5503_LincolnCountyMSWLF_GWMR_20180214

October 2017 Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Lincoln County Landfill – Permit #55-03
Crouse, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
PREPARED FOR:
Lincoln County
5291 Crouse Road
Crouse, North Carolina 28033
PREPARED BY:
S&ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
February 14, 2018
S&ME, Inc. | 9751 Southern Pine Boulevard | Charlotte, NC 28273 | p 704.523.4726 | www.smeinc.com
February 14, 2018
Lincoln County
5291 Crouse Road
Crouse, North Carolina 28033
Attention: Mr. Mark Bivins
Reference: October 2017 Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Lincoln County Landfill Permit #55-03
Crouse, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Dear Mr. Bivins:
S&ME Inc. (S&ME) has completed the October 2017 Semi-Annual Monitoring and Reporting for the Lincoln
County Landfill. This report presents the results of the second monitoring event of the year for the facility.
S&ME appreciates the continued opportunity to provide services to you and Lincoln County. If you have any
questions or need additional information regarding this report, please contact us at [phone].
Sincerely,
S&ME, Inc.
Jasmine Tayouga Julie P. Robertson, P.G.
Staff Professional Project Manager/Senior Geologist
Registration No. 1995
Cc: Jaclynne Drummond, NCDEQ – Solid Waste Section
October 2017 Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Lincoln County Landfill Permit #55-03
Crouse, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
February 14, 2018 ii
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1
2.0 Groundwater Levels and Flow ....................................................................................... 1
3.0 Analytical Data .................................................................................................................. 1
3.1 Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling .................................................................................... 1
3.1.1 MSW Area “E” and Phase 1 ............................................................................................................. 1
3.1.1.1 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) ......................................................................................... 2
3.1.1.2 Inorganic Constituents (Metals) ................................................................................................... 3
3.1.2 MSW Phase 2 .................................................................................................................................... 4
3.1.2.1 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) ......................................................................................... 4
3.1.2.2 Inorganic Constituents (Metals) ................................................................................................... 4
3.1.3 MSW Phase 3 .................................................................................................................................... 5
3.1.3.1 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) ......................................................................................... 5
3.1.3.2 Inorganic Constituents (Metals) ................................................................................................... 5
3.1.4 C&D Landfill Phase 1 and 2 ............................................................................................................. 5
3.1.4.1 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) ......................................................................................... 6
3.1.4.2 Inorganic Constituents (Metals) ................................................................................................... 6
3.1.4.3 Classical Chemistry Compounds ................................................................................................. 6
3.2 Surface Water Sampling ................................................................................................................ 6
3.2.1 Surface Water Locations SW-1 through SW-5 ................................................................................. 7
3.2.2 Surface Water Location SW-6 ........................................................................................................... 7
3.3 Leachate Sampling ......................................................................................................................... 7
4.0 Statistical Analysis ............................................................................................................ 7
4.1 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) ......................................................................................... 8
4.2 Total Metals ..................................................................................................................................... 8
5.0 Methane Readings ............................................................................................................ 9
October 2017 Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Lincoln County Landfill Permit #55-03
Crouse, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
February 14, 2018 iii
Appendices
Appendix I – Drawings
Appendix II – Tables
Appendix III – Well Sampling Logs and Laboratory Reports
Appendix IV – Statistical Analysis Procedures
Appendix V – Graphs Depicting Concentrations over Time for Wells with a Statistically Significant Increase
Appendix VI – Monthly Methane Data (April 2017 – October 2017)
October 2017 Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Lincoln County Landfill Permit #55-03
Crouse, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
February 14, 2018 1
1.0 Introduction
S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) was contracted by Lincoln County to provide groundwater, surface water, and leachate
monitoring services at the Lincoln County Landfill located at 5291 Crouse Road in Crouse, North Carolina. This
semi-annual monitoring event was conducted on October 9th – 11th, 2017.
This report presents the results of the second semi-annual sampling event for the year 2017 at the facility. The
facility’s monitoring network includes one background well (MW-1A), twenty-eight compliance wells, six (6)
surface water sample locations, and one leachate sample. The next sampling event is scheduled for April 2018 and
will include wells associated with the newly constructed Phase 4.
2.0 Groundwater Levels and Flow
The water table elevations and our interpretation of the groundwater surface expressed as a potentiometric map
along with groundwater flow direction are shown on Drawing 1 of 1 in Appendix I. Based upon the
groundwater elevations in the vicinity of the landfill, groundwater in this area is projected to flow primarily to the
south, with secondary flow toward the southwest and southeast toward tributaries located east and west of the
landfills. Groundwater levels for the monitoring wells are presented in Table 1 in Appendix II.
The hydraulic gradient (i) in the vicinity of each well was estimated by calculating the vertical difference between
the groundwater elevation at each well and one or more nearby contour lines from Drawing 1 of 1. This value
was then divided by the horizontal distance measured from the well to the selected groundwater elevation
contour line. Groundwater velocity was calculated by multiplying the gradient (i) by the hydraulic conductivity (k)
and dividing by the estimated effective porosity (ne) of the aquifer. Table 2 in Appendix II summarizes the
groundwater flow rates for the monitoring wells.
3.0 Analytical Data
Analytical results for the landfill monitoring wells, surface water samples, and leachate sample are summarized in
Tables 4 through 10 in Appendix II. Detections above the NCAC 2L .0202 Groundwater Quality Standards (2L
Standards), NCAC 2B surface water standards (2B Standards), and/or SW GWP Standard are highlighted in gray.
Field measurements of pH, conductivity, and temperature are summarized in Table 3 in Appendix II. Well
sampling logs containing this information are included in Appendix III.
3.1 Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling
3.1.1 MSW Area “E” and Phase 1
MSW Area “E” and Phase 1 groundwater monitoring well locations were sampled for Appendix I volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) and Appendix I metals. In addition to Appendix I VOCs and metals, the groundwater analysis
for background monitoring well MW-1A also included inorganic constituents iron and manganese. A summary of
October 2017 Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Lincoln County Landfill Permit #55-03
Crouse, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
February 14, 2018 2
the detected analytes associated with this Phase of the landfill is included as Table 4 in Appendix II. The
groundwater monitoring wells associated with these areas include background well MW-1A, compliance wells
MW-8, MW-9, and MW-10R that monitor the abandoned leachate pond, and compliance wells MW-12 through
MW-20 that monitor down gradient and side gradient of the unlined MSW landfill Area “E” and the lined MSW
landfill identified as Phase 1.
During the previous sampling event it was discovered that MW-15 was damaged and could not be sampled.
Lincoln County was notified of the damage and the well will be replaced.
Based on the laboratory analytical reports included in Appendix III, thirteen VOCs and sixteen metals were
detected in MSW Area “E” and Phase 1 groundwater monitoring wells during the October 2017 monitoring event.
During the October 2017 sampling event MW-8 was dry and could not be sampled. MW-10R went dry while
purging and did not recharge enough to collect a laboratory sample.
3.1.1.1 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Background monitoring well MW-1A had a detection of Chloroform at a concentration of 12 micrograms per liter
(µg/L), which is below the 2L Standard of 70 µg/L. Both Bromoform and Chloroform have historically been
detected in monitoring well MW-1A which are commonly associated with chlorinated municipal water. Due to
MW-1A’s close proximity to Crouse Road, it is likely that the detection of Chloroform in the well is from a leaking
nearby municipal water or sewer line.
No VOCs were detected in groundwater monitoring wells MW-9, MW-12, and MW-18 during the October 2017
monitoring event.
Monitoring wells MW-13, MW-14, MW-16R, MW-17R, MW-19, and MW-20 contained two or more of the fifteen
VOCs detected. Of the VOCs detected, five compounds were detected above their respective 2L Standard: 1,1-
Dichloroethane, Benzene, Methylene Chloride, Tetrachloroethene, and Vinyl Chloride. Please note that
groundwater monitoring well MW-14 had no VOC detections above its respective 2L Standards.
The analytical results for groundwater monitoring well MW-13 indicated that 1,1-Dichloroethane, Benzene,
Tetrachloroethene, and Vinyl Chloride were detected above their respective 2L Standards. The results of which are
as follows:
•1,1-Dichloroethane detected at 11 µg/L. 2L Standard is 6 µg/L.
•Benzene detected at 4 µg/L. 2L Standard is 1 µg/L.
•Tetrachloroethene detected at 2.5 µg/L. 2L Standard is 0.7 µg/L.
•Vinyl Chloride detected at 0.68 µg/L. 2L Standard is 0.03 µg/L.
The results for groundwater monitoring well MW-16R indicated that Benzene and Vinyl Chloride were detected
above their respective 2L Standard. The results of which are as follows:
•Benzene detected at 5.3 µg/L. 2L Standard is 1 µg/L.
•Vinyl chloride detected at 2.8 µg/L. 2L Standard is 0.03 µg/L.
The results for groundwater monitoring well MW-17R indicated that 1,1-Dichloroethane, Benzene, and Methylene
Chloride were detected above their respective 2L Standard. The results of which are as follows:
October 2017 Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Lincoln County Landfill Permit #55-03
Crouse, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
February 14, 2018 3
•1,1-Dichloroethane detected at 6.2 µg/L. 2L Standard is 6 µg/L.
•Benzene detected at 4.2 µg/L. 2L Standard is 1 µg/L.
•Methylene Chloride detected at 39 µg/L. 2L Standard is 5 µg/L.
The results for groundwater monitoring well MW-19 indicated that 1,1-Dichloroethane, Benzene, and
Tetrachloroethene were detected above their respective 2L Standard. The results are as follows:
•1,1-Dichloroethane detected at 12 µg/L. 2L Standard is 6 µg/L.
•Benzene detected at 1.4 µg/L. 2L Standard is 1 µg/L.
•Tetrachloroethene detected at 2.0 µg/L. 2L Standard is 0.7 µg/L.
The results for groundwater monitoring well MW-20 indicated that 1,1-Dichloroethane, Benzene,
Tetrachloroethene, and Vinyl Chloride were detected above their respective 2L Standard. The results are as
follows:
•1,1-Dichloroethane detected at 7.2 µg/L. 2L Standard is 6 µg/L.
•Benzene detected at 1.9 µg/L. 2L Standard is 1 µg/L.
•Tetrachloroethene detected at 0.82 J µg/L. 2L Standard is 0.7 µg/L.
•Vinyl Chloride detected at 0.87 J µg/L. 2L Standard is 0.03 µg/L.
Groundwater monitoring wells MW-13, MW-14, MW-16R, MW-17R, MW-19 and MW-20 monitor down gradient
and side gradient of the of the unlined Area “E” landfill, and the volatile organic constituents detected in these
wells are associated with the unlined landfill section.
