The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About010010_Follow-up_20181113s ?_ a Water Resources Environmental Quality November 13, 2018 CERTIFIED MAIL # 7015 0640 0005 8164 0117 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Mr. George H. Woody Triple W Farms 3545 E. Greensboro Road Snow Camp, NC 27349 SUBJECT: Follow -Up to Notice of Intent to Enforce NOV-2018-PC-0216 Certificate of Coverage #AWC010010 ,Facility#01-10 Alamance County Dear Mr. Woody: ROY COOPER Governor NUCHAEL S. REGAN Secretary LINDA CULPEPPER Interim Director This letter is to summarize a follow-up inspection conducted by Rebecca Chandler, Christine Lawson and Melissa Rosebrock on November 8, 2018. The inspection report, attached, details the Division of Water Resource (DWR) observations. Also find attached, a revised final copy of the October 31, 2018 inspection report. Be reminded that there are several ongoing animal waste management violations that must be addressed: 1. Permit conditions III. 13.e. and V.2. The waste level in the new structure continues to be above the maximum liquid/start pump mark. Animal waste needs to be removed immediately and properly land applied. The waste level has been non -compliant since at least June 22, 2018. 2. Permit condition 111.13. e. The waste level was higher on November 8, 2018 than during the previous visit of October 31, 2018. Our office must be notified of increasing non-compliance. 3. Permit condition 111.11. Freeboard records have not been maintained since June 2018. Freeboard level must be recorded weekly. 4. Permit condition 1.111. Animal waste continues be pushed from the ramp of the barn and is flowing downhill to where it has accumulated only 66 feet from a well. Waste must be removed, and land -applied immediately. This has been a habitual violation of several years which may cause or have already caused ground water contamination. 5. Permit condition 1.111. The waste from the small uncovered concrete pit at the rear of the parlor was to be piped underground to the new structure. If waste is not to be managed in this manner, then the certified animal waste management plan (CAWMP) must be revised to reflect this. If the parlor is no longer needed due to conversion to a type beef operation, then the pit may be closed out. <�>� Nothing Compares'-_,_, State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality 450 W. Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105 Phone: 336-776-98001 FAX: 336-776-9797 Woody, NOV-2018-PC-0216 November 13, 2018 Page 2 Other concerns: Although a portion of the concrete wall of the wet stack has been backfilled to control seepage, the wall needs to be repaired as soon as possible. 2. Soil continues to wash from around the concrete footings of the posts for the roof above the wet stack and dry -pack barn. The loss of soil can impact the stream as well as the eventual structural stability of the wet stack. Written Response: A reminder that this office requires that the violations, as detailed above, be abated immediately and properly resolved. Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A, these violations and any future violations are subject to a civil penalty assessment of up to a maximum of $25,000.00 per day for each violation. Please respond to our office within ten (10) days describing the actions you have taken, or propose to take, to address each of the violations and concerns listed above. Your response should be sent to my attention at the address listed in the footer on page one. If you have questions regarding this Notice, please contact Melissa Rosebrock or me at (336) 776-9800 or by email at melissa.rosebrock@ncdenr.gov or sherri.knight@ncdenr.gov. Sincerely, Sherri V. Knight, P. E. Regional Supervisor Water Quality Regional Operations Section Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ— WSRO Attachments: Revised final October 31, 2018 inspection report November 8, 2018 inspection report cc: WSRO File Copy NCDEQ DWR-Animal Waste Feeding Operations and Ground Water Section Alamance County NRCS and Soil and Water Conservation District (via er9A5 95 0 Division of Water Resources ❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency Facility Number: 010010 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC010010 ❑ Denied Access Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date: Reason for Visit: Follow-up County: Alamance Region: Winston-Salem Date of Visit:=.11/08/2018 Entry Time: 02:45 pm Exit Time: 4:00 pm Incident # Farm Name: Triple W Farms Owner Email: hwoody273@bellsouth.r Owner: Harold Woody Phone: 336-213-8644 Mailing Address: 3545 E Greensboro Rd Snow Camp NC 27349 Physical Address: 3545 E Greensboro -Chapel Hill Hwy Snow Camp NC 27349 Facility Status: ❑ Compliant Not Compliant Integrator: Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 54' 15" Longitude: 79' 18' 00" Take 87 south 13 miles to Dauls Exxon - turn right - go 1/2 miles to farm on right Question Areas: Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application Records and Documents Other Issues Certified Operator: George H Woody Operator Certification Number: 997975 Secondary