5503_LincolnCountyMSWLF_GWMR_20170803

April 2017 Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Lincoln County Landfill - Permit # 55-03
Crouse, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Prepared for:
Lincoln County
5291 Crouse Road
Crouse, North Carolina 28033
Prepared by:
S&ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
August 3, 2017

S&ME, Inc. | 9751 Southern Pine Boulevard | Charlotte, NC 28273 | p 704.523.4726 | f 704.525.3953 | www.smeinc.com

August 3, 2017
Lincoln County
5291 Crouse Road
Crouse, North Carolina 28033
Attention: Mr. Mark Bivins
Reference: April 2017 Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Lincoln County Landfill Permit # 55-03
Crouse, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Dear Mr. Bivins:
S&ME Inc. (S&ME) has completed the April 2017 Semi-Annual Monitoring and Reporting for the Lincoln
County Landfill. This report presents the results of the second monitoring event of the year for the facility.
S&ME appreciates the continued opportunity to provide services to you and Lincoln County. If you have
any questions or need additional information regarding this report, please contact us at [phone].
Sincerely,
S&ME, Inc.
Jasmine Tayouga, E.I. Julie P. Robertson, P.G.
Staff Professional Project Manager/Senior Geologist
NC Registration No. 1995

Cc: Jaclynne Drummond, NCDENR – Solid Waste Section

April 2017 Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Lincoln County Landfill Permit # 55-03
Crouse, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
August 3, 2017 ii

Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1
2.0 Groundwater Levels and Flow............................................................................ 1
3.0 Analytical Data ...................................................................................................... 1
3.1 Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling ...................................................................... 1
3.1.1 MSW Area “E” and Phase 1 ............................................................................................... 1
3.1.1.1 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) ........................................................................... 2
3.1.1.2 Inorganic Constituents (Metals) ..................................................................................... 3
3.1.2 MSW Phase 2 ...................................................................................................................... 4
3.1.2.1 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) ........................................................................... 4
3.1.2.2 Inorganic Constituents (Metals) ..................................................................................... 4
3.1.3 MSW Phase 3 ...................................................................................................................... 4
3.1.3.1 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) ........................................................................... 4
3.1.3.2 Inorganic Constituents (Metals) ..................................................................................... 4
3.1.4 C&D Landfill Phase 1 and 2 ............................................................................................... 5
3.1.4.1 Inorganic Constituents (Metals) ..................................................................................... 5
3.1.4.2 Classical Chemistry Compounds ................................................................................... 6
3.2 Surface Water Sampling .................................................................................................. 6
3.2.1 Surface Water Locations SW-1 through SW-5 ................................................................... 6
3.2.2 Surface Water Location SW-6 ............................................................................................. 6
3.3 Leachate Sampling............................................................................................................ 6
4.0 Statistical Analysis ................................................................................................ 7
4.1 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) ........................................................................... 7
4.2 Total Metals ....................................................................................................................... 8
5.0 Methane Readings ................................................................................................. 8

April 2017 Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Lincoln County Landfill Permit # 55-03
Crouse, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
August 3, 2017 iii
Appendices
Appendix I – Drawings
Appendix II –Tables
Appendix III – Well Sampling Logs and Laboratory Reports
Appendix IV – Statistical Analysis Procedures
Appendix V – Graphs Depicting Concentrations over Time for Wells with a Statistically Significant
Increase
Appendix VI – Monthly Methane Data (October 2016 – April 2017)

April 2017 Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Lincoln County Landfill Permit # 55-03
Crouse, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
August 3, 2017 1
1.0 Introduction
S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) was contracted by Lincoln County to provide groundwater, surface water, and leachate
monitoring services at the Lincoln County Landfill located at 5291 Crouse Road in Crouse, North Carolina.
This semi-annual monitoring event was conducted on April 10th through 12th, 2017.
This report presents the results of the first semi-annual sampling event for the year 2017 at the facility.
The facility’s monitoring network includes one background well (MW-1A), twenty-eight compliance wells,
six (6) surface water sample locations, and one leachate sample. The next sampling event is scheduled for
October 2017 and will include wells associated with the newly constructed Phase 4.
2.0 Groundwater Levels and Flow
The water table elevations and our interpretation of the groundwater surface expressed as a
potentiometric map along with groundwater flow direction are shown on Drawing 1 of 1 in Appendix I.
Based upon the groundwater elevations in the vicinity of the landfill, groundwater in this area is projected
to flow primarily to the south, with secondary flow toward the southwest and southeast toward tributaries
located east and west of the landfills. Groundwater levels for the monitoring wells are presented in Table
1 in Appendix II.
The hydraulic gradient (i) in the vicinity of each well was estimated by calculating the vertical difference
between the groundwater elevation at each well and one or more nearby contour lines from Drawing 1
of 1. This value was then divided by the horizontal distance measured from the well to the selected
groundwater elevation contour line. Groundwater velocity was calculated by multiplying the gradient (i)
by the hydraulic conductivity (k) and dividing by the estimated effective porosity (ne) of the aquifer. Table
2 in Appendix II summarizes the groundwater flow rates for the monitoring wells.
3.0 Analytical Data
Analytical results for the landfill monitoring wells, surface water samples, and leachate sample are
summarized in Tables 4 through 10 in Appendix II. Detections above the NCAC 2L .0202 Groundwater
Quality Standards (2L Standards), NCAC 2B surface water standards (2B Standards), and/or SW GWP
Standard are highlighted in gray. Field measurements of pH, conductivity, and temperature are
summarized in Table 3 in Appendix II. Well sampling logs containing this information are included in
Appendix III.
3.1 Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling
3.1.1 MSW Area “E” and Phase 1
MSW Area “E” and Phase 1 groundwater monitoring well locations were sampled for Appendix I volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) and Appendix I metals. In addition to Appendix I VOCs and metals, the
groundwater analysis for background monitoring well MW-1A also included inorganic constituents iron
and manganese. A summary of the detected analytes associated with this Phase of the landfill is included
as Table 4 in Appendix II. The groundwater monitoring wells associated with these areas include
April 2017 Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Lincoln County Landfill Permit # 55-03
Crouse, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
August 3, 2017 2
background well MW-1A, compliance wells MW-8, MW-9, and MW-10R that monitor the abandoned
leachate pond, and compliance wells MW-12 through MW-20 that monitor down gradient and side
gradient of the unlined MSW landfill Area “E” and the lined MSW landfill identified as Phase 1. During the
April 2017 sampling event it was discovered that MW-15 was damaged and could not be sampled.
Lincoln County was notified of the damage and the well will be replaced.
Based on the laboratory analytical reports included in Appendix III, fifteen VOCs and fifteen metals were
detected in MSW Area “E” and Phase 1 groundwater monitoring wells during the April 2017 monitoring
event. During the April 2017 monitoring even MW-8 was dry, and therefore not sampled.
3.1.1.1 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Background monitoring well MW-1A had a detection of Chloroform at a concentration of 16 micrograms
per liter (µg/L), which is below the 2L Standard of 70 µg/L. Both Bromoform and Chloroform have
historically been detected in monitoring well MW-1A which are commonly associated with chlorinated
municipal water. Due to MW-1A’s close proximity to Crouse Road, it is likely that the detection of
Chloroform in the well is from a leaking nearby municipal water or sewer line.
No VOCs were detected in groundwater monitoring wells MW-9, MW-10R, MW-12, MW-18, and MW-20
during the April 2017 monitoring event.
Monitoring wells MW-13, MW-14, MW-16R, MW-17R, and MW-19 contained two or more of the fifteen
VOCs detected. Of the VOCs detected, five compounds were detected above their respective 2L Standard:
1,1-Dichloroethane, Benzene, Methylene Chloride, Tetrachloroethene, and Vinyl Chloride. Please note
that groundwater monitoring well MW-14 had no VOC detections above its respective 2L Standards.
The analytical results for groundwater monitoring well MW-13 indicated that 1,1-Dichloroethane,
Benzene, Tetrachloroethene, and Vinyl Chloride were detected above their respective 2L Standards. The
results of which are as follows:
 1,1-Dichloroethane detected at 17 µg/L. 2L Standard is 6 µg/L.
 Benzene detected at 5.5 µg/L. 2L Standard is 1 µg/L.
 Tetrachloroethene detected at 2.6 µg/L. 2L Standard is 0.7 µg/L.
 Vinyl Chloride detected at 1.5 µg/L. 2L Standard is 0.3 µg/L.
The results for groundwater monitoring well MW-16R indicated that Benzene and Vinyl Chloride were
detected above their respective 2L Standard. The results of which are as follows:
 Benzene detected at 6.7 µg/L. 2L Standard is 1 µg/L.
 Vinyl chloride detected at 4.6 µg/L. 2L Standard is 0.03 µg/L.
The results for groundwater monitoring well MW-17R indicated that 1,1-Dichloroethane, Benzene, and
Methylene Chloride were detected above their respective 2L Standard. The results of which are as follows:
 1,1-Dichloroethane detected at 8.2 µg/L. 2L Standard is 6 µg/L.
 Benzene detected at 5.3 µg/L. 2L Standard is 1 µg/L.
 Methylene Chloride at 55 µg/L. 2L Standard is 5 µg/L.
The results for groundwater monitoring well MW-19 indicated that 1,1-Dichloroethane, Benzene,
Methylene Chloride, and Tetrachloroethene were detected above their respective 2L Standard. The results
are as follows:
April 2017 Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Lincoln County Landfill Permit # 55-03
Crouse, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
August 3, 2017 3
 1,1-Dichloroethane detected at 19 µg/L. 2L Standard is 6 µg/L.
 Benzene detected at 2.4 µg/L. 2L Standard is 1 µg/L.
 Methylene Chloride detected at 5.3 µg/L. 2L Standard is 5 µg/L.
 Tetrachloroethene detected at 2.6 µg/L. 2L Standard is 0.7 µg/L.
Groundwater monitoring wells MW-13, MW-14, MW-16R, MW-17R, MW-19 and MW-20 monitor down
gradient and side gradient of the of the unlined Area “E” landfill, and the volatile organic constituents
detected in these wells are associated with the unlined landfill section.
3.1.1.2 Inorganic Constituents (Metals)
The groundwater monitoring wells associated with the MSW Area “E” and Phase 1 landfills had three or
more Appendix I metals detected. Five constituents were detected above their respective 2L Standard or
SW GWP Standard: Antimony, Arsenic, Cobalt, Iron, and Thallium.

