20191273 Ver 1_PCN_PJD_COR_Walnut Creek Greenway_20190923_20190923

A=COM
September 23, 2019
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
AECOM 919 461 1100 tel
1600 Perimeter Park Drive 919 461 1415 fax
Suite 400
Morrisville, North Carolina
www.aecom.com
Attn: Mr. James C. Lastinger
E: James. [e-mail]. miI
P: [phone] x32
Re: Walnut Creek Greenway Project
City of Raleigh
Dear Mr. Lastinger:
On behalf of the City of Raleigh, AECOM is submitting a Pre -Construction Notification
(PCN) application for their Walnut Creek Greenway project for your review and
approval. In accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344), we
are requesting authorization for a Department of the Army Nationwide Permit #42 to
disturbed 0.08 acres of Water of the United States (WOUS) for the development of
this project.
The City of Raleigh proposes to construct a segment of the Walnut Creek Greenway,
which will connect from the existing Walnut Creek Greenway at Trailwood Drive to
NCSU Centennial Campus in Raleigh. This trail segment is approximately 1/4 mile in
length. The trail will include one bridge crossing of a perennial stream, Bushy Creek.
The purpose of the project is to connect two existing portions of the Walnut Creek
Greenway. The new connection will allow pedestrian traffic to avoid walking along a
busy roadway (Advent Ferry Road) using a narrow, dilapidated sidewalk.
An agent authorization letter is attached. If you should have any questions regarding
the enclosed information or would like to schedule a site meeting please contact me at
[e-mail] or [phone].
Sincerely,
AECOM Technical Services, Inc.
't.
Charles Benton, PWS
Natural Resources Department Manager
cc: Kris Nikfar, AICP, City of Raleigh
Brian Alexander, AECOM
Ms. Karen Higgins, NCDWR

A=COM
AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
The undersigned Client, City of Raleigh, does hereby appoint AECOM Technical Services of North
Carolina Inc., hereinafter referred to as AECOM, as his, her, or it's agent for the purpose of petitioning
the appropriate local, state, and federal environmental regulatory agencies (US Army Corps of Engineers,
NC Division of Water Quality, local municipalities, etc.) for: a) review and approval of the jurisdictional
boundaries of onsite jurisdictional areas (wetlands, streams, riparian buffers, etc.) and/or; b) preparation
and submittal of appropriate environmental permit applications/requests for the City of Raleigh Walnut
Creek Greenway Trail ro'ect extending from Trailwood Drive to Walnut Creek Greenway, South
of Avent Ferry Road, Raleigh, Wake County (NCDOT T.I.P. # C-5604-OC) (C.O.R. Project #274-
PR-W alnutC reekGreenway-080119).
The Client does hereby authorize that said agent has the authority to do the following acts on
behalf of the owner:
1) To submit appropriate requests/applications and the required supplemental materials;
2) To attend meetings to give representation on behalf of the Client.
3) To authorize access to subject property for the purpose of environmental review by
appropriate regulatory agencies.
This authorization shall continue in effect until completion of the contracted task or termination
by the Client.
Agent's Name, Address, & Telephone: Date:
AECOM Technical Services of North
Carolina, Inc.
701 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 475
Raleigh, NC 27607
Tele. [phone]
Signature of Client:
6-7-19_
(Entity)
Kris Nikfar CIP Project Manager
(Name — Print) (Title)
ignature)
222 W Hargett St
(Mailing Address)
Raleigh, NC 27601
(City, State, Zip)
Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

