970008_Historical_20080220

OFFICIAL
USE
D Postage
$
Certified Fee
Postmark
9 Return Receipt Fee
Here
3 (Endorsement Required)
3 Restricted Delivery Fee
7 (Endorsement Required)
3 Total i
9
F-se,,,t. Mr Clifton Hutchinson
6501 Traphill Road
Traphill NC 28685 r--.

Iertified Provides:
I A mailing*er
t
0 A unique for your mailpiece
A signature upon delivery
A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years
mportant Reminders.
Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First -Class Mail or Priority Mail.
® Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail.
NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. Fo
valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail.
For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof a
delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Returt
Receipt (PS Form 3811), to the article and add applicable postage to cover the
fee. Endorse mailpiece 'Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver foi
a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt �k
required.
For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee of
addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the
endorsement "Restricted Delivery".
If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arts
cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mai
receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail.
MPORTANT, Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry..
IS Form 3800, January 2001 (Reverse) 102595-01-M-1041

i
madv
0
ENDER: r
I also wish to receive the follow
in
❑ Complete hems 1 and/ dr 2 for additional services.
0
ing services (for an extra fee):
H
Complete items 3, 4a; and 4b.
Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this
>O
card tory'ou.-
1 • ❑ Addressee's Address
d
❑ Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not
permit.
2. ❑ Restricted Delivery
ai
./-0 Write 'Return Receipt Requested" on the mailpiece below the article number.
�-
❑ The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date
p
delivered.
m
3. Article Addressed to:
4a. Article Number 70 O
o
o.
E
o
D
Mr Cliff Hutchison
4b. Service Type
❑ Registered '�&ertified
u
6501 Taphill Road
❑ Express Mail ❑ Insured
Traphill NC 28685
Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD
i
7. Date o Delivery
5. Received By: (Print Name
8. Addressee's Address (Only if requested and
u_
fee is paid)
5 6. Sicinazur ddressee or. A ent
a
!� !till ! r-f •� a i ii
•i
PS Fjdrm4W, December 1994 102595-99-B•0223 Domestic Return Receipt

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE \`.., -First-Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
• LISPS
IL Permit.No. G-10
4 Print your name, address, and ZIP Code in this box •
ua
G►
C DENR
-WATER QUALITY SECTION (X\
585 WAUGHTOWN STREET RECEIV�D
STON SALEM NC 27107-2241 N C Dept . of I1_ N R
___ n11G_1-_7 20M
vv+n-si-cml bate m
Regional Office

ils'ionof`Water Quality -
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number: 970008 Facility Status: Inactive Permit: A
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: ComDlaint
Date of Visit: 02/20/2008 Entry Time:10:00 AM
*� 11 oo3U
Q Denied Access
Inactive or Closed Date:
County: Wilkes Region: Winston-Salem
Exit Time:11:30 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Hutchison Dairy Owner Email:
Owner: Clifton G Hutchison Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 6501 Traphill Rd
Physical Address:
Traphill NC 28685
Facility Status: 0 Compliant Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36°18'53" Longitude: 81003'26"
Hwy. 21 north of Elkin to Traphill Rd. 9 miles on Traphill Rd. ,SR1002 and farm is on the left. Second, smaller pond is located on
Mountain View Rd.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Application
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Cliff Hutchison Phone:
On -site representative Cliff Hutchison Phone:
Primary Inspector: Melissa Rosebrock
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
-OrK Yo ew M - 5wP
Phone:
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWD970008 Own(,._ ' cility: Clifton G Hutchison Facility Number : 970008
Inspection Date: 02/20/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
Inspection Summary:
Today's visit was the result of an anonymous complaint received by DWQ on 2/1/08 alleging that too much manure (cattle and poultry)
had been land -applied to the receiving crop. Caller stated that the problem was occuring in fields along the river, 1.5 miles west of
traphill Elementary.
At this location, poultry waste had not been applied yet to the field of small grain but was stockpiled in the field. Although the stockpile
was only 20-30 feet from a small branch, there was no run-off of leachate into the branch since the stockpiled litter was down hill from
surface waters and there was very little leachate movement (about 1 foot).
DWQ continued driving west another three miles to the dairy. We observed that a newly purchased field had received dairy waste. We
could visually see where waste had been applied and no evidence of run-off was observed. Per Derek, there had been a dispute with a
neighbor over the purchase of this field.
We checked the creek and found one location that contained some sludge worms. No cattle were at the dairy and owner's son, Derek,
stated that they had gotten rid of the dairy cows at least a month ago.
No other evidence of stream problems (algae, foam, etc.) was observed. There
There is a new housing development directly beside the dairy. Roads are paved and streetlights have been installed, but no home
construction has begun. ,
Page: 2

Permit: AWD970008 (:.Itir- Facility: Clifton G Hutchison b -+`' Facility Number: 970008
Inspection Date: 02/20/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Cattle
Q Cattle -Milk Cow 80 0
Total Design Capacity: 80
Total SSLW: 112,000
Page: 3

Permit: AWD970008 Ownc,--._'cility: Clifton G Hutchison
Inspection Date: 02/20/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 970008
Reason for Visit: Complaint
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
.NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ■
❑
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Q
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Fescue
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Page: 4

Permit: AWD970008 ( <r -Facility: Clifton GHutchison - Facility Number: 970008
Inspection Date: 02/20/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack -adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Page: 5

:n
Facility Number 97 g Date of Visit: 6/29/2004 Time: 0930
Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
j3 Permitted N Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered
Farm Name: HutZhisa11.1biry...............................................
Owner Name:lKlifianL.................................... HjAiehj59ia......
Mailing Address: hS.41.TX.Rpltilj.RQAd ...............................
Facility Contact: Cliffutslaiso>x...
Onsite Representative: GlAff.,�nsl.])iexOtt Tut�ilisatl....
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
..... County: W...ilk,rs................................................ WSW ........
Phone No:G:92:2�2Uh...............................................:...........
TrAphilLAC........
Phone No:....
......... Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
... 2868 :9921.
Hwy. 21 north of Elkin to Traphill Rd. 9 miles on Traphill Rd. ,SR1002 and farm is on the left. Second, smaller pond is r
located on Mountain View Rd.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry N Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 36 • 18 S3 " Longitude 81 ` 03 ' 2666
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Poultry apacCattle ty ._ Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ElSpillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ......W.asie.P.ond.................................................................................................................................................. .......
ElYes ElNo
?
ElYes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
N Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
Structure 6
Freeboard (inches): 30
12112103
Continued
Freeboard (inches): 30
12112103
Continued

f.
Facility Number: 97-8 Date of .inspection 6/29/2004 u
5. Are there any immediate threats to the i .«miry of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees; sN
severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® o
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ® No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes ® No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) Fescue (Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ® No
Air Quality representative immediately.
❑ Field Copy ® Final Notes
's visit was to follow-up on a compliance inspection conducted two years ago in which 6-8 inches of waste and sediment was
ed in the creek on each end of the culvert.
Although the stream looks better this time, there is still 4-6" of sediment/waste in the creek near the upper end of the culvert at the
iry on Traphill Road.
Suggest excluding cattle from the stream passing through the property of the dairy on Mountain View Road. Dissolved oxygen (DO)
is measured to be 8.4 mg/L upstream and 6.6 mg/L downstream. NC Water Quality Statutes state that the DO must be at least 5.05
VL. The operator of this dairy, Derek Hutchison, wants to install fencing, a well, and drinkers. 1 spoke with SWCDINRCS about this
ue and this farm may be a candidate for cost -share assistance. It is suggested that the operator contact the Wilkes Co.
PCDINRCS to discuss this issue.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signal
Date:
12112103 Continued

