760010_Inspection_20190930

Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 1Vi,Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: I 1 I ,6�U�1 dill Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: VjknWh Region:
Farm Name: y—evAi h !4 na yn,\, Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: ,$ U J4 n Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
V
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone: -� '7 i'T C1 6-J — L) oq L
0_d. Sooki e& Ak �OAi o
Phone:
Integrator: Curvi s
Certification Number: 2 9� l —Iy
Certification Number:
Latitude: 2 6 yW r � A Longitude: R v1a S '
l l 5 4-o ada r Se>�ov rc 2Yik C� +ucv\
O 6vs.3 (( 5 MC
tiara ( , (2d
(. �hadt_e.r
I
Wean to Finish
Layer
t )ai Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -Layer
)airy Calf
Feeder to Finish Moo LqDai
)airyHeifer
Farrow to Wean
D Cow
H
('
Farrow to Feeder
4' , of IN—INon-Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
(' Beef Stocker
Gilts (
Non -Layers
t(±, Beef Feeder
Boars G
Pullets
i I� Beef Brood Cow
�tt Jill «(
�i i4 ii
Turkel
dui t.
I��«'�'Ir«'IIs'
{9j,
i� lrs it++I ( 1 1
Turke Poultsjj:
E€€
Mill
11111
the
1t4t'i Other ?j�j`
kited
Other
4M`« 4 0!UIt45t iik�i
, ,i tltt kl 11{, pl l ;.L alto iitd[
00
i li
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes K I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: Date of Inspection: Q
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: (gL71�Y1
Spillway?: �-
Designed Freeboard (in):
r
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
(A No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
4 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
;, No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
p� M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acce table Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crop Type(s): CIU-L-
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
19
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
�
Its No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
JXNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? r� Yes ❑ No
Waste Application Weekly Freeboard Wa e Anal ❑ � Soil Analysis �,'�n'PTr fus
IoRainfall ❑ Stocking Ej Crop Yield 120 Minute nsp Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
eat er o
19 Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
Qq NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection: tJ
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes *KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [—]Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose-'° with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were hif
29. At the time of the inspection did the f rl Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If es, contact a regional Air Quality nn"°r"^I IX
fmy g Q Ty -
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Ref aiue No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard 1 1 /4v or4Z Blu �%io
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at ti �l4 { L, fnC r_ "' hA cif I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Laf iQG.` f l Aj_x 1 t
32. Were any additional problems or In --}-.., - / ,
lJ / No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail l
LAC (�r.-a y�r 1 � C "� %s No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a folio Y� ) es No ❑ NA ❑ NE
i� c' / '
I�
en
i
y vS fLaPG( f0
11.�5A—e cnvtatl�i5i g �. 6a d w, . �.%� ,(sue i r;;,r ewfi+uv%s
�1
'n"
Mo-(It-e-r 1' e 5 v rtlL f� e rk N Inca- W � -H r� %bv frn<< CL I CIA3- Z7� V
V 1 V
9,1 S, 5 due Ali s Tar [201q).
CbL(.t b rah oti. �, �� { t.; s t�e�a C�ot�� �.�"=2' fo n
-I( I I %0�
Reviewer/Inspector
Reviewer/Inspector
Page 3 of 3
(2p'ro2n�.l n i ni-1-� ifs � Crab V
I-t 51^�
16 kov-5 2-I lw�
Phone,?a6'1,6, C f 05
Date: 30 (,f
2112015