OIC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone 24 hour contact name Harold Woody Phone : 336-213-8644 On -site representative Harold Woody Phone : 336-213-8644 Primary Inspector: Melissa Rosebrock Inspector Signature: Secondary Inspector(s): Christine Lawson Rebecca D Chandler Inspection Summary: Phone: 3 76- 71 &- g 6 q 9 Date: ! Z O f $ page: 1 Permit: AWC010010 Owner - Facility : Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010 Inspection Date: 11/08/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up 3. Waste that has accumulated beneath the push off ramp and flowed downhill is only 66 feet from a well. There is a concern for well water contamination since this practice has been occuring for several years. The stockpiling of waste too close to a well continues to be a habitual violation. 4. Waste level in the new waste pond is 35 inches over the maximum liquid/start pump mark (22 inches below spillway). This is a continuing violation. See June 22, July 12, and October 31, 2018 inspections. 5. & 7. Large crack in concrete wall of wet stack has been temporarily back -filled to stop leak of animal waste. Mr. Woody states that permanent repairs are to be made when he can get sub -contractor out to the farm. Small leak continues in another part of the concrete wall (under the roofed section) but has only traveled a foot. 6. The small uncovered concrete pit at the rear of the milk parlor is still being used to hold waste until it can be pumped directly .into a honey wagon and applied. If waste is NOT going to be conveyed to the new waste pond via underground pipe, then this method of waste management'must be removed from the waste plan (CAWMP). If the dairy parlor is no longer in use, then the pit may be closed out. Mr. Woody states that the farm is in process of converting from a milking operation to a beef brood cow/calf operation. 9. As noted in previous inspections over the last several years, the improper management of animal waste beneath the push off ramp continues to be a violation of the CAWMP and the permit. Again, the new waste pond was NOT designed to receive overland flow of solid waste. 11. Animal waste solids were being applied today. Mr. Woody was reminded to obtain a waste analysis within 60 days and to record all the loads being applied. 21. Freeboard records are not being maintained. This is a continued violation (see June 22, July 12, and October 31, 2018 inspection reports). 30. See June, July, and October 2018 inspections. Mr. Woody has pumped some waste out since June 2018 but the waste level is still non -compliant. Mr. Woody responded to WSRO requests for freeboard updates by sending photos on September 7 and September 18, 2018. The WSRO received a partially completed plan of action (POA) on September 10, 2018. The WSRO was not aware that the non -compliant freeboard level had increased further since the October 31, 2018 inspection. 34. The WSRO will need to continue monitoring the freeboard level in the new structure until compliant. page: 2 Permit: AWC010010 Owner- Facility: Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010 Inspection Date: 11/08/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up Waste Structures Disignated Observed Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard Dry Stack 02 01/23/13 18.00 Waste Pit CONCRETE PIT T 18.00 Waste Pond 01 04/23/13 57.00 22.00 page: 3 Permit: AWC010010 Owner - Facility : Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010 Inspection Date: 11/08/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No Na Ne 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Discharge originated at: Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other ❑ a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ 110 ❑ b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No Na Ne 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le] large M ❑ ❑ ❑ trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ waste management or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require M ❑ ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? Waste Application Yes No Na Ne 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ M ❑ ,❑ maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? ❑ Hydraulic Overload? ❑ Frozen Ground? ❑ Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑ PAN? ❑ Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑ Total Phosphorus? ❑ Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑ Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑ Evidence of wind drift? ❑ Application outside of application area? ❑ page: 4 Permit: AWC010010 Owner - Facility : Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010 Inspection Date: 11/08/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up Waste Application Yes No No No Crop Type 1 Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Oats) Crop Type 2 Crop Type 3 Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Soil Type 2 Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Records and Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box below. WUP? Checklists? Design? Maps? Lease Agreements? . Other? If Other, please specify 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? Weekly Freeboard? Waste Analysis? Soil analysis? Waste Transfers? Weather code? Rainfall? Stocking? *0711M "I Lmmj� IMENN Em ❑■❑❑ ❑■❑❑ Yes No No Ne 0 No MEMNON ■❑❑❑ i m page: 5 Permit: AWC010010 Owner - Facility : Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010 Inspection Date: 11/08/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for,Visit: Follow-up Records and Documents Yes No Na Ne Crop yields? ❑ 120 Minute inspections? ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey ❑ 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ ❑ ❑ 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment ❑ ❑ ❑ (NPDES only)? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ ❑ ❑ 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the ❑ ❑ ❑ appropriate box(es) below: Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑ List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ E ❑ ❑ 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Other Issues Yes No Na Ne 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ E ❑ ❑ and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, ❑ E ❑ ❑ contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? E ❑ ❑ ❑ (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ E ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Application Field ❑ Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑ Other ❑ If Other, please specify 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ page: 6 Division of Water ResourcesEl I Division of Soil and Water Conservation / Other Agency Facility Number: 010010 Facility Status: Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up Date of Visit ;--10/31l2018 T Entry Time: 09:30 am Farm Name: Triple W Farms Active Permit: AWC010010 Inactive Or Closed Date: County: Alamance Region: Exit Time: 12:40 pm Incident # Owner Email: Owner: Harold Woody Phone: Mailing Address: 3545 E Greensboro Rd Snow Camp NC 27349 Physical Address: 3545 E Greensboro -Chapel Hill Hwy F ili Stat s Snow Camp NC 27349 ac ty u ❑ Compliant IIIIIII Not Compliant Integrator: Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 54' 15" Take 87 south 13 miles to Dauls Exxon - turn right - go 1/2 miles to farm on right. Question Areas: Dischrge & Stream Impacts Records and Documents Winston-Salem hwoody273@ bel Isouth.r 336-213-8644- Longitude: 79° 18' 00" Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application Other Issues Certified Operator: George H Woody Operator Certification Number: 997975 Secondary OIC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone 24 hour contact name Harold Woody Phone: 336-213-8644 On -site representative Harold Woody Phone: 336-213-8644 Primary Inspector: Me issa Rosebrock Phone: 3 36 7 7� Inspector Signature: Y-).1_L1. 4 —'� Date: i b 3t ` -ZG Secondary Inspector(s): Rebecca D Chandler Inspection Summary: page: 1 Permit: AWC010010 Owner - Facility : Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010 Inspection Date: 10/31/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up 3. Small amount of waste is leaking from east wall of wet stack. Observed evidence of waste flowing into downhill ditch/gully about 75 feet from wet stack wall. Not yet entering stream. 3. Stream crossing has been completed and looks good. Mr. Woody did not receive financial assistance and estimates he has spent about $1,200. 4. Newest waste structure has been pumped since June 2018 inspection but is still 33 inches over the maximum liquid mark (start pump mark). 5. Seepage of waste from crack in wall of wet stack. 6. Concrete pit behind parlor is not certified and waste has not yet been piped to the new WSP. Mr. Woody may close the pit per NRCS standards if he is no longer using parlor. Mr. Woody stated that he is in the process of converting to an angus beef brood cow operation in which he would sell the angus calves. He is just milking now to feed the current stock of dairy, calves/heifers and will quit milking in two months and will thus not need the parlor or the concrete pit. Of the current population of heifers, about half are dairy and the other half are beef. 7. OIC to backfill wall with soil by end of day tomorrow (prior to next rain event) and send photo to WSRO. Permanently repair wall ASAP. 9. Waste is still being pushed off the end of the barn ramp where it accumulates on the ground and flows down hill. The accumulation of waste is 102 feet from a potable well today. DWR discussed with Mr. Woody that waste may not accumulate or be stored within 100 feet of the well. Also discussed that the waste must be cleaned up and applied and that the new waste pond was NOT intended to capture the overland flow of waste from the push off ramp. 9. May need to clean out culvert pipe at south end of the new WSP in which silo leachate is first captured. Appears that it might be clogged but couldn't confirm due to excessive vegetation. It was noted that silage has not been stored in the silo for at least several months. 21.DWR WSRO requested to review Mr. Woody's records for rainfall and freeboard. The June 2018 compliance inspection noted that these records were not being maintained. Mr. Woody is maintaining rainfall records on another document then periodically transcribes the information onto the "official form." "*"Freeboard records HAVE NOT been recorded since June 2018. This is a continued violation of the permit. 