3.1.1.2 Inorganic Constituents (Metals)
The groundwater monitoring wells associated with the MSW Area “E” and Phase 1 landfills had three or more
Appendix I metals detected. Eight constituents were detected above their respective 2L Standard or SW GWP
Standard: Antimony, Arsenic, Chromium, Cobalt, Iron, Manganese, Thallium, and Vanadium.
•Antimony was detected above its SW GWP Standard of 1 µg/L in background groundwater monitoring
well MW-1A, compliance monitoring wells MW-9, MW-14, and MW-19 at concentrations ranging from
1.30 J µg/L to 4.76 J µg/L.
•Arsenic was detected above its 2L Standard of 10 µg/L in compliance monitoring well MW-16R at a
concentration of 18.0 µg/L.
•Chromium was detected above its 2L Standard of 10 µg/L in background monitoring well MW-1A at a
concentration of 53.10 µg/L.
•Cobalt was detected above its SW GWP Standard of 1 µg/L in background monitoring well MW-1A,
compliance monitoring wells MW-12, MW-13, MW-14, MW-16R, MW-17R, MW-18, and MW-20 at
concentrations ranging from 1.17 J µg/L to 242 µg/L.
•Iron was detected above its 2L Standard of 300 µg/L in background monitoring well MW-1A at a
concentration of 16,300 µg/L.
•Manganese was detected above its 2L Standard of 50 µg/L in background monitoring well MW-1A at a
concentration of 301 µg/L.
October 2017 Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Lincoln County Landfill Permit #55-03
Crouse, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
February 14, 2018 4
•Thallium was detected above its SW GWP Standard of 0.28 µg/L in background monitoring well MW-1A,
compliance monitoring wells MW-13, MW-16R, and MW-17R at concentrations ranging from 0.370 J to
24.2 JD µg/L.
•Vanadium was detected above its SW GWP Standard of 0.3 µg/L in background monitoring well MW-1A,
compliance monitoring wells MW-9, MW-12, MW-13, MW-17R, and MW-18 at concentrations ranging
from 1.65 J to 34.5 µg/L.
Total metal concentrations in groundwater sampled from wells are often dependent on the turbidity or suspended
particulates (from the aquifer formation) retrieved with the groundwater sample. The turbidity is a function of the
sampling method, well construction, how the well was developed, and the grain size/consolidation of the
lithologic unit sampled. Since the unfiltered samples are acidified in the field at the time of collection, metals
contained within the particulates are dissolved into the sample. Thus, the presence of turbidity in groundwater
samples often results in elevated (false positive) analytical results for total metal concentrations. Therefore, the
presence of elevated total metal concentrations does not necessarily correlate with groundwater impact.
Based on historical water quality data, the background well and each of the compliance groundwater monitoring
wells have contained at least one total metal at concentrations above the 2L Standards. Metal concentrations in
several wells have fluctuated below and above detection limits. In background well MW-1A, beryllium, cadmium,
chromium, cobalt, iron, lead, silver, and vanadium have been detected at concentrations above the 2L Standards.
Based on this data, it appears that the majority of the metals detected within the monitoring wells are either
naturally occurring or a product of turbidity during sampling.
3.1.2 MSW Phase 2
MSW Phase 2 groundwater monitoring well locations were sampled for Appendix I VOCs and Appendix I metals.
A summary of the detected analytes associated with this Phase of the landfill is included as Table 5 in Appendix
II. The groundwater monitoring wells associated with this Phase are compliance wells MW-21 and MW-24 that
monitor side gradient of the landfill and MW-25 and MW-25A that monitor the Phase 2 sump. During the
October 2017 monitoring event MW-25 was dry and could not be sampled.
3.1.2.1 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
No VOCs were detected above their respective 2L Standard or SW GWP Standard in the MSW Phase 2 monitoring
wells during the October 2017 monitoring event. 1,1-Dichloroethane was detected in MW-25A at a concentration
of 0.55 J µg/L which is below its 2L Standard of 6 µg/L. Acetone was detected in MW-21 at a concentration of 36 J
µg/L which is below its 2L Standard of 6,000 µg/L.
3.1.2.2 Inorganic Constituents (Metals)
The groundwater monitoring wells associated with the Phase 2 landfill had four or more Appendix I metals
detections, three of which were detected above their respective SW GWP Standards. Cobalt was detected above
the SW GWP Standard of 1 µg/L in groundwater monitoring well MW-25A at a concentration of 6.86 J µg/L.
Thallium was detected above the SW GWP Standard of 0.28 µg/L in groundwater monitoring well MW-24 at a
concentration of 0.336 J µg/L. Vanadium was detected above the SW GWP Standard of 0.3 µg/L in groundwater
monitoring well MW-25A at a concentration of 2.02 J µg/L.
October 2017 Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Lincoln County Landfill Permit #55-03
Crouse, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
February 14, 2018 5
As previously discussed above, it appears that the majority of the metals detected within the groundwater
monitoring wells are either naturally occurring or a product of turbidity during sampling.
3.1.3 MSW Phase 3
MSW Phase 3 groundwater monitoring well locations were sampled for Appendix I VOCs and Appendix I metals.
A summary of the detected analytes associated with this phase of the landfill is included in Table 6 in Appendix
II. The groundwater monitoring wells associated with this area include compliance well MW-32R that monitors
down gradient and side gradient of the landfill and MW-33/33A and MW-35/35A that monitor the Phase 3 sump
locations. Monitoring well MW-34 that previously monitored downgradient of Phase 3 was abandoned during
Phase 4 construction activities. During the October 2017 monitoring event MW-35 went dry during purging and a
laboratory sample could not be collected.
3.1.3.1 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
No VOCs were detected in the MSW Phase 3 monitoring wells during the October 2017 monitoring event.
3.1.3.2 Inorganic Constituents (Metals)
The groundwater monitoring wells associated with the Phase 3 landfill had three or more Appendix I metals
detected, three of which were detected above their respective 2L Standard or SW GWP Standard. The detections
above standards are as follows:
•Antimony was detected above the SW GWP Standard of 1 µg/L in groundwater monitoring wells MW-33A
and MW-35A at concentrations of 4.36 J µg/L and 4.78 J µg/L, respectively.
•Cobalt was detected above the SW GWP Standard of 1 µg/L in groundwater monitoring well MW-33A at a
concentration of 1.53 J µg/L.
•Vanadium was detected above the SW GWP Standard of 0.3 µg/L in groundwater monitoring well MW-
35A at a concentration of 3.19 J µg/L.
As previously discussed above, it appears that the majority of the metals detected within the groundwater
monitoring wells are either naturally occurring or a product of turbidity during sampling.
3.1.4 C&D Landfill Phase 1 and 2
C&D Landfill Phase 1 and Phase 2 groundwater monitoring well locations were sampled for Appendix I VOCs;
Appendix I metals plus mercury, manganese, and iron; and four classical chemistry compounds: Chloride, Total
Dissolved Solids, Sulfate, and Alkalinity. A summary of the detected analytes associated with the C&D Landfills is
included as Table 7 and 8 in Appendix II. The groundwater monitoring wells associated with the C&D landfill
include compliance wells MW-26, MW-27, and MW-28 that monitor Phase 1 and MW-29, MW-30, MW-31, and
MW-36 that monitor Phase 2. Groundwater monitoring well MW-36 was installed near the C&D compliance
boundary as part of the 2013 C&D Assessment.
October 2017 Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Lincoln County Landfill Permit #55-03
Crouse, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
February 14, 2018 6
3.1.4.1 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
C&D Landfill groundwater monitoring wells had five VOCs detected during the October 2017 monitoring event,
two (2) of which were detected above their respective 2L Standard.
•Tetrachloroethene was detected in groundwater monitoring well MW-28 at a concentration of 8.9 µg/L,
which is above its 2L Standard of 0.7 µg/L.
•Vinyl Chloride was detected in groundwater monitoring well MW-28 at a concentration of 0.84 J µg/L,
which is above its 2L Standard of 0.03 µg/L.
3.1.4.2 Inorganic Constituents (Metals)
The groundwater monitoring wells associated with the C&D landfill had six or more metals detections, and four (4)
constituents were detected above their respective 2L Standard and/or SW GWP Standard. The detections above
standards are as follows:
•Cobalt was detected in groundwater monitoring wells MW-26, MW-27, and MW-28 at a concentrations
ranging from 1.11 J to 12.0 µg/L which are above the SW GWP Standard of 1 µg/L.
•Iron was detected in groundwater monitoring wells MW-26, MW-27, MW-29, MW-30, MW-31, and MW-
36 at concentrations ranging from 347 to 52,400 µg/L, which are above the 2L Standard of 300 µg/L.
•Manganese was detected in groundwater monitoring wells MW-27, MW-29 and MW-30 at concentrations
of 203 µg/L and 1620 µg/L, respectively, which are above the 2L Standard of 50 µg/L.
•Vanadium was detected in groundwater monitoring wells MW-26, MW-27, MW-29, and MW-36 at
concentrations ranging from 1.86 J to 4.24 J µg/L, which are above the SW GWP Standard of 0.3 µg/L.
As previously discussed above, it appears that the majority of the metals detected within the groundwater
monitoring wells are either naturally occurring or a product of turbidity during sampling. Since October 2007, Iron
and Manganese have been included in the analysis for the C&D wells, and since April 2008, Iron and Manganese
were included in the analysis for the background well MW-1A. Iron and Manganese have been detected in MW-
1A in each monitoring event that has included their analysis.
3.1.4.3 Classical Chemistry Compounds
Total Dissolved Solids, Chloride, Sulfate, and Alkalinity were analyzed for in the C&D landfill groundwater
monitoring wells. The results of the analyses are summarized in Tables 7 and 8 in Appendix II. Please note that
none of the classical chemistry compounds analyzed for exceeded any of the established 2L Standards and/or SW
GWP Standards.
3.2 Surface Water Sampling
Lincoln County Landfill has five surface water sampling locations positioned in the tributaries located to the east,
south, and west of the landfill as indicated on the attached Drawing 1 of 1 in Appendix I. The original five
surface water samples are analyzed for Appendix I VOCs and Appendix I metals plus Mercury, Iron and
Manganese. Beginning with the April 2010 sampling event, a sixth surface water sample location was added to
the semi-annual monitoring plan, SW-6. The addition of SW-6 to the monitoring plan was in response to the
October 2017 Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Lincoln County Landfill Permit #55-03
Crouse, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
February 14, 2018 7
January 2009 leachate release at the facility. SW-6 is located at the discharge of the lowland area downgradient
from the leachate holding tanks as indicated on Drawing 1 of 1. A summary of the detected analytes associated
with the surface water samples collected is included as Table 9 in Appendix II.
3.2.1 Surface Water Locations SW-1 through SW-5
No VOCs were detected in surface water sampling locations during the October 2017 sampling event.
