HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCS000041_COMPLIANCE_20080617STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCS PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
� 1. /� S,-D&bO tf�
DOC TYPE
IJ FINAL PERMIT
❑ MONITORING REPORTS
0 APPLICATION
COMPLIANCE �p�I
❑ OTHER
DOC DATE
❑ 2,00f� ctg I�
YYYYMMDD
m
Ln
cr-
M
r�
n
n
II
1T
r-i
h
O
C:2
h
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secret Z�,L
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resours
it
Coleen i-I. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
June 17, 2008
CERTIFIED MAIL 70071490 0004 4509 5324
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Ken Golder, President
Clariant Corporation
PO Box 18278
Charlotte, North Carolina 28218
Subject: Notice of Violation — Illegal Discharge
Violation of G.S.143-215.1 and NCS000041
Tracking Number: NOV-2008-DV-0267
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Clariant Mt Holly West Facility
Stormwater Permit Number NCS000041
Gaston County, NC
Dear Mr. Golder:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection report for the
stormwater inspection conducted at the subject facility on June 3, 2008, by Ms. Marcia Allocco
and Ms. Donna Hood of this Office. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the
inspection. Overall, the facility's Stormwater program was well developed and implemented.
However, this report is being issued as a Notice of Violation (NOV) due to the illicit
discharge discovered at Stormwater Outfall 006 during the inspection. This discharge is in
violation of the subject Stormwater Permit and North Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215.1,
as detailed in the Permit and Outfalls section of the enclosed report.
Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A, a civil penalty of not more than twenty-five thousand
dollars ($25,000.00) may be assessed against any person who violates or fails to act in
accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of any permit issued pursuant to G.S.
143-215.1.
Also be advised that G.S. 143-215.6A provides for a civil penalty assessment of not more
than twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000), or twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) per day
when the violation is of a continuing nature, against any person who is required but fails to apply
for or to secure a permit required by G.S. 143-215.1. Penalties may also be assessed for any
damage to the surface waters of the State that may result from the unpermitted discharge.
VANo Carolina
NCDENR )utura!!y
Mooresville Regional Office Division of Water Quality Phone 704-663-1699 Customer Service
Internet: am'-w-mcwaterqualil org, 610 East Center Ave, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Fax 704-663-6040 1-877-623-6748
An Egtjal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper
Mr. Mr. Ken Golder, Clariant Corporation
NOV-2008-DV-0267, Page 2
June l7, 2008
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this Office by July 2, 2008,
addressing the above -noted violations in the enclosed report. In responding to the violations,
please address your comments to the attention of Ms. Allocco. Specifically please provide
information on the following:
• The cause of the illegal discharge which occurred during the compliance inspection
• Measures taken to cease the discharge, remove the illegal discharge, and remediate
the stormwater outfall including waste disposal manifests for contaminated soil
• The specific measures taken to identify the material in the stormwater outfall
including any relevant Material Safety Data Sheets
• Measures taken to prevent future illegal discharges including any reviews/inspections
of systems upstream from the remaining stormwater outfalls on site
• Any notifications made regarding the illegal discharge including whom was notified,
how the notification occurred, and any additional actions taken as a result of those
notifications
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Allocco at (704) 663-1699.
Sincerely,
,--- �/-/ /I i'/_-
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
Mooresville Regional Office
Enclosure
cc: NPS-ACO Unit
Mr. Gil Insley, Clariant Corporation
PO Box 866
625 East Catawba Avenue
Mt Holly, NC 28120
.r
Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCS000041 Effective: 05/12/03 Expiration: 05/31/08 Owner: Clariant Corporation
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Mount Holly West (MHW) Facility
County: Gaston 625 E Catawba Ave
Region: Mooresville
Mount Holly NC 28120
Contact Person: Andre Pollard Title: Phone. •704-822-2519
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
On -site representative Gil Insley Phone: 704-822-2218
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 06/03/2008 Entry Time: 10:35 AM Exit Time: 02:55 PM
Primary Inspector: Marcia Allocco Phone: 704-663-1699
Ext2204
Secondary Inspector(s):
Donna Hood Phone: 704-663-1699 Ext.2193
Reason for Inspection: Complaint Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Stormwater Discharge, Individual
Facility Status: n Compliant ■ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
■ Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1
Permit: NCS000041 Owner -Facility: Clariant Corporation
Inspection pate: 06103/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Complaint
Inspection summary:
Permit and Outfalls (cont.):
The inspection was conducted during dry weather and no discharges were detected at Outfalls 001, 003, 004, and 005
However, an illicit discharge was noted in Outfall 006 during the inspection.
An unknown brown, oily, liquid with yellow foam was noted in the flared outlet of the concrete discharge pipe for this
outfall and in the riprap and earthen sections of the discharge channel. The unknown liquid had mixed with Catawba
River water, which resulted in a brown liquid with trace foam on the surface. The stormwater collection system was traced
immediately upstream where a gate valve had been installed and the contents of the collection system could be easily
viewed, The same unknown liquid was noted in the collection system upstream of the gate valve and sand was placed at
the end of the collection pipe. Pictures of the unknown discharge are contained in last section of this report.
Clariant personnel were instructed to remove the unknown liquid from the stormwater collection system, outfall, and
discharge channel and to take measures to prevent further discharge.
Page: 2
. l
Permit. NCS000041 Owner - Facility: Clariant Corporation
Inspection Date: 06/03/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Complaint
c'tnrmwntar PnIhifinn Provantinn Plan Yes NO NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
Comment: The list of spills on site was current as of the date of the last SPPP review
(December 17, 2007) and included a note to include the January 2008 pre-treatment
spill, which reached a storm drain, when the SPPP is next revised.
All required secondary containment is provided with many of the tank farm containment
areas draining to the chemical sewer and the on -site pre-treatment facility.
The permittee has segregated stormwater on site with a portion flowing to the chemical
sewer onsite and "clean stormwater allowed to discharge through the designated
outfalls along with cooling tower blowdown permitted under NCG500047.
Employee training is conducted annually and includes a detailed written test regarding
the requirements of the stormwater permit.
The Spill Prevention and Response Plan requirements are met through the creation and
implementation of a SPCC plan and included by reference in the SPPP.
Qualitative Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
Comment: The permittee provided records of the semi-annual qualitative monitoring
which was last completed on May 28, 2008, at approximately 11:00 am (pre -fish kill).
Analytical Monitoring
■ n n n
■ n n n
■nnn
■nnn
■ n n n
■ n n n
■nnn
■ n n n
■nnn
■nnn
■nnn
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■nnn
■nnn
■nnn
Yes No NA NE
■nnn
Yes No NA NE
Page: 3
Permit: NCS000041 Owner - Facility: Clariant Corporation
Inspection Date: 06/0312008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
Reason for Visit: Complaint
Comment: The permittee has designated six outfalls (001, 002, 003, 004, 005, and
006) on site that discharge to the Catawba River. A seventh outfall has been
designated but it receives water from the Town of Mt Holly collection system and
discharges the water to the River through Outfall 006. The permittee has the ability to
prevent unwanted discharges through valves on the stormwater outfalls. The permittee
recently installed a gate valve on Outfall 006. A visual inspection was made on all
ouffails except for Outfall 002, which is not currently being used.
Additional information regarding the Permit and Outfalls is contained in the Summary
section of the inspection report.
■nnn
nn■n
Page: 4
it � -��,�,�r�'ti';�,\;, ;+y •' -
Permit: NCS000041 Owner - Facility: Clariant Corporation - Clariant West
Inspection Date: 06/03/08 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit Complaint
Inspection Pictures (cont.)
