19950447 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_19950103

Sweetwater
Johnston County
April 15, 1995
Ratting Sheet # 1
G-11 Initially this site was simply proposed as a play
through area (overstory would be removed). During the site review,
Kevin Martin (S&EC) offered to enhance this wetland in order to
provided greater nutrient removal function.
Given the proposed changes of the watershed. (specifically the
creation of a golf course) I think this is both- reasonable. and
beneficial...
G-10 The G-11 ratting sheet can be applied to this site as
well. Kevin Martin adequately explained the need for fill and
offered to place velocity dissipators and spreader devices down
slope of the proposed impact.
Kevin Martin discussed additional enhancement to this area;
however, it is my opinion that appropriate storm water management
is more critical and the proposed enhancement would not offer
significant benefits at this location.

Ratting Sheet # 2
G-6 Please note that in the revision of this project
(submitted by S&EC) this site was not proposed to be impacted.
During the site inspection I said that I would "would not
recommend impacts of the G-6 site". This site represents a
proposed pond. The development has several alternatives for
irrigation of the golf course and impacts to almost an acre of
wetlands would not be perceived to be appropriate.
It is important to note: I did clearly state, if you can
adequately defend the need for this pond it could be considered,
however, the pond would need to be move downstream to a golf coarse
play through area (this site is located immediately downstream from
this proposed pond).
G-7 The G-6 ratting sheet can be applied to this site as
well.
It should be noted that in S&EC's revision they states that as
per DEM's requests the client has agreed to perform ,shrub and
wetland grass/sedge planting (1.03 acres) along the creek where
Hole number 5A plays over the creek to reduce warming of
streamwaters.

A
Sweetwater
Page -2-
This is not an accurate statement. During the site visit, I
did not request this specific activity. However, I did asked them
to explain how specifically a play through area would be initially
accomplished and maintained. During this time they (S&EC) proposed
the idea of wetland enhancement and/or planting along the stream
edge (I explained to S&EC that planting along this stream edge
would not be an impact wetlands at this site).
At the end of this site discussion I did not discourage a any
proposed planting along the stream bank area. I simply said that
the RRO would require specific description of how play through
areas would be accomplished and if any enhancement was proposed
that it should also be included in the description. (note: if we
are going to require mitigation or further wetland enhancement for
activities proposed at Sweetwater we should carefully consider what
we are willing to included as enhancement.)
Ratting Sheet # 3
J Impacts to wetlands for stormwater pond.
Wetland soils are brilliantly modeled and slough off into
stream channel. The site appears to predominately loaded from
groundwater emanating from a shoulder slope. I recommend that this
site be permitted and that specific retention times be addressed
and a velocity dissipator should be required at the outfall.
Written conformation of this is recommended prior issuance WQ
Certification.
Ratting Sheet #4
L-2 These impacts are
this project being completed.
removal function and this vi
virtue of being subjected i
recommends avoidance of t
appropriate as per current DE
wetland (35)).
avoidable and are not prohibitive of
The wetlands do offer some pollutant
Llue is likely to be enhanced by the
.o the proposed urban setting. RRO
his site, provided that this is
M policy (noted the low score of this
- Issues/requirements discussed during site visit and agreed
to by Kevin Martin:
to 1i
* a 25 foot buffer of 3 inch tall "rough" along the perimeter
of the golf course to reduce nutrient, pesticide, and storm
event impacts.
.A
Sweetwater
Page -3-
* Not only return to grade but the Stabilization of utility
line crossings in wetlands.
* Specifically explain how play through areas will be
completed and maintained.
* G-11 enhancement/mitigation
There are other locations at this proposed development that I
visited. The aforementioned sites and issues are what I
perceive to be the major issues of this site. If you have any
questions or wish to meet and discuss this project further
please call.
/ds
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
" ILFRAA
174,rA
[D EHNFi
May 1, 1995
Johnston County
DEM Project # 95447
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Mr. Charles Winston
c% Solaris Development Corporation
1 Copley Parkway, Suite 310
Morrisville, N.C. 27560 FIL E Copy
Dear -Mr. Winston:
You have our approval to place fill material in 9.33 acres of wetlands or waters for the purpose
of constructing utility lines at Sweetwater development, as you described in your application dated
30 March 1995. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General
Water Quality Certification Numbers 2664. These certifications allow you to use Nationwide Permit
Numbers 12 when they are issued by the Corps of Engineers.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If
you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application.
For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification.
Antiseep collars shall be placed at 150 foot intervals where the utility lines cross through wetlands. In
addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your
project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory
hearing. You must act within 30 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing,
send a written petition which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the
Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and
its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Environmental Management under Section 401
of the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Domey at 919-733-1786.
Sincerely,
P ston Howard, J t. E.
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
Raleigh DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Central Files
Kevin Martin; Soil and Environmental Consultants 95447.1tr
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 501k recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
CIS
-;t l4? 1 1• ... .i 1 \Il \ t l L t. ..i.lt !' --7)
t t ; Iji "tl () 4 j `.1'+(-,
IT T,
4 4

9.J 4 f 1 1 4 :_:,- t' Y l.J_4
i 1?`.,'l'?L•1 ?-...

'; lI.Nj'tyVi ,:.1 C

(9 1
-- - - L _ fvs _
w C/z
;iil...1_'-.i..
Z(v

? ?f 3 5
L'f
l
?
__
1 1 y J} 1. i J. I •.1 - ?: L} `
,- ?r,• ??at ', r , ? :. ;: .t ljti`i, :.i1-1 r: N..1f i 'ii ?.f •?`.1 r ? ??