Ten (10) or more metals were detected in surface water sampling locations SW-1, SW-2, SW-3, SW-4, and SW-5,
none of which were detected at concentrations above their respective 2B Standard.
3.2.2 Surface Water Location SW-6
No VOCs were detected in surface water sampling location SW-6 during the October 2017 sampling event. Seven
(7) metals were detected in SW-6, none of which were detected at concentrations above their respective 2B
Standard. Of the classical chemistry compounds analyzed for, none were detected above their respective 2B
Standard.
3.3 Leachate Sampling
A sample of the leachate from the leachate collection system for the landfill was collected from the lift station
prior to leachate entering the on-site leachate holding tanks. The leachate sample was analyzed for Appendix I
VOCs, Appendix I metals, BOD, COD, Nitrate/Nitrite, Sulfate, TSS, and Phosphorous. A summary of the detected
analytes for the leachate is included as Table 10 in Appendix II.
4.0 Statistical Analysis
S&ME compared the water quality data with the 2L Standards and the SW GWP standards and performed a
statistical evaluation of the data. S&ME utilized three (3) statistical methods to evaluate statistically significant
increases between the compliance monitoring wells and the background monitoring well (MW-1A).
The first method utilized was a one-way parametric Analysis of Variance (Parametric ANOVA). The parametric
ANOVA analysis is recommended by the 1992 guidance document for parameters with fewer than 15% non-
detects in a specific well.
The second method used was the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric rank method. The Kruskal-Wallis method is
recommended by the 1992 guidance document for parameters that have 15% to 90% non-detects in a specific
well.
The third method used was an inter-well non-parametric prediction limit. The prediction limit was used for
parameters with greater than 90% non-detects in a specific well. The 1992 guidance document recommends this
method when a significant portion of the samples are non-detect.
Tables 11 through 13 in Appendix II summarize the results of the statistical analysis. Copies of the analytical
procedures used to perform the analysis used by the ChemStat software are included in Appendix IV.
October 2017 Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Lincoln County Landfill Permit #55-03
Crouse, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
February 14, 2018 8
4.1 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
One (1) or more volatile organic compounds were found to have a statistical increase over background
concentrations in groundwater monitoring wells MW-13, MW-14, MW-16(16R), MW-17(17R), MW-19, and MW-20
that are located downgradient from the unlined closed landfill Area “E”. The statistical increases are as follows:
•1,1-Dichloroethane in groundwater monitoring wells MW-13, MW-14, MW-16(16R), MW-19 and MW-20.
It should be noted that concentrations of 1,1-Dichloroethene in MW-13 and MW-16 have decreased over
time.
•1,4-Dichlorobenzene in groundwater monitoring wells MW-13 and MW-16(16R).
•Acetone in groundwater monitoring well MW-13, which has ranged from non-detect to detect over time.
•Benzene in groundwater monitoring wells MW-13, MW-16(16R), and MW-19. Reported concentrations
over time have been generally stable.
•cis-1,2-Dichloroethene in groundwater monitoring wells MW-13, MW-16(16R), MW-19 and MW-20.
Concentrations at these wells have been relatively stable, although a rising trend over time is noted at
MW-16.
•Chlorobenzene in groundwater monitoring well MW-16(16R).
•Chloroethane in groundwater monitoring wells MW-13 and MW-16(16R). It should be noted that
concentrations of Chloroethane in well MW-13 have decreased over time and both MW-13 and MW-
16(16R) have concentrations that vary from non-detect to detect.
•Methylene Chloride in groundwater monitoring wells MW-13, MW-16(16R), MW-19 and MW-20. It should
be noted that concentrations of Methylene Chloride in wells MW-19 and MW-20 have decreased over
time.
•Tetrachloroethene in groundwater monitoring wells MW-13, MW-17 (17R), and MW-19. Reported
concentrations over time have been generally stable. October 2017 was the first statistically significant
increase for MW-17(17R).
•Toluene in groundwater monitoring well MW-13.
•Trichloroethene in groundwater monitoring wells MW-13, MW-19, and MW-20. Reported concentrations
over time have been generally stable. October 2017 was the first statistically significant increase for MW-
17(17R).
•Trichlorofluoromethane in MW-19. Over time concentrations have varied from non-detect to detect.
•Vinyl Chloride in groundwater monitoring wells MW-13 and MW-16(16R). Reported concentrations over
time have been generally stable.
•Total Xylenes in groundwater monitoring wells MW-13, MW-16(16R) and MW-19. Reported
concentrations over time have been generally stable in MW-13; MW-16 concentrations vary from non-
detect to detect. October 2017 was the first statistically significant increase in MW-19.
There were no volatile organic compounds with statistically significant increases over background for the
Phase 2 and Phase 3 MSW wells. Graphs depicting concentrations over time for constituents with a statistical
increase are provided in Appendix V.
4.2 Total Metals
Total metal concentrations in groundwater sampled from wells are often dependent on the turbidity or suspended
particulates (from the aquifer formation) retrieved with the groundwater sample. The turbidity is a function of the
October 2017 Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Lincoln County Landfill Permit #55-03
Crouse, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
February 14, 2018 9
sampling method, well construction, how the well was developed, and the grain size/consolidation of the
lithologic unit sampled. Since the unfiltered samples are acidified in the field at the time of sample collection,
metals contained within the particulates are dissolved into the water sample. Thus, the presence of turbidity in
groundwater samples often results in elevated (false positive) analytical results for total metal concentrations.
Therefore, the presence of elevated total metal concentrations does not necessarily correlate with groundwater
impact.
Based on the historical water quality data, the background well and each of the compliance groundwater
monitoring wells (excluding MW-22) have contained at least one (1) total metal at concentrations above the 2L
Standards. The statistical evaluation indicates that twelve (12) of the compliance groundwater monitoring wells
(MW-8, 10, 12, 13, 15, 16(16R), 17(17R), 24, 25, 25A, 33, and MW-33A) contained at least one (1) metal at a
statistically significant level higher than the background well. Metal concentrations in several wells have
fluctuated between non-detect and detect. In the background well, MW-1A, antimony, beryllium, cadmium,
chromium, cobalt, iron, lead, manganese, silver, thallium, and vanadium have historically been detected at
concentrations above the 2L Standards. Graphs depicting concentrations over time for constituents with a
statistical increase are provided in Appendix V.
5.0 Methane Readings
Methane Readings are collected from eleven (11) locations on site, including eight (8) methane monitoring wells
(MMW-1 through MMW-8) and the scale house, landfill shop, and lift station on site. Methane readings are
measured monthly by Lincoln County personnel using a GEM 2000 gas meter. April 2017 through October 2017
methane readings and a figure showing their locations are located in Appendix VI. Please note that September
2017 methane readings were not recorded due to equipment failure. A new meter was purchased and readings
resumed in October 2017.
Appendices
Appendix I – Drawings
kjkjkjkjkjkjkjkjkjkjkjkjkjkjkjkjkjkjkjkjkjkjkjkjkjkj!.!.!.!.!.!.kjC&D PHASE II
C&D PHASE I
EXISTING AREA "E"CLOSED LANDFILLEXISTING AREA "D"PHASE IPHASE II
PHASE III805 810855860830845870875880825815PHASE IV
FUTURE PHASE V
820835840850865MW-8DRY
MW-9803.15
MW-12812.78MW-24813.02
MW-25/25A806.14
MW-21815.19 MW-18840.76 MW-19832.13
MW-13839.30
MW-14839.54
MW-20843.39
MW-28869.43MW-29836.45
MW-36824.60
MW-30830.90 MW-31847.24
MW-26856.09
MW-27861.62
MW-1A884.95
MW-17R855.32
MW-10R804.45
MW-32R807.43
MW-16R858.50
MW-35/MW-35A803.77
MW-33/MW-33A801.74
SW-4
SW-5
SW-1
SW-2
SW-3
SW-6
SHOAL RD CROUSE RDYO
D
E
R

R
D
SHIRLEY
R
E
Y
N
O
L
D
S

L
N
GROUNDWATER SURFACE MAPOctober 9-10, 2017LINCOLN COUNTY LANDFILLCROUSE, NORTH CAROLINA1 1356-07-004SJT2-14-2018FIGURE NO.SCALE:PROJECT NO.DATE:DRAWN BY:³1 " = 400 'Q:\1356\LINCOLN COUNTY\07-004\GIS\OCT 2017 GW Map 11x17_arcmap104.mxd plotted by JTayouga 02-14-20180 500 1,000
(IN FEET)
MW-15NS
Legend
kj Groundwater Wells
!.Surface Water Sample Locations
Roads
MSW Boundary
Property Line
C&D Landfill Boundary
Streams on Landfill Property
Groundwater Flow Direction
4' Contours
10/2017 Groundwater Surface
Appendix II – Tables
Latitude Longitude Ground TOC DTW - TOC GW ELEV.
