860010_PERMITTING_20171231

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
Maple Ridge Dairy Inc
Maple Ridge Dairy
1174 Pine Ridge Rd
Mount Airy, NC 27030
Dear Maple Ridge Dairy Inc:
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
October 1, 2014
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC860010
Maple Ridge Dairy
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Surry County
In accordance with your renewal request, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage
(COC) issued to Maple Ridge Dairy Inc, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
management system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for Maple Ridge Dairy, located in Surry County, with an animal capacity of no greater
than the following annual averages:
Dairy Calf:
Dairy Heifer: 100
Milk Cow: 600
Dry Cow:
Beef Stocker Calf:
Beef Feeder:
Beef Brood Cow:
Other:
This COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2019, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWC860010 that was previously issued to this facility. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system
for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be
established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or
increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to
the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or
number of animals.
Please read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit carefully. Please pay careful attention to the
If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site -specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Phone:[phone] \ Internet: htto:IM".ncdenr.gov/
An Equal Opportunity 1 Atrinnafive Action Employer —Made in part by recycled paper

• 4'
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CA`vVMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Program for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition 11.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You
may find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Blacksburg/Roanoke, VA
National Weather Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at:
http://www.weather.izov/mk/
This facility is located in a county covered by our Winston-Salem Regional Office. The Regional Office
staff may be reached at 336-771-5000. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Program staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Thomas A. Reeder
Director, Division of Water Resources
Enclosure (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs)
Winston-Salem Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Surry County Health Department
Surry County Soil and Water Conservation District
WQROS Central Files (Permit No. AWC860010)
AFO Notebooks

a
...
t
REC; IVED
' N.C. Dept. of ENR
JUL 18 2006
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization Winston-Salem
Regional Office
07-17-2006
This plan has been prepared for:
Maple Ridge Dairy
Dairy Horton
646 Pine Ridge Road
Mt. Airy, NC 27030
This plan has been developed by:
Greg Goings
NRCS
220 cooper street
Dobson, NC 27017
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
Signature (owner)
Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By:
Technical Specialist Signature
Date
-----.. _. _.-------------------_-----------------....---------------------....-------------------------------------------..
271713 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 07-17-2006 Cover Pagel

,rr
Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S2
Dairy (Milk Cow) Liquid Manure Slurry waste generated 4,649,400 gals/year by 600
animal DairyJUFowi Liquid Manure Slurry operation. This production facility as
waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
46025
Incorporated
62762
Injected
71130
Irrigated
41841
Max. Avail.
PAN (Ibs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (Ibs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (Ibs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
46,025
91866
-45,841
9,280,127
-4,630,727
S45
Dai (dUif6FY- olid waste generated 1,200.00 tons/year by 4110.0:an W51:Dairy (Heifer)
Solid•dpe a ion..
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
5160
Incorporated
6840
Injected
N/A
Irrigated
N/A
Max. Avail.
PAN (Ibs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (Ibs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (Ibs)
Actual Quantity
Applied (Tons)
Surplus/Deficit
(Tons)
Year 1
5,160
9095
-3,935
2,114.97
914.97
----------------------------------------_ .....-----------.- -----_.......---- - - - --....--- -----------------------------
Note: In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
* Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
271713 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 07-17-2006 Source Page Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates
are also provided for, each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shown, where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (LI)
Sail Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
4966
1
9.80
9.80
N/A
Fairview
Com, Silage
19.0 Tons
4966
Is
9.00
9.00
N/A
Riverview-P
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
4966
2
5.10
5.10
N/A
Fairview
Cam, Silage
18.4 Tons
4966
2a
5.10
5.10
N/A
Fairview
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
4966
3
9.40
9.40
N/A
Fairview
Com, Silage
19.0 Tons
4966
3a
9.40
9.40
N/A
Fairview
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
4966
4
8.10
8.10
N/A
Fairview
Com, Silage
19.0 Tons
4966
4a
8.10
8.10
N/A
Fairview
Small Grain, Silage
8.3 Tons
4966
5
13.10
13.10
N/A
Fairview
Cam, Silage .
19.0 Tons
4966
58
13.10
13.10
N/A
Fairview
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
4966
6
11.40
11.40
N/A
Fairview
Com, Silage
19.0 Tons
4966
6a
11.40
11.40
N/A
Fairview
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
4966
7
8.50
8.50
N/A
Fairview
Com, Silage
18.4 Tons
4966
7a
8.50
8.50
N/A
Fairview
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
5034
1
9.00
9.00
N/A
Riverview-P
Com, Silage
22.0 Tons
5034
la
9.00
9.00
N/A
Riverview-P
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
5034
2
3.70
3.70
N/A
Riverview-P
Com, Silage
22.0 Tons
5034
2a
3.70
3.70
N/A
Riverview-P
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
5034
3
20.80
20.80
N/A
Riverview-P
Com, Silage
22.0 Tons
5034
3a
20.80
20.80
N/A
Fairview
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
5034
4
7.30
7.30
N/A
Riverview-P
Com, Silage
22.0 Tons
5034
4a
7.30
7.30
N/A
Fairview
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
5034
5
3.60
3.60
N/A
Riverview-P
Com, Silage
22.0 Tons
5034
5a
3.60
3.60
N/A
Riverview-P
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
5035
1
14.40
14.40
N/A
Pacolet
Com, Silage -
19.0 Tons
5035
1 a
14.40
14.40
N/A
Pacolet
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
5035
3
1.70
1.70
N/A
Fairview
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
5035
4
19.10
19.10
N/A
Fairview
Com, Silage
19.0 Tons
5035
4a
19.10
19.10
N/A
Fairview
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 ]Tons
5035
5
2.50
2.50
N/A
Fairview
Fescue Hay
4.3
271713 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 7/17/2006
PCS Page Page 1 of 2
NOTE; Symbol' means user entered data.

Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
5035
6
1.90
1.90
N/A
Fairview
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
5035
7
10.80
10.80
N/A
Fairview
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
5035
8
8.90
8.90
N/A
Fairview
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
5035
9
17.20
17.20
N/A
Fairview
Corn, Silage
19.0 Tons
5035
9a
17.20
17.20
N/A
Fairview
Small Grain, Silage
8,6 Tons
5064
1
46.80
46.80
N/A
Fairview
Corn, Silage
19.0 Tons
5064
2
1.90
1.90
N/A
Chewacla-P
Corn, Silage
28.0 Tons
5197
1
27.20
27.20
N/A
Cecil
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
5197
10
4.80
4.80
N/A
Pacolet
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
5197
11
4.90
4.90
N/A
Pacolet
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
5197
12
16.00
16.00
N/A
Pacolet
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
5197
2
11.00
11.00
N/A
Pacolet
Corn, Silage
18A Tons
5197
8
37.30
37.30
N/A
Masada
Corn, Silage
22.8 Tons
5197
8a
37.30
37.30
N/A
Masada
Small Grain, Silage
11.0 Tons
5197
9
30.00
30.00
N/A
Pacolet
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
5446
1
17.30
17.30
N/A
Fairview
Corn, Silage
19.0 Tons
5446
In
17.30
17.30
N/A
Fairview
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
5446
2
4.70
4.70
N/A
Fairview
Corn, Silage
19.0 Tons
5446
2a
4.70
4.70
N/A
Fairview
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
5446
3
2.80
2.80
N/A
Fairview
Corn, Silage
19.0 Tons
5446
3a
2,80
2.80
N/A
Fairview
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
PLAN TOTALS: 612.80 612.80
Ll
Potential Le6ching
Technteal,Guidanee -° I iif' ' l
'
Low potential tocontribute to soluble
None '
< 2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
�- 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
<= 10
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered.
> 10
Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term
No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers
(391).
271713 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 7/17/2006
PCs Page Page 2 of 2
NOTE: Symbol • means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use
the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to
maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
In
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
- Applies
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Reqd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applies
Method
Manure
PA
NutricntA
pplied
(lbs(A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
4966
1t
1 S2
airview
1 9.80
9.80
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
1 207
0
1 0
Broad.
207
20.91
0.00
204.93
0.001
4966
la
S2
Riverview-P
9.00
9.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
0
Broad.
100
10.10
0.00
90.92
0.0
4966
2
S2
Fairview
5.10
5.10
Com, Silage
18.4 Ton
2/15-6/30
201
0
0
Broad.
201
20.31
0.00
103.55
0.0
4966
2a
S2
Fairview
5.10
5.10
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/I-3131
95
0
0
Broad.
95
9.60
0.00
48.94
0.0
4966
3
S2
Fairview
9.40
9.40
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
207
20.91
0.00
196.56
0.0
4966
3a
S2
airview
1 9.40
9.40
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
1 95
0
1 0
Broad.
951
9.60
0.00
90.211
0.001
4966
4
S2
airview
8.10
8.10
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
207
20.91
0.00
169.38
0.00
4966
4a
S2
airview
8.10
8.10
Small Grain, Silage
8.3 Tons
911-3/31
92
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
4966
5
S2
airview
13.10
13.10
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
207
20.91
0.00
273.93
0.0
4966
Sa
S2
airview
13.10
13. 10
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
95
9.60
0.00
125.72
0.00
4966
6
S2
Fairview
1 11.40
11.40
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
1 207
0
1 0
1 Broad.
2071
20.91
0.00
238.381
0.00
4966
6a
S2
Fairview
11.40
11.40
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
95
9.60
0.00
109.40
0.00
4966
7
S2
Fairview
8.50
8.50
Com, Silage
18.4 Ton
2/15-6/30
201
0
0
Broad.
201
20.31
0.00
172.59
0.00
4966
7a
S2
airview
8.50
8.50
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95.
0
0
Broad.
95
9.60
0.00
81.57
0.00
5034
1
S45
'verview-P
9.00
9.00
Com, Silage
22.0 Ton
2/15fi/30
240
0
0
Broad.
240
0.00
55.81
0.00
502.3
5034
la
S2
verview-P
1 9.001
9.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
911-3/31
1 100
1 0
1 0
1 Broad.
10q
10.10
O.DOl
90.92
0.00
271713 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 7/17/2006 WUT Page Page 1 of 3

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
APplic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Reqd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NumentA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
'(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gaUA
Tons
1000 gals
tons
5034 1
2
1 S2
Riverview-P
1 3.70
3.70
Com,.Silage
22.0 Ton
2115-6/30 1
240
0
0
Broad.
240,24.24
0.00
89.71
0.00
5034
2a
S2
Riverview-P
3.70
3.70
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
9/1-3131
100
0
0
Broad.
100
10.10
0.00
37.38
0.0
5034
3
S2
Riverview-P
20.80
20.80
Cont, Silage
22.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
240
0
0
Broad.
240
24.24
0.00
504.29
0.00
5034
3a
S2
Fairview
20.80
20.80
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
911-3/31
100
0
0
Broad.
100
10.10
0.00
210.12
0.00
5034
4
S2Riverview-P
7.30
7.30
Com, Silage
2.0 Ton
2115-6/30
240
0
0
Broad.
240
24.24
0.00
176.99
0.00
5034
4a
I S2
Fairview
17.30
7.30
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
9/1-3131
1 100
0
1 0
1 Broad.
10q
10.10
0.00
73.741
0.00
5034
5
S2
Riverview-P
3.60
3.60
Com, Silage
22.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
240
0
0
Broad.
240
24.24
0.00
87.28
0.00
5034
5a
S2
Riverview-P
3.60
3.60
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
0
Broad.
100
10.10
0.00
36.37
0.00
5035
1
S45
Pacolet
14.40
14.40
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
207
0.00
48.14
0.00
693.20
5035
la
S2
Pawlet
14.40
14.40
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
95
9.60
0.00
138.19
0.00
5035
3
S2
Fairview
1 1.70
1.70
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
1 8/1-7/31
191
0
1 0
Broad.
1911
19.30
0.001
32.801
0.00
5035
4
S45
Fairview
19.10
19.10
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2115-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
207
0.00
48.14
0.00
919.45
5035
4a
S2
Fairview
19.10
19.10
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
95
9.60
0.00
183.30
0.00
5035
5
S2
Fairview
2.50
2.50
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
811-7/31
191
0
0
Broad.
191
19.30
0.00
48.24
0.0
5035
6
S2
Fairview
1.90
1.90
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
811-7/31
143
0
0
Broad.
143
14.45
0.00
27.45
0.00
5035
7
S2
Fairview
1 10.80
10.80
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
911-7131
137
0
1 0
1 Broad.
13
13.841
0.00
149.471
0.00
5035
8
S2
Fairview
8.90
8.90
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
8/1-7/31
137
0
- 0
Broad.
137
13.94
0.00
123.17
0.00
5035
9
S2
Fairview
17.20
17.20
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
207
20.91
0.00
359.67
0.00
5035
9a
S2
Fairview
17.20
17.20
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3131
95
0
0
Broad.
95
9.60
0.00
165.06
0.0
5064
1
S2
Fairview
46.80
46.80
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
207
20.91
0.00
978.63
0.0
5064
1 2
S2
hewacla-P
1 1.901
1.90
Com, Silage
8.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
291
0
0
Broad.
291
29.40
0.
55.85
0.00
5197
1
S2
Cecil
27.20
27.20
Com, Silage
1.9 Ton
2115-6/30
239
0
0
Broad.
239
24.14
0.0
656.70
0.00
271713 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 7/17/2006 WUT Page Page 2 of 3

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tmct
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(Ibs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutricruA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000 _
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
5197
10
1 S2
Parole[
4.80
4.80
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
8/1-7/31
137
0
0
Broad.
13
13.84
0.00
66.43
0.00
5197
Il
S2
acole[
4.90
4.90
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
8/I-7/31
137
0
0
Broad.
137
13.84
0.00
67.81
0.00
5197
12
S2
Pacolet
16.00
16.00
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
8/1-7131
137
0
0
Broad.
137
13.94
0.00
221.43
0.00
5197
2
S2
Pacolet
11.00
11.00
Com, Silage
18.4 Ton
2/15-6/30
201
0
0
Broad.
201
26.31
0.00
223.35
0.00
5197
8
S2
asada
37.30
37.30
Com, Silage
22.8 Ton
2/15-6/30
249
0
0
Broad.
249
25.15
0.00
938.23
0.00
5197
8a
S2
Mmada
137.30
3730
Small Grain, Silage
11.0 Toni
911-3/31
1 122
0
1 0
1 Broad.
122112.32
0.00
459.701
0.00
5197
9
S2
Pacolet
30.00
30.00
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
8/1-7/31
137
0
0
Broad.
137
13.84
0.00
415.19
0.00
5446
1
S2
Fairview
17.30
17.30
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
207
20.91
0.00
361.76
0.00
5446
Is
S2
Fairview
17.30
17.30
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
95
9.60
0.00
166.02
0.00
5446
2
S2
Fairview
4.70
4.70
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2115-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
207
20.91
0.00
98.28
0.00
5446
1 2a
I S2
lFairview
1 4.701
4.70
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/t-3/31
I 95
I0
I 0
Broad.
I 95
9.60
0.00
45.111
0.00
5446
1 3
1 S2
Fairview
1 2.80
2.80
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207
1 0
1 0
1 Broad.
1 207
20.91
0.00
58.55
0.00
5446
3a
S2
Fairview
2.80
2.80
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
95
9.60
0.00
26.87
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
9,280.13
Total Produced, I000 gallons
4,649.40
;
Balance, I000 gallons
4,63073
_-
Total Applied, tons
.;
2,114.97
Total Produced, tons
R.;'_M
1,200.00
Balance, tons
x _.YM,,
-914.97
Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol • means user entered data
271713 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 7/17/2006
WUT Page Page 3 of 3

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available
at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days
minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or
holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that
the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative,
the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these
situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the
structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Canacitv
Source Name
I Dairy Milk Cow Liquid Manure Slurry
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
9/1
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
180
1
2
180
1
3
180
1
4
180
1
5
180
1
6
180
1
7
154
1
8
128
1
9
124
1
10
119
1
11
115
1
12
115
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
---------------..-._....----------------------------- -- _..._---_-----------------------------------------------------------------------
271713 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 07-17-2006 Capacity Page Page 1 of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation
or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns
or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the
waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is
within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to
secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving
crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but
less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard
393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land
application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and
Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such
that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and flies.
.... -------------------------------- --- ----------------------------
271713 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 7/17/2006 Specification Page 1

8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on
these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted
to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior
to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from
a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25
feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to
prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
........................................................ ....- - -----------------------------------------
271713 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 7/17/2006 Specification Page 2

17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops
for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for
direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further
applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of
the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied
based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen
based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be
adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5)
years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
271713 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 7/17/2006 Specification Page 3

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 10, 11, 12, 6, 7, 8, 9
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 Ib/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 Ib/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 Ib/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 Ib/ac. N to
pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and
Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 2
Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant
1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for
your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be
applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when
corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected
yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be
reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and
expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus
is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is
essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest.
----------- --------- ------------------ -- ----------- ------
271713 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 07-17-2006 Crop Note Page Page l of 5

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant
1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for
your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be
applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when
corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 Ibs nitrogen per ton of expected
yield applying no more than 100 to 120 Ibs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be
reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and
expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus
is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is
essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9
Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant
1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for
your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 Ibs, nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be
applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when
corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 Ibs nitrogen per ton of expected
yield applying no more than 100 to 120 Ibs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be
reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and
expected yield. Apply phosphorus and, potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus
is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is
essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest.
----------------------- ----------------------------------------------------.---------- ------ - - ........... ---- ......---------
271713 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 07-17-2006 Crop Note Page Page 2 of 5

The following crop note applies to field(s): 8
Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant
1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for
your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be
applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when
corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected
yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be
reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and
expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus
is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is
essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 3, 5
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 Ib/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 Ib/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 Ib/ac. N to
pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% to 50% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar.
20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
--------------------------------------------...-- ---------------
271713 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 07-17-2006 Crop Note Page Page 3 of 5

The following crop note applies to field(s): la, 2a, 5a
Small Grain Silage, Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains,
small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current
NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide".Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when
planting no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU
Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety
with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 30 lbs N at planting.
Increase N at planting by 20% for no -till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a
soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February -March. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. N
per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be
analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain. Timely management
of diseases, weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover
crop after harvest.
The following crop note applies to field(s): la, 2a, 3a, 4a, 5a, 6a, 7a, 9a
Small Grain Silage, Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains,
small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current
NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide".Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when
planting no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU
Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety
with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 30 lbs N at planting.
Increase N at planting by 20% for no -till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a
soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February -March. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. N
per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be
analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain. Timely management
of diseases, weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover
crop after harvest.
.---.... ---------------------------------------- ------ ------------------------------------------- ------------------- ---...----- --- ----- --
271713 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 07-17-2006 Crop Note Page Page 4 of 5

The following crop note applies to field(s): 8a
Small Grain Silage, Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains,
small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current
NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide".Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when
planting no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU
Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety
with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 30 Ibs N at planting.
Increase N at planting by 20% for no -till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a
soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February -March. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. N
per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be
analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain. Timely management
of diseases, weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover
crop after harvest.
271713 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 07-17-2006 Crop Note Page Page 5 of 5

RECEIVEt)
N.C.Oept. of ENR
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste UtilizatiA 13 2006
This plan has been prepared for:
Maple Ridge Dairy
Dairy Horton
646 Pine Ridge Road
Mt. Airy, NC 27030
06-22-2006
Winston-Salem
Regional Office
This plan has been developed by:
Greg Goings
NRCS
220 cooper street
Dobson, NC 27017
Developer nature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
Signature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: �— �� �� lee
—
Technical pe ialist ignatur Date
---..... ------......-----......... ------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- -------- ------
542759 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-22-2006 Cover Page I

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S2
Dairy (Milk Cow) Liquid Manure Slurry waste generated 4,649,400 gals/year by 9600]
animal DairyWilk Cow) L quid Manure Slurry operation. This production facility has
waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
46025 ,
Incorporated
62762
Injected
71130
Irrigated
41841
Max. Avail.
PAN (Ibs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (Ibs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (Ibs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
1 46,025
70290
-24,265
7,100,588
-2,451,188
S45
Dairy (Heifer) Solid waste generated 1,200.00 tons/year by a O073—fi nal) a a6ry 6if6 )
S.olifl operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
5160
Incorporated
6840
Injected
N/A
Irrigated
N/A
Max. Avail.
PAN (Ibs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (Ibs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (Ibs)
I Actual Quantity
Applied (Tons)
Surplus/Deficit
(Tons)
Year 1
5,160
9095
1 -3,935
1 2,114.97
-914.97
Note: - -------- In -- s--ID, ----- m-eans- ---- stan- -d- ar--d---so- urce- , U - -- --e- anns-- user de
- - --------------------------------------......-- -----
so S mfined source.
* Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
542759 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-22-2006 Source Page Page I of I

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates
are also provided for each crop In the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shown, where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (LH
Soil Series
,
Crop Sequence
RYE
4966
1
9.80
9.80
N/A
Fairview
Corn, Silage
19.0 Tons
4966
2
5.10
5.10
N/A
Fairview
Corn, Silage
18.4 Tons
4966
3
9.40
9A0
N/A
Fairview
Corn, Silage
19.0 Tons
4966
4
8.10
8.10
N/A
Fairview
Corn, Silage
19.0 Tons
4966
5
13.10
13.10
N/A
Fairview
Corn, Silage
19.0 Tons
4966
6
11.40
11.40
N/A
Fairview
Corn, Silage
19.0 Tons
4966
7
8.50
8.50
N/A
Fairview
Corn, Silage
18.4 Tons
5034
1
9.00
9.00
N/A
Riverview-P
Corn, Silage
22.0 Tons
5034
2
3.70
3.70
N/A
Riverview-P
Corn, Silage
22.0 Tons
5034
3
20.80
20.80
N/A
Riverview-P
Corn, Silage
22.0 Tons
5034
4
7.30
7.30
N/A
Riverview-P
Corn, Silage
22.0 Tons
5034
5
3.60
3.60
N/A
Riverview-P
Corn, Silage
22.0 Tons
5035
1
14.40
14.40
N/A
Pacolet
Corn, Silage
19.0 Tons
5035
3
1.70
1.70
N/A
Fairview
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
5035
4
19.10
19.10
N/A
Fairview
Corn, Silage
19.0 Tons
5035
5
2.50
2.50
N/A
Fairview
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
5035
6
1.90
1.90
N/A
Fairview
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
5035
7
10.80
10.80
N/A
Fairview
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
5035
8
8.90
8.90
N/A
Fairview
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
5035
9
17.20
17.20
N/A
Fairview
Corn, Silage
19.0 Tons
5064
1
46.80
46.80
N/A
Fairview
Corn, Silage
19.0 Tons
5064
2
1.90
1.90
N%A
Chewacla-P
Corn, Silage
28.0 Tons
5197
1
27.20
27.20
N/A
Cecil
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
5197
10
4.80
4.80
N/A
Pacolet
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
5197
11
4.90
4.90
N/A
Pacolet
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
5197
12
16.00
16.00
N/A
Pacolet
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
5197
2
11.00
I1.00
N/A
Pacolet
Corn, Silage
18.4 Tons
5197
8
37.30
37.30
N/A
Masada
Corn, Silage
22.8 Tons
30.00
30.00
N/A
Pacolet
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
E5446EE
17.30
17.30
N/A
Fairview
Com, Silage
19.0 Tons
542759 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 622/2006
PCS Page Page I of 2
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
5446
2
4,70
4.70
N/A
Fairview
Com, Silage
190 Tons
5446
3
2.80
2.80
N/A
Fairview
Com, Silage
19 0 Tons
PLAN TOTALS: 391.00 391.00
J TeAnical�Guid nce Ik` 'I ;Vf"
"d
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
< 2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
>= 2 &
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
<= 10
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered.
> 10
Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Tenn
No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers
(391).
542759 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 6/22/2006
PCS Page Page 2 of 2
NOTE: Symbol' means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use
the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to
maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
FM
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManurcA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gaVA
Tons
1000 gals
tons
4966
1
S2 .
Fairview
1 9.80
9.80
Com, Silage
19.0 Toni
2/15W30
1 207
0
1 0
Broad.
207
20.91
0.00
204.93
0.00
4966
2
S2
airview
5.10
5.10
Corn, Silage
18.4 Ton
2/15-6/30
201
0
0
Broad.
201
20.31
0.00
103.55
0.00
4966
3
S2
Fairview
9.40
9.40
Corn, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6130
207
0
0
Broad.
207
20.91
0.00
196.56
0.00
4966
4
S2
airview
& 10
8.10
Cont, Silage
19.0 Ton
2115-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
207
20.91
0.00
169.38
0.00
4966
5
S2
Fairview
13.10
13.10
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
207
20.91
0.00
273.93
0.00
4966
6
S2
Fairview
1 11.40
1 L40
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-WO
1 207
0
1 0
1 Broad.
207120.91
0.00
238.381
0.00
4966
7
S2
airview
8.50
8.50
Com, Silage
18.4 Ton
2/15-6/30
201
0
0
Broad.
201
20.31
0.00
172.59
0.00
5034
1
S45
iverview-P
9.00
9.00
Com, Silage
22.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
240
0
0
Broad.
240
0.00
55.81
0.00
502.32
5034
2
S2
iverview-P
3.70
3.70
Corn, Silage
22.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
240
0
0
Broad.
240
24.24
0.00
89.71
0.00
5034
3
S2
iverview-P -
20.80
. 20.80
Cont, Silage
22.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
240
0
0
Broad.
- 240
24.24
0.00
504.29
0.00
5034
4
S2
iverview-P
1 7.30
7.30
Com, Silage
22.0 Toni
2115-6130
1 240
0
1 0
1 Broad.
2401
24.24
0.00
176.991
0.00
5034
5
S2
iverview-P
3.60
3.60
Corn, Silage
22.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
240
0
0
Broad.
240
24.24
0.00
87.28
0.00
5035
1
S45
acolet
14.40
14.40
Cont, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6130
207
0
0
Broad.
207
0.00
48.14
0.00
693.20
5035
3
S2
airview
1.70
1.70
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
191
0
0
Broad.
191
19.30
0.00
32.80
0.00
5035
4
S45
airview
19.10
19.10
Corn, Silage
19.0 Ton
2115-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
207
0.00
48.14
0.00
919A5
5035
5
S2
I airview
1 2.50
2.50
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
811-7131
1 191
1 0
1 0
1 Broad.
11911
19.30
0.
48.241
0.00
542759 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/22/2006 WUT Page Page 1 of 2

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
-
Crop
RYE
APPIic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
(IWA)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
'Liquid
Mm=A
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
I000
pyA
Tons
1000 gals
tons
5035
6
1 S2
Fairview
1 1.90
1.90
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
1 143
0
1 0
1 Broad.
143
14.45
0.00
27.451
0.00
5035
7
S2
Fairview
10.80
10.80
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
8/1-7131
137
0
0
Broad.
137
13.84
0.00
149.47
0.00
5035
8
S2
Fairview
8.90
8.90
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
911-7/31
137
0
0
Broad.
137
13.84
0.00
123.17
0.00
5035
9
S2
Fairview
17.20
17.20
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
207
20.91
0.00
359.67
0.00
5064
1
S2
Fairview
46.80
46.80
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15.6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
207
20.91
0.00
978.63
0.00
5064
2
S2
hewacla-P
11.90
1.90
Com, Silage
8.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
1 291
0
1 0
1 Broad.
291129.40
0.00
55.851
0.00
5197
1
S2
ecil
27.20
27.20
Com, Silage
21.9 Ton
2115-6/30
239
0
0
Broad.
239
24.14
0.00
656.70
0.00
5197
10
S2
Pacolet
4.80
4.80
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
811-7131
137
0
0
Broad.
137
13.84
0.00
66.43
0.00
5197
11
S2
Pacolet
4.90
4.90
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
8/1-7/31
137
0
0
Broad.
137
13.84
0.00
67.81
0.0
5197
12
S2
Pacolet
16.00
16.00
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
811-7131
137
0
0
Broad.
137
13.84
0.00
221.43
0.00
5197
2
S2
Pacolet
1 11.00
1 1.00
Com, Silage
18.4 Ton
2/15-680
1 201
0
1 0
1 Broad.
2011
20.31
0.00
223.351
0.00
5197
8
S2
Masada
37.30
37.30
Com, Silage
2.8 Ton
2/15-6/30
249
0
0
Broad.
249
25.15
0.00
938.23
0.00
5197
9
S2
Pawlet
30.00
30.00
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
8/1-7/31
137
0
0,
Broad.
137
13.94
0.00
415.19
0.00
5446
1
S2
Fairview
17.30
17.30
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6130
207
0
0
Broad.
207
20.91
0.00
361.76
0.00
5446
2
S2
Fairview
4.70
4.70
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
207
20.91
0.00
98.28
0.00
5446
3
S2
airview
12.801
2.80
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
1 2/15fi/90
207
1 0
1 0
1 Broad.
1 207120.91
0.00
58.551
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
7,100.59==^==Y"
Total Produced, ioo0 gallons
4,649.40
h ,::
Balance, l000 gallons
-2,451.1
Total Applied, tons
2,114.97
Total Produced, tons
�'" `-"-�'
&�- _--.-
1,200.0
Balance, tons
.�-
214.9
Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol s means user entered data.
542759 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/22/2006
WUT Page Page 2 of 2

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available
at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days
minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or
holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that
the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative,
the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these
situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the
structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Capacity
Source Name
I Dairy Milk Cow Liquid Manure Slurry
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
9/1
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
68
l
2
142
1
3
180
I
4
180
1
5
180
l
6
180
1
7
154
1
8
128
I
9
107
1
10
85
1
11
64
1
12
33
« Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
-... ----.. --.-....--------------------------------------------------------`--------...-------------`-------------=-----------------
542759 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-22-2006 Capacity Page Page I of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation
or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns
or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the
waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is
within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to
secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving
crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but
less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard
393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land
application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and
Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such
that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and flies.
... ....... .... .---- ---------- ------------------------------ --- ---- --- ----- --------------------------------
542759 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/22/2006 Specification Page 1

8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on
these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted
to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior
to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from
a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25
feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to
prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
542759 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/22/2006 Specification Page 2

17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution; and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops
for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for
direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further
applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of
the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied
based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen
based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be
adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5)
years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
--------------------------- -- --- __-- ----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
542759 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/22/2006 Specification Pape 3

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 10, 11, 12, 6, 7, 8, 9
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Piedmont; tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 Ib/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 Ib/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to
pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and
Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 2
Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant
1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for
your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be
applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when
corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 Ibs nitrogen per ton of expected
yield applying no more than 100 to 120 Ibs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be
reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and
expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus
is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is
essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest.
. - ------------------------------ ------ .................. ..... .... ... .... ........ .. . - ------------------------
542759 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-22-2006 Crop Note Page Page 1 of 3

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant
1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for
your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be
applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when
corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected
yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be
reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and
expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus
is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is
essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9
Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant
1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for
your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be
applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when
corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 Ibs nitrogen per ton of expected
yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be
reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and
expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus
is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is
essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest.
----------------------------------- ---- ---
542759 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-22-2006 Crop Note Page Page 2 of 3

The following crop note applies to field(s): 8
Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant
1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for
your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be
applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when
corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 Ibs nitrogen per ton of expected
yield applying no more than 160 to 120 Ibs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be
reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and
expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus
is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is
essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 3, 5
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 Ib/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 Ib/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to
pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% to 50% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar.
20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
-------- ------------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
542759 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-22-2006 Crop Note Page Page 3 of 3

i/ q/ E aAPcy r- v/s VP-Ab �70�
Lbw
Y� %Y,
•¢'/•✓irl10 ,aSrX ice'

11
'7-
1
RECEIVCD
of ENrl
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
wI �stor-U lam
September 22, 2006
,William and Daniel q
Maple Ridge Dairy r'
646 Pine Ridge Road
Mt. Airy, NC 27030
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC860010
Maple Ridge Dairy
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Surry County
Dear William and Daniel Horton:
In accordance with your application for increase in animal numbers received on August 31, 2006, we are
hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to William and Daniel Horton,
authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application
system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Maple Ridge Dairy, located in Surry County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 600 Dairy Cows and 100 Heifers and the application to land as
specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AW6860010 dated October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) Will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is
a package containing the new and revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please oav
careful attention to the record keepine and monitoring conditions in this permit.
Please note the following requirement. A copy of the completed Animal Waste Management Plan
Certification, and a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) evaluation for land application sites must be
submitted to the Division of Water Quality upon completion of construction and prior to increasing
cattle numbers above your current permitted capacity.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: v ,nmateroualitv.orc Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal Oppodunity/Affrmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
t�` Caro ins
Vtura)71/
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service: [phone]
i

The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Winston-Salem Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information
concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact J. R. Joshi at [phone].
Sincerely--
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Winston-Salem Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Surry County Health Department
Surry County Soil and Water Conservation District
APS Central Files (Permit No. AWC860010)
AFO Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Animal Feeding Operations Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
State General Permit — New or Expanding Animal Waste Operations
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility name: Maple Ridge Dairy `L
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Ma le Ride Dairy Inc.
1.3 Mailing address: 646 Pine Ridge Rooaad�� nQ
City, State: M. Airy, NC
Telephone number (include area code): (336 ) 719 - 7904
1.4 Physical address:202 Horton Road
City, State: Mt. Airy, NC_
Telephone number (include area code): ( 336 ) 719 - 7904
1.5 County where facility is located: Surry
Zip:
Zip:27030
ss
o �a
rs c,Ti
� M
rn 'r —
✓ �
I �
�o
u3 o�
HL7
mm
y cdo� r_
1.6 Facility location (directions from nearest major highway, using SR numbers for state roads): Highway 89 Turn on SR 1396.
Horton Road turns right 150 yds from Hwy. 89
1.7 Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Ownei�Bill'Horton ):
1.8 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; circle wLb.type-Wlisted
1.9 Facility's original start-up date: 1946
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility number: 86_10
2.2 Operation Description:
Date(s) of facility expansion(s) (if applicable): Oct. 2006
Please enter the Design Capacity of the system. The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum number forwhich the waste
management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattleof Cattle No. of Animals
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish _
❑ Farrow to Wean (# sow) _
❑ Farrow to Feeder (# sow) _
❑ Farrow to Finish (# sow) _
❑ Wean to Finish (# sow)
❑ Gilts
❑ Boar/Stud
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Turkey
❑ Turkey Poults _
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Stocker Calf
❑ Dairy Calf
® Dairy Heifer 100
❑ Dry Cow
® Milk Cow 600
FORM: AWO-STATE-G-N/E 1/10/06 Page 1 of 5

1!
® Other Type of Livestock on the farm: Dry Cows No. of Animals: 300 on pasture
FORM: AWO-STATE-G-N/E 1/10/06
Page 2 of 5

3.
2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers:and•ar as not covered by the application
system): 612_ Required Acreage (as listed in the CAWMP
2.4 Number of lagoons: Tof� 1!qqu�iredCanac
I Capacity (cubic feet): ity (cubic feet):
Number of Storage Pond s: I Totaal opacity (cubic feet): 259182 Required Capacity (cubic feet): 16345
2.5 Are subsurface drains prIesent.within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or W (circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the waste management system? YES or (circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? AV or NO (circle one)
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST:
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and two copies of the application for State General Permit -
Animal Waste Operations;
3.2 Three copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied and a county road map vdth the location of the n
facility indicated; J/L
3.3 Three copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a permit application for t u
animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components. Some of these components may not have been required at the time
the facility was certified but should be added to the CA WMP for permitting purposes:
3.3.1 NRCS Site Evaluation Form NC-CPA-17 or equivalent
3.3.2 A hazard classification of the proposed lagoons, if required
3.3.3 Documentation that proposed swine facilities meet the Swine Farm Siting Act, including a site map prepared by
a Registered Land Surveyor. The scale of this map shall not exceed 1 inch = 400 feet. At a minimum, the site
map shall show the distance from the proposed houses and lagoons to occupied residences within 1500 feet,
schools, hospitals, churches, outdoor recreational facilities, national parks, state parks, historic properties, or
child care centers within 2500 feet, property boundaries within 500 feet, water supply wells within 500 feet.
The map shall also show the location of any property boundaries and perennial streams or rivers located within
75 feet of waste application areas.
3.3.4 Documentation showing that all adjoining property owners, all property owners who own property located
across a public road, street, or highway from the facility, the local health department, and the county manager
or chair of the county board of commissioners if there is no county manager, have been notified by certified
mail of your intent to construct or expand a swine farm at this location.
3.3.5 A wetlands determination
3.3.6 The lagoon/storage facility design
3.3.7 Proposed runoff control measures, if required
3.3.8 Irrigation or other land application method design
3.3.9 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) produced and
utilized by the facility
3.3.10 The soil series present on every waste disposal field
3.3.11 The crops grown on every waste disposal field
3.3.12 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP
3.3.13 The PAN applied to every waste disposal field
3.3.14 The waste application windows for every'crop utilized in the WUP
3.3.15 The required NRCS Standard specifications
FORM: AWO-STATE-G-N/E 1/10/06 Page 3 of 5

3.3.16 Emergency Action Plan
3.3.17 Insect Control Checklist with options noted
3.3.18 Odor Control Checklist with options noted
3.3.19 Mortality Control Checklist with options noted
3.3.20 Documentation proving this facility is exempt from the Moritoria on Construction or
Expansion of Swine Farms, if the application is for a swine facility
3.3.21 A map showing the topography of the proposed facility location showing features
that affect facility design, the dimensions and elevations of any existing facilities,
the fields used for waste application, and areas where surface runoff is to be
controlled
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the additional compownts with your
submittal. (Composting, waste transfers, etc.)
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION: I
(Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for ll.l'Icnp It (� d�c rG wt 5 �/tC. (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me an is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned tome as incomplete. , A
Signature
Date /— ?-O�
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. 1 understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATIONS UNIT
1636 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1636
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-STATE-G-N/E 1/10/06 Page 4 of 5

4P
6. SURFACE WATER CLASSIFICATION:
This form must be completed by the appropriate DWQ regional office and included as a part of the
project submittal information.
INSTRUCTIONS TO NC PROFESSIONALS:
The classification of the downslope surface waters (the surface waters that any overflow from the facility would flow toward) in
which this animal waste management system will be operated must be determined by the appropriate DWQ regional office.
Therefore, you are required, prior to submittal of the application package, to submit this form, with items 1 through 6
completed, to the appropriate Division of Water Quality Regional Aquifer Protection Supervisor (see page 6 of 10). At a
minimum, you must include an 8.5" by I V copy of the portion of a 7.5 minute USGS Topographic Map which shows the
location of this animal waste application system and the downslope surface waters in which they will be located. Identify the
closest downslope surface waters on the attached map copy. Once the regional office has completed the classification,
reincorporate this completed page and the topographic map into the complete application form and submit the
application package.
6.1 Farm Name:Ao*e, Izt-e, 7bQI r�
6.2 Name & complete address of engineerifirm:_
N 79
Telephone number: ( _ ) _ - _
6.3 Name of closest downslope surface waters :—MOo re 5 FO r K C Ire e
6.4 County(ies) where the animal waste management system and surface waters are located S V r r
6.5 'Map name and date: __Cp-1ncL- I9$ S
6.6 NC Professional's Seal (If appropriate), Signature, and Date:
NIN
TO: REGIONAL AQUIFER PROTECTION SUPERVISOR
Please provide me with the classification of the watershed where this animal waste managment facility will be or has been
constructed or field located, as identified on the attached map segment(s): j
Name of surface waters: I' \on f es �n r K (, rP P Y, l
Classification (as established by the Environmental Management
Proposed classification, if applicable: _
Signature of regional office personnel:
(All attachments must be signed)
0©
FORM: AWO-NPDES-G-N/E 1/10/06 Page 4 of 5

Animal Waste Management Plan
(Please tvoe or Drint all information that does not
General Information:
Latitude and Longitude:
N.C. Deot. of ENR
JUL 18 2007
y No: 86 -- /' a.
No: 334- 7/9- 79o11
County Farm is located in:
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.):
Type of Swine
o Wean to Feeder
o Feeder to Finish
o Farrow to Wean
o Farrow to Feeder
o Farrow to Finish
o Gilts
o Boars
Type of Poultry No. ofAnimals
o Layer
o Non -Layer
Type of Beef No. of Animals
o Brood
o Feeders
o Stockers
Other Type of ivestock:
No. of Animals
lvDb
l
Number of Animal "-.�
Type of Dairy
o Milking
o'Dry
o Heifers
o Calves
Acreage Available for Application: (/61 Required Acreage: r�T
Number of Lagoons / Storage, Ponds: / Total Capacity: �J ZZ 18-�k Cubic Feet (0)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or NO (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
Owner / Manager Agreement
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. l (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity :of the waste treatment and storage
system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from the
storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made conveyance or from a storm
event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the application of animal waste. I (we)
understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be minimized using technical standards
the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification must be approved by a
technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. A change in land
ownership requires written notification to DWQ or a new certification (if the approved plan is changed) within 60 days of a
title transfer. �~ "
Name of LaDA Owner:`tl "'
Signature:. i�.. _-Q----� Date. 9- 7-o&
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
AWC — December 15, 2005 1
lbo.

Technical Specialist Certification
L As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A
NCAC 617 .0005, 1 certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Water Quality as specified in 15A
NCAC 2H.0217 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service and/or the North Carolina Soil and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 21-1.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The following elements are
included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist who may sign each certification (SD,
SI, WUP, RC,1), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are technically competent.
II Certification of Design
A) Collection, Storage, Treatment System
Check the appropriate box
o Existing facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
t?�torage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with waste utilization requirements.
New, expanded or retrofitted facility, (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and ponds,
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Oren Go i pas
Affiliation Date Work Completed: /o?�o 5-
Address
No.:.336-38G• 9>
B) Land Application Site (WUP) V
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rats.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): GrP4 Go:
Affiliation Date
Address (Agency): _NkC-r
appropriate
Facility without exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
e! Facility with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from
accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS.
No.: 3 SG - 3136 - 8 psi
lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Cyr e4 (Sg,
Affiliation Date
Address (Agency): _ _ N IZC.S
eted: 7/D'7
No.:.Z36-38G-87S t
AWC — December 15, 2006/ 2

D). Application and Handling Equipment
Check the appropriate box
Existing or expandingfacility acility with exstin waste aste application equipment (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the waste
management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed
either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been established;
required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the plan).
New, expanded or existing facility without existing waste application equipment for spray irrigation. (I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the plan
at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of applications
has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part
of the plan).
New. expanded, or existing facility without exists waste application equipment for land spreading not using spray
irrigation. (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste managememplan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the plan
at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of applications
has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part
of the plan).
Name of Technical Specialist (Please
Affiliation Date Work Completed: F
E) Odor Control Insect Control Mortality Management and Emergency Action Plan (SD
SI. WUP. RC or 1)
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist, an Insect Control
Checklist, a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odors and insects have
been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best Management
Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the Mortality
Management Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete andcan be implemented by this facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date
Address (Agency): N t2G S
Completed: io/6 f
87.5"/
F) Written Notice of NewW Expanding Swine Fardr
The following signature block Is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June
21, 1996. If the facility was built before June 21, 1996, when was it constructed or last
expanded
I (we) certify that I (we) have attempted to wntact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners who
own property located across a public road, street, or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was in
compliance with the requirements of NCGS 106-805. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified is
attached.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
AWC — December 15, 2005

III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection, Storage, Treatment Installation
New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been installed in
accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum sundards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please
Affiliation_. Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): 5 Phone No.33(yyS t�( ,S I
Signature: ,je . Date: `11 i3 /07
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please
Completed: 711,144-
Address (Agency): Phone No.: JIM --094- 8 7s/
Signature: Date: '7�1, c� -7
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots (RC)
Facility with exterior lots
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as specified in
the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): G r c 4 G e, ,. 3 s
Affiliation y Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency), C 5 Phone No.: s26- S86 -,T-76Z
Signature: 1 a Date: 7�13/e7
D) Application and Handling Equipment Installation (WUP or I)
W-Mimal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready for use; calibration
and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
o Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in theplan has not been installed but the owner has
proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified in the
contract agrees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please
Affiliation /1!1? G S v Date Work Completed: 7//.S/ej 17,
Address (Agency): Phone No.: 354 -394-S7e-7
AWC — December 15, 2005

E) Odor Control, Insect Control and MortaW Management (SD SI WUP RC or Il
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. The
mortality management system as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):_ On r e a l m. r, y y
Affiliation Date
Address (Agency): C S Phone No.: 334 • 6 86 -9�s1
Signature: o Date: 7//S�o'7
Please return the completed form to the Division of Water Quality at the following address:
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste
Management Plan to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy in
your files with your Animal Waste Management Plan.
AWC — December 15, 2005 5

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
Maple Ridge
Bill Horton
299 Horton Road
Mt. Airy, NC 27030
05-01-2007
This plan has been developed by:
Greg Goings
NRCS
220 cooper street
Dobson, NC 27017
f�.
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
• the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
Signatu (ow ter) Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: S 3 7
Techni e1 Fecialist Signature Date
------------------------------- .------------------------- ---...... _-------------- ---------------------------------------------------------- -
Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 05-01-2007 Cover Page 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S45
Dairy (Heifer) Solid waste generated 1,200.00 tons/year by a 100 animal Dairy (Heifer)
Solid operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
5160
Incorporated
6840
Injected
N/A
Irrigated
N/A
Max. Avail.
PAN (Ibs) +
Actual PAN
Applied (Ibs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (Ibs)
Actual Quantity
Applied (Tons)
Surplus/Deficit
(Tons)
Year 1
5,160
18239
-13,079
4,241.56
-3,041.56
--- -----------------------------------....------------------------------------------------
....---- — ------------------ ---------- -
Note: In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
* Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
239756 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 05-01-2007 Source Page Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates
are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shown, where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
5197
1
27.22
27.00
N/A
Fairview
Com, Grain
104 bu.
5197
2
11.00
I1.00
N/A
Fairview
Com, Grain
104 bu.
5197
8
37.00
37.00
N/A
Fairview
Com, Silage
19.0 Tons
5197
1 9
30.00
30.00
N/A
Fairview
Com, Silage
1 19.0 Tons
PLAN TOTALS: 105.22 105.00
µl r., I'*1.45" Ik ➢ PE
�I
l+�.F,..`
Fel — ! v t f 5 [
irkgy,��iil'p4.w )TechnicalOurdance, ..4��aF, i4ya��,.`"��+,�_. :n�,
IL�.,P,otennall�eachm8€�.�"�i r,
��i�if�'
.
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
< 2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
�— 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
<= 10
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.- Other conservation practices that improve the soils
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficicncy should be considered.
> 10
Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term
No -Till (778), and edge -of --field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers
(391).
239756 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 5/1/2007
PCS Page Page I of I
NOTE: Symbol • means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use
the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to
maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
_
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nummit
Req'd
(Ibs/A)
Comm.
FM
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NumentA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
5197
1
S45
airview
27.22
27.00
Com, Grain
IN bu.
2/15fi/30
1 115
1 0
0
Broad.
115
0.00
26.74
0.00
722.08
5197
2 -
S45[Fairview
11.001
11.001Cum,
Grain
104 bu.
2/15-6/30
115
0
0
Broad.
115
0.00
26.74
0.00
294.18
5197
8
1 S45
airview
37.00
37.00
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6l30
207
0
0
Broad.
207
0.00
48.14
0.00
1,781.14
5197
9
1 S45
airview
1 30.00
30.00
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
207
0.00
48.14
0.00
1,444.16
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
0.00
Total Produced, In00 gallons
0.00
=• :®:;. 'j
F`'-,
Balance, 1000 gallons
0.00
Total Applied, tons
Total Produced tons
Balance, torn
Notes: 1. In the tract column, — symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol' means user entered data
239756 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 5/1/2007 WUT Page Page I of I

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S2
Dairy (Milk Cow) Liquid Manure Slurry waste generated 4,649,400 gals/year by a 600
animal Dairy (Milk Cow) Liquid Manure Slurry operation. This production facility has
waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
46025
Incorporated
62762
Injected
71130
Irrigated
41841
Max. Avail.
PAN (Ibs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (Ibs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (Ibs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
46,025
61762
-15,737
1 6,239,131
-1,589,731
---------- -- -- - -- ------- - ---- - - -- - -- ---- - - - --- ---------------------------------------------
-
Note: In source [D, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
* Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
707801 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 05-01-2007 Source Page Page 1 of I

Narrative
Plan does not include the waste from calf operation. This program does not allow for two sources of
waste to be figured. A seperate plan is included for the calf waste.
----- ----------------------------------------------
707801 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 05-01-2007 Narrative Page Page I of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates are
also provided for each crop, as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index (LI) and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment
Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field, where available.
If a field's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the harvested plant
biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT Rating should receive no
additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating, starter fertilizers may be recommended in accordance with North
Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205 applied to each crop is shown in the following table if
the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Plat
Rating
LI
Soil Series
Crop Se
P Sequence
RYE
P
Remove)l
(Ibslacrc)
Applied
(16s/ecre)
4966
1
9.70
9.70
Low
N/A
Fairview
Com, Silage
19.0 Tons
65
N/A
4966
2
5.00
5.00
Low
N/A
Fairview
Com, Silage
19.0 Tons
65
N/A
4966
3
9.40
9.40
Low
N/A
Fairview
Com, Silage
19.0 Tons
65
N/A
4966
1 4
1 8.0
8.001
Low
N/A
I Fairview
Com, Silage
19.0 Tons
65
N/A
4966
5-6
24.4
24.40
Low
N/A
Fairview
Com, Silage
19.0 Tons
65
N/A
5034
2
4.4
4.40
Low
N/A
Congaree
Com, Silage.
28.0 Tons
95
N/A
5034
3.4
30.8
30.80
Low
N/A
Congaree
Com, Silage
28.0 Tons
95
N/A
5034
5
4.0
4.00
Low
N/A
Congaree.
Com, Silage
28.0 Tons
95
N/A
5035
1
14.9
14.90
Low
N/A
Fairview
Com, Silage
19.0 Tons
65
N/A
5035
1 2
10.0
10.001
Low
N/A
I Fairview
Com, Silage
19.6 Tons
67
N/A
5035
3
2.5
2.50
Low
N/A
Fairview
Com, Silage
19.0 Tons
65
N/A
5035
4
19.4
19.40
Low
N/A
Fairview
Com, Silage
19.0 Tons
65
N/A
5035
5
3.0
3.00
Low
N/A
Fairview
Com, Silage
19.0 Tons
65
N/A
5035
6
2.6
2.60
Low
N/A
Fairview
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
7
N/A
5035
7
11.8
11.80
Low
N/A
Fairview
Com, Silage
19.0 Tons
65
N/A
5035
8
I0.1
10.10
Low
N/A
Fairview
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
7
N/A
5035
9
17.7
17.70
Low
N/A
Fairview
Com, Silage
19.0 Tons
65
N/A
5064
1
53.4
53.40
Low
N/A
Fairview
Com, Silage
19.0 Tons
65
N/A
5064
2
1.6
1.60
Low
N/A
Fairview
Com, Silage
20.0 Tons
68
N/A
5417
1
6.3
6.30
Unknown
N/A
Congaree
Com, Silage
28.0 Tons
95
N/A
5417
2
4.5
4.50
Low
N/A
Congaree
Com, Silage
28.0 Tons
95
N/A
5446
1 1
17.3
17.301
Low
I N/A
I Fairview
Com, Silage
19.0 Tons
65
N/A
5446
1 2-3
1 7.4
7.40
Low
I N/A
I Fairview
Com, Silage
19.0 Tons
65
N/A
PLAN TOTALS: 278.20 278.20
707801 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 5/l2007
PCS Page Page 1 of 2
NOTE: Symbol' means user entered data.

Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
< 2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
>= 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
<= 10
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils
nutrient leaching below the mot zone.
available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered. Examples
> 10
are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term No -Till (778),
and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
PLATUrid6.
Pull I-
e, 1, h,I ayl nagemenj Ri6mm6ndationrl �11
QiIt
r-
0-25
Low
No adjustment needed; N based application
25-50
Medium
No adjustment needed; N based application
51- 100
High
Application limited to crop P removal
> 100
Very High
Starter P application only
707801 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 5/l/2007
PCS Page Page 2 of 2
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use
the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, thew nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to
maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year F
Tract
Field
Source
In
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Regd
(lbs(A)
Comm.
Ferr
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NuhientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
solid
Manure
Applied
lure)
Liquid
Manurc
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
ga0
Tons
1000 gals
tons
4966
1 t
1 S2
airview
19.70
9.70
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
2071]20.91
0.0
202.94
0.00
4966
2
S2
Fairview -
5.00
5.00
Corn, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
207
0.0
164.55
0.00
4966
3
S2
Fairview
9.40
9.40
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
20
0.00
196.56
0.00
4966
4
S2
Fairview
8.00
8.00
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
207
0.00
167.29
0.00
4966
5-6
S2
Fairview
24.40
24.40
Corn, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-WO
207
0
0
Broad.
207
20.91
0.00
510.23
0.00
5034
1 2
S2
Congaree
1 4.40
4.40
Com, Silage
28.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
1 305
0
1 0
1 Broad.
3051
30.81
0.00
135.571
0.00
5034
34
S2
Congaree
30.80
30.80
Corn, Silage
28.0 Ton
2/15.WO
305
0
0
Broad.
305
30.81
0.00
948.97
0.00
5034
5
S2
ongaree
4.00
4.00
Corn, Silage
28.0 Ton
2/15-WO
305
0
0
Broad.
305
30.811
0.00
123.24
0.00
5035
I
S2
airview
14.90
14.90
Corn, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15.6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
207
20.91
0.00
311.57
0.00
5035
2
S2
Fairview
10.00
10.00
Corn, Silage
19.6 Ton
2/15-6/30
214
0
0
Broad.
214
21.62
0.00
216.18
0.00
5035
3
S2
airview
1 2.50
2.50
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207
1 0
1 0
Broad.
207
20.91
0.0
52.281
0.00
5035
4
S2
airview
19.40
19.40
Corn, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6130
207
0
0
Broad.
207
20.91
0.00
405.67
0.00
5035
5
S2
Fairview
3.00
3.00
Cont, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
207
20.91
0.00
62.73
0.00
5035
6
S2
Fairview
2.60
2.60
Fescue Pastore
4.3 Tons
8/1-7131
143 -
0
0
Broad.
143
14.45
0.00
37.56
0.00
5035
7
S2
Fairview
11.80
11.80
Cont, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
207
20.911
0.00
246.75
0.00
5035
8
S2
Fairview
10.101
10. 10
Fescue Pastore
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
143
1 0
0
Broad.
143
14.45
0.00
145.90
0.00
707801 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 5/l/2007 WUT Page Page 1 of

Waste Utilization Table
Year I
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert_
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manurc
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
lure)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
.
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
5035
9
JS2Fairview
rview
17.70
I7.70
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2115-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
207,20.91
0.00
370A2
0.00
5064
1
53.40
53.40
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
207
20.91
0.00
1,116.64
0.00
5064
2
rview
1.60
1.60
Cam, Silage
0.0 Ton
2/15-6130
218
0
0
Broad.
218
22.02
0.00
35.24
0.00
5417
1
ngaree
6.30
6.30
Com, Silage
8.0 Ton
2/15-WO
305
0
0
Broad.
305
30.81
0.0
194.11
0.00
5417
2
ngaree
4.50
4.50
Com, Silage
8.0 Ton
2115-6/30
305
0
0
Broad.
305
30.81
0.00
I38.65
0.00
5446
I
rview
17.301
17.30
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
1 207
1 0
1 0
1 Broad.
1 207
20.91
0.0
361.76
0.00
5446
2-3
S2
Fairview
7.40
7.40
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
207
20.91
0.00
154.74
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
6,239.13
TW
. - Total Pmdmcd, lo00 gallom
4,649.40
AY.4m
Balance, 10oo gallons
-1,589.73
;...$"...
- ` Total Applied, tons
I MOA
0.00
Total Produced, Was
_
0.00
'.� Balance, tons
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol • means user entered data
707801 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 5/l/2007 WUT Page Page 2 of 2

The Nutrient Management Recommendations table shown below provides an annual summary of the nutrient management plan
developed for this operation. This table provides a nutrient balance for the listed fields and drops for each year of the plan.
Required nutrients are based on the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements and soil test results. The
quantity of nutrient supplied by each source is also identified.
The total quantity of nitrogen applied to each crop should not exceed the required amount. However, the quantity of other
nutrients applied may exceed their required amounts. This most commonly occurs when manure or other byproducts are utilized
to meet the nitrogen needs of the crop. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal waste be limited so
as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field. In such situations,
additional nitrogen applications from nonorganic sources may be required to supply the recommended amounts of nitrogen.
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(lbs/A)
P2O5
(lbs/A)
K2O
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
IField
4966
1
Req'd Nutrients
207
I50
220
0
0
6
2
0
Acres IApp.
Period
9.70
2115-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Com, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
Soil Series
Fairview
Residual
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
19.0 Tons
04-27-07
Manure
207
204
309
100
4 4
1
0
P Removal
Rating
65 lbs/w.
ow
BALANCE
0
54
89
100
4 -2
-1
0
Tmm
Field
4966
2
Req'd Nutrients
207
150
220
0
0 6
2
0
Acres
App. Period
5.00
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Com, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
Cormercial Fen.
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
Soil Series
Fairview
Residual
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
19.0 Tons
04.27.07
Manure
207
204
309
too
4 4
1
0
P Removal
Rating
65 Ibs/ac.
ow
BALANCE
0
54
89
100
4 -2
-1
0
Tract
Fi<Id
4966
3
Req'd Nutrients
207
150
220
0
0 6
2
0
Acr<s
App. Period
9.40
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
=a
an
tam
am
NEW
WMW
CROP
Com, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
Soil Series
Fairview
Residual
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
19.0 Tons
04.27.07
Manure
207
204
309
100
4 4
1
0
P Removal
Rating
65 Ibs/ac.
Low -
BALANCE
0
54
89
100
4 -2
-1
0
Tract
Field
4966
4
Req'd Nutrients
207
0
- 220
0
10
6
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
8.00
2/15-6130
Supplied By:
-a
CROP
Com, Silage
Starter
0
01
0
0
0 0
0
0
Commercial Fert,
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
Soil Series
lFairview
Residual
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
1 19.0 Tons
1 04-27-07
Manure
207
204
309
100
4 4
1
0
P Removal
IRating
165 Ibs/ac.
ILOW
BALANCE
0
204
69
100
-6
-2
1
0
707801 .Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 5/1/2007 NMR Page Page 1 of

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(lbs/A)
P2O5
(lbs/A)
K2O
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
IField
4966
5-6
Req'd Nutrients
207
0
220
0
0
6
2
0
Acres I App.
Period
24.40
2/15.6/30
Supplied By:
a
Wo
=a
sm
-,
mmawl
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Fairview
Residual
0
0
0
0$44
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
19.0 Tons
04-27.07
Manure
207
204
309
100
1
0
P Removal
Rating
65 lbs/ac.
ow
BALANCE
0
204
89
100
-1Tract
Field
5034
2
Rq'd Nutrents
305
150
120
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
q.40
2/ISfi/30
Supplied By:
'
vii tom' ICROP
Com, Silage
Starter
0
00
0
0
0
Commercial Fen.
0
0
0
0
01
0
Soil Series
Congaree
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
28.0 Tons
04-26-07
Manure
305
301
455
147
5
6
1
0
P Removal
Rating
9516s/ec.
ow
BALANCE
0
151
335
147
5
6
1
0
Tmct
Field
5034
34
Req'd Nutrients
305
I50
I50
0
0
6
2
0
Acres
App. Period
30.80
2/I5-6/30
applied By:
'
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
011
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
Commercial Fen.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Congaree
Residual
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
28.0 Tons
04.26-07
Manure
305
301
455
_ 1471
5
6
l
0
PR<moval
Rating
95 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
151
305
1471
5
0
-1
0
Tract
Field
5034
5
Req'd Nutrients
305
150
220
01
0
6
2
0
Acres App. Period
4.00
2/15.6/30
SuppliedBy:
CROP
Corn, Silage
starterl
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
Corttmercial Fert.1
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
Soil Series
Congaree
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
RYE Sample
Date
28.0 Tons
04-26.07
Manure
305
301
455
147
5
6
I
0
P Removal
Rating
95 lbs/ac.
ow
BALANCE
0
151
235
147
5
0
-1
0
Tract
Field
5035
1
Req'd Nutrients
207
140
220
0
0
6
2
0
Acres
App. Period
14.90
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
"
_ a,
CROP
Com, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Fairview
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYEJ Sample
Date
1 19.0 Tons
1 04-2677
Manure
207
204
309
100
4
41
1
0
PRemoval
Rating
I 65lbs/ac.
row
BALANCE
1 01
641
891
1001
4
-2
-1
0
707801 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 5/l/2007 NMR Page Page 2 of 5

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(lbs/A)
P2O5
(lbs/A)
K2O
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
IField
5035
2
Req'd Nutrients
214
150
220
0
0
6
2
0
Acres IApp.
Period
10.00
2115-6/30
Supplied By:
ME
YAM
_ W
j
CROP
Com, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial pert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Fairview
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYEJ Sample Date
19.6 Tons
04.26-07
Manure
214
211
319
103
4
5
1
0
P Removal
IRating
67 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
61
99
103
4
-1
-1
0
Tract
IField
5035
3
Req'd Nutrients
207
150
220
0
0
6
2
0
Acres App.
Period
2.50
2/15.6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Com, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial FM.
0
0
0
011
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Fairview
0
0
- 0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
19.0 Tons
04.26-07
207
204
309
100
4
4
1
0
P Removal
Rating
65 Ibs/ac.
ow
0
54
89
100
4
-2
-1
0
Tact
Field
5035
4
HBALANCE
207
150
220
0
0
6
2
00
Acres
App. Period
19.40
2/15-6/30
Esum
CROP
Com, Silage
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial FM.
0
0
0
01
01
0
01
0
Soil Series
Fairview
Residual
0
0
0
0
01
0
01
0
RYE Sample
Date
19.0 Tons
04-26-07
Manure
207
204
309
100
4
4
1
0
P Removal
I Rating
65 Ibs/ac.
ow
BALANCE
0
54
89
100
4
-2
-1
0
Tract
Field
5035
5
Req'd Nutrients
207
150
220
0
0
6
2
0
Acres I
App. Period
3.00
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
CROP
Com, Silage
Starter
Commercial FM.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Fairview
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
19.0 Tons
04-26-07
Manure
207
204
309
100
4
4
1
0
P Removal
Rating
65 Ibs/ac.
ow
BALANCE
0
54
89
100
4
-2
-1
0
Tract
Field
5035
6
Req'd Nutrients
143
I50
150
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
2.60
8/1-7/31
Supplied By:
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
CROP
Fescue Pasture
Starter
Commercial Fert.
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
lFairview
IResidual
0
0
01
01
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
4.3 Tons
04-26-07
Manure
143
141
213
69
3
3
11
0
P Removal
I Rating
1 7 Ibs/ac.
ow
I BALANCE
• 0
-9
631
691
31
3
11
0
707801 Database Version 3.1 Dale Printed: 5/12007 - NMA Page Page 3 of 5

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(lbs/A)
P2O5
(lbs/A)
K2O
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
5035
7
Req'd Nutrients
207
150
220
0
0
6
2
0
Acres IApp.
Period
11.80
2/15-6130
Supplied By:
"
=10
Wn
MW
EauWM
VMS..'
'
.CROP
Com, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Fairview
Residual
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
19.0 Tons
04-26-07
Manure
207
204
309
100
4
4
1
0
P Removal
Rating
65 Ibs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
54
89
100
4
-2
-1
0
Tract
Field
5035
8
Req'd Nutrients
143
150
150
0
0
0
0
0
Acres IApp. Period
10.10
8/1-7/31
Supplied By:
I
CROP
Fescue Pasture
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Fairview
Residual
0
0
0
01
01
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
4.3 Tons
04-26-07
Manure
143
141
213
69
3
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
7lbs/ac.
ILOW
BALANCE
0
-9
63
69
3
3
1
0
Tract
IField
5035
9
Req'd Nutrients
207
150
220
0
0
6
2
0
Acres IApp.
Period
17.70
1 2/15-6/30
upplied By:
CROP
Corn, Silage
Startcr
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
1 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Fairview
Residual
0
0
0
01
01
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
. 19.0 Tons
04-26-07
Manure
207
204
309
100
4
4
1
0
P Removal
Rating
65 Ibs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
54
89
100
4
-2
-1
0
Tmct
Field
5064
1
Req'd Nutrients
207
130
100
0
10
6
0
1
Acres
App. Period
53.40
2/15.6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Com, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
1 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Fairview
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
19.0 Tons
04-27-07
Manure
207
204
309
100
4
4
1
0
P Removal
Radng
65 Ibs/ae.
Low
BALANCE
0
74
209
100
-6
-2
1
-1
Tact
Field
5064
2
Req'd Nutrients
218
150
220
0
0
6
0
1
Acres
App. Period
1.60
2115.6130
Supplied By:
MW
OW
ME
j
CROP
Com, Silage
Starter
0
- 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fen.
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
Soil Series
Fairview
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
1 20.0 Tons
1 04.27-07
Manure
218
215
325
105
4
5
l
- 0
P Removal
IRating
1 68 Ibs/ac.
ILow
BALANCE
0
65
105
1091
4
-11
1
-1
707801 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 5/1/2007 NMR Page Page 4 of 5

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
]
N
(lbs/A)
P2O5
(lbs/A)
K2O
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
I Field
5417
1
Req'd Nutrients
305
150
220
0
0
6
2
0
Acres JApp.
Period
6.30
2115-6/30
Supplied By:
am
an
W=MW
am1200
WN
CROP
Com, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
Soil Series
Congaree
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
RYE Semple Date
28.0 Tons
04-27-07
Manure
305
301
455
147
5
6 1
0
P Removal
Rating
95 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
151
235
147
5
0 -1
'0
Tract
Field
5417
2
Req'd Nutrients
305
90
40
0
0
6 0
0
Acres
App. Period
4.50
2/15.6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Com, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
Commercial FM.
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
Soil Series
Congaree
Residual
0
0
0
0
- 0
0 0
0
RYE Sample
Date
28.0 Tons
04.27-07
Manure
305
301
455
147
5
6 1
0
P Remaval
Rating
95 lbs/ac.
ow
BALANCE
0
211
415
147
5
0 1
0
Tmct
Field
5446
1
Req'd Nutrients
207
90
50
- 0
10
6 0
0
Acres
App. P<riod
17.30
2/15.6/30 -.
Supplied By:
'
CROP
Com, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
l Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
Soil Series
Fairview
sidual
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
RYE Sample
Date
19.0 Tons
04-27-07anure
2BA
207
204
309
100
4
4 1
0
P Removal
Rating
65 Ibs/ac.
ow
CE
0
114
259
100
-6
-2
1
0
Tract
Field
5446
2-3
trients
207
130
200
' 0
0
6 0
0
Acres IApp.
Period
7.40
2/15.6/30
Supplied By:
ON
so
-am
WM
OW
CROP
Com, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
Commercial Fort.
0
01
0
0
0
0 0
0
Soil Series
lFairview
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
RYE Sample
Date
1 19.0 Tons
1 04-27-07
Manure
207
2041
309
100
4
4 - 1
0
P Removal
Rating
1 65 Ibs/ae.
row
BALANCE
0
741
109
100
4
•2
1
0
NOTE: Symbol • means user entered data.
707801 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 5/1/2007 NMR Page Page 5 of

The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that should be taken if soil tests indicate excessive levels of
copper or zinc. Fields that receive manure must have an annual soil analysis for these elements. High levels of zinc and copper can adversely affect plant growth.
Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels. Site life can be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and
zinc to be applied in Ibs/acre by 0.036 and 0.071, respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85. By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc, we
can predict life of the site for waste disposal.
In addition to copper and zinc indices, this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each crop based on the most recent soil sample. Application of
lime at recommended rates is necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production.
Reouired Soil Test Values
Tract
Field
Crop
pH
Lime Recom.
(tonslacre)
Cu-I
Copper Recommendation
Zn-I
Zinc Recommendation
4966
t
Corn, Silage
6.5
0.0
0
None
0
None
4966
2
Corn, Silage
.0
0.0
0
None
0
None '
4966
3
Corn, Silage
.0
0.0
0
None
0
None
4966
4
Corn, Silage
6.1
0.0
92
None
0
None
4966
5-6
Corn, Silage
.0
0.0
0
None
0
None
5034
2
Corn, Silage
6.7
0.0
32
None
27
None
5034
3-4
Corn, Silage
6.8
0.0
15
None
8
None
5034
5
Corn, Silage
6.6
0.0
0
None
0
None
5035
I
Corn, Silage
.0
0.0
0
None
0
None -
5035
2
Corn, Silage
.0
- 0.0
0
None
0
None
5035
3
Corn, Silage -
.0
0.0
0
None
0
None
5035
4
Corn, Silage
.0
0.0
0
None
0
None
5035
5
Corn, Silage
.0
0.0
0
None
0
None
5035
6
Fescue Pasture
.0
0.0
0
None
0
None
5035
7
Corn, Silage
.0
0.0
0
None
0
None
5035
8
Fescue Pasture
.0
0.0
0
None
0
None
5035
9
Corn, Silage
.0
0.0
0
None
0
None
5064
1
Corn, Silage
5.7
0.5
- 38
None
0
None
5064
2
Corn, Silage
5.4
0.7
26
None
0
None
5417
1
Corn, Silage
4.9
0.41
10
None
0
None
5417
2
Com, Silage
6.3
0.01
95
None
0
None
5446
1 1
lCorn, Silage -
5.8
0.01
52
None -
.0
None
5446
1 2-3
1 Corn, Silage
6.2
0.01
87
None
0
None
----------- ___----- ____------- _-------- ----------- __------------------ ---------- __-------------------- _-_._-______....___.-_---__--..._____.-...-.......--_------__.._......_._-_---_ ___
707801 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 05-01-2007 STV Page Page I of 2

Required Soil Test Values
Lime Recom.
Tract
Field
Cmp
pH
(tons/=c)
CuI
Copper Recommendation
Zn-I Zinc Recommendation
707801 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 05-01-2007 STV Page Page 2 of 2

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available
at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days
minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or
holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that
the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative,
the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these
situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the
structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Stora a Cat)acitv
Source Name
Da' Milk Cow Liquid Manure Slurry
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
9/1
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
35
1
2
104
1
3
171
1
4
180
1
5
180
1
6
180
1
7
149
1
8
119
1
9
92
1
10
62
1
11
33
1
12
2
• Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
------------ ------------------------------------------------------- ...... ------------------------------------------------------ -----
Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 05-01-2007 Capacity Page Page 1 of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1.. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation
or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns .
or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the
waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is
within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to
secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving
crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but
less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard
393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land
application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and
Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such
that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and flies.
-......._.-.... -....- ...... ..... ..... - ..... ......................... --------- -------------- ...
707801 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 5/1/2007 Specification Page l

8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on
these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted
to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior
to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1,1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from
a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25
feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15.. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to
prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist'. Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
- ...................... -----------------------------------------------------------------------------........
.
707801 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 5/1/2007 Specification Page 2

17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops
for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for
direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further
applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of
the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied
based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen
based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels., pH shall be
adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5)
years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ .----------------------
707801 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 5/I/2007 Specification Page 3

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 6, 8
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 Ib/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 Ib/ac. N to
pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and
Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 3-4, 5
Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant
1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for
your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be
applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when
corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected
yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be
reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and
expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus
is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the com. Timely management of weeds and insects is
essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest.
--------------------------------- ------------- ---------- ..... ..... ------ --------- ...-----------------------------------------------------
707801 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 05-01-2007 Crop Note Page Page I of 2

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 2-3, 3, 4, 5, 5-6, 7, 9
Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant
1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for
your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be
applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when
corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected
yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be
reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and
expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus
is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is
essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest.
707801 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 05-01-2007 Crop Note Page Page 2 of 2

M,n'
PFO.

m -:

Ni.

.1.
mi I

v

I'A I -al
ta1�✓�Y
in%
v,W. , m

m

� x&
�� w��
/� y�� . a; �
� � %� y
'� �7e
���/
t� � i� :
� a� e�
��ea��£��������
:� ...,� ..� ..,
�
:�����/�������"j
�
'
}
� � � � :�
�� \� � �

f,�
t.^

cS
� r � r n
�....

701
0,p�a0 Control by USGS and NOSINOAA
Topography by photogrammetric methods from aerial
photographs taken 1967. Field checked 1968 on Virginia
Polyconic Projection. 10,000-toot grid licks based
coordinate system, south zone, and North Carolina coordinate system
1000-meter Universal Transverse Mercator grid ticks,
zone 17, shown in blue
1927 North American Datum
To place on the predicted North American Datum 1983
move the projection lines 9 d shed corner ticks
17 meters west as shown by
Red Pint indicates area in which only landmark buildings are shown
may be private inha ati s within the boundaries of
There rvations shown on this map
the National or State rese
cn
96 MILS 3 MILS
OTDECLINAT ON AT CENTER OFCSHEETH

NCANAT Version: 1.70
PLAT Results For
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
moderately eroded
Crop:
BMPs:
Fertilizers:
applications
Surry
4/27/2007 1:16:49 PM
INPUTS
2007
Surry
josh horton
4966
1-2-3
FeB2: Fairview sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes,
Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
Vegetative Buffer Width = 25 ft.
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 8.7 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 14.1 lb
Application Method: All other surface
Soil Loss: 1 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 20-29 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 29
WV Factor (DATABASE) 1.2
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 1
SOLUBLE P = 0
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 9
TOTAL P RATING = 10 (LOW)

NCANAT Version: 1.70
PLAT Results For: Surry 4/27/2007 1:17:24 PM
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
moderately eroded
Crop:
BMPs:
Fertilizers:'
applications
Soil LOSS:
Receiving Slope Distance
Soil Test 0" - 4"
WV Factor (DATABASE)
" Hydrologic Condition:
PARTICULATE P = 2
SOLUBLE P = 2
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 9
TOTAL P RATING = 13 (LOW
INPUTS
2007
Surry
josh horton
4966
4-5-6
FeB2: Fairview sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes,
Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
Vegetative Buffer Width = 25 ft.
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 8.7 1000 gal
Lb P205: 14.1 lb
Application Method: All other surface
1 t/ac/yr
20-29 ft
102
1.2
GOOD
OUTPUTS

NCANAT Version: 1.70
pcsrCL' 3.,5 F.•cdd
PLAT Results For: Surry 4/26/2007 11:00:21 AM
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
moderately eroded
Crop:
BMPs:
Fertilizers:
applications
Soil Loss:
Receiving Slope Distance
Soil Test 0" - 4"
WV Factor (DATABASE)
Hydrologic Condition:
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 0
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 9
TOTAL P RATING = 9
(LOW)
INPUTS
2007
Surry
josh horton
5446
1
FeB2: Fairview sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes,
Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
Vegetative Buffer Width = 25 ft.
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 8.7 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 14.1 lb
Application Method: All other surface
1 t/ac/yr
20-29 ft
24
1.2
GOOD
OUTPUTS

NCANAT Version: 1.70
PLAT Results For: Surry 4/26/2007 11:02:11 AM
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
moderately eroded
Crop:
BMPs:
Fertilizers:
applications.
Soil Loss:
Receiving Slope Distance
Soil Test 0" - 4
WV_Factor (DATABASE)
Hydrologic Condition:
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 0
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 9
TOTAL P RATING = 9 (LOW
INPUTS
2007
Surry
josh horton
5446
2
FeB2: Fairview sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes,
Corn (Silage) Conservation Tillage - high residue
Vegetative Buffer Width = 25 ft.
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 8.7 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 14.1 lb
Application Method: All other surface
1 t/ac/yr
20-29 ft
8
1.2
GOOD
19111 "IJI&9

NCANAT Version: 1.70
PLAT Results For: Surry
4/26/2007 1:23:42 PM
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
flooded
Crop:
BMPs:
Fertilizers:
applications
Soil Loss:
Receiving Slope Distance
Soil Test 0" - 4"
WV Factor (DATABASE)
Artificial Drainage System:
Hydrologic Condition:,
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 0
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 17
TOTAL P RATING = 17 (LOW)
INPUTS
2007
Surry
josh horton
5034
1
ArA: Arkaqua loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently
Corn (Grain) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
Vegetative Buffer width = 20 ft.
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 8.7 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 14.1 lb
Application Method: All other surface
1 t/ac/yr
20-29 ft
0
1
NO
GOOD
OUTPUTS

NCANAT Version: 1.70
PLAT Results For: Surry 4/26/2007 1:24:07 PM
INPUTS
Calendar Year:
2007
County:
Surry
Producer Identifier:
josh horton
Tract Number:
5034
Field Number:
2
Soil Series:
ArA: Arkaqua loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently
flooded
Crop:
Corn (Grain) : Conservation
Tillage - high residue
BMPs:
Vegetative Buffer Width =
20 ft.
Fertilizers:
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount:
8.7 1000 gal
Lb P2O5:
14.1 lb
Application Method:
All other surface
applications
Soil Loss:
1 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance
20-29 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4"
0
WV Factor (DATABASE)
1
Artificial Drainage System:
NO
Hydrologic Condition:
GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 0
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 17
P RATING = 17 (LOW)

NCANAT Version: 1.70
PLAT Results For: Surry 4/26/2007 1:24:07 PM
INPUTS
Calendar Year:
2007
County:
Surry
Producer Identifier:
josh horton
Tract Number:
5034
Field Number:
2
Soil Series:
ArA: Arkaqua loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently
flooded
Crop:
Corn (Grain) : Conservation
Tillage - high residue
BMPs:
Vegetative Buffer Width =
20 ft.
Fertilizers:
Dairy -slurry .
Yearly Applied Amount:
8.7 1000 gal
Lb P2O5:
14.1 lb
Application Method:
All other surface
applications
Soil Loss:
1 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance
20-29 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4"
0
WV Factor (DATABASE)
1
Artificial Drainage System:
NO
Hydrologic Condition:
GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 0
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 17
TOTAL P RATING = 17 (LOW)

NCANAT Version: 1.70 dool,e p/4u
PLAT Results For: Surry 4/26/2007 10:38:29 AM
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
moderately eroded
Crop:
BMPs:
Fertilizers:
applications
Soil Loss:
Receiving Slope Distance
Soil Test 0" - 4"
WV_Factor (DATABASE)
Hydrologic Condition:
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 0
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 9
TOTAL P RATING =
(LOW)
INPUTS
2007
Surry
josh horton
5035
1
FeB2: Fairview sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes,
Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
Vegetative Buffer Width = 25 ft.
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 8.7 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 14.1 lb
Application Method: All other surface
1 t/ac/yr
20-29 ft
0
1.2
GOOD
OUTPUTS

NCANAT Version: 1.70
PLAT Results For: Surry 4/26/2007 10:41:45 AM
INPUTS
Calendar Year:
2007
County:
Surry
Producer Identifier:
josh horton
Tract Number:
5035
Field Number:
2
Soil Series:
FeB2: Fairview sandy clay loam, 2 to 8
percent slopes,
moderately eroded
Crop:
Corn (Silage) : Conservation
Tillage -
high residue
BMPs:
Vegetative Buffer Width =
25 ft.
Fertilizers:
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount:
8.7 1000
gal
Lb P205:
14.1 lb
Application Method:
All other
surface
applications
Soil Loss:
1 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance
20-29 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4"
0
WV Factor (DATABASE)
1.2
Hydrologic Condition:
GOOD
[+111911JI&I
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 0
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 9
TOTAL P RATING = 9 (LOW)

NCANAT Version: 1.70
PLAT Results For: Surry 4/26/2007 10:43:48 AM
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
moderately eroded
Crop:
BMPs:
Fertilizers:
applications.
Soil Loss:
Receiving Slope Distance
Soil Test 0" - 4"
WV_Factor (DATABASE)
Hydrologic Condition:
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 0
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 9
TOTAL P RATING = 9 (LOW)
I
INPUTS
2007
Surry
josh horton
5035
3
FeB2: Fairview sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes,
Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
Vegetative Buffer Width = 25 ft.
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 8.7 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 14.1 lb
Application Method: All other surface
1 t/ac/yr
20-29 ft
5
1.2
GOOD
OUTPUTS

NCANAT Version: 1.70
PLAT Results For: Surry 4/26/2007 10:46:06 AM
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
moderately eroded
Crop:
BMPs:
Fertilizers:
applications
Soil Loss:
Receiving Slope Distance
Soil Test 0" - 4"
WV Factor (DATABASE)
Hydrologic Condition:
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 0
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 9
TOTAL P RATING = 9
INPUTS
2007
Surry
josh horton
5035
4
FeB2: Fairview sandy clay loam,.2 to 8 percent slopes,
Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
Vegetative Buffer Width = 25 ft.
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 8.7 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 14.1 lb
Application Method: All other surface
1 t/ac/yr
20-29 ft
5
1.2
GOOD
OUTPUTS

NCANAT Version: 1.70
PLAT Results For: Surry
4/26/2007
10:48:54 AM
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
moderately eroded
Crop:
BMPs:
Fertilizers:
applications
INPUTS
2007
Surry
josh horton
5035
5
FeB2: Fairview sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes,
Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
Vegetative Buffer Width = 25 ft.
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 8.7 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 14.1 lb
Application Method: All other surface
Soil Loss: 1 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 20-29 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 0
WV_Factor (DATABASE) 1.2
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 0
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 9
TOTAL P RATING = 9 (LOW)

NCANAT Version: 1.70
PLAT Results For: Surry . 4/26/2007 11:19:33 AM
INPUTS
Calendar Year:
2007
County:
Surry
Producer Identifier:
josh horton
Tract Number:
5035
Field Number:
6
Soil Series:
FeB2: Fairview sandy clay
loam,
2 to 8 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
Crop:
Fescue (Pasture)**
BMPs:
Vegetative Buffer Width
= 25
ft.
Fertilizers:
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount:
8.7
1000 gal
Lb P2O5:
14.1
lb
Application Method:
All
other surface
applications
Soil Loss:
1 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance
20-29 ft .
Soil Test 0" - 4"
0
WV_Factor (DATABASE)
1.2
Hydrologic Condition:
GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 0
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 6
TOTAL P RATING = 6 (LOW

NCANAT Version: 1.70
PLAT Results For: Surry 4/26/2007 10:52:08 AM
INPUTS
Calendar Year:
2007
County:
Surry
Producer Identifier:
josh horton
Tract Number:
5035
Field Number:
7
Soil Series:
FeB2: Fairview sandy clay loam, 2 to 8
percent slopes,
moderately eroded
Crop:
Corn (Silage) : Conservation
Tillage -
high residue
BMPs:
Vegetative Buffer Width =
25 ft.
Fertilizers:
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount:
8.7 1000
gal
Lb P2O5:
14.1 lb
Application Method:
All other
surface
applications
Soil Loss:
1 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance
20-29 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4"
.
0
WV Factor (DATABASE)
1.2
Hydrologic Condition:
GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 0
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 9
TOTAL P RATING = 9 (LOW)

NCANAT Version: 1.70
PLAT Results For: Surry 4/26/2007 11:19:48 AM
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
moderately eroded
Crop:
BMPs:
Fertilizers:
applications
Soil Loss:
Receiving Slope Distance
Soil Test 0" - 4"
WV Factor (DATABASE)
Hydrologic Condition:
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 0
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 6
TOTAL P RATING = 6 (LOW)
INPUTS
2007
Surry
josh horton
5035
8
FeB2: Fairview sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes,
Fescue (Pasture)"
Vegetative Buffer Width = 25 ft.
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 8.7 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 14.1 lb
Application Method: All other surface
1 t/ac/yr
20-29 ft
0
1.2
GOOD
OUTPUTS

NCANAT Version: 1.70
PLAT.Results For: Surry
4/26/2007
10:54:24 AM
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
moderately eroded
Crop:
BMPs:
Fertilizers:
applications
INPUTS
2007
Surry
josh horton
5035
9
FeB2: Fairview sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes,
Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
Vegetative Buffer Width = 25 ft.
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 8.7 1000 gal
.Lb P2O5: 14.1 lb
Application Method: All other surface
Soil Loss: 1 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 20-29 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 0
WV_Factor (DATABASE) 1.2
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 0
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 9
TOTAL P RATING = 9 (LOW)
N

NCANAT Version: 1.70
PLAT Results For: Surry 4/26/2007 11:20.:14 AM
Calendar Year:
County: .
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
moderately eroded
Crop:
BMPs:
Fertilizers:
applications
Soil Loss:
Receiving Slope Distance
Soil Test 0" - 4"
WV_Factor (DATABASE)
Hydrologic Condition:
PARTICULATE P = 1
SOLUBLE P = 0
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 6
TOTAL P RATING = 7 (LOW)
INPUTS
2007
Surry
josh horton
5035
9
FeB2: Fairview sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes,
Fescue (Pasture)**
Vegetative Buffer Width = 25 ft.
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount
Lb P205:
Application Method:
1 t/ac/yr
20-29 ft
32
1.2
GOOD
8.7 1000 gal
14.1 lb
All other surface

NCANAT Version: 1.70
PLAT Results For: Surry 4/26/2007 10:55:56 AM
INPUTS
Calendar Year:
2007
County:
Surry
Producer Identifier:
josh horton
Tract Number:
5035
Field Number:
10
Soil Series:
FeB2: Fairview sandy clay
loam, 2 to 8
percent slopes,
moderately eroded
Crop:
Corn (Silage) : Conservation
Tillage -
high residue
BMPs:
Vegetative Buffer width
= 25 ft.
Fertilizers:
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount:
8.7 1000
gal
Lb P205:
14.1 lb
Application Method:
All other
surface
applications
Soil Loss:
1 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance
20-29 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4"
0
WV Factor (DATABASE)
1.2
Hydrologic Condition:
GOOD
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 0
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 9
TOTAL P RATING = 9 (LOW)
0

NCANAT Version: 1.70
PLAT Results For: Surry
4/26/2007 11:18:28 AM
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
moderately eroded
Crop:
BMPs:
Fertilizers:
applications
Soil Loss:
Receiving Slope Distance
Soil Test 0" - 4"
WV Factor (DATABASE)
Hydrologic Condition:
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 0
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 6
TOTAL P RATING = 6 (LOW)
INPUTS
2007
Surry
josh horton
5035
3
FeB2: Fairview sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes,
Fescue (Pasture)** :
Vegetative Buffer Width = 25 ft.
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount
Lb P205:
Application Method:
1 t/ac/yr
20-29 ft
0
1.2
GOOD
8.7 1000 gal
14.1 lb
All other surface

NCANAT Version: 1.70
PLAT Results For: Surry 4/26/2007 11:12:27 AM
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
moderately eroded
Crop:
BMPs:
Fertilizers:
applications
Soil Loss:
Receiving Slope Distance
Soil Test 0" - 4"
WV Factor (DATABASE)
Hydrologic Condition:
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 0
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 9
TOTAL P RATING = 9
LOW)
INPUTS
2007
Surry
josh horton
5064
2
FeB2: Fairview sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes,
Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage — high residue
Vegetative Buffer Width = 25 ft.
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 8.7 1000 gal
Lb P205: 14.1 lb
Application Method: All other surface
1 t/ac/yr
20-29 ft
0
1.2
GOOD
OUTPUTS

NCANAT Version: 1.70
PLAT Results For: Surry 4/26/2007 11:16:30 AM
t
INPUTS
Calendar Year:
2007
County: .
Surry
Producer Identifier:
josh horton
Tract Number:
5064
Field Number:
3
Soil Series:
FeB2: Fairview sandy clay loam, 2 to 8
percent slopes,
moderately eroded
Crop:
Corn (Silage) : Conservation
Tillage -
high residue
BMPs:
Vegetative Buffer Width =
25 ft.
Fertilizers:
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount:
8.7 1000
gal
Lb P2O5:
14.1 lb
Application Method:
All other
surface
applications
Soil Loss:
1 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance
20-29 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4"
0
WV_Factor (DATABASE)
1.2
Hydrologic Condition:
GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 0
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 9
TOTAL P RATING = 9 (LOW)

NCANAT Version: 1.70
PLAT Results For: Surry 4/26/2007 11:10:51 AM
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
moderately eroded
Crop:
BMPs:
Fertilizers:
applications
Soil Loss:
Receiving Slope Distance
Soil Test 0" - 9"
WV Factor (DATABASE)
Hydrologic Condition:
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 0
LEACHATE P 0
SOURCE P = 9
TOTAL P RATING = 9 (LOW)
INPUTS
2007
Surry
josh horton
5964
1
FeB2: Fairview sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes,
Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
Vegetative Buffer Width = 25 ft.
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 8.7 1000 gal.
Lb P2O5: 14.1 lb
Application Method: All other surface
1 t/ac/yr
20-29 ft
8
1.2
GOOD
OUTPUTS

NCANAT Version: 1.70
PLAT Results For: Surry 4/26/2007 11:17:24 AM
INPUTS
Calendar Year:
2007
County:
Surry
Producer Identifier:
josh horton
Tract Number:
5064
Field Number:
4
Soil Series:
FeB2: Fairview sandy clay loam, 2 to 8
percent slopes,
moderately eroded
Crop:
Corn (Silage) : Conservation
Tillage -
high residue
BMPs:
Vegetative Buffer Width =
25 ft.
Fertilizers:
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount:
8.7 1000
gal
Lb P2O5:
14.1 lb
Application Method:
All other
surface
applications '
Soil Loss:
1 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance
20-29 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4"
0
WV Factor (DATABASE)
1.2
Hydrologic Condition:
GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 0
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 9
TOTAL P RATING = 9
n

NCANAT Version: 1.70
PLAT.Results For: Surry
4/26/2007 11:06:32 AM
INPUTS
Calendar Year:
County:
2007 �j
Surry
Producer Identifier:
josh horton
Tract Number:
5417
Field Number:
1
Soil Series:
FeB2: sandy clay loam, 2 to 8
percent slopes,
moderately eroded'
Crop:
Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage -
high residue
BMPs:
Vegetative Buffer Width = 25 ft.
Fertilizers:
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 8.7 1000
gal
Lb P205: 14.1 lb
Application Method: All other
surface
applications
Soil Loss:
1 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance
20-29 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4"
0
WV Factor (DATABASE)
1.2
Hydrologic Condition:
GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 0
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 9
TOTAL P RATING = 9 (LOW)

NCANAT Version: 1.70
PLAT Results For: Surry
4/26/2007 11:08:14 AM
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
moderately eroded
Crop:
BMPs:
Fertilizers:
applications
INPUTS
2007
Surry
josh horton
5417
2
FeB2: Fairview sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes,
Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
Vegetative Buffer Width = 25 ft.
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 8.7 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 14.1 lb
Application Method: All other surface
Soil Loss: 1 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 20-29 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 23
WV Factor (DATABASE) 1.2
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 0
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 9
TOTAL P RATING = 9 (LOW)

LNG A&C-g_yon Pfi9 3Z'
n on.7365WebSiewwnc_mo10-
Ro
FORWON,
ti77
Grower:
Horton, Josh
Copies To:.
1
�9 6 r• 17�..bw
1167 Pine Ridge Rd.
¢ y
Mount Airy, NC 27030
oil Test Report
y
oil.�o
1a. ySSFarm:
C �L/
gi9, 73Yd
4/20/2007 C"�piy SERVING N.C. RESIDENTS FOR OVER 60 YEARS
Surry County
Agronomist Comments
• `
A - 3, $, 12
-Field}information
Appl ediLtme;
Recommendaiious
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year L
N P205 Rao
Mg S
Cu
Zn B Mn
See Note
001 ��3 s f
1st Crop: Corn Grain 0
120-160 WI 50-70
0 0
0
0 .0 $pH
3
2nd Crop: Corn Grain 0
120-160 140-160 50-70
0 0
0
0 .0 $pH
3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CBC BS% Ac pH P-1 K I Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mn-AI(1)Mn-AI(2) Zn-1
Zn-Al
Cu-I
S-I SS -I
NO3-N N714-N Na
MIN 0.09 0.89
4.8 100.0 0.0 6.7 U 38 64.0 32.0
26 22 22 27
27
32
115
0.2
Fteld,�tnformafion , , � � -: �.�
AppHed'Ltme,
�Rectimmendati
�
, , ,_ �;�.�
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year Lime
N P205 K20
Mg S
Cu
Zn B Mn
See Note
002 7so3
1st Crop: Corn Grain IAT
120-160 140-160 60-80
0 0
0
6 .0 10
3
2nd Crop: Corn Grain 0
120-160 140-160 60-80
0 0
0
$ .0 $
3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
C6C BS% Ac pH �_I K-1 Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mn-Al(I)Mn-AI(2) Znd
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-I SS-1
NO3-N Nll4-N Na
MIN 0.09 1.20
5.6 59.0 2.3 5.0 l4- 33 40.0 16.0
9 22 22 19
19
28
175
0.1
Fteldsinformation= ,', •Qr
App6ed%C
__
-,Recommendations '
'
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year Lime
NP205 K20
Mg S
Cu
Zn B Mn
See Note
003
1st Crop: Corn Grain 0
120-160 120-140 20-40
0 0
0
0 .0 pH$
3
T503S 4
2nd Crop: Corn Grain 0
120-i60 120-140 20-40
0 0
0
0 .0 pH$
3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CBC BS% Ac pH I K-I Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mn-AI(1)Mn-AI(2) Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
S-1 SS-1
NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.22 1.01
6.2 94.0 0.4 6.6 r5 56 62.0 27.0
57 42 42 63
63
57
60
0.1
"Fieldj[nlbrmation
r .. -
9pplied�LimeReeommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr TlA
Crop or Year Lime
P205 K20
Mg S
Cu
Zn B Mn
See Note
004
1st Crop: Corn Grain 0
120-16G 140-160 80-100
0 0
2
6 .0 $pH
3
1 SO 3 S S
2nd Crop: Corn Grain 0
120-160 140-160 80-100
0 0
$
$ .0 $pH
3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CBC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mn-AI(1)Mn-AI(2) Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-I
S-I SS-1
NO3-N N714-N Na
MIN 0.04 0.92
4.7 91.0 0.4 6.8 0 26 57.0 33.0
6 8 8 0
0
15
137
0.2

NCDA&CS Agrgnomic§Dii ision Pltone: (.919)L7r33 26515 We4)Si_te , ivww ncagr c'om(agronomi% Grower: Horton Josh �°� Regortj 3.2Z,7 P 2
tField Informat�on� =
Apptied�lameItecommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
IV P205 K20
Mg S
Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
005
1st Crop: Com Grain
1.2T
120-160 14o-160 30-50
0 0
2
6
.0
0
3
T03 S 7
2nd Crop: Com Grain
0
120-160 140-160 30-50
0 0
$
$
.0
0
3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS% Ac PH I
K--I
Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mn-A1(1)Mn-A/(2) Zn-I
Zn-A/
Cu-I
S-I
SS -I
NO3-N NH4-N
No
MIN 0.04 0.97
4.0 55.0 1.8 4.9
54
30.0 19.0
21 30 30 6
6
18
255
0.1
Field Information'
Applied Lime
%Fammendations ,
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N P205 K20
Mg S
Cu
Zu
B
Mn
See Note
006
1st Crop: Com Grain
0
120-160 140-160 30-50 .
0 0
0
6
.0
$pH
3
S a35
2nd Crop: Corn Grain
0
120-160 140-i60 30-50
0 0
0
$
.0
$pH
3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS% Ac pH P-I
K-I
Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mn-AI(1)Mn-AI(2) Zm1
Zn-AI
Cu-I
S-I
SS-1
NO3-N NHa-N
Na
MIN 0.04 1.18
6.0 93.0 0.4 6.3 C 0
52
57.0 33.0
9 18 18 22
22
30
173
0.2
ifiel&information
AppliedfL'ime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
IV P205 K20
Mg S
Cu
Zu
B
Mn
See Note
007
1st Crop: Com Grain
IAT
120-160 140-160 50-70
0 0
0
0
.0
0
3
7s035 /Q
2nd Crop: Com Grain
0
120-160 140-160 50-70
0 0
0
0
.0
0
3
Test Results
Sail Class HM% W/V
CEC BS% Ac pH I
KI
Ca% Mg%
Mn-/ Mn-A/(1)Mn-AI(2) Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
S-1
SS -I
NO3-N N714-N
Na
MIN 0.13 1.13
5.6 61.0 2.2 4.9 r0
38
38.0 20.0
23 31 31 35
35
37
148
0.1
' FiePd)lnfocmafiony -:
_
Applied L'�me,'
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
P205 K20
Mg S
Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
008
1st Crop: Corn Grain
1.617
120-160 140-160 10-30
0 0
2
6
.0
0
3
75z/ / 7 I
2nd Crop: Small Grains
0
80-100 140-160 10-30
0 0
$
$
.0
10
3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS% Ac PH I
K-I
Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mn-A/(1)Mn-A/(2) Zn-1
Zn-A1
Cu-I
S-I
SS -I
NO3-N NH4-N
Na
MIN 0.09 0.98
6.0 60.0 2.4 4.9
68
41.0 13.0
19 28 21 18
18
25
205
0.1
FieldinformaUon
",,a
'AppliedI?ime13ecommenda'tionsMIS-..
WHOOMMMO
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
IV P205 K20 •
Mg S
Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
009
Ist Crop: Corn Grain
0
120-160 70-90 0-20
0 0
0
0
.0
0
3
75H l7 .2,
2nd Crop: Small Grains
0
80-100 70-90 0-20
0 0
0
0
.0
0
3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS% Ac pH
K-I
Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mn-All
-A!(2) Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
S-/
SS-/ .
NO3 N NH4 N
Na
MIN 0.36 1.03
7.3 89.0 0.8 6.3 23
82
59.0 24.0
93 68 .61. 117
117
95
50
0.2

