760011_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20180223

*" �y
Division of Water.Res6tih
Fi ihty Number - �; i� 0 Division of Soil and Watei wisern
in 0 Other Agency
ra �..�
Type of Visit: 9Q Compliance Inspection U Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: tRRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other • D. Denied Access
Date of Visit: Z 3 Arrival Time:190 45' Departure Time: County: �l h Region: LA_-,5P�
Farm Name: F(-,r0' M Owner Email:
Owner Name: '(� rej-- T'0_6+e4-- Phone: C 3 3Ya b 6 9 - 16S4$ T"
Mailing Address: o2 1-0riQ hl- &-bunkV A&yKSo—ur, KI L 9-73 / 4
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: A f__e4q4_ �5- -.�- Title: Phone: 33(0 ' ?d q
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Integrator: PU r v t 5
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Latitude: 35 6 Ll6 l 3 0 11
Longitude: 7q b 35� f q% t I
v s W-wy L4 a I J N a- N%x> y q1 S, Lo I,-- b4- �o u y
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
7 105
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Other
Other
Design
Current -
Wet Poultry
Capacity
Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Design
Current
Dry Poultry
Capacity
Pop.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
the
iry Cow
iry Calf
iry Heifer
v Cow
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes IxNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of inspection: i
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ez� ❑ Yes gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? �t� ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 19 War L_moer � n
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): a
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes D< No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 5jKNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [:]Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes N(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s): -
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 9No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
P
❑ Yes
W No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
CN�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑Ch kl' ❑ D ❑ M ❑ Lease A reements
❑Other•
❑ WU ec fists esign aps g
21. Does record keeping need�i�ovement? • e� �ela�u— Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
aste Ap;Zn [�/ ekly Freeboar Waste Analysis oil Analysis 5Jaste Transfers Weather Code
Rainfall cking Crop Yield 120 Minute Inspections onthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections nudge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No X NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: —7 to - ( I Date of Inspection: 77a
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes bjjrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [:]Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
D;rNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
DdNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
rV No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
[�K No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
PdNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
McNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
[R�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
1• O 4 T U U �- Q� 0� t tx l c;M
l a v 17 �0 t r" ors ® , � c;2 O 1 p
5kd� . Svrvrg-� dve� \0 12-131'd.6l9`
�o''�,t�.�u►�2, a017 OD1 = 1S.S' LsS bog- y.Z2. Ls5' d�3
( a 9-0 17 00l SS boa _o, 740
Lt., u P = Sao l (P / // �y
Reviewer/Inspector Name: �Q(,� f---�� �� L� Phone:
tP 7 `1 9 -/
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: A3
Page 3 of 3 2141201 S