20160372 Ver 2_Year 0 Monitoring Report_20190820

Mitigation
L.
Project
Information
UpI(
ID#*
Select Reviewer:*
Mac Haupt
Initial Review 08/20/2019
Completed Date
Mitigation Project Submittal - 8/20/201, -
Version *
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site? *
Type of Mitigation Project:*
V Stream r- Wetlands W Buffer r- Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Lindsay Crocker
Project Informatio-
Existing 20160372
(DWR) (nunbers only no dash)
ID#:*
Project Type: F DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Stony Fork
County: Johnston
Document Information
r Yes r
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Existing
Version: (nurnbersonly)
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation As -Built Plans
File Upload: Stony Fork_ 97085_MY0_2019.pdf 13.04MB
Rease upload only one RDF of the conplete file that needs to be subnitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Lindsay Crocker
Signature:

As-built Baseline Monitoring Report

Stony Fork Restoration Site
Upper Neuse River Basin - 03020201
Monitoring Year 00
DMS Contract 6830
DMS Project Number 97085

DWR #: 2016-0372
USACE Action ID: 2016-00875
Johnston County, North Carolina

Prepared for:
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699

Baseline Data Collected: May 2019
Date Submitted: July 2019
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97085 Baseline Monitoring Document

Monitoring and Design Firm

Prepared by:

KCI Associates of North Carolina, PC
4505 Falls of Neuse Road
Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27609
[phone]

Project Contact: Tim Morris
Email: [e-mail]

June 2019

KCI ASSOCIATES OF N ORTH C AROLINA, P.A. www.kci.com
Employee-Owned Since 1988

MEMORANDUM

Date: August 7, 2019
To: Lindsay Crocker, DMS Project Manager
From: Adam Spiller, Project Manager
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
Subject: MY-00 Monitoring Report Comments
Stony Fork DMS #6830, Contract 006830
Neuse River Basin CU 030202018
Johnston County, North Carolina

Please find below our responses in italics to the MY-00 Monitoring Report comments from NCDMS
received on August 5, 2019, for the Stony Fork Restoration Site.

As-Built Drawing Comments:
 Vegetation: the table of planted species in the as-built drawings doesn’t match some of the shown
planted vegetation on Table 6. Please update the table on as-built drawings to include additional
planted (and red-line additional spp. as necessary).
 This As-built drawings have been updated to reflect the actual number and species that were
planted at the site. In addition, several stems classified as planted stems in Table 6 have been re-
classified as volunteers.

Baseline/MY0 Comments:
 Cover Page, Add the River Basin and 8-digit CU number
 This change has been made.

 Page 1, last paragraph: Pressure transducer or camera is missing on SF3. Is the crest gauge there
serving as a surrogate to provide bankfull info in lieu of flow gauge?
 The stream gauge on SF3 is a pressure transducer, like those measuring flow on the tributaries.
While the data collected from this gauge could be used to determine flow, it is currently only
being interpreted to provide verification of bankfull events. The text of the report has been
updated to make this clearer.

 Page 2, second paragraph: the vegetative success for stream buffer and riparian buffer success
criteria are intermingled. Please provide sentences separating the two success criterium for
clarity. Also, insert the other parameters for success from the Mitigation Plan, including flow
requirements and <10% change for riffles to be comprehensive and ensure that they match (check
bankfull event success). You may directly copy and paste the success criteria (7.0) from the
Mitigation Plan or reference the Mitigation Plan if easier.
 This change has been made.

E NGINEERS  S CIENTISTS  S URVEYORS  C ONSTRUCTION M ANAGERS
4505 Falls of Neuse Road Suite 400 Raleigh, NC 27609 [phone] [phone] Fax
KCI ASSOCIATES OF N ORTH C AROLINA, P.A. www.kci.com
Employee-Owned Since 1988
 Vegetation Table 5: see comment on As-Built drawings above. Please provide number of stems
and species planted to include as a separate table in the baseline report also.
 This change has been made.

 Page 25, check riffle slope in the profile section, max-min appears to be swapped.
 Tables 7a through 7h were reviewed and no cases of max-min being swapped were found.

 Long-pro: can you overlay design thalweg? This appears to show in the legend on a few reaches,
but it not visible.
 This change has been made.

 Table 1. Please re-name the ‘Restoration Footage’ column to ‘As-Built Restoration Footage.’
Provide a column to the left of ‘Restoration Footage’ that shows the ‘MP Restoration Footage’
(DMS understands there are slight differences on SF2 and SF3). Make a footnote that project
credits are based on Mitigation Plan credits. There is a lot of confusion as to what the IRT would
like to use for crediting, and DMS would like to make the numbers as visually clear as possible.
 This change has been made. The Project Components table on the As-built drawings has also
been updated to reflect the correct number of credits.

Electronic Deliverables:
 Need asset shapefiles. Stream asset should be attributed by reach name and restoration approach.
Riparian buffer shapefiles should be attributed by restoration approach (R, E, P) and broken out
to show width if the credit ratio is different (i.e. buffer restoration TOB-100, restoration 101-
200’). These asset segments should essentially match the submitted segments in Table 1.
 This change has been made.

 Need TOB feature and planted area.
 This change has been made.

 Ensure all shapefiles are submitted in NAD 83 (State Plane). Currently, these are GCS for the
monitoring features.
 This change has been made.

Sincerely,

Adam Spiller
Project Manager
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97085 Baseline Monitoring Document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROJECT SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................ 1
BASELINE CONDITONS ........................................................................................................................... 2
Figure 1. Project Site Vicinity Map .............................................................................................................. 3
REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................. 4

Appendix A – Background Tables
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits ................................................................................... 6
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History .......................................................................................... 7
Table 3. Project Contacts .............................................................................................................................. 8
Table 4. Project Information ......................................................................................................................... 9

Appendix B – Visual Assessment Data
CCPV .......................................................................................................................................................... 11
Photo Reference Points ............................................................................................................................... 17
Vegetation Plot Photos ................................................................................................................................ 19

Appendix C – Vegetation Plot Data
Table 5. Species and Quantity of Planted Stems ........................................................................................ 22
Table 6. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species ...................................................................... 23

Appendix D – Stream Measurement and Geomorphology Data
Table 7. Baseline Stream Data Summary ................................................................................................... 26
Table 8. Cross-section Morphology Data Table ......................................................................................... 34
Longitudinal Profile Plot ............................................................................................................................. 36
Cross-section Plots ...................................................................................................................................... 43
Pebble Counts ............................................................................................................................................. 59

Appendix E – As-Built Plan Sheets
As-Built Plan Sheets ................................................................................................................................... 73
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97085 1 Baseline Monitoring Document
PROJECT SUMMARY
The Stony Fork Restoration Site (SFRS) was completed in May 2019 and restored a total of 6,810 linear
feet of stream and 949,747 square feet of riparian buffer under the Neuse Buffer Rule (NCAC Rule 15A
02B.029). The SFRS is a riparian system in the Upper Neuse River Basin (03020201 8-digit cataloging
unit) in Johnston County, North Carolina. The site’s natural hydrologic regime had been substantially
modified through the relocation and straightening of the existing stream channels, impacted by land
clearing, and cleared of any riparian buffer. This completed project will restore impacted agricultural and
timber lands to a stable stream ecosystem with a functional riparian buffer and floodplain access.

The SFRS is protected by a 24.4 acre permanent conservation easement, held by the State of North Carolina.
The site is located approximately 5.5 miles north of Benson, NC. Specifically, the site is 0.2 mile west on
Elevation Road from its intersection with Federal Road (SR-1331).

The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) published the Neuse River Basin Priorities
in 2010. These were updated in for the Neuse 01 cataloging unit (CU) in 2015 due to extensive mitigation
needs and changes in watershed conditions since 2010. The project 14 digit CU 03020201150010) was
identified as a Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) in the updated priorities. The goals and priorities for the
SFRS are based on the information presented in the Neuse River Basin Restoration Priorities: maintaining
and enhancing water quality, restoring hydrology, and improving fish and wildlife habitat (NCEEP, 2009).
The project will support the following basin priorities:
‐ Managing stormwater runoff
‐ Improving/restoring riparian buffers
‐ Reducing sediment loading
‐ Improving stream stability

The goals for the project are to:
‐ Restore channelized and agriculture impacted streams to stable C/Cb channels.
‐ Restore a forested riparian buffer to provide bank stability, filtration, and shading.

The project goals will be addressed through the following objectives:
‐ Relocate a channelized stream to its historic landscape position.
‐ Install cross-sections sized to the bankfull discharge.
‐ Create bedform diversity with pools, riffles, and habitat structures
‐ Plant the site with native trees and shrubs and an herbaceous seed mix.

Project planting and construction were completed in May 2019. The SFRS involved restoration and
establishment of a functioning stream ecosystem with 6,810 linear feet of stream restored by re-meandering
the stream and by tying the bankfull elevation to the historic floodplain where feasible. The entire site was
planted to establish a forested riparian buffer. The site was constructed as designed with no major
modifications from the design plan. The monitoring components were installed in May 2019. Four
automatically recording pressure transducer stream gauges that take a reading every 10 minutes were
installed in the upper third of T1, T1-A, T2 and T3 to document flow within those reaches. Cameras were
installed in the vicinity of each of these gauges and set to record a short video once a day to provide
additional verification of flow. An additional automatically recording pressure transducer stream gauge was
installed near the bottom of the main stem (SF3) to record the occurrence of bankfull events. To determine
the success of the planted mitigation areas, seven 10 m x 10 m permanent vegetation monitoring plots were
established. An additional five 10 m x 10 m random vegetation monitoring plots were sampled as well. The
locations of the planted stems relative to the origin were recorded within the permanent plots and the species
and height of each planted stem were recorded for all plots. Any volunteers found within the plots were
also grouped into size categories by species, but separate from the planted stems. Twelve permanent photo
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97085 2 Baseline Monitoring Document
reference points were established and will be taken annually. Sixteen permanent cross-sections (eight riffle
cross-sections and eight pool cross-sections) were also established and a detailed longitudinal profile of the
stream was taken. Wolman pebble counts were performed at all of the riffle cross-sections. The cross-
section measurements will be repeated in future monitoring years, but the longitudinal profile will only be
repeated if there are concerns about bed elevation adjustments. Reports will be submitted to DMS each year
and the first year of monitoring will take place in 2019. First year monitoring data is scheduled to be
collected in November 2019, six months after baseline data collection.
Vegetative success criteria for the stream mitigation is 260 woody stems/acre after five years, and 210
woody stems/acre after seven years. Trees in each plot must average seven feet in height at Year 5 and ten
feet in height at Year 7. Volunteer species must be present for a minimum of two growing seasons and must
be a species from the approved planting list to count toward vegetative success. A single species may not
account for more than 50% of the required number of stems within any plot. A minimum of four bankfull
events must also be recorded during the monitoring period. All project streams must show a minimum of
30 continuous days of flow within a calendar year for three out of the first four years of monitoring. Bank
height ratios (BHR) should not exceed 1.2 and the entrenchment ratios (ER) should be 2.2 or greater. BHR
and ER at any measured riffle cross-section should not change more than 10% from the baseline
condition during any given monitoring interval (e.g. no more than 10% between years 1 and 2, 2 and 3, 3
and 5, or 5 and 7). Visual assessments will also be used to identify problem areas.
Vegetative success criteria for the areas proposed for riparian buffer credit is 260 woody stems/acre at the
end of five years of monitoring. Trees in each plot must average seven feet in height at Year 5. There
should be a minimum of four native hardwood tree species, with no species greater than 50% of the stems.
Volunteer species must be from the approved planting list to count toward vegetative success.
BASELINE CONDITIONS
The site was planted in May 2019 with tree tube protection installed around approximately 1 out of every
14 of the planted stems. The baseline conditions monitoring was conducted May 6 through 15, 2019. The
average plot stem density from the twelve surveyed plots is 1,523 planted stems/acre. Baseline monitoring
was conducted during dormancy, so most of the stems were not identified to species. During MY01, these
trees will be identified to species.
The baseline survey found that the stream was constructed as designed and all structures were installed as
planned with small variations called out in the as-built plans. The profile and cross-section survey found
that the dimension and profile of the stream are as designed, with some small variation as is typical for
stream restoration projects.
o
o
o
ooo
o
o
oo
o
o
o
o
oooo o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
ooo o
o
o
oo
o
o
o
o
o
ooo
o
o
o
oooo o
o
o oo
o
ooo
o
ooo
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
oooo o
o
oo
o
oo
o
o o
o
o
o
o
o
oo
o
o
o o
o
o
o
o
oooooooo ooo oooooo oooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
o
oo o
o o
oo
o
o
o
oo
o
o
o
o
o
ooo
o
oo o
oo
o
o
oo
o
o
o
o
o o
oo
o
o
ooo
o
oooo
o
o
o
o
oo
ooo
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o o ooo
o
o
oo
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
oo
o
o
o
o
o
o
oo
o o
o
o
oo
o
o
o
o
oo
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
ÊÚ
§¨¦40
§¨¦95
50
27
242
242
£¤301
BENSON
B l a c k Creek
ÊÚ
WAKE
JOHNSTON
WAYNE
NASH
SAMPSON
HARNETT
WILSON
ÊÚ Project Site Location
County Boundary
Major Roads
Minor Roads o Airports (none within a 5-mi radius)
Major Rivers and Streams
Cities and Towns Elevation RdFederal RdÜ 0 10.5 Miles
FIGURE 1. VICINITY MAP, STONY FORK RESTORATION SITE, JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97085 4 Baseline Monitoring Document
REFERENCES

