010021_INSPECTIONS_20171231

! Facility Number: — • •
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (La2oons,11oldina! Ponds. Flush Pits. etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard ft : le
()............................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoffff�entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ........... ............................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only-
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
Ndviolitionsor deficiencies. were noted during this.visit..Yoti 4ill receive no further
correspondence about this:visit.,
❑ Yes P No
Z,Tes ❑ No
Structure 6
❑ Yes
..
❑ Yes
�I�
LG,10�
❑ Yes
&14ro
❑Yes P1�0
❑ Yes UNS'
❑ YesI�.Pd�
Cl Yes 13<0
❑ Yes 9.110
❑ Yes lt], o
ElYes Mk/o
❑ Yes UP
9, M" -o
Id— N ��Cou:c� !e✓e,/ /liaaktAj — fAtse w,'H 6,e �`��iN w�e,� X"0OA.1'
P��-/red �Ow,✓,
Reviewer/Inspector Name " <_ ..� � „ a •,,,,�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
7/25/97
Date: %rn-/3-97

❑ DD Sion of soi and Water Conservation ❑ Other AgencyWi
_
' B l-�; &16ivision of Water Quality tom° r-
10 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review V Other
[Time
ate of Inspection fib- 9
Facility Number Jj
of Inspection d; rJ 24 ha (hh:mm)
Registered E3 Certified ❑ Applied for Permit ❑ Permitted ❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated: ..........................
Farm Nante:........1��Cl..{. ........Ale,..�t2,f.Q.!v........�N...`...................... County:..........r��!%/.y!.�P.^ c.:Q.....7.............................
OwnerName: ............1.,.A.2....................................................... Phone No:.............. .............................
Facility Contact:..........uv!......... Title: .......... C1..W.z...e.V............................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address:.....7 '. ky.......5/oRC......... R..............................................................................................................................
/ ........
Onsite Representative: ....................-5.''............................................................... Integrator: ........................................................................p............
r: Certified Operato...................Tr! t................ .... �GA/1e..e.t,S.(J..�......... Operator Certification Number;..._rz2.��c .. �...1.............
Location of Farm:
Latitude =• =' =11 Longitude =• =' 0"
Design'';�,.Current
,-'
Design � :,,Current :,:.,' Design Curient, a
Swore '�, ,
Capacity`;Population
Poultry
Capacity: Population Cattle Capacity;,
.� ..
Population
„-
❑ Wean to Feeder
10 Layer
',
❑ Dairy
S D
❑ Feeder to Finish
JLJ Non -Layer
I
-Dairy
iy
-❑
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
' <.
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity',
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
❑Boars
�.-.
Number of Lago' ontis / Hldm og•Ptititls 10Subsurface Drains Present J10Lagoon Area
10Spray Field Area
❑ No liquid Waste Management SystemrV
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes Ij, <01'
❑ Yes L,U.Pao
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes M44w0
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes EKO
❑ Yes 0?1'0
❑ Yes M41
Continued on back

State of North Carolio
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Tim McPherson
Cook & McPherson Inc. Farm
2600 Staley Store Rd
Liberty NC 27298
Dear Tim McPherson:
A
•: '
NCDENR--..
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATrEn L34%6� . �+ s
January 15, 1998 r" i 1.
JAN 2 0 1998
Winston-Salem
Subject: Removal ofRWgdhnal Offic*
Facility Number 01-21
Alamance County
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an active animal
waste management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to the
surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $10,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits listed
below, you will be required to obtain and implement a certified animal waste management plan and notify the Division
of Water Quality prior to stocking animals to that level. Threshold numbers of animals that require certified animal
waste management plans are as follows:
Swine
250
Confined Cattle
100
Horses
75
Sheep
1,000
Poulu with a liquid wastes tem
30,000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sue Homewood of our staff
at [phone] ext 502.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (;W,ihston-Salem_Water Quality Regional"Office f
Alamance Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
���
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