Facility; Number: 97-8 " ate of Inspection 6/29/2004
Required Records & .Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
N Yes
❑ No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
N Yes
❑ No
NPDES .Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
N No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Need to cut a couple of trees on the embankment of the waste pond on Mountain View Road.
Need to scrape manure from the stocktrail at the dairy on Traphill Road. There is the probablility that waste is washed from the
cktrail and into the stream during rain events.
Mr Hutchison has requested that Hutchison Dairy be removed from the compliance database. The waste level and condition of the
.e ponds of both dairies have been good for two years. Due to the continuing environmental concern described in #4, however, thf
ston-Salem Regional Office can not endorse Mr. Hutchison's request at this time.
. Stocktrail on traphill Road was designed so that cattle would cross under the road (through the creek) then travel uphill on the
icktrail so that a gate could be closed behind them. Cattle were to be excluded from surface waters except when traveling between
pasture/lot and the freestall barn. Mr. Hutchison says that he can't keep the cattle confined behind the gate (and out of the stream)
cause it has stressed the cattle in the past. Mr. Hutchison wants to re -build or build a new freestall barn so that the cattle can stay
nfined and won't have to cross the road and can therefore stay out of the stream. I spoke with the Wilkes Co. SWCDINRCS
garding possible federal money or other sources of financial assistance. It is suggested that Mr. Hutchison contact SWCDINRCS
discuss this issue.
12112103

Type of Visit %Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit gRoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit:wg�g Time:
EZEM
M. Not Operational O Below Threshold
13 Permitted (Certified [3 ConditionCertified 0 Registered
1 a
Farm Name: .4 f..:�(,! d
..
Owner Name: ..... 6111f ...................... e., . I
Mailing Address: ,,, „1 ,,,,Tra-ph,„ ,
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
County:.......... ..e...�.1 ..............
Phone No:.3.`�...a....gs...f...'.........a...:Z 6.Z
...�.�........a...$ b.-...qa?z
Facility Contact: ...............Ury
............................... ......... Title:................................................................ hone o:...................................................
Onsite Representative:... .e K) ................................ Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:................................. ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:.........................................
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry YCattle ❑ Horse Latitude ®•' ®" Longitude•�.�
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes 1,(No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑Yes XNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ® Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment 7�
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes i�N0
Structure I tructure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 7k
IdentifierV454-.......................... .... ................................ ....................
Freeboard (inches):
12112103', Continued

Facility Number: — _ Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to L ,,-r tegrity of any of the structures observed? (ie, LL . , severe erosion,
❑ Yes
No
X
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
❑ Yes
XNo
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
Yes
❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
'Yes
`
❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
/
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
TO
❑ Excessive PondinQ ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops dijor with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
[:]Yes
No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
XK
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ❑ No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Final Notes
)RUAfs� vsP
aiJ 7nF.vie.�).
Reviewer/Inspector Name t
Reviewer/Inspector Signatu/�j • Date:
I2/12/03 A A 00 JJ� P � / a La �� —mil v-/, s ,(t ff AA 104—H-Va Continued

Facility Number: — ''late of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? N/A —u = eTzWe--
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) -No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes XNO
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? �� - B Yes— l
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? w r/
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) , /El
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes VNo
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? )<Yes ❑ No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?—/,❑`` Yes Cj No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facilit 'covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35) ❑ Yes )No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to instali and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? ❑ Yes ❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form.
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
cicllt�Ors 1�Crttntrtents 8 d%Dr I1 3ng5 \. s r � e 0
joO5,
PT
(0,000
02,
l S
12/I2/03 �VIV t:/ n f

Facility Number 97 g Date of Visit: 6/24/2002 Time: 1255
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [j Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Rutdis aD.&Y
Owner Name: G1iftw.................................... HiAte.W50i l...........................
Mailing Address: 6S.Ql.Tx.OAIxiIA.RQAd.....................................................
Facility Contact: MifMutdinsop ...........................................Title:...
Onsite Representative: Cliff.HMjV.Wjj$Qlj................................................
CertifiedOperator:..........................................................................................
Location of Farm:
..................... County: Wjlkqs ................................................ WSRO........
Phone No: G-9S.7.-ZZQ...........................................................
.......... Tnaphill...N.C........................................................... U.685-9022..
Phone No:....... ....:.........
Integrator:..... .......................................
.. Operator Certification Number:
3wy. 21 north of Elkin to Traphill Rd. 9 miles on Traphill Rd. ,SR1002 and farm is on the left. Second, smaller pond is
ocated on Mountain View Rd. w
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle El Horse Latitude 36 • 18 S3 Longitude 81 , ! 03 26 ��
Design Current
Swine Cnnneity Pnnnlation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I ® Dairy 80 7 1
❑ Non -Layer I JE] Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 80
Total SSLW r 112,000
Number" of Lagoons 0 -� ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid,Traps 1 ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ......Waste. pond ...... ................................... ..................................... ............................ I....... ................................... .......
Freeboard (inches): 12 _
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes []No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
[]Yes: ®No
Structure 6
05103101 41—G 7A 19 'n �—C'aritinued

Facility Number: 97-8 Date of Inspection 6/24/2002
.r
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees; severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain)
q
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
[NIUME►=4M
® Yes ❑ No
El Yes ❑ No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer°to question #) Explain any YES answers and/oi any -re ns or any other comments.
LTse drawings offacihty to better explain situations: (use additional pages as necessary) ❑Field Copy ®Final Notes
3. and 8. Stocktrail needs to be scraped and repaired immediately. About 6 inches of manure in creek on date of inspection. Cattle are
congregating at both ends of the culvert that passes under the road causing manure to pool in this area. Creek that passes through the
culvert is picking up much of the manure and depositing it downstream. About 1300 feet of stream is impacted by this operation.
9. Need maximum liquid marker on waste storage structure at Traphill Road facility.
14. Irrigation system is not in operation yet per operator.
15. Four fields are above 3000 threshold for copper. Can no longer apply animal waste on those fields but operator sayus he's not sure
which fields those are from the sample number on the soil test results. Need to contact SWCD for assistance.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Melis a Rosebrock ,.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: —� Date:
05103101 • l / Continued

Facility Number: 97-8 D.-Ito f Inspection 1 6/24/2002
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
16. Per operator, he has not pumped storage structure due to flat tire on the on the honey wagon.
18. No maps were with the CAWMP.
19. No records were available. Waste plan is written for 80 cattle w/ 90 day storage in waste storage structure. Operator says he
hasn't applied cattle waste since December 2001 and these records were not available.
24. and 25. Need to take stream samples fpor possible enforcement case.
hauler is picking -up about 7100 to 7600 lbs. of milk every -other -day.
Visited second farm on Mountain Valley (?) Road off of Traphill Road:
Need to keep cattle out of fenced buffer area. Otherwise the operation looks much better this year. About 3100 to 37001bs. milk is
picked -up every -other -day.
05103101

