HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-03-20 Duke NC Waste Management Plan 2018 Update3191 Pine Hall Road Walnut Cove, NC 27009 336-215-4576
Page 1 of 2
March 20, 2018 North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Waste Management Solid Waste Section
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Attn: Ms. Shawn McKee (submitted electronically)
Re: Duke Energy Management Plan 2018 Update
Permit No. Various 526 South Church Street Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
Dear Ms. McKee,
Attached you will find the Waste Management Plan for Duke Energy (Duke) Coal Combustion Residual Industrial Landfill Facilities. As previously discussed with the Section, waste management at Duke facilities operates as a system thereby resulting in a better representation as a combined Waste Management Plan.
This Solid Waste Management Plan pertains to landfills at operational coal combustion facilities:
• Allen Steam Station Retired Ash Basin Landfill Permit No. 3612
• Belews Creek Steam Station Craig Road Ash Landfill
Permit No. 8504
• Belews Flue Gas Desulfurization Residue Landfill
Permit No. 8505
• Cliffside Steam Station Coal Combustion Products Landfill
Permit No. 8106
• Marshall Steam Station FGD Residue Landfill, Phase I, Cell 1
Permit No. 1809
• Marshall Steam Station Industrial Landfill #1
Permit No. 1812
• Mayo Steam Electric Plant Coal Combustion Product Landfill
Permit No. 7305
• Roxboro Steam Electric Plant Landfill
Permit No. 7302
And facilities that have landfills to support closure of ash basins at retired coal combustion facilities:
• Dan River Steam Station Landfill (Under Construction) Permit No. 7906
• Sutton Steam Electric Plant Landfill (Under Construction)
Permit No. 6512
This plan is being submitted as courtesy in accordance with GS 130A-309.09D.
Page 2 of 2
If you need additional information in regards to this submittal please do not hesitate to call or email, 336-
215-4576 or kimberlee.witt@duke-energy.com.
Regards,
Kimberlee Witt, PE Environmental Services
Attachments: North Carolina Ten-Year Waste Management Plan 2018 Update
cc: Ed Mussler - NCDEQ Shannon Aufman - NCDEQ Larry Frost - NCDEQ
Evan Andrews - Duke Energy Scott Nordgren - Duke Energy
Ed Sullivan – Duke Energy
North Carolina
Waste Management Plan
2018 Update
526 South Church Street
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
March 20, 2018
Duke Energy NC Ten-Year Waste Management Plan 2018 Update
Table of Contents
1.0 Overview ........................................................................................................................ 1
2.0 Waste Management Strategy ......................................................................................... 1
2.1 Fly Ash ........................................................................................................................... 2
2.2 Bottom Ash ..................................................................................................................... 2
2.3 Flue Gas Desulphurization (FGD) Residue ..................................................................... 2
3.0 Future Ash Beneficiation Projects ................................................................................... 3
List of Abbreviations & Acronyms
BTU British Thermal Unit
CCP Coal Combustion Products
CCP TS Duke Energy Coal Combustion Products & Technical Support
CCR Coal Combustion Residuals
NCDEQ North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
DWM Division of Waste Management
FGD Flue Gas Desulfurization
PTO Permit to Operate
Duke Energy NC Waste Management Plan 2018 Update Page 1 of 4
1.0 Overview
In accordance with North Carolina Administrative Code Section 130A-309.09D(c); A generator of
industrial solid waste that owns and operates an industrial solid waste facility for the management of industrial solid waste generated by that generator shall develop a Waste Management Plan. This plan
shall be updated at least every three years and be provided to the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality (DEQ) upon request.
This Duke Energy (Duke) Solid Waste Management Plan pertains to landfills at operational coal combustion facilities:
• Allen Steam Station Retired Ash Basin Landfill (RAB Landfill)
Permit No. 3612
• Belews Creek Steam Station Craig Road Ash Landfill (Craig Road Landfill)
Permit No. 8504
• Belews Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) Residue Landfill, Phase I (FGD Landfill)
Permit No. 8505
• Cliffside Steam Station Coal Combustion Products (CCP) Landfill (CCP Landfill)
Permit No. 8106
• Marshall Steam Station FGD Residue Landfill, Phase I, Cell 1 (FGD Landfill)
Permit No. 1809
• Marshall Steam Station Industrial Landfill #1 (ILF 1)
Permit No. 1812
• Mayo Steam Electric Plant Coal Combustion Product Landfill (Landfill)
Permit No. 7305
• Roxboro Steam Electric Plant Landfill (Landfill)
Permit No. 7302 And facilities that have landfills to support closure of ash basins at retired coal combustion facilities:
• Dan River Steam Station Landfill (Landfill)
Permit No. 7906
• Sutton Electric Steam Plant Landfill (Landfill) Permit No. 6512
The initial permits to operate (PTO) for the above-listed landfills were issued by the NCDEQ, Division of Waste Management (DWM), and are subject to review every five years.
This Waste Management Plan presented is developed in accordance with GS 130A-309.09D.