NCDENR, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. 2010. Neuse River Basin Restoration Priorities
2009. Raleigh, NC. Last accessed 5/2019 at:
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Mitigation%20Services/Watershed_Planning/Neuse_River_Bas
in/FINAL%20RBRP%20Neuse%202010_%2020111207%20CORRECTED.pdf9

NCDENR, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. 2014. NCDENR, Ecosystem Enhancement
Program. 2014.
Stream and Wetland Mitigation Monitoring Guidelines. Last accessed 1/2016 at:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?p_l_id=60409&folderId=18877169
&name=DLFE-86604.pdf

NCDENR, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. 2014. Stream and Wetland Mitigation Monitoring
Guidelines. Last accessed 6/2015 at:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?p_l_id=60409&folderId=18877169
&name=DLFE-86606.pdf

Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97085 5 Baseline Monitoring Document
APPENDIX A
Background Tables
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97085 6 Baseline Monitoring Document
*Mitigation Plan footage used for credit calculations. **Crossings have been removed from creditable linear footage for all project streams
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Stony Fork Restoration Site, DMS Project #97085
Mitigation Credits
Stream Riparian
Wetland
Non-riparian
Wetland Buffer
Nitrogen
Nutrient
Offset
Phosphorous
Nutrient
Offset
Type R RE R RE R RE R RE
Linear
Feet/Acres 6,405 405 450,285 sf 499,462 sf
Credits 6,405 181 425,434 59,904
TOTAL
CREDITS 6,586 480,338
Project Components
Project
Component
-or-
Reach ID
Stationing/
Location
Existing
Footage/
Square Footage
Approach
(PI, PII
etc.)
Restoration
-or-
Restoration
Equivalent
MP
Restoration
Footage*
As-built
Restoration
Footage
Mitigation
Ratio
SF1 10+00 – 21+55 1,235 PI/PII R 1,155 1,155 1:1
SF2 21+55 – 49+54 2,453 PI R 2,707** 2,714** 1:1
SF3 49+54 – 56+08 618 PI R 624** 624** 1:1
T1 100+00 – 105+10 365 PI/PII R 510 510 1:1
T1A 150+00 – 151+59 47 PI/PII R 159 159 1:1
T2-1 200+00 – 203+34 327 N/A EII 334 334 2.5:1
T2-2 203+34 – 206+71 326 PI/PII R 337 337 1:1
T2-3 206+71 – 215+26 780 PI/PII R 855 855 1:1
T3-1 300+00 – 300+71 72 PI/PII EI 71 71 1.5:1
T3-2 300+71 – 301+29 82 PI/PII R 58 58 1:1
Buffer
Restoration
TOB to 100’
N/A 413,194 N/A R 413,194 413,194 100%
Buffer
Restoration
101-200’
N/A 37,091 N/A R 37,091 37,091 33%
Buffer
Enhancement
TOB to 100’
N/A 74,802 N/A E 74,802 74,802 50%
Buffer
Preservation
TOB to 100’
N/A 424,660 N/A P 424,660 424,660 10%
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97085 7 Baseline Monitoring Document
Activity or Report Data Collection Complete Actual Completion or
Delivery
Mitigation Plan Sept. 5, 2018
Final Design - Construction Plans Oct. 15, 2018
Construction Grading Completed May 3, 2019
Planting Completed May 6, 2019
Baseline Monitoring/Report July 2018
Vegetation Monitoring May 9, 2019
Stream Survey May 15, 2019
Table 2. Project Activity & Reporting History
Stony Fork Restoration Sites, DMS Project #97085
Component Summation
Restoration Level Stream
(linear feet)
Riparian Wetlands
(Acres)
Non-Riparian
Wetlands
(Acres)
Buffer (square feet)
Riverine Non-Riverine
Restoration 6,405 450,285
Enhancement 74,802
Enhancement I 71
Enhancement II 334
Creation
Preservation 424,660
(175,029 allowable for credit)
High Quality
Preservation
TOTAL CREDITS 6,586 480,338
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97085 8 Baseline Monitoring Document

Table 3. Project Contacts
Stony Fork Restoration Site, DMS Project #97085
Design Firm KCI Associates of North Carolina, PC
4505 Falls of Neuse Road
Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27609
Contact: Mr. Tim Morris
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Construction Contractor Fluvial Solutions, Inc.
Stony Fork and T3 PO Box 28749
Raleigh, NC 27611
Contact: Mr. Peter Jelenevsky
Phone: [phone]
Construction Contractor KCI Environmental Technologies and Construction
T1, T1A, and T2 4505 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27609
Contact: Mr. Tim Morris
Phone: [phone]
Planting Contractor Bruton Natural Systems, Inc.
PO Box 1197
Fremont, NC 27830
Contact: Mr. Charlie Bruton
Phone: [phone]
Monitoring Performers

KCI Associates of North Carolina, PC
4505 Falls of Neuse Road
Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27609
Contact: Mr. Adam Spiller
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97085 9 Baseline Monitoring Document

Table 4. Project Information
Stony Fork Restoration Site, DMS Project #97085
Project Name Stony Fork Restoration Site
County Johnston County
Project Area 24.4 acres
Project Coordinates (lat. and long.) 35°26'55.0"N, 78°31'18.5"W
Planted Acreage (acres of woody
stems planted) 24.4 acres
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Coastal Plain
River Basin Neuse
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit 03020201 USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit 03020201150010
DWQ Sub-basin 03-04-04
Project Drainage Area (acres) 497 acres
Project Drainage Area Percentage of
Impervious Area 5%
CGIA Land Use Classification
Managed Herbaceous Cover 53% (262 ac), Mixed Hardwoods/Conifers 31% (150 ac), Low
Density Developed 9% (42 ac), Medium Density Residential 5% (24 ac),
Transportation/Impervious 3% (13 ac)
Existing Reach Summary Information
Parameters Stony Fork T1 and T1A T2 T3
Length of reach (linear feet) 3,141 412 1,433 154
Valley confinement
Drainage area (acres) 497 12 150 29
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral Perennial Intermittent Perennial Intermittent
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification C; NSW C; NSW C; NSW C; NSW
Stream Classification (existing) G4c G4 G4 G4
Stream Classification (proposed) C4 C4 C4 C4
Evolutionary trend (Simon) Channelized, Stage III Channelized, Stage III Channelized, Stage III Modified with
pond, Stage III
FEMA classification None None None None
Existing Wetland Summary Information
Parameters
Size of Wetland (acres) 0.33 (WA and WE) 0.06 (WB) 0.14 (WC and WF)
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Bottomland
Hardwood Forest Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh
Mapped Soil Series Gilead sandy loam Bibb sandy loam Bibb sandy loam
Drainage class Moderately Well Drained Poorly Drained Poorly Drained
Soil Hydric Status Non-hydric Hydric Hydric
Source of Hydrology Surface Water Stream Floodplain Stream Floodplain
Restoration or Enhancement Method N/A N/A N/A

Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97085 10 Baseline Monitoring Document
Table 4, continued
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation Applicable? Resolved? Supporting
Documentation
Waters of the United States – Section
404 Yes Yes 404 permit
Waters of the United States – Section
401 Yes Yes 401 permit
Endangered Species Act No N/A N/A
Historic Preservation Act No N/A N/A
Coastal Zone Management Act
(CZMA)/ Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA)
No N/A N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance No Yes N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat No N/A N/A

Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97085 11 Baseline Monitoring Document

APPENDIX B

Visual Assessment Data

^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
Star t SF1
T2-1
SF2
T2-2
T1 T1A
T3-1 T3-2
T2-3
SF3
Sheet 1
Sheet 4
Sheet 3
Sheet 2
4
6
5
3
2
1 75
2 83 4916121 0 14134
5
6
7
2
3
1 R1
R5
R4
R2
R3
Source: Google Earth, 2018
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLANVIEW STO NY FOR K RESTORATION SITEJOHNSTON COUNTY, NC ±0 310155Feet
Stream Mitigation
R (6,405 lf / 6,405 SMCs)
EI (71 lf / 47 SMC s)
EII (334 lf / 134 SMCs)
Buffer Mitig ation
R 0-100'(413,194 sf / 413,194 credits)
R 101-200'(37,091 sf / 12,240 credits)
E (74,802 sf / 37,401 credits)
P (424,660 sf / 17,503 credits)
Project Easement
Cross-Sections
^_Photo Points
Flow G auge
Camera
Bankfull Gauge
Vegetation Monitoring Plots
Success Criteria Met
Success Criteria Not Met
Overview
^_
^_
Star t SF1
SF2
T1 T1A
T3-1 T3-2
27+0026+0025+0024+0023+0022+0021+0020+0019+0018+0017+0016+0015+0014+0013+0012+0011+0010+003 0 1 +0 0
3 0 0 +0 0
151+00
1
5
0
+
0
0
104+00103+001 0 2 +0 0
101+00100+0029+0028+002
1 12
3 491211
1 0
4
1 R1
R2
Source: Google Earth, 2018
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLANVIEW STO NY FOR K RESTORATION SITEJOHNSTON COUNTY, NC ±0 10050Feet
Stream Mitigation
R (6,405 lf / 6,405 SMCs)
EI (71 lf / 47 SMC s)
EII (334 lf / 134 SMCs)
Buffer Mitig ation
R 0-100'(413,194 sf / 413,194 credits)
R 101-200'(37,091 sf / 12,240 credits)
E (74,802 sf / 37,401 credits)
P (424,660 sf / 17,503 credits)
Project Easement
Cross-Sections
^_Photo Points
Flow G auge
Camera
Bankfull Gauge
Vegetation Monitoring Plots
Success Criteria Met
Success Criteria Not Met
SHEET 1 of 4
^_27+0042+0041+0040+0039+0038+0037+0036+0035+0034+0033+0032+0031+0030+0029+0028+0044+0043+003
5
6
3 42
3
R2
R3
Source: Google Earth, 2018
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLANVIEW STO NY FOR K RESTORATION SITEJOHNSTON COUNTY, NC ±0 10050Feet
Stream Mitigation
R (6,405 lf / 6,405 SMCs)
EI (71 lf / 47 SMC s)
EII (334 lf / 134 SMCs)
Buffer Mitig ation
R 0-100'(413,194 sf / 413,194 credits)
R 101-200'(37,091 sf / 12,240 credits)
E (74,802 sf / 37,401 credits)
P (424,660 sf / 17,503 credits)
Project Easement
Cross-Sections
^_Photo Points
Flow G auge
Camera
Bankfull Gauge
Vegetation Monitoring Plots
Success Criteria Met
Success Criteria Not Met
SHEET 2 of 4
^_
^_
T2-3
SF3
42+0041+0056+0055+0054+0053+0052+0051+0050+0048+0047+0046+0045+0044+0043+00214+00213+00
2 1 2 +0 0211+00210+00209+0049+00215+00208+00207+0020 6 +0 0
6
5 75
6 816157
6
3
R5
R4
Source: Google Earth, 2018
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLANVIEW STO NY FOR K RESTORATION SITEJOHNSTON COUNTY, NC ±0 10050Feet
Stream Mitigation
R (6,405 lf / 6,405 SMCs)
EI (71 lf / 47 SMC s)
EII (334 lf / 134 SMCs)
Buffer Mitig ation
R 0-100'(413,194 sf / 413,194 credits)
R 101-200'(37,091 sf / 12,240 credits)
E (74,802 sf / 37,401 credits)
P (424,660 sf / 17,503 credits)
Project Easement
Cross-Sections
^_Photo Points
Flow G auge
Camera
Bankfull Gauge
Vegetation Monitoring Plots
Success Criteria Met
Success Criteria Not Met
SHEET 3 of 4
^_
^_
T2-1 T2-2
T2-3
SF3
51+0050+0048+00214+00213+00
2 1 2 +0 0211+00210+00209+0049+00215+00208+00207+0020 6 +0 0
205+00
204+00203+00202+00201+00200+004
5 7161514135
6
7
R4
Source: Google Earth, 2018
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLANVIEW STO NY FOR K RESTORATION SITEJOHNSTON COUNTY, NC ±0 10050Feet
Stream Mitigation
R (6,405 lf / 6,405 SMCs)
EI (71 lf / 47 SMC s)
EII (334 lf / 134 SMCs)
Buffer Mitig ation
R 0-100'(413,194 sf / 413,194 credits)
R 101-200'(37,091 sf / 12,240 credits)
E (74,802 sf / 37,401 credits)
P (424,660 sf / 17,503 credits)
Project Easement
Cross-Sections
^_Photo Points
Flow G auge
Camera
Bankfull Gauge
Vegetation Monitoring Plots
Success Criteria Met
Success Criteria Not Met
SHEET 4 of 4
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97085 17 Baseline Monitoring Report

