20191273 Ver 1_Walnut creek PJD package_20190923

Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilminglon Distrid
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via email, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http:llww,,v.saw.usace. army.millMissions/Regulato!yPermitProgrram/Contact /CougtyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: (828) 281-812.0
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
SiTL'NIINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: 910-251-4633
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOTIUSACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Avent Ferry Road at Trailwood Drive
City, State:
County:
Raleigh, NC
Wake Cou
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): See Property Owners List
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Charles Benton. PWS iAECOM
Mailing Address: 1600 Perimeter Park Drive, STE 400,
Morrisville, NC 27560
Telephone Number: 919-461-1431
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION2
Name: See attached Property Owners List
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter..
'- Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION'-4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Print Name
Capacity: ✓❑ Owner ❑Authorized Agent
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my locaVstate authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
i For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
a If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
' Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑� I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved TD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an improved JD for the property identified herein,
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site detennined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
❑v Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
® Size of Property or Review Area 4.5 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
❑✓
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
35.769416
Longitude:-78.689797
❑✓ A legible delineation imp depicting the aquatic resources and the property/rev iew area.
Delineation snaps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).'
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Deteriiunations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
❑— Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland forin needs to be completed for each wetland type)
Please refer to the pidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied neap meets the necessary mapping standards. http:' «r","•.saw.usace.army.iiul,"Missions.'Rezilatory-Peiiiut-
Pro arani- Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination forin
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Forms
® Vicinity Map
® Aerial Photograph
® USGS Topographic Map
❑ Soil Survey Map
❑v other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
1-1 Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.nril/Portals/S9/does/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02 App A Prelim_ JD_ Form_fillable.pdf
8 Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.iiul. Missions/R.egulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department ofJustice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be ma de available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your naive and property location where federal j urisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approvedjurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary, however, if information is not provided, the
request for anAJD cannot be evaluated nor can anAJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Ch —Bm mn,—. —.. I —Pam —Park dri U.—.Mane .N 2769 4AWIicsrt�Cky of d 1.l h
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Wake City: Raleigh
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.769416 Long.:-78.689797
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody:
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION,
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
SA
35.769100
-78.690018
550ft
non -wetland waters
Section 404
SB
35.769575
-78.689301
327ft
non -wetland waters
Section 404
WA
35.769510
-78.689887
0.50 ac
wetland
Section 404
A
35.769331
-78.689755
0.22 ac
wetland
Section 404
Wg
35.770025
-78.688562
0.0005 ac
wetland
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved J❑ (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
❑■ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requester:
Map:See attached figures
❑■ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheetsldelineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑■
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 7.5' Raleigh West, NC 2016
❑- Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Web Soil Survey, 2017
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMAIFIRM maps:
El
0
100-year Floodplain Elevation is:
Photographs: 0 Aerial (Name & Date):
or
.(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑■ Other (Name & Date): Field photos from June 23, 2017
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
1 Districts may establish tirneframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Page intentionally blank
Inserted for double sided printing

rCary
a District Dr
-- Wade Ave
CO
r� P
Westchase Blvd ix
G U ' aD
j — a � it
�
Chapel Hill Rd \ :� �� m
Nllls `o
in borough St
1
Cary \ Lake
L
r
Q
a
@
U
to
n
0
a
I Cc -
Johnson
Park
o
pr o
v N
E
cLLcP
Tanager',,
a
o_
- Pir•.tnu
e
I \
Project
Location
U Q
m
Lake Raleigh
o Hardwo&d
g Forest
3
ypulm.�-�
o Ll� /'
Gap�t�
St
c
_
o
m in
3
3 c
p
0
0 0
00
:JGarne
ocO
cM! Tryon Rdr
enton St
Bem Ave
Ot, RA4',
U �y
y
CARS
Walnut Creek
Greenway Project
Raleigh, NC
Legend
Q Study Area
NC N H P Natural Areas
Municipal Boundaries
Approximate Project
Coordinates:
35.769437
-78.689812
N
Miles
0 0.25 0.5
f
Wake County
Upper Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201
Figure 1
Project Vicinity
June 2017
NAD83 NC StatePlane
This map is for reference only