4 T-
?.B
b

` Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
244 West Millbrook Road ¦ Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 ¦ [phone] ¦ Fax [phone]
NC DEHNR, DEM
Water Quality Planning
Attn: Mr. John Domey
4401 Reedy Creek Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27607
Dear Mr. Domey and Ms. Manuel:
March 30,1995
US Army Corps of En
Attn: Ms. Jean Manuel
6512 Falls of the Neuse WR 3 r
Suite 105
Raleigh, NC 27615-684 DENNR RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
The purpose of this letter is to request a revision to our application for
Nationwide Permits 26,14,12 and 18 and a 401 Water Quality Certification for
the project known as the Sweetwater which was submitted on 2/24/95. The
project is bisected by SR 1550 and White Oak Creek in Johnston County, NC as
shown on the enclosed plans and vicinity map. Our original application was
incomplete because it lacked any proposed mitigation and most importantly it
incorrectly identified a road crossing as being qualified for a Nationwide Permit
26 when in reality (because the crossing is below headwaters) it should have
been a Nationwide 14. I realize this may cause the restart of the 30 day permit
processing "clock'.
Fill in Waters of the US has been revised accordingly and will be required to
develop the site for golf course and residential community, including road s,
cart paths, parking, and lots. It will be necessary to impact a total of 6.82 acres of
jurisdictional Waters of the US above headwaters for placement of the proposed
facilities. In addition to the 4.94 acres to be impacted under NW 26. Other
impacts are 1.78 acres for Nationwide 14 and .10 acres for below headwaters
Nationwide 18 and 9.33 acres under Nationwide 12. (See attached revised map
for impact location and size.)
The plans for the development have been modified in order to minimize impacts
by 1.54 ac. overall as compared to our original application; upland areas have
been utilized as much as possible. Wetland enhancement on holes 1A, 2B and
7C has been proposed in locations as shown on the attached tables as well, total
acres to be enhanced equal 1.01 ac. For water quality protection/mitigation the
client is building two stormwater detention ponds and at DEM's request has
agreed to perform shrub and wetland grass/ sedge plantings (1.03 acres) along
the creek where Hole number 5A plays over the creek to reduce warming of
streamwaters.
o?)
Oq -
Soil/Site Evaluation ¦ Mapping and Physical Analysis ¦ Wetlands Mapping and Mitigation ¦ Environmental Audits
On-Site Waste Treatment Systems, Evaluation and Design
ii
V
V
c
s
To expedite the permitting process and to ease the process for everyone
involved, the following individuals/agencies have been provided with a
complete copy of this entire application package: Danny Smith (DEM Raleigh
Regional Office), David Franklin (Wilmington Corps), USF&WS, and NC Dept
of Cultural Resources.
Detailed plans for the residential pods surrounding the course are close to their
final version but may require future revisions. The client realizes that these
must be addressed prior to construction. It is anticipated that any changes
would require no or only minimal wetland impacts.
If you intend to perform a site visit, please call and we can arrange for someone
to accompany you.
Sincerely,
Kevin C. Martin,
President
cc: (w/enclosures) David Franklin, Wilmington Corps
Danny Smith, DEM'Raleigh Regional Office
USF&WS
Cultural Resources
KCM/jmb
DEM ID: ACTION ID:
Nationwide Permit Requested (Provide Nationwide Permit #): 2 6.14 ,12 & 18
JOINT FORM FOR
Nationwide permits that require notification to the Corps of Engineers
Nationwide permits that require application for Section 401 certification
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENGINEER
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
ATTN: CESAW-CO-E
Telephone [phone]
WATER QUALITY PLANNING
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
P.O. BOX 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
ATTN: MR. JOHN DORNEY
Telephone [phone]
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE CORPS OF
ENGINEERS. SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT. PLEASE PRINT.
1. Owners Name: Charles Winston c/o Solaris Development Corporation
2. Owners Address: 1 Copley Pkwy Ste 310, Morrisville. NC 27560
3. Owners Phone Number (Home): (Work): 9191469-1316
4. If Applicable: Agent's name or responsible corporate official, address, phone number.
Inc.
-Attn: r. evin martini President
244 W_ XiUbroak Rd
Raleigh, NC 27609 Ph: 919/846-5900
5. Location of work (MUST ATTACH MAP). County: Johnston
Nearest Town or City: Between Garner and Clayton
Specific Location (Include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): We -, t o f t h e i n t e r G a a n o f
S.R. 1550 and 1551. See attached Section of USGS Garner Quad.
6. Name of Closest Stream/River. Wh i t P Oak r r P ek
7. River Basin: N t' vK5 P_
8. Is this project located in a watershed classified as Trout, SA, HQW, ORW, WSI, or WS II?
YES ( ) NO (x)
9. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property?
YES ( ) NO (x) If yes, explain.
10. Estimated total number of acres of waters of the U.S. including wetlands, located on project site:
Uncertaillbu more than 30
11. Number of acres of waters of the U.S. inc d agewetlands, impacted` by the prop( ?sed roject
Filled: 3. B 4 .'I SS . O 1
Drained:
Excavated: / , I `1-'13
?l , 3 U 1
Total Impacted: q• q!y .1 1 3
12 Description of proposed work (Attach PLANS-81/7' X 11" drawings only):
Commercial and Residential neve1o_pmAnt and Golf-Course.
13. Purpose of proposed work To develope a village community including a
golf o irs by maximizing nti 1 i za.tinn of uplands,
14. State reasons why the applicant believes that this activity must be carried out in wetlands. Also,
note measures taken to minimize wetland impacts. See attached letter by S & E C .
15. Youere required bo contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) regarding the presence or any Federally listed or proposed for listing
endangered or threatened species or critical habitat in the permit area that may be affected by the
proposed project Have you done so? YES (x ) NO ( )
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS AND/OR NMFS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
16. You are required to contact the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) regarding the presence
of historic properties in the permit area which may be affected by the proposed project? Have you done
so? ' YES ( x) . NO ( )
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
17. Additional information required by Mt
A. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, and lakes on the property.
B. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project
C. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant to the
placement of delineation line.
D. If a stormwater management plan is required for this project, attach copy.
E. What island use of surrounding property? Rural residential and/or agricultural
F. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal? mun i c iB a 1
e- v&L 313o)7?
Agent's-Signature Date
Table 1
"Reason" for Impact
(Regardless of Permit Type)
Reason
Golf Cart Crossings
Golf Fill
Roads
Stormwater Lakes
Lot Fill
Acreage
0.393 ac.
0.391
4.27
1.11
0.63
WETLAND GOLF COURSE IMPACTS
Impact # Hole # Im act T Me Amount of IM pact Permit T e
G-1 1A Culvert Crossing 100' x 20' = 2000 S. F. 26
G-2 1A Planting/Enhancement 13,000 S.F. NA
G-3 2A Clearing 3,100 S.F. NA
G-4 2A Culvert Crossing 20' x 110' = 2,200 S.F. 26
G-5 3A Clearing 2,175 S.F. NA

