The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSILAS TALBERT_MISC_20171231Facility Number Ol 1000 Date of Visit: 6/3/2004 Time: 0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold 0 Permitted 0 Certified E3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: FarmName: SiI,uS.lAlkti................................................................................................... County:..................................................................................... OwnerName: SilaS.........................................1..111but........................................................ Phone No: 33.6J7.6,3.3.85 ........................................................... Mailing Address: 3911Z.SaaaAahalY/..ttlalehan0..GhuAch.liaad.......................................................................................................................................... Facility Contact: SilaS.�allzexx.tet.Eliza..'..............................Title:................................................................ Phone No: 919 Z1.B,.43.b1..Tlizas.csll.. Onsite Representative: SItaS Ialb..ltl:t............................................................................... Integrator:...................................................................................... Certified Operator: ................................................... Location of Farm: Operator Certification Number: I@ Swine []Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0- =, 0" Longitude "0 ", "I, Design I '' Currer wine CaMICitV Poouiation Poultry i ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Gilts ❑ Boars Number. of Lagoons. Design ❑ Other Tot al Design Capacity Total SSLW C Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gai/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge. Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes []No ❑ Yes []No ❑ Yes 0 No ®Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No Structure 6 Identifier: Freeboard (inches): 12112103 Continued Facility Number: of-l000 • Date of Inspection F 6/3/2004 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes A ❑ No seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ❑ No closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes ❑ No elevation markings? Waste Annlication 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No 11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Excessive Pending ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc 12. Crop type Fescue (Graze) 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No Odor Issues 17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes OR No 19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes []No roads, building structure, and/or public property) 20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ® No Air Quality representative immediately. Field Coov ® Final Notes estigation was conducted by Jenny Freeman (DWQ) and myself as a result of a complaint alleging manure in the creek due to Caller was concerned about the quality of water that his cattle were consuming. On the date of our investigation there were nine adult swine in a "wallowing hole" in an unnamed trib coming from the overflow pipe in an upstream freshwater pond. The water in the 25 foot long "pig hole" was extremely turbid due to clay soil being disturbed. The min banks up and down stream from this hole were well buffered and vegetated. The area of stream immediately below the hole was at with no apparent turdity violations. There was no evidence that sediment was leaving the sight. 