 Antimony was detected above its SW GWP Standard of 1 µg/L in background groundwater
monitoring well MW-1A at a concentration of 1.03 J µg/L, and in compliance monitoring well
MW-14 at a concentration of 5.75 µg/L.
 Arsenic was detected above its 2L Standard of 10 µg/L in compliance monitoring well MW-13 at a
concentration of 12.5 µg/L, and in compliance monitoring well MW-16R at a concentration of 17.9
µg/L.
 Cobalt was detected above its SW GWP Standard of 70 µg/L in compliance monitoring wells MW-
12, MW-13, MW-14, MW-16R, MW-17R, MW-18, and MW-19 at concentrations ranging from 1.73
J µg/L to 276 µg/L.
 Iron was detected above its 2L Standard of 300 µg/L in background monitoring well MW-1A at a
concentration of 2,380 µg/L.
 Thallium was detected above its SW GWP Standard of 0.28 µg/L in compliance monitoring wells
MW-12, MW-13, MW-16R, MW-17R, and MW-18 at concentrations ranging from 0.333 J to 1.75 J
µg/L.
 Vanadium was detected above its SW GWP Standard of 0.3 µg/L in background monitoring well
MW-1A, compliance monitoring wells MW-10R, MW-17R, and MW-18 at concentrations ranging
from 2.36 J to 14.8 J µg/L.
Total metal concentrations in groundwater sampled from wells are often dependent on the turbidity or
suspended particulates (from the aquifer formation) retrieved with the groundwater sample. The turbidity
is a function of the sampling method, well construction, how the well was developed, and the grain
size/consolidation of the lithologic unit sampled. Since the unfiltered samples are acidified in the field at
the time of collection, metals contained within the particulates are dissolved into the sample. Thus, the
presence of turbidity in groundwater samples often results in elevated (false positive) analytical results for
total metal concentrations. Therefore, the presence of elevated total metal concentrations does not
necessarily correlate with groundwater impact.
Based on historical water quality data, the background well and each of the compliance groundwater
monitoring wells have contained at least one total metal at concentrations above the 2L Standards. Metal
concentrations in several wells have fluctuated below and above detection limits. In background well MW-
1A, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, iron, lead, silver, and vanadium have been detected at
concentrations above the 2L Standards. Based on this data, it appears that the majority of the metals
April 2017 Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Lincoln County Landfill Permit # 55-03
Crouse, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
August 3, 2017 4
detected within the monitoring wells are either naturally occurring or a product of turbidity during
sampling.
3.1.2 MSW Phase 2
MSW Phase 2 groundwater monitoring well locations were sampled for Appendix I VOCs and Appendix I
metals. A summary of the detected analytes associated with this Phase of the landfill is included as Table
5 in Appendix II. The groundwater monitoring wells associated with this Phase are compliance wells MW-
21 and MW-24 that monitor side gradient of the landfill and MW-25 and MW-25A that monitor the Phase
2 sump.
3.1.2.1 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
No VOCs were detected above their respective 2L Standard or SW GWP Standard in the MSW Phase 2
monitoring wells during the April 2017 monitoring event. 2-Butanone and Acetone were both detected in
MW-25A at respective concentrations of 0.42 J µg/L and 15 µg/L which are below their respective 2L and
SW GWP Standards.
3.1.2.2 Inorganic Constituents (Metals)
The groundwater monitoring wells associated with the Phase 2 landfill had five or more Appendix I metals
detections, three of which were detected above its respective SW GWP Standard. Antimony was detected
above the SW GWP Standard of 1 µg/L in groundwater monitoring well MW-25A at a concentration of
1.27 J µg/L. Cobalt was detected above the SW GWP Standard of 1 µg/L in groundwater monitoring wells
MW-21 and MW-25A at concentrations of 2.15 J and 21.9 µg/L, respectively. Thallium was detected
above the SW GWP Standard of 0.28 µg/L in groundwater monitoring wells MW-21, MW-24, MW-25, and
MW-25A at concentrations ranging from 0.333 J to 0.654 J µg/L.
As previously discussed above, it appears that the majority of the metals detected within the groundwater
monitoring wells are either naturally occurring or a product of turbidity during sampling.
3.1.3 MSW Phase 3
MSW Phase 3 groundwater monitoring well locations were sampled for Appendix I VOCs and Appendix I
metals. A summary of the detected analytes associated with this phase of the landfill is included in Table
6 in Appendix II. The groundwater monitoring wells associated with this area include compliance well
MW-32R that monitors down gradient and side gradient of the landfill and MW-33/33A and MW-35/35A
that monitor the Phase 3 sump locations. Monitoring well MW-34 that previously monitored
downgradient of Phase 3 was abandoned during Phase 4 construction activities.
3.1.3.1 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
No VOCs were detected in the MSW Phase 3 monitoring wells during the April 2017 monitoring event.
3.1.3.2 Inorganic Constituents (Metals)
The groundwater monitoring wells associated with the Phase 3 landfill had four or more Appendix I
metals detected, fourof which were detected above their respective 2L Standard or SW GWP Standard.
The detections above standards are as follows:
April 2017 Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Lincoln County Landfill Permit # 55-03
Crouse, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
August 3, 2017 5
 Antimony was detected above the SW GWP Standard of 1 µg/L in groundwater monitoring well
MW-33A at a concentration of 4.61 J µg/L.
 Cobalt was detected above the SW GWP Standard of 1 µg/L in groundwater monitoring well MW-
35 at a concentration of 3.69 J µg/L.
 Thallium was detected above the SW GWP Standard of 0.28 µg/L in groundwater monitoring well
MW-33 at a concentrations of 0.491 J µg/L.
 Vanadium was detected above the SW GWP Standard of 0.3 µg/L in groundwater monitoring
wells MW-32R, MW-35, and MW-35A at concentrations ranging from 4.54 J to 15.7 J µg/L.
As previously discussed above, it appears that the majority of the metals detected within the groundwater
monitoring wells are either naturally occurring or a product of turbidity during sampling.
3.1.4 C&D Landfill Phase 1 and 2
C&D Landfill Phase 1 and Phase 2 groundwater monitoring well locations were sampled for Appendix I
VOCs; Appendix I metals plus mercury, manganese, and iron; and four classical chemistry compounds:
Chloride, Total Dissolved Solids, Sulfate, and Alkalinity. A summary of the detected analytes associated
with the C&D Landfills is included as Table 7 and 8 in Appendix II. The groundwater monitoring wells
associated with the C&D landfill include compliance wells MW-26, MW-27, and MW-28 that monitor
Phase 1 and MW-29, MW-30, MW-31, and MW-36 that monitor Phase 2. Groundwater monitoring well
MW-36 was installed near the C&D compliance boundary as part of the 2013 C&D Assessment. Volatile
Organic Compounds (VOCs)
C&D Landfill groundwater monitoring wells had five VOCs detected during the April 2017 monitoring
event, two (2) of which were detected above their respective 2L Standard.

 Tetrachloroethene was detected in groundwater monitoring well MW-28 at a concentration of 9.6
µg/L, which is above its 2L Standard of 0.7 µg/L.
 Vinyl Chloride was detected in groundwater monitoring well MW-28 at a concentration of 1.2
µg/L, which is above its 2L Standard of 0.03 µg/L.
3.1.4.1 Inorganic Constituents (Metals)
The groundwater monitoring wells associated with the C&D landfill had seven or more metals detections,
and five (5) constituents were detected above their respective 2L Standard and/or SW GWP Standard. The
detections above standards are as follows:

