790005_Inspection_20180510

Division of Water Resources--
Fuci
lity Number 7q - C ] 0 Division of Soil and Water( servation
Other Agency �Y'V`'
Type of Visit: IRCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: jp I r Arrival Time:
Departure Time: I-I County: ( 1 YV1Region:
Farm Name: I Q. yDS ` 1{ �/ �17 M_ Ownerr Email:
Owner Name: Phone: 4=—:?JAA
Intnv�v�v s I�arl�es Zvi l l�,,nn,.. � ,� ( r1 �
Mailing Address: �5�(fi g � CA'I(A ylc�• V 1A A �`Q\ Iy0"
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: �cjhVwy Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
* 311ouf tV.eadtt
Certified Operator: Certification Number: hl � �, 6r yptAY
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
I
E e AN-5 U k i V c� L Hv\f� 73 f) � Wl 66 CL)I+v\jy 153 I �Cv�enn n��narv\ Mi l li I
L V-gw c� V_A . Kam svl (,
kk
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dai Cow
Wean to Feeder I jNon-Layer 11 Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish ILayers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars 1 1 Pullets FTBeef Brood Cow
Turkeys
..'Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
I
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ;KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: C
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes [:] No ❑-NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes [:] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) [:] Yes ❑y No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? El Yes y� x No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters [:] Yes /�� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
I
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - M Date of Inspection: rr I Q
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: LTw°✓�
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): �{,
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion,seepage,etc.) r�
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE `
waste management or closure plan? T`
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) t
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes K I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? TC
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers, setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ;gLNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Windows ` ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
K 12. Crop Type(s): �Ki ' Vlf Q, C b( � C7 `1 aa-L '5,YYLG CZ —.
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes )Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 1%No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes Ili No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. 7"
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check�pt� the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
i
Waste Application Weekly Freeboard LAWaste Analysis Soil Analysis [— -W ers )Q Weather Code
ij Rainfall 1p Stocking)Q Crop Yield f7m'120 Minute Inspections Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections B-S�ey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes W No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No N NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued 4
I

Facili Number: '_7CA Date of Inspection: 6 )
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste app.- .don equipment as required by the permit. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) 7�
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 77��
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34 Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes �e No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Cottingents(refer; r
tb gees Ion#�t Upla Yi airy, I S dnswers'a�id/or any dil�t4opal ecorpme dahops nr any other co hmel4tsa iy 4 "
Use��Xa4vliigs offagilitytu better;eFP�
i
1. �Inr C� 2�11 dal 150�m��l s �gy�Q�� -� yea t= tTU .
�} Ca l i brit-hi ova v�U& -k z be Coyvt U+-(d {:�X( e AA-j 0 Cr7l�U 17 .
III\ Iov�hhn -,loves
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Q (1 CAIw1( I u Phone:;) t :]1p� c 1 6
Reviewer/Inspector Sig na Date: 1 b 0
Page 3 of 3 21412015