Photo Reference Photos

PP1U – MY-00 – 5/15/19 PP1D – MY-00 – 5/15/19

PP2U – MY-00 – 5/15/19 PP2D – MY-00 – 5/15/19

PP3U – MY-00 – 5/15/19 PP3D – MY-00 – 5/15/19
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97085 18 Baseline Monitoring Report

PP4U – MY-00 – 5/15/19 PP4D – MY-00 – 5/15/19

PP5U – MY-00 – 5/15/19 PP5D – MY-00 – 5/15/19

PP6U – MY-00 – 5/15/19 PP6D – MY-00 – 5/15/19

Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97085 19 Baseline Monitoring Report

Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos

Vegetation Plot 1 – MY-00 – 5/15/19 Vegetation Plot 2 – MY-00 – 5/15/19

Vegetation Plot 3 – MY-00 – 5/15/19 Vegetation Plot 4 – MY-00 – 5/15/19

Vegetation Plot 5 – MY-00 – 5/15/19 Vegetation Plot 6 – MY-00 - 5/15/19

Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97085 20 Baseline Monitoring Report

Vegetation Plot 7 – MY-00 – 5/15/19 Vegetation Plot R1 – MY-00 – 5/15/19

Vegetation Plot R2 – MY00 – 5/15/19 Vegetation Plot R3 – MY00 – 5/15/19

Vegetation Plot R4 – MY00 – 5/15/19 Vegetation Plot R5 – MY00 – 5/15/19

Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97085 21 Baseline Monitoring Report

APPENDIX C

Vegetation Plot Data

Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMS Project #97085 22 Baseline Monitoring Report Table 5. Species and Quantity of Planted Stems Stony Fork Restoration Site, DMS Project #97085Common Name Scientific Name 1 Gallon Containers Bare Root Live Stakes Sycamore Platanus occidentalis 145 3120 Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii 142 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 2720 River Birch Betula nigra 3120 Willow Oak Quercus phellos 3220 Tulip Poplar Liriodenron tulipifera 145 3320 Southern Red Oak Quercus falcata 26 2300 White Oak Quercus alba 27 1900 Persimmon Diospyros virginiana 900 Pin Oak Quercus palustris 70 900 Bald Cypress Taxodium distichum 400 Black Willow Salix nigra 2525 Silky Willow Salix sericea 2525 Silky Dogwood Cornus ammomum 400 2525
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMS Project #97085 23 Baseline Monitoring Report Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted TotalBald Cypress (Taxodium distichum)11Elderberry (Sambucus canadensis)Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)225566Oak (Quercus sp.) 11 22 11 77Pin Oak (Quercus palustris)2211Red Maple (Acer rubrum)2River Birch (Betula nigra)1111Silky Dogwood (Cornus amomum)22 33 44 11Sugar Berry (Celtis laevigata)Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxi) 33 111111Sweet Bay (Magnolia virginiana)1Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis)3311 1111 11Tulip Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera)3311White Oak (Quercus alba)14Willow Oak (Quercus phellos)11 2 2Unknown 15 15 22 22 22 22 4 4 5 5 13 13 16 1627 27 26 26 26 26 20 20 17 23 20 20 22 226 6 4 4 446 6 6 8 556 61093 1052 1052 809 688 809 890Current Plot Data (MY00 2019)Table 6. Stem Count by Plot and SpeciesStony Fork Restoration Site, DMS Project #97085Plot 06 Plot 07110.025 0.025Plot 01 Plot 02 Plot 03 Plot 04 Plot 051Speciessize (ACRES)Species countStems per ACREStem countsize (ares)0.02511110.025 0.025 0.025 0.025
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMS Project #97085 24 Baseline Monitoring Report Stony Fork Restoration Site, DMS Project #97085SpeciesPlanted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted TotalBald Cypress (Taxodium distichum)11Elderberry (Sambucus canadensis)22Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)2 2 66335 5 2929Oak (Quercus sp.)1 1 11332 2 1818Pin Oak (Quercus palustris)33Red Maple (Acer rubrum)2River Birch (Betula nigra)22Silky Dogwood (Cornus amomum)10 10Sugar Berry (Celtis laevigata)22Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxi)1177Sweet Bay (Magnolia virginiana)1Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis)2299Tulip Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera)1166 331414White Oak (Quercus alba)1125Willow Oak (Quercus phellos)33Unknown8 8 16 16 40 40 17 17 21 21 199 19915 19 24 24 52 52 24 24 24 24 297 30780.2068444433221216607 971 2104 971 971 1502 1553Current Plot Data (MY00 2019) Annual MeansTable 6, continued.size (ares)size (ACRES)Stem count111110.025 0.025 0.025MY00 (2019)Plot R50.025Stems per ACREPlot R1 Plot R2 Plot R3 Plot R4Species count0.025
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97085 25 Baseline Monitoring Report 