 Cobalt was detected in groundwater monitoring wells MW-26, MW-27, and MW-28 at a
concentrations ranging from 1.69 J to 10.6 µg/L which are above the SW GWP Standard of 1 µg/L.
 Iron was detected in groundwater monitoring wells MW-26, MW-27, MW-29, MW-30, MW-31,
and MW-36 at concentrations ranging from 516 to 40,200 µg/L, which are above the 2L Standard
of 300 µg/L.
 Manganese was detected in groundwater monitoring wells MW-26, MW-27 and MW-29 at
concentrations ranging from 66.4 to 1,240 µg/L, which are above the 2L Standard of 50 µg/L.
 Thallium was detected in groundwater monitoring wells MW-26 and MW-27 at concentrations of
0.371 J µg/L and 0.634 J µg/L, respectively, which are above the SW GWP Standard of 0.28 µg/L.
April 2017 Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Lincoln County Landfill Permit # 55-03
Crouse, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
August 3, 2017 6
 Vanadium was detected in groundwater monitoring wells MW-26, MW-27, and MW-29 at
concentrations ranging from 1.50 J to 4.45 J µg/L, which are above the SW GWP Standard of 0.3
µg/L.
As previously discussed above, it appears that the majority of the metals detected within the groundwater
monitoring wells are either naturally occurring or a product of turbidity during sampling. Since October
2007, Iron and Manganese have been included in the analysis for the C&D wells, and since April 2008, Iron
and Manganese were included in the analysis for the background well MW-1A. Iron and Manganese have
been detected in MW-1A in each monitoring event that has included their analysis.
3.1.4.2 Classical Chemistry Compounds
Total Dissolved Solids, Chloride, Sulfate, and Alkalinity were analyzed for in the C&D landfill groundwater
monitoring wells. The results of the analyses are summarized in Tables 7 and 8 in Appendix II. Please
note that none of the classical chemistry compounds analyzed for exceeded any of the established 2L
Standards and/or SW GWP Standards.
3.2 Surface Water Sampling
Lincoln County Landfill has five surface water sampling locations positioned in the tributaries located to
the east, south, and west of the landfill as indicated on the attached Drawing 1 of 1 in Appendix I. The
original five surface water samples are analyzed for Appendix I VOCs and Appendix I metals plus Mercury,
Iron and Manganese. Beginning with the April 2010 sampling event, a sixth surface water sample location
was added to the semi-annual monitoring plan, SW-6. The addition of SW-6 to the monitoring plan was
in response to the January 2009 leachate release at the facility. SW-6 is located at the discharge of the
lowland area downgradient from the leachate holding tanks as indicated on Drawing 1 of 1. A summary
of the detected analytes associated with the surface water samples collected is included as Table 9 in
Appendix II.
3.2.1 Surface Water Locations SW-1 through SW-5
No VOCs were detected in surface water sampling locations during the April 2017 sampling event.
Five (5) or more metals were detected in surface water sampling locations SW-1, SW-2, SW-3, SW-4, and
SW-5, one of which was detected at a concentration above its respective 2B Standard. Thallium was
detected at SW-1 at a concentration of 0.501 J µg/L, which is above the 2B Standard of 0.47 µg/L.
3.2.2 Surface Water Location SW-6
No VOCs were detected in surface water sampling location SW-6 during the April 2017 sampling event.
Eight (8) metals were detected in SW-6, none of which were detected at concentrations above their
respective 2B Standard.
3.3 Leachate Sampling
A sample of the leachate from the leachate collection system for the landfill was collected from the lift
station prior to leachate entering the on-site leachate holding tanks. The leachate sample was analyzed
for Appendix I VOCs, Appendix I metals, BOD, COD, Nitrate/Nitrite, Sulfate, TSS, and Phosphorous. A
summary of the detected analytes for the leachate is included as Table 10 in Appendix II.
April 2017 Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Lincoln County Landfill Permit # 55-03
Crouse, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
August 3, 2017 7
4.0 Statistical Analysis
S&ME compared the water quality data with the 2L Standards and the SW GWP standards and performed
a statistical evaluation of the data. S&ME utilized three (3) statistical methods to evaluate statistically
significant increases between the compliance monitoring wells and the background monitoring well (MW-
1A).
The first method utilized was a one-way parametric Analysis of Variance (Parametric ANOVA). The
parametric ANOVA analysis is recommended by the 1992 guidance document for parameters with fewer
than 15% non-detects in a specific well.
The second method used was the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric rank method. The Kruskal-Wallis
method is recommended by the 1992 guidance document for parameters that have 15% to 90% non-
detects in a specific well.
The third method used was an inter-well non-parametric prediction limit. The prediction limit was used for
parameters with greater than 90% non-detects in a specific well. The 1992 guidance document
recommends this method when a significant portion of the samples are non-detect.
Tables 11 through 13 in Appendix II summarize the results of the statistical analysis. Copies of the
analytical procedures used to perform the analysis used by the ChemStat software are included in
Appendix IV.
4.1 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
One (1) or more volatile organic compounds were found to have a statistical increase over background
concentrations in groundwater monitoring wells MW-13, MW-14, MW-16(16R), MW-17(17R), MW-19, and
MW-20 that are located downgradient from the unlined closed landfill Area “E”. The statistical increases
are as follows:
 1,1-Dichloroethane in groundwater monitoring wells MW-13, MW-14, MW-16(16R), MW-19 and
MW-20. It should be noted that concentrations of 1,1-Dichloroethene in MW-13 and MW-16
have decreased over time, and MW-20 had no detection of 1,1-Dichloroethane in April 2017.
 1,4-Dichlorobenzene in groundwater monitoring wells MW-13 and MW-16(16R).
 Acetone in groundwater monitoring well MW-13, which has ranged from non-detect to detect
over time.
 Benzene in groundwater monitoring wells MW-13, MW-16(16R), and MW-19. Reported
concentrations over time have been generally stable.
 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene in groundwater monitoring wells MW-13, MW-16(16R), MW-19 and MW-
20. Concentrations at these wells have been relatively stable, although a rising trend over time is
noted at MW-16.
 Chlorobenzene in groundwater monitoring well MW-16(16R).
 Chloroethane in groundwater monitoring well MW-13. It should be noted that concentrations of
Chloroethane in well MW-13 have decreased over time.
 Methylene Chloride in groundwater monitoring wells MW-13, MW-16(16R), MW-19 and MW-20.
It should be noted that concentrations of Methylene Chloride in wells MW-19 and MW-20 have
decreased over time.
 Tetrachloroethene in groundwater monitoring wells MW-13 and MW-19. Reported
concentrations over time have been generally stable.
April 2017 Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Lincoln County Landfill Permit # 55-03
Crouse, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
August 3, 2017 8
 Toluene in groundwater monitoring well MW-13.
 Trichloroethene in groundwater monitoring wells MW-13 and MW-19. Reported concentrations
over time have been generally stable.
 Vinyl Chloride in groundwater monitoring wells MW-13 and MW-16(16R). Reported
concentrations over time have been generally stable.
 Total Xylenes in groundwater monitoring wells MW-13, MW-16(16R) and MW-17(17R). Reported
concentrations over time have been generally stable in MW-13 and MW-17(17R); MW-16
concentrations vary from non-detect to detect.

There were no volatile organic compounds with statistically significant increases over background for
the Phase 2 and Phase 3 MSW wells. Graphs depicting concentrations over time for constituents with
a statistical increase are provided in Appendix V.
4.2 Total Metals
Total metal concentrations in groundwater sampled from wells are often dependent on the turbidity or
suspended particulates (from the aquifer formation) retrieved with the groundwater sample. The turbidity
is a function of the sampling method, well construction, how the well was developed, and the grain
size/consolidation of the lithologic unit sampled. Since the unfiltered samples are acidified in the field at
the time of sample collection, metals contained within the particulates are dissolved into the water
sample. Thus, the presence of turbidity in groundwater samples often results in elevated (false positive)
analytical results for total metal concentrations. Therefore, the presence of elevated total metal
concentrations does not necessarily correlate with groundwater impact.
Based on the historical water quality data, the background well and each of the compliance groundwater
monitoring wells (excluding MW-19, 22, 24 and 25) have contained at least one (1) total metal at
concentrations above the 2L Standards. The statistical evaluation indicates that nine (9) of the compliance
groundwater monitoring wells (MW-8, 10, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 25A, and MW-33A) contained at least one (1)
metal at a statistically significant level higher than the background well. Metal concentrations in several
wells have fluctuated between non-detect and detect. In the background well, MW-1A, antimony,
beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, iron, lead, silver, and vanadium have been detected at
concentrations above the 2L Standards. Graphs depicting concentrations over time for constituents with a
statistical increase are provided in Appendix V.
5.0 Methane Readings
Methane Readings are collected from eleven (11) locations on site, including eight (8) methane
monitoring wells (MMW-1 through MMW-8) and the scale house, landfill shop, and lift station on site.
Methane readings are measured monthly by Lincoln County personnel using a GEM 2000 gas meter.
October 2016 through April 2017 methane readings and a figure showing their locations are located in
Appendix VI.

Appendices

Appendix I – Drawings
kjkjkjkjkjkjkjkjkjkjkjkjkjkjkjkjkjkjkjkjkjkjkjkjkjkj!.!.!.!.!.!.kjC&D PHASE II
C&D PHASE I
EXISTING AREA "E"
CLOSED LANDFILLEXISTING AREA "D"
PHASE IPHASE II
PHASE III805
810820850860885840830845865870875880825815PHASE IV
FUTURE PHASE V
MW-8
DRY
MW-9
805.66
MW-12
823.61MW-24
816.13
MW-25/25A
808.10
MW-21
817.70 MW-18
838.71 MW-19
831.04
MW-13
839.90
MW-14
840.15
MW-20
845.06
MW-28
869.97
MW-29
837.97
MW-36
827.34
MW-30
833.50
MW-31
851.03
MW-26
857.50
MW-27
862.77
MW-1A
885.45
MW-17R
855.63
MW-10R
806.55
MW-32R
811.91
MW-16R
860.80
MW-35/MW-35A
804.39
MW-33/MW-33A
806.24
SW-4
SW-5
SW-1
SW-2
SW-3
SW-6
SHOAL R
D CROUSE RDY
O
D
E
R

R
D
SHIRL
E
Y

R
E
Y
N
O
L
D
S

L
N
GROUNDWATER SURFACE MAPApril 10-11, 2017LINCOLN COUNTY LANDFILLCROUSE, NORTH CAROLINA1 1356-07-004SJT8-3-2017FIGURE NO.SCALE:PROJECT NO.DATE:DRAWN BY:³1 " = 400 'Q:\1356\LINCOLN COUNTY\07-004\GIS\APRIL 2017 GW Map 11x17.mxd plotted by JTayouga 08-03-20170 500 1,000
(IN FEET)
Legend
kj Groundwater Wells
!.Surface Water Sample Locations
Roads
MSW Boundary
Property Line
C&D Landfill Boundary
Streams on Landfill Property
Groundwater Flow Direction
4' Contours
04/2017 Groundwater Surface
MW-15
NS