ae'o� wA rEgQ�
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 42 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑X Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑X Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑X Yes ❑ No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 In
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Walnut Creek Greenway
2b.
County:
Wake
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Raleigh
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
T.I.P. # C-5604-OC
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
See Attachment A - Supporting Documentation - Section A
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
3e.
City, state, zip:
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify: City of Raleigh
4b.
Name:
Kris Nikfar, AICP
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Parks, Recreation and Cultural Resources Department
4d.
Street address:
222 West Hargett Street
4e.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC, 27606
4f.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
4g.
Fax no.:
[phone]
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Charles Benton
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
AECOM
5c.
Street address:
1600 Perimeter Park Drive, STE 400
5d.
City, state, zip:
Morrisville, NC 27607
5e.
Telephone no.:
919-461-1431
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
See attached documentation
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.769416 Longitude: 78.689797
1 c.
Property size:
4.5 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Walnut Creek
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
See 132b: Table 1 in supporting documentation
2c.
River basin:
Neuse
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
See B3 in supporting documentation
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
See B3 in supporting documetation
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
See B3 in supporting documentation
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
El Preliminary El Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company: AECOM
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
AECOM field delineated the project study area on June 23, 2017. The PJD request package is included in Attachment B
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑X Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fill
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.02
W2 P
Fill
Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh
No
Corps
0.06
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.08
2h. Comments:
See attached WOUS Impact Plans
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 T
Stabilization
Bushy Creek
PER
Corps
10
S2 -
Choose one
S3 -
Choose one
S4 -
Choose one
-
S5 -
Choose one
S6 -
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
10
3i. Comments:
Impact is riprap placed on the left bank of the stream at the bridge bent. The riprap would be placed below the top -of -bank, but above the OHWM.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
O2
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑X Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number—
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
131 P
Greenway Trail
Walnut Creek
No
0
2,648
B2 P
Pedestrian Bridge
Bushy Creek
No
608
423
B3
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments: Project is a greenway trail that is an allowable use under the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules.
Page 5 of 10

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
See D1 in supporting Documentation
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
See D1 in supporting documentation
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b.
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b.
Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c.
Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments: Project is a greenway trail that is an allowable use under the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules.
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑X Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
See
E in supporting documentation
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
100 %
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
Project is a 10' wide asphalt, greenway trail and has been determined to be de minimis in aiding in increased stormwater runoff.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑X Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑X Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑X No
letter.) Project was documented under a Categorical Exclusion (see attached)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
El Yes ❑X No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Project is a greenway trail. No future impacts are anticipated to result from the construction of this project.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A- the greenway will not generate any wastewater that will need to be treated.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
0 Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑X Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS IPaC. On July 16, 2018, Gary Jordan of the USFWS Raleigh Ecological Services Office stated that the USFWS had no specific concerns or
comments for this project.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes 0 No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/resource/map/essential-fish-habitat-mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
A check of site files housed at the OSA and on the online GIS system maintained by the NCSHPO
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑X Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
This project has received a CLOMR for the pedestrian bridge crossing.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA mapping - https://msc.fema.gov/portal
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.
Page 10 of 10

Attachment A

Page intentionally blank
Inserted for double sided printing

A.3 Owner Information
Parcel 793256213
SURE & STEADFAST PROP LTD PTNRP
1201 BUCK JONES RD, RALEIGH NC 27606-3326
Deed Book/Page 008494/01585
Parcel 793250141
ELEANOR N AURAND RVCBLE LVNG TRUST AURAND, THOMAS J
TRUSTEE 2625 EAGLE VALLEY DR, WOODBURY MN 55129-4213
Deed Book/Page
Parcel 793252278
CITY OF RALEIGH 222 W HARGETT ST, RALEIGH NC 27601-1316
Deed Book/Page 008438/01723
B. Project Information and General Project History
B.2.b Water Quality Classification
Table 1. Water Qualitv Classification of Named Streams within the Project Vicini
SA Walnut Creek 27-34-(1.7) C;NSW
SB Bushy Creek 27-34-3 C;NSW
B.3 Project Description
The City of Raleigh is proposing to construct an approximately 700 foot extension of the Walnut
Creek Greenway trail which is a fifteen -mile -long trail east -west off -road transportation network.
The project will include a 10 foot wide asphalt path and a pedestrian bridge over Bushy Creek.
Standard construction equipment will be used for the project. Construction of the bridge will be
from the top of the bank, and no equipment will be located within the stream channel. See the
attached Walnut Creek Greenway WOUS Impact Plans.
The project is located Northwest of Lake Raleigh and just East from the intersection of Avent
Ferry Rd. and Trailwood Dr. in Raleigh North Carolina. The immediate area consists of
residential (R-10) zoned hardwood forest surrounded by urban housing and commercial
businesses. The project site is primarily flat land consisting of silty clay loam soils. The site
consists of a mixed pine hardwood forest containing red maple, sweet gum, and loblolly pine.
The understory consists of green ash, willow oak, and water oak saplings and a Japanese stilt
grass, Chinese privet, and giant cane herbaceous layer. An existing sanitary sewer line is located
adjacent to the proposed greenway trail.