7/8/04 - Spoke with Eliza, who owns the swine and is attempting to purchase the land from Mr. Talbert. She stated that the swine would be moved from the hole within two months, and the area re -seeded. MMR Reviewer/Inspector Name Mel' a Rosebeock Reviewer/Inspector Signatu Date: 1211210.3 % Fin Continued Facility Number: 01-1000 Dirf Inspection 6/3/2004 • Required Records & Documents 21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ' 22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No 23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling 24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ❑ No 25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No 26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ❑ No 27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ®No 28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ® No 29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No NPDES Permitted Facilities 30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35) ❑ Yes ®No 31, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No 32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No 33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? ❑ Yes ❑ No 34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No 35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form []Rainfall []Inspection After V Rain ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form 12112103 n �Sa,TY r: "' /• N e i''"n*a ,i.. 2� \X'QRN RTRR}! - it O S i�.c 6 Ns�D� t� M ' ��'i`�AS',_„eo, 2 N. JIM MIN iS•. � t" � . F I A _4s rql i'� Y O o I COOK , -Ewl LE.N +T ►H "`" T, P.1 .oM 1. Np�W. r91 q�? cr. °•YF� h°} S E ONVILLE 1i'I I 54 �PD6 EAST �o o Ro o� Cr. awooD r- Y cal / 'P BOY +a 2L� 4g y to% oyP. NY OGO PO. � MAIN (F e� MAP (i & v ELWpY Da. o U ti y ca ai`b�t'`Oti s z �.1 = r x' hqA 54 EAST .a\�� ONNgcy ORO "�°�WE�Nv 1�� F F.S.NO.0 t. $ _ RO. o S l- `Tr C B\ILLf RS�ti P,\ \R w( D H M ly°J' z O .Zv o +i JUOGE2 h fN/CNSOO..p O 4Ch r OHJP °yo,n � (� P gd y o o, RNARRE L °R. RD C Jh S O O DR0� 0 NE TT R 9DOEo z'F ORTS CpROUN w 1 BO(W 4RG IFT- DR.\i ��, V� 9L4'v R ¢C OR. Y d N ti `a0 LN. j y0P 0(BT TON v I = o NO H- 0\5 NF4 a pq--..cP ii S PAY CT R n o p'FpRq y N N 'Pc(e''"p- 54 RO -.. _._.._�. o St s BioG % 87 SOUTH ¢' mM•E a R y NU a Da s K `�\ a' 3 00 'F'F O PP $ O DR. OP t.$j NQZi o o f \`,\, L EyPa Lp LN oPN BRAMBLEWOO (N R T SOLP0. V1Ew PO Fyo. RNy( �Yp It 50.0. PpH 9 CNYf CrB BRAMBLEGD OAC JE AR WA' POe °qk VGEN I N fY 20 ° A �R P Sy ° FIORROW T ✓ s 4-p\ 'Iv -BR CKEN- e-�1,�`\ SH SCN. R0. 3 °4j SHN WILOBERRY CT Ot OIy NK MER ETn. VCY 3/ ~� O✓ AO HILL\OSPTyy y GEtX EX IER� _ RD.I eBk�-S-"T5Z•,!iLIGHT—r" STONE q, sne. T.W P.-r'�`�0'�� z u (1Do9 p� W OGXSt.. m�� Yet,— PDg �IBEEo—.. �. 4NN D101D5 N WLIN� wESL N Tw'P pfT ypf p0.0. 2 , 1; o ,b L /�t�yi TY MULBERRY 90 B 1� o O R i , ° l N Sf COPPER RIp, ORfS ° ¢¢, SAXAPAH f 0 � lpFL C E at �o E JORDAN I JEWEL aD �ELEM. SCH. O y PN LN I i F/ SO � Ito. AP�OTq ( MBE¢ � \? �' � o (,OIF•P � �G N CR o¢i is 2 ELI . sH oi..e' koo...iHa`P2s sWA��,yy CAME LN. v a o ra TT'WW� PBow wo oNNWHITNEYiANITE �VGEDniEDR.a p TRF2 z REC. �ROEIDN ELIoR \ WHITNEY GR'PS HVI Z.y HILL 8 fgy.T LNW ay INTKLN ERS SGOaO ttr COO��yR, VN o RD F.S. NO.T5 EY. GRfE iE GREEN a 4,Ly OP a NS BORO - CHgpEL Ew0 DO CL r mW o �� MIS DR. N(LC R0. . IMP P L DLEY C oa �J P p}L ti¢ RC Py R° RS E HIN LN JJJJ 1 9 y Z �4jYi � m s Y +;+• 1�f �.� 5�. �R° , I^ ', LS TPMOBAN- C 7, Gr. ; w WH E ,o XOLBON . cY,ia a= ROSE' pilrl`,R�GC`�3 r M ILI HIII. RM CO � D RDNo ING o ' ._ m n L 3983 810 Oc FEET 3982 57'3C "80 EF NN I no n77 (io I -SA CO 40 AIJl y s.. r " 1 Mr IV, 00; yx Y r y c"n •'. { +' r r xs rtrt t. Y . _ fii= � s m w;,ii � ri r •:..-Snib--_. ,. t q#£ i t i t z. d AT wu y? y4 j yT 0. i # • x� .r'k � ,� �# 33 .�✓ t x ry t 1 i £�, r _4 4AA TF 3,e 4 \iL S b.,4q ♦ t ��. Al CYTvIJ fi o CD fi IT ah AC rt k. d .<_� �y V• h