(MM/DD/YY)(ft)(ft-MSL)
MW-1A Background - - - 35.4305188° -081.3550147° - - -929.27 - - - to - - -- - - to - - -- - - to - - -- - - to - - -- - - to - - -- - -44.32 884.95
MW-8 Leachate Lagoon - - -35.4204767°-081.3543964°- - -840.03 - - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -DRY N/A
MW-9 Leachate Lagoon - - -35.4205014°-081.3544769°- - -840.20 - - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -37.05 803.15
MW-10R Leachate Lagoon - - -35.4209399°-081.3538215°- - -834.97 - - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -30.52 804.45
MW-12 Area "E" and Phase 1 - - -35.4229138°-081.3543339°- - -827.57 - - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -14.79 812.78
MW-13 Area "E" and Phase 1 - - -35.4252197°-081.3569120°- - -872.78 - - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -33.48 839.30
MW-14 Area "E" and Phase 1 - - -35.4252431°-081.3570085°- - -871.44 - - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -31.90 839.54
MW-15 Area "E" and Phase 1 - - -35.4232655°-081.3580245°- - -847.86 - - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -Note 1 N/A
MW-16R Area "E" and Phase 1 - - -35.4270857°-081.3570696°- - -876.39 - - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -17.89 858.50
MW-17R Area "E" and Phase 1 07/20/93 35.4262555°-081.3548668°898.14 899.64 0.0 to 20.0 20.0 to 35.0 0.0 to 16.0 16.0 to 18.0 18.0 to 45.5 - - -44.32 855.32
MW-18 Area "E" and Phase 1 - - -35.4246249°-081.3576782°859.20 861.41 - - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -15.2 to 30.2 - - -20.65 840.76
MW-19 Area "E" and Phase 1 - - -35.4247561°-081.3576590°859.95 859.73 - - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -63.0 to 68.0 - - -27.60 832.13
MW-20 Area "E" and Phase 1 - - -35.4256922°-081.3575990°- - -860.00 - - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -10.1 to 25.1 - - -16.61 843.39
MW-21 Phase 2 09/03/99 35.4221305°-081.3579143°853.80 855.91 0.0 to 27.0 27.0 to 42.0 0.0 to 23.0 23.0 to 25.0 25.0 to 42.0 SAP 40.72 815.19
MW-24 Phase 2 09/02/99 35.4219922°-081.3540276°838.95 841.13 0.0 to 14.0 14.0 to 29.0 0.0 to 10.0 10.0 to 12.0 12.0 to 29.0 SAP 28.11 813.02
MW-25 Phase 2 08/31/99 35.4213534°-081.3546541°836.75 838.73 0.0 to 15.0 15.0 to 30.0 0.0 to 11.0 11.0 to 13.0 13.0 to 30.0 SAP DRY N/A
MW-25A Phase 2 09/01/99 35.4212848°-081.3547068°836.75 838.84 0.0 to 50.0 50.0 to 60.0 0.0 to 46.0 46.0 to 48.0 48.0 to 60.0 SAP 32.70 806.14
MW-26 C&D Phase 1 09/08/99 35.4273089°-081.3527074°869.11 871.19 0.0 to 6.0 6.0 to 21.0 0.0 to 4.0 4.0 to 5.0 5.0 to 21.0 SAP 15.10 856.09
MW-27 C&D Phase 1 09/07/99 35.4278831°-081.3533157°879.03 880.90 0.0 to 10.0 10.0 to 25.0 0.0 to 6.0 6.0 to 8.0 8.0 to 25.0 SAP 19.28 861.62
MW-28 C&D Phase 1 04/01/99 35.4276977°-081.3542728°912.72 915.68 0.0 to 36.0 36.0 to 51.0 0.0 to 32.0 32.0 to 34.0 34.0 to 51.0 SAP 46.25 869.43
MW-29 C&D Phase 2 04/30/02 35.4252895°-081.3534741°877.45 879.97 0.0 to 30.0 30.0 to 45.0 0.0 to 26.0 26.0 to 28.0 28.0 to 45.0 PWR 43.52 836.45
MW-30 C&D Phase 2 05/02/02 35.4259842°-081.3520549°883.72 886.35 0.0 to 45.0 45.0 to 60.0 0.0 to 41.0 41.0 to 43.0 43.0 to 60.0 SAP 55.45 830.90
MW-31 C&D Phase 2 06/19/03 35.4266563°-081.3521999°877.40 879.88 0.0 to 25.0 25.0 to 40.0 0.0 to 21.0 21.0 to 23.0 23.0 to 40.0 PWR 32.64 847.24
MW-32R Phase 3 12/20/04 35.4214589°-081.3583317°825.89 827.25 0.0 to 10.0 10.0 to 25.0 0.0 to 6.0 6.0 to 8.0 8.0 to 25.0 SAP 19.82 807.43
MW-33 Phase 3 12/30/04 35.4208632°-081.3585631°816.33 819.38 0.0 to 7.0 7.0 to 22.0 0.0 to 3.0 3.0 to 5.0 5.0 to 22.0 SAP 17.64 801.74
MW-33A Phase 3 12/30/04 35.4208632°-081.3585631°815.94 818.67 0.0 to 56.5 56.5 to 61.5 0.0 to 52.5 52.5 to 54.5 54.5 to 61.5 ROCK 17.41 801.26
MW-35 Phase 3 12/28/04 35.4200537°-081.3551088°836.85 839.64 0.0 to 19.0 19.0 to 34.0 0.0 to 15.0 15.0 to 17.0 17.0 to 34.0 SAP 35.87 803.77
MW-35A Phase 3 12/28/04 35.4200537°-081.3551088°836.77 839.83 0.0 to 60.0 60.0 to 65.0 0.0 to 56.0 56.0 to 58.0 58.0 to 65.0 SAP 37.52 802.31
MW-36 C&D Phase 2 06/26/13 35.4252949° -081.3518019° 852.00 854.83 0.0 to 19.5 19.5 to 34.5 0.0 to 9.5 9.5 to 17.7 17.7 to 35.0 SAP 30.23 824.60
Notes:
(ft-MSL)Feet Mean Sea Level DTW Depth to Water Sch. 40 Schedule 40 Pipe PWR Partially Weathered Rock
(ft-bls)Feet Below Land Surface GW ELEV.Groundwater Elevation 0.010 Slot 0.010-Inch Machine-Slotted Pipe ROCK Bedrock
TOC Top of Casing #2 Filter Sand Medium to Fine Grained Silica Sand Neat Cement Cement Mixture without Bentonite - - -Not Available
Ground Ground Surface Bentonite Bentonite Pellets SAP Saprolite
DRY No water in well at time of sampling Note 1 Well was destroyed during clearing operations. Scheduled to be replaced.
NS Well was not sampled
N/A Not Applicable
2-inch, SCH. 40, PVC 2-inch, 0.010 Slot, PVC Neat Cement Bentonite Interval
(decimal degrees)(ft-MSL)(ft-bls)(ft-bls)(ft-bls)
Screen Interval Grout Interval Seal Interval Filter Pack Geology in
Screen
Interval
October 2017
(ft-bls)(ft-bls)
Table 1
Well Construction Summary and Water Level Data
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No: 1356-07-004
Well ID Area Monitored
Install Date
GPS Coordinates Survey Elevations Casing Interval
K n I v
Well Hydraulic Cond. Eff. Porosity Gradient Flow Velocity
ID (ft/day)(ne)(ft/ft)(ft/yr)
MW-1A - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-8 - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-10R - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-12 - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-13 - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-15 - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-16R - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-17R 1.4E+00 17%0.01 36
MW-18 - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-20 - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-21 4.5E-01 23%0.02 17
MW-24 - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-25 - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-26 - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-27 - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-28 - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-29 8.6E-01 3%0.04 366
MW-30 5.0E+00 24%0.05 402
MW-31 - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-32R 2.6E-01 20%0.03 14
MW-33 3.0E+00 27%0.02 85
MW-34 - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-35 4.9E-01 16%0.004 4
MW-36 3.5E+00 20%0.004 26
Notes:
(4) Seepage velocity v = (K*i)/ne
- - -Not Available
(1) Hydraulic Conductivity was calculated from slug tests performed after well
construction.
October 2017
(3) Hydraulic gradient calculated by measuring linear feet between selected contour
intervals.
Table 2
Groundwater Flow Data
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No: 1356-07-004
(2) Effective porosity was estimated from soils collected within the saturated portion of
screen interval during well construction.
Well ID DTW TOC
(ft-bls)pH Temp (°C)Conductance
(μS)
MW-1A 44.32 5.86 18.0 15
MW-8
MW-9 37.05 5.57 16.8 40
MW-10R 30.52 6.13 17.9 155
MW-12 14.79 5.82 18.1 199
MW-13 33.48 18.10 18.1 282
MW-14 31.90 6.00 17.5 113
MW-16R 17.89 6.39 17.6 730
MW-17R 44.32 NA 17.9 57
MW-18 20.65 6.14 17.3 142
MW-19 27.60 6.22 16.0 133
MW-20 16.61 5.69 17.3 123
MW-21 40.72 6.06 17.0 105
MW-24 28.11 5.20 18.5 252
MW-25
MW-25A 32.70 5.92 18.4 152
MW-26 15.10 5.58 18.2 94
MW-27 19.28 5.18 17.1 372
MW-28 46.25 4.70 18.9 39
MW-29 43.52 5.57 18.3 311
MW-30 55.45 5.62 17.0 71
MW-31 32.64 5.60 16.8 52
MW-32R 19.82 5.75 17.0 44
MW-33 17.64 6.01 18.7 91
MW-33A 17.41 6.85 16.4 253
MW-35 35.87 3.05 18.1 101
MW-35A 37.52 6.61 16.9 49
MW-36 30.23 5.40 15.6 22
Notes:
°C degrees Celsius
μS micro siemems
NTU nephelometric turbidity unit
Table 3
October 2017 - Field Parameters in Monitoring Wells
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
DRY
Dry
Notes:
(1) ug/L = micrograms per liter (parts per billion)
(2) mg/L = milligrams per liter (parts per million)
(3) μS = microSiemens
(4) 15A NCAC 2L = North Carolina Groundwater Quality Standards
(5) 15A NCAC 2B = North Carolina Surface Water Quality Standards
(6) GWP ST = Solid Waste Groundwater Protection Standard
(7) NE = No established standard
(8) Bold indicates above 15A NCAC 2L, 15A NCAC 2B, or SWS GWP standard
(9) Compounds not shown were not detected.
