010020_INSPECTIONS_20171231

State of North
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality —
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor NCDENR
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
May 17, 2000
George Zachary
7456 Zachary Lane
Snow Camp NC 27369
Subject: Rating of Potential Risk
Inactive Waste Lagoons and Storage Ponds
George Zachary Farm
Facility Number 1-20
Alamance County
Dear George Zachary;
During the 1999 session,the North Carolina General Assembly passed a law directing the North
Carolina Department of Environment of Natural Resources (DENR) to develop an inventory and
ranking of all inactive lagoons and storage ponds in the State. In order to meet this directive, a
representative of DENR has recently evaluated the inactive lagoon(s) and/or storage pond(s) on your
property. Inactive lagoons and storage ponds were defined by the Statute as structures which were
previously used to store animal waste but have not received waste for at least one year.
The information collected on your property is contained in the attached field data sheets. Using
this field data, staff ranked your inactive waste structures as high, medium or low according to its
potential risk for polluting surface and/or groundwater. Your waste structure(s) was ranked as
follows:
Structure Number Surface Area (Acres) Rankin
1 0.06 Medium
This ranking is based in part on the conditions existing on the day of the site visit. Changes in
these conditions or the collection and evaluation of additional data may modify the ranking of your
waste structure(s) in the future.
Information on your facility along with over 1000 others contained in the inventory has been
provided to the General Assembly. During this year's session, the General Assembly will consider
additional requirements for future management of these structures which may include requiring
proper closure of inactive lagoons and storage ponds according to current or alternative standards.
585 Waughtown Street,Winston-Salem,North Carolina 27107 Telephone[phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycledflO%prat-consumer paper

j.
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other [I Denied Access
Facility Number
E3 Permitted 0 Certified E3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered
Date of Visit
10 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: 71119. _$.........
Farm Name: Georgt2achaa-Farm......................................................................... County: Alawnrg...................................WS 0 R .......
Owner Name: Gp.9.rge................................... Zadkary.................................................... Phone No: 3. 6 3.7.6,3.715
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title: ............................................................... Phone No:
Mailing Address: 7456.Zachaa..L.Rixg:...........
A..Camp..KC.................................................. 2.72.69
OnsiteRepresentative: .......................................................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Location of Farm:
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
E]!Swine :N:Poultry ®'Cattle -E]'Horse
-Design ,Current .Design :Current %Design :Current
:Swine 'Capacity Population -POultrY Capacity Population -Cattle
Population
E]Wean to Feeder 'C!!Pacity
F0�Yer ®Dairy 125 0
0 Feeder to Finish 10 Non-Layer I Ir-1 Non-Dairy 30
E]Farrow to Wean
[]Farrow to Feeder I[]Other
Q Farrow to Finish TotalDesignCapacity 125
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW 175,000
Number of-Lagoons Holding Ponds]Solid:Traps
DischarLes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? El Yes 9 No
Discharge ori6nated at: El Lagoon El Spray Field []Other
a. It'discharge is observed. was the convevance man-made? 0 Yes E]No
b. If discharge is observed.did it reach Water of the State?(If Yes.notify DWQ) -1 No
El Yes r
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in ual/min?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 1:1 Yes 0 No
3. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? E]Spillway
E]Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatinent
Please see attached Lagoon Field Data Sheets
Reviewer/Inspector Name Melissa Rosebrock Larry;C6ble
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Printed on: 5/12/2000

Facility Number 1 — 20 *agoon Number 1............. Lagoor ntifier Rehi.rld-Elarn........
O Active 0 Inactive Latitude 35 i53 F22-1
Waste Last Added .7./.1/.9..5........................................... Longitude F797 F1 97 •32
Determined by: ® Owner [] Estimated By GPS or Map? ® GPS ❑Map
GPS file number: IS021615A i
Surface Area (acres): q:Q.fi........................
Embankment Height (feet): 3.,.8...........................
Distance to Stream: O<250 feet Q 250 feet - 1000 feet O>1000 feet
By measurement or Map? ® Field Measurement ❑Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? O Yes # No
Intervening Stream? *Yes O No
Distance to WS or HQW (miles): O< 5 O 5 - 10 0 > 10
i
Overtopping from Outside Waters? Q Yes O No O Unknown
Spillway O Yes 0 No Adequate Marker O Yes O No
Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches): 18
inspection date .2/1 6/2000
appearance of O Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid O Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
p Lagoon Liquid Clear
O Lagoon Empty Freeboard(inches): 6
embankment condition Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
O Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
O Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions_or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design I'
O Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design I i
ip
O No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status Q High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
O No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
O Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
application equipment fail to make contact
and/or Sprayfield Q Yes O No O Unknown with representative O Yes No €
unavailable f '
comments 8b. Well is 408 feet uphill across intermittant stream and down gradient.
10. Per Mr. Zachary, pond has flooded some in past.
12. Not built according to NRCS
15. He has some equipment but it is for sale.

