The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About990034_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20180313Division of Water Resources ❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency Facility Number: 990034 FacilityStatus: Active Permit: AWC990034 El Denied Access Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date: Reason for Visit: Routine County: Region: gion: Winston-Salem Date of visit: 03/13/2018 EntryTime: 10:10 am Exit Time: 12:00 pm Incident # Farm Name: Riley livestock, Inc. Owner Email: rilo4510@gmail.com Owner: Timothy Clay Riley Phone: 704-881-1192 Mailing Address: PO Box 219 Hamptonville NC 27020 Physical Address: 5146 Crater Rd Hamptonville NC 27020 Facility Status: ❑ Compliant Not Compliant Integrator: Location of Farm: Latitude: 36° 05' Longitude: 80° 50' 17" From Hwy 421, take Exit 264 (Asbury Church Road, turn toward intersection with gas station on SR 1125. Turn left onto SR 1125 and go about 0.744 miles. Tturn left onto 1206. The farm is on the right. Also: 016 Golden Leaf Lane, Hamptonville, NC 27020: question Areas: Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application Records and Documents Other Issues Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number: Secondary OIC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone 24 hour contact name Zane Riley Phone : 704-881-1192 On -site representative Zane Riley Phone : 704-881-1192 Primary Inspector: Rebecca D Chandler Phone: Inspector Signature: Date: Secondary Inspector(s): Inspection Summary: 2. & 9. - Runoff noted from 421 site? Evidence of runoff, solids collected at top of ditch leading offsite. Facility directed to immediatiy stop any flow with hay bales and scrape ditch clean asap/when weather permits. 9. Runoff from main? None noted today, not a concern. Will check next visit.._ 22. Rain gauge reinstalled? Yes, thank you 24. Calibrations completed? Due in 2018. WSRO to send reminder. 21. Soil test completed? Due Sept 2018. WSRO to send reminder. 21. Waste analysis completed in 60-day window? No, reminder for quarterly sampling.- 21. Crop yields recorded? No, Mathis responsible for crops, please get yields from him. 21. Weather codes being recorded? No, was using old form. Provided new SOLID-1 and instructed on weather code use. 32. Any updates to WUP? Yes, new tract added in 8/2017. 9. Immediatly clean out ditch/culvert next to drystack. 7. Decide on solution for runoff flow from concrete feed barn. 34. Follow-up visit scheduled for April 26. page: 1 Permit: AWC990034 Owner - Facility : Timothy Clay Riley Facility Number: 990034 Inspection Date: 03/13/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions Cattle Cattle - Beef Stocker Calf 400 185 Cattle - Dairy Heifer 900 600 Total Design Capacity: 1,300 Total SSLW: 1,120,000 page: 2 Permit: AWC990034 Owner- Facility : Timothy Clay Riley Facility Number: 990034 Inspection Date: 03/13/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Discharges $ Stream Impacts Yes No Na Ne 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑0 ❑ ❑ Discharge originated at: Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other ❑ a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ M ❑ ❑ b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ❑ c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? M ❑ ❑ ❑ 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the ❑ .❑ ❑ State other than from a discharge?. Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment Yes No Na Ne 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ❑ M ❑ If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (LeJ large ❑ ❑M ❑ trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ M ❑ ❑ waste management or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? Waste Application Yes No Na Ne 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ 0❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? ❑ Hydraulic Overload? ❑ Frozen Ground? ❑ Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑ PAN? ❑ Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑ Total Phosphorus? ❑ Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑ Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑ Evidence of wind drift? ❑ Application outside of application area? ❑ page: 3 Permit: AWC990034 Owner - Facility : Timothy Clay Riley Facility Number: 990034 Inspection Date: 03/13/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Waste Aoolication Yes No Na Ne Crop Type 1 Com (Silage) Crop Type 2 Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Oats) Crop Type 3 Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Soil Type 2 Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Records and Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box below. WUP? Checklists? Design? Maps? Lease Agreements? Other? If Other, please specify 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? Weekly Freeboard? Waste Analysis? Soil analysis? Waste Transfers? Weather code? Rainfall? Stocking? ❑■❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ E ❑ ❑ Yes No Na Ne no is 0 on IEEE page: 4 Permit: AWC990034 Owner - Facility : Timothy Clay Riley Facility Number: 990034 Inspection Date: 03/13/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Records and Documents Yes No Na Ne Crop yields? ❑ 120 Minute inspections? ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey ❑ 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment ❑ ❑ N ❑ (NPDES only)? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ E ❑ ❑ 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the ❑ ❑ M ❑ appropriate box(es) below: Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑ List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ❑, ❑ 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑0 ❑ ❑ Other Issues Yes No Na Ne 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Application Field ❑ Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑ Other ❑ If Other, please specify 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ page: 5 l B A Y •. @t i� /9 r Krt,,i , r Yam_ i�'rO4� -•.. Y ,t A�l �.1' P' Ali A _ i