(10) SWSL = North Carolina Department of Environmtental Quality, Solid Waste Section Limit established in 2007
(11) NA = Not Analyzed
(12) J = Analyte detected is between the Method Detection Limit (MDL) and the SWSL
(13) B = Analyte was detected in the associated method blank
(14) D = The sample was analyzed at dilution
(15) Dry = Surface water sample location dry or no flow, location not sampled
(16) NS - Not Sampled
Notes for Tables 4 through 10
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
EPA Appendix I Volatile
Organic Compounds Method
8260 (µg/L)
NCDEQ
SWSL
15A
NCAC
2L
Soild
Waste
GWP ST
MW-1A MW-8 MW-9 MW-10R MW-12 MW-13 MW-14 MW-15 MW-16R MW-17R MW-18 MW-19 MW-20
1,1-Dichloroethane 5 6 NE 11 2.7 J 0.79 J 6.2 12 7.2
1,4 - Dichlorobenzene 1 6 NE 2.4 4.3 2.2 1.9
cis-1,2,-Dichloroethene 5 70 NE 2.8 J 9.1 3.5 J 1.3 J 4.9 J
Acetone 100 6000 NE 12 J
Benzene 1 1 NE 4 5.3 4.2 1.4 1.9
Chlorobenzene 3 50 NE 5.0
Chloroform 5 70 NE 12
Ethyl Chloride (Chloroethane)10 3000 NE 0.98 J 0.86 J 1.1 J
Methylene Chloride 1 5 NE 39 0.66 J
Tetrachloroethene 1 0.7 NE 2.5 0.65 J 2.0 0.82 J
Trichloroethane 1 3 NE 1.7 0.45 J 1.1 1.5 0.58 J
Vinyl chloride 1 0.03 NE 0.68 J 2.8 0.87 J
Xylenes (total)5 500 NE 1.3 12 1.6 J 2.5 J
EPA Appendix I Metals
Method 6010B/6020 (µg/L)
Antimony 6 NE 1 3.74 J 1.30 J 4.76 J 1.55 J
Arsenic 10 10 NE 9.14 J 18.0
Barium 100 700 NE 218 28.5 J 153 97.8 J 28.3 J 689 122 52.4 J 32.8 J 102
Beryllium 1 NE 4 0.276 J 0.155 J 0.139 J 0.323 J
Chromium 10 10 NE 53.10 2.42 J 2.21 J 3.85 J 1.41 J
Cobalt 10 NE 1 13.5 22.8 242 3.59 J 56.7 17.7 1.17 J 7.64 J
Copper 10 1000 NE 16.9 4.04 J 3.60 J 7.37 J
Iron 300 300 NE 16,300 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Lead 10 15 NE 12.7 4.73 J 4.40 J
Manganese 50 50 NE 301 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Nickel 50 100 NE 28.3 J 8.00 J 14.0 J 3.23 J 76.1 10.4 J 4.97 J 3.93 J
Selenium 10 20 NE 1.50 J 1.10 J
Silver 10 20 NE 3.65 J
Thallium 5.5 NE 0.28 0.663 J 0.177 J 1.04 J 24.2 JD 0.370 J 0.221 J 0.252 J
Vanadium 25 NE 0.3 34.5 1.65 J 2.22 J 3.64 J 4.66 J 3.83 J
Zinc 10 1000 NE 69.2 4.89 J 22.1 36.1 15.5 8.56 J 8.26 J
Table 4
October 2017 - Detected Analytes in Monitoring Wells for MSW Area “E” and Phase 1
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
DRY
DRY
NS
NS
DRY
DRY
EPA Appendix I Volatile
Organic Compounds Method
8260 (µg/L)
NCDEQ
SWSL
15A
NCAC
2L
Soild
Waste
GWP ST
MW-21 MW-24 MW-25 MW-25A
1,1-Dichloroethane 5 6 NE DRY 0.55 J
Acetone 100 6000 NE 36 J
EPA Appendix I Metals
Method 6010B/6020 (µg/L)
Antimony 6 NE 1 0.889 J
Barium 100 700 NE 62.4 J 224 166
Beryllium 1 NE 4 0.322 J 1.26
Cobalt 10 NE 1 6.86 J
Copper 10 1000 NE 5.95 J
Nickel 50 100 NE 2.88 J
Thallium 5.5 NE 0.28 0.171 J 0.336 J
Vanadium 25 NE 0.3 2.02 J
Zinc 10 1000 NE 11.3 30.5 12.6
Table 5
October 2017 - Detected Analytes in Monitoring Wells for MSW Phase 2
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
DRY
EPA Appendix I Volatile
Organic Compounds Method
8260 (µg/L)
NCDEQ
SWSL
15A
NCAC
2L
Soild
Waste
GWP ST
MW-32R MW-33 MW-33A MW-35 MW-35A
EPA Appendix I Metals
Method 6010B/6020 (µg/L)
Antimony 6 NE 1 4.36 J 4.78 J
Barium 100 700 NE 9.10 J 43.6 J 7.68 J 36.2 J
Beryllium 1 NE 4 0.161 J
Chromium 10 10 NE 2.69 J
Cobalt 10 NE 1 1.53 J
Copper 10 1000 NE 3.04 J
Thallium 5.5 NE 0.28 0.111 J 0.120 J
Vanadium 25 NE 0.3 3.19 J
Zinc 10 1000 NE 4.75 J 28.0 7.83 J
No Volatile Organic Compounds Detected in Phase 3 in October 2017
Table 6
October 2017 - Detected Analytes in Monitoring Wells for MSW Phase 3
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
DRY
EPA Appendix I Volatile
Organic Compounds Method
8260 (µg/L)
NCDEQ
SWSL
15A NCAC
2L
Soild
Waste
GWP ST
MW-26 MW-27 MW-28
1,1-Dichloroethane 5 6 NE 0.70 J
Tetrachloroethene 1 0.7 NE 0.50 J 8.9
Tetrahydrofuran NE NE NE 3.1
Trichloroethene 1 3 NE 0.55 J
Vinyl Chloride 1 0.03 NE 0.84 J
EPA Appendix I Metals
Method 6010B/6020 (µg/L)
Barium 100 700 NE 117 121 114
Beryllium 1 NE 4 0.439 J
Cadmium 1 2 NE 1.11
Chromium 10 10 NE 3.83 J 1.50 J
Cobalt 10 NE 1 1.11 J 12.0 2.48 J
Copper 10 1000 NE 4.48 J 1.79 J
Iron 300 300 NE 576 430 25.8 J
Manganese 50 50 NE 13.0 J 1,620 26.1 J
Nickel 50 100 NE 18.8 J 4.94 J
Thallium 5.5 NE 0.28 0.268 J 0.148 J
Vanadium 25 NE 0.3 1.86 J 3.17 J
Zinc 10 1000 NE 5.92 J 20.6 9.72 J
Classical Chemistry
Compounds (mg/L)
Chloride NE 250 NE 3.6 J 17
Sulfate as SO4 250 250 NE 3.5 J 84 J
Total Dissolved Solids NE 500 NE 220
Total Alkalinity NE NE NE 35 64 15
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Lincoln County Landfill
October 2017 - Detected Analytes in Monitoring Wells for C&D Phase 1
Table 7
EPA Appendix I Volatile Organic
Compounds Method 8260 (µg/L)
NCDEQ
SWSL
15A
NCAC
2L
Soild
Waste
GWP ST
MW-29 MW-30 MW-31 MW-36
EPA Appendix I Metals Method
6010B/6020 (µg/L)
Barium 100 700 NE 20.5 J 80.8 J 5.71 J 67.7 J
Beryllium 1 NE 4 0.433 J
Chromium 10 10 NE 8.84 J 3.61 J
Cobalt 10 NE 70 2.04 J
Copper 10 1000 NE 6.93 J 2.20 J
Iron 300 300 NE 52,400 347 10,000 1,410
Lead 10 15 NE 4.51 J
Manganese 50 50 NE 203 55.1 38.5 J 18.2 J
Nickel 50 100 NE 13.2 J 2.90 J 3.35 J
Thallium 5.5 NE 0.28 0.145 J
Vanadium 25 NE 0.3 4.24 J 2.09 J
Zinc 10 1000 NE 14.2 19.2 4.47 J 8.34 J
Classical Chemistry Compounds
(mg/L)
Chloride NE 250 NE 6
Sulfate as SO4 250 250 NE 5.6 J 8.7 J
Total Dissolved Solids NE 500 NE 190
Total Alkalinity NE NE NE 150 25
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Lincoln County Landfill
October 2017 - Detected Analytes in Monitoring Wells for C&D Phase 2
Table 8
No Volatile Organic Compounds Detected in C&D Phase 2 in October 2017
EPA Appendix I Volatile
Organic Compounds Method
8260 (µg/L)
15A NCAC
2B SW-1 SW-2 SW-3 SW-4 SW-5 SW-6
EPA Appendix I Metals
Method 6010B/6020 (µg/L)
Antimony 640 35.7 J 35.8 J
Arsenic 50 7.32 J
Barium 1,000 58.3 J 33.8 J 44.6 J 32.9 J
Chromium 74 3.06 J 2.11 J 3.40 J 2.97 J
Cobalt 270 1.27 J 4.48 J
Copper 7 2.58 J 3.67 J 4.67 J
Iron NE 2,760 1,270 3,160 612 1,020
Lead 25 3.87 J 3.93 J
Manganese NE 171 74.6 315 66.7 49.7 J
Nickel 88 3.15 J 3.34 J
Thallium 0.47 0.260 J 0.180 J 0.137 J 0.137 J 0.126 J
Vanadium NE 5.11 J 3.10 J 6.90 J 2.02 J 7.54 J
Zinc 36 15.3 12.6 20.4
Classical Chemistry
Compounds (mg/L)
BOD NE NA NA NA NA NA 2.1
COD NE NA NA NA NA NA 26
Sulfate as SO4 NE NA NA NA NA NA 7.5
Phosphorous NE NA NA NA NA NA 0.085 J
Nitrate as N NE NA NA NA NA NA 0.090 J
Nitrate/Nitrite as N NE NA NA NA NA NA 0.090 J
Total Suspended Solids NE NA NA NA NA NA 18
Total Alkalinity NE NA NA NA NA NA 15
Table 9
October 2017 - Detected Analytes in Surface Water Samples
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
No Volatile Organic Compounds Detected in October 2017
EPA Appendix I Volatile Organic
Compounds Method 8260 (µg/L)
NCDEQ SWSL Lift Station
EPA Appendix I Metals Method
6010B/6020 (µg/L)
Arsenic 10 16.8
Barium 100 284
Chromium 10 3.70 J
Cobalt 10 9.16 J
Copper 10
Lead 10 3.41 J
Nickel 50 16.1 J
Thallium 5.5 4.66 JD
Vanadium 25 2.35 J
Zinc 10 6.93 J
Classical Chemistry Compounds (mg/L)
BOD NE 13
COD NE 180
Sulfate as SO4 250 7.0 J
Phosphorous NE 0.150
Nitrate as N 10 0.180 J
Nitrite as N 1000 0.150 J
Nitrate/Nitrite as N NE 0.330
Total Alkalinity NE 550 D
Total Suspended Solids NE 26
Table 10
October 2017 - Detected Analytes in Leachate
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
No Volatile Organic Compounds Detected in October 2017
Notes:
(1) SSI = Statistically Significant Increase
(2) PA = One Way Parametric Analysis of Variance (Parametric ANOVA)
The parametric ANOVA analysis is recommended by the 1992 guidance document for parameters
with fewer than 15% non-detects in a specific well.
(3) KW = Kruskal Wallis Non-Parametric Rank Analysis
The Kruskal-Wallis method is recommended by the 1992 guidance document for parameters that
have 15% to 90% non-detects in a specific well.
(4) PL = Non-Parametric Inter-Well Prediction Limit Analysis
The prediction limit was used for parameters with greater than 90% non-detects in a specific well.
The 1992 guidance document recommends this method when a significant portion of the samples
are non-detect.
