20080737 Ver 10_S-FOL-001 REB Rec Plan Full_20181120

Balfour Beatty i BRANCH
Infrastructure Inc. ME* CIVIL
A joint Venture
NCDOT Contract C204043
U2519AA — AB Fayetteville Outer Loop Project
Reference: Submittal S-FOL-001 REB Borrow Pit Reclamation Plan
Subject: Plan for Development of a Borrow and Waste Site at the Barnhill (REB Acquisitions) Property
Intersection of Lake Upchurch Dr and Old Plank Rd, Hope Mills in Cumberland County
Based on the attached documentation, the Balfour Beatty / Branch Civil Joint Venture (BB-BC-JV) plans
to develop the REB Property on Lake Upchurch Dr and Old Plank Rd. in Cumberland County into a Pond
per NCDOT Specifications.
1. The mine will be excavated as described in the Reclamation Plan for Borrow Site —
Attachment A.
2. While this site is being developed, material that is deemed unsuitable (either organics or
undercut) will be hauled to and stored temporarily inside of the excavation area of the REB
Reclamation Site.
3. Once the bottom of pond is reached, BB-BC-JV will shape the slopes and may use this
previously stockpiled material (See Plan for Details in Attachment C). BB-BC-JV will ensure
that the backfill material is placed uniform to ensure smooth contours and the minimum 3
to 1 slopes or flatter. The backfill material will be soil only and will be generated from within
the U2519AA-AB site only.
4. The final bottom of pond will be 4 feet in water depth or greater per the standard minimum
depth given by NCDOT (See Plan for Details of the "bottom of pond")
5. Final grading will then take place with permanent seeding operations, etc. as is required by
NCDOT Standard Specification. This includes the 1 year maintenance / monitoring period.
Additional Notes
- Permanent Seeding operations will take place on the pond slopes after the slopes have been
graded for a permanent condition. Materials left in stockpiles undisturbed will be Temporary
Seeded and Mulched. In addition, where there are exposed erodible slopes with area greater
than 1 acre and these slopes pose any threat of turbidity or silt loss off the site, seeding will be
performed per NCDOT Standards and Project Special Provisions. (See the attached seeding
specifications)
- The dewatering basin to be utilized during borrow excavation and has been designed to handle
maximum flow of 800 GPM. (See attached Dewatering Basin Design Calculations)
- The dewatering pump will be set to float and pump from the surface of the water. The pump
discharge will be set up as shown in the attached detail.

- Using the SKAGGS method, the maximum offset from the adjacent wetlands was determined to
be a 152 Ft. in the NoA Soils area. With that in mind a field survey will be conducted to
determine this buffer. This will be staked in the field to ensure the minimum offset from
excavation to wetlands as is required.
Plan Attachments:
Attachment A
— Reclamation Plan for Contracted Projects (Borrow Pit)
Attachment B —
Reclamation Plan for Contracted Projects (Waste Site)
Attachment C —
Drawing of proposed site with Pond Cross Section
Attachment D
— Environmental Evaluation with Wetland, Endangered Species, & SCAGGS Data
Attachment E — State Historic Preservation Office Evaluation
Attachment F — Soil Survey
Attachment G — Seeding and Mulching Specifications
Attachment H — Dewatering Basin Calculations
Attachment I — Dewatering Discharge Requirements & Turbidity Reduction Options
Please let us know if you require any additional information or clarification regarding this site.
Thanks,
Peter D. Distefano
Project Manager
U2519AA-AB Fayetteville Outer Loop Project
BBI-BC JV
430 Eastwood Rd., Wilmington, NC 28403
Tel. [phone] l / Cell. 910.367.7800
CC: Submittal File / Division File

12/11/08
Reclamation Plan for Contracted Projects
Borrow Pit
Date: 10/18/2018
Contract Number: C204043 TIP No: U-2519AA&AB
Project #/ WBS Element: 34817.3.4 County: CUMBERLAND
Contractor: Balfour Beatty / Branch Civil Joint Venture Responsible Person: Keith Nixon
Contractor Address: 430 Eastwood Road. Wilmington, INC 28403
Property Owner: REB ACQUISITIONS LLC Phone Number: 252-823-1021
Property Owner Address: PO BOX 7948 ROCKY MOUNT NC 27804
Borrow Pit Tax Parcel ID# 9493-93-0484
Property Address: Intersection of Lake Upchurch Dr and Old Plank Rd, Hope Mills, North Carolina (1888 Lake Upchurch Dr Approximate)
Total acreage of proposed pit: 46
Expected depth of excavation: 25 Ft. (Depending on existing ground elevations, which vary slightly)
Present use of land: Agriculture
Proposed use after reclamation: a Pond
Proposed sequence of excavation (include amount of clearing & proposed slope rates):
First all Erosion Control Measures will be installed. The pond will be dug from the property boundary towards NCDOT R/W.
This will be done sequentially in approximately 10 ft. lifts. Final slopes will be graded out to 3:1 or flatter.
Did the Environmental Evaluation indicate the presence of any wetlands or endangered
species?(if yes, briefly list findings and indicate physical means by which buffer zone will be
delineated):
Wetlands were found (See the attached Delineation). Wetlands will not be impacted by the excavation. Silt fencing, diversion
ditching and outlet SDOs will be installed as shown on the attached plan sheets. These will be inspected weekly as well as after
every rain event over 1/2" to ensure that devices are functioning properly. No endangered species were found. (See the attached Report)
Is any portion of the pit or access & haul roads within a watershed with riparian buffer zone
requirements? (if yes, indicate physical means by which buffer will be delineated and how
diffuse flow into the buffer zone will be maintained):
No.
Reclamation Procedures for Borrow/Waste/Staging Areas for Contracted Projects 12/11/08 11

12/11/08
Is the site adjacent to High Quality Waters as defined by the Department of Environment and
Natural Resources? (if yes, note how the devices have been designed to meet DENR
requirements):
No.
Are there any conditions identified on the State Historic Preservation Office Review Form for
borrow activities? Explain:
No.
Describe the intended plan for the reclamation and subsequent use of all affected lands, and
indicate the general methods to be used in reclaiming this land, including any stockpile areas,
haul roads and ditches. Describe the sequence for reclaiming the pit. Attach a map which
illustrates this plan, showing the location and design of all temporary and permanent erosion
control devices. All features shall comply with the appropriate specifications, standards and
reflect Best Management Practices (BMP). The plan shall indicate setbacks to adjacent
properties, buffer zones and if de -watering is required and the pit is located within the 15
county region of the CCPCUA, the GPS coordinate location of any well located within 1500
ft. of the pit.
First, all Erosion Control measures will be installed. Next, any stripping and surface preparations will be done and berming of
topsoil. Excavation will then begin along the western edge and continue to the East as was descibed previously in 10 FT lifts. Stockpiles
(if needed) will be maintained with erosion control measures for the life of the reclamation. The haul road will be maintained along the
project alignment sufficient enough to carry off -road truck loads associated with the excavation. The pond will be kept dewatered with a
floating pump and the discharge will be made into the dewatering basin. Finally, no wells could be found within 1500 ft. of this site.
Will excavation extend below the water table? (If yes, see a, b, & c, below): Yes
a) Specify how de -watering will be accomplished. Include proposed method of reducing
effluent turbidity so that it meets the requirements of the Division of Water Quality. Show any
pit dewatering basins, construction details, and calculations on the plan:
A dewatering basin will be used to dewater into from the proposed pond. The pump that is to be used will be set in the pit installed onto a
float to ensure pumping from the surface. The pump discharge will be placed into a difuser to further prevent erosion or turbidity creation
within the dewatering basin itself. Finally strict monitoring of the discharge will be kept and corrections made to the plan if they arise.
b) If the pit is within the Central Coastal Plain Capacity Use Area, list the person responsible
for completing The Division of Water Resources CCPCUA spread sheet and method of
submission to the Resident Engineer:
Pit is not in a CCPCUA County
Reclamation Procedures for Borrow/Waste/Staging Areas for Contracted Projects 12/11/08 12

12/11/08
c) If water is to remain in the pit after completion, state the estimated depth of the water. (At
least a depth = 4 ft.). Indicate the water table depth prior to beginning excavation and the
method used to obtain this information:
Depth to water table elevations are listed in the attached report. This data was gathered from the soil survey from the USDA / NRCS soils report for the site area
(Cumberland County) and was listed as 2-3 ft. depth below the ground surface for the GoA (Goldsboro Loamy Sand) and 40 to 72 inches below the ground
for the NoA (Norfolk Loamy Sand) that is present in the majority of the site area. With this information theoretical water levels with a Pit Depth of 25 Ft. are 19-22 Ft.
Describe the proposed schedule of permanent seeding and mulching. Detail the frequency of
permanent seeding and mulching. Note that a permanent stand of vegetation is required prior
to a final inspection:
Perminent Seeding will begin within 15 days of reaching proposed final grades. As final grades are
achieved perminent seeding will be executed accordingly. (See attached Seed Specifiations on
proposed types of seed to be used.)
Reclamation Procedures for Borrow/Waste/Staging Areas for Contracted Projects 12/11/08 13

12n U08
Property Owner's Statement for Borrow Site:
1 hereby certify that 1 am in agreement with this development, use, and reclamation plan, and
any exceptions noted when approved by the Engineer, and that I understand that 1 will be
responsible for the site upon completion of its use in the construction of the project noted in
the map legend. I understand that this plan, when approved, will serve as a guide in
controlling erosion and sediment in accordance with the Mining Act and the Sediment and
Pollution Control Act and as enforced by the North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources (DENR). 1 understand that any work exceeding the minimum necessary for
compliance with DENR requirements, should be negotiated between the Contractor and the
Property Owner. My signature below authorizes The Department of Transportation (DOT),
the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) or its agents, to enter upon my
property for a period of one year from the date of final acceptance of the project for which this
site plan is executed. If necessary, the DOT will be allowed to have the Contractor repair any
areas that are not in compliance with DENR requirements. After a one year inspection is held,
1 will be solely responsible for assuring that the site is in compliance with DENR regulations. 1
have the right to change the condition of the site after the final inspection and prior to the one
year follow-up inspection. However, if I make such changes, I acknowledge that DOT is
released from all obligations and conditions of this agreement and 1 will become solely
responsible for the condition of the site beginning on the date that I change the final inspection
condition.
Signatures:
Contractor's Representative:
supplemental agreements/date)
Owners of Record:
(signature/date)
(signature/date)
Resident Engineer:
(signature /date)
Exceptions:
Concurrence with exceptions:
Property Owner: Contractor:
( signature/date)
(signature/date)
(signature/date)
(signature/date) (signature/date)
Attachments: (See plan cover for full list of attachments including environmental reviews, etc.)
Cc:
Reclamation Procedures for Borrow/Waste/Staging Areas for Contracted Projects 12/ 11/08 14

12/11/08
Reclamation Plan for Contracted Projects
Waste Site
Date: 10/18/2018
Contract Number: C204043 TIP No: U-2519AA&BB
Project No/WBS Element: 34817.3.4 County: CUMBERLAND
Contractor: Balfour Beatty / Branch Civil Joint Venture Responsible Person: Keith Nixon
Contractor Address: 430 Eastwood Road. Wilmington, NC 28403
Property Owner: REB ACQUISITIONS LLC Phone Number: 252-823-1021
Property Owner Address: PO BOX 7948 ROCKY MOUNT NC 27804
Waste Site Tax Parcel ID# 9493-93-0484
Property Address: Intersection of Lake Upchurch Dr and Old Plank Rd, Hope Mills, North Carolina (1888 Lake Upchurch Dr Approximate)
Total acreage of proposed site: 46
Expected depth of waste: Approximately 5 Ft.
Present use of land: Agriculture
Proposed use after reclamation: A Pond
Expected type of waste that will be placed in the site (examples: asphalt, concrete, soil, stone):
Unsuitable soils from the project & Borrow Pit areas only (See Attachment C for Pond Area Details). Includes Undercut material and
other poor materials that are inappropriate for building a roadway structure.
Proposed sequence of placing waste (include proposed slope rates):
Material will be placed in the bottom of the previously dug pond.
Soils will be placed in feasable lifts and at a time such to create a uniform pond slope.
Did the Environmental Evaluation indicate the presence of any wetlands or endangered
species?(if yes, briefly list findings and physical means by which area will be delineated):
Wetlands were found (See the attached Delineation). Wetlands will not be impacted by the waste. Silt fencing, diversion
ditching and outlet SDOs will be installed as shown on the attached plan sheets. These will be inspected weekly as well as after
every rain event over 1/2" to ensure that devices are functioning properly. No endangered species were found. (See the attached Report)
Reclamation Procedures for Borrow/Waste/Staging Areas for Contracted Projects 12/11/08 15