NCDA&CSiAgro',nomic$Drvis_@n
PLtiong z(4i.9)t733e26 5 Web $ite � ncag�con►/agonomt%` 6rowit Horton+Josh Report No 3?27t7 Pg 3
FieldInformatiou
Applled�L'imei
(tRecommendations-
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
IV P205
K20
Mg S
Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
010
1st Crop: Corn Grain
5T
120-160 120-140
30-50
0 0
0
0
.0
0
3
T60611
2nd Crop: Small Grains
0
80-100 120-140
30-50
0 0
0
0
.0
0
3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CBC BS% Ac pH RI K-I
Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mn-AI(1)Mn-AI(2) Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
S-I
SS-1
NO3•N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.51 1.26
5.0 70.0 1.5 5.7 r 8 49
47.0 19.0
41 42
35 75
75
38
34
0.1
Fiel'dllnformati_on
APPliedhme;Re
oc mmeq.,e pous . _ .
a
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N P205
K20
Mg S
Cu
Zu
B
Mn
See Note
Oil
1st Crop: Corn Grain
.TT
120-160 14o-16o
40-60
0 0
0
6
.0
10
3
T o b l% a
2nd Crop: Small Grains
0
80-100 140-160
40-60
0 0
0
$
.0
$
3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CUC. BS% Ac pH K-I
Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mn-A1(1)Mn-AI(2) Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
S-I
SS-1
NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.22 1.26
I'PRI
4.6 70.0 1.4 5.4 42
45.0 21.0
11 24
17 18
18
26
71
0.1
,Field.'Informa_fio_n °__ .
AppliedLTime�
�Rec"" o_mm ndations
_
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N P205
K20
Mg S
Cu
Zu
B
Mn
See Note
012
1st Crop: 'Corn Grain
0
120-160 140-160
80-100
0 0
2
6
.0
$pH
3
TSo6 -/ 3
2nd Crop: Small Grains
0
80-100 140-160
80-100
0 0
$
$
.0
$pH
3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CBC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I
Ca% Mg%
Mn-I MmA1(1)Mn-AI(2) Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
S-I
SS-1
NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN o.04 0.92
4.5 100.0 0.0 6.8 0 25
62.0 36.0
7 9
2 2
2
17
132
0.2.
Fieliltlnformation _ «;
_
`� "' " °
ApplieULimeiRecommenda
MCen " ons
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
P205
K20
Mg S
Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
013
1st Crop: Com,Silage
0
180-220 140-160
120-140
0 0
. 2
6
.0
0
3
Ts 0611 1%
2nd Crop: Small Grains
0
80-100 140-160
60-80
0 0
$
$
.0
0
3
Test Results
Sou Class LW% W/V
CEC BS% Ac pH RI K I
Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mn-AI(1)Mn-AI(2) Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
S-I
SS-1
NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.13 0.98
2.8 82.0 0.5 5.6 0 32
59.0 17.0
460 299
292 17
17
16
227
0.1
Fteld`Information ."_
A�pplted
Lrm_e',Iteeommen
_ _
ons
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
L
NP205
K20
Mg S
Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
014
1slCrop: Fes/OG/rim,E
2.3T
50-70 140-160
0
0 0
$
$
.0
$
12
Tso3 5 3
2nd Crop: Fes/OG/rim,M
0
120-200 140-160
10-30
0 0
$
$
.0
$
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CBC BS% Ac pH rP-I &I
Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mn-A1(1)Mn-AI(2) Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-1
SS -I
NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.13 L01
4.7 49.0 2.4 4.9 U. 62
26.0 16.o
14 18
18 15
15
24
216
0.1

<NCDA&CS"Agro_nomrc"I)rvisroaPlione(91Q)r7,33�2655 W-ebaSite.Swww:n grcom/agronomi/�Grower Hortou�Josh ReportANo13227t7 Pg4
;FieldtInformationn,
hed`Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
iv P205 K20
Mg S
Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
015
1st Crop: Fes/OG/rim,E
0
50-70 140-160 0
0 0
0
0
.0
pH$
12
_
S035 6
2nd Crop: Fes/OG/rim,M
0
120-200 140-160 30-50
0 0
0
0
.0
pH$
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS%
Ac pH K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mn-AI(1)Mn-AI(2) Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-I
SS-1
NO3-N NHa-N
Na
MIN 0.32 1.01
5.8 91.0
0.5 6.6 54
59.0 29.0
41 32 32 49
49
42
76
0.1
F,>cel_d'Informaf>on
' *
e " :Lrimefe' Applied;
11%conimenda`tiogs
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N P205 K20
Mg S
Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
016
1st Crop: Fes/OG/rim,E
.5T
50-70 140-160 10-30
0 0
$
$
.0
$
12
%5035
2nd Crop: Fes/OG/rim,M
0
120-200 140-160 50-70
0 0
$
$
.0
$
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS%
Ac ' pH P-1 K-I
Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mn-AI(I)Mn-AI(2) Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
S-1
SS-1
NO3-N NH4-N
Na
MIN oA4 1.12
6.1 89.0
0.7 6.2 041
51.0 33.0
7 14 14 10
10
12
316
0.1
FieldInfoemation�� �; ,
Appiiedtllilne
�Reco _ ndat_ions
-
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N P205 K20
Mg S
Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
017
1st Crop: Fes/OG/rim,E
AT
50-70 60-80 0
0 0
0
0
.0
0
12
TSo35 94)
0
2nd Crop: Fes/OG/rim,M
0
120-200 50-70 10-30
0
0
0
.0
0
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS%
Ac pH 1 r-I K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mm1 Mn-AI(I)Mn-AI(2) Zn-1
Zn-Al
Cu-I
S-I
SS-1
NO3-N NH4-N
No
MIN 0.27 1.23
6.3 87.0
0.8 6.4 �2 63
55.0 27.0
60 45 45 132
132
83
32
0.1
Fteldalnformation
lied
_ P
titme.
i'�
•ro.
Recommendations .
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N P205 K20
Mg S
Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
018
1st Crop: Com Grain
0
120-160 140-160 20-40
0 0
0
0
.0
$pH
3
j 503�
2nd Crop: Soybeans
0
0 14o-i60 20-40
0 0
0
0
$pH
3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mn-AI(1)Mn-AI(2) Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-/
SS -I
NO3-N NH4-N
Na
MIN 0.09 1.20
5.4 93.0
0.4 6.6 9 60
54.0 33.0
23 22 15 34
34
32
61
0.1
__ _ �APP...
1F1el4lnformation ' a,
"lied
J
Lune°
Recommends 'ons
k1____._. ._._
Sample No. last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N P205 K20
Mg S
Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
019
Ist Crop: Corn Grain
0
120-160 14o-16o 60-80
0 0
2
6
.0
0
3
T503y
2nd Crop: Soybeans
0
0 140-160 60-80
0 0
$
$
_
0
3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS%
Ac pH rP/ K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mn-AI(1)Mn-Al(2) Zn-I
Zn-Al
Cu-I
S-1
SS -I
NO3-N NH4-N
Na
MIN 0.04 1.10
6.4 89.0
0.7 6.1 0 34
52.0 34.0
32 35 28 5
5
9
420
0.1

NCDA&CS;Ag ouomic.Diviston .,Ph`onex(91;Q),733 2655 Well Site fwww g ®'m/agi. ; miY� _wee: Horton osb _ _ Report No 3227t7 P_.g 5]
n co ono _ Gco __ ,J:`�..
-.
FielilInfo oration i:°
Applied Lime
`Reeoinmendations
Crop or Year
Lime
IV P205 K20
Mg S
Cu
_
Zn
B
Mn
_
See Note
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
020
1st Crop: Corn Grain
1.7T
120-160 140-160 60-80
0 0
0
6
.0
0
3
T5o3 9 3
2nd Crop: Soybeans
0
0 140-160 60-80
0 0
0
$
0
3
Test Results
Soil C14SS HM% W/V
CEC BS% Ac pH P-1
K-/
Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mn-AI(1)Mn-AI(2) Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
S-/
SS-1
NO3-N NH4-N
Na
MIN 0.09 1.20
5.4 50.0 2.7 4.9 0
36
29.0 16.0
32 36 29 5
5
26
197
0.1
Field)In(ormation ,� . '
Ap liedL'imR
m e._ons
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N P205 K20
Mg S
Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
021 51,4 1 z
1st Crop: Corn Grain
AT
120-160 140-160 70-90
0 0
2
6
.0
0
3
T-G ),r l
2nd Crop: Soybeans
0
0 140-160 70-90
0 0
$
$
..
0
3
Test Results
Soil Class IIM% W/V
CEC BS% Ac pH P-/
K-I
Ca% Mg%
Mn-/ Mn-Al(I)Mn-Al(2) Zn-I
Zn-Al
CO-1
S-I
SS-/
NO3-N NH4-N
Na
MIN 0.09 1•04
3.0 80.0 0.6 4.9 1
29
42.0 33.0
155 110 103 13
13
10
351
0.2
�Fie"formationj+aP. ,,
ilppliedELim
JRecotnmendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
IV P205 K20
Mg S
Cu
Zn'
B
Mn
See Note
022
;L
1st Crop: Corn Grain
0
120-160 140-160 70-90
0 0
- 2
6
.0
0
3
j
2nd Crop: Soybeans
0
0 140-160 70-90
0 0
$
$
0
3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS% Ac pH P-/
K-I
Ca% Mg%
Mn-/ Mn-AI(1)Mn-A/(2) Zn-I
Zn-Al
Cu-I
S-I
SS-1
NO3-N N714-N
Na
MIN 0.04 0.99
2.5 92.0 0.2 5.9 0
27
73.0 16.0
411 265 258 9
9
11
204
0.1
EieldInformallonr
AppliediCime
ERecommenda_ons
f
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
IV P205 K20
Mg S
Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
023 Jo@^^
1st Crop: Corn Grain
0
120-160 140-160 20-40
.0 0
0
0
.0
$pH
3
ipw�""
2nd Crop: Soybeans
0
0 140-160 20-40
0 0
0
0
$pH
3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS% Ac pH P-I
K-/
Ca% Mg%
Mn-/ Mn-Al(1)Mn-Al(2) Zn-I
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-I
SS-1
NO3-N NH4-N
Na
MIN 0.09 1.15
5.1 92.0 0.4 6.5 0
58
55.0 32.0
22 23 16 33
33
31
116
0.2
Fielii4Informati4n
Ap'pliedaL►meR
commendationsill
_
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
IV. P205 K20
Mg S
Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
027 Sa &. -j
1st Crop: Corn Grain
0
120-160 0 0
0 0
0
0
.0
0
3
2nd Crop: Soybeans
0
0 0 0
0 0
0
0
0
3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS% Ac pH
K-I
Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mn-Al(1)Mn-A1(2) Zn-I.
Zn-Al
Cu-I
S-1
SS-/
NO3-N A714-N
Na
MIN 0.41 1.06
6.1 9o.0 o.6 6.1 1102
171
51.0 25.0
. 156 109 102 181
181
92
118
0.3
Im

NCDA&CS; g,o&iniel, Diyistonf„<c+Pzhone (919)733z,2655" Web $iteµ ncagr_con (agronomy/jGrowec. jjf5' gaJo'_sh ReportxNo 32277 g 6
-.__.:.
Fiel$'Iaformaton+F,s
AppliIam_e,Recommendaiionsgig
1
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N P2O5 K2O
Mg S
Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
025
1st Crop: Corn,SilaBe
0
180-220 80-100 40-60
0 0
0
0
.0
0
3
7 s�I2its !
2nd Crop: Cori
0
180-220 80-100 40-60
0 0
0
0
.0
0
3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS% Ac pH (PI K-I
Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mn-AI(1)Mn-AI(2) Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
Sill
SS -I
NO3-N A714-N Na
MIN 0.18 1.06
4.4 91.0 0.4 5.8 L24 79
55.0 28.0
175 125 125 103
103
52
303
.0.2
P(eldaInforJilin atiou e ;
Applied Lime
LRec4M endition; s _
;
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
P2O5 K2O
Mg S
Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
026
1st Crop: Com,Sllage
0
180-220 120-140 60-80
0 0
0
0
.0
0
3
TSyy6 ,Z
2nd Crop: Corn,SilaRe
0
180-220 120-140 60-80
0 0
0
0
.0
0
3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS% Ac pH
P-I Kill
Ca% Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-Al(1)Mn-All Zn-I
Zn-Al
Cu-I
Sill
SS -I
NO3-N AWN Na
MIN 0.09 0.99
3.5. 94.0 0.2 6.2
61
66.0 19.0
450 284 284 76
76
29
190
0.1
F eld Infoemation "'"
^
Applie`d I ime
Will!
Sample No Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
P2O5 K2O
Mg S
Cu
Zn
B
Mn
_ See Note
028 TSyy6 3
1st Crop: Corn,Silage
.5T
180-220 70-90 70-90
0 0
0
0
.0
0
3
2nd Crop: Com,Silage
0
180-220 70-90 70-90
0 0
0
0
.0
0
3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS% Ac pH I K1
Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mn-AI(1)Mn-All Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-I
SS-1
NO3-N NbF N Na
MIN 0.46 1.22
5.8 74.0 1.5 5.7. 29 . 58
49.0 20.0
61 54 54 170
170
87
55
0.1

_
�NCDA&CSrAgonomrcDiyslon'Phou(919)7332655 Web Slte.www;nclgr"`com/agron_omi/
_
--
--
Report No:2033:4�;,,;._
Grourer.•
Johnson, Walter -
Copies To:
EMA Resources Inc
_
204 Breezy Ridge Way
Soil
Mount Airy, NC 27030
��sdx Test Report
Fam SUI
2/7/2007 SERVING N.C. RESIDENT'S FOR OVER 60 YEARS
Surry County
Agronomist Comments
A - 3, t
Fieldllnformatloa.
;1pPliedaLime
mmlrtatons
T
-AME
ill
Is F
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N P205 - K20
Mg S
Cu
Za B
Ma See Note
00008
Ist Crop: Small Grains
0
80-100 50-70 20-40
0 0
0
0 .0
0 3
2nd Crop:
0
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC- BS% Ac pH P-I K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mn-A/(1) Mn-A/(2)
Zn-/ ZnAI
Cu-1
S-I
SS -I NO3-N NH4-N No
MIN 0.71 1.03 7.4 76.0 1.8 6.0 32 57
49.0 23.0
62 47
429 429
81
53
0.1
Wie-�1 Information
___._v..
shed Lue
i"PY ._�_
`Recomm n"da`tioas _
K n
_
NOXISM
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N P205 K20
Mg S
Cu
Zn B
Mn See Note
00009
1st Crop: Small Grains
0
80-100 0 10-30
0 0
- 0
0 .0
pH$ 3
2nd Crop:
0
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mnd Mn-A/(I) Mn-AI(2)
Zn-/ Dill
Cu-1
S-1
SSI NO3-N NHt-N No
MIN 0.51 1.12 8.8 92.0 0.7 6.7 75 63
60.0 28.0
114 68
1236 1236
269
31
0.0
[Pied ormation
Applied lime)g
Rewmmendatlons
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lire
N. P205 K20
Mg S
Cu
Zra B
Mn See Note
00010
1st Crop: Small Grains
0
81 0 0
0 0
0
0 .0
pH$ 3
2nd Crop:
0
Test Results
SoUClass HAf% Will CEC BS% Ac pH P-/ K-/
Ca% Mg%
Mn-I MnAI(I) Mn-AI(2)
Dill Zn-Al
Ca-/
S-/
SS NO3-N NI[l No
MIN J0.66 090 91 91.0 0.8 6.7 1t1 86
62.0 25.0
82 49
906 906
102
39
0.0

-,
_
y`
Grower.
Horton, josh
copies Ta•
il67 Pine Ridge Rd.
Mount Airy, NC 27030
Sou
Test wd
4RS/t007 SERVING, N.C. RESIDENTS FOR OVER 60 YEARS
Parar
Sorry County
Agronomist Comments
A - 3. 8,12
:.
Crop or Year
Lime
P20s KaO
At
S
Ca
Zn B
Atra
See Note
Sample Na Last Crop
Me Yr TIA
001
Is( Crop: Corn Grain
0
120-I60 140.160 50.70
0
0
0
0 .0
$PH
3
2ndCrop: Com,5w
0
120-160 140.160 50-70
0
0
0
0 .0
EPH
3
Test Results
Sao Class 1Ff% W/V
CW
W%
Ac pA P-1 K-1
Ca% A"
Ab►1 NrrAl(1)MWAf(2) Pal
ZWA/
&vl
S-1
SS4
A03-N A94-N Na
MIN 0.09 0.89
4.B
100.0
0.0 6.7 0 38
64.o 32:0
26 22 22 27
27
32
115
0.2
]N1�.itt('0� . "' ..
•
Me Yr
; ....
TIA
..._. 5. -,. ... �i- l°I;O�
Crop or Year
' iBiNid9Wi9t:
Lime
P201 K20
Affi
S
Cu
Za B
Aft
See Note l
Sample Ab Last Crop
002
Isi Crop: Corn Grain
1.4T
120.36D 140-160 60.80
0
0
o
6 .0
to
3
2ndCrop: Com,SdW
0
120160 140-160 60-80
0
0
0
$ .0
$
3
Test Results
5081class LfN% W/V
C8C
BS%
Ac pA RI K-1
Ca% ft%
Mb-1 Abs-Al(I)Aba-dr(2) Za-1
Zra-M
Ca-1
S-1
SS-1
AO3-N WOW Na
MIN 0.09 1.20
5.6
59.0
2.3 - 5.0 0 33
40.0 16.0
9 22 22 19
19
28
175
0.1
teldinEo on
Lam{
.:1
Me Yr
TIA
Crop or rear
.
Lime
.+if, Y.�y,i,if4, d(NGYA.uI N!`�i+�'if.':.
P205 K20
-•Ya"M1�I:f'Y:'i
S
L^
Cs
r. ..
Zia ' B
yA./�
Aft
v,.., K ., :...
See Note
Sample Na Last Crop
003
1sl Crop: Corn Grain
0
I20.160 120.140 20 40
0
0
0
0 " .0
PR$
3
2ndCrop: C M'Si1w
0
12416o M140 20.40
0
0
0
0 .0
PH$
3
Teel Results
Soil Class lAil% W/V
GriC
Bf%
Ac pu P-1 K-1
Ca% Alg%
Marl Na-Ar(1)Nj-Al(2) Za1
ZraAr
C04
S.1
SS-!
M -N WIN AW
MIN 012 1.01
- 6.2
94.0
0.4 6.6 5 56
62.0 27.0
57 42 . 42 63
63
57
60
0.1
Me Yr
TIA
Csstp or Year
Lime
Pror N20
d;q
S. +
Ca
Za + B
" Aft
See Note "
Sample No Last Crop
. 004
Is[Crop: Can Grain
0
120-160 140--160 80-100
Q
0
2
6 .0
$pH
3
'
2ndOw: CornXap
0
120-160 140-160 80-100
0
0
S
$ .0
$pH
3
Test Results
Soil Class Mf% W/V
OC
BS%
Ac pll P-1 K-1
Ca% A>g%
Ma-1 Afiv AX(I)Ms4f(2) Zra-1
Za-Ar
Cis-1
S-1
SS4
AVJ-N A94-N Ara
MIN 0.04 0.92
4.7
91.0
0.4 6.8 0 26
57.0 33.0
6 8 8 0
0
15
137
0.2

Lbae
P205 KpO
� S
Cu
Zts
8
All
See Note
Sarsple No. Last
Crop
Mo W
T!A Crop or Year
1.2T
120.160 140.160 30-50
0 0
2
6
A
0
3
005
Ist crop: Com Grain
0
120-160 140-160 30-50
0 0
$
S
.0
0
3
7mdCmp: Corn,SllaRe
Test Results
111
Ce%
All Ayr-N(1)NwAll Z*4
YAI
11.1
SI
SS -I
Ail AdrN No
S19i1 Qass 1M%
W/V
CDC
Its% Ac pH P-I
C. 0 54
30.0 19.0
21 30 30 6
6
1s
zss
0.1
MIN 0.04
0.97
4.0
55.0 l.s
11
CZZ
'
L&W
PA5 Ka0
Ali S
ca
B
See Note
Last
All Yr
T/A Crop or Year
141 an-sa
n o
0
6r00
„ J&- 3
WISs
2ndCrop: Gan,Silage
0
120-f60 140-160 30.50
0 0
0'
$
0
EpH
3
Teat Results
Ac P-I K-I
Ca%
.4
Afsal MaAJ(2)MaA((2) Zal
YaAT
Ca-J
Sl
SS -I
AV3-N AB*N Na
02
Sea CIM Hu%
WjV
CBC
BY% pH
0.4 63 0 52
57.0 33.0
9 18 22
'
22
30
l73
MIN o.04
1.19
6.0
93.0
a.l
Lime
;
IhOt KtO
S
Cu
Ys
jr
Aft
See Note
SampleS& Last Crop
Ala Yr Crop r!A or Year
1AT
12oA60 140.160 50.70
0 0
0
0
.0
0
3
007
1st Crop: Cam Grab
ul
0
Mi60 14o-160 5070
0 0
0
0
.0
0
3
Ind :
Test Results
P-1 K-I
Ca% A(g%
ALrI MaN(1) MaAf(2) Zo I
Zo At
Ca-1
Sl
ssl
AO3 N A9aN o
,soil Crag W%
W/Y
CBc
Jul Ac PH
4.9 0 38
3s.0 20.0
23 31 31 35
35
37
148
MIN 0.13
1.13
5.6
61.0 2.2
..
Limo
P2Os Ks0
Mq S
Cu
2s
8
Ala
Ste Ante
Sample Na Last Crop
Ma W r!A Crop or Year
i.6T
12o-160 140.160 10-30
0 0
2
6
.0
0
3
008
Isl Cmp: Coro Gral
2adGop: Sma11 Gr S
0
Ill 14o-160 1030
0 0
$
$.0
10
3
Test Results
Ac P I K-1
Ca% D{q%
MWI AiWA{(1) HWM(Z) Za-1
YA-AI
pr-1
S-1
SSd
M3-N W4-N Na
Soil Class Ed%
W/V
CBC
BS% pH
4.9 0 68
41.0 13.0
19 28 21 Is
. 18
I5
205.
0.1
MIN 0.09
0.98
6.0
60.0 2-4 I III
.
III
I
y,.
..
..
Lime
PROS K2O
ft S
Cu
Za
B
Ayr
Ses Nola
j Sample Na Last LYop
Alo Yr P/A Crop or Year
0
120-160 70.90 0.20
0 0
0
0
.0
0
3
0
j
1st Crop: Cor Grrtn
Ind Cmp: Small Gr&1
0
80 l00 70.90 0-20
0 0
0
0
.0
0
3
Test Resoles
_ft24%0
" b668 61(a) >aN Z
Ci95
50
SS J
Ail 11H1 x O
j soU class Bi!%
W
0.8 63 23 82
59.0
93
117
� MIN 036
0
.

I
ample An tau chop
No Yr TIA
Crop orrear
LAIM
N
P105
K20
010
I
Ist Crop: Corn Grain
I
5T
120-160
120-140
W50
Zod Crap: Small Grains
0
WAD
120 -140
WSO
trz
5
Cis
za
B
Aft
see Awe
0
a
0
.0
.0
0
3
0
a
0
0
.0
0
3
soa CJ=s Mf x W/V
CRC
EM
Ac PH " X-1
C4% A"
Aft -I XWAf(1)Af*-Af(2) Zx-1
ZWAI
C*4
S-1
SS-1
AVj-N Mi-N
Na
MIN 0.51 126
5.0
70.0
1.5 5.7 8 49
47.0 19.0
41
42
35 75
75
38
34
0.1
WIV.
OV or Year
Lute
PS05
Jut)
At
S
Of
Zx
8
Mu
. . . . . . .....
See Note
'Sample No. Led Crop
No Yr TIA
oil
ist Lz6p: Cam Graid
JT
IM-160
140-160
o
0
o
6
o
to
j
2&d Crop: Small Grains
0
80-100
140-160
40 60
0
0
Q
$
.0
$
3
Test Results
Soil cj4w filf % W/V
aC
W%
Ac PH P-1 A -I
Ca% 4%
Bits. -I M*-Ar(1)Ab,,-Af(2) Zu-1
bo-A!
Cu-1
S-f
SS-1
AV3-N Ag#.N
No
MIN 0.22 1.26
4.6
70.0
1.4 5.4 0 42
45.0 21.0
11
24
17 18
18
26
71
0.1
Reld Informs
Sample Na Last Crop
No Yr
r/A
Crop or Year
Lime
PJ05
KJO
Alk
S
Cu
Zs'
8
mis
zi
SWN-OU
012
Ist Crop: Corn Grain
0
120-160
140-160
80-100
0
0
2
6
.0
$pH
3
2tidCrW. Sm;dlGrWns
0
so-wo
No-M
wjoo
0
0
$
.0
$Pli
3
Test Results
Soil aaff Mf% W/V
CEC
Z%
Ac PH P-1 A-'
Ca% AGM;
Afis-1 Jiv-90)XII-AIR) YA-1
Zb- M
OLF-1
S-1
SS-1
AU5-N Aff#-N
Na
MIN 0.04 0.92
4.5
100.0
ov 6$ o 25
62.0. 36.0
7
9
2 2
2
17
132
0.2
r
V7
Simple Na Last &up
No VP
TIA
Crop or Year
Lime
zy
P403
KaO
At
8
Cr
as
9
Bfw
See AWe
013
1st Crop: CDMSibp
0
I80.220
140-160
120-140
0
0
2
6
.0
0
3
2ndCrup: Small orains
0
80-IOD
140-160
60-80
0
0
$
s
.0
0
3
Test RaWts
.
Soil Class Mf% Wry
MIN 0.13 0.98
aC M Ac PH " K-1
2.8 92.0 0.5 5.6 0 32
C4% ft%
59.0 17.0
A**1 Aj5WAr(j)Abj.Ar(2) yjsl
460 299 Z92 17
ZsWAF
17
CA-1
16
S.1
227
SS.,
M .0-N Aff+N Na
0.1
SWWO NO. Last CrOP
Me Yr Thi
OV or Your
Lime
jv
PJW K20
s
Cu -
z1a 3
Mn
SWN010
014
1s1 Crop: Feswmm,E
13T
50-70
1416o 0
0 0
$
s .0
12
2adCmp: Fe*W/nm,M
0
120L200
10-160 10-30
a 0
t
S .O
12
Test Results
saa Clan IN% W/V W Z% AC PH P-1 X-1 CA At% RO-1 hf1*Af(1)AfwAf(2) YX-1 YJs-/J Ct&l S4 sf-I A05-N Aff#.N No
. MIN 0.13 1.01 4.7 49.0 2.4 4.9 0 62 26.0 .16.0 14 18 is 15 15 24 216 At I

S_ ampk Na
Last Crop
No Yr
r/A
Crop or Year
Lkw
PJOS
Kjo
jg S
Ca
7a
B
Aft
Soo Note
015
IstCrop; FesiUG/1W
0,
50.70 140.16D
0
0 0
0
0
.0
pHs
12
2nd Qw: FeaA1GA1rn M
0
120.200 10460
30.50
0 0
0
0
.0
NO
12
Test U."alb
Solt Class
w% W/V
CBC
By%
Ac pH P•1 R 1
CA% A(q%
Nod Atm-A1(1) Afa•M(2) Zad
720 9
CU-1
S-I
S,54
AID*N M4-N No
MIN
0.32 1.01
5.8
91.0
0.5 6.6 0 54
59.0 29.0
41 32
32 49
49
42
76
0.1
Crop or Year
L/me
P2ON
K2O
S
Ca
Za
B
d5r
See Note
--'12
Saolp=�JWO
p16.
"FetlB migl`'.-..,"
.-,yT.........3M7T...'TWIW-'-.,•
�- ....0...0.....1....$....�
...�_..
2ndCrop: FCVUG/19n,M :
0'
I20-7A0 14040
5(1,70
0 0
s
$
A
$
12
Test Results
Sbacim
Hu% W/V
C&C
B5%
Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca% hfg%
Nal AfaN(1)MaA1(2) 26-1
ZA-AI
Cad
S•1
SF-1
JWS-N IY14-N No
MIN
0.04 1.12
6.1
89.0
0.7 62 0 41
51.0 33.0
7 14
14 10
10
12
316
OA
No Yr
r!A
RNIN A.,
Crop or Year
L6ase
P2O5
mica
DO
AV S
Ca
Za
B
Aft
See Abte
Sample Na Last Crop.
017
1st Crop: Fesjw/firn,l:
AT
50-70 60-80
0
0 0
0
0
.0
0
12
Ind Crop: - FeslD Mm,M :
0
120.200 50-70
10.3D
0 0
0
0
.0
0
12
Test Results
soil C =
Nd% W/V
CEC
ffi%
Ac pH P-1 K-1.
Co% At%
Awl RwAl(1)Abs-Af(2) Zr-1
Z%-A►
Ca-1
S-1
SS-1
A05-N A94-N Na
MIN
0.Z7 1.23
6.3
87.0
0.8 6.4 32 63
55.0 27.0
60 45
45 132
132
83
32
0.1
Afo Yr
T/A
Crop or Year
L6ae
m Psft
KsO
it S
Ca
Za
B
M°
See Note
Sample Na Last Crop
018
1sl Crop: Com Grain
0
120-160 14o-i60
20.40
0 0
0
0
.0
$pH
3
2ndCrw Soybeans
0
0 140-160
2040
0 0
0
0
spH
3
Test Results
SollClass
HIf% W/V
CSC
BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca% At%
ASsd Ahn•AI(1)ALmAr(2) Zsr1-
Za-AI
Co-]
S-1
S-1
AOS-N A94-N No
MIN
0.09 1.20
5.4
93.0
OA 6.6 0 60
54.0 33.0
23 22
15 34
34
32
61
0.1
-. .
:11ace
Sampk No.
Last Crop
Ate Yr
Y/A
Crop or Year
jv P2OS
K2O
At S
as
Za
B
Afa
Sias Able
019
IslCrop: COmGrain
0
120-160 140-160
60-80
0 D
2.
6
.0
0
3
2ndCrop: Soybeam
0
0 140-160
6080
0 0
s
$
0
3
Pest Results
So1lctm HN% W/V aC BM Ac pH P-1 &l Ca% A*% Abel Na-AW)JIft(M ) Ym-1 Za-A1 Ga•1 3.1 m-1 AW-'v twarr era
MIN 0.04 1.10 6.4 89.0 0.7 6.1 0 34 52A 34.0 32 35 29 5 5 9 420 0.1

S"*k14a
Last Crop
No Yr r7A
Crop or rear
Luse
P2t)f
1[t0
A1� S
(le
9n B
Ab1
see Note
020
1st Crop: Com Grain
1.7T
120.160
140.160
6043o
0 0
0
6 A
0
3
2nd Cmp: Soybeans
0
0
140-W
60So
0 0
0
E
0
3
Soo Ck "
Am W/V
Q,C
Bs%
Ac pH P•!
KI
Ca% 4%
A b-1 A w-V(I)Ati�A1(2) Zs-1
Za-Ar
Ca.]
S!
53-1
At" M4-N No
MIN
0.09 1.20
5.4
50.0
2.7 4.9 0
36
29.0 %.0
32
36
29 5
5
26
197
0.1
wftin
Sample Na
Last Crop
No Yr
r/A
Crop or Year
Clam
Pew
Kap
AS S
Ce
Zu B
Abs
See Nate
.,
••1+��.._�.yp�-
.......
.......�,...,...Y�,�,.
..$._..T.....b
_.o...
,p
2nd Chp: Soybeans0
0
140-160
70-90 .
0 D
S
0
3
Teat Results
SWClars
!Al!% W/V
cw
W%
Ac pB P•1
XI
Ce% ft%
3br1 A6rA1•(!)Al1o`AI(2) Zu-1
ZaAI
L3a-1
S!
SSI
AOrN AlltN Na
MIN
0.09 1.04
3.0
80.0
Ob 4.9 1
29
42.0 33.0
155
IIO
103 13
13
10
353
02
..
.
'
. sample Na
Las1 Crop
No Yr
r/A
Crap or Year
Luse
Peps
j
At S
Ca
Zes B
Aft
See Rote
02Z
151 Crop: Cam Grain
0
120-16D
140.16D
70-90
0 0
2
6 .0
0
3
2ndCrop: Soybeans
0
0
140460
70-W
0 0
1
S
0
3
Test Results
son class Mf% WN
CRC
WN
Ac pA P-1
X--1
Ca%
4%
MO-1 AfarA►(1)M5`N(2) YA-1
Zai-Ar
LYa!
St
SS•1
AOrN A94-N
No
MIN 0.04 0.99
2.5
92.0
0.2 5.9 0
27
73.0
16A
411
.:.. . ^ ; a. ..
L:... r.... '
r'
iM2�
Smxple No. Last Crop
No Yr
T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
P205 R21!
An
S
Cx
Ze
B
Aft
See Adote
023
1st Crop: Coin Grain
0
120.160 140160 20 40
0
D .
0
0
.0
$pll
3
2adCrop- So*m
0
0 140-160 20-40
0
0
0
0
$pH
3
Test Resnits
Soa Class Ba!% W/V
MIN 1.15
CRC
ffi%
Ac pg P61
A;-1
Ca%
J"
Af g-1 Alitdl(1)AfarAr(2) br/
Z _Ar
pr-1
S-1
Z1
Mj-N %#-N Na
.0.09
5.1
92.0
0.4 6.5 0
58
55-0
32.0
22 23 16 33
33
31
116
02
Sample No. Last Crop
No Yr
^
P205 W
Aj1
S
T/A
pap or Year
Lim
CW
Za
B
Aba
See Node
027
13 Clap: Corn Grain
0
120 160 0 0
0
0
0
0
.0
0
3
andtrl�Soybeans
0
0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
3
Test Results
sots crass Bab% W/V C6C B9% AC py P-1 R--1 CAN 4% Abr1 Jh1-9(1) AbrAi(2) Y*I 7srAr Ca-1 S-1 SS-! MI-N ANaN Na
AN 0.41 1.06 6.1 90.0 0.6 6.t 102 171 51.0 25.0 156 109 102 181 181 92 119 0.3

Sample Are.
025
Last Crop
me Yr
Y/A
&0 or Year
1stCrop. Com6SbWe
We 2ndCrop: CorrSiI
LAWO
0
0
_ N PWs JGo
180-220 80.100 40-60
180-220 90-100 40.60
it S
o 0
0 0
Ce
o
0
Zs
o
0
B
o
.0
A&
0
' 0
See Nate
3
3
Test Results
sea Class
MIN
Mf% - W/V
0.]8 1.06
aC
4.4
B4%
91.0
Ac PH P-t RI
0.4 51 24 79
Ca%
55-0
eg%
28.0
Jbrl AfwAl(I)JfwM(2) Lt-I
175 125 125 103
Z -Af
103
C04
52
Sl '
303
SS-1
AVkN )U4-N
Na
02
,?
+
No Yr
r/A
]
L rk
Sample No. Last Crop
Crop or Year Lime IT PJGS J;to it S lit Zu B J6s See Note
n n n n n ;
end CW: CorASO We
a
180-220 120.140 60.80
0 0
" 0
0
.0
0
3
Test Results
SoitClass
ICON
B6f% W/V
Q09 0.99
CUC
3.5
BS%
94.0
Ac PH P4 R--1
0.2 6.2 8 61
Ca%
66.o
A"
19.0
Jbrd eNnAr(I)JIa.Y(2) Zod
450 284 284 76
ZO.Ar
76
cwI
29
S-I
190
SS -I
AOyN M4-N
Na
0.1
~
No Yr
r/A
Crop or Year
1st Crop: Com,sds8e
2nd Crop: Com S We
Lime
5T
0
P205 jw
180-220 70-90 7090
180.220 70-90 70-90
S
0 0
0 0
Co.
0
0
Zm
0
0
B
.0
.0
J&
0
0
See Abte
3
3
Sample No. Last crop
on
Test Results
sea ad"
hIIN
W% W/V
0.46 1.22
CffC
5.8
BM
74.0
Ac PH P•1 IC!
1.5 5.7 29 58
Co%
49.0
ft%
20.0
Jbr-1 Abj-AI(I)JfwA1(2) Ta-I
61 54 54 170
9n-Af
370
Ca -I
87
S•1
55
SS•I
Aw-N ABtN
Na
0.1

i "? >f r.'; S 4 vty ♦ z.�wvw«w—v--vc'3. ..� �.. �"."'�`-'r •ir-�`'-T ,��� ,—'
I k *i ♦4 1}. eF.N �4,r i " s _-'� U #`p- tee- � /. n \ J c Lh �,�` h,� ��,.•r�. Prd ��e r .�
FF".if+� �.� f�k � ( 1 ..- tr��. � � ^'_""'xr!r �.d Y, � . .1 � ;'`� �s���rl.� � - �,�.��Vfir`�✓ n�� b° ' t {i I _ r r t ..
i gf (r
M;.�{-�'jD r '1a � Y;,I���' I •�,r: ( .. I� ad -t i � �i t `I� � � �b� �.y�, C i / � .. F
PihII S} it � _ � �-�-.,..t'•: � �2 L. �„-/
..,.?„f'�^1.0
'ti��+ 4k' �VY�r �� � t� �� e ♦ 4- � � i ry "A .�' i Wit, t � d jy�� .. �s � ^'. � •? t _ t� '.
v k �7 , .d6 � t`Y-x.P♦ ^{4 �t'� x� ,Ct v`��t a` �� i i'� � -F7/� -'`' %�`], `i7":
jg
7 ♦�Y 0 \ �� a4,. r � `+Si ('i '. i nr h"�'k Ze.- � v�,<a t if
` K1 m-.•^J,',i7?ss"t+.• +x. 'y �I � �� s' 1 � ��'h ti t� r � �S� Et r� � o �• � - t� " �� 11 0 ] i o� .�.(�' , �t �r
Jt
�''i s i � 4Yt" w'i�t i ' oo; "�'irC �' Xt :)_' ] �`.�' � �! .y.,t v '�l c�TN ••,). �/�y+♦ ; . i � � �1 �...- �-�' r, �//��7� � a �'
��v ♦ • � of .hFk � y t °„ ! �r t t. ?.v si"3 � �V. � � 4� nC� r � . �,u7 � f, a `1M '�'
t#z w a• t p � I�, ti � x rIQ
t� �����' ��' `i' .; F L. ��y .Ayi,� r,"rF�y� ``*4: r♦ '{ �
.r t e.,'S`. D `,F1' •7';'vv ��eylri��,y.�{.!.: aS.�,�a.-i><i' aL�Clec' t`lft„�t,'.�- I7-L :-
-
f . • a �r (/y�v- aJ
�`f
µ40t.F
t Zr A�. � �`�• t, 1..
t( ' - t ,i � rat _ rt T:- I r � ,. .ale' 0 � ,!+��i�� 8^f yt I`u ?� ♦%:� `�� �-F� t �� J�4��0 o ib ��i }`t X F Li. "5 r �� M1 � 11
" }.• J _�� t�.le I�, .1r ag >:1 aS .ram ` _N
14
'✓ L, t n! �•'P 't] _ Yi _ s�A' 3_,4 �t'21�., r t.,-4�! ♦� .e d ry 1)) :n =
1.X
1 4.-..x'�,-, lt/j, ., R i e G'
wtt �. h �kl
,v4)
, � ��' �� .��n � y� u � ' ` !� r Y,Li � m ,{•° � �j• ' � t` ` �"-�`"4i o �t .I .N� ) l `�' � �" � ° �=�
^!�.ri) - r � P'�..k,� n, vr5- O tf����r���(( � w}�. . ��y ♦ ^,. t ;. }1 J e ` �' t dal ,
<D�-nr�..�. � by °'fib i Yt � $ -° b - o � � � ? c S' � tC �,}.. i . < � � � ��4� i ��V A�o � 8. v". •� ,j
-'tr 4.ilL ��`tSk'�1tl,trts�.,�t;'t.'i���'',t o� �� ���5 d° 'J.�,t�.•''%. .SAS eP .y?� "`t�t�it""i-*..re`i`�Pv+`` ';i_ - 'j .�+'��j

N.i�`yrl.ir.;
A
�v .l\ I.a�a ty�% s (j���$$/p � ;. � •^"` -.•• 4.'V , r �. .k,,�.
'_`..f n
µA i Ci Y ..�.•'. t+"�;. '" I �� e ' } ems-
"i,'�.., C_.... �( 4`4
' t �� �•. -. �} i *i" r � hd1 � . ...M? 9�� � . 'fir rf .: i
,',�
r - \ - •Q� i� � `...�. �v Ir�� �!." u ,r��
Y.h 1
� ,I•,
,I
t
1 _ t w iYySQ f Y 'r diy !d 3 1.
.07,.
�^ �✓ �' '::1 � �A4.y. It :�'w�* )f.1y Y. � ✓.�. �'r'4'�f. y f�k.. r ��,`.'i� 9{`t ..r: � �� y�`�r a���\` �r)�,; ,,f►w�f •+`. �..
4% 1 `ter." 5r (- J,. �: � Q�`l� wJ'�yi • .. �,«" 5,,, , t \��{ ,p,?�
�y"+�V, `�4 t �tpC i✓Ij�� .}j�l.'a�.��y �+�M1, (! i.'7�t-x-t ;" !y/y'�s. .dF f y �i�
' ya "` r*za'�tk+{,. ^iU�J ,yw ".,jy�� p'_"Y n"la.'1�'....,..-` � � .+ ,r ..� •*>`:.[VL'�' * �'`'� I
lti:'i�'4 4��t a`Lt k "[ 1 �.' a �i (� �� ✓v�. �1'a�,'[xft i.: ..:
a ��. � .Y �; +4�K� l f � ,��✓ 4M1. �ti r �.', �. i�( JS� r �'.�T� p y�..��V1 1 �{�.r���' :Fi 1 s
wk
�+i f .'W`.7� h � C \`^rr�jr a i �. �f Z;M _, 2 y� fk t � ,I $�. � r�� � y �q s rt,r'r_ \ 5�,� t� y,3,,,,, �4•-�
"
j � - d fJt. lA'� J /yl /f3� �.Y i� �.. •� ' `°lam
I, ".- !�. ✓, , �'`'Erh,"'a �'" fi a i ! " "'y ` "`.4 /� +c'hc+��'I�rY� . tyl 7�'
5 ♦ .r ��''�` r ie� .,'b'. � i 4 yr `S�1 l�^' 'n' h. L i ��'. �.
Ny.$
It,t<
rl
.-•� " s �nfi i�,-+�r�6*�^y���.��.V.' a 4 S � k "'v- - ry y� � .-r> '°n�,T t� ..-.N
es rFA ti p ..�yxi 5 1w� \� , �R•Fy.1- y'~ r ; , l ,. R� 'r i a 1 f .. \ J _ Y� a w f
(•..� J.y.L rw �' f Frl',r � r tl.. f `` fir .. .+.*fY '
�,w.T.. -
�" `lya w*t ro ey ��, fl .r� �"'1�'.° .t1 '•'JI'' �+, 't6` ! It,
-:�y t� `M
>,y�J� c�{ n�»✓$ r�yy[ r }" F�i.�t+� l ! _ �C' f }1 fw, ! e ti ., , .^. io�. �.
3. for
����5•a,'�n lwk �JYGH"I M1f� -1' `. �.i \� µ, t -w l ,:l f4 � ?' %#@ I, 1 �.i
+.i4 �. [d � 'a v� 7 �,t S�1'��1Ty � g ty1t.. rt•�fq,! s .rE,. ! ova 6 '4� . z � � :. �I
in G. .a.3<.:i-.. � !� lf• �.Uj.^—t I ..IJ �jil.ir` � .�`. I.t. .:\ r

N 1
w, `err �` , • -1�` l' _ � ` - � .�' jj��' x>t, r 6`
AM
�3• � y q rl. � } :.w "e:. A _�! - � i � t,�iRa�-} Z -.p 1'�i. �i
Ir �i�� �l ai+^e�fsJ`.� � f: / ,A O ityx^.2. '`..,. < - "i ,'rit . 1 , * � � \•` �.. /sr
It
IR T� � l YV J f uY
,3
Nyj ��. �a ..�'� w• MfSC :.^' 4 \ S �k_��� �- .r" +-r LI ".3^t
1 � -o-. J ^� {{�p;���aa�'- .'�� C 4�., 3•ry �' j) 5r� ��. `' � '�' � L:zr.�, k �,�,� '.
+1+' P .: i�u� y '' l � ; 1`y} f .c I ;. ,"\�'4 1 ? •� 1 "`ua. �h. � : � �+t
Y,.� ,ire ,�:Aa Y' 4 .. ,. �, K. � Ar � •__ '^� i .'
, f, r j••
-.—x,-
_ S ,1�;,�, •c, '�` �yt \ !Ir � .ri-,,�..,� 'v... "Zr 'r /F'.J{ .r .. 'C y - , �-�-- ty�,._ d �.
,H- b .) •� �o Vol
yu`Z: -+o,,. � �{{]�. , • f i 8�� 1 - �".�' �g,�/r �yf`i �t i�a«
• 1.l 'w L GJ .3� � � .�1�
sib � r p
�-,..,.�,, �-1 y� i ! `f • It ! 11 " � `,Y.�'.. '+ r-.. � IE�� s
i
�
0;5
� ��r�a y� • �3„
���1 � i��, �r�,` iv�.3" � YF��'.•'�:.:�� }�: .+S�a�fh ry ter. �; �.•W i �' >- x rj
IL
v'1 Y � A
r i/'� ,., a'� r "'(� � ��}^va�,. It F"'� 1' YV, -« \ i� - "' 'M1�-•' �A'',�'4�b
g� s �t
Ilk
;q§3' 'wF 21 ii ^-P`` f el " �� •�yv �i+•, ''o ii '1-•S aN ii: N � lrC. 1. � y .j � \ J
kv T yMr'/: y F'g3I•��^`'.-, t Y`; ��„i�- t � *`�'r'fi,.,y, '�y r�. (�i` 'u ' \ , .i, / ', •��� 'Pr �r'

ti •# ��'�i� Yj�e, r ,Z,+/ .„, 4fh"'< o° ��`L�.' j 'v `� c 1 r r
",trip}^?r6+p4 T.•�'{'' 4 `• i t f- 1,.1 f* 6„/l .a a .r, Rt
as�
>F u' / rT J".'�ii; U ,�~' +.a t � B•t�i Q��� ,� - 1 a f.� � �•
•4 w.� ••� C 1 �...11'. yl+��. ei ♦ a es (�..,.. y''O
Y SO
✓r •h.•.A jF, ��� '-.� �4t •F. kp� o v ��.ly.���� Y �f'
V'*J:YC1>`•T"ld v 7� �'w i%t•�yi
yn..S.e•r-r 'ttt '. ,i y� ,. L `4�� �r',�.:•' . -' M1� ,��e• � � � �.11 . �' f�'%y
v�t�r.Y-fiy Y "Y2i'�1 ���� t• � v i �'�
s•
tleit�..
`'7. 4 � •� <� ,� '-+ t n'"""�z�a' �, c#� � � Ai. � pj. 9� �1�r�i �Jc: A
�� t�, �N, 1p tii; t i C ��': �, �n�.� 7 rr• rt �, ,.I� 'b. � r �y" �i.,� � V
eta'{
14
� v � Fi4 , J� `?s t °.,, `i ��,r1 � • r Cr � } �'J' � A'1 � 4 � �4: �� i� ��,
'^-�j-�^..G u v
0,
}� A' Q T Y Y►�� J JL o . v ,
'y�1t t���
AS
YA
t rt�,\�Y�' o '�L';4�' (v •crt � �- ^�.�.� ° �``k 'C `4 x{� _� ,l �' A'•
'14'F•d'.II�Sy� _i�R A Q' i• .. f ! l /— 1' ` `.. /� -y� �• � ,u .
1
,d c o
gttt t ° �_. t t • t � q� � t
tr''Wo
� co 4
4
. !L'" rf 9 by •l"I S i �r� d 1- 4 \.,.+•-_•T.,,t � 1
-),.��/ 7'1
cYt \. A' T �7�,/'t♦ v. y ', - 11 4=f^s }'^:' ��-; e .... A
Q � •.w1 .k ti,. } �- � � t+ s 'r �yr.
h
L.
�' •� .'d, 1
z

w miam Lawrence r-ionon
Maple Ridge Farm Inc
1174 Pine Ridge Road
Mt. Airy NC 27030
Dear William Lawrence Horton:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
October 1, 2004 RECEfiveD
N E. DePt, of EH IM
O C T 0 1 2004
Winston-Salem
Regional Office
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC860010
Maple Ridge Farm Inc
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Surry County
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on January 22, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to William
Lawrence Horton, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and
land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC860010 which expires October 1, 2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Maple Ridge Farm Inc, located in Sorry County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 200 Dairy cattle and the application to land as specified in the
facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record king
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
Aquifer Protection Section -Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638
Phone: [phone] / FAX: [phone] / Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
NorthCarolina
)Vaturallry

The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Winston-Salem Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact J.R. Joshi at [phone].
Sincerely,
_�o I
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Winston-Salem Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Surry County Health Department
Surry County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC860010
APS Central Files

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Ouality
May 1, 2003
William Lawrence Horton
Maple Ridge Farm Inc
1174 Pine Ridge Road
Mt. Airy NC 27030
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC860010
Maple Ridge Farm Inc
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Surry County
Dear William Lawrence Horton:
On April 28, 2003, the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the
Division of Water Quality (Division) to extend the expiration date of the Cattle Waste Operation General
Permit AWG200000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the
expiration date to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division will be working with
all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Permit.
In accordance with your application received on January 22, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to William
Lawrence4Horton, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and
land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC860010 which expired on April 30, 2003.
This'approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Maple Ridge Farm Inc, located in Sutry.County, with, an.animal.capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 200 Dairy cattle and the application to land as specified in the
facility'sCertified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed..
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
AWA
NZ`b MR
Internet httpl/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone] -
50% recycled/1 0% post -consumer paper

Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Winston-Salem Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at (336) 7714600. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact J R Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
i11E®
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
N.C.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's) MAY 19 2003
Winston-Salem Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Surry County Health Department
' Surry County Soil and Water Conservation District Wif1St^or_ alem._.
Permit File AWC860010 ,lie al QifIC®
NDPU Files
...

