20041808 Ver 3_Application_20090831

TALBERT& BRIGHT
August 26, 2009
LkP o u{ - I S o 8 L)3
Ms. Lia Myott Gilleski
NCDENR DWQ
2321 Crabtree Blvd. E?A I P,
Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604 --
(? M(? Re:
D m@[N6 V A
AUG 3 1 2009
DENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
Dear Ms. Gilleski,
Stanly County Airport 401 Water
Quality Certification and Storm
Water Management Plan Submittal
Stanly County Airport Terminal
Stanly County Airport
New London, North Carolina
TBI Project No.: 3803-0803
Please find enclosed the following items being submitted for review for the above referenced
project.
• $2,000 check made payable to North Carolina Division of Water Quality
• Five (5) copies of the completed PCN application
• Five (5) copies of the associated plan
• One (1) copy of the PCN submittal checklist
• Three (3) copies of the Express Review Stormwater Management Plan
Application
• Three (3) copies of the supporting calculations
• Three (3) copies of the Operation & Maintenance Agreement
• Three (3) copies of the Stormwater Management Plans
• One (1) copy of the Stormwater Management Plan on a CD
We look forward to working with NCDENR in providing these measures. If you have any
questions concerning the information in this letter please feel free to contact me at (704) 426-
6070.
Sincerely,
Chad Vernon
cc: David Griffin, Stanly County Airport
Ronald A. Geiger, HDR
ENGINEERING & PLANNING CONSULTANES
4944 PARKWAY PLAZA BOULEVARD SUITE 350 CIIARLOTTE, NORFH CAROLINA 28217 704.426.6070 FAX [phone]
CIIARLOTTE, NOR] H CAROLINA , WILMINGTON. NORI H CAROLINA • RICHMOND, VIRGINIA , COLUMBIA. SOUTH CAROLINA

Version 1.4
January 9, 2009
401 Oversight/Express Permitting PCN Submittal Checklist
The application fee (Checks may be made out to "N.C. Division of Water Quality"
- $240.00 for 401 Water Quality Certification with minor impacts
- $570.00 for 401 Water Quality Certification with major impacts
- Express Review Fee (Amount requested on Acceptance Letter)
Five (5) complete and collated copies of the PCN Application and supporting
documentation (instead of providing 5 copies of the full size plans you may provide two
copies of full size plans along with three copies of 11 X 17 plans)
Stormwater Management Plan (if applicable - see PCN Form Help File Section E)
1) Please provide three (3) copies of the stormwater management plans along with all
supporting information pertaining to this project including the following:
a. Entire site develop ment/layout plans delineating all drainage areas;
b. Design calculation sheets for all proposed BMP(s) sized for both on-site and
off-site drainage;
c. BMP supplements for each proposed BMP and Required Items Check List
(http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/bmp forms.htm) along with all required
items;
d. A Notarized Operation & Maintenance Agreement for each stormwater
management facility;
e. Detailed construction drawing sheets shall include
(i) Erosion and sediment control plans;
(ii) Installation and planting schedules for the proposed BMPs;
(iii) Appropriately scaled plan views and cross sectional details of all
BMPs and associated components - inlet and outlet structures,
forebay, respective zones and pertinent elevations.
? If your project is located within a State implemented Riparian Buffer Rule Area, submit the
following along with site plans and PCN form:
1) Three (3) copies of the details for on-site diffuse flow provisions, (refer to
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/bmp_forms.htm).
[Q( DWQ Stream Determination Forms for streams on property and DWQ determination
letter for wetlands or streams (if applicable).
The following is the most critical of all the information that you must provide. The quality and
detail of the information will often determine the expeditiousness of the review. The following is
a checklist of the types of pertinent information required at a minimum:
Maps and Plans:
F.15WIM 2
CA The most recent version of the 1:24,000 USGS Topographic Map - Please cleanly draw or
delineate the site boundaries on the topographic map.
IF* -rc'IA.
The most recent version of the bound and published County NRCS Soil Survey Map -
(required for projects within the Neuse River Basin, Tar-Pamlico River Basin, Randleman
Lake Watershed and the Catawba River Basin, also recommended for all projects) -
Please clearly delineate the site boundaries, etc. on the map. If the delineation obscures
any of the features, it is recommended that a clean copy be provided. Copies of the
Version 1.4
January 9, 2009
current soil survey and/or soil survey map sheets can be obtained from the local NRCS
Countyy Office (http://www.nc.nres.usda.gov/). GIS soil layers are not acceptable.
[Vicinity map - Please clearly mark the location and approximate boundaries of the property
and project on the map. Please indicate north arrow and scale. Please include applicable
road names or State Road numbers.
The Site Plan - The most critical map to be provided is the site plan. You must provide full
sized plans. The following is the minimum list of plans that are typically needed.
E Pre-construction/Pre-existing conditions - This sheet (or sheets) must include:
• All jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetland, stream, water features, State regulated
buffers (delineated into Zones 1 and 2)
• Topographic contours with elevations
• Any existing structures and impervious areas
• Existing utility lines and easements
• Existing roads, culverts, and other pertinent features
• North arrow and the scale (1":50' scale is recommended).
2
dProposed conditions - This sheet (or sheets) must include:
• All jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetland, stream, water features, State regulated
buffers (delineated into Zones 1 and 2)
• Lot layout (if a subdivision or commercial development is proposed) - lots must be
developable without further impacts to jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetlands,
streams, water features, and State regulated buffers. Building envelopes must be
provided when streams, wetlands, riparian buffers, or water features exist on a lot
• All built-out structures and impervious cover
• Final grading contours with elevations
• All utilities and easements (including septic fields on all lots within 100 feet of stream,
wetland, or water features - if applicable)
• Impacted areas - these should correspond with the Impact numbers listed on your PCN
form.
d Drainage Plans - Final drainage plans must include the following:
• Locations and pertinent elevations and sizes of the stormwater collection system and
drainage ways
• All inlets and outlets must also be shown with pertinent elevations (All outlets to
wetlands must be at a non-erosive velocity, generally less than 2 ft/sec during the peak
flow from the 10-yr storm)
• Scaled stormwater BMPs must also be indicated as required by DWQ rules and policies
• In certain cases (see Section E of PCN form), final stormwater management plans must
also be provided (see Stormwater Management Plan Checklist)
7&? 2.
[Proposed Impacts - All impacts to jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetland, stream,
water features, and State regulated buffers must be shown and labeled on the site plans at
a scale no smaller than 1" = 50'. All excavation, fill, flooding, stabilization, and other impacts
that will be conducted in or near jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetland, stream, water
features, and State regulated buffers must be indicated. Please provide cross sectional
details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage (burial of culvert 20% for culverts <_ 48
inches, and 1-foot for culverts > 48 inches).

Version 1.4
January 9, 2009
Wetland Impacts:
Precise grading and final elevation contours must be provided. Existing
vegetation and any clearing must be specified.
All subsurface utility lines must indicate the location of anti-seep collars.
Construction detail for anti-seep collars must be provided.
[( Roadway or other crossings of riparian wetlands may require floodway culverts to
maintain existing hydrological conditions.
Plans should show that the hydrology of remaining wetlands on the site will be
maintained.
Stream Impacts:
[?f Stream impacts must be clearly shown on the plans. The centerline as well as
the banks of the stream must be surveyed or located by GPS for the portion of
the stream to be impacted.
E The inlet and the outlet of all culverts should be aligned with the stream as
much as possible. Inlet and outlet elevations and streambed elevations should
be indicated. Any inlet or outlet protection must be shown and enumerated on
the impact map(s).
? For bottomless culverts or other spans, a vertical cross section should be
provided that shows the minimum distance from each span to each stream bank,
the stream cross section, the height of the span above the stream and the
minimum distance from the edge of each footer to each stream bank.
Additionally, please provide a signed and sealed geotechnical report of
subsurface soils at the proposed bottomless culvert location. The report must
comply with the Division of Highways - Guidelines for Drainage Studies and
Hydraulic Design, prepared by A.L. Hankins, Jr., State Hydraulics Engineer -
1999.
? Multiple culverts or sectioned box culverts typically require the use of sills, off-
setting or other means to match the cross section of the existing stream (in order
to maintain stream stability and provide aquatic life passage). A vertical cross
section of the culverts should be shown overlain with the up and downstream
stream cross section including the stream flood-prone area.
? Impacts associated with dam construction must indicate and enumerate all fill
associated with the dam footprint, spillway and any bank stream bank
stabilization. The length of stream impounded must also be indicated and
enumerated.
ItS&ME
EX.P 04 -1808 u3
August 18. 2009
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
15 1 Patton Avenue. Room 208
Asheville. North Carolina 28801-006
Attention: Mr. Steve Lund. USACE
Ms. Lia Mvott Gilleski. NCDWQ
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard. Suite 250
Raleigh. North Carolina 27604-2260
Reference: Nationwide Permit # 39 Application
Stanly County Airport Terminal Project
New London. Stanly County. North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1614-09-064
Dear Mr. Lund and Ms. Gilleski:
AUG ? ?,
2009
sANDS PU
XtW'8
On behalf of the Stanly County Airport Authority. S&ME. Inc. (S&ME) is pleased to submit a
Nationwide Permit Application for impacts to 274 linear feet 0f) of jurisdictional stream and
0.09 acre of wetland at the Stanly County Airport near New London. Stan1v County. North
Carolina.
Per conversations with Mr. Steve Lund of the USACE and Mr. Alan Johnson of NCDVJQ the
stream to be impacted is aquatically unimportant and will not require compensatory mitigation.
Compensatory mitigation will be provided for the wetland impacts.
The proposed project consists of the construction of a new terminal. associated parking area. and
two new access roads (Entrance and Connector roads). The proposed improvements are
designed to comply with existing Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) guidelines regarding
the Building Restriction Line (BRL) and will enhance airport safety measures. The project will
also create a larger facility to meet Airport customer and staff needs.
Please find the enclosed information related to the project:
• Appendix I: Signed PCN Form
Agent Authorization Form
SWE, INC. / 134 Suber Road / Columbia, SC 29210 / p 803.561.9024 f 803.561.9177 / www.smeinc.com
Individual Permit Application S&ME Project No. 1614-09-064
Stanly County Airport Terminal Project August 18, 2009
• Appendix II: Permit Figures
Site Vicinity Map (Figure 1); Topographic Map (Figure 2); Aerial Map -
Existing Conditions (Figure 3); Soils Map (Figure 3A); Building
Restriction Line Exhibit (Figure 4); Site Plan (Figure 5); Profile View -
Entrance Road (Figure 6), Profile View - Connector Road (Figure 7)
• Appendix III: Previous U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Nationwide Permit
(NWP) 39 issued November 24, 2004 (Action ID 200330686)
Previous 2004 North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) 401
Water Quality Certification (DWQ# 04-1808)
Previous North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP)
Invoice for 2004 Impacts
• Appendix IV: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Advisory Circular 150/5300-13
regarding BRLs
Appendix V: NCEEP Letter of Acceptance
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) Correspondence
Protected Species Assessment (S&ME, Inc. 2004)
NC State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Correspondence
Previous USACE Jurisdictional Determination Letter
Appendix VI Stream Assessment Sheets (USACE and NCDWQ)
CLOSING
By copy of this correspondence and completed application, we are requesting your concurrence
with this permit application. Thank you for your cooperation regarding this project. If you have
any questions or require additional information, please contact Chris Daves at your earliest
convenience at [phone].
Sincerely,
S1&ME, Inc.
Chris Daves, P.W.S. Lisa J. eckstrom, C.W.B., C.E., LEED A.P.
Biologist Senior Reviewer
Attachments
cc: Ms. Judith Elder-Lincke, Chad Vernon - Talbert & Bright, Inc.
Individual Permit Application S&ME Project No. 1614-09-064
Stang County Airport Terminal Project August 18, 2009
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The Stanly County Airport (the Airport) is located at 38512 Aviation Drive approximately 4.5
miles southeast of New London and 1.5 miles west of Badin in Stanly County, North Carolina.
The approximate location of the project area is depicted on the attached Site Vicinity Map
(Figure 1 in Appendix II) and the 1993 New London, North Carolina United States Geological
Service (USGS) Topographic Map (Figure 2 in Appendix II).
The Airport is primarily a general aviation airport with flight training and limited passenger
service operations. The North Carolina Air National Guard also operates from at this Airport.
The Airport currently contains two runways which include Runway 4R-22L (5,500 feet long by
100 feet wide) and Runway 4L-22R (3,500 feet long and 75 feet wide).
On November 24, 2004, the USACE issued a Nationwide Permit (NWP) 39 (USACE Action ID
200330686) for impacts to 0.29 acre of wetlands and 120 if of an intermittent stream at the
Airport for the construction of two T-hangars located immediately adjacent to the proposed
terminal site. A DWQ 401 Water Quality Certification (DWQ# 04-1808) was issued December
2, 2004. Mitigation for the impacts included payment into the NCEEP for wetland impacts only.
Copies of the previous USACE and DWQ permits are included in Appendix III for your
reference.
The proposed terminal improvements will include impacts to 274 if to an intermittent stream and
0.09 acre of wetland. Per conversations with Mr. Steve Lund of the USACE and Mr. Alan
Johnson of NCDWQ, the stream to be impacted is aquatically unimportant and will not require
compensatory mitigation. Compensatory mitigation will be provided for the wetland impacts.
NATURE OF ACTIVITY'
The proposed project consists of the following improvements to the Airport:
• Construction of a new two-story, 12,000 square foot (sf) terminal building and associated
parking area. The new terminal will house an operations area, a customer waiting area, a
pilot's lounge/quiet room, a large conference room to be used for various county meetings,
Airport personnel office space, and future office space that is likely to be used by the county's
economic development department in the future. Approximately 85 parking spaces, including
four handicap spaces, are proposed.
• A two-lane entrance road connecting the terminal and parking area to Airport Road. The
entrance road will be approximately 570 if and includes embankment construction, grading,
drainage, erosion and sediment control, and the culverting of an unnamed intermittent stream.
• A two-lane connector road linking Aviation Drive and the rest of the airfield to the new
terminal and parking area. The connector road will be approximately 430 1£
Individual Permit Application SWE Project No. 1614-09-064
Stanly County Airport Terminal Project August 18, 2009
PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED
The existing general aviation terminal building and parking area at the Airport were constructed
in 1977 to serve a runway that began with a 3,900-foot length. In the last three decades, the
runway has been lengthened to 5,5001f and strengthened to support multiple operations of large,
military and civilian jet aircraft, which also necessitated the expansion of the BRL. As a result,
the existing Airport terminal building and adjoining parking area are located within the existing
BRL. See Figure 3 (Aerial Map - Existing Conditions) and Figure 4 (BRL Exhibit) in Appendix
II for the location of the BRL.
The BRL is defined as "A line which identifies suitable building area locations on airports."
For civilian airports, it is described in FAA Advisory Circular 150/5300-13. According to FAA
regulations, the BRL should include the runway protection zones, runway object free areas,
runway visibility zones, navigational aid (NAVAID) critical areas, areas required for terminal
instrument procedures, and an airport traffic control clear line of sight. A copy of the applicable
portion of the Advisory Circular is included in Appendix IV.
The existing terminal building is one-story, approximately 4,000 sf, and consists of an operations
area, a small conference room, and airport personnel office space. The purpose of the project is
to construct a new, larger terminal building and parking area that meets the needs of public
demand and building codes, and also to comply with existing FAA guidelines regarding BRLs.
The proposed improvements will be located outside the existing BRL and will enhance Airport
safety measures.
EXISTING PROJECT AREA CONDITIONS
The project area is approximately 14 acres and is located east of the existing terminal building
and two T-hangars on Airport property. The project area primarily consists of previously
cleared, open land. The remainder of the project area consists of a small pine-hardwood area,
two intermittent streams, and two small wetlands. Refer to Figure 3 (Aerial Map -Existing
Conditions) in Appendix II for the approximate locations of these areas. Descriptions of these
areas are provided below:
Open Land
The open areas appeared to be periodically maintained. Dominant species observed included
blackberry (Rebus sp.), dog-fennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), green bristle grass (Setaria
viridis), velvet witchgrass (Dichanthelium scoparium), Elliott's bluestem (Andropogon elliotti)
and broomsedge (A. virginicus).
Pine-Hardwood Wooded Area
A pine-hardwood wooded area was observed on the eastern portion of the site adjacent to Airport
Road. This area appeared to have recently (1 to 2 years ago) been thinned. Species observed
included loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), Virginia pine (P. virginiana), white oak (Quercus alba),
southern red oak (Q. falcata), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), eastern red cedar (Juniperus
virginiana), and muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia).
Individual Permit Application S&ME Project No. 1614-09-064
Stanly County Airport Terminal Project August 18, 2009
Streams
Stream 1 is intermittent, flows roughly south to north, and is approximately two to three feet
wide. Stream 1 originates on-site and is flanked by Wetland B as it exits the site to the northeast.
Stream 2 is also intermittent and flows onto the site via a culvert underneath Airport Road.
Stream 2, which is flanked by Wetland A, is approximately two to three feet wide. The riparian
buffer surrounding these streams in minimal and consists mainly of saplings and blackberry. See
the Stream Assessment Sheets in Appendix VI.
Wetlands
Wetlands A and B abut Streams I and 2. The dominant vegetation in the wetlands included red
maple (Acer rubrum) and sweetgum saplings, Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), dogfennel,
Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), soft rush (Juncus effusus), and blackberry.
Previous Jurisdictional Determination
The on-site jurisdictional features were delineated by S&ME in April 2003 and a Notice of
Jurisdictional Determination (USACE Action ID 200330686) was issued on May 14, 2003
(Appendix V). Corps biologist Amanda Jones signed the final wetland plat on November 24,
2004. Wetland and stream features in the project area are further described in Tables 1 and 2.
PROPOSED IMPACTS TO JURISDICTIONAL WATERS
The entrance road connecting the proposed tenninal and Airport Road will include installation of a
culvert within Stream 1. The culvert and fill slopes associated with the proposed entrance road will
impact approximately 179 If of Stream l and 0.079 acre of Wetland B. The proposed connector road
linking Aviation Drive and the existing fuel farm to the new terminal will impact approximately 95 If
of Stream 1 with fill slopes and a culvert. Stream impacts total approximately 274 If. Wetland
impacts total approximately 0.09 acre.
Construction of the proposed slopes to support the roads will require placement of approximately
20,000 cubic yards of clean, earthen. fill material. The proposed discharge (earthen fill, culvert) into
the jurisdictional stream and wetland is necessary to facilitate construction of suitable, stable
foundation for both roads. The fill material is to be discharged by industry-standard dump trucks,
pans and bulldozers. Refer to the Site Plan (Figure 5), Profile View - Entrance Road (Figure 6),- and
Profile View - Connector Road (Figure 7) in Appendix 11 for depictions of the proposed impacts.
Table 1: Project Area Wetlands Classification and Size
Table 2: Project Area Stream Classification and Size
Individual Permit Application S&ME Project No. 1614-09-064
Stanly County Airport Terminal Project August 18, 2009
Table 3: Proposed Impacts To On-site Streams
S>
{fir _
4 ,'y k. 04",
Stream 1 Fill Slopes/Culvert under 42" 179
Entrance Road
Stream 1 Fill Slopes/Culvert under "
42 95
Connector Road
Total 274
ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS/AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
No Action Alternative
The No Action Alternative includes not developing the site with the proposed terminal and
entrance/connector roads. In the absence of the proposed project, the site will remain vacant and
will not be used to construct a new, larger terminal building needed to meet public demand and
create additional space for Airport functions. The existing terminal will remain inside the BRL
and not in compliance with existing FAA guidelines regarding BRLs.
Alternative 1- Preferred Alternative
The project will consist of two new roadways that will connect the proposed terminal building to
Airport Road and to the rest of the airfield via Aviation Drive. Aircraft and vehicular safety
concerns made it impossible to avoid the stream and wetlands completely. Airport staff will
need to access the existing fuel farm from the new terminal building that does not require the
vehicles to access the main road (Airport Road). Frequent trips will be made to the fuel farm and
it would create a safety issue to enter into the main roadway each time. Additionally, the fuel
trucks are not licensed to be on public roads.
Alternative 1 would impact approximately 274 if of Stream 1, and approximately 0.09 acre of
Wetland B. The roadways were laid out to minimize impacts to the existing wetland/stream
areas as much as possible. The terminal entrance road was curved to reduce the impacts to the
bulkier portion of the wetlands. Both roadways attempt to intersect the wetlands/stream areas as
close to perpendicular as possible. The roads tie-in slopes have been designed to be as steep as
site conditions will allow and still achieve vegetative growth (thus minimizing the stream
impacts). A bottomless culvert was considered for the impacted area along the entrance road,
but proved to be too expensive for this project.
Alternative 2
Alternative 2 involves the same layout for the terminal, parking lot and connector road, but
includes construction of a straight entrance road connecting Airport Road and the proposed
terminal. Alternative 2 impacts approximately 312 if of Stream 1, approximately 601f of Stream
2, and 0.052 acre of Wetlands A and B. Alternative 2 was not selected because of the additional
linear footage (372 if vs. 274 1f in Alternative 1) that would be impacted.
Table 4: Proposed Impacts To On-site Wetlands
Individual Permit Application S&ME Project No. 1614-09-064
Stanly County Airport Terminal Project August 18, 2009
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION
1. Mitigation Banks
There were no known private mitigation banks with the requested credit type located in the
hydrologic unit where the proposed impacts will take place.
2. In-Lieu Fee Programs
To offset the unavoidable loss of jurisdictional stream, the applicant intends to satisfy mitigation
requirements by payment of funds into the NCEEP. Per conversations with the USACE and
NCDWQ, the impacted stream is aquatically unimportant and will not require compensatory
mitigation. Compensatory mitigation will be provided for the wetland impacts. A letter from the
NCEEP (March 12, 2009) indicating they are willing to accept payment for impacts associated
with the proposed project is included in Appendix V.
PROTECTED SPECIES
One federally protected (endangered) species, Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii),
is currently listed in Stanly County. On March 2, 2009, scoping letters were sent to the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP).
The NCNHP was aware of an existing Schweinitz's sunflower location in the area
(approximately one mile south of site). The NCNHP recommended a survey for Schweinitz's
sunflower be conducted in the appropriate season (late August-October) to determine if this
specie was present or would be impacted by the proposed project. A copy of the NCNHP letter
is attached in Appendix V. At the time this permit was submitted, a response from the USFWS
had yet to be received.
In 2004, S&ME conducted a Protected Species Assessment of the site as part of the previous
NWP for the T-hangar project, and determined that, based on the literature and pedestrian field
review, the open land and woodland margins on the site may provide suitable habitat for the
Schweinitz's sunflower. The field review did not reveal the presence of federally listed
protected species on the site. It was our opinion that the proposed development of the project
area is not likely to impact listed protected species at the time. A copy of the Protected Species
Assessment is included in Appendix V.
HISTORICAL/CULTURAL RESOURCES
A scoping letter was sent to the North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources - State
Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) in 2004 for the same site of the proposed activities. The
SHPO issued a letter (September 28, 2004) indicating they were "aware of no historic resources
which would be affected by the project." A copy of the SHPO confirmation letter is included in
Appendix V.
5
Appendix I
Signed PCN Form
Agent Authorization Form
ql) 0FNNAF?96-k-
o Nii? r
aX,Q b4- tS o % U3
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification PC Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes ? No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply).
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ® Yes ? No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Stanly County Airport Terminal Project
2b. County: Stanly
2c. Nearest municipality / town: New London
2d. Subdivision name: Stanly County Airport
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Stanly County Airport Authority
3b. Deed Book and Page No. DB631, P557
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): David Griffin, Airport Manager
3d. Street address: 38512 Aviation Drive
3e. City, state, zip: New London, NC 28127
3f. Telephone no.: 704-982-9013
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. AgenttConsultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Chris Daves, P.W.S. (Please address all correspondance to agent)
5b. Business name
(if applicable): S&ME. Inc.
5c. Street address: 134 Suber Road
5d. City, state, zip: Columbia. SC 29210
5e. Telephone no.: 803-561-9024
5f. Fax no.: 803-561-9177
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a . Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 665104703056
1 b . Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.41 D99 Longitude: - 80.14801
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c . Property size: 14 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a . Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project: UT to Little Mountain Creek
2b . Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-IV
2c. River basin: Yadkin-Pee Dee
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Land Use = 1.05.03.01 & .03 - Transportation, Air Trasportation Facility, Non-Military & Military Facilities
Land Cover=
311/3121 - Managed Herbaceous Cover/Unmanaged Herbaceous Cover (80%);
441(05) - Oak Pine Mixed Deciduous-Coniferous Forestland, Rolling Uplands (12%);
53 - Linear Drainage (<1 %);
4.02 - Retention or Sediment Pond (2%)
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.318
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
780
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to construct a new, larger terminal building and parking area that meets the needs of public
demand and building codes, and also to comply with existing FAA guidelines regarding Building Restriction Lines (BRLs).
The proposed improvements will be located outside the existing BRL and will enhance Airport safety measures.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Industry standard dump trucks, pans, and bulldozers will be used for the project. The proposed project consists of the
following improvements to the Airport:
• Construction of a new two-story, 12.000 square foot (sf) terminal building and associated parking area. The new terminal
will house an operations area, a customer waiting area, a pilot's lounge/quiet room, a large conference room to be used
for various county meetings, Airport personnel office space, and future office space that is likely to be used by the
'
county
s economic development department in the future. Approximately 85 parking spaces, including four handicap
spaces, are proposed.
• A two-lane entrance road connecting the terminal and parking area to Airport Road. The entrance road will be
approximately 570 If and includes embankment construction. grading, drainage, erosion and sediment control
and the
,
culverting of an unnamed intermittent; aquatically unimportant stream.
• A two-lane connector road linking Aviation Drive and the rest of the airfield to the new terminal and parking area. The
connector road will be approximately 430 If.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes ? No ? Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
? Preliminary ®Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: S&ME, Inc.
Name (if known): Joe Lawler, P.W.S. Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Notice of Jurisdictional Determination (USACE Action ?D 200330686) on May 14, 2003 with final plat signed 11-24-2004.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ® No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary (T
W1 ®P ? T Fill/Culvert Cutover ? Yes
® No ® Corps
? DWQ
0.09
W2 ? P ? T El Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2a. Total wetland impacts 0.09
2h. Comments: Construction of the proposed slopes to support the roads will require placement of approximately 20,000 cubic
yards of clean, earthen, fill material. The proposed discharge (earthen fill, culvert) into the wetland/stream is necessary to
facilitate construction of suitable, stable foundation for both roads.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404. 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ® P ? T Culvert UT1 (Stream 1) PER
® INT ®Corps 2
? DWQ 95