32. Concrete waste pit was to be piped into the new WSP per the 2016 waste plan but this has not happened and Mr. Woody does not intend to complete this task since he states that he will not be using the milk parlor or pit after this year. At the end of the year he states that his operation will be converted to an angus beef farm where the brood cows and calves will be raised on exterior lots or pastures or in barns. 32. Slurry waste that is pushed from ramp of barn located south of dry pack barn was to have been dropped into a catch box and then sent directly to the new WSP per the 2016 waste plan. Mr. Woody had stated his plans to complete this but slurry waste is still being stockpiled on the ground. 34. DWR will need to follow-up on recordkeeping and transition to beef brood cow operation. page: 2 Permit: AWC010010 Owner -Facility.: Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010 Inspection Date: 10/31/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions Cattle Cattle - Other 57 Cattle - Dairy Heifer 200 58 Cattle - Milk Cow 400 72 Total Design Capacity: 600 Total SSLW: 760,000 Waste Structures «�{ CiG'Sez[i Disignated Observed Type Identifier -0ate StarCDate Freeboard Freeboard Dry Stack 02 01/23/13 15.00 Waste Pit CONCRETE PIT 48.00 Waste Pond 01 04/23/13 57.00 page: 3 U Permit: AWC010010 Owner - Facility : Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010 Inspection Date: 10/31/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up Discharges $ Stream Impacts Yes No Na Ne 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ❑ ❑ Discharge originated at: Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other ❑ a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ 1-10 ❑ b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ M ❑ 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the ❑ ❑ ❑ State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection, Storage $ Treatment Yes No Na Ne 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ❑ ❑ If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6zAre there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ waste management or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable ❑, ❑ ❑ to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require M ❑ ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? Waste Application Yes No Na Ne 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? ❑ Hydraulic Overload? ❑ Frozen Ground? ❑ Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑ PAN? ❑ Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑ Total Phosphorus? ❑ Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑ Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑ Evidence of wind drift? ❑ Application outside of application area? ❑ page: 4 Permit: AWC010010 Owner - Facility : Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010 Inspection Date: 10/31/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up Waste Application Yes No Na Ne Crop Type 1 Crop Type 2 Crop Type 3 Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 . Soil Type 1 Soil Type 2 Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Management Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ M ❑ ❑ 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ❑ ❑ 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ M ❑ ❑ Records and Documents Yes No Na Ne 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. WUP? ❑ Checklists? ❑ Design? ❑ Maps? ❑ Lease Agreements? ❑ Other? ❑ If Other, please specify 21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? ❑ Weekly Freeboard? Waste Analysis? ❑ Soil analysis? ❑ Waste Transfers? ❑ Weather code? ❑ Rainfall? ❑ Stocking? ❑ page: 5 r Permit: AWC010010 Owner - Facility : Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010 Inspection Date: 10/31/18 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up Records and Documents Yes No Na Ne Crop yields? ❑ 120 Minute inspections? ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey ❑ 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment ❑ ❑ E ❑ (NPDES only)? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ ❑ ❑ 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the ❑ ❑ ❑ appropriate box(es) below: Failure to complete annual sludge survey' ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑ List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ❑ ❑ 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Other Issues Yes No Na Ne 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ N ❑ ❑ and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, ❑ E ❑ ❑ contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? M ❑ ❑ ❑ (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? ❑ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Application Field ❑ Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑ Other ❑ If Other, please specify 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ' 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ page: 6