APPENDIX D

Stream Measurement and Geomorphology Data

Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMS Project #97085 26 Baseline Monitoring Report Table 7a. SF1 Data Summary Stony Fork Restoration Site, DMS Project #97085 Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data Design As-built Dimension - Riffle Min Mean Max n Bankfull Width (ft) 7.2 14.8-18.8 9.7 9.3 1 Floodprone Width (ft) 8.7 >50 100 >80 1 Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.9 1.3-1.8 0.7 0.8 1 Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.2 1.9-2.4 1.1 1.2 1 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) 6.4 25 7.0 7.0 1 Width/Depth Ratio 8.1 9.0-14.0 13.5 12.2 1 Entrenchment Ratio 1.2 >2.5 10.3 8.7 1 Bank Height Ratio 2.9 1.0-1.2 1.0 1.0 1 Pattern Channel Beltwidth (ft) * 60 30-55 30-55 Radius of Curvature (ft) * 16—87 20-29 20-29 Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) * 3.5—12.9 9.6-13.6 9.6-13.6 Meander Wavelength (ft) * 66—191 93-132 93-132 Meander Width Ratio * 4.1 3.1-5.7 3.1-5.7 Profile Riffle Length (ft) 23.40 31.55 40.95 17 Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.009 0.013—0.035 0.009-0.015 0.0031 0.0141 0.0137 17 Pool Length (ft) * 14—33 21-46 12.47 28.73 41.34 17 Pool Spacing (ft) * 2.7—7.1 5.6-7.3 44.28 68.72 142.01 17 Substrate and Transport Parameters SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% /Be% 3/40/57/0/0/0 0/4/90/7/0/0 d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm) 0.15/1.2/2.2/7.5/11/-0.4/7.1 Gravel Gravel 9.4/16/22/33/53/70 Channel length (ft) 1235 1155 1155 Drainage Area (SM) 0.27 1.49 0.27 0.27 Rosgen Classification G4c C4 C4 C4 Sinuosity 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 Water Surface Slope (ft/ft) 0.009 0.005 0.009 0.01 * : no data shown for pools, radius of curvature or meanders in existing stream do to channelization / lack of bed diversity
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMS Project #97085 27 Baseline Monitoring Report Table 7b. SF2 Baseline Stream Data Summary Stony Fork Restoration Site, DMS Project #97085 Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data (SF) Design As-built Dimension - Riffle Min Mean Max n Bankfull Width (ft) 5.0-10.0 14.8-18.8 11.3 12.2 12.4 12.6 2 Floodprone Width (ft) 7.4-14.5 >50 100 53.3 67.0 80.7 2 Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1.0-1.4 1.3-1.8 0.8 0.9 0.95 1.0 2 Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.3-2.2 1.9-2.4 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.6 2 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) 6.9-8.9 25 9.4 10.6 11.6 12.5 2 Width/Depth Ratio 3.7-11.2 9.0-14.0 13.5 12.8 13.5 14.1 2 Entrenchment Ratio 1.4-1.5 >2.5 8.8 4.2 5.4 6.6 2 Bank Height Ratio 1.6-2.1 1.0-1.2 1.0 1 1 1 2 Pattern Channel Beltwidth (ft) * 60 37-65 37-65 Radius of Curvature (ft) * 16—87 22-33 22-33 Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) * 3.5—12.9 9.3-13.1 9.3-13.1 Meander Wavelength (ft) * 66—191 105-148 105-148 Meander Width Ratio * 4.1 3.3-5.8 3.3-5.8 Profile Riffle Length (ft) 17.58 39.07 86.38 36 Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.003-0.008 0.013—0.035 0.009 - 0.015 0.0021 0.0118 0.0256 36 Pool Length (ft) * 14—33 24-52 12.51 28.83 52.39 34 Pool Spacing (ft) * 2.7—7.1 5.2-7.4 43.01 81.44 178.86 34 Substrate and Transport Parameters SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% /Be% 20.3/30/49.8/0/0/0 5/8/54/33/0/0 d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm) 0.33/0.61/1.2/6.2/9.8/0.3/5.5 Gravel Gravel 5.9/31/45/61/98.5/140 Channel length (ft) 2453 2802 2802 Drainage Area (SM) 0.41 1.49 0.41 0.41 Rosgen Classification G4c—G5c C4 C4 C4 Sinuosity 1.1 1.3 1.2 1.2 Water Surface Slope (ft/ft) 0.008 0.005 0.008 0.008 * : no data shown for pools, radius of curvature or meanders in existing stream do to channelization / lack of bed diversity
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMS Project #97085 28 Baseline Monitoring Report Table 7c. SF3 Baseline Stream Data Summary Stony Fork Restoration Site, DMS Project #97085 Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data (SF) Design As-built Dimension - Riffle Min Mean Max n Bankfull Width (ft) 10.5 14.8-18.8 12.6 11.6 1 Floodprone Width (ft) 14.4 >50 100 92.4 1 Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1.2 1.3-1.8 0.9 1.1 1 Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.3 1.9-2.4 1.4 1.7 1 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) 12.5 25 11.8 12.9 1 Width/Depth Ratio 8.9 9.0-14.0 13.5 10.4 1 Entrenchment Ratio 1.4 >2.5 7.9 8.0 1 Bank Height Ratio 2.0 1.0-1.2 1.0 1.0 1 Pattern Channel Beltwidth (ft) * 60 46-77 46-77 Radius of Curvature (ft) * 16—87 28-35 28-35 Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) * 3.5—12.9 11.7-14 11.7-14 Meander Wavelength (ft) * 66—191 148-176 148-176 Meander Width Ratio * 4.1 3.7-6.1 3.7-6.1 Profile Riffle Length (ft) 7.4 35.2 52.4 7 Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.006 0.013—0.035 0.01 0.0032 0.0075 0.0175 7 Pool Length (ft) * 14—33 35-62 12.4 33.9 39.7 7 Pool Spacing (ft) * 2.7—7.1 6.7-8.0 92.0 103.1 114.4 7 Substrate and Transport Parameters SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% /Be% 10/0/0/0/0/0 21/21/40/18/0/0 d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm) 1.1/6.0/8.3/12/15/-0.7/3.3 Gravel Gravel 0.06/0.77/16/29/70/120 Channel length (ft) 618 654 654 Drainage Area (SM) 0.84 1.49 0.84 0.84 Rosgen Classification G4c C4 C4 C4 Sinuosity 1.1 1.3 1.2 1.2 Water Surface Slope (ft/ft) 0.006 0.005 0.008 0.006 * : no data shown for pools, radius of curvature or meanders in existing stream do to channelization / lack of bed diversity 
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMS Project #97085 29 Baseline Monitoring Report Table 7d. T1 Baseline Stream Data Summary Stony Fork Restoration Site, DMS Project #97085 Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data (SF) Design As-built Dimension - Riffle Min Mean Max n Bankfull Width (ft) 3.4 14.8-18.8 5.0 4.2 1 Floodprone Width (ft) 4.5 >50 50 45.0 1 Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.3 1.3-1.8 0.4 0.2 1 Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.4 1.9-2.4 0.6 0.5 1 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) 0.9 25 1.9 0.9 1 Width/Depth Ratio 12.7 9.0-14.0 13.5 18.6 1 Entrenchment Ratio 1.3 >2.5 10 10.8 1 Bank Height Ratio 4.5 1.0-1.2 1.0 1.0 1 Pattern Channel Beltwidth (ft) * 60 23-37 23-37 Radius of Curvature (ft) * 16—87 11-17 11-17 Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) * 3.5—12.9 11.6-14.4 11.6-14.4 Meander Wavelength (ft) * 66—191 58-72 58-72 Meander Width Ratio * 4.1 4.6-7.4 4.6-7.4 Profile Riffle Length (ft) 4.53 18.2 29.1 11 Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.035 0.013—0.035 0.014-0.04 0.00 0.024 0.045 11 Pool Length (ft) * 14—33 11-29 7.29 40.2 65.6 11 Pool Spacing (ft) * 2.7—7.1 6.2-8.8 35.7 45.7 60.3 11 Substrate and Transport Parameters SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% /Be% 10/3/21/66/0/0 d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm) Silt-Clay Gravel Gravel 37/65/78/94/130/170 Channel length (ft) 365 510 510 Drainage Area (SM) 0.02 1.49 0.02 0.02 Rosgen Classification G5 C4 C4 C4 Sinuosity 1.0 1.3 1.2 1.2 Water Surface Slope (ft/ft) 0.035 0.005 0.020 0.019 * : no data shown for pools, radius of curvature or meanders in existing stream do to channelization / lack of bed diversity
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMS Project #97085 30 Baseline Monitoring Report Table 7e. T2-1 Baseline Stream Data Summary Stony Fork Restoration Site, DMS Project #97085 Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data Design As-built Dimension - Riffle Bankfull Width (ft) 4.5-5.7 14.8-18.8 5.0 Floodprone Width (ft) 5.7-30.7 >50 50 Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.8-1.7 1.3-1.8 0.4 Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.2-2.1 1.9-2.4 0.6 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) 3.6-9.4 25 1.9 Width/Depth Ratio 3.4-5.4 9.0-14.0 13.5 Entrenchment Ratio 1.3-5.4 >2.5 10 Bank Height Ratio 1.5-4.1 1.0-1.2 1.0 Pattern Channel Beltwidth (ft) * 60 25-40 25-40 Radius of Curvature (ft) * 16—87 12-15 12-15 Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) * 3.5—12.9 14 14 Meander Wavelength (ft) * 66—191 70 70 Meander Width Ratio * 4.1 5.0-8.0 5.0-8.0 Profile Riffle Length (ft) Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.009-0.020 0.013—0.035 0.016 Pool Length (ft) * 14—33 6-16 Pool Spacing (ft) * 2.7—7.1 6.4-8.0 Substrate and Transport Parameters SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% /Be% d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm) Silt-Clay Gravel Gravel Channel length (ft) 327 334 334 Drainage Area (SM) 0.23 1.49 0.04 0.04 Rosgen Classification G5c C4 C4 C4 Sinuosity 1.1 1.3 1.2 1.2 Water Surface Slope (ft/ft) 0.014 0.005 0.012 * : no data shown for pools, radius of curvature or meanders in existing stream do to channelization / lack of bed diversity 
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMS Project #97085 31 Baseline Monitoring Report Table 7f. T2-2 Baseline Stream Data Summary Stony Fork Restoration Site, DMS Project #97085 Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data Design As-built Min Mean Max n Bankfull Width (ft) 4.5-5.7 14.8-18.8 7.6 9.7 1 Floodprone Width (ft) 5.7-30.7 >50 50 43.4 1 Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.8-1.7 1.3-1.8 0.6 0.6 1 Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.2-2.1 1.9-2.4 0.8 1.0 1 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) 3.6-9.4 25 4.3 5.8 1 Width/Depth Ratio 3.4-5.4 9.0-14.0 13.4 16.4 1 Entrenchment Ratio 1.3-5.4 >2.5 6.6 4.5 1 Bank Height Ratio 1.5-4.1 1.0-1.2 1.0 1.0 1 Pattern Channel Beltwidth (ft) * 60 28-45 28-45 Radius of Curvature (ft) * 16—87 16-23 16-23 Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) * 3.5—12.9 11.2-11.8 11.2-11.8 Meander Wavelength (ft) * 66—191 85-90 85-90 Meander Width Ratio * 4.1 3.7-5.9 3.7-5.9 Profile Riffle Length (ft) 20.0 29.0 56.7 6 Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.009-0.020 0.013—0.035 0.014 0.01 0.018 0.028 6 Pool Length (ft) * 14—33 14-24 10.8 17.6 22.8 6 Pool Spacing (ft) * 2.7—7.1 5.7-6.6 47.0 48.8 51.2 6 Substrate and Transport Parameters SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% /Be% 6/45/15/33/0/0 d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm) Silt-Clay Gravel Gravel 26/35/42/51/74/110 Channel length (ft) 326 337 337 Drainage Area (SM) 0.23 1.49 0.15 0.15 Rosgen Classification G5c C4 C4 C4 Sinuosity 1.1 1.3 1.2 1.2 Water Surface Slope (ft/ft) 0.014 0.005 0.012 0.011 * : no data shown for pools, radius of curvature or meanders in existing stream do to channelization / lack of bed diversity
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMS Project #97085 32 Baseline Monitoring Report Table 7g. T2-3 Baseline Stream Data Summary Stony Fork Restoration Site, DMS Project #97085 Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data Design As-built Dimension - Riffle Min Mean Max n Bankfull Width (ft) 4.5-5.7 14.8-18.8 9.0 8.6 1 Floodprone Width (ft) 5.7-30.7 >50 50 80.9 1 Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.8-1.7 1.3-1.8 0.6 0.7 1 Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.2-2.1 1.9-2.4 1.0 1.2 1 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) 3.6-9.4 25 5.8 6.0 1 Width/Depth Ratio 3.4-5.4 9.0-14.0 13.9 12.3 1 Entrenchment Ratio 1.3-5.4 >2.5 5.6 9.4 1 Bank Height Ratio 1.5-4.1 1.0-1.2 1.0 1.0 1 Pattern Channel Beltwidth (ft) * 60 32-45 32-45 Radius of Curvature (ft) * 16—87 18-23 18-23 Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) * 3.5—12.9 10.2-11.1 10.2-11.1 Meander Wavelength (ft) * 66—191 92-100 92-100 Meander Width Ratio * 4.1 3.6-6.0 3.6-6.0 Profile Riffle Length (ft) 25.8 33.6 38.9 15 Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.009-0.020 0.013—0.035 0.012-0.015 0.002 0.014 0.024 15 Pool Length (ft) * 14—33 12-34 8.48 35.6 91.4 14 Pool Spacing (ft) * 2.7—7.1 5.1-7.0 45.7 57.3 77.4 14 Substrate and Transport Parameters SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% /Be% 4/7/65/24/0/0 d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm) 0.031/0.13/0.21/2.0/6.1/0.1/8 Gravel Gravel 18/35/45/77/120 Channel length (ft) 780 855 855 Drainage Area (SM) 0.23 1.49 0.23 0.23 Rosgen Classification G5c C4 C4 C4 Sinuosity 1.1 1.3 1.2 1.2 Water Surface Slope (ft/ft) 0.014 0.005 0.011 0.011 * : no data shown for pools, radius of curvature or meanders in existing stream do to channelization / lack of bed diversity 
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMS Project #97085 33 Baseline Monitoring Report Table 7h. T3 Baseline Stream Data Summary Stony Fork Restoration Site, DMS Project #97085 Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data Design As-built Dimension - Riffle Min Mean Max n Bankfull Width (ft) 4.2-4.8 14.8 5.0 5.2 1 Floodprone Width (ft) 5.0-5.9 >50 50 38.0 1 Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.4-0.6 1.3-1.8 0.4 0.4 1 Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.6-0.7 1.9-2.4 0.6 0.7 1 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) 1.9-2.6 25 1.9 2.1 1 Width/Depth Ratio 6.9-12.6 9.0-14.0 13.5 13.0 1 Entrenchment Ratio 1.2 >2.5 10 7.2 1 Bank Height Ratio 3.2-3.4 1.0-1.2 1.0 1.0 1 Pattern Channel Beltwidth (ft) ** 60 16-26 16-26 Radius of Curvature (ft) ** 16—87 11-14 11-14 Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) ** 3.5—12.9 8.6-9.4 8.6-9.4 Meander Wavelength (ft) ** 66—191 43-47 43-47 Meander Width Ratio ** 4.1 3.2-5.2 3.2-5.2 Profile Riffle Length (ft) 34.3 36.9 39.5 2 Riffle Slope (ft/ft) ** 0.013—0.035 0.0025 0.006 0.0098 0.014 2 Pool Length (ft) ** 14—33 7-15 38.43 1 Pool Spacing (ft) ** 2.7—7.1 4.2-5.4 Substrate and Transport Parameters SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% /Be% 8/67/25/0/0/0 9/15/58/19/0/0 d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm) N/A Gravel Gravel 0.3/8.2/18/35/72/140 Channel length (ft) 154 129 129 Drainage Area (SM) 0.05 1.49 0.02 0.02 Rosgen Classification G4 C4 C4 C4 Sinuosity 1.0 1.3 1.2 1.2 Water Surface Slope (ft/ft) 0.007 0.005 0.0016 0.005 ** :channel affected by former pond 