12/11/08
Did the Environmental Evaluation indicate the presence of any wetlands or endangered
species?(if yes, briefly list findings and physical means by which area will be delineated):
Same as previous.
Is any portion of the pit within a watershed with riparian buffer zone regulations? (if yes
indicate physical means by which buffer will be delineated and how diffuse flow will be
maintained):
No
Is the site adjacent to High Quality Waters as defined by the Department of Environment and
Natural Resources? (if yes, note how the devices have been designed to meet DENR
requirements):
No
Are there any conditions identified on the State Historic Preservation Office Review Form for
waste activities? Explain:
No
Describe the intended plan for the reclamation and subsequent use of all affected lands, and
indicate the general methods to be used in reclaiming this land, including any stockpile areas,
haul roads and ditches. Describe the sequence for reclaiming the site. Attach a map
illustrating this plan, showing the location and design of all temporary and permanent erosion
control devices. All features shall comply with the appropriate specifications, standards and
reflect Best Management Practices (BMP). The plan shall indicate setbacks to adjacent
properties, buffer zones and wetlands.
Please see the attached narrative document titled 'Plan for Development of Borrow and Waste Site at the REB Pit'
This describes the exact sequence of action and references all
backup documentation. This 'Reclamation Plan for Waste Site" is to work in conjunction with the attached 'Reclamation
Plan for Borrow Site".
Describe the proposed schedule of permanent seeding and mulching. Detail the frequency of
permanent seeding and mulching. Note that a permanent stand of vegetation is required prior
to a final inspection:
Perminent Seeding will begin within 15 days of reaching proposed final grades. As final grades are
achieved perminent seeding will be executed accordingly. (See attached Seed Specifiations on proposed types of seed to be used.)
Reclamation Procedures for Borrow/Waste/Staging Areas for Contracted Projects 12/11/08 16

12/11/08
Property Owner's Statement for Waste Site:
1 hereby certify that I am in agreement with this development, use, and reclamation plan, and
any exceptions noted when approved by the Engineer, and that I understand that 1 will be
responsible for the site upon completion of its use in the construction of the project noted in the
map legend. I understand that this plan, when approved, will serve as a guide in controlling
erosion and sediment in accordance with the Mining Act and the Sediment and Pollution
Control Act and as enforced by the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (DENR). I understand that any work exceeding the minimum necessary for
compliance with DENR requirements, should be negotiated between the Contractor and the
Property Owner. My signature below authorizes The Department of Transportation (DOT), the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) or its agents, to enter upon my
property for a period of one year from the date of final acceptance of the project for which this
site plan is executed. If necessary, the DOT will be allowed to have the Contractor repair any
areas that are not in compliance with DENR requirements. After a one year inspection is held, 1
will be solely responsible for assuring that the site is in compliance with DENR regulations. I
have the right to change the condition of the site after the final inspection and prior to the one
year follow-up inspection. However, if I make such changes, I acknowledge that DOT is
released from all obligations and conditions of this agreement and 1 will become solely
responsible for the condition of the site beginning on the date that I change the final inspection
condition.
Signatures:
Contractor's Representative:
(authorized to
Owners of Record:
W'tness
(signature/date)
(signature/date)
(signature/date)
Resident Engineer:
Exceptions:
Concurrence with exceptions:
Property Owner:
igfvfupplemental agreements / dat
J.&L
J�,
(signature/date)
(signature/date)
(signature/date)
(signature /date)
(signature/date)
Attachments: Site map with details
Environmental Evaluations, etc.
Cc:
Contractor:
(signature/date)
Reclamation Procedures for Borrow/Waste/Staging Areas for Contracted Projects 12/11/08 17

1j %'As - fl/
I T
a /yf t'
LATERAL EFFEI
159' Soils type
0 rw a
w pow
do
a j
ea
SILT DITCH TO BE CUT AS NEEDED
TO DIRECT WATER INTO BASIN
SITE DRAINS TO ITSELF
'i'$'Pw
STONE ENERGY DISSIPATER
\ CLA55 B RIP -RAP ON FILTER FABRIC
DISCHARGE POINT
_�4°503 I .9"N LAT 79'00' 14. 1 "W LON
433887 NORTH 1995824 EAST
INFILTRATION
w �\ SEDIMENT BASIN
w \ 5'X 1 35'
(D ATEP BASIN)
y2
w �
`w
e \ F
w�
J �
y2
SAFETY FENCE
(TYPICAL)
INSTALL SPECIAL SEDIMENT
CONTROL OPENINGS (SDO)
IN SILT FENCE A5 NEEDED
�a
'P
— 51TE
�a
O �
inity Sketc
Not to Swle
La� Liam
EMME
©�=E
—
/
49 .
O
Y -YI�n
wYlaw.�
w�YiYi
www.
9
s
�3
'
o �
"o
o a
a
i o
0 7
TEMPORARY
SILT FENCE
PROPOSED ".`wx'"ww
CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE
d
Lateral Effect 5'
\ of 5 RA 1 29'
Soils NoA 1 52'
N d
. ww wwww wwws Y�=wi w� � a Nw
\I o
00
Propposed Pond
251 Depth
1 ,996,860 5q Ft
46 Acres
,6 15,876 CU Yd
ING
DLINE
a
APPROXIMATE JURI ICTIONAL
DITCH LOCATION
HAL OWEN * A550C.
LEGEND 0
EX.
SDO — ECIAL SEDI T CONTROL FENCE
TOT ST ARD DWG 1606.01
TYP. SEE NTYPICAL \J
HIGHLY VISIBLE NCE (SAFETY)/ Z WL
SILT FENCE / PROPERTY BOUNDARY
— OPOSED P D qgm
— P NDARY
----- — EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR
— — EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR
— PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR
— PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR 0 200 400
Feet
NO. DATE APPR. BARNHILL TRACT
MPORARY
SILT FENCE
zo
(TYPICAL)
OPR POSED OFFROAD
STR �,N ENTRANCE
ROADWAY
PROJECT PUE
O ROADWAY J
PROJECT ROW
N
I
Proposed
Stockpile j
X Area _.._.._.
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
WL -- WL WL
— WL ­_ WL
EMA FLOOD MAP INFO:
PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON PANEL 3710949300K & 20040300J,
effective on 01/05/2007
Mine Area scaled in Zone X Area of minimal flood h zord.
CNEtl(FD M1E
CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
NORTH CAROLINA
Balfour Beath BRANCH
Infrastructure Inc. ci vi I
A Joint denture
B. C NE
B. CDNE
Reclamatio n Flan
OVERVIEW PLAN / WETLANDS
NCDOf LEYFL YI tamnunoa
DER�EE3865
FAYETTEVILLE OUTER LOOP
TIP PROJECT U-2519
CONTRACT C204043
a"ao�a� .d R..d, W� l"<.
a,o Eases""a a"aa, wuaa.,�"n xc aaaao
P. DISTEFANO
.rrYvrEo
owwx owc
D. REED 9/27/2018
cuY,R Ysrxova
AS NOTED
51111iff
13
0
1 2

STONE ENERGY
DISSIPATOR
rr
1 r-0ryt
a
L� UNCLASSIFIED ANTI -SEEP
EARTH MATERIAL COLLAR
m i COIR FIBER BAFFLE STEEL POSTS
VARIABLE
TYPICAL SECTION VIEW
DEWATERING BASIN DETAILS
SILT
3: II SLOPE
ECTION
OF
NO. I DATE I APPR. BARNHILL TRACT
CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
NORTH CAROLINA
FAYETTEVILLE OUTER LOOP
TIP PROJECT U-2519
CONTRACT C204043
Bnlfou, Beatty Infrastructure Inc.
1/4 WIRE MESH
SEDIMENT CONTROL STONE ,
1 ft min
WATER FLOW 2=_.
�� I ICI
J/// STEEL POST - 2 ft DEPTH
14 WIRE MESH _;
2 ft
�3ft�
VARIABLE
1
DIMENSION �* WIRE NESH�
2 ft
SEDIMENT CONTROL STONE
1 ft min
SPECIAL SEDIMENT CONTROL
FENCE DETAIL 1606.01
SILT FENCE DRAINAGE BREAKS CAN BE
>SPECIAL SEDIMENT CONTROL FENCE
>EXCELSIOR WATTLE
>COIR FIBER WATTLE
GKOU
/- 2 5'
FILL SLOPE
WASTE MATERIAL
VAR.
2' TO 10' :.
VAR. —
0' TO 2'
CROSS SECTIONAL VIEW
TEMPORARY SILT DITCH DETAIL 1630.03
AS NEEDED TO DIRECT DRAINAGE INTO DERATERING BASIN
STOCKPILES TO BE LOCATED NITHIN
THE BOUNDARY, LOCATIONS TO BE
WIDTH (MAY VARY)
DETERMINED AS NEEDED
2.1 SLOPES FOR CLAYEY MATERIAL
3:1 SLOPES FOR SANDY MATERIAL
GROUND
AGGKEG, re
GOMPA—D
SAND
HAUL ROAD
TYPICAL CROSS—SECTION OF
WITH ROAD CP055 SECTION
NOT TO 5CA
STOCKPILE OR OVERBURDEN AREAS
NOT TO SCALE
HAUL ROAD NOTES
1: WHERE THE HAUL ROAD APPEARS TO NEED ADDITIONAL
STABILITY, THE CROSS SECTION SHOWN ABOVE WILL BE
REFERENCED
2: COMPACTED SAND WILL BE USED AS WELL AS A SAND
MIXTURE TOPPING.
3: ADDITIONALLY, AGGREGATE MAY BE USED AS A FINAL
MEASURE WHERE STABILITY CANNOT BE ACHIEVED WITH
SAND ALONE.
4: HAUL ROAD WILL BE LINED ON BOTH SIDES WITH SILT FENCE
TO PREVENT SILT LOSS FROM THE HAUL ROAD.
CLASS 'A' STONE
8 IN. MIN. DEPTH
Balfour Beatty M B RA N C H
Infrastructure Inc. MCIVIL D. REED#3865
�P.�LDISTEFANO
A joint Venture
NOTES
GENERAL NOTES
1: SILT DITCHES WALL BE CUT AS NECESSARY FOR DRAINAGE
INTO THE PIT
2: DITCH CROSSINGS WALL BE BRIDGED AS TO NOT IMPACT THE
ENVIRONMENTAL STABILITY OF THE EXISTING CONDITIONS OF
THE EXISTING DITCHES
3: STOCKPILES WALL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE PIT BOUNDARY,
LOCATIONS TO BE DETERMINED AS NEEDED.
4: STOCKPILES WALL BE USED FOR SLOPES AS SOON AS
POSSIBLE.
1. PROVIDE TURNING RADIUS SUFFICIENT TO ACCOMMODATE LARGE
TRUCKS.
2. LOCATE ENTRANCES TO PROVIDE FOR UTILIZATION
BY ALL CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES.
3. MUST BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT
TRACKING OR DIRECT FLOW OF MUD ONTO STREETS.
PERIODIC TOPDRESSING WITH STONE WILL BE NECESSARY.
4. ANY MATERIAL TRACKED ONTO THE ROADWAY MUST BE
CLEANED UP IMMEDIATELY.
5. LOCATE GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AT ALL POINTS OF
INGRESS AND EGRESS UNTIL SITE IS STABILIZED. PROVIDE
FREQUENT CHECKS OF THE DEVICE AND TIMELY MAINTENANCE.
6. NUMBER AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES TO
BE ❑ETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER.
7. USE CLASS 'A' STONE OR OTHER COARSE AGGREGATE APPROVED
BY THE ENGINEER.
8. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES IN A WAY TO PREVENT VEHICLES
FROM BYPASSING CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE LEAVING PROJECT SITE.
GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE 1607.01
WIDTH AND LENGTH TO BE MODIFIED
FOR TRAFFIC AS NEEDED
NOTE: PLACE GEOTEXTILE FOR DRAINAGE BENEATH STONE
Reclamation Plan
OVERVIEW PLAN / WETLANDS 2
REED
NOTED
8
2 a 2