IN
Type of Visit A Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: Time:
10 Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted 0 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: County: ,� i / I lie 5
Owner Name: I i rO T / ) hh I ? v1 Phone No: 3 . 10 ' q 7' 2 -7- Q
Mailing Address: 61 T-Whi I Tr h i l,t,,) C, 2 8 6 gS
Facility Contact: I' C Q tl : Phone No:
Onsite Representative: U C� n 0 Integrator:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry X Cattie ❑Horse Latitude • ®4 ®44 Longitude • ®' ®"
Desrgn� r Cuiient
Design Gprrerit- Design Current
"Swine r Ca aci� z_ lE'o iilahoii
Poultry Capacity Pti" ulatioria Catkle _ C' aci Po' afi%on w
.� ❑Wean to Feeder
❑ La er Dairy='
❑Feeder to Finish
EE],
❑Non -Layer ❑Non Dairy
�«�
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Other
❑Farrow to Feeder
x
❑ Farrow to Finish
h
g Total Design achy
e '' p
Total SSL y
{
. ❑ Gilts
Boars
e agoons
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
lding Ponds
❑ No Li uid Waste Man- ement S stem
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes KNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ko
Stru t� Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 5 P� Po
Freeboard (inches):
05103101 Continued �A

Facility Number: qj— Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, k4re r sion, []Yes Ikj-No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ErNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive
12. Crop type
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes X. No
El PAN El Hydraulic Overload El Yes %No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated i01e Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
2 L ° Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes NNo
❑ Yes [No
o
El Yes
❑ Yeso
❑ Yeso
v1 1
Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
Yes XNo
34Yes ❑ No
'❑`Yes No
❑l Yes �No
,�J Yes ❑ No
'V` Yes ❑ No
I No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. I
O5
1
031
01
l j�h C1 �n
Continued

N.
11
is
l9.
Facility Number: q1—
/11
Date of Inspection a2
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below Yes o
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes N(No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes A No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? es o
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes NrNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? MYes Q N&
1n'J�,d NO
a
<-� Jt2tvpo��0
O51031O1 � � • ��/�(�� �`
lr"�C

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 97 g Date of Visit: 10/31/2001 Time: 13:15
0 Not Operational O Below Threshold
13 Permitted ® Certified E3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: H tcbisQ.10.aixy............
County: Wilkes ................................................ WSRO........
Owner Name: CliftQlx.................................... Hmicb sofa.................................................. Phone No: 6-95..7.-z20...........................................................
Mailing Address: 65.Q1.Tz:all.W11.RRad.......................................... IxaFllii11..1YC.......................................................... x$b8-9922..
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: ljft9�l..c.1?.ei xll�ut�ClliSR11............................................. Integrator:
Certified Operator: ..............
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:...........
Rwy. 21 north of Elkin to Traphill Rd. 9 miles on Traphill Rd. ,SR1002 and farm is on the left. Second, smaller pond is
ocated on Mountain View Rd.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry" ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 36 • 18 ' S3 Longitude 81 • 03 ' 26
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I ®Dairy 80 60
❑ Non -Layer I 1 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 80
Total SSLW 112,000
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
L
lding Ponds / Solid Traps 1 ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) El Yes ❑ No.
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway. ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 60
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 97-8 Date of Inspection 10/31/2001 '_'
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ tre(' , sere erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No,
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type Fescue (Graze)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WIT, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ,
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
`Comments (refer to question #)c ,Rxplain a .y YESganswers an /or any eco 'mmendationsi r any other comments:
Tse drawmgs of f cih I ULLer exp a dditional pag as ecessary) ❑Field Copy ®Final Notes
Facility is operating below the threshold of numbers and has sent in a request to be removed form. Facility is not subject to a review,
however, the DWQ has not removed this facility due to past water quality problems. Today's visit was mainly to check the freeboard
level on the waste pond and see if there were any water qualityproblems evident.
# 18. Mr. Hutchison did not have the waste plan and application records on site. Questions pertaining to waste application could not be
answered since there were no records to review. Mr. Hutchison has installed a new irrigation system with underground mainline and
hydrants. Facility will have to have irrigation figured on effective acres since the system is new. The inactive waste pond has been
closed out and graded and seeded. Waste and soil analysis are off the NCDA website.
er/Inspector Nameer/Inspector
E
Signature: Date:
05103101 Continued

FcilctyVumber: 97-8 Pat- of Inspection 10/31/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑Yes ❑ No
30.. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ®No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
O5103101

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
F7
Facility Number 97 08 Date of Visit: 6/29/2001 Time: 1120 Printed on: 7/2/2001
Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
13 Permitted 0 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..................
Farm Name: H tcbismix.Raiiy............................................................................................ County: \'.l'Akcs...
W.SRQ........
Owner Name: Clifton .................................... HutcWson .................................................. Phone No: M-9S.7-220f...........................................................
Mailing Address: 6S.Qjjx:Upball.lioad........................................................................... Jr.4pbilL.N.0 .......................................................... 2$G8-9Q2Z..
Facility Contact: Cliff HWhisan............................................. Title:....
Onsite Representative: C.jjff.Hntcltisou..................
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
........ Integrator:........
Operator Certification Number: ..........................................
Hwy. 21 north of Elkin to Traphill Rd. 9 miles on Traphill Rd. ,SR1002 and farm is on the left. Second, smaller pond is A
located on Mountain View Rd. w
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 36 • 18 6 53 {{ Longitude 81 ' 03 26
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ® Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ..Waste.strttcture.. ......Other.fanm....... .......................... :......... ................................... ......................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 48 24
05103101 416.4- Continued
7n"I

Y
Facility Number: 97-08 Date of Inspection 6/29/2001
0 Printed on: 7/2/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the ' _rity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ tm-, ..;vere erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ® Yes ❑ No
Waste Aaalication
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
11.
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
® No
12.
Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) Fescue (Hay) Fescue (Graze)
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
IN No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20.
Is facility not in with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
® Yes
❑ No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
® Yes
❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ® Yes ❑ No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
❑ Field Copy ® Final Notes
3. Dissolved oxygen was recorded at farm on Mountain Valley Road: Below waste pond=5.5 mg/L; 50' upstream from this area where
cattle cross and have denuded creekbed and bank=4.2 mg/L; 300' upstream where creek enters property=5.4 mg/L.
9. Structure is a concrete walled waste holding pond.
21. Facility has less than 100 cows and is not permitted.
24. Need to check waste pond levels next year.
25. 2001 Soil samples results have been received. Need to cease animal waste application on "Frank Hutchison" fields since copper is
now >3000.
27. Dead animals eo to landfill in Roarine River.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector
Date:
05103101 -1 Continued

Facility Number: 97-08 P,„��� �f Inspection 6/29/2001
Printed on: 7/2/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
O5103101

Z
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: Time: I f, 177)
Q Not O eration ow Threshold
0 Permitted 4Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshol.
Farm Name: ....1.U4'A
.P.....Rap!L.11.)6.�.�•• 1.... County: �L...� ta's. .............................. ...........
Owner Name:.....a4n-'6-6n... .�' vl.................................. Phone No: 3.: � ...: �....................................................ol,
Facility Contact: ....�jj.fv .....� 1 !� J 4. rJ ! itle:.......................................................... Phone No:............. / .. ...........
Mailing Address: .............. ®! ...1:1......... ..':........... r jt.l,�.�.: .0 .........� �6 0 ............
OnsiteRepresentative:.............................................Integrator: ..................................................................................
Certified Operator:.. ......Pam. aole V. al&-r.......... Operator Certification Number:,,,,,. ...................................
Location of Farm:
�LS -"-I > F �$ q2-
6$4,e4r 'P d M
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry dcattle ❑ Horse Latitude • ®° ,�j �° Longitudes
n.
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean .
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
n
ruuwiry , t a acr Jro ulaao
❑ Layer
'71❑ Non -Layer
❑ Other —��
.Tot
Non-
T6 "SSL
Z i Q00
I Nur of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present
mbe❑Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
huidrng Ponds,r SolidTraps.,: ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System'
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Siruct re 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: .. .. .. .... .............Q�Lt!1(Q�lr ....
..................7 .................................
Freeboard (inches):
5/00
❑ Yes � No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes "No
NYes o
❑ Yes XNo
Structure 6
Continued on back
❑ Other —��
.Tot
Non-
T6 "SSL
Z i Q00
I Nur of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present
mbe❑Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
huidrng Ponds,r SolidTraps.,: ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System'
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Siruct re 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: .. .. .. .... .............Q�Lt!1(Q�lr ....
..................7 .................................
Freeboard (inches):
5/00
❑ Yes � No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes "No
NYes o
❑ Yes XNo
Structure 6
Continued on back

