The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About860004_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20180618T-, 0 Division of Water Resources ❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency Facility Number: 860004 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC860004 Denied Access In section P T e• Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date: Yp Reason for Visit: Other County: Surry Region: Date of Visit: 06/18/2018 Entry Time: 09:15 am Exit Time: 10:00 am Incident # Farm Name: Double E Farms Owner Email: Owner: Eddie Johnson Phone: Mailing Address: 502 White Rd Elkin NC 28621 Physical Address: 502 White Rd Elkin NC 28621 Facility Status: 0Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: L & H Farms Location of Farm: Latitude: 36° 24' 08" White Rd. 1124 1/2 mile south of Zephyr Rd. Approx. 2 1/2 miles west of Dobson. Question Areas: Dischrge & Stream Impacts Records and Documents Winston-Salem 336-366-4827 Longitude: 80' 46' 14" Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application Other Issues Certified Operator: Thomas E Johnson Operator Certification Number: 21416 Secondary OIC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone 24 hour contact name Eddie Johnson Phone: 336-366-3368 On -site representative Eddie Johnson Phone: 336-366-3368 gPrimary Inspector: Melissa Rosebrock Phone: 336-77fo-q(nq Inspector Signature: 1 d.(1 Date: �O SecondaryInspector(s): Inspection Summary: Today's visit was to assist the Solid Waste staff (Jason Watkins-WSRO and Charles Gerstall-MRO) with an ongoing investigation they are conducting with Virginia DEQ regarding the marketing and possible unpermitted re -use of product shipped from Virginia. 3. No evidence of the run-off of pollutants from the mulch or gypsum/"sheet rock" material into surface waters. 32. Portion of Tract-1009 (34.3 acres total) is being utilized for the mulch grinding business. MUST remove this acreage from waste plan. See technical specialist for assistance with revising waste plan. page: 1 Permit: AWC860004 Owner - Facility : Eddie Johnson Facility Number: 860004 Inspection Date: 06/18/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Other Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions Cattle Cattle -Other 7 Cattle - Beef Feeder 350 Total Design Capacity: 350 Total SSLW: 280,000 Waste Structures Disignated Observed Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard Waste Pit PIT _T page: 2 Permit: AWC860004 Owner - Facility : Eddie Johnson Facility Number: 860004 Inspection Date: 06/18/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: -Other Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No Na Ne 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ M ❑ ❑ Discharge originated at: Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other ❑ a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ 01111 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No Na Ne 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large ❑ M ❑ ❑ trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ 0 ❑l ❑ waste management or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? Waste Application Yes No Na Ne 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑0 ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? ❑ Hydraulic Overload? ❑ Frozen Ground? ❑ Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑ PAN? ❑ Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑ Total Phosphorus? ❑ Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑ Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑ Evidence of wind drift? ❑ Application outside of application area? ❑ page: 3 Permit: AWC860004 Owner - Facility: Eddie Johnson Facility Number: 860004 Inspection Date: 06/18/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Other Waste Appllcatlon Yes No Na Ne Crop Type 1 Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Oats) Crop Type 2 Corn (Silage) Crop Type 3 Corn (Grain) Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Soil Type 2 Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste ❑ E ❑ ❑ Management Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ❑ ❑ 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑M ❑ ❑ Records and Documents Yes No Na Ne 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ❑ ❑ 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. WUP? ❑ Checklists? ❑ Design? ❑ Maps? ❑ Lease Agreements? ❑ Other? ❑ If Other, please specify 21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ 0 ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? ❑ Weekly Freeboard? ❑ Waste Analysis? ❑ Soil analysis? ❑ Waste Transfers? ❑ Weather code? ❑ Rainfall? ❑ Stocking? ❑ page: 4 Permit: AWC860004 Owner - Facility : Eddie Johnson Facility Number: 860004 Inspection Date: 06/18/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Other Records and Documents Yes No Na Ne Crop yields? ❑ 120 Minute inspections? ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey ❑ 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install.and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment ❑ ❑ ❑ (NPDES only)? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ ❑ ❑ 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the ❑ ❑ M ❑ appropriate box(es) below: Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑ List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ❑ ❑ 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ 1111 Other Issues Yes No Na Ne 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ ❑ ❑ and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ contact a regional Air'Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ M ❑ ❑ (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? ❑ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Application Field ❑ Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑ Other ❑ If Other, please specify 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or M ❑ ❑ ❑ CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ page: 5