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id, SANV-2014-01272 County; Cumberland/Robeson U.S.G.S. Quad: NC-PARKTON
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner: Ms. Henrietta Filer
Address: 420 F. Creekview ➢r.
Hampstead, NC 28443
Telephone Number: [phone]
Size (acres) 294
Nearest Waterway Big Swamp,
USGS HUC 3030004
Location description;
f4t Ac.). 9493809780 (47.4 Ac).
Lidicate Which of the „Follo hig Ai)i)lV:
A. Preliminary Determination
Nearest Town Hobe Mills
River Basin U er Cape Fear. North Carolina.
Coordinates Latitude:34.939266.
Longitude:-79.004239
Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have
this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Anny (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a
jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action .
under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). If you wish, you may request
an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also, you may provide
new information for fiirther consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
B. Approved Detei•inhiatim
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X There are waters of the U.S,_ including wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit
re uirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act CWA 33 USC & 1344). Unless there is a chap a in tine law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a lmriod not to exceed five years from the date
of this notification.
r tyethe Waiers of tile U.S.
nlWetlands
tlidelineated. bile „to fire
size of ouPro aand/or oupresent worldoadtla Corisma not beable to acorlislr this
c
_._.
e mica#jar ill a timely manner. For a more i.rf by t os timely delineation,i you may wish to obtain consultantTo be
considered final my delineation must be verified he Co
The waters of the U.S. including wetlands on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be
reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to
CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
The waters of the U.S, including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted or the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on . Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification,
There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USG 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
Page 1 of 2

Applicant:
Ms. Henrietta Filer File Number: SAW-2014.01272
Date: November 7, 2014
Attached is: See
❑ INITIAL PROFFERED
Section below
PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
❑
PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of percussion
B
❑
PERMIT DENIAL
®
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
C
I1
PRFI.TMRJARV Ir to TerlTn` FnXTAr n
D
B:
INITIAL PROFFERED P)✓RM1T: Yon umy accept or object to the permit.
ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and rehirn it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terns and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
OBJECT: If you object to the pern>it (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions thereinyou may request
that the permit be modified accordingly, You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to , the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
may acceptor appeal the permit
ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and rehn'n it to the district engineer for final
authorizationI If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions there'll),
you may appear the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIM,: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Adntirristrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED
information.
may accept orappeal the approved JD or provide new
ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date ofthis notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its enthety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division enghieer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

a
°�i;
�
t
�,
�
•�
� �
r .
�
—
� .,,
�._ _r
,.
_
_ _
�,.
�
� `
t

A.
C.
• •A A • '-•
PARCELINFORMAIION
Street Address:
City, State:
County:
Directions:
Lake Upchurch Rd and Plank Rd
Hope Mills, NC
Cumberland and Robeson
Take Blacks Bridge Rd north from Parkton (becomes Brlsson Rd at Co, line). Turn
leIt on Lake Upchurch Rd. Site Is on left before intersection with Oki Plank Rd,
Parcel Index Numbers) (PIN):
REQIJESTOR INI+ORMATION
Name:
Mailing Address:
Teleplione Number:
Electronic Mail Address':
Select one:
9493A3.0484 (135ac}, 0403.02.3792 (28.Bac), 9493.9t-55t4 (7Aac)
9493-71-8612 (81Ac), and 9493-80-9780 (47ac)
0 `4�
Hal Owen &Associates, Inc.
PO Box 400, Llllinglon NO 27540
910-893-8743
halowen@earthlinkmet
❑ I am tJre cw•rent property owner.
❑✓ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant2
❑ Interested Buyer ot• Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
PROPERTY OWNER INFOR1ulA'I'ION
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address3:
Henrietta Filer
420 E. Creekvlew Drive
Hampstead, NC 28443
810.319-0852
[e-mail]
®Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g, a copy of Deed, County OISlParcel(Tax Record data)
1 if available
2 Must attach completed Agent Author(zation Form
s if available
Version: December 2013 Page 3

FROM : FILEW PHONE NO. : 336 676 7268 Jun. 23 2014 05:i5PM P3
Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIk1CATTON4
1, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -sits investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
2gtnh i C7T7K it. C / (fi
Property Owner (please print). bate
Signature
❑ 1 arm requesting that the Corps provide a n� Jli for the property identified herein.
lis request does include a delineation.
1 atu requesting that the Coryfs provide a prciiminary JD fox the property identifed herein,
This request does NOT include a delineation.
1 am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or
absence of WoUSs and provide an BVWAv Jp £or the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
® 1 am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all Wo'US on a property/project
area and provide an aburoved JD (this may or may not include a surrey plat),
l am requesting that the Corps evaluate end approve a delineation o£ WoU5 (oonducted
by others) on a property/project area and provide an approved Jip (rrray ox spay not
include a survey plat).
zt�o currayt NCOOT/USACE protocols. skip to Part Lt.
��..
DecemberVarsioni

jurisdictional Determination Aequest
1?. ALL REQUESTS
❑✓ Map of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
0 Size of Property or Project Area 297
acres
' v
I v I I verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
G. JD REQUESTS BI201VI CONSULTANTS OI2 AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests:
❑ Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Aetermination Form.
❑, Project Coordinates: Latitude
Longitude
Maps (no larger than l 1x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑ USGS Topographic Map
❑ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LTDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)

jurisdictional Determination &equest
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
Wetland Data Sheets
Tributaries:
USACE Assessment Forms
Upland Data Sheets Li Other• Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
Landscape Photos, if taken
Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
® All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
® Locations of photo stations
® Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
(2} Approved JDs including �Jerification of a Delineation:
Project Coordinates: 34.939266 Latitude '79.004239 Longitude
Maps (no larger titan 11x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
21 Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
Aerial Photography o£the project area
® USGS Topographic Map
Soil Smvey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan,
previous delineation maps)
' 29737 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at:
htto•//www usace army mil/Missions/CivilWorks/ReeulatorvProeramandPermits/ree suoo.asox
Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at:
httre//nnrtal.nrdenr.arn/c/document Iibrarv/eet flWould=703c586-dab8-496o-ba43-ASb7faf06f4c&erounld=38364 and,

Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
Wetland Data Sheets
Tributaries:
USACB Assessment Forms
Upland Data Sheets Lj Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
❑✓ Landscape Photos,ifiakon
Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
® Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
® Locations of photo stations
s Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
Supporting Jurisdictional hr£ormation (£or Approved JDs only)
Approved jurisdictional Determination Forms) (also known as "Rapanos
Forms)")
Maps) depicting the potential (or lack of potential) hydrologic connection(s),
adjacency, etc, to navigable waters.
Version: December 2013 PagIN

FROM FILED
PHONE No. : 336 676 7268
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
P120PERTY INFORMATION
Tun. 23 2014 05:14PM P2
t`
ProiectName:
Filer
Property
Address:
Patterson Road
piN:
Cumberland Co. 9493-91-5514 (135A5 Ac.),
0403- M792 (26,66 Act), 9493-91-5514 (7.4 Act)
Robeson Co. 9493718612 SI Ac 9493809780 47.4 Ac
County:
Cumberland and Robeson
OWNER INFORMATION
Name:
Henrietta Filer
Mailing Address:
420 E Crcekview 1]rive, loam stead NC 28443
Telephone Number:
1 910-319-00652
E-mail Address:
I bhfiler ,charter.net
The undersigned, registered property owners) of the above noted property, do hereby
authorize mr, Hal Owen of Hal Owen & Associates, Ina to act on my/our behalf and
tako all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of jurisdictional
determinations, CWA Section 401 and 404 permits and certifications, and any and all
standard and special conditions attached.
IIWe aiso authorize representativesfrom the US Army Corps of Engineers to enter the
above noted property foe tho purpose of making a Jurisdictional Determination.
I We hereby certify the above Information submitted in this application is true and
accurate to the best of my/our knowledge.
This authorization will remain in effect for (5) five years unless revoked by the
undersigned in writing.
Authorized Signature
(Please legibly print name here:
Authorized Signature
(Please legibly print name here:
Date
Title Dat®

Property Records for Robeson County parcels
If you End any issues with this data, please contact us at maycards r co.robeson.ne.us
M AP'NO. i.-.BzOCK LOT
40T SIZEat ACREAGE
NUMER,IC
INDEX
!3
I
47:4 ACS,
12.1
DESCRIPTION
TAXING
DISTRICT
East of SR 1710
but not
adjoining
pa TH ,
OWNER'S NAME
ADDRESS
DECO DECO
IDLE
PATE
1'
Eller,
Itenrietta
4201 Stonehenge
Road
853
40
2-20-
ereonsboro, NC
27406
1994
2.
3.
4.
S,
Sf you End any issues with this data, please contact us at rnancards(rD_,ep.roUeson. nc.us
7L•OT
LOT SIZEor"dCREA4E
NUMERIC CODEX
�81:OCK
3
1 1
1
68 i7 Ac. (cai,)
ROBESON COUNTY,N.0
DESCRIPTION R1 ADS. ACCe S.Sc
TAXING DISTRICT
East of S, R, 01710 on County Line ?
Parktoa Township
OriNER'5 NAMEADDRESS
DE90
COOK
PA
NO. GE
OGE
DATE
1.
Filer, Henrietta Taylor
2721 Southvieci Dr,
8Z
352
3-8-38
Birmingham, Ala. Mitt
2,
I3
I
4.
6,
ALL STATES AERIAL SURVEY&., INC,
Filer Property

Vicinity Map Filer Property, Robeson and Cumberland Counties NC
� n 3
1003 ( i I llly Rl
tf(JCi lufyl7T.S f� -, %.�
Y'=P0'1t3•,
f,1 Si 1266
nockfidl Camp{ -)
�
and RelTeal Centera,.
c a t 1115 N,Us�'.;vi Ad
S
gad
sr kIid � O�a4 n10 Val � a i
U d"
Filer Property os
Rd
1713
P�
i T12
1714
(TI
I T15 T16 v
Qa
a
�C
1f
I715 �
1T12 (71
Park(4n
1T31
4,a
I T20
f, T23
1
I T25 'SU
T31 I�u 'end
� �t
C ;oosi;(c
301
1T23
I ;Ya
hlap data T2014 Google�y Litemode 7
Center coordinates for the site are 34.939266 latitude and-79.004239 longitude.
filer Property, Robeson and Cumberland Counties NC

PARKTON QUADRANGLE
NORTH CAROLINA
7.5-MINUTE SERIES (2013)
SCALE 1:24 000
I 03 0 I:ItOh'iTCAS 1 2
12�0 ,ea 0 MCTERS tt�7 1N
03 0
MUS
IG^f.3 6 1O1U 1tOO X-J) 40t sroo i3;C0 rM OW) 900J ICw]

HOPE MILLS QUADRANGLE
NOlVfH CAROL1NA
7.5•MINUTE SERIES (2013)
"713
)5
"67
SCALE 1:24 000
I b3 0 KIlOk9EURS 1 2
Iv"A ID 0 AFCIIRS few 20)
05 d
"Us
IGK"0 0 IG,TI 21A0 ddd) 8doo SC0) fL:A04 8003
._ Sm