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMS Project #97085 34 Baseline Monitoring Report Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5MY+Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area 206.8 206.6 192.5Bank Height Ratio Based on AB Bankfull Area - 1.0 1.0Thalweg Elevation 204.8 205.3 190.9LTOB Elevation 206.8 206.6 192.5LTOB Max Depth (ft) 1.9 1.2 1.6LTOB Cross Sectional Area (ft2)11.5 7.1 12.5Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5MY+Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area 192.0 182.1181.74Bank Height Ratio Based on AB Bankfull Area - 1.0 -Thalweg Elevation 190.1 180.8 179.4LTOB Elevation 192.0 182.1 181.7LTOB Max Depth (ft) 1.9 1.4 2.4LTOB Cross Sectional Area (ft2)13.6 10.6 14.5Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5MY+Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area 176.0175.26 206.99Bank Height Ratio Based on AB Bankfull Area 1.0 - -Thalweg Elevation 174.3 172.6 205.9LTOB Elevation 176.0 175.3 207.0LTOB Max Depth (ft) 1.7 2.7 1.1LTOB Cross Sectional Area (ft2)12.8 20.7 3.7Cross-Section 7 (Riffle) Station 50+76, SFCross-Section 8 (Pool) Station 51+25, SFCross-Section 9 (Pool) Station 300+78, T3Table 8. Cross Section Dimensional Morphology Summary Stony Fork Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project #97085Cross-Section 1 (Pool) Station 13+32, SFCross-Section 2 (Riffle) Station 13+59, SFCross-Section 3 (Riffle) Station 27+57, SFCross-Section 4 (Pool) Station 27+93, SFCross-Section 5 (Riffle) Station 41+58, SFCross-Section 6 (Pool) Station 41+95, SF 
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMS Project #97085 35 Baseline Monitoring Report Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5MY+Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area 207.1 198.2198.39Bank Height Ratio Based on AB Bankfull Area 1.0 1.0 -Thalweg Elevation 206.4 197.7 197.2LTOB Elevation 207.1 198.2 198.4LTOB Max Depth (ft) 0.7 0.5 1.2LTOB Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2.1 0.9 0.8Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5MY+Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area#####187.9180.87Bank Height Ratio Based on AB Bankfull Area - 1.0 -Thalweg Elevation 186.9 186.9 179.1LTOB Elevation 188.4 187.9 180.9LTOB Max Depth (ft) 1.5 1.0 1.8LTOB Cross Sectional Area (ft2)9.3 5.8 11.2Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area 180.7Bank Height Ratio Based on AB Bankfull Area 1.0Thalweg Elevation 179.6LTOB Elevation 180.7LTOB Max Depth (ft) 1.2LTOB Cross Sectional Area (ft2)6.0Cross-Section 15 (Pool) Station 210+94, T2Cross-Section 16 (Riffle) Station 211+23, T2Table 8. Cross Section Dimensional Morphology Summary Stony Fork Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project #97085Cross-Section 10 (Riffle) Station 300+94, T3Cross-Section 11 (Riffle) Station 103+63, T1Cross-Section 12 (Pool) Station 103+85, T1Cross-Section 13 (Pool) Station 204+25, T2Cross-Section 14 (Riffle) Station 204+45, T2      
SWS = ‐0.01x + 218.61SBKF= ‐0.0095x + 218.71961971981992002012022032042052062072082092101000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000Elevation (ft)Station (ft)Longitudinal ProfileStony Fork ‐ Reach 1Monitoring Year 00, 2019DesignMY00Water SurfaceBankfullCross SectionStructure
SWS = ‐0.0076x + 212.33SBKF = ‐0.0078x + 214.111741751761771781791801811821831841851861871881891901911921931941951961971981992002150 2650 3150 3650 4150 4650Elevation (ft)Station (ft)Longitudinal ProfileStony Fork ‐ Reach 2Monitoring Year 00, 2019DesignMY00Water SurfaceBankfullCross SectionStructure
SWS = ‐0.0055x + 202.12SBKF = ‐0.0058x + 204.961701711721731741751764950 5050 5150 5250 5350 5450 5550 5650 5750Elevation (ft)Station (ft)Longitudinal ProfileStony Fork ‐ Reach 3Monitoring Year 00, 2019DesignMY00Water SurfaceBankfullCross SectionStructure
SWS= ‐0.0194x + 398.65SBKF= ‐0.0224x + 430.6919419519619719819920020120220320420520620720820921010000 10050 10100 10150 10200 10250 10300 10350 10400 10450Elevation (ft)Station (ft)Longitudinal ProfileStony Fork ‐ T1Monitoring Year 00, 2019DesignMY00Water SurfaceBankfullCross SectionStructure
SWS= ‐0.0318x + 682.25SBKF= ‐0.0316x + 678.7919920020120220320420520615000 15020 15040 15060 15080 15100 15120 15140Elevation (ft)Station (ft)Longitudinal ProfileStony Fork ‐ T1‐AMonitoring Year 00, 2019DesignMY00Water SurfaceBankfullStructure
SWS= ‐0.0113x + 417.92SBKF= ‐0.0112x + 416.7817417517617717817918018118218318418518618718818919020300 20500 20700 20900 21100 21300 21500Elevation (ft)Station (ft)Longitudinal ProfileStony Fork ‐ T2Monitoring Year 00, 2019DesignMY00Water SurfaceBankfullCross SectionStructure
SWS= ‐0.0049x + 354.38SBKF= ‐0.005x + 35820420520620720820921030000 30020 30040 30060 30080 30100 30120Elevation (ft)Station (ft)Longitudinal ProfileStony Fork ‐ T3Monitoring Year 00, 2019DesignMY00Water SurfaceBankfullStructure
Cross-Section PlotsStation Elevation-0.02 208.20206.750.00 208.48204.838.80 207.6011.515.13 207.0911.522.98 207.1612.631.31 207.16---39.85 207.12---46.63 206.941.948.31 206.750.949.70 206.38---51.22 206.06---51.94 205.97---53.34 204.9454.38 204.8355.42 204.8656.80 205.3257.72 205.7158.14 206.3458.85 206.3759.73 206.8462.85 206.9464.16 207.4165.60 207.5070.81 207.4276.81 207.1984.90 206.6788.17 206.5188.23 207.01River Basin:Neuse River Site:Stony ForkXS IDXS1Drainage Area (sq mi):0.28Date:5/14/2019Field Crew:T. Seelinger, A. GutierrezW / D Ratio:SUMMARY DATABankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull AreaBankfull Cross-Sectional Area:Bankfull Width:Flood Prone Area Elevation:Flood Prone Width:LTOB Max Depth (ft)Mean Depth at Bankfull:LTOB Cross Sectional Area (ft2)Thalweg ElevationEntrenchment Ratio:Bank Height Ratio Based on AB Bankfull Area:2042052062072082092100 1020304050607080Elevation (feet)Station (feet)Stony Fork, XS1, Pool, SFBankfullMY00
Cross-Section PlotsStation Elevation0.00 208.25206.570.02 207.96205.338.03 207.557.020.02 206.947.127.09 206.609.333.07 206.68207.837.00 206.7080.740.07 206.641.242.55 206.640.843.74 206.6312.245.20 206.278.745.82 205.911.046.46 205.6947.33 205.5348.00 205.3648.88 205.3349.70 205.3950.83 205.5752.10 206.2353.17 206.5754.42 206.6160.72 206.5066.91 206.7972.44 206.8683.61 206.7383.68 207.06LTOB Cross Sectional Area (ft2)Bankfull Width:Flood Prone Area Elevation:Flood Prone Width:LTOB Max Depth (ft)Mean Depth at Bankfull:W / D Ratio:Entrenchment Ratio:Bank Height Ratio Based on AB Bankfull Area:SUMMARY DATABankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull AreaBankfull Cross-Sectional Area:Thalweg ElevationDate:5/14/2019Field Crew:T. Seelinger, A. GutierrezDrainage Area (sq mi):0.28River Basin:Neuse RiverSite:Stony ForkXS IDXS22052062072082090 1020304050607080Elevation (feet)Station (feet)Stony Fork, XS2, Riffle, SFBankfullFlood Prone AreaMY00
Cross-Section PlotsStation Elevation0.00 195.53192.510.11 195.30190.875.15 195.2412.514.10 194.5612.518.74 193.5012.626.01 192.84194.235.57 192.5953.338.13 192.541.640.51 191.591.042.27 191.1912.843.31 190.994.244.16 191.011.045.33 190.8746.88 191.0549.10 192.1150.84 192.5153.37 192.6059.47 192.6961.76 192.8465.07 193.5569.58 194.2171.03 194.2070.97 194.59LTOB Cross Sectional Area (ft2)Bankfull Width:Flood Prone Area Elevation:Flood Prone Width:LTOB Max Depth (ft)Mean Depth at Bankfull:W / D Ratio:Entrenchment Ratio:Bank Height Ratio Based on AB Bankfull Area:Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:Thalweg ElevationDate:5/14/2019Field Crew:T. Seelinger, A. GutierrezSUMMARY DATABankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull AreaDrainage Area (sq mi):0.46River Basin:Neuse RiverSite:Stony ForkXS IDXS31901911921931941951960 10203040506070Elevation (feet)Station (feet)Stony Fork, XS3, Riffle, SFBankfullFlood Prone AreaMY00
Cross-Section PlotsStation Elevation0.00 195.33191.990.10 195.01190.069.23 194.4113.613.25 193.8113.619.84 192.7012.524.02 192.37---25.02 192.29---25.76 192.011.926.55 191.381.127.98 190.39---29.30 190.25---30.31 190.06---31.81 190.2532.86 190.7333.55 190.8335.00 191.2538.33 191.9941.46 192.1249.96 192.3559.79 192.8666.06 193.4066.08 193.78LTOB Cross Sectional Area (ft2)Bankfull Width:Flood Prone Area Elevation:Flood Prone Width:LTOB Max Depth (ft)Mean Depth at Bankfull:W / D Ratio:Entrenchment Ratio:Bank Height Ratio Based on AB Bankfull Area:Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:Thalweg ElevationDate:5/14/2019Field Crew:T. Seelinger, A. GutierrezSUMMARY DATABankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull AreaDrainage Area (sq mi):0.46River Basin:Neuse RiverSite:Stony ForkXS IDXS41891901911921931941951960 102030405060Elevation (feet)Station (feet)Stony Fork, XS4, Pool, SFBankfullMY00
Cross-Section PlotsStation Elevation0.00 183.09182.130.16 182.44180.769.26 182.3910.618.68 182.8710.727.23 182.5412.230.81 182.31183.531.33 182.2080.732.19 181.941.434.05 181.260.934.48 181.0514.135.41 180.766.636.66 180.831.038.24 180.9139.07 180.9240.08 181.0341.75 181.4443.80 182.1346.99 182.3254.92 182.4365.62 182.4075.29 182.4080.82 182.5880.67 183.28LTOB Cross Sectional Area (ft2)Bankfull Width:Flood Prone Area Elevation:Flood Prone Width:LTOB Max Depth (ft)Mean Depth at Bankfull:W / D Ratio:Entrenchment Ratio:Bank Height Ratio Based on AB Bankfull Area:Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:Thalweg ElevationDate:5/14/2019Field Crew:T. Seelinger, A. GutierrezSUMMARY DATABankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull AreaDrainage Area (sq mi):0.46River Basin:Neuse RiverSite:Stony ForkXS IDXS51801811821831840 1020304050607080Elevation (feet)Station (feet)Stony Fork, XS5, Riffle, SFBankfullFlood Prone AreaMY00
Cross-Section PlotsStation Elevation0.00 183.55181.740.14 183.31179.367.54 182.5714.514.20 182.0814.518.65 181.8312.021.77 181.74---23.23 181.20---23.93 180.802.425.12 179.681.226.48 179.36---27.54 179.38---29.15 180.04---30.14 180.8331.18 181.0834.22 181.8537.38 181.8946.89 181.7959.21 182.4468.65 182.4381.11 182.5681.12 183.18LTOB Cross Sectional Area (ft2)Bankfull Width:Flood Prone Area Elevation:Flood Prone Width:LTOB Max Depth (ft)Mean Depth at Bankfull:W / D Ratio:Entrenchment Ratio:Bank Height Ratio Based on AB Bankfull Area:Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:Thalweg ElevationDate:5/14/2019Field Crew:T. Seelinger, A. GutierrezSUMMARY DATABankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull AreaDrainage Area (sq mi):0.46River Basin:Neuse RiverSite:Stony ForkXS IDXS61781791801811821831840 1020304050607080Elevation (feet)Station (feet)Stony Fork, XS6, Pool, SFBankfullMY00
Cross-Section PlotsStation Elevation0.00 177.93176.020.08 177.25174.295.05 176.6812.812.15 176.2212.921.90 176.1211.632.98 176.12177.737.38 176.3392.439.83 175.861.741.62 175.241.142.48 174.7610.442.76 174.648.043.07 174.381.044.02 174.3945.44 174.2946.60 174.5947.84 174.6150.60 175.4353.18 176.0257.32 175.9368.30 175.9679.12 176.1992.31 176.8792.38 177.48LTOB Cross Sectional Area (ft2)Bankfull Width:Flood Prone Area Elevation:Flood Prone Width:LTOB Max Depth (ft)Mean Depth at Bankfull:W / D Ratio:Entrenchment Ratio:Bank Height Ratio Based on AB Bankfull Area:Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:Thalweg ElevationDate:5/14/2019Field Crew:T. Seelinger, A. GutierrezSUMMARY DATABankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull AreaDrainage Area (sq mi):0.83River Basin:Neuse RiverSite:Stony ForkXS IDXS71731741751761771781790 102030405060708090Elevation (feet)Station (feet)Stony Fork, XS7, Riffle, SFBankfullFlood Prone AreaMY00
Cross-Section PlotsStation Elevation0.00 176.45175.260.10 175.87172.5512.58 175.5620.728.15 175.4720.739.84 175.1713.542.41 175.26---44.84 174.75---46.65 174.102.747.86 173.881.549.81 172.79---51.67 172.55---52.70 172.68---53.95 173.1154.80 173.5455.06 174.1855.56 174.4757.52 175.1159.06 175.3765.89 175.3676.86 176.2981.13 176.6981.12 177.59LTOB Cross Sectional Area (ft2)Bankfull Width:Flood Prone Area Elevation:Flood Prone Width:LTOB Max Depth (ft)Mean Depth at Bankfull:W / D Ratio:Entrenchment Ratio:Bank Height Ratio Based on AB Bankfull Area:Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:Thalweg ElevationDate:5/14/2019Field Crew:T. Seelinger, A. GutierrezSUMMARY DATABankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull AreaDrainage Area (sq mi):0.83River Basin:Neuse RiverSite:Stony ForkXS IDXS81721731741751761771781790 1020304050607080Elevation (feet)Station (feet)Stony Fork, XS8, Pool, SFBankfullMY00
Cross-Section PlotsStation Elevation0.00 210.71206.99-0.03 210.22205.855.95 209.983.78.84 209.883.710.30 209.705.514.17 208.60---18.51 207.58---21.41 207.211.124.82 207.100.726.16 206.99---26.65 206.68---26.97 206.64---27.82 205.8728.51 205.8528.97 205.8830.31 206.3130.81 206.6031.19 206.8931.80 207.0133.28 207.0638.10 207.0543.02 207.1350.96 208.0556.37 208.5660.59 208.8260.67 209.34LTOB Cross Sectional Area (ft2)Bankfull Width:Flood Prone Area Elevation:Flood Prone Width:LTOB Max Depth (ft)Mean Depth at Bankfull:W / D Ratio:Entrenchment Ratio:Bank Height Ratio Based on AB Bankfull Area:Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:Thalweg ElevationDate:5/14/2019Field Crew:T. Seelinger, A. GutierrezSUMMARY DATABankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull AreaDrainage Area (sq mi):0.04River Basin:Neuse RiverSite:Stony ForkXS IDXS92052062072082092102112120 102030405060Elevation (feet)Station (feet)Stony Fork, XS9, Pool, T3BankfullMY00