G-7 5A Planting/Enhancement 45,000 S.F. NA
G-8 5A Bride 10' x 100' NA
G-9 7A Fill 6045 S.F. 26
G-10 7A Clearing 6350 S.F. NA
G-11 7A Clearing 29,450 S.F. NA
G-12 .7A Bride 10' x 70' NA
G-13 8A Clearing 9,750 S.F. NA
G-14 8A Bride 10'x 30' NA
G-15 2B Planting/Enhancement 14,880 S.F. NA
G-16 2B Culvert Crossing 45'x25'= 1125 S.F. 26
G-17 2B Planting/Enhancement 13,800 S.F. NA
G-18 3B Lake Excavation 4,175 S.F. 26
G-19 3B Bride 10' x 15' NA
G-20 4B Clearing 54,550 S.F. NA
G-21 5B Clearing 600 S.F. NA
G-22 5B Culvert Pie 5'x 140'= 700 S.F. 26
G-23 6B Culvert Crossing 20'x 10'= 200 S.F. 26
G-24 6B Clearing 2,525 S.F. NA
G-25 7B Bride 10' x 265' NA
G-26 7B Clearing 43,550 S.F. NA
G-27 8B Clearing 7,100 S.F. NA
G-28 8B Culvert Crossing 20'X 40' = 800 S.F. 26
G-29 9B Clearing 3,720 S.F. NA
G-30 9B Culvert Crossing 20'X 15'= 300 S.F. 26
G-31 1C Fill Lake ? 1000 S.F. +/- 26
G-32 1C Piping/Culvert 500 S.F. +/- 26
G-33 2C Clearing 17,300 S.F. +/- NA
G-34 2C Culvert Crossing 20'X 50'= 1,000 S.F. 26
G-35 3C Clearing 3,550 S.F. NA
G-36 3C Culvert Crossing 25'X 20'= 500 S.F. 26
G-37 4C Clearing 10,700 S.F. NA
G-38 4C Culvert Crossing 20'X 40'= 800 S.F. 26
G-39 5C Culvert Crossing 20'X 30'= 600 S.F. 26
G-40 6C Culvert Crossing 20'X 10'= 200 S.F. 26
G-41 6C Culvert Crossing 20'X 10'= 200 S.F. 26
G-42 6C * Culvert Crossing 20'X 60' = 1200 S.F. 26
G-43 6C Clearing and Fill 17,550 S.F. Clearing,
6650 S.F. Fill NA
26
G-44 7C Planting/Enhancement 2,450 S.F. NA
G-45 7C * Culvert Crossing 20'x 185= 3,700 S.F. 26
G-46 8C Culvert Crossing 20' x 35' = 700 S.F. 26
G-47 9C Culvert Crossing 20' x 20' = 400 S.F. 26
G-48 9C Clearing 14,725 S.F. NA
G-49 2B NW18 above U13, Fill 18
L-2 Lot Fill 22,800 S. 26
L-3 Lot Fill S.F. .26
Note: All +/-The Amount

v
*or
Z
?? l y
? a
y a /?
Kok ;I \\
00 ,
\? C
C14
Nationwide
Permit #
U1 150LF x 40W = 6,000 SF
U2 500 x 30'W = 15,000 SF
U3 300 x 20 W = 6,000 SF
U4 150 x 20 W = 3,000 SF
U5 120 x 20 W = 2,400 SF
U6 200 x 40 W = 8,000 SF
U7 170 x 40 W = 6,800 SF
U8 250 x 30 W = 7,500 SF
U9 300 x 20 W = 6,000 SF
U10 120 x 40 W = 4,800 SF
U11 200 x 40 W = 8,000 SF
U12 160 x 40 W = 6,400 SF
U13 600 x 40 W = 24,000 SF
U14 100 x 100 W = 10,000 SF
U15 2000 x 40 W = 80,000 SF
U16 500 x 40 W = 20,000 SF 1
U17 1100 x 20W = 22,000 SF
U18 600.x 30 W = 18,000 SF
U19 300 x low = 3,000 Sr'.
U20 550 x 20 W = 11,000 SF
U21 250 x30 W = 7,500 SF
U22 300 x 30 W = 9,000 SF
U23 450 x 30 W = 13,500 SF
U24 250 x 30 W = 7,500 SF
U25 110 x 40 W = 4,400 SF
U26 550 x 40 W = 22,000 SF
U27 550 x 40 W = 22,000 SF
U29 1400 x 30 W = 42,000 SF
U29 300 x 30 W = 9,000 SF
U30 160 x 30 W = 4,800 SF
12