Notes for Tables 11 through 13
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Statistical
Percent Analysis
Parameter Well ID Non-Detect Method SSI Comments
1,1,1-Trichloroethane MW-13 90%KW FALSE
1,1-Dichloroethane MW-13 2%P PA TRUE Concentrations have decreased over time
MW-14 49%KW TRUE
MW-16 25%KW TRUE Concentrations have decreased over time
MW-17 78%KW FALSE
MW-19 31%KW TRUE
MW-20 36%KW TRUE
1,1-Dichloroethene MW-16 96%PL FALSE
MW-19 98%PL FALSE
1,2-Dichloroethane MW-13 94%PL FALSE
1,4-Dichlorobenzene MW-13 53%KW TRUE
MW-16 54%KW TRUE
MW-17 87%KW FALSE
MW-19 90%PL FALSE
MW-20 83%KW FALSE
2-Butanone MW-13 98%PL FALSE
Acetone MW-12 98%PL FALSE
MW-13 51%KW TRUE Concentrations vary from non-detect to detect
MW-14 96%PL FALSE
MW-16 90%KW FALSE
MW-17 73%KW FALSE
MW-15 98%PL FALSE
MW-9 98%PL FALSE
MW-18 97%PL FALSE
MW-19 95%PL FALSE
MW-20 98%PL FALSE
Antimony MW-12 96%PL FALSE
MW-13 90%KW FALSE
MW-14 53%KW FALSE
MW-16 94%PL FALSE
MW-10 91%PL FALSE
MW-8 93%PL FASLSE
MW-9 74%KW FALSE
MW-18 90%PL FALSE
MW-19 55%KW FALSE
MW-20 93%PL FALSE
Arsenic MW-12 84%KW FALSE
MW-13 47%KW TRUE Concentrations vary from non-detect to detect
MW-14 94%PL FALSE
MW-16 56%KW TRUE
MW-17 96%PL FALSE
MW-10 91%PL FALSE
MW-15 91%PL FALSE
MW-8 89%KW FALSE
MW-9 94%PL FALSE
MW-18 90%PL FALSE
MW-19 90%PL FALSE
MW-20 83%KW FALSE
Table 11
October 2017 Statistical Analysis for Phase 1 and Area "E"
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Page 1 of 6
Statistical
Percent Analysis
Parameter Well ID Non-Detect Method SSI Comments
Table 11
October 2017 Statistical Analysis for Phase 1 and Area "E"
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Barium MW-12 37%KW TRUE
MW-13 33%KW TRUE
MW-14 43%KW FALSE
MW-16 33%KW TRUE
MW-17 33%KW TRUE
MW-10 23%KW TRUE
MW-15 22%KW TRUE
MW-8 39%KW FALSE
MW-9 33%KW FALSE
MW-18 31%KW FALSE
MW-19 48%KW FALSE
MW-20 31%KW FALSE
Benzene MW-13 33%KW TRUE
MW-16 50%KW TRUE
MW-17 84%KW FALSE
MW-19 62%KW TRUE
MW-20 69%KW FALSE
Beryllium MW-12 61%KW FALSE
MW-13 69%KW FALSE
MW-14 98%PL FALSE
MW-16 79%KW FALSE
MW-17 56%KW FALSE
MW-10 59%KW FALSE
MW-15 39%KW TRUE Concentrations have decreased over time
MW-8 56%KW TRUE
MW-9 90%KW FALSE
MW-18 86%KW FALSE
MW-19 95%PL FALSE
MW-20 79%KW FALSE
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene MW-13 45%KW TRUE
MW-16 48%KW TRUE
MW-17 87%KW FALSE
MW-19 55%KW TRUE
MW-20 62%KW TRUE
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene MW-12 98%PL FALSE
Cadmium MW-12 71%KW FALSE
MW-13 76%KW FALSE
MW-14 75%KW FALSE
MW-16 75%KW FALSE
MW-17 78%KW FALSE
MW-10 77%KW FALSE
MW-15 76%KW FALSE
MW-8 75%KW FALSE
MW-9 90%KW FALSE
MW-18 90%PL FALSE
MW-19 98%KW FALSE
MW-20 88%KW FALSE
Chlorobenzene MW-13 88%KW FALSE
MW-16 58%KW TRUE
Chloroethane MW-13 35%KW TRUE Concentrations vary from non-detect to detect
MW-16 60%KW TRUE Concentrations vary from non-detect to detect
MW-19 95%PL FALSE
MW-20 81%KW FALSE
Chloromethane MW-10 97%PL FALSE
MW-12 98%PL FALSE
MW-13 98%PL FALSE
MW-16 98%PL FALSE
MW-9 98%PL FALSE
MW-20 98%PL FALSE
Page 2 of 6
Statistical
Percent Analysis
Parameter Well ID Non-Detect Method SSI Comments
Table 11
October 2017 Statistical Analysis for Phase 1 and Area "E"
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Chromium MW-12 80%KW FALSE
MW-13 45%KW FALSE
MW-14 82%KW FALSE
MW-16 52%KW FALSE
MW-17 49%KW FALSE
MW-10
MW-15
MW-8
MW-9 33%KW FALSE
MW-18 76%KW FALSE
MW-20 83%KW FALSE
Cobalt MW-12 29%KW TRUE
MW-13 0%ANOVA TRUE
MW-14 73%KW FALSE
MW-16 8%ANOVA FALSE
MW-17 38%KW TRUE
MW-10 32%KW FALSE
MW-15 76%KW FALSE
MW-8 32%KW TRUE
MW-9 90%KW FALSE
MW-18 60%KW FALSE
MW-19 95%PL FALSE
MW-20 62%KW FALSE
Copper MW-12 71%KW FALSE
MW-13 65%KW FALSE
MW-14 41%KW FALSE
MW-16 92%PL FALSE
MW-17 60%KW FALSE
MW-10 59%KW FALSE
MW-15 78%KW FALSE
MW-8 57%KW FALSE
MW-9 67%KW FALSE
MW-18 52%KW FALSE
MW-19 76%KW FALSE
MW-20 86%KW FALSE
Ethylbenzene MW-13 80%KW FALSE
MW-16 96%PL FALSE
Page 3 of 6
Statistical
Percent Analysis
Parameter Well ID Non-Detect Method SSI Comments
Table 11
October 2017 Statistical Analysis for Phase 1 and Area "E"
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Lead MW-12 88%KW FALSE
MW-13 69%KW FALSE
MW-14 94%PL FALSE
MW-16 46%KW TRUE Non-Detect in April 2017
MW-17 82%KW FALSE
MW-10 68%KW FALSE
MW-15 74%KW FALSE
MW-8 57%KW FALSE
MW-9 88%KW FALSE
MW-18 90%PL FALSE
MW-19 95%PL FALSE
MW-20 86%KW FALSE
Methylene Chloride MW-12 98%PL FALSE
MW-13 49%KW TRUE Concentrations have decreased over time
MW-14 92%PL FALSE
MW-16 60%KW TRUE Concentrations have been non-detect since Oct 2011
MW-17 87%KW FALSE
MW-19 48%KW TRUE Concentrations have decreased over time
MW-20 48%KW TRUE Concentrations have decreased over time
Nickel MW-12 55%KW FALSE
MW-13 45%KW FALSE
MW-14 63%KW FALSE
MW-16 52%KW FALSE
MW-17 44%KW FALSE
MW-10 68%KW FALSE
MW-15 96%PL FALSE
MW-8 61%KW FALSE
MW-9 98%PL FALSE
MW-18 62%KW FALSE
MW-19 98%PL FALSE
MW-20 83%KW FALSE
Selenium MW-13 98%PL FALSE
MW-16 88%KW FALSE
MW-17 98%PL FALSE
MW-10 95%PL FALSE
MW-15 98%PL FALSE
MW-8 96%PL FALSE
MW-18 93%PL FALSE
MW-19 98%PL FALSE
MW-20 95%PL FALSE
Page 4 of 6
Statistical
Percent Analysis
Parameter Well ID Non-Detect Method SSI Comments
Table 11
October 2017 Statistical Analysis for Phase 1 and Area "E"
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Silver MW-12 96%PL FALSE
MW-13 86%KW FALSE
MW-14 96%PL FALSE
MW-16 69%KW TRUE FIRST SSI OCTOBER 2017
MW-17 96%PL FALSE
MW-10 93%PL FALSE
MW-15 98%PL FALSE
MW-8 96%PL FALSE
MW-9 96%PL FALSE
MW-19 95%PL FALSE
t-1,2-Dichloroehthene MW-16 98%PL FALSE
t-1,4-Dichlor-2-Butene MW-14 98%PL FALSE
MW-19 98%PL FALSE
Tetrachloroethene MW-13 47%KW TRUE
MW-14 84%KW FALSE
MW-17 69%KW TRUE FIRST SSI OCTOBER 2017
MW-19 48%KW TRUE
MW-20 71%KW FALSE
Thallium MW-12 63%KW FALSE
MW-13 43%KW TRUE
MW-14 90%KW FALSE
MW-16 50%KW FALSE
MW-17 84%KW FALSE
MW-10 89%KW FALSE
MW-15 89%KW FALSE
MW-8 75%KW FALSE
MW-18 60%KW FALSE
MW-19 95%PL FALSE
MW-20 95%PL FALSE
Toluene MW-12 98%PL FALSE
MW-13 69%KW TRUE Concentrations vary from non-detect to detect
Trichloroethene MW-13 47%KW TRUE
MW-14 86%KW FALSE
MW-16 88%KW FALSE
MW-17 80%KW FALSE
MW-19 50%KW TRUE
MW-20 71%KW TRUE FIRST SSI OCTOBER 2017
Trichlorofluoromethane MW-16 92%PL FALSE
MW-17 93%PL FALSE
MW-19 67%KW TRUE Concentrations vary from non-detect to detect
Vanadium MW-12 84%KW FALSE
MW-13 67%KW FALSE
MW-14 84%KW FALSE
MW-16 90%KW FALSE
MW-17 69%KW FALSE
MW-10 30%KW TRUE
MW-15 65%KW FALSE
MW-8 32%KW FALSE
MW-9 60%KW FALSE
MW-18 60%KW FALSE
MW-19 81%KW FALSE
MW-20 90%PL FALSE
Page 5 of 6
Statistical
Percent Analysis
Parameter Well ID Non-Detect Method SSI Comments
Table 11
October 2017 Statistical Analysis for Phase 1 and Area "E"
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Vinyl Chloride MW-12 98%PL FALSE
MW-13 59%KW TRUE Non-Detect in April 2015
MW-16 27%KW TRUE Concentrations have decreased over time
MW-20 83%KW FALSE
Xylenes (Total)MW-13 40%KW TRUE
MW-16 56%KW TRUE Concentrations vary from non-detect to detect
MW-17 87%KW FALSE FIRST FALSE OCTOBER 2017
MW-19 67%KW TRUE FIRST SSI OCTOBER 2017
MW-20 74%KW FALSE
Zinc MW-12 2%ANOVA TRUE Concentrations have decreased over time
MW-13 37%KW FALSE
MW-14 45%KW FALSE
MW-16 35%KW FALSE
MW-17 36%KW FALSE
MW-10 27%KW FALSE
MW-15 59%KW FALSE
MW-8 36%KW FALSE
MW-9 56%KW FALSE
MW-18 52%KW FALSE
MW-19 64%KW FALSE
MW-20 62%KW FALSE
Page 6 of 6
Statistical
Percent Analysis
Parameter Well ID Non-Detect Method SSI Comments
Dichloroethane MW-25A 95%PL FALSE
Butanone MW-25A 95%PL FALSE
Acetone MW-21 85%KW FALSE
MW-24 97%PL FALSE
MW-25 97%PL FALSE
MW-25A 87%KW FALSE
Antimony MW-21 95%PL FALSE
MW-24 97%PL FALSE
MW-25 95%PL FALSE
MW-25A 44%KW FALSE
Arsenic MW-21 95%PL FALSE
MW-24 87%KW FALSE
MW-25 89%KW FALSE
MW-25A 85%KW FALSE
Barium MW-21 31%KW FALSE
MW-24 36%KW FALSE
MW-25 38%KW TRUE
MW-25A 31%KW FALSE
Beryllium MW-21 51%KW FALSE
MW-24 49%KW TRUE
MW-25 54%KW FALSE
MW-25A 87%KW FALSE
Cadmium MW-21 90%KW FALSE
MW-24 92%PL FALSE
MW-25 84%KW FALSE
MW-25A 87%KW FALSE
Chloromethane MW-21 97%PL FALSE
MW-25 97%PL FALSE
MW-25A 97%PL FALSE
Chromium MW-21 82%KW FALSE
MW-24 79%KW FALSE
MW-25 49%KW FALSE
MW-25A 33%KW FALSE
Cobalt MW-21 82%KW FALSE
MW-24 87%KW FALSE
MW-25 97%PL FALSE
MW-25A 49%KW TRUE
Copper MW-21 72%KW FALSE
MW-24 74%KW FALSE
MW-25 76%KW FALSE
MW-25A 67%KW FALSE
Lead MW-21 92%PL FALSE
MW-24 97%PL FALSE
MW-25A 95%PL FALSE
Nickel MW-21 92%PL FALSE
MW-24 74%KW FALSE
MW-25 65%KW FALSE
MW-25A 97%PL FALSE
Selenium MW-21 97%PL FALSE
MW-25 97%PL FALSE
Table 12
October 2017 Statistical Analysis for Phase 2