This picture was taken upstream of
the discharge structure and newly
installed gate valve for Outfall 006.
The picture shows the same
unknown liquid in the stormwater
collection system. Any liquids in this
pipe discharge to Outfall 006_
The picture shows a close-
up of the unknown liquid in
the stormwater collection
system upstream of the gate
valve for Outfall 006.
Page: 7
4
NC Stormwater Questions for Facilities in BIMS
Permit No.:
NCS00004
Facility Name:
Permit Effective:
r7-
Discharges to:
Inspection Date:
Ca � 310ER)
Inspection Type
CEi CSI Complaint Other
Inspector(s):
�rx:.--t �
Agency:
MRO MCWQP
Entry Time:
o 2"�A*_k
Facility Contact (s)
;o
ac
Exit Time
�', }'JP> ffn
Work Days
Facility Status:
Compliant Non -Compliant
Neither
5h .Ic: 41 � �
��ae-��c OfE
Page 1 of 5
Rev. 0, 9/07
NC Stormwater Questions for Facilities in BIMS
ca��k
dU-1-1
U
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes
No
NA
NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
E
❑
❑
❑
Site Plan
1. Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
❑
❑
❑
Facility location in relation to roads and surface waters. Includes: name of receiving stream or name of municipal
storm sewer system, and accurate lat. and long. of point of discharge. This helps the permittee o understand their
location with respect to receiving waters.
2. Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
51❑
Fo
❑
Should cover storage practices, loading and unloading areas, outdoor process areas, dust or particulate generating
or control processes, and waste isposal practices, tc. _ �� p
s�-
eci — Op cc - �i
t
3. Woes'the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and
❑
❑
❑
drainage areas?
Should show
• Location of industrial activities (storage areas, disposal areas, process areas, unloading and loading areas)
• The drainage structures
• Drainage areas for each outfall and activities occurring in the drainage area
• Building locations
• Existing BMPs and impervious surfaces and the % of each drainage area that is impervious
+ For each outfall, a narrative description of the potential pollutants which could be expected to be present in the
stormwater discharge.
This forces permittee to analyze the site with relation to stormwater discharges. It is also a tool for the inspector to
understand if the site has changed over time, i.e. if site map does not match facility they must update their plan.
aLCZ Inoaa- �4� aLrs - n -
4. Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3
❑
❑
❑
years?
Needs to include corrective actions that were taken. The permittee needs to know what the reportable quantities are
for wastewater, oil pollution, and gARA Title III.
�Cu r tic c� p` l l i its up A`o ac.-tQ-, c.:;'& W—U 1 eA--�
5. Have stormwater outfalls been evaluated for the presence of non-stormwater
❑
❑
❑
discharges?
Signature required:
• Corporation - signed by Responsible Corporate Officer or assigned manager
• Partnership or Sole Proprietorship -- General Partner or the Proprietor
+ Municipality, State, Federal, or other public agency - either principal executive officer or ranking elected official
Comments:
v
Page 2 of 5
Rev. 0, 9107
NC Stormwater Questions for Facilities in BiMS
Stormwater Management Plan
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Has the facility evaluated feasible altematives to current practices?
❑
❑
❑
• Provide a review of the technical and economic feasibility of changing the methods of operations and/or
storage practices to eliminate or reduce exposure of materials and processes to stormwater.
• In areas where elimination of exposure is not practical, the stormwater management plan shall document the
feasibility of diverting the stormwater runoff away from areas of potential contamination.
2. Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
❑
❑
❑
• Applies to liquid raw materials, manufactured products, waste materials, or by-products
• Single AST capacity > 660 gallons
• Multiple AS containers in close proximity to each other with a total combined capacity of > 1,320
• If connected to SW conveyance; controlled by manually activated valves or other similar devices? (Closed?)
• Collected water observed for color, foam, outfall staining, visible sheens, and dry weather flow prior to release
• Document individual making observation, description of water, date, and time of release (RR=5 yrs)
3. Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
❑
1 ❑ 1
❑
Narrative description of BMPs to be considered including oil and grease separation, debris control, vegetative filter
strips, infiltration and stormwater detention or retention, where necessary.
• The need for structural BMPs shall be based on the assessment of potential sources to contribute significant
quantities of pollutants to stormwater discharges and data collected through monitoring of stormwater
discharges.
�Ylo�-�� G.�n-F` Cat-.L-Y� 1•Yl.s�-iYL�G
4. Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
ElEl
❑
• Assessment of potential pollutant sources based on materials inventory of the facility
• Facility personnel responsible for implementing the SPRP shall be identified
• Responsible person shall be on -site at all times during facility operations that have the potential to
contaminatg stormwater runoff through spills or exposure of materials associated with the facility operations.
•-�( CJYIT CYI L741l
5. Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping
❑
❑
❑
Plan?
• Document schedules of inspections and maintenance activities of stormwater control systems, plant
equipment and systems
• Inspect material handling areas
• Regular cleaning schedules of these areas
6. Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
V
I ❑
1 ❑
❑
• Provide at a minimum, annual training for all personnel including: proper spill response, cleanup procedures,
preventative maintenance activities for all personnel involved in any of the facility's operations that have
the potential to contaminate stormwater runoff
• Develop training schedule and identify facility personnel responsible for implementing the training
I
ck_2.�
Page 3 of 5
Rev. 0, 9107
NIC Stormwater Questions for Facilities in BiMS
i
Ye
No
NA
NE
7. Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Parties?
V
❑
❑
❑
Identify position responsible for the overall coordination, development, implementation, and evision of the SPPP
8. Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
❑
1 ❑
❑
Have there been any changes to the design, construction, operation, or maintenance of the facility, which would have
a significant effect on the potential for the discharge of pollutants to surface waters? Does plan include changes?
Pica L'k-p� talt�- -
9. Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
❑
❑
❑
• Inspect at a minimum semiannually once in Fall (Sept. -Nov) and once in Spring (Apr -June)
• Inspection and subsequent maintenance activities performed shall be documented
o Record date and time
o individual performing inspection
o Narrative description of the stormwater outfall and plant equipment and systems
• Records should be incorporated into the SPPP
10. Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
❑
❑
❑
Have they done what they said they were going to do and have they documented it. Examples include:
• Monitoring and measurements including sampling data
• Inspections
• Maintenance activities
• Training provided to employees
• Activities to implement BMPs associated with industrial activities including vehicle maintenance. (RR=5 yrs)
Comments:
Qualitative Monitoring
Ye
No
NA
NE
1. Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
N1
❑
❑
❑
Sampling in Spring (April -June) and Fall (September -November)
Color Odor Clarity Floating Solids
Suspended solids Foam Oil Sheen Other indicators
Comment: V
Page 4 of 5 Rev, 0, 9/07
i
NC Stormwater Questions for Facilities in BIMS
Analytical Monitoring
Ye
No
NA
NE
1. Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
❑ -
❑
❑
2. Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance
El
❑
areas?
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls
Ye
No
NA
NE
1. Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
❑
❑
2. Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
❑
❑
❑
❑
3. If the facility has representative outfall status; has it been documented by the
❑
El❑
Division?
4. Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
UL� --" -4A &DLD
rcot.�� rt, , c,Q� L- � OLA in
a
(5c 5L,
�cx�-anca u�.nk �►n bn-�.x� � � l.��r��- �-,-'� �- V--��' "� sh - w h.�.
