Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout790006_Inspection_20190813 Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: (Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access Date of Visit: Arrival Time: --FJ Departure Time: County: Region: r--FT I w �d Farm Name: _j PA wt�n ayy+ a+ �yJ�Y_& Owner.Email: Owner Name: �I-j W{�1(Aln_,� Y i JDV I.5 Phone: Mailing Address: I �('.�`} { ' (�SIJ j I IQ L7o y '�l� J>)v«ih+ IbciLr y Rd , �QidS�l l le NC, 2� 320 Physical )�, Facility Contact: Kcy) e k b)Y l q k+ Title: Phone:C� t/p 3' Ep p Onsite Representative: Integrator: Certified Operator: Certification Number: Back-up Operator: /Certification Number: (It i Location of Farm: Latitude: �j�pb 'f�h Longitude: —I1 t q 1 105 1, vl kfibalt-Lj tlf i i F �, { goi F, F1,. s ti �� ,� 3 lS � Wean to Finish Layer DairyCow Wean to Feeder Non La er DairyCalf Nal .Feeder to Finish p F� � Dairy Heifer Farrow to Wean i j i � } �: Dry Cow Farrow to Feeder t , 1Fl�l,{ ,� � Non-Dairy Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder Boars ( Pullets I lBecfBroodCow A MI 'h{i"' Turkeys `II;�l Ill .41 I Jill I '�� !��<<, TurkeyPoults Other Other Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [!3/No ❑ NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [yZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes [!No ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page I of 3 21412015 Continued Facili Number: - Date of Inspection: 3 l Waste Collection&Treatment 4 4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Strluctture•_2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: WWr� Spillway?: Designed Freeboard(in): -71 Observed Freeboard(in): 5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees,severe erosion, seepage,etc.) 6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR 7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes YNNo ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) 9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes C9 No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application � - 10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes u No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [�o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift�❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12.Crop Type(s): V�tx I' n/a1 C i21 AV) ( � 13. Soil Type(s): 14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes Ee"Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE 15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ff No ❑ NA ❑ NE 16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes E o ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes EeNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [E]-go ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records&Documents 19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE 20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21. es record keeping need improvement?If yes,check appropriate box . ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Waste Application [']"Weekly Freeboard [ Vaste Analysis Soil Analysis ns ers El/weather Code Rainfall ❑Stocking [Crop Yield �20 Minute Inspections onthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections [lS.Ivdge sw-my 22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No Eg-NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: 24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [ AIo ❑ NA/ ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check El Yes LJ�'i"o ❑Di�1 ❑ NE the appropriate box(es)below. ❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structme(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [l To ❑ NA ❑ NE 27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No C NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes []-No ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? l��4\ 29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes2/No ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE permit?(i.e.,discharge, freeboard problems,over-application) 31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [B No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [t o ❑ NA ❑ NE 33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes EJ'No ❑ NA ❑ NE 34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes E f No ❑ NA ❑ NE soi> S CL�iaV to 7_pZ l Cl2z-- q.� y� "',�'PP'/ lmn1PX III Reviewer/Inspector Name: G 4leV Phone: CL-5 eta a Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Page 3 of 3 21412015