (speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel,
selenium, silver, thallium, and zinc)
7
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
☐ Metals – EPA Priority Pollutant List – 13 (arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium
(speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, mercury, nickel, lead, antimony, selenium, silver,
thallium, and zinc)
☐ Other Constituent(s) & Analytical Method(s):

☒ Proposed Measures to Obtain Pre-Approval for Reuse of Impacted Soil within the
Brownfields Property Boundary
☒ Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields Project Manager
☒ Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil on
site map to Brownfields Project Manager once known
☐ Use geotextile to mark depth of fill material (provide description of material)
☒ Manage soil under impervious cap ☒ or clean fill ☒
Describe cap or fill: To be determined but likely placed under pavement areas or
buildings, if necessary. (provide location diagram)
☒ Confer with NC BF Project Manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re-
recorded if actions are Post-Recordation).
☐ Other: Click here to enter text.

☒ Final grade sampling of exposed soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or permanent
hardscape): [if not checked provide rationale for not needing]
Provide diagram of soil sampling locations, number of samples, and denote Chemical
Analytical Program with check boxes below (Check all that apply):
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium (speciated), mercury,
lead, selenium and silver)
☐ Metals –Hazardous Substance List -14 (antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium,
chromium (speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel,
selenium, silver, thallium, and zinc)
☐ Metals – EPA Priority Pollutant List – 13 (arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium
(speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, mercury, nickel, lead, antimony, selenium, silver,
thallium, and zinc)
☐ Pesticides
☐ PCBs
☒ Other Constituents & Analytical Method: Based on initial redevelopment plans for
the site, exposed soils (not under structures or hardscape) will be mostly limited to landscaped areas
along the perimeter of the building or in open tree planters (Exhibit D – Proposed Post Grade
Samples). After grading, a final grade sampling plan will be submitted to NCDEQ for review and
approval. The plan will include collection of soil samples from representative locations that are not
covered by an impervious surface or fill that meets applicable screening levels.
OFFSITE TRANSPORT & DISPOSITION OF EXCAVATED SOIL
NOTE: Unless soil will be transported offsite for disposal in a permitted facility under applicable
regulations, no contaminated or potentially contaminated soil may leave the site without approval
from the brownfields program. Failure to obtain approval may violate a brownfields agreement,
endangering liability protections and making said action subject to enforcement. Justifications
provided below must be approved by the Program in writing prior to completing transport activities.
8
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
☒ Transport and dispose of impacted soil offsite (documentation of final disposition must be sent to
Brownfields Project Manager)
☒ Landfill – analytical program determined by landfill
☒ Landfarm or other treatment facility Click here to enter text.
☒ Use as Beneficial Fill Offsite – provide justification: Soil sampling has not identified
contamination. Only what could be naturally occurring concentrations of arsenic have been detected
in soils and thus the soils meet the beneficial fill requirements.
☒ Use as Beneficial Fill at another Suitable Brownfields Site – (Note: a determination that a
site is a “Suitable Brownfields” site will require, at a minimum, that similar concentrations of the same
or similar contaminants already exist at both sites, use of impacted soil as beneficial soil will not
increase the potential for risk to human health and the environment at that site, and that notarized
documentation of the acceptance of such soil from the property owner of the receiving site is
provided to Brownfields. Provide justification: Soil sampling has not identified contamination. Only
what could be naturally occurring concentrations of arsenic have been detected in soils.

MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES
☐ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill
(Preferred)

☒ Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is not a
hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they were
removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original depth from
which it was excavated.

☐ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport, and/or
degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants? Result: Yes □ No □
If no, include rationale here. Click here to enter text.
If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials

Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches: Suitable soil excavated to
install utilities will be placed back into the trench and compacted. Ultimately the soil will be capped
with the building or hardscape.

PART 2. GROUNDWATER – Please fill out the information below and attach figure showing
distribution of groundwater contaminants at site

What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property? ~25 feet

Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ☐onsite ☒ offsite ☐ both ☐ or unknown
sources? Describe source(s): The groundwater is contaminated above NC2LGWQ by
tetrachloroethene and MTBE (See Table 2 – Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results and Figure
1). Historic maps of the site area indicate gasoline underground storage tanks were located west-
northwest of the site, an automobile repair facility was located north-northwest of the site and a used
automobile business was located northeast of the site.

9
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property? Undetermined but based on
surface topography to the southeast.

Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes, describe these activities: N/A

In the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered during redevelopment activities (even if
no is checked above), list activities for contingent management of groundwater (e.g., dewatering of
groundwater from excavations or foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary
sewer, or sampling procedures): It is not anticipated that contaminated groundwater will be
encountered based grading and redevelopment plans. If groundwater is encountered during
redevelopment activities, appropriate worker safety measures will be undertaken and groundwater
will be allowed to re-infiltrate for approximately 24 hours (if it does not affect the construction
schedule). If accumulated water remains, samples of the accumulated water will be collected and
analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals to determine if contaminants are present. Accumulated
water that contains contaminants above NCAC 2B Surface Water Standards will be containerized and
disposed at an off-site permitted facility in accordance with regulatory requirements. Accumulated
water that does not contain contaminants above NCAC 2B Surface Water Standards will be managed
on the site or discharged to the storm sewer in accordance with municipal, state and federal
requirements.

PART 3. SURFACE WATER – Please fill out the information below.
Attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property.

Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated: ☐ Yes ☒ No

Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment activities?
☐ Yes ☒ No

In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment activities, or
clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of such events (e.g.
flooding, contaminated surface water run-off, stormwater impacts): No surface water features exist
onsite. If stormwater or water from an unidentified source collects in excavation areas, appropriate
worker safety measures will be undertaken and the water will be allowed to infiltrate for
approximately 24 hours (if it does not affect the construction schedule). If accumulated water
remains after allowing time to infiltrate, samples of the accumulated water will be collected and
analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals. Accumulated water that contains contaminants above
NCAC 2B Surface Water Standards will be containerized and disposed of at an off-site permitted
facility. Accumulated water that does not contain contaminants above NCAC 2B Surface Water
Standards will be managed on the site or discharged to surface water or the storm sewer in
accordance with municipal, state, and federal requirements.

PART 4. SEDIMENT – Please fill out the information below.
Is sediment at the property known to be contaminated: ☐ Yes ☒ No

10
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment activities?
☐ Yes ☒ No

If yes, attach a map showing location of known contaminated sediment at the property.

In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance): N/A. No surface water features
exist on site.

PART 5. SOIL VAPOR – Please fill out the information below.
Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the following
vapor intrusion screening levels in the following media:

IHSB Residential Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
Groundwater: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown

IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
Groundwater: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown

Attach a map showing the location of soil vapor contaminants that exceed site screening levels.

If applicable, at what depth(s) is soil vapor known to be contaminated? at least 5 feet bgs

Will workers encounter contaminated soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities?
☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown

In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities (trenches,
manways, basements or other subsurface work, list activities for management of such contact: Soil
gas sampling did not identify contaminants above industrial/commercial standards (See Table 3 -
Summary of Soil Vapor Analytical Results and Figure 1) and thus workers are not expected to
encounter contaminated soil vapor during redevelopment activities. In the event that contaminated
soil vapors are encountered during redevelopment activities, the area will be evacuated and
appropriate safety screening of the vapors will be performed under the direction of a North Carolina
licensed geologist or engineer. If results indicate further action is warranted, appropriate engineering
controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be implemented.

PART 6. SUB-SLAB SOIL VAPOR -please fill out the information below if existing buildings or
foundations will be retained in the redevelopment.

Are sub-slab soil vapor data available for the Brownfields Property? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown

11
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
If data indicate that sub-slab soil vapor concentrations exceed screening levels, attach a map showing
the location of these exceedances.

At what depth(s) is sub-slab soil vapor known to be contaminated? ☐ 0-6 inches ☐ Other, If other
describe: Click here to enter text.

Will workers encounter contaminated sub-slab soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities?
☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown

In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact: Soil gas sampling did not identify contaminants above
industrial/commercial standards (See Table 3 - Summary of Soil Vapor Analytical Results and Figure 1)
and thus workers are not expected to encounter contaminated sub-slab soil vapor during
redevelopment activities. In the event that contaminated sub-slab soil vapors are encountered during
redevelopment activities, the area will be evacuated and appropriate safety screening of the vapors
will be performed under the direction of a North Carolina licensed geologist or engineer. If results
indicate further action is warranted, appropriate engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans)
will be implemented.

PART 7. INDOOR AIR – Please fill out the information below .

Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown

If yes, attach a map showing the location where indoor air contaminants exceed site screening levels.

If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk-based screening levels will not
be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated indoor air
during planned redevelopment activities?
☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown

In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact: Although not anticipated, in the event contaminated
indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, the work area will be evacuated and
appropriate worker safety screening of vapor will be performed under the direction of a North
Carolina licensed geologist or engineer. If results indicate further action is warranted, appropriate
engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be implemented.

PART 8 – Vapor Mitigation System – Please fill out the information below .

Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system proposed for this Brownfields Property?
☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown

If yes, provide the date the plan was submitted to the Brownfields Program.
12
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
A vapor mitigation system has not been deemed necessary for Phase I redevelopment plans (i.e., non-
residential). Any future residential use/redevelopment will occur in compliance with the Brownfields
Agreement’s Land Use Restrictions. Prior to such residential use/redevelopment, indoor air and/or sub
slab vapor screening will be conducted per a work plan approved by the NCDEQ Brownsfield Program
Attach the plan.

Has the vapor mitigation plan been approved by the NC Brownfields Program?
☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
Has the vapor mitigation plan been signed and sealed by a North Carolina professional engineer?
☐ Yes ☐ No

What are the components of the vapor intrusion mitigation system?
☐ Sub-slab depressurization system
☐ Sub-membrane depressurization system
☐ Block-wall depressurization system
☐ Drain tile depressurization system
☐ Passive mitigation methods
☐ Vapor barriers
☐ Perforated piping vented to exterior
☐ Other method: Click here to enter text.

PART 9. CONTINGENCY FOR ENCOUNTERING UNKNOWN TANKS, DRUMS, OR OTHER WASTE
MATERIALS

Please provide a contingency plan in the event unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, or other
waste materials are encountered during site activities.

Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth-moving activities at
the site:
☒ Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps)
☐ Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel lines, utility lines, etc.
☒ Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors

Notification to State Brownfields Project Manager, UST Section, Fire Department, and/or other
officials, as necessary and appropriate, is required when new potential source(s) of contamination are
discovered. See Notification Section on Page 1 for notification requirements.

POST-REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING
In accordance with the site’s Brownfield Agreement, provide a report within the designated schedule
to the State Brownfields Project Manager.

EAST CATHERINE STPUBLIC RIGHT OF WAYSOUTH TRYON ST
60' PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY
(UNIT FILE 758)WEST CATHERINE ST30' PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY(MB 50/542)NO.
Date:
REVISIONS:BY:DATE:
Designed by:
Drawn By:1318-e6 central ave.charlotte, nc 28205urbandesignpartners.comnc firm no: P-0418sc coa no: C-03044P 704.334.3303F 704.334.3305Scale:
Project No:
Sheet No:
1300 S Tryon
Site Plan
1300 South Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28203
NCG
UDP
December 22, 2017
C-3.0
New City Design
Group
1304 Hillsborough St
Raleigh, NC 27605
1"=10'
17-067 NOTES:DEVELOPMENT SUMMARYTAX PARCEL ID #:073-072-10TOTAL SITE AREA:0.341 ACEXISTING ZONING:TOD-MFLOOR AREA RATIO:0.85SETBACKS:FRONT:20'SIDE:0'REAR:20'MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT:40'PROPOSED USE:RESTAURANT/ BEERGARDEN (EDEE)VEHICULAR PARKING:REQUIRED:NOT REQ.BICYCLE PARKING:REQUIRED:LONG-TERM:0 SPACESSHORT-TERM:2 SPACESPROPOSEDLONG-TERM:0 SPACESSHORT-TERM:4 SPACESPAVING LEGEND6" CONCRETE PAVING4" CONCRETE PAVING
SOUTH TRYON ST
60' PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY
(UNIT FILE 758)WEST CATHERINE ST30' PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY(MB 50/542)STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURE TABLESTRUCTURE NAMESTRUCTURE DETAILSNO.
Date:
REVISIONS:BY:DATE:
Designed by:
Drawn By:1318-e6 central ave.charlotte, nc 28205urbandesignpartners.comnc firm no: P-0418sc coa no: C-03044P 704.334.3303F 704.334.3305Scale:
Project No:
Sheet No:
1300 S Tryon
Grading, Storm & Utility Plan
1300 South Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28203
NCG
UDP
December 22, 2017
C-4.0
New City Design
Group
1304 Hillsborough St
Raleigh, NC 27605
1"=20'
17-067 POST CONSTRUCTION SUMMARYTAX PARCEL NUMBERS:PARCEL NUMBEDEVELOPMENT TYPE: SF, MF, COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL, MIXED USESUBJECT TO PCCO:YES OR NOPOST CONSTRUCTION DISTRICT: CENTRAL CATAWBAWESTERN CATAWBAYADKINSIX MILEDRAINAGE AREAS: XX ACEXISTING IMPERVIOUS:0EXISTING BUILT-UPON AREA:XX%PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS:BUILDING:SFROAD/SIDEWALK:SFDRIVEWAYS:SFPATIOS: SFTOTAL IMPERVIOUS:SFACPROPOSED BUILT-UPON-AREA:XX%DENSITY:HIGHDEVELOPMENT OR REDEVELOPMENT:DEVELOPMENTNATURAL AREA REQUIRED:N/ANATURAL AREA PROVIDED:N/ASTREAM BUFFER PROTECTED ONSITE:ACTRANSIT STATION:YES OR NODISTRESSED BUSINESS DISTRICT:YES OR NOMITIGATION TYPE:N/A, 85% TSS,1-YR VOL/10-YR PEAKPAYMENT IN-LIEUNATURAL AREA MITIGATION:YES OR NOBUFFER MITIGATION:YES OR NOTOTAL PHOSPHORUS MITIGATION:YES OR NOGRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE NOTES:UTILITY NOTES:
301738521 v2
Exhibit C
Contingency Procedures for Encountering Unknown Tanks, Drums, or Other Waste Materials
The following contingency procedures will be followed upon discovery of an unknown source of
contamination that may require management (such as unknown USTs, stained soil, drums, etc.), and the procedures for suspending excavation work, transferring any materials, and notifying applicable local, State and/or Federal agencies. The contingency procedures include
the following: 1) If soils with staining or an odor, an underground tank, containers, or any other
previously unidentified regulated constituent source are found during construction, grading or excavation, activities will be suspended until the condition can be
evaluated by the environmental consultant and, if necessary, an adequate plan is
implemented to address the unexpected condition.