Pier
Will
ode
a�
mm
L
�O
o �
Walnut Creek
Greenway Project
Raleigh, NC
Legend
0 Study Area
Source: USGS 7.5' Topo
Quad for Raleigh West, NC 2016
N
Feet
0 125 250
Y
- Wake County
Upper Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201
Figure 2
USGS Topo Quad
June 2017
NAD83 NC StatePlane
This map is for reference only

01-- RA4
U �y
•
�0 f C :AR0
Walnut Creek
Greenway Project
Raleigh, NC
Legend
Study Area
N
Feet
0 50 100
- Wake County
Upper Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201
Figure 3
Orthoimagery
June 2017
NAD83 NC StatePlane
This map is for reference only

01-- RA4
U �y
•
�0 f C :AR0
Walnut Creek
Greenway Project
Raleigh, NC
Legend
Study Area
Flagpoints
Perennial Stream
Wetland
PEM
® PFO
N
Feet
0 50 100
- Wake County
Upper Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201
Figure 4
Jurisdictional
Features
June 2017
NAD83 NC StatePlane
This map is for reference only

�` �*
01
00
�®
01
of xAt�Jc�
o.�
Walnut Creek
Greenway Project
Raleigh, NC
Legend
Q Study Area
® 1%Annual Chance Flood
Hazard
® Regulatory Floodway
Special Floodway
Area of Undetermined Flood
Hazard
0.2% Annual Chance Flood
Hazard
Future Conditions 1%Annual
Chance Flood Hazard
F Area with Reduced Risk Due
to Levee
Source: National Flood
Hazard Layer 2017
N
Feet
0 125 250
- Wake County
Upper Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201
Figure 5
FEMA Flood Zones
June 2017
NAD83 NC StatePlane
This map is for reference only

Page intentionally blank
Inserted for double sided printing

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Walnut Creek Greenway City/County: Raleigh, NC Sampling Date: 6/23/2017
Applicant/Owner: City of Raleigh State: NC Sampling Point: WA/WB-up
Investigator(s): P. Gerlach/ AECOM Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P MLRA 136 Lat: 35.769688 Long:-78.688339 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: WoA, Wehadkee and Bibb soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded N WI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Upland pair for wetlands WA and WB on floodplain of Walnut Creek, in between the two wetlands.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (1133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (1139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:WA/WB-up
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Green Ash
50
Yes
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 (A)
2. Acer rubrum, Red Maple
30
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3, Betula nigra, River Birch
10
No
FACW
Species Across All Strata: 11 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 81.8% (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
90 = Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover:
45 20% of total cover:
18
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: }
FACW species 75 x 2 = 150
1. Carpinus caroliniana, American Hornbeam
10
Yes
FAC
FAG species 125 x 3 = 375
2. Acer rubrum, Red Maple
5
Yes
FAC
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3'
UPL species 30 x 5 = 150
4'
Column Totals: 230 (A) 675 (B)
5.
6.
Prevalence index = B/A = 2.93
15
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
7.5 20% of total cover:
3
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
x 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1. Ligustrum sinense, Chinese Privet
30
Yes
FACU
x 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Green Ash
10
Yes
FACW
- 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3.
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6•
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
40
= Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover:
20 20% of total cover:
8
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. Microstegium vimineum, Japanese Stilt Grass
60
Yes
FAC
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. Vinca major, Bigleaf Periwinkle
20
Yes
UPL
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3. Arundinaria gigantea, Giant Cane
5
No
FACW
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4
5.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7•
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
8
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
9.
ft (1 m) in height.
10.
11.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
85 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 42.5 20% of total cover: 17
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Vitis rotundifolia, Muscadine 10 Yes FAC
2. Toxicodendron radicans, Eastern Poison Ivy 5 Yes FAC
3. Smilax rotundifolia, Horsebrier 5 Yes FAC
4.
5' Hydrophytic
20 = Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4 Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WA/wB-up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 3/4 100% Silty loam
2-12 10YR 4/6 100% Silty loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils'
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
} _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (Fig) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No x
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

