Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout860029_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20181121e l0 , oLL' 1-7 5 VV ( 1v G Division of Water Resources Facility Number ' _ = g �., Division of Soil and Water Conservation ., 0 Other Agency Type of visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: (Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: Z) Arrival Time: Departure Time: Z,2 County: Region: VU SAO Farm Name: 1p o b l e., 6 FoL rrn -' Owner Email: Owner Name: &Adk't ;q- E; 11 ?4 ToV)n5on Phone: Mailing Address: j O Z W 1n1+'e' I1-1 n N (— z,? 6 Z.1 Physical Address: F;v-d L'0+ (ay) C Facility Contact: Edj,j g, -Tt) hQ,yprl Title: Phone: .334) - 34 6 - -7 ZS- 7 Onsite Representative: �1 Qi SO tgn S o n Integrator: 1-4N Certified Operator: VOMO,5 6 , C Ecu ie -To kinsnin, Tr, Certification Number: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Certification Number: 3(o10 /6611 t, Latitude: Longitude: T, Q a q6 P— I Design Current Design Current Design Current Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop. Wean to Finish Layer Wean to Feeder Non-Layerry Feeder to Finish Farrow to Wean Design Current Farrow to Feeder • Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non -Dairy Farrow to Finish Layers Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? Beef Feeder Dairy Cow Dai Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Beef Stocker Beef Brood Cow ❑ Yes Nf No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes 56 No ❑ Yes Uf No ❑NA ❑NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued ❑ Yes Nf No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes 56 No ❑ Yes Uf No ❑NA ❑NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes 56 No ❑ Yes Uf No ❑NA ❑NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued S W 1 M li lFacility Number: `S (Q - L y jDate of Inspection: 1 112,11201 Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 i� Identifier: "66 Spillway?: DesftQ Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 01 No ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 06 No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes Kj No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [A No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [� No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes D No ❑ NA ❑ NE VPA cessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals Cu, Zn, etc.) N ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): (NCJ § t5*'6-U L.d� 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [VT No ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes Dd No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. q ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other: [21. oes record keeping need i provement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application [�] Weekly Freeboard [R`W'aste Analysis . Soil Analysis ❑ Yes X0 rs ❑ NA. [Weather ❑ NE Code [2(Rainfall [L�Stocking Crop Yield �0 Minute Inspections Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑Yes �J No ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ///F-1 No X NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued w Facili Number: Z 1,0 - a Date of Inspection: ( Zo 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? [—]Yes 4No ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: ❑ Yes 1� No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes] No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 06o ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes 14 No ❑ NA ❑ NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? [:)Yes �6 No ❑ NA ❑ NE %l�lP,s ah dam f e.Qa�+ed ��Ve�e�a:.�i Cc�.t i br a4e, t`e c� a- �e �t <-f_e l5 I h moo( dve_ �' ;M9 e C-6 e+,0_ �Pr�r+� o2a(T� due Sri n �d2-l; - :t736 b Pvl1 ?°� 8' - P�n� gates a,J4� �D\e, rev CA ? - M 0. _ �. Me)c+ 51u13e. surval dve Dec. 31, JOAO (PAVE Plaxt-� wig i n S o d o� S CSP►��v� 8_ove - Cnn+ hctrV es+4 o� a_)c. cC AS' f &S . � a s� �-a,�'e, s5 k e e4 i� , ,e, A vc-+ Lo v jj_ ( In a.V-v� 5 -'P, u 5 to- PAN i n Iv a-5 +Q- A L a,n -Ere rn u1 I Reviewer/Inspector T Reviewer/Inspector S Page 3 of 3 cra P, Phone: ,336-1 %b' 91M Date: 1 l' 21— 2- 0 j 21412015