2) PID readings will be taken. If PID readings are low and no other indications of
contamination are present, site activities will proceed. If PID readings and other indicators suggest potential contamination is present, the materials will either be left
in place or excavated and stockpiled in drums or on plastic sheeting so construction activities can proceed. Sampling will be performed on the material to determine the nature of the material and proper disposal method. Chemical analysis for VOCs,
SVOCs and RCRA metals will be performed by the environmental professional’s selected North Carolina Certified Laboratory, unless change in the analysis is
appropriate based on discussions with the regulatory agency and disposal facility.
3) Identification of an unexpected condition will be promptly communicated to the
NCDEQ Project Manager, and the Owner’s representative.
The environmental consultant (ECS) should be notified immediately if unanticipated conditions
are encountered during grading or site work. Excavated soil that is known or suspected of being contaminated shall be placed on plastic and covered with plastic to limit transfer of impacted materials by wind or rain.
EAST CATHERINE STPUBLIC RIGHT OF WAYSOUTH TRYON ST
60' PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY
(UNIT FILE 758)WEST CATHERINE ST30' PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY(MB 50/542)NO.
Date:
REVISIONS:BY:DATE:
Designed by:
Drawn By:1318-e6 central ave.charlotte, nc 28205urbandesignpartners.comnc firm no: P-0418sc coa no: C-03044P 704.334.3303F 704.334.3305Scale:
Project No:
Sheet No:
1300 S Tryon
Site Plan
1300 South Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28203
NCG
UDP
December 22, 2017
C-3.0
New City Design
Group
1304 Hillsborough St
Raleigh, NC 27605
1"=10'
17-067 NOTES:DEVELOPMENT SUMMARYTAX PARCEL ID #:073-072-10TOTAL SITE AREA:0.341 ACEXISTING ZONING:TOD-MFLOOR AREA RATIO:0.85SETBACKS:FRONT:20'SIDE:0'REAR:20'MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT:40'PROPOSED USE:RESTAURANT/ BEERGARDEN (EDEE)VEHICULAR PARKING:REQUIRED:NOT REQ.BICYCLE PARKING:REQUIRED:LONG-TERM:0 SPACESSHORT-TERM:2 SPACESPROPOSEDLONG-TERM:0 SPACESSHORT-TERM:4 SPACESPAVING LEGEND6" CONCRETE PAVING4" CONCRETE PAVING
LEGEND
SOURCE:

GOOGLE EARTH 2016 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH (VIA THE INTERNET)

SCALE AS SHOWN
FIGURE 1
SAMPLE LOCATION MAP

SOIL & SOIL GAS WORKPLAN
1300 SOUTH TRYON STREET
CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
ECS PROJECT NO. 49-4161-D