sion of Salfand Water Conservation 0 Other
sion of Water Quality
: tV 1cnU[me'=.V l:Olnptaln[ •:V rOttotT-up O[ UVYIj [nSp
cility Number' "
Date of Inspection /(jam 9
Time of Inspection D.' U. 24 hr.(hh:mm)
t3Registered Ceitified 0 Applied for Permit 0 Permitted 10 Not Operational 1 Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ........ f2-14�Q..{1•..... ...1.'S�. .Ct22S.O.N..........�N...� ...................... County:..........f � /y! t^c.�.....>.............................
Owner Name:,...........,1. M.......�l!J�... h.QR...f°^................................................. Phone No: ..............lv.e�. ..-. �G. J.............................
Facility Contact: ..........Zr n............ Title: .......n..C1..4P.!✓...0tv............................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress:..... a.jk. ST ley-C-.......... 4�................................................................................................... ............................
.................................................. .
Onsite Representative: ... _............
...:2 e. .............................................................. Integrator: ................................................. _...................................
Certified Operator; .................... [..7.& .................... .......... Operator Certification Number;...... .I&.. /..9...........
Location of Farm:
Latitude =• =' 0'1 Longitude =• =, ="
I'Mr
Swine
`Dgn'° Current-
Ca,aci Po'ulaGtib�Popltc
' , ? a ba" �DestgnCu rrent€ $ aDestg° Gurren6 %'
%CapacttyPopulahon��CattleCapac�ty,Populahon
a
_P Y
Y��.
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
s ❑ Non Layer ❑ Non Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder
Vic Other
99
❑ Farrow to Finish
bIX, �[ q ,y�'''�y',£
ui S?.v ' R M� ''H T r, W �..
t ��`` k U `��` W ,�. t4
�;",�.� To talgDestgn Capacity �S (j
/�
Gilts
�❑Udts
g iy� 66 Jry
r�
❑
N�um}fro Lagoosn
Lagoon
Molding tiP nds> 0 ea
SubsurfaceWa to
❑ SpLA
O
No Liquid Management System
IraId�Ar
General t (�
1. Are [here any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ,_,, o/
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0-Yes mx`o
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [I Now
3..Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes SP(O
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes 111,110
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? -- ❑ Yes LDWNo0
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes L1140
7/25/97
Continued on back

'IFacrhty Number, � � -, . �' I •
8 Are theme lagoons of storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
- Structures (Laeoons,Hoidine Ponds. Flush Pits. etc.)
9. ` is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
" Structure t Stmcture 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
idenufier.. _
..............................................................................................................................................
Freeboard ft
( ):...... ............. :............... .................... :............... ................................... ....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11, Is eiosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ffl<
P— es ❑ No
Structure 5 Structure 6
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of W//yyMP, or runoff�entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type.........y.ha.Ss...... C..n4.........................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
P-No ..
ElYes
G.Ko�
❑ Yes
&Fo
BI—es ❑ No
❑ Yes Lt 4<0
❑ Yes D1IRr
❑ Yes GLN6
❑ Yes E1W
❑ Yes EKO
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes Etvo
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes E' O
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes E3, o
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes h7<o
NO.VIolBtlohi'ordeficiencies:werenotedduringthis:visit. You'willi•ecei:veitoftirfhei•
correspiAdence: aWiit this:visit:: • : `:
9'— /V
O"', Su. ; I— krr s
�d- Iv,ue v:c� /e✓e.l /kAQki u — %xese w,'!l 6,p ii w4e." f a�oa.✓
POAyele C&IVn/,
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
7/25/97
Date: In