Sol Map —Cumberland County, NoM Carolina, an<I Robeson County, NoNt Carolina
(Filer Property)
MAP LEGEND
Area of
Inteeesl (AOI)
L J
Area of lnlerest (A01)
Sogs
�....�
Sol Nap unit Polygons
z-0
Sol Map U,lt lines
17
Sol Nap Unit Points
Special Point Features
(;)
Blovom
Bomr Pit
Gay Spot
Gazed Depression
Privet Pit
„
Gravelly Spot
Landin
Lava Flow
u
Marsh or sawmp
hMaii Ovany
0
Miscellaneous Water
0
Perennial Water
V
Rock Gulcrop
+
Saline Spot
Sandy Spol
iii
severely Eroded Spot
®
Sinkhole
le
Side or Shp
sf
Sadc Spot
MAP INFORMATION
� Spot Area
Thesoii surveys that comprise your AOl were mapped al scales
ranging from 1:20,000 to 1:24,000.
SlanySpol
Please rely on bar scale on each map sheet for map
(� VeryBtany Spot
measurements.
vicl Spot
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
A ONer
Web Soil Survey URL hllplAvebsoilsurvey.nres.uschi
Coordinate System: Web Merealor(EPSG:3S57)
OM Special line Features
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
Water Features
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
Streams and Ganda
distance and area. A projection that pteserves area, such as the
Transportation
others equal-area coi projection, should be used If more accurate
calwlations of distance or area are required.
1-H Rats
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS comfort data as of
mar Interstate Highways
the version date(s) listed below.
US Poulos
Soil Survey Area: Cumberland County, North Carolina
Major Reads
Survey Area Data: Version 13. Dec 20,2013
_ Loral Roads
Soil Survey Area: Robeson County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data Version 11, Deci6, 2013
background
Aerial Photography
Your area of interest (AD[) includes more than one soil survey area.
These survey areas may have been mapped at different scales, with
a different land use in mind, at different times, or at different levels
of detail. This may result in map unit symbols, soil properties, and
interpretations that do not completely agree across soil surveyarea
boundaries.
Soiimap units are labeled (asspace alkays)formapscales 1:50,000
orlarger.
Dales) aerial images were photographed: Mar7,2010—Apr3,
2011
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting
of map unit boundaries may be evident.
USp� Natural Resources Web Sol Survey 7/2/2014
Conservation Servico National Cooperative Shc Survey Paget of3

Soil Map-Cumbedand County, North Carolina, and Robeson County, North Carolina
Map Unit Legend
Filer Property
Cumberland County, North Carolina (NC051)
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres In AOI
Percent of AOI
AuA
Autryville loamy sand, 0 to 2
percent slopes
51.1
7.4%
BaD
Blaney loamy sand, 8 to 15
percent slopes
0.9
0.1 %
GoA
Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2
percent slopes
50.0
7.2 %
LaB
Lakeland sand, 1 to 8 percent
slopes
10.8
1.6%
Ly
Lynchburg sandy loam
2.8
0.4%
Mc
McColl loam
17.8
2.6%
NoA
Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2
percent slopes
102.6
14.9%
Pg
Pantego loam
8.6
1.2%
Ra -
Rains sandy loam
42.6
6.2%
W
Water
0.0
0.0%
WaB
Wagram loamy sand, 0 to 6
percent slopes
0.5
0.1
we
Woodinglon loamy sand
53.5
7.8%
Subtotals for Soil Survey Area
341.2
49.4%
Totals for Area of Interest
690.0
100.0 %
Robeson County, North Carolina (NC155)
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
Co
Coxville loam
10.8
1.6%
GoA
Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2
percent slopes
87.0
12.6%
LaB
Lakeland sand, 0 to 6 percent
slopes
11.8
13
Ly
Lynchburg sandy loam
12.4
1.8%
NoA
Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2
percent slopes
18.9
2.7%
Pg
Pantego fine sandy loam
59.9
8.7%
Re
Rains sandy loam
142.9
20.7%
WkB
Wakulla sand, 0 to 6 percent
slopes
5.2
03
Subtotals for Soil Survey Area
346.9
50.6%
Totals for Area of Interest
690.0
100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soll Survey 7/2/2014
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
project/site: Filer Property city/County: Cumberland & Robeson
Applicant/owner: Henrietta Filer state: NC
Invesligator(s): Krissina Newcomb Section, Township, Range:
Landfomr (hillslope, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P MLRA 133A Let:
Soil Ma Unit Name: Ra - Rains sandy loam
Locat relief (concave, convex, none):
P
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this Gme of year? Yes X
Are Vegetation _. Soil _, or Hydrology_ significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation _, Soil _, or Hydrology X naturally problematic?
Long:
Sam Date: 24 June 2014
Sampling Point: 1
slope (%): 1
Datum:
NWlclassification: PF041B
No _ (h no, explain in Remarks)
'Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No _
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophylic Vegetation Presenl7
Yes
X
No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes
X
No
within a Wetland? Yes X No
I
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
No
Site recently timbered (summer 2013).
HYDROLOGY
Pdmary Indicators (minimum of one is required• check all chat aoolvl _Sudace Soil Cracks (65)
_ Surface Water (A1)
_
High Water Table (A2)
_ Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (131)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613)
_ Marl Deposits I (LRR U)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C8)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Iran Deposits (65)
_Other (Explain inRemarks)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
_ Water -Stained Leaves(139)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): X
Water Table Present? Yes _ No Depth (inches): _
Saturation Present? Yes _ No X Depth (inches):
Sparsely Vegetated Concave
Surface (BS)
_ Drainage Patterns (B78)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
_ FAG -Neutral Test (D5)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No®
The dry
Sparsely Vegetated Concave
Surface (BS)
_ Drainage Patterns (B78)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
_ FAG -Neutral Test (D5)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No®
The dry
season began around May. No evidence
of hydrologic manipulation
was observed,
nor any
nearby ditches that could be draining the
area. During a site visit at
the beginning of May, some
of this area exhibited inundation.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 1
30ft radius
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
Absolute
%coverSpecies?
Dominant Indicator
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
21
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
3,
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (Ayg)
5.
6.
50%of total cover:
Saollna Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
1.
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Prevalence Index worksheeL•
Total %Cover of: Multiply by
OBL species x i =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
2.
3.
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4
5.
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A=
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50%of total cover:
20% of total cover: 19
_ t - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
1. Liquidambar styracaflua
80
Yes FAC
X 2 - Dominance Test is>50%
_ 3- Prevalence Index is 53.01
Problematic Hydrophylic Vegetation' (Explain)
ynmcators of hyddc soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Vaccinlum
corymbosum
5 No FACW
3. Quercus nigra 5 No FAC
4, Acer rubrum 5 No FAC
5
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
0
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50%of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
47.5
95 = Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woodyvines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) a more In height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) a larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
3
Yes FAC
Sapling- Woody plants, excluding woodyvines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more In height and less
than 31n. (7.6 cm) DBH.
2. Quercus nigra 3 Yes FAC
3. Clethra alnifolia 3 Yes FACW
4
Leucothoe axillaris
3
Yes FACW
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 it It to 6 m) in height.
5.
g
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
71
plants, except woody vines, less then approximately
s,
3 it (1 m) in height.
01
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
10,
it.
12
=Total Cover
50%of total cover:
6
20% Of
total cover: 2A
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
1. Vitis rotundifolia
10
Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
50% of total cover:
5
10 = Total Cover
20% Of total cover: 2
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Site was timbered in the summer of
2013,
A few
seed pines were left standing, but otherwise there are no
tree or sapling vegetation layers.
US Army Caps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Pant:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth
needed to document the Indicator or confirm
the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(Inches) Color (moist) %
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Twe Loc
Texture Remarks
0-18 10YR 3/1 100
L
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solle:
Hislosol (Al)
_ PolWalue Belau Surface (88) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_
Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (1718) (outside MLRA 150A, 6)
_
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (Fi9) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A&) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
_
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (FS)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
_ Thick Dark Surface (At 2)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) 31ndicatas of hydrophyt(c vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
X Umbric Surface (1713) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (St) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 161)
unless disturbed a problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A0 150B)
Sandy Redox (85)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719) (MLRA 149A)
_
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (Inches):
Hydric Sol] Present? Yes )( No
Remarks:
US Army Caps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Pro)ecusite: Filer Property City/county: Cumberland & Robeson
AppllcanUOwner: Henrietta Filer
Investigator(s): Krissina Newcomb Section, Township, Range: _
Sampling Date: 24 June 2014
Slate: NC Sampling Point: 2
Lendform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P MLRA 133A Let: Long:
Soil Map Unit Name: LaB - Lakeland sand 0 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification:
slope (%): 3
Datwn:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this 6me of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil., or Hydrology_ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil .,or Hydrology. naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophyllc Vegetation Present?
Yes X
No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes ^
No X
within a Wetland? Yes No X
Welland Hydrology Present?
Yes
No X
Site recently timbered (summer 2013).
HYDROLOGY
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is recuiredcheck all that anoty) _Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface
Water (Al)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Water Marks(B1)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Drift Deposits (W)
Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave
Surface (BB)
_ Mad Deposits (1315) (LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry -Season Water Table (02)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C?)
Iron Deposits (65)
_ _Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (69)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): X
Water Table Present? Yes _ No Depth (Inches):
Saturation Present? Yes _ No X Depth (inches):
1i-TirR.g�A
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ PAC -Neutral Test (135)
_ Sphagnum moss (08) (LRR T, U)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No %(
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0
1i-TirR.g�A
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ PAC -Neutral Test (135)
_ Sphagnum moss (08) (LRR T, U)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No %(
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
1
e Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
That Are 06L, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
3.
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, a FAC: (AB)
6.
50%of total cover:
Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
=Total Cover
20%of trial cover:
Prevalence Index worksheef:
Total %Cover of: Multiply bv:
OBLSapling
FAC species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
2.
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index = BlA=
=
Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators:
50%of total cover:
20 %of total cover:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
1. Liauidambar stvracaflua
2. Carya glabra
3. Prunus serotina
40
10
5
Yes FAC
No FACU
No FACU
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
—3- Prevalence Index Is:;3.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hyddc soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
q, RhUS COpa1110Um 5 No UPL
5. Magnoliayirginlana No FACW
61
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
62 =
Total Cover
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
50%of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radlUS )
1, Smilax rotundifolia
31 20%of total cover: 12A
1 Yes FAC
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more In height and 31n,
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling— Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 R (6 m) or more in height and less
Than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
2. egg is irg niana 1 Yes FAC
3.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 R (1 to 6 m) in height.
41
5.
Herb —Ail herbaceous (non -woody) plants, Including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
6
71
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
g
3 it (1 m) in height.
01
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
10,
11.
2 =
Total Cover
50 % of total cover:
�_ 20% of
total cover: 0A
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
51
Hydrophytic
50% of total cover:
=Total Cover
20 % of total cover:
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No®
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations
Site was timbered in the summer of
below).
2013, A few
seed pines were
left standing, but otherwise there are no
tree or sapling vegetation layers.
US Army Caps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: 2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth
needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type] Loc
Texture Remarks
0.7 10YR 5/3
LS
7-22 2.5Y 6/6
_ _
LS
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Deplellon, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL=Pae Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solis':
_ Histosd (Al)
_ Polyvalue Belau Surface (88) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Hlstic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Hlstic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Verlic (F78) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Solis (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
s Organic Bodies (AS) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(PALRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (177)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (178)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Mad (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochre (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (At 2)
_ Iran -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
31ndicato s of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Praide Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbdc Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (81) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Verlic (F78) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Solis (1719) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes. No X
Remarks:
US Army Caps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
project/site: Filer Property city/county: Cumberland & Robeson sampling Date: 7 May 2014
Applicant/Owner: Henrietta Filer state: NC Sampling Point: 3
rivesligator(s): Krissina Newcomb Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P MLRA 133A Lae
Soil Map Unit Name: Ra - Rains sandy loam
Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Long:
NWI classification:
Datum:
PF04
Are
climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical
for thts time of year! Yes X
No _ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are
Vegetation Soil
or Hydrology
_ significantly disturbed?
Are `Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are
Vegetation _, Soil
_, or Hydrology
_ naturally problematic?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytlo Vegetation Present? Yes
No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes X
No
within a Wetland? Yes No X
Welland Hydrology Present?
Yes
No
Remarks:
This data sheet is
composed from
notes taken at
the site and is incomplete.
HYDROLOGY
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reouired
check all that aoalvl
_Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (All _
Aquatic Fauna (813)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (610)
_ Saturation (A3) —
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_, Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (81) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (03)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (82) _
Presence bf Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (CB)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C(l)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
Iron Deposits (65) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Sphagnum moss (DB) (LRR T, U)
Surface VJaler Presenl7
Yes _
No X
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?
Yes
No X(
an ((nc ies,
>30
Saturation Present?
Yes
No X
Depth (inches):
>30
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes.
No %(
Includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge,
monitoring
well, aerial photos,
previous inspections), if available:
Remarks: Start of dry
season, however no apparent water table or saturation was observed within 30
inches of the
soil surface.
A deep
ditch is located south of
this observation point and bisects this bay. It
appears this
area has been drained.
US Army Corps of Engineers AUan(ic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
% Cover Species Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Quercus nigra
That Are OBL, FACW, a FAC: (A)
2. Liquidambar styracaflua
Total Number of Dominant
3. Ilex ooaca
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
50%of total cover:
Saollno Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
1
20% of total cover:
Total %Cover of: Multiply by.*
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
2 -
3
41
5.
61
Prevalence Index = BrA=
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30ft (adIUS )
_
_ 2- Dominance Test is>50%
1.
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
2.
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
41
'Indicators of hyddc soil and wetland hydrology must
6
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
6.
=Total Cover
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
50 % of total cover:
20% of total cover:
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (OBH).
1. Smilax rotundifolia
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2
approximately 20 it (6 m) a more In height and less
then 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
3.
4.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
5
6.
Herb —AII herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
7
8.
3 It (1 m) in height.
9.
Woody vine —All woody vines, regardless of height.
10,
11.
= Total Cover
509A of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius }
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50%of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present?
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations
below).
US Army Caps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth
needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Tme Loc
Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 3/2
3-9 10YR 6/1
9-18 10YR 6/1 95
10YR 5/6 5 C M
18-24 10YR 6/1 60
10YR 5/6 40 C M
24-30 10YR 5/6
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solls":
_ Histosd (Al)
_ Polyvalue Belau Surface (88) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Hlstic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S. T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (171) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150")
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (173)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (178)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (AS) (LRR P, T)
_ Mad (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (1712) (LRR O, P, T)
"Indicators of hydrephytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P. T, U)
welland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochdo (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (84)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Sandy Redox (85)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (86)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1720) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Sell Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Caps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