Appendix II –Tables
Latitude Longitude Ground TOC DTW - TOC GW ELEV.
(MM/DD/YY)(ft)(ft-MSL)
MW-1A Background - - - 35.4305188° -081.3550147° - - - 929.27 - - - to - - - - - - to - - - - - - to - - - - - - to - - - - - - to - - - - - -43.82 885.45
MW-8 Leachate Lagoon - - -35.4204767°-081.3543964°- - -840.03 - - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -DRY N/A
MW-9 Leachate Lagoon - - -35.4205014°-081.3544769°- - -840.20 - - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -34.54 805.66
MW-10R Leachate Lagoon - - -35.4209399°-081.3538215°- - -834.97 - - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -28.42 806.55
MW-12 Area "E" and Phase 1 - - -35.4229138°-081.3543339°- - -827.57 - - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -3.96 823.61
MW-13 Area "E" and Phase 1 - - -35.4252197°-081.3569120°- - -872.78 - - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -32.88 839.90
MW-14 Area "E" and Phase 1 - - -35.4252431°-081.3570085°- - -871.44 - - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -31.29 840.15
MW-15 Area "E" and Phase 1 - - -35.4232655°-081.3580245°- - -847.86 - - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -Note 1 N/A
MW-16R Area "E" and Phase 1 - - -35.4270857°-081.3570696°- - -876.39 - - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -15.59 860.80
MW-17R Area "E" and Phase 1 07/20/93 35.4262555°-081.3548668°898.14 899.64 0.0 to 20.0 20.0 to 35.0 0.0 to 16.0 16.0 to 18.0 18.0 to 45.5 - - -44.01 855.63
MW-18 Area "E" and Phase 1 - - -35.4246249°-081.3576782°859.20 861.41 - - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -15.2 to 30.2 - - -22.70 838.71
MW-19 Area "E" and Phase 1 - - -35.4247561°-081.3576590°859.95 859.73 - - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -63.0 to 68.0 - - -28.69 831.04
MW-20 Area "E" and Phase 1 - - -35.4256922°-081.3575990°- - -860.00 - - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -- - -to - - -10.1 to 25.1 - - -14.94 845.06
MW-21 Phase 2 09/03/99 35.4221305°-081.3579143°853.80 855.91 0.0 to 27.0 27.0 to 42.0 0.0 to 23.0 23.0 to 25.0 25.0 to 42.0 SAP 38.21 817.70
MW-24 Phase 2 09/02/99 35.4219922°-081.3540276°838.95 841.13 0.0 to 14.0 14.0 to 29.0 0.0 to 10.0 10.0 to 12.0 12.0 to 29.0 SAP 25.00 816.13
MW-25 Phase 2 08/31/99 35.4213534°-081.3546541°836.75 838.73 0.0 to 15.0 15.0 to 30.0 0.0 to 11.0 11.0 to 13.0 13.0 to 30.0 SAP 30.63 808.10
MW-25A Phase 2 09/01/99 35.4212848°-081.3547068°836.75 838.84 0.0 to 50.0 50.0 to 60.0 0.0 to 46.0 46.0 to 48.0 48.0 to 60.0 SAP 30.86 807.98
MW-26 C&D Phase 1 09/08/99 35.4273089°-081.3527074°869.11 871.19 0.0 to 6.0 6.0 to 21.0 0.0 to 4.0 4.0 to 5.0 5.0 to 21.0 SAP 13.69 857.50
MW-27 C&D Phase 1 09/07/99 35.4278831°-081.3533157°879.03 880.90 0.0 to 10.0 10.0 to 25.0 0.0 to 6.0 6.0 to 8.0 8.0 to 25.0 SAP 18.13 862.77
MW-28 C&D Phase 1 04/01/99 35.4276977°-081.3542728°912.72 915.68 0.0 to 36.0 36.0 to 51.0 0.0 to 32.0 32.0 to 34.0 34.0 to 51.0 SAP 45.71 869.97
MW-29 C&D Phase 2 04/30/02 35.4252895°-081.3534741°877.45 879.97 0.0 to 30.0 30.0 to 45.0 0.0 to 26.0 26.0 to 28.0 28.0 to 45.0 PWR 42.00 837.97
MW-30 C&D Phase 2 05/02/02 35.4259842°-081.3520549°883.72 886.35 0.0 to 45.0 45.0 to 60.0 0.0 to 41.0 41.0 to 43.0 43.0 to 60.0 SAP 52.85 833.50
MW-31 C&D Phase 2 06/19/03 35.4266563°-081.3521999°877.40 879.88 0.0 to 25.0 25.0 to 40.0 0.0 to 21.0 21.0 to 23.0 23.0 to 40.0 PWR 28.85 851.03
MW-32R Phase 3 12/20/04 35.4214589°-081.3583317°825.89 827.25 0.0 to 10.0 10.0 to 25.0 0.0 to 6.0 6.0 to 8.0 8.0 to 25.0 SAP 15.34 811.91
MW-33 Phase 3 12/30/04 35.4208632°-081.3585631°816.33 819.38 0.0 to 7.0 7.0 to 22.0 0.0 to 3.0 3.0 to 5.0 5.0 to 22.0 SAP 13.14 806.24
MW-33A Phase 3 12/30/04 35.4208632°-081.3585631°815.94 818.67 0.0 to 56.5 56.5 to 61.5 0.0 to 52.5 52.5 to 54.5 54.5 to 61.5 ROCK 13.74 804.93
MW-35 Phase 3 12/28/04 35.4200537°-081.3551088°836.85 839.64 0.0 to 19.0 19.0 to 34.0 0.0 to 15.0 15.0 to 17.0 17.0 to 34.0 SAP 35.25 804.39
MW-35A Phase 3 12/28/04 35.4200537°-081.3551088°836.77 839.83 0.0 to 60.0 60.0 to 65.0 0.0 to 56.0 56.0 to 58.0 58.0 to 65.0 SAP 35.48 804.35
MW-36 C&D Phase 2 06/26/13 35.4252949° -081.3518019° 852.00 854.83 0.0 to 19.5 19.5 to 34.5 0.0 to 9.5 9.5 to 17.7 17.7 to 35.0 SAP 27.49 827.34
Notes:
(ft-MSL)Feet Mean Sea Level DTW Depth to Water Sch. 40 Schedule 40 Pipe PWR Partially Weathered Rock
(ft-bls)Feet Below Land Surface GW ELEV.Groundwater Elevation 0.010 Slot 0.010-Inch Machine-Slotted Pipe ROCK Bedrock
TOC Top of Casing #2 Filter Sand Medium to Fine Grained Silica Sand Neat Cement Cement Mixture without Bentonite - - -Not Available
Ground Ground Surface Bentonite Bentonite Pellets SAP Saprolite
DRY No water in well at time of sampling Note 1 Well was destroyed during clearing operations. Scheduled to be replaced.
NS Well was not sampled
N/A Not Applicable
2-inch, SCH. 40, PVC 2-inch, 0.010 Slot, PVC Neat Cement Bentonite Interval
(decimal degrees)(ft-MSL)(ft-bls)(ft-bls)(ft-bls)
Screen Interval Grout Interval Seal Interval Filter Pack Geology in
Screen
Interval
April 2017
(ft-bls)(ft-bls)
Table 1
Well Construction Summary and Water Level Data
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No: 1356-07-004
Well ID Area Monitored
Install Date
GPS Coordinates Survey Elevations Casing Interval
K n I v
Well Hydraulic Cond. Eff. Porosity Gradient Flow Velocity
ID (ft/day)(ne)(ft/ft) (ft/yr)
MW-1A - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-8 - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-10R - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-12 - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-13 - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-15 - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-16R - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-17R 1.4E+00 17%0.01 39
MW-18 - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-20 - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-21 4.5E-01 23%0.01 9
MW-24 - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-25 1.0E-01 24%0.02 3
MW-26 - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-27 - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-28 3.2E-01 - - -- - -- - -
MW-29 8.6E-01 3%0.01 120
MW-30 5.0E+00 24%0.01 59
MW-31 - - -- - -- - -- - -
MW-32R 2.6E-01 20%0.02 9
MW-33 3.0E+00 27%0.03 111
MW-34 7.5E+00 21%- - -- - -
MW-35 4.9E-01 16%0.01 10
MW-36 3.5E+00 20%0.03 171
Notes:
(4) Seepage velocity v = (K*i)/ne
- - -Not Available
(1) Hydraulic Conductivity was calculated from slug tests performed after well
construction.
April 2017
(3) Hydraulic gradient calculated by measuring linear feet between selected contour
intervals.
Table 2
Groundwater Flow Data
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No: 1356-07-004
(2) Effective porosity was estimated from soils collected within the saturated portion of
screen interval during well construction.
Well ID DTW TOC
(ft-bls)pH Temp (°C)Conductance
(μS)
MW-1A 43.82 6.05 16.7 23
MW-8
MW-9 34.54 6.71 16.1 39
MW-10R 28.42 6.80 16.9 182
MW-12 3.96 5.31 13.9 92
MW-13 32.88 6.20 17.3 293
MW-14 31.29 6.43 17.2 107
MW-16R 15.59 6.45 15.5 725
MW-17R 44.01 5.37 17.4 52
MW-18 22.70 6.61 15.0 169
MW-19 28.69 6.23 15.7 112
MW-20 14.94 5.89 15.2 51
MW-21 38.21 5.65 16.3 85
MW-24 25.00 5.66 16.5 252
MW-25 30.63 5.93 17.9 158
MW-25A 30.86 6.35 17.5 137
MW-26 13.69 5.83 14.6 116
MW-27 18.13 5.50 15.8 219
MW-28 45.71 5.26 17.1 41
MW-29 42.00 6.02 16.9 287
MW-30 52.85 5.97 15.6 50
MW-31 28.85 5.47 15.9 48
MW-32R 15.34 5.35 15.1 17
MW-33 13.14 5.89 14.7 82
MW-33A 13.74 6.72 15.8 215
MW-35 35.25 6.60 15.9 18
MW-35A 35.48 6.39 16.1 47
MW-36 27.49 5.63 15.2 15
Notes:
°C degrees Celsius
μS micro siemems
NTU nephelometric turbidity unit
Table 3
April 2017 - Field Parameters in Monitoring Wells
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
DRY
Notes:
(1) ug/L = micrograms per liter (parts per billion)
(2) mg/L = milligrams per liter (parts per million)
(3) μS = microSiemens
(4) 15A NCAC 2L = North Carolina Groundwater Quality Standards
(5) 15A NCAC 2B = North Carolina Surface Water Quality Standards
(6) GWP ST = Solid Waste Groundwater Protection Standard
(7) NE = No established standard
(8) Bold indicates above 15A NCAC 2L, 15A NCAC 2B, or SWS GWP standard
(9) Compounds not shown were not detected.
(10) SWSL = North Carolina Department of Environmtental Quality, Solid Waste Section Limit established in 2007
(11) NA = Not Analyzed
(12) J = Analyte detected is between the Method Detection Limit (MDL) and the SWSL
(13) B = Analyte was detected in the associated method blank
(14) D = The sample was analyzed at dilution
(15) Dry = Surface water sample location dry or no flow, location not sampled
(16) NS - Not Sampled
Notes for Tables 4 through 10
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
EPA Appendix I Volatile
Organic Compounds Method
8260 (µg/L)
NCDEQ
SWSL
15A
NCAC
2L
Soild
Waste
GWP ST
