010010_Structure Evaluation Follow-up_20180712

Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 010010 Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWC010010
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Structure Evaluation
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for visit: Follow-up County:
Alamance Region:
Winston-Salem
Date.of Visit. Entry Time: 12:00 pm Exit Time: 12:30 pm Incident #
Farm Name: Triple W Farms
Owner Email:
hwoody273@bellsouth.r
Owner: Harold Woody
Phone:
336-213-8644
Mailing Address: 3545 E Greensboro Rd
Snow Camp NC 27349
Physical Address: 3545 E Greensboro -Chapel Hill Hwy
Snow Camp NC 27349
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude:
35' 54' 15" Longitude:
79' 18' 00"
Take 87 south 13 miles to Dauls Exxon - turn right - go 1/2 miles to farm on right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Certified Operator: George H Woody
Operator Certification Number:
997975
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Harold Woody
Phone : [phone]
On -site representative Harold Woody
Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector: Melissa Rosebrock
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
page: 1

Permit: AWC010010 Owner - Facility : Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010
Inspection Date: 07/12/18 Inpsection Type: Structure Evaluation Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Today's visit was to check on the progress (since the June 22, 2018 inspection) by Mr. Woody to bring the waste level in the new
structure into compliance. Mr. Woody was notified of this visit by text 30 minutes prior to my arrival. On -farm staff stated that Mr.
Woody had gone to Liberty, NC for a tank. There was no evidence of rain for the last several days. Hay has been cut and bales
observed in the field(s).
3. Stockpiled waste is still being allowed to accumulate below the push -off ramp near the old Harveststore
4. Waste level in the new structure is still above the maximum liquid mark and has flowed into the spillway. There is several feet of
vegetation prior to the waste level rising another three inches before cresting and flowing downhill. WASTE LEVEL,IS.STILLy,
NON -COMPLIANT (see 6-22-2018 inspection).
6. Small concrete pit behind the parlor has not yet been certified OR closed AND waste is not being conveyed to the new waste
structure as was stated to be completed in the narrative of the 1-26-2016 waste plan.
7. New waste structure needs to mowed as soon as possible. Is currently difficult to inspect the condition of the dam due to the
tall vegetation.
7. Need to mow the waste diversion/collection ditches and retention basins near the new waste structure so that the condition
and the amount of waste in them can be assessed.
8. Could not evaluate or confirm presence of marker in the new waste structure since the waste level was so high.
9. Waste in waste ditches and retention basins are filling up with sediment and manure. There is a concern that waste water will
not be contained to the ditch and retention basin and will flow around the structure and flow downhill towards the stream.
page: 2

Permit: AWC010010 Owner- Facility: Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010
Inspection Date:11111111110MMW Inpsection Type: Structure Evaluation Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Dry Stack
02
01/23/13
Waste Pond
01
04/23/13
57.00
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
0
❑ ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
0
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑0
❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
M
❑ ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
0
❑ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑ ❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
0
❑ ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
page: 3