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
D.1 Avoidance and Minimization
Throughout the project development and preliminary engineering design process, efforts have
been made to avoid and minimize impacts to wetlands and streams. To minimize impacts to
wetlands and streams, the trail's path parallels Walnut Creek at the narrowest section of the
wetland (WA). The temporary staging area was positioned to the West of the wetland (WA)
causing no direct disturbance.
To minimize stream impacts, a bridge will be constructed over Bushy Creek maintaining natural
water flow of the stream. All work will be conducted from the top of the bank. For stabilization,
approximately 10 feet of riprap would be place below the top -of -bank, but above the ordinary
high water mark (OHWM), on the left bank of Bushy Creek near the bent of the pedestrian
bridge.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Roy COOPER
GOVERNOR
August 24, 2018
Ms. Kris Morley-Nikfar
City of Raleigh
P. O. Box 590
Raleigh, NC 27602
SUBJECT: Environmental Document
City of Raleigh, Wake County
Project: C-5604 OC; WBS Element: 43714.2.7; 43714.3.7
Federal -Aid No: CMAQ-0520(058)
Project Name: Walnut Creek Greenway
Dear Ms. Morley-Nikfar:
JAMES H. TROGDON, III
SECRETARY
Please find enclosed, for your file, a Categorical Exclusion (CE) Form, which has been approved
by NCDOT. This form will serve as your environmental document for the above referenced
project.
This document is only valid as long as the following conditions are met:
- No change in the location of the project
- No actual or potential environmental changes (human or natural) have been identified.
- The project area of influence has not been listed in or become eligible to be listed in the
National Register of Historic Places.
If at any time prior to receiving Construction Authorization from FHWA the above conditions
change, you must notify me immediately.
If I may be of additional assistance, please call me at [e-mail].
Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM MGMT
1595 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NC 27699-1595
Sin erely,
heila Gibbs
Transportation Program Consultant
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968
Website: www.nedot.gov
Location:
1020 BIRCH RIDGE DRIVE
RALEIGH, NC 27610

Project
Location
Walnut Creek
Greenway Project
Raleigh, NC
Legend
Q Study Area
NC NHP Natural Areas
Municipal Boundaries
Approximate Project
Coordinates:
35.769437
-78.689812
N
10009::= Miles
0 0.25 0.5
Iq4w
= Wake County
Upper Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201
Figure 1
Project Vicinity
1-1—
NA0UNcSIa --
This mep Is for reference on

NWESa,
LN MW 6NCK ACCESS TO D,0'CAHE� �
LGEARIND MU IS AUO ED IN BZI —
AV fJM/Bft'MD IS PExYIREQ r 1'
N
--FER%
__� -i�'ST �—
� ----_ _
ROID
T-�vmP-.....•�—_
_
S N
W
•�
2REPLACE AIL DAMAGED ETISTIAG
SNYriA AMD aae AND GUITEA \ ! _ i .zrr.o Y 4
UPON CDYPLET.1'YI.
'�j�l 2 yr J
/
I
�,
KKKKKK
<D
s
w
i 0 Weu 9G
'
E z
iCiC
ISE DETAIL SHEET
a
mt, elnfn
-" +
wr zr69� _
' MAI��gg,LIS5 p519 /ErJ¢0 pll9 HrlSq p5b grJlBp pL9 BrgBpp , .
.tif•V� B.iCENArI G• ISIT S6BrNll G•YWWfWI G- SBLYCPSr[rl G• lSWOJf
n r -
For !r N9e D • «B D • 9av D • S MB D • I—
egg+ee
a LTR
r
ND I
'L- A 6/I
Yr
-, Ht
• 7
y
;tYJ3si
O
--
i6'
o
En.sw ..z
Ee
tt
Ef - zea]r
r- > E - 1lA.x2
�'.
p
El - tB/P(
n IS
290
`��
p- rJ.ADJ P(#q]SEJ LRA0.•
� • �
Pr. rSrJ?LO
E[
'-' i
I
xer
1.
] r-
.
IRnr+Aw1/
_ _
--..
uPAcr wu, ruPacr wcz
rP Nr
e OiS 51e. 1509 .
fuM
� ExrS rx44PLx0 Bi
\
\S_�..
• a0/
/ EOO ePPvgP�
-L99 Se♦EE y�5\e0
E 0 PO0
___.__._._. Srn. 6 16 r
G � r�,9C`u1'"e °Y
�
�'�plvr
Lfl
REVISIMM
�
_..
..
...
70
t I
4([] o
e
IOa00 10.30 10.60 10.90 I1.I0
11.50 11.80 1ta10 It.AO 11.]0 1l.00 10i00 13." 10.90 tx-20 1...
1—. 1..10 15 0 15•10 16.00 16.00
16. 60 16.90 1].30 1I.50
wwr. ru.

