760051_Inspection_20190917

Type of Visit: 9Q Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: q (c Arrival Time: Departure Time: = County: Wt�"Y` Regioi:
Farm Name: lRi ,r\ c\ h � -aY- o,--
Owner Name: Z p&yiy1 N n jv-v-�
Mailing Address: ?j' (J"I o V)6Ahar �,(rn L Vk . ,
Owner Email:
Phone:
k, P,
Physical Address: \9A Crpt,t;"v MD, Ln. 1,JI V\R 1V10Y6 NCi Q'n-,n-J
Facility Contact: ,DSO h W Yt!4V\+ Title:
Onsite Representative: `
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
i�y��(5`�'� �icsrn%�$lnEboro
D Qk'GSv.wfi
V2+A
2.Q 2rY-A e -kXn
>
o�n G�ldr-r,.✓�+,rt ��e.. 1.R .
� 'FArrn 'cv��
d�
;;jjjj t
I
Wean to Finish
Layer
r"" Dairy Cow
1
Wean to Feeder
Non -Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
' fi,i� �)
(Iyilti
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
�. ��Ii_.
(j
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
t a �,[,��'+I!
i
{ Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
E
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
if
i Turkeys
�]�
Turkey P Its
Other
) Other
;�� }
" �' i,tE�,�
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
CA No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: jDate of Inspection: C1 ^'j l�
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes M' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): D
Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
[X No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
'1% No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental
threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
%No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
-
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, 2 etc.
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crop Type(s): cot VA
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ YesLpj
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
❑ No
NA
Pq
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
K No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
NfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[X No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
[)'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If y U., Him
-B'
❑ Yes
�Q No
❑ NA
❑ NE
�] Waste Application � Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis a fys
[}V+asYePrans€us
Weather Code
Rainfall ❑ Stocking bo Crop Yield DIMMmut"nspections W Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
"'j�rn�
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
[—]Yes
% No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
?j NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412015 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection: 1
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ No NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑Yes
�a No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
[ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
[A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
tM No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
r�71 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
pav'. L YUN1,(\.t I)USN Ni �12v S, L (JS
"moo 10y o f Tex- y (2g6 i Ci ).
r� t� co,,L e rDti `av\ Cb,, ,pu_-F-ed q eM �j E rol o�V e Gift r\
6(14fil
o..bs
Reviewer/Inspector
Reviewer/Inspector
Page 3 of 3
Phone:�5?jb- 11E,"q�ti5
Date: (� +
21412015