MW-1A MW-8 MW-9 MW-10R MW-12 MW-13 MW-14 MW-15 MW-16R MW-17R MW-18 MW-19 MW-20
1,1-Dichloroethane 5 6 NE 17 4.3 J 1.2 J 8.2 19
1,4 - Dichlorobenzene 1 6 NE 3.6 4.0 2.9 0.45 J
cis-1,2,-Dichloroethene 5 70 NE 3.0 J 3.0 J 1.1 J
Acetone 100 6000 NE 54 J
Benzene 1 1 NE 5.5 6.7 5.3 2.4
Chlorobenzene 3 50 NE 0.43 J 4.4
Chloroform 5 70 NE 16
Ethyl Chloride (Chloroethane)10 3000 NE 2.7 J
Methylene Chloride 1 5 NE 55 5.3
Tetrachloroethene 1 0.7 NE 2.6 0.65 J 2.6
Toluene 1 600 NE 0.93 J
Trichloroethane 1 3 NE 2.2 0.60 J 1.3 1.9
Trichlorofluoromethane 1 2000 NE 0.49 J 0.49 J
Vinyl chloride 1 0.03 NE 1.5 4.6
Xylenes (total)5 500 NE 1.8 J 11 1.6 JEPA Appendix I Metals
Method 6010B/6020 (µg/L)
Antimony 6 NE 1 1.03 J 0.653 J 5.75 J 3.39 J
Arsenic 10 10 NE 12.5 17.9
Barium 100 700 NE 46.7 33.2 J 32.3 J 214 113 29.7 J 436 125 84.0 J 34.2 J 42.9 J
Beryllium 1 NE 4 0.136 J
Chromium 10 10 NE 8.29 J 2.54 J 7.20 J 1.94 J 2.44 J 7.45 J
Cobalt 10 NE 1 1.73 J 9.70 J 276 3.33 J 30.8 17.1 5.31 J
Copper 10 1000 NE 5.49 J 2.71 J 1.65 J 7.89 J 3.87 J 5.96 J 4.49 J 8.28 J 5.76 J 2.43 J
Iron 300 300 NE 2,380
Lead 10 15 NE 3.10 J
Manganese 50 50 NE 29.5 J
Nickel 50 100 NE 6.38 J 2.54 J 3.51 J 18.0 J 2.69 J 9.07 J 8.92 J 6.16 J
Silver 10 20 NE 2.46 J 5.58 J
Thallium 5.5 NE 0.28 0.236 J 0.236 J 0.537 J 1.13 J 0.203 J 1.75 J 0.581 J 0.644 J 0.208 J 0.333 J
Vanadium 25 NE 0.3 4.36 J 3.98 J 2.36 J 14.8 J
Zinc 10 1000 NE 12.7 5.93 J 4.79 J 24.1 5.26 J 17.6 15.9 16.3 9.46 J
Table 4
April 2017 - Detected Analytes in Monitoring Wells for MSW Area “E” and Phase 1
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
DRY
DRY
NS
NS
EPA Appendix I Volatile
Organic Compounds Method
8260 (µg/L)
NCDEQ
SWSL
15A
NCAC
2L
Soild
Waste
GWP ST
MW-21 MW-24 MW-25 MW-25A
2-Butanone 100 4000 NE 5.0 J
Acetone 100 6000 NE 110 15
EPA Appendix I Metals
Method 6010B/6020 (µg/L)
Antimony 6 NE 1 1.27 J
Barium 100 700 NE 58.0 J 227 284 142
Beryllium 1 NE 4 0.920 J
Cadmium 1 2 NE 0.428 J
Cobalt 10 NE 1 2.15 J 21.9
Copper 10 1000 NE 3.56 J 5.37 J 1.67 J 4.07 J
Nickel 50 100 NE 7.38 J 2.74 J
Thallium 5.5 NE 0.28 0.333 J 0.654 J 0.394 J 0.443 J
Zinc 10 1000 NE 5.07 J 30.8 28.0 14.2
Table 5
April 2017 - Detected Analytes in Monitoring Wells for MSW Phase 2
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
EPA Appendix I Volatile
Organic Compounds Method
8260 (µg/L)
NCDEQ
SWSL
15A
NCAC
2L
Soild
Waste
GWP ST
MW-32R MW-33 MW-33A MW-35 MW-35A
EPA Appendix I Metals
Method 6010B/6020 (µg/L)
Antimony 6 NE 1 4.61 J 3.02 J
Barium 100 700 NE 25.8 J 43.9 J 6.52 J 67.7 J 37.2 J
Chromium 10 10 NE 1.96 J 5.10 J 2.53 J
Cobalt 10 NE 1 3.69 J
Copper 10 1000 NE 3.28 J 2.65 J 7.01 J 5.22 J 3.45 J
Nickel 50 100 NE 3.03 J
Thallium 5.5 NE 0.28 0.220 J 0.491 J 0.266 J 0.202 J
Vanadium 25 NE 0.3 4.54 J 15.7 J 2.19 J
Zinc 10 1000 NE 5.01 J 15.5 13.8 6.31 J
No Volatile Organic Compounds Detected in Phase 3 in April 2017
Table 6
April 2017 - Detected Analytes in Monitoring Wells for MSW Phase 3
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
EPA Appendix I Volatile
Organic Compounds Method
8260 (µg/L)
NCDEQ
SWSL
15A NCAC
2L
Soild
Waste
GWP ST
MW-26 MW-27 MW-28
1,1-Dichloroethane 5 6 NE 0.76 J
Acetone 100 6000 NE 10 J 19 J
Tetrachloroethene 1 0.7 NE 9.6
Trichloroethene 1 3 NE 0.59 J
Vinyl Chloride 1 0.03 NE 1.2
EPA Appendix I Metals
Method 6010B/6020 (µg/L)
Barium 100 700 NE 66.3 J 186 105
Beryllium 1 NE 4 0.390 J
Cadmium 1 2 NE 1.24
Chromium 10 10 NE 2.61 J 1.56 J
Cobalt 10 NE 1 1.69 J 10.6 2.76 J
Copper 10 1000 NE 6.65 J 3.69 J 4.92 J
Iron 300 300 NE 1120 516 66.4 J
Manganese 50 50 NE 66.4 1,240 30.9 J
Nickel 50 100 NE 3.84 J 17.2 J 4.88 J
Silver 10 20 NE 2.63 J 3.04 J 2.81 J
Thallium 5.5 NE 0.28 0.371 J 0.634 J 0.217 J
Vanadium 25 NE 0.3 1.50 J 3.12 J
Zinc 10 1000 NE 7.29 J 17.7 11.1
Classical Chemistry
Compounds (mg/L)
Chloride NE 250 NE 5.8 13
Sulfate as SO4 250 250 NE 17 J 60 J
Total Dissolved Solids NE 500 NE 56 180
Total Alkalinity NE NE NE 23 46 17
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Lincoln County Landfill
April 2017 - Detected Analytes in Monitoring Wells for C&D Phase 1
Table 7
EPA Appendix I Volatile Organic
Compounds Method 8260 (µg/L)
NCDEQ
SWSL
15A
NCAC
2L
Soild
Waste
GWP ST
MW-29 MW-30 MW-31 MW-36
Methyl Chloride (Chloromethane)1 3 NE 2.8
EPA Appendix I Metals Method
6010B/6020 (µg/L)
Barium 100 700 NE 17.7 J 75.9 J 9.72 J 103
Beryllium 1 NE 4 0.376 J 0.149 J
Cadmium 1 2 NE 0.367 J 0.563 J 0.400 J 0.367 J
Chromium 10 10 NE 4.16 J
Cobalt 10 NE 70 8.41 J 1.31 J 2.83 J
Copper 10 1000 NE 4.10 J 4.19 J 3.78 J 5.03 J
Iron 300 300 NE 40,200 733 6,030 3,070
Manganese 50 50 NE 172 43.6 J 49.5 J 49.5 J
Nickel 50 100 NE 13.9 J 3.23 J 3.15 J
Silver 10 20 NE 2.65 J 2.62 J 2.49 J 2.93 J
Thallium 5.5 NE 0.28 0.229 J 0.128 J 0.216 J
Vanadium 25 NE 0.3 4.45 J
Zinc 10 1000 NE 15.9 6.57 J 16.2
Classical Chemistry Compounds
(mg/L)
Chloride NE 250 NE 4.1 J 3.4 J
Sulfate as SO4 250 250 NE 10 J 3.8 J 9.3 J
Total Dissolved Solids NE 500 NE 170 60
Total Alkalinity NE NE NE 120 23
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Lincoln County Landfill
April 2017 - Detected Analytes in Monitoring Wells for C&D Phase 2
Table 8
EPA Appendix I Volatile
Organic Compounds Method
8260 (µg/L)
15A NCAC
2B SW-1 SW-2 SW-3 SW-4 SW-5 SW-6
EPA Appendix I Metals
Method 6010B/6020 (µg/L)
Barium 1,000 39.0 J 25.5 J 93.7 J 22.5 J 41.1 J 59.8 J
Chromium 74 1.74 J 9.68 J
Cobalt 270 2.14 J 1.42 J 36.7 3.69 J 5.65 J
Copper 7 4.00 J 3.40 J 3.59 J 2.55 J 3.11 J 6.51 J
Iron NE 1,680 855 9,580 445 2,290
Manganese NE 300 140 3,490 28.3 383
Nickel 88 4.30 J
Thallium 0.47 0.501 J 0.207 J 0.360 J 0.302 J 0.276 J
Vanadium NE 1.55 J 2.65 J 13.9 J
Zinc 36 15.9 17.4 21.0
Classical Chemistry
Compounds (mg/L)
COD NE 24
Sulfate as SO4 NE 5.5 J
Phosphorous NE 0.056 J
Nitrate as N NE 0.089 J
Nitrate/Nitrite as N NE 0.089 J
Total Suspended Solids NE 88
Total Alkalinity NE 15
Table 9
April 2017 - Detected Analytes in Surface Water Samples
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
No Volatile Organic Compounds Detected in April 2017
EPA Appendix I Volatile Organic
Compounds Method 8260 (µg/L)
NCDEQ SWSL Lift Station
EPA Appendix I Metals Method
6010B/6020 (µg/L)
Arsenic 10 169
Barium 100 1,280
Chromium 10 10.1
Cobalt 10 9.03 J
Copper 10 4.07 J
Nickel 50 33.9 J
Thallium 5.5 1.95 JD
Vanadium 25 7.42 J
Zinc 10 22.6
Classical Chemistry Compounds (mg/L)
BOD NE 28
COD NE 380
Sulfate as SO4 250 4.7 J
Phosphorous NE 1 D
Nitrite as N 1000 0.160 J
Nitrate/Nitrite as N NE 0.140
Total Alkalinity NE 1300 D
Total Suspended Solids NE 220
Table 10
April 2017 - Detected Analytes in Leachate
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
No Volatile Organic Compounds Detected in April 2017
Notes:
(1) SSI = Statistically Significant Increase
(2) PA = One Way Parametric Analysis of Variance (Parametric ANOVA)
The parametric ANOVA analysis is recommended by the 1992 guidance document for parameters
with fewer than 15% non-detects in a specific well.
(3) KW = Kruskal Wallis Non-Parametric Rank Analysis
The Kruskal-Wallis method is recommended by the 1992 guidance document for parameters that
have 15% to 90% non-detects in a specific well.
(4) PL = Non-Parametric Inter-Well Prediction Limit Analysis
The prediction limit was used for parameters with greater than 90% non-detects in a specific well.
The 1992 guidance document recommends this method when a significant portion of the samples
are non-detect.
Notes for Tables 11 through 13
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Statistical
Percent Analysis
Parameter Well ID Non-Detect Method SSI Comments
1,1,1-Trichloroethane MW-13 90%KW FALSE
1,1-Dichloroethane MW-13 2%PA TRUE Concentrations have decreased over time
MW-14 50%KW TRUE
MW-16 26%KW TRUE Concentrations have decreased over time
MW-17 80%KW FALSE
MW-19 32%KW TRUE
MW-20 37%KW TRUE Not detected during April 2017 sampling event
1,1-Dichloroethene MW-16 96%PL FALSE
MW-19 98%PL FALSE
1,2-Dichloroethane MW-13 94%PL FALSE
1,4-Dichlorobenzene MW-13 54%KW TRUE
MW-16 55%KW TRUE
MW-17 89%KW FALSE
MW-19 90%KW FALSE
MW-20 85%KW FALSE
2-Butanone MW-13 98%PL FALSE
Acetone MW-12 98%PL FALSE
MW-13 52%KW TRUE Concentrations vary from non-detect to detect
MW-14 96%PL FALSE
MW-16 89%KW FALSE
MW-17 73%KW FALSE
MW-15 98%PL FALSE
MW-9 98%PL FALSE
MW-18 98%PL FALSE
MW-19 95%PL FALSE
MW-20 98%PL FALSE
Antimony MW-12 96%PL FALSE
MW-13 90%KW FALSE
MW-14 54%KW FALSE
MW-16 94%PL FALSE
MW-10 91%PL FALSE
MW-8 93%PL FALSE
MW-9 76%KW FALSE
MW-18 90%KW FALSE
MW-19 56%KW FALSE
MW-20 93%PL FALSE
Arsenic MW-12 83%KW FALSE
MW-13 46%KW TRUE Concentrations vary from non-detect to detect
MW-14 94%PL FALSE
MW-16 57%KW TRUE
MW-17 95%PL FALSE
MW-10 91%PL FALSE
MW-15 91%PL FALSE
MW-8 89%KW FALSE
MW-9 94%PL FALSE
MW-18 90%KW FALSE
MW-19 90%KW FALSE
MW-20 83%KW FALSE
Barium MW-12 38%KW TRUE
MW-13 33%KW TRUE
MW-14 44%KW FALSE
MW-16 34%KW TRUE
MW-17 34%KW TRUE
MW-10 23%KW TRUE
MW-15 22%KW TRUE
MW-8 39%KW FALSE
MW-9 34%KW FALSE