Cross-Section PlotsStation Elevation0.00 209.76207.100.07 209.23206.407.02 208.722.114.95 208.192.120.87 207.885.228.27 207.57207.835.56 207.2738.039.10 207.380.741.35 207.270.442.57 206.9513.043.21 206.627.243.88 206.531.044.86 206.4045.53 206.5445.85 206.6446.49 206.9147.25 206.9748.22 207.1049.57 207.0352.47 207.1358.00 207.5565.96 208.2772.00 208.3872.00 209.07LTOB Cross Sectional Area (ft2)Bankfull Width:Flood Prone Area Elevation:Flood Prone Width:LTOB Max Depth (ft)Mean Depth at Bankfull:W / D Ratio:Entrenchment Ratio:Bank Height Ratio Based on AB Bankfull Area:Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:Thalweg ElevationDate:5/14/2019Field Crew:T. Seelinger, A. GutierrezSUMMARY DATABankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull AreaDrainage Area (sq mi):0.04River Basin:Neuse RiverSite:Stony ForkXS IDXS102062072082092102110 10203040506070Elevation (feet)Station (feet)Stony Fork, XS10, Riffle, T3BankfullFlood Prone AreaMY00
Cross-Section PlotsStation Elevation0.00 198.91198.190.09 198.77197.658.40 198.610.916.84 198.630.924.03 198.494.231.03 198.38198.736.12 198.1948.237.46 198.080.537.98 197.940.238.21 197.7618.638.38 197.6511.638.94 197.661.039.41 197.9539.98 198.1040.92 198.3942.19 198.5342.92 198.5144.40 198.6248.33 198.6955.78 198.8969.12 199.5572.54 199.9072.51 199.57LTOB Cross Sectional Area (ft2)Bankfull Width:Flood Prone Area Elevation:Flood Prone Width:LTOB Max Depth (ft)Mean Depth at Bankfull:W / D Ratio:Entrenchment Ratio:Bank Height Ratio Based on AB Bankfull Area:Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:Thalweg ElevationDate:5/14/2019Field Crew:T. Seelinger, A. GutierrezSUMMARY DATABankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull AreaDrainage Area (sq mi):0.02River Basin:Neuse RiverSite:Stony ForkXS IDXS111971981992002010 10203040506070Elevation (feet)Station (feet)Stony Fork, XS11, Riffle, T1BankfullFlood Prone AreaMY00
Cross-Section PlotsStation Elevation0.00 199.30198.39-0.03 198.95197.225.00 198.950.812.52 198.990.817.94 198.753.023.83 198.55---30.06 198.57---37.00 198.541.239.90 198.470.341.40 198.39---42.09 198.25---43.81 197.78---44.86 197.4345.49 197.2246.54 197.2547.02 197.3147.40 197.6848.32 198.1249.12 198.4951.12 198.5653.67 198.7455.03 198.9858.02 199.5963.96 199.8975.32 199.7375.31 200.07LTOB Cross Sectional Area (ft2)Bankfull Width:Flood Prone Area Elevation:Flood Prone Width:LTOB Max Depth (ft)Mean Depth at Bankfull:W / D Ratio:Entrenchment Ratio:Bank Height Ratio Based on AB Bankfull Area:Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:Thalweg ElevationDate:5/14/2019Field Crew:T. Seelinger, A. GutierrezSUMMARY DATABankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull AreaDrainage Area (sq mi):0.02River Basin:Neuse RiverSite:Stony ForkXS IDXS121961971981992002010 10203040506070Elevation (feet)Station (feet)Stony Fork, XS12, Pool, T1BankfullMY00
Cross-Section PlotsStation Elevation0.00 190.20188.380.08 189.71186.857.45 188.949.314.27 188.459.323.57 188.4511.331.29 188.44---34.47 188.38---35.81 188.051.537.90 187.370.839.77 187.28---40.41 187.24---41.15 187.09---42.04 186.8542.63 187.0143.04 187.2044.31 187.7744.98 188.2046.06 188.4449.22 188.6153.70 189.2062.55 189.9762.59 190.57LTOB Cross Sectional Area (ft2)Bankfull Width:Flood Prone Area Elevation:Flood Prone Width:LTOB Max Depth (ft)Mean Depth at Bankfull:W / D Ratio:Entrenchment Ratio:Bank Height Ratio Based on AB Bankfull Area:Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:Thalweg ElevationDate:5/14/2019Field Crew:T. Seelinger, A. GutierrezSUMMARY DATABankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull AreaDrainage Area (sq mi):0.14River Basin:Neuse RiverSite:Stony ForkXS IDXS131861871881891901910 102030405060Elevation (feet)Station (feet)Stony Fork, XS13, Pool, T2BankfullMY00
Cross-Section PlotsStation Elevation0.00 190.47187.900.18 189.66186.906.74 189.145.813.43 188.545.822.20 188.109.728.40 188.02188.932.97 187.9043.434.24 187.761.035.14 187.340.636.02 187.3216.436.33 187.294.536.46 187.081.036.93 186.9937.85 186.9338.80 186.9039.41 187.0239.59 187.2540.26 187.1641.66 187.4742.31 187.4342.76 187.9743.76 188.1345.60 188.2150.99 188.4253.97 189.2560.77 189.6062.42 189.7962.59 190.61LTOB Cross Sectional Area (ft2)Bankfull Width:Flood Prone Area Elevation:Flood Prone Width:LTOB Max Depth (ft)Mean Depth at Bankfull:W / D Ratio:Entrenchment Ratio:Bank Height Ratio Based on AB Bankfull Area:Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:Thalweg ElevationDate:5/14/2019Field Crew:T. Seelinger, A. GutierrezSUMMARY DATABankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull AreaDrainage Area (sq mi):0.14River Basin:Neuse RiverSite:Stony ForkXS IDXS141861871881891901910 102030405060Elevation (feet)Station (feet)Stony Fork, XS14, Riffle, T2BankfullFlood Prone AreaMY00
Cross-Section PlotsStation Elevation0.00 183.66180.870.04 183.01179.051.52 182.8311.26.06 182.1611.218.25 181.6311.826.54 181.30---34.18 181.02---37.17 180.871.839.66 180.361.040.94 180.03---42.07 179.73---42.86 179.36---43.70 179.3845.06 179.0946.23 179.0547.14 180.0348.87 180.8349.44 181.2550.71 181.2053.58 181.2455.77 181.8363.39 181.9976.64 181.9476.67 182.49LTOB Cross Sectional Area (ft2)Bankfull Width:Flood Prone Area Elevation:Flood Prone Width:LTOB Max Depth (ft)Mean Depth at Bankfull:W / D Ratio:Entrenchment Ratio:Bank Height Ratio Based on AB Bankfull Area:Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:Thalweg ElevationDate:5/14/2019Field Crew:T. Seelinger, A. GutierrezSUMMARY DATABankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull AreaDrainage Area (sq mi):0.22River Basin:Neuse RiverSite:Stony ForkXS IDXS151781791801811821831841850 10203040506070Elevation (feet)Station (feet)Stony Fork, XS15, Pool, T2BankfullMY00
Cross-Section PlotsStation Elevation0.00 183.72180.730.03 183.04179.581.64 182.856.07.74 182.036.014.76 181.458.623.79 181.21181.931.07 180.8780.933.69 180.901.234.55 180.870.735.50 180.6112.337.04 180.199.437.42 179.951.037.72 179.8338.78 179.6340.45 179.6841.03 179.5841.65 179.8242.01 180.0343.06 180.4743.66 180.7344.56 180.7448.93 180.7154.83 181.1261.57 181.3776.48 181.7190.51 181.4490.51 182.30River Basin:Neuse RiverSite:Stony ForkXS IDXS16Drainage Area (sq mi):0.22Date:5/14/2019Field Crew:T. Seelinger, A. GutierrezSUMMARY DATABankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull AreaBankfull Cross-Sectional Area:Thalweg ElevationLTOB Cross Sectional Area (ft2)Bankfull Width:Flood Prone Area Elevation:Flood Prone Width:LTOB Max Depth (ft)Mean Depth at Bankfull:W / D Ratio:Entrenchment Ratio:Bank Height Ratio Based on AB Bankfull Area:1791801811821831841850 102030405060708090Elevation (feet)Station (feet)Stony Fork, XS16, Riffle, T2BankfullFlood Prone AreaMY00
Particle Millimeter CountSilt/Clay < 0.062 S/CVery Fine .062 - .125S3Fine .125 - .25AMedium .25 - .50NCoarse .50 - 1DVery Coarse 1 - 2S1Very Fine 2 - 4Fine 4 - 5.7 G 3Fine 5.7 - 8 R 5Medium 8 - 11.3 A 10Medium 11.3 - 16 V 16Coarse 16 - 22.6 E 16Coarse 22.6 - 32 L 15Very Coarse 32 - 45 S 12Very Coarse 45 - 64 19Small 64 - 90 C 6Small 90 - 128 O 1Large 128 - 180 BLarge 180 - 256 LSmall 256 - 362 BSmall 362 - 512 LD169.4mean 22.3 silt/clay 0%Medium 512 - 1024 DD3516dispersion 2.4 sand 4%Lrg- Very Lrg 1024 - 2048 RD5022skewness 0.01 gravel 90%Bedrock >2048 BDRKD6533cobble 7%Total107D8453boulder 0%D9570bedrock 0%hardpan0%wood/det0%artificial0%Cross-Section 1 Riffle - MY-00Size (mm) Size Distribution TypeNote:0%20%40%60%80%100%0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000% Finer Than (Cumulative)Particle Size - MillimetersParticle Size DistributionStony ForkXS 2 RiffleAs Built
Particle MillimeterCountSilt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 3Very Fine .062 - .125S5Fine .125 - .25AMedium .25 - .50NCoarse .50 - 1DVery Coarse 1 - 2SVery Fine 2 - 4Fine 4 - 5.7 G 2Fine 5.7 - 8 R 1Medium 8 - 11.3 A 6Medium 11.3 - 16 V 5Coarse 16 - 22.6 E 10Coarse 22.6 - 32 L 9Very Coarse 32 - 45 S 20Very Coarse 45 - 64 13Small 64 - 90 C 13Small 90 - 128 O 13Large 128 - 180 B 2Large 180 - 256 LSmall 256 - 362 BSmall 362 - 512 LD1611mean 30.9 silt/clay3%Medium 512 - 1024 DD3526dispersion 2.9 sand5%Lrg- Very Lrg 1024 - 2048 RD5038skewness -0.09 gravel65%Bedrock >2048 BDRKD6552cobble27%Total102D8487boulder 0%D95120bedrock 0%hardpan0%wood/det0%artificial0%Cross-Section 3 Riffle - MY-00TypeSize DistributionNote:Size (mm)0%20%40%60%80%100%0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000% Finer Than (Cumulative)Particle Size - MillimetersParticle Size DistributionStony ForkXS 3 RiffleAs Built
Particle MillimeterCountSilt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 7Very Fine .062 - .125 S 2Fine .125 - .25 A 3Medium .25 - .50N3Coarse .50 - 1D3Very Coarse 1 - 2 SVery Fine 2 - 4Fine 4 - 5.7 GFine 5.7 - 8 RMedium 8 - 11.3 A 1Medium 11.3 - 16 V 1Coarse 16 - 22.6 E 3Coarse 22.6 - 32 L 10Very Coarse 32 - 45 S 13Very Coarse 45 - 64 18Small 64 - 90 C 19Small 90 - 128 O 13Large 128 - 180 B 7Large 180 - 256 L 2Small 256 - 362 B1Small 362 - 512 LD160.79mean 9.3 silt/clay 7%Medium 512 - 1024 DD3536dispersion 34.0 sand 10%Lrg- Very Lrg 1024 - 2048 RD5052skewness -0.51 gravel 43%Bedrock >2048 BDRKD6570cobble 39%Total106D84110boulder 1%D95160bedrock 0%hardpan0%wood/det0%artificial0%Cross-Section 5 Riffle - MY-00TypeSize DistributionNote:Size (mm)0%20%40%60%80%100%0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000% Finer Than (Cumulative)Particle Size - MillimetersParticle Size DistributionStony ForkXS 5 RiffleAs Built
Particle MillimeterCountSilt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 22Very Fine .062 - .125S4Fine .125 - .25A7Medium .25 - .50NCoarse .50 - 1D6Very Coarse 1 - 2S5Very Fine 2 - 4Fine 4 - 5.7 GFine 5.7 - 8 R 1Medium 8 - 11.3 A 2Medium 11.3 - 16 V 6Coarse 16 - 22.6 E 9Coarse 22.6 - 32 L 9Very Coarse 32 - 45 S 5Very Coarse 45 - 64 10Small 64 - 90 C 8Small 90 - 128 O8Large 128 - 180 B3Large 180 - 256 LSmall 256 - 362 BSmall 362 - 512 LD160.062mean 2.1 silt/clay 21%Medium 512 - 1024 DD350.77dispersion 131.2 sand 21%Lrg- Very Lrg 1024 - 2048 RD5016skewness -0.51 gravel 40%Bedrock >2048 BDRKD6529cobble 18%Total105D8470boulder 0%D95120bedrock 0%hardpan0%wood/det0%artificial0%Cross-Section 7 Riffle -MY-00TypeSize DistributionNote:Size (mm)0%20%40%60%80%100%0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000% Finer Than (Cumulative)Particle Size - MillimetersParticle Size DistributionStony ForkXS 7 RiffleAs Built
Particle MillimeterCountSilt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 10Very Fine .062 - .125S6Fine .125 - .25A1Medium .25 - .50N3Coarse .50 - 1D5Very Coarse 1 - 2S2Very Fine 2 - 4 2Fine 4 - 5.7 G 2Fine 5.7 - 8 R 8Medium 8 - 11.3 A 9Medium 11.3 - 16 V 5Coarse 16 - 22.6 E 8Coarse 22.6 - 32 L 10Very Coarse 32 - 45 S 9Very Coarse 45 - 64 12Small 64 - 90 C 8Small 90 - 128 O 5Large 128 - 180 B 8Large 180 - 256 LSmall 256 - 362 BSmall 362 - 512 LD160.32mean 4.8 silt/clay 9%Medium 512 - 1024 DD358.2dispersion 30.1 sand 15%Lrg- Very Lrg 1024 - 2048 RD5018skewness -0.37 gravel 58%Bedrock >2048 BDRKD6535cobble 19%Total113D8472boulder 0%D95140bedrock 0%hardpan0%wood/det0%artificial0%Cross-Section 10 Riffle - MY-00TypeSize DistributionNote:Size (mm)0%20%40%60%80%100%0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000% Finer Than (Cumulative)Particle Size - MillimetersParticle Size DistributionStony ForkXS 10 RiffleAs Built
Particle MillimeterCountSilt/Clay < 0.062 S/C11Very Fine .062 - .125S2Fine .125 - .25AMedium .25 - .50N1Coarse .50 - 1DVery Coarse 1 - 2SVery Fine 2 - 4Fine 4 - 5.7 GFine 5.7 - 8 RMedium 8 - 11.3 AMedium 11.3 - 16 VCoarse 16 - 22.6 ECoarse 22.6 - 32 L1Very Coarse 32 - 45 S6Very Coarse 45 - 6416Small 64 - 90 C31Small 90 - 128 O24Large 128 - 180 B15Large 180 - 256 L2Small 256 - 362 BSmall 362 - 512 LD1637mean 69.4 silt/clay 10%Medium 512 - 1024 DD3565dispersion 1.9 sand 3%Lrg- Very Lrg 1024 - 2048 RD5078skewness -0.07 gravel 21%Bedrock >2048 BDRKD6594cobble 66%Total109D84130boulder 0%D95170bedrock 0%hardpan0%wood/det0%artificial0%Cross-Section 11 Riffle -MY-00TypeSize DistributionNote:Size (mm)0%20%40%60%80%100%0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000% Finer Than (Cumulative)Particle Size - MillimetersParticle Size DistributionStony ForkXS 11 RiffleAs Built
Particle MillimeterCountSilt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 7Very Fine .062 - .125S7Fine .125 - .25A4Medium .25 - .50N22Coarse .50 - 1D13Very Coarse 1 - 2S3Very Fine 2 - 4 1Fine 4 - 5.7 GFine 5.7 - 8 RMedium 8 - 11.3 AMedium 11.3 - 16 VCoarse 16 - 22.6 E 1Coarse 22.6 - 32 L 2Very Coarse 32 - 45 S 4Very Coarse 45 - 64 8Small 64 - 90 C 14Small 90 - 128 O 11Large 128 - 180 B 8Large 180 - 256 L 3Small 256 - 362 BSmall 362 - 512 LD1626mean 43.9 silt/clay 6%Medium 512 - 1024 DD3535dispersion 1.7 sand 45%Lrg- Very Lrg 1024 - 2048 RD5042skewness 0.03 gravel 15%Bedrock >2048 BDRKD6551cobble 33%Total108D8474boulder 0%D95110bedrock 0%hardpan0%wood/det0%artificial0%Cross-Section 14 Riffle - MY-00TypeSize DistributionNote:Size (mm)0%20%40%60%80%100%0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000% Finer Than (Cumulative)Particle Size - MillimetersParticle Size DistributionStony ForkXS 14 RiffleAs Built
Particle MillimeterCountSilt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 4Very Fine .062 - .125SFine .125 - .25A3Medium .25 - .50NCoarse .50 - 1D4Very Coarse 1 - 2SVery Fine 2 - 4Fine 4 - 5.7 GFine 5.7 - 8 R 1Medium 8 - 11.3 A 1Medium 11.3 - 16 V 1Coarse 16 - 22.6 E 5Coarse 22.6 - 32 L 10Very Coarse 32 - 45 S 22Very Coarse 45 - 64 26Small 64 - 90 C 14Small 90 - 128 O 6Large 128 - 180 B 3Large 180 - 256 L 1Small 256 - 362 BSmall 362 - 512 LD1618mean 37.2 silt/clay 4%Medium 512 - 1024 DD3535dispersion 2.1 sand 7%Lrg- Very Lrg 1024 - 2048 RD5045skewness -0.10 gravel 65%Bedrock >2048 BDRKD6555cobble 24%Total101D8477boulder 0%D95120bedrock 0%hardpan0%wood/det0%artificial0%Cross-Section 16 Riffle - MY-00Size (mm) Size Distribution TypeNote:0%20%40%60%80%100%0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000% Finer Than (Cumulative)Particle Size - MillimetersParticle Size DistributionStony ForkXS 16 RiffleAs Built
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97085 71 Baseline Monitoring Report 