1-2-
TOTAL 403,600 SF (NW 12)L1 300 x 10 W = 3000 SF 26
r
Permit #
A 190'LF x 75' W (12' Ht @ 4:1=48LF x 2 + 50' ROW)_ 14,256SF l _
B 120'LF x 150'W Same as above 18,000 S Z .
Z6
C 130'LF x 150'W Same as above = 19,500 SF ?
D I. 160'LF x 150'W Same as above = 24,000 SF -
II 80'LF x 35'W = 2,800 SF
.
.
III 35'LF x 17.5'W = "
612 SF Zb
E 40'LF x 120'W (18Ht @ 3:1=55LF + 50 ROW) = 4,800 SF Z6
F 50'LF x 80'W (5Ht @ 3:1 = 15LF x 2 + 50 ROW) = 4,000 SF
G 35'LF x 80'W Same as Above = 2,800 SF
00 SF
6
H I 30'LF x 200'W (25Ht @ 3:1 = 75LF x 2 +50 ROW) = ,0 _
ZG
*II
I 200'LF x 30'W
I IO'LF x 80'W =
(5Ht @ 3:1=15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 6,000 SF
8,800 SF 1?
*J PLANIlVIETER = 38;008 SF to
K 45'LF x 80'W (5Ht @ 3:1 = 15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 3,600 SF
600 SF
5 2-0
\
L 70' LF x 80'W
' Same as above =
= ,
400 SF
2 Z-b
M
N W
30'LF x 80
PLANIMETER (.15") Same as above
(5Ht @3:1=15 x 2 +50 ROW) = ,
1,500 SF
O PLANIN ETER (1.4") (2OHt @ 4:1 = 80 + 50 ROW) = 142,500 SF
Z?
P PLANIN ETER (1.73") (IOHt @ 3:1= 30 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 17,300 SF
Q PLANIMETER (.51") (5Ht @ 3:1 = 15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 5,100 SF
Zfv
R PLANIlvMTER (.25") (5Ht @ 3:1= 15 x 2 +50 ROW) 2,500 SF b
2
S
T 15' x 5'
PLANM ETER (.65") -
(1OHt @ IJ = 15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 758 SF
6,500 SF -
u 38'LF x 80'W (IOHt @ 3:1 = 15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 3,040 SF 7..6
V 25'LF x 80'W (10Ht @ 3:1= 15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 2,000 SF 2-6
W 5'LF x 80'W (5Ht @ 3:1 = 15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 400 SF
?
?
X 5'LF x 80'W (5Ht @ 3:1 =15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 400 SF -
y 5'LF x 80'W (5Ht @ 3:1 =15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 400 SF 1?0
Z 70'LF x 80'W (5Ht @ 3:1 = 15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 3,600 SF 1?l
AA 110' LF x 80'W (5Ht nu. 3:1 = 15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 8.800 SF 1 _
TOTAL 242,218 SF
Nationwide/
* = Storm Water Ponds
to- • Z
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
May 5, 1995
Regulatory Branch
Action ID No. 199404978, Nationwide Permit No. 12 (Utility Line Backfill and
Bedding), Nationwide Permit No. 14 (Road Crossing), Nationwide Permit No. 18
(Minor Discharges), and Nationwide Permit No. 26 (Headwater and Isolated
Waters)
Mr. Charles Winston 1
Solaris Development Corporation p
1 Copley Parkway, Suite 310 ?i
?Oju?
Morrisville, North Carolina 27560
Dear Mr. Winston:
Reference your-application of March 30, 1995, for Department of the Army
(DA) authorization to impact a total of 16.15 acres of jurisdictional wetlands
for your proposed commercial and residential development and golf course
(Sweetwater), on your approximately 900 acre tract of land located on the
north and south sides of S.R. 1550 (Winston Road), approximately 1 mile east
of S.R. 1525 (Cornwallis Road), approximately 4 miles west of Clayton,
Johnston County, North Carolina. The site is adjacent and above the
headwaters of several unnamed tributaries to White Oak Creek and adjacent to,
and below the headwaters of White Oak Creek.
Reference is also made to the telephone conversation of April 28, 1995,
between your agent, Mr. Kevin Martin with Soil & Environmental Consultants,
Incorporated, and Mrs. Jean B. Manuele of my Raleigh Field Office staff
regarding your permit application and conceptual wetland mitigation. During
this conversation, Mr. Martin was informed that we are willing to provide
nationwide permit authorization for the work provided the present, conceptual
mitigation plan is implemented. However, the permit will be conditioned to
require that a final mitigation plan is submitted and approved by the Corps
prior to any construction activities occurring within jurisdictional waters of
the United States. This final plan must include, at a minimum, a list of the
plant species to be utilized in the areas of proposed wetland enhancement,
proposed vegetative success criteria (e.g. 75% areal coverage), the
approximate dates of proposed mitigation construction, as-built plans, and a
monitoring plan with reporting procedures.
Your permit application indicated that the proposed project will involve
filling 3.84 acres and the excavation of 1.1 acres of headwaters and isolated
waters, 1.78 acres of fill in wetlands for minor road construction, 0.1 acre
of fill in wetlands associated with minor discharges and 9.33 acres of
excavation and site restoration in jurisdictional waters of the United States
associated with the construction of utility lines.
For the purposes of the Corps of Engineers' Regulatory Program, Title 33,
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 330.6, published in the Federal
Register on November 22, 1991, lists nationwide permits. Authorization was
provided, pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, for discharges of
dredged or fill material into headwaters and isolated waters. Authorization
was also provided for the discharge of material for backfill or bedding for
Printed on 0 Recycled Paper
.- %
-2-
utility lines, including outfall and intake structures, provided there is no
change in pre-construction contours. Pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and
Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, authorization was provided
for fills for roads crossing waters of the United States (including wetlands
and other special aquatic sites) provided:
a. The width of the fill is limited to the minimum necessary for the
actual crossing;
b. The fill placed in waters of the United States is limited to a filled
area of no more than one-third acre. Furthermore, no more than a total of 200
linear feet of the fill for the roadway can occur in special aquatic sites,
including wetlands; -
C. The crossing is culverted, bridged or otherwise designed to prevent
the restriction of, and to withstand, expected highflows and the movement of
aquatic organisms;
d. The crossing, including all attendant features, both temporary and
permanent, is part of a single and complete project for crossing of a water of
the United States; and
e. For fills in special aquatic sites, including wetlands, the permittee
notifies the District Engineer (DE) in accordance with the "Notification"
general condition.
Authorization was also provided for discharges of dredged or fill
material into all waters of the United States provided:
a. The discharge does not exceed 25 cubic yards;
b. The discharge will not cause the loss of more than 1/10 acre of a
special aquatic site, including wetlands. For the purposes of this nationwide
permit, the acreage limitation includes the filled area plus special aquatic
sites that are adversely affected by flooding and special aquatic sites that
are drained so that they would no longer be a water of the United States as a
result of the project.
Your proposed work is authorized by this nationwide permit, provided it
is accomplished in strict accordance with the enclosed conditions and the
following special mitigation conditions:
The conceptual mitigation plan as described in Mr. Martin's letter of
March 30, 1995, will be implemented in its entirety. A final mitigation plan,
elaborating upon this conceptual document, must be submitted and approved by
the Corps prior to any construction activities occurring within jurisdictional
waters of the United States. The final plan must include, at a minimum, a list
of the plant species to be utilized in the areas of proposed wetland
enhancement, the approximate dates of mitigation construction activities
(e.g.,-grading, planting, etc.), proposed vegetative success criteria (e.g.
f
-3-
75% aerial coverage for herbaceous vegetation), as-built plans, and a
monitoring plan with reporting procedures. The required mitigation
construction must be accomplished concurrently with the authorized work to
provide for planting of all mitigation sites within the first available
planting season (November through March) after site construction begins.
In addition to the above authorization, you must receive a Section 401 water
quality certification from the North Carolina Division of Environmental
Management (NCDEM). You should contact Mr. John Dorney, telephone (919) 733-
1786, regarding water quality certification. This nationwide permit does not
relieve you of the responsibility to obtain other required State or local
approval.
This verification will be valid until the nationwide permits are
modified, reissued or revoked, which will occur prior to January 21, 1997. It
is incumbent upon you to remain informed of changes to the nationwide permits,
which will be announced by public notice when they occur. If you commence, or
are under contract to commence, this activity before the date the nationwide
permits are modified or revoked, you will have twelve months from the date of
the modification or revocation to complete the activity under the present
terms and conditions of these nationwide permits.
Questions or comments may be addressed to Mrs. Jean B. Manuele, Raleigh
Field office, telephone [phone], Extension 24.
Sincerely,
G. Wayne Wright
Chief, Regulatory Branch
Enclosures
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
/John Dorney
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
Mr. Jeff Coutu
Planning Director
Johnston County Planning and
Inspections Department
Post Office Box 1052
Smithfield, North Carolina 27577
Mr. C.P. Thompson, Jr.
Director of Code Enforcement
Johnston County Inspections
Department
Post Office Box 1052
Smithfield, North Carolina 27577
Mr. Kevin Martin
Soil & Environmental Consultants,
Inc.
244 West Millbrook Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609