� s ADC VAC. j)
-wic:1
�` m
=5e�rn r 'fie' �r.�f a�IJL Q� \Jr�-�"�'
f �Je'
•• .yam/A ! L 1 !�1/ �wl _ I1 • 'J� C 1 c
OL
a-2.C-X-�
rr�
9M
Page 5 of 5
Rev. 0, 9107
4 �P��
a �����5� �������
���`^ '���3h�����gdt�����
v� �����a 4�l?�3��eo
�����������a`�����9
j �. u y 'yv � 3 ��
id �N�S�d��� �V
3
+��9. � � �
�����5 ������ ����-���
�� �
�'����'��3��� a�����
����� '5������R��
������a3��� ����
MRO Incident 1 Complaint Report
Investigator:
Received By: .��
Contact Date: a�Q1ce
Date Received: 85(q'q Ce)
Investigated Date:
Time Received: • 3� m
Response Dater
-County: �l
Complaint Type: Y Incident #: (BIMS,`RUST, ETC)
��11
,Z p S 015-70
Investigated? es ❑ no ,
r
Violation? s El no
7yes.
NOV Sent? `❑ no I
Responsible Party:
Complainant:-� c5
Responsible Party Address 1 P one:
Complainant Address 1 Phone:
OAS--ri CZ-44 VJ< t
Nature of Complaint:Ui
t'a cL- lnn�x ur�ck,
Pu
n, j::�'
k - n A��
50-111d �a �
Directions to Site:
-oD S +0 O,�3 , -i" n r
Actions Taken/Comments:
bs/ 3 a, a /�� F.c c�•e.t-+„�. 5� �i1� ,r t,L (7-4 -
To ti„ L-'�e #,r,/ b^cjj (7a 4 ' SI g - g U3) A&
y
Ref rred to:
❑ UST ❑ LQ ❑ AP ❑ SWP ❑ Haz. Waste ❑ Solid Waste ❑ PWS ❑ County HD
Referred on: Referred by:
IWO
.fuckaseegee rd, charlotte - Google Maps
Page 1 of 1
Address Tuckaseegee Rd Get Google Maps on yaw phone
Goy - e. Charlotte, NC Tmctthewood'GMAPS-ma66asa
la 8
PS
http:/lmaps. google.com/maps?i-�&hl=en&geocode=&q=tuckaseegee+rd,+charlotte&sll=... 5/29/2008
Page 1 of 2
f W Kill Field Investigation Form
= ' Rev. 6/D7
a DWQ Fish K>< gat><on Fo
Send To: DWQ Environmental Sciences Section Attn: Mark Hale or Elizabeth Fensin
__.:.. 1621MaUSmamCeter,RalagkNCT699-16a {9 733-W Fax (9]M733-M
e-rna;)
Investiizators:i_: r : EBB.se rtlt:
Investigation Date and Time: May 30, 2008 through June 6, 2008
Manhours Required-.80-90
Investigators:M. Allocco, D. Hood, W. Bell, and MCWQP
Organization:NC DWQ and MCWQP
Regional Office: Mooresville
Address:610 E. Center Ave, Ste 301, Mooresville, NC
Phone:704-663-1699
Reporting Party: Sot Smet, Rowboat Dock &
Address:
Phone:704-663-
3478
Coinvestigators:
Address:
Phone:
Kill Event Location:
Waterbody:Lake Wylie
Station:
Subbasin:
County: Gaston/Mecklenburg County line
Nearest Town/Landmark:Mt Holly at Rt 27 bridge over Lake Wylie
Tributaries or other waters affected:
Latitiude:
Longitude:
Attach map describing area of event and provide coordinates
Complete For Fish Kill and Disease Events
Date Event Began (First reported): May 29, 2008
1 Time: 02:37 PM
At time of investigation, kill event is : in progress ❑ completed:
Area covered by kill: River (miles): 2 miles Lake /Estuary (acres, square miles):
Event Duration: Days: Hours:< 24 hrs
Finthh Sneciec Affected -
Species: Carp
Size Range: 2 lb. to 15 lb. I
Approx Number: 100
In Distress / Dying ❑ Dead ® Decayed ❑ I Percent observed with sores or lesions:
Species: Catfish
I Size Range: 6 inches to 251b
Approx Number: 500
In Distress / Dying ❑ Dead ® Decayed ❑ I Percent observed with sores or lesions:
Species: Bluegill
I Size Range: 3 inches to 6 inches
I Approx Number: 900
In Distress I Dying ❑ Dead ® Decayed ❑ Percent observed with sores or lesions:
Species: Shad
Size Range: 2 inches to 4 inches
Approx Number: 500
In Distress / Dying ❑ Dead ® Decayed ❑
I Percent observed with sores or lesions:
Other Organisms Affected: Brown water snake
Total Finfish Mortality: > 2, 000 1 Total Mortality of Other Organisms:
Fish Disease Observations:
Lesions/Sores ❑ Injuries ❑ Flared Gills ❑ Excessive mucus ❑ Tumors ❑ Visible Parasites ❑
Gasping ❑ Loss of equilibrium ❑ Erratic behavior ❑ Attempts to leave water ❑ LetharU
Convulsions ❑ Other❑ Describe:
General Lesion and Sore Observations:
Size(cm): Location (view diagrams below):
Appearance/ Comments:
%j _
Page 2 of 2
Physical Observations and Water Oualitv Measurements:
Station:Mid Channel upstream of
Station No.:
Time: 5/30/08
Sadler Island
1255
Cloud Cover: 50% Seas: calm Air Tem : low 90s I Preci : 0
Wind Direction:
Wind Speed: I Secchi Depth:
Bottom Depth: 5 feet
Prior Weather (3-4 days): last rain 5/28/08
Outfalls Present: Y ® N ❑ Describe: several outfalls from NPDES facilities in the area
Spills in area ? Y ❑ N ❑ Describe:
Other Activity.
Depth
(meters)
Dissolved
Oxygen(mg/L)
%
Saturation
Surface
7.78
1.0
2.0
7.01
3.0
4.0
5.0
pH I Temperature I Conductivity Salinity
(oCl 1 (PPO
7.23 124.17 1 106
7.14 122.90 1 114
Algal Bloom: Fill out this section if bloom occurs in conjunction with fish kill or disease. If bloom occurs without
affected fish, fill out Algal Bloom Report form only and send to Division of Water Quality ESS Attn: Ecosystems Unit Staff"
Visual characteristics:
U Discolored Water Describe:
Flecks, ❑ Balls, ❑Filaments
❑ Surface Film
Other
[Phytoplankton Samples Sent to ESS? Yes L] NoL] Phytoplankton Sample Quantity: One 500ml
polyethylene container preserved with 2-3 ml Lugols solution and one 500m1 polyethylene container unpreserved Send to
DWQ Laboratory Section marked Attn: Ecosystem Unit Staff.
Biological and Chemical Samnles Collected During Investigation:
Fish (Describe):
Iced, Preserved ?
Station:
Sample No.:
Contact for Results:
Phone:
Algae/Plants (Describe):
Iced, Preserved ?
Station:
Sample No.:
Contact for Results:
Phone:
Other (Describe):
Iced, Preserved ?
Station:
Sample No.:
Contact for Results:
Phone:
Chemical Samples: Metals® Pesticides❑ Nutrients❑ Chlor A❑ Other❑ Describe:
Station: =
Sample No.:
Contact for Results: David Caldwell, MCWQP
I Phone: 704-336-5452
Photographs and /or videos taken? YL9 NU
Where on file? Name:DWQ Mooresville/MCWQP Phone: 704-663-1699
4
Additional Comments, Observations, Conclusions, etc. (attach additional sheet if necessary):
Fish Kill was originally called in by Rowboat Dock and Dredge which was building a dock at the end of Riverfront
Pkwy in.Mt Holly. This location is 2 miles downstream from lighest point where fish were noted just downstream from
Outfall 006 at Clariant West Facility in Mt Holly. A specific count of fish and #/species was not done. Approx. 2,000
fish (carp, catfish, shad, bluegill, bass, crappie and one snake) were observed dead and bloated on 5/30/08. Live fish
were noted on 5/30/08 so kill most likely occurred night of 5/28 and morning of 5/29. Water quality readings on 5/30/08
were within normal levels. From stormwater inspection of 6/3/08 DWQ found chemicals in Clariant West Facility
Outfall 006 that may have been released during rain storm on afternoonlevening of 5/28. Both products that could
have been discharged are highly toxic to fish with LC50 values of 0.1-1.0 mg/L.