290
285
280
FILL— ,
--_—EL. 283=J —_
HORIZONTAL CURVE DATA -L-
PI STA.15.3T.82 PI STA 17-28.02
A=50. 24'02.V(LT) A=33. N'03A'N.TI
0 = ST• 144A 0 T6. 23'39.T•
L = 8T.9T L = H3.20'
T = ATA6' T = 2232'
R a 100.00' R = T5.00'
r
I -F-- 1 1
16-50 I7•00
FIX EXP. f!
PPE -MANUFACTURED R.
PEDESTRIAN STEEL El
TRUSS BRIDGE
_/r
STEEL H12k53 PILES `EL.2T9s EL.2T9t CLASS I J
(TYP.) RIP RAP
ttP.l
TGP a
END RENT I RAtK END RENT 2
SECTION ALONG C OF BRIDGE
APPROACH RAILING ITVPJ
—TRAIL SN6ACE
EXISTING GROUND
-L- PROFILE DATA
STATION
ELEVATION
GRADE IN
GRADE OUT
IS•9<.95
28T32
•MT8A
�­0000
16.01.95
28T.H2
i2.0000
0.0000
16.75.11
28T.42
0.0000
-2.0000
I6.85.11
28T.22
-2.0000
-6.9515

Page intentionally blank
Inserted for double sided printing

Attachment B

Page intentionally blank
Inserted for double sided printing

Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Anny Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Carps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http:l{www.saw.usace. army.mil/MissionslRegglatoKyPernutProgram/Contact/CouptyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CMUILOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number. [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
R LMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOTfUSACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

A.
B.
C.
Jurisdictional Determination Request
PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Avent Ferry Road at Trailwood Drive
City, State:
County:
Raleigh, NC
Wake Coun
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): See Property Owners List
REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Naive: Charles Benton, PWS (AECOM)
Mailing Address: 1600 Perimeter Park Drive, STE 400,
Morrisville, NC 27560
Telephone Number: 919-461-1431
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑— I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: See attached Property Owners List
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
- Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed. County GIS/Parcei/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. 1, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Kris Nikfar, AICP
Print Name
Capacity: v'❑ Owner ❑ Authorized Agent'
9-23-20119
Date _
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
X❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my pernut application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOTILJSACE protocols, skip to Part E.
' If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
} Must provide agent authorization forin/letter sided by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select one)
❑� I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Deterinination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United.
States are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02 ).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional inforination
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
❑v Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
Size of Property or Review Area 4•5 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
35.769416
Longitude:-78.689797
❑— A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation leaps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).'
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:.
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
❑v Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http:llwww.saw.usace.arnW.inil/Missions/Re i� lato;]-Pennit-
Prograny Yuri sdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑ Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
Vicinity Map
❑v Aerial Photograph
USES Topographic Map
❑ Soil Survey Map
❑� other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
❑✓ Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
1-1 Other Assessment Forms
e Nvww.saw.usace.army.millPortals/59/docs/regulatoryfregdoes/JDIRGL_08-02_App A Prelim_ JD_ Form_fillable.pdf
' Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions.Regulatory-Permit-Prograin/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your naive and property location where federaljurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), whichwill be made available to the public on the District's w ebsite
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission ofrequested information is voluntary, however, if information is not provided, the
request for anAJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Ch eies@e mn,PWS AECOM 16- -,rk —..1.4 0. A1.-- M V1 4Appb--agent; Cn, dF "h A3
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: Nc County/parish/borough: Wake City: Raleigh
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.769416 Long.:-78.689797
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody:
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION..
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
SA
35.769100
-78.690018
550 ft
non -wetland waters
Section 404
SB
35.769575
-78.689301
32 j ft
non -wetland waters
Section 404
W,Ai,
35.769510
-78.689887
0.50 ac
Wetland
Section 404
WA
35.769331
-78.689755
0.22 ac
wetland
Section, 404
WB
35.770025
-78.688562
0.0005 ac
Wetland
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate..
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a. PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
❑■ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:See attached figures
❑■ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requester.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑■ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name
7.5' Raleigh West, NC 2016
❑- Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Web Soil Survey, 2017
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is:
❑■ Photographs: 0 Aerial (Name & Date):
or
(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
0 Other (Name & Date): Field photos from June 23, 2017
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
9-23-19
Signature anu sate
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Page intentionally blank
Inserted for double sided printing

