760008_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20180201

Division of Water Resour,i
Factlit umber 0 Division of Soil and Watei iservation
_ to : 36 M
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: WFompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: >rkoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: I 0,210IMr Arrival Time: Departure Time: OU-1 County: a — (Aegion: W S KC
Farm Name: t, Y"QN2.Y1 �O�irl.5
. 7
Owner Email: ;�
Owner Name: [�� G r 49L'V41 Phone: ja&- $ 7 9 1 S S 3
Mailing Address: q % 1 I L QAyL b e*h Mill RA NC, ;R 7 a0
Physical Address: 4ele
Facility Contact: 1 V I6iK' C vein Title: Phone: d .33to — W3 Q3yj
d Pu r V s" 1 U+
Onsite Representative: Integrator: r0 t,,A tR4 i 'r i
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Certification Number:
�/
Latitude: 35 05 I I S$ I Longitude: 7 9'13 Y' Co f /
tawy 22-0 SDL*11 1 Nd- Few4 q% CIS Q&5+ Colerit¢ La&L to Ott-(,
Nl % 1l 2d . Farm can 164,
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars •
Other
Other
Layer
Non -La er
Design Current
Dry Poultry Capacity Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Pouets
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? _
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
.Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facifity Number: 1 - 0 Date of Inspection: 01 1c
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Para
2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: V4&s r& Pons
Spillway?: _
Designed Freeboard (in): _
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage,.etc.)
❑ Yes
Structure 5
% No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 19 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
1 _ . . r
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ Yes] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes AKO'No
❑ Yes X No
❑ Yes D6 No
❑ Yes VNo
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Other:
[21. oes record keeping need i provement? I�f�ws,.cl�o
Waste Analysis Soil Analysis
[:]Yes
[�tizaete�T.r�nsf�re
O�No
❑ ❑ NE
Weather Code
Waste Application eekly Freeboard
ZRainfall �2(stocking [3Crop Yield []" 120 Minute Inspections [] Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
d No
❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
[:]Yes
❑ No
10 NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412015 Continued

Facility Number: % - 0 7 Date of Inspection:
24. Did the `facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ZNo
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ NA ❑ NE
CR051A ❑ NE
❑ Yes ,KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ;'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes -0"—'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ,K No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes E�(No
❑ Yes MrNo
❑ Yes NrNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Z or 2 0 l $' s oil 4e*-b covA f le,+eA
Slurry 4, aIIM3a-hon Calibres-i &an Gowfte+J retutcQA
in 201-7 ? t � �w 17.
0 V", ___ 10
Reviewer/Inspector Name: M G'
Reviewer/Inspector
Page 3 of 3
Phone: M 4-1'% & � 9 &9 9
Date: Q Z1O 1 / Z. Mj?
2/4/201 S