June 5, 2008 — Phone Conversation between Mr. Gil Insley (Clariant Corporation)
and M. Allocco (DWQ)
Mr. Insley reported that Clariant had completed the clean up of the stormwater outfall
which took approximately 3 hours. Two samples were taken for analysis, one in the
stormwater outfall and one in the outfall pipe upstream from the gate valve at outfall 006.
Mr. Insley stated that the cause of the release witnessed on June 3, 2008, was from a
failed sump pump, which due to the piping in the area near Plant 5 overflowed liquids
destined for the chemical sewer to the stormwater system, which drains to Outfall 006.
Mr. Insley stated that the piping had been reconfigured to drain to the containment area
for the chemical tank farm and that area drains to the chemical sewer. Mr. Insley further
stated that there could have been chemicals in the same sump that may have
overflowed on May 28th and caused the fish kill. Mr. Insley stated that no one at the
company knew about the discharge because the piping was underground. Mr. Insley
stated that Clariant thought that they had satisfactory redundancy in the area to prevent
such a spill.
June 5, 2008 — MRO staff received anonymous call regarding fish kill in the
Catawba
MRO staff was told that a bad batch of material was manufactured at the Clariant West
facility on May 28, 2008, which got into the sump at Plant 5 and was discharged to the
Catawba River. The sump overflowed due to the rainstorm in the Mt Holly area (1.5")
that overwhelmed the sump pump.
June 10, 2008 — Follow-up inspection
This was a follow-up visit to the June 3, 2008, inspection to review the progress in
removing the illicit discharge at Outfall 006. All soil and contaminated rock has been
removed from the discharge channel and the entire channel and banks had been filled
with riprap. There was no evidence of any residual contamination in the outfall pipe
upstream of the gate valve for Outfall 006, which held the majority of the unknown liquid
on the June 3, 2008, inspection. The piping has been reconfigured at the sump for Plant
5 so that overflows do not go to the stormwater system discharging to Outfall 006 but
rather to the tank farm containment area and eventually to the chemical sewer. Possible
chemicals in the unknown liquid of June 3, 2008, included air scrubber materials
including caustic and two C12-C18 amines. Possible candidates include Genamin LA
302 D and Genamin T 100 both of which have a LC50 for fish of 0.1 to 1.0 mg/L.
Clariant released a press release on June 12, 2008, taking the blame for the fish kill of
May 29, 2008, on Lake Wylie.
t5
L_
June 12, 2008
On June 3, N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) representatives visited industries with plants located
along the Catawba River in the Mount Holly area, including Clariant, in follow-up to an unexplained fish
kill that occurred on the river on or about May 29.
Daring this visit, Clariant and the DWQ representatives together discovered residues of materials used to
make soap and cosmetic ingredients in a permitted stormwater drain that flows to the Catawba River.
Some of the residues are generally considered to be toxic to fish.
As a protective mcasure, Clariant environmental personnel immediately blocked the drain at the river's
edge to prevent any flow of water through it, completely cleaned the drain to remove all residues, and
removed potentially affected soil from the base of the drain.
A subsequent internal investigation by Clariant determined that the presence of the soap -making
ingredient was caused when a pump and an electronic level detector malfunctioned, resulting in an
ovc&ow into the drain.
The malfunctioning pump and level detector were immediately repaired and tested and all other drains,
pumps and level detectors in the manufacturing building where the malfunction occurred have been
thoroughly inspected and tested. The system was modified to prevent overflow to stormwater in the event
of power failure or other malfunction.
Clariant has informed its local community advisory panel, the Catawba Riverkeeper, Charlotte-
Mecklenburg Storm Water Services, Mount Holly City officials and Gaston County's state legislative
delegation about the situation.
1 Because it is unknown when, or in what amount, material may have entered the river, Clariant cannot
conclusively link the material found in the stormwatcr drain to the river incident. However, the soap -
making ingredients should not have boen in the stormwater drain.
Regardless of the uncertainty over the cause of the fish kill, Clariant wishes to assure the community of
its commitment to be -a responsiblevorponde citizen. Clariant will be working with the N.C. Fish &
Wildlife Commission to determine what voluntary steps might be appropriate for the company to take to
_.accict_in.rebuiLE ng the fish population in that swtio" u he Catawba River.
The Clariant Mount Holly plant has been a member of the Mount Holly community since 1953. The
plant manufactures a wide variety of ingredients for soap, cosmetic and personal care consumer products.
ZOO/ZM 'd bti0# LS:ZL 800Z/ZL/90 9ZZZ ZZ8 VOL
uiWV4""-gUU;'PT3:WO.A�
Charlotte Observer 1 06/12/2008 1 Chemical plant spill likely caused fish kill
Page 1 of 2
WMAIMM Charlotte9com Charlotte, y6
1 Q e -,--�►!e��_' x`+�� Hill-owl.91'169' -- -r Md .
Subsaber Ssrviep
e No to
i■ ''!r'[, a ♦j
I` Welcome Guest
Search O Cherletts.wrn O Anhtwc Q web search powered by YAR001 SEARCH
2 ` Login I Register I Sign in to Classifieds
Jobs . - _
_ Posted on Thu, Jun. 12.2006 email print reprint or license
Cars
_
Real Estate
AIM del.icaus Digg it
Apartments
- ;
Shop
All Classifieds
Chemical spill likely caused fish
! TA -1,`VCis the IFI&sldr , �-
• Create an Ad
plant
i
• Find an Ad
kill
�'
�I r �
-Ngal_Notices
a ' e
_ihatsRactn
BRUCE HENDERSON
! bhendersonCRehadotteebserver.arm
. • r
MomaChaAotte_
_
Chemical maker Clariard Corp, says a spill from its Mount Holy West plant probably killed
thousands of fish in the Catawba River in late May.
Breakfast is the most important meal of the day.
News
i The kill, which daimed 2,000 to 10,000 fish, had stumped investigators. Water samples in
Breaking News
the kill area, south of N.C. 27 and north of Wilkinson Boulevard, found nothing toxic.
Q Disagree Q Agree
Columnists
Education
Clariant said a recently -discovered spill at its plant on the Gaston County side of the river
Vag
Nation
happened at about the same time.
Obituaries
-We don't know if we're caused this, but we wanted to make it right,' said Mike Teague,
� � mT To .Enter email address 1�
E0i
Politics
{ Cladant's vice president for environment, safety and health. 'l think people are going to
Weather
conclude that we did it whether we did or noL'
MORE NEWS FROM TOPIX NET
Weird News
The spill was discovered as state water-qualtty officials, looking for the cause. toured the
Mooresville, NC
World
plant a few days after the kill. They and plant officials found chemical residues in a storm
Manufacturing
Opinion
drain that leads to the take.
Gaston County, NC
13uainess-- -
-
j A pump and alarm apparently failed due to a lightning strike or power surge, Clariant said,
Charlotte, NC
Mount Holy, NC
sports -
-, sending an unknown amount of ingredients for soaps, detergents and cosmetics into the
Chemicals
Entertainment
storm drain.