APPENDIX E

As-Built Plan Sheets

SF1 10+00 to 21+55 1,235 Restoration 1 to 11,155 1,15521+55 to 32+62 1,1431,105 1,105SF2* 33+19 to 44+53 1,027 Restoration 1 to 11,134 1,13444+84 to 49+54 283470 47049+54 to 55+52 592598 59855+82 to 56+08 2626 26Tributary 1 100+00 to 105+10 365 Restoration 1 to 1510 510Tributary 1A 150+00 to 151+59 47 Restoration 1 to 1159 159Tributary 2‐1 200+00 to 203+34 326 Enhancement II 2.5 to 1334 134Tributary 2‐2 203+34 to 206+71 318 Restoration 1 to 1337 337Tributary 2‐3 206+71 to 215+26 820 Restoration 1 to 1855 855Tributary 3 300+00 to 300+71 72 Enhancement I 1.5 to 171 47Tributary 3 300+71 to 301+29 82 Restoration 1 to 158 58TOTAL STREAM CREDITS6,586Buffer Restoration TOB to 100'N/A413,194    Buffer Restoration TOB to 100'1.00 413,194    413,194    Buffer Restoration 101‐200'N/A37,091   Buffer Restoration 101‐200'0.3337,091   12,240   Buffer Enhancement TOB to 100'N/A74,802   Buffer Enhancement TOB to 100'0.5074,802   37,401   Buffer Preservation TOB to 100'N/A175,029    Buffer Preservation TOB to 100'0.10 175,029      17,503   480,338    * Crossings have been removed from creditable linear footage for all project streams.TOTAL BUFFER CREDITSMitigation RatioRestoration Footage or AreaMitigation  CreditsRestoration 1 to 1PROJECT COMPONENTS – 6,588 STREAM CREDITS AND 480,338 BUFFER CREDITSSF3*Reach IDProposed        StationingExisting Footage or Square FeetApproach
GENERAL NOTES:
THIS PLAT DOES NOT REPRESENT A BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE PARENT
TRACTS. THE PARENT TRACT BOUNDARIES ADJACENT TO THIS EASEMENT
ARE NOT CHANGED BY THIS PLAT.
DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES IN U.S.
SURVEY FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
THE BASIS OF THE MERIDIANS AND COORDINATES FOR THIS PLAT IS THE
NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, NORTH AMERICAN
DATUM 1983 (NAD 83), BASED ON DIFFERENTIAL GPS OBSERVATIONS. ALL
DISTANCES ARE GROUND UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
NO UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATING PERFORMED DURING THE COURSE
OF THIS SURVEY.
PROJECT LEGEND:
Proposed Thalweg
w/Approximate Bankfull Limits -------------
Proposed Riffle Enhancement
Proposed Riffle Grade Control
Proposed Step Pool ------------------------------
Proposed Live Lift ---------------------------------
Existing Channel to be Filled ----------------
Proposed Channel Block
0
CONTROL POINTS
DESC.
NORTHING
EASTING
ELEV.
KCI#27
618367.2470
2141562.051
198.4900
KCI#70
618647.1690
2141408.330
215.5190
KCI#71
618910.1740
2141115.861
277.1050
KCI#79
618217.9490
2142061.939
194.4710
KCI#90
618209.5420
2141067.742
201.9430
KCI#300
618178.5924
2142094.378
192.3853
KCI#301
618590.2717
2142474.796
185.2785
KCI#302
619120.0287
2142959.327
179.2967
KCI#303
619333.5622
2143164.350
177.1733
KCI#304
619462.2658
2142986.297
180.6263
KCI#305
619680.7375
2142807.789
183.4926
KCI#306
619507.7895
2143539.344
173.8932
KCI#401
617998.2136
2140619.690
208.7900
KCI#90CHK
618209.6074
2141067.627
201.8893
KCI#640
618335.4015
2141177.787
200.5566
KCI#641
618110.9101
2140889.317
204.7602
NL
618008.3538
2140585.509
208.5186
NL
618163.5139
2140377.491
225.0919
NL
619953.0220
2142386.066
196.3783
NL
619615.5746
2143665.436
174.2422
NL
619741.1450
2144001.311
191.5167
Existing Tree Line
Minor Contour Line
Major Contour Line ---720----
------------------
dl
w z
J
U) o
Of
O
O�� °LL z
z�
Ow a D
Of o
(f)Q � o
LU
Q
z
� z
o
GENERAL
NOTES &
PROJECT
LEGEND
SHEET 2 OF 8

111111111/ I ' ♦
♦
1 1�� I ♦
ltk CAF?
SEAL
G7 32733 I ��
=7,9 Al =
j tiA1tyE�Q' A m.
•`''111, 11+1j1`'1 -40'-20' 0' 40' 80'
BEGIN
- J I
li�i�r— I — I TRIBUTARY Z�l
GRAPHIC SCALEoll
PRO✓ECTENG/NEER PRO✓ECTSURI/EYOR I m,
/
A \\
ALL TOPOGRAPHIC AND FEATURE DATA
ARE BASED ON THE AS -BUILT SURVEY -
COMPLETED ON MAY 06, 2019. lco
300+
I I _ . • - \ 00\
' � / � NSERVgTI .••• / �� I > 1 /"\ t -`--' \\
BEGIN
TRIB 1A
I
I
1
I
I
I
1
1
1
/
/ , I 1
ill 1111 .v v v
`-
III11►111-
10
-------
_,/ O' ,-_
1 BEGIN SF1
l � +
vD
/ /'
\ -,o
o
Q
i•••�'• -1
'♦••.� /'
__, // ���
1 0
102+OD-/
\` ` \�/ \\ l
s
\
I
\
\
— BEGIN
TRIB3
x
®
•••
\
BEGIN
TRIB 1A
I
I
1
I
I
I
1
1
1
/
/ , I 1
ill 1111 .v v v
`-
III11►111-
-------
_,/ O' ,-_
1 BEGIN SF1
i•••�'• -1
'♦••.� /'
__, // ���
l,, 0X9 \---��
\` ` \�/ \\ l
1
1
-------------------�
-- f--------------------------�--
INSTALLED 'RIFFLE
ENHANCEMENT'
INSTALLED
'LIVE LIFT'
CONSERVATIONEASEMENT ------------ --�-------,
----------------------------- -- --
INSTALLED'RIFFLE BEGIN SF2
GRADE CONTROL' (END TRIBUTARY 1)
INSTALLED
'STEP POOL'.
M
N
0
a
N Wo
Z F n
1� Z u Q
U N00
QJ
W NU
¢ 2 �F
g W0
Z
d W z
0
U) Nm
Z LL J
W �
w z
I— J
v o
F -Z Q1
U
W O_ c�
c/) ~
ILL O z
U)
I—
Z Z U) ��♦, Z
w
°wag0
Q Q o
w
F-
U)
-
U o
SITE PLAN
REACH:
SF1, SF2 &
T1, T1A, T3

/ =
ALL TOPOGRAPHIC AND FEATURE DATA
ARE BASED ON THE AS -BUILT SURVEY / SEAL
COMPLETED ON MAY 06, 2019.
32733
/ % O
9'NI��...
NAEL 0:
/
EXISITNG GRAVEL /
ACCESS DRIVE /
PRO✓ECTSURUEYOR PRO✓ECTENG/NEER
/
EXISITNG ASPHALT /
DRIVE
/
n — Lo O
F ,` / as ♦♦ F ZU
Lu �� / pO ' w g�
w ,,♦♦ UiEZi
Lu
�
INCOMING DRAINAGE ♦' / X:>Z
Lu �� STABILIZED 40/ M U w
❑
-- _ ��.�, / Lu
-40'-20' 0' 40' 80' ♦♦♦♦ \ ' / \ U) ou
Lu -,mow `.� ♦♦♦ z z�
`. GRAPHIC SCALE ♦ =
2 ` /
♦ ♦♦♦
U / \ O ♦,
~O % INSTALLED'RIFFLE% / ♦♦ / `, Q
'�vv �� + ��� ♦ ENHANCEMENT' ♦' / - ,�/ 2 o
�__,
♦
♦♦ _
0
w�
INSTALLED
'LIVE
♦'
�/ --
- - ` -----
% LIFT,
I
,♦♦ % _/ ,♦♦
o N
of
\\ \
\cl
p \ ��
♦' /l di�� co♦'
g+ Lu
�a
02 z
Lu
—\\
�' '/ CJI/'—/ ' I
a
OO
,� \ \ \ \
�\ \ I ,�
1 1 �, / ''/ /' 1 — — ♦♦
of
W
JCS
-
J Lu
♦, �\
\�\\ \ \ QA.,
/// // / / ��/ ♦
♦♦
ZLLQ
In
Na'
00
z
Lu
970
/0♦♦♦
O '/ii -_
\ / ��♦\♦
Op�F9
\ �'�
�p 5�♦
tcy/
\ ♦ / _
_ sy l
4k,
\
J ��O
INSTALLED
\ \ \\\ \ \ \ ��
\
\\ \\ \ // / ' `\
\
`, S�Qi♦
♦
Lu
¢
z
STEP POOL'.
♦ -
��♦
♦ \ \
�� Av vV vv \V AV vA
/
J)
0
INSTALLED'RIFFLE
GRADE CONTROL'
��QO \ \ \ p�.�
\ c� \\ II I\
♦'♦♦ X�l /'�
`\ `\� " ' '
�, '
�,
♦'♦
♦
Z con<
O
\
♦;S,cc f
♦��� v v �r7wv 1 A
'��. \\ J
�i O vv �' / w
,♦♦
Y
0-1 Q �i
�O� \`
�'
I
♦♦
♦
L�
z
\ \ \\\ \
N /
♦
} O
N
0 Lu
z
o
Qq
0
z
40
40
0
\SRF
z
\\ \ - _ _ _
,�
_ ; , \ `� / / /' / ♦♦ 55' WIDE EASEMENT
- /
\ \GNr
O
\ \ `
ip / / / / ♦♦ EXCEPTION
♦♦ FUTURE ASPHALT
INCOMING DRAINAGE �� �
40 DRIVE DRIVE BY OTHERS
� �, ` _ _ - � /'
\
� \
NTC: MAY zoos
STABILIZED ��
, ♦♦
- - -- ♦♦
�
\ '\
SCALE: GRAPHIC
,��
\
! ♦♦♦
\
\
SITE PLAN
♦
♦♦
\
REACH:
♦
SF2
,4♦
\
SHEET 4 OF
8