Facility Number: 9 — d Date of Inspection }
' 1
5. Are there any immediate threats to the 11IL .ity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees; severe erosion, ❑ Yes ] No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes �No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes *0
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes PNo
12. Crop type Pro
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those c0signatid in the Certified Animal W ste Management Pl (CAWMPV ❑ Yes No .
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvementT ❑ Yes / No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No
Repaired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? $its—F}No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) Yves XNo
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes JA No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes �00
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? XYes ❑ No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) - ❑ Yes 4No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes VNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?] Yes No
o yiolati#6s'or• deficiencies vtsYre noted• d�rring this'visit; Yoa wiil ceeeiye Ito further' `1
corres ori�ence: about this visit.
KK
'off (referto quest<on Explaut! piny YES answers an'cor any rccome�cf ahons�orjny osier ca tits.
JP­
3 y s�W; NOW
'won&s of ty to �e�t�r plain situ tions (use ° -d, ages as net .. ...; .., �r
� , � e ..O
64 o-- .
MA
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signal
Date:
5100
I

•Facility Number: — of .Inspection Z �`
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes XkNo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
. No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
XNo
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
'VNo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
bo to .2 �&OIL
7 olu�/�
:CKU'
r(aiki = 9.
_ _ Q . Ekta�sa-,,.Zp� pies a2✓e.
916shooa rl
O /

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 97 08 Date of Visit: 9/14/2000 Time: 1440 Printed on: 9/15/2000
0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
[j Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: RTd.Q j5.QlXD.aily............................................................................................ County: wilk0i................................................ WSRO.........
Owner Name: C1ift v.................................... H.Mir.W50i1............................ Phone No:
Facility Contact: Cliff.I ILWhi.SA11 .................................. I.......... Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: 05.Q.1 raphill.RoAd............................................................................ Tzah l...N.c.......................................................... 2$05-9.922..
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: ...................................................
Location of Farm:
................ Integrator:......................................................................................
..... Operator Certification Number: ..........................................
3wy. 21 north of Elkin to Traphill Rd. 9 miles on Traphill Rd. ,SR1002 and farm is on the left. Second, smaller pond is +
ocated on Mountain View Rd.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 36 • 18 ' S3 Longitude 81 • 03 26 "
Design Current
Swine- Cnnacity Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer log Dairy 80
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 80
Total SSLW 112,000
Number of Lagoons 0 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present jl❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ..Lg...Wuaste. Rand.................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 72
5100
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 6
Continued on back

Facility Number: 97-08 Date of Inspection 9/14/2000 - Printed on: 9/15/2006
5. Are there any immediate threats to the r ty of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trei were erosion, ❑ Yes [@ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do, any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
® Yes
❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
® Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
- ❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of.adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Required Records& Documents
17. Fail�to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
" ❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes ❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ❑ No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Were, any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Ndo iolations:or deficiencies were noted ;duting•thig visit. ;You;will "rece yib,h6 urther
corres orid6c' e. about; this .visit. - .. '
Only questions 1-9 were addressed in this follow-up inspection. AL
Waste storage pond located on Traphill Rd. had been pumped down since initial compliance inspection last month. No overflow noted
today. Mr. Hutchison was not at the farm so fields where waste application occured could not be determined. Looked at if some of the
vegetation had been cleaned up around the waste pond. Still needs more maintenance. Stock trails need maintenance.
•
Reviewer/Inspector Name IMeli a Rosebrock "
�,.
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur . Date:' 6 5100