Project
Location
Walnut Creek
Greenway Project
Raleigh, NC
Legend
Q Study Area
NC NHP Natural Areas
Municipal Boundaries
Approximate Project
Coordinates:
35.769437
-78.689812
N
10009::= Miles
0 0.25 0.5
Iq4w
= Wake County
Upper Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201
Figure 1
Project Vicinity
1-1—
NA0UNcSIa --
This mep Is for reference on

Ui
Walnut Creek
Greenway Project
Raleigh, NC
Legend
Q Study Area
Source: USGS 7.5' Topo
Quad for Raleigh West, INC 2016
N
Feet {
0 125 250
-�24w
- Wake County
Upper Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201
Figure 2
USGS Topo Quad

}
rR� .�. � t 19J'•
oo
i• F.��` � �'k' y, I �i. -b ,fir` ;' ti
Walnut Creek
Greenway Project
Raleigh, NC
Legend
FD Study Area
MMMMK::= Feet {
0 50 100
c9ow
- Wake County
Upper Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201
Figure 3
Orthoinnagery

•
I I.G.
/�,/ - ��
AAL
PMM me u�m
mm
�D
TO mw
/?.
tum
C'Gt6J WAM.MomiPIM
_ 'EtaIM 6
•�.M,
P .wm

�r+tirl5-13
yt
P ep\
Y
p
Y
o
0 �
A
r
o �+
v ;
/,.• o I01
r I
O b
i0
� e
Walnut Creek
Greenway Project
Raleigh, NC
Legend
Q Study Area
■ 1% Annual Chance Flood
Hazartl
■ Regulatory Floodway
Special Floodway
Area of Undetermined Flood
Hazard
■ 0.2%Andual Chance Flood
Hazard
Future Conditions 1%Annual
Chance Flood Hazard
i Area with Reduced Risk Due
to Levee
Source: National Flood
Hazard Layer 2017 J
Feet {
0 125 250
`4w
- Wake County
Upper Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201
Figure 5
FEMA Flood Zones
noea Nc sarecia�e