v
w
w
Lu
T_
U)
Lu
w
U)
w
z
J
F
Q
MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 7 FOR TRIBUTARY 2
�H CARO • ,
w
z
►
OR
J
10
_ SEAL
.�'��
-
a . 32733 zi
7 v,
_O
SF3
►o \
;
R,
O
CHAEL 0.,
z
O
►R'
�
o
►z{ n
tl
PRO✓EOTENGWEER RRO✓EOTSURVEYOR 1
INCOMING DRAINAGE ►
STABILIZED ►
1
dr
1
1
1
♦1
I'
I'
-40'-20' 0' 40' 80'
GRAPHIC SCALE
,�♦ /
30' WIDE EASEMENT " r ^\
EXCEPTION
i
i
1
1 `
1 `
lo
r r �� ll � ♦ �.�N"C
0)
0.0
000�
�P'�MEN .
CON%�R��•
INSTALLED
'LIVE LIFT'
INSTALLED'RIFFLE
ENHANCEMENT'
INSTALLED'RIFFLE
GRADE CONTROL'
INSTALLED
'STEP POOL'
w
w
w
cox
w
w
co
w
z
J
2
U
H
Q
ow
zj
0
V1 W
OZ
as
UF-
LA
� i • N o
�♦ F w
F- r�
uu r
Z �N
�����������.00 w ma
' ` V W : Q J o
WW
W �-U ¢ Z DF
5 Z�
'o
Z_
J (�
z LL
w V
w
z
/--------����
^ BEGIN —
J
cf)
O
.�'��
o
_O
SF3
O
R,
O
}Z
ti
z
O
Z
a =
�
o
� z
Q
W
ALL TOPOGRAPHIC AND FEATURE DATA
_
ARE BASED ON THE AS -BUILT SURVEY
U)
O
COMPLETED ON MAY 06, 2019.
0.0
000�
�P'�MEN .
CON%�R��•
INSTALLED
'LIVE LIFT'
INSTALLED'RIFFLE
ENHANCEMENT'
INSTALLED'RIFFLE
GRADE CONTROL'
INSTALLED
'STEP POOL'
w
w
w
cox
w
w
co
w
z
J
2
U
H
Q
ow
zj
0
V1 W
OZ
as
UF-
LA
� i • N o
�♦ F w
F- r�
uu r
Z �N
�����������.00 w ma
' ` V W : Q J o
WW
W �-U ¢ Z DF
5 Z�
'o
Z_
J (�
z LL
w V
SITE PLAN
REACH:
SF2 & SF3
w
z
J
cf)
O
o
_O
O
R,
O
}Z
ti
z
O
Z
a =
�
o
� z
Q
W
ALL TOPOGRAPHIC AND FEATURE DATA
_
ARE BASED ON THE AS -BUILT SURVEY
U)
O
COMPLETED ON MAY 06, 2019.
SITE PLAN
REACH:
SF2 & SF3

HEN
�tllllll fflllll
.`'PSH CAHQ��ry`
AEXISITNG
CCESS DRIVE
;Q
SEAL '
32733
30' WIDE EASEMENT
EXCEPTION
VA :
g
•
�
♦
riralluttt►t
LL�
10R0. E70TSl1RV5r0R
RRO✓ECTENGYNEER
5_
+
-_ + ��
s
4.g�
r ' _ ----
END
♦
♦
/r 11// i
00/+�5 _-- __-- - ;
; ��
ALL TOPOGRAPHIC AND FEATURE DATA
zu
o>
�
r i l r -- ♦
► ♦ �
ARE BASED ON THE AS-BUILT SURVEY
>
J
i
I � ♦
COMPLETED ON MAY 06, 2019.
oz
- ' +of
-
1"n
r i ' �
-40' -20' 0' 40' 80'
zg
��
i r ♦
INNER BANK GRADED
ATA 3:1 SLOPE
GRAPHIC SCALE
0
'
S it
_
P�i�
m
o
/ r /l i� �---
r i-
/� `G,�,,
p0
II��
11z Z
w
7N
a
U)
W
/rrr /'r���/�
4*
`
7w to
<�
/ /'�// \
' ' r /
�,
N
0d'
o
i
��
Nw
W
rr l
♦�
Lu Fr
zo
U
r ♦�
INSTALLED
o
J
LIVE LIFT'
z
(�
LLLu
��
-0
INSTALLED'RIFFLE
w
v
���
i
ENHANCEMENT'
W
z
J
N
0
Z UD
U
O �
F
�
O � 4
0
�`
z
O
N
z
Z cn ti
Z
O Lu
Z)
Q �
`�
o
Lu
z
Z
�
o
oars: MAY 2019
scan: GRAPHIC
SITE PLAN
REACH:
SF3
SHEET 6 OF
8

�y{R11{IR►R►►�'
,•�P�H CARO J
SEAL
_y ? 32733
'��'•�,CHAEL
PRO✓ECTENG/NEER
PRO✓ECTSURI/EYOR
ALL TOPOGRAPHIC AND FEATURE DATA
ARE BASED ON THE AS -BUILT SURVEY
COMPLETED ON MAY 06, 2019.
-40'-20' 0'
GRAPHIC S
INCOMING DRAINAGE
STABILIZED
♦
♦
♦
♦♦
♦
INCOMING DRAINAGE "-
STABILIZED
�♦ 9
(�
♦♦�lGC� // X%0
♦�� 0 ♦ -� / / ..
♦ 0
♦♦♦ ++ BEGIN
♦♦ o TRIB 2-2
♦ cv
INSTALLE
- 'STEP PO
I 4pi
i
I
♦♦
♦
.�♦♦
►
►
►
►
►
40' 80' . ►
CALE - 0 rA7XA
- -
� EPs ✓
0.0
- / /
'A
♦ ,-��Qi �� � / � �_�--� III
♦♦ ___-/ ��%;tel/' x� J / _i / �_I--
♦♦ �'�// Ori
♦♦
!-Oe
♦♦
/
/
Op '
00,"
J / �
GIN-
TRIB 2-3 .
x - _
Z - INCOMING DRAINAGE
STABILIZED
`♦♦ INSTALLED
J ♦ 'LIVE LIFT
6� ♦♦ INSTALLED'RIFFLE
♦♦♦ ENHANCEMENT'
I
♦
♦
♦
I
1 ♦♦
♦
I
I
I
♦♦ INCOMING DRAINAGE
♦ STABILIZED
BEGIN
TRIB 2-1
D
OL'
INSTALLED'RIFFLE
GRADE CONTROL'
'STEP POOL' AND'RIFFLE
ENHANCEMENT' INSTALLED
TO STABILIZE INCOMING
DRAINAGE
I
/
I/
/
i
0
LL
2
Lu
U)
z
O
LL
M
F
Lu
Lu
ow
Lu O>
w V W
(n >_
oz
w 0
z as
=vLZ
U z�
ti
0
0
a
F- Lu�
Z 7 N
Lu fniz
Q
W p) Q00
J
Wit
Wz NLuU
F
Z
3 0:
d LL Z
0
o JV'
I Lu
Lu
� LL
Lu
W
H
z
Y 0
C) Q
0IY
ILL 0
Z U)
O LLI
U
Q
W
IY
ti U
SITE PLAN
REACH:
TRIB 2-1, 2-2, 2-3
Y�
0
LL
2
Lu
U)
z
O
LL
M
F
Lu
Lu
ow
Lu O>
w V W
(n >_
oz
w 0
z as
=vLZ
U z�
ti
0
0
a
F- Lu�
Z 7 N
Lu fniz
Q
W p) Q00
J
Wit
Wz NLuU
F
Z
3 0:
d LL Z
0
o JV'
I Lu
Lu
� LL
Lu
W
H
z
Y 0
C) Q
0IY
ILL 0
Z U)
O LLI
U
Q
W
IY
ti U
SITE PLAN
REACH:
TRIB 2-1, 2-2, 2-3

RIPARIAN FOREST PLANTING:
PLANTING ZONE 1 = 13.4 ACRES
12" - 18" BARE ROOT MATERIAL
968 STEMS/ACRE (9' X 5' SPACING), RANDOM SPECIES PLACEMENT
COMMON NAME
SCIENTIFIC NAME
STATUS
% OF TOTAL
# OF PLANTS
AMERICAN SYCAMORE
PLATANUS OCCIDENTALIS
FACW
24
3,120
SILKY DOGWOOD
CORNUS AMMOMUM
FACW
3
400
BALD CYPRESS
TAXODIUM DISTICHUM
OBL
3
400
GREEN ASH
FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANICA
FACW
21
2,720
RIVER BIRCH
BETULA NIGRA
FACW
24
3,120
WILLOW OAK
QUERCUS PHELLOS
FAC
14
1,820
TULIP POPLAR
LIRIODENDRON TULIPIFERA
FACU
11
1,420
13,000
PLANTING ZONE 2 = 9.5 ACRES
12" - 18" BARE ROOT MATERIAL
968 STEMS/ACRE (9'X 5' SPACING), RANDOM SPECIES PLACEMENT
COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS
% OF TOTAL
# OF PLANTS
TULIP POPLAR LIRIODENDRON TULIPIFERA
FACU
20
1,900
SOUTHERN RED OAK QUERCUS FALCATA
FACU
25
2,300
WILLOW OAK QUERCUS PHELLOS
FAC
15
1,400
WHITE OAK QUERCUS ALBA
FACU
20
1,900
AMERICAN PERSIMMON DIOSPYROS VIRGINIANA
FAC
10
900
PIN OAK QUERCUS PALUSTRIS
FACW
10
900
9,300
PLANTING ZONE 3 = 6.2 ACRES (APPROX)
SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING ZONE AS NEEDED FOR AREAS CLEARED
OF CHINESE PRIVET
ONE -GALLON CONTAINER TREES AT 20'X 20' SPACING, OR
BARE ROOT TREES IN TREE SHELTERS AT 10' ON CENTER SPACING
COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME
STATUS
% OF TOTAL
# OF PLANTS
RIVER BIRCH BETULA NIGRA
FACW
21
145
AMERICAN SYCAMORE PLATANUS OCCIDENTALIS
FACW
21
145
WHITE OAK QUERCUS ALBA
FACU
4
27
SOUTHERN RED OAK QUERCUS FALCATA
FACU
4
26
SWAMP CHESTNUT OAK QUERCUS MICHAUXII
FACW
20
142
PIN OAK QUERCUS PALUSTRIS
FACW
10
70
WILLOW OAK QUERCUS PHELLOS
FAC
21
145
STREAM ZONE:
STREAM ZONE
LIVE STAKES: 1.5' TO 2' LENGTHS, 1/2' TO 2" DIAMETER,
PLANT AT 3' SPACING, RANDOM SPECIES PLACEMENT.
COMMON NAME
BLACK WILLOW
SILKY WILLOW
SILKY DOGWOOD
1��1{Ililliii■■
,•�'.1H CAgo'•■
rQ
SEAL
32733 '
:7-
■■liii111151LLti
LIVE STAKES
SCALE: NTS
PRO✓ECTENG/NEER
SQUARE CUT
BUDS
(FACING UPWARD) - \ O
NG
(05E O 2" IDIAMETER)
w
a
ANGLE CUT 30°-45°�
=S OF CHANNEL.
JUS ON OUTER BENDS.
i OF CHANNEL.
NS ON OUTER BENDS.
OW
u
F_(1)
r
w
U
w
3
a
U
w
w
0
Z
w
PLANTING
PLAN