S2 ®P ? T
Culvert
UT1 (Stream 1) ? PER I
®INT ® Corps
? pWQ 2
179
S3 ? P ? T [I PER
? INT j ?Corps
? DWQ
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ I
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
E] INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T [:1 PER El Corps
? INT ' ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 274
3i. Comments: Stream is intermittment and aquatically unimportant. Stream was considered aquatically unimportant in 20D4
and again on June 4, 2009 (Allen Johnson of DWQ). Scored 20.25 on the DWQ Stream Identification Form (Version 3.1) and
35 on the USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet (See attached forms).
Page of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10. 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 15b. 5c. 5d. 5e
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose
number of pond
Stream Impacts (feet)
Flooded I Filled I Excavated I Flooded I Filled I Excavated
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. '
? Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact , I
number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary T impact required?

B1 ?P?T ? Yes
?No
B2 ?P?T ?Yes ,i
? No
B3 ? P ? T ? Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts j
6i. Comments:
Wetland impacts (acres)
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Aircraft and vehicular safety concerns as well as the position of the wetland/stream in the landscape made it impossible to
avoid the stream and wetlands completely. In an effort to minimize impacts, the roadways were laid out to minimize impacts
to the existing wetland/stream areas as much as possible. The terminal entrance road was slightly curved to reduce the
impacts to the bulkier portion of the wetlands. Both roadways attempt to intersect the wetlands/stream areas as close to
perpendicular as possible. The roads tie-in slopes have been designed to be as steep as site conditions will allow and still
achieve vegetative growth (thus minimizing the stream impacts). A bottomless culvert was considered for the impacted area
along the entrance road, but proved to be too expensive for this project.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
See above. Also, proper sediment and erosion control BMPs will be implemented during and after construction.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ® Yes ? No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes. mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ® DWQ ® Corps
? Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
®Payment to in-lieu fee program
project?
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ® Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0.25 acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments: On November 24, 2004, the USACE issued a Nationwide Permit (NWP) 39 (USACE Action ID 200330686) for
impacts to 0.29 acre of wetlands for the construction of two T-hangars located immediately adjacent to the proposed terminal
site. A DWQ 401 Water Quality Certification (DWQ# 04-1808) was issued December 2, 2004. Mitigation for the impacts
included payment into the NCEEP for wetland impacts. The proposed terminal improvements will include impacts to 0.09
acre of wetland. No mitigation required for stream impacts per Corps and DWQ due to intermittent/aquatically unimportant
status.
5. Complete if Usina a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ? No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8of12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
? Yes No
?
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 16%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ? No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The stormwater management plan will use grassed swales, filter strips, and bioretent ion to achieve 85% TSS removal.
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
® DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? N/A
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties

4a.
Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? HOW
? ORW
(check all that apply):
? Session Law 2D06-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ? No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ® Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ® Yes ? No
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 20D8 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ? Yes ? No
Comments: Categorical Exclusion
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
ddi
i ? Yes ® No
a
t
onal development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Additional development from this proposed project is not anticipated. The proposed project is only going to serve the
current needs of the airport (larger terminal building and parking area that meets the needs of public demand and building
codes; comply with existing FAA guidelines regarding BRLs).
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
D
L omestic sewage only. Routed to municipal sewer system.
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ® Yes ? No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. El Raleigh
® Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS website @ (http://www.fws.gov/nc-es/es/cntyiist/stanly.html); USFWS informal consultation letter (April 6, 2009)
NCNHP website @ (http,//149.168.1.196/nhp/)- NCNHP informal consultation (March 13, 2009)
Protected Species Assessment, S&ME, Inc. (November 2, 2004) - Search specifically conducted for Schweinitz's sunflower.
No federally protected species identified in project area.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish
? Yes
No
habitat?
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
South Atlantic Habitat & Ecosystem IMS (http://ocean.floridamarine.org/efh-coral/ims/viewer.htm)
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
SHPO Consultation Letter - ER04-2156 (Sept 28, 2004) - No historic resources affected for project area
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Sc. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM 371 D6650DOJ
(http://msc.fema.gov/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CategoryDisplay?cataiogld=1 OD01 &storeld=10001 &categoryld=12D01 &langld=-
1
&userType=G&type=1)
Chris Daves. P.W.S. ( _r 8-19-09
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
ka V e'?
Applicant/Agent's Signature; Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the
applicant is provided.)
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10. 2008 Version
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Date: March 3, 2009
Project Information
?S&ME
S&ME Project Name: Stanly County Airport Improvement Projects
Type of Project: Permitting for Wetland/ Stream Impacts or Jurisdictional Delineation
.....__._.. ............ ....._._....................................... ............................ ...._....... .__..........__........_.................. _
Location: Staniy County Airport, Stanly County, North Carolina
¦ I?I?II??IWIYIIIIYI
Property Owner/Representative Information
Business Name:
Mailing Address:
City, State, Zip Code:
Telephone No.
Contact:
38512 Aviation Drive
New London, NC 28127
rulr-yoc-yu 1 a
David M. Griffin
Agent Information
Business Name:
Street Address:
City, State, Zip Code:
Telephone No.
Contact:
S&ME, Inc.
134 Suber Road
Columbia, SC 29210
803.551-9024
Chris Daves
Authorization: 0 ,,,?"__.,.- M behalf of
(Contact Signature
Stanl y County Airport hereby authorize
(Name of Landowner or Project Sponsor)
S&ME to act as agent with the USACE in connection with the above-
mentioned project.
Appendix II
Permit Figures
Site Vicinity Map (Figure 1)
Topographic Map (Figure 2)
Aerial Map - Existing Conditions (Figure 3)
Soils Map (Figure 3A)
Building Restriction Line Exhibit (Figure 4)
Site Plan (Figure 5)
Profile View - Entrance Road (Figure 6)
Profile View - Connector Road (Figure 7)

M1 _•
}: 1 r z
M

{ a.
7{, O
o z
C-
Qz? ?

tl
z >?.z

"k ?-Eo
o?
o
Z U
/ z

? a
, J
LU Z +

I y r'

'f_
LU

f;
O) o
C _ 2

N

Imo ' (n
C
co
LLJ
Lc) 0
M 00
J a
? Q
0
a

01

N W
IL
<

;., v-
-
ILJ
1 _ m uj

+ O
? _ N x M O
m
_ 'rr ? ..... O M
U

0

_+_ .

-
w
m
LLI z
} ?44
{ t+i- 1 r p
z w
U 3 w
a w a
p
??Itt

oc)

NO r ? f

?
4 i
-
f

?
-7
?
r
l .• f / J ?
`
,
? 1 y k
.2 ? v

jL*
a
a
u f -

mac f'? J AY-? O Ll

j

X ?'rm?r.?

ti 416
q 14.j ?
V
- C L 4

` d C Q O ?
Z Z ? ,, <1 O
V
u OC m C O
)
j

y
w

lll W Q F
-

-?

a
W
H
U)
w zz?
Q O o 0
Q O ?
X U a
o"co
a
a
1" o
0

?
u? z
M
J
?- Lt

t/? U
o Z ?=
ooz

J ?
N oz<
v _

Q ? z
?

Q?-z
a?`n ate.
J
SOURCE: STANLY COUNTY SOIL SURVEY- SHEET 2
NTS SOILS MAP FIGURE NO.
LJB STANST OUN RPORT TERMINAL
NORTH C ROL N OJECT 3A
WCD *S&ME 8/18/2009 S&ME PROJECT NO. 1614-09-064
EXISTING 5AO0'XlW RUNWAY

TERMINAL
BUILDING
mBRIE - BRL -
-ICJ L

BUILDING RESTRICTION LINE
- BRL BRL BRL -
BRL -1
EXISTING APRON
0
EXISTING
ACCESS ROAD L
(AVIATION DR.)
OPP
Apq?
-HANGARS
EXISTING
FUEL FARM

TERMINAL
BUILDING
FUTURE
PARKING
Figure 0 200' 100' 0 200' TAMERT&BRIGHT
Stanly County Airport SCALE IN FEET »an ??eII0U=A°'''s?n'"'?'B
r?wtrwHA2Awsotaav,? e[mno
Building Restriction Line Exhibit 1 "=200 PM& ''"
EXISTING TAXIWAY
c::-:::=
0
/ C)
N U- Q
J
Utv.o
aNC v
v
°z
Q W J
H
N
U
<
oz
o
S''l F? 1 I 0.. u
ca
o Z
r r W ?
3 a < FW- O
Q j a ? z
j Q. cc
'f i F
LLJ
77
Q.
z - ?_ -
. ?.•.///? ?.. }?i III ?ri ___ ? _ -'- •r ? ?' z -
k
<
m
1 R ` I I? r
? Q
a o
I % G
p y? 1 w 1
i
J fi Q
I N Q` ? ';? N ''?•? J T?`?
'? y .l? O u W E
o W ?1111
Q 2 U y Q a o N
_ o z ?I f
I I i'? ' rf p °'
I ?1 +tr" ? l? r? r p o
2 -
. W Q t1?1?7 o
L
C 1 J W m
L?Ll 3: L,
F? o < _ < a
N v o 0
PROPOSED PAVEMENT
580
3
EXISTING GROUN
570
PROPOSED GRADE'
42„ RCP CLASS @ 1.31
166.00 L.F•
O
Ln o
cfl r?i
? cD
560 4-)_
LU
O J O
O W
+
O Z z
7 L<- O-
PIPE INVERT 1'-
BELOW SUBSTRA
06
00 O
? II
tp
II w
? w
cfl _
+?o
?zZ
N?NC'
Ul (n It 0
580
570
560
179 LF STEAM IMPACT
550 _ 550
10+00 11+00 12+00
50 25 0 50
SCALE IN FEET
1"=50'
Storm Drain Profile TAMERT&BRIGHT
Albemarle- Stanly County Airport ffiIIQO dt PiANNQ10 OON9ULTADTI3
FIGURE 6 - PROFILE VIEW 4"4PAIWWAYMAMBOUIBVARg8IMMO
ENTRANCE ROAD MKM WMMM P MU7
590 - ---
- x-580
L/IJ IIIVV VI.VVIVL/ 120.00 L.F. 2" RCP
CCS-Jll 0.50
570 570
0 O
O
6 !
Ln L
i
II
00 D :D
00
+
O Z ± Z
I,H(V ?I F-- C,4
560, cn cn cn cn ? 560
95 LF STEAM
IMPACT
I
10+00 11+00
50 25 0 50
SCALE IN FEET
1"=50'
Storm Drain Profile
TALBERT&BRIGHT
Albemarle- Stanly County Airport
IDm=IIiO &PIAAIlaIOOON9ULTANI3
FIGURE 7 - PROFILE VIEW I9MPMMATP1AZADOURVAIAMUM
CONNECTOR ROAD aiAi1.0718,NMHCAWXMA 3M7
PHOM 704476 070 PAM 704 p6 M
Appendix III
Previous U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE)
Nationwide Permit (NWP) 39 issued November 24, 2004
(Action ID 200330686)
Previous 2004 North Carolina Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) 401 Water Quality Certification
(DWQ# 04-1808)
Previous North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP) Invoice for 2004 Impacts
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID. 200330686 County: Stanly USGS Quad: New London
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner / Authorized Agent: Mr. David Griffin
Address: Stanly County Airport Authority
40659 Airport Road
New London, NC 28127
Telephone No.: 704-982-9154
Size and location of property (water body, road name/number, town, etc.): The site for the proposed
hangars is located at the existing Albemarle-Stanly Countv Airport facility, east of NC Hwv 52,
near Albemarle, Stanly County, North Carolina
Description of project area and activity: The permit authorizes the installation of culverts and
Rllacement of fill associated with the construction of additional airport hangars Permanent impacts
to stream channels and wetlands authorized by this permit are 120 linear feet of stream channel
and 0.29 acres of wetands. Special Conditions: You shall mitigate for 0.29 acres of unavoidable
impacts to wetlands associated with this project by payment to the North Carolina
Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) in the amount necessary to perform
restoration to 0.58 acres of inrisdictional riparian hardwood forest wetlands in the Yadkin
River Basin Catalo in Unit 03040104. Construction within 'urisdictional areas on the
property shall begin only after the permittee has made full payment with certified check to
the NCEEP, and the NCEEP has made written confirmation to the District Engineer, that
it agrees to accept responsibility for the mitigation work required, pursuant to Paragraph
IV.D. of the Memorandum of Understanding between the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington
Distric dated November 4,1998.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
? Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number:
Nationwide Permit Number: 39
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the
attached Nationwide conditions, the attached special conditions, and your submitted plans. Any violation of the
attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a
restoration order and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization
is modified, suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit
authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified
below, provided it complies with all requirements of the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit
authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the activity would no longer comply with
the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction) or
are under contract to continence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the activity
is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation,
unless discretionary authority has been exercised on a case-by-case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the
authorization.
-2-
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality
Certification. You should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine
Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area
Management Act (LAMA), prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management.
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the pennittee of the responsibility to obtain any other
required Federal, State or local approvals/pennits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of
Engineers regulatory program, please contact Amanda D. Jones at 828-271-7980 x232.
Corps Regulatory Official Amanda D. Jones Date: November 24, 2004
Expiration Date of Verification: November 24, 2006
Determination of Jurisdiction:
? Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above
described project area. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory
Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
? There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless
there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not
to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
? There are waters of the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit
requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the
law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years
from the date of this notification.
® The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action.
Please reference jurisdictional determination issued May 14, 2003. Action ID: 200330686.
Basis of Jurisdictional Determination: The site contains wetlands according to criteria defined in the US Armv
Corps of Engineers Delineation Manual and are adiacent to unnamed tributaries on the property The
stream channels contain a ordinary hieh water mark and are unnamed tributaries to Little Mountain Creek
in the Vadlan River basin.
Corps Regulatory Official: Amanda D. Jones
Date November 24. 2004
Copy Furnished:
S&ME, Attn: Chris Daves, 134 Suber Road, Columbia, NC 29210
NCEEP, Attar: Jun Stanfill, 1619 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1619