vtsron of Water Quality �
Ono Soil and Water Conservation •
Other Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑Denied Access
Facility Number Ol 20
E3 Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified a Registered Date of Visit 2/16/2000
10 Not Operational Q Below Threshold Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: 71.11p8.,.,.,.,.,.,
Farm Name: Gentge.Zachau..F.arm............................................................................... County: A.Iawwr..........................................W.SKO.......
OwnerName: Getttge................................... Zachary...................................................... Phone No: 3d(ee:37.kr. .7.15...........................................................
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title: ............................................................... Phone No: ....................................................
Mailing Address: 7.4SG.Z,achary..Gaue............................................................................ SM.W..Camp..NC.................................................. 27.369.............
OnsiteRepresentative:........................................................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Location of Farm:
R.7..Saulb..ftam.B . lx,.. R.aula_Grxceskncn.:..�h . .Hill..1.inald....l.�£t.nxtltu.Stoskard.Rd... t_auta.Zafh .�ansr,....
r ®Swine ®Poultry ®CtNe� se a t it
v ; Desis-gn`.r C.t�urent -a`�£' 3Dg� C.1wr-°trs,� ' � "ems t� ye -�
Ca aci ,P_o olation - Poultry a. cr ,&Po ulation . Cattle _ -_;vim- Ca ct Po tdahon
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer 0 -®Dairy 125 0
❑Feeder to Finish Non Dairy 30 ^°
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Other mxct
❑Farrow to Feeder
❑Farrow to Finishex= 4
❑Gilts =Total Desi acit 125 gn Capy i
❑Boars +TotalrSSLW� 175,000 F
r
:���:... - vim- �; ,-a�Y R� }F-,£�• , k�`. i�",s�^ *'<a*;--�.? s`t r:
Number of Lagoons I Holding Ponds/dSolid Traps 1� _
Discharees&Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated Flow in gal/min?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
3. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
Please see attached Lagoon Field Data Sheets
Reviewer/Inspector Name [Melisp Rose k Larry Coble
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Printed on: 4/11/2000
t%M

Facility Number 01 — 20
Igoon Number ............. Lagoon I tifier ghiad..S fn.....................................:.
O Active O0 Inactive Latitude 35 53
Waste Last Added .7./..1./.19.8........................................... Longitude 79 19 32
Determined by: ®Owner ❑ Estimated By GPS or Map? ®GPS ❑ Map
GPS file number: IS021615A
Surface Area (acres): Q,,Q,f........................
Embankment Height (feet): 3,.8...........................
Distance to Stream: O<250 feet OO 250 feet - 1000 feet O >1000 feet
By measurement or Map? ® Field Measurement ❑ Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? O Yes OO No
Intervening Stream? *Yes O No
Distance to WS or HOW (miles): O < 5 O 5 - 10 OQ > 10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? OQ Yes O No O Unknown
Inspection date 2/16/2000
appearance of O Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid O Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
Op Lagoon Liquid Clear
O Lagoon Empty Freeboard(inches): 6
embankment condition O0 Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
O Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
O Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
* Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
O No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status O High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
Oi No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
O Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
application equipment fail to make contact O Yes Q NO
and/or Spraylield 0Yes O No O Unknown with representative
unavailable
comments 8b. Well is 408 feet uphill across intermittant stream and down gradient.
10. Per Mr. Zachary, pond has flooded some in past.
12. Not built according to NRCS
15. He has some equipment but it is for sale.

a te7Gm;~r,"S' s4!
�t1[ly
Initial Evaluation O Follow-up Evaluation 0 Denied Access (3 Does Facility Require a Follow-up ft �0
Facility Number _.. Date of Evaluation
Time of Evaluative 7A hr.(hh:mm) QQ'
13 Permitted O CertiRed )(Registered E3 Nan-Registered nactire Faaliry gDare Last Operated: b7 J0
111� AA
Farm Name: _tF/ Comfy: Alaryunce--7
Owner Name:_ Y Phone N. 3�• -3 7(y - 3 / i S
Facility Contact: `-f _TiUr. Phone No:
Mailing Address: 1 S�j Zachar tan Snow Can&p, Mc- a
onshe Representative: __ Integralon
Location of Farm:
la
a
:: Dm(m':cCarrmt PoWtry - Design Coirmt "ewe
OSwine ad ::Po oLhon. a.. - .... : ai Po u1aYon
Wean Fcedcr Isyet Dairy
Fader to Finish Non-1 Non-Dairy Q
Fmtow m Wem
Farrow to,Feeder
Other
Farow,m Finish - TotaLDestgn CapeClty . +
Gilts
`•:.: Roma t.. � ... ._:.TonalSS>WT _.
1f te., _./i .CfmaberuYLagoms r e SL .:
r' .oT Hdldi Bonds/Sold
Dlsehorees&Stream Impacts �/
1. Is any discharge chummed from say lagoon? ❑Yes GU No
a If discharge is observed.was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes !❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the Smm?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated Row in gal/min?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge hom any lagoon? ❑Yes XNo
Waste Collection&Treatment YI�/
3. Estimate F=boad Level: ❑Spillway ❑Yta Nn
S CNR Sirnzwm2 SWctum3 SWCmm4 SWCWie$ Stmctmc6
MCM Identifier:
Fr bwrd(inches):
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Revrewer/Inspector Signature: - Date: Q11414
-Q