d
95279
• Soil Environmental Consultants, Inc.
244 West Millbrook Road ¦ Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 ¦ [phone] N Fax [phone]
February 24, 1995
NC DEHNR, .DEM
Water Quality Planning
Attn: Mr. John Dorney
4401 Reedy Creek Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27607
US Army Corps of Eng
Attn: Ms. Jean Manuel
6512 Falls of the Neuse
suite 105
Raleigh, NC 27615-684
v U r_
C ?
13M Erb
Dear Mr. Dorney and Ms. Manuel:
The purpose of this letter is to request Nationwide Permits 26,14,12 and 18 and
a 401 Water Quality Certification for the project known as the Sweetwater. The
project is bisected by SR 1550 and White Oak Creek in Johnston County, NC as
shown on the enclosed plans and vicinity map.
We previously met Jean Manuel on-site on two occasions to review wetland
delienations and discuss impacts. We also discussed this project in the office
with John Dorney and Danny Smith of DEM. Overall the Engineer Architect
and Developer have minimized impacts to high and medium value wetlands to
the greatest extent possible. In fact considering the amount of wetland on-site
they have done on outstanding job in wetland avoidance.
Fill in Wagers of the US will be required to develop the site for golf course and
residential community, including roadways, cart paths, parking, and lots. It will
be necessary to impact a total ofg2?acres of jurisdictional Waters of the US above
headwaters for placement of the proposed facilities. In addition to the : acres
to be impacted under NW 26. Other impacts are 1: acres for Nationwide 14
and .10 acres for below headwaters' Nationwide 18 andck33acres under
Nationwide 12. (See attached map for impact location and size.)
The plans for the development have been modified in order to minimize impacts
to wetlands; upland areas have been utilized as much as possible.
Site Photo 1 shows the high quality wetland area along White Oak Creek that
has been avoided other than for 1 road crossing. Site Photo 2 and 3 show the
low quality wetland area to be impacted for construction of a. storm water pond
(impact area J on map). Site Photo 4 shows the low quality wetland area along
an old sewer line to be impacted by the golf hole 6C (impact area G43). The
location of the Nationwide 18 impact is at 'impact area G44 and is above the
Soil/Site Evaluation ¦ Mapping and Physical Analysis ¦ Wetlands Mapping and Mitigation ¦ Environmental Audits
On-Site Waste Treatment Systems, Evaluation and Design
t
4
proposed utility line. Site Photo 5 shows the wetland area in front of the green
of hole 3B to be cleared and played over. This area has potential for being
tamed into a freshwater marsh similar to that along White Oak Creek. It
currently is a marginal wetland area of red maple, gum and loblolly pine with
minimal function and Valve. This possibility can be discussed further during
the permit process as potential enhancement
To expedite the permitting process and to ease the process for everyone
involved, the following individuals/agencies have been provided with a
complete copy of this entire,application package: Danny Smith (DEM Raleigh
Regional Office), David Franklin (Wilmington Corps), USF&WS, and NC Dept
of Cultural Resources.
Detailed plans for the residential pods surrounding the course are close to their
final version but may require future revisions. The client realizes that these
must be addressed prior to construction. It is anticipated that any changes
would require no or only minimal wetland impacts.
If you intend to perform a site visit, please call and we can,arrange for,someone
to accompany you.
Sincerely,
Kevin C. Martin,
President
cc: (w/enclosures) David Franklin, Wilmington Corps
Danny Smith, DEM Raleigh Regional Office
USF&WS
Cultural Resources
Note: S&EC has already performed an endangered species survey for the Dwarf
Wedge Mussel and submitted it to the USF&WS. They concurred with our
finding of no adverse impact to the mussel (see attached USF&WS letter dated
11/23/94). The client has agreed to follow the-USF&WS,33on-binding
recommendations in most areas'on the project except where golf holes cross the
creeks. Please note that the known population referred to in their letter is more
than 1 mile downstream of the project site, is in Swift Creek and is down stream r
of Austin Pond.- The Sweetwater project is upstream of Austin Pond.
KCM/jmb
1,