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: Lawrence Horton - Maple Ridge Dairy.
Location: 1174 Pine Ridge Rd, Mt Airy, NC 27030
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Dairy
Number of Animals: 200 cows
(Design Capacity)
Application Method(s): Solid Spreader and Travelling Irrigation System
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to
prevent pollution of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the
animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required
for the crops in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. You must have
the animal waste analyzed to determine nutrient content as close to the time of
application as practical and at least within 60 days of the date of application before
each application cycle. Soil nutrients in all fields where waste will be applied
must be analyzed at least annually so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for
realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Soil test and waste analysis records shall
be kept for five (5) years.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order
to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to.insure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and
the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than
the crop can utilize. Lime must be applied to application fields as
recommended by soil test to maintain the plant uptake of nutrients.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates,
leaching, potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available water
holding capacities.
3. Animal waste shall be applied on land eroding at less than five tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding at
five or more tons but less than ten tons per acre per year providing
grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field.

4. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall,
or when the soil surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may
result in runoff to surface waters which is a violation of the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) .0200 regulations.
5. Wind conditions at the time of field application of waste should also
be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop production and to reduce
the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing
crop. Otherwise, apply waste no earlier than 30 days prior to
planting a crop or prior to forages breaking dormancy. Injecting or
otherwise incorporating animal waste below the soil surface will
conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
7. Zinc and copper levels in the soils in all fields where waste is applied
shall be monitored and alternative application fields shall be used
when these metals approach excess levels.
This plan is based on waste application by box spreader and travelling irrigation
system (method (s) of application) for this is the manner in which you have chosen
to apply your waste. If you choose to alter the method (s) of application in the
future you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for various waste application
methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient
content for dairy (type operation) systems in North Carolina. Actual acreage
requirements shall be based .on waste analysis reports from storage structures in
your waste management system.
Your waste dry stack (storage structure) is designed for 60 days of temporary
storage and the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
60 days. In no instance should the volume of waste being stored in your structure
be higher than the maximum storage marker except on the event of a 25 year - 24
hour storm.
Your waste storage pond (storage structure designed for parlor water) is designed
for 120 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must be removed on
the average of once every 3 months.

Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for
assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre to apply and the proper
application rate prior to applying the waste.
The waste management system which is covered by this waste utilization plan shall
be operated only by persons which hold a valid certificate as an operator in charge
of an animal waste management system.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance
with 15A NCAC2H.0217 (the .0200 rules) adopted by the Water Pollution Control
System Operator Certification Commission.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface
water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject to the assessment of civil
penalties of up to $10,000 per day per violation by the Division of Water
Quality for every day the discharge continues.
2. Follow the waste utilization plan on land that has been described in the plan
for receiving animal waste application.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet , but not exceed the Nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climate conditions, and level of management unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of application for other nutrients. Actual
yields may be used in lieu of realistic yield tables at discretion of the
planner.
4. Animal waste shall be applied on land eroding at less than five tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied on land that is eroding at five or more tons
but less than ten tons.per acre per year providing grass filter strips are
installed where runoff leaves the field. (See NRCS Field Office Technical
Guide Standard 393--Filter Strips)
5. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events,
or when soil surface is frozen. When animal waste is to be applied on acres
subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste
may be broadcast, provided the application does not occur during a season
prone to flooding.
6. Wastes shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop
or forages breaking dormancy.
7. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface water.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.

9. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet to dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
10. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
rights -of -way.
11. Animal waste applied on grassed waterways shall be at agronomic rates and
in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site. Animal waste shall
not be applied on grassed waterways which discharge directly into water
courses.
12. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at
least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall
be the rate -determining element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall
be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals
approach excess levels.
13. Soil test and waste analysis records shall be kept for five years.
14. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed soil infiltration rates.
No ponding shall occur.
15. A highly visible marker shall be installed to mark the maximum storage
volume for waste storage ponds. For waste treatment lagoons, highly
visible permanent markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage. Pumping shall be managed to maintain
the liquid level between the markers.
16. Records of waste application shall be maintained to establish actual
application rates. The records will include date of application, amount of
waste applied per acre by tract number and field number, most recent waste
analysis and soil test report, and the realistic yield expectation. (R.Y.E.)
nitrogen rate. Waste application records shall be maintained for five years.
17. Reduce hayland nitrogen rate by 25 percent on grassland being grazed when
applying animal waste.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which
will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.

19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, etc. should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills.
20. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the
waste utilization plan when there is a change in the operation, number of
animals (an increase), method of utilization, or available land.
21. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets NC regulations.
North Carolina General Statute 106-403 requires that dead animals be
disposed of within 24 hours in a manner approved by the state veterinarian.
22. Insect control and odor control checklists shall be included as well as an
Emergency Action Plan.

WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
Maple Ridge Dairy Farm
Operation:
This animal waste management system consist of th following components:
1. Contaminated liquid storage pond
2. Three dry stacks (all ajoined) for solids
3. Irrigation System
4. Solids Spreader System
All waste is scraped daily into the dry stacks which are designed for 200 cows with storage
for 66 days. There is also a waste storage pond which catches the parlor water. The liquid
storage pond has storage for 120 days. The waste from the dry stacks is land applied using a
box spreader and the liquid waste is irrigated.
This Animal Waste Management System is designed to prevent discharge of animal waste
contaminates to surface waters from the 25 year-24 hour storm, as required under the non -
discharge regulations.
Proper liquid management should be a year-round priority for storage ponds. It is important
to manage levels so that you do not have problems during extended rainy and wet periods.
Maximum storage capacity of the dry stacks as well as liquid holding ponds should be
available for periods when there are extended rainy spells.
The level of management for the entire system will determine the service life of the waste
storage pond and dry stacks. Once the solids have reached the waste storage pond, how
effectively the waste is agitated will determine the amount of solids which remain in the
waste storage pond.
Over time it is expected that some solids will accumulate in the waste storage pond. The
accumulated solids should not reduce the usable capacity of the waste storage pond to a
point, which requires removal of the solids for many years if adequate lot scraping and waste
agitation is maintained. In contrast, poor management will result in rapid accumulation of
solids, which will reduce the usable capacity of the waste storage pond to the point that some
form of dredging will be required. If removal of sludge is required at any time, samples
should be taken for analysis and waste should be applied agronomically. Applications of
sludge also increase the amount of odor and extra precautions should be taken to reduce
odors.

MAINTENANCE
Routine maintenance of a waste storage pond is necessary to ensure the structure does not
erode, weaken, or otherwise allow the wastes to leak or discharge. Routine maintenance
involves the following:
Maintenance of a vegetative cover for the dam. The dam should be mowed at least
annually. Mowing operations must take place only when the soil of the dam is dry
and vegetation should not be mowed to a height of less than four (4) inches at any
time.
Brush and trees on the embankment must be controlled.
All equipment should be checked and maintained properly.
You should inspect around the waste storage pond (embankment) frequently and look for
settlement, cracking, or holes, side slope stability, wet or damp areas on the back slope,
erosion due to lack of vegetation and rodent and tree damage. Any of these features could
weaken the dam and should be fixed immediately.
Routine maintenance of the dry stack should be done periodically and is necessary to ensure
the walls are not weakened allowing waste to discharge.

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ [phone]
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 911
SWCD 386-8109
NRCS 386-8109
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or
leave your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to
ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for all
employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
b. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
C. Call a pumping contractor.
d. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B. Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
C. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C. Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -actions include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
C. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D. Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -actions include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
C. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.

E. Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to
flowing leaks -possible actions:
- --a-- ---Dig-a-small--sump-or ditch -away-from--the-embankment-to-catch-all.-- - ..
seepage, put in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and
fill holes and compact with a clay type soil.
C. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
C. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
--- -- g.--Are potable water wells-in_danger_(either on or off of the mroperty)? _ _
h. How much reached surface waters?
3. Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality)
regional office; Phone [phone]. After hours, emergency number: 1-
800-858-0368. Your phone call should include: Your name, facility,
telephone number, the details of the incident from item 2 above, the exact
location of the facility, the location or direction of movement of the spill,
weather and wind conditions, the corrective measures that have been
undertaken, and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves the property or enters surface waters, call local EMS phone
number 835-6113.
C. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number 679-2061, local SWCD office phone number
386-8109, and local NRCS office for advice/technical assistance; phone
number 386-8109.
4. If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriff's Department and explain your
problem to them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5. Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off -site
damage.
a. Contractor's Name: Lawrence Horton
b. Contractor's Address: 646 Pine Ridge Rd Mt Airy NC 27030
C. Contractor's Phone: [phone]

6. Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (NRCS, Consulting Engineer,
etc.)
a. Name: J. R. Everhart
b. Phone: [phone]
7. Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify
the damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep
problems with release of wastes from happening again.

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead Dairy production O Vegetative or wooded buffers
L"Recommended best management practices
C'Good judgment and common sense
Paved lots or barn Wet manure -covered Scrape or flush daily
alley surfaces surfaces Promote drying with proper ventilation
O-Routine checks and maintenance on waterers,
hydrants, pipes, stock tanks
Bedded areas
• Urine
• Partial microbial
decomposition
Manure dry stacks
• Partial microbial
decomposition
Storage tank or
• Partial microbial
basin surface
decomposition
•, Mixing while filling
• Agitation when emptying
Settling basin • Partial microbial
surfaces decomposition
Manure, slurry, or
sludge spreader
outlets
• Mixing while filling
•Agitation when emptyi
• Agitation when spread
• Volatile gas emissions
drying with proper ventilation
wet or manure -covered bedding
Provide liquid drainage for stored manure
O Bottom or mid -level loading
O Tank covers
Cl Basin surface mats of solids
O Minimize lot runoff and liquid additions
O Agitate only prior to manure removal
O Proven biological additives or oxidants
O Liquid drainage from settled solids
O Remove solids regularly
O Soil injection of slurry/sludges
O Wash residual manure from spreader afteruse
O Proven biological additives or oxidants
AMOC -November 11, 1996, page 1

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Uncovered manure, Volatile gas emissions while ❑ Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slurry, or sludge on drying ❑ Soil incorporation within 48 hours
field surfaces EKSpread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
Cl Proven biological additives or oxidants
Flush tanks Agitation of recycled lagoon ❑ Flush tank covers
liquid while tanks are filling ❑ Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with
anti -siphon vents
Outside drain
collection or junction
boxes
Lift stations
End of drainpipes at
lagoon
Lagoon surfaces
Irrigation sprinkler
nozzles
• Agitation during wastewater ❑ Box covers
conveyance
• Agitation during sump tank
filling and drawdown
• Agitation during wastewater
conveyance
• Volatile gas emission
• Biological mixing
• Agitation
• High pressure agitation
• Wind drift
Cl Sump tank covers
❑ Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon liquid level
Cl Proper lagoon liquid capacity
❑ Correct lagoon startup procedures
❑ Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio
❑ Minimum agitation when pumping
❑ Mechanical aeration
❑ Proven biological additives
❑ Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind
❑ Minimum recommended operating procedure
Cl Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface
❑ Pump from second -stage lagoon
❑ Flush residual manure from pipes at end of
slurry/sludge pumpings
AMOC - November 11, 1996, page 2

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Cnnrce Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Dead animals • Carcass decomposition
Standing water • Improper drainage G
around facilities . Microbial decomposition of
organic matter
disposition A carcasses
Grade and landscape such that water drains away
from facilities
Mud tracked onto • Poorly maintained access a�Farm access road maintenance
public roads from roads
farm access
Additional Information: Available From
Cattle Manure Management; .0200 Rule/BMP Packet NCSU, County Extension Center
Dairy Educational Unit Manure Management System— Lake Wheeler Road Field Laboratory; EBAPB9-95 NCSU— BAE
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83 NCSU— BAE
Management of Dairy Wastewater; EBAE 106-83 NCSU— BAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet NCSU— BAE
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension
Z
AMOC - Novemher 11, 1996, page 3

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Liquid Systems
Flush gutters Accumulation of solids O Flush system is designed and operated sufficiently
to remove accumulated solids from gutters as
designed
O Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
Lagoons and pits • Crusted solids O Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the crusting
of solids to a depth of no more than 6 to 8 inches
over more than 30 percent of surface
Excessive vegetative • Decaying vegetation Er Maintain vegetative control along banks of
growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter along
water'; edge on impoundment§ perimeter.
Feeders
• Feed spillage
FV Design, operate, and maintain feed systems
(e.g., bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
accumulation of decaying wastage
O'�Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g.,7- to 10-
day interval during summer; 15 to 30-day interval
during winter)
AN41C - November 11, 1996, page 1

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause Z BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Feed storage • Accumulations of feed
residues
Animal holding are. -is • Accumulations of animal
wastes and feed wastage
Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
ensuring drainage is away from site and/or providing
adequate containment (e.g., covered bin for
brewers grain and similar high moisture grain
products)
Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as needed
Ef Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along fences
and other locations where waste accumulates and
disturbance by animals is minimal
9'Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal
holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes
(i.e., inspect for and remove or break up
accumulated solids as needed)
Dry manure handling • Accumulations of animal fY'kemove spillage on a routine basis (e.g.,
systems wastes 7- to 10-day interval during summer; 1S to 30-day
interval during winter) where manure is loaded for
land application or disposal
MI�Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles
Cl Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and manure
handling areas as needed
For more information contact:
Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7613.
AMTC - November 11, 1996, page 2

Mortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
❑ Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
tream or public body of water.
a/Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
❑ Complete incineration
❑ In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
/ approved by the Department of Agriculture
2( Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
December 18, 1996

Dairy Waste Utilization - Third Party Applicator Agreement
I, ///IL ll4-(44 hereby acknowledge that I have
received a copy, have read and understand the Waste
Utilization Plan dated
11
for/by
in Iry County.
16, that was developed
I hereby agree to manage and land apply the dairy waste
from this facility in a manner consistent with the
requirements of this Waste Utilization Plan and keep
copies of all required records as specified in the plan.
Third Party Applicator: Date:�2� %
Waste Producer: r%//Ul�%_Date:
Technical Representative: - Date:D3 a,
Term of Agreement: I a 3 ,19 98to�ecc.
�9'2oln .

M4, Afkvm
r
Exposure
- .13 Wv,
It
V:I: 4t
F to
Cl)
jr
MVOC
All
# crf
12

lip 7
of
2
4
w
djZ
JAT
o� Sl

�•�4(��Y' 1 'e'. 7y��t}'-tu'�-+y'��'1
I � _/ _ •_._ ��. 1Y •i' / !,� G• �'SF'�'.��-'•.fiQ;lSy.�q�r.tiy �� 4 {���
it Sr. • M � �.1 r , 5�.� ,.yy'I r � � e 1,I
to-.>:;�', ;; .,,•. •. ,�.�,.... a In 50 d x 3
T '#' I�?. t�Xf> sib 'r��:r?..<<`�' .yf.•�.'�', �..� � .. ....Y.��p�.
I
• • � / 1� :i, :.�Nt\,`\ {. , a'�\ � c��I _ Wit`♦fti•`�'".rf�'i!�' `�
31
4 7-
J' Y' OiL •N ��1 i �i. „9 � r1'ut'���..
Nfj:QA.�S� - ;, •- ✓`' 3� y-,,,;Yi�:�'N 1' f�l.,`:
i:Ti L � • va t ,r! • _ a:-�� .w, J r Jr�f+C S-� � ry7/ ,_�, �
f 'J"� ♦ h i• • �Y i
,�. . \ � a4 f ,i 1 gb �' !:'7. _1 �N�!f'`41,t� � fi:1 K-`t�,:yJ 'V' "�-r,• .��
a � `4-1 L,.�� 6,I✓�..« d , n , ;\ +,�I �,t•R' i'w�..v r J'y�].�� 4L S'' • r':> ��•'S
'di I!f'r C"`'r S/ �t i '.'IM. /,� � �1 �•�ri�•�? ��u'�4 �A ..r�C ..
�,� ,O yi{ n t"i c I„ � + • I L'L I i 'Z' a� �..
f t.I'7r'f' J'y� '• ' .a^` Yam+ �.�'%:.j r_ y �'/, `�i� 1{ T .�I .•� 44�+U ,.
'7 ."�. f�r `y-"��rv-t".•'a 7'� +.i "7 .� �' : •' i j'1 L• 1. �, .' 1,(y � � �•' } ! Yy ..a r� b••% r i �1
, C� ♦ice. 1,�„ ��y„ •.y�.74 ,nly � ,� �'1 � ![ iT•:•P,. •,'C
a
. -q r� r�'1i � '•Y. � \ r��++ art ,i t "�� I r ` `•.
.y 'i������.;.•r �t;a,/"',�;, Y,,�;. :��i ' \Y. fy �:a � :� .�,j'� ��.; .,fir �.
• � � � � �i / � j'v''�.'nc.•. '.,�.,��f"�,��'/• :.�'s=X�i_ .. �t.:: � � � !i +. ;r.''�ti/�,�'\. `�'C.•.her •.�.
tk'a y • . .(� Y `l � 7 r f•� t.y , ,•„ gwffa!• .. r�� ^::.. _ Y \
� , + i I: `�v s• � '�,•-fir `
rti=✓•I-- Jc lj.Ih�
t� �:.:. . �`•.,� gQ 6+� J-t _3��!��f?,i r� Fj �,��J � 1 • r _.»' .! f{_ i J

o'E f • 1 !��-��r+
t•��.fC:t. � }ariyy � 1 �r�¢?�ir'.�r-
• y •h • ,d �r �� , ` � � i,, �; Y`•-Y1
��
• t �� h „ ;.posy �.._ � . � , , ..�:�.��,. ;• ,," 1 ,��
y, ram,, r � p./ r y.• �' .�
•'r J'• � ..ti$`r• .-''• F ^y 3.� � ;'�c '�A YJi Jy
1 •'''•'. •4' .�3••,7 a'h ' � _ , �!' �•.ti:�=v� I Yf0 tfr����� \ • i _�biA't .
SN
' g : y � , �! � •' j ��.•r J t�•l• / b -� yam'
Ys.w ' .� r rY' • .{.. � 1•'•� P � �yc},�i' 6i:Qi \, a , �;'� `•t•, ' S.^'.
*a��Cy (.t• 9%T',i x v� •Ga�„c'�„''"��t'Nsrte� �,�;Pr�:.. D _• _l O/ '� , c .K-
V.
Ij
DNE
,y�a, •�
sty' • r L g ,;.=4.t� L ,'.'"' `/� •�y' �` '�"'`�` "`#'''R'"r
4 1•. `�+ p-.c •,.cam � *� �, !i l V• I ' iJ\ I I •b J h • s:'�='�i ,-.. ' �K� rr� Ki "'e~.a1'::
� ti � •w ��Y� '.+y,k�: , � • . j dyy Y�• �� £'� l�rr 1 f� ,� 'Y•"Y "y>r� �...•n .
`yT 7 c•1— 'y,,,-�cyis•�-„Cs,,•\� ti ) �. ;.y.,a't. '3�j ♦ t!:
`syr °�''<!:i .S I'/ '.e1... _. ___aY_'F�i.::: ]. +i.}CCe'•ff.•. _g•G. Z.4-�
fit
•'V•i'.''� ma's .V - {v , `•
W.
ExposLLre \.
V
Ll
Far m S
wY [�� '� . .. ii • Y

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Maple Ridge Dairy Farm
The animal waste on Maple Ridge Dairy Farm is scraped daily into
three dry stacks. The storage capacity for the three dry stacks is
for 200 cows with 60 day storage. 4u°Uaccumulation of waste is
tr3j278jy ton or approximately 54?6 toh every 6PAday"s
The waste from the dry stacks can be applied to any of the
following tracts of land: T5034-1,2(13.6 ac.), T5034-3(21.2 ac.),
T5034-4(7.5 ac.), T5034-5 (3.4 ac.), T5064-1(46.77 ac.), T5064-
2(1.9 ac.), T5035-1(14.37 ac.), T5035-2 (16.31 ac.), T5035-4 (10
ac.), T5035-9(17.21 ac.), T5035-5(2.46 ac.), T5035-7.(10.79 ac.),
T5035-10(3.0 ac.), T5035-9A (9.0 ac.), T5035-8(8.87 ac.), T5035-4A
(9.0 ac.), T5035-3 (8.87 ac.), T5035-4A(9.0 ac,.),T5035-3A(4.0
ac.)T5064-4 (18.0), T5064-3 (7.0), T5446-1 (16.6), T5446-2 (4.4),
T5446-3 (2.65). Approximately 266 acres of land are available to
land apply all the waste. Waste will be land applied 6 times
throughout the year on a schedule of every 60 days in Feb., April,
June, August, October, and December. The cropping system which is
utilized on Maple Ridge Dairy Farm is strip cropping, double
cropping of corn for silage, corn for grain, small grain, hay land
and pasture land. Sorghum silage is also grown on the farm which
is planted mid June and harvested mid October.
There is also a waste holding pond on the farm which is used to
catch water from the milking parlor and any runoff that may occur.
There will be very little nitrogen in the waste in the holding
pond. The waste holding pond is designed for 200 cows. The
capacity of the pond is designed for 4 gallons of water/cow/day.
This total is 560 gallons/day. The total waste accumulation for.a
eari 204k400allons. The waste would be land applied 3"
per year with -!I-20 dayss storag The waste accumulation for01f2T0F°
jeda? would be approximately 0187ol0i0:0�galplons. The waste from the
holding pond would be applied by a travelling irrigation sprinkler
system inn 5hWg-.:u', and l�tafembe';r. In March the waste would be
applied to T5035-2 and T5035-4-w-iere cor isplantedfor silage.
In J_ my the w'asF—e will be applied to T5035-2 which is sorghum for
silage. The November applications of waste can be applied to T5035-
2 where small grain for silage will be sowed on the fields after
the corn silage is chopped.
The total plant available nitrogen produced on Maple Ridge Dairy
Farm is 34,824 pounds. With the land available for both solid and
liquid waste applications and the cropping system utilized there is
adequate land available to utilize 41,858 pounds of plant available
nitrogen.

February -March Solid Waste Application
Field
Crop
Prior Crop
Useable
Rate/Acre
Total
Total PAN
Ac.
(ton)
Application
Utilized
(ton)
T5034-1,2
Corn
Small
13.6
9.6
131
1305.6
Silage
Grain
Silage
T5034-3
Corn
Small
21.2
9.6
204
2035.6
Silage
Grain
Silage
T5035-9
Corn
Small
8.6
9.6
82.6
825.6
Silage
Grain
Silage
T5064-2
Corn
Small
1.9
9.6
18.24
182.4
Silage
Grain
Silage
T5035-3A
Orchard
Orchard
4.0
10
40
400
grass
grass
T5035-4A
Fescue
Fescue
9.0
10
90
900
Total
58.3
564.88
5648.8

April -May Solid Waste Application
Field
Crop
Prior Crop
Useable
Ac.
Rate/Acre
(ton)
Total
Application
(ton)
Total
PAN
Utiliz
T5064-1
Corn Silage
Small Grain
23
9.6
220.8
2208
T5035-1
Corn Silage
Small Grain
7.2
9.6
69.12
691.2
T5035-10
fescue
fescue
3.0
10
30
300
T5035-9A
fescue
fescue
9.0
10
90
900
T5035-8
fescue
fescue
8.87
10
88.7
887
T5035-7
sorghum
silage
small grain
10.79
14.4
155.38
1553.8
Total
61.86
654
6540

June -July Solid Waste Application
Field
Crop
Prior
Useable
Rate/Acre
Total
Total
Crop
Acres
(Ton)
Application
PAN
(ton)
Utilized
T5064-1
Sorghum
Corn
23
14.4
331.2
3312
Silage
Silage
T5064-2
Sorghum
Corn
1.9
14.4
27.36
273.6
Silage
Silage
T5035-1
Sorghum
Corn
7.1
14.4
102.24
1022.4
Silage
Silage
T5035-4
Sorghum
Corn
5
14.4
72
720
Silage
Silage
T5035-5
Sorghum
Corn
2.46
14.4
35.42
354.2
Silage
Silage
T5035-9
Sorghum
Corn
8.6
14.4
123.84
1238.4
Silage
Silage
Total
48.06
1
1 692.06
6920.6

August -September Solid Waste Application
Field
Crop
Prior Crop
Useable
Acres
Rate/
Acre
Total
Application
(ton)
PAN
utilized
T5035-10
Fescue
Fescue
3
10
30
300
T5035-9A
Fescue
Fescue
9
10
90
900
T5035-8
Fescue
Fescue
8.87
10
88.7
887
T5035-4A
Fescue
Fescue
9
10
90
10
T5035-3A
Orchard
grass
Orchardgrass
4
10
40
400
T5034-
1,2
Small
Grain
Corn Silage
13.6
12
163.2
1632
T5034-3
Small
Grain
Corn Silage
21.2
12
254.4
2544
T5034-4
Small
Grain
Corn Silage
7.5
12
90
900
T5034-5
Small
Grain
Corn Silage
3.4
12
40.8
408
Total
79.57
887.1
8871
The total accumulation of waste in the dry stack over a 60 day
period is approximately s 3:4V ton. To supply all nitrogen
requirements for fescue, 39.3 tons of waste could be applied. To
supply all nitrogen requirements for orchardgrass 52.8 ton of waste
could be applied. This application rate is in excess of what
should realistically be applied. The maximum amount of waste that
will be applied is 15 ton per acre on both fescue and orchardgrass.
With an application rate of 15 ton this will supply 52.5 pounds of
nitrogen. The 33.87 acres on which this application can be made is
more than adequate to apply the waste generated this 60 day period.

October -November Solid Waste Application
Field
Crop
Prior.Crop
Useable
Rate/Acre
Total
Acres
Application
(ton)
T5035-9
Small Grain
Corn
8.6
12
103.2
Silage
T5035-4
Small Grain
Corn
5
12
60
Silage
T5035-1
Small Grain
Corn
7.2
12
86.4
Silage
T5064-2
Small Grain
Corn
1.9
12
22.8
Silage
T5064-1
Small Grain
Corn
23
12
276
Silage
Total
I
1
45.7
548.4
The total accumulation of waste in the dry stack over a 60 day
period is approximately 546 ton. Rate of 12 ton this will supply
120 pounds of nitrogen. The 53.85 acres on which this application
can be made is more than adequate to apply the waste generated this
60 day period.

December Solid Waste Application
Field
Crop
Prior Crop
Useable
Rate/Acre
Total
Acres
Application
(ton)
T5044-4
Small
Corn Silage
18
12
216
Grain
T 5 0 $
Small
Corn Silage
7.0
12
84
Grain
T5446-11
Small
Corn Silage
16.6
12
199.2
Grain
T5446-2
Small
Corn Silage
4.4
12
52.8
Grain
T5446-3
Small
Corn Silage
2.65
12
31.8
Grain
Total
48.65
1 1
583.8
The total accumulation of waste in the dry stack over a 60 day
period is approximately 546 ton. To supply all nitrogen
requirements for small grain (1205 lbs. n/ac) 12 ton of waste can
be applied.
NOTE:
The 46.65 acres on which this waste can be applied is more than
adequate to apply waste generated over this 60 day period.

The Realistic Yield Expectations (R.Y.E.) are as follows:
lbs PAN
Commercial from
Crop
R.Y.E.
lbs.N/R.Y.E
1bs.PAN/ac
Fertilizer
Waste
Small
10 ton
12
120
0
120
Grain
Corn
18 ton
12
216
120
96
Silage
Sorghum
12 ton
12
144
0
.144
Silage
Fescue
Pasture
4.0 ton
50
200(.75)=150
0
150
Orchard
grass
4.0 ton
50
200
0
200
Solid Waste
Application Rate (tons/acre)
Applic. Rate (tons/ac.) = crop PAN requirement ( lb/ac)
lb PAN/ton (from waste analysis
Small Grain Silage = 120 lbs. = 12 tons
10
Corn Silage = 96 lbs = 9.6 ton
10
Sorghum Silage = 144 = 14.4 ton
10
Fescue Pasture = 150 = 15 ton
10
Fescue Hay = 200 = 20 ton
10
Orchardgrass hay = 200 = 20 ton
10

Liquid waste Application Rate (gallons/acre)
Application Rate = crop PAN requirement x 1000
acre lb PAN/1000 gal
Small Grain Silage = 120 x 1000 = 12,000 gallons
10
Corn Silage = 96 x 1000 = 9,600 gallons
10
Sorghum Silage = 144 x 1000 14,400 gallons
Fescue Pasture = 150 x 1000 = 15,000 gallons
10
Fescue Hay = 200 x 1000 = 20,000 gallons
10
Orchardgrass hay = 200 x 1000 = 20,000 gallons
10
Total annual accumulation of Waste
3278 ton of solid waste
or
546 ton every 60 days
Total PAN produced/year from solids
3278 ton x 10 lbs. PAN/ton = 32,780 pounds PAN
Liquid Waste Holding Pond
Total annual accumulation = 204,400 gallons
Total PAN produced/year from liquid waste
204,400 x 10 = 2044 lbs. PAN
1000
Total PAN produced on Maple Ridge Dairy Farm is
32,780 + 2,044 = 34,824 lbs. PAN

Liquid Waste Application - March -April
Prior
Field Crolo
Crop
Useable Ac
T5035-2 Corn
Small
Grain 6.1
Silage
T5035-4 Corn
Small
Grain 3.75
_. .. Silage.
9.85
Rate/Ac. Total Application
9600 gal 58,560 gal.
9600 gal 36,000 gal
94,560 gal
If 6.6 ton are applied with waste from dry stack at 10 lbs. n/ton=
6.6(10) = 66 lbs. Nitrogen
The total nitrogen required from waste is 66 pounds
60 lbs. total
-42 lbs. N from solid waste
18 lbs.
66 lbs. of N can be applied from liquid waste
66 X 1000 = 9000 gallon of liquid waste/acre
10
The total accumulation of waste in the holding pond over the 120 day period
is approximately 69,000 gallons.
69,000 gallons = 10.45 acres needed for application
6,600 gal./ac
Application depth =
6,600 gal/ac = .04 inches
27,154 gal/ac in x7.6 ac.
Liquid Waste Application - July -August
Prior
Field Crop Crop Useable Ac Rate/Ac. Total Application
T5035-2 Sorghum Corn 6_1 14,400 gal 87,840 cral.
Silage 6.1 87,840 gallons
The solid waste application that is made in August is 10 ton/acre. If 15
ton/acre are applied with waste from the dry stack at 10 lbs. N/ton=
10 (10) = 100 lbs. N from solid waste
The total nitrogen that can be applied is 150 pounds.
150 - in = 50 lbs. of N that can be applied
The 7.5 acres of fescue that are useable for irrigation is adequate to apply
the liquid waste. The total accumulation of waste on the holding pond over
the 120 day period is approximately 69,000 gallons.
69,000 gal = 9.200 gal./ac.
7.5
92000 = 9.2 (2 lbs N/1000 gal) = 18.4 lb.N
1000
Application depth =
9200 gal/ac.
27,154 gal/ac. in x 7.5 ac. _ .05 inches

Liquid Waste Application - October -December
Prior
Field Crop Crop Useable Ac
T5035-2 Small Sorghum 6_1
Grain Silage 6.1
(Tropical)
Rate/Ac. Total Application
12,000 gal 73,200 gal.
73,200 gal
The solid waste application should be reduced to 10 ton per acre on T5035-2
because of liquid waste application made to this field.
If 10 ton are applied with waste from dry stack at 3.5 lbs N/ton
10 (3.5) = 35 lbs. Nitrogen
The total nitrogen required from waste is 55 pounds.
55 lbs. total N
-35 lbs. N from solid waste
20
20 pounds of N can be applied from liquid waste.
20 x 1000 = 10,000 gal./ac.
2
The total accumulation of waste in the holding pond over the 120 day
period is approximately 69,000 gallons.
69,000 = 6.9 acres needed for application
10,000
Application depth =
10,000gal/ac. _ .05 in.
27,154 gal/ac. in x 6.9 ac

ecwQ
•a�szr. a:;q 5Lti.TddE o� zo-sd aoE� sso-:.EJ-,.T�
c. i.-ddE oq asoz tad o.unomz aq� 5L-�-z=asap
sadosd aye p i an-a�as non �aTTz a .�,-o
aou2 -s-ssz soS ;sodas -sd�zssE a�szr aA� uozoEr�asuo Tro$
To-�sTp vo'+zuasao� s EM puz-05 so (aJrnsa$ EJo a q TTY�
I.L�a::zcT) aJ-trag uo-_ nrasuo� saJznosag Zzss:.4zH T Z
uo zna-3 paaosa asnTon=ts =no�L �aso_s
SL-aq a�szn so aur-,Ton as. -noes aourtsII- ou nI Sa'
isana acuo :o Gzszanz arm uo azzzo_s 2co=2-�_nox
1oc au5-sap s- �..eT.
nuE a5s=o_s !zsZoa=aq o SLVP _ P
ae je�: Sae Yod C2=r"
a-��SCS Y3f.3MD8 •Ne:^.^.' �� 25 G�ZddY IG38...SOX S: S� l: C3QX SCF S.,3:8L'S +z5:.
Zn
aq cT Sp Ta7 a;; Jr .^.:MO.�S cP= pa.-J TAP aa$

_: , WAS TE UT T L �:ZA_T� o�..:.... ...��-�? .
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGRE=Nm_
Na=e or Far=:
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand .and will follow and implement the specificatica
and the operation and maintenance prccedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the fa-*� named above. I
(we) know that any e= ansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or const_act'ion of new
facilities will ream--e a new certfication to be submitted to the
Division of Environment Management (OEM) before the new animals are
stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of
an;r,al waste from this system to surface wasters of the state from
a star= event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour stores. The
approved _plan will be farm on -site at the fam office and at the
office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will
be available for review by OF -%I upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: W; I I i'Am
(Please prat)
Signature: ,Q/�'� Date: �f�
Name of Manager(If different from owner):
Signature:
Name of Technical Specialist: (?.lease
Affiliation: �V•C
_ Dated::
print)
Ve
Address (Agency) : P D, RIVX �7
Signature:
,,1%0
Date: t S a

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MAYBE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Existing Animal Waste Operations
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections that are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
I.1 Facility Name: Maple Ridge Farm Inc
1.2 Print Land Owner�''s''jjna��e: Lawrence Horton
1.3 Mailing address:rXri6FPine Ridge Road
City, State: Mt. Airy NC Zip: 27030
Telephone Number (include area code): [phone]
1.4 County where facility is located:
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): Pine Ridge Road off Hwy. 89 8 miles west of Mt.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 01/C
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: _86_ (county number); _10 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Description: Cattle operation
airy
140- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? =yes; no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum num er for which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Catfle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy .200
0 Feeder to Finish - 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 1 of 4 86 - 10

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system):_ZG6 .2?!l- ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): +43 1711
2.4 Number of lagoons/ storage ponds (circle which is applicable): I_
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES of z� (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES. 01700(please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only).
YES or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? /V/4
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? 4A
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit -Animal Applicants Initials
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components. Some of these components may not
have been required at the time the facility was certified but should be added to the
CAWMP for permitting purposes:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
'3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
13.3 A map of every field used for land application.
—3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
': 3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field..
. 3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
' 3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
—3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
�33.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
—3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan.
33.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
�3:3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
_ .= 33.14 Mortality Control Checklist -with the -selected method noted: -
�13.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
�3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 86 - 10

Facility Number: 86 - 10
Facility Name: Maple Ridge Farm Inc
4. APP1�L//ICANT'S 10ER'T/IFICATION:
1, r (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for MaD/e. Rd.ae F0.ryUnZAe. (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate Jnd complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned to me as incomplete.
Signature - / 2 i�J Date
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only If different from the Land Owner)
I, (Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS: .
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 86 - to

Animal Waste Management Plan Certification
Please tvoe or Drint all information that does not require a sivnamre'
General Information:
Name of Farm: hM A
Owner(s) Name: -
Mailing Address:
Farm Location:
Latitude and Longitude: � 1,.—a
County Farm is located
_2Q- —P-6 Integrator:
y No: 1�
No:�1b-5?P%
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.): L f A 5 i d e a -P SR 166 SAS. <an Ay 41,; 4,. cei a-"P
Operation Description:
Type of Swine No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder
Cl Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
0 Boars
Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type ofC the No. of Animals
0 Layer of
200
Cl Pullets ❑ Beef
Other Type of Livestock: Number of Animals:
Acreage Available for Application: d l to Required Acreage: / 7 Y
Number of Lagoons / Storage Ponds: C2 —Da 4L0 Total Capacity: Cubic Feet (ft3) c,�Do J,ca 1 ��
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or NO (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
************************************************************************************
Owner / Manager Agreement
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made
conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the
application of animal waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be
minimized using technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be
filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification
must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to
implementation. A change in land ownership requires written notification to DEM or a new certification (if the approved
plan is changed) within 60 days of a title transfer.
Name of Land Owner:
Dater/rfso,-t
Name of Manager(if different from owner):
Date:
AWC -- August 1, 1997

Technical Specialist Certification
1 As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A
NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Management
(DEM) as specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and/or the
North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-
.0005. The following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist
who may sign each certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC, I), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are
technically competent.
IL Certification of Design
A) Collection, Storage, Treatment System
Check the appropriate box
❑ Existina facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with waste utilization
urrements.
d1leNew. exoanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and ponds,
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please
Affiliation NP—cs Date Work
Address (Agency):_ Imo 'Bex 021 R . 'po I .san
B) Land Anolication" Site (WUP) "
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation IV C- Date Work Completed: / ' _5 Irb
Address (Agenq'y): P A ox % % Phone No.: c 3 3 l.,) iv -
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check the appropriate box
❑ Facility without exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
Ga Facility with exterior lots (RC)
'Methods to minimise the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation alzcs Date Work Completed: 8zna /?a
Address (Agency):,
No.: ,38G-S�st
00
AWC -- August 1, 1997

D). Application and Handling Equipment
Check the appropriate box
Ira Fxis ing or expanding facility wiL ezictin waste application egg(pmept (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been
established; required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of
the plan).
0 New. expanded. or existing facility without existing waste application equipment for spray irrigation (I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
Q New. expanded, or existing facility without existing waste application equipment for land sureading not using
spray irrigation. (WUP or 1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan). I _ , ,
Name of Technical Specialist (Please
Affiliation _N 'C:. C ou�1� q1 ✓L �xte nsla Date Work Completed:5'D
Address (Agengy): R E? u x 9 "7 1/ d N l %z ,IUD -�)'7D 5 -Phone No.: 3 3 G 6 7q -ad 6
E) Odor Control, Insect Control, Mortality Management and Emergenev Action Plan (SD
SI. WUP. RC or D
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist. an Insect
Control Checklist, a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odors and
insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the
Mortality Management Plan and the Emergency Ac%''on Plan are co plete d can be implemented by this facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): /Va war ZJ.-�� ,
Address (Agency): V. D. &, Y7 6(JC )?O S i Phnne Nn_ (13 6
F) Written Notice of New or Expanding Swine Farm
The following signature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June
21, 1996. If the facility was built before June 21, 1996, when was it constructed or last
expanded
I (we) certify that I (we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners
who own property located across a public road, street, or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was
in compliance with the requirements of NCGS 106-805. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified is
attached.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
AWC -- August 1, 1997 3

III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection. Storage, Treatment Installation
New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been installed
in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Greg Go;iM s
Affiliation Nkc s Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency):,
;k [he . appropriate box
No.: AV 3RA-9.5'1
G�' The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
0 Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (month/day/year); the proposed cover crop is
appropriate for compliance with the wasteutiliialion plan.
❑ Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 30 days
of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control;
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Aa-ut inl , `i-
Affiliation �J.�4__ &- & /�2 ,-.s Date Work
Address (Agency): A D. &, `-7 w lle . kJ( _� 7DS:5 Phone No.. (9'3 6� (,-?9
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in M. B
above -has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as speed in my (our) waste utilization plan,
and if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control, and will submit to DEM a verification of completion
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I (we)
realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an
enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Date:
AWC -- August 1, 1997

C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots (RC)
Facility with exterior lots
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been•installed as specified
in the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): a -9 Go;r g e
Affiliation N,0C5 Date Work Completed: BAS Ase
Address (Agency): Po aex Q t A �3�bbsan Phone No.: J-98-S7sJ
D) Application and Handling Equipment Installation (WUP or I)
Check the�apywpriate block
Ca Animal waste application and handling equipment specked in the plan is on site and ready for use;
calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Er -'Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner
has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified in
the contract agrees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
❑ Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has
been purchased and will be on site and installed by (month/day/year); there is adequate
storage to bold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in
accordance with the cropping system contained in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have
been provided to the owners and are contaifieo as part of the plan_ ,
Name of Technical Specialist (Please
ate., —'Date Work
Address
�o 61
The following signattice block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I
(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me
(us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control. Insect Control and Mortality Management (SD, SI, WUP. RC or
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. The
mortality management system as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is operational.
Name of Technical S ecialist (Please Print):--k
Affiliation _ Date Work Completed: `f 5 n
Address (Aaencvl':_ _P 0, �o,c q? ya,.oI L,v 11e . )JC
AwC -- August 1, 1997

Please return the completed form to the Division of Water Quality at the following address:
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division Of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Branch, Compliance Unit
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste
Management Plan to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy
in your files with your Animal Waste Management Plan.
64,
AWC -- August 1, 1997 6

• State of North Carolina •
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form RECEIVED
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL) WATER QUALITYSECT70N
General Permit - Existing Animal Waste OperationApR 06 2000
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file wi the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections that ar �(ff tl'WlUp
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name:
1.2 Print Land Owner�''sna��e: Lawrence
1.3 Mailing address:rXr��vine Ridge Ro
City, Sate: Mt. Airy NC Zip:
Telephone Number (include area code): [phone]
1.4 County where facility is located:
AtCEIVED
N.C. Dept. of EHNR
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): _Pine Ridge Road off Hwy. 89 8 miles west of Mt
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 01/01/47
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: 86 (county number); 10_ (facility number).
2.2 Operation Descnp iot n: Cattle operation
Dairy
140- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? =yes; F71no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum num ear for which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Catt•.e No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 1 of 4 86 - 10

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system):0946 Z2S' ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 44•S 1'7,/
2.4 Number of lagoons/ storage ponds (circle which is applicable):
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES o N(please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES, oro (please circle'one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
YES or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? / /14
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? 4A
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal .
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components. Some of these components may not
have been required at the time the facility was certified but should be added to the
CAWMP for permitting purposes:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
'3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
✓3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
' 3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
`- 3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
—3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
✓33.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
—3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan.
-3'3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
33.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
° 3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
�3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
Applicants Initials
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 86 -10

. • RECEIVE D �
WATEROU�
Facility Number: 86 - 10
AFR � 6 2000
Facility Name: Maple Ridge Farm Inc a PertnliVo9
NoI~Discharg
4. APP1LIICANT'S /CERTIFICATION:
1, W l ��; a w�" [� • 140fo r\ (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for /vl aD le, k4e FA rw. -Z—ne . (Facility name listed in question 1. 1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate Jnd complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned to me as incomplete.
Signature Date - !>'Irlxly i
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
1, (Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for _(Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS: .
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 86 -10

'/.P, Cf sa�
- n
II L.),1
.
i • �r�
J
ot', �'lY
= iY7 X , °il .k. Ooi. _
. _,�,V
...__. --_.___._ ......_... ._ .. - ..___...
--------- ..._ ... _...
1

State of Borth Carolina1.') t,
Department of Environment
And Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
WILLIAM L. HORTON
MAPLE RIDGE FARM INC
1174 PINE RIDGE ROAD
MT. AIRY NC 27030
Dear William L. Horton:
i
!No�Vor
IRONMENT AiMW RA htOURCES
N.C. Dept -of EHNR
October 13, 2000 NOV 0 6 2000
Winston-Srtlem
e,�ipnai Office
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC860010
Maple Ridge Farm Inc
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Surry County
In accordance with your application received on April 6, 2000, we are forwarding this Certificate
of Coverage (COC) issued to William L. Horton, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG200000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from a Maple Ridge Farm Inc Farm, located in Surry County, with
an animal capacity of no greater than200 Dairy cows and the application to land as specified in the
Certified Animal Waste Management CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
The facility's CAWMP meets all requirements in place at the time of certification. However, it
appears that the irrigation system on site may not adequately cover all acreage listed in the Waste
Utilization Plan. The owner should address this inconsistency as soon as possible.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626.0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage A860010
Maple Ridge Farm Inc
Page 2
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions sp&cified in this COC, the
General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance
with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive
relief.
Upon notification by the.Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Winston-Salem Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning. this
COC or the General Permit, please contact Susan Cauley at [phone] ext. 546.
.Kerr T. Stevens
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
SurryCounty Health Department
Winston-Salem Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Surry County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files

T 4
RECEIVED
N.C. Dept. of E:i-iM-
NOV O 6 2000
June 7, 2000
Susan Cauley
NCDENR
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699-1617
Dear Susan:
North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service
YadkmotiannFy ftA?,hlure and Life Sciences
North Carolina Cooperative Extension
College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
PO Box 97
Yadkinville NC 27055
[phone] Fax: [phone]
Winston-Salem
Regional offie�, RECEIVED
f0:d
ncr,•,0icc; cr` ;,, iftin
F
This letter is in reference to an additional information request for Maple Ridge Farm Inc
(Application No. AWC860010). 1 am addressing items 2 and 4 in your request. As for the
irrigation parameters, irrigation is done by a contract operator and I do not have all of his
specifics; however, I am enclosing the portion of the waste utilization plan which shows how
much can be irrigated per acre. All that is irrigated is a small waste holding pond which
catches parlor water. The rest of the animal waste is stored in dry stacks and land applied
with a solids spreader. I am also enclosing more maps which are highlighted so that
hopefully they can be read easier. As for questions and explanations on Tract 5035: Fields
10, 3A, 9A, 4A, and Tract 5064: Field 3 these are fields where land has been cleared and
now in cropland. There have been no recent aerial maps done; therefore the information on
acreage is justifiable by what Mr. Horton pays taxes on and plants according to the planter
or drill acreage counter.
Please don't hesitate to call me with any questions at [phone].
Sincerely,
Nancy . Keith
Area Specialized Agent, Dairy
NWK/pwm
Enclosures
cc Lawrence Horton
Employment and program opportohl es are offered to all people regardless of race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability.
North Carolina State University, North Carolina A&T State University, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and local governments cooperating.