Diso as Chemicals
Local News
' A couple of chemicals in the ingredients are toxic to fish, Teague said, but would have
Cabanus
j quickly degraded in the water and and eluded investigators.
Catawba
RYsil circumstantial that this led to the kill," he said, ill could wry well been the
ve
i
j Enter Keyword(a):
Gastonli-incoln
j cause.'
Lake Normanilredell i
Southern Meck The pump has been repaired, the drain cleaned and fixes made to keep future overflows
I
I Enter a City:
The City
from reaching the drain, Teague said. He said Clariard will talk to the state wildlife agency
about restocking fish in the lake or taking other steps to remedy the damage.
Select a State:
Union
University City
Rob Krebs, a state water -quality official based in Mooresville, said the company had made
- Ail United States -
Wastem Mack
I needed fixes. He wouldn't speculate on whether the state is likely to fine Clariant-
Select a Category:
Yorkll-ancaster'I
would almost command them for acting so rapidly to make sure this doesn't happen
3 - All Job Categories -
Data Center _
again," said Catawba Riverkeeper David Merryman,
Mobile News _
_ Merryman, who toured the facility Thursday morning, said he hopes the company wig Take
further steps to prevent store wafer and chemicals from muting together in the same
overflow holding area.
Advarwwd Job Search
_ Search by Category
ONUNE EXTRAS
7daJa Oseer
Read tomorroWs Charfolte Observer for more details on this developing sto ry
Luring Here- --
Archiros_
risitehaAotte—corn -
Forums_ —1
Traffic Reports __1
Ads From Observer I
Adverttsirlg Sections
Local Coupons-_
Celebrations 1
Yellow Pages _
Maps 3 Directions
SITE SERVICES
She Index_ ---- -_ -I
R55 !
Place art Ad
4
art a Bad Link
j
Ittion __
hq://www.charlotte.com/breaking__pews/story/666462.html 6/12/2008
FW: W080530162522_0605081534.pdf special sampling
Subject: FW: W080530162522_0605081534.pdf special sampling
From: "Caldwell, David" <David.Caldwell@mecklenburgcountync.gov>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 13:51:52 -0400
To: "Marcia Allocco" <marcia. allocco@ncmail. net>
Here's the complete results from our metals sampling. The site labeled Clariant is just upstream of Meck.
Clariant discharge and mid channel, the next site south is Sadler which is mid channel about midway
down Sadler Island in front of the residence piers. The last site is mid channel at 1-85
David Caldwell, Environmental Supervisor
Mecklenburg County Land Use & Environmental Services
Water Quality Program
700 North Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
phone 704-336-5500 fax 704-336-4391
From: Hutson, Rhondafmailto:RHutson@ci.charlotte.nc.us)
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 3.50 PM
To: Price, Jeff; Caldwell, David, Buetow, David
Subject: W080530162522_0605081534.pdf special sampling
Importance: High
<<W080530162522_0605081534. pdf»
Rhonda L. Hutson, QAO
Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities
Laboratory Services Division
4222 Westmont Drive
Charlotte, NC 28217
PHONE: 7o4/336-3690
CELL: 9801722-6611
FAX: 7o4/632-8397
We appreciate your feedback - click hereto fill out a survey
162522_0605081534.pdf;
Content -Description: W080530162522_0605081534.pd-
Content-Type: applicationloctet-stream
Content -Encoding: base64
1 of 1 6/6/2008 1:56 PM
Laboratory Analysis Report
Report Date: 6/5/2008 03:34 PM
WWI;
I;
LABORATORY SERVICES DIVISION
LOCATION: 1-85
LOC ID: W-SPEC
SAMPLE DATE -TIME: 5/30/2008 .14:40 CHAIN OF CUSTODY #: 080530162522
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Grab
Parameter
Result
Units
RL
Method
Start Date/
Time
Analyst
ACT0361 ALUMINIUM BY ICPMS
440
uglL
100
EPA 200.E
6/5/2008
12:00
KGB
AC70361 ANTIMONY BY ICPMS
< 5.0
uglL
5.0
EPA 200.8
6/4/2008
16:03
KGB
AC70361 ARSENIC BY ICPMS
< 5.0
ug1L
5.0
EPA 200.8
6/4/2008
16:03
KGB
AC70361 BARIUM BY ICPMS
< 100
ug1L
100
EPA 200.8
6/4/2008
16:03
KGB
AC70361 BERYLLIUM BY ICPMS
< 5.0
ug1L
5.0
EPA 200.8
6/4/2008
16:03
KGB
AC70361 CADMIUM BY ICPMS
< 1.0
ug1L
1.0
EPA 200.8
6/4/2008
16:03
KGB
AC70361 CHROMIUM BY ICPMS
< 5.0
ug1L
5.0
EPA 200.8
61512D08
11:23
KGB
AC70361 COBALT BY ICPMS
< 5.0
ug1L
5.0
EPA 200.8
6/5/2008
11:23
KGB
AC7036i COPPER BY ICPMS
3.9
ug1L
2.D
EPA 200.8
6/5/2008
11:23
KGB
ACT0361 IRON BY ICPMS
610
uglL
500
EPA 200.8
e512008
12:00
KGB
AC70361 LEAD BY ICPMS
< 5.0
ug1L
5.0
EPA 200.8
6/512008
1123
KGB
AC70361 MANGANESE BY ICPMS
43
uglL
10
EPA 200.8
6/5/2008
11:23
KGB
AC70361 MERCURY, TOTAL
<0.2
ug1L
0.2
EPA 245.1
612/2008
15:06
STC
AC70361 MERCURY, TOTAL DIGESTION
Completed
EPA 245.1
6/2/2008
10:15
STC
AC70361 MOLYBDENUM BY ICP
< 5.0
ug1L
5.0
EPA 200.8
6/4/2008
16:03
KGB
AC70361 NICKEL BY ICPMS
< 2.0
'jug1L
2.0
EPA 200.8
6/412008
16:03
KGB
AC70361 SELENIUM BY ICPMS .'
. < 5.0
ug1L
5.0
EPA 200.8
6/412008
16:03
KGB
AC70361 SILVER BY ICPMS
< 5.0
uglL
5.0
EPA 200.8
6/512008
11:23
KGB
AC70361 THALLIUM BY ICPMS
< 5.0
ug1L
5.0
EPA 200.8
6/5/2008
11:23
KGB
AC70361 TIN BY ICPMS -
< 5.0
ug1L
5.0
EPA 200.8
615/2008
11:23
KGB
AC70361 TITANIUM BY ICPMS
17
ug1L
5.0
EPA 200.8
6/5/2008
11:23
KGB
AC70361 VANADIUM BY ICPMS
10
ug1L
10
EPA 200:6
6/5/2008
11:23
KGB
AC70361 ZINC BY ICPMS
11
ug1L
10
EPA 200.8
614/2008
16:03
KGB
Page i of 2
' Laboratory Analysis Report
Report Date: 8/5/2008 0134 PM
rxsi ec.vrucwiam
a•er. s
LABORATORY SERVICES DIVISION -
LOCATION: 1-85
LOC ID: W-SPEC
SAMPLE DATE -TIME: 5/30/2008 14:40 GRAIN OF CUSTODY #: 080530162522
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Grab
Parameter
Result Units RL Method
Start Date/
Time Analyst
METALS DIGESTION
EPA 200-0
512/2008 9:30
RCS
Comment:
{ n r
Laboratory Supervisor:-
Laboratory Certifications: CMU-Enviro ental Laboratoryry Services N C.DHHS Laboratory No. 37417; N C. DENR No 192
Brookshire: .C. DENR No.162. N.C. DHNS Laboratory No. 37605
Page 2 of 2
Laboratory Analysis Report
..,.,. Report Date: 6/5/2008 03:35 PM
rrk.