MW-18 32%KW FALSE
MW-19 49%KW FALSE
MW-20 32%KW FALSE
Table 11
April 2017 Statistical Analysis for Phase 1 and Area "E"
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Page 1 of 5
Statistical
Percent Analysis
Parameter Well ID Non-Detect Method SSI Comments
Table 11
April 2017 Statistical Analysis for Phase 1 and Area "E"
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Benzene MW-13 33%KW TRUE
MW-16 51%KW TRUE
MW-17 86%KW FALSE
MW-19 63%KW TRUE
MW-20 71%KW FALSE
Beryllium MW-12 63%KW FALSE
MW-13 71%KW FALSE
MW-14 98%PL FALSE
MW-16 81%KW FALSE
MW-17 57%KW FALSE
MW-10 59%KW FALSE
MW-15 39%KW TRUE Concentrations have decreased over time
MW-8 46%KW TRUE
MW-9 89%KW FALSE
MW-18 85%KW FALSE
MW-19 95%PL FALSE
MW-20 78%KW FALSE
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene MW-13 46%KW TRUE
MW-16 49%KW TRUE
MW-17 89%KW FALSE
MW-19 56%KW TRUE
MW-20 63%KW TRUE
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene MW-12 98%PL FALSE
Cadmium MW-12 71%KW FALSE
MW-13 75%KW FALSE
MW-14 75%KW FALSE
MW-16 74%KW FALSE
MW-17 77%KW FALSE
MW-10 77%KW FALSE
MW-15 76%KW FALSE
MW-8 75%KW FALSE
MW-9 89%KW FALSE
MW-18 90%KW FALSE
MW-19 98%KW FALSE
MW-20 88%KW FALSE
Chlorobenzene MW-13 88%KW FALSE
MW-16 60%KW TRUE
Chloroethane MW-13 35%KW TRUE Concentrations vary from non-detect to detect
MW-16 62%KW TRUE Concentrations vary from non-detect to detect
MW-19 95%PL FALSE
MW-20 83%KW FALSE
Chloromethane MW-10 97%PL FALSE
MW-12 98%PL FALSE
MW-13 98%PL FALSE
MW-16 98%PL FALSE
MW-9 98%PL FALSE
MW-20 98%PL FALSE
Chromium MW-12 79%KW FALSE
MW-13 44%KW FALSE
MW-14 81%KW FALSE
MW-16 53%KW FALSE
MW-17 50%KW FALSE
MW-10 32%KW FALSE
MW-15 76%KW FALSE
MW-8 32%KW FALSE
MW-9 34%KW FALSE
MW-18 78%KW FALSE
MW-20 83%KW FALSE
Page 2 of 5
Statistical
Percent Analysis
Parameter Well ID Non-Detect Method SSI Comments
Table 11
April 2017 Statistical Analysis for Phase 1 and Area "E"
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Cobalt MW-12 29%KW TRUE
MW-13 0%PA TRUE
MW-14 75%KW FALSE
MW-16 9%PA FALSE
MW-17 39%KW TRUE
MW-10 64%KW FALSE
MW-15 76%KW FALSE
MW-8 32%KW TRUE
MW-9 89%KW FALSE
MW-18 61%KW FALSE
MW-19 95%PL FALSE
MW-20 63%KW FALSE
Copper MW-12 71%KW FALSE
MW-13 65%KW FALSE
MW-14 42%KW FALSE
MW-16 91%PL FALSE
MW-17 61%KW FALSE
MW-10 59%KW FALSE
MW-15 78%KW FALSE
MW-8 57%KW FALSE
MW-9 66%KW FALSE
MW-18 54%KW FALSE
MW-19 76%KW FALSE
MW-20 85%KW FALSE
Ethylbenzene MW-13 79%KW FALSE
MW-16 96%PL FALSE
Lead MW-12 88%KW FALSE
MW-13 69%KW FALSE
MW-14 94%PL FALSE
MW-16 47%KW TRUE Non-Detect in April 2017
MW-17 84%KW FALSE
MW-10 68%KW FALSE
MW-15 74%KW FALSE
MW-8 57%KW FALSE
MW-9 87%KW FALSE
MW-18 90%KW FALSE
MW-19 95%PL FALSE
MW-20 85%KW FALSE
Methylene Chloride MW-12 98%PL FALSE
MW-13 48%KW TRUE Concentrations have decreased over time
MW-14 92%PL FALSE
MW-16 60%KW TRUE Concentrations have been non-detect since Oct 2011
MW-17 89%KW FALSE
MW-19 46%KW TRUE Concentrations have decreased over time
MW-20 49%KW TRUE Concentrations have decreased over time
Nickel MW-12 56%KW FALSE
MW-13 46%KW FALSE
MW-14 65%KW FALSE
MW-16 53%KW FALSE
MW-17 45%KW FALSE
MW-10 68%KW FALSE
MW-15 96%PL FALSE
MW-8 61%KW FALSE
MW-9 98%PL FALSE
MW-18 63%KW FALSE
MW-19 98%PL FALSE
MW-20 85%KW FALSE
Page 3 of 5
Statistical
Percent Analysis
Parameter Well ID Non-Detect Method SSI Comments
Table 11
April 2017 Statistical Analysis for Phase 1 and Area "E"
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Selenium MW-13 98%PL FALSE
MW-16 87%KW FALSE
MW-17 98%PL FALSE
MW-10 95%PL FALSE
MW-15 98%PL FALSE
MW-8 96%PL FALSE
MW-18 95%PL FALSE
MW-19 98%PL FALSE
MW-20 95%PL FALSE
Silver MW-12 96%PL FALSE
MW-13 85%KW FALSE
MW-14 96%PL FALSE
MW-16 70%KW FALSE
MW-17 95%PL FALSE
MW-10 93%PL FALSE
MW-15 98%PL FALSE
MW-8 96%PL FALSE
MW-9 96%PL FALSE
MW-19 95%PL FALSE
Tetrachloroethene MW-13 48%KW TRUE
MW-14 83%KW FALSE
MW-17 70%KW FALSE
MW-19 49%KW TRUE
MW-20 73%KW FALSE
Thallium MW-12 65%KW FALSE
MW-13 44%KW TRUE
MW-14 90%KW FALSE
MW-16 51%KW FALSE
MW-17 86%KW FALSE
MW-10 89%KW FALSE
MW-15 89%KW FALSE
MW-8 75%KW FALSE
MW-18 61%KW FALSE
MW-19 95%PL FALSE
MW-20 98%PL FALSE
Toluene MW-12 98%PL FALSE
MW-13 69%KW TRUE Concentrations vary from non-detect to detect
Trichloroethene MW-13 48%KW TRUE
MW-14 88%KW FALSE
MW-16 87%KW FALSE
MW-17 82%KW FALSE
MW-19 51%KW TRUE
MW-20 73%KW FALSE
Trichlorofluoromethane MW-16 91%PL FALSE
MW-17 93%PL FALSE
MW-19 66%KW TRUE Concentrations vary from non-detect to detect
Vanadium MW-12 85%KW FALSE
MW-13 69%KW FALSE
MW-14 83%KW FALSE
MW-16 89%KW FALSE
MW-17 70%KW FALSE
MW-10 30%KW TRUE
MW-15 65%KW FALSE
MW-8 32%KW FALSE
MW-9 62%KW FALSE
MW-18 61%KW FALSE
MW-19 80%KW FALSE
MW-20 90%KW FALSE
Vinyl Chloride MW-12 98%PL FALSE
MW-13 60%KW TRUE Non-Detect in April 2015
MW-16 28%KW TRUE Concentrations have decreased over time
MW-20 85%KW FALSE
Page 4 of 5
Statistical
Percent Analysis
Parameter Well ID Non-Detect Method SSI Comments
Table 11
April 2017 Statistical Analysis for Phase 1 and Area "E"
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Xylenes (Total)MW-13 40%KW TRUE
MW-16 55%KW TRUE Concentrations vary from non-detect to detect
MW-17 89%KW TRUE
MW-19 68%KW FALSE
MW-20 76%KW FALSE
Zinc MW-12 2%PA TRUE Concentrations have decreased over time
MW-13 35%KW FALSE
MW-14 46%KW FALSE
MW-16 34%KW FALSE
MW-17 36%KW FALSE
MW-10 27%KW FALSE
MW-15 59%KW FALSE
MW-8 36%KW FALSE
MW-9 55%KW FALSE
MW-18 54%KW FALSE
MW-19 66%KW FALSE
MW-20 63%KW FALSE
Page 5 of 5
Statistical
Percent Analysis
Parameter Well ID Non-Detect Method SSI Comments
Acetone MW-21 87%KW FALSE
MW-24 97%PL FALSE
MW-25 97%PL FALSE
MW-25A 87%KW FALSE
Antimony MW-21 95%PL FALSE
MW-24 97%PL FALSE
MW-25 95%PL FALSE
MW-25A 45%KW FALSE
Arsenic MW-21 95%PL FALSE
MW-24 87%KW FALSE
MW-25 89%KW FALSE
MW-25A 84%KW FALSE
Barium MW-21 32%KW FALSE
MW-24 37%KW FALSE
MW-25 38%KW TRUE
MW-25A 32%KW FALSE
Beryllium MW-21 53%KW FALSE
MW-24 50%KW TRUE
MW-25 54%KW FALSE
MW-25A 87%KW FALSE
Cadmium MW-21 89%KW FALSE
MW-24 92%PL FALSE
MW-25 84%KW FALSE
MW-25A 87%KW FALSE
Chloromethane MW-21 97%PL FALSE
MW-25 97%PL FALSE
MW-25A 97%PL FALSE
Chromium MW-21 82%KW FALSE
MW-24 79%KW FALSE
MW-25 49%KW FALSE
MW-25A 32%KW FALSE
Cobalt MW-21 82%KW FALSE
MW-24 87%KW FALSE
MW-25 97%PL FALSE
MW-25A 50%KW TRUE
Copper MW-21 71%KW FALSE
MW-24 74%KW FALSE
MW-25 76%KW FALSE
MW-25A 68%KW FALSE
Lead MW-21 92%PL FALSE
MW-24 97%PL FALSE
MW-25A 95%PL FALSE
Nickel MW-21 92%PL FALSE
MW-24 76%KW FALSE
MW-25 65%KW FALSE
MW-25A 97%PL FALSE
Table 12
April 2017 Statistical Analysis for Phase 2
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Page 1 of 2
Statistical
Percent Analysis
Parameter Well ID Non-Detect Method SSI Comments
Table 12
April 2017 Statistical Analysis for Phase 2
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Selenium MW-21 97%PL FALSE
MW-25 97%PL FALSE
Silver MW-24 95%PL FALSE
MW-25 97%PL FALSE
MW-25A 97%PL FALSE
Thallium MW-21 95%PL FALSE
MW-24 71%KW FALSE
MW-25 84%KW FALSE
MW-25A 97%PL FALSE
Vanadium MW-21 71%KW FALSE
MW-24 89%KW FALSE
MW-25 89%KW FALSE
MW-25A 45%KW FALSE
Zinc MW-21 61%KW FALSE
MW-24 42%KW FALSE
MW-25 43%KW FALSE
MW-25A 47%KW FALSE
Page 2 of 2
Statistical
Percent Analysis
Parameter Well ID Non-Detect Method SSI Comments
Acetone MW-32 96%PL FALSE
MW-33 96%PL FALSE
MW-33A 93%PL FALSE
MW-35 96%PL FALSE
MW-35A 93%PL FALSE
Antimony MW-32 93%Pl FALSE
MW-33 93%Pl FALSE
MW-33A 30%KW TRUE
MW-35 85%KW FALSE
MW-35A 48%KW FALSE
Arsenic MW-32 89%KW FALSE
MW-33 89%KW FALSE
MW-33A 96%PL FALSE
MW-35 92%PL FALSE
MW-35A 85%KW FALSE
Barium MW-32 7%PA FALSE
MW-33 7%PA FALSE
MW-33A 22%KW FALSE
MW-35 8%PA FALSE
MW-35A 7%PA FALSE
Beryllium MW-32 48%KW FALSE
MW-33 44%KW FALSE
MW-33A 96%PL FALSE
MW-35 46%KW FALSE
MW-35A 78%KW FALSE
Cadmium MW-33A 85%KW FALSE
MW-35A 96%PL FALSE
Chloroform MW-33A 85%KW FALSE
MW-35A 96%PL FALSE
Chromium MW-32 70%KW FALSE
MW-33 93%PL FALSE
MW-35 65%KW FALSE
MW-35A 26%KW FALSE
Cobalt MW-32 89%KW FALSE
MW-33A 96%PL FALSE
MW-35 54%KW FALSE
MW-35A 93%PL FALSE
Copper MW-32 63%KW FALSE
MW-33 85%KW FALSE
MW-33A 33%KW FALSE
MW-35 73%KW FALSE
MW-35A 67%KW FALSE
Lead MW-32 52%KW FALSE
MW-33 96%PL FALSE
MW-33A 96%PL FALSE
MW-35 92%PL FALSE
Nickel MW-32 81%KW FALSE
MW-33 96%PL FALSE
MW-35 77%KW FALSE
MW-35A 93%PL FALSE
Selenium MW-32 93%PL FALSE
MW-33 93%PL FALSE
MW-35A 96%PL FALSE
Table 13
April 2017 Statistical Analysis for Phase 3
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Page 1 of 2
Statistical
Percent Analysis
Parameter Well ID Non-Detect Method SSI Comments
Table 13
April 2017 Statistical Analysis for Phase 3
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project No. 1356-07-004
Silver MW-32 93%PL FALSE
MW-33 96%PL FALSE
MW-33A 96%PL FALSE
Thallium MW-32 81%KW FALSE
MW-33 93%PL FALSE
MW-33A 96%PL FALSE
MW-35 77%KW FALSE
Vanadium MW-32 37%KW FALSE
MW-33 93%PL FALSE
MW-33A 78%KW FALSE
MW-35 50%KW FALSE
MW-35A 22%KW FALSE
Zinc MW-32 30%KW FALSE
MW-33 37%KW FALSE
MW-33A 22%KW FALSE
MW-35 19%KW FALSE
MW-35A 37%KW FALSE
Page 2 of 2