Liquid Waste Application March
Prior
Field Crop Crop Useable Ac
T5035-2 Corn Small Grain 6.1
Silage
T5035-4 Corn Small Grain 3.75
Silage
Total 9.85
Total PAt
Rate./Ac. Total Application Utilizec
9600 ga2''`Q �''`arni58;, 560 gal. 585.6
9600 gal 36,000 gal
94,560 gal
96 lbs. of N can be applied from liquid waste
360
945.6
96 X 1000 = 9600 gallon of liquid waste/acre
10
The total accumulation of waste in the holding pond over the 120 day period is
approximately 68,000 gallons.
68,000 gallons = 7.08 acres needed for application
9,600 gal./ac
Liquid Waste Application - July
Prior Total Par
Field Crop Crop Useable Ac Rate/Ac. Total Application Utilized
T5035-2 Sorghum Corn 6.1 14,400 gal 87,840 gal. 878.4
Silage Silage
144 pounds of N can be applied from liquid waste.
144 x 1000 = 14,000 gallons fo liquid waste/acre
10
The total accumulationof waste in the holding pond over a 120 day period is.
approximately 68,000 gallons.
68000 gallons = 4.8 acres needed for application
14000 gal/ac.
Liquid Waste Application - November
Prior
Field Crop Crop Useable Ac
T5035-2 Small Sorghum 6.1
Grain Silage
Total PAD
Rate/Ac. Total Application Utilized
12,000 gal 73,200 gal. 732
120 pounds of N can be applied from liquid waste.
120 x 1000 = 12,000 gallons of liquid waste/acre
10
The total accumulation of waste in the holding pond over the 120 day period
is approximately 68,000 gallons.
68,000 = 5.6 acres needed for application
12,000

10
lop
'
i ORA ISSSq' P II
� f _
ye •:. •�. ti :sYa _`'tom . ' !;f NO,
.ytD �• - � ` � f� � i � , t 1 C w � � w 'gyp
M� ltio�it'''-�.;�Yrj } '.�'.'':' p'�•' -.r� lid _ u t•'w�' ✓ ,,
tiif'!•.'�I A'•i "f '� .k- I �.
f� C- �5"•+ ^" �? -r "i1f�'�1'tL•�' .• .�.��' K✓�V c J �V~'1'; �_���j� _ T � _a
1 . ?_. =i'r a- - .. cvr".- 5� y,-Fy • Y_r �'vr�..�'�j.�"j IN
Ifr•�° - r�r�ia *��t; �•"" 1�'`'}ti�r5 �.. .��-} �` `aF �""T. � � _*. �'?Ft �,' •e ^7�-s.,p lt .s
ram*`
w �r/
r
r':..`,2yi,t r`fts •,\ I:ja� �'7 :•ir .•rrIf i
';•� .ice
OR
a ( I' +.qrr
n
ExposLLre •{t �, a-` "� 1 # olr
1 �1• r4.. � I fI'''• F'.•r .l N
2 ,-+ _
�•}� % t ;`/y- ♦ t � � •r � `�... tly�_.s.,,J�y,A,y"Y w'c� � e 2

/ V }•
It
n 'riat�'�a ` C i7 `A .}.y V) J, _a ..i 1=`•
to ' G -.�.,..eN r-• v Y v+^ , -" / t
Al�; t}t •r�J./',,�r i " / — (�.. IT`.j.�`} W -T' ti\ `t• a '*ti �
A
t ,�t.'r,J,}v',�y 1. .._.. ...r - : ,-t lr,r ra 'tt n�t�t`f �''�;•, a. •
is W w . -;
•:� ..-�• i•:i ! • ,:.4.� i. 1 alY!Ll �: 14 t__ . 1/. � n �>�J rl - .t ♦ � . v , h •.:� �•{.•tt:
'y ,r, / \ . - /i t a 4a .. p� . {C' • ...rrC������y 1 •N:
i �' t 4 i!a � %� ' lJGv ti\iYY � `,• _ • �^ ,, �Y��!if T1 Itl
.r. i x a.� 7`vf i . /` Fai.'1•t'; ,.. .'' C,° '�• 'Art kil ^G
WAIM
• ►► 3 t /,^' z�'/ , • '`` ,_., .IO '= A? tl• ate,: •.t,"jt'. iY. c ,
,1'; •�Ll.\s }•~!- r':
� YtP � { �`\ �� .c � ,�� �.p t' ;� qj n� : ; j(•"r . �r r `a1t� .�
�r,{ ,
S1Y N - W W— tii 1 "A it.(' \ "" i" ,I.:i i t t�:i / •4 '-•},
rlr �� �.9, iii,;y�; , •,ylt'1� �� t r?11J.- +t`ta�`
At
\11�iIB L { WOOCS w
AV

.77
AM
Z-A

I
Z.V-71
'P lu
40
V.
'k Z il
I

iRECEIVED • RECEIVED
Dept. of EHNR 'WATERO' IAU YSEUION
May7, 2000
Maple Reidgedge Farm Inc. . NOV 0 6 2000 !JUN 1 J 2000
Application No. AWC860010 NOn-
Winston-SalemflischargepQ
Dear SusanCauley, Regional Office [Milling
The information below will adress items I and 3 ask for in your letter dated May 17,2000. Nancy Keith will
adress items 2 and 4.
1. Measurements are for constructed pond. We certified only the volume stored.
2. The wash water was calculated using 4 gallons per cow per day. This is based on wash down taking 20
minutes and hose discharging 3.5 gallons per minute for total of 70 gallons. Two tank are flushed with
25 gallons of water two times per milking. 200 gallons extra are figured for excess use. Total of 540
gallons daily use. This calculates at 3 gallons per head per day.
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone], extension 3.
Sincerely,
Greg G ' gs
NRCS Surry County

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTU
Soil Conservation Service
' NC-ENG-40
Rev. 7/91 .
PLAN OF EXCAVATED WASTE STORAGE PIT
NAME: �dWYP.r7GP f✓dr{on Date:
County:
Address:
L ENG TN '
\� SI DE SLOPE L-STo I
01
W
AYE. TOP ELEV.
'� �� --- -- --- / L; IO SECTION
_/7 Y
--------- '
y/ —r —------- —�--- cons�ruc�ec� Voiu"e
AVE. BOTTOM ELEV. / G'XCee�s Yol� �e 1nc=e 1aj
/ � �d0 da�5 5to ra52.
Ncw Vo 1. JC0 �. `.�<: l LENGTH '2Z S
%ac
1e,+ measa�-J
a0� ZZ ,9 /so �� s
i T avts * T. (��P--,
(See back for voluNe ealculetimu)
�s
4 /va /s s Use of facility: Wa.s1, Wa, P- A,)
capacity: i i 4. ,3su Gallons /o, s�{! Ft3
Soil Type:
Bench Mark Description
Bottom
Normal Liguid Level
Storage for normal Precip.
Maximum Liquid Level
25 yr. Storm Storage
Crest ESW
Max.Flow Depth
Freeboard
Top of Dam
Ca�cula1•o�,s
Elev.
Elev.
(+)
Ft.
Elev.
(+)
Ft.
Elev.
(+)
Ft.
(+)
Ft.
Elev.

Anti Waste Management Plan Certification
WATRECEIVE,)
General Information:
Name of Farm: ft A
Owner(s) Name
Mailing Addres
Farm Location:
Latitude and Longitude: � 11 —a
Please attach a copy of a county road map
names, directions, milepost, etc.): LeA
Operation Description:
Type of Swine No. of Animals
Q Wean to Feeder
O Feeder to Finish
Q Farrow to Wean
O Farrow to Feeder �—
Q Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
O Boars
No:den-qDqi ��c1. a p}��'fitting
y—fLYL_-- / (J
No: i - �
County Farm is located in._ 5 „ Retn
/ 4 .3 4 —�2L Integrator:
with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
.•ue r �0 .I.
Type of Poultry No. of Animals
O Layer
O Pullers
Type of C the No. o' f,gnimals
a air00
❑ Beef
Other Type ofLivesrock: NumberofAnimals:
. •- ,5 a .aurc rot Application: p (p (p g 1 % y
Required Acreage:
Number of Lagoons / Storage Ponds :
aZ" 9L 1-D Total Capacity: Cubic Feet (ft3)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or NO (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
Owner / Manager Agreement
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made
conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the
application of animal waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be
minimized using technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be
filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification
must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to
implementation. A change in land ownership requires written notification to DEM or a new certification (if the approved
plan is changed) within 60 days of a title transfer.
Name of Land Owner: LAWGOAi/,Z U
Name of Manager(if different from owner)- Date: sue_//, ,
AWC -- August 1. 1997
Date:

Telknical Specialist Certification
1 As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A
NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Management
(DEMO as specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and/or the
North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-
.0005. The following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist
who may sign each certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC, I), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are
technically competent.
II. Certification of Design
A) Collection, Storage. Treatment System
Check the appropriate box
G Existing facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with waste utilization
mrements.
U New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and ponds,
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Gre4 C-,ainc s
Affiliation MRCS Date Work Completed: 11 /t5-Ag
Address (Agency): Imo Zbx atR . fie%b.un PhoneNo.:_ .336-3R4-89
B) Land AnnlicatioA'Site (WUP)
The plats provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please
Work Completed:_ `f/)'-/-b
Address (ARenq'y): N O
Nil,
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check the appropriate box
❑ Facility without exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
a Facility with exterior lots (RC)
'Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Greer Go; A5 c
Affiliation_ NQc. s Date Work Completed: 1 �98
Address (Agency): P.O Bex a r8 i-Na b. Nc-. Phone No.: .?84-89SI
AWC -- August 1, 1997

D). Application and H&•
Checck the appropnare boz Equipment
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in
(WUP or 1)
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover area r required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specified h as e ary to accommodate the
rates, a
established; required buffers an � maintainednutrienand calibration andsadjusutmenle �rgnce f a contained as
the plan)timing of applications has been
part of
O New. err.anriea _ .-
Animal waste application equipment specified in�the plan has been designed to a 1 w
to
accommodate the waste management plan; v m
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic[ or nutrienttion loading oadin rates- ment can a ischedule a required aste as by the
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration timing of
contained as part of the plan). and adjustment guidance are
Q w
Snrav ' nation ' 'ty w' x. w 1' e .
---r^ —_ (WUPorn r land spreadine not i
ne
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance aof
re
contained as part of the plan). rates; a schedule for timing re
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): a�
Address
Work
No.: : 3 ( ,
_Y<-6--2?
E) Odor Control. Insect Control. Mortality Management and Emergency Action Plan SD
SI. WUP_ RC or
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Manama
ement Odor Control Checklist, Control Checklist, a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency Action plan. Sources of both a rsand
insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the
Mortality Management Plan and the Emergency Ac 'on Plan are cc plete d can be implemented by this facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): a n e
Address
Work
1:3
F) Written Notice of New or ThEx andin Swine Farm followiV v e lowing signature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June
1, 1996. If the facility was built before June 21, 1996, when was it constructed or last
expanded
I (we) certify that I (we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all ad'oinin
who own property located across a public road street or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was
J g property owners and all property owners
at compliance with the requirements of NCGS 106-gig. A copy of the notice and a list of the property
attached.
P P rty owners notified is
Name of Land Owner:
Signature:
Name of Manager (if different from owner): Date:
Signature:
AWC -- August 1, 1997 _ Date:

III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection. Storage. Treatment Installation
New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been installed
in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Gre a Go: na T
Affiliation_ N➢-c s Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency):
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
Check the appropriate box
lL�
No.: A-V 3RA-9y-, t
The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
❑ Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (month/day/year); the proposed cover crop is
appropriate for compliance with the wasteutilization plan.
❑ Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in. the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 30 days
of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control;
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Pry
Affiliation ;k
Address
Work
eted: il
No.- 336 (,-7°)- o(v
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in M. B
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan,
and if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control, and will submit to DEM a verification of completion
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I (we)
realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an
enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
AWC -- August 1, 1997

C) Runoff Controls fronsterior Lots (RC) •
Facili with exterior 1 is
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and free use areas have been installed as
in the plan. 8 heavy
specified
For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): y�e
Affiliation NAc c —�' ��° ��
Address
Work Completed: 8a__ g /91
D) Aoolication and Handlin 7 Eauinme t Installahon Check the apprnpnate block (WUP or I)
Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the
calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
plan is on site and ready for use;
Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner
has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified in
the contract agrees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has
been purchased and will be on site and installed by
storage to hold the waste until the equipment is installed— anted until the waste can be
Y Y ) there is adequate
accordance with the cropping system coutained in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidaland nce have
been provided to the owners and are contame as part of the ian_
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Al �,_ .. I.1 � _ ,tp
Address (Agenclv): A,()
Work
No.:
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date I
nal certification
specified in the conditio.
(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste in plan and will subject
(us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
me
Name of Land Owner:
Name of Manager (if different from
Signature:
E) Odor Control. Insect Control and Mortality Manai
Methods to control odors and i
Date:
Date:
mortality management system asnsects as specified in the specified in the Plan has also l been installed and an have b
een installed
pean o al operational. The
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):�u
. —. . 11 n A _
Address
0,
e.
N
Work
No.:
61
AWC -- August 1, 1997

Please return the completed form to the Division of Water Quality at the following address:
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division Of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Branch, Compliance Unit
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste
Management Plan to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy
in your files with your Animal Waste Management Plan.
AWC -- ,august 1, 1997 6

iTt[
a 10
°ev[.
_ S
T
i bby.. •9.�TiTt: .
�e � 1 1Cdr
0
mtE
♦�
6
tl
Fn
t 'iTC
t'
'ttR
Zn
G
—
.i
RR r
L
°v
a
Won
� 1
iw
a
e
teT
1Y1
oiui4nw
,:.•.
'rtj �'
WJ
A3In All M fl
y
w.
•
rl
°
•ye 1\
Yq .
� al
aT'?�
r
�
A;
C iRl
�
o
CD
o n
e
N
t'
m ly
b
nr s- e°
o' •
xefr
n
�,
eMY
�!
$
o btf a[
7.1V
l s
t6rT
J
T[R
a
e iei
Tiil^
iiif s.
=
o
yo+wlS
L m
T6-t
:A 1.
r p
4
�
Lf
�1
6ft1
NIW
nm nnx !Di
/ � vlWpeE
�—
n
f
LRr'
M1 �
n
lOYI ^
f:
SOYI'Aie
.�
lOM
01
tuw
�
s
WE
tsE
`/
yr�
maE ,,
C
1
\
[ Tn
0
ear[ '�
m
ww
/\ YVL NNSY
l'\
AWf10J HOSL'lLh

r
ExposLLre
i
# of

•
0
M:::::::... TEAS TE:.. U.T�LI-ZA_:T.I:ON.. =,:_PLAN:w.��:
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AG,'Ls=Tm_
Name of Fa=:
Owner/bfanager Agreement
I (we) understand .and will follow and implement the sneci_icaticn
and the coeration and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste util'_zation plan for the far= named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treat--ient and storage system or construction of new
facilities will recu?-e a new certification to be submitted to the
Division of Environment Management (OE_X) before the new animals are
stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of
ani.-aal waste from this system to surface wasters of the state from
a storm, event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The
approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office and at the
office of the local Soil and Ovate: Conservation District and will
be available for review by OF-% anon request,
Name of Facility owner: J[l1'IIi'Am c,. 140RLO111
(Please print)
Signature: ��1 ��i � Date:. /,_
Name of Manager(If different from owner):
Signature: Dates://
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please print) wane, �, o
Address (Agency): P D, l5tix g 7
Y��k �V,"III iUC' 2705 s'
Signature:
Date: 7 ��

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Maple Ridge Dairy Farm
The animal waste on Maple Ridge Dairy Farm is scraped daily into
three dry stacks. The storage capacity for the three dry stacks is
for 200 cows with 60 day storage. Annual accumulation of waste is
3278 ton or approximately 546 ton every 60 days.
The waste from the dry stacks can be applied to any of the
following tracts of land: T5034-1,2(13.6 ac.), T5034-3(21.2 ac.),
T5034-4(7.5 ac.), T5034-5 (3.4 ac.), T5064-1(46.77 ac.), T5064-
2(1.9 ac.), T5035-1(14.37 ac.), T5035-2 (16.31 ac.), T5035-4 (10
ac.), T5035-9(17.21 ac.), T5035-5(2.46 ac.), T5035-7 (10.79 ac.),
T5035-10(3.0 ac.), T5035-9A (9.0 ac.), T5035-8(8.87 ac.), T5035-4A
(9.0 ac.), T5035-3 (8.87 ac.), T5035-4A(9.0 ac.),T5035-3A(4.0
ac.)T5064-4 (18.0), T5064-3 (7.0), T5446-1 (16.6), T5446-2 (4.4),
T5446-3 (2.65). Approximately 266 acres of land are available to
land apply all the waste. Waste will be land applied 6 times
throughout the year on a schedule of every 60 days in Feb., April,
June, August, October, and December. The cropping system which is
utilized on Maple Ridge Dairy Farm is strip cropping, double
cropping of corn for silage, corn for grain, small grain, hay land
and pasture land. Sorghum silage is also grown on the farm which
is planted mid June and harvested mid October.
There is also a waste holding pond on the farm which is used to
catch water from the milking parlor and any runoff that may occur.
There will be very little nitrogen in the waste in the holding
pond. The waste holding pond is designed for 200 cows. The
capacity of the pond is designed for 4 gallons of water/cow/day.
This total is 560 gallons/day. The total waste accumulation for a
year is 204,400 gallons. The waste would be land applied 3 times
per year with 120 days storage. The waste accumulation for 120
days would be approximately 68,000 gallons. The waste from the
holding pond would be applied by a travelling irrigation sprinkler
system in March, July, and November. In March the waste would be
applied to T5035-2 and T5035-4, where corn is planted for silage.
In July the waste will be applied to T5035-2 which is sorghum for
silage. The November applications of waste can be applied to T5035-
2 where small grain for silage will be sowed on the fields after
the corn silage is chopped.
The total plant available nitrogen produced on Maple Ridge Dairy
Farm is 34,824 pounds. With the land available for both solid and
liquid waste applications and the cropping system utilized there is
adequate land available to utilize 41,858 pounds of plant available
nitrogen.

The Realistic Yield Expectations (R.Y.E.) are as follows:
lbs PAN
Commercial from
Crop
R.Y.E.
lbs.N/R.Y.E
1bs.PAN/ac
Fertilizer
Waste
Small
10 ton
12
120
0
120
Grain
Corn
18 ton
12
216
120
96
Silage
Sorghum
12 ton
12
144
0
.144
Silage
Fescue
Pasture
4.0 ton
50
200(.75)=150
0
150
Orchard
grass
4.0 ton
50
200
0
200
Solid Waste
Application Rate (tons/acre)
Applic. Rate (tons/ac.) = crop PAN reauirement ( lb/ac)
lb PAN/ton (from waste analysis
Small Grain Silage = 120 lbs. = 12 tons
10
Corn Silage = 96 lbs = 9.6 ton
10
Sorghum Silage = 144 = 14.4 ton
10
Fescue Pasture = 150 = 15 ton
10
Fescue Hay = 200 = 20 ton
10
Orchardgrass hay = 200 = 20 ton
10

Liquid waste Application Rate (gallons/acre)
Application Rate = crop PAN requirement x 1000
acre lb PAN/1000 gal
Small Grain Silage = 120 x 1000 = 12,000 gallons
10
Corn Silage = 96 x 1000 = 9,600 gallons
10
Sorghum Silage = 144 x 1000 = 14,400 gallons
Fescue Pasture = 150 x 1000 = 15,000 gallons
10
Fescue Hay = 200 x 1000 = 20,000 gallons
10
Orchardgrass hay = 200 x 1000 = 20,000 gallons
S
Total annual accumulation of Waste
3278 ton of solid waste
or
546 ton every 60 days
Total PAN produced/year from solids
3278 ton x 10 lbs. PAN/ton = 32,780 pounds PAN
Liquid Waste Holding Pond
Total annual accumulation = 204,400 gallons
Total PAN produced/year from liquid waste
204,400 x 10 = 2044 lbs. PAN
1000
Total PAN produced on Maple Ridge Dairy Farm is
32,780 + 2,044 = 34,824 lbs. PAN

February Solid Waste Application
Field
Crop
Prior Crop
Useable
Rate/Acre
Total
Total PAN
Ac.
(ton)
Application
Utilized
(ton)
T5034-1,2
Corn
Small
13.6
9.6
131
1305.6
Silage
Grain
Silage
T5034-3
Corn
Small
21.2
9.6
204
2035.6
Silage
Grain
Silage
T5035-9
Corn
Small
8.6
9.6
82.6
825.6
Silage
Grain
Silage
T5064-2
Corn
Small
1.9
9.6
18.24
182.4
Silage
Grain
Silage
T5035-3A
Orchard
Orchard
4.0
10
40
400
grass
grass
T5035-4A
Fescue
Fescue
9.0
10
90
900
Total
58.3
564.88
5648.8

E
April Solid Waste Application
Field
Crop
Prior Crop
Useable
Ac.
Rate/Acre
(ton)
Total
Application
(ton)
Total
PAN
Utilizi
T5064-1
Corn Silage
Small Grain
23
9.6
220.8
2208
T5035-1
Corn Silage
Small Grain
7.2
9.6
69.12
691.2
T5035-10
fescue
fescue
3.0
10
30
300
T5035-9A
fescue
fescue
9.0
10
90
900
T5035-8
fescue
fescue
8.87
10
88.7
887
T5035-7
sorghum
silage
small grain
10.79
14.4
155.38
1553.8
Total
61.86
654
6540

LI
June Solid Waste Application
Field
Crop
Prior
Useable
Rate/Acre
Total
Total
Crop
Acres
(Ton)
Application
PAN
(ton)
Utilized
T5064-1
Sorghum
Corn
23
14.4
331.2
3312
Silage
Silage
T5064-2
Sorghum
Corn
1.9
14.4
27.36
273.6
Silage
Silage
T5035-1
Sorghum
Corn
7.1
14.4
102.24
1022.4
Silage
Silage
T5035-4
Sorghum
Corn
5
14.4
72
720
Silage
Silage
T5035-5
Sorghum
Corn
2.46
14.4
35.42
354.2
Silage
Silage
T5035-9
Sorghum
Corn
8.6
14.4
123.84
1238.4
Silage
Silage
Total
48.06
692.06
6920.6

August Solid Waste Application
Field
Crop
Prior
Crop
Useable
Acres
Rate/
Acre
(ton)
Total
Application
(ton)
PAN
utilized
(lbs.)
T5035-10
Fescue
Fescue
3
10
30
300
T5035-9A
Fescue
Fescue
9
10
90
900
T5035-8
Fescue
Fescue
8.87
10
88.7
887
T5035-4A
Fescue
Fescue
9
10
90
900
T5035-3A
Orchard
grass
Orchard
grass
4
10
40
400
T5034-
1,2
Small
Grain
Corn
Silage
13.6
12
163.2
1632
T5034-3
Small
Grain
Corn
Silage
21.2
12
254.4
2544
T5034-4
Small
Grain
Corn
Silage
7.5
12
90
900
T5034-5
Small
Grain
Corn
Silage
3.4
12
40.8
408
Total
79.57
887.1
8871

0 0
October Solid Waste Application
Field
Crop
Prior Crop
Useable
Rate/Acre
Total
Total
Acres
Application
Pan
(ton)
Utilized
T5035-9
Small
Corn
8.6
12
103.2
1032
Grain
Silage
T5035-4
Small
Corn
5
12
60
600
Grain
Silage
T5035-1
Small
Corn
7.2
12
86.4
864
Grain
Silage
T5064-2
Small
Corn
1.9
12
22.8
228
Grain
Silage
T5064-1
Small
Corn
23
12
276
2760
Grain
Silage
Total
45.7
548.4
5484

0
0
December Solid Waste Application
Field
Crop
Prior
Useable
Rate/Acre
Total
Total
Crop
Acres
Application
PAN
(ton)
Utlilized
T5064-4
Small
Corn
18
12
216
2160
Grain
Silage
T5064-3
Small
Corn
7
12
84
840
Grain
Silage
T5446-1
Small
Corn
16.6
12
199.2
1992
Grain
Silage
T5446-2
Small
Corn
4.4
12
52.8
528
Grain
Silage
T5446-3
Small
Corn
2.65
12
31.8
318
Grain
Silage
Total
48.65
583.8
5838

.
Liquid
Waste Application
arch
Prior
Field
Crop
Crop Useable Ac
T5035-2
Corn
Small Grain 6.1
Silage
T5035-4
Corn
Small Grain 3.75
Silage
Total 9.85
0
Total PAN
Rate/Ac. Total Application Utilized
9600 gal 58,560 gal. 585.6
9600 gal 36,000 gal 360
94,560 gal 945.6
96 lbs. of N can be applied from liquid waste
96 X 1000 = 9600 gallon of liquid waste/acre
10
The total accumulation of waste in the holding pond over the 120 day period is
approximately 68,000 gallons.
68,000 gallons = 7.08 acres needed for application
9,600 gal./ac
Liquid Waste Application - July
Prior
Field Crop Crop Useable Ac
T5035-2 Sorghum Corn 6.1
Silage Silage
Total Pan
Rate/Ac. Total Application Utilized
14,400 gal 87,840 gal. 878.4
144 pounds of N can be applied from liquid waste.
144 x 1000 = 14,000 gallons fo liquid waste/acre
10
The total accumulation of waste in the holding pond over a 120 day period is
approximately 68,000 gallons.
68000 gallons = 4.8 acres needed for application
14000 gal/ac.
Liquid Waste Application - November
Prior
Field Crop Crop Useable Ac
T5035-2 Small Sorghum 6.1
Grain Silage
Total PAN
Rate/Ac. Total Application Utilized
12,000 gal 73,200 gal. 732
120 pounds of N can be applied from liquid waste.
120 x 1000 = 12,000 gallons of liquid waste/acre
10
The total accumulation of waste in the holding pond over the 120 day period
is approximately 68,000 gallons.
68,000 = 5.6 acres needed for application
12,000

4t, I.,
Exposure
4
"Jill,
0,
3XI
fi

,y
IF
ZA-
Pam,
it ��.: rf .. .___ .�•
v
't
Xr
"'I( x r I�`ris'Y, yd..�Y- V1•�?�•I � •�'( l y.'w��j•
AV
r j
t" t4
6
ES' .* � 1}
L.M,I,�t•�� '. j' " M1/'Y i'�<y �y� �' - �!_»+'� - -.d
9 `C. ,p tr< `' y;^Y . • ;� 'f'y ^I Lpc�tt�l 1► �i� y. f�
4v.t'+y�aa. Ti k .•fP'�»`l .¢r*y :,�<t, `;i}+�{•'�5� <�I /i�.rs '^v'�?JJ J1r yJ4._ h�pq
'1T� yiy,`,•�' ..�'.+t .i o 1 H 7< k�'{ x L, y- y7`�% .✓_-�..-`J yv�0/ � flr�•�y�L�f'aY^ I .�
R `
i 7!`•' ..�., t a. �-� � ' r � V t � �' ����.'�.,.���''r 'r�`9�. • , j��j w,.Nr"• \ Y•k'' f.l..l�� r
AW
{r°•. "v 'r. , •.r .'1 'N't y-a., ,.�',`,.y Y "yi ,+�,j d ✓, y`.
L i . ;;j-y.y..T .�,' • fir^ tqd 4 !•e r� � \ � • 2 •7'}'",?� ,
1 �xC • �� � � ,e,. 1
a 'dal, _ `��7 •' �}��6"��il - </1-/ "I I , _ 1L i t�+•�,, ► .:+.dl•, 6 �'<.
a'•45
Ail
•.' /'` �+'.a,t..,-��..+••e�r-�. }Jt�. t4��Y«+l/�*y..,rlriii /.� .'":'� 4��"'f ..�
# of
Exposure , ` ;s ,i
+rl: a . - <•'Lb � � ,, ik ' j' .Far rr� $
,�ry-��— � r.*:.y�; :..�llln,, "vt``aK • fs.. F��:-'''... � L�F' . ,'1 .

67B
vp-
30-5
so
.10B
13
6,D
03
c 13
222 17
14
sg,,5v
1.2 k K�o
V4
)F AGRICULTURE APPROX. SCALE SOIL SURVEY FIELD SHEET
'ION SERVICE .1 2000' SURRY COUNTY,, NORTH CAROLIN!
I -" G *IT" VS0A.SCS.FOAT WOR H I XAS ADVANCE COPY - SUBJECT TO CHANGE
.XPERIMENT STATION wvfv-1 .'T .1.1�

4 +,—
�e . J/ h� 1`W�yY,�-, ��� T.� 1 Tllc1.•'��� �� ,,,t�x ! a tt4 LL_i
.a4� � ��`. �''<b l-e�.t1. ta+/ 'Ft' �T.\ ea•, - �/: a oo '• t
4 - "a.?l—` N 1Ryy'ft L.'� 11 ;li'w� -i a.•'S..: MS 't N ttjl ..
�� � "' � � � td3Y1�T � '.r\'a , �, {,, R��} l}ya.�q`` ..'`��M!• 1 � -1 j.'. \ - ';��i}� \ t
•S 5, l a o t i ♦ i�.j n � a'ti �.• p,1� Cn 1 n ` � \_�.
�.�� 1 t S. ; ._r�4` e. t�;•��- r� irW't.�,:�/r;�t'tx sk_ � �l,l �V � �ti'. '\� v -"� ?����r ; L
�+� it ,+ n'� �5 ,\�— p1jlr • -
��..'+"y' -1 '�k ^ `. ' O..i '. •{qib. iT +. Z y,;
�!A-MR I a °:St V1I 4 1- R' V .... S i•�Y,;c� i-/i • ?J•2 ,�� '�'(�
ti
+ +�' Thl��'n �•t 1` ` •'Ir�4.`l 1. �6 wn� L 1T\Vv�.4 '�:
ljRt. _v t �,.�.c,h . .•t .'�.+ +tZ'i. '� � ..� r/. �yS'«� N i %'lY}is. 1 _
���•,�.A yay} -� • $ �`�"' � � � ?.�, a � „• �ti+' fir � ��� , ,:
w��,r{i�,+{� L �~i'i.lr1t2 (1 - ,�~l4.�{����:�.ba•a\ NNl �' 1 ]f � 4 1�1 � .::�� � � � r� 1
�ti.>J S� 'i'.t.tL,, i�•. \� �`+t.{ w .L'rti '� t�4[��r a i 7 �; - kv ¢•�.Ir.r
. t � ��. 1. � „ �} gi ��i" �+' �1�-�5..'i. Y. •�/}a' R.
�'Y 1. C W mCSsl3'`Q tv'I—Vr.'vii. �y, Is S':'.f; f
�`�`�`' 'F i ..� a • „ T+t%m �n t �'�A� ��.r DIY � ' S lflr+ !t♦1(t � 1/ � • • �Ct•f • . �_ �: 5.�� V,In,, '< •s kaa7 e.v ju. - V'��,.< q'i�. �,! W �� '.� r'b.:of .. `' , . IA�f,, .,4E•"IT
� ��%/+1 �lttt�`, `�`il � �ot�7 a`•i '. 4rVl_ ��i �� 1 � ��'�t�w
7• . ! r 1" �$t' ,` tq , . t �•r.{.�:r, ' V ti t�Zl s ! tSlril , 1 'yi ..^.. • ! `r� \ �-' . t s 1 4
C7fi,.'1ilyrlAp:.rj�>.
`kA'Cfp'C�Y^ {[ aI f°1'.Yi'1 f•.. , /
' 1- �/}.'L>3.' +tj•+ K4 t � S, , Jjff. �. 'i Y� � C t'``1"t ti� $ { aeyy t` ,s.. '
S �1Y � ti, '\�` • (({ ��iJ • A V. - i h l��t ••Y/�. Syy��++++1'r��' � 4".YS"' � w •J
4. ti a..r t a+ � �..• w a� i�� Cry _ i u jt � �-/ r��r. �t •t.�a �T 't1i t� Ys,`�v.�r / � A
lr`:s�t.i.! •,t as OmV= . J``*_`� .. .,� . "a�4{: it' �- ♦y'y, p py r� i�l.ca,��,. )};." / ..'- VI r L`
x .J d {` , Z.' .. 1. : •ti } [4 ' i a4: f i i 9t�.(/ =`.�Yf tt{t �'�� e �tn
~. rt a. ?, •AYE ^ '-�i�•-`lSh. ltir.f .`1.� ,I\"jif{� i/J�AY;a ai't�,•.� a.�y .�(i,` ' {'y�1QrW�e
YS.� . ] \ 'L b L }. J 1 ♦lm i( R ♦.
.` _.: /{jj�•,\ �V 't ;,'{I ] S` i'; W ' .: �r 1M ♦ �O{al�.,�i!(. ^:IpJ� i~Yr - 1.1
�'- tC ! ~y .ZC��', :. :..1 �yR��� Gtia; ✓rS {..! �..5 iakr as,�.•�r'h J:... �. c' `i LJi
>l:.�i�i�'i.- .L',� iv{K`.' �:• ,! . f.. A:1 �. �` 'a' ,' �. :i6��yt Z}�'{.rt+}. lti sSr v"'". i✓✓'' �.-. X�`'C .:pe

9
E-2
'Z U
r 47r M 306 36C
ol
If
-30'b
Pia C Onjp ol
le
tar
by -P
ATVAWCEr.
Ica 1000,
4i .......
it
la, 4

•a
t
��t�a r� to 's�/ �'irJ}�,� i`% I /• y+ - ; M/
Ij h�•Y 0� � JY 4 i� � 'tE'' �i�v x f� /'.
NY
i - �7 . ' R� r�Y� S "' � ,yi<�` tom. yr •��..lY ,. �.p. r Fy A'.
.•iy � +• '•yj dfybi � � '4� �.ti',"
. " �,, ,. ' • is �° � J J k 'C ��'�'. � " r
40
M 1•.: � ,�e��. 'i+r1r�•i �•'y'a ' /� .<"�t .y�` hr +�l h - Y:• � .,,• •r 'i� r �'V.
1,�Y�'""�+-�'��i > -t I'"�-'�. i tY�•� ^� Y'� ��te'�Cr • .•fit: �'4'� a�:
Y � r.L +'-y iM.,, j $81 �% rt,_4,a� s ♦ r ! T z1Fy •^ ` ! jr �
.. Ii1 1._ T— r%'^�i,`^.y�''7rJ4.��•��1"nx ��I ".��� w�i K„X� !• 1�.'�. i +(..�;,
of
a Exposuxre
'I .^?• , t j c %• �� � , •ram ' ,nr.� - _
j�ijJ� +� � \ �i�-' �r � i �� • R. �� bi%
, :err ^ � .: l -. •1� _ �..c ? .Ttr/,fF.+

/ 4
' •" pA{ � J�� '.t, �+fi $ fr '� any yja�w.ii
� 1 .l '�h Y •� r/1' 4 •�
qa � Off
• S R�'ie ° d RY rt . �R r P Y • �t : �1 r �!�+p9 5 ,
'� •] 1®•® ,vJ3t� ri v!e"r , \\.� tarv'�7 ,'�-�syC. •,N A, {„aTl
y Jl.yiiy e'h`W.
v t 1•: e�r,hRt�
T,j �y}.
Jf '•rfc. �'`M$ :: ry:b � i'(�� � ,'1 t i ,. � �'" rc ... a
2.
c
c r •4w_,...r. �xa�) �68� •�F. 'Y�^} r'�" 1 ewt ' t a ,~ - +�•,
30Qy uc vr. Y'z.>'i7'• t c� y r •.�_.._„•..,,r 'e
�.... 13:��e1�`e:i''{t,n,. •.+. r'��\ B��_..
%l 11 c•4 � ` 1. I � � �' 3�a '.
31p e i 1 A41�, l? b j 11 3 ��., a r 918
4:
L�, 315
J \ 30B
'a14,r,
JUp.
� HOC ,, r:� 11e y 3JB
30d
ly�o SU ! r /yV''r
as �.. tabu'/ /,� BA •fir w t is r J GY+:JC� 11b�3r.(,{�
sou 1/% `•�..a.`'t.
30c ZTIII '3p C^ 1 8 / U J r E 5. e.gUO
L �
7e i y.r ri rt e 4. to
Y _ .•3. .If•. rA 1 ;"f' +,� �arOl'; # Y t� o.. '^ 1 �d
the7,i +J`` 3 'i:v-•# 300 1 V j 1 C . 3OL uI ^J
r'Y OB
r�
O♦r^f 0
Z O •.(,` c; j, c 2p 4 Tu < 3nc_ 1113o C �/' rh
L 'r` S°nt\:. �e N
J
m 3Jn
•'/--
_ � <lEOG � fi .3g 3<�t,..` C/� rf �-,��3od�'ki r•o l-r \\' I �' tN :ti:' 130d ShI�'�.e�/ � U i
30L
:'' /3'. � ?. cF•>� t . :�` J ":h n .r tiir
i 30G '30 �` 9, � f'G�..k� j 1 snB t 4e�('%',�� � t'• e``
h ' 1'.' 1.r y1 c diL• UJ 'fir
CNIL. 1 ♦ /� 1
drM1's t"7\ � y a"� '. �•` AW ���
`1Eoa a3° d
_ .::.'!✓.'30� ,o c c 1Y... \ - 30C _l. � 30E g 1
APPROX. SCALE In = 20001 SOIL SURVEY FIELD SHEET
/ % SURRY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
TION USOASCS.FORT WORTH ruAS % ADVANCE COPY • SUBJECT TO CHANGE
'� wA cC+coMon co r, AcoaR u•T m. w •.0
•. •. nc o..rrcco •.o .. us+.•. uc co•.a,�co.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: Lawrence Horton - Maple Ridge Dairy
Location: 1174 Pine Ridge Rd, Mt Airy, NC 27030
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Dairy
Number of Animals: 200 cows
(Design Capacity)
Application Method(s): Solid Spreader and Travelling Irrigation System
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to
prevent pollution of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the
animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required
for the crops in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. You must have
the animal waste analyzed to determine nutrient content as close to the time of
application as practical and at least within 60 days of the date of application before
each application cycle. Soil nutrients in all fields where waste will be applied
must be analyzed at least annually so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for
realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Soil test and waste analysis records shall
be kept for five (5) years.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order
to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to insure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and
the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than
the crop can utilize. Lime must be applied to application fields as
recommended by soil test to maintain the plant uptake of nutrients.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates,
leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available water
holding capacities.
3. Animal waste shall be applied on land eroding at less than five tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding at
five or more tons but less than ten tons per acre per year providing
grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field.

•
4. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall,
or when the soil surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may
result in runoff to surface waters which is a violation of the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) .0200 regulations.
5. Wind conditions at the time of field application of waste should also
be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop production and to reduce
the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing
crop. Otherwise, apply waste no earlier than 30 days prior to
planting a crop or prior to forages breaking dormancy. Injecting or
otherwise incorporating animal waste below the soil surface will
conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
7. Zinc and copper levels in the soils in all fields where waste is applied
shall be monitored and alternative application fields shall be used
when these metals approach excess levels.
This plan is based on waste application by box spreader and travelling irri ag tion
system (method (s) of application) for this is the manner in which you have chosen
to apply your waste. If you choose to alter the method (s) of application in the
future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for various waste application
methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient
content for dairy (type operation) systems in North Carolina. Actual acreage
requirements shall be based on waste analysis reports from storage structures in
your waste management system.
Your waste dry stack (storage structure) is designed for 60 days of temporary
storage and the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
60 days. In no instance should the volume of waste being stored in your structure
be higher than the maximum storage marker except on the event of a 25 year - 24
hour storm.
Your waste storage pond (storage structure designed for parlor water) is designed
for 120 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must be removed on
the average of once every 3 months.

Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for
assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre to apply and the proper
application rate prior to applying the waste.
The waste management system which is covered by this waste utilization plan shall
be operated only by persons which hold a valid certificate as an operator in charge
of an animal waste management system.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance
with 15A NCAC2H.0217 (the .0200 rules) adopted by the Water Pollution Control
System Operator Certification Commission.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface
water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject to the assessment of civil
penalties of up to $10,000 per day per violation by the Division of Water
Quality for every day the discharge continues.
2. Follow the waste utilization plan on land that has been described in the plan
for receiving animal waste application.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet , but not exceed the Nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climate conditions, and level of management unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of application for other nutrients. Actual
yields may be used in lieu of realistic yield tables at discretion of the
planner.
4. Animal waste shall be applied on land eroding at less than five tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied on land that is eroding at five or more tons
but less than ten tons per acre per year providing grass filter strips are
installed where runoff leaves the field. (See NRCS Field Office Technical
Guide Standard 393--Filter Strips)
5. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events,
or when soil surface is frozen. When animal waste is to be applied on acres
subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste
may be broadcast, provided the application does not occur during a season
prone to flooding.
6. Wastes shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop
or forages breaking dormancy.
7. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface water.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.

0
9. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet to dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
10. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
rights -of -way.
11. Animal waste applied on grassed waterways shall be at agronomic rates and
in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site. Animal waste shall
not be applied on grassed waterways which discharge directly into water
courses.
12. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at
least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall
be the rate -determining element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall
be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals
approach excess levels.
13. Soil test and waste analysis .records shall be kept for five years.
14. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed soil infiltration rates.
No ponding shall occur.
15. A highly visible marker shall be installed to mark the maximum storage
volume for waste storage ponds. For waste treatment lagoons, highly
visible permanent markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage. Pumping shall be managed to maintain
the liquid level between the markers.
16. Records of waste application shall be maintained to establish actual
application rates. The records will include date of application, amount of
waste applied per acre by tract number and field number, most recent waste
analysis and soil test report, and the realistic yield expectation. (R.Y.E.)
nitrogen rate. Waste application records shall be maintained for five years.
17. Reduce hayland nitrogen rate by 25 percent on grassland being grazed when
applying animal waste.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which
will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.

0
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, etc. should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills.
20. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the
waste utilization plan when there is a change in the operation, number of
animals (an increase), method of utilization, or available land.
21. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets NC regulations.
North Carolina General Statute 106-403 requires that dead animals be
disposed of within 24 hours in a manner approved by the state veterinarian.
22. Insect control and odor control checklists shall be included as well as an
Emergency Action Plan.

lJ
WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
Maple Ridge Dairy Farm
Operation:
This animal waste management system consist of th following components:
1. Contaminated liquid storage pond
2. Three dry stacks (all ajoined) for solids
3. Irrigation System
4. Solids Spreader System
All waste is scraped daily into the dry stacks which are designed for 200 cows with storage
for 66 days. There is also a waste storage pond which catches the parlor water. The liquid
storage pond has storage for 120 days. The waste from the dry stacks is land applied using a
box spreader and the liquid waste is irrigated.
This Animal Waste Management System is designed to prevent discharge of animal waste
contaminates to surface waters from the 25 year-24 hour storm, as required under the non -
discharge regulations.
Proper liquid management should be a year-round priority for storage ponds. It is important
to manage levels so that you do not have problems during extended rainy and wet periods.
Maximum storage capacity of the dry stacks as well as liquid holding ponds should be
available for periods when there are extended rainy spells.
The level of management for the entire system will determine the service life of the waste
storage pond and dry stacks. Once the solids have reached the waste storage pond, how
effectively the waste is agitated will determine the amount of solids which remain in the
waste storage pond.
Over time it is expected that some solids will accumulate in the waste storage pond. The
accumulated solids should not reduce the usable capacity of the waste storage pond to a
point, which requires removal of the solids for many years if adequate lot scraping and waste
agitation is maintained. In contrast, poor management will result in rapid accumulation of
solids, which will reduce the usable capacity of the waste storage pond to the point that some
form of dredging will be required. If removal of sludge is required at any time, samples
should be taken for analysis and waste should be applied agronomically. Applications of
sludge also increase the amount of odor and extra precautions should be taken to reduce
odors.

0
MAINTENANCE
Routine maintenance of a waste storage pond is necessary to ensure the structure does not
erode, weaken, or otherwise allow the wastes to leak or discharge. Routine maintenance
involves the following:
Maintenance of a vegetative cover for the dam. The dam should be mowed at least
annually. Mowing operations must take place only when the soil of the dam is dry
and vegetation should not be mowed to a height of less than four (4) inches at any
time.
Brush and trees on the embankment must be controlled.
All equipment should be checked and maintained properly.
You should inspect around the waste storage pond (embankment) frequently and look for
settlement, cracking, or holes, side slope stability, wet or damp areas on the back slope,
erosion due to lack of vegetation and rodent and tree damage. Any of these features could
weaken the dam and should be fixed immediately.
Routine maintenance of the dry stack should be done periodically and is necessary to ensure
the walls are not weakened allowing waste to discharge.

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWO [phone]
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 911
SWCD 386-8109
NRCS 386-8109
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or
leave your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to
ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for all
employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may.or may not be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
b. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
C. Call a pumping contractor.
d. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B. Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
C. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C. Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -actions include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
C. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D. Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -actions include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
C. Make sure nosiphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.

0 •
E. Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to
flowing leaks -possible actions:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all
seepage, put in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and
fill holes and compact with a clay type soil.
C. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
C. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3. Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality)
regional office; Phone [phone]. After hours, emergency number: 1-
800-858-0368. Your phone call should include: Your name, facility,
telephone number, the details of the incident from item 2 above, the exact
location of the facility, the location or direction of movement of the spill,
weather and wind conditions, the corrective measures that have been
undertaken, and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves the property or enters surface waters, call local EMS phone
number, 835-6113.
C. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number 679-2061, local SWCD office phone number
386-8109, and local NRCS office for advice/technical assistance; phone
number 386-8109.
4. If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriff's Department and explain your
problem to them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5. Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off -site
damage.
a. Contractor's Name: Lawrence Horton
b. Contractor's Address: 646 Pine Ridee Rd , Mt Airy NC 27030
C. Contractor's Phone: [phone]

0
u
6. Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (NRCS, Consulting Engineer,
etc.)
a. Name: J. R. Everhart
b. Phone: [phone]
7. Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify
the damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep
problems with release of wastes from happening again.