Page intentionally blank
Inserted for double sided printing

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Walnut Creek Greenway City/County: Raleigh, NC Sampling Date: 6/23/2017
Applicant/Owner: City of Raleigh State: NC Sampling Point: WA -wet
Investigator(s): P. Gerlach/ AECOM Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P MLRA 136 Lat: 35.769367 Long:-78.690376 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: WoA, Wehadkee and Bibb soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded N WI classification: PFO
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No x (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes x No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Forested wetland on floodplain at confluence of Walnut Creek and Bushy Creek. Wetland is bounded to the north by the roadway
embankment of Avent Ferry Rd. A sewer easment transects the wetland, dominated by emergent vegetation, including Polygonum
pensylvanicum (65%), Microstegium vimineum (10%), Peltandra virginica (5%), Saururus cernuus (5%), Boahmeria cylindrica (5%), and Carex
lurida (5%).
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
X Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (1133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
x Water -Stained Leaves (1139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:WA-wet
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Acer rubrum, Red Maple
30
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 12 (A)
2. Liquidambar styraciflua, Sweet -Gum
25
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3, Pinus taeda, Loblolly Pine
20
Yes
FAC
Species Across All Strata: 13 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 92.3% (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
75 = Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover:
37.5 20% of total cover:
15
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: }
FACW species 10 x 2 = 20
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Green Ash
5
Yes
FACW
FAG species 115 x 3 = 345
2. Quercus phellos, Willow Oak
5
Yes
FAC
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3. Quercus nigra, Water Oak
5
Yes
FAC
UPL species 5 x 5 = 25
4'
Column Totals: 130 (A) 390 (B)
5.
6.
Prevalence index = BIA = 3.00
15
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
7.5 20% of total cover:
3
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
x 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1. Acer rubrum, Red Maple
5
Yes
FAC
x 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
2. Acer negundo, Ash -Leaf Maple
5
Yes
FAC
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3.
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6•
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
10
= Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover:
5 20% of total cover:
2
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. Microstegium vimineum, Japanese Stilt Grass
10
Yes
FAC
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. Ligustrum sinense, Chinese Privet
5
Yes
FACU
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3. Arundinaria gigantea, Giant Cane
5
Yes
FACW
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4
5. Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6 approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7• Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
8 herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
9. ft (1 m) in height.
10.
11. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
20 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Toxicodendron radicans, Eastern Poison Ivy 5 Yes FAC
2. Smilax rotundifolia, Horsebrier 5 Yes FAC
4.
5' Hydrophytic
10 = Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2 Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
PEM portion with herbaceous layer dominated by Polygonum pensylvanicum (65%), Microstegium vimineum (10%), Peltandra virginica (5%), Saururus cernuus
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WA -wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks
0-4
10YR 3/2
90%
5YR 5/8 10% C PL Silty clay loam
4-12
10YR 4/2
50%
7.5YR 4/6 50% C PL Silty clay loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils'
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
} _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

