HomeMy WebLinkAbout970032_Inspection_20180724Division:of Water Resourc. a
Facility Number - 3 7- 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 3 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: g Routine O Complaint O Follow-uD 0 Referral O Emergencv 0 Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: bvArrival Time: Departure Time: J County: CeS Region:
C{
,t
I:`1
Farm Name: Par d t)& w Son �5 Owner Email:
Owner Name: -p1A V °p"f10.,,r`ti, u
Mailing Address: 16 -1 � A I
Physical Address:
Phone: N 336 -- 53.5"-7q,`Y
M & 6 7 6
�9
Facility Contact: l�C me -ran
11
okA(- ll
,b f2'7l.{'1&1CVl 3 3& " `JYe/ -�(SA
U (�- Title: Phone:
Cc�1"
o 6- S7-61/5-'
Onsite Representative:
n
l �A,1,�
Integrator:
Certified Operator:
t J
Certification Number:
NIZA
Back-up Operator:
p�A
NIA
/ A
Certification Number:
t v IA'
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 31P J 21 q(,,) t/ Longitude:
_!!SQ �� t 32—
US t y y2.1
N, -tv =Y-,-- 7.72 , m +-6p Oraowp , 2- &U1,1 ma -to Pd
I
P� d • ,
Ftx..r-trl
G r1 nL
Design Current Design Current
'Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. C
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
La er
Non -La er
Design Current
Dry Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
14M
Heifer
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
JgNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[;Oo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued
j
Facility Number: (IT Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment (.
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? []Yes W o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure d13 Structurre"'4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: �_J E%t 1 �E i e) Of L{1t? Ad "
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes yNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes NrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? [:]Yes gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No D�NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? 77��
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need [-]Yes N"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? 77��
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [>_kNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s)
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
IRfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
CR�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
❑ No
Skr&A
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
rVNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
T No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
01N0
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
W No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists [:]Design [:]Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
2211./plies record keeping need improvement? 4_Y7
❑ Yes
Wo
❑ N
El
❑ NE
ste Application eekk� Freebvm�- Waste Analysis Soil Analysis �YYYY""
n V Rainfall Inspections
LLLJJJ ���'°°°gefitzrvc�
Code
LVJ Rainfall Stocking Crop Yield !Qu Auwd`-'--"""-- Monthly and
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
PO No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
DeA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412019 Continued
Facility Number: 4
7 - ,32 jDate of Inspection: _1 tZ . ZO R
24."Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes M No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ NA ❑ NE
DIA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No C�rNA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document [—]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? '3 r % 3601
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
[—]Yes DjNo [_]NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Xj No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes
UNo
❑NA
❑NE
4 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
�. Soil fest due- in jo!q- .lnelL ij)e,-� 7I'n�4To4ee5+
J -415 Fa`
a' o G J 00[ l bra { ec1 I Y1 co l a' ?No wa 5+e
�plte.cl since, 2,a I!� e,al; brci,}urn g P[ec�s� �'al i bra.�e. w�-�-�-
k;ntie. wa5� 1S a.,epli�� a
aa 5��5�' $CXin d- Q.iJP��i�� waS}emsrnuv��'7 iL
Reviewer/Inspector
Reviewer/Inspector
Page 3 of 3
Phone: ,11b0 716 d I b
Date: 1-
21412015