Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout030002_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20180823=WA101wi.�- Division of Water Resources 'Facility Number ®- Q 0 Division of Soil and Water C rvation�M Other Agency Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: Arrival Time: a(> Departure Time: County: AUpiegion: Wsp_o Farm Name: TTG �C�C Pi C�P�2 �L �Ct 1 f Q �r h� Owner Email: Owner Name: W i It ►v. Rlan 26116bn6U G5+&-i Phone: Mailing Address: to (p C, _A eA (e-y R. A• t E n n 1 C e, NC a- S 6 L-3 Physical Address: (,� 7 1 ( � OL (� 2U � � • , n n I Ce-i 6VJ 3 � �( 7 n Facility Contact: 1 � \ DUr V� Q,_ �j D" f D M (� �/ Title: 6 \1J ►) ew'- Phone: e-, -3 3/p — (0 5 '7 3 3 Onsite Representative: T ('aGAJ BC>46M Integrator: Z 336 - aC'o- a 3qf Certified Operator: �/ Certification Number: vj -gM— ! OLI — _ 39 Back-up Operator: Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: 36 JC) 13 Longitude: 2 Q0 S (a I US SZ N -- W 1---r- 7-7S, U 5 Vkw y$ 9 VJ I Q-- e._ V n. l e Swine Design Current Design Current Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Ria er Wean to Finish Wean to Feeder Feeder to Finish Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish Gilts Boars Other Other Design Current Dry Poultry Capacity POD. Layers Non -Layers Pullets Turkeys Turkey Poults Other Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? _ d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? Design Current Cattle Capacity Pop. , Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow .Non -Dairy Beef Stocker 6 Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow ❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes [:]No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes 2No Yes ❑ No ❑NA ❑NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑NA ❑NE Page I of 3 21412015 Continued Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: $ 02 ? ILJ Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Identifier: wsP ilO K PeI� Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): _ Observed Freeboard (in): _ 5- _ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? ❑ Yes E4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 5 Structure 6 ❑ Yes C!5(No ❑ NA ❑ NE []Yes [XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require bKes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes X No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): CAe;tlt)l? 0- 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents ArYes [-]No ❑ Yes gNo ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE EN -NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes &-No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes D�No ❑ NA ❑ NE 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other: 21. Does record keeping need i provement? ❑ Waste ApVStockingEj ion [Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis Soil [ainfall Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections Monthly 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Analysis r—► "'+P r ` ❑ Weather Code and V Rainfall Inspections ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No J'NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued Facili Number: LQ3 - 8 Z Date of inspection: y' 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes rNo ❑,NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No CR'1QA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ,�` o ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 0No ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? [—]Yes WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the [� Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes N�No NA ❑ NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? Kyes WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes &�'No ❑ NA ❑ NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE &j4A,,-j �do\o a,��c �0+ (&own+he_ ro") MO-1 n40-1 v)eA ? �. Corn ra t r\ a AA eA a U__� L P 2 N o _ S -e-;- CAI ►n•1 i h �- e,��-i n ti -n te- r 1Z � �l-l� I� v► n� sect Z � I 5� �( -t-�-5 d�� l n a o � 9• In l beL ou-) �e4+�,rt ew VJ5 P w A, 5/'Ar\ 01 � \D� 0.�DoVe lM�ia� N1� ��:�j z Z �3 -la o-er Uv\ air IL M i � KL p a.r � o 0 VJ P M ' S i o ne-o-r �� P w`�n-t' �O�-1t- v� a 1� o r 5 I Ip c�G �,%n L2c� In 04- - ru h o EX CASE c ve v OL-1 V'-0 Ave-,, u r\C'Ovj' b K V Reviewer/Inspector Name: Revie r/In' ector 0 3 CCR - -. I .__ , L 3;- Wy-Phone: ,33(o —77 to 9J Date: j ,Z d ir✓% T