• ` , r wiYwd e. a x.
Wig' X i
"� '*�._.r.:4.r` __. ,... `� ...,.-_- ,� �,� -1'-' p t.- — __-r._e �;.` >r,.-. ',.v?'C,d i �ti'•^"':o rra�P ro_ `. -aa-°' s, �k'
"
A
a
Y' - �i-.....-�'"'.• " a .' ,:.:. _.. �'� 1�� �,1 ;+ ra,'��`�' ��a ,,,1�:^'r. i y„ "x,,. �,.,� � ��* �c4 �"1j�, ,��^. f &
>
�. .., •a r .: x q,*,. ��� .., r . .o ...:r=+., : - 4 _ _ i,�: . , , .� s^c ,.+� � .�. -: -3„� e� t �cy�.X � s;r;,. ,,,,, �..
- ..�._ .. "� ,E .. '..ia-.r% ,�a,^r`' a. a. �:�.'�...-.>�...:..'w..-.�'_�+,:..ar:.-..�"a t j ..T ,a.`„•.:}'r � �,.,. � w�, .,-:. �e,.,e.,, �"" �,.-� r ?u
' ` _:.,. ry . ... �y' W" ..^g'�•ife ,� i�%t y5 1 � d 6 ^, q. ..
"
' _, ...try f:xf y •4sY �K. '" .t2 ' � r w .f � a ^„�` � � ! 6 --sti ". � ^:. � � H-uc -. """c....
4
'
�$ .� � a. `� �° '$`i' a"r'°`'>,4`�� d"..or'i „, �'"""��� � �`�'.._.. �,. --•cam:
.?m�>�+�"�S.' s.� w � _ n ,n . •s1i � �Y�w �' ;. t, r „L,;� ',«S •s�"�'�,ttr�'�i,.'"i`w. avi•
,x
,./�:� .✓ ',Scf .i- ._.� �i. a, )"��M_ >�� ;i� � ra a�� �,•Y�?+'a."�`s ems,-�,.s.,4,�'. a. -- �'�,.r, 5;� _ j'
-� „r.�.. � ^'t +»� r-.n,.,Kr`s' rrr" 'a# �s� � r-."'"" a '�.r t•:�i ..w a a. .• ', _ ".
4 `s# n•. ��'^ � i:. J� r „.,�,y .a""s`"" � �� ,:�, �.. s >» mw;. r, "+ ,��"..�`- � � 3.n, w.: 'a �„°,r ..,, , .
,�,»:«. ,�.' •.� '` .N "ij?Yw.. ,�iT�' "F, ¢..r^. 5;�e,.. �, ty"�':'#" � � � •,} w � '"' ;% .i ,. E, .ram '` ��' ^.� Y � -
� 'ir'" ,,, .... ♦ �fr.."".�'�+,k.:: `� ta}.°'-r",,,,r^�-'C�aE'�'*t�.,.�.i� r3..'ti„n��.�.�. ,��i^?..� �;,.� "�`" '"> ti x."°'""' �' a `^`e''' .;.�.,
r
��yr�t,. f, .. ..-,."Y''A•:°"' !"'..�§"";. a`;+✓.i�''•'3t"""'�>.^y4-�"��.rywd s.,a•✓.: Y '�.'•` Pk„., t,¢v+y t; _
'r - °.t r�:>b.. Tr,.fk^ ;'1' S+y's#�.'�.`.a'3'"#+• i g',e s.c,.: of Z`:rt s� .rr �»!r-, „w".•.. ,
�. ry ` ^t ' a 9 sky!Cp • t *k.> fi .:�+" �y B";, ; Via• s t
``+..•.: ,:.�!: "�. ar. .�>�' "�<2'»"�;.,� ,�4yw+ .. ,a :�{.q�,1�'v. ��K yp��.'ri:� „r,�.��'�,�,;; ,;;� 14
,.�->D«"..., s r »trx<" -'a A gar .. � . � .. �:>. : „ ^.._ 4,c.„2. xH- ,q„ ± , � , ,,...,4-r;' ,?� �'L$`��."P: ;.ry„�. TPA;. ,.�4 �. ,.,•'+�*' � �'Y fit-�yt -a : , `
y+ r a
• •� . • �+a �" ,�'k '�„.�.5s w +% .�H"+s�„ � i"..=°'r�aa > '��a<.t""s„ s. ''.�:�. ;.�ii;: x$l" ^9 ,. n � �.. '»"�. �.:..,�... -.
gr-rR s :Gws±.r •. - "i,`y4.`, e. { • .w„ - ,.n f.,`fY .i .`ra sr=r'.•"4 �`' »4s>r- c'a .:*s'a,„_ -•>r^:°e.-... m,. r,..
s e. •p%';'"w. �,.. �,.. .. .Y �..; ',��• '"�:'%ry '� -;: �. ,.� _ ;+.�..,�. +,.Hi,"ti•%..a �;"i
P+x ���+�'�"'�' �d x
_ .'i a. �1' , °a:. )I • -�.. �.. �,: ��' _; �fp:'-� �. s � •i°v ^,'�a •- ^(.... - ��-' s°r�T'. r.'�
�' - ^�^*.�'=^ 1 '! r4•� '" 5 V:'r' Cf :+ Y 1..- f. C» �...�
,. :•�, jp,„ � �. 4�.� „: "° ..# ^a..w�,.,,i.[. °., ."' ,,�y,�� • f. "<"'K.r,t z. `v. '.3.,tr ... �, 4 1 k :-;'� �a. `�*`�G.., r'} '"xz«k .,elf
. _. °.i.,, , ., •, r -`-, . ; tJ, /�` ' .. f •r ; ; -• . ,, t t, ,.`,�� _4'", ,, rF' y, wrs. .,,'4. n.. , '�.. >
, L3 r v { {•_ - . d, t..::.r .l�'.Yv,,, �'�'�� 1!r' 'c';°�_a°"',��, at �•,r �` �'.�� .' Y;� ®*� !s✓
�l J '�-._ g. ,• =���5�� �;' ( .; . .,.' a .y ' :.... �py, � f:... �' - "� 'i-y.
� :-�., r n� .:, r i - r ..•. �,- .cr r-. �,;.;, . .-� �7,--t ,. �•r.�i< or{�,�T'�"C�11 ^.�`a, ,� •. i;' �lft s+_F'k L. - t_•'a� "� ;. �,:L X •�;�_`;�"`'�, 7w'y �S ":"', X : �.F'�,�,j
.�. t...�.a°.�•. Z'"'% .r:�°C .p s,,.'-�s. ..,yam .. 4...7 a i.-. .../.��.& :a;•w. y�, �o , �..ry,� t•..., y:♦ �,,,,i 'r w;xr'� 'a..: .%�•, a
-sJ'^"' 'a.:as, „'.�:: '" "i�ai+h�A '� . �:.. .,) y �.:' •P. v Str�' L �'i-.. ;_ - ��! �� ��'R.,'•"""1"'a .'a>^s.'.,.: ,.e. �.i `a' :a+•.
" "fm' ° `l, y, .;. � ,,. `;, ,..., a. T'�„ ,"�` ,: �`,, F {, .,T.. 5's • .•k y, q � ,, ,�,*� ( �'1P.. •u >�' r'�'`"`4.t,� � ^�;%' +"'�'- i,� '' I: � "�+''�".
Tr , ' r� �a^"r � •�„w"v �" : ,, s » �a- . , Tr rx .i" ; �` - +�`_ . t< s.� . � -r,. s t: q � -7� S:- } %+i- > a., t. me R, "'r r" . , °'-'ri' � f; ..a; ' . "s�.
` x 'Y E4'% �•- ""'' #•. i... «,. w1. x :'. ^. ,'.:> •»mr. W �rY , �"++:. g .. ` ,:C„. .. :.-.y ..^'r'
,• a_.... * k •,,,. ...,.. t . "Q4oT""',' my. �: .•` , Y,-, .-'�''"'"3, ,p. i. >t ,-0,,,,:«.*^S'' s ,•-T'"•'r ..�.a,.... wa w*ss _»c.'�F..*,a., r•.�r''t a. ;^?:'
'i7 •s: •� .:� ����. .�Y- '�'.y ; e �.;; 1 ..�%.e�ti � �,,,r..,..�.., a s •�-` ,.-„'. .ss.>^s„ , .nr�e .,�.}:�i'e� a;"'a .,"„ r"
• � ' � A'"�%' YYt. r: .i, . � � '^.iy�?„\;y�-.. �.. ,,. ,� I. '/ �J jjj."1' ' �,-`��{'F .9-�`,,-<'",.�� �+.�': jaa��S,y ..x�r r �.*.•
\j r �� > �,a�'�i5y� 'q•:•m'i �-; s<�, f},4 �fn�.., ,+ rY"` f a.=+''3+ ' r"' 'tom ,� �-•,-S .�+y��x"+a��.-�"�''�,..,,,�'•'f'?ia`s'"t.'..L�¢
g -
:i � -.' � �' '°fix*.. '� !' „as..�r rr.a-,r„• . 'x=. a'.,
. „,� •. ¢r ;�," r'$•. ter/ �>? ": ^rw�>y''.'. �.,« .,Y.. r .��r. :�"` " t �•-€far•, ,� � { .,r.' �'' ''�.
�+ ", � ';,, d . TM� > ,.. - .• M � V;�i+.: IY..:r°', a ,u�.> 'r c �`°"° 5.; e
?fir_
'filL .' X� 7 . '�. � •' m .Ex�p» Y �. w. �, ..> �:• ^Tyu �i �'r ".!'� r•, f,> �w.� „e'`�
..•.. ♦ ".. t-_-fj'�,.t K J"'. Y r`Y ' f yXr so-:,. a m:•:t� *, ._ e-.-:y C.fr r 4 wa* •^?• L,.a� �°'.,w� � ,a��.. �.,..n t � 4:,`4m r' �».,....w
�.d`. �.'d w.li ,•.r s ,,s -,,t ..> �i a,.y .i'' di _ ,r, �;:. -s4 'p'r «. .r` c-r "``• °-.�.....>..,..:.>.« ' `�° �1��� 1."'', ,.;��„ X ".�.„• ••` •"t'.'.0 "a+.'..„,r.. � `�'x ,y-.y7„+:�f_�^w '� } �A';�a. y�,T% a" ti =: ,,_, `t,
4 �. < ,!-, r> � ;. ,, r = "'' •. ti "'# 5 :'"'' �' ..e�. YX ,, flr= ..�";,r-•-: `��.L:•s.dy r �,`�. a y,.;.# .. �. •
•, .. ..';w 'm ' f ;.. ...�C fi � '-. �„':»ac`+4...&-u',:��A4+'=^��'yr`4"*""','.: :,a. i'R _�,, sa.',. � y' °��.aa.. -
,._ ,. L. 1 ... / ' `�a, N',:r s�A.. >¥• �.", .�wr�' , � ..�5'; +.' ; ,r "" arm' "` ? '� � 'w&a- '"'` > .�-
q _ �-' aA."','���.''�' a �.* ,�/ �..� •,sy�? _ . ". r _ *.
µ
n ,
ry
's. r M�j. � f �'a �,r VgdY"s;'a+✓?'5�.4.-. L 4, 'U,Ta.:✓r"�`;'"" ". 'J x,, y .�, '",.."^ ,. :':-..�+T-:--'-'.'....,"" '-`•ij -s K"..
f •. • bbbb _ _
,,... y, }'�ytY r��` •;'� xy:., w.,. 5 .j 'r�,Y+, .4n,►ti�..'., '"Y'�'7 � y'"� � .r 1�y �r. �, Y' aj:z '
��•• �i "��F� s�Z�v.•,-�J�.i'' �� `� ..�^��x-•a r a _`:.' S -•�i s�..s"�„!�; : S 1' f .2' r' `s... "•• t a �.''" ""
? A" ae 'rt :.z , '.uvt�s.a,..a _4 .+`ry k... t •s +
,�!' �-: ..Yr.1 ^.::' .,p.' �''t �'n. 9E't s "� e;1•'±'. K_ b .z.. ` r<• ?�.
f �`"' E .�
v+„' rb x _ #,G+.>"»,rr,+., x6 ` "1 +"`y q'.`. .-.. ., 'r - """.`-�..>?=•s� ,„ ,o,„,q9 „, „ ."r4;.
y R�.
•7.�.:,,; s*..... �. :. ';^ ... n ,.„ x Y� w; ,' � .. a �.. x., '» i'.. ,m , ,X*..;,r v , •+ ::. ^> ';".w .. �' "w, ti x'z..`„,1. v^"v».;. s1•.:,°:: * ...�.., R"ax ;: x. tom'
� m , .,... »yw;,. ! ... ;*^",c '»t�. ..« `&•.',� �%°. m `�' � .s,re r ,.. .. +yy��' . .. ' y � �` ,4..9r r � 4 4,.r. • a-'�.+�, �^ g"�+ksN 1� a +g"^ "R#"�a dp "" -au s.»ra�m"'a�,
' - .��`-� F r*"5 r... �.. - .� t y.' _ ��- �. ,;�^: ;g A..�" �S v ...£ "�._, � �es4'T' C 1� `°� "•:. �r„�' "" l: f �r. .». Y...^.:^vw � F
i a��« •. , �"' �.- �` ;�,•. .: �1r� ..ei. !s{ ?�>�'` ,. ,Y�ir .'Ti �;{v - ,°' :> ` is � , c-` �i'g'�•ro�`, q":a "'"� ' `•r'" ` s �,-
';<V .. ;' : y � "c ,. � i' , , ^rbc.�'^, �, :<`'.C%�,_ "` ?.i :>�:= , � •'Soft !�. }SPr'f "��r r,s "."^;-^:_
_ „- r, . ° - . -s. - .� ;�r /�"`sw k':� �;*.,� 3.4 i '*j•- -
,� k,s,�.. ; .«.. �`':da x,, wr" a: � C y< t, �.. ..« ':�;": •...,:�,, ,,r"'a p' a' ' "i, x<. '�" p `t�
•,�l'" �`-- ' ,. x,.. ."..-� s , s. r.,YSc:. t-�^,;, � .,<, r�-?" ,r'.° .:.;•"' r :�i».a� �/° . m ,� iA•;:r � ��i^ �"�e., °``�.'° � "'}�-* .�,� ;
:��� ; 1� ` • ,:.. < , ,.L -,, .., "�.,. { �! .. .;� "y,. a�l--+[�•'S:., ..,m... „/, •��e.�„��t�S_ �'e%;°-�....., �+`'�� �;=i"'"� ,. w+c-'Y"""".rczt.�:.rs?::; - r'�a "�...
, - . � ,..:.x "';�'w: .P ; .JTM. ,» " ,•✓` �.1?'*, �. �; _.'�1 .. .�. f.. 4r .`'•sn,^'rr - .1�':.-'s'g•. ��',.� ,".ii •-t ',,..� ..".1i"...,. '"-i` - .¢....-r. m.n�.w..:�.+.:�: , � p Y;�#,-i' '- -�;•,-
.� .��- .. - ."- _.-.. "�..+ 'S7 r-... v.. .�- . < • .i, a °...�, .�.-.-�� .<r' ;�:., -r.. ,. i.``,.1`c'. �.-.-�'..+`•,'�TMrenriR' r-;�`!,' - :�%' e�S�'�""Vt,c'"'� u�S:..