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source
Cause
BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead
•
Dairy production
O Vegetative or wooded buffers
MrlRecommended best management practices
CYGood judgment and common sense
Paved lots or barn
•
Wet manure -covered
EI�Scrape or flush daily
alley surfaces
surfaces
9--p-romote drying with proper ventilation
Erkoutine checks and maintenance on waterers,
hydrants, pipes, stock tanks
Bedded areas
•
Urine
&�Promote drying with proper ventilation
Mr ,' eplace wet or manure -covered bedding
•
Partial microbial
decomposition
Manure dry stacks
•
Partial microbial
Provide liquid drainage for stored manure
decomposition
Storage tank or
•
Partial microbial
O Bottom or mid -level loading
basin surface
decomposition
O Tank covers
•
Mixing while filling
O Basin surface mats of solids
•
Agitation when emptying
O Minimize lot runoff and liquid additions
O Agitate only prior to manure removal
O Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin
•
Partial microbial
O Liquid drainage from settled solids
surfaces
decomposition
O Remove solids regularly
• Mixing while filling
• Agitation when emptying
Manure, slurry, or • Agitation when spreading O Soil injection of slurry/sludges
sludge spreader . Volatile gas emissions O Wash residual manure from spreader afteruse
outlets O Proven biological additives or oxidants
AMOC - November 11, 1996, page 1

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Uncovered manure, Volatile gas emissions while O Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slurry, or sludge on drying 0 Soil incorporation within 48 hours
field surfaces 9"S-pread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
O Proven biological additives or oxidants
Flush tanks • Agitation of recycled lagoon
liquid while tanks are filling
Outside drain • Agitation during wastewater
collection or junction conveyance
boxes
Lift stations • Agitation during sump tank
filling and drawdown
0 Flush tank covers
O Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with
anti -siphon vents
O Box covers
0 Sump tank covers
End of drainpipes at • Agitation during wastewater O Extend discharge point of pipes undemeatn
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces • Volatile gas emission O Proper lagoon liquid capacity
• Biological mixing 0 Correct lagoon startup procedures
• Agitation O Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio
Cl Minimum agitation when pumping
0 Mechanical aeration •
0 Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler • High pressure agitation O Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind
nozzles • Wind drift 0 Minimum recommended operating procedure
0 Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface
0 Pump from second -stage lagoon
0 Flush residual manure from pipes at end of
slurry/sludge pumpings
AMOC - November 11, 1996, page 2

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
rnimp BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Dead animals • Carcass decomposition i J"Proper disposition of carcasses
Standing water • Improper drainage Er Grade and landscape such that water drains away
around facilities . Microbial decomposition of from facilities
organic matter
Mud tracked onto • Poorly maintained access B'Farm access road maintenance
public roads from roads
farm access
Additional Information: Available From:
Cattle Manure Management; .0200 Rule/BMP Packet NCSU, County Extension Center
Dairy Educational Unit Manure Management System— Lake Wheeler Road Field Laboratory; EBAID9-95 NCSU— BAE
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83 NCSU— BAE
Management of Dairy Wastewater; EBAE 106-83 NCSU— BAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings
NCSU— BAE
Florida Cooperative Extension
0
AMOC - November 11, 1996, page 3

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Liquid Systems
Flush gutters • Accumulation of solids Cl Flush system is designed and operated sufficiently
to remove accumulated solids from gutters as
designed
O Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
Lagoons and pits Crusted solids O Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the crusting
of solids to a depth of no more than 6 to 8 inches
over more than 30 percent of surface
Excessive vegetative • Decaying vegetation Maintain vegetative control along banks of
growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter along
water§ edge on impoundment'; perimeter.
Feeders
• Feed spillage
Design, operate, and maintain feed systems
(e.g., bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
� /accumulation of decaying wastage
L3 Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g.,7- to 10-
day interval during summer; 15 to 30-day interval
during winter)
•
AMIC - November 11, 1996, page 1

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause z BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Feed storage Accumulations of feed Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
residues immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
ensuring drainage is away from site and/or providing
adequate containment (e.g., covered bin for
brewer§ grain and similar high moisture grain
products)
O Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as needed
Animal holding areas Accumulations of animal Ef Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along fences
wastes and feed wastage and other locations where waste accumulates and
disturbance by animals is minimal
i-Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal
holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes
(i.e., inspect for and remove or break up
accumulated solids as needed)
Dry manure handling • Accumulations of animal Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g.,
systems wastes 7- to 10-day interval during summer; 15 to 30-day
interval during winter) where manure is loaded for
land application or disposal
EVProvide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles i
O Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and manure
handling areas as needed
For more information contact:
Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7613.
AMIC - November 11, 1996, page 2

•
E
Mortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
❑ Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
❑ Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
❑ Complete incineration
❑ In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
December 18, 1996

0
Dairy Waste Utilization - Third Party Applicator Agreement
I, "` ,L JXj4,�44 hereby acknowledge that I have
received a copy, have read and understand the Waste
Utilization Plan dated /llar�ti 16, /^4N that wa/s/ developed
/��
for/by /�'/ ple �dar_ 100 ig iy / as CII/_1 ;/ �1,
in �kr r County.
I hereby agree to manage and land apply the dairy waste
from this facility in a manner consistent with the
requirements of this Waste Utilization Plan and keep
copies of all required records as specified in the plan.
Third Party Applicator: Date:
Waste Producer: r%/�l��y �/y_ Date:
Technical Representative: Date: 0 3 a.
Term of Agreement: o , 19 98 to /� z t �� 31
-a-f a O 1 d .

LW
0
rt"m
0
aMAYV AKA
F�->A
p vill IOQ
' x� ;N`` ,.-j' i
. A
f lrl ;4.
'
l r w .
aMAo< vaAK >D TQ d O/M bN. 11,0 . 1n Ac n
�IaMQ VaJI[ TY MAL lJaO QXV. W . 6! . ft .DIAK a. f I
Al3lM
FrAm" rw W m Ta Or nw SXVAT . m
KMCI TIP OF W n 1=1 . Tu
M X I —n Lr, O aiVATM • W
WITOI V A t ttaM¢ IN MVAT= . au
®SOIL INVESTIGATION SITES Nl > #10
wmVAT
u,
120 0 120 240 360
s
Scale, l' = 120'
Maple Ridge Dairy ita� —.� Apr r a �M
Sorry County, North Carolina „� ON WW T o ,..
Plan View of New Facilities (Planned Contours)
Planned Waste Storage Pond (Planned Contours)
O�U A
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE

Q
cr s
r ,
aqpj—
te— !, ` f J
Ps.�ar�i�•'`�. `� Moores Fork `k
jet Ny\
r .<t f� i yfr���f, \Y1. II ,i\3. "k ,t� ,/x'•1 I j? S � s.,�5 ti '� r y
��. i. � �f 4•� r�+rj5 i.dl �,�f r?"+r>.�♦ � t �; y_ iy .x,r���.t;,c4 ����Y�t ;���� � 1 ,� � f
'.� �:� � � . t � }+��> ;'>,ti♦e3 �.(, ��s, �� � i� o'a �;tn'ct"� � �,`'ry[ +fi�i � .�. �;
' r. `, 1 >� , 1 � V l•' � l , ti SI !:.-. t /' it r __ �. I �
a 'Isl I�,�. r''s� 7- 4SR..,.• �'�r '� i .�j,/ >, #•j /a, ,t J
�� ..1, ✓'AJ -. .# a .S��.i ♦{ w /{�"� + I� �� �ij.. bYh i 57♦, t,�+).' ik o�`
ro O ., r• ! Trr �j , . .♦. ✓'r T. / ron Ra u'M'
'y --' � 1iy7i• �� tiC ♦�.fY �' a�:tr ✓' �... / 1 ��� ,YA,
���, I,�/�♦ >ti ) � .il�i•.. ?a, �"f'/�/�i' �
� s�, ��t *•'.h �. 4 ♦t 1�,1., r•�d. 'y ,� � i �i�>' �r+��i(+!r)•'�{ �r �'yYrt +' Ilv.`/�� f
m _ a � rt �, _ ..+�'� ,y,� ♦ t �� . � �.' �,.`-'4„i ,5; �lrJt \l� r � x . � 3 �, 1 r + •�'+
r "^ �j•i((.�i )),t{l �t + �Q ���: + i ii X +/ tl.- •i fY"S \ \
VV
�er�l•)JJ'� ,r� �+r�Si 1 t� � ♦��Y ri i � �.W _ ��//(,�, -{ V rY+f.,� � y � 3 i t
j .:, t�.. try -0(i~ ✓,. if 'Q 1 _. �`,�`'��� �i � 'a
>�t00TE M'V NO ioalrs� ';'. r �.�/ .4 't. i _''� i' Yr .-4,

(")
Maple Ridge Farms
oan: sae�r�kscl:
PO kq
—rWarWMwPycro
SoArIVIMY
. rnrprmwcnran
rWAIDmhM
e f!M
r WYa&4dY
M

Daniel Horton [[e-mail]]
Wednesday, October 31, 2012 8:56 AM
Mitchell, Patrick
Pumping info
pumping info.10 10 12.pdf
Here is the pumping infro you needed. I used elevations from Surry County tax maps in my chart.
`Base elevation
1250' at lagoon
psi
needed
Field ID
Elevation
Elevation Change
psi change
500gpm
700gpm
800gpm
5035-1
1300'
+50'
+22
92
153
169
5035-2
1280'
+30'
+13
83
144
160
5035-4
1270'
+20'
+9
79
140
156
5035-9
1300'
+50'
+22
92
153
169
5446-1
1210'
-40'
-17
53
114
130
5446-2
1190,
-50'
-26
44
105
121
5446-3
1190,
-50'
-26
44
105
121
5064-1
1210'
-40'
-17
53
114
130

www.midatianticag.com
customer Information:
Mid -Atlantic AgriSystems
1106 Ashville Rd.
Quarryville, PA 17566
1-800-222-2948
717-529-2782
(FAX) 717-529-3137
Worksheet
Date: 10 / 10 / 12
Ross E.Johnson
(610) 563 — 6196 cell
Billin''tidilress .
Company:
e Farm
Name:
Daniel Horton
Name:
Address:
Address:
City/State/Zip
City/Statel
E-mail:
E-mall :
Phone:
Phone:
i , q e '+ ,�}i i f/i .v �'l J4���,. Ir i lid'{I �y x1 Jr
xi�• �Id �tyiV�
Equipment being used
Houle 15" 6 blade pump: 150 max. pressure; 350' hd , 1200 gpm max. cap.
Hobbs 4" x 1,250' hose
1,320' of 6" hose
(?) feet of 6" pvc pipe
3-pt. hitch applicator with 4" swing arm and multiple drop hoses
** Zero feet of elevation change used in calculations below
500 gpm through 4" x 1,250' of hose
142' of head
500 gpm through 1,320' of 6" hose ; .01584 per ft. of pvc pipe or hose...
20.91' head
162.91 'head
Total :
70.52 si
700 gpm through 4" x 1,250' of hose
265.42' of head
700 gpm through 1,320' of 6" hose ; .02952 per ft. of pvc pipe or hose...
38.97 head
304.39' head
Total :
131.77 psi
** Every 2.31' of elevation difference adds / subtracts 1 psi
Force — feeding pressure pump with agitator pump adds 15psi +/- to discharge
pressure
3-pt. applicator requires only 25 psi +/- to operate
800 gpm increases psi needed in 4" hose to 147
** Limiting factor for maximum gpm will always be the 4" hose

w\!/'/t �'�w�w ..l;�Y i�"�._� ''"."..\rtv ^t.•.. I♦_t '`1♦v. ..r ..
.t f`J \~t'\1r.a/_w It _r♦r!\t•�.��•s�♦r \rt wt/,r't`rt ♦�\l�r`/�f••L.\r �t�+�`�♦�/t_�,��1'1`Iw\f\^t"r\-\J \i,,
!�^' /4\r♦tf �1 Y.. �!♦/.{`tJr.i•.t it.-"t-\\„�t�IN ♦ty Jr./,.fit\%t,l\=w4'„/:'.t\r/,.f \r♦t _.�t♦
'�- f/��? ���, IJ\l tlltf t\r ,.• 4 ��./\'� ! .11,'t'f! �ti r`�,�`w ��r, }/...flt^,< I`�_rJ.lr..l.,f.r•,JJ I` "rt i J\ t �rL'•f,. •-
.rf�r/\�w ♦ ♦ !\ t_..\\J �`w t\I writ tw jta\ t -'t V\-" /-.\t\� _r\`I ;r~\ _,rj'I/ y^r / N. /:\
.- !w? �rrl/t •.t/\'t\ `I t^yV \ /'r I,rt'f 1' I\j}f/\ ri \ 1 t •.:""t♦ rifl,�w\ t ! \ Ir wr /t 11 /tw ,J l_ 1....% ,t... l
♦yi`t^f ylt Jt.r .11'f r1ft�^rt ,!♦!`t/\I�11Ne
+. ..tirl\_l,,,Fi fJ'�1 �.^4+\larti!,`1�t \41w I.,it!\/♦I,.^,f aj \t t^
�t :l: ♦ri\?14-fM111`iwl .t_/Ir /wt_-^.r.'fil�ylrt ��f:rtw\t+,tr!I♦1t�\yft: �•�♦�.1\!.t _`,�w'-i'f�♦ �wt�
i N/ 4 f t _. r ♦ I r \! . i ` ♦ r : 1 ..1 L� i / f \ j ,..♦ ^f. i \/ 1 `• I " AN
� J \ V' . i x`. , r ^' I \ - t J \` I � \- � � \ „♦I „ ••` r 1 �„\ / I
��:.!,tri\!� ii rt"`.f\f r1'/I♦1•: i`I r�wr ♦r\',r-;...`'/j�1/♦'I♦'♦it�tw,i l~Y +♦I.L`i \/♦t �'L.�l._ I
1r1+\� fl1 1'"`/Ij t.. •- ."1/w!♦ t �yt t \ wf t^ t!r ♦ .h"♦1w wt_17w , t
/\.. ,,/♦~lw.,,ti +. ..1\/? l �f`-. ..rl .. .. `,f tF` 1�..\♦J�.'ti\1\ ♦t
•!i'r :.,�+!-•'♦! \/ \"4't`ii /ly rJ. rt �r �:`I, �.\�f`! ! J..t"�'�fi4f tlrtk/i ����\i-/�r��••-: /J �`�\+r`'f.. �r♦!•fY tit flfl.
t ♦ \ /_ J t \ / 5 ♦. / ^ / 4 ! I . (.' 1` 1 ♦ l `" + I I _"' 1 ♦ t -. t ♦ .. J w \ , t...
1 rim/j_l _ -.( J ,. `/`rl `'.`+-` `,.i ...t .t.(, l.t`~'"rt�.. ..f� ..r.. J-.Iw r•.t /\•t. j\� f. I tL- I
tit♦/ fF.♦. Ir\'♦/_itl lw'v'..'i♦.+� ✓`t�+*i.rt-^'' `.%: \I•.i Jr'•f '�',a \ l
4-f \'t Iv 1'r-.. I�Iw , / •t I' r •'' i \1 r w \♦ I ./.,^+ F`. ! '",!.`` rt� t\ w \I ` ,'`f.�t
, ,.. ,� i I • \ I .. I ` 1 .. \ I ,. i / i A \
it .,.f�J1 -/-,J ♦/%Ifs ;=Jwr�+`i'•t.! 11 \�{..\'/\1\/ rl/♦//i!t !�'l�.l l♦",!-..r rt-. `i _ ♦r�r rl.. .mil
L y l J/\ •' y l+ !♦ r 1/ r a J .._ J t/ t` 4 t , l t y i /\/ r r` .J ♦ 1 -?-, tfi
i\ll r` t
1' I.II w�.r \r t.-i'-♦ \
^' J t ISdtU ab��t U! d /\-4,L-\1 t .w'-t%f' t+♦rw rt r.
w •1 � '� �ti�I �, }9rq .Q(rp(y �/1 f��t l/\ w-
1 \�f �r., ,. J. -. 7 � J - I- '' i / C ✓+'�I , \ r ♦ , t ,...
.'' tv tit f \� YS.. .� �(`.'- rwwt: w,l ..I `.••-1 /I� , \1\el♦ J f ♦w4 '^l wl\..•. w/t. r.-^ I \ r l `. ! _!-...J f .�i.... r`r.i' 1 �j:
V'+ 1t- ,-♦ tt// \\ lw I/_;(`!+"11 \_.- \f\/\"'tom `/\! f\J; \-tl _t •.J `i♦+♦J 4"�.`5i1L r♦♦,\
-IYw l,- 1./t/ .. 4w ,!♦-.i t'`„r-ti` e.,lr Il.tti�(\ tom/ l/\'� ar 4,. ♦r 1\/4 �t_!r ✓.. t! f-two t� wwl ♦1,.J ^'\„ i
5/ If♦nlwJt..lst'.I- /t ��8 11IbIS dX.'`w \., {r t \r 1.1-,�I♦tr rl.tt..t_ .`fw_ •.r�, r
I"r�''/ r". , t' ;t ,wC -Sr`! W 3_ , . y.. J. .• ,-t....\\'t . `..f r \"� iw
,, / i �!i �.^--•+1..5 r, Ir 1 i\t f,, f\f r/\w 1'♦/\/ 4- /� 1., t._�_I I r /"- / ✓ ,.'
ddoaj nW/OjgS-�I7T4Nr�♦�tti111 ♦wJ \J�•l l`tf1t,`wtll~f•�t,_4� j♦,
i\f\r\I�!`/``•4^^rl,.i"'/.rl'Irt;jl�l`JttfiMr(41.\,tc �i`t f_\t.\/.��t
.r tr\1/t1`/lr♦f M711\''rl� "" �fti ._�tl�i.�lw\t .\ �\ J!\/i\ji\r\♦/t".1 1�/l,/ 41 .—r \�.../`
t�\t.t/\�1✓\(_tJtr if\` -I rf ^,'+.,1+.! UW1 }w ,1] n tL i!\tl i\yJ\.r /\irtlrt_.f\\1 J,
♦" t 1 \ ti. \ 1♦I.. \ ` '♦.. 4 �^ r�r_���� �V�����tSG�\ r1 _. I I .1 rr•,-,.J^Ir 't \ w..l,• / - J rtr
4♦\t\�.'..1'1/I" `' t fl \ \l-'4'•�4.�-1 �7 ll"\,.tom f�tr t
.titrl,•1`t�r3�`��t\rtr'lr ltft i1/l l"'./511"f ~5`^!4. ~!/ / t,klltf5?/\I^I,'t5 rlr - N�ir
o(
\i...•-. i.,.I '.rL'/ \/-..t\5`\,.,I ...4., I\I\�\f{ \1{rs
-N,\i `•. ;: i �Ir It tI\'tl t� IN '1-4/\'i.' �i 1f' ;\�aJ4r5 ti�t�.l '4- tYr r%-I wi
l ../ '^!� `,.. r f r \ t'"\,./ 4�{\'1 ♦'-1 Lr4 \`'!-..t �i r i f " tJw'r4rt
r•I` tl ,r..i !mot t. t -•4 !. r I '"-'r ,, tl ..1 t ti1.'tt 1�`�'4�t ..\
i +\ .` r♦ '. i! 1 ., t: \ N 1 it ^ \r l t t IN tw \ r; / \I l t i �r t 4 L J_ t 1/ r l.-•ire ti. i .. / L I - i\ \' I I.
\\r .,w I\i i1 .-4 t`.,i t/4--t♦J /,7;r I�!4" f\,r`- !r ,�!I :•1
45,1ly ♦I ,.i t^f L.±1_l�./;�.•Ii 4'.li�;'""r\If�jyJ\li {.l+t l5../i--..-.^i♦
`t,.twtiiil'I;JNJ\t\-^t/�t,.\,I~I~ 1r4 �4.1'-ty.11-'„ 4"`4`\`�1-t4 r•.`tJ/♦i!`I'\J
t'\; Jillr i,..-L,:`�\ r�1. 1^ir�Lf-1/ 1 t-....l 1,'r - i \ie 4!\ Yr
,I !� 4♦l _' .1*i1J\Jir 4-�'_Na�t !nb uI C�-Il. C�t/:Ia LMB#SA t t�51`-/t�5t--
rYr!\1 t I\/ \ t I,f r 1'.•Iw \.\?' ♦11\t -tw
i ,.I NJ 1\ r t `tit.\.� ,. 1111U�,/:r a.lh 5 + / _t'1 !,,_\/,w` ♦..r i.
_{`' f r!� V r� t' �aJO]�,1501 t?�glie, -jala-\% t
\., l ♦t\Il +.t\\4J'"`" t\"rrt ..J. ' /1-'t lr�4 _\� yl? `� \I r4'-1♦r !.!.5^1-..;•r'\t'"
r\r_fi,♦Ir♦.+..\ I\♦'i \'L.-/ Ji 14 ! .+i.•t\ _5_J_\_.� �fr 4l .^f?-_.11.. _\! r/ '.w t.-•„r
t/~t- t \ I ♦1�5 t!J + �.lr\! ` ti\ ±L 7.,, \ft`\7 ,t.L r \ ♦i '� f\_-.�! ��� \ ;r\ 4J LYIl\t , ♦/^\ \ J 1 I \; ��I� t/i \ ft^ ire
I- 1 w\ \}♦ // J i' \ 4. t "\ „ t_ J 1 J\ i
vl'♦.' i\y% i ~ i It tl \'iw.!»tl \t \"^17 ` 1\1 \ \+"r 4�\' 4 \r\ t \! if-.v t+•�`-r I t/ �rV \ftir4i. rl`..J\1
tr\rt 5'1 �.w",, ^I`!\i..\-'♦ \- ~fir \ '.\!irlf f i 1 L -�1_••f`r4/•. ,,r4_•t t� ♦r'.t 5!t
r'trI .-\♦/ /_-!t:\i♦1lt it !_\t \f`. '. \1 _�1 / L�
t"'~1♦I"71.1^"ti'^\f .,t lt\!\r 1,.'litt rl' ift r� i� J_ `/�._\r--aJ-I..Jry.ir l��t.•t.•5rtl,l 5/1\
^.t♦/art\ -.I" . \t i / it 4^•\I_\ f�'LI ..\�_fl,-\''... Jt..I J'``f •-,. r' -/" _I:t
.Ir\.r _f-'\tJ _'\"tr,w t..1 /4..._\r'.. /..I :\/� t�Jt..,�rtl ♦i f\ rt .•+I.,

Field Calibration Procedures for Animal
Wastewater Application Equipment
HOSE -DRAG Hose -drag -type equipment has gained popularity in recent years for land
Wastewater application of wastewater' in North Carolina. It offers several advantages
Equipment over traditional irrigation systems including odor reduction, nitrogen
conservation, and a relatively high flow rate that cuts the application time.
Hose -drag systems may also be used to apply wastewater to areas not ac-
cessible by traditional irrigation equipment. For more details on hose drag
systems including tables of application depths for various tractor speeds and
equipment widths refer to Extension publication AG-634, Hose Drag Systems
for Land Application of Liquid Manure and Wastewater.
State law requires field calibration of all land application equipment used
on animal production farms. Specialists certifying animal waste manage-
ment plans must also certify that operators have been provided calibration
and adjustment guidance for all land application equipment.
1 Wastewater in this publication refers to both liquid manure and municipal and industrial wastewater.
General Guidelines their discharge points. Since these two basic types
Several factors determine the distribution of liquid of hose -drag units should be operated with different
wastewater from hose -drag land application equip- overlap, application rates will differ depending upon
ment: E the overlap or "effective application width chosen
by the operator.
• flow rate-
• operating pressure
• the speed of the tractor pulling the unit
• overlap of adjacent passes made by the equip-
ment
This publication explains calibration procedures
for the "low -profile -type" discharge system (Figure
1) and a "boom -type" system. (Figure 2). The two
systems have different spread patterns. The low -
profile -type units discharge close to the ground
either through hooded shrouds or splash plates
and do not spread much beyond their physical
width. They are normally run "edge to edge" in
adjacent passes. Boom -type units discharge from
a slightly higher elevation under slightly more
pressure. Wastewater goes substantially beyond
Figure 1. Hose drag application unit (low -profile -
type).

Figure 2. Hose drag (boom -type) unit is shown in
these two photos.
HOSE -DRAG
WASTEWATER EQUIPMENT
Average application depth in inches can be ob-
tained using:
Equation 1:
Depth= Flow rate in gallons per minute
54.9 x Effective width in feet x Tractor speed in miles per hour
The effective width is the distance between the
centerlines of adjacent passes of the unit. For "low -
profile -type" units, the effective width is essentially the
advertised size of the hose drag systems. Typical widths
for these systems are 8, 10, 12, 15, and 20 feet. Tables
showing applied depth for low -profile -type units of the
above listed widths can be found in Table 1.
For boom -type units, the effective width is deter.
mined in the field by measuring the distance between
centerlines of adjacent passes of the unit. Convert
depths obtained from the equation above or to gal-
lons per acre by multiplying by 27,154.
Once the application depth has been determined,
the tractor speed may need to be adjusted to meet
requirements in the waste utilization plan. To find
the tractor speed in miles per hour required to apply a
desired application depth, use:
Equation 2:
Speed = Flow rate in gallons per minute
54.9 x Application depth in inches x Effective width in feet
The calibration of hose -drag -type equipment
involves;.- ,-: ti- awed
2. Measuring flow rate to the equipment.
3. Establishing the effective application width.
4. Measuring the wetted width of a single pass, and
of two adjacent passes for boom -type units in
order to establish an effective width. The wetted
width of boom -type units can vary with boom
height, nozzle pressure, and with adjustment of
splash -plate angle if so equipped.
S. Figuring the average application depth.
6. Comparing the average application depth to the
depth allowed in the waste utilization plan. Vari-
ables (usually tractor speed) are adjusted as needed
so that actual application depth does not exceed
the allowed depth in the approved plan.
than 0.75 inch during any given application. Limits
set by the waste utilization plan and existing soil
moisture conditions will determine maximum ap-
plication depths.
Flow rates are determined from a flow meter that
may be permanently mounted on the hose -drag unit
upstream of the distribution box or manifold, or
temporarily placed inline with the hose supplying the
hose -drag unit. If using a hose reel with a temporar-
ily placed meter, position the flow meter between the
hydrant and the reel.

Field Procedure
The field procedure consists of 1) measuring tractor
,speed, 2) measuring flow rate, and 3) for boom -type
systems, measuring effective width. Enter collected in-
formation into the appropriate field data sheet (Figure
5 for low -profile type units and Figure 6 for boom -type
units).
Determining Tractor. Speed, S
(See Figure 3)
(You will need flags, a stop watch or watch with sec-
ond hand, and a tape measure or measuring wheel).
Repeat steps 2 through 4 below and average the two
measured speeds.
1. Measure a distance over a relatively flat area where
application will occur. A minimum distance of 100
feet is recommended. Set flags at each end.
2. Operate tractor with unit and hose attached, but
no wastewater being discharged, to establish a
targeted speed. Record gear range and gear, throttle
setting (rpm), and speedometer reading (if tractor
has a speedometer).
3. Record the time is takes for the unit to cover the
distance established in step 1. Make sure to start
and stop your watch at either end of the run at a
common point of reference on the unit, such as
when the front axle of the tractor passes the flag.
4. Calculate tractor speed. Tractor speed in miles per
hour can be calculated by using:
0
TT
t
Equation 3:
Distance in feet
Seconds it takes to cover distance x 1.47
If you use a distance of 100 feet, get tractor speed
by dividing 68.18 by the seconds it takes to cover 100
feet.
Determining Flow Rate, Q:
(You will need a flow meter and a stop watch or
watch with a second hand.)
Determine flow rate by either 1) recording the in-
stantaneous flow rate or 2) by using the flow totalizer
and elapsed time. Measure flow rate with the unit in
motion to avoid over -application and after determin-
ing tractor speed as outlined in the previous section.
1. Run the system in motion until all air is out of
the mainline and hose, and the flow rate has been
stabilized as shown by the flow rate needle or the
digital readout on flowmeter. If a hose reel is used
to supply wastewater, record the pressure at the
reel. if a reel is not used, record the pressure at the
pump.
2a. Record instantaneous flow rate in gallons per min-
ute (gpm).
OR
2b. Subtract beginning flow totalizer reading from
ending flow totalizer reading for a time period not
less than 15 minutes. Convert to gpm by dividing
Record time (T), sec. to
travel distance (L) ft.
1
Figure 3. When determining tractor speed, travel distance (L) should be at least 100 feet.

the totalizer, make sure to note the value of the
last (farthest right) digit. Often this digit indicates
hundreds of gallons, in which case the totalizer
number needs to be multiplied by 100.
Note: Step 2b should be used rather than 2a if
the instantaneous flow rate varies by more than 10
percent after all the air has been purged from the sys-
tem and the flow has stabilized. For flow meters with
needles (normally propeller -type), this is indicated by
a "bouncing" needle.
Determining Effective Width, We (See
Figures 4a, 4b, and 4c):
(You will need flags and a tape measure or measur-
ing wheel.)
Low -profile —type units
For "low -profile" -type units (Figure 1 and Figure
4a) operated with little to no overlap (edge -to -edge),
simply record the advertised width. This width is
roughly the width of the unit.
Boom -type units
It is not as easy to determine the effective width
for boom -type units (Figures 2, 4b, and 4c). To
achieve consistent application uniformity between
adjacent passes, the distance between the nozzles in
adjacent passes should be the same as the fixed dis-
tance between the nozzles on the boom. This requir
("N" in Figure 4b) . For the case with two nozzles the
effective width should be 2 x N . If the field mea-
sured effective width calculated in the following steps
differs by more than 15 percent of this target value,
adjust the pass distance.
For boom -type units, the wetted widths measured
in step 2 will depend upon nozzle pressure, boom
height, and angle of the splash plates. If boom height
and splash plate angle are adjustable, make note of
these settings as an adjustment will alter the wet-
ted width and, therefore, the calibration. Boom -type
units may also be subject to drift, so calibration of
these units should be done in wind speeds of 5 mph
or less.
HOSE -DRAG
WASTEWATER EQUIPMENT
1. Measure the distance between the fixed nozzles.
Multiply this distance by the number of nozzles
on the boom to obtain the target effective width.
2. For boom -type units (see Figure 2 and Figure 4b)
that spread wastewater an appreciable distance
from the nozzle:
a. Measure the wetted width of a single pass (Wm )
b. Measure the wetted width of two adjacent passes
(W2m)
Repeat steps 2a. and 2b. twice for a total of three
measurements each. Take these measurements at least
25 feet from each other, and average both wetted
width measurements.
The effective width (We) is:
Equation 4:
We = W2m - %
The tractor speed, flow rate, and effective width
measurements are used to calculate application depth
in the field data sheet or with Equation 1. Data from
the field data sheet may be used with Equation 2 to
determine the target tractor speed to achieve a desired
application depth.
Interpretation and Adjustments
Compare the calculated application depth against
the depth allowed in the animal waste utilization
plan, and against any problems observed in the field.
If either the application depth measured in the field
too high. To reduce the application rate, increase the
tractor speed. The target tractor speed may be calcu-
lated from Equation 2 using the system flow rate and
effective width determined in the field procedure.
If the application rate is less than desired (and
under the permitted limit), reduce tractor speed to
increase the application rate. After adjusting the trac-
tor speed, verify the new speed using the procedure
previously described. In no case should the applica-
tion rate allow ponding or runoff, regardless of the
permitted limit.

L.3
• N —►;
(target We = 2 x N)
Figure 4. Determination of a.) effective width (We) for low -profile -type hose drag units; b.) target effective
width for a 2 nozzle boom example, and c.) field -determined effective width for boom -type hose drag units.
To achieve consistent application uniformity,
boom -type units should be driven such that the dis-
tance between nozzles in adjacent passes is about the
same as the distance between the fixed nozzles on the
boom (see Figure 4). In this case the target effective
width (target Wd, the distance between the centerline
of the tractor in two adjacent passes, is equal to the
number of nozzles on the boom times the distance
between the fixed nozzles (N). If the field -measured
effective width (W) calculated in Equation 4 differs
by more than 15 percent from the target value, adjust
the pass width.
0

HOSE -DRAG
WASTEWATER EQUIPMENT
Hose Drag System Calibration Data Sheet for "low -profile" units
Date: Land Owner: Farm No.
1. Determine Tractor Speed, S:
a. Distance ft
Trial Trial
b. Elapsed time sec. sec.
(a)
c. Tractor speed = =
(b) X 1.47
2. Determine Flow Rate, Q
Pressure (Pump)' psi Reel psi
g. Instantaneous flow rate gpm
or...
d. Ending totalizer reading gallons
e. Beginning totalizer reading gallons
f. Elapsed time between odometer readings min.
Ending odometer reading (d)— beginning odometer reading (e)
g. Flow rate =
Elapsed time (f)
Effective Width, We
h. Effective width ft.
Average
mph
gpm
(9) 9Pm
Application Depth, D = = inches
54.9 X (h) We X (c) speed
Figure S. Field Data Sheet for "low -profile" units
I

Nose Drag System Calibration Data Sheet for "boom -type" units
Date: Land Owner: Farm No.
1. Determine Tractor Speed, S:
a. Distance ft
Trial Trial Average
b. Elapsed time sec. sec.
(a)
c. Tractor speed = =
(b) X 1.47
2. Determine Flow Rate, Q
Pressure (Pump) psi Reel psi
g. Instantaneous flow rate gpm
or...
d. Ending totalizer reading gallons
e. Beginning totalizer reading gallons
f. Elapsed time between odometer readings min.
Ending odometer reading (d) — inning odometer reading (e)
g. flow rate =
Elapsed time (f)
Effective Width, K
Boorn-type units (see Figures 2, 4b, and 4c)
h. Distance between nozzles (N) ft. I. Number of nozzles
Target We = (i) X (h) = ft.
Distance boom to around in. SDlash Dlate anale from he
j. Wetted Width of 1 pass (W.), ft.
k. Wetted Width of 2 passes (W2m) ft.
I. Measured We = W2m (k) - (W,,) = ft.
Application Depth, D
(g) gpm
54.9 X (1)We X (c) speed
Figure 6. Field Data Sheet for "boom -type" units
inches
0191111
mph
17

HOSE -DRAG
WASTEWATER EQUIPMENT
Table 1. Application depths (inches) for 8-foot hose drag waste application systems by discharge and tractor speed
Note: To obtain gallons per acre, multiply application depth (inches) in table by 27,154, Application depths to 1.00 inch are shown but
applications greater than 0.75 inch are not recommended.
TraeterS eed (mph)
Discharge m
0.s
1
1.5
2
2.5
1 3
3.5
4
200
0.91
0.46
0.30
0.23
0.18
1 0.15
0.13
0.11
225
0.51
0.34
0.26
0.21
0.17
0.15
0.13
250
-
0.57
0.38
0.28
0.23
0.19
0.16
0.14
275
-
0.63
0.42
0.31
0.25
0.21
0.18
0.16
300
-
0.68
0.46
0.34
0.27
0.23
0.20
0.17
325
0.74
0.49
0.37
0.30
0.25
0.21
0.19
350
-
0.80
0.53
0.40
0.32
0.27
0.23
0.20
375
-
0.85
0.57
0.43
0.34
0.28
0.24
0.21
400
-
0.91
0.61
0.46
0.36
0.30
0.26
0,23
425
0.97
0.65
1 0.48
0.39
0.32
0.28
0.24
450
0.68
0.51
0.41
0.34
0.29
0.26
475
-
0.72
0.54
0.43
1 0.36
0.31
017
Soo
-
0.76
0.57
0.46
0.38
0.33
0.28
525
-
0.80
0.60
0.48
0.40
0.34
030
550
0.84
0.63
0.50
0.42
036
0.31
575
0.87
0.66
0.52
OA4
0.37
0.33
600
0.91
0.68
0.55
0.46
0.39
0.34
62S
0.95
011
0.57
0.47
0.41
0.36
650
0.99
0.74
0.59
0.49
0.42
0.37
675
0.77
0.62
0.51
0.44
0.38
700
0.80
0.64
0.53
0.46
0.40
725
0.83
0.66
0.55
0.47
0.41
750
0.85
0.66
1 0.57
0.49
0.43
775
0.88
0.71
0.59
0.50
0.44
800
0.91
0.73
0.61
0.52
0.46
825
0.94
0,75
0.63
- 054
0.47
850
0.97
0.77
0.65
0.55
0.48
875
1.00
0.80
0.66
0.57
0.50
900
0.82
0.68
0.59
0.51
Table 2. Application depths (inches) for 10-foot hose drag waste application systems by discharge and tractor speed
Note: To obtain gallons per acre, multiply application depth (inches) in table by 27,754. Application depths to 1.00 Inch are shown but
applications greater than 0.75 inch are not recommended,
Tractors eed m h
Discharge m
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
200
073
0.36
0.24
0.18
0.15
0.12
0.10
0.09
225
0.82
0.41
0.27
0.21
0.16
0.14
0.12
0.10
250
0.91
0.46
0.30
0.23
0.18
0.15
0.43
0.11
275
1.00
030
0.33
0.25
0.20
0.17
0.14
0.13
_300-
-035--
-0:36---'
-0.27---
--0:22---0.18--'-"-0:16'--
"'-0.1'4-
350
0.64
0.43
0.32
0.26
0.21
0AB
0.16
375
0.68
0.46
0.34
0.27
0.23
0.20
0.17 -
400
0.73
0.49
0.36
0.29
0.24
0.21
0.18
425
0.77
0.52
0.39
0.31
1 0.26
0.22
0.19
450
0.82
0.55
0.41
0.33
0.27
0.23
0.21
475
0.87
058
0.43
0.35
0.29
0.25
0.22
Soo
0.91
0.61
0.46
0.36
0.30
0.26
0.23
525
0.96
0.64
0.48
0.38
0.32
0.27
0.24
550
1.00
0.67
0.50
0.40
0.33
0.29
0.25
575
0.70
0.52
0.42
0.35
0.30
0.26
600
0.73
0.55
0,44
0.36
0.31
0.27
625
0.76
0.57
0.46
0.38
0.33
0.28
650
0.79
0.59
0.47
0.39
0.34
1 030
675
0.82
0.62
0.49
0.41
0.35
0.31
700
0.85
0.64
0.51 1
0.43
0.36
0.32
725
0.88
0.66
0.53
0.44
0.38
0.33
750
0.91
0.68
0.55
0.46
0.39
0.34
775
0.94
0.71
0.57
0.47
0.40
0.35
800
0.97
0.73
0.58
0.49
0.42
0.36
825
1.00
0.75
0.60
0.50
0.43
0.38
850
0.77
0.62
0.52
0.44
0.39
875
0.80
0.64
0.53
0.46
0.40
900
0.82
0.66
0.55
0.47
0.41

Table 3. Application depths (inches) for 12-foot hose drag waste application systems by discharge and tractor speed
Note: To obtain gallons per acre, multiply application depth (inches) in table by 27,154. Application depths to 1.00 inch are shown but
applications greater than 0.75 inch are not recommended.
Tractor S aad (mph)
Ircha e (qpm
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
IS
4
300
0.91
0.46
0.30
0.23
0.18
0.15
0.13
0.11
325
0.99
0.49
0.33
0.25
0.20
0.16
0.14
0.12
350
0.53
0.35
0.27
0.21
0.18
0.15
0.13
375
0.57
0.38
0.28
0.23
0.19
0.16
0.14
400
0.61
0.41
0.30
0.24
0.20
0.17
0.15
425
0.65
0.43
0.32
0.26
0.22
0.18
0.16
450
US
0.46
0.34
0.27
0.23
0.20
0.17
475
0.72
0.48
0.36
0.29
0.24
0.21
0.18
Soo
016'
0.51
0.38
0.30
0.25
0.22
0.19
325
0.80
053
0.40
0.32
1 0.27
0.23
1 0.20
550
0.84
0.56
OA2
0.33
0.28
0.24
0.21
575
0.87
0.58
0.44
0.35
0.29
0.25
0.22
600
0.91
0.61
0.46
0.36
0.30
0.26
0.23
625
0.95
0.63
0.47
0.38
0.32
0.27
0.24
650
0.99
0.66
0.49
0.39
0.33
0.28
0.25
675
0.68
0.51
0.41
0.34
0.29
0.26
700
0.71
0.53
0.43
0.35
0.30
0.27
725
0.73
0.55
OA4
0.37
0.31
0.28
750
0.76
0.37
0.46
0.38
0.33
0.28
775
0.78
0.59
0.47
0.39
0.34
0.29
800
0.81
0.61
0.49
1 0.41
0.35
0.30
825
0.84
0.63
0.50
0.42
0.36
0,31
850
0.86
0.65
0.52
0.43
0.37
0.32
873
0.89
0.66
0.53
0.44
0.38
0.33
900
0.91
0.68
0.55
0.46
0.39
0.34
925
0.94
0.70
O.S6
0.47
0.40
0.35
950
0.96
0.72
0.58
0.48
0.41
0.36
975
0.99
0.74
0.59
0.49
0.42
0.37
1,000
0.76
0.61
0.51
0.43
0.38
Table 4. Application depths (inches) for 15-foot hose drag waste application systems by discharge and tractor speed
Note: To obtain gallons per acre, multiply application depth (inches) in table by 27,154. Application depths to 7.00 inch are shown but
applications greater than 0.75 inch are not recommended.
TractorS eed(m h)
Discharge m
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
300
0.73
0.36
0.24
0.18
0.15
0.12
0.10
0.09
325
0.79
0.39
0.26
0.20
0.16
0.13
0.11
0.10
350
0.85
0.43
0.28
021
0.17
0.14
0.12
0.11
375
0.91
0.46
0.30
0.23
0.18
0.15
0.13
0.11
-400-'^
--0.97-
-0:49-"
--0:32--
-024--0:19`-"
-016-'
-"-0.14-
-0.12-
450
-
0.55
0.36
0.27
0.22
0.18
0.16
0.14
475
0.58
0.38
0.29
0.23
0.19
0.16
0.14
500
0.61
0.41
0.30
0.24
0.20
0.17
0.15
525
0.64
0.43
1 0.32
0.26
1 0.21
0.18
0.16
550
0.67
0.45
0.33
0.27
0.22
0.19
0.17
575
0.70
0.47
0.35
0.28
0.23
0.20
0.17
600
0.73
0.49
0.36
0.29
0.24
0.21
0.18
625
0.76
0.51
0.38
0.30
0.25
0.22
0.19
650
0.79
0.53
0.39
0.32
0.26
0.23
020
675
0.82
0.55
0.41
0.33
0.27
0.23
0.21
700
0.85
0.57
0.43
0.34
0.28
0.24
0.21
725
0.88
0.59
0.44
0.35
0.29
0.25
0.22
750
0.91
0.61
0.46
0.36
0.30
0.26
1 0.23
775
0.94
0.63
0.47
0.38
0.31
0.27
0.24
800
0.97
0.65
0.49
0.39
0.32
0.28
0.24
825
1,00
0.67
0.50
0,40
0.33
0.29
0.25
850
0.69
0.52
0.41
0.34
0.30
0.26
875
0.71
0.53
OA3
6.35
0.30
0.27
900
0.73
0.55
0.44
0.36
0.31
0.27
925
0.75
0.56
0.45
0.37
0.32
0.28
950
0.77
0.58
0.46
0.38
0.33
0.29
975
-
0.79
0.59
0.47
0.39
0.34
0.30
1,000
0.81
0.61
OA9
0.41
0.35
0.30
10

HOSE -DRAG
WASTEWATER EQUIPMENT
Table 5. Application depths (inches) for 20-foot hose drag waste application systems by discharge and tractor speed
Note: To obtain gallons per acre, multiply application depth (inches) in table by 27,154. Application depths to 1,00 inch are shown but
applications greater than 0.75 inch are not recommended.
Tractor 3 ead (mph)
Discharge m
%5
1
1.5
1 2
1 2.5
1 3
3.5
1 4
Soo
0.91
0.46
0.30
1 0.23
0.18
1 0.15
0.13
1 0.11
525
0,99
0.48
0.32
1 0.24
0.19
1 0.16
0.74
1 0.12
550
1.0
0.50
0.33
1 0.25
0.20
1 0.17
0.14
1 0.13
575
-
0.52
0.35
1 0.26
0.21
1 0.17
0.15
1 0.13
600
-
0.55
0.36
0.27
0.22
1 0.18
0.16
1 0.14
625
-
0.57
0.38
0.28
0.23
1 0.19
0.16
1 0.14
650
-
0.59
0.39
0.30
0.24
1 0.20
0.17
1 0.15
675
-
0.62
0.41
0.31
0.25
1 0.21
0.18
1 0.15
700
-
0.64
0.43
0.32
0.26
0.21
0.18
0.16
725
-
0.66
0.44
0.33
0.26
0.22
039
0.17
750
-
O.68
0.46
0.34
0.27
0.23
0.20
0.17
775
-
0.71
0.47
0.35
0.28
0.24
0.20
0.18
800
-
0.73
0.49
0.36
a29
0.24
0.21
0.18
825
-
0.73
0.50
0.38
0.30
0.25
0.21
0.19
850
-
0.77
0.52
1 0.39
0.31
0.26
0.22
O.19
875
-
0.80
0.53
0.40
0.32
0.27
0.23
0.20
900
-
0.82
0.55
0.41
0.33
0.27
0.23
0.21
923
-
0.84
0.56
0.42
0.34
0.28
0.24
0.21
950
-
0.87
0.58
0.43
0.35
0.29
0.25
0.22
975
-
0.89
0.59
0.44
0.36
0.30
0.25
0.22
1,000
-
0.91
0.61
0.46
0.36
0.30
0.26
0.23
1,025
-
0.93
0.62
0.47
0.37
0.31
0.27
0.23
1,050
-
0.96
0.64
0.48
0.38
0.32
0.27
0.24
1,073
-
0.98
0.65
0,49
0.39
0.33
0.28
0.24
1,100
-
1.00
0.67
0.50
0.40
0.33
0.29
0.25
1,125
i
0.68
0.51
0.41
0.34
0.29
0.26
1,150
-
0.70
0.52
0.42
0.35
0.30
0.26
1,173
1
OJl 10.54
0.43
0.36
0.31
0.27
1,200
-
-
0.73
0.55
0.44
0.36
0.31
0.27

Prepared by
Garry-Grabow,.Assistant.Professor. and.Extension.Specialist,.Department.of.Biological.and.Agricultural. Engineering
Karl Shaffep, °-•ensioa Assoeiate, Department of SEA!SEiene
and
Sanjay Shah, Assistant Professor and Extension Specialist, Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering
Figure 1 shows an AerWay unit with Hydro Engineering manifold, and Figure 2 shows a Cadman two nozzle boom with splash plate kit.
7,750 copies of this public document were printed at a cost of $3,991.00 or $0.52 per copy.
Published by
NORTH CAROLINA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE
C O L L E G E O F
AGRICULTURE& LIFE SCIENCES
ACADEMICS • RESEARCH A E X T E N S 1 0 h
AG-553-8 12/07-7.75M JMG
E08-50257

Nose Drag System Calibration Data Sheet for "boom -type" units
Date: Land Owner: Farm No.
1. Determine Tractor Speed, S:
a. Distance ft
Trial Trial Average
b. Elapsed time sec. sec.
(a)
c. Tractor speed =
(b) X 1.47
2. Determine Flow Rate, Q
Pressure (Pump) psi Reel psi
g. Instantaneous flow rate gpm
or...
d. Ending totalizer reading gallons
e. Beginning totalizer reading gallons
f. Elapsed time between odometer readings min.
Ending odometer reading (d) — inning odometer reading (e)
g. Flow rate =
Elapsed time (f)
Effective Width, W,
Boom -type units (see Figures 2, 4b, and 4c)
h. Distance between nozzles (N) ft. L Number of nozzles
Target We = (i) X (h) = ft.
Distance boom to ground in. Splash plate angle from horizontal _
Trial Trial Trial Average
j. Wetted Width of 1 pass (Wm), ft.
k. Wetted Width of 2 passes (W,m) ft.
I. Measured We = W,m (k) - (W,m) = ft.
Application Depth, D
54.9 X (I)We X
(g) gpm
(c) speed
Figure 6. Field Data Sheet for "boom -type" units
degrees
inches
gpm
mph
0

T .
,�.� m
T
,.:

HOSE -DRAG
WASTEWATER EQUIPMENT
Hose Drag System Calibration Data Sheet for "low -profile" units
Date: Land Owner: Farm No.
1. Determine Tractor Speed, S:
a. Distance ft
Trial Trial Average
b. Elapsed time sec. sec.
(a)
c. Tractor speed = _
(b) X 1.47
2. Determine Flow Rate, Q
Pressure (Pump) psi Reel psi
g. Instantaneous flow rate gpm
or...
d. Ending totalizer reading gallons
e. Beginning totalizer reading gallons
f. Elapsed time between odometer readings min.
Ending odometer reading (d)— beginning odometer reading (e)
g. Flow rate =
Effective Width, W.
Low -profile units (see Figures 1 and 4a)
h. Effective width ft.
Application Depth, D =
Elapsed time (f)
(9) gpm
54.9 X (h) We X (c) speed
Figure 5. Field Data Sheet for "low -profile" units
mph
gpm
inches
FA

