010025_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20180504

,WDrvision of Water Resource
Sj Y
FacilityNumber 170 - a? �t 0 Division of Soil and Water I nervation
Otlie ;AAgegcy %
Type of Visit: A;tutine
e Inspection Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: L-10 Departure Time: County: nA^vlCe Region: ,.�P�
Farm Name: NQiW i I V1 �. ��j p�sQ,1,1' FOu1rYYj Owner Email:
`.
Owner Name: 1" A &>r\f V) O 11\/ Ne.' Phone: 3 36 — 3 76 — 6 J i(ji-
UI VVt t Por} r1 s 1-, � P
Mailing Address: -533'W -7hoM P-�, MP_hc_n'0_ ..N716.7— 37&— 3963
Physical Address: -T2—NC_ a ?3Q Z—
Facility Contact: W i l bu i t�pyol in Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: 'fnteg—
Certified Operator: Certification Number: /Q i- 5 • jZ L31 /!
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Certification Number:
o l�
Latitude: 3 9 5 / 023 Longitude:
M-g62a5+) NWy SQL , �L om
Swine
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -La er
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Design Current
Dry Poultry Canaeity Pon_
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
0 57"
�g 1/n�
Design Curr.E
Cattle Capacity. Pop
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
,Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
[:]Yes [�KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [:]No
[:]Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3
21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: _ ILIfl
Waste Collection & Treatment �
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storagAP//114heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
XNo
❑
❑
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: W &,5+e' Pb'A
Spillway?: a P/
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
[WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
NKo
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental
threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
LyNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
;rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window �❑ U Evidence of WindDrift❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 1- 'ei, �a, ,�j`t'J' r-e
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes IkNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ,�rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
[:]No
C�J-1QA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
�io
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
�,(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
X No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
XrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need i provement?
❑ YesVNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis Soil Analysis
❑ Weather Code
EZinfall [Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
D-
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
o
JJJ❑
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
1
No
JS QA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412015 Continued

Facility Number: of- p2 Date of Inspection: MQ�',' Zp
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste appi cation equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ;yNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No Dq'NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes 5No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues 77��
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes J�j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
[XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
eNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
[jrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
NfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
CaNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
dZ 1 • C her-� a o t 7 S o i 1 4es -f - re-5 u Ws , �j� (�..�. o � � o v-� �, il'N,� �-
d - Cal i Ip r-c��--i d � � v � i n a ©� q o o�� s �q� q �sir� �- �-
Co C�6sure— p lain ? Not le4-r Q
Vken 'rs aw a-i�+rti G©ft._'irrN,ct,-� 8 �' o� d �i ncc L
gSSis-�nC.e � &I0:'Vre vvS P• c�vlc� 1k1LT Cto
1
N0 w PP�LeQ�ion ins P'c '�
n
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatux
Page 3 of 3
Phone: Me11=71 b — 96 1
Date: QT 4 d a-m
21412015