Appendix III – Well Sampling Logs and Laboratory Reports
Surface Water and Leachate Samples
Lincoln County Landfill
S&ME Project 1356-07-004
Location Date Time Sampled Sample Observations
SW-1 4/12/2017 945 none/clear
SW-2 4/12/2017 1030 orange tint, turbid, organics, stagnant water
SW-3 4/12/2017 1045 none/clear
SW-4 4/12/2017 1115 none/clear
SW-5 4/12/2017 1145 turbid, mostly stagnant
Lift Station 4/12/2017 1340 (Sampled from Pump #2 Lift Station)
SW- 6 4/12/2017 1300 turbid, some debris
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-1A
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 4/10/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0 917 9.31 16.0
2.2 921 7.05 16.7
4.4 924 6.25 16.8
Final 6.6 927 6.05 16.7
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Comments
Lab
25
21
23
4/11/2017
13.18
2.2
57
Electric Water Level Probe
Field-Cleaned Typhoon Pump
Sunny
57.00
TOC
43.82
ENCO
HCL
1215
disposable teflon bailer
none/clear
Appendix I Metals + Hg,
Mn, Fe HNO3(1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-8
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 4/10/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0
Final
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
31.00
0.00
Disposable Teflon Bailer
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
31.00
Sunny
ENCO
HCL
HNO3
disposable teflon bailer
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-9
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 4/10/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0 1340 6.68 17.5
5.9 1344 6.61 16.4
11.8 1348 6.67 16.4
Final 17.7 1353 6.71 16.1
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
TOC
34.54
70.50
35
39
38
35.96
5.9
Electric Water Level Probe
Field Cleaned Typhoon Pump
ENCO
none/clear
HCL
HNO3
39
4/11/2017
1355
disposable teflon bailer
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-10R
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 4/10/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0 1407 6.78 17.2
0.5 1408 6.80 16.9
1.0 -
Final 1.5 -
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
4/11/2017
1420
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
none/clear
HCL
HNO3
185
182
3.08
Disposable Teflon Bailer
Sunny
0.5
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
28.42
31.50
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-12
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 4/10/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0 1520 5.63 16.3
2.4 1522 5.33 14.5
4.8 1523 5.36 14.1
Final 7.2 1524 5.31 13.9
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
TOC
3.96
18.50
Sunny
93
94
94
14.54
2.4
Electric Water Level Probe
Field Cleaned Typhoon Pump
ENCO
none/clear
HCL
HNO3
92
4/11/2017
1445
disposable teflon bailer
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-13
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 4/10/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0 1102 6.15 17.4
1.2 1104 6.12 17.4
2.4 1107 6.16 17.4
Final 4.6 1111 6.20 17.3
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
4/11/2017
1245
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
none/clear
HCL
HNO3
261
266
287
7.62
Disposable Teflon Bailer
293
Sunny
1.2
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
32.88
40.50
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-14
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 4/10/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0 1058 6.63 18.7
7.3 1104 6.51 17.2
14.6 1110 6.41 17.1
Final 21.9 1116 6.43 17.2
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
TOC
31.29
76.00
Sunny
112
101
107
44.71
7.3
Electric Water Level Probe
Field Cleaned Typhoon Pump
ENCO
none/clear
HCL
HNO3
107
4/11/2017
1240
disposable teflon bailer
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-15
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0
Final
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
HCL
HNO3
Disposable Teflon Bailer
Sunny
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
30.50
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-16R
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 4/10/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0 941 6.41 15.9
1.0 942 6.43 15.5
2.0 943 6.45 15.5
Final 3.0 945 6.45 15.5
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
TOC
15.59
21.60
Sunny
759
748
747
6.01
0.99
Electric Water Level Probe
Disposable Teflon Bailer
ENCO
none/clear
HCL
HNO3
725
4/11/2017
1225
disposable teflon bailer
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-17R
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 4/11/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0 948 5.45 17.5
0.6 950 5.38 17.4
1.2 952 5.37 17.4
Final 1.8 954 5.37 17.4
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
4/12/2017
845
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
none/clear
HCL
HNO3
58
52
56
3.49
Disposable Teflon Bailer
52
Sunny
0.6
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
44.01
47.50
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-18
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 4/10/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0 1030 6.56 15.2
1.5 1033 6.62 14.8
3.0 1036 6.61 15.0
Final 4.5
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
DRY @ 3.0 gallons
TOC
22.70
32.00
Sunny
172
175
169
9.30
1.5
Electric Water Level Probe
Disposable Teflon Bailer
ENCO
turbid
HCL
HNO3
4/11/2017
1255
disposable teflon bailer
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-19
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 4/10/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0 1022 6.32 17.2
7.1 1029 6.25 16.6
14.2 1034 6.25 15.7
Final 21.3 1038 6.23 15.7
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
4/11/2017
1250
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
none/clear
HCL
HNO3
116
111
114
43.31
Field Cleaned Typhoon Pump
112
Sunny
7.1
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
28.69
72.00
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-20
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 4/10/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0 955 7.18 15.6
2.0 957 6.28 15.0
4.0 1000 6.00 15.1
Final 6.0 1005 5.89 15.2
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
TOC
14.94
27.00
Sunny
53
43
46
12.06
2.0
Electric Water Level Probe
Disposable Teflon Bailer
ENCO
none/clear
HCL
HNO3
51
4/11/2017
1230
disposable teflon bailer
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-21
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 4/10/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0 1139 5.75 17.3
1.0 1142 5.69 16.5
2.0 1144 5.67 16.3
Final 3.0 1147 5.65 16.3
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
4/11/2017
1305
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
none/clear
HCL
HNO3
83
83
91
5.90
Disposable Teflon Bailer
85
Sunny
1.0
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
38.21
44.11
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-24
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 4/10/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0 1505 6.49 16.9
1.1 1507 5.93 16.6
2.2 1508 5.91 16.6
Final 3.3 1509 5.66 16.5
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
TOC
25.00
31.60
Sunny
253
256
255
6.60
1.1
Electric Water Level Probe
Disposable Teflon Bailer
ENCO
none/clear
HCL
HNO3
252
4/11/2017
1430
disposable teflon bailer
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-25
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 4/10/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0 1431 5.87 17.8
0.1 1432 5.87 17.9
0.2 1433 5.93 17.9
Final 0.3
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
4/11/2017
1415
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
none/clear
HCL
HNO3
157
162
158
0.87
Disposable Teflon Bailer
DRY before 0.3 gallons
Sunny
0.1
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
30.63
31.50
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-25A
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 4/10/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0 1428 6.83 18.5
4.8 1437 6.25 17.6
9.6 1443 6.31 17.6
Final 14.4 1448 6.35 17.5
Note: During purging well went dry after 4 gal.; let recharge for 5 mins and continued without issue.
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
TOC
30.86
60.00
Sunny
141
151
136
29.14
4.8
Electric Water Level Probe
Field Cleaned Typhoon Pump
ENCO
none/clear
HCL
HNO3
137
4/11/2017
1405
disposable teflon bailer
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-26
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 4/11/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0 1118 5.62 15.0
1.5 1120 5.71 14.7
3.0 1123 5.77 14.6
Final 4.5 1125 5.83 14.6
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs & THF (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals + Hg, Mn, Fe (1) 250 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
955
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
none/clear
HCL
HNO3
111
Alkalinity/TDS/
Chloride/Sulfate (1) 250 mL plastic bottle
Sunny
1.5
None
4/12/2017
Disposable Teflon Bailer
116
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
13.69
23.00
9.31
126
118
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-27
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 4/11/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0 1133 5.53 16.1
1.5 1136 5.49 15.7
3.0 1138 5.47 15.8
Final 4.5 1140 5.50 15.8
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs & THF (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals + Hg, Mn, Fe (1) 250 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
219
Sunny
Alkalinity/TDS/
Chloride/Sulfate (1) 250 mL plastic bottle None
8.87
1.5
222
177
214
Disposable Teflon Bailer
TOC
18.13
27.00
Electric Water Level Probe
ENCO
none/clear
HCL
HNO3
4/12/2017
1010
disposable teflon bailer
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-28
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 4/11/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0 931 5.45 17.4
1.4 935 5.25 17.3
2.8 937 5.26 17.1
Final 4.2 939 5.26 17.1
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs & THF (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals + Hg, Mn, Fe (1) 250 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
835
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
none/clear
HCL
HNO3
43
Alkalinity/TDS/
Chloride/Sulfate (1) 250 mL plastic bottle
Sunny
1.4
None
4/12/2017
Disposable Teflon Bailer
41
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
45.71
54.50
8.79
59
47
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-29
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 4/11/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0 1006 5.97 17.1
0.5 1007 5.99 17.0
1.0 1008 6.05 17.0
Final 1.5 1009 6.02 16.9
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs & THF (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals + Hg, Mn, Fe (1) 250 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
855
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
none/clear
HCL
HNO3
295
Alkalinity/TDS/
Chloride/Sulfate (1) 250 mL plastic bottle
Sunny
0.5
None
4/12/2017
Disposable Teflon Bailer
287
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
42.00
45.00
3.00
275
295
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-30
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 4/11/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0 1035 5.84 16.0
1.8 1039 6.00 15.7
3.6 1042 5.93 15.7
Final 5.4 1045 5.97 15.6
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs & THF (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals + Hg, Mn, Fe (1) 250 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
920
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
none/clear
HCL
HNO3
46
Alkalinity/TDS/
Chloride/Sulfate (1) 250 mL plastic bottle
Sunny
1.8
None
4/12/2017
Disposable Teflon Bailer
50
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
52.85
64.00
11.15
62
55
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-31
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 4/11/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0 1057 6.10 16.2
1.8 1059 5.65 16.0
3.6 1103 5.54 15.9
Final 5.4 1107 5.47 15.9
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs & THF (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals + Hg, Mn, Fe (1) 250 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
935
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
none/clear
HCL
HNO3
46
Alkalinity/TDS/
Chloride/Sulfate (1) 250 mL plastic bottle
Sunny
1.8
None
4/12/2017
Disposable Teflon Bailer
48
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
28.85
40.00
11.15
60
52
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-32R
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 4/10/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0 1153 6.09 15.4
2.1 1158 5.46 15.0
4.2 1202 5.40 15.1
Final 6.3 1204 5.35 15.1
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottles
Comments
Lab
TOC
15.34
28.05
Sunny
15
17
18
12.71
Disposable Teflon Bailer
2.1
Electric Water Level Probe
ENCO
slightly turbid
HCL
HNO3
17
4/11/2017
1315
disposable teflon bailer
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-33
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 4/10/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0 1219 5.90 15.6
2.0 1223 5.87 15.6
4.0 1223 5.82 14.6
Final 6.0 1231 5.89 14.7
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottles
Comments
Lab
4/11/2017
1330
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
HCL
HNO3
78
82
80
12.16
Disposable Teflon Bailer
82
Sunny
2.0
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
13.14
25.30
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-33A
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 4/10/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0 1215 6.04 16.5
8.3 1222 6.66 15.8
16.6 1227 6.72 15.7
Final 24.9 1234 6.72 15.8
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottles
Comments
Lab
TOC
13.74
64.55
Sunny
204
241
230
50.81
Field Cleaned Typhoon Pump
8.3
Electric Water Level Probe
ENCO
none/clear
HCL
HNO3
215
4/11/2017
1325
disposable teflon bailer
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-35
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 4/10/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0 1305 6.73 16.5
0.3 1307 5.81 16.2
0.6 1308 5.54 16.2
Final 0.9 1316 6.60 15.9
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottles
Comments
Lab
TOC
35.25
37.25
Sunny
16
13
13
2.00
Disposable Teflon Bailer
0.3
Electric Water Level Probe
ENCO
slightly turbid
HCL
HNO3
18
4/11/2017
1340
disposable teflon bailer
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-35A
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 4/10/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0 1301 8.10 17.9
5.6 1305 6.53 16.9
11.2 1309 6.38 16.1
Final 16.8 1313 6.39 16.1
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals (1) 500 mL plastic bottles
Comments
Lab
4/11/2017
1345
disposable teflon bailer
ENCO
none/clear
HCL
HNO3
46
49
46
34.21
Field Cleaned Typhoon Pump
47
Sunny
5.6
Electric Water Level Probe
TOC
35.48
69.69
Project Name: Lincoln County Landfill
Project Location: Crouse, North Carolina
Project Number: 1356-07-004
Well ID MW-36
Sampling Personnel (1) SJT (2) NGS
Weather Conditions
Unusual Site Conditions
Water Level Data
Measuring Point Location Well Casing Volume
Depth to Water (ft)
Depth to Base of Well (ft)(well casing volume = water column*0.174)
Water Column (ft)
Equipment Used to Measure Depths
Well Purging Data
Date 4/11/2017 Purging Equipment
Total Volume (Gal)Time pH Temp (C)Conductance (µS)
Initial 0 1019 5.83 15.9
1.5 1021 5.64 15.3
3.0 1024 5.62 15.2
Final 4.5 1026 5.63 15.2
Well Sampling Data
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Sampling Equipment
Sample Observations
Analytical Data
Method Container Type and No.Preservation
Appendix I VOCs & THF (3) 40 mL glass vials
Appendix I Metals + Hg, Mn, Fe(1) 250 mL plastic bottle
Comments
Lab
slightly turbid
ENCO
HCL
HNO3
Alkalinity/TDS/
Chloride/Sulfate (1) 250 mL plastic bottle None
19
15
15
4/12/2017
910
disposable teflon bailer
27.49
36.68
9.19
Electric Water Level Probe
Disposable Teflon Bailer
22
Sunny
TOC 1.5