Mr. David Griffin
Stanly County Airport Authority
40659 Airport Rd.
New London, NC 28127
Subject: T Hangar Project
Michael F. rw4q. Clovcrnor
??'illiam G. Ross Jr., secretary
North Carolina Dcpariment of Environment and Natural Resources
Alrui W. Klimck. P.E. Director
Division orwater Quality
f?LE December 2, 2004
DWQ# 04-1808
Stanly County
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Griffin:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to impact
0.29 acre of wetland and 120 linear feet (If) of unnamed stream to Little Mountain Creek in order to construct
the T Hangar facility in Stanly County, as described in your application received by the Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) on November 8, 2004. After reviewing your application, we have determined that this project is
covered by Water Quality General Certification Number 3402, which can be viewed on our web site at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.uslncwetlands. The General Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Number
39 once it is issued to you by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Please note that you should get any other
federal, state or local permits before proceeding with your project, including those required by (but not limited
to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
The above noted Certification will expire when the associated 404 permit expires unless otherwise
specified in the General Certification. This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described
in your application. If you change your project, you must notify us in writing, and you may be required to send
us a new application for a new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the
Certification and approval letter, and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions.
In addition to the requirements of the certification, you must also comply with the following conditions:
1. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all remaining jurisdictional wetlands and waters
or areas within 50 feet of all streams and ponds on the property. These mechanisms shall be put in place
within 30 days of the date of this letter or the issuance of the 4D4 Permit (whichever is later). A sample deed
notification format can be downloaded from the 401NVetiands Unit web site at
httr)://h2o. enr. state. nc. us/ncwetiands.
2. The Mooresville Regional office shall be notified in writing once construction of the project has begun.
3. We understand that you have chosen to contribute to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) in order
to compensate for the impacts to the wetland. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2R .0402 and 15A NCAC 2B
.0242(7), this contribution will satisfy our compensatory mitigation requirements under 15A NCAC 2H
.05D6(h) and 15A NCAC 2B .0233(1 D). Until the EEP receives and clears your check (made payable to:
DENR - Ecosystem Enhancement Program), the impacts shall not occur. Ms. Deborah Anderson should be
contacted at [phone] if you have any questions concerning the EEP. You have one month from the
date of this Certification to make this payment. For accounting purposes, this Certification authorizes the fill
No `rthCarohna
North Caroline Division of Water Quality 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet h2o.enr state.nc.us FAX [phone].623-6748
An Equa( OpportunWAffttmative Acfion Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
p?C? W A ???QG
? 1r
D 't
of 0.29 acre of wetland in the Yadkin Pee Dee River Basin. Please be aware that the EEP rules require
rounding of wetland impacts to the nearest quarter acre (15A NCAC 2R .0503(b)).
4. A final written stormwater management plan shall be approved in writing by this Office prior to the
construction of any permanent facilities at the subject site. The stormwater facilities must be designed to
treat the runoff from the entire project, unless otherwise explicitly approved by the Division of Water
Quality. Also, before any permanent building is occupied at the subject site, the facilities (as approved by
this Office) shall be constructed and operational, and the stormwater management plan (as approved by
this Office) shall be implemented. The structural stormwater practices as approved by this Office as well as
drainage patterns must be maintained in perpetuity. No changes to the structural stormwater practices
shall be made without written authorization from the Division of Water Quality.
5. No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the
footprint of the.impacts depicted in the Preconstruction Notification application. All construction activities
shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur.
6. Erosion and sediment control practices must utilize Best Management Practices (BMP) and be in full
compliance with all specifications governing the proper design, installation, and operation and maintenance o
such BMP in order to protect surface water standards:
a. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control measures
must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most recent version of
the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all
construction sites, borrow pit sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor-owned or
leased borrow pits associated with the project.
b. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Surface
Mining Manual.
c. The reclamation measures and implementation of these measures must be in accordance with the
requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
7. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent
practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable,
they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within two months of the date the Division of Land
Resources has released the project.
8. Upon completion of the project, the applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of
Completion" form to the 401 /Wetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality. Please send photographs
upstream and downstream of each culvert site to document correct installation along with the CetVficate of
"Completion form Nr a
L t-l
9. Continuing Compliance. The Stanly County Airport Authority (Mr. David Griffin, contact) shall conduct its
activities in a manner consistent with state water quality standards (including any requirements for
compliance with section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act) and any other appropriate requirements of state and
federal law. If DWQ determines that such standards or laws are not being met (including the failure to
sustain a designated or achieved use) or that state or federal law is being violated, or that further conditions
are necessary to assure compliance, DWQ may reevaluate and modify this certification to include conditions
appropriate to assure compliance with such standards and requirements in accordance with 15 A NCAC
2H.0507(d). Before codifying the certification, DWQ shall notify Mr. Griffin and the US Army Corps of
Engineers, provide public notice in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0503, and provide opportunity for public
hearing in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0504. Any new or revised conditions shall be provided to Mr.
Griffin in writing, shall be provided to the United States Army Corps of Engineers for reference in any permit
issued pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and shall also become conditions of the 404 Permit
for the project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You
must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition that
conforms to Chapter 1508 of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714
Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless
you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.
If you have any questions, please telephone Alan Johnson in the Mooresville Regional Office at 704-663-1699 or
Cyndi Karoly in the Central Office in Raleigh 919-733-9721.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AJlaj
Attachments
cc: Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville
Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands Unit
Land Quality, MRO
S&ME, Chris Daves
Central Files
DEC-06-2004 15:18
TALBERT BRIGHT
l Os stem
?I , W
1
PROGWA
INVOICE
Novcmber 30, 2004
J)WQ# 04-1808
COE# 200330686
David Griffin
Stanly County Airport A,uthvri.ty
4059 Airport Road
New London, NC 28127
Project: Albemarle-Startly County Airport•T-Hanger
County: Staoly
P. e2/212
You have chosen to satisfy the compensatory mitigatxan requirements of the Section 4011404 permit issut3d
for DWQ Project Name: Albcmark-Stanly County Airport-T-Hanger, DWQ# 04-1808 diTouglz payment of a
foo to the Nonh Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0500. your fee
has been calculated as follows (Please note: payment for wetlands is calculated in imaremants of 0,25 acres);
Riparian Wetlands
0.75 acres x $24,SS2.08 = $19,414.00
Total amount payment $18,414.00
Please mail a check in the atnouriv of $18,414.00 made payable to;
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program to the address below.
If you havc any gue:sdons concerning this payment,
Plca.Se contact Carol Shaw at 919-733-5208.
NC DENR/1?cosysrem Enhancement Program
1619 Mail Sarvice Center
kaiaigh, NC 27599-1619
Paymanis to 1ha Ecwystcm Enitancemant Program are jat reimburmbia unIOU a request for n4mhurnrocnt iu rcceivnd v itbin 12
month of rho dam of the rwaipt, A iottcr must aaoompany requests for reimbursorotrst from the permitting agendas stating that the
permit and/or authorization br* tin rescinded.
PYD" Our S>`A&

North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancomont Program, 1819 Mutt Service Center, lialelgh, NC 27899-1619 1 919-733-5208 / Wyvy#,Rcoop.not
TDTAL P.02
Appendix Iv
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Advisory
Circular 15015300-13 regarding BRLs
fa9w
U.S. Department
of Transportation
Federal Aviation
Administration
AIRPORT DESIGN
/ INCORPORATES CHANGES 1 THRU 13 /
9/29/89 150/5300-13
Date: Advisory Circular
AC 150/5300-13 CHG 5
(c) When the thresholds are
staggered and the approach is to the far threshold, the
minimum 2,500-foot (762 m) separation requires an
increase of 100 feet (30 m) for every 500 feet (152 m) of
threshold stagger.
209. RUNWAY TO PARALLEL TAXIWAY AM
TAXILANE SEPARATTON.
a. Standards. Tables 2.1 and 2-2 present the
runway centerline to parallel taxiway/taxilane centerline
separation standard. This distance is such to satisfy the
requirement that no part of an aircraft (tail tip, wing tip)
on taxiway/taxilane centerline is within the runway safety
area or penetrates the obstacle free tone (OFZ). The
computer program cited in appendix 11 may be used to
determine the increase to these separation distances for
elevation.
b. Recommendations. To have room for the
acute-angled exit taxiway, provide a runway centerline to
parallel taxiway centerline of at least 400 feet (120 m) for
Airplane Design Groups I and 11, 500 feet (150 m) for
Airplane Design Group 111, and 600 feet (180 m) for
Airplane Design Groups IV, V, and VI.
210. BUILDING RESTRICTION LINE (BRL). A
BRL should be placed on an airport layout plan for
identifying suitable building area locations on airports.
The BRL should encompass the runway protection zones,
the runway object free area, the runway visibility zone
(see paragraph 503), NAVAID critical areas, areas
required for terminal instrument procedures, and airport
traffic control tower clear line of sight.
211. OBJECT CLEARING CRITERIA. Safe and
efficient operations at an airport require that certain areas
on and near the airport be clear of objects or restricted to
objects with a certain function, composition, andlor
height. The object clearing criteria subdivides the
14 CFR Part 77, Subpart C, airspace and the object free
area (OFA) ground area by type of objects tolerated
within each subdivision. Aircraft are controlled by the
aircraft operating rules and not by this criteria.
a. Standards. Object clearance requirements
are as follows:
(1) Object Free Area (OFA). Object free
areas require clearing of objects as specified in
paragraph 307, Runway Object Free Area, and
paragraph 404, Taxiway and Taxilane Object Free Area
(OFA).
2/14197
(2) Runway and Taxiway safety Areas.
Runway and taxiway safety areas require clearing of
objects, except for objects that need to be located in the
runway or taxiway safety area because of their function.
Objects higher than 3 inches (7.6 cm) above grade should
be constructed on low impact resistant supports (frangible
mounted structures) of the lowest practical height with the
frangible point no higher than 3 inches (7.6 cm) above
grade. Other objects, such as manholes, should be
constructed at grade. In no case should their height
exceed 3 inches (7.6 cm) above grade. Underground fuel
storage facilities should not be located within runway and
taxiway safety areas (see AC 150/5230-4), Aircraft Fuel
Storage, Handling, and Dispensing on Airports).
Tables 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, and 4-1 specify runway and taxiway
safety area standard dimensions.
(3) Obstacle Free ne (OFZ). Obstacle
Free Zones require clearing of object penetrations, except
for frangible visual NAVAIDs that need to be located in
the OFZ because of their function. Paragraph 306
specifies OFZ standard dimensions.
(4) Threshold. The threshold obstacle
clearance surfaces, defined in Appendix 2, paragraph 5,
require clearing of object penetrations.
(5) NAVAIDsI Certain areas require
clearing for the establishment and operation of NAVAIDs.
These NAVAID critical areas are depicted in chapter 6.
(6) 14 CFR Pan 77 Obstructions to Air
Navgation- Obstructions to air navigation must be
removed unless an FAA aeronautical study, based on
proposed operations, determined otherwise. To determine
otherwise, the FAA must find no substantial adverse
effect as defined in Order 7400.2, Procedures for
Handling Airspace Matters, Chapter 7, Evaluating
Aeronautical Effect, Section 1, General. The FAA,
normally, limits aeronautical studies of existing objects to
obstructions to air navigation which are not included in
the criteria cited in paragraphs 211a(1) through (5).
(7) Runway Protection Zone (RPZ). The
RPZ requires cleating of incompatible objects and
activities as specified in paragraphs 212a(1)(a) and
212a(2).
(8) General. Other objects which require
clearing are those which generally can have an adverse
effect on the airport. These include objects in the irmer
part of the approach area (coinciding with the RPZ) such
as fuel handling and storage facilities, stroke and dust
generating activities, misleading lights, and those which
may create glare or attract wildlife.
12 Chap 2
06/19/2008
b. Recommendations. Other objects that are
desirable to clear, if practicable, are objects that do not
have a substantial adverse effect on the airport but, if
removed, will enhance operations. These include objects in
the controlled activity area and obstructions to air
navigation that are not covered in paragraph 21 La,
especially those penetrating an approach surface. On a
paved runway, the approach surface starts 200 feet (61 in)
beyond the area usable for takeoff or landing, whichever is
more demanding. On an unpaved runway, the approach
surface starts at the end of the area usable for takeoff or
landing.
212. RUNWAY PROTECTION ZONE (RPZ). The
RPZ's function is to enhance die protection of people and
property on the ground. This is achieved through airport
owner control over RPZs. Such control includes clearing
RPZ areas (and maintaining them clear) of incompatible
objects and activities. Control is preferably exercised
through the acquisition of sufficient property interest in the
RPZ.
a. Standards.
(1) RPZ ConfigurationA"ation. The RPZ is
trapezoidal in shape and centered about the extended
runway centerline. The central portion and controlled
activity area the two components of the RPZ (see
Figure 2-3). The RPZ dimension for a particular runway
end is a function of the type of aircraft and approach
visibility minimum associated with that runway end. Table
2-4 provides standard dimensions for RPZs. Other than
with a special application of declared distances, the RPZ
begins 200 feet (60 m) beyond the end of the area usable
for takeoff or landing. With a special application of
declared distances, see Appendix 14, separate approach and
departure RPZs are required for each runway end.
(a) The Central Portion of the RPZ. The
central portion of the RPZ extends from the beginning to
the end of the RPZ, centered on the runway centerline. Its
width is equal to the width of the runway OFA (see
Figure 2-3). Paragraph 307 contains the dimensional
standards for the OFA.
(b) The Controller) Activity Area. The
controlled activity area is the portion of the RPZ to the
sides of the central portion of the RPZ.
(2) Land Use. In addition to the criteria
specified in paragraph 211, the following land use criteria
apply within the RPZ:
AC 150/5300-13 CHG 13
(a) While it is desirable to clear all objects
from the RPZ, some uses are permitted, provided they do
not attract wildlife (see paragraph 202.g., W ddlife Hazards,
and Appendix 17 for dimensional standards), are outside of
the Runway OFA, and do not interfere with navigational
aids. Automobile parking facilities, although discouraged,
may be penmitted, provided the parking facilities and any
associated appurtenances, in addition to meeting all of the
preceding conditions, are located outside of the central
portion of the RPZ. Fuel storage facilities may not be
located in the RPZ.
(b) Land uses prohibited from the RPZ are
residences and places of public assembly. (Churches,
schools, hospitals, office buildings, shopping centers, and
other uses with similar concentrations of persons typify
places of public assembly.) Fuel storage facilities may not
be located in the RPZ.
b. Recommendations. Where it is determined to be
impracticable for the airport owner to acquire and plan the
land uses within the entire RPZ, the RPZ land use standards
have recommendation status for that portion of the RPZ not
controlled by the airport owner,
c. FAA Studies of Objects and Activities in the
Vicinity of Airports. The FAA policy is to protect the
public investment in the national airport system. To
implement this policy, the FAA studies existing and
proposed objects and activities, both off and on public-use
airports, with respect to their effect upon the safe and
efficient use of the airports and safety of persons and
property on the ground. These objects need not be
obstructions to air navigation, as defined in 14 CFR
Part 77. As the result of a study, the FAA may issue an
advisory recommendation in opposition to the presence of
any off airport object or activity in the vicinity of a public-
use airport that conflicts with an airport planning or design
standard or recommendation.
213. RUNWAY HOLDING POSITION (HOLDLINE).
At airports with operating airport traffic control towers,
runway holding positions (holdlines) identify the location
on a taxiway where a pilot is to stop when he/she does not
have clearance to proceed onto the runway. At airports
without operating control towers, these holdlines identify
the location where a pilot should assure there is adequate
separation with other aircraft before proceeding onto the
runway. The holdline standards, which assume a
perpendicular distance from a runway centerline to an
intersecting taxiway centerline, are in Tables 2-1 and 2-2.
However, these distance standards may need to be longer
and placed in such a way to take into account the largest
aircraft (tail, body, or wing tip) expected to use the
runway from penetrating the Obstacle Free Zone.
214. to 299. RESERVED
Chap 2 13
Appendix V
NCEEP Letter of Acceptance
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP)
Correspondence
Protected Species Assessment (S&ME, Inc. 2004)
NC State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
Correspondence
Previous USACE Jurisdictional Determination Letter
Y
tem
Jn w?I elinent
rRDDRAM
March 12, 2009
David Griffin
Stanly C. Airport Authority
38512 Aviation Dr.
New London, NC 28127 Expiration of Acceptance: December 12, 2009
Project: Stanly Co. Airport Terminal Project County: Stanly
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to accept
payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that the payment will
be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these
agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal qr local
&avernment pomiiis regnlatiopor authorizations associated with the Wppsed activity including SL 2008 152• An Act to Promote
This acceptance is valid for nine months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a copy of the
issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's
responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based
on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the In
Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed at www.nceep.net,
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the following
table.
River
Basin CU
Location Stream (feet) Wetlands (acres) Buffer I
(Sq. Ft.) Buffer II
(Sq. Ft,)
Cold Cool Warm Ri arian Non-Ri ian Coastal Marsh
Impact Yadkin 03040104 0 ' 0 400 0.25 0 0 0 0
Credits Yadkin 03040104 0 0 800 0.50 0 0 0 0
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. If the regulatory agencies require
mitigation credits greater than indicated above, and the applicant wants NCEEP to be responsible for the additional mitigation, the
applicant will need to submit a mitigation request to NCEEP for approval prior to permit issuance. The mitigation will be performed
in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1995.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Valerie Mitchener at [phone].
Sincerely, ((??
William ,Gilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, NCDWQ Wetlands/401 Unit
Steve Lund, USACE-Asheville
Alan Johnson, NCDWQ-1K4ooresvil1e
Chris Daves, agent
File
AmtoYr;;fg ... L .. Pro" OU4, Sfa&
.T ?:dfl
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Natural Resources Planning and Conservation
Beverly Eaves Perdue Linda Pearsall
Governor Director
March 13, 2009
Chris Daves
S&ME, Inc.
134 Suber Road
Columbia, SC 29210
Subject: Stanly County Airport Terminal Project. No. 1614-09-064
Dear Mr. Daves:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
I have examined the Natural Heritage Program records for this site as indicated on the map you
sent. We have no records from the site itself. However, we have a record for smooth sunflower
(Helianthus laevigatus) very near the site. It occurs on the road side about 0.1 mile to the south.
We also have a record for the federally listed Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii)
about 1 mile south of the site. Because smooth sunflower often co-occurs with Schweinitz's
sunflower, and either can occur in open habitat, including forest edges and road sides, there
appears to be high potential for either species to occur on the site. A careful survey in the
appropriate season is needed to determine if these species are present and would be affected by
the project.
. /
Sincerely,