1
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
08-11-2010
This plan has been prepared for:
Maple Ridge Dairy
Bill Horton
1174 Pine Ridge Rd.
Mt. Airy, NC 2 703 0
Type of Plan:
This plan has been developed by:
RECEIVED
Greg Goings N.C. Dept. of ENR
NRCS JAN 19 2011
220 cooper street Winston-Salem
Regional Office
Dobson, NC 27017
/`1ei
Developer nature
Nutrient Management with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
Signature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer)
Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural. Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By:
Technica pecialist Signature Date
_.... _...------.........------....._..............--..........-------......... _.. _.......... _---_----------.-_--...-...---------
698225 Database Version 3.1 . Date Printed: 08-11-2010 Cover Page 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
U6
Waste Storage Ponds 1 & 2 waste generated 6,253,000 gals/year by a 540 animal Dairy
(Heifer) Liquid Manure Slurry operation. This production facility has waste storage
capacities of approximately 120 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
39351
Incorporated
53661
Injected
60815
Irrigated
35774
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) •
Actual PAN
Applied (Ibs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
tual Volume
lied (Gallons)
R6,641,747
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
39,351
41798
-2,447
-388,747
U7
Drystacks waste generated 445,000 gals/year by a 600 animal Dairy (Heifer) Liquid
Manure Slurry operation. This production facility has waste storage capacities of
approximately 90 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
6674
Incorporated
9100
Injected
16314
Irrigated
6067
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) •
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
6,674
18271
-11,597
.1,218,335
-773,335
......._.. ....n.--.---- - . . . .. ........ ....._--- -------------------..............----------------------....--
Note:* In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
+ Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
698225 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 08-11-20I0 Source Page Page I of 2

U8
Dry Cow Bedded Barn 100 cows @ 75% Collection waste generated 1,265.00
tons/year by a 100 animal Dairy (Milk Cow) Solid operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
5440
Incorporated
7211
Injected
N/A
Irrigated
N/A
Max. Avail.
PAN (Ibs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (Ibs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Quantity
Applied (Tons)
Surplus/Deficit .
(Tons)
Year 1
5,440
10661
-5,221
2,479.29
-1,214.29
U9
Heifer Facility for 200 to 500 lb Heifers waste generated 410.00 tons/year by a 100
animal Dairy (Calf) Solid operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
1763
Incorporated
2337
Injected
N/A
Irrigated
N/A
Max. Avail.
PAN (Ibs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (Ibs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (Ibs)
Actual Quantity
Applied (Tons)
Surplus/Deficit
(Tons)
Year 1
1,763
10636
-8,873
2,473.39
-2,063.39
U10
Heifer Facility for Day Old to 200 Lb Heifers waste generated 93.00 tons/year by a 50
animal Dairy (Calf) Solid operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
400
Incorporated
530
Injected
N/A
Irrigated
N/A
Max. Avail.
PAN (Ibs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (Ibs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (Ibs)
Actual Quantity
Applied (Tons)
Surplus/Deficit
(Tons)
Year 1
400
9714
-9,314
2,289.81
-2,196.81
This plan includes a User Defined Source to determine the total pounds of PAN in lieu
of NRCS Standard values. Refer to North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service publication AG439-42
entitled 'Soil Facts: Use of On -Farm Records for Modifying a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan" for
guidance on using on -farm records to develop a User Defined Source.
No
-te: In s- ... snource
l---.. ...ID...,..S...means..... . ...standard.. . -d source, - -e, ..U..m..eans....user....de..fi
.....ned........source.--
.....-------*--- ......--- ------ -----------------
* Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
698225 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 08-11-2010 Source Page Page 2 of 2

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates are
also provided for each crop, as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index (LI) and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment
Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field, where available.
If a field's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the harvested plant
biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT Rating should receive no
additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating, starter fertilizers may be recommended in accordance with North
Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205 applied to each crop is shown in the following table if
the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Plat
Rating
LI
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
P205
Removal
(tbs/aerc)
Applied
(Ibs/acrc)
4966
1
9.7
- 9.70
Low
N/A
Fairview
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tom
46
N/A
Corn, Silage
19.0 Tons
65
N/A
4966
2
5.00
5.00
Low
N/A
Fairview
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tom
46
N/A
Com, Silage
19.0 Tom
65
N/A
4966
3
9.40
9.40
Low
N/A
Fairview
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
46
N/A
Corn, Silage
19.0 Tom
65
N/A
4966
4
8.0c
8.00
Low
N/A
Fairview
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tom
46
N/A
Cora, Silage
19.OTo
65
N/A
4966
5
13.10
13.10
Low
N/A
fair
Small Grain, Silage
N/A
0
N/A
Com, Silage
NIA
0
N/A
4966
5-6
24.40
24.40
Low
N/A
Fairview
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
46
N/A
Com, Silage
19.0 Tom
65
N/A
5034
1
10.20
10.20
Low
N/A
Congaree
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Tons
54
N/A
Com, Silage
28.0 Tons
95
N/A
5034
2
4.40
4.40
Low
N/A
Congaree
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Tons
54
N/A
Com, Silage
28.0 Tons
95
N/A
5034
34
30.80
30.80
Low
N/A
Congaree
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Tons
54
N/A
-
Com, Silage
28.0 Tom
95
N/A
5034
5
4.00
4.00
Low
N/A
Congaree
iSmall Grain, Silage
10.0 Tonsl
54
N/A
-
Com, Silage
28.0 Ton
95
N/A
5035
1
14.9
14.90
Low
N/A
Fairview
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 To
46
N/A
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
65
N/A
5035
2
10.
10.00
Low
N/A
Fairview
Small Grain, Silage
8.8 To
48
N/A
Com, Silage
19.6 Ton
67
N/A
5035
3
2.50
2,50
Low
N/A
Fairview
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
46
N/A
Com, Silage
19.0 Tons
65
N/A
5035
4
19.40
N/A
Fairview
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 To
46
N/A
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
65
N/A
698225 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 8/112010
NOTE: Symbol • means user entered data.
PCS Page Page 1 of 2

Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Plat
Rating
LI
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
P205
Removal
(lbs/scre)
Applied
(lbs/acre)
5035
6
2.60
2.60
Low
N/A
Fairview
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
7
N/A
5035
7
11.80
11.80
Low
N/A
Fairview
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
46
N/A
Com, Silage
19.0 Tons
65
N/A
5035
8
10.1
10-101
Low
I N/A
Fairview
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
7
N/A
5035
9
17.70
17.7
Low
I N/A
Fairview
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
46
N/A
Com, Silage
19.0 Tons
65
N/A
5064
1
53.4C
53.40
Low
N/A
Fairview
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tom
46
N/A
Com, Silage
19.0 Tom
65
N/A
5064
2
1.6C
1.60
Low
N/A
Fairview
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tom
49
N/A
Com, Silage
20.0 Ton4
68
N/A
. 5417
1
6.30
6.30
Unknown
N/A
Congaree
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Tons
54
N/A
Corn, Silage
28.0 Ton
95
N/A
5417
2
4.5
4.5C
Low
N/A
Congaree
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 T . on
54
N/A
Com, Silage
28.0 Ton
95
N/A
5446
1
17.30
17.30
Low
N/A
Fairview
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Ton
46
N/A
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
65
N/A
5446
2-3
7.4
7.4
Low
N/A
Fairview'
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 To
46
N/A
Com, Silage
19.0 To
65
N/A
'LAN TOTALS: t ALS: 298.50 298.50.
Ll '.
l or¢midl+leachin "
; :.. hx a6 w : .a y,; , -+,r.
)L,,
.'".
-,.�� � „a z;7'¢chn(oaly(°tdance *
None
Low potential to contribute to soluble
2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
>= 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
<- 10
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils
utrient leaching below the root zone.
available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered. Exampl
> 10
are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term No -Till (778),
and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
PLiiTlndex,
1
`f F ,
Rhng",�,�„�'ittp�7e�ti�'��Frn'ikg�e,�µn.�enReo
Low
iy i 1 tat Ya'.'$r "�3 ' a.
meNdano
tIAOI �LLli3{.�N yu�.Jl�k i y n�kvi 4.14.'
No adjustment needed; N based application
0 - 25
25 - 50
Medium
No adjustment needed; N based application
51 - 100
High
Application limited to crop P removal
> 100
VeryHigh
Starter P application only
698225 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 8/11/2010
PCs Page Page 2 of
NOTE: Symbol 'means user entered data.'

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use
the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to
maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
-
Source
m
soil series
ToW
Acres
: Use.
Aa
Crop
RYE
Applic.
mod
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Regd
(Ibs/A)
Comm.
Fert
Numem
'Applied
(Ibs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applie
Method
Manure
PA
Nut irn
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManweA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Maaure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
l000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
4966
1
U6
Fairview
9.70
9.70
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
40
6.36
0.0
61.65
0.00
4966
1
U7Fairview
9.70
9.70
Small Gain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
10
0.67
0.00
6.47
0.00
4966
1
USFairview
9.70
9.70
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1.3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
IS
0.00
3.49
0.00
33.84
4966
1
U9Fairview
..70
9.70
Small Gain, Silage
8.6 Tons
911-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
15
0.00
3.49
0.00
33.84
4966
I
UIOFairview
9.70
9.70
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1.3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
15
0.00
3.49
0.00
33.84
4966
1
1 U6[Fairview
9.70
9.70
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207 1
0
0
Broad.
100
15.89
0.001
154.14
0.00
4966
1
U7
Fairview
9.70
9.70
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-&30
207
0
0
Broad. 1
50
3.33
O-OC
32.34
0.00
4966
1
US
Fairview
9.70
9.70
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2115-WO
207
0
0
Broad.
20
0.00
4.65
0.00
45.12
4966
1
U9
Fairview.
9.70
9.70
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-00
207
0
0
Broad.
20
0.00
4.65
0.00
45.12
4966
1
UIO
Fairview
9.70
9.70
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15.6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
17
0.00
3.95
0.001
38.35
4966
2
U6
Fairview
5.00
5.00
Small Gain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95 1
0 1
0
Broad.
40
6.36
0.00
31.78
0.00
4966
2
U7
Fairview
5.00
5.00
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0 1
0
Broad.
10
0.67
0.00
3.33
0.00
4966
2
U8
Fairview
5.00
5.00
Small Gain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/Id/31
95
0
0
Broad.
15
0.00
3.49
0.00
17.44
4966
2
U9'
Fairview
5.00
5.00
Small Gain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3131
95
0
0
Broad.
IS
0.00
3.49
0.00
17.44
4966 1
2
UIO
Fairview
5.00
5.00
Small Gain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
15
0.00
3.49
0.00
17.44
4966
2
U6
Fairview
5.00
5.00
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
100
15.89
0.00
79.45
0.00
698225 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/11/2010 WUT Page Page 1 of 11

Waste Utilization Table
Ve
Toter
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Ades
Use.
Acres
.
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(Ibs/A)
Comm.
Fert
Nutnem
Applied
OWA)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutfientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure.
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
4966
2
U7
Fairview
5.001
5.00
Com, Silage
19.0 Toni
2115-00
207
0
0
Broad.
501
3.33
0.00
16.671
0.00
4966
2
US
Fairview
. 5.00
5.00
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
20
0.00
4.65
0.00
23.26
4966
2
U9
Fairview
5.00
5.00
Corn, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15.6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
20
0.00
4.65
0.00
23.26
4966
2
UIO
Fairview
5.00
5.00
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
17
0.00
3.95
0.00
19.77
4966
3
U6
Fairview
9.40
9AO
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
40
6.36
0.00
59.75
0.00
4966
3
1 U7
11Fairview
9.40
9.40
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
911-3/31
95
f 0
0
Broad.
101
0.67
0.00
627
0.00
4966
3
U8
Fairview
9.40
9.40
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95.
0
0
Broad.
IS
0.00
3.49
0.00
32.79
4966
3
U9
Fairview
9.40
9.40
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/I-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
15
0.00
3.49
0.00
32.79
4966
3
UIO
Fairview
9.40
9.40
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
15
0.00
3.49
0.00
32.79
4966
3
U6
Fairview
9.40
9.40
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207
0
1 0
Broad.
100
15.891
0.00
14937
0.00
4966
3
U7
Fairview
9.40
9.40
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2115-00 1
207
0
0
Broad.
50
3.33
0.00
31.34
0.00
4966
3
U8
Fairview
9.40
9.40
Corn, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30 1
207
0
0
Broad.
20
0.00
4.65
0.00
43.72
4966
3
U9
airview
9.40
9.40
Corn, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
20
0.00
4.65
0.00
43.72
4966
3
U10
Fairview
9.40
9.40
Corn, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15.6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
17
0.00
3.95
0.00
37.16
4966
4
U6 Ifairview
8.00
8.00
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
40
6.36
0.00
50.851
0.00
4966
4
U7
Fairview
9.00
5.00
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.-
101
0.67
0.00
5.33
0.00
4966
4
U8
Fairview
8.00
8.00
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
15
0.00
3.49
0.00
27.91
4966
4
U9
Fairview
8.00
8.00
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
15
0.00
3.49
0.00
27.91
4966
4
U10
Fairview
8.00
8.00
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
15
0.00
3.49
0.00
27.91
4966 1
4
U6
Fairview
9.00
. 8.00
Corn, Silage
19.0 Ton
2115-6/30
207 1
0
0
Broad. 1
100
15.89
0.00
127.12
0.00
4966
4
U7
Fairview
8.00
8.00
Corn, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
50
3.33
0.00
26.67
0.00
4966
4
U8
Fairview
8.00
8.00
Cern, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207
0 1
0
Broad.
20
0.00
4.65
0.00
37.21
698225 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/11/2010 WUT Page Page 2 of I 1

Waste Utilization Table
Tract
Field
Source
ID
-
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
_
Crop
RYE
-
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Obs/A)
Contra.
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Rea.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
4966
1 4
1 U9
1 Fairview
8.001
8.00
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
1 20
0.00
4.65
0.00
37.21
4966
4
1 UIO
lFairview
8.00
8.00
Cam, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15fi130
207
0
0
Broad.
17
0.00
3.95
0.00
31.63
4966
5
U6
fair
13.10
13.10
Small Grain, Silage
N/A
9/1-3/31
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4966
5
U7
fair
13.10
13.10
Small Grain, Silage
N/A
9/1-3/31
0
0
-0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4966
5
U8
fair
13.10
13.10
Small Grain, Silage
N/A
9/1-3/31
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4966
5
U9
fair
13.10
13.10
Small Grain, Silage
N/A
911-3/31
0
1 0
1 0
Broad.
01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4966
5
U10
Ifair
13.10
13.10
Small Grain, Silage
N/A .
9/1-3/31
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4966
5
U6
fair
13.10
13.10
Cam, Silage
N/A
2115-WO
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4966
5
U7
fair
13.10
13.10
Cam, Silage -
N/A
2/15-WO
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4966
5
U8
fair
13.10
13.10
Cam, Silage
N/A
2/156/30
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4966
5
U9
fair
13.10
13.10
Com, Silage
N/A
21156130
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4966
5
UIO
fair
13.10
13.10
Cam, Silage
N/A
2/15.6nO
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4966
56
U6
Fairview
24.40
24.40
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1.3131
95
0
0
Broad.
40
6.36
0.00
155.09
0.00
4966
56
U7
Fairview
24.40
24.40
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad. 1
101
0.67
0.00
16.27
ON
4966 1
56
U8
Fairview
24.40
24.40
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
IS
0.00
3.49
0.00
85.11
4966
56
U9
Fairview
24.40
24.40
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95 1
0 1
0
Broad.
15
0.00
3.49
0.00
85.11
4966
56
Ulo
Fairview
24.40
24.40
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
911-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
15
0.00
3.49
0.00
85.11
4966
56
U6
Fairview
24.40
24.40
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/156/30
207
0
0
Broad.
100
15.89
0.00
387.72
0.00
4966
56
U7
Fairview
24.40
24.40
Cam, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/156/30
207
0
0
Broad.
50
3.33
0.00
81.35
0.00
4966
56
U8
Fairview
24,40
24.40
Cam, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/156/30
207
0
0
Broad.
20
0.00
4.65
0.00
113.49
4966
5-6
U9
Fairview
24.40
24.40
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/156/30
207
0
0
Broad.
2
0.00
4.65
0.00
113.49
4966
5-6UI0
Fairview
24.40
24.40
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/156/30
207
0
0
Broad.
171
0.00
3.95
0.00
96.46
698225 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/1 MO10 WUT Page Page 3 of 11

Waste Utilization Table
Vear 1
Tract
Field
Source
In
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
'
Crop
RYE
-
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(Ibs/A)
Comm.
FM
Nutrient
Applied
(1bs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NumertA
pplied
(lbs(A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
5034
1
1 U6
Forigarce
1010
10.20
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Ton
9/I-3131
1 III
0
0
Broad.
471
7.47
0.00
76.181
0.00
5634
1
U7
Congaree
10.20
10.20
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
111
0
0
Broad.
12
0.80
0.00
8.16
O.00
5034
1
U8
Congaree
10.20
10.20
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
Ill
0
0
Broad.
18
0.00
4.19
0.00
42.70
5034
I
U9
Congaree
10.20
10.20
Small Grain, Silage -
10.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
ill
0
0
Broad.
18
0.00
4.19
0.00
42.70
5034
1
UIO
Congaree
10.20
10.20
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
Ill
0
0
Broad.
16
0.00
4.19
0.00
42.70
5034
I
1 U6
Congaree
10.20
10.20
Com, Silage
8.0 Ton
2/15.6/30
305
0
.0
1 Broad:
1471
23.36
0.00
238.26
O.00
5034
1
U7
Congaree
10.20
10.20
Com, Silage
28.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
305
0
0
Broad.
74
4.93
0.00
5033
0.00
5034
1
U8
Congaree -
10.20
10.20
Com, Silage
28.0 Ton
2/I5630
305
0
0
Broad.
29
0.00
6.74
0.00
68.79
5034
1
U9
Congaree
10.20
10.20
Com, Silage
28.0 Ton
2115.WO
305
0
1 0
Broad.
29
0.00
6.74
0.00
68.79
5034
1
UIO
Congaree
10.20
I0.20
Corn, Silage
28.0 Ton
2/I5-WO
305
0
0
Broad.
25
0.00
5.81
0.00
59.30
5034
2
U6
Congaree
4.40
4.40
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Ton
9/1-3131
Ill
0
0
Broad.
47
7.47
0.001
32.861
0.00
5034
2
U7
Congaree
4.40
4.40
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
III
0
0
Broad.
12
0,80
0.00
3.52
0.00
5034
2
U8
Congaree
4.40
4.40
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
Ill
0
0
Broad.
18
0.00
4.19
0.00
18.42
5034
2
U9
Congaree
4.40
4.40
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Ton
9/1-3/3I
Ill
0
0
Broad.
18
0.00
4.19
0.00
18.42
5034 1
2
UIO
Congaree
4.40
4.40
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
Ill
0
0
Broad.
16
0.00
4.19
0.00
18.42
5034
2
U6
Congaree
4.40
4.40
Com, Silage
28.OTon,
2/15-6/30
305
0
0
Broad.
1471
23.36
0.00
102.781
0.00
5034
2
U7
Congaree
4.40
4.40
Com, Silage
28.0 Ton
2115-6/30
305
0
0
Broad.
74
4.93
0.00
21.71
0.00
5034
2
U8
Congaree
4.40
4.40
Com, Silage
28.0 Ton
2115-6/30
305
0
0
Broad.
29
0.00
6.74
0.00
29.67
5034
2
U9
Congaree
4.40
4.40
Com, Silage
28.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
305
0
0
Broad.
29
0.00
6.74
0.00
29.67
5034
2
UIO
Congaree
4.40
4.40
Com, Silage
28.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
305
0
0
Broad.
25
0.00
5.81
0.00
25.58
5034
3-4
U6
Congaree
30.80
30.80
Small Grain, Silage 110.0
Ton
9/1-3/3I
III
0
0 1
Broad.
471
7.47
0.00
230.03
0.00
5034
34
U7
Congaree
30.80
30.80
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
Ill
0
0
Broad.
12
0.80
0.00
24.65
0.00
698225 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/11/2010 WUT Page Page 4 of I I

Waste Utilization Table
Vear 1
Tract
-
Field
Source
ID
'
Soil Series
Tom]
Acres
Use.
Acres
-
Crop
RYE
Applie.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
RegV
(lbs/A)
Conan.
Fen-
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Re,
(Ibs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
Mnnure
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(am)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gol/A
Tom
1000 gals
tons
5034
34
1 US
Congaree
30.80
30.80
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
Ill
1 0
1 0
Broad.
18
0.00
4.19
0.00
129.93
5034
34
U9
Congaree
30.80
30.80
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Ton
9/Id/31
Ill
0
0
Broad.
18
0.00
4.19
0.00
128.93
5034
34
1 U10
Congaree
30.80
30.80
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Ton
9/1-3/31,
Ill
0
0
Broad.
16
0.00
4.19
0.00
128.93
5034
34
U6
Congaree
30.80
30.80
Corn, Silage
28.0 Ton
2/156/30
305
0
0
Broad.
147
23.36
0.00
719.45
0.00
5034
34
U7
Congaree
30.80
30.80
Com, Silage
28.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
305
0
0
Broad.
71
4.93
O.00
151.98
0.00
5034
34
U8
Congaree
30.80
30.80
Com, Silage
8.0 Ton
2/15.6/30
305
0
0
Broad.
29
0.00
6.74
0.001
207.72
5034
34
U9
Congaree
30.80
30.80
Com, Silage
28.0 Ton
2/156/30
305
0
0
Broad.
29
0.00
6.74
0.00
207.72
5034
34
1 UIO
Congaree
30.80
30.80
Com, Silage
28.0 Ton
2115-00
305
0
0
Broad.
25
0.00
5.81
0.00
179.07
5034.
5
U6.
Congaree -
4.00
4.00
Small Grain, Silage -
10.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
III
0
0
Broad.
47
7.47
0.00
29.87
0.00
5034
5
U7
Congaree
4.00
4.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
Ill
0
0
Broad.
12
0.80
0.00
3.20
0.00
5034
5
U8
Congaree
4.00
4.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
Ill
0
0
Broad.
18
0.00
4.19
0.001
16.74
5034
5
U9
Congaree
4.00
4.00
Small Grain, Silage -
I0.0 Ton
9/1.3/31
Ill
0
0
Broad.
18
0.00
4.19
0.00
16.74
5034
5
UIO
Congaree
4.00
4.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
Ill
0
0
Broad.
Iq
0.001
4.19
0.00
16.74
5034
5
U6
Congaree
4.00
4.00
Corn, Silage
28.0 Ton
2/15-00
305
0
0
Broad.
14
23.36
0.00
93.44
0.00
5034
5
U7
Congaree
4.00
4.00
Com, Silage
28.0 Ton
2/15-00
305
0
0
Broad.
74
4.93
0.00
19.74
0.00
5034
5
US
Congarm
4.00
4.00
Com, Silage
8.0 Ton
2/156/30
305
0
0
Broad.
29
0.00
6.74
0.001
26.98
5034
5
U9
Congaree
4.00
4.00
Com, Silage
28.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
305
0
0
Broad.
29
0.00
6.74
0.00
26.98
5034
5
UIO
Congaree
4.00
4.00
Com, Silage
28.0 Ton
2/15.00
305
0
0
Broad.
25
0.00
5.81
0.00
23.26
5035
1
U6
Fairview
14.90
14.90
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1.3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
4A636
0.00
94.71
0.00
5035
1
U7
Fairview
14.90
14.90
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
10
0.00
9.94
0.005035
I
U8
Fairview
1490
14.90Small
Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons9/1.3131
95
0
0
Broad.
15
3.49
0.00
51.98
5035
1
U9
Fairview
14.90
14.90
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/3l
95
0
0
Broad.
15
3.49
0.00
51.98
698225 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/11/2010 WUT Page Page 5 of 11

i
Waste Utilization Table
Vear 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
-
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fem
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
-
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NumemA
pplied
(Ibs/A)
Liquid
ManmA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000'gals
tons
- 5035
t
1 UIO
Fairview
14.90
14.90
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
911-3/31
95
1 0
1 0
Broad.
151
0.00
3.49
0.001
51.98
5035
1
1 U6
lFairview
14.90
14.90
Cam, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15.6130
207
0
0
Broad.
100
15.89
0.00
236.77
0.00
5035
t
U7
Fairview
14.90
14.90
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15.6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
50
3.33
0.00
49.68
0.00
5035
1
U8
Fairview
14.90
14.90
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
V15-6/30
207
0
0
Bmad.
20
0.00
4.65
0.00
69.30
5035
1
U9
Fairview
14.90
14.90
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
20
0.00
4.65
0.00
69.30
5035
1
UIO
Fairview
14.90
14.90
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207
1 0
1 0
1 Broad.
171
0.00
3.95
0.001
58.91
5035
2
U6
Fairview
10.00.
10.00
Small Grain, Silage -
8.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
98
0
1 0
1 Broad.
41
6.52
0.00
65.15
0.00
5035
2
U7
Fairview
10.00
10.00
Small Grain, Silage
8.8 Tons
9/I-3/31
98
0
1 0
Broad.
IO
0.67
0.00
6.67
0.00
5035
2
US
Fairview
10.00
10.00
Small Grain, Silage
8.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
98
0
0
Broad.
15
0.00
3.49
0.00
34.88
5035
2
U9
Fairview
10.00
10.00
Small Grain, Silage
8.8 Tons
9/1-3131
98
0
0
Broad.
15
0.00
3.49
0.00
34.88
5035
2
UIO
Fairview
10.00
10.00
Small Grain, Silage
8.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
98
0
0
Broad.
15
0.00
3.491
0.001
34.88
5035
2
U6
Fairview
10.00
10.00
Com, Silage
19.6 Ton
2/15-6/30
214
0
0
Broad.
103
16.37
0.00
163.67
0.00
5035
2
U7
Fairview
10.00
10.00
Corn, Silage
19.6 Ton
2/15-6/30
214
0
0
Broad.
52
3.47
0.00
34.67
0.00
5035 1
2 1
US
Fairview
10.00
10.00
Com, Silage
19.6 Ton
2115-00
214
0
0
Broad.
21
0.00
4.88
0.00
48.84
5035
2
U9
Fairview
10.00
10.00
Com, Silage
19.6 Ton
2/15-6/30
214
0
0
Broad.
21
0.00
4.88
0.00
48.84
5035
2
UIO
Fairview
10.00
10.00
Com, Silage
19.6 Ton
2/15-6/30
214
0
0
Broad.
17
0.00
4.191
0.0 01
41.86
5035
3
U6
Fairview
2.50
2.50
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad. 1
40
636
0.00
15.89
0.00
5035
3
U7
Fairview
2.50
2.50
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1.3/31
95
0 1
0
Broad.
10
0.67
0.00
1.67
0.00
5035
3
U8
Fairview
2.50
2.50
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
15
0.00
3.49
0.00
8.72
5035
3
U9
Fairvim
2.50
2.50
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3131
95
0
0
Broad.
15
0.00
3.49
0.00
8.72
5035
3
UIO
Fairview
2.50
2.50
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
15
0.00
3.491
0.00
8.72
5035
3
U6 IFairview
2.50
2.50
Com, Silage • -
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
100
55.89
0.00
39.73
0.00
698225 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/11/2010 WUT Page Page 6 of 11

Waste Utilization Table
Year I
Tract
Field
Source
In
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applie.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd.
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fat
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs(A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrien
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
MM=A
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
g.YA
Tons
1000 gals
tons
5035
3
1 U7
Fairview
2.50
2.50
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/156/30
1 207
0
1 0
Broad.
50
3.33
0.00
8.341
0.00
5035
3
U8
Fairview
2.50
2.50
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/156/30
207
0
0
Broad.
20
0.00
4.65
0.00
11.63
5035
3
U9
Fairview
2.50
2.50
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-WO
207
0
0
Broad.
20
0.00
4.65
0.00
11.63
5035
3
UIO
Fairview
2.50
2.50
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/156/30
207
0
0
Broad.
17
0.00
3.95
0.00
9.88
5035
4
U6
Fairview
19.40
19.40
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
40
6.36
0.00
123.31
0.00
5035
4
U7
Fairview
19.40
19.40
,Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
10
0.67
0.00
12.94
0.00
5035
4
U8
Fairview
19.40
19.40
Small Grain, Silage -
8.6 Tons
9/1.3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
15
0.00
3.49
0.00
67.67
5035
4
U9
Fairview
19.40
19.40
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
15
0.00
3.49
0.00
67.67
5035
4
UIO
Fairview
19.40
19.40
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1.3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
IS
0.00
3.49
0.00
67.67
5035
4
U6
Fairview
19.40
19.40
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/156/30
207
0
0
Broad.
100
15.89
0.00
308.27
0.00
5035
4
U7
Fairview
19.40
19.40
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/156/30
207
0
1 0
Broad.
50
3.33
0.00
64.68
0.00
5035
4
U8
Fairview
19.40
19.40
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/156/30
207
0
0
Broad.
20
0.00
4.65
0.00
90.23
5035
4
U9
Fairview
19.40
19.40
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/156/30
207
0
0
Broad.
20
0.00
4.65
0.00
90.23
5035
4
U10
Fairview
19.40
19.40
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/156/30
207
0
0
Broad.
17
0.00
3.95
0.00
76.70
5035
6
U6
Fairview
2.60
2.60
Fescue Pasture -
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
143
0
0
Broad. 1
25
3.97
0.00
10.33
0.00
5035
6
U7
Fairview
2.60
2.60
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
143
0 1
0
Broad.
25
L67
0.00
4.33
0.00
5035
6
U8
Fairview
2.60
2.60
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
8/1-7131
143
0
0
Broad.
30
0.00
6.98
0.00
18.14
5035
6
U9
Fairview
2.60
2.60
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
8/1-7131
143
0
0
Broad.
28
0.00
6.51
0.00
16.93
5035
6
UIO
Fairview
2.60
2.60
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
143
0
0
Broad.
35
0.00
8.14
0.00
21.16
5035
7
U6
Fairview
11.80
11.80
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1.3131
95
0
0 1
Broad.
40
6.36
0.00
75.00
0.00
5035
7
U7
Fairview
11.80
1180
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
911-3/31
95
0
0
1
Broad.
10
0.67
0.00
7.87
0.00
5035
7
US
Fairview
I1.80
11.805mall
Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/I-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
IS
0.00
3.49
0.00
4L16
698225 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/11/2010 WUT Page Page 7 of I 1

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
-
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
-
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
ties.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Marron;
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
- N
N
N
N
1000
gaVA
Tons
1000 gals
tons
5035
7
U9
Fairview
11.80
11.80
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
15
0.00
3.491
0.00
41.16
5035
7 -
UIO
Fairview
11.80
11.80
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
15
O.00
3.49
0.00
41.16
5035
7
U6
Fairview
11.80
11.80
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-WO
207
0
0
Broad.
100
15.89
0.00
187.51
0.00
5035
7
U7
Fairview
11.80
11.80
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207
0
0.
Broad.
50
3.33
0.00
39.34
0.00
5035
7
U8
Fairview
11.80
11.80
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/156/30
207
0
0
Broad.
20
0.00
4.65
0.00
54.88
5035
7
1 U9
lFairview
11.80
11.80
Corn, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/156/30
1 207
0
1 0
Broad.
20
0.00
4.65
0.00
54.88
5035
7
U10[Fairview
11.80
11.80
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2115-WO
207
0
0
Broad.
17
0.00
3.95
0.00
46.65
5035
8
U6
Fairview
10.10
10.10
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
143
0
0
Broad.
25
3.97
0.00
40.12
0.00
5035
8
1 U7
airview -
10.10
10.10
Fescuc Pastures
4.3 Tons
9/1-7/3 t
143
0
0
Broad.
25
1.67
0.00
16.84
0.00
5035
8
US
Fairview
10.10
10.10
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
143
0
0
Broad.
30
0.00
6.981
0.001
70.46
5035
8
U9
Fairview
10.10
10. 10
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
9/1-7/31
143
1 0
1 0
Broad.
28
0.00
6.51
0.00
65.77
5035
8
UIO
Fairview
10.10
10.10
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
8/1.7/31
143
0
0
Broad.
35
0.00
8.14
0.00
82.21
5035
9
U6
Fairview
17.70
17.70
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
911-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
40
6.36
0.00
112.50
0.00
5035
9 1
U7
Fairview
17.70
17.70
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
10
0.67
0.00
11.80
0.00
5035
9
US
Fairview
17.70
17.70
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
911-3/31
95 -
0
0
Broad.
15
0.001
3.49
0.001
61.74
5035
9
U9
Fairview
17.70
17.70
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
911-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
15
0.00
3.49
0.00
61.74
5035
9
UIO
Fairview
17.70
17.70
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
911-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
15
0.00
3.49
0.00
61.74
5035
9
U6
Fairview
17.70
17.70
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/156/30
207
0
0
Broad.
too
15.89
0.00
281.26
0.00
5035
9
U7
Fairview
17.70
17.70
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/156/30
207
0
0
Broad.
50
3.33
0.00
59.01
0.00
5035
9
U8 lFairvicw
17.70
17.70
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/156/30
207
0
0
Broad. 1
201
0.06
4.65
0.001
82.32
5035
9
U9
Fairview
17.70
17.70
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/156/30 1
207 1
0
0
Broad. 1
20
0.00
4.65
0.00
82.32
5035
9
UIO
Fairview
17.70
17.70
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/156/30 1
207 1
0
0 1
Broad. 1
17
0.00
3.95
0.00
69.98
698225 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/11/2010 1 )NUT Page Page 8 of 11

i
Waste Utilization Table Year 1
Tract
'
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
.
Crop
'
RYE
Applies
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Regd
(Ibs/A)
Comm.
FcM
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
. (Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
-
. N
-
N
1000
gaVA
Tom
1000 gels
tons
5064
1
U6
Fairview
53.40
53.40
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
40
6.36
0.00
339.42
0.00
5064
1
U7
Fairview
53.40
53.40
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/I-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
IO
0.67
0.00
35.61
0.00
5064
1
U8
Fairview
53.40
53.40
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0 -
0
Broad.
15
0.00
3.49
0.00
186.28
5064
1
U9
Fairview
53.40
53.40
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
6
0
Broad.
15
0.00
3.49
0.00
186.28
5064
1
UIO
Fairview
53.40
53.40
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
911-361
95
0
0
Broad.
IS
0.00
3.49
0.00
186.28
5064
1
1 U6
Fairview
53.40
53.40
Corn, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15.600
207
0
0
Broad.
100
15.89
0.00
848.541
0.00
5064
1
U7
Fairview
53.40
53.40
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/156/30
207
0
0
Broad.
50
3.33
0.00
178.04
0.00
5064
1
U8
Fairview
53.40
- 53.40
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-00
207
0
0
Broad.
20
0.00
4.65
0.00
248.37
5064
1
U9
Fairview
51.10
53.40
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/156/30
207
1 0
0
Broad.
20
0.00
4.65
0.00
248.37
5064
1
U10
Fairview
53.40
53.40
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-WO
207
0
0
Broad.
171
0.00
3.95
0.00
211.11
5064
2
U6
Fairview
1.60
1.60
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
911-3/31
100
0
0
Broad.
42
6.67
0.00
10.68
0.00
5064
2 .
U7
Fairview
1.60
1.60
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
911-3/31
100
0
0
Broad.
11
0.73
0.00
1.171
0.00
5064
2
U8
Fairview
1.60
1.60
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
9/I-3/31
100
0
0
Broad.
16
0.00
3.72
0.00
5.95
5064
2
U9
Fairview
1.60
1.60
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
100 1
0
0
Broad.
16
0.00
3.72
0.00
5.95
5064
2
U10
Fairview
1.60
1.60
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
0
Broad.
15
0.00
3.72
0.00
5.95
5064
2
U6
Fairview
1.60
1.60
Com, Sil
20.0 Ton
2/156/30
218
0
0
Broad.
105
16.69
0.00
26.70
0.00
5064
2
U7
Fairview
1.60
1.60
Com, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/156/30
218
0
0
Broad.
53
3.53
0.00
5.66
0.00
5064
2
U8
Fairview
1.60
1.60
Com, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/156/30
218
0
0
Broad.
21
0.00
4.88
0.00
7.81
5064
2
U9
Fairview
1.60
1.60
Com, Silage
20.0 Ton
2115-WO
218
0
0
Broad.
21
0.00
4.88
0.00
7.81
5064
2
UIO
Fairview
1.60
1.60
Com, Silage -
0.0 Ton
2/15-6130
218
0
0
Broad.
18
0.00
4.19
0.00
6.70
5417
1 -
U6 lCongarce
6.301
6.30
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Ton
911-3/31
lit
0
0
Broad.
47
7.47
0.00
47.05
0.00
5417
1 1
U7
Congaree 1
6.30
" 6.30
Small Grain, Silage _
10.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
Ill
0
0
Broad.
12
0.80
0.00
5.04
0.00
698225 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/11/2010 WUT Page Page 9 of I I

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
APPIic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(163/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NumentA
pplied
(Ibs/A)
Liquid
ManumA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000ga1s
tons
5417
1
US
Congaree
6.30
6.30
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
Ill
1 0
1 0
Broad.
1 18
0.00
4.19
0.00
26.37
5417
1
U9
Congaree
6.30
6.30
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
ill
0
0
Broad.
18
0.00
4.19
0.00
26.37
5417
1
UIO
Congaree
6.30
6.30
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
ill
0
0
Broad.
16
0.00
4.19
0.00
26.37
5417
1
U6
Congaree
6.30
6.30
Cam, Silage
8.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
305
0
0
Broad.
14
23.36
0.00
147.16
0.00
5417
1
U7
Congaree
6.30
6.30
Cam, Silage
8.0 Ton
2/15.6130
305
0
0
Broad.
74
4.93
0.00
31.09
0.00
5417
1
US
Congaree
6.30
6.30
Cam, Silage
28.0 Ton
2/15.6/30
305
0
1 0
1 Broad.
291
0.001
6.74
0.00
42.49
5417
1
U9
Congaree
6.30
. 6.30
Cam, Silage .
28.0 Ton
2115-6/30
305
0
0
Broad.
29
0.00
. 6.74
0.00
42.49
5417
I
UIO
Congaree
6.30
6.30
Cam, Silage
28.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
305
0
0
Broad.
25
0.00
5.81
0.00
36.63
5417
2
U6
Congaree
4.50
4.50
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
Ill
0
0
Broad.
47
7.47
0.00
33.61
0.00
5417
2
U7
Congaree
4.50
4.50
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Ton
911-3/31
ill
0
0
Broad.
12
0.80
0.00
3.60
0.00
5417
2
US
Congaree
4.50
4.50
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
Ill
0
0
Broad.
18
0.00
4.19
0.00
18.84
5417
2
U9
Congaree
4.50
4.50
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
ill
0
0
Broad.
18
0.00
4.19
0.00
18.84
5417
2
U10
Congaree
4.50
4.50
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
ill
0
0
Broad.
1
0.00
4.19
0.00
18.84
5417
2
U6
Congaree
4.50
4.50
Cam, Silage
8.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
305
0
0
Broad.
147
23.36
0.00
105.11
0.00
5417
2
U7
Congaree
4.50
4.50
Cam, Silage •
28.0 Ton
2115-6/30
305
0
0
Broad.
74
4.93
0.00
22.21
0.00
5417 1
2
U8
Congaree
4.50
4.50
Cam, Silage
28.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
305
0 1
0 1
Broad.
29
0.00
6.74
0.00
30.35
5417
2
U9
Congaree
4.50
4.50
Cam, Silage
28.0 Ton
2115-6/30
305
0
0
Broad.
29
0.00
6.74
0.00
30.35
5417
2
UIO
Congaree
4.50
4.50
Com, Silage
28.0 Ton
2115-6/30
305
0
0
Broad.
25
0.00
5.81
0.00
26A6
5446
I
U6
Fairview
17.30
17.30
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3131
95
0
0
Broad.
40
6.36
0.00
109.96
0.00
5446
1
U7
Fairview
17.30
17.30
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
10
0.67
0.00
11.54
0.00
5446 1
1
U8
Fairview
17.30
17.30
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
15
0.00
3.49
0.00
60.35
5446
- I
U9
Fairview
17.30
17.30
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3131
95
0
0
Broad.
15
0.00
3.49
0.00
60.35
698225 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/11/2010 WUT Page Page 10 of 11

W.�. IIr:I:iafinn T.M.
Vnar t
Tract
-
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
-
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
FM
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Medtod
Manure
PA
NutriemA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
MmumA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gaUA
Tons
1000 gals
tons
5446
1
UIO
vairview
17.30
17.30
Small Crain, Silage -
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
1 95
0
0
1 Broad.
15
0.00
3.49
0.001
60.35
5446
1
U6
Fairview
17.30
17.30
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
too
15.89
0.00
274.90
0.00
5446
1
U7
Fairview
17.30
17.30
Cont, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
50
3.33
0.00
57.68
0.00
5446
1
US
Fairview
17.30
17.30
Cont, Silage
19.0 Ton
2115-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
20
0.00
4.65
0.00
80.46
5446
1
U9
Fairview
17.30
17.30
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-WO
207 .
0
0
Broad.
201
0.001
4.65
0.00
80.46
5446
1
U10
Fairview
17.30
17.30
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207
0
1 0
1 Broad.
17
0.00
3.95
0.00
68.39
5446
2-3
U6
Fairview
7.40
7.40
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
911-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
40
6.36
0.00
47.04
0.00
5446
2-3
U7
Fairview
7.40
7.40
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
10
0.67
0.00
4.93
0.00
5446
2-3
U8
Fairview
7.40
7.40
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
911-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
15
0.00
3.49
0.00
25.81
5446
2-3
U9
Fairview
7.40
7.40
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3131
95
0
0
Broad.
1 15
0.00
3.49
0.00
25.81
5446
2-3
U10
Fairview
7.40
7.40
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
15
0.00
3.49
0.001
25.81
5446
2-3
U6
Fairview
7.40
7.40
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
100
15.89
0.00
117.59
0.00
5446
2-3
U7
Fairview
7.40
7.40
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2115-WO
207
0
0
Broad.
50
3.33
0.00
24.67
0.00
5446
2-3
U8
Fairview
7.40.
7.40
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2115-WO
207
0
0
Broad.
20
0.00
4.65
0.00
34A2
5446
2-3
U9
lFairview
17.40
7.40
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/15.6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
20
0.00
4.65
0.00
34.42
5446
2-3
U10
Fairview
7.401
7.40
Com, Silage
19.0 Ton
2/I5-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
1 17
0.00
3.95
0.00
29.26
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
7,860.08
_ Total Produced, loon gallon
6,698.00
. €
Balance, 1000 gallons
-1,162.08
am
Total Applied, tam
FAjjW
7,242.49
Total Produced, tom
sm1,768.00
Balance, tom
-5,474.49
Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol' means user entered data
698225 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/11/2010
WUT Page Page 11 of 11

The Nutrient Management Recommendations table shown below provides an annual summary of the nutrient management plan
developed for this operation. This table provides a nutrient balance for the listed fields and crops for each year of the plan.
Required nutrients are based on the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements and soil test results. The
quantity of nutrient supplied by each source is also identified.
The total quantity of nitrogen applied to each crop should not exceed the required amount. However, the quantity of other
nutrients applied may exceed their required amounts. This most commonly occurs when manure or other byproducts are utilized
to meet the nitrogen needs of the crop. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal waste be limited so
as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field. In such situations,
additional nitrogen applications from nonorganic sources may be required to supply the recommended amounts of nitrogen.
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
0
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(Ibs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract IField
4966
1
Req'd Nutrients
95
150
150
0
01
6
2
0
Acres I
App. Period
9.70
9/1.3/31
upplied By:
0
- CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
.0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Fairview
Residuall
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
8.6 Tons
1 04-27-07
Manure
95
94
139
48
. 1
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
46 Ibs/ac.
Low.
BALANCE
'. 0
-56
-I1
48
1
•5
-2
0
Tract
I Field
4966
2
Req'd Nutrients
95
150
I50
0
0
6
2
0
Acres
App. Period
5.00
9/1-3/31
upplied By:
0
01
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Fairview
Residual
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
8.6 Tons
04.27-C
Mamurel
95
941
139
48
1
I
0
0
P Removel
Rating
46 lbs/ac.
IN
BALANCE
0
-56
-I1
48
1
-5
-2
0
Tract
Field
4966
3
Req'd Nutrien
95
I50
150
0
0
6
2
0
Acres
App. Period
9.40
9/1-3/31
SuppliedBy:
0
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Fairview
Residuall
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
8.6 Tons
1 04-27-07
Manure
95
94
139
48
1
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
46 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-56
-11
48
1
-5
-2
0
Tract
IField
4966
4
Req'd Nutrients
95
0
150
01
101
6
01
0
Acres IApp.
Period
8.00
9/1-3/31
applied By:
0
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
'0
0
01
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
- 0
0
0
Soil Serie#IFaiwiew
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
DatTons
04-27-07
Manure
95
94
139
48
I
1P
Removal
Ratinbs/ac.
ow
BALANCE
0
94
-I I
48
-9
-5
0
0
Preview .Database Version3.1 Date Printed: 8/11/2010 NMR Page Page 1 of 10

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
0
N
(lbs/A)
P2O5
(lbs/A)
K2O
(Ibs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract IField
4966
5
Req'd NutrienL
0
0
I50
0
0
6
2
0
Acres
App. Period
13.10
9/1-3/31
Supplied By:
0
0
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
fair
Residual
0
01
0
0
0
0
01
0
RYE Sample
Dam
0.0 Tons
04-27-07
Manure
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
P Removal
Rating
0lbs/ae.
Low
BALANCE
0
0
-I50
0
0
-6
-2
0
Tract
Field
4966
5-6
Req'd No trients
95
0
150
0
0
6
2
0
Acres IApp.
Period
24.40
9/1.3/31
Supplied By;
0
0
0
am
0
MKM"KM
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
Commercial pert
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Fairview
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Dam
8.6 Tons
04-27.07
Manure
95
94
139
48
1
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
46 lbs/ac.
ow
BALANCE
0
94
-11
48
1
•5
-2
0
Tract
Field
5034
1
Req'd Nutrients111
150
70
0
.0
6
0
2
Acres
App. Period
10.20
9/1.3131
Supplied By:
an
0
Na-
0.
CROP
Small Grain, Silage .
Starter
0
01
0
0
0
0
Commercial peril
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Congaree
Residuall
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
10,0 Tons
1 04-26.07
manurel
111
112
168
56
1
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
54 lbs/ac.
ILOW
BALANCE
1 0
-38
98
56
1
-5
0
'-2
Tract
Field
5034
2
Req'd Nutrients
Ili
150
60
0
0
0
01
0
Acres IApp.
Period
4.40 1
9/1.3/31
Supplied By:
0
0
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial FM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Congaree
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYEJ Sample
Dam
10.0 Tons
04-26.07
marturel
111
112
168
56
l
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
54 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-38
108
56
11
I
0
0
Tract
IField
5034
34
Req'd Nutrien
111
150
90
0
- 01
6
2
0
Acres IApp.
Period
30.80
911-3/31
Supplied By:
0
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
Commercial Fen
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
Soil Series
Congaree
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
10.0 Tons
04.26-07
Manure
1I1
112
168
56
1
1
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
54 lbs/ac. ILOW
BALANCE
0
.381
78
56
1
- -5
•2
0
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/112010 NMR Page Page 2 of 10