DEM ID: ACTION ID:
Nationwide Permit Requested (Provide Nationwide Permit ft 2 6 , 14 , 12 & 18
JOINT FORM FOR
Nationwide permits that require notification to the Corps of Engineers
Nationwide permits that require application for Section 401 certification
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENGINEER
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
ATTN: CESAW-CO-E
Telephone [phone]
WATER QUALITY PLANNING
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
P.O. BOX 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
ATTN: MR. JOHN DORNEY
Telephone [phone]
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE CORPS OF
ENGINEERS. SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT. PLEASE PRINT.
1. Owners Name: Charles Winston c/o Solaris Development Corporation
2. Owners Address: 1 Copley Pkwy., Ste 310, Morrisville, NC 27560
3. Owners Phone Number (Home):
(Work): 9191469-1316
4. If Apphcable: Agent's name or responsible corporate official, address, phone number.
591 and y Q pnsultants, Inc.
ttn: r. Ke in ar in, Presiclen
244 W Milllarook-R..d.
Raleigh, NC 27609 Ph: 919/846-5900
5. Location of work (MUST ATTACH MAP). County: T nh n G t nn
Nearest Town or City: Between Garner and Clayton
Specific Location (Include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): W e G. n f the i n. r s e c ion of
S.R. 1550 and 1551. See attached Section of USGS Garner Quad.
6. Name of Closest Stream/River. - White Oak r r e e k
7. River Basin e U S
8. Is this project located in a watershed classified as Trout, SA, HQW, ORW,.WSI, or WS H?
YES,( ) NO (x)
9. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property?
YES ( ) NO (x) If yes, explain.
10. Estimated total number of acres of waters of the U.S. including wetlands, located on project site:
Uncertain but more than 30
11. Number of acres of waters of the U.S. incd $gwetlandsN , impacted by the propo ed roject
Filled: 4.5 6 k,457 601
Drained:
Excavated: _
Total Impacted:
12. Description of proposed work (Attach PLANS-81/2" X 11" drawings only):
Commercial and Residential Development and Golf Course
13. Purpose of proposed work To develope a village community including a
got ours by maximizing utilization of uplands
14. State reasons why the applicant believes that this activity must be carried out in wetlands. Also,
note measures taken to minimize wetland impacts. See attached letter by S & E C .
15. Youce required to contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) regarding the presence or any Federally listed or proposed for listing
endangered or threatened species or critical habitat in the permit area that may be affected by the
proposed project Have you done so? YES (x ) NO ( )
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS AND/OR NMFS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
16. You are required to contact the State Histmic Preservation Officer (SHPO) regarding the presence
of historic properties in the permit area which may be affected by the proposed project? Have you done
so? YES ( x) . NO ( )
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
17. Additional information required by DEM:
A. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, and lakes on the property.
B. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project.
C. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant to the
placement of delineation line.
D. If a stormwater management plan is required for this project, attach copy.
E. What island use of surrounding property? Rural residential and/or a g r i cu l t u ra 1
F. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal? municipal.,
Agent's Signature Date
JUL.-25"94(MON) 16:53 WINSTON HOSPITALITY TEL:[phone] P.002
THE WINSTON GROUP, INC.
P. O. BOX 31826 /RALEIGH, MC 27622 1 2209 CEMT(IRY DRIVE ! SUITE 300
TELEPHONE [phone]
To Whom It May Concern:
I, Charles Winston, owner of approximately 974 acres in Johnston County, hereby
designated Solaris Development Corporation D.B.A. Sunstar Homes to act in my
behalf as my agent to obtain any and all permits from the appropriate government
agencies for the purpose of developing the property into a master planned residential
community, including a "town center" and 27-hole golf course.
This the 24day of July, 1
Charles Winston
THE. STATE OF NORTH CARO.IrINA
COUNTY OF WAKE
F• 1? ? , a Notary Public for Wake County,
North Carolina, ce.-tlfy that (tharles Winston personally came before me this day and
acknowledged that he executed the foregoing Instrument.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND ,AND SEAS. OF OFFICE this aday of July,
1994.
Notary Public in and for the
State of North Carolina
My commission expires
Date: --T - "7,1 - ?A A?
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402
PROJECT NAME/DESCRIPTION: Sweetwater, Johnston County, North Carolina
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
ATTENTION: Ms. Jean Benton Manuele FIELD OFFICE: Raleigh
To Whom it May Concern:
I, the contract purchaser and authorized agent of the property owners on the
attached list, hereby designate and authorize Soil and Environmental Consultants,
Inc., to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of wetland delineations,
permit applications, to furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support
of the applications, etc., from this day forward. This the 1,1! day ofNaA
.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence
this project

'Ps
Contract Purchaser
the agent for
r

ame-
Title
cc: Mr. John Dorney
North Carolina Department of EH & NR
Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Planning
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626
Mr. Kevin Martin
Soil and Environmental Consultants, Inc.
KCM/jmb

1
3

MN
GN
5'
89 MILS 1.30'
27MILS
GRID AND 1973 MAGNETIC NORTH
DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET
SCALE 1:24 000
1 2 0 1 MILE
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 FEET
1 .5 0 1 KILOMETRE
CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