Michael P. Schafale
Natural Heritage Program
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone] FAX; 919-715-3060 Internet; www.oneNCNaturally.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
One
Nor. thCarolina
?i??xturia!!r?
Natural Resources Manning and onservation
#S&ME
November 2, 2004
Talbert & Bright
4944 Parkway Plaza Boulevard, Suite 350
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
Attention: Mr. Chad Vernon
Reference: Protected Species Assessment
Albemarle-Stanly County Airport T-Hangar Project
Stanly County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1614-04-340A
Dear Mr. Vernon;
S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) is pleased to submit this report detailing our Protected Species Assessment
for the above-referenced site located west of Badin in Stanly County; North Carolina (Figure 1).
This work was performed in accordance with S&ME Proposal No. 1614-3791-04, dated
November 1, 2004. This report and the on-site pedestrian survey have been conducted to assess
the potential for the presence of protected species at the Albemarle-Stanly County Airport in
preparation for proposed additions on the site.
The 19.9-acre site (35° 24.68'N/80° 8.95W) is located west of and adjacent to Airport Road (SR
1949) and is owned by the Stanly County Airport Authority (Stanly County Tax Parcel No.
665002767703). The site is identified on a portion of the New London, N.C. USGS 7.5-minute
topographic quadrangle map, dated 1993 (Figure 2). Proposed plans for the project area include
the construction of two airplane hangars, a stormwater pond, and associated aprons. The area of
impact of the proposed project is located on the western portion of the site.
SBJJiE, Inc. [phone]
134 Suber Road [phone] fax
Columbia, South Carolino 29210 www.srneinc.com
Protected Species Assessment S&ME Project No. 1614-04-340A
Albemarle-Stanly County Airport T-Hangar Project November 2, 2004
1.0 SITE/HABITAT DESCRIPTIONS
The project area is located in northeastern Stanly County within the Pjedinont Physiographic
Province of North Carolina. The area of impact consists of undeveloped, open land and a small
portion of woodland, which includes 0.29 acres of jurisdictional wetlands and 120 linear feet of
intermittent stream channel. The properties adjacent to the site consist of woodland, a fuel farm
and associated airport buildings. The undeveloped portions of the site primarily consist of two
habitat types: open land and mixed hardwood woodland. Two intermittent stream channels and
jurisdictional wetlands are located within the wooded area. Refer to the Site Aerial Map (Figure
3) for the locations of various habitats and stream features.
Open Land
A majority of the site consists of open land. The herbaceous layer covers approximately 90
percent of the ground. Dominant herbaceous species observed included broomsedge
(Andropogon elliottii), foxtail grass (Setaria geniculata), purpletop (Tridens favus), panic grass
(Panicum spp.), dandelion (Taraxacum officinale), doll's daisy (Erigeron spp.), rabbitfoot clover
(Trifolium repens), red clover (T. pratense), wild strawberry (Fragaria virginica), cinquefoil
(Potentilla canadensis), thistle (Cirsium horridulum), vetch (Vicia spp.), Indian hemp
(Apocynum cannabinum), wood sorrel (Oxalis Florida) and horse-nettle (Solanum carolinense).
Portions of the open land appear to be maintained by periodic mowing.
Vegetation surrounding the jurisdictional wetlands near the fringes of the open land included
beggar ticks (Bidens spp.), dock (Rumex spp.), sundrops (Oenothera spp.), sericea lespedeza
(Lespedeza cuneata), soft rush (Juncus eFfusus), needlepod rush (Juncus scirpoides), umbrella
sedge (Cyperus strigosus) and smartweed (Polygonum pensylvanicum). Ironweed (Vernonia
noveboracensis), elderberry (Sambucus canadensis), pokeweed (Phytolacca americana),
cottonwood (Populus deltoides), red maple (Ater rubrum) and Chinese privet (Ligustrum
sinense) were also observed in this area.
2
Protected Species Assessment S&MF Project No. 1614-04-340A
Albemarle-Stanly County Airport T-Hangar Project _ November 2, 2004
Mixed Hardwood Woodland
Mixed hardwood woodland areas are located on the eastern, central and northern portions of the
site. Within the wooded areas, linear wetlands flanking two intermittent streams are present.
The canopy within the mixed hardwood woodland has a closure ranging from approximately 70
to 80 percent at heights ranging from approximately 70 to 90 feet. Dominant canopy species
include tulip-tree (Liriodendron tulipifera), white oak (Quercus alba), willow oak (Q. phellos),
red maple, American sycamore (Platanus occidentalis) and sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua).
The subcanopy has a closure of approximately 20 percent at a height ranging from approximately
10 to 25 feet. Individuals of the canopy dominants as well as flowering dogwood (Cornus
florida) and winged elm (Ulmus alata) comprise the subcanopy.
The under-story shrub and woody vine layer within the mixed hardwood community has
coverage of approximately 10 to 20 percent. Dominant shrub and woody vine species include
saplings of the canopy and subcanopy dominants, as well as Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera
japonica), bamboo grass (Microstegium vimineum), grecnbriar (Smilax rotundifolia) and
blackberry (Rubus spp.). The herbaceous layer is minimal and covers less than five percent of
the ground.
The longer of the two intermittent streams originates within the thin, wooded area on the central
portion of the site and flows east, northeast. Another intermittent stream flows underneath
Airport Road and joins the other stream. The channels are shallow and less than three feet wide.
Channel bed substrate consisted of loamy silts and silty foams. No standing or flowing water
was observed in the two intermittent streams during the pedestrian survey. Various mosses and
Christmas fern (Polystichum acrostichoides) were observed near the dry streams.
3
Protected Species Assessment S&ME Project No. 1614-04-340A
Albemarle-Stan] County Airport T-Han ar Project_ November 2 2004
2.0 PROTECTED SPECIES
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database was consulted regarding
current federal and state listed species within Stanly County. Listed species and their respective
federal and state status are identified in Table 1. Explanations of Federal and State rankings are
included at the end of the table. The NCNHP database identified the following federal and state
listed species in the vicinity of the site:
TABLE 1: PROTECTED FLORA & FAUNA SUMMARY
ALBEMARLE-STANLY COUNTY AIRPORT T-HANGAR PROJECT
Species State Status Federal Status Brief Habitat Description
Creeper T Mixed substrates (silt, sand, gravel) of
Strophitus undulatus streams, rivers and lakes
Carolina fatmucket T Streams with a substrate of pebbles or large
Lampsihs radiata conspicua rocks
Carolina creeksheli E
FSC Silty sand or clay along small streams of
Villosa vaughaniana the Pee Dee & Catawba River basins
Bald eagle T T (PD) Mature forests or cliffs near larger bodies
Haliaeetus leucocephalus of water
Prairie blue wild indigo Glades, woodland borders and open forest
Baptisia minor var. aberrans located over basic soils
Georgia aster
Symphyotrichum georgianum T C Open woods and roadsides
Schweinitz's sunflower P E Open woods and roadsides with
Helianthw schweinitzii Mecklenburg/Iredell/Enon/Poindexter soils
Wright's cliff-brake
Pellaea wrightiana E-SC -- Rock outcrops with seepage areas
Yadkin River goldenrod

Solidago plumosa E FSC Riverside banks of the Yadkin River
- ?.•.6 ., i - i nrcatcneu C, -A anmdate
FSC - Fedcral Species of Concern SC - Special Concern PD - Proposed De-listed
The NCNHP records identified the presence of known occurrences of the Carolina creekshell,
bald eagle and Schweinitz's sunflower within the New London, North Carolina USGS
Quadrangle. A pedestrian field review was performed for the federal and state listed species in
suitable habitats within the site on November 2, 2004. Chris Daves and Catherine McRae of
S&ME performed the field review. Descriptions of the species listed above, and the results of
the pedestrian field review are included in the following sections of this report.
4
Protected Species Assessment S&ME Project No. 1614-04-340A
Albemarle-Stanly County Airport T-Hanaar_Proicet November 2, 2004
Creeper -- State Listed Threatened
BIOLOGICAL OPINION: NO EFFECT
The creeper is a freshwater mussel usually characterized by a smooth, shiny, yellowish to .dark
brown periostracurn (outer covering of shell). Shells tend to be thin and fragile. Green rays of
the periostracum may extend the entire surface of the shell. Its nacre (interior shell) is iridescent
with colors ranging from gray to blue to salmon. The habitat of the creeper consists of a variety
of substrates including silt, sand, and gravel within headwater streams, large rivers, or lakes to a
depth of four meters. The species has been reported in the Bear Creek subbasin, which
encompasses the western portion of Stanly County, including the city of Albemarle.
The on-site intennittent channels do not appear to provide suitable habitat for the creeper. These
streams did not contain water at the time of our field review. No known occurrences of the
creeper have been documented in the immediate area of the airport. No mussel species were
observed during the pedestrian survey. Accordingly, future development of the site is not
expected to impact this species.
Carolina fatmucket - State Listed Threatened
BIOLOGICAL OPINION: NO EFFECT
The Carolina fatmucket is a mussel that generally inhabits streams with a substrate of pebbles or
large rocks, although a few populations have been documented in lakes. The oval-shaped shell is
reddish-brown and is covered with dark greenish-black streaks. There are two elongated and
slightly bowed lateral teeth found on the left valve and one on the right valve. Each valve has
two triangular tooth-like structures along the hinge of the shell. This mussel has been reported in
Stanly County with a documented population in Lake Tillery, which is located several miles
southeast of the proposed project.
The on-site intermittent channels do not appear to provide suitable habitat for the Carolina
fatmucket. These streams did not contain water at the time of our field review. No known
occurrences of the Carolina fatmucket have been documented in the immediate area of the
airport. No mussel species were observed during the pedestrian survey. Accordingly, future
development of the site is not expected to impact this species.
Carolina creekshell -- Federal Species of Concern State Listed Endangered
BIOLOGICAL OPINION: NO EFFECT
The Carolina creekshell is a freshwater mussel usually characterized by a golden-brown shell.
Rays of the periostracurn are generally complete, narrow and green in color. Its marsupium (egg
pouch) is ivory-colored and its nacre is bluish white or white. The habitat of the Carolina
creekshell consists of silty sand or clay along small stream banks. In areas of abundance, the
species has been found occupying substrates of mixed sand and gravel. The species has been
reported in the Long, Big Bear, Stony, Mountain, and Little Mountain creeks within Stanly
County.
5
Protected Species Assessment S&ME Project No. 1614-04-340A
Albemarle-Stanly Count Airport T-Man ar Project November 2 2004
Although known occurrences of the Carolina creekshell have been reported in Little Mountain
Creek located north of the site. the on-site intermittent channels do not appear to provide suitable
habitat for the Carolina creekshell. These streams did not contain water at the time of our field
review. No mussel species were observed during the pedestrian survey. Accordingly, future
development of the site is not expected to impact this species.
Bald eagle - Federall Listed Threatened State Listed Threatened
BIOLOGICAL OPINION: NO EFFECT
This large raptor has characteristic adult plumage consisting of a white head and tail with a dark
brown body. Juvenile eagles are completely dark brown and do not fully develop the majestic
white head and tail until the fifth or sixth year. Fish are the primary food source, but bald eagles
will also take a variety of birds, mammals, and turtles (both live and as carrion) when fish are not
readily available. Adults average about three feet from head to tail, weigh approximately 10 to
12 pounds and have a wingspread that can reach seven feet. Generally, female bald eagles are
somewhat larger than the males. The typical nest is constructed of large sticks and is lined with
soft materials such as pine needles and grasses. The nests are very large, measuring up to six feet
across and weighing hundreds of pounds. Nesting and feeding sites are generally in the vicinity
of large bodies of open water.
The site does not contain suitable habitat for the bald eagle. There are no large open waters on
the site. Badin Lake, the closest large body of open water, is over a mile north of the site. No
active or abandoned bald eagle nest sites were observed as a result of the pedestrian field review.
Accordingly, future development of the site is not expected to impact this species.
Prairie blue wild indigo - State Listed Threatened
BIOLOGICAL OPINION: NO EFFECT
The prairie blue wild indigo is a rhizomatous, perennial herb with obovate to lanceolate, three-
foliated leaves. It usually grows to a height of 1.5 to 3 feet. Flowers are blue or violet and bloom
in April and May. Legumes are usually thin-walled, brittle and firm with 3 to 6 cm long bodies.
The habitat of the prairie blue wild indigo includes glades, woodland borders and open forest
located over basic soils.
The site does not provide suitable habitat for prairie blue wild indigo. No open forests or glades
were located on the site. No individuals of this species were identified during the pedestrian
survey. Accordingly, future development of the site is not expected to impact this species.
6
Protected Species Assessment S&ME Project No. 1614-04-340A
Albemarle-Stanly County Airport T-Hangar Project November 2, 2004
Georgia aster - State Listed Threatened
BIOLOGICAL OPINION: NO EFFECT
Georgia aster is a perennial herb in the aster family that generally grows up to 1 meter in height.
The leaves are gradually reduced proceeding upwards along the stem. The ray flowers are purple
while the disk flowers are white, turning darker with age. The flowers are approximately 7 cm in
diameter. The plant flowers during the month of October. Typical habitat associated with
Georgia aster includes areas with regular moderate disturbance such as open woods, cedar
barrens, roadsides, and power line rights-of-way. The preferred sites are characterized by
abundant sunlight and little competition in the herbaceous layer.
The site contains areas that may provide suitable habitat for the Georgia aster. Dry upland and
open land are abundant on the site. No known occurrences of this species have been documented
in the immediate area of the airport. Additionally, this species is listed as a historic record for
Stanly County, indicating that it has not been observed in the county in at least 20 years.
Accordingly, future development of the site is not expected to impact this species.
Schweinitz s sunflower - Federally Listed Endan ered State Listed Endano-ere
d
BIOLOGICAL OPINION: NO EFFECT
Schweinitz's sunflower is a perennial herb in the aster family that generally grows up to 1.5
meters in height. This plant has tuberous roots, with each stem attached to a single tuberous root.
The stems are scabrous and generally reddish in color. The leaves are sob pubescent below and
scabrous on the upper surface. The ray flowers are yellow, while the disk flowers are purplish.
Schweinitz's sunflower blooms during the month of September. The habitat of Schweinitz's
sunflower is open woods, roadsides, and power line rights-of-way, often on basic soils with bare
spots or a gravel component. The preferred sites are characterized by abundant sunlight and little
competition in the herbaceous layer.
The site contains possible suitable habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower. Woodland margins and
open land are abundant on the site. No known occurrences of this species have been documented
in the immediate area of the airport and no individuals of Schweinitz's sunflower were observed
during field review. Accordingly, future development of the site is not expected to impact this
species.
7
Protected Species Assessment S&ME Project No. 1614-04-340A
Albemarle-Stanly County Airport T-Hangar Proiect November 2, 2004
Wri rht's cliff-brake - State Listed Endangered
BIOLOGICAL OPINION: NO EFFECT
This plant is characterized by rhizome scales with pale brown margins and a dark median stripe.
Fronds are bipinnately compound. Each leaflet has a slightly wavy margin that is rolled under
toward the center. Spores are uniform in size and shape. The North Carolina population of this
species is disjunct from the typical southwestern United States locale. Habitat for Wright's cliff-
brake includes rock outcrops that are either exposed or partially shaded. The rock outcrops
usually contain nutrient-rich seepage.
The site does not provide suitable habitat for Wright's cliff brake. No rock outcrops were
identified within the site boundaries. No individuals of this species were identified during the
pedestrian survey. Accordingly, future development of the site is not expected to impact this
species.
Yadkin River Qoldenrod -1 ederallXS
2ecies of Concern State Listed Endan ered
BIOLOGICAL OPINION: NO EFFECT
This perennial, rhizomatous herb was thought to be extinct after the construction of two dams on
the Yadkin River until a small population was discovered in 1994. Leaves are alternate and
flowers are bright yellow with blooming usually occurring in the fall. Habitat for Yadkin River
goldenrod includes the rocky riverbanks of the Yadkin River.
The site does not contain suitable habitat for the Yadkin River goldenrod. The only known
population of this species is located on Yadkin River, several miles north of the site. No
individuals of this species were identified during the pedestrian field review. Accordingly, future
development of the site is not expected to impact this species.
In addition to these protected species, the NCNHP identified a population of the smooth
sunflower (Helianthus laevigatus), located directly across Airport Road from the proposed
project. Smooth sunflower is classified by the NCNHP as a significantly rare plant that is at the
periphery of its range in North Carolina. During field review, the known population was located
directly across Airport Road from the site. Additionally, approximately 20 individuals of smooth
sunflower (Photo 6) were identified within the subject site. These plants were located along a
wooded border in the eastern portion of the property (Figure 3). At this time, no development
plans are proposed for this portion of the property and accordingly, these plants are not
anticipated to be impacted by the proposed development.
8
Protected Species Assessment S&ME Project No. 1614-04-340A
Albemarle-Stanly County Airport T-Han ar Project November 2, 2004
3.0 METHODOLOGY
S&ME reviewed the NCNHP database for records of protected species known to occur within
Stanly County, N.C. The purpose of the search was to identify current and historic documented
occurrences of protected species located within this county. Additionally, S&ME personnel
reviewed available supporting information including the New London, N.C. USGS Topographic
Quadrangle, and applicable soil survey sheets. The purpose of reviewing this supporting
information was to identify drainage features and soil types in the study area. During field
reconnaissance, S&ME personnel integrated the information obtained from this supporting
documentation with field evaluation for the presence of protected species or potential protected
species habitat. Portions of the study area that matched descriptions of preferred habitat for
protected species listed in Table I were considered to be potential habitat for the respective
protected species. These areas were subsequently field reviewed more intensively to confirm the
presence/absence of the respective species.
4.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Based on the literature review, habitat assessment, and pedestrian field review of the site, it is our
opinion that the site does not provide suitable habitat for most of the listed protected species with
documented populations in Stanly County. Open land and woodland margins on the site may
provide suitable habitat for the Georgia aster and Schweinitr's sunflower. The pedestrian field
review did not reveal the presence of federally or state listed protected species on the site. It is
our opinion that the proposed development of the project area is not likely to impact listed
protected species. No further study of the site is recommended at this time.
9
Protected Species Assessment S&ME Project No. 1614-04-340A
Albemarle-Stanly County Airport T-Han ar Proie ct November 2 2004
S&ME appreciates the opportunity to be of service to you by performing this threatened and
endangered species assessment for the site. Please contact us at [phone] with any
questions regarding this report or if you require any additional information.
Sincerely,
S&ME, Inc.
Y6tU
Chris Daves Catherine McRae
Biologist Natural Resources Project Manager
J itehead,
Environmental Department Manager
ATTACHMENTS
Figure I - Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2 - Site Topographic Map - USGS New London, NC Quad
Figure 3 - Site Aerial Map w/ Habitat Locations
Site Photographs
10

?-.
F W

o l O

a a
Q z

a'
Q Q ?
Q o
=
? U co

,- a U
r ? ?
Z
? Z co
N U a r
O z
U Z)
O
sti J
Z
? Q J
z
S
- ?
Q
W ~
x cf)

O
Z
O ~{? w m
n
U G?> CO W

i Z ' :r oa
J a
R'
Q Q
W

m W
J
A Q

0
04
4 W Q
J J
m W
Q ?

0 N
W

57

{•' _ N cViJ U O O

3 f:
LLI
•
. "
1 4 1 - mow!
? `s'° ??
1 f"f,1'}
? a .1'V?r.
{'?
'Kj
1?
sh U
ELI

?.o

h z
U ?
+ ?Lt z<

,?-_•,,? 4Ftl 'tiy ':_..
_ '\? !f '°..
_ - shy- cn c;
m

14. w
LLJ

1
Tp

.?. }
s
r z
a

•' `
? r ?, 2
a

t
- - r
=^ U
W Z
D Z
Lh z
t: 0 v

1
ti 0) LLI
_

1I' '%

0
z
E w M
c
m O

L
O
O
O?
= Z U
W
0 O
Q a?Q
_Z
J
0 o
J Z O Q
m Q °v
m Q F U M
m
C m o
cca 3
C = d 0 ?
L c
Q
OU ?
O
m
m ?
J Z
h Q J
C L

m Z
Q
w
m
2 W
-i
Q Q 0
z
m
o W
`o n F. W O
0 0 m
w
m m Q
0 Q N

W
W
U

Photo 1 - Facing east in study area across existing
maintained field.