Page intentionally blank
Inserted for double sided printing

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Walnut Creek Greenway City/County: Raleigh, NC Sampling Date: 6/23/2017
Applicant/Owner: City of Raleigh State: NC Sampling Point: WB-wet
Investigator(s): P. Gerlach/ AECOM Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P MLRA 136 Lat: 35.769764 Long:-78.688177 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: WoA, Wehadkee and Bibb soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded N WI classification: PFO
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Forested floodplain wetland located on floodplain of Walnut Creek, in between existing greenway and apartment building.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (1133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
x Water -Stained Leaves (1139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:WB-wet
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Acer rubrum, Red Maple
50
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
2. Betula nigra, River Birch
30
Yes
FACW
Total Number of Dominant
3, Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Green Ash
15
No
FACW
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
4. Ulmus americana, American Elm
10
No
FACW
Percent of Dominant Species
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 88.9% (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
105 = Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover.
52.5 20% of total cover:
21
OBL species 35 x 1 = 35
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: }
FACW species 75 x 2 = 150
1. Acer rubrum, Red Maple
15
Yes
FAC
FAG species 130 x 3 = 390
2. Carpinus caroliniana, American Hornbeam
15
Yes
FAC
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Green Ash
5
No
FACW
UPL species 10 x 5 = 50
4.
Column Totals: 250 (A) 625 (B)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index = BIA = 2.50
35
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
17.5 20% of total cover:
7
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
x 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1. Ligustrum sinense, Chinese Privet
10
Yes
FACU
x 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
2. Carpinus caroliniana, American Hornbeam
5
Yes
FAC
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3.
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6•
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
15
= Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover:
7.5 20% of total cover:
3
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. Microstegium vimineum, Japanese Stilt Grass
40
Yes
FAC
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. Saururus cernuus, Lizard's -Tail
30
Yes
OBL
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3. Arundinaria gigantea, Giant Cane
10
No
FACW
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
4. Boehmeria cylindrica, Small -Spike False Nettle
5
No
FACW
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5. Peltandra virginica, Green Arrow -Arum
5
No
OBL
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7•
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
8
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
9.
ft (1 m) in height.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
11.
90 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
45 20% of total cover:
18
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Toxicodendron radicans, Eastern Poison Ivy
5
Yes
FAC
2.
4.
5' Hydrophytic
5 = Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 2.5 20% of total cover: 1 Present? Yes x No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point:wB-wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks
0-10
10YR 4/2
95%
5YR 4/6 5% C PL Silty loam
10-12
10YR 3/2
70%
5YR 4/6 30% C PL Silty loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils'
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
} _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

Page intentionally blank
Inserted for double sided printing

Parcel ID
793256213
793250141
793252278
Walnut Creek Greenway Property Owners List
Owner Name
SURE & STEADFAST PROP LTD PTNRP
ELEANOR N AURAND RVCBLE LVNG TRUST AURAND, THOMAS J
TRUSTEE
CN��Le7�:7_1��[ell.l
Mailing Address
1201 BUCK JONES RD, RALEIGH NC 27606-3326
2625 EAGLE VALLEY DR, WOODBURY MN 55129-4213
f 1*4TiTA1.W3H:11a011111111:7_14:1Cell.I0[eiiZ:ii159IR
Book and Page No.
Deed Book/Page 008494101585
Deed Book/Page /
Deed Book/Page 008438101723

Page intentionally blank
Inserted for double sided printing

Walnut Creek Greenway
Raleigh, NC
Photo 01. Stream SA (Walnut Creek), looking downstream
Photo 03. Stream SB (Bushy Creek), looking upstream at
Avent Ferry Road crossing
Photo 05. Stream SB (Bushy Creek) at confluence with
stream SA (Walnut Creek)
Photo 02. Stream SA (Walnut Creek), looking upstream at
Trailwood Dr crossing
Photo 04. Stream SB (Bushy Creek), looking west, with
wetland WA in the background
Photo 06. Wetland WA, looking west at wetland data point
The City of Raleigh

Walnut Creek Greenway
Raleigh, INC
Photo 07. Wetland WA, looking east at PEM portion in
sewer easement
Photo 09. Upland data point for wetlands WA and WB,
looking south
Photo 08. Wetland WB, looking north at wetland data point
Photo 10. Intersection of sewer easement and existing
greenway next to stream SB (Bushy Creek), looking
northwest
The City of Raleigh