� c 'tii..y
vlslon .of Water,Quallt'411y
f k vlslonpof Soil:and Water Conser�vatloin .� a
r UVi1 ergAgency d -t
r s+ r t ' `?,-3,�f'" tip• ;; s .
k� ��.�'. .1. 8t .•t...i�' a.�'.� R!y'v.'L _u� E ,a.?. .'?•��'•'
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 97 g Date of Visit: 8/3/2000 Time: 1100 Printed on: 8/3/2000
0 Not Operational Q Below Threshold
Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: HutchisoaRaia.......... :................................................................................ County: WAk s............................................... !?E',SRQ........
Owner Name: Clifton ....................................HIALCU500 .................................................. Phone No: ��fi-9.S2-2�2U�...........................................................
Facility Contact: Cliff,QllIchis.9a.............................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: 65.Ql.ja:apWU.RQAd............................................................................ jjCAP'bj1l..HC..........................................................
Onsite Representative: CInff.QjAt.C. i5oxt.......................................................................... Integrator:......................................................... .............................
CertifiedOperator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
lwy. 21 north of Elkin to Traphil] Rd. 9 miles on Traphill Rd. ,SR1002 and farm is on the left. A
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry N Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 36 • 18 f 53 [{ Longitude 81 • 03 4 26 f!
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ® Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes N No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes N No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? <1 GPM
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes N No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? N Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other,than from a discharge? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway N Yes [:]No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ......Wasta Rand........................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches):. 0.0
5100 Continued on back

Facility Number: 97-8 Date of Inspection 8/3/2000 Printed on: 8/3/2000 <
5. Are there any immediate threats to the _D ity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ tri _.;vere erosion, ® Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ® Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
D: 10 yiolatioris:or defieienc es•were:nbted during -this; visit:.Y u:wiil :reee ve•no-furthec.:
. , ,correspondence. about this .visit. " . ..
1. Waste structure is overflowing with liquid waste from holding pond. Solids are higher than concrete walls.
2. Looks like discharge has been occuring for a few days.
4. No spillway -no freeboard.
5. Concrete blocks are containing most waste for now.
7. Pond needs to be pumped immediately and vegetation mowed/cut around dam.
8. Stock trail needs scraping and/or maintenence performed.
9. Need to have a gauge marker installed.
18. No waste plan on site --at the house.
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
IN Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signatu Q / ,( Date: ty d 5/00

