860029_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20181121

e l0 , oLL' 1-7 5 VV ( 1v G
Division of Water Resources
Facility Number ' _ = g �., Division of Soil and Water Conservation
.,
0 Other Agency
Type of visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: (Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Z)
Arrival Time: Departure Time: Z,2 County: Region: VU SAO
Farm Name: 1p o b l e.,
6
FoL rrn -'
Owner Email:
Owner Name: &Adk't ;q- E;
11 ?4 ToV)n5on
Phone:
Mailing Address: j O Z
W 1n1+'e'
I1-1 n
N (— z,? 6 Z.1
Physical Address:
F;v-d
L'0+ (ay) C
Facility Contact: Edj,j
g, -Tt)
hQ,yprl Title:
Phone: .334) - 34 6 - -7 ZS- 7
Onsite Representative:
�1
Qi SO tgn S o n
Integrator: 1-4N
Certified Operator: VOMO,5
6 , C Ecu ie -To kinsnin,
Tr, Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Certification Number:
3(o10 /6611 t,
Latitude: Longitude: T, Q a q6
P—
I
Design Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry
Capacity
Pop.
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Layer
Wean to Feeder
Non-Layerry
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
Farrow to Feeder
• Dry Poultry
Capacity
Pop.
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Beef Feeder
Dairy Cow
Dai Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Beef Stocker
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes Nf No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 56 No
❑ Yes Uf No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued
❑ Yes Nf No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 56 No
❑ Yes Uf No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 56 No
❑ Yes Uf No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

S W 1 M li
lFacility Number: `S (Q - L y jDate of Inspection: 1 112,11201
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
i� Identifier: "66
Spillway?:
DesftQ Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 01 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 06 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes Kj No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes D No ❑ NA ❑ NE
VPA
cessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals Cu, Zn, etc.)
N ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): (NCJ § t5*'6-U L.d�
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[VT No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
Dd No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
q
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Other:
[21. oes record keeping need i provement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application [�] Weekly Freeboard [R`W'aste Analysis . Soil Analysis
❑ Yes X0
rs
❑ NA.
[Weather
❑ NE
Code
[2(Rainfall [L�Stocking Crop Yield �0 Minute Inspections Monthly and V Rainfall
Inspections
❑ Sludge
Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑Yes
�J No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
///F-1 No
X NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412015 Continued

w
Facili Number: Z 1,0 - a Date of Inspection: ( Zo
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? [—]Yes 4No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes
1� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes]
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 06o ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes 14 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? [:)Yes �6 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
%l�lP,s ah dam f e.Qa�+ed ��Ve�e�a:.�i
Cc�.t i br a4e, t`e c� a- �e �t <-f_e l5 I h moo(
dve_ �' ;M9 e C-6 e+,0_ �Pr�r+� o2a(T� due Sri n �d2-l;
- :t736 b Pvl1 ?°� 8' - P�n� gates a,J4� �D\e, rev CA ? - M 0. _
�. Me)c+ 51u13e. surval dve Dec. 31, JOAO
(PAVE
Plaxt-� wig i n S o d o� S CSP►��v�
8_ove - Cnn+ hctrV es+4 o� a_)c. cC AS' f &S . � a s� �-a,�'e, s5 k e e4 i� , ,e, A vc-+
Lo v jj_ ( In a.V-v� 5 -'P, u 5 to- PAN i n Iv a-5 +Q- A L a,n -Ere rn u1 I
Reviewer/Inspector T
Reviewer/Inspector S
Page 3 of 3
cra P,
Phone: ,336-1 %b' 91M
Date: 1 l' 21— 2- 0 j
21412015