r+Kon2.recurewF
LABORATORY SERVICES DIVISION
LOCATION: Sadler
LOC ID: W-SPEC
SAMPLE DATE -TIME: 5/30/2008 14:35 CHAIN OF CUSTODY #: 080530162522
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Grab
Parameter
Result
Units
RL
Method
Start Date/
Time
Anatyst
AC70362 ALUMINIUM BY ICPMS
870
ug1L
100
EPA 20D.8
6/5/2008
14:31
KGB
AC70362 ANTIMONY BY ICPMS
< 5.0
ug/L
5.0
EPA 200.8
6/4/2008
16:06
KGB
AC70362 ARSENIC BY ICPMS
< 5.0
ug/L
5.0
EPA 200.8
6/4/2008
16:06
KGB
AC70362 BARIUM BY ICPMS
< 100
ug1L
100
EPA 200.8
6/4/2008
16:06
KGB
AC70362 BERYLLIUM BY ICPMS
< 5.0
ug1L
5.0
EPA 200.8
614/2006
16:06
KGB
AC70362 CADMIUM BY ICPMS
< 1.0
ug1L
1.0
EPA 200.8
614/2008
16:06
KGB
AC70362 CHROMIUM BY ICPMS
< 5.0
ug1L
5.0
EPA 200.8
615/2008
11:27
KGB
AC70362 COBALT BY ICPMS
< 5.0
ug1L
5.0
EPA 200.8
6/5/2008
11:27
KGB
AC70362 COPPER BY ICPMS
4.4
ug1L
2.0
EPA 200.8
6/5/2008
11:27
KGB
AC70362 IRON BY ICPMS
460
ug1L
500
EPA 200.6
615/2008
12:04
KGB
AC70362 LEAD BY ICPMS
< 5.0
ug/L
5.0
EPA 200.8
615/2008
-11:27
KGB
AC70362 MANGANESE BY ICPMS
41
ug1L
10
EPA 200.8
6/5/2008
11.27
KGB
AC70362 MERCURY, TOTAL
<0.2
ug/L
0.2
EPA 245.1
6/2/2008
15:06
STC
AC70362 MERCURY, TOTAL DIGESTION
Completed
EPA 245.1
6/2/2008
10:15
STC
AC70362 MOLYBDENUM BY ICP
< 5.0
ug/L
5.0
EPA 200.8
6/412008
16:06
KGB
AC70362 NICKEL. -BY ICPMS
< 2.0
ug1L
2.0
EPA 200.8
6/412008
16:06
KGB
AC70362 SELENIUM BY ICPMS
< 5.0
ug/L
5.0
EPA 200.8
6/412008
16:06
KGB
AC70362 SILVER BY ICPMS
< 5.0
ug1L
5.0
EPA 200.8
6/5/2008
11-27
KGB
AC70362 THALLIUM BY ICPMS
< 5.0
ug1L
5.0
EPA 200.8
6/5/2008
11:27
KGB
AC70362 TIN BY ICPMS
< 5.0
uglL
5.0
EPA 200.8
615/2008
11:27
KGB
AC70362 TITANIUM BY ICPMS
24
ug1L
5.0
EPA 200.8
6/5/2008
11:27
KGB
AC70362 VANADIUM BY ICPMS
12
ug/L
10
EPA 200.8
6/5/2008
11-27
KGB
AC70362 ZINC BY ICPMS
< 10
uglL
10
EPA 200.8
6/4/2008
16:06
KGB
Page 1 of 2
' Laboratory Analysis Report
Report Date: 6/5/2008 0135 PM
u xe:ra
LABORATORY SERVICES DIVISION
LOCATION: Sadler
LOG ID: W-SPEC
SAMPLE DATE -TIME: 5/30/2008 14:35
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Grab
CHAIN OF CUSTODY #: 080530162522
Parameter
Result Units RI- Method
Start Date!
Time Analyst
METALS DIGESTION
EPA 200.0
612/2008 9:30
RCS
Comment:
Laboratory Supervisor:
Z
Laboratory Certifications:+am.ok..'�ON.
lat Laboratoryry Services N.GDHH$ Laboratorsyy No, 37417: N_C DENR No. 192
DENR No. tj N.C. DHFi5 Laboratory No. 376105
Page 2 of 2
' Laboratory Analysis Report
Report Date: 6/5/2008 03:35 PM
Laiita.eeuewwn
LABORATORY SERVICES DIVISION
LOCATION: Clariant
LOC ID: W-SPEC
SAMPLE DATE -TIME: 5/30/2008 14:05 CHAIN OF CUSTODY #: 080530162522
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Grab
Parameter
Result
Units
RL
Method
Start Date/
Time Analyst
AC70363 ALUMINIUM BY ICPMS
170
ug1L
10
EPA 200.8
6/5/2008
11:30
KGB
AC70363 ANTIMONY BY ICPMS
< 5.0
uglL
5.0
EPA 200.8
6/4/2008
16:10
KGB
AC70363 ARSENIC BY ICPMS
< 5.0
ug1L
5.0
EPA 200.8
6/4/2008
16:10
KGB
AC70363 BARIUM BY ICPMS
< 100
ug1L
100
EPA 200.8
6/4/2008
16:10
KGB
AC70363 BERYLLIUM BY ICPMS
< 5.0
uglL
5.0
EPA 200.8
6/4/2008
16:10
KGB
AC70363 CADMIUM BY ICPMS
< 1.0
uglL
1.0
EPA 2G0-8
6/412008
16 10
KGB
AC70363 CHROMIUM BY ICPMS
< 5.0
uglL
5.0
EPA 200.8
615/2008
11:30
KGB
AC70363 COBALT BY ICPMS
< 5.0
ug1L
5.0
EPA 200.8
6/5/2008
11:30
KGB
AC70363 COPPER BY ICPMS
4.5
ug/L
2.0
EPA 200.8
6/5/2008
11:30
KGB
AC70363 IRON BY ICPMS
280
uglL
100
EPA 200.8
6/5/2008
14:34
KGB
AC70363 LEAD BY ICPMS
< 5.0
uglL
5.0
EPA 200.8
615/2008
11:30
KGB
AC70363 MANGANESE BY ICPMS
29
uglL
10
EPA 200.8
6/5/2008
11:30
KGB
AC70363 MERCURY, TOTAL
<0.2
uglL
0.2
EPA 245.1
6/212008
15:06
STC
AC70363 MERCURY, TOTAL DIGESTION
Completed
EPA 245.1
61212008
10:15
STC
AC70363 MOLYBDENUM BY 1CP
< 5.0
ug1L
5.0
EPA 200.8
6/412008
16:10
KGB
AC70363 NICKEL BY ICPMS
< 2.0
ug1L
2.0
EPA 200.8:
6/4/2008
16:10
KGB
AC70363 SELENIUM BY ICPMS
< 5.0
ug1L
5.0
EPA 200.8
61412008
16:10
KGB
AC70363 SILVER BY ICPMS
< 5.0
uglL
5.0
EPA 200.8
6/5/2008
11:30
KGB
AC70363 THALLIUM BY ICPMS
< 5.0
uglL
5.0
EPA 200.8
6/512008
11:30
KGB
AC70363 TIN BY ICPMS
< 5.0
uglL
5.0
EPA 200.8
6/5/2008
11:30
KGB
AC70363 TITANIUM BY ICPMS
10
ug1L
5.0
EPA 200.8
6/5/2008
11-30
KGB
AC70363 VANADIUM{ BY ICPMS
11
uglL
10
EPA 200-8
6/5/2008
11:30
KGB
AC70363 ZINC BY ICPMS
< 10
ug1L
10
EPA 200.8
6/4/2008
16:10
KGB
Page 1 of 2
* Laboratory Analysis Report
Report Date: 6/5/2008 03:35 PM
}L.i—Ig ()'I`TIw..