Page intentionally blank
Inserted for double sided printing

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Walnut Creek Greenway City/County: Raleigh, NC Sampling Date: 6/23/2017
Applicant/Owner: City of Raleigh State: NC Sampling Point: WA/WB-up
Investigator(s): P. Gerlach/ AECOM Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P MLRA 136 Lot: 35.769688 Long:-78.688339 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: WoA, Wehadkee and Bibb soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes " No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Upland pair for wetlands WA and WB on floodplain of Walnut Creek, in between the two wetlands.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (810)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (1133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
_ Iron Deposits (85)
x Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (89)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No x
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:WA/WB-up
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Green Ash
50
Yes
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 (A)
2. Acer rubrum, Red Maple
30
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3, Betula nigra, River Birch
10
No
FACW
Species Across All Strata: 11 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 81.8% (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
90 = Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover:
45 20%of total cover:
18
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: a
FACW species 75 x 2 = 150
1. Carpinus caroliniana, American Hornbeam
10
Yes
FAC
FAC species 125 x 3 = 375
2. Acer rubrum, Red Maple
5
Yes
FAC
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3.
UPL species 30 x 5 = 150
4.
Column Totals: 230 (A) 675 (B)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index = B!A = 2.93
15
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
7.5 20% of total cover:
3
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
x 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1, Ligustrum sinense, Chinese Privet
30
Yes
FACU
x 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Green Ash
10
Yes
FACW
_ 4 • Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3.
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6•
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
40
= Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover:
20 20% of total cover:
8
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. Microstegium vimineum, Japanese Stilt Grass
60
Yes
FAC
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. Vinca major, Bigleaf Periwinkle
20
Yes
UPL
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3. Arundinaria gigantea, Giant Cane
5
No
FACW
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4
5.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6
approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height.
7.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
8
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
9.
ft (1 m) in height.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
11.
85 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 42.5
20% of total cover:
17
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Vitis rotundifolia, Muscadine
10
Yes
FAC
2. Toxicodendron radicans, Eastern Poison Ivy
5
Yes
FAC
3. Smilax rotundifolia, Horsebrier
5
Yes
FAC
4.
5'
Hydrophytic
20
= Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover: 10
20% of total cover:
4
Present? Yes x No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WA/wB-up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvae Loc Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 3/4 100% Silty loam
2-12 10YR 4/6 100% Silty loam
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox(S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No x
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

Page intentionally blank
Inserted for double sided printing

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Walnut Creek Greenway City/County: Raleigh, NC Sampling Date: 6/23/2017
Applicant/Owner: City of Raleigh State: NC Sampling Point: WA -wet
Investigator(s): P. Gerlach/ AECOM Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P MLRA 136 Lot: 35.769367 Long:-78.690376 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: WoA, Wehadkee and Bibb soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: PFO
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No x (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes x No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
Forested wetland on floodplain at confluence of Walnut Creek and Bushy Creek. Wetland is bounded to the north by the roadway
embankment of Avent Ferry Rd. A sewer easment transects the wetland, dominated by emergent vegetation, including Polygonum
pensylvanicum (65%), Microstegium vimineum (10%), Peltandra virginica (5%), Saururus cernuus (5%), Boahmeria cylindrica (5%), and Carex
lurida (5%).
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (810)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
x Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (1133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
_ Iron Deposits (85)
x Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
x Water -Stained Leaves (89)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
x FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:WA-wet
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Acer rubrum, Red Maple
30
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 12 (A)
2. Liquidambar stvraciflua, Sweet -Gum
25
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3• Pinus taeda, Loblolly Pine
20
Yes
FAC
Species Across All Strata: 13 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 92.3% (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
75 = Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover:
37.5 20%of total cover:
15
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
FACW species 10 x 2 = 20
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Green Ash
5
Yes
FACW
FAC species 115 x 3 = 345
2. Quercus phellos, Willow Oak
5
Yes
FAC
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3. Quercus nigra, Water Oak
5
Yes
FAC
UPL species 5 x 5 = 25
4.
Column Totals: 130 (A) 390 (B)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index = B!A = 3.00
15
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
7.5 20% of total cover:
3
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
x 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1, Acer rubrum, Red Maple
5
Yes
FAC
x 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
2. Acer negundo, Ash -Leaf Maple
5
Yes
FAC
_ 4 • Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3.
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
10
= Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover:
5 20% of total cover:
2
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. Microstegium vimineum, Japanese Stilt Grass
10
Yes
FAC
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. Ligustrum sinense, Chinese Privet
5
Yes
FACU
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3. Arundinaria gigantea, Giant Cane
5
Yes
FACW
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4
5. Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6 approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height.
7• Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
13 herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
9. ft (1 m) in height.
10.
11. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
20 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Toxicodendron radicans, Eastern Poison Ivy 5 Yes FAC
2. Smilax rotundifolia, Horsebrier 5 Yes FAC
4.
5 Hydrophytic
10 = Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Present? Yes x No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
PEM portion with herbaceous layer dominated by Polygonum pensylvanicum (65%), Microstegium vimineum (10%), Peltandra virginica (5%), Saururus cernuus
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WA -wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvae Loc Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 3/2 90% 5YR 5/8 10% C PL Silty clay loam
4-12 10YR 4/2 50% 7.5YR 4/6 50% C PL Silty clay loam
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox(S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
x Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