2.0 Waste Management Strategy – Plans for Waste Reduction
and Disposal
The Duke Energy operational coal combustion facilities generate electric power by combustion of coal
which produces fly ash, bottom ash, FGD residue (gypsum), and other coal combustion residuals (CCR) on an operational basis. The operation of a station and the quantity of CCR produced depends
on interconnected power demands of the Duke system as a whole (including renewable power sources
and facilities that produce energy through nuclear, hydroelectric, and natural gas sources). The quantity of ash generated at the coal combustion facilities depends on factors such as the operation of the plant,
the reuse of ash in by-products, the heat of combustion of the coal itself (measured in British Thermal Units (BTUs)), ash content of the coal, the quantity of coal burned, and closure of coal ash basins. The
Duke Energy NC Waste Management Plan 2018 Update Page 2 of 4
quantity of FGD residue (synthetic gypsum) produced depends on the sulfur content and volume of coal combusted. These factors typically vary over the course of a single year, causing fluctuations in the
quantity and quality of ash and gypsum. The fuel chemistry also impacts the amount of CCR produced
at each station. Additionally, the rise in natural gas powered electricity generation has led to speculation that coal generation facilities may see a more limited role in fulfilling the region’s electricity
demand during this planning period. This prediction, coupled with increasing strength in the ash reuse markets is expected to increase the demand for ash used in byproducts, resulting in a decrease in the quantity of material disposed in the landfills.
The aforementioned factors result in difficulty estimating future disposal and reuse volumes for CCR material. This Waste Management Plan is only intended to be an estimate based on information
available at the time the report was generated.
Duke’s Coal Combustion Products & Technical Support (CCP TS) Group was developed to seek
markets and applications for use of coal combustion byproducts. This group continuously works toward maximizing the re-use of coal combustion byproducts. Marketing of combustion byproducts is Duke's
primary effort towards waste reduction.
Duke reports CCR production, excavation, and reuse annually in accordance with 15A NCAC 13B
.1710. Table 1, below, summarizes CCR volumes produced, disposed, used in structural fill facilities, and alternatively used as described in 15A NCAC 13B .1708 for the past 5 years. It is the goal of the CCP TS Group to increase reuse to the maximum extent possible.
As shown in Table 1, recent ash basin excavation projects resulting in re-use in addition to mining synthetic from historical landfills has resulted in total annual beneficial re-use greater than 100%. Re-
use volumes will vary greatly over the next few years due to regulatory requirements included in the Coal Ash Management Act of 2014.
Duke Energy NC Waste Management Plan 2018 Update Page 3 of 4
Table 1 - Historical CCR Beneficial Reuse
Production CCR Material
Year
Ash (tons) Synthetic Gypsum (tons) Total CCR
Produced Re-Used Disposed Produced Re-Used Disposed % Beneficially
Reused
2017 1,422,288 3,675,584 949,758 1,408,609 1,552,182 51,379 185%
2016 1,296,824 1,602,819 2,247,347 1,148,712 1,572,019 35,696 130%
2015 1,698,218 1,369,679 1,081,593 1,579,276 1,407,994 249,698 85%
2014 2,562,279 1,351,136 1,211,143 1,717,268 1,298,208 419,060 62%
2013 2,181,627 1,589,832 591,795 1,563,410 1,316,997 246,413 78%
Table 1 notes: 1. Information was obtained from Duke Energy annual reports required by 15A NCAC 13B .1710. 2. Data is provided by the NCDEQ fiscal year (July 1 - June 30) as required by 15A NCAC 13B .1710. 3. Produced ash includes estimate of CCR material sluiced to basins 4. Re-Used and disposed CCR material includes ash from basins.
5. 2013 was the first reporting period for the combined Duke Energy and Progress Energy thereby the start of this table. 2.1 Fly Ash and Bottom Ash
Fly ash is a light airborne particulate that results from the combustion of pulverized coal. Fly ash reuse is mostly used as a replacement for other aggregates, such as Portland cement, in concrete production.
Bottom ash is a heavier ash particle that falls to the bottom of the plant boilers during combustion.
Bottom ash reuse mostly occurs in concrete block manufacturing.
During the Duke 2017 fiscal year, approximately 1,243,137 tons of ash was produced at Duke facilities
in North Carolina. Approximately 42% of the ash produced was beneficially used in the concrete
market. The CCP TS Group is continuing to pursue the beneficial use of fly ash. Duke anticipates that an improving regional economy will increase the demand for beneficial use of fly ash, resulting in a
decrease in the quantity of material disposed in the landfills.
2.2 Flue Gas Desulphurization (FGD) Residue
The FGD systems at Duke's North Carolina coal generating facilities were designed to produce wallboard-quality synthetic gypsum enabling the material to be beneficially reused. Synthetic gypsum
reuse occurs mostly in the wallboard industry but is also seen in agricultural markets as a substitute for
natural gypsum. During the Duke 2017 fiscal year, approximately 1,205,977 tons of synthetic gypsum were produced at Duke facilities in North Carolina. Market demand in 2017 was greater than Duke
Energy's synthetic production. Previously landfilled gypsum was excavated resulting in a reuse rate greater than production. Approximately 116% of the gypsum was beneficially used in the manufacturing of gypsum wallboard or agricultural uses. The CCP TS Group is continuing to pursue the
beneficial use of synthetic gypsum. Duke believes that an improving regional economy will increase the demand for wall-board, resulting in a decrease in the quantity of material disposed in the landfills.
3.0 Future Ash Beneficiation Projects
Duke Energy NC Waste Management Plan 2018 Update Page 4 of 4
North Carolina General Statute 130A-309.216 Ash beneficiation projects, was ratified as part of House Bill 630 on July 1, 2016, and signed into law on July 14, 2016. NCGS 130A-309.216 requires an
impoundment owner to identify at least three sites capable of processing 300,000 tons annually of ash
suitable for cement processing purposes. Weatherspoon, HF Lee, and Buck facilities have been identified as the three facilities capable of implementing beneficial reuse. These facilities are
anticipated to increase coal combustion material available for re-use in the concrete industry.