sr!a.Ori:.a! C V.[ cwu
Y't r rs
LABORATORY SERVICES DIVISION
LOCATION: Clariant
LOC ID: W-SPEC
SAMPLE DATE -TIME: 5/30/2008 14:05
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Grab
CHAIN OF CUSTODY #: 080530162522
Parameter
Result knits RL Method
Start Date/
Time Analyst
METALS DIGESTION
EPA 200.0
6/2/2008 9:30
RCS
Comment:
Laboratory Supervisor: r` 1
Laboratory Certifications: CMU-Envir mental Laboratory Services N.0 DHHS Laboratoryry No. 37417; N.C. DENR No. 192
Brookshire N.C. DENR No,162. N.C. DHHS Laboratory No. 37606
Page 2 of 2
Ye '7ct
CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG UTILITIES - LABORATORY SERVICES DIVISION
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
Hal Marshall Laboratory, 700 North Tryon St., Charlotte, NC 28202, 7041336-5460 PAGE OF
CLIENT: MECKLENBURG COUNTY, LUESA- WATER QUALITY PROGRAM Send Report To; ^ ` r � �4 COC#: ?0 S :M `4-G
FACILITY: NA 70ON Tryon St. Ste. 205 Sampled By (Print Name)
PROJECT: Special Request Charlotte, NC 28202
LAB CODE: W i till 11- cc
Sample Collection
Sample
Tam ralure
SamDleTvDe
Sample
Containers
Chemical
Preservative
Analyses
Requested
Date
Time
E
r
L
Z
�i
U
p
O
S
rn
rn
4
opo
a
p
4
w
a
w
SAMPLE ID
8
E
w--5
rl�i
1
N
`2
/
7
NOTES: Complete yellow shaded sections; each "X" needs to be circled.
Nutrients include: Ammonia, TKN, NOX, and Total P.
w- i7j4L y
Metals include: k"'' L•�
T'-qT plt' �� Ctrl W?COMMENTS: Monitoring Lab Codes for: Jurisdictions
c►Lc�=
Rec4 d l (;;Awe 7
-<
Dew
�� L;
TTme
eligmened ar (swinire)
Reure BY. rsg,"wr.l
Dele
eingoWxd By;(Sgnst—i
ReCaM By. (Sgrviwe)
sae
City of Charlotte Towns Davidson, DA Pineville: PI
aN.4.dhoid By [sge,t ret
Reui.ad ay (signature)
Dale
Time
IC-S0.1)-Cl ID-4- Cornelius'. CR Matthews: MA
Huntersvifle: HU Mint Hill: MH
Form Revision 09; effective 9130105
Ambient Monitoring System Station Summaries
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
Basinvride Assessment Report
Location: CATAWBA R]V AT NC 27 NR THRIFT
Station #: C3900000
Hydrologic Unit Code:
3050101
Latitude: 35.29818
Longitude:-81.00323
Stream
class:
WS-IV CA
Agency: NCAMBNT
NC stream index:
11-(117)
Time period: 01/28/2003
to 12/13/2007
#
#
Results not meeting EL
Percentiles
results ND
EL
#
%
%Conf Min
10th
25th
50th
75th
90th
Max
Field
D.O. (mg/L)
56
0
<4
0
0
4
5.1
5.7
7.5
9
10.1
11.1
56
0
<5
4
7.1
4
5.1
5.7
7.5
9
10.1
11.1
pH (SU)
56
0
<6
9
16.1
95.1 5.5
5.8
6
63
6.8
7.1
7.6
56
0
>9
0
0
5.5
5.8
6
6.3
6.8
7.1
7.6
Salinity (ppt)
1
0
NIA
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
Spec. conductance
55
0
NIA
52
53
56
58
63
69
78
(umhos/cm at 25°C)
Water Temperature (°C)
56
0
>32
1
1.8
7.5
10.5
13.5
20.9
27
30.9
32.4
Other
Chlorophyll a (ug/L)
50
10
>40
0
0
1
1
1
2
2
5
27
TSS (mg/L)
20
6
N/A
2.5
2.5
3
5
6.2
10.7
12
Turbidity (NTU)
57
0
>25
1
1.8
1.3
2.1
2.6
3.5
5.2
6.7
29
Nutrients (mg/L)
NH3 as N
53
15
NIA
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.06
0.12
NO2 + NO3 as N
53
1
> 10
0
0
0,02
0.07
0.1
0.17
0.21
0.25
0.49
TKN as N
53
32
NIA
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.22
0.26
0,31
Total Phosphorus
53
22
N/A
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.04
Metals (ug/L)
Aluminum, total (Al)
17
0
N/A
90
98
120
180
300
400
400
Arsenic, total (As)
17
17
>10
0
0
5
5
5
5
10
10
10
Cadmium, total (Cd)
17
17
>2
0
0
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
Chromium, total (Cr)
17
17
>50
0
0
10
10
25
25
25
25
25
Copper, total (Cu)
17
4
>7
0
0
2
2
2
3
4
4
5
Iron, total (Fe)
17
0
>1000
0
0
120
128
155
170
305
474
490
Lead, total (Pb)
17
17
>25
0
0
10
l0
10
10
10
10
10
Manganese, total (Mn)
17
0
>200
0
0
13
14
20
28
40
50
56
Mercury, total (Hg)
16
16
>0.012
0
0
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
Nickel, total (Ni)
17
17
>25
0
0
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Zinc, total (Zn)
17
17
>50
0
0
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Fecal coliform (#/IOOmL)
# results: Geomean
# > 400: %>
400: %Conf:
56 11
0
0
ftl
# result: number of observations
# ND: number of observations reported to be below detection level (non -detect)
EL: Evaluation Level; applicable numeric or narrative water quality standard or action level
Results not meeting EL: number and percentages of observations not meeting evaluation level
%Conf : States the percent statistical confidence that the actual percentage of exceedances is at least 10% (20% for Fecal Coliform)
Stations with less than 10 results for a given parameter were not evaluated for statistical confidence
Ambient Monitoring System Station Summaries
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
Basinwide Assessment Report
Location: CATAWBA RIV AT POWERLINE CROSSING AT S BELMONT X REF C4210000-
Station #: C4220000 Hydrologic Unit Code: 3050101
Latitude: 35.21480 Longitude:-81.00971 Stream class: WS-IV&B CA
Agency: NCAMBNT NC stream index: ] 1-(122)
Time period: 01/28/2003 to 01/0312007
# # Results not meeting EL Percentiles
results ND EL # % %Conf Min loth 25th 50th 75th 90th Max
Field
D.O. (mg/L)
44
0
<4
0
0
4.7
5.9
7
8.2
9.1
9.9
1 I.1
44
0
<5
1
2.3
4.7'
5.9
7
8.2
91
9.9
1L1
pH (SU)
43
0
<6
1
2.3
5.9
6
6.2
6.4
7.1
7.5
8.6
43
0
>9
0
0
59
6
6.2
6.4
71
75
8.6
Salinity (ppt)
1
0.