''" • il. t•0
tN.
Photo 2 - Facing northwest in study area across
maintained field.

Photo 3: Facing west along intermittent channel on central
portion of study area.

Photo 4: Facing northwest across area identified as potential
protected species habitat.
Photo 5: Facing south along intermittent channel in eastern Photo 6: Photo of Helianthus laevigatus plant identified along
portion of study area. existing treeline on eastern portion of study area.
11/02/04 SITE PHOTOS
Taken by: CAM ALBEMARLE-STANLY CO. AIRPORT T-HANGAR PROJECT
Checked by: LJB Stanly County, North Carolina
le 0 E
SWE JOB NO. 1614-04-340A
ti
Michael F. Easley, Governor
Lisbeih C. Evans, Secretary
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
September 28, 2004
Joey Lawler
S&ME
PO Box 7668
Charlotte, NC 28241-7668
Office of Archives and History
Division of Historical Resources
David Brool<, Director
Re: Proposed expansion of Albemarle-Stanly County Airport, A.l.bemarle Stanly County, ER04 2156
Dear Mr. Lawler:
Thank you for your letter of August 2, 2004, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources, which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have quesuans concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above-referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
--?Peter B. Sandbeck
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Peter B. Sandbeck Administrator
Location Railing Add,=$
ADMINISTRATION 507 N Blount Stmt, U. cigir NC TcleplwnclFax
4677 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-461 7
RESTQRATIU.N 515 N Blount Street, Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 (919)733-476373 ;-bG53
SURVEY d PLANNING 515 N. Blown street, Ralei h, NC (9)9)73 3-654 717 1 5-[801
g 4617)1461 Se-Vice Center. Raleigh NC 27699-0617 (9J 9)733-6545/715.4B01
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ff3: 200330686
( OLMty. Staniy
Waters of the U.S. Surrey/DeiineationVerifcation
Property owner/Authorized Agent: A.lbeniarie-Stanly County Airport, c/o S&I'V%, Inc.
Address: P.Q. Box 7668
Charlotte, INC 28241-7669
Telephone Number:
Size and Location of Property (waterbody, Highway name/number, towm, etc).
Albemarle-Staanly Co. Airport located on a i9.9 acre tract west of and adjacent to SR 1549
(.airport Rd.), northeast of Albemarle.
Indicate Which of the following apply:
.., There are waters of the U.S. on the above described property which have been accurately
ll.aMedideli:aeated, We recommend that the delineated lines be surveyed. The surveyed
lines must be verified by our staffbefore the Corps will make a final jurisdictional
determination on your property.
The submitted survey plat dated for the above referenced property
accurately reflects the limits of waters of the U.S. on the proMiy, Unless there is a
change in the law or 4rtr published regulations, this determination may, be relied upori for
a period not to exceed S years from the date .cat this ponce.
Placement of dredged or :611 material in waters of the U.S, on this property without a A?aftm=
of the Army permit is in most cases, a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC
1311). A permit is not required for work. on the property restricted entirely to existing ttigh
ground. If you have any questions regarding the Corps of Engineers regulatory program, please
contact:
Steve Chnuin at _ [phone] x5
Project Manager Signature
4

Appendix VI
Stream Assessment Sheets
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: 5/11/2009 Project: Stanly County Airport Latitude: 35
41099°N
Terminal Project .
Evaluator: Chris Daves, P.W.S. Site: Stream 1 (Unnamed Tributary) Longitude: 80.14801OW
Total Points = 20.25
Stream is at least intermittent if> 19 County: Stanly Other:
Quad Name

or perennial if> 30 New
London
A. Geomorphology Subtotal=9. Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1 Continuous Bed & Bank
0
1
3
2) Sinuosity 0 NORM" 2 3
3) In channel structure: riffle pool sequence 1 2 3
4) Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 Iowa& 2 3
5) Active/Relic Floodplain 0 2 3
6) Depositional bars or benches 1 2 3
7) Braided channel 1 2 3
8) Recent alluvial deposits 1 2 3
9)' Natural levees 1 2 3
10) Headcuts 1 2 3
11) Grade controls 0.5 1 1.5
12) Natural valley and drainageway 0 0.5 1
13) 2" Order or greater channel on existing USGS/
NRCS ma or other documented evidence. No = 0
< < °•« ;,
Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussions in manual
R.Hvdrnlnuv(Rashtntal-X_111 Ah-+ 117-11 X4_A
14 Groundwater flow/discharge 0 ?3..
15) Water in channel and >48 hrs since rain, or water in
channel - d or growing season 0 2 3
16 Leaf litter 1.5 0.5 0
17 Sediment on plants ' 0.5 1 1.5
18 Organic debris lines or piles (wrack lines 0 1 1.5
19 H dric soils No = 0
C. Biology [Subtotal= 4.70 Absent Weak Moderate Strong
20 n Fibrous roots in channel 3 0
21 b Rooted ]ants in channel 3 1 0
22 Crayfish 0 1 1.5
23 Bivalves 1 2 3
24 Fish 0.5 1 1.5
25 Amphibians 0.5 1 1.5
26 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance 0 1 1.5
27 Filamentous alga; eri h on 0 2 3
28 Iron oxidizing bacteria/fun us
29) b Plants in streambed
h _ 0.5 1
FAC=0.5 FACW=0.75 OBL=1.5 SAV=2. 1.5
0 Other = 0
unu,S Lu ana L 1 rocus on the presence or upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants
Notes: Sketch:
1. Intermittent stream, Seasonal RPW.
2. USGS (1' order); NRCS (1 ' order then 2nd order further downstream).
3. Few crayfish burrows observed in wetland area outside channel.
4. EPT not observed on rocks or leaf packs. Scarce amounts of water striders observed.
USACOE AID # DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
17 1 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET _AQF
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's Name: Stanly County Airport Authority 2. Evaluator's name
3. Date of Evaluation: May 11, 2009
5. Name of stream: Stream 1 (UT to Little Mountain Cr.)
7. Approximate drainage area:
Approximately 30 Acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: - 300 feet
6. River basin: Yadkin-Pee Dee
8. Stream order: 1st
10. County: Stanly
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees 11. Subdivision name (if any): N/A
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 35.41099°N Longitude (ex. - 77.556611 80.14801°W
Other GIS Other:
Method location determined GPS
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note the nearby roads and landmarks and attach a map identifying stream(s) location):
Located at northeast of the intersection of Airport Rd. and Aviation Blvd. at the Stanly County Airport
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Fill slopes and culverts for roads to access the new proposed terminal project
15. Recent weather conditions: Rainy, warm, approximately 1.5 to 2 inches of rain fell in the week prior to site visit
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Misty, warm (60 degrees)
17. Identify any special waterway classification known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point?
19. Does the channel appear on a USGS quad map? NO
0 % Residential
21. Estimated watershed land use: -
10 % Forested
22. Bankfull width:
2-3 feet
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0-2%) X Gentle (24%) Moderate (4-10%) Steep (>I0%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location. terrain.
vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the
range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should
reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions. enter 0 in
the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g..
the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity. and a separate form used to
evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 35 Comments: RPW with seasonal flow. Area surrounding stream has been timbered.
Streamside area choked with invasives such as privet, Japanese honeysuckle, multi-flora rose, blackberry as well as sweet gum and goldenrod.
Streambed
Evaluators Signature: Date: 5.11.09
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality.
The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular
mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
Chris Daves, PWS
4. Time of Evaluation: 12:00 pm
Nutrient Sensitive Waters X Water Supply Watershed IV (I-IV)
Detention Pond
NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 0.25 acres
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey: NO
40 % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
50 % Cleared/Logged % Other
23. Bankfull height (from bed to top of bank): 0.5-1 foot
Ey-P C4 -Igoe 03
Q[A@MOWMN
AUU 3 1 2009
DENR - WATER QUALITY
WERMS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
Subsurface Investigation
Albemarle- Stanly County Airport - New Terminal Building
New London, North Carolina
GeoTechnologies Project No. 1-08-0388-EA
Prepared For:
Talbert & Bright, Inc.
4944 Parkwav Plaza Boulevard, Suite 350
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
August 5, 2008
GeoTechnologies, Inc. P.A.
3200 Wellington Court, Suite 108
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615

\\\\\? - o
fSf ?4I
August 6, 2008
Talbert & Bright, Inc.
4944 Parkway Plaza Boulevard
Suite 350
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
Attention: Mr. Chad Vernon
Reference: Report of Subsurface Evaluation
New Terminal Building
Albemarle-Stanly County Airport
New London. North Carolina
GeoTechnologies Project No. 1-08-0388-EA
Gentlemen:
3200 Wellington Court, Suite 108
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
www.geotechpa.com
GeoTechnologies, Inc. has completed the authorized investigation to evaluate subsurface
soil conditions for the new terminal building at Albemarle-Stanly County Airport located in New
London, North Carolina. Subsurface conditions at the site were investigated by completing fourteen
soil test borings at the approximate locations shown on the attached Figure IA and Figure 1B site
plans. Table I?lists the North Carolina State Plane coordinates of each boring. The boring locations
were established in the field using a hand-held Trimble GPS unit, and therefore the indicated
locations should be considered accurate to within 10 feet. The test borings were extended to
termination depths ranging from approximately 6.5 to 14.5 feet below site grade utilizing standard
penetration test procedures at selected intervals to evaluate the consistency and density of the
subsurface soils. This report presents the findings of our investigation and our recommendations
concerning site grading and foundation support.
SITE AND PROJECT INFORMATION
It is our understanding that a partially cleared area adjacent to the existing apron and t-
hangars, east of the current terminal building, is under consideration for development with a new
two?storv terminal building. Parking areas will be located to the southeast of the new terminal
building.
At the time this report was issued, GeoTechnologies had not been provided with any
structural loading details or final grades. However, based on our past experience with similar
facilities, we anticipate that column loads will not exceed 100 kips, and that wall loads will not
exceed 3 to 4 klf. It is our understanding that the entire site will be raised to some degree, with the
shallowest fill depths in the building area and the deepest fill depths in the roadways.
Geotechnicol and Construction Materials Testing Services

Talbert & Bright, Inc.
Albemarle-Stanly County Airport-New Terminal
August 6, 2003
Page: 2
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Generalized subsurface profiles prepared from the test boring data are attached to this report
as Figure 2A and 2B to graphically illustrate subsurface conditions encountered at this site. More
detailed descriptions of the conditions encountered at the individual test boring locations are then
presented on the attached test boring records.
Topsoil extended no deeper than a few inches in any of the test borings. Soils near the
surface consisted of low plasticity silty clays, clayey silts and sands with Unified Soil
Classifications of CL-ML and SC-SM. These soils extend to depths of up to 7 feet, and exhibited
penetration resistances in the range of 10 blows per foot (bpf) to more than 30 bpf. Fill soil
consisting of clayey silt with gravel was encountered in boring B-5 to 7 feet. Penetration resistances
within this soil were 9 and 47 bpf.
Partially weathered rock (PWR) was encountered at depths as shallow as a few inches in
some borings, and all borings encountered PWR at depths of no more than about 7 feet. PWR is
defined as material which could be penetrated with the soil drilling augers but which exhibited
penetration resistances in excess of 100 bpf. All the test borings were terminated in PWR at depths
in the range of 6.5 to 14.7 feet. Borings B- 1. B-2, B-4, B-6, B-8, and B-12 reached auger refusal at
depths ranging from 6.5 to 12.5 feet.
No groundwater was encountered in any of the borings, however, the site is conducive to the
development of perched groundwater during periods of wet weather.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The following recommendations are made based upon a review of the attached test boring
data, our understanding of the proposed construction, and past experience with similar projects and
subsurface conditions. Once specific development details become available, that information should
be provided to GeoTechnologies so that our recommendations can be confirmed, extended, or
modified as necessary. Additionally, should subsurface conditions adverse to those indicated by this
report be encountered during construction, those differences should be reported to us for review and
comment.
Site Grading Considerations. Site grading should initially begin with the removal of any
surface vegetation from within the limits of the new construction. Following removal of these
materials. GeoTechnologies recommends that all areas at grade or designated to receive fill be
proofrolled with a loaded tandem axle dump truck in the presence of a geotechnical engineer to
identify areas which require repair. Special attention should be given to areas with old fill (B-5).
These areas should be evaluated with proofrolling and with hand auger borings to verify that they
are consistent with our test boring results. Final grades are not known to us, however, it appears that
the entire site will need to be raised. Fill depths are expected to be shallow at the new terminal
building, near the apron, and to increase in depth away from the apron with the deepest areas of till
in the driveways.
WNW

Talbert & Bright, Inc.
Albemarle-Stanly County Airport - New Terminal
AUL,Ust 6. 2008
Page: 3
The on-site materials, excluding vegetation, should be suitable for reuse as structural fill
provided compaction moisture can be maintained near optimum. The contractor should be prepared
to moisture condition (wet or dry) the soils as necessary in order to achieve adequate compaction.
Any rock till should be used in nonstructural areas or in deeper pavement fills unless it is first run
through a crusher. No rock particle sizes of greater than 6 inches may be used in building pad areas.
Off-site borrow should consist of clayey or silty sands or low plasticity silts and clays having a
Unified Soil Classification of SC, SM, ML, or CL. Fill soils should be compacted to not less than
95% of the standard Proctor maximum dry density, except in the final foot for building pads, where
this requirement should be increased to 98% of the standard Proctor maximum, and in the final 8
inches for roadways and parking areas, where this requirement should be increased to 100% of the
standard Proctor maximum. Subgrade in structural areas should be proofrolled with a loaded
tandem axle dump truck prior to placement of aggregate base.
Foundation Support Considerations. The results of the test borings indicate that subsurface
conditions on the site are suitable for use of shallow spread footing foundations assuming that site
grading is performed as previously outlined. The foundations may be designed for a maximum
allowable bearing pressure of 4,000 psf for foundations bearing on approved soils. Foundations
should bear at a minimum of 18 inches below grade for frost protection. If foundations are
excavated to PWR, an allowable bearing pressure of 10,000 psf may be used. The foundations
should bear on properly compacted fill materials, or on approved virgin soils. GeoTechnologies
recommends that all foundation excavations be evaluated by a geotechnical engineer to verify that
suitable bearing materials have been encountered. This inspection should include verifying that the
bearing soils are not highly plastic. In the event that the bearing soils are observed to be unstable,
those areas should be repaired as directed by the on-site engineer.
For the assumed maximum structural loadings, we estimate that total settlements will be on
the order of 1 inch or less. Figure 3 shows expected settlements versus different assumed column
loads up to 200 kips. This figure assumes that grade in the building will not be raised by more than
4 feet as settlements will increase with increasing fill thickness.
Approved residual soils or compacted structural fill will provide adequate support for
conventional concrete slab-on-grades. We recommend that slab-on-grades be designed for an
assumed Subgrade modulus of 100 pci. If stone is used below the slab-on-grades, we recommend
using CABC base course stone rather than clean washed stone in order to provide better protection
for the subgrade until concrete can be placed.
Difficult Excavation Considerations. One of the most significant findings of our
investigation is the presence of very shallow difficult excavation materials, including in proposed
borrow areas. As indicated by the attached test boring data, the subsurface profile includes partially
weathered rock beginning at depths as shallow as a few inches in some areas. Our experience has
been that PWR exhibiting resistances of 50 blows per 2 inches of penetration and softer can
generally be preloosened with a D-8 dozer drawing a single tooth ripper during general site grading.
Material harder than 50 blows per 2 inches of penetration generally requires blasting to remove with

Talbert & Bright, Inc.
Albemarle-Stanly County Airport - New Terminal
AULyust 6. 2008
Pa'e: 4
conventional equipment. The attached Figure 4A and Figure 4B show the depths at which PWR was
encountered at each of the test boring locations, while Figure 4C and Figure 4D indicate those areas
where PWR which exhibited penetration resistances of 50 blows per 2 inches of penetration or
harder was encountered or where auger refusal was met.
The equipment utilized for installation of utilities and foundations is less powerful than that
which is used in general excavation and our experience has been that excavation of PWR harder
than 50 blows per 4 inches of penetration is typically impossible with most equipment available for
trench excavation, such as track mounted backhoes equivalent to a CAT 320 or 330. Large track
mounted backhoes with rock teeth can sometimes excavate PWR with penetration resistances
ranging from 50 blows per 4 inches to 50 blows per 6 inches of penetration; however, the rate of
excavation is slow and most contractors will request a trench rock price for any removal of PWR.
Therefore, it is recommended that trench excavation depths be kept at a minimum in order to reduce
the amount of difficult excavation material which will be encountered. Additionally, consideration
should be given to using a common utility trench corridor if possible and preripping the corridor
with a D-8 dozer if possible during general site grading, or blasting if necessary. Contractors have
also been successful in the past utilizing a Vermeer rock saw to install small diameter utilities where
they must extend into PWR. We suggest that if grades will not be raised in the building that
consideration be given to preripping and preblasting below the maximum utility or foundation depth
to facilitate their installation.
If blasting is used to loosen PWR, special care must be taken to not overblast, and to remove
all loose rock after blasting, especially in structural areas. All material blasted or ripped must be
replaced with compacted fill.
Pavement Design Considerations. No detailed information regarding traffic volumes was
available at the time of this investigation. If you will provide us with an estimate of traffic volumes
and loadings, we will be happy to prepare a detailed pavement design.
Lab tests have indicated that a design CBR value on the order of 1 to 1.5% is representative
of the fine-grained soils found on-site. If present below pavement subgrades these soils will require
a heaver than normal pavement section and may require either chemical stabilization or removal
and replacement to at least 12 inches below the soil subgrade. If a significant area of the pavement
subgrade is impacted by these soils, consideration should be given to using lime/cement
stabilization to improve subgrade support (instead of mass undercut). Plan grades will dictate the
amount of these soils exposed, and this will help to determine if any repair is necessary, and if
necessary which approach will be most cost effective. Since it is anticipated that the parking lot and
roadway areas will be raised, we recommend that granular borrow material be stockpiled if possible
to be used as till in at least the top foot of the parking lot and roadway areas. Properly conditioned,
these soils will exhibit CBR values on the order of 7%. Alternatively, an off site granular source
Could be identified. The silty soils found around boring B-13 should be avoided for use in the top
foot of subgrade below pavement structures.

Y
Talbert & Bright, Inc.
Albemarle-Stanly County Airport - New Terminal
August 6, 2008
Page: 5
The most important factors affecting pavement life in the area of the site are the condition of
the subgrade immediately prior to base course stone placement and post construction drainage. We
recommend that the subgrade of all pavement areas be proofrolled and that any yielding areas be
identified and repaired prior to placement of the base coarse stone. All subgrade soils should be
compacted to a minimum of 100% of the standard Proctor maximum dry density immediately prior
to base course stone placement where appropriate. We recommend that all pavement areas be
properly graded to promote run-off of water and to prevent ponding of water on the pavement
surface which can lead to eventual saturation of subgrade soils and the loss of pavement support.
Permanent drainage swales and/or french drains should be installed on the uphill side of pavement
areas to intercept and divert water. Strip drains should be provided within traffic islands to prevent
stone and subgrade saturation.
Seismic Design Considerations. Based on the results of the soil test borings and our past
experience in the area, we recommend utilizing a soil site classification of "C" with respect to soil
seismic design considerations.
GeoTechnologies, Inc. appreciates the opportunity to be of service on this phase of the
project. Please contact us if you have any questions concerning this letter or if we may be of
additional service on this or other projects.
Sincerely,
WB-CEH
i
' p
J?t?llf? i114$?i ? ,
GeoTechnologies, Inc.