SOIL & SOIL GAS SAMPLE LOCATION
PREVIOUS GROUNDWATER SAMPLE LOCATIONS
GW-1
GW-2
GW-3
GW-4
SB-3/SG-3
SB-2/SG-2
SB-1/SG-1
TABLE 1: SUMMARY OF SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Parameter
Sample ID SB-1 SB-1 duplicate SB-2 SB-3
Collection Depth (feet bgs)3-5 3-5 3-5 3-5
Collection Date
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8270
SVOCs BRL BRL BRL BRL ----
Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260
Tetrachloroethene <0.0065 <0.0071 <0.0071 0.0096 17 82
RCRA Metals
Mercury 0.13 0.0079 0.69 0.26 2.3 9.7
Arsenic 3.3 3.3 2.5 4.1 0.68 3.0
Barium 36 32 10 J 39 3,100 47,000
Cadmium <0.32 <0.31 <0.30 0.036 J 14 200
Chromium (III)33 38 27 45 23,000 350,000
Chromium (VI)<0.51 <0.50 NA NA 0.31 6.5
Lead 8.2 8.1 8.8 19 400 800
Selenium 0.96 J 1.2 1.9 2.1 78 1,200
Silver <0.32 <0.31 0.037 J 0.036 J 78 1,200
Notes:
Results presented in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), analogous to parts per million (ppm)
Feet bgs = Feet below ground surface
PSRG = Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (February 2018)
Bold denotes concentration exceeds the Residential PSRG
Underline denotes concentration exceeds the Industrial/Commercial PSRG
NA = Not analyzed for this metal
J = Detected but below the Reporting Limit; therefore, result is an estiamted concentrationBRL = Below Laboratory Reporting Limits for all compounds
COMPARISION CRITERIA
Residential Use
PSRG
Industrial/Commercial
Health Based PSRG
1/30/18
CBG REAL ESTATE, LLC
1300 SOUTH TRYON STREET
CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
ECS PROJECT NO. 49-4161-C
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Parameter
Sample ID GW-1 GW-2 GW-3 GW-4
Collection Date 4/26/17 4/26/17 4/26/17 4/26/17
Screened Interval 31-35ft 31-35ft 36-40ft 36-40ft
Ammonia as N
Ammonia <100 370 310 130 --1,500 3,170 13,300
Glycols
Glycols BRL BRL BRL BRL -- -- -- --
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
SVOCs BRL BRL BRL BRL -- -- -- --
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Isopropyl Ether <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 2.4 70 --1,390 5,860
Methyl-tert-Butyl-Ether <0.50 <0.50 2.2 120 20 --4,500 20,000
Tetrachloroethylene 1.5 4.0 <0.50 <0.50 0.7 --12 48
Notes:
Results presented in micrograms per liter (ug/L), analogous to parts per billion (ppb)
BRL = Compound not detected at a concentration above the method reporting limit
DWM = Division of Waste Management
VISL = Vapor Intrusion Screening Level (October 2017)Bold denotes a detection above the North Carolina 2L Groundwater Quality Standard
DWM Non-
Residential VISL
COMPARISION CRITERIA
NC 2L
Groundwater
Quality Standards
DWM Residential
VISL
TABLE 2: SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1300 SOUTH TRYON STREET
CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
ECS PROJECT NO. 49-4161-C
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CBG REAL ESTATE, LLC
Interim Maximum
Allowable
Concentration
(IMAC)
TABLE 3: SUMMARY OF SOIL VAPOR ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Parameter
Sample ID SG-1 SG-2 SG-3 DUP
Collection Date 1/31/18 1/31/18 2/3/18 1/31/18
Dichlorodifluoromethane 13 12 <5.0 17 700 8,800
Trichlorofluoromethane 19 22 <5.6 30 ----
Methylene Chloride 5.9 9.1 <3.5 <3.5 4,200 53,000
Benzene 9.8 <3.2 <3.2 <3.2 120 1,600
Carbon disulfide <6.3 <6.3 14 <6.3 4,900 61,000
Trichloroethene <5.5 <5.5 12 <5.5 14 180
Tetrachloroethene <6.9 31 470 11 280 3,500
Vinyl Chloride <2.6 <2.6 3.6 <2.6 56 2,800
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 8.3 5.8 <5.0 <5.0 420 5,300
Toluene 89 110 23 45 35,000 440,000
Ethylbenzene 9.6 9.2 <4.4 <4.4 370 4,900
m,p-Xylenes 39 31 11 14 700 8,800
o-Xylenes 14 11 <4.4 5.4 700 8,800
Notes:
VISL = Vapor Intrusion Screening Level dated February 2018
Results presented in micrograms per cubic meter (ug/m3)
Bold indicates a detection above the Residential VISL
DUP = Duplicate of SG-1
Volatile Organic Compounds by TO-15
CBG REAL ESTATE, LLC
1300 SOUTH TRYON STREET
CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
ECS PROJECT NO. 49-4161-C
ANALYTICAL RESULTS COMPARISON CRITERIA
Residential
VISL
Non-Residential
VISL