290014_Inspection_20181128

Division of Water Resourc
Facility Number ® `( ] ' Q Division of Soil and Water conservation ' m
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit�0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1 1 1(iy(1 y Arrival Time: q Departure Time: County: (1�V t Son Region: >te L)
Farm Name: NOvSeJWb C(AfAft Owner Email:
Owner Name: uksS, Z' CNrmjse' Phone:
Mailing Address: Ef(A(Av- GOYI Vl9hS Eli- i'o CA 1�1 G }�xi r)-
�J
Physical Address: /� $ 8
Facility Contact: �QS d t/y Uus 6 Title: Phone: �;k g6o - J �j
Onsite Representative: I Integrator: II,^,
Certified Operator: V Certification Number: �60� ��
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: GJ �d �� Longitude: B'U 3 ul 65
i
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop'.
Wean to Finish I ILayer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder I jNon-Layer I I I Dairy Calf G�J
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Ca"'aci Pop.,, Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish ILayers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
,z
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
LL
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [)p No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

/ Facility Number: - Date of Ins ection: t
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? TTT❑��� Yes ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structuure�1 Structu(r�e''2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 - Structure 6
Identifier: \ v �1� 01ACY
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): r -
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [:] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [:] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? r"Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 14 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Apolication y�
10.Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 1 Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
1z. cropType(s): PSCU� �eS CA)b pl�tUY� Ccyn b� �ctot/ �1vu'�11 G1�G1(Vl <; �U b
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes "No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [Li No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes `P�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents T
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 1No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes [A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
i
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,chec- pp to�xCb --- Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NEWaste Application Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysi sis Waste TransfersWeather Code
Rainfall Stocking Crop Yield 0 120 Minute Inspections Rainfall Inspections
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ��y 7y No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes T❑` No V�NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

IFac!Uty Number: cat IDate of Inspection: �0 y
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste apt, 'ation equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey []Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [,n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ®No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
'4
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes j1W No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
F
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(yiuens(xeferto queshoq#) E�pltiin any YESnanswers.ad/or anyaddihonal reo :weildations or;any pthet)coi 1mQnts �r=i"
>Ise;dranaugs of facility:to better g Xain srtuat of s(use`adrli oga}rgages as tec@wary}" Sl"
N01 C� � � w, �e - Auy Q
�I , �lelre ���s Cc��i�-e� ;n �,t� - ��� ;F w,�� �� ov . �Clv�ek- �u-�t� �ns�
U) Irria(x�irnn was CAU2 2011 — un-i[, Iinj ii.
-��Urnn "I��� a\\c�00c� .`
—7 Au e ac)w n y n 2�t c1
�. l Dv,� cv ecls Or �MC1t n Rush N� hUvt Ua v\ ba(A {1 U ec � 61/`-e- l ows Y-e Ce
5�" h be Udd(essed, Om-z:, .A-b Ica
Gl� YeGGrS s �c �Pn� v� eked ro �l�c��e �eSvrve�� vnc�
la^� Ve � Vs CCV�t f�-P ec�.
l� l� ll� L4 `l
Od. Nlasae (�n(�L���s, nn�s�e ; �� ��,nn� 'jo\N 0-�P�' cWA_Iovvs
ar�cli s < RonO nnJdle YVOKX
i
Reviewer/Inspector Name: -�,U/{C.e C*(A iA C r Phone: ION.-7 1�1"C1_1 0C)
i
p � Date:
Reviewer/Inspector ector Siena j
a
Page 3 of 3 21412015