GARNER, N. C.
NE/4 GARNER 15' QUADRANGLE
FIGURE 2. TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES OF 35078-F5-TF-024
SUBJECT PROPERTY
1964
PNrI'Tr'lnr?i??cn .n<.-.
Table 1
"Reason" for Impact
(Regardless of Permit Type)
Reason
Golf Cart Crossings
Golf Fill
Roads
Stormwater Lakes
Lot Fill
Acreage
0.393 ac.
0.391
4.596
2.34
0.70
WETLAND GOLF COURSE IMPACTS
Impact # Hole # Impact Type Amount of Impact Permit Type
G-1 1A Culvert Crossing 100' x 20' = 2000 S.F. Z. (o
G-2 1A Clearing 13,000 S.F. p?
G-3 2A Clearing 3,100 S.F. (v l
G-4 2A Culvert Crossing 20' x 110' = 2,200 S.F.
G-5 3A Clearing 2,175 S. F.
G-6 4A Lake Excavation 53,650 S.F. aip
G-7 5A Clearing 45,000 S.F. jy,la
G-8 5A Bride 10' x 100'
G-9 7A Fill 6045 S.F. Z(?
G-10 7A Clearing 6350 S. F. tV A
G-11 7A Clearing 29,450 S.F.
G-12 7A Bride 10' x 70' N
G-13 8A Clearing 9,750 S.F.
G-14 8A Bride 10'x 30'
G-15 2B Clearing 14,880 S.F.
G-16 2B Culvert Crossing 45'x 25' = 1125 S. F.
G-17 2B Clearing 13,800 S.F.
G-18 3B Lake Excavation 4,175 S.F. l?
G-19 3B Bride 10'x 15' f?
G-20 4B Clearing 54,550 S.F.
G-21 5B Clearing 600 S.F.
G-22 5B Culvert Pie 5'x 140'= 700 S.F. Z?
G-23 6B Culvert Crossing 20'x 10'= 200 S.F. 6
G-24 6B Clearing 2,525 S.F. a
G-25 7B Bride 10' x 265'
G-26 7B Clearing 43,550 S.F. ?A A,
G-27 8B Clearing 7,100 S. F.
G-28 8B Culvert Crossing 20'X 40'= 800 S.F. Z(o
G-29 9B Clearing 3,720 S.F.
G-30 9B Culvert Crossing 20'X 15'= 300 S.F. b
G-31 1C Fill Lake 1000 S.F. +/- Z
G-32 1 C Piping/Culvert 500 S. F. +/- (d
G-33 2C Clearing 17,300 S.F.
G-34 2C Culvert Crossing 20'X 50'= 1,000 S'.F.
G-35 3C Clearing 3,550 S.F.
'G-36 3C Culvert Crossing 25'X 20'= 500 S.F.
G-37 4C Clearing 10,700 S.F.
G-38 4C Culvert Crossing 20'X 40'= 800 S.F. 2 b
G-39 5C Culvert Crossing 20'X 30'= 600 S.F. Z(o
G-40 6C Culvert Crossing 20'X 10'= 200 S.F. 1(0
G-41 6C Culvert Crossing 20'X 10'= 200 S.F.
G-42 6C * Culvert Crossing 20'X 60'= 1200 S.F* 2,(0
G-43 6C Clearing and Fill 17,550 S.F. Clearing, A
6650 S. F. Fill Z (o
G-44 7C Clearing 2,450 S.F.
G-45 7C * Culvert Crossing 20'x 185'= 3,700 S.F. ?(o
G-46 8C Culvert Crossing 20'x 35' = 700 S.F. 2
G-47 9C Culvert Crossing 20' x 20' = 400 S.F. (o
G-48 9C Clearing 14,725 S.F.
G-49 2B NW18 above U13, Fill .1 ac. Q
L-2 Lot Fill 22,800 S.F. ?,(o
L-3 Lot Fill 1,800 S.F. Z(?
Note: All +/-The Amount
1 ?b? ronw ?a2
Q e-c
A 190'LF x 150'W (12' Ht @ 4:1=48LF x 2 + 50' ROW)= 28,500 SF -)-(o
B 120'LF x 150'W Same as above = 18,000 SF 2 (o
c 130'LF x 150'W Same as above = 19,500 SF Z?
D I. 160'LF x 150'W Same as above = 24,000 SF
It 80'LF x 35'W = 2,800 SF
III 35'LF x 17.5'W = 612 SF 2(O
E 40'LF x 120'W (18Ht @ 3:1=55LF + 50 ROW) = 4,800 SF 26
F 50'LF x 80'W (5Ht (d), 3:1 = 15LF x 2 + 50 ROW) = 4,000 SF
G 35'LF x 80'W Same as Above = 2,800 SF ?-?
H I 30'LF x 200'W (25Ht (a,) 3:1 = 75LF x 2 +50 ROW) = 6,000 SF
*II 200'LF x 30'W = 6,000 SF Z-G
I 110'LF x 80'W (511t @ 3:1=15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 8,800 SF N q

*J
PLANIMETER
=
38,008 SF ._
7 (o
K 45'LF x 80'W (51it @ 3:1 = 15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 3,600 SF Z?
L 70'LF x 80'W Same as above = 500 SF
M 30'LF x 80'W Same as above = 2,400 SF ?-?
N PLANMETER (.15") (5Ht @3:1=15 x 2 +50 ROW) = 1,500 SF Z.b
O PLANIMETER (1.4") (20Ht @ 4:1 = 80 + 50 ROW) = 14,500 SF
P PLANIMETER (1.73") (IOHt @ 3:1 = 30 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 17,300 SF
Q PLANIMETER (.51 ") (5Ht @ 3:1 = 15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 5,100 SF
R PLANIMETER (.25") (511t @ 3:1 = 15 x 2 +50 ROW) = 2,500 SF lb
S 15' x 5' = 758 SF 2-(0
T PLANIMETER (.65") (lOHt @ 3:1 = 15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 6,500 SF
U 38'LF x 80'W (101-It @ 3:1 = 15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 3,040 SF 1.(v
V 25'LF x 80'W (10Ht @ 3:1 = 15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 2,000 SF 2(0
W 5'LF x 80'W (5Ht @ 3:1 = 15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 400 SF
X 5'LF x 80'W (5Ht @ 3:1 = 15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 400 SF ?-?
Y 5'LF x 80'W (511t @ 3:1 = 15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 400 SF 1(v
Z 70'LF x 80'W (5Ht @ 3:1 = 15 x 2 + 50 ROW) _ 5,600 SF N
AA 110' LF x 80'W (51it (a. 3:1 = 15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 8.800 SF 14
TOTAL 242,218 SF.
* = Storm Water Ponds