Facflity Number: 97-8 17 ` A Inspection F 8/3/2000 Printed on: 8/3/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s),noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
19. No waste, soil, or application records. last time this pond was pumpedwas 12/99. No records for 12/99 applications.
21. No certified operator.
22. DWQ did not receive call that waste pond was overflowing.
24. Need to. recheck after pumping waste pond.
J
5100

itine O Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection D
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Permitted Certified 13 Conditionally Certified E3 Registered JE3 Not Opera Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: A ............ County:.W.1..4.1S..t:z..............................................
Owner Name:....1.:..�. 0. .........H14&i.,s.an ............................... Phone No:. f�. ?!... A-d :F.....................
Facility Contact: .f ... . ........ H.U.+e.hj'..5.0ntle:................................................................ Phone No:....................
11
MailingAddress:.. Q...........Tr h.iij........... ........................1.. j' ..�.11....t.! ' �.............. �. �...... ..........................
149
Onsite Representative:..1...�1.�. .. �i......... !. � i �..ril..J.&. n ........... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:....... r .��...:........................................................................ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ' ®' ®" Longitude ' ®' �"
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? . ❑ Yes No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Ves []No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes N0
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 1�+µ66-
Freeboard(inches): ................................................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: —< f` _ ``e of .Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding Q PAN
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with t ose designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reauired Records & Documents
❑ Yes *0
Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes VNO
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes IgNo
❑ Yes �LNo
❑ Yes )(No
❑ Yes �No
17.. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? MIA _n *m ^ "-
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) X Yes No
20: Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ffXNo
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? XYes ❑ No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations_ as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) Yes ❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes tXNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?] Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes No
o ;or• decinrn(edcixin*4hiYoit willtebeyiofurhroieeeogsv•eRt; ;
.. • corresnoric�ence: about" thi's visit: • . • ...:.........::............... • ... .
}w as+e. 5+r-uciv vex-Oo W t n i j u i d LO -Pry ryA
WLI,nn poh,� . ®501 j 5 are
C.00 i6� It I4 a vsd) in 0c -Uri n -for q
�� , LS - �
��I
4191 NO 5 N A 0 WOI_ 4"15�cl . m
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signal
Date:

Facility Number: — L ) of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? OM I "r C20W
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? 0 M T— 02600
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes XNO
❑ Yes tVNo
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes A No
Ste..,,
�. Pond ne-ed5 � be �u�ec� I PRM,ocIin" w- ve�e�i-iov1
mowed e, o} ow ou end daim -
�v�ai}ta�ned�cl� oPvewm
Fit
0
weed 4t vwt om e M oLoL cc 11�5�-�.1��-a'►
® I)o WO,15+C- koolg o`�
® Lo a,6+ � o o y , o
tJ, 5 � ��pl � �- v
vine �Pn � 5 (ern d Loas -'O,a w ouS
lal°I°I • No re.eo�d6 �a� a�a Ae��� Csa-4ions
�30 CeXAA 4�eA oQerajo e-
as . - d ra+ re, e.all 4,PA-t Loas te- and
I�aS wer�o w � r4�
re = "C�Pt,�-- a�-�-� v n/�O ( n

Facility Number 97 $ Date of Inspection 10/27/99
Time of Inspection 15:00 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered 10 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Hutcbis.9i0miry........................................................................................... County: I?E'.i gs................................................ \?E',SRQ........
Owner Name: Cliftam.................................... HIAkw5on .................................................. Phone No: 33.6::957.72210.8 ..........................................................
Facility Contact:
........ Title:....
Mailing Address: 65.Ql.jA:aPhill.l;,aAd............................................................................ TrAphill..N.C.....
Onsite Representative: CIitftom.kr1.utclxixtsQjt►.................................................................. Integrator:
Phone No:
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
200.5-9Q22..
............... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Ixill.�tsl,.9.imll�s.otx.�xm dill.l�d...,SIiJQ02..a�nsl.faxxn is.o>x.tl►e1�ft..................................................................
Latitude Longitude 81 • 03 35 ��
Dischar¢es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: conc. struct.
Freeboard (inches): ...............77...............
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes ® No
3/23/99 Continued on back
Printed on 8/2/2000

'Facility Number: 97-8 "e of Inspection 10/27/99
6. Are there structures on -site which art _ )roperly addressed and/or managed through . --I.te management or
closure plan? ® Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste ADDlicatio
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) Fescue (Graze)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0: �'�T6. iolatiotis:or defieWncies-were:noted during this: visit::y6.u:will :rt6AV&nolurther.: -
;corresnondence. about this :visit: " :::::::::: :
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes ® No
UP is written for 80 head.
18 No certification papers on site.
19 No application records.
wner said he would probably come off the registration list ( below threshold). Left request to be remove form, OIC form, and
goon closure form.
6 There is an old waste storage structure that needs to be closed out.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Rock Ddrham
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
on 8/2/2000

Facility Number: 97-8 of Inspection F 10/27/99
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
26,29 & 32 are N/A
0
Printed on 8/2/2000

fi 13 Diivisiion 1
:Division A
ivii&iion of Wai
14PRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection
0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number
E�
Date of Inspection
.Ac2/ls
6- 7-qq
Time of Inspection fJ; 00 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted 13 Certified .C] Conditionally Certified�R/egistered
10 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
FarmName: N
..................... County: .......... W..I.�1 �5................................. V.S..R0.....
Owner Name: ........ V�t�•t-i�N...©..N............r..'.....
.... /4.UTCI.15.15N
..............................
... ... Phone No: ...... 3.3.4..'...9e?.�.'..n2.uZQ.�.......................
Facility Contact: .l�.L.1.FTDN.......
Aq.r(414PAI........Title
:.............O.
.AI. ................... I.......... Phone No:........s1'� ..........................
Mailing Address: .......(RA5..Q..1.......... TP% ptt.1,G.L............ Rp.:............................... ......... ..i..t4A.PN1k.G................... a.�'4.�,.t~.
.............................
OnsiteRepresentative: ........................................................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
LI
Certified Operator: ...... cl.J.,FTQ/�/ ....14.Y2i=fi1.doN Operator Certification Number: ? l !(l f ...................
Location of Farm:
..._._.................................... R.,........................................... ........................ ....................................................................................................................................................
� w
Latitude ®• / 8 ��� Longitude g/ • �` ���
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: []Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse.impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: Dl; I t t(
Freeboard(inches): ........................ ............................................................................................................................................. .......
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes [U W
seepage, etc.)
Continued on back U 1'
3/23/99
❑ Yes [ io
❑ Yes [VXo
❑ Yes E10
❑ Yes M4o
❑ Yes [D Ko
❑ Yes [i].?
❑ Yes �`v
Structure 6

`te �.►1' Inspection
cility Number: T% — 0 ? `9
F Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
❑ Yes ffLx10
❑ Yes R<O
❑ Yes 111,Pdb
❑ Yes P "o
❑ Yes EE14o
❑ Yes
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes j(—j bib
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes �v
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes WXo
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes [�o
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[P-<o
Required Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
Ves
❑ No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
92-Yes
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
E14'e's
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes,
d(- 1wo
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑Yes
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
LKo
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
j�o
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
[tfes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? v r�
❑ Yes
❑ No
0: Nd-yW*aiidris :or• deficiencies *6re noted• during •this:visit: • Y:oit will •r. ebO*i6 iio further
corresoondence. abou this .visit.. .. ... ........ .. ...... .........
/V PCs n-n� r"-O� '4'�A Q'4�'Z4 W"'_
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ,L � _ Date:
3/23/99

acifity Number: 7 — D F of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
�2G� mrv�r-�r,�+�•
❑ Yes EW
❑ Yes U-1
❑ Yes
[U Wo
❑ Yes
Uxo
Al lj� ❑ Yes
❑ No
3/23/99