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Page 1 of 2
Statistical
Percent Analysis
Parameter Well ID Non-Detect Method SSI Comments
Table 12
October 2017 Statistical Analysis for Phase 2
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Silver MW-24 95%PL FALSE
MW-25 97%PL FALSE
MW-25A 97%PL FALSE
Thallium MW-21 92%PL FALSE
MW-24 69%KW FALSE
MW-25 84%KW FALSE
MW-25A 97%PL FALSE
Vanadium MW-21 78%KW FALSE
MW-24 90%KW FALSE
MW-25 89%KW FALSE
MW-25A 44%KW FALSE
Zinc MW-21 59%KW FALSE
MW-24 41%KW FALSE
MW-25 43%KW FALSE
MW-25A 46%KW FALSE
Page 2 of 2
Statistical
Percent Analysis
Parameter Well ID Non-Detect Method SSI Comments
Acetone MW-32 96%PL FALSE
MW-33 96%PL FALSE
MW-33A 93%PL FALSE
MW-35 96%PL FALSE
MW-35A 93%PL FALSE
Antimony MW-32 93%PL FALSE
MW-33 93%PL FALSE
MW-33A 29%KW TRUE
MW-35 85%KW FALSE
MW-35A 46%KW FALSE
Arsenic MW-32 89%KW FALSE
MW-33 89%KW FALSE
MW-33A 96%PL FALSE
MW-35 92%PL FALSE
MW-35A 86%KW FALSE
Barium MW-32 7%PA FALSE
MW-33 7%PA FALSE
MW-33A 21%KW FALSE
MW-35 8%PA FALSE
MW-35A 7%PA FALSE
Beryllium MW-32 48%KW FALSE
MW-33 43%KW TRUE FIRST SSI OCTOBER 2017
MW-33A 96%PL FALSE
MW-35 46%KW FALSE
MW-35A 79%KW FALSE
Cadmium MW-33A 86%KW FALSE
MW-35A 96%PL FALSE
Chloroform MW-33A 86%KW FALSE
MW-35A 96%PL FALSE
Chloromethane MW-32 96%PL FALSE
MW-33 96%PL FALSE
MW-35 96%PL FALSE
MW-35A 96%PL FALSE
Chromium MW-32 70%KW FALSE
MW-33 93%PL FALSE
MW-35 65%KW FALSE
MW-35A 25%KW FALSE
Cobalt MW-32 89%KW FALSE
MW-33A 93%PL FALSE
MW-35 54%KW FALSE
MW-35A 93%PL FALSE
Table 13
October 2017 Statistical Analysis for Phase 3
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Page 1 of 2
Statistical
Percent Analysis
Parameter Well ID Non-Detect Method SSI Comments
Table 13
October 2017 Statistical Analysis for Phase 3
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Copper MW-32 63%KW FALSE
MW-33 86%KW FALSE
MW-33A 32%KW FALSE
MW-35 73%KW FALSE
MW-35A 68%KW FALSE
Lead MW-32 52%KW FALSE
MW-33 96%PL FALSE
MW-33A 96%PL FALSE
MW-35 92%PL FALSE
Nickel MW-32 81%KW FALSE
MW-33 96%PL FALSE
MW-35 77%KW FALSE
MW-35A 93%PL FALSE
Selenium MW-32 93%PL FALSE
MW-33 93%PL FALSE
MW-35A 96%PL FALSE
Silver MW-32 93%PL FALSE
MW-33 96%PL FALSE
MW-33A 96%PL FALSE
Thallium MW-32 81%KW FALSE
MW-33 89%KW FALSE
MW-33A 96%PL FALSE
MW-35 77%KW FALSE
Vanadium MW-32 37%KW FALSE
MW-33 93%PL FALSE
MW-33A 79%KW FALSE
MW-35 50%KW FALSE
MW-35A 21%KW FALSE
Zinc MW-32 30%KW FALSE
MW-33 39%KW FALSE
MW-33A 21%KW FALSE
MW-35 19%KW FALSE
MW-35A 35%KW FALSE
Page 2 of 2
Appendix III – Well Sampling Logs and Laboratory Reports
Surface Water and Leachate Samples
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project 1356-07-004
Location Date Time Sampled Sample Observations
SW-1 10/10/2017 14:25 NA
SW-2 10/10/2017 15:45 NA
SW-3 10/10/2017 15:55 Stagnant, slightly turbid
SW-4 10/11/2017 9:25 NA
SW-5 10/11/2017 9:15 NA
Lift Station 10/11/2017 11:50 NA
SW- 6 10/11/2017 11:35 Grass, freshly mowed, low water level
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-1A
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.164)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/9/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0.0 0816 7.21 19.4
2.1 0819 6.82 17.9
4.2 0822 5.92 17.5
Final 6.3 0825 5.86 18.0
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Comments
Lab
36
22
15
10/10/2017
12.68
2.1
25
Electric Water Level Probe
Field-Cleaned Typhoon Pump
Rainy
57.00
TOC
44.32
ENCO
HCL
0900
disposable teflon bailer
slightly turbid
Appendix I Metals + Hg,
Mn, Fe HNO3(1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-8
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.164)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0
Final
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
31.00
Disposable Teflon Bailer
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
ENCO
HCL
HNO3
disposable teflon bailer
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-9
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.164)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/9/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0.0 1143 5.78 19
5.5 1148 5.65 17.1
11.0 1153 5.61 17.00
Final 16.5 1158 5.57 16.8
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
TOC
37.05
70.50
Rainy
39
38
42
33.45
5.5
Electric Water Level Probe
Field Cleaned Typhoon Pump
ENCO
NA
HCL
HNO3
40
10/10/2017
11:30
disposable teflon bailer
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-10R
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.164)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/9/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0.0 1220 6.13 17.9
Final
*Checked on 10/10/17 and still no recharge.
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
HCL
HNO3
155
0.98
Disposable Teflon Bailer
Went dry - was only able to get approximately 1/4th of a bailer purged.
Rainy
0.2
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
30.52
31.50
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-12
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.164)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/9/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0.0 1305 5.91 19.1
0.6 1306 5.85 18.5
1.2 1307 5.81 18.3
Final 1.8 1308 5.82 18.1
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
TOC
14.79
18.50
Rainy
261
260
197
3.71
0.6
Electric Water Level Probe
Disposable Teflon Bailer
ENCO
NA
HCL
HNO3
199
10/10/2017
1220
disposable teflon bailer
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-13
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.164)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/9/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0.0 1350 19.2 19.2
1.2 1352 18.8 18.8
2.4 1354 18.7 18.7
Final 3.6 1357 18.1 18.1
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
10/10/2017
0935
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
NA
HCL
HNO3
279
280
281
7.02
Disposable Teflon Bailer
282
Rainy
1.2
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
33.48
40.50
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-14
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.164)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/10/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0.0 1353 6.40 18.8
7.2 1359 5.95 17.5
14.4 1406 5.93 17.5
Final 21.6 1413 6.00 17.5
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
TOC
31.90
76.00
Rainy
130
125
112
44.10
7.2
Electric Water Level Probe
Field Cleaned Typhoon Pump
ENCO
NA
HCL
HNO3
113
10/11/2017
0950
disposable teflon bailer
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-15
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.164)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0
Final
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
HCL
HNO3
Disposable Teflon Bailer
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
30.50
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-16R
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.164)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/9/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0.0 0842 6.18 17.9
0.6 0844 6.30 17.9
1.2 0846 6.34 17.7
Final 1.8 0848 6.39 17.6
*Note - turbid and slight odor
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
TOC
17.89
21.60
Rainy
784
735
725
3.71
0.61
Electric Water Level Probe
Disposable Teflon Bailer
ENCO
NA
HCL
HNO3
730
10/10/2017
0915
disposable teflon bailer
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-17R
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.164)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/9/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0.0 1038 4.96*18.3
0.5 1040 4.65*18.0
1.0 1041 4.62*17.9
Final 1.5 1043 3.29*17.9
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
10/10/2017
1230
disposable teflon bailer
* = pH meter malfunction, replaced for next well
ENCO
NA
HCL
HNO3
93
61
60
3.18
Disposable Teflon Bailer
57
Rainy
0.5
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
44.32
47.50
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-18
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.164)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/9/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0 0925 6.36 17.5
1.9 0930 6.14 17.3
3.8
Final 5.7
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
TOC
20.65
32.00
Rainy
11.35
1.9
Electric Water Level Probe
Disposable Teflon Bailer
140
Dry at approximately 2.2 gallons.
