030013_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20190221

Facility Number
-
Division of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservat►on-.�
s
Other Agency
Type of Visit: 1PCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: (A Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: �(( Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Q ha
Farm Name: b6 VjV c A),EUavIS jai ►�V Yw� Owner Email:
Owner Name: bbv C_Vayls Phone: !1-b6 ,-1)-7—y j 15
Mailing Address: C�1' o,
Physical Address:
v
Facility Contact: �d�J 1p/an5 Title:
Onsite Representative: `
Certified Operator: v
Back-up Operator:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Region:
USSyN �_7U w 7-_-r-1 s —> n1G'89 Cif iDO _ Nci�
—,)Cg-)
��hd9-r ®�Pt 2as0�►�►- Igo CLw�c,� .
Swine
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -La er
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Design Current
Dry Poultry Canacitv Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
. c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Design'...Current <.
Cattle Capacity Pop.`
Dairy Cow
O
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - i Date of Inspection: 1
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes [A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?.
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 4Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes N[ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes � No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes �ZNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [ANo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Meta as (Cu, Zn, etc.
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
1Wind
12. Crop Type(s): coo x l' Ck (A i M� , 9M Ct l t (J Y6U (\ r6V QF
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes J;gj No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? []Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [K No ❑ NA ❑ NE
-18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ANo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes T� � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes J4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application Weekly Freeboard 10 Waste Analysis Soil Analysis Weather Code
Rainfall NO Stocking M Crop Yield Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ;RftWMP-2111R,Pv
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No MA NA ❑ NE
Wk
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes KNo
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ NA ❑ NE
NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
r" No
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
V1 Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond V Other: , h2 .& Y (w-e-
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
171 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
g4. S01I5 CoYv,PU_4-ed ? q& IoMtl , �Cluk ck n
g 4. CGUI bOTMI -M b01 � *\A a� y.za r . (am. Lo--e d 3 c ►� , A 0-e ay no-%-t
Ctn e ca= s rrn cL l t 9 rC6 ,n 9A, tJ ( 9,eo l b) . -f VvAkik- Of\) .
1 C7 am Cavtd-+ 1; 6-VI �4 S spa �vu 1pG�(—Ccsw�eN o �O�o��h �ja� �`, vJPS�`�
MarV-e.,- Pa%
U?d0_+_r_A
M s, bvIk- �; �\ v d �la� t o VjZ- ke aw' a e5
Wbi c 6, �2; �0 as +t'kog grw ave �appe� �I�
WC�A WCAC Cauca" (I' U-Vklu
Reviewer/Inspector
Reviewer/Inspector
Page 3 of 3
Phone:" L T U -9105
Date: 'Znj_� %A
21412 15