Conrad Harris, El
Staff Engineer
V
Ernest L. Stitzinger, P.E.
NC Registration No. 25534
\ INXI, GooTechnologies, Inc.
FIGURES & TABLES

BORING NORTHING EASTING
B-1 N 606,926.11 E 1,657,542.62
B-2 N 606,871.32 E 1,657,531.53
B-3 N 606,816.53 E 1,657,520.45
B-4 N 606,884.49 E 1,657,631.31
B-5 N 606,783.28 E 1,657,644.22
B-6 N 606,682.07 E 1,657,657.13
B-7 N 606,661.23 E 1,657,800.45
B-8 N 606,455.08 E 1,657,730.63
B-9 N 606,520.40 E 1,657,980.51
B-11 N 611,265.59 E 1,660,163.06
B-12 N 611,799.30 E 1,660,739.41
B-13 N 612,161.78 E 1,660,778.48
B-14 N 611,477.45 E 1,660,477.35
B-15 N 611,699.21 E 1,660,380.91
ALBEMARLE-STANLY COUNTY AIRPORT
NEW TERMINAL BUILDING
NEW LONDON, NORTH CAROLINA
BORING LOCATIONS
Project No. 1-08-0388-EA
able No. 1
NC STATE PLANE COORDINATES, FEET

-FUT RE
TERMINAL
BUILDING
r-J F-B------ --- --------
C? Q I r- --1
I r-
zz I r_ ? B-4`t9 -_-1
Q I r- L-----------J -?
X = I r'- _ 1
w I F- B-5 -7
r- ---- _
1 L_ I r- - - -? I -J
I L Ir- ---- --I _-J
I L- I - ---- - 1 -J
I L_ I-- ---- --I J
1 L- I L- -- - --I _ I -J
I L_ IL- ---- --J -?
I ?- L- ---- -J
B- 6
---
I I
I I I I I
I I I I i
I I I I I
I I I I I
I i ;. I I
i i I I I _-
I
I I I I I
L----------------- J I I L--------------
- -------------? / - --------------
'----- -------------
B-8
EXLS-TANG
-FUEL FARM,' _
I I
?--- FUTURE
B-9 V ENTRANCE'- _
I 1
I I
I I
,- OR
BORING LOCATION
ALBEMARLE-STANLY COUNTY AIRPORT
NEW TERMINAL BUILDING
NEW LONDON, NORTH CAROLINA
SITE PLAN
BORING LOCATIONS
Project No. 1-08-0388-EA
Figure No. 1A
Scale: not to scale
EXISTING APRON
V
l6
N
N
Y U
U
O C
O ll? O
a 7 ro
? L "
U d
U ?
W N s ,?
r? - L T
v o d ti c
W a 3
o o = N
F- J a
wk4 C??
V' N
T O O
v LO Lr)
ti
m Caaaa?acacc?c aea
W
J_
in
LL
o
Q O o
-- - - -
C C C G C Q a C Q C G C] C G C G C
W m _
U
Q
LL
M N
C) O
? Q7 to LO
m m C C C 4 Q 4 C ?... 4 C C a C v G 4
vJ
W M
t? O O
T In Ln
ELI
III
z
W
O O O
N U,) Ln LO
Cl)
-
00 -, a??adaaaaCaaaC?aaa?C? Ccaaaa?
c
0
Q
w
??
?co
o Q
(n C0 N
c? O O
Q Z
w
J Z
?
U 0 m C?
U) ? U-
ca
C
O
L

L U
O
CL

L }
L

Z

O
1- O E "a
U U L c
W 0 O
) ?+ F- J
O 3 3
NT cfl O O
a (nz z
"v M
•' O O
Un LO LO
CV - -
m ;C G Q v C C C a C c G4 C G C Q C C C G C ?
in
N M
M LO O
O N CD co O N
T T

?
/W
v
w
J
Q ?

L
N N
N
?
U
O
O O
T 0 d C
U v LL
T m
T
.U ? d
T
0 a

U N
Cl
'Z
N
fC 3:

T
C)
N
(p L
p

o
a
m T
-
a L
c
0 0 ' o U)
F- J CL (n J m
- E E -?:, I

Q
w
r7 Cl) N
w
J
LL
O
cl?
CL
w
Q
LL
co
w
_N
J
w
z
'w
V
0 o Ca o
LO LO a
m V° V?V?a?V?V?V?V?•:;?c`c?VQV?a??c?V
in
O Ch _N
O O
L(? O O
Cn LO
r N LO
? N
co _O
N7 l()
? '?' V ?G_?V"V ? 7 `•V QVV CV
Lq
r7 N C")
6 O N
tt) (n O O
Un
0
V
LL
CV O
LO
CV p
r ?
O CV (O co O N
3 0
O M
O Oa
(n CO N
to O O
Q z
w o w
z
Q CO
U O O
U LL
(a
O

U
o
Q =
L L
a o
z

0
t- C
U U c
H J
?'
O c 3 3
(n C? 2 N
0- cnz z
C)
LO
N
a
w

E
cn
LO LO LO co LO
O ? p ? p N
CD CD O
(seqoui) juawalljas
0
0
N
O
LO ?-?
CL
,_
CD 0
CD -- J
T-
O
L J
O
00
00
M M
O
00
O
T-
0 O
zz
L
.o
L ?
v
a
O
J
z
w
w
J
F-
H
w
F-
0
a
? a
a z
F O
z W
? a
O U
U =
J Q.
z O
?Jz
aZ
wz0
w O
m 3:
J w w
¢zz
i??
FUTURE jF7
EXISTING APRON
f
FU-T?RE
TERMINAL
BUILDING
B-2
- - - - - - 31 J
- Ad
3-
F
----
--
-
--- ------?
----I L

B-4?
L-- ---------J -?
5? :E
LLJ
B-5 -?

--
I - -
-- --? _J
-- -
J
:
I--
3?1 L -- .
I -
-- _JI -J
--? j -J
Imo-
?7 --
--
C --
-- -Jj --J
C- J --4
i --4
V --4

I
I \ / I
I I I

I
I
I
I I
I I I
` 1

jZ•? I I
I I I
I
----J I I I
I I L--------------
-------- -------
----- - ? ----------------
i• I
I ... I
I I
EXLSTI'NG
FUEL FARV,

I I
I I
7`i--- FUTURE
B- OV ENTRANCE
I I
I I
I I
I I

- I I
1 I
I I _
I _
4/ P0 BORING LOCATION Rr oc -

ALBEMARLE-STANLY COUNTY AIRPORT SITE PLAN Project No. 1-08-0388-EA
NEW TERMINAL BUILDING Figure No. 4A
NEW LONDON, NORTH CAROLINA DEPTH TO PARTIALLY WEATHERED ROCK Scale: not to scale
Q am
w
00 U
co
m N
p cr O
co r
p O
c
r
O O
Z Z
U U
d ? _N
O = R
L .? U
a u cn
Z
c
Q
U
c
`J
C
m

N
(Id
Q
z
O
U1
E?
O
U
O
E-'
U
c
O
Y
U
O
w
w
w
z Q
Q w
J
a }
W
? J
fn Q
F-
a'
Q
a
O
F-
F-
a
w
0
F-
O
a
? Q
a Z
? J
z O
O Z U
J E5 ~
Z
m O
F- J Z
W Z Z
O
W O
co
J W W
Q Z Z
r

FUTURE
EXISTING APRON
r'

I.
F U-TURE
TERMINAL
BUILDING
r--- "B - 2

_
- r <. B - I
v r--J I--- --- --- --- ------- - L
I

COQ I ~- -- - -?
z? I r- - --
?- -? -?

F-z - I t -
( B-4?
_ I r
-----------
L------------?
X = I r - -7
w I r - B-5 -?

F _ 7-
---
F
I L? -
I L_ I -- ---- - I _J
I L- I I L- -- -? I J
I t - I L- ---- --? I -?
I B-61-- AL Ji -?
I I-- `? ?\ ? C J - -4
I I- - V - I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I 1 I I
I ,1 I I
I I } I I
I I?I I
I I I I __1
I I I I I
----------------- J I I L --------------
---------------------------
---------------
------------
I I
XLSTING
UEL FARM
I
7 ice- FUTURE
13-9151 ENTRANCE-°=
I I
_ I I
I I
i
-- I I
I I
-_ I I
q/RpoR \ --? i\\
BORING LOCATION
EMARLE-STANLY COUNTY AIRPORT
! TERMINAL BUILDING
J LONDON, NORTH CAROLINA
SITE PLAN
DEPTH TO PWR, N > 5012"
Project No. 1-08-0388-EA
Figure No- 4C
Scale: not to scale

ll,
°? \1
s 00
00
C> 0
00

V d

C2 N

P2
tj ?; ? ? 7t! J :!
o
-t r l?.,
n

h
_
' T

Z

u ?- O Z U

M 0

Z Z
w O

.?

J W W
Q Z Z
LABORATORY TESTS
????? GooTechnologies,
Cl)
W
F
W
O
N Q
W
J O
m m
Q a
H
U-
O
Q
(n
/
U) ) J
C (n

U U (/)
o -
d M ? ? M (D
J CO M ?T O
U

N
ccz m O CO CO O CO
J U p° r' 6 O N
0 IX :
.
r
cu
° N a0 00 V (D
J U
0 ti O
m
C: CD Q y
? O O P-
m

C
d o
N
!?
U? In V'
6
M $? f) LO Cl) co r- M
a

m Q
w
C OJ
(10
v x
O
O O O
O
E (n 1:3
O Cl)
6> O (D O
O
ro m
.? 00
0 0 0-

Z
U '-

Lo E
O
CD. 0o
O
?Z v .-moo
FL J N N N co N
O O U
O
0- Z .
_ O
Q 0p a-
E
O
0 0 0
O
p N O O O <
C
O J
J M M M co
M
Z3 O
O J
p
O
O O O CO O
C Z r
O m U
X Q N CV N M (D
Q
j
Cn
CU
r' N N O N
-
r
O
O
ro U E
E
O S i
w

co

N N LIO

rn
r- O O
Q CL p . N .-
02
- d
+.
F
y
\ r- co
U') (D V 07 (0 Lo I M . O .
-
(D LO M O N
(D M M

•
°.
.?
O o C
) (V O CD N
N
M V N
co a0
Z N N
t
??Ln LO LO. O (n U?O Ui O Lr) LO LC) O O Ln LO O
d O O O O O O O O O V O O O v 6 O O v
0
N M ?t t1") Cp ti 00 O r- N M Ln
i c r
O mmCD mco m m m m ?' mLCI mCO
00
135 _ T__
Job No: 1-08-0388-EA Date: 815108
+ IT
_-
L Job Name: Stanly County Airport New Terminal
130' T
Job Location: Ablemarle, North Carolina -
Boring No: B-4
Sample No: Bulk
i
125L-- _T - I Depth: -- - -
17
---i__ TEST RESULTS
Method of Test: ASTM D 698
120--F-
Maximum \ Dry Density: 112.0 PCF
_ __!
Optimum Moisture Content: _---_15,_8%
-?--- Natural Moisture Content:
1151 - I Atterberg Limits: _ LL 37.0 PI 13.0
r j?T I Soil Description: Brown_ Medium to Fine_ _
--.SOO[ 11??k I Ni I _Sandy SILT- - -- - j
110 - T, L
- - -
7 -1
?105
-F -7- -
T
F -
44_47 -r-T--T T
T 1
100 -- _T_ ?- --T- -_ ?__ *- ?_
N_L_ I _44t ! 1 _ CURVES OF 100% SATURATION
-I- - -
95 - ?--? - FOR SPECIFIC GRAVITY EQUAL TO:
?- -
i
2.80
901 T
I
-- ?_
- - 2.60
- -I T
_T _T
i
I I
85 TITT -i'--T i
1- 1 T ?_ T
-1
_ = r -- - -- 1 _ -I
iu
?- -- - j $ tj F, JT
- - -
- T
I!T -I -- - 7- -
-- `
75? ---
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
WATER CONTENT (Percent Dry Weight)
MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONSHIP
GeoTechnologies, Inc. PA
? J
f'2?--oTechr.ologies, Inc.
OB #: 1-08-?3388-Ef,
DATE: '-A 200E
`DOTES: PROCTOR DA
Cp?
SOIL DESCRIPTION
CBR DATA SHEET
JOB NAME: Stanley County Airport
SAMPLE LC. B-4 DEPTH:
TEST PROCEDURE:
Max. Dry Density = 112.0 PCF
Brown Medium to Fine Sandy Silt
CBR SPECIMEN DATA Swell Data
`.ioiSTURE CO, iTEriT 14.3% Initial Reading 0.759
VV ET DEI`JS TY 125.6 lbsJcu ft. Final Reading 0.910
DRY CENS'T' 109.91bs.icu.1t. Mold Height 4.580
COMPACT Oi' 98.1 % % Swell 3.30
LOAD CELLLB.
7U. 0 _
60. 0
50. 0
46". 0
30. 0
20. 0
i n
0. 0
RATE OF DEFORMATION 05 in.!min.
SURCHARGE USED 10 Ibs
ASTM D 698

0.000 0.1 D0 0.200
CBR @ 0.1"
CEP X02" -
SWELL
0.300 0.400 0.500
1.2
1.6
3.3
0.600
0
N
N_ o
0
N
v! o
#
cli
fC O

u
..Z/ L
171E

, i

I I

-
I T

- ---
-
-
-- r
-
--
- --

T -

- -F - -
I I
V V ° V D
o m co n co v) v
)Lj6iaM A8 aaUid IUaaJad

P
D
0
0
II
N_
NII
a
U
17
tr1
LL
N
w
N
U)
F-
J_
U)
? I
e
O L'
w
?_ I Z
N LL
I
N_
v (n ' -{
G Q
z
C7 cn I
?I
Io
w
N
w
U)
ff
a
O
it
i
w
o Z
J
w
w
o!
a?
o'
v U
-- o
O O O O °
M N r
O
W
U)
0
N •
CUO
Z
Q
r?
i
H
J
N
c co
'Zi VJ
ul p)
M
N iz 0
ti'' O co
U' O
00
o
c 00
OI 2 o
N c Z
0 3 a;
o p c?
a
J o
a
J ?
L O -CZ
Q
U
CL
Q
o L
> ?- o
?Z
w
0 E
L
Z I >q-
_ .Y c 3 a?
0
m M M au)zQ
T
Job No: 1-08-0388-EA Date: 8/5/08
' I Job Name: Stanl County Airport _N_ New Terminal
I
OL
Job Location: Ablemarle North Carolina
- j Boring No: B-11 ,B-12
?- _ Sample No: Bulk
1
TEST RESULTS
Method of Test: ASTM D 698
?0' - j ( I\ Maximum Dry Density: 122.0 PCF
--
- - Optimum Moisture Content: 11.2%
Natural iftisture Content: %_-.--
51r -
Atterberg Limits: _ LL 30.0 PI 9.0
Soil Description: Brown Clayey-Silty Fine to _
Coarse SAND
I0 -_ -- -I \ I i
rt --
___T_
?I
)0 7
I t i I I i
J CURVES OF 100% SATURATION
)5 \ FOR SPECIFIC GRAVITY EQUAL TO:
T i?
- 2.80
I I
90 T -- ] 9_4- T
-,_-i- - I 260
I
--
35 r --F -- T
- _ l
-_T
-?I\
1T
I
II
75L i
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
WATER CONTENT (Percent Dry Weight)
MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONSHIP
::. 'o?;;:-
G-- o T e ?
JOB #: -08-0388-Ei
DATE: 814/200E
OTES: PROCTOR DAT;,:
Cpt. Voisture = 1 1 .2 4,
SOIL DESCFi°T':'N
CBR DATA SHEET
JOB NAME: Stanley County Airport
SAMPLE I.D. B-11,12 DEPTH:
TEST PROCEDURE: ASTM D 698
Max. Dry Density = 122.0 PCF
Brown Clayey Silty Fine To Coarse Sand
CBR SPECIVEN DATA Swell Data
MOISTURE CO''1TE?JT 11.8% Initial Reading 0.309
VVET DENSITY 135.2 Ibs.lcu.ft. Final Reading 0.372
DRY DENSITY 120.9 Ibs./cu.ft. Mold Height 4.575
°a COMPA.CT`CN 99.1 % % Swell 1.38
_OAD CELL ?0?0 L3. RATE OF DEFORMATION
300.0
250.0 -
SURCHARGE USED
05 in./min.
10 Ibs.
200.0 - --
150.0 -
100.0
50.0 - - -
0. C' ----
0.000 0.100 0.200 0.300 0.400 0.500 0.600
CBR @ 0.1 7.8
CBR @ 0.2° 9.8
°% S1v%'ELL 1.4

O
N
J o
N ?
C)
_N
f/1 0
c
cV o
(n #
Cl)

v
#
J 7/C

i

I

i
I I

__-_
_.-----
-
- -- ------------
I
t--...

•
i
I

w
N
U)
}
Q
I
wi
z
LL
0
IIN
N
H
z I ?
? I
m I
_ I
O N
N ILL
a? I
N_
v (n i
2 z I
uai
Z
N ;-w--
Q
O
v I U
z
I_
J
W
a
LL
w
W
O
0
O O O O O O O O C.
O O°
O O N I` CO In V M N r
;y61OM !8 JOUIJ IUOOJOd
G
F-
m
LL. ?
vJ '
LLJ
N •.
U)
Z
d
V ?
z
Q
d
f4
O Q
U
W
OI 0 1
co
ui C M
:N, LL O
I
V)l
?I w ?
U? O CO
of A r O
of LO
c? Co
U O
N r z
0 3
o O
CO m
J o
a
J o
J o
U
'I
Z?
L OL
Q- U
2' Q
>+- O
w. ?v z
•-
O O
z F-
_
n
m m m IEL cnz<
r ?
«a?-'-rrE'cy?^ 9
'? j • T'?'` } ?71' X7+7 ! ? ? :? '?F ''s . a
" 4.r
135
- -
I , I FT-ii -t? Job No: 1-08-0388-EA Date: 8/5108
130 Job Name: StaEly County Air ort New Terminal _
- Job Location: Ablemarle, North Carolina
Boring No: - B-13
Sample No: Bulk
125 Depth: --
_ TEST RESULTS
Method of Test: ASTM D 698
1201' -? Maximum Dry Density: 103.8 PCF
t
7-1
?? - Optimum Moisture Content: 20.8%
- Natural Moisture Content:
0 115 - -
L I Atterberg Limits: _ LL__36.0 PI 6.0
- - 717- Soil Description: Brown Medium to Fine
7
Sandy SILT
- - -
CL
1100
-
a I 1 _
z 105
W - - _?- -
r I
I A007
100 -- - I-00
- 1
I I '
CURVES OF 100°/ SATURATION
95' f - T- r-- - FOR SPECIFIC GRAVITY EQUAL TO:
I
- -
1- I - - I 1 - 1' - -2.80
90 -+ - -- -- - - 2.70
1 -- - $_ --2.60
I
85
80
1
F
-:1_ ---} r - i _ - --
75L t
?
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
WATER CONTENT (Percent Dry Weight)
MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONSHIP
GeoTechnologies, Inc. PA
GeoTe
JOB #:
DATE:
NOTES:
chroloo eS, Ir.c.
1-08-0888-E,?,
8!4; 2008
PROCTOR CATA:
Opt. %-!oisture = 20.510
SOIL DESCRIPTION
CBR DATA SHEET
JOB NAME: Stanley County Airport
SAMPLE I.D. B-13 DEPTH:
TEST PROCEDURE: ASTM D 698
Max. Dry Density = 103.8 PCF
Brown Medium to Fine Sandy Silt
C^R SPECIM.EN D,,?% TA Swell Data
MOISTURE CONTENT 20.4??o Initial Reading 0.506
wET DENSIT'r 122.7 Ibs./cu.tt. Final Reading 0.700
DRY DENSITY 101.9 lbs./cu.tt. Mold Height 4.562
° COr,/IPACTiON 982 % % Swell 4.25
LOAD CELL 2000 LB RATE OF DEFORMATION .05 in./min.
SURCHARGE USED 10 Ibs.
O
O
N
? O
N_ O
U) #
'V
V) o
c
4 0
(n #
0
4t
0
'IT
A/E
..Z/L
i

r r-
i
I!
I _
I I ?-
? I

I i
i

i
I
I
,
I -
I
I i I
i

i
I
?
I

i
I ? i I
i l
I

? I -

N
W
'N
U)
a
III-?
D N i
o ? W
W
I F"
I J
a
D
d
O W
LL
i
N
N
a fn --
C p
.? I Z
D ,L
V I
W
w
a
O
U,
a !_ U
D
W
z
J I _
a?1
III
V)
1WI
call
c U
O
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0°
O a) 00 r O N a M N .-
jy6iaM A8 jaui=l auaajad
0
F-
c
QL
F- •
'N
v ,
Z
{.L
??" ww
i !
i
F..
J_
T <
c c W
0 o GO
00
O
R O 00
O Co
? W
C O
N 00
O
N c z
0 3 a;
o p RS
cn Co ?
a
J
a
J o
J ?
U
Z
I I O ?
a ' r
Q ? L
4-1
m r ?Z
w
'-
O
L L-
o I I VU ? ?
z O >, H F
? ? Y I O ? 3 CJ
m m m dcnzQ
M//////////7z; z; - ._
13
13
12
12
0 11
Ll.
U_
Q
U
a
?, 111
a
C
O
a
r
Cl)
10:
w
0
0
10(
9;
9C
8e
3o
75