142
ENCO
NA
HCL
HNO3
10/10/2017
1010
disposable teflon bailer
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-19
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.164)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/9/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0.0 0920 6.34 18.1
7.3 0926 6.30 16.1
14.6 0931 6.21 15.9
Final 21.9 0938 6.22 16.0
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
10/10/2017
1015
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
NA
HCL
HNO3
123
127
125
44.40
Field Cleaned Typhoon Pump
133
Rainy
7.3
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
27.60
72.00
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-20
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.164)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/9/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0.0 0857 6.24 17.3
1.7 0902 5.91 17.2
3.4 0905 5.68 17.4
Final 5.1 0908 5.69 17.3
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
TOC
16.61
27.00
Rainy
173
156
139
10.39
1.7
Electric Water Level Probe
Disposable Teflon Bailer
ENCO
NA
HCL
HNO3
123
0920
10/10/2017
disposable teflon bailer
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-21
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.164)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/9/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0.0 1013 6.09 17.3
0.6 1014 6.05 17.1
1.2 1016 6.03 16.9
Final 1.8 1018 6.06 17.0
* Dead insects in water, odor
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
10/10/2017
1025
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
some organics present
HCL
HNO3
122
109
103
3.39
Disposable Teflon Bailer
105
Rainy
Well cap off - broken protective cover
0.6
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
40.72
44.11
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-24
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.164)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/9/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0.0 1237 5.29 19.9
0.6 1239 5.30 18.7
1.2 1241 5.21 18.5
Final 1.8 1243 5.20 18.5
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
TOC
28.11
31.60
Rainy
262
261
260
3.49
0.6
Electric Water Level Probe
Disposable Teflon Bailer
ENCO
NA
HCL
HNO3
252
10/10/2017
1210
disposable teflon bailer
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-25
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.164)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/9/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0
Final
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
HCL
HNO3
Disposable Teflon Bailer
Rainy
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
31.50
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-25A
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.164)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/10/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0.0 1145 5.99 20.4
4.5 1150 5.90 18.7
9.0 1155 5.93 18.4
Final 13.5 1200 5.92 18.4
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
TOC
32.70
60.00
Rainy
135
160
153
27.30
4.5
Electric Water Level Probe
Field Cleaned Typhoon Pump
ENCO
NA
HCL
HNO3
152
10/11/2017
1015
disposable teflon bailer
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-26
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.164)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/10/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0.0 1518 5.71 19.2
1.3 1520 5.57 18.4
2.6 1523 5.62 18.3
Final 3.9 1526 5.58 18.2
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs & THF (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals + Hg, Mn, Fe(1) 250 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
1100
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
NA
HCL
HNO3
95
Alkalinity/TDS/
Chloride/Sulfate (1) 250 mL plastic bottle
Rainy
1.3
None
10/11/2017
Disposable Teflon Bailer
94
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
15.10
23.00
7.90
107
103
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-27
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.164)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/10/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0.0 1445 5.12 18.6
1.3 1448 5.11 17.9
2.6 1451 5.11 17.5
Final 3.9 1454 5.18 17.1
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs & THF (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals + Hg, Mn, Fe(1) 250 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
372
Cloudy
Alkalinity/TDS/
Chloride/Sulfate (1) 250 mL plastic bottle None
7.72
1.3
382
337
370
Disposable Teflon Bailer
TOC
19.28
27.00
Electric Water Level Probe
ENCO
NA
HCL
HNO3
10/11/2017
1110
disposable teflon bailer
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-28
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.164)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/9/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0.0 1315 4.78 19.3
1.4 1318 4.79 19.1
2.8 1320 4.71 18.9
Final 4.2 1322 4.70 18.9
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs & THF (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals + Hg, Mn, Fe(1) 250 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
1245
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
NA
HCL
HNO3
43
Alkalinity/TDS/
Chloride/Sulfate (1) 250 mL plastic bottle
Rainy
1.4
None
10/10/2017
Disposable Teflon Bailer
39
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
46.25
54.50
8.25
48
45
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-29
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.164)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/9/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0.0 1505 5.57 18.7
0.2 1506 5.61 18.5
0.4 1507 5.63 18.5
Final 0.6 1508 5.57 18.3
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs & THF (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals + Hg, Mn, Fe(1) 250 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
1305
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
NA
HCL
HNO3
305
Alkalinity/TDS/
Chloride/Sulfate (1) 250 mL plastic bottle
Rainy
0.2
None
10/10/2017
Disposable Teflon Bailer
311
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
43.52
45.00
1.48
319
300
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-30
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.164)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/10/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0.0 1339 5.54 16.9
1.4 1344 5.54 17.1
2.8 1347 5.59 16.7
Final 4.2 1351 5.62 17.0
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs & THF (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals + Hg, Mn, Fe(1) 250 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
1040
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
NA
HCL
HNO3
35
Alkalinity/TDS/
Chloride/Sulfate (1) 250 mL plastic bottle
Cloudy
1.4
None
10/11/2017
Disposable Teflon Bailer
71
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
55.45
64.00
8.55
47
55
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-31
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/10/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0.0 1408 5.67 17.4
1.2 1411 5.51 17.3
2.4 1415 5.57 17.1
Final 3.6 1418 5.60 16.8
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs & THF (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals + Hg, Mn, Fe(1) 250 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
1055
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
NA
HCL
HNO3
54
Alkalinity/TDS/
Chloride/Sulfate (1) 250 mL plastic bottle
Cloudy
1.2
None
10/11/2017
Disposable Teflon Bailer
52
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
32.64
40.00
7.36
72
54
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-32R
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.164)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/9/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0.0 0957 6.22 17.1
1.3 0959 5.82 17.3
2.6 1002 5.80 17.2
Final 3.9 1004 5.75 17.0
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottles
Comments
Lab
TOC
19.82
28.05
Rainy
43
43
38
8.23
Disposable Teflon Bailer
1.3
Electric Water Level Probe
ENCO
NA
HCL
HNO3
44
10/10/2017
1035
disposable teflon bailer
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-33
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.164)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/9/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0 1430 5.36 19.3
1.3 1432 6.01 18.7
Final
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottles
Comments
Lab
10/10/2017
1040
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
NA
HCL
HNO3
91
7.66
Disposable Teflon Bailer
Dry after approximately 1.3 gallons.
Rainy
1.3
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
17.64
25.30
87
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-33A
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.164)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/10/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0.0 1035 6.49 18.3
7.3 1040 6.75 16.7
14.6 1046 6.90 16.5
Final 21.9 1052 6.85 16.4
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottles
Comments
Lab
TOC
17.41
64.55
Rainy
227
256
261
47.14
Field Cleaned Typhoon Pump
7.7
Electric Water Level Probe
ENCO
NA
HCL
HNO3
253
10/11/2017
1000
disposable teflon bailer
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-35
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.164)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/9/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0.0 1105 3.05 18.1
0.2 DRY after a quarter of a bailer - pH was off and tried to
0.4 measure with new instrument but no water left in well.
Final 0.6
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottles
Comments
Lab
Rainy
101
1.38
Disposable Teflon Bailer
0.2
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
35.87
37.25
ENCO
HCL
HNO3
disposable teflon bailer
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-35A
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.164)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/9/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0.0 1103 6.62 17.4
5.3 1106 6.67 17.1
10.6 1111 6.63 17.1
Final 15.9 1120 6.61 16.9
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottles
Comments
Lab
10/10/2017
120
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
NA
HCL
HNO3
51
50
49
32.17
Field Cleaned Typhoon Pump
49
Rainy
5.3
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
37.52
69.69
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-36
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.164)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 10/10/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0.0 1320 5.55 18.2
1.1 1322 5.30 16.3
2.2 1325 5.34 16.2
Final 3.3 1327 5.40 15.6
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs & THF (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals + Hg, Mn, Fe(1) 250 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
Slightly turbid at end of sampling
ENCO
HCL
HNO3
Alkalinity/TDS/
Chloride/Sulfate (1) 250 mL plastic bottle None
22
22
22
10/11/2017
1030
disposable teflon bailer
30.23
36.68
6.45
Electric Water Level Probe
Disposable Teflon Bailer
29
Cloudy
TOC 1.1
Appendix IV – Statistical Analysis Procedures
Appendix V – Graphs Depicting Concentrations over Time for Wells
with a Statistically Significant Increase
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
1,1 - Dichloroethane
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-13 MW-14 MW-16 MW-19 MW-20
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
1,4 - Dichlorobenzene
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-13 MW-16
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Acetone
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-13
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Arsenic
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-13 MW-16
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Barium
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-15 MW-16 MW-10 MW-12 MW-13 MW-17
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Benzene
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-13 MW-16 MW-19
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Beryllium
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-15 MW-8
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
cis-1,2-Dichloroethane
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-13 MW-16 MW-19 MW-20
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Chlorobenzene
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-16
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Chloroethane
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-13 MW-16
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Cobalt
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-12 MW-13 MW-17 MW-8
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Lead
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-16
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Methylene Chloride
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-13 MW-16 MW-19 MW-20
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Silver
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-16
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Tetrachloroethene
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-13 MW-19 MW-17
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Thallium
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-13
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Toluene
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-13
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Trichloroethene
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-13 MW-19 MW-20
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Trichlorofluoromethane
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-19
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Vanadium
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-10
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
5
10
15
20
25
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Vinyl Chloride
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-13 MW-16
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Total Xylenes
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-13 MW-16 MW-17 MW-19
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Zinc
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-12
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
1/1/1999 9/27/2001 6/23/2004 3/20/2007 12/14/2009 9/9/2012 6/6/2015 3/2/2018 11/26/2020Concentration (ug/L)Date
Barium
Phase 2 Wells With SSI
MW-25
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
1/1/1999 9/27/2001 6/23/2004 3/20/2007 12/14/2009 9/9/2012 6/6/2015 3/2/2018 11/26/2020Concentration (ug/L)Date
Beryllium
Phase 2 Wells With SSI
MW-24
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1/1/1999 9/27/2001 6/23/2004 3/20/2007 12/14/2009 9/9/2012 6/6/2015 3/2/2018 11/26/2020Concentration (ug/L)Date
Cobalt
Phase 2 Wells With SSI
MW-25A
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1/14/2004 10/10/2006 7/6/2009 4/1/2012 12/27/2014 9/22/2017 6/18/2020Concentration (ug/L)Date
Antimony
Phase 3 Wells With SSI
MW-33A
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
1/14/2004 10/10/2006 7/6/2009 4/1/2012 12/27/2014 9/22/2017 6/18/2020Concentration (ug/L)Date
Antimony
Phase 3 Wells With SSI
MW-33
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
Appendix VI – Monthly Methane Data (April 2017 – October 2017)
LEGENDWWW.SMEINC.COM1METHANE MONTORING LOCATIONS
LINCOLN COUNTY LANDFILL
CROUSE, NORTH CAROLINA LIFTSTATIONSCALEHOUSESHOPAREA