Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout960017_Inspection_20181009ft Division of Water Resources Facility Number 7 - - 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency Type bf Visit: 40 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: T Region: Farm Name: r^q r` rl'\ Owner Name: Mailing Address: —1� �Ql►i CrQ�2.l� �k)r , Physical Address: Facility Contact: IlewkI t t \ Title: Onsite Representative:I�) Certified Operator: 1 hO ryxct_s Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Swine Wean to Finish Wean to Feeder Feeder to Finish Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish Gilts Boars Other Other Latitude: Owner Email: Phone: ts �'_)yn , �c ����1 Phone: Integrator: �. Y '- Certification Number: b > c Certification Number: Design Current Design Current Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Layer Non -La er Design Current Dry Poultry C'anacity Pon - Layers Non -Layers Pullets Turkeys Poults H(Ourke ther Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? Longitude: Design Current Cattle Capacity Pop. Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow .Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ N F ❑Yes [:]No ❑NA ❑NE ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes [—]No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 7No o ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters [:]Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page I of 3 21412015 Continued Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): a_!a.- 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes EjZo ❑ NA ❑ NV, (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑/o ❑ NA ❑ NF, waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [(No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes E]�No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes I;J Nlo ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [�o ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑/o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): kkayy\q y1:5 V 1 lQ 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes CFNo ;�No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes Fj/No ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes �oo ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ['No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists El Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [j<o ❑ ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued FaciliNumber: - Date of Inspection: 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [ /No ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes 6 No ❑ NA ❑ NE th6 appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑klA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes E to ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA O N E If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes E� ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes u /N0 ❑ NA ❑ NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawines offacility to better explain situations (use additional nacres as necessarv). CI-1 of Is Ck - ? 'I t QvrNrQ ; n1-ce l '3 (o, �Ce �rc,Y', ►� Coc� --I%- 17 Ld 1 S Rrv`� (--.-,A-T bk� �- co r r-r- s foicl '\C I,,\ I 1&1\_� Reviewer/Inspector Name: �0 Phone:q q Y--S t Ll v i Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: , (� �l 1 Page 3 of 3 21412015