Job No: 1-08-0388-EA Date:
8/5108
I Job Name: Stanly County Airport New Terminal
Job Location: Ablemarle, North Carolina _
?.
I Boring No: B-14
--- - Sample No: BUlk
Depth:
TEST RESULTS

I \

-
Method of , ASTM D
Test: 698
Maximum Dry Density: 126.0 PCF
Optimum Moisture Content: 10.9%
Natural Moisture Content:
Atterberg Limits: LL 31.0 PI 10.0
I\ Soil Description: Brown Clayey Silty Fine to
i _ Coarse SAND

I I I
I I I
I 1 I i I
?
?
?
I I
?? I II
'---' !
' I I I I -T-- i I'I
it _
j
T-? ?
I I I
- -I I CURVES OF 100% SATURATION
FOR SPECIFIC GRAVITY EQUAL TO:
I I
2.80
\
I
2.70
i
1 1 I
I I \ __-- 2.60

I
-i
77
I
?

i

II i
I
I -
I

I1
? I I
I I I
? -
_
I
IT
I
-T

-
I
v 15 LU 25 30 35 40 45
WATER CONTENT (Percent Dry Weight)
MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONSHIP
GeoTechnologies, Inc. PA
?eoT.;.-irologies, Inc.
JOB n: 1-08-0388-EF;
DATE: 8/4,,2008
NOTES: PROCTOR DATA
Cpt. Moisture = 10-9°%
SOIL DESCRIPTION
CBR DATA SHEET
JOB NAME: Stanley County Airport
SAMPLE I.D. B-14 DEPTH:
TEST PROCEDURE. ASTM D 698
Max. Dry Density = 126.0 PCF
Brown Clayey Silty Fine To Coarse Sand
CBR SPECIMEN DATA Swell Data
?AO!STURE COriTEXT 11.90/10 Initial Reading 0.281
WET DENS;- ! 133.2 lbs./cu.ft. Final Reading 0.309
DRY DENS! i" 123.5 ibs./cu.ft. Mold Height 4.579
% COMPACT ON 98.0 % % Swell 0.61
OAD CELL 20-) LB. RATE OF DEFORMATION .05 in./min.
SURCHARGE USED 10 lbs.
C, 10
300.0 -
250.0 - -
200.0
15?.C
- ; '` -- - -- - -
100.0
0.000 C . '! 00 0.200 0.300 0.400 0.500 0.600
9.6
?Rro2° --- 12.8-
S` YELL - - 0.6

c
c
N c
d
U7 c
C
co c
G7 ?+
L7
s

„7/E

I

, C

i ?

I
-
-

-

i
-
_ - -- T
-- --
i ? ?
I
I
I

T- I
, -
I

I I ?
W
N
Y
? la
J
it U
V) LU
Z
FL
a
w
N
N
F-
J_
? y
L
N
w
z
LL
C
c? U
D
w
W
Cf)
a
O
U
I W
o ?
w
J L
W
a
IC?w
V)
a
O
o U
0
o ° o 0 0 C. 0 0 0 0_
O Q) co 1- CO V7 V (") N ?-
V4613M AS JOUld IUODJ@d
0
I.i. _
(n
,.
N
V)
Z
Q
I ?
Z
Q
I
U Q
o o W
v C co
N U- O
i
A
Y ?
U'• O
o r' p
Ln
co
U o
N Z
3 ca
m 0
a o
o?
J
a
O
L L
Q U
a
p
?Z
cal ;.? ?~ ?
m°i m m aU)ZQ
BORING RECORDS
??\`A
CrooTechnologies, Inc.
TEST BORING RECORD
DEPTH DESCRIPT[ON ELEVATION
(FT.)
= v_ _
I lard Tan Cla}- y SILT EVIL
Very I Iard Partially `Weathered Rock: - Sampled as -D
I an Clayey SIL 1'
Ven Hard I'artia!k Weathered Rock: Sninpled as 4
1 T-
11m cia\ „v SILT
G
Vcrv Hard Partially \Vrathercd Rorc - Sampled as
'an Clancy SILT L
' G•
Id.O
12 Very Hard Partially Leathered Rock - Sampled as
Can Claycy SILT
?Au?er rcluual at I'
Grounci%?ater not encountered at time of borin-.
.IUl, N1',.N111FR 1-0S-U)SS-F-A
130RING NC-1N113ER B- 1
DATE 7- t 5-U8
P.A(;E I OF I
PENETRATION
(13LOWS/ET.)
10 '_0 -t0 60
i I I
i
?j
i
ll
? I
i I
?.l
BLOWS PER
SIX INCITES
100
I
d-17-1-t
i
3J-50/25"
I
71

I, q I
?F
id
?L
I jR
r
TEST BORING RECORD
DFPTI-1 DESCRIPTION ELEVATION PENETRATION BLOWS PER
(FZ .) (FT.) (BLOWS/FT.) SIX INCHES
0 10 20 40 60 100
?l oh,oil _t I -?- -
Vci\ Hard Tan Clu\ w SILT pm-
vcr Hard Partially Wcather,?d pock - Sample a
fan GClaycN SILT D
I Turd PartUalle weathered Rock - Sampled as ?
D
fain Gray Claycv ')IL I'
4
j
i I I _ I?
\ugu rcf?ual at 1 L_?' I
I
I '
i
I
i
I I
5 0?3„
c
I y-
c
r
I ??
I i ? I I
I
I
Groundwater not encountered at time of'Font,.
JOB NUMBER 1-08-0')SS-FA
I; '.:ING NUNTBI- R [3-
v-L ? 1-1 `-M
'AtjF 1 OF
37
TEST BORING RECORD
DEP'i H DFSCRIVTION ELEVATION PENETRAI ION BLOWS PER
(FT.) (BLOWS/FT.) SIX INCHES
uu 0 10 20 40 60 10U
Voir SliffOr?nI Lin CI ve SILT \-IL
? I
Very Hard Partially Weathered Rock - Sampled as D i
Tan Clavev SILT
0
Verv Hard Partially Weathered Rock - Sampled as
'I'an Clavev SILT D
I
IQ
J
4
I; I Veiti Hard Partially Weathered Rock - Sampled as
Tan?Clrnc? SILt _ _
Borne terminated at 14, 1'.
i
,
l
Groundwater t,ot encountered at time or hol ill,'
?t)/' ,
50/1'
t1;)RM' NUMBER E3- 3
DATE ;-I5-OS [40m-
PA C,E 1 0 F I
x

z
Q
V

TEST BORING RECORD
l
DEP i'1; DESCRIPTION ELEVATION PENETRATION BLOWS PER
SIX INCHES
„ (FT.) (BLOWS/FT.)
h)
(1 0 10 20 40 60 100
? topsoil ICL
I
Vcm SwfTan ciat Clayey SILT NIL 6-8-9
I ?Vciy i nn d Partially Weathered Rocl< - Sampled as D
Can Clayey SILT
50r"
I
I I

\, i, i I trd Parualk 'Aeathercd Rock - Samplccias? 4.
I Lu1Clavcy SILT

Aup?J relusal at 1 L_'
Groundwater not encountered at time of boring.
J01; NUMBER 1-0S-03SS-EA
':"TIRING NL.'<' BFIZ B--1
DATL 7-1-5-03
PAGE 1 0 F
it II II ? i II
I
i
II li I, ? j
r'i T --?-
I
,
Z
I°
I?
1 JI

TEST BORING RECORD
DIi:PTH DESCRIPTION ELEVATION PENETRATION BLOWS PER
(FT.) (FT.) (BLOWS/FT.) SIX INCHES
0 0 0 10 20 40 60 100
0 1' Topsoil ---- CL
Pill - I laid Tan 6r-,i\ Clayey SILT wish pieces ot, MC
?.parti.1lly AVcathered Ruck _ ?CL
'ill - St:lf Urav Black Tin Cla}cy SILT with Rocks IMf
Vcry Hard PartiallN. Weathered Rock - Samplcd as
"fan Clavev SILT
I
Vcn 1 lard Partially \Vcathered Rock - Sautplcd pis
' Tan Cla?e? SILT
Qorin', terminated at ld?'.
Groundwater not encountered at time of bor111C,
JU3 Nu11NI13ER 1-08-0388-EA
BORING NUMBER B- 5
1) A TE 7-15-04
PAGE I OF 1

TEST BORItiG RECORD
DEPTH DESCRIPTION ELEVATION PENETRATION BLOWS PER
(FT.) (FT.) (BLOWS/FT.) SIX INCHES
o0 0 10 20 40 60 100
fol;soil 'StItI 0Iansc l.uI C!a>-e- SIf.I ???..
o
_
den- I !ard Partially Weathered Rocl. - Sampled as
o
fan Clavc% SIL I- G

I N
Very I-lard Partially Weathered Rock - Sampled as D
Tan Clayey SILT C
4
90L
Very Hard Partially Weathered Rock - Sampled as D
Tan Claw SILT D
\uger refusal at I I'
d-6-I0
38-501, 1"
50/0.5'
0
m
c
L
a
s
z
2
L
JOB NU,)/IBER 1-08-0358-EA
'BORING NUNIBER B-6
D ATL 7-1 -?-O?
PAGE 1 OF 1 v
GMIndwator not encountered at time of borim,

DEPTH
(FT.)
00
l)
G
a.u
Y
TEST BORING RECORD
DESCRIPTION ELEVATION PENETRATION
(FT.) (BLOWS/FT.)
0 10 20 40 60 100
Groundwater not encountered at time of borink.
JOB N[ FIBER 1-08-0388-EA
BORING NUMBER B-
DATE 7-15-08
PAGF. I OF 1
1
BLOWS PER
SIX INCHES

I?
Z
s
I~
L

TEST BORING RI!;COIZD
DEP"CH DESCRIPTION ELEVATION PENETRATION BLOWS PER
(FT.) (FT.) (BLOWS/FT.) SIX INCHES
0 10 20 40 60 100
I) I ?. Topsoil -- ? Lr(?
Stir( l)rang,: Gr,? lain Clayey SILT NIL'
4-6-(
Vcn Ilan i'art;all\ '?? cathercd Rock - Sampled as ?a
Pu,ple Oran'Ic Cla_ cv SILT
p
5 13-50/J
Very [-[aid ['art,aIIy Weathered Rock - Samplcd as Q
Gray Purplc Orange Clayev SILT
AU°er rCCu5ttl at 6.5.
rcl
I
r
i
i
I
Groundwater not encountered at time of hot-in".
.1013 NLNIBER 1-08-038,-A:A
BORING NUMBER B- S
DATE 7-15-08
PAGE I OF I
III
Ti ?r

m
2
C
r^
ti
I
II z
F
s
71
_?

11
DEPTH DESCRIPTION
(FT.)
it o
n ? ? ?I ??p,tioil ---
i Sii!?i?C.r??? Ian Cla?cv S[I.T
I Lind Oi am-,c Ttin CInvev SU
CL
CL
IVIL
I-
701
Vu\ I lord f'aniall- eatliered Rod, - Sampled as Q
9 tl grange Gray Tan Clayey SILT
BLOWS PER
SIX INCHES
1-5-6
G-f6-?6
Goring Icnnmated at 9' ---- -- -
i
I ! I I
III
I i
? ? i , III
II I ??
TT?
i
j
c
I ?
? ? IIII
Gn?unc!«'?tte!? not cncuunt?red at tithe ?Fborin?r.
.108' NUNIBER I-08-038S-EA
h',JRING NUMBER B- 9
VE 1 0
1), GE I (AF I
TEST BORING RECORD
ELEVATION PENETRATION
(FT.) (BLOWS/FT.)
_ 0 10 20 40 60 100
e/

TEST BORING RECORD

DEP I'll DESCRIPTION ELEVATION PENETRATION BLOWS PER
(l??h) (FT.) (BLONVS/FT.) SIN INCHES
0 10 20 40 60 100
0 Topsoil --- -
,j Very Hard Partially Weathered Ro& Sampled as G
"
S
Ta? Fine to Medium Sandy Clavey SILT I I-
0/3
F? ?erp i?ard Pa [t LIH V \VcathC1ed Rock -Sampled aS a
an I ,n.; to vvk: 1ium 5andv Clay SfLT
n Ilard Pact ally bVcath
r
d R
l
k S
d -- ?
c
e
oc
amp
e
?u o? - -
Fan I-inc lo Medium Sandy Clayey SILT

J,
I `I I! I I I
i?
! Bonne tcnninated at 14 ?'
i
5 0/2 "

I ?r
I,;
i=

z
?Q
F=-

i
Groundv?Mel- nut encountered at time of borinLy.
JOB N'UNIBER 1-0-03SS-LA
BORING NUMBER B-1 I
DATE ?-1 ;-US
PAGE 1 OF 1
III: r- --r
I G I ? I? ? I i
C
/;'? •, ? 000:.
c
TEST BORING RECORD
DEPTH DESCRIPTION ELEVATION PENETRATION BLOWS PER
(FT.) (FT.) (BLOWS/FT.) SIX INCHES
uo 0 10 20 40 60 100
CSC -
cn Hard Tan Fmc to Medium S nd Clnyc? S\I' J
sll ?r I`
Visv Hard Partially wcathcred Rocl. - Sampled as
1.in FIfic to VCdium Sand_V CIa%ev SILT G 50!6D
D
90
i
? ery Hard Parti tliv Weathucd Rock - Sampled as? D 5011
U H Tan fine to Vedium Sande Clavev S(I.T ?
Auger refusal at Ili I
i
I

i
Ground%?ater twt encountered at time or boring,
JOB NLiv1BER 1-08-0388-FA
BORING NUMBER B-1?
DATE 7-1 5-08
PAG F I (_>F 1
_ i=
•
4
TEST BORING RECORD
DEPTH DESCRIPTION ELEVATION PENETRATION BLOWS PER
(F-r.) (FT.) (BLOWS/FT.) SIX INCHES
0_o 0 10 20 40 60 100
0 ? Topsoil _ ML 71111-
Vcrv StilYto Hard Oranec Tan Coed SILT
I
j
7.0 _
Vei v I Earl Partially Weathered Rock - Sampled as
Kick Gmv Tan SILT D?
C•
D
D
Vcrv Hard Partially Weathered Rock - Sampled as
Tan ('Im\' Finc S,mdv SIL I'
D?
13orine terminatcd at 14
I
Groundwater not encountered at time of boring.
JOB NUMBER I-OS-0355-LA
BORING NUMBER B-13
DATE 7-1-5-US
P,kGE 1 OF I
i I
14-I8-32
15-33-37
i06,,
I
-' 1

v
u>
m
C
IL
m
lie
1=
-ill
e
IL
TEST BORING RECORD
DEPTH DESCRIPTION ELEVATION PENETRATION
(FT.) (FT.) (BLOWS/FT.)
o u 0 10 20 40 60 100
, -1-r-r-r---
,? , C? 1 ? ps o i I s c,
,?t If :.in Vcdmill to 1 S;Indv Cla?,c Sill S\I
V.n I MJ P;1111 ll\ \G athereJ Rock - Sampled as
lan iAIcdium 10 1 inc Sandi Cla?c? SILT
Boring tcrminatt
I?
lf?
D
GI
D?
u
BLOWS PER
SIX INCHES
a-6-4
?0/0_ ?,
?o/3
Dili?"
ti
i
i
Groundwater not encountered at time of boring.
JOB NUMBER I-08-0,88-1:A
BORING NUMBER B-IO
DATE 7-] ;-08
PAGE I OF t
0
? c.
ci
c?
w
ro
o
Z
I
C;

TEST BORING RECORD
DEPTH DESCRIPTION ELEVATION PENETRATION
(FT.) (FT.) (BLOWS/FT.)
0 10 20 40 60 100
u.> i\ ?ohsoil '
I s \ c,c 1 [ud I tti illy A\-c tthcred Rock - Sam1 plcd as
Ian title Sandy CI iv e? SILT with Gravel -?
Very Hard Partially \\ eathered Rod: - Sampled as Q j
Ian .Bundy Clayey SILT
i
13.0 1
Very Hard Parnally Weathered Rock - Sampled as
I-t Tan Sandy Clayey SILT
F Boring terminated at 42-1
v
D
i f
Groundwater not encountered it time of boring.
JOB NL':, lIBER I -0S-03SS-LA
B,ORIN(; NU-NIMC-R B - I
D ATE 7-15-08
PAGE I OF I