?Ict? io'??•1 t C? ?.
U1 150LF x 40W = 6,000 SF
U2 500 x 30'W = 15,000 SF
U3 300 x 20 W = 6,000 SF
U4 150 x 20 W = 3,000 SF
U5 120 x 20 W = 2,400 SF
U6 200 x 40 W = 8,000 SF
U7 170 x 40 W = 6,800 SF
U8 250 x 30 W = 7,500 SF
U9 300 x 20 W = 6,000 SF 12
U10 120 x 40 W = 4,800 SF
Ul 1 200 x 40 W = 8,000 SF
U12 160 x 40 W = 6,400 SF
U13 600 x 40 W = 24,000 SF
U14 100 x 100 W = 10,000 SF
U15 2000 x 40 W = 80,000 SF
U16 500 x 40 W = 20,000 SF
U17 1100 x 20W = 22,000 SF
U18 600 x 30 W = 18,000 SF
L l 600 x 10 W = 6,000 SF 1-6
U20 550 x 20 W = 11,000 SF
U21 250 x 30 W = 7,500 SF
U22 300 x 30 W = 9,000 SF
U23 450 x 30 W = 13,500 SF
U24 250 x 30 W = 7,500 SF
U25 110 x 40 W = 47400 SF
U26 550 x 40 W = 22,000 SF
U27 550 x 40 W = 22,000 SF
U28 1400 x 30 W = 42,000 SF
U29 300 x 30 W = 9,000 SF
U30 160 x 30 W = 4,800 SF
1Z
TOTAL 406,600 SF (N W ???
¦
TAKE?¦
United States Department of the Interior AMEai
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Ecological Services
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
November 23, 1994
Chris Huysman
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
244 West.Millbrook Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
SUBJECT: Dwarf Wedge Mussel Survey in White Oak Creek,
Tributary of Swift Creek, Johnston County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Huysman
Thank you for your letter of November 11, 1994, regarding the
above-referenced project. Based on your survey methodology and
the negative results regarding the presence of the dwarf wedge
mussel (Alasmidon heterodon) in White Oak Creek, it appears
that this proposed project will not impact the dwarf wedge
mussel. However, we do recommend that the applicant adopt the
following precautions for a known population of the dwarf wedge
mussel at the confluence of White Oak Creek and Swift Creek:
1. Leave a natural, woody vegetation buffer extending 50 feet
on either side of the creeks;
2. Provide a 50 foot chemical free buffer zone along the
creeks.
3. Install sedimentation and erosion control barriers 'during
construction activities.
We appreciate your efforts and cooperation in providing our
agency with endangered species information early in the
permitting process. 'If you have any further questions
regarding this matter, please contact Candace Martino at 919-
856-4520 ext. 30.
Sincerely,
David Horning
Endangered Species Coordinator
?V
o_
D Vc v -
t\l??? ? B lc,caP
L

Project name'LL?Z-7 Nearest roadn1-L L?!S,)
County I MIN- j7)(Q Wetland arealP nacres Wetland wid?h H,&A kM) feet

J
9
CO
t
?S J
KL8
Wetland type (select one) Other
• D Swamp forest Z) Shoreline •
D Bottomland hardwood forest Z-1 Brackish marsh
• ? Carolina bay Freshwater marsh •
• ? Pocosin Bog/Fen •
D Pine savannah Ephemeral wetland
• D Wet flat '
The rating system cannot be applied to salt marshes.
•.•.•.•.....•.•..........•••••••••••.••••••••••••.••••••w
Sum .
Water storage

......:<.:.;::.: x 4.00 -
Bank/Shoreline stabilization "` ><:
Pollutant removal
..................... .
Sensitive watershed x 1.50 -

Tr
l
id •' 14'edandsrore
.
a
ve
corr
or
Special ecological attributes *

Wildlife habitat x 1.50 = •
Aquatic life value --?- •

Recreation/Education ?_ •
_
Economic value a 0'25 .
r?[1A CO 7
? Hydrologically connected ? Hydrologically Isolated
Project -Ame Near- -^ road
County J-2rri\)Sr0r0 Wetland areal k acres Wetland width ?? feet
.
•
Wetland type (select one) ($1 Other 2 in LQm
? Swamp forest Shoreline •
? Bottomland hardwood forest Brackish marsh
? Carolina bay Freshwater marsh •
? Pocosin ? Bog/Fen •
? Pine savannah J Ephemeral wetland
? Wet flat •
The rating system cannot be applied to salt marshes. .
sum
Water storage ?_:>:<<> <>>:;:

Bank/Shoreline stabilization x 4.00 - .
Pollutant removal 1 •

.....................
..................... .
Sensitive watershed !
" '` x 1.SQ -
-
-
'
Weiland snore •
Travel corridor

Special ecological attributes ?-
Wildlife habitat --- x 1.50 =
Aquatic life value f_
•

Recreation/Education •
x 0.25 -
Economic value s?
f •
-
*
• • . . . . • • • • . . .. . • . • . • • • • .
.•• • . • ... • . 0000 0000 . . . . . . . . . . . .
/N[c?>??(N? acw /r???, mss ?y -?--\ w??s ?v srt?{ cwW a s -
(:t"V
LJ
LJC?\l.?`?)`?L O'???.^ V?
` --
0 HydrologlcaQy connected ? Hydrologically Isolated
Site Photo 1. High quality wetland adjacent to White Oak Creek.
Site Photo 4. Golf Course impact area on hole 6 C (low quality wetland).
Site Photo 3. Location of large stormwater impoundment (low quality wetland).
Site Photo 2.
Site Photo 5. Potential wetland enhancement area (hole 313).