13Division of Si rid Water Conservation [3Other — ncy
Division of Water Quality
14D Routine 0 COMDlaint 0 FOIIOW-UD of DWO inSDeCtiOn 0 FoUOW-UD of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
L.. — -- Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered [3Certified [3 Applied for Permit 13Permitted 1[3 Not Operational] Date Last Operated: ..........................
FarmName: .......... ....... ............................ .................. County:.......... .........................
Owner Name:.......: ..... ............................ Phone No: ....... ..................
..7 ..
Facility Contact: ... C0.4 ...... 2....L.....-R.. ......�.. .................. Title: ......... Aig-ve,
-k .................................... Phone No:..... . ......................
MailingAddress: 4-S-0j ...... 2A-4 .................. ...... . ..... . .... ................................... ...................... ..............
OnsiteRepresentative: ........................................................................................................... Integrator: ............
Certified Operator ...... Operator Certific altion Number-, .....
.................... ......
.................... ................
Location of Farm-
, Im. .......... ........ ...........
V..................................................................................................... rr
—IC ....................................
Latitude • 6 46 Longitude 0 4 3S 46
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? 0 Yes U3-<o
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0 Yes o
Discharge originated at: El Lagoon 0 Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? 0 Yes EkN'o
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes gj-<o
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
Z� dA
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes 91<6
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? El Yes 924o
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? 0 Yes 0540
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
MIMM
0 Yes EK0
El Yes U<0

Wacility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (LagoonsAoldiMg Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1
Identifier: u+
..............
Freeboard (ft): ................F...............
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes Uq<o
❑ Yes 11J'No
Structure 5 Structure 6
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14.. Is there physical evidence of over application?
. (If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ✓�
.................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes W-Ko
❑ Yes mwo
❑ Yes P Wo
0-Ye-s ❑ No
❑ Yes P o
❑ Yes (o
❑ Yes QINIO
❑ Yes [ j]o
V-V'es
❑ No
❑ Yes
04o
❑ Yes
°
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No.
N.O.viola' dons or. deficiencies. were noted during tnis.visit.- You' '4ilt recdi e, ' &further .
- ; � correspondence alioufthis. visit; � .::. � - .....: � .. .
a� Uz '4
P. i_ / /25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: !L— '?— R j'

I ❑DSWC mal to
peration RevlF
O Routine 0 Cam Taint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number
Farm Status: R Registered ❑ Applied for Permit
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted
Date of Inspection LT—lT-q
Time of Inspection Lqy i O 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
(ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
or Ins pection (includes travel and processing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated: ...............................................................................
FarmName: ...... .t�¢ k........ llurf....................................................... County:.........................................................
Land Owner Name:. ................................................ Phone No: ....... 1 Q......... 2z.... 21.0f..................
FacilityConctact:...U44....... ............................................................................. ....%�l...................................... - ....
Title: Phone No:
MailingAddress:....%Jr�O�...... (� .............................................................................. .............,
OnsiteRepresentative: .......................................................................................... 7 ...... �!'T......
epresentative:.................................................................................................:.`:.... Integrator:..................................... .............
Certified Operator:......................................ifJ�+ ............................ Operator Certification Number: ... ��.�.%.�...................
.
Location of Farm: - -
0
...... ... .... ........ ..........
.........................................................................................................................................................
r
Latitude ®' F ®« Longitude
Type of Operation and Design Canacitv
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
❑ Other
Subsurface Drains Present
Area 0 Spray Field Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require.
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
LK Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 205o
❑ Yes LVf No
❑ Yes 024
❑ Yes M N* o
Ml'es ❑ No
❑ Yes M*N*o
ty Y es ❑ No
Continued on back

'"acility Number: 17. .-
......... .... ... . ..
6. Is facility not in compliance with an .Iicable setback criteria in effect at the time,ign? ❑ Yes UKo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes Mlf4o
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes 9�4o`
Structures (Lagoons and/or HoldingPonds)
onds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
9Ko
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
1... �1C.. ............................ ............................ ............................ ............................
...... ................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
+Lsivo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
M—Ko
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
o2r<o
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Y s,
❑ No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
aWo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type�..............................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ NoeV/,4
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
V'Ro
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
Ra-!Ko
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
�Wo
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
92-les
❑❑ No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
lld'No
For Certified Facilities OnLy
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
At 'ra
tlok� ,tom a 6*_fl It" dz
.:..Name _:...:.,..:. .. ..............::., ....... :::: .... ....««::::::.........:.....,,....:.:. <:..5w.:,,.>::..,..: ..>.,x'..<s'tt..... ..:,..a .:::.:.,..;�<: ter.. ex:
. .:.. .. ... .:.. ........ .. .. .. .... ...,....,....... ...:................_. .... .. ... ....., .. .<ff^`C pia S:` Reviewer/Inspector ,...�.. :.:..........<.:.......................... :.......... , �:.::,..
.,........ ...,.�. .�......
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 1=17- T 7
cc. Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

Site Requires Imt kte Attention:
racility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT c( .7 _
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SrM VISITATION RECORD
DATE: "Z 4 - / ,1995
Farm NamNOwner O L I F ToN 4-UlQU ISo;y
Mailing Address: C Ko1`N11L- Ro Ter n pa )i-4-
Cbaaty: _ _ tiy 1 � K E S
Integrator: C- o k G SM1,1w Phone: q 1 0 - 7 7/ - y 6 b o
On Site Representative:PuBQEw _�i��ruG� Phone: DO- YS7- e6S`l
Physical Addressa4cation: a4114 Q - Y _ Z . _�._ 4
Type of Operation: Swine ____ Poultry Qattle -2s-
g0 _ Number of Animals on Site:
Design Capacity:
DEM Cert6aadon Number: ACE— DEM Certification Number. ACNEW—
Latitude: _jk_' 19' _J�L" Longitude: -j,_' ..-,02 --IL" Elevation: —Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal WLm Lagoon have sufficient fiwboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: ,-_,_fit. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the l7Y:nor
(s)? Yes No Was any erosion observed? Yes aCN;
Is adequate land available for spray? No Is the cover crop adequate?CYti or No
Crop(s) being utilized' (r'-��-
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings?�Ror No
100 Fact from Wells? *or No
Is the ariimel waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes orLwo-)
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing sysmh4 or other
similar man-made devices? Yes oKNo If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
qny irrigated on specifip image with cover crop)?(Q or No '
Additional Oornmeats:
TM 6
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.

n ,
�T OPERATIONS f`. BRANCH - Wr F .� :e�19-?15-C�04 `, Jul° �4 Q , 15 15 P. 13115
srm Vl5 TATION RPIC:OR1?
DAM
A �1�
y.`l
C�otttit .,_..
Agent Yisitin .Situa '� ---
S
motor: � �• Y
Upc Phoom
On Sita itstvo;
Physical AddM$; - - -
' Moiling Addrcsa: k � n {
Type of OporatiOrl. $wlna k�nitty
Drslgn C%Mity: ..T? .�.. Nwnbe;' of Animb-�'-
i�tticurie: �+. ° ►t � Lonlkudo:
Typo of J+)spcctlon-, around __ �_._ Aerial ..�
Clccla Yes of No
aa�a h$re awl '#oi t (rcebaord of i moot +25 year24 ti=storm avaat
Dws the AniuW WUGC J4
(�pptpacimute3y l Foot t 7 Bich) ae No Actual rn=j?oard., DOM
�. Pect
1?or ipCftlt.ei with MOM
am lagcon, ple me adl°1ft:3i the ntiict lli$�03' froc�d tmdt r
couUnaits moon,
fr=the lx oo�n(s)`? Yes or ftWas them oodon cf 1m dam?: Yes
. Was eny �ex.lnt&G obtcrvcd B aaGc Ycs lea _
14 adequate .and arallable for load applae 4Un7 Yas go Isthe cuvur crop pdcq
Additiunttl t^,pQ�rrieslLt:
�.
. -- -..
f . Si *lvtc of A�c:nt
Ffut to [phone]
i
f. 'ON X�.3 t'014# Sys vgsn c t a3rts -zt n
j p ,� l S8Z�J6L6 i6'
s.