BLOWS PER
SIX INCHES
1 0-3S-?0/3"
37-Jo/S'
X0/3"
50/2"
Q
n
L
a
C
Ci
r?
Z
.Z
l

r"
0,
C. Vernon
Subject: FW: Stanly Terminal
Chad,
I have converted the standard permeability measurement of cm/sec to inch/ hour below. The soils at the site should be in
the range of 1 E-05 cm/sec.
1 E-05 0.01417 inches per hour
Chad,
The soils in the terminal area consist primarily of slightly clayey fine
sandy silts. These soils will typically produce a permeability of about
1E-05 to 1E-06. I would not expect the permeability to be less than
1E-06. I would note that rock is fairly shallow across the site,
typically within 6 feet of the surface and this will impact the
infiltration of water into the soils by creating a perched water
condition above the rock layer.
1101MR41
GeotechnicaI and Construction Materials Testing Services
David R. Harris
3200 Wellington Court, Suite 108
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Mobile: [phone]
Nextel ID: 150 *26 *33011
(ihrn.ri,((; Lcoik!cllp,]'conl
h1q):/hr«cotcc 11pa.ro m
1
. _ _ _ _T_.
_ _ rT _ s ,s ~ ~ - , , w, V- r, . ~ - - ~
r { j i Jrl~~( ( ,
~ r r i , ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ 1+ ~ r y' ~ I I
1 f+~1 f ~ 1 ~ ~ W
' i ti 1 ~ ~ ~ ,~'~l /r ~ I ~ i r i ~
a r~ j ~ r ; , i ~ ~ _ 1, ~
! ~ t f ~ r J /t \ { JJ
I _._.m.~,.___~._~n-A. _.~~_._r____._,_ ~.~1 _
y~ ~"i ~~r~ _._.r
r, \ .._...,._v....... .................~.......~....,,.w ~ . l [ ~ ~ 1 i
N ~ ~ \
f s , ~ ~ t - , w _ ~ S ; 8 - Z
k ~ ~ ! rte. 6 i ~ + ' / ~ ' „ 3 _ ?0
I ? ~ ...,o-3 i;~~~~id.:~;. i ~ : ~ i >
~ \ ~ ~ l _ i .
~3 I { :~„r CuJT 5Ai3Gfi" E ~ ° i E A
i _ ~ ' ,i ~i~a s~~rr~ / vv . ~ r 1
a r i , ~~v oar ~ i ` ~ , t ~ 4''
t ~ ~ ~ ~.,~..e.,, ~ e~ . _ _ ~ s ~ `y i ~ , E ( ~ ~ ~ .
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i b i~ ~ P 1, I i N N7 d' ~
~ 4 E fir, i 4 ~ ~ 1 ' i i ~ /r ti_~y \
ii / r ~ I i t ~ ~ S 3 i ~i v 'N 2" ' ~ ~ i i 4 j \ i j. D
! t t ~ ~ ~ k ~ ~ ,r ~ i 1 1 ( ~t~ ~ "nG~ i ~ 4 E , ..k ~ I i , ? t tr 4 ~ ' i r~ °
j I 5 ~ ~ f ( , ; i~ ~ Yom,' c i ,rt ~ ~ o
i i ~ I ~ ~ it ~ t ~ ~ ` ' `i ! i
I ~ ~ ~ i ~ , ; f ~ ~ ,.,i w cn ° m w a
r U -di ~ ~ U ~ 4.~
l~ ~ ~
~~...i i f ^ ~ HANOAR FFE 5920Y p~p i I + ~ '''~\V I i' 1,., ~ t k I~:a~~ i:itg 56J.1iu ~ fI m \ i f i'' j m W ~ m ~
! ! i i is , ~58Q Ott m . ~ ~ , k i f { ; i , ,,a, ou°srCd,S;~'~ ~ t i ~ _ _ _ ,r' i } ~
+ ~ ~ i ; 4 ~ t~ ~ _ ~ t~ t ~ i ~ - _ ~ - ~ ~ ~ m D (n ~C` ~ U U W Z Y
1 ~ ~ ~ U W
~ ~ ~ ( e~+cne r~ sss.ok' 1 f . ~ 1 r k I ~ / ~ t ' ~ ' ~ i - i w CC° ~ ~ = d ti ~ d d ~ U ~
l y a f~ ( ; r _ ~ s i~.3
i i ~ € ~ r''h ~e i1I,1+ P ~ ~ r, ~ ( t u-,~~ ~ 1r+1i, 1 r i~ i F ~ ~ ~ 6 ( I ~ r>1~ E j 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ . 1 : r P r i ~ _ , , Fr
;"C77 ~ Y ' j ~ ~ ~ f I f I r ~ 'r i ' J ~ ~ ~ ~ ' i f ~ ~ . ~f , f'~ o' ~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ ~c.d ff ~
S k i r ~ ~ r /l ~ i i ~ f
~ ' 3 } ~ ( (d~7 it ( - i ~t}' ! \ t ~ /f ~ ~ ,t,A, ~i{ i' l,I
% ~ w~~r~i ~1 t i 1` ~ i ~,r k !L~ ~ ~ Chit{ ~ ~ Iji ti (~i' t i ' i t irk(ti 1 a tli t~ t ~ '=°lli 1 / ;r, k~li r' /
~ ~ ~ k ~ j 7 k~' V> > ~ v ti ~ / { 'tai ~'il ' ` / / / 'i~
~ r~
~ ~ ~ rr ~ car ~~~,~a° ; f ; ,l S't t;~ _ , , ~ / ~ ~ v ? w , ~ ~ . 4,{ ~i ,,n
fi
l' 1 f
~ i , i k ~ 1~ r ~ 't~
( ~ ~ ~ s s ~ ~ _ _ 1 t r ,j ~
i
r
L
j i i t
. . r , i l ~i
1 ~ 1 k~ . yp 1 ~ `k ."f i ~ I wP ~ t ~f ! ,,.r'" ~ ~-'~''""~.r-i~ ` ~ , L ~ } ~ ~ kJ 1 ~ ~ ~ : r ,
~ ..r' ;'P ~~SUF l~ i 'aad..~r r;'~ F--'" ~~J' 1~ ~ i. ~ 4 i ` , t ~ i ~ t~ + ~ ~ ,ll""' ~ ~ ~ ~ , . j . , ~ ,%ry* i
~ _ k ~ u ~ ~ r \ ~ / . `
Y" ,F' ~ a '}„q ~ "yam . ~..y~„~ f .1 i ~L ` _
~
, r r a. F + 3 y r I d ~ ~ A ~ 1 i r li +i ~ 1 f 1 i ~ r K 1 ~ , • f f, ~ ~
, y i "--~t3- i r t`
k t / / ;r'-v 1 ' .F~-~~•~4~1U~";j ti ,r ~ ~t 1~ ~ f 1 .r r ~ ~ i ~ ! i i i "•:~`,~~`~.~°'•-~''~,i•.~'-:.~._ - _ . ~ ..~~r~~`~~,
j 1
f , I ti / f ~ tr°.. r= l ( 1, r ~ 1 l E ~ ~ k . ,""`r, _ ~ r''' ~ i ~ , - , ~ , r ~ r t J r ~J~. , ! r`te'; !
~ r~k ti f~ ~ j~l~!~ f~ `a^~~i~,. ~ ! !i r! ! i r ~ ~f ~ ~ t v _ _ _ ~ _ ~ r;~^"' ,o k " r ~ f~ ' / v~fl~.ri t?° ! v' t l ~ v `rte - , r -
/p~ / ~ 9
I ~ ~ ~e S ~ f / ~ , 5` I / ~`~.'g, i t / J ~ f i .r a"`}~ ...--'".r .!s .e-' / t 'w / i 1 ~ ~._w-.' f i • i t „l~ ~`i ~ I f~ ^~-'2 1 l~ f i } ~`ti ~ ~~raa~,,,.u ~ . +
~ . ~ ~ _ "W > , I p + f _ ~ A 1 bra ~ , ~ ~ 4 ~ f d ! ~ .t l ~ 1"•.. j 1 ~'Y ti,..r?i i ~ ~ + t V , .v ~ N , r J61-.~~y P"~ 1
. K. , /,r p l ~ ~ ~ , ~ /'.r.,.. u t f w. ~ ~ ~ { . ! r ` o
~ ~4~ _.~r _ ~ w.~ .M ~ ~i.~ ~ , 1ri.. t y 1 F?d~ {
-;.;^v r ~ r u~ ~~r~s.,, l ~ i, 1 ~ ~ ~ 'mss ~ - } , s u , a g~ tip,. .r^'~ ~1`~. r^rk ~ L / ~ ~ ~ F` ~ ,f / ~ ~o...~'' ~r,.~ ~
w.. a f , ~ ~ _ 6 !r.~ ^c ~,^t,'w a~p'^^.( ~ s 1 / ~r" ~ t~ ~dS1~1 , bhp 9 ,1 a.1 'v.,,~+„r' ~"Y t
M~ ~ ~u. / ~ M .~ti ~ ! ~ l r r°'' t~~~ Gal r`~ -r'~_' r t ~..,r~ J.
'art ~k,. c}: ~ 1 ~ , ~ r ~ J-'r~ a m a, 4~. f~:+ ~ns.~~, ~N°CERNHTTE F"Ar ~t3 ~H,.:: y,~ ~1 / Sr / J r ! ,,?f ~ ~ ~ ~ \r .~l R p~
IN~ERt~TTEt~~
F, ~ ~
~ f ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ m ~ a a ~ .....--gym m re s EXISTING CONTOUR
\ r
W EXISTING STORM DRAIN
r ~ ~ 3 ~3 rte, • ~ ~ ~ ! ~ a / ~ `"f ~ p 'gip` Cl "'``"tea.. ' ~7`~ `"•..~.w ~-,_„f ~ ~1"~,y..~L t k i ~ ~ / i ~ EXISTING SANITARY SEWER

5 - ~ ~ ti„ f N~ _ ~ EXISTING DROP INLET
. T EXISTING MANHOLE ~
= v 1 • ll s ....e..._ ~ ~ ~ - Jar r _ ``~~\\\s-, w_ ~ ~ WETLANDS _II
F ,r-., wc- , i r , A`"-1
4 - , ~ ~ ~ ~ .r3rB Q
'`cwt ~ r~.~ i ~ ~r"~r''~ _ _ - - ~ - Fry
% ' ~r
f _ ~ , _
t~~
` \ ~S
=ray t ' ~r '•.~i M.4, ti,F / =..'..~-a' r^"i,~"^ ...m i TOE, ~"e
e
Y n~ ` i ~y ~ ~ ~`~~i--";fix

ppn
M .~,}e U 1 -.g - W
~-,1 .mow ~ ~1'ir~ I
Y
• ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 AUG ~ ~ 2009 m
~1 ~ ~ ~ , D~~R • WATER QUAI.iTY ~
~ 9~TlDS A49D ST~~TE~ DR~tdCN

Q
Z
w
,1~~,~ ~ ~
50 25 50 25 0 50 100 150 _ _
ENG1Np PL G CONSULTANTS
4944 PLAZA BOULEVARD, SU]TE 350
SCALE IN FEET Cti NORTH CAROLINA 28217 SHT.
1 "=50' PHONE: 704426,6070 FAX: 704426
NORTH CAROLINA LICENSE NO. G1163
www.talbertandbright.com OF
777-

F, y ~ a:i 1 l " ~ ~'r 1 ~ 11 /
G;; ~ j ~ r j 1 ~ ( A ~F 7 ~
r ii Fn i ~ r ! t ~ 3 ! .w. _ I ~~#O~i~~~ T~ i GE Sll~IMARY
~ r`~ ' ` 1~' I ff ( 7~ f ( I t~ i S-1 N 606,728.26E 1,658,112.41 S-~ N 606,728.91E 1,657,433.39 S-1 T® S-2 0
- FLARED END SECTION SUBDRAIN CLEANOUT 1.66..00 L.F. 42'° RCP
c ~ ~ I 1 ~ J,~ JI ~ 4^~,,_ U.- ~ 58~ "J GROUND ELEV.=564.50 8°' {NV=586.24 @ 1.39%, CLASS III
. , 42" INV. OUT=563.50
I -...J ,r` i ~ ~ , / / C _ S 7' N 606,365:59 E 1,657,590:52 S-3 T~ S-4
- ~-V-- S-2 N 606,590.70E 1,658,019.50 MANHOLE 120.00 L.F. 42'° RCP HEADWALL RIM ELEV.:=589..75 @ 0.50%, CLASS:1Il j.
GROUND ELEV.=566.80 EX. 18" INV. IN=586.751 l
~ ~.l I 1 f 42° INV. IN=565.80 18" INV OUT=586.55 3-~ T® S-5 ~ ~
J ` ~ ~ ~ ' ~ 1.69.21 L:F. 36" RCP z
~ ~ ~ T ~ ~ ~ ss-~ ' ~ ` _ ' ~ h4~``~ S~ N 606,511.32E 1,657,868.97 S-S N 607,043.19E 1,657,584.98 @ 4.00%, CLASS III ~
/ ~ -~nl 3 ~ ~ i ; I s / '`/f! /~~/i !`.rf ~''i l`r'r°J / .'i l%'f _ _ ~ _ . - FLARED END SECTION FLARED -END SECTION. ~ r 42" INV OUT=569.00 18" INV OUT=580.00 T® S-6 ~
i ~ ~ 1 i , ~ _ ~
? ~ 9 ~ sxcr i ~ ~ r M., ;j` 201.06 L.F. 8" PVC
S--~ N 606,552.69E 1,657,756.33 S- N 606,882.43E 1,657,459.39 @ 2.11% SCHEDULE 40 ~ _ 4x4 DROP INLET 3x3 DROP INLET
~r ~ • ~ ~ ~~~t FFE 5$8.5 , f r - ~o H~ ~ 1 _ ~ . m ~ ~ r' _ _ ~ GRATE ELEV.=579.01 GRATE ELEV.=586:.14 T S-Z
~ ~ ~ ~ a _ 7 18" INV. IN=572.52 18" INV. OUT=582.64 250 L.F. 18" RCP
t ~ ~ 7 i ,rf`,l°1'~/J/'ir~~fr/~r~'~ _-~3 r~ A. i j ~ 36" INV. IN=571.02 @ 5.61 CLASS III N
t ~ ~ I ~ ,f IG a a I ~ ~ i 1 9 ~ s t{, 42° IN'V: OUT=569.60
' ss-~r: j f ~ ~ ; l ~ E ~ ~ 9 ~ r ~ i~ :.w~?i 1 1, i ` 1 s To S~
~ ~ 1 'd l fK8^~ `7 i ! `,7`! , i ~ i ` 1 ~ ~ , ` ~ ,r 1 ~ i ~ I R ` N 606,614.81E 1,657,598.94 204.00 L.F. 18" RCP M
gy ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ i '~i / j MANHOLE @ 1.29%, CLASS III d°o RIM ELEV.=586.10 °
I ~ ~ l , I , . { ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ INV. I'N=582.00 ' r%) , w
i , '--e " EX. 36" INV. IN=578.431 w ~ ° m ~ ~
k, i ~ t ~ v ; , r , . 't ~ N _ E ~ I ~ 36" INV. OUT=577.79 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ °
E { ;..t f m z o i~ o
I c ~ l ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ( ~ ~ % d ~ , € ` r ` ~ Z } (I,}
~ 1 ~ ~ ~ E d , ~ . - . _ i ~ , , ; ~ - 5
~ ~ ~3 i ~ - ~ l r / w W (n Z ~ ~ W lU~l Z X I
f, _ f ~ ~ _ ~ I ~ ~ ~ 3 - . 6 i , , ,1r Y ri ~i i - Ytk 1 i'. ~ t ~ ~ U W
E t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 f ' ~ ~ wwoat ~ se2.m~ ~ + I ~ ~ ~ i t t ..--''l ~ ~ i I I! i~t ~~ti V'i, ~
~ 1
C? ~ ! ;r ~ j l~ I t f ~ I I ~I ~ f ~ l , , ~`y p
% pia ! ~ ~ ~ ~ E~ p , i sti _ _ ; i ~ ~ _ y, ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ _ i ! w"~~
- , ~ ~ , ~ '
! i ~ t ~ i ! ~ ~ _ , ~ s ~ ,r' ' ~ ~ 4! fir; Y
N f
1 t ~ ft t: r ! ' i W ,~w.
s i i I ~ r l `t j . 1 ! ( St ;s~5 I ~ ~ ~ r' I ~
~ w~ 5mv aa' i i 1; j ~ ~ l
-f"~ 1 i ~ ~ ~ r ~ r,,~ '<<<<~, ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ` ~ . - _ t t FUTURE IMPERVIOUS ~ . ~ ' ~
< I ~ i ~ 1 ~ i ~ fib, t~ i t ~ ~,._,r' - - i l ~ ~`1
~ ~ ~ I I f%
SS I I ~ ~ ~ j
1 n ~1, _ ~ ~ t F `
r f l 3~ l i ~ ~ ~ r , iI
i; g y y f r i ~ 1 `1
l
r- _ M- ,r , ` r 1 ~ ~ f _ - - d--° ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ . ~ ~ s r
~ , F 5f dart'? y~ r ,,,_..r~-""~ f L_-_._: t ~ , f f t _ ; w N.
r i~ I ) ~ „ ~ ~ - ~ . 1} k i~
.-4n ~'C ~a E
.m _ } w r•~ I f i~
~ ~ , ! { ' ~I { 1~ ~ 1, 4 1 ~ y t ~ I _ ~ `
a ~ _ ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ r ~ r d z ~ s ~ 1 \ f' ~ ~ u _ rte. ~ ~ e J
r r i...,, ~ Y ~ r,. ~ ~`f.
_ r ~ 'd ; ~ ~ - r,, ~ r ~ ~ i / F i ~y r ~ / 1 t/ ~y J S A
/r t I ~
1 ( t ~ i ~ ~ ti % .r-' ~ 5 ~ ~r i r ,,r~° s'' y.M ~ r
1 A r" P ( J~ ! ~ j Hl ; ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ 580--}, : ~ ~ . ,,r r~ ~ a\~ 4` ^Z `w. r' r' f f ~ ~ ~"~GE` 4 i ~..?1 / ~ 4 '~1 - ,~j ~„r~~~ rr [ ~ . ,r r r Mi r
~ „ ~~jf t 1 1 ~ r^_''' / l 1 > / i 1 ~.w. ; J` di ~ 1 ~ I ~ ' - _ y . ~ ~ l,~'r-
f f , ~ ( 6 ~ \ ~ ra.,~ ~ `..kt ~ y ~ ~ "~~i 'fir" ~ ~ ti`s, f ~ ~ ~ 4 :rj 1 / t w - f'' a
~ ~ ~ /F ` l A,, r, ~9 / t . ~ f f
- _ P . ~ < / S~'R AM"~~JMPyACT ~ , ~ , l ' ~"a ~ ~ i t / r ~ ~ - p ~k s 1, ~ jr ~ r,z ~~F .r w''"',~,~ .....,,.,f'~ r?~J F r~"3t ~ ~ ~ z ~ I f ~ 7~ ~-Q3~ r~; 5'~ ~F} ~ ~ ~ ~ F~'~~ ~i It ~B 1 _ _ !
, „ ( i
' `^"y~ ,,:ei gY r Y+ ~ ~ ~ r r J ~ f ~ 1, °V _ ~ r- - . f ~ s f -
` ~ s~F*~ , 't i ~ ] j ,r 1 ~ r l~q;Ivl .:~~J'i~ j,i7 ,a.,; _ 6 r. - t J ~ y w'~ ; 3 t f n ~ 9 f aR <i ~ ~.s~ t ~ h.~;?. ! " ~:J' J )n ~p~ ~ _ ~ ; . w t , ~If ~ ~ - ~ C id ~ v w FV/ e,: ! s ~^,...r~; ~ f ; r,-.t ,d f
~ ~i s R~MnE~
y IPit` ~tJ3 4S9 ~ , ~ 1 e. ` i - r` ~ f ~ o a a 1 - CP ~ ~J~
t ~ ~ 4 42~ p. ~
t f~'~•. f r ~ 1 ~ m ~ ~ ~ .__M_- - F~..~ - _ - ° EXISTING CONTOUR
I`` j/ F F "aid.:, i f J ~ ~ ~ ~'C9 r3
Q `4~6jy~ ~4 -,~.a'" 1 f rte,:<:Mw.., t ~ f / d` - EXISTING STORM DRAIN
7 ~ "`._m_ - e - EXISTING SANITARY SEWER `
' , ~ ~ ; .,,A ! i'~ ~ ~ ~ z r E ti STREAM 1 IMPACT ( _,_y - , ~n 3 , ' ~ ? M _ _
. - " (~79 LF) _ . _ ~ ~ t ~ - ~ - i~~~ EXISTING DROP INLET
. ~ _ _ _ EXISTING MANHOLE ~
~ , ~II
fi~ i ~ ~ .Z / ~ - - , `w w .a M ~ ~ ~ ~ r'" / 'w r ~ - X 576.89 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
Y ,~'h„" ~ tit. ...n.. ~ _ /-699-~``~ PROPOSED CONTOUR Q
s . \ J v , e ~ ,
~ "`MF v 4 ~ t ` `~e,.. U ,~--700-`° PROPOSED INDEX CONTOUR ~
4
~ ~ ~ ~ PROPOSED BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT ,
,r. _ s~ PROPOSED DROP INLET
~r ~ s n - ~ , M ~ }^"-4~
~ PROPOSED MANHOLE
~ ~ ~
~ PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE PIPE
~ w PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION ° z
r ~ ~
~ h ® PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ~
,~;..~r~ U
1. ~._.,~~.,a WETLANDS A~ ~ ~ ~ w
3•

~ ; ~

4
TACK COAT PRIME COAT „ Z I w
2.5 S-9.56 J
2.25°` I-19.06
8" CABC
50 25 50 25 0 50 100 150 _____r___ _
TYPICAL SECTION hNUIN ' ' (i & PLANNING CONSULT
NOT TO SCALE 4944 PARKWAY PLAM BOULEVARD, SUM 350 SHT.
SCALE IN FEET M, NORTH CAROLINA 25217
1 50' PHON& 704-426.6070 FAX 70426-0
NORTH CAROLINA LICENSE NO. C,1163
www.talbertandbright.com OF