760003_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20180319

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - C<s Division of Soil and Water C rvation 10 AM
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: M Routine O ComDlaint O Follow -no O Referral O Emer¢encv O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: ® County: &0d �Ih Region: 5
Farm Name: App l e -�i G Id VQfM Owner Email:
Owner Name: Qh i 1 i Q Fn u «ii'e 11 n Phone:
Mailing Address: % -7 ZS F-ri e VJ Sit t RQ • ir0 tjj() rJ u M i +1 , NC .27 2-1 L1
Physical Address: nnL1S 9 q K j V je_,�r11 LLS I j e_ D irI V e_ r 1� Ylt Stu f /�iC� a 7 3 1 (e
Facility Contact: f �l 1 pQ uGGTTe _ Title: 1'_ Phone:
Onsite Representative: I G u `i' RO tp t V �In[egrator: f V r v 1
Certified Operator: Ph t L i Q Fay C_e G -4tt �.—} Certification Number: 12_13 t 1 .t 61 g b/
ftek-up Gpersiiii, 20 ben CCZ 334 -8 a y— a s g Certification Number:
-_331e 17 (2� o ,/ pp ,
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35 37 1 S Longitude: -7 f q (0 5s
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finist
Farrow to Weat
Farrow to Feedi
Farrow to Finisl
Gilts
Other
Other
0
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non--
La er
Design Current
Dry Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layers
Non -La ers
Pullets
Turke s
TurkeyPoults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
1
Design Current
Cattle CapacitA Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [:]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes [:]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes gNo
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

rC I1AfI' V Apra 4 U GikVf
i�'IUAdCAa r 61-\ . Cau l �I t�cv I, I V14
/rl d-/- S'

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection: ��2 14
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes tA No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? []Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: up 1> or bo\W 'r
Spillway?: IA41L }o ro S8 r
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): a'+�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes rk No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes D<No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �To ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes J!Q'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
jg'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
5;3'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
D?00N" o
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑Yes
[No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
tR'No
❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
%No
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[Waste
❑ Yes
Dj�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Application Q Weekly Freeboard [Waste Analysis [`Soil Analysis
G_W��
2veather Code
❑ Rainfall [v? Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
Ersludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
JNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
gNA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412015 Continued

Facili Number: Date of Ins ectiow
jE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ YesrN
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yeso
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
9No
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
YNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
LS1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[�(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
% No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
U e drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). Ey e
7 e,Se_Avhm cin uPPt r Ia &n ? "66 vll\ vp: 0 Viec.ls oe-y- ' vtst+
ab1$ 50115 "mplete-A 7 Nof ef, e-V)t , nt: vis't t
dbl8 t-0librc� tlav� � ow�p lctec�t 7 No yofl t1 Weci� u�eXf V' �o
puLP5 4 hose'5 re f\aced 7 ��5 —
wn
P5• A61&Aiona.l 51u61'34 re,m6veh40uti lo\,,e_r *
15 Meld year (owea- louses rect�vedt sltx4 e , ra-Lt ao►l b%.* vec�e
Est /lnoeec�t'tn�qq l'k'hl-54LfV-0.o 51In0 t- all slUA3e- oLfplTC04i
o ppll l aA n (,are be, cove oc+erk more, &f-pi oily m N6 n ppl�
)n Deeearr,loer wher�hnJre was oPQorlvnitt� ��,�C2, .,�Inea� 1no�
(10� �2.t 0,0. 1 pla�nte�•
jotu-ter ra-Ario 9/.zot7 = 0. 37 uPPA-r= D , -Zl
Reviewer/Inspector Name: A,11�fXi �O5[�tlfbit �� ` Phone: 33(, —nle— q6y
ReviewerQnspectorSignature-.Ail J'I'AD Date:ILI
3 p2O(
Page 3 of 3 21412015