£ 5N E.,:� fie' �✓ f .h ,.'/' ¢
ee
DAL
ie
f b
vy

Barnhill - GoA Lateral_Effect_Summary.txt
********************************************************************************
----Lateral Effect Program Summary ----
Application of Skaggs Method
Copyright 2006-2014. Brian D Phillips, R Wayne Skaggs, G M Chescheir
North Carolina State University Dept of Biological & Agricultural Engineering
Version: 2.8.1.0
Project Run Date and Time: 11/1/2018 7:56:12 AM
Output Filename: C:\LateralEffect\outputs\Lateral_Effect_Summary.txt
********************************************************************************
Project Information
Project : Barnhill Pit - GoA
User: DREED
Company / Agency: Balfour Beatty / Branch Civil
Department:
Project Location: Robeson County
Project Coordinates: 34d56'32"N 79D00'14"W
Soil ID: GoA
Notes:
Site Parameters
------------------------------------------------------------------
State: North Carolina
County / Parish: Cumberland
Surface Storage: 1_inch_(2.5_cm)
Ditch Depth or Depth to Water Surface: 2 ft
Depth to Restrictive Layer: 25 ft
Drainable Porosity: 0.04
Hydroperiod: 14 days
User defined T25 or Default T25: DEFAULT
T25 value: 8.4 days
User Conductivity or Soil Survey Conductivity: SOIL SURVEY
Weighted Hydraulic Conductivity: 1.7610 in/hr
Hydraulic Conductivity Data by Layer for Soil: GoA _Goldsboro
Weighted Hydraulic Conductivity Calculated Using: Average K Values
Bottom Depth in Low K in/hr High K in/hr Average K in/hr
Layer 1 8.00 1.98 19.98 10.98423
Page 1

Barnhill - GoA Lateral_Effect_Summary.txt
Layer
2
15.00
1.98
19.98
Layer
3
45.00
0.57
1.98
Layer
4
300
0.57
1.98
Layer
5
0.00
0.00
0.00
Layer
6
0.00
0.00
0.00
Layer
7
0.00
0.00
0.00
Layer
8
0.00
0.00
0.00
----------------------------------------------
Lateral Effect: 153.5 ft
Page 2
10.98423
1.275588
1.275588
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

Barnhill - NoA Lateral_Effect_Summary.txt
********************************************************************************
----Lateral Effect Program Summary ----
Application of Skaggs Method
Copyright 2006-2014. Brian D Phillips, R Wayne Skaggs, G M Chescheir
North Carolina State University Dept of Biological & Agricultural Engineering
Version: 2.8.1.0
Project Run Date and Time: 11/1/2018 7:57:37 AM
Output Filename: C:\LateralEffect\outputs\Lateral_Effect_Summary.txt
********************************************************************************
Project Information
Project : Barnhill Pit - NoA
User: DREED
Company / Agency: Balfour Beatty / Branch Civil
Department:
Project Location: Robeson County
Project Coordinates: 34d56'32"N 79D00'14"W
Soil ID: NoA
Notes:
Site Parameters
------------------------------------------------------------------
State: North Carolina
County / Parish: Cumberland
Surface Storage: 1_inch_(2.5_cm)
Ditch Depth or Depth to Water Surface: 2 ft
Depth to Restrictive Layer: 25 ft
Drainable Porosity: 0.04
Hydroperiod: 14 days
User defined T25 or Default T25: DEFAULT
T25 value: 8.4 days
User Conductivity or Soil Survey Conductivity: SOIL SURVEY
Weighted Hydraulic Conductivity: 1.7287 in/hr
Hydraulic Conductivity Data by Layer for Soil: NoA _Norfolk
Weighted Hydraulic Conductivity Calculated Using: Average K Values
Bottom Depth in Low K in/hr High K in/hr Average K in/hr
Layer 1 9.00 1.98 19.98 10.98423
Page 1

Barnhill - NoA Lateral_Effect_Summary.txt
Layer
2
14.00
1.98
19.98
Layer
3
70.00
0.57
1.98
Layer
4
300
0.57
1.98
Layer
5
0.00
0.00
0.00
Layer
6
0.00
0.00
0.00
Layer
7
0.00
0.00
0.00
Layer
8
0.00
0.00
0.00
----------------------------------------------
Lateral Effect: 152.1 ft
Page 2
10.98423
1.275588
1.275588
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

Barnhill - Ra Lateral_Effect_Summary.txt
********************************************************************************
----Lateral Effect Program Summary ----
Application of Skaggs Method
Copyright 2006-2014. Brian D Phillips, R Wayne Skaggs, G M Chescheir
North Carolina State University Dept of Biological & Agricultural Engineering
Version: 2.8.1.0
Project Run Date and Time: 11/1/2018 7:59:04 AM
Output Filename: C:\LateralEffect\outputs\Lateral_Effect_Summary.txt
********************************************************************************
Project Information
Project : Barnhill Pit - Ra
User: DREED
Company / Agency: Balfour Beatty / Branch Civil
Department:
Project Location: Robeson County
Project Coordinates: 34d56'32"N 79D00'14"W
Soil ID: Ra
Notes:
Site Parameters
------------------------------------------------------------------
State: North Carolina
County / Parish: Cumberland
Surface Storage: 1_inch_(2.5_cm)
Ditch Depth or Depth to Water Surface: 2 ft
Depth to Restrictive Layer: 25 ft
Drainable Porosity: 0.04
Hydroperiod: 14 days
User defined T25 or Default T25: DEFAULT
T25 value: 8.4 days
User Conductivity or Soil Survey Conductivity: SOIL SURVEY
Weighted Hydraulic Conductivity: 1.2371 in/hr
Hydraulic Conductivity Data by Layer for Soil: Ra_Rains—drained
Weighted Hydraulic Conductivity Calculated Using: Average K Values
Bottom Depth in Low K in/hr High K in/hr Average K in/hr
Layer 1 7.00 1.98 5.95 3.968496
Page 1

Barnhill - Ra
Layer
2
12.00
1.98
Layer
3
20.00
0.57
Layer
4
62.00
0.57
Layer
5
300
0.20
Layer
6
0.00
0.00
Layer
7
0.00
0.00
Layer
8
0.00
0.00
Lateral Effect: 128.7 ft
Lateral_Effect_Summary.txt
5.95
3.968496
1.98
1.275588
1.98
1.275588
1.98
1.0913364
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Page 2

Received: 08 / 2 11 2U 18
BORROW PIT/WASTE AREA INFORMATION FORM FOR
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW State Historic
Please Print or Type Preservation Office
County Cumberland Pit Name Barnhill Acreage_84.
Highway Project No. and Description U-2519 Fayetteville Outer Loop ER 18-2135
Contractor Balfour Beatty Infrastructure Inc, c/o Dail Reed
Company and Contact Name Due -- $' 29' 18
430 Eastwood Road, Suite 200
Street Address or P.O. Sox A- & rj
Wilmington NC 28403
Town, State, Zip Code
910-599-1911 (Cell) 910-595-4306 (Fax) Due
Telephone/Fax Numbers
8/20/2018 s
Date Submitted
ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES
1. Are there any buildings or structures on the project site? (Include abandoned barns, farmhouses,
tobacco sheds, bridges, etc.)
Googie earth showed an old farmhouse, it has been demolished.
2. If yes, submit one set of photographs of any structures which appear to have been built before World War II
(Polaroid -type snapshots are okay). Photos should show the front and one side of structure and area behind
structure.
ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
1. Present and previous land uses of the proposed borrow area.
Agricultural farm and woodland
2. What kind of site preparation, if any, has taken place on the project site?
Test Holes and environmental evaluation
3. Have anv artifacts (arrowheads, pottery, etc.) been found on the site?
None to our Knowledge
4. Are any marked or unmarked cemeteries located within the proposed pit area?
None
5, Has the area been surveyed by an archaeologist? If ves, give the name of the archaeologist and the date of the
survey, if know. NO
Please attach a copy of a map showing the exact location of the proposed borrow pit/waste area. A portion
of an identified USGS quad sheet is preferred and will ensure timely review of your project. Submit the
completed form and map to: Renee Gledhill -Earley, Environmental Review Coordinator, State Historic
Preservation Office, 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-4617 (telephone [phone]).
**Allow at least thirty days for our review and comment**
We have no comment on the project as proposed.
Additional information is needed to complete our review.
An archaeological survey is recommended.
��6Signed: Date:
Renee Gledhill -Earley
i ehruary 2008
AUG 2 2 2018

USDA United States
Department of
Agriculture
N RCS
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Cumberland County, North
Carolina, and Robeson
County, North Carolina
BARNHILL MINE
October 1, 2018

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nres/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nres142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
2

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone] (voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
3

Contents
Preface............................................................................................................. .
How Soil Surveys Are Made...........................................................................
SoilMap............................................................................................................
SoilMap.........................................................................................................
Legend...........................................................................................................
MapUnit Legend............................................................................................
MapUnit Descriptions....................................................................................
Cumberland County, North Carolina..........................................................
AuA—Autryville loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes ................................
GoA—Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Southern Coastal
Plain.................................................................................................
LaB—Lakeland sand, 1 to 8 percent slopes ...........................................
Ly—Lynchburg sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes .................................
NoA—Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes ...................................
Pg—Pantego loam..................................................................................
Ra—Rains sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes ........................................
Wo—Woodington loamy sand................................................................
Robeson County, North Carolina................................................................
GoA—Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Southern Coastal
Plain.................................................................................................
LaB—Lakeland sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes ...........................................
Ly—Lynchburg sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes .................................
NoA—Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes ...................................
Pg—Pantego fine sandy loam................................................................
Ra—Rains sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes ........................................
WkB—Wakulla sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes ............................................
References...................................................................................................... .
.2
.5
.8
..9
10
12
12
15
15
16
17
18
19
20
22
24
26
26
27
28
29
31
32
34
36
4