Appendix IV – Statistical Analysis Procedures

Appendix V – Graphs Depicting Concentrations over Time for
Wells with a Statistically Significant Increase

0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
1,1 - Dichloroethane
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-13 MW-14 MW-16 MW-19 MW-20
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
1,4 - Dichlorobenzene
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-13 MW-16
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Acetone
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-13
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Arsenic
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-13 MW-16
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Barium
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-15 MW-16 MW-10 MW-12 MW-13 MW-17
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Benzene
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-13 MW-16 MW-19
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Beryllium
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-15 MW-8
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
cis-1,2-Dichloroethane
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-13 MW-16 MW-19 MW-20
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Chlorobenzene
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-16
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Chloroethane
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-13 MW-16
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Cobalt
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-12 MW-13 MW-17 MW-8
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Lead
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-16
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Methylene Chloride
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-13 MW-16 MW-19 MW-20
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Tetrachloroethene
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-13 MW-19
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Thallium
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-13
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Toluene
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-13
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Trichloroethene
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-13 MW-19
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Trichlorofluoromethane
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-19
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Vanadium
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-10
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
5
10
15
20
25
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Vinyl Chloride
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-13 MW-16
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Total Xylenes
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-13 MW-16 MW-17
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
1/1/1992 9/27/1994 6/23/1997 3/19/2000 12/14/2002 9/9/2005 6/5/2008 3/2/2011 11/26/2013 8/22/2016 5/19/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Zinc
Phase 1 and Area "E" Wells With SSI
MW-12
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
1/1/1999 9/27/2001 6/23/2004 3/20/2007 12/14/2009 9/9/2012 6/6/2015 3/2/2018 11/26/2020Concentration (ug/L)Date
Barium
Phase 2 Wells With SSI
MW-25
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
1/1/1999 9/27/2001 6/23/2004 3/20/2007 12/14/2009 9/9/2012 6/6/2015 3/2/2018 11/26/2020Concentration (ug/L)Date
Beryllium
Phase 2 Wells With SSI
MW-24
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1/1/1999 9/27/2001 6/23/2004 3/20/2007 12/14/2009 9/9/2012 6/6/2015 3/2/2018 11/26/2020Concentration (ug/L)Date
Cobalt
Phase 2 Wells With SSI
MW-25A
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1/14/2004 5/28/2005 10/10/2006 2/22/2008 7/6/2009 11/18/2010 4/1/2012 8/14/2013 12/27/2014 5/10/2016 9/22/2017 2/4/2019Concentration (ug/L)Date
Antimony
Phase 3 Wells With SSI
MW-33A
Note:
Non-DetectValues are Set at Method Detection Limits

Appendix VI– Monthly Methane Data
(October 2016 – April 2017)