Page intentionally blank
Inserted for double sided printing

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Walnut Creek Greenway City/County: Raleigh, NC Sampling Date: 6/23/2017
Applicant/Owner: City of Raleigh State: NC Sampling Point: WB-wet
Investigator(s): P. Gerlach/ AECOM Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P MLRA 136 Lot: 35.769764 Long:-78.688177 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: WoA, Wehadkee and Bibb soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: PFO
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
Forested floodplain wetland located on floodplain of Walnut Creek, in between existing greenway and apartment building.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (810)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (1133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
_ Iron Deposits (85)
x Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
x Water -Stained Leaves (89)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
x FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:WB-wet
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Acer rubrum, Red Maple
50
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
2. Betula nigra, River Birch
30
Yes
FACW
Total Number of Dominant
3, Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Green Ash
15
No
FACW
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
4. Ulmus americana, American Elm
10
No
FACW
Percent of Dominant Species
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 88.9% (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
105 = Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover:
52.5 20%of total cover:
21
OBL species 35 x 1 = 35
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: a
FACW species 75 x 2 = 150
1. Acer rubrum, Red Maple
15
Yes
FAC
FAC species 130 x 3 = 390
2. Carpinus caroliniana, American Hornbeam
15
Yes
FAC
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Green Ash
5
No
FACW
UPL species 10 x 5 = 50
4.
Column Totals: 250 (A) 625 (B)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index = B!A = 2.50
35
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
17.5 20% of total cover:
7
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
x 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1, Ligustrum sinense, Chinese Privet
10
Yes
FACU
x 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
2. Carpinus caroliniana, American Hornbeam
5
Yes
FAC
_ 4 • Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3.
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6•
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
15
= Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover:
7.5 20% of total cover:
3
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. Microstegium vimineum, Japanese Stilt Grass
40
Yes
FAC
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. Saururus cernuus, Lizard's -Tail
30
Yes
OBL
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3. Arundinaria gigantea, Giant Cane
10
No
FACW
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
4. Boehmeria cylindrica, Small -Spike False Nettle
5
No
FACW
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5. Peltandra virginica, Green Arrow -Arum
5
No
OBL
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6
approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height.
7•
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
8
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
9.
ft (1 m) in height.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
11.
90 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
45 20% of total cover:
18
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Toxicodendron radicans, Eastern Poison Ivy
5
Yes
FAC
2.
4.
5' Hydrophytic
5 = Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 2.5 20% of total cover: 1
Present? Yes x No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WB-wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Tvae Loc Texture Remarks
0-10
10YR 4/2
95%
5YR 4/6 5% C PL Silty loam
10-12
10YR 3/2
70%
5YR 4/6 30% C PL Silty loam
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox(S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
x Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

Page intentionally blank
Inserted for double sided printing

Walnut Creek Greenway Property Owners List
Parcel ID Owner Name
793256213 SURE & STEADFAST PROP LTD PTNRP
793250141 ELEANOR N AURAND RVCBLE LVNG TRUST AURAND, THOMAS J
TRUSTEE
793252278 CITY OF RALEIGH
Mailing Address
1201 BUCK JONES RD. RALEIGH NC 27606-3326
2625 EAGLE VALLEY DR, WOODBURY MN 55129-4213
222 W HARGETT ST. RALEIGH NC 27601-1316
Book and Page No.
Deed Book/Page 008494/01585
Deed Book/Page /
Deed Book/Page 008438101723

Page intentionally blank
Inserted for double sided printing

Walnut Creek Greenway
Raleigh, NC
Photo 01. Stream SA (Walnut Creek), looking downstream
Photo 03. Stream SB (Bushy Creek), looking upstream at
Avent Perry Road crossing
Photo 05. Stream SB (Bushy Creek) at confluence with
stream SA (Walnut Creek)
Photo 02. Stream SA (Walnut Creek), looking upstream at
Trailwood Dr crossing
Photo 04. Stream SB (Bushy Creek), looking west, with
wetland WA in the background
Photo 06. Wetland WA, looking west at wetland data point
The City of Raleigh