How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil
5

Custom Soil Resource Report
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil -landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
0

Custom Soil Resource Report
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.
7

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
0

681400
34° 56' 45" N
34° 564" N
Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
681600 681800 682000 682200 682400 682600
681400 681600 681800 682000
3
Map Scale: 1:6,160 if printed on B landscape (17" x 11") sheet.
Meters N
0 50 100 200 300
Few
0 250 500 1000 1500
Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
682800
682200 682400 682600 682800 683000 683200 683400
3
a"
34' 56' 45' N
1
34' 564" N
683600
3
N

MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
0
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
0
Soil Map Unit Polygons
im 0
Soil Map Unit Lines
■
Soil Map Unit Points
Special
Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
.4
Gravelly Spot
0
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
+
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
oa
Sodic Spot
Custom Soil Resource Report
A
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
+�
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
�}}
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
a
Aerial Photography
MAP INFORMATION
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at scales
ranging from 1:20,000 to 1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Cumberland County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 19, Sep 10, 2018
Soil Survey Area: Robeson County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 16, Sep 10, 2018
Your area of interest (AOI) includes more than one soil survey
area. These survey areas may have been mapped at different
scales, with a different land use in mind, at different times, or at
different levels of detail. This may result in map unit symbols, soil
properties, and interpretations that do not completely agree
across soil survey area boundaries.
10

MAP LEGEND
Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP INFORMATION
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jun 15, 2015—Dec 4,
2017
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shiftina of maD unit boundaries may be evident.
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
AuA
Autryville loamy sand, 0 to 2
percent slopes
0.2
43.0
0.1 %
20.3%
GoA
Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2
percent slopes, Southern
Coastal Plain
LaB
Lakeland sand, 1 to 8 percent
slopes
3.1
1.4%
Ly
Lynchburg sandy loam, 0 to 2
percent slopes
2.8
1.3%
NoA
Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2
percent slopes
70.0
33.0%
Pg
Pantego loam
0.5
0.2%
Ra
Rains sandy loam, 0 to 2
percent slopes
27.9
13.2%
Wo
Woodington loamy sand
48.5
22.9%
Subtotals for Soil Survey Area
195.9
92.4%
Totals for Area of Interest
212.0
100.0%
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
GoA
Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2
3.2
1.5%
percent slopes, Southern
Coastal Plain
LaB
Lakeland sand, 0 to 6 percent
1.9
0.9%
slopes
Ly
Lynchburg sandy loam, 0 to 2
1.8
0.9%
percent slopes
NoA
Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2
5.2
2.5%
percent slopes
Pg
Pantego fine sandy loam
0.2
0.1 %
Ra
Rains sandy loam, 0 to 2
1.4
0.7%
percent slopes
WkB
Wakulla sand, 0 to 6 percent
2.3
1.1 %
slopes
Subtotals for Soil Survey Area
16.1
7.6%
Totals for Area of Interest
212.0
100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
Iandform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
Cumberland County, North Carolina
AuA—Autryville loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: w6yt
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Autryville and similar soils: 90 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Autryville
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, ridges on marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder, summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Sandy and loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 9 inches: loamy sand
E and B - 9 to 26 inches: loamy sand
Bt - 26 to 46 inches: sandy loam
E' - 46 to 58 inches: loamy sand
B't - 58 to 85 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 48 to 72 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Low (about 5.0 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
15

Custom Soil Resource Report
GoA—Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Southern Coastal
Plain
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2v750
Elevation: 110 to 300 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Goldsboro and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Goldsboro
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 9 inches: loamy sand
E - 9 to 12 inches: loamy sand
Bt - 12 to 62 inches: sandy clay loam
Btg - 62 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Moderately well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 24 to 36 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 8.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
16

Custom Soil Resource Report
Minor Components
Norfolk
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Convex, linear
Across -slope shape: Convex, linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Lynchburg
Percent of map unit: 7 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
LaB—Lakeland sand, 1 to 8 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: w714
Elevation: 160 to 660 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 52 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 245 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Lakeland and similar soils: 80 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Lakeland
Setting
Landform: Low hills
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Sandy marine deposits and/or eolian sands
Typical profile
A - 0 to 6 inches: sand
C1 - 6 to 48 inches: sand
C2 - 48 to 80 inches: sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
17

Custom Soil Resource Report
Natural drainage class: Excessively drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (5.95
to 19.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Low (about 4.0 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: Dry Sandy Upland Woodland (F137XY001GA)
Hydric soil rating: No
Ly—Lynchburg sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2vx8p
Elevation: 10 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Lynchburg and similar soils: 84 percent
Minor components: 16 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Lynchburg
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: sandy loam
E - 8 to 11 inches: sandy loam
Bt - 11 to 21 inches: sandy clay loam
Btg - 21 to 65 inches: sandy clay loam
BCg - 65 to 85 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
18

Custom Soil Resource Report
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 6 to 18 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 6.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Goldsboro
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Rains
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip, talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
NoA—Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2v75w
Elevation: 10 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Norfolk and similar soils: 83 percent
Minor components: 17 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Norfolk
Setting
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
19

Custom Soil Resource Report
Down -slope shape: Convex, linear
Across -slope shape: Convex, linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: loamy sand
E - 8 to 14 inches: loamy sand
Bt - 14 to 65 inches: sandy clay loam
BC - 65 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 40 to 72 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 6.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 1
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Goldsboro
Percent of map unit: 9 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Wagram
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, ridges on marine
terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest, talf
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Pg—Pantego loam
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: w71 p
20

Custom Soil Resource Report
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Pantego, drained, and similar soils: 80 percent
Pantego, undrained, and similar soils: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Pantego, Drained
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Concave
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 10 inches: loam
A - 10 to 18 inches: loam
Bt - 18 to 27 inches: sandy clay loam
Btg - 27 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Very poorly drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: Rare
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: High (about 10.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Pantego, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Concave
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 18 inches: loam
Bt - 18 to 27 inches: sandy clay loam
Btg - 27 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 1 percent
21

Custom Soil Resource Report
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Very poorly drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: Rare
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: High (about 10.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Ra—Rains sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2v760
Elevation: 30 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Rains, undrained, and similar soils: 58 percent
Rains, drained, and similar soils: 24 percent
Minor components: 18 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Rains, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, carolina bays on marine terraces, broad
interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip, talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 6 inches: sandy loam
Eg - 6 to 12 inches: sandy loam
Btg - 12 to 65 inches: sandy clay loam
BCg - 65 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
22

Custom Soil Resource Report
Natural drainage class: Poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.20 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Rains, Drained
Setting
Landform: Carolina bays on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine
terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip, talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 6 inches: sandy loam
Eg - 6 to 12 inches: sandy loam
Btg - 12 to 65 inches: sandy clay loam
BCg - 65 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.20 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 12 to 36 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Minor Components
Lynchburg
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
23

Custom Soil Resource Report
Pantego, undrained
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Landform: Stream terraces, flats, broad interstream divides
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread, talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Concave
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Wo—Woodington loamy sand
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: w72s
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Woodington, drained, and similar soils: 80 percent
Woodington, undrained, and similar soils: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Woodington, Drained
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, depressions on marine terraces, broad
interstream divides on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Concave
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 4 inches: loamy sand
E - 4 to 12 inches: loamy sand
Btg - 12 to 47 inches: sandy loam
Cg - 47 to 85 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.0 inches)
24

Custom Soil Resource Report
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Woodington, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, depressions on marine terraces, broad
interstream divides on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Concave
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 4 inches: loamy sand
E - 4 to 12 inches: loamy sand
Btg - 12 to 47 inches: sandy loam
Cg - 47 to 85 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.0 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
25

Custom Soil Resource Report
Robeson County, North Carolina
GoA—Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Southern Coastal
Plain
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2v750
Elevation: 110 to 300 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Goldsboro and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Goldsboro
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 9 inches: loamy sand
E - 9 to 12 inches: loamy sand
Bt - 12 to 62 inches: sandy clay loam
Btg - 62 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Moderately well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 24 to 36 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 8.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Norfolk
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
26

Custom Soil Resource Report
Down -slope shape: Convex, linear
Across -slope shape: Convex, linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Lynchburg
Percent of map unit: 7 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
LaB—Lakeland sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3vfb
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Lakeland and similar soils: 80 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Lakeland
Setting
Landform: Ridges on marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder, summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Sandy marine deposits and/or eolian sands
Typical profile
A - 0 to 6 inches: sand
C1 - 6 to 48 inches: sand
C2 - 48 to 80 inches: sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Excessively drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (5.95
to 19.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
27

Custom Soil Resource Report
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Low (about 4.0 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Leon
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Concave
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Ly—Lynchburg sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2vx8p
Elevation: 10 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Lynchburg and similar soils: 84 percent
Minor components: 16 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Lynchburg
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: sandy loam
E - 8 to 11 inches: sandy loam
Bt - 11 to 21 inches: sandy clay loam
Btg - 21 to 65 inches: sandy clay loam
BCg - 65 to 85 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
28

Custom Soil Resource Report
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 6 to 18 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 6.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Goldsboro
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Rains
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip, talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
NoA—Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2v75w
Elevation: 10 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Norfolk and similar soils: 83 percent
Minor components: 17 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
29

Custom Soil Resource Report
Description of Norfolk
Setting
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Convex, linear
Across -slope shape: Convex, linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: loamy sand
E - 8 to 14 inches: loamy sand
Bt - 14 to 65 inches: sandy clay loam
BC - 65 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 40 to 72 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 6.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 1
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Goldsboro
Percent of map unit: 9 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Wagram
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, ridges on marine
terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest, talf
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
30

Custom Soil Resource Report
Pg—Pantego fine sandy loam
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3vfq
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Pantego, drained, and similar soils: 80 percent
Pantego, undrained, and similar soils: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Pantego, Drained
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Concave
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 10 inches: loam
A - 10 to 18 inches: loam
Bt - 18 to 27 inches: sandy clay loam
Btg - 27 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Very poorly drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: Rare
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: High (about 10.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
31

Custom Soil Resource Report
Description of Pantego, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Concave
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 18 inches: loam
Bt - 18 to 27 inches: sandy clay loam
Btg - 27 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Very poorly drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: Rare
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: High (about 10.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Ra—Rains sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2v760
Elevation: 30 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Rains, undrained, and similar soils: 58 percent
Rains, drained, and similar soils: 24 percent
Minor components: 18 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
32

Custom Soil Resource Report
Description of Rains, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Carolina bays on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine
terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip, talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 6 inches: sandy loam
Eg - 6 to 12 inches: sandy loam
Btg - 12 to 65 inches: sandy clay loam
BCg - 65 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.20 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Rains, Drained
Setting
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces,
carolina bays on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip, talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 6 inches: sandy loam
Eg - 6 to 12 inches: sandy loam
Btg - 12 to 65 inches: sandy clay loam
BCg - 65 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.20 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 12 to 36 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
33

Custom Soil Resource Report
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Minor Components
Lynchburg
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Pantego, undrained
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Landform: Stream terraces, flats, broad interstream divides
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread, talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Concave
Hydric soil rating: Yes
WkB—Wakulla sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3vg5
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Wakulla and similar soils: 90 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Wakulla
Setting
Landform: Ridges on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine
terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder, summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
34

Custom Soil Resource Report
Parent material: Sandy and loamy marine deposits and/or eolian sands
Typical profile
A - 0 to 7 inches: sand
E - 7 to 24 inches: sand
Bt - 24 to 42 inches: loamy sand
C - 42 to 85 inches: sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (1.98
to 19.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Very low (about 2.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
35

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres 142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www. nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nres142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084
36

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nres142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nres142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/lnternet/FSE—DOCUMENTS/nrcsl 42p2_052290.pdf
37

