760060_follow-up_20180222

�• 1 17&_,i_T
>r Division of Water Resource "I �
.. f<P
� J d
cih umber... _ 7 - f S Division ooil and Water i ervation dui
s
Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: iyRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:_ Arrival Time: , .. —lam Departure Time: County: ' "� Region: INS✓- it Q
Farm Name: 1)4ci r t �P-5 _rN C ° Owner Email:
Owner Name: A (r � tL OOP M OLh Phone:
Mailing Address: ao �{ Lo d 2d • Sfo�+�S \J 1 �' �� NL a- ;7_5
Physical Address: Fo_r �QL • J LI dj � — ! n� a 7 ;LqS�'
Facility Contact: And Koop mo_n Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator: �' r i s le y �o� f - lo�dZ - a 74
Location of Farm: Latitude: 3 S '5 1 o
Us RWi al S, t)0161 L11
Design � Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
vJI
Phone: Q --
Integrator:
Certification Number: NZ&
Certification Number:
16 Longitude: 7 9 0 3 g" oZ 1/ t'
t o,fl
Design Current
Wet Poultry
Capacity . Pop.
Layer
Non -La er
Design Current -
Dry Poultry
Capacity . Po
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
L
;le
Cy ow
y Calf
y Heifer
Cow
Stocker
Feeder
Brood Cow
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[:]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
s ❑ No
TYes JeNo
s ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: -
Date of Inspection: ;VT ,
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? D� e—
a. 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
�� r ltpy �' v► wed
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 *Struc9re 4 StNcture 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Law&jr Lc�� f�D�`�°
Spillway?.
Designed Freeboard in :�� � 5 -roc)
`qoObserved Freeboard (in): 3
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes �Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes [:]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require 1K Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes DeNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload . ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)77777T''""'''"
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination? ',1"&!� L 1 V\R,
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes JNo
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes "t'No
❑ Yes D�No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes IS No
❑ Other:
W21 oes record keeping need i provement? If yes, check he appropriate box Belo ❑ Yes Pg No
aste Application Weekly Freeboard [Waste Analysis Soil Analysis D_W �
Rainfall 12<tocking [Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 2 of 3
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
1�JA ❑ NE
ffff����^^^"'���I Weather Code
❑NA ❑NE
Dj(NA ❑ NE
21412015 Continued

r Or
Facility Number: "] 1,9 - 60 jDate of inspection: oZ/ a-g '
f 1-J
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste appi,caLion equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes XNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes ❑ No
[XNA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge. survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes ONo
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes 5No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes Mr No
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes DKo
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes XNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes DTo ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? t Yes
INo ❑NA ❑NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑No ❑NA ❑NE
:3. �Yl�-n5 re: Vi-mb Wo,+4-4r p did ? Y �S, MvS� G�4 P 1n➢Q.5� i hr-5
ns -02 re,p ab reA ? q� v �o w.c-S i
T Purmax\ov9x e,sA-m.%k16h2A on & cis 3 ids \1�P, A-& % 0Tn
. CAA 1%bra o►N C> r ar 1e, a re-ade*, d t3e '2 011. S l uv ry -�o� tL 7 �
a " Uovar e,re>p' � ad &-M A-b 5ov- h\>yv\ a_&A e ca 2 5 ee ae %l % vv5 park
3 SP.ur�a al Tree s�F� �Id� ne P_h to be OL,6Mo4 Alb wup. sez- a©n
✓� se'�\ 15pecta l5k 05 i1 Prece55 CS ajal V1 5®r hLjM �;iI&
l rai g�l�.� No Veg `�.J
Est S � � � � � pl t -h ov1
ex p e_ctec� m� P �-; �_ s��. , `+4'1
t013 ;L F- I re-,etveci �o-sfe t�lr�!` `� iols'• l,'I�}-le
6,rop pj&_n+-ed U-)/'tvl 30chal s .
d- c-e,--sue dens cLA_e"V' 60hSA-rUCA4001
S t&P -Q k0LAj t� a-F +e. rein
W 501i d s-tac-y—n; I� �/\t vt L4,0K"'Uoo
t --a z -4 3 4 P t e'a-s e- UDa s to ,V
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Y1A P./t t 550.
Reviewer/Inspector Si ture: �1 d�\�l'(�-�
Page 3 of 3 3 �� Ir✓/I Y\ 3C>
Phone:,�J�p%�7�p� ��✓
Date:
21412015