NIA
1.6
1-6
1-6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
Spec. conductance
44
0
NIA
55
57
59
63
73
82
92
(umhos/cm at 25°C)
Water Temperature ('C)
44
0
>32
2
4.5
6.6
10.3
13.1
21.4
28.6
31.5
32.8
Other
Chlorophyll a (ug1L)
39
4
>40
0
0
1
1
2
3
11
17
23
TSS (mgfL)
16
1
N/A
2.5
2.7
4
7.1
11.2
37.7
72
Turbidity (NTU)
45
0
>25
3
6.7
2.7
4
5
7.4
10.5
15
200
Nutrients (mg/L)
NH3 as N
41
16
N/A
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.07
0,15
NO2 + NO3 as N
41
4
> 10
0
0
0.02
0.02
0.12
0.17
0.22
0.25
0.3
TKN as N
41
11
N/A
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.25
0.34
0.4
0.82
Total Phosphorus
41
0
N/A
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.22
Metals (ug/L)
Aluminum, total (Al)
16
0
N/A
190
197
222
410
588
1071
1400
Arsenic, total (As)
16
16
>10
0
0
5
5
5
5
10
10
10
Cadmium, total (Cd)
16
16
>2
0
0
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
Chromium, total (Cr)
16
16
>50
0
0
10
20
25
25
25
25
25
Copper, total (Cu)
16
2
>7
2
12.5 78.9
2
2
2
3
4
9
10
Iron, total (Fe)
16
0
>1000
2
12.5 78.9
250
257
302
420
625
1330
1400
Lead, total (Ph)
16
16
>25
0
0
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Manganese, total (Mn)
16
0
>200
0
0
20
24
29
42
54
110
190
Mercury, total (Hg)
16
16
>0.012
0
0
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
Nickel, total (Ni)
16
16
>25
0
0
10
10
10
t0
10
10
10
Zinc, total (Zn)
16
15
>50
0
0
10
10
10
10
10
21
46
Fecal coliform (#/100mL)
# results: Geomean
# > 400: % > 400: %Conf:
44 17
2
5
Key:
# result: number of observations
# ND: number of observations reported to be below detection level (non -detect)
EL: Evaluation Level; applicable numeric or narrative water quality standard or action level
Results not meeting EL: number and percentages of observations not meeting evaluation level
%Conf : States the percent statistical confidence that the actual percentage of exceedances is at least 10% (20% for Fecal Coliform)
Stations with less than 10 results for a given parameter were not evaluated for statistical confidence
[Fwd: Wastewater Spill - Clariant Corporation]
Subject: [Fwd: Wastewater Spill - Clariant Corporation]
From: Barbara Sifford <barbara.sifford@ncmail.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 14:24:13 -0500
To: Marcia Allocco <Marcia.Allocco@ncmail.net>
Incident no. 200800034 in BIMS
Barbara Sifford - Barbara.Sifford@ncmail.net
Environmental Technician V
North Carolina Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources
Div. of Water Quality
610 E. Center Ave., Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Ph: 704.663.1699 Fax: 704.663.6040
Subject: Wastewater Spill - Clariant Corporation
From: Gil.lnsley@clariant:com
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 12:46:32 -0500
To: barbara.sifford@ncmail.net, tommy.almond@co.gaston.nc.us,
wastetreatment@mthoily.us
CC: Andre.Pollard@clariant.com, Ron.Walton@clariant.com
CJJ7-- { P_frrx-A-t
Ncs�D000_4-1
This e-mail is to follow up on my phone calls to report a wastewater spill.
The spill occurred at the wastewater pretreatment facility of:
Clariant Corporation
625 East Catawba Avenue
Mount Holly, NC 28120
Wastewater pretreatment Industrial User Permit # 1158
Stormwater permit # NCS000041
The spill was discovered at approximately 03:00 on January 3, 2008. The
material spilled was treated wastewater. The wastewater was leaving the
sand filter, which is the last step in the pretreatment process before it
is sent to the City Of Mount Holly POTW.
The cause of the release was a broken sight glass on the sand filter.
The quantity released is initially estimated to be 5000 gallons. Of that,
an estimated 50 gallons flowed into a storm sewer, which discharges to the
Catawba River, and an estimated 500 gallons escaped into a grassy area on
site. The remainder was contained in a sump and pumped back into the
headworks of our wastewater treatment facility.
To stop the spill, our wastewater treatment equipment was reconfigured to
bypass the sand filter, as designed. The sight glass will be repaired and
then the sand filter will be put back into service.
The following phone calls were made today to report this spill:
11:56 - Mount Holly POTW
12:01 - Gaston County Emergency Management
12:06 - NC DENR, Mooresville Regional office
There is no requirement to contact the State Emergency Response
1 of 2 1/8/2008 2:10 PM
[�wd: Wastewater Spill - Clariant Corporation]
Commission, and this fact was confirmed by Barbara Sifford of the NC
DENR Mooresville office.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact
me.
Sincerely,
Gil Insley
Environmental Leader
Clariant Corporation - Mount Holly West Plant
704-822-2218
2il.insley@clariant.com
3
Content -Type: message/rfc822
;Wastewater Spill - Clariant Corporation.'
Content -Encoding: 7bit
2 of 2 1/8/2008 2: 10 PM
Collection System SSO 24-Hour Notification
7�5 0
Collection System: Number and Name WQCSm _ a� 000 r
Incident Number from BIMS tzo
c
Incident Reviewed (Date):
Incident Action Taken: BPJ
NOV-2007-DV
a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a is a IF a a a a a IF a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a
r.
Spill Date 1 ��
Reported Date v
Time Om
Time ��P' am
Reported To SWP Staff or EM Staff- 1j5S
Reported By l Phone
Address of SpillGc.t�
County &r:_;� City
Cause of Spill +�
Total Estimated Gallons —O�C T^ Est. Gal to StreamO
1, /�
Stream (�E6WU cJ ( Fish Kill: Yes No Number Species
Non Required Information' and other comments relating to SSO incident:
Response time minutes Zone Map Quad -
S(�c7 CaQPr�v� t�� auc�' fJ.7C
J.Y
Page Three
.10 "'
The area adjacent to outfall 001 was observed to be used for
the storage of chemical drums.- A paved area funneled storm water
drainage from this area into the discharge pipe. The potential
for discharge contamination and a direct route for spills to
enter the river exist. The Company has been requested in a CEI
dated December 20, 1989 to take corrective action.
Pending approval of
NPDES Permit be renewed.
the wLA, it is recommended that the
Signature of report preparer
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
k Page Two
r
Part III - EVALUATION AND RECOIL' MDATIONS
r'
1. Performance Evaluation: The following compares self -monitoring data
with previous per. -At limitations:
Self-Monitorin Data
Parameter Limitation 001 002
p0 6.0-9.0 s.u. 6.11-8.49 s.u. 6.43--7.67 s.u.
Temperature No; to raise
receiving stream
> 5°F >0.20F >0.20F
Flow 0. ,,]43 14GD 0.043 MGD
2. 0 & M 'valuation: -.Some spillage of chemical was apparent near the
storm drain for. Discharge. `001-..- This 9�ilage had killed the grass
in a strip -from a- paved diem" storage area to the storm drain. This
problem was pointed out to -Mr.- Cundiff.:.: It was. advised 'that" the storage
should '3e dyked of ber;,,,ed to' prevent future occurrences..
3. Recov Teulatioz;s. and/or Special iConditions: It is recommended. that the
M9 Al t9907
(.4)4V__7 CINV73/ NIV.LNnow)
m eT IZAc
NY
'ON 4
20 American Street, Mount Holly, nc - Google Maps
Page 1 of 1
Address 20 American St
Goegle- Mt Holly, NC 28120
Ma
NO
P V1-7
"
ru.
c�
�� `' '� d
r
Get Google Maps on your phone
49 Tan the word "GMAPS'to 466453
http://niaps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=20+Ameri
+Mount+H... 5/30/2008