C204043 (U-2519AA & AB) Project Special Provisions Cumberland & Roberson Counties
PERMANENT VEGETATION ESTABLISHMENT
(6-11-15) 104
DB01 G160
Establish permanent vegetation stands of the Long Term Stabilization mixtures identified in the
Erosion Control Scope of Work found elsewhere in this RFP. During the period between initial
vegetation planting and final project acceptance, perform all work necessary to establish 80%
coverage of permanent vegetation within the project limits, as well as, in borrow and waste pits.
This work shall include erosion control device maintenance and installation, repair seeding and
mulching, supplemental seeding and mulching, mowing, and fertilizer topdressing, as directed.
All work shall be performed in accordance with the Erosion and Sedimentation Control Scope of
Work found elsewhere in this RFP and the applicable section of the 2012 Standard
Specifications for Roads and Structures.
Once the Engineer has determined that 80% coverage of permanent vegetation has been
established, the Design -Build Team will be notified to remove the remaining erosion control
devices that are no longer needed. The Design -Build Team shall be responsible for, and shall
correct, any areas disturbed by operations performed in permanent vegetation establishment and
the removal of temporary erosion control measures, whether occurring prior to or after placing
traffic on the project.
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL / STORMWATER CERTIFICATION
(1-16-07) (Rev. 9-20-16) 105-16, 225-2, 16 DB1 G180
General
Schedule and conduct construction activities in a manner that will minimize soil erosion and the
resulting sedimentation and turbidity of surface waters. Comply with the requirements herein
regardless of whether or not a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit
for the work is required.
Establish a chain of responsibility for operations and subcontractors' operations to ensure that
the Erosion and Sediment Control / Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan is implemented and
maintained over the life of the contract.
(A) Certified Supervisor — Provide a certified Erosion and Sediment Control / Stormwater
(E&SC/SW) Supervisor to manage the Design -Build Team and subcontractor(s)
operations, ensure compliance with Federal, State and Local ordinances and regulations,
and manage the Quality Control Program.
(B) Certified Foreman — Provide a certified, trained foreman for each construction operation
that increases the potential for soil erosion or the possible sedimentation and turbidity of
surface waters.
(C) Certified Installer — Provide a certified installer to install or direct the installation for
erosion or sediment / stormwater control practices.
K93

C204043 (U-2519AA & AB) Project Special Provisions Cumberland & Roberson Counties
(D) Certified Designer — Provide a certified designer for the design of the erosion and
sediment control / stormwater component of reclamation plans and, if applicable, for the
design of the project erosion and sediment control / stormwater plan.
Roles and Responsibilities
(A) Certified Erosion and Sediment Control / Stormwater Supervisor - The Certified
Supervisor shall be Level II and shall be responsible for ensuring the erosion and
sediment control / stormwater plan is adequately implemented and maintained on the
project and for conducting the quality control program. The Certified Supervisor shall be
on the project within 24 hours notice from initial exposure of an erodible surface to the
project's final acceptance. The Certified Supervisor shall perform the following duties:
(1) Manage Operations - Coordinate and schedule the work of subcontractors so that
erosion and sediment control / stormwater measures are fully executed for each
operation and in a timely manner over the duration of the contract.
(a) Oversee the work of subcontractors so that appropriate erosion and
sediment control / stormwater preventive measures are conformed to at
each stage of the work.
(b) Prepare the required National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) Inspection Record and submit to the Engineer.
(c) Attend all weekly or monthly construction meetings to discuss the
findings of the NPDES inspection and other related issues.
(d) Implement the erosion and sediment control / stormwater site plans
requested.
(e) Provide any needed erosion and sediment control / stormwater practices
for the Design -Build Team's temporary work not shown on the plans
developed by the Design -Build Team, such as, but not limited to work
platforms, temporary construction, pumping operations, plant and storage
yards, and cofferdams.
(f) Acquire applicable permits and comply with requirements for borrow pits,
dewatering, and any temporary work conducted by the Design -Build Team
in jurisdictional areas.
(g) Conduct all erosion and sediment control / stormwater work in a timely
and workmanlike manner.
(h) Fully perform and install erosion and sediment control / stormwater work
prior to any suspension of the work.
(i) Coordinate with Department, Federal, State and Local Regulatory
agencies on resolution of erosion and sediment control / stormwater issues
due to the Design -Build Team's operations.
(j) Ensure that proper cleanup occurs from vehicle tracking on paved surfaces
and / or any location where sediment leaves the right of way.
(k) Have available a set of erosion and sediment control / stormwater plans
that are initialed and include the installation date of Best Management
Practices. These practices shall include temporary and permanent
groundcover and be properly updated to reflect necessary plan and field
01i

C204043 (U-2519AA & AB) Project Special Provisions Cumberland & Roberson Counties
changes for use and review by Department personnel, as well as regulatory
agencies.
(2) Requirements set forth under the NPDES Permit — The Department's NPDES
Stormwater Permit (NCS000250) outlines certain objectives and management
measures pertaining to construction activities. The permit references NCGO10000,
General Permit to Discharge Stormwater under the NPDES, and states that the
Department shall incorporate the applicable requirements into its delegated
Erosion and Sediment Control Program for construction activities disturbing one
or more acres of land. The Department further incorporates these requirements on
all contracted bridge and culvert work at jurisdictional waters, regardless of size.
Some of the requirements shall be, but are not limited to:
(a) Control project site waste to prevent contamination of surface or ground
waters of the state, e.g. from equipment operations / maintenance
construction materials, concrete washout, chemicals, litter, fuels,
lubricants, coolants, hydraulic fluids, any other petroleum products, and
sanitary waste.
(b) Inspect erosion and sediment control / stormwater devices and stormwater
discharge outfalls at least once every 7 calendar days, and within 24 hours
after a rainfall event of 0.5 inch, or greater, that occurs within a 24-hour
period. At the discretion of Division of Water Resources personnel,
additional monitoring may be required if the receiving stream is 303(d)
listed for turbidity and the project has had documented problems
managing turbidity.
(c) Maintain an onsite rain gauge or use the Department's Multi -Sensor
Precipitation Estimate website to maintain a daily record of rainfall
amounts and dates.
(d) Maintain erosion and sediment control / stormwater inspection records for
review by Department and Regulatory personnel upon request.
(e) Implement approved reclamation plans on all borrow pits, waste sites and
staging areas.
(f) Maintain a log of turbidity test results as outlined in the Department's
Procedure for Monitoring Borrow Pit Discharge.
(g) Provide secondary containment for bulk storage of liquid materials.
(h) Provide training for employees concerning general erosion and sediment
control / stormwater awareness, the Department's NPDES Stormwater
Permit NCS000250 requirements, and the applicable requirements of the
General Permit, NCG010000.
(i) Report violations of the NPDES Permit to the Engineer immediately who
will notify the NC Department of Environmental Quality Regional Office
within 24 hours of becoming aware of the violation.
(3) Quality Control Program - Maintain a quality control program to control erosion,
prevent sedimentation and follow provisions / conditions of permits. The quality
control program shall:
35

C204043 (U-2519AA & AB) Project Special Provisions Cumberland & Roberson Counties
(a) Follow permit requirements related to the Design -Build Team and
subcontractors' construction activities.
(b) Ensure that all operators and / or subcontractor(s) on site have the proper
erosion and sediment control / stormwater certification.
(c) Notify the Engineer when the required certified erosion and sediment
control / stormwater personnel are not available on the job site when
needed.
(d) Conduct the inspections required by the NPDES Permit.
(e) Take corrective actions in the proper timeframe as required by the NPDES
Permit for problem areas identified during the NPDES inspections.
(f) Incorporate erosion control into the work in a timely manner and stabilize
disturbed areas with mulch / seed or vegetative cover on a section -by -
section basis.
(g) Use flocculants approved by state regulatory authorities where appropriate
and where required for turbidity and sedimentation reduction.
(h) Ensure proper installation and maintenance of temporary erosion and
sediment control devices.
(i) Remove temporary erosion or sediment control devices when they are no
longer necessary as agreed upon by the Engineer.
(j) The Design -Build Team's quality control and inspection procedures shall
be subject to review by the Engineer. Maintain NPDES inspection records
and make records available at all times for verification by the Engineer.
(B) Certified Foreman - At least one Certified Foreman shall be onsite for each type
of work listed herein during the respective construction activities to control
erosion, prevent sedimentation and follow permit provisions:
(1) Foreman in charge of grading activities
(2) Foreman in charge of bridge or culvert construction over jurisdictional
areas
(3) Foreman in charge of utility activities
The Design -Build Team may request to use the same person as the Level II
Supervisor and Level II Foreman. This person shall be onsite whenever
construction activities as described above are taking place. This request shall be
approved by the Engineer prior to work beginning.
The Design -Build Team may request to name a single Level II Foreman to
oversee multiple construction activities on small bridge or culvert replacement
projects. This request shall be approved by the Engineer prior to work beginning.
(C) Certified Installers - Provide at least one onsite, Level I Certified Installer for
each of the following erosion and sediment control / stormwater crew:
(1)
Seeding and Mulching
(2)
Temporary Seeding
(3)
Temporary Mulching
(4)
Sodding
Olt

C204043 (U-2519AA & AB) Project Special Provisions Cumberland & Roberson Counties
(5) Silt fence or other perimeter erosion / sediment control device installations
(6) Erosion control blanket installation
(7) Hydraulic tackifier installation
(8) Turbidity curtain installation
(9) Rock ditch check / sediment dam installation
(10) Ditch liner / matting installation
(11) Inlet protection
(12) Riprap placement
(13) Stormwater BMP installations (such as but not limited to level spreaders,
retention / detention devices)
(14) Pipe installations within jurisdictional areas
If a Level I Certified Installer is not onsite, the Design -Build Team may substitute
a Level II Foreman for a Level I Installer, provided the Level II Foreman is not
tasked to another crew requiring Level II Foreman oversight.
(D) Certified Designer — Include the certification number of the Level III-B Certified
Designer on the erosion and sediment control / stormwater component of all
reclamation plans and if applicable, the certification number of the Level III -A
Certified Designer on the design of the project erosion and sediment control /
stormwater plan.
Preconstruction Meeting
Furnish the names of the Certified Erosion and Sediment Control / Stormwater Supervisor,
Certified Foremen, Certified Installers and Certified Designers and notify the Engineer, in
writing, of changes in certified personnel over the life of the contract within two days of change.
Ethical Responsibility
Any company performing work for the North Carolina Department of Transportation has the
ethical responsibility to fully disclose any reprimand or dismissal of an employee resulting from
improper testing or falsification of records.
Revocation or Suspension of Certification
Upon recommendation of the Chief Engineer to the certification entity, certification for
Supervisor, Certified Foremen, Certified Installers and Certified Designer may be revoked or
suspended with the issuance of an Immediate Corrective Action (ICA), Notice of Violation
(NOV), or Cease and Desist Order for erosion and sediment control / stormwater related issues.
The Chief Engineer may recommend suspension or permanent revocation of certification due to
the following:
(A) Failure to adequately perform the duties as defined within this certification
provision
(B) Issuance of an ICA, NOV, or Cease and Desist Order
37