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
N
(Ibs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(Ibs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(Ibs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
IField
5034
S
Req'd Nutrients
111
150
150
0
0
6
2
0
Acres IApp. Period
4.00
Supplied By:
CROP
-
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fear
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
• Soil Series
Congaree
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
U
RYE Sample
Date
IO.OTons
04-26-07
Manure
111
112
168
56
1
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
'54 lbs/ac.
w
BALANCE
0
-38
18
56
1
•5
-2
0
Tract
Field
5035
1
Req'd Nutrients
95
140
150
0
0
6
2
0
Acres
App. Period
14.90
9/1.3/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
- 0
Soil Series
Fairview
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
8.6 Tons
04-26-07
Manure
95
94
139
48
1
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
4616s/ae.
w
BALANCE
0
46
•11
48
1
-5
-2
0
Tray
Field
5035
2
Req'd Nutrients98
150
150
0
0
6
2
0
Acres
App. Period
10.00
911-3131
Supplied By:
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0L49
0
- 0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil SeriesFairview
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
8.8 Tons
04-26-07
Manure
%
95
141
1
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
48 lbs/ac.
ow
BALANCE
-2
•55
-9
1
-5
-2Tract
Field
5035
3
Req'd NuMen
95
150
150
0
6
2
0
Acres
App. Period
2.50
9/1.3/31
Supplied By;
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fcrtj
0
01
0
0
0
0
01
0
Soil Series
Fairview
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYEJ Sample
Date
8.6 Tons
04-26.07
Manure
95
94
139
48
1
1
0
0
P Removal
IRating
46 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-56
-11
48
1
-5
-2
0
Tract
IField
5035
4
Req'd Nutrients-
95
150
150
0
0
6
2
0
Acres I
App. Period
19.40
9/1.3/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
01
0
0
0
0
01
0
eries
Fairview
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
[�Soi
E Same
Date
8.6 Tons
04-26-07
Manure
95
94
139
48
l
I
0
0
PRernovzdrd'Rating
1 4616s/ac.
ILow
BALANCE
1 0
-56
•ll
48
1
-5
-21
0
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/112010 NMR Page Page 3 of 10

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
0
N
(Ibs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons%A)
Tract
Field
5035
7
Req'd Nutrients
95
150
150
0
0
6
2
0
Acres
App. Period
11.80
9/1-3/31
Supplied By:
0
0
0
0
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Fairview -
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
to
8.6 Tons
04.26.07
Manure
95
94
139
48
1
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
g61bs/ac,
ow
BALANCE
0
-56
•11
48
I
-5
-2
0
Tract
Field
5035
9
Req'd Nutrients95
150
150
0
0
6
2
0
Acres
App. Period
17.70
9/1.3/31
applied By:
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Fairview
Residu
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sablple
Date
8.6 Tons
04-26-07
manurcl
95
94
1391
48.
11
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating.
46 lbs/ac.
ow
BALANCE
1 0
-56
.11
48
1
-5
-2
0
Tract
Field
5064
1
Req'd Nutrients
95
130
40
0
10
6
0
1
Acres
App. Period
53.40
9/1-3/31
Supplied By:
0
01
0
0
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Fairview
Residual
0
01
0
0
0
0
- 0
0
RYE Sample
Date
- 8.6 Tons
04-27-07
Mamie
95
94
139
481
11
I
0
0
P Removal
Rating
46 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-36
99
48
-9
-5
0
-1
Tract
Field
5064
2
Req'd Nutrien
100
150
150
mn�0
10
6
01
1
Acres IApp.
Period
1.60
9/1-3/31
Supplied By:
iffim
0
0
0
. CROP
Small Grain, Silage
I Starter
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fertj
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Fairview
Residual
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
- 0
RYEJ Sample
Date
9.0 Tons
04-27-07
marmurel
100
1001
151
491
1
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
49 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-501
1
49
-9
, -5
0
-1
Tram
I Field
5417
1
Req'd Nutrients
111
150
150
0
0
6
2
0
Acres
App. Period
6.30
9/1.3/31
Supplied By:
0
0
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
01
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Congaree
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Dat<
10.0 Tons
04-27-07
manuml
1111
112
168
56
1
1
0
0
P Removal
IRating
54 lbs/ac.
ow
BALANCE 1.
0
-38
IS
56
I
-5
-2
0
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/11/2010 NMR Page Page 4 of 10

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
0
N
(lbs/A)
P2O5
(lbs/A)
K2O
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(Ibs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
IField
5417
2
Req'd Nutrient,
III
80
0
0
0
6
0
0
Acres IApp.
Period
4.50
9/1.3/31
Supplied By:WWI
0
0
8=1
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
0
ol
0
Soil Series
Congaree
Residual
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
RYEJ Sample
Date
10.0 Tons
04-27-07
Manure
111
112
168
56
1
1 1
0
0
P Removal
IRating
54 Ibs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
32
168
56
1
-5
0
0
Tmcs
I Field
5446
1
Req'd Nutrients
95
80
l0
0
10
6
0
0
Acres IApp.
Period
17.30
9/1.3/31
Supplied By:
0
0
0
0
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
Commercial peril
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SoilSeriesFairview
-
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
. 0
RYE Sample
Date
8.6 Tons
04-27.07
Manure
95
94
139
48
1
1
0
P Removal
Rating
46 lbs/ac.
ow
BALANCE
0
14
129
48
-9
-5
07
Tract
Field
5446
2-3
Req'd Nutrien
95
130
130
0
0
6
0
0
Act!"
App. Period
7.40
9/1-3/31
Supplied By:
0
0
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
Soil Series lFairview
Residual
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date 1
8.6 Tons
1 04-27-07
1 mamarl
95
94
139
481
I
1 1
0
0
P Removal
Rating 1
46 lbs/ac.
ow
BALANCE
0
-36
9
481
I
-5
0
0
NOTE: Symbol a means user entered data
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/112010 NMR Page Page 5 of 10

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(lbs/A)
P2O5
(lbs/A)
K2O
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
IField
4966
1
Req'd Nutrienu
207
150
220
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
9.70
2/15-6/30
SuppliedBy:
0
0
CROP
Com, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Fairview
Residuall
0
01
0
0
01
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
19.0 Tons
1 04-27-07
manurel
207
2051
311
101
31
3
0
0
P Removal
Rating
65 lbs/ac.
PW
BALANCE
0
55
91
101
3
3
0
0
Tract
Field
4966
2
Req'd Nutrien
207
150
220
- 0
0
0
0
0
Acres IApp.
Period
5.00
1 2/15.6/30
Supplied By:
0
0
CROP
Com, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
01
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Fairview
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYEI Sample
Date
19.0 Tons
04-27-07
Manure
207
205
311
101
3
3
0
0
P Removal
IRating
65 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
55
91
101
3
3
0
0
Tract
Field
4966
3
Req'd Nutrients
207
150
220
0
01
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
9.40
2/15.00
Supplied By:
0
CROP
Com, Silage
Starter
0
- 0
0
01
0
0
0
Commercial Fort
0
. 0
0
0
01
0
0
0
Soil Series
Fairview
Residual
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
19.0 Tons
04-27.07
Manure
207
205
311
101
3
3
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
65 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
55
91
101
3
3
0
0
Truer
Field
4966
4
Req'd Nutrients
207
0
220
0
0
0
01
0
Acres IApp. Period
8.00
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
0
6
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
01
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Fairview
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
-0
0
0
RYEJ Sample
Date
19.0 Tons .
04-27-07
Manure
207
205
311
101
. 3
3
0
0
P Removal
Rating
65 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
205
91
101
3
3
0
0
Tract
I Field
4966
5
Req'd Nutrien
0
0
220
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I App.
Period
13.10
2/15-00
Supplied By:
0
0
CROP
Com, Silage ..
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
fair IResidual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYEJ Sample
Date
0.0 Tons
04.27-0J
Manure
0
0
0
0
0
0
0E100
P Removal
Rating
0lbs/ac.
ow
BALANCE
0
0
-220
0
0
0
0
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:, 8/11/2010 NMR Page Page 6 of 10

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
]
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
IField
4966
5.6
Req'd Nutrients
207
0
220
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
24.40
2/15.6/30 .
Supplied By:
0
0
0
CROP
Com, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Pert
0
0
0
0
0
0
00
Soil Series
Fairview
Residu
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
RYEJ Sample
Date
19.0 Tons
04-27-07
manuml
207
205
311
101
3
3
0
0
P Removal
Raring
65 lbs/ac,
vkw
BALANCE
0
205
91
101
3
3
0
0
Tract
Field
5034
1
Req'd Nutrients305
150
130
0
0
0
0
0
Acres IApp.
Period
10.20
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
Commercial Fert
0
01
0
0
01
0
0
- 0
Soil Series
Congaree
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYEJ Sample
Date
28.0 Tons
04-26-07
Manure
304
301
457
150
6
5
1
0
P Removal
IRating
95 Ibs/ae.
Low
BALANCE
-1
151
327
150
6
5
1
0
Tract
IField
5034
2
Req'd Nutrients
305
150
120
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
4.40
2115-6130
Supplied By:MOMMEW
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fort
0
0
0
01
01
0
01
0
Soil Series
Congaree
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE sample
Date
28.0 Tons
04.26-07
manurel
304
301
457
150
6
5
1
0
P Removal
Rating
95 Ibs/ac.
ow
BALANCE
-1
151
337
150
6
5
1
0
Tract
Field
5034
34
Req'd Nutrients
305
150
I50
0
'0
0
0
0
Acres IApp.
Period
30.80
2115-6/30_Supplied
By:
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
01
01
0
01
0
Soil Series
Congaree
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
28.0 Tons
04.26-07
manurcl
304
301
457
150
6
5
1
0
PRemoval
Rating
95 Ibs/ac:
Pw
.BALANCE
-1
151
307
150
6
5
- I
0
Tract
Field
5034
5
Req'd Nutrients
305
1501,
220
.0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
4.00
2115-6/30
SuppliedBy:
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
01
01
0
0
0
Soil Series
ongaree
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
care
28.0 Tons
04-26-07
Manure
304
301
457
I50
6
5
1
0
P Removal
Rating
95 lbs/ac.
ow
BALANCE
-1
151
237
150
6
5
1
0
........_.Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/11/2010 NMR Page Page 7 of 10

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(lbs/A)
P2O5
(lbs/A)
K2O
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
IField
5035
1
Req'd Nutrients
207
140
220
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
14.90
2115-6130
Supplied By:
0
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Pert
0
0
01
01
0
0
01
0
Soil Series
Fairview
Residual
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
19.0 Tons
04-26-07
Manure
207
205
311
101
3
3
0
0
P Removal
Rating
651bs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
65
91
101
3
3
0
0
Tram
Field
5035
2
Req'd Nutrients
214
150
220
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
10.00
2/15.6Wtl
upplied By:
0
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
lFairview
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
19.6 Tons
04-26.07
Manure
214
213
324
106
3
3
0
0
P Removal
Rating
67 lbs/ac,
ow
BALANCE
0
631
104
106
31
3
01
0
Tract
IField
5035
3
Req'd Nutrients
207
150
220
0
01
0
01
0
Acros I
App. Period
2.50
2/15.6/30
applied By:
0
0
CROP
Com, Silage
Starter
0
0
01
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
Soil Series
Fairview
Residual
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
RYEJ Sample Date
19.0 Tons
04.26-07
Manure
207
205
311
101
31
3
0
0
P Removal
Rating
65 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
551
91
101
.3
3
0
0
Tram
I Field
5035
4
Req'd Nutrients
207
1501
220
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
19.40
2/15.6130
upplied By:
0
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Fairview
Rwiduall
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
19.0 Tons 1
04.26-07
Manure
207
205
311
101
31
3
0
0
P Removal
Rating
65 lbs/ac. ILOW
BALANCE 1
0
55
91
101
3
3
0
0
Tract
I Field.
5035
6
Req'd Nutrien
143
In
I50
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I App.
Period
2.60
B/I.7/31
upplied By:
0
0
CROP
Fescue Pasture
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Fairview
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYEJ Sample
Date 1
4.3 Tons 1
04.2607
Manure
143
143
209
711
31
0
P Removal
I Rating 1
7lbs/ac. ILOW
BALANCE
0
-1
59
7t
3
31
0
0
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/11/2010 NMR Page Page 8 of 10

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(lbs/A)
P2O5
(lbs/A)
K2O
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbstA)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract Field
5035
7
Req'd Nutrien
207
150
220
0
0
0
0
0
Acres IApp.
Period
11.80
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
0
0
CROP
Com, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
. Soil Series
Fairview
Residu
0
01
0
0
01
0
01
0
RYEJ Sample
Date
19.0 Tons
04-26-07
Manure
207
205
311
101
31
3
0
0
P Removal
IRating
65 Ibs/ae.
Low
BALANCE
0
55
91
101
31
3
0
0
Tract
Field
5035
8
Req'd Nutrients
143
150
150
0
0
0
0
0
Acre
App. Period
10.10
8/1.7/31
Supplied By:MOWN
0
' CROP
Fescue Pasture
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Pert
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Fairview
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
4.3 Tons
04-26-07
Manure
143
143
209
.71
3
3
0
0
P R<moval
Rating
7lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-7
591
711
3
3
0
0
Tract
Field
5035
9
Req'd Nutrien t,
207
150
220
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
17.70
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
0
0
CROP
Com, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
. 0
0
0
Soil Series lFairview
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
19.0 Tons
04-26-07
Manure
207
205
311
101
3
3
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
65 Ibs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
55
91
101
3
3
0
0
Tract
Field
5064
1
Req'd Nutrients
207
,130
100
0
0
0
0
0
Acres;
App, Period
53.40
2/15-00
Supplied By:
0
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Fairview
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
19.0 Tons
04-27-07
Manure
207
205
311
101
3
3
0
.0
PR emoval
Rating
65 Ibs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
75
211
101
3
3
0
0
Tract
Field
5064.
2
: Req'd Nutrients
218
150
220
0
0
- 0
0
0
Acre App.
Period
1.60
2/15.6/30
Supplied By:
0
ON
WN
N-W
ON
CROP
Com, Silage
Starter
- 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Fairview
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
20.0 Tons
04-27-07
Manure
218
216
328
106
3
3
0
0
P Removal
Rating
68 Ibs/ae.
ow
BALANCE
0
66
108
106
3
3
0
0
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/11/2010 . NMR Page Page 9 of 10

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(lbs/A)
P2O5
(lbs/A)
K2O
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(Ibs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
IField
5417
1
Req'd Nutrients
305
1501
220
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
6.30
2/15.6130
Supplied By:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CROP
Com, Silage
Starter
0
Commercial Pert
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Congaree
Residuall
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
RYEJ Sample
Date
. 28.0 Tons
04-27-07
Manure
304
301
457
I50
6
5
1
0
P Removal
Rating
95 Ibs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
-1
151
237
150
6
5
1
0
Tract
Field
5417
2
Req'd Nutrient,305
90
40
0
0
0
0
0
Acres IApp.
Period
4.50
2115.00
Supplied By:
0
01
0
W
OWN
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Pert
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Congaree
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
28.0 Tons
1 04-27-07
Matturel
304
301
457
150
6
5
1
0
PRemoval
Rating
95 lbs/ac.
ow
BALANCE
-1
211
417
150
6
5
1
0
Tract
IField
5446
1
.Req'd Nutrients
207
90
=0
0
0
0
0
. 0
Acres.
App, Period
17.30
1 2/15-00
upplied By:
0
0
0
I•
CROP
Com, Silage
Starter
01
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
Soil Series
Fairview
Residual
0
0
0
0
.01
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Dnte
19.0 Tons
04-27-07
Manurel
207
205
311
101
3
3
0
0
em P Roval
Rating
65 Ibs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
115
261
101
3
3
0
0
Tract
Field
5446
2-3
Req'd Nutrien
207
130
200
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
7.40
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
0
0
CROP
Com, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert
.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Fairview
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
19.OTons 1
04.27-07
Manure
207
205
3111
101
- 3
3
0
0
P Removal
Rating
65 lbs/ac.
w
BALANCE
0
75
1111
1011
31
31
0
0
NOTE: Symbol • means user entered data.
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/11/2010 NMR Page Page 10 of 10

The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that should be taken if soil tests indicate excessive levels of
copper or zinc. Fields that receive manure must have an annual soil analysis for these elements. High levels of zinc and copper can adversely affect plant growth.
Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels. Site life can be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and
zinc to be applied in Ibs/acre by 0.036 and 0.071, respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85. By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc, we
can predict life of the site for waste disposal
In addition to copper and zinc indices, this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each crop based on the most recent soil sample. Application of
lime at recommended rates is necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production.
Required Soil Test Values
Tract
Field
Crop
pH
Lime Recant.
(tons/a-)
CL-1
Copper Rewmmeodation
Zn-I
Zinc Recommendation
4966
1
Small Grain, Silage
. 6.5
0.0
0
None
0
None
4966
1
Com, Silage
6.5
0.0
0
None
0
None
4966
2
Small Grain; Silage
.0
0.0
0
None
0
None
4966
2
Com, Silage
.0
0.0
0
None
0
None
4966
3
Small Grain, Silage
.0
0.0
0
None
0
None
4966
3
Com, Silage
.0
0.0
0
None
0
None
4966
4 -
Small Grain, Silage
6.1
0.0
92
None
0
None
4966
4
Com, Silage
6.1
0.0
92
None -
0
None -
4966
5
Small Grain, Silage
.0
0.0
0
None
0
None
4966
5
Corn, Silage
.0
0.0
0
None
0
None
4966
5-6
Small Grain, Silage
.0
0.0
0
None
0
None
4966
5-6
Com, Silage
.0
0.0-
0
None
0
None
5034
1
Small Grain, Silage
5.0
1.5
28
None -
19
None
5034
1
Com, Silage
5.0
0.0
28
None -
19
None
5034
2
Small Grain, Silage
6.7
0.0
32
None
27
None
5034
2
Com, Silage
6.7
0.0
32
None
27
None
5034
34
Small Grain, Silage -
6.8
0.0
15
None
g
None
5034
34
Com, Silage
6.8
0.0
15
None
g
None
5034
5
Small Grain, Silage
6.6
0.0
0
None
0
None
5034
5
Com, Silage -
6.6
0.01
0
None
0
None
5035
1
Small Grain, Silage -
.0
0.0
0
None
0
None
5035
I
Com, Silage
.0
0.0
0
None
0
None
5035
2
Small Grain, Silage
.0
0.0
0
None
p
None
---'---`-'-'---------=--------------'------.........-------------------------- -------------------- ----------------------------------
698225 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 08-11-2010 STV Page Page 1 of 2

Required Soil Test Values
Tmet
Field
-
Crop
pH
Lime Recom
(Wnslwm)
Ca -I
Copper Recommendation
Zn-I
Zinc Recommendation
5035
2
lCorn, Silage -
.0
0.0
0
None
0
None
5035
3
Small Grain, Silage
.0
0.0
0
None
0
None
5035
3
Com, Silage - -
.0
0.0
0
None
0
None
5035
4
Small Grain, Silage
.0
0.0
0
None
0
None
5035
4
Com, Silage
.0
0.0
0
None
0
None
5035
6
Fescue Pasture
.0
0.0
0
None
0
None
5035
7
Small Chain, Silage
.0
0.0
0
None
0-
None
5035
7
Com, Silage
.0
0.0
0 -
None -
- 0
None
5035
8
Fescue Pasture
.0
- 0.0
0
None
0
None
5035
9
Small Grain, Silage
.0
0.0
0
None -
0
None
5035
9
Com, Silage
.0
0.0
0
None
0
None
5064
1
Small Grain, Silage
5.7
0.5-
38
None
0
None
5064
I
Com, Silage -
5.7
0.0
38
None
0
None
5064
2
Small Grain, Silage
5.4
0.7
26
None
0
None
5064
2.
Com, Silage -
5.4
0.0
26
None
0
None
5417
I
Small Gmin, Silage
4.9
0.4
10
None
0
None
5417
1 1
Com, Silage
4.9
0.0
10
None
0
None
5417
2 ISmall
Grain, Silage
6.3
0.0
95
None
0
None
5417
2
Com, Silage
6.3
0.0
95
None
0
None
5446
1
Small Grain, Silage
5.8
0.0
52
None
0
None
5446
I Icom,
Silage 1
5.8
0.01
52
None
0
None
5446
2-3 1
Small Grain, Silage 1
6.2 1
0.01
87 1
None -
0
None
5446
2-3 lCom,
Silage 1
6.2 1
0.01
87 1
None
0
None
698225 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 08-11-2010 STV Page Page 2 of 2

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available
at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days
minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or
holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that
the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative,
the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these
situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the
structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storita Ca acit
Source Name
jDrysta,ks
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
9/1
90
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
59
1
2
31
i
3
0
1
4
90
1
5
90
1
6
90
1
7
59
1
8
28
1
9
2
1
10
53
1
11
62
1
12
70
Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
------------------------ ........------ ----.......-.........----...--.
698225 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 08-11-2010 Capacity Page Page 1 of 2

Available Waste Stora a Cai)acitv
Source Name
I Waste Storage Ponds 1 & 2
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
9/1
120'
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
75
1
2
47
1
3
16
1
4
82
1
5
120
1
6
120
1
7
89
1
8
58
1
9
29
1
10
51
1
11
47
1
12
42
• Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
------------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.-- ------------ ------------. -. -
698225 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 08-11-2010 Capacity Page Page 2 of 2

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
I. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation
or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns
or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the
waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is
within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to
secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving
crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than.5 tons per acre per year.
Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but
less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard
393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land
application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application. does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and
Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such
that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and flies.
............I......................................................------------- ---- --.... ------------------:----I...... ..i...........
698225 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/11/2010 Specification Page 1

8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on
these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted
to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior
to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from
a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or after October 1,1995, shall not be applied closer that 25
feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to
prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
- -- - .......... -..................-------------------------------- ---------...............................................
698225 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/11/2010 Specification Page 2

17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon
areas should be kept.mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops
for direct human consumption. However,.if animal waste is used on crops for
direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further
applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of
the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied
based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen
based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be
adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five .years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5)
years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
...... --- ....._...---------------------------------------------------------------------- _---- ..
698225 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/11/2010 Specification Page 3

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 6, 8
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 Ib/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 Ib/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 Ib/ac. N to
pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and
Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 34, 5
Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, com should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Pant
1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for
your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be
applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when
com is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 Ibs nitrogen per ton of expected
yield applying no more than 100 to 120 Ibs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be
reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and
expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus
is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is
essential in profitable com silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest.
........ ....... ................ ......................... ..--:...... -- .............. ......... _-- ------
698225 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 08-1 I-2010 Crop Note Page Page 1 of 3

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 2-3, 3, 4, 5-6, 7, 9
Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant
1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety"green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for
your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be
applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when
corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 Ibs nitrogen per ton of expected
yield applying no more than 100 to 120 Ibs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be
reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and
expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus
is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is
essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 3-4, 5
Small Grain Silage, Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains,
small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current
NCSU "Small.Grain Production Guide".Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when
planting no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU
Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety
with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 30 Ibs N at planting.
Increase N at planting by 20% for no -till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a
soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February -March. Apply 10 to 121bs. N
per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be
analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain. Timely management
of diseases, weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover
crop after harvest.
.....................--------------..........------.....--------...---------.............- ------------.- ----.
698225 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 08-11-2010 Crop Note Page Page 2 of 3

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 2-3, 3, 4, 5-6, 7, 9
Small Grain Silage, Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains,
small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant IS to 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current
NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide".Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when
planting no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU
Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety
with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 30 Ibs N at planting.
Increase N at planting by 20% for no -till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a
soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February -March. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. N
per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield.Plant samples can be
analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain. Timely management
of diseases, weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover
crop after harvest.
.............................. .......----------. ---......----....------------------------------ ------
698225 Database Version 3.1 p 'YDate Printed: 08-11-2010 Crop Note Page Page 3 of 3
>.' k
'�'fQ

W5x o
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
08-16-2007
This plan has been prepared for:
Maple Ridge Dairy /l
Bill Horton
299 Horton Road
Mt. Airy, NC 2 703 0
This plan has been developed by:
RECEIVED
Greg Goings N.C. Dept. of ENR
NRCs APR 0 9 2009
220 cooper street Winston-salem
Regional Office
Dobson, NC 27017
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
�\ the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
Signature (owner)
Signature (manager or producer)
.F-N-o,2
Date
Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: i - 8 ,Qo
Technical ialist Signature Date
--------------- .------------------------------------------------------------------------------ --'................................... -------------
784252 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 08-16-2007 Cover Page l

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S2
Dairy (Milk Cow) Liquid Manure Slurry waste generated 4,649,400 gals/year by a 600
animal Dairy (Milk Cow) Liquid Manure Slurry operation. This production facility has
waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
46025
Incorporated
62762
Injected
71130
Irrigated
41841
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (Ibs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (Ibs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
46,025
91636
-45,611
9,256,989
4,607,589
------------------------- ---------------------------------- -............... ................. -- ------------------------------------------- .....
Note: In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
* Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
784252 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 08-16-2007 Source Page Page 1 of 1

A`N A
Gr
NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Maple Ridge Dairy Inc
Maple Ridge Dairy
1174 Pine Ridge Rd
Mount Airy, NC 27030
Dear Maple Ridge Dairy Inc:
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
October 1, 2009
RECEIVED De Freeman
N.C. Dapt of ENR
Secretary
OCT 1 4 2009
Winston-Salem
Rnlonal Office
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC860010
Maple Ridge Dairy
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Si rry County
In accordance with your renewal request, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage
(COC) issued to Maple Ridge Dairy Inc, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
management system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the Maple Ridge Dairy, located in Surry County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than the following annual averages:
Dairy Calf:
Dairy Heifer: 100
Milk Cow: 600
Dry Cow:
Beef Stocker Calf:
Beef Feeder:
Beef Brood Cow:
Other:
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2014, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWC860010 that was previously issued to this facility. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system
for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be
established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or
increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to
the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or
number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Please nay careful attention to the
record keening and monitoring conditions in this permit. Record keening forms are unchanged with this
General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keepingforms.
orms.
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1636
Location: 2728 Capital Blvd., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 One
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Customer Service: 1-877.623-6748 No'jrtth C� rofina
Internet: ppo tncwateryua live rg AWitra�ly
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affiimauve Action Employer

If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site -specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey, any property rights in either real or personal property.
Per 15A NCAC 2T .0105(h) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, then an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Unit for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition II.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You
may find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Blacksburg/Roanoke, VA
National Weather Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at:
www.erh.noaa.lzovler/mk/
This facility is located in a county covered by our Winston-Salem Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information
concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at
[phone].
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosure (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs)
Winston-Salem Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Surry County Health Department
Surry County Soil and Water Conservation District
APS Central Files (Permit No. AWC860010)
AFO Notebooks

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Maple Ridge Dairy, Inc
Maple Ridge Dairy
646 Pine Ridge Rd
Mt. Airy, NC 27030
Dear Maple Ridge Dairy, Inc:
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Dee Freeman
Director Secretary
RECEIVED
April 28, 2009 N.C. Dept of ENR
APR 3 0 2009
Winston-Salem
Regional Office
Subject: Additional Information Request
Application No. AWC860010
Maple Ridge Dairy
Sorry County
The Animal Feeding Operation Unit of Division of Water Quality's Aquifer Protection Section has completed a
preliminary review of your renewal permit application package. Additional information is required before we
may continue our review. Please address the following items within 30 (thirty) days of receipt of this letter:
You were requested to submit, two copies of your facility'swaste utilization plan (WUP.or, nutrient -
management plan,.NMP).with.your permit renewal application.. Our record show both copies ofthe waste.plan
are,incomplete.inyour permit application. Please submit complete copies of -your current WUP. or NMP 4o my.
attention at the address given at the bottom of the first page of this letter.
Please 'be aware.that:.you are responsible formeeting.all requirements'setforth in North Ca'rolina'rules and-..-. :: vrs-;. • :` : ,..
u-rregulationsz�•'Any.oversights.that occurred in:the ''review of the,subject application. package,are:still'the:zria
..._.: :<responsibility.ofthe applicant: In addition; any omissions made in responding to the:above.itemsshall resultin:'•%-...
future requests for additional information.
Please reference the:subject•application. number when providingahe requested information: All documents shall^.i,, :.: r
be signed, sealed and dated, -;with two (2) copiessubmitted to my attentiomat the address below. Please.note thatai.,tr 'I-,: ';;U,
failure to provide this additional information on or before the above requested date may result in your
application being returned as incomplete.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Miressa D. Garoma
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: :Winston-Salem Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Surry County Soil and Water Conservation District
APS Files- AWC860010
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Internet: www.ncwatergualitv.ore Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper
'telephone:
Fax 1:
Fax 2:
Customer Service:
Om YhCarol ina
Witrn//Y
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]

Surry Cc
Dlsclalmer: The information contained on this page is taken from aerial mapping, tax mapping, and public records and is NOT to be construed or
used as a sur%ey or legal description'. Only a licensed professional land suneyor can legally determine precise locations, ele%ebons, length and
direction of a fine, and areas.
Measure Results
Length: 860 feet (0.2 miles)
httc./�Ica is net Anderson B Associates, Inc. htto//~ a ndassoc; com
vable.asp
V
i
1 of 1 12/31/2013 8:36 AM

RJ
Atr.l iAa
4tldp WM r
1*2j 1
MIAMP141 v
WAW71WAd+lJ 1
S�IaM�IaaPN!dS
Wd1445Wa0dJdJ-
00d
SIDtpkwu :q
suu¢� a6piy a�d¢W
,

Mitchell, Patrick
From: Daniel Horton [[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31. 2012 8:56 AM
To: Mitchell, Patrick
Subject: Pumping info
Attachments: pumping info.10 10 12.pdf
Patrick,
Here is the pumping infro you needed. I used elevations from Surry County tax maps in my chart.
Base elevation 1250' at lagoon
psineeded
Field ID
Elevation
Elevation Change
psi change
500gpm
700gpm
800gpm
5035-1
1300'
+50'
+22
92
153
169
5035-2
1280'
+30'
+13
83
144
160
5035-4
1270'
+20'
+9
79
140
156
5035-9
1300'
+50'
+22
92
153
169
5446-1
1210'
-40'
-17
53
114
130
5446-2
1190,
-50,
-26
44
105
121
5446-3
1190,
-50'
-26
44
105
121
5064-1
1210'
-40'
-17
53
114
130

MID -ATLANTIC
agn s
www.midatianticag.com
Customer Information:
Mid -Atlantic AgriSystems
1106 Ashville Rd.
Quarryville, PA 17566
1-800-222-2948
717-529-2782
(FAX)717-529-3137
Worksheet
Date: 10 / 10 / 12
Ross E.Johnson
(610) 563 — 6196 cell
'Billing" Address:.11 ,,„ i
.Shi in Address:
' 1
Company:
Maple Ridge Farm
Company:
Name:
Daniel Horton
Name:
Address:
Address:
City/State/Zip
City/StatelZip
E-mail,
E-mail:
Phone:
Phone:
Equipment being used
Houle 15" 6 blade pump: 150 max. pressure; 350' hd , 1200 gpm max. cap.
Hobbs 4" x 1,250' hose
1,320' of 6" hose
(?) feet of 6" pvc pipe
3-pt. hitch applicator with 4" swing arm and multiple drop hoses
** Zero feet of elevation change used in calculations below
500 gpm through 4" x 1,250' of hose
142' of head
500 gpm through 1,320' of 6" hose ; .01584 per ft. of pvc pipe or hose...
20.91' head
Total :
162.91 'head
70.52 psi
700 gpm through 4" x 1,250' of hose
265.42' of head
700 gpm through 1,320' of 6" hose ; .02952 per ft. of pvc pipe or hose...
38.97 head
Total :
304.39' head
131.77 psi
'* Every 2.31' of elevation difference adds / subtracts 1 psi
Force — feeding pressure pump with agitator pump adds 15psi +/- to discharge
pressure
3-pt. applicator requires only 25 psi +/- to operate
800 gpm increases psi needed in 4" hose to 147
** Limiting factor for maximum gpm will always be the 4" hose

AN
iF 'fit{� /r __ • -��t • � ' • r
�` �,' '' ,,'�.✓/OprPs J 7 ', ll} �l.i� '_. �1 f.5. \ Moores
`4 � Y}�s �Y . y' r 4ork Y • 11 � � _ .. •e
-
�f;
i~? + � 4 • ,•(•p i �^fit � +� �t� � Y � ��� +>1 �-0.; (.+� 7 T r irw >"<jJ J,/, 1�� eR �,.:5 - +
=M'\ lr�. Y� � `'; P eta .vat } }�, i �J f { vt1+'',.�, "a' "�i•�• �,� b,_�,�> T• b. / :`
? s ,aid. 'iit' 3Srkai -z{ iwtitir� \�t ,.� S �i. Jys�i��Ti•
�. [+, �'t h' ' �.u� r •P/•:r r4^ �'�� t���'��}i �,��;+�q f�'�iI `i �/r$1U�43sI.>'�'�'� " r.
W Y �t i e r r: !J\\ �'�y �-.,,fir;�• I a+ + �•�i�• h 1
I i!' :b *non Rn
c.. t1i A � ?� *i7t` i•'i-j �Y 1 �� �xw� v�y Y ,,,i r 1 '4h
q t y \\C
;,
� 1Y�{S},trj g�A�� 3.rYa �•trt lc l-\\x}'�.��(1-��"�i, l�� �.
•\ 'fit ,}. )�r� } Si
:�� i <r�,x3'"� .v' ''.1j y �'r'�I 7T•`1�.vi'�`l+'i .�'`� � -
pu'- .,.'t J vx Y � '.� r k.i. .} i r +M c�R J e•e

►Zevi��
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
fMaple.Ridge Dairy
r-
Bill-Horton- —
299 Horton Road
Mt. Airy, NC 2 703 0
k07-20-2007
This plan has been developed by:
Greg Goings
NRCS
220 cooper street
Dobson, NC 27017
6 -.'---
Developer �Oature
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
Signature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By:
Technical S •ialist Signature Date
._..................--................. ...---- ---- - _...._..........------------..._..............._......_-----------------------
685320 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 07-20-2007 Cover Page 1

RECEIVED
Animal Waste Management Plan Certification N.C. Oeot of ENR
Please type or print all information that does not require a signature)
Ezistin' or .. New or. . Ex ande lease'circle one
General Information: Permit e: Re9'°°' o"`e
Name of Farm:
Owner(s)
Mailing f
Farm Location: County Farm is located
y No: F3 K. - In
No: 336 -'7)9- 79Z)4
Latitude and Longitude: 36 30 O j / 80 4.3 j �5 Integrator: — --
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.):
of
No. ofAnimals
o Wean to Feeder
o Feeder to Finish
o Farrow to Wean
o Farrow to Feeder
o Farrow to Finish
o Gilts
o Boars
Type of Poultry
o Layer
o Non -Layer
Type of Beef
o Brood
o Feeders
o Stockers
No. ofAnimals
No. ofAnimals
Type of Dairy No. ofAnimals
@(Milking Co00
oDry
rHeifers /D O
o Calves
Other Type ofLivestoek: Number ofAnimals:
ExpamfingOperatmn'Only,�I ;
f
v fr d !(_:
PrevmusiDesign Gapucrty. �00 Addthonal Design Cap'amty t. ^Total;D`esigri Capacity
Acreage Available for Application: /� / Required Acreage: -7,4D
Number of waste structures: `f Total Capacity: e4 3!o O Cubic Feet (0)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or 00
(please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the waste structures (please circle one or both as applicable)
************************************************************************************
Owner / Manager Agreement
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage
system or construction of new facilities will require a permit application and a new certification to be submitted to the Division
of Water Quality (DWQ) and permit approval received before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must
be no discharge of animal waste from the storage system to surface waters of the state unless specifically. allowed under a
permit from DWQ and there must not be run-off from the application of animal waste. I (we) understand that run-off of
pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be minimized using technical standards developed by the USDA -Natural
Resources Conservation Service (MRCS). The approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the DWQ Regional Office and
the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD). I (we) know that any modification must be approved by
a technical specialist and submitted to the DWQ Regional Office and local SWCD and required approvals received from DWQ
prior to implementation. A change in farm ownership requires a permit application to be sent to DWQ along with a new
certification (if the approved plan is changed).
Name of L
Signature:
Name of N- - o
Signature: Date:
AWC - September 18, 2006

Technical Specialist Certification
I As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A
NCAC 6H .0104, I certify that the animal waste management system, for the farm named above has an animal waste
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Water Quality as specified in 15A
NCAC 2T .1300 (formerly 2H .0217) and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service and/or the North Carolina Soil
and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2T .1300 (formerly 2H .0217) and 15A NCAC 6F .0101-.0105.
The following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist who may
sign each certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC, 1), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are technically
competent.
IL Certification of Design
A) Collection, Storage, Treatment System
Check the appropriate box
Existing facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with waste utilization requirements.
✓New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and ponds,
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): G re a eso 'n as
Affiliation Date Work Completed: IQ lh
Address (j
Signature:
No.: -331. - 3$4- 8 75'
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is suitable
for waste management; and the hydraulic and nutrient loading ratesare appropriate for the site and receiving crop.
Name of Technical Specialist. (Please Print): �` P a �6t
Affiliation Date Work Completed: IQ16 ,S
Address
Signatur
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check the appropriate box
o Facility without exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots
✓ Facility with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please
Affiliation `� Date Work Completed: 7 107
7s—/
AWC - September 18, 2006

III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection, Storage, Treatment Installation
New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been installed in
accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):_Lf-
Affiliation 'Jzs:.c� Date Work Completed: 7 a
Address (Agency): Phone No.:&% Mnpsi5/
711 1/0 7
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): 6; re a C4,
Affiliation Date
Completed: 7 /131d 6
Address (Agency): IV265 Phone No.: 33 G - 3 86 - 9 7- t
Signature: Date:
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots (RC)
Facility with exterior lots
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as specified in
the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): G rez 4 G b
Affiliation Date
Address (Aeencv): N2t: S
Signature:
D) Application and Handling Equipment Installafion (WUP or 1)
No.: 334•384-89S`t
7/i s /,o 7
p Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready for use; calibration
and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
o Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner has
proposed leasing or third parry application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified in the
contract agrees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and ate contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date
Address
Completed: /a / 5
Phone No.: 331, -3 81 - 9'7sl
AWC - September 18, 2006

D). Application and Handling Equipment
Check the appropriate box
W Existing or expanding facility with existingwaste aste application equipment (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the waste
management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed
either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been established;
required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidanceare contained as part of the plan).
New, expanded, or existing facility without existing waste application equipment for spray irrigation. (1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the plan
at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of applications
has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part
of the plan).
New, expanded, or existing facility without existing waste application equipment for land spreading not using spray
irrigation. (WUP or 1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the plan
at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of applications
has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part
of the plan).
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):_ C5 rB 4 G o ; rl 4 C
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency):
No.: 33L -,38& - 8X5/
9/7�D6
E) Odor Control, Insect Control, Mortality Management and Emergency Action Plan (SD
SI, WUP, RC or I)
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist, an Insect Control
Checklist, a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odors and insects have
been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best Management
Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the Mortality
Management Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): (3r-ea moo:
Affiliation Date
Address (Agency): _ A/ )ZG 5
Completed:
F) Written Notice of New or Expanding Swine Farm
The following signature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June
21, 1996. If the facility was built before June 21, 1996, when was it constructed or last expanded
9s
I (we) certify that I (we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners andall property owners who
own property located across a public road, street, or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was in
compliance with the requirements.of NCGS 106-805. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notifed are
attached.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
AWC -September 18, 2006

E) Odor Control Insect Control and Mortality Management (SU, Sl, W UF, KU or 1)
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational.
mortality management system as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): AA*e G .-a a G o .',-.y c
Work
Please return the completed form to the Division of Water Quality at the following address:
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
The
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste
Management Plan to the DWQ Regional Office and the local Soil and Water Conservation
District Office and to keep a copy in your files with your Animal Waste Management Plan.
AWC - September IS, 2006 5

United States Department of Agriculture
v6.;NRCS
Natural Resources Conservation Service
530 West Innes St. 704-637-2400
Salisbury, NC 28144 704-637-8077 — Fax
February 14, 2007
Subject: ENG- Maple Ridge Dairy
Waste Storage Pond
Approval for Payment
Dobson, Co NC
EQIP #
To: Dick Everhart
District Conservationist
Dobson, NC
This is the Approval letter for Maple Ridge Dairy Farms, Waste Storage Pond for coast share
payment. I have completed the on site investigation and review of notes, drawings and
pictures of the project, and it was installed according to NRCS design and specification on
February 16 , 2007.
At this time I am approving the practice for cost share.
If you have question let me know.
M.L. Fisher
Civil Engineering Technician, Area 2
CC: Jacquie Simon
The Natural Resources Conservation Service provides leadership in a partnership effort to help people
conserve, maintain, and improve our natural resources and environment.
An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

3, 1 State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Animal Feeding Operations Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
State General Permit — New or Expanding Animal Waste Operations
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility name:,Maple_Ridge Dairy �
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Bill Horton_
1.3 Mailing address: 646 Pine Ridge Road
City, State: NC Zip: 27030
Telephone number (include area code): (336 ) 719 - 7904
1.4 Physical address: 299 Horton Road_
City, State: NC Zip: 27030_
Telephone number (include area code): (336 ) 719 - 7904
1.5 County where facility is located: Surry
1.6 Facility location (directions from nearest major highway, using SR numbers for state roads): HWY. 89 to SR 1396 right on
SR1663
1.7 Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):_
1.8 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; circle which type is listed):_
1.9 Facility's original start-up date: 1946 Date(s) of facility expansion(s) (if applicable): fall 2006
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility number: 8686=10
2.2 Operation Description: expanding to 700
Please enter the Design Capacity of the system. The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum number for which the waste
management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals
Tyne of Poultry No. of Animals
Type of Cattle No. of Animals
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Farrow to Wean (# sow) _
❑ Turkey
❑ Beef Stocker Calf
❑ Farrow to Feeder (# sow) _
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Farrow to Finish (# sow) _
® Dairy Heifer CI00 -1
❑ Wean to Finish (# sow) _
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Gilts
® Milk Cow 1600. -
❑ Boar/Stud
FORM: AWO-STATE-G-N/E 1/10/06 Page 1 of 5

0
2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system):.614—Required Acreage (as listed in the CAWMP)-340_'�
2.4 Number of lagoons: _ Total Capacity (cubic feet): _ Required Capacity (cubic feet):
Number of Storage Ponds: 2 Total Capacity (cubic feet): 288360 Required Capacity (cubic feet): 16345 Figure
contains two dry stack WSF
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or (circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the waste management system? YES or(9)(circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? YES or NO (circle one)
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST:
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and two copies of the application for State General Permit -
Animal Waste Operations; ali
3.2 Three copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied and a county roadmap with the location of the
facility indicated;
3.3 Three copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CA WMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a permit application for
animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components. Some ofthese components may not have been required at the time
the facility was certified but should be added to the CAWMP for permitting purposes:
3.3.1 NRCS Site Evaluation Form NC-CPA-17 or equivalent
3.3.2 A hazard classification of the proposed lagoons, if required
3.3.3 Documentation that proposed swine facilities meet the Swine Farm Siting Act, including a site map prepared by
a Registered Land Surveyor. The scale of this map shall notexceed 1 inch = 400 feet. At a minimum, the site
Wrap shall show the distance from the proposed houses and lagoons to occupied residences within 1500 feet,
schools, hospitals, churches, outdoor recreational facilities, national parks, state parks, historc properties, or
child care centers within 2500 feet, property boundaries within 500 feet, water supply wells within 500 feet.
The map shall also show the location of any property boundaries and perennial streams or rivers located within
75 feet of waste application areas.
3.3.4 Documentation showing that all adjoining property owners, all property owners who own property located
across a public road; street, or highway from the facility, the local health department, and the county manager
or chair of the county board of commissioners if there is no county manager, have been notified by certified
mail of your intent to construct or expand a swine farm at this location.
3.3.5 A wetlands determination
3.3.6 The lagoon/storage facility design
3.3.7 Proposed runoff control measures, if required
3.3.8 Irrigation or other land application method design
3.3.9 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) produced and
utilized by the facility
3.3.10 The soil series present on every waste disposal field
3.3.11 The crops grown on every waste disposal field
3.3.12 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP
3.3.13 The PAN applied to every waste disposal field
3.3.14 The waste application windows for every crop itilized in the WUP
FORM: AWO-STATE-G-N/E 1/10/06 Page 3 of 5

3.3.15 The required NRCS Standard specifications
3.3.16 Emergency Action Plan
3.3.17 Insect Control Checklist with options noted
3.3.18 Odor Control Checklist with options noted
3.3.19 Mortality Control Checklist with options noted
3.3.20 Documentation proving this facility is exempt from the Moritoria on Construction or
Expansion of Swine Farms, if the application is for a swine facility
3.3.21 A map showing the topography of the proposed facility location showing features
that affect facility design, the dimensions and elevations of any existing facilities,
the fields used for waste application, and areas where surface runoff is to be
controlled
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the additionalcomponents with your
submittal. (Composting, waste transfers, etc.)
IIIWUNI.T1ITIVE
1, /4 ,71 Rbj_ a n (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for %!%QD/e �aP L ]Q - r 1w (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me mate and corn to to the best of thy knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned to
me as�inccom`plet
Signature l N/N C Date
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
I, At ) 1 a1 i hV -e � (Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for J �__K �'�su Oo; r� (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me d is accurate and Eomplete to the est of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned yas incomplete.
Signature Date -7/ a 0 / 0 -7
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATIONS UNIT
1636 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1636
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-STATE-G-N/E 1/10/06 Page 4 of 5

COMPUTATION SHEET P21/ l sed / U'p QT U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
NRCS-ENG-523A Rev 10.97
-_ -- --- ai i I��1JeJ_ +Port -
G_orne
V .

COMPUTATION SHEET U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOMCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
NRCS-ENG-5234 Rev 10-97

COMPUTATION SHEET U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
NRCS-ENG-5234 Rav 7097

! ! .� \.\(}'- /:,� I 1 i( V I,R G I `J,+,I A ' _ - .I-1.. _':,. .-r.l-• -" `1... - �_
L3 236 IZ 23' I ` . I -
.-
J 2 I +10-190" ISn �w- 7 118 5 IyO
�w v IID-2 2
am ys F2� 1
k »' l
30 p 8 150' , p \ 4 70
�- it M C 4- {fir- i �'. r.s - t I ,. n>,>» •t F'�,.. 2, V�
i8al a 6-106' , - q.�EF M 4 , v
�i to IHI96 to IBB F' fFV.,
361.
o k 13 240 C 6
>3-6 . ! D 10 18b
I-6 r y•r,
17-IZ2
�W I4-258 34
46
o i A-8 I2 226 - � ~, - 1 \ r K-630
0^ IBM
! ,' I ♦- V - 1..� 6 a •�"> 1 �j .
I�EEro i. I3-8 P '» Y11 200 �' .--i ?.I - 1 B _ ^3' S 82... h'wya :r ° �' ,P, > �•
256 ° MI\4M ! D 8 9,462 n i, %% , , .� `L-d » ,
`� � >» ,. 1 I � -, ea � r ':., � -12'F •5O _ mm• \.. h °m >e�i° .>` m. o» �y•! .
% 3 12 22LF BSON d a m
24Q G-10
2, zg ruw E.p,Nrrw .
I: -
A -I
-IO 1260
I� __>° •°°m,•: r+> v .! C-�I "Z \!� � 1 1 um Jri .f'.V �`>� ».✓ '• n,t _ i '°' 1 -." 4. Z•
\'.le rmr ID Iso ) » 86 om ,+ i . i a" Z-26
1h E
I t I1 0I r\ L
/ ♦ y F
9
I12 .,
C C- i 4
INDEX TO AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY z ���0 `' t � "L� II•IµF,
IOI78 K-12; A
1977 PHOTOGRAPHS
6 46
COUNTY
RRY
_ ... �'• • . � r .�: �
-
. u ,, � I , 13B ,:�� � r �; � w,,5-fio ,�fR �• 8 j } rC. 4 .:, , r t
IA I I ION76u I F-Ib 1-16 IJ6 w _qNORTH CAROLINA 21
6
L Ib r NJbq'
U.S.Department of Agrltulture 4uw 1 r• ° — c T
132
H I6 t' "
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
1 � � � ORSY
1b
jt _ SLATE EOp fNIwGG[.MENti I M�
t ;�' rl. ` �/ it ,1 J �� I • \I��
Raleigh, North Carolina
,