970004_Inspection_20190827

Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: '(� Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: V"( 1ee5
Physical Address:
Facility
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Latitude:'2,3 )j (j L4 � Longitude:
Region: W
WO
U5�f21 N —� Cat;, n�+►,ar
P4
VA IQJ+eA
i2cl, 7 Y�r.�►^
dillIlil t:((v3j
l rz. „i 't it l�.,
I # t
Iz' (a
t1d74itF�re�.�#II„bS�U I�,�"I
i 4 ti
1�E yy I �1 iip,!
I.: }4N i[�s�-0,
Wean to Finish
Layer
DairyCow
Q
Wean to Feeder
Non -Layer
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
�ihl€
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
1!'� �'"
Ion -Dairy
I` Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
(4 Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
ik���fi
TurkeyPoultsmill"i
(F Other
Other
){��G3¢j{
�f iei4 IS ti��� ti9 !i
t t S t =' u!IU tti i'i1
�$ftl
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
Yes
❑ No
Yes
❑ No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection: 1
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1
Identifier: Qj I;rt
Structure 2 Structure 3
N�0�
Structure 4
'P`i U�
Structure 5
( CA
Structure 6 'S
p
Spillway?: _
Designed Freeboard (in): 105b a` -
Observed Freeboard (in): � r
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes j Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) TT
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
t672Z Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental
threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
C"Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
­10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[:]Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
K No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑Yes
A No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
A No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reouired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
A No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists [:]Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? Ifes eHee
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
�i
Waste Application Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysissis
�fecs
Weather
Code
Rainfall ®Stocking Crop 'iel B e Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
JANA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412015 Continued

Facility Number: Date of inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 000 � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No � NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWNIP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes(
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes 9 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
NYes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[—]Yes [—]No [_]NA ONE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
3. E)UF� iveN �it�y�? veg t m� �abust�t d? No caw; nusKo ems` tugA
5h`h e a b+ t
J0-h wed)4_�vsC
c PAN vf�+vvea
30,5pnnq f 'VviAt ear Frtu ,rcl Wa C�-i bh Wf t'tt� f16i►Fi'ca:h&► %rmv� ll'1,t.�e
� ,�nekiI ' i' gclSed barks �r { ev o`oe rtw,vr . V
C7 i�a uC UC(AG�� i tN e b4 e
C�twr. p �Paa eslUnarlc� 15 �rVqqnt fib=
76 �1Givt5 %v p?enrufer?fl4iL�hisGsPnMa IC41Sc ek x a.
. Cau�ovr ►uw of Si b� (Cwa irn % reels s
V
r . vp eaiyd CowwayaCIA N co, wad-c� a, lUka-S 'kb Ing is v\ rvkcLl
%i,SW V r;) Le A iof* uh f fmnnc A R,, V)ri m r o1 A ml' `45 sic he ?tlw ti A
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector S u Yvee:
Pa,,3of3
M
Phone: ++
— �Date:
#bbnn� i
2/4/2015