C204043 (U-2519AA & AB) Project Special Provisions Cumberland & Roberson Counties
(C) Failure to fully perform environmental commitments as detailed within the permit
conditions and specifications
(D) Demonstration of erroneous documentation or reporting techniques
(E) Cheating or copying another candidate's work on an examination
(F) Intentional falsification of records
(G) Directing a subordinate under direct or indirect supervision to perform any of the
above actions
(H) Dismissal from a company for any of the above reasons
(I) Suspension or revocation of one's certification by another entity
Suspension or revocation of a certification will be sent by certified mail to the certificant and the
Corporate Head of the company that employs the certificant.
A certificant has the right to appeal any adverse action which results in suspension or permanent
revocation of certification by responding, in writing, to the Chief Engineer within ten calendar
days after receiving notice of the proposed adverse action.
Chief Engineer
1536 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1536
Failure to appeal within ten calendar days shall result in the proposed adverse action becoming
effective on the date specified on the certified notice. Failure to appeal within the time specified
shall result in a waiver of all future appeal rights regarding the adverse action taken. The
certificant will not be allowed to perform duties associated with the certification during the
appeal process. The Chief Engineer will hear the appeal and make a decision within seven days
of hearing the appeal. The decision of the Chief Engineer shall be final and will be made in
writing to the certificant.
If a certification is temporarily suspended, the certificant shall pass any applicable written
examination and any proficiency examination, at the conclusion of the specified suspension
period, prior to having the certification reinstated.
Measurement and Payment
Certified Erosion and Sediment Control / Stormwater Supervisor, Certified Foremen, Certified
Installers and Certified Designer will be incidental to the project for which no direct
compensation will be made.
PROCEDURE FOR MONITORING BORROW PIT DISCHARGE
(1-22-13) DB1 G181
Water discharge from borrow pit sites shall not cause surface waters to exceed 50 NTUs
(nephelometric turbidity unit) in streams not designated as trout waters and 10 NTUs in streams,
lakes or reservoirs designated as trout waters. For lakes and reservoirs not designated as trout
waters, the turbidity shall not exceed 25 NTUs. If the turbidity exceeds these levels due to
natural background conditions, the existing turbidity level shall not be increased.
0.01

C204043 (U-2519AA & AB) Project Special Provisions Cumberland & Roberson Counties
If during any operating day, the downstream water quality exceeds the standard, the Design -
Build Team shall do all of the following:
(A) Either cease discharge or modify the discharge volume or turbidity levels to bring the
downstream turbidity levels into compliance, or
(B) Evaluate the upstream conditions to determine if the exceedance of the standard is due to
natural background conditions. If the background turbidity measurements exceed the
standard, operation of the pit and discharge can continue as long as the stream turbidity
levels are not increased due to the discharge.
(C) Measure and record the turbidity test results (time, date and sampler) at all defined
sampling locations 30 minutes after startup and at a minimum, one additional sampling of
all sampling locations during that 24-hour period in which the borrow pit is discharging.
(D) Notify DWR within 24 hours of any stream turbidity standard exceedances that are not
brought into compliance.
During the Environmental Assessment required by Article 230-4 of the 2012 Standard
Specifications for Roads and Structures, the Design -Build Team shall define the point at which
the discharge enters into the State's surface waters and the appropriate sampling locations.
Sampling locations shall include points upstream and downstream from the point at which the
discharge enters these waters. Upstream sampling location shall be located so that it is not
influenced by backwater conditions and represents natural background conditions. Downstream
sampling location shall be located at the point where complete mixing of the discharge and
receiving water has occurred.
The discharge shall be closely monitored when water from the dewatering activities is introduced
into jurisdictional wetlands. Any time visible sedimentation (deposition of sediment) on the
wetland surface is observed, the dewatering activity will be suspended until turbidity levels in
the stilling basin can be reduced to a level where sediment deposition does not occur. Staining of
wetland surfaces from suspended clay particles, occurring after evaporation or infiltration, does
not constitute sedimentation. No activities shall occur in wetlands that adversely affect the
functioning of a wetland. Visible sedimentation will be considered an indication of possible
adverse impacts on wetland use.
The Engineer will perform independent turbidity tests on a random basis. These results will be
maintained in a log within the project records. Records will include, at a minimum, turbidity test
results, time, date and name of sampler. Should the Department's test results exceed those of the
Design -Build Team's test results, an immediate test shall be performed jointly with the results
superseding the previous test results of both the Department and the Design -Build Team.
To plan, design, construct, and maintain BMPs to address water quality standards, the Design -
Build Team shall use the NCDOT Turbidity Reduction Options for Borrow Pits Matrix, available
at the website noted below:
http://www.ncdot.gov/doh/operations/dp_chief eng/roadside/fieldops/downloads/Files/
K�1

C204043 (U-2519AA & AB) Project Special Provisions Cumberland & Roberson Counties
TurbidityReductionOptionSheet.pdf
Tier I Methods include stilling basins which are standard compensatory BMPs. Other Tier I
methods are noncompensatory and shall be used when needed to meet the stream turbidity
standards. Tier II Methods are also noncompensatory and are options that may be needed for
protection of rare or unique resources or where special environmental conditions exist at the site
which have led to additional requirements being placed in the DWR's 401 Certifications and
approval letters, Isolated Wetland Permits, Riparian Buffer Authorization or a DOT Reclamation
Plan's Environmental Assessment for the specific site. Should the Design -Build Team exhaust
all Tier I Methods on a site exclusive of rare or unique resources or special environmental
conditions, Tier II Methods may be required by regulators on a case by case basis per
supplemental agreement.
The Design -Build Team may use cation exchange capacity (CEC) values from proposed site
borings to plan and develop the Price Proposal for the project. CEC values exceeding 15
milliequivalents per 100 grams of soil may indicate a high potential for turbidity and should be
avoided when dewatering into surface water is proposed.
No additional compensation for monitoring borrow pit discharge will be paid.
CLEARING AND GRUBBING
(9-1 -1 1)(Rev. 8-18-15)
DB2 RO1
With the exception of areas with Permanent Utility Easements, perform clearing on this project
to the limits established by Method "III" shown on Roadway Standard Drawing No. 200.03. In
areas with Permanent Utility Easements, clearing shall extend to the right of way limits.
BURNING RESTRICTIONS
(7-1-95) DB2 R05
Open burning shall not be permitted on any portion of the right of way limits established for this
project. The Design -Build Team shall not burn the clearing, grubbing or demolition debris
designated for disposal and generated from the project at locations within the project limits, off
the project limits or at any waste or borrow sites in Cumberland County. The Design -Build Team
shall dispose of the clearing, grubbing and demolition debris by means other than burning and in
accordance with state and local rules and regulations.
BUILDING AND APPURTENANCE REMOVAL / DEMOLITION
(9-1-11) DB2 R12B
Unless otherwise as agreed upon by the Department, seal all wells and remove or demolish all
buildings and appurtenances, in their entirety, that are located either partially or completely
within the project's right of way limits or are located outside the project's right of way limits but
within property purchased as an uneconomical remnant in accordance with Sections 205, 210
and 215 of the 2012 Standard Specifications for Roads and Structures.
The Department will perform all assessment, removal and disposal of asbestos. Once the
Design -Build Team has acquired a parcel and all buildings and appurtenances have been vacated,
►C

Borrow Pit Basin Calculations
Pump Rate = 800 gpm = 107 cfm = 1.78 ft3 s Detention Time = 2 Hours Depth =3ft
Volume Needed = V=Td*Q = 2hrs*1.78(113/s)*3600(s/hr) = 12816 ft3
Minimum Surface Area = A = V/d = 12816ft3(vol)/3ft(Depth)= 4,278 ft2
Basin Size = 45'&135' Top Width x 36'&126' Top Length x 3' Depth (1.5:1 Slopes)
Basin Ratio = (45'+36')/2W*(135'+126')/21 = 3.22:1 Ratio
Basin Surface Area = 6,075 Ft2 (Meets Min 4278 ft2)(At wier elevation)
calculations are as follows
Basin base width & Base length with 1.5:1 sideslopes:
Wbase=Wtop -(depth x 1.5 x 2 sides) = 45-(3x1.5x2) = 36 Wbase
Lbase=Ltop -(depth x 1.5 x 2 sides) = 145-(3x1.5x2) = 126 Lbase
Basin Volume calculations (Min Required = 12,816f13)
Vol=Depth W L+ W L +[(W L + W L )/2]}
/3 � top top base base top base base top
V01=3/3{(45*135+36*126)+[(36*126+36*135)/2]}
Basin Volume = 15,876 f13 (Meets Min 12,816 f13)(15,876ft3/0.13368Gal=110,761Ga')

BOTTOM OF BASIN TOP
ELEV +/- 35' ELEV
rFFF� COIR FIBER
38.0 III 29•0 BAFFLE��
1 IIIF 1 139.0
148.0
OF BASIN
+/- 38'
DEWATERING BASIN SIZING DETAIL

1VLl;'1'; VCAS; li; W'1'CYL111ll; K
(MC)SF LIKELY 55 CAL DRU 11)
BASIN INLET DETAIL FOR BORROW PIT DEWATERINO
hRON1BC1111{OW PIT PUNII,
NOT TO SCALE
31
WIN SAb'NLE 1
CLASSS 12' Min Dii
X W-RA1'

BORROW PIT DEWATERING BASIN:
(3-17-09) (Rev 3-2-11)
Description
Water discharge from borrow pit sites shall not cause surface waters to exceed 50 NTUs
(nephelometric turbidity unit) in streams not designated as trout waters and 10 NTUs in streams,
lakes or reservoirs designated as trout waters. For lakes and reservoirs not designated as trout
waters, the turbidity shall not exceed 25 NTUs. If the turbidity exceeds these levels due to
natural background conditions, the existing turbidity level shall not be increased.
Construct, maintain and remove earth embankments used to reduce turbidity from dewatering
borrow sites. Work includes providing porous coir fiber baffle, filtration geotextile, stone and
outlet structures; cleaning out, maintaining, removing and disposing of the borrow pit dewatering
basin and all components; and reshaping, dressing, seeding and mulching the area.
Materials
Refer to Division 10
Item
Riprap, Class A, B, 1, and 2
Geotextile for Drainage, Type 2
Coir Fiber Baffle
Section
1042
1056
1640-2
Use suitable excavated materials, as specified in Sections 225, 230 and 240 of the Standard
Specifications in the construction of earth embankments for borrow pit dewatering basins, except
where otherwise specified.
Construction Methods
Construct borrow pit dewatering basins according to the detail in the erosion control plans, and at
locations shown on Reclamation Plans or in areas as directed.
The volume of the borrow pit dewatering basin will be based on a 2 hour retention time. The
pump rate shall not exceed 1,000 GPM. The Contractor, at his option, may use a greater
retention time for managing turbidity.
The straight line distance between the inlet and outlet shall be divided to include a forebay
chamber in the upper quarter cell. Install one porous coir fiber baffle across the full width of the
basin to delineate the forebay chamber. Do not use earthen or rock baffle. Install filtration
geotextile on the interior side slopes and the floor of the forebay.
The water pumped from the borrow pit into the dewatering basin shall be obtained from the top
of the water column and shall be discharged into the forebay in a non -erodible manner.

The borrow pit dewatering basin outlet shall be a vertical non -perforated riser pipe or flash board
riser attached with a watertight connection to a barrel that carries the water through the
embankment.
Maintenance and Removal
Maintain the borrow pit dewatering basin, coir fiber baffle, and remove and dispose of silt
accumulations in accordance with Article 1630-3 of the Standard Specifications. The Contractor
may include a drain device for maintenance and removal at his discretion.
Remove the borrow pit dewatering basin once dewatering operations are completed. Grade,
seed, and mulch the area after removal of the borrow pit dewatering basin in accordance with
Section 1660 of the Standard Specifications. The area shall be stabilized with an approved
groundcover before final acceptance of the site.
Measurement and Payment
No direct payment will be made for borrow pit dewatering basins with the exception of the work
of silt removal during dewatering basin operation and the work of seeding and mulching after
removal of the dewatering basin. All other work and materials required for installation,
maintenance and removal of borrow pit dewatering basins shall be incidental to Borrow
Excavation. Such price and payments will be full compensation for the work of constructing,
maintaining and removing the borrow pit dewatering basin including, but not limited to, the
construction and removal of the borrow pit dewatering basin; furnishing of the outlet structure,
baffle, filtration geotextile, stone and optional drain devices; and removal of all such items once
dewatering operations are completed.
Removal and disposal of silt accumulations during dewatering operations will be measured and
paid at the contract unit price per cubic yard for Silt Excavation in accordance with Article 1630-
4 of the Standard Specifications.
Grading, seeding, and mulching the area after removal of the borrow pit dewatering basin will be
measured and paid at the contract unit price per acre for Seeding and Mulching in accordance
with Section 1660-8 of the Standard Specifications.