Walnut Creek Greenway
Raleigh, NC
Photo 07. Wetland WA, looking east at PEM portion in
sewer easement
Photo 09. Upland data point for wetlands WA and WB,
looking south
Photo 08. Wetland WB, looking north at wetland data point
Photo 10. Intersection of sewer easement and existing
greenway next to stream SIB (Bushy Creek), looking
northwest
The City of Raleigh

Walnut Creek Greenway
Flag point locations
WA-01
35.769347
Longitude
-78.690501
WA-02
35.769324
-78.690561
WA-03
35.769259
-78.690458
WA-04
35.769333
-78.690366
WA-05
35.769365
-78.690334
WA-06
35.769436
-78.690202
WA-07
35.769461
-78.690119
WA-08
35.769505
-78.69008
WA-09
35.769434
-78.690089
WA-10
35.769342
-78.690166
WA-11
35.769226
-78.690193
WA-12
35.769185
-78.69013
WA-13
35.769143
-78.690019
WA-14
35.769222
-78.689924
WA-15
35.76924
-78.689805
WA-16
35.769299
-78.689708
WA-17
35.769399
-78.689574
WA-18
35.769451
-78.68942
WA-19
35.769578
-78.689425
WA-20
35.769625
-78.689485
WA-21
35.769724
-78.689564
WA-22
35.769784
-78.689612
WA-23
35.769726
-78.689752
WA-24
35.769631
-78.689897
WA-25
35.769584
-78.689966
WA-26
35.769549
-78.690097
WA-27
35.769491
-78.690098
WA-28
35.769452
-78.690199
WA-29
35.769431
-78.690317
WB-01
35,769668
-78.688193
WB-02
35.76965
-78.688067
WB-03
35.769646
-78.687869
WB-04
35.769646
-78.687748
WB-100
35.770125
-78.688095
WB-101
35.770121
-78.68829
WB-102
35.770077
-78.688517
WB-103
35.77005
-78.688627
WB-104
35.769955
-78.688519
WB-105
35.769915
-78.688497
WB-106
35.76979
Longitude
-78.688358
WB-107
35.769813
-78.688261
WB-108
35.769712
-78.688243
SA-LB-01
35.76833
-78.69079
SA-LB-02
35.76837
-78.69064
SA-LB-03
35.76842
-78.69055
SA-LB-04
35.76851
-78.69055
SA-LB-05
35.76862
-78.69045
SA-LB-06
35.76868
-78.69035
SA-LB-07
35.76878
-78.69028
SA-LB-08
35.76892
-78.69035
SA-LB-09
35.769
-78.69032
SA-LB-I0
35.76904
-78.69022
SA-LB-11
35.76912
-78.69003
SA-LB-12
35.76914
-78.68993
SA-LB-12
35.76915
-78.68983
SA-LB-13
SA-LB-14
SA-LB-15
SA-LB-15A
35.76917
35.76918
35.76911
35.76917
-78.68969
-78.68954
-78.68945
-78.68932
SA-LB-16
35.7692
-78.68924
SB-RB-01
35.76928
-78.68916
SB-RB-02
35.76939
-78.68922
SB-RB-03
35.76949
-78.68932
SB-RB-04
35.76959
-78.68938
SB-RB-05
35.76967
-78.68941
SB-RB-06
35.76979
-78.68947
SB-RB-07
35.76986
-78.68953
SB-LB-100
35.76992
-78.68939
SB-LB-101
35.76986
-78.68938
SB-LB-102
35.76975
-78.68935
SB-LB-103
35.76965
-78.6893
SB-LB-104
35.76954
-78.68924
SB-LB-105
35.76948
-78.68913
SB-LB-106
35.76939
-78.68903
SB-LB-107
35.76934
-78.68906
SB-LB-108
35.76924
-78.68909
SB-LB-109
35.76919
-78.68896
SA-LB-100
35.76926
-78.68885
City of Raleigh Raleigh, North Carolina

Walnut Creek Greenway
Flag point locations
ID
SA-LB-101
-'WLatitude
35.7693
Longitude
-78.68877
SA-LB-102
35.7693
-78.68864
SA-LB-103
35.76929
-78.68858
SA-LB-104
35.76926
-78.68843
SA-LB-105
35.76923
-78.68835
City of Raleigh Raleigh, North Carolina