Walnut Creek Greenway
Flag point locations
WA-01
35.769347
Longitude
-78.690501
WA-02
35.769324
-78.690561
WA-03
35,769259
-78.690458
WA-04
35.769333
-78.690366
WA-05
35.769365
-78.690334
WA-06
35.769436
-78.690202
WA-07
35.769461
-78.690119
WA-08
35.769505
-78.69008
WA-09
35.769434
-78.690089
WA-10
35.769342
-78.690166
WA-11
35.769226
-78.690193
WA-12
35.769185
-78.69013
WA-13
35,769143
-78.690019
WA-14
35.769222
-78.689924
WA-15
35.76924
-78.689805
WA-16
35.769299
-78.689708
WA-17
WA-18
WA-19
35.769399
35.769451
35.769578
-78.689574
-78.68942
-78.689425
WA-20
35.769625
-78.689485
WA-21
35.769724
-78.689564
WA-22
35.769784
-78.689612
WA-23
35.769726
-78.689752
WA-24
35.769631
-78.689897
WA-25
35.769584
-78.689966
WA-26
35.769549
-78.690097
WA-27
35.769491
-78.690098
WA-28
35.769452
-78.690199
WA-29
35.769431
-78.690317
WB-01
35.769668
-78.688193
WB-02
35.76965
-78.688067
WB-03
35.769646
-78.687869
WB-04
35.769646
-78.687748
WB-100
35.770125
-78.688095
WB-101
35.770121
-78.68829
WB-102
35.770077
-78.688517
WB-103
35.77005
-78.688627
WB-104
35.769955
-78.688519
WB-105
35.769915
-78.688497
ID
Latitude
WB-106
35.76979
-78.688358
WB-107
35.769813
-78.688261
WB-108
35.769712
-78.688243
SA-LB-01
35.76833
-78.69079
SA-LB-02
35.76837
-78.69064
SA-LB-03
35.76842
-78.69055
SA-LB-04
35.76851
-78.69055
SA-LB-05
35.76862
-78.69045
SA-LB-06
35.76868
-78.69035
SA-LB-07
SA-LB-08
SA-LB-09
35.76878
35.76892
35.769
-78.69028
-78.69035
-78.69032
SA-LB-10
35.76904
-78.69022
SA-LB-11
35.76912
-78.69003
SA-LB-12
35.76914
-78.68993
SA-LB-12
35.76915
-78.68983
SA-LB-13
SA-LB-14
SA-LB-15
35.76917
35.76918
35.76911
-78.68969
-78.68954
-78.68945
SA-LB-15A
35.76917
-78.68932
SA-LB-16
35.7692
-78.68924
SB-RB-01
35.76928
-78.68916
SB-RB-02
35.76939
-78.68922
SB-RB-03
35.76949
-78.68932
SB-RB-04
35.76959
-78.68938
SB-RB-05
35.76967
-78.68941
SB-RB-06
35.76979
-78.68947
SB-RB-07
35.76986
-78.68953
SB-LB-100
35.76992
-78.68939
SB-LB-101
35.76986
-78.68938
SB-LB-102
35.76975
-78.68935
SB-LB-103
35.76965
-78.6893
SB-LB-104
35.76954
-78.68924
SB-LB-105
35.76948
-78.68913
SB-LB-106
35.76939
-78.68903
SB-LB-107
35.76934
-78.68906
SB-LB-108
35.76924
-78.68909
SB-LB-109
35.76919
-78.68896
SA-LB-100
35.76926
-78.68885
City of Raleigh Raleigh, North Carolina

Walnut Creek Greenway
Flag point locations
Longitude
SA-LB-101
35.7693
-78.68877
SA-LB-102
35.7693
-78.68864
SA-LB-103
35.76929
-78.68858
SA-LB-104
35.76926
-78.68843
SA-LB-105
35.76923
-78.68835
City of Raleigh Raleigh, North Carolina