State of North Caro*
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
April 3, 1997
Tim McPherson
Cook & McPherson Inc . Farm
2600 Staley Store Rd
Liberty NC 27298
Dear Mr. McPherson:
APR 0 7 1997
VWnston-Salem
Regional Office
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Designation of Operator in Charge
Cook & McPherson Inc. Farm
Facility Number 01--21
Alamance County
You were notified by letter dated December 5, 1996, that you were required to designate a certified animal waste
management system operator as Operator in Charge for the subject facility by January 1, 1997. Enclosed with that
letter was an Operator in Charge Designation Form specifically for your facility, Instructions for Completing
Application for Temporary Certification as an Animal Waste Management System Operator, and an Application for
Temporary Certification as an Animal Waste Management System Operator. Our records indicate that these
completed Forms have not yet been returned to our office.
As was explained in the previous letter, a training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste
management systems involving cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry (with a liquid waste system). Therefore owners of
these systems were allowed to request that they be issued temporary certifications until December 31, 1997. All that
was required to receive this temporary certification was the completion of the Application Form.
For you convenience, we are sending you additional copies of the Operator in Charge Designation Form specifically
for your facility, Instructions for Completing Application for Temporary Certification as an Animal Waste
Management System Operator, and an Application for Temporary Certification as an Animal Waste Management
System Operator. Please return this completed Form to this office as soon as possible but in no case later than April
25, 1997. This office maintains a list of certified operators in your area if you need assistance in locating a certified
operator.
Please note that failure to designate an Operator in Charge of your animal waste management system, is a violation
of N.C.G.S. 90A-47.2 and you will be assessed a civil penalty unless an appropriately certified operator is designated.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as absolving you of the responsibility and liability for
any past or future violations for your failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please contact our Technical Assistance and Certification Group at
(919)733-002E
�Sincerely,
for
Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
cc: Winston-Salem Regional Office
Facility File
Enclosures
P.O. Box 29535, FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 NO C An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Telephone [phone]°k recycles/ 10% post -consumer paper

'- [iLALITY SECTION TO lJSRO P.02/02
JLL-14-1995 15134 FROM DEMWER •
Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.
DMSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: A/0 / �_ ,1995
nne:.,23
Farm
Mam
County: f l l c G P F Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative 7_6� Phone:
Physical Address/Location:
Type of Operation: Swine __ _ Poultry _ Cattle 1� 7
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site: � � •�
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude:_' Longitude:2Z_: Elevation:
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: `�[. 'C _ Inches
Was any seepage obswed from the lagpon(s)? Yes No as any erosion ? ,Yes or
Is adequate land available for spray? 6e No Is the cover crop adequate? Ye No
Caop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Yes or No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Trine? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or No if Yes, Please.Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.
TnTa P-02

/1 h
20 CANE Illlpl „ l2�"� y}IIIlJ1/
} V
a wo
0�
�n � l izjpz/ /n u� � 1 ••
\ a `✓, l
a
f
_-cHnnuw„

OPERATIONS BPHhlCH - b Fax:[phone] Jul 24 '95 10:28 P.05/18
Site kc 1=tdiate Atmntio�n�
� Pncility,Ptnmbet' 'i�,�.=�'/
SITE VISl*V,,A1ON,RFC0Rt7
CotmtY ,.../yGG -----
Agent Visiting Site: .r.a•G-._ c Phones—
operator _ — Phone;
On Site Renresencuiw:_. Phono: —
Mysical Address;
J
Mailing Addrr,:3:_L�5__
Type ofOperslion: Swinc _-- Poultry Caldc Lj
Design Capacity. i / SJ _ Number cf Animnla on Site: 1 2
Type orTrom, moon: Clnrund Vr _ Aerial-Y_.._.
Circle Yc!i or No
Does the A,tintal Wane Upon have suff icient freeecard of 1 Foot +• 15 yeiT -h hoar storm evnut
(approximately I Foot -� 7 Ne Actual Pnxboani: _ L _ prod ^ ire
For facilities with more then me 1ub+orm• plmso address th. etl:cr ingoons' fnzboard tinder the -
eomntcidt: scadoc.
Was any seopaga observed from d — lagcou(i)? Ycv oL1 �Pl ty theta ufusion of "IV
Is adLquate land avallabte Car lar.J aps licSrion7� f�t No Is the arvcr crop adNcn A No
.AJJ';�tionalt:omma_nts:
✓pYrL.✓ .�Cr_Fi n...`.l :r' G.Y tiN S.f: ✓ti-. — � .
Fat to [phone]
y
of Agait