Inactive Lagoon Field Data Sheet
Facility Number: Inactive Lagoon Number:
Latitude FA ®'P-3 717L" Longitude . ®'DI " f�tGPS' [I Map e�
4. Waste Last Added(mmlyy) Owner ❑Estimated /
5. Estimate of lagoon surface area(acres) 0-Q
6. Effective height of embankment(feet) E�a=
7. Distance to Blue Line or Intermittent Stream(feet) 0,250 250- 1000 ❑>I000
Determined From Field Measurement ❑Map
8. Down Gradient Well
a. Is there a down gradient well located within 250 feet? Yes No
b. Is an intervening stream not located between any part of the lagoon and the nearest well? Yes []No
9. Distance to WS waters or HQW(mi.) JE1<5 ❑5- 10 >10
I-Hoaw River WS=
10. Does the representative know of overtopping from outside waters? Ycs ❑No ❑Unknown
11.Appearance of Lagoon Liquid
a. Sludge Near Surface ❑
b. Lagoon Liquid Dark.Discolored El
c. Lagoon Liquid Clear t�
12. Embankment Condition
a. Poorly Built,Large Trees,Erosion,Burrows,Slumping,Seepage,Tile Drains,etc.
b. Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition ❑
c. Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards ❑
13. Outside Drainage Area .
a. Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design ,❑�
b. Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
c. No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained ❑
14. Liner Status
a. High Potential for Leaking,No Liner,Sandy Soil,Rock Outcrops Present,etc. 0
b. No Liner,Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
c. Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
15. Application Equipment and/or Sprayfield Not Available Yes ❑No ❑Unknown
16. Contact could not be made with on-site representative ❑Yes No

Comments(Refer to Question N): Explain any Yes answer and/or any other comment.
/o . Pe r mr. 2otcfno_ k, I Pond has (ooc�2cd
Some. 'i vi `fie
a . f`lo+ bu'( 14accor-din � 4-6N2�5
7 b . 146 Uphill aera55
i �'l�'M�i �awt 5+-r2�arn and p�oron
9 rAd�� �e��f frorv� �Snd .
IS. { Ie 1Q5 Some uiprnw+ buf
(zotj FILE. S �ba �� is�

Site Sketch Showing All Active and Inactive Lagoons
lg �
841
� N
ILEF

M'
R'STI3 fP
35'511,3 + I- }
Alamance County Inactive Lagoons Surface Area 0.06 acres
Lat/Long Scale 1:200 e021615a.cor
WGS 198<
N 2/17/2000
T 0 25.00
Pathfinder Office
I
OS Server Feet 0 Trimble

State of North Car
Department of Envi nment,
Health and Natural Resources • •
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt,Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary C>FEE— H N
A. Preston Howard,Jr., P.E., Director RECEIVED 1
August29, 1997 N.C. Dept. of EHNR
George Zachary SEP U 5 1997
George Zachary Farm
7456 Zachary Lane wl{1$tr1! _i •, ' „T1
Snow Cam NC 27369
P Regi.oflcli Ciiiil.e
Subject: Removal of Registration -
Facility Number 01-20
Alamance County
Dear George Zachary:
This is to ackmowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H.0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H.0217,and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H.0217,your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to the
surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to S 10.000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits listed
below,you will be required to obtain a certified animal waste management plan prior to stocking animals to that level.
Threshold numbers of animals which require certified animal waste management plans are as follows:
Swine 250
Confined Cattle 100
Horses 75
Sheep 1,000
Poultry with a liquid waste system 30.000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sue Homewood of our staff
at(919) 733-5083 ext502.
Sincerely,
r+ I '
-t-�K
A.Preston Howard,Jr.,P.E.
cc: Winston-Salem Water Quality Regional Office
Alamance Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
P.O.Box 29535,Raleigh,North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 5017, recycled/10% post-consumer paper

( v. pI Wl_ITY SECTION TO 4SRO P.02/02
JL0..-14-1995 15:34 FROM DEt4
•
Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.
DMSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISTIATION RECORD
DATE: 0Cd4 aO , 1995
Time: ` Z U
Farm Name/Ownw.mains
"�m: /
Integrator. Phone:�
On Site Representative: rc�co 41 phone ��
Physical AddresslL=tion:
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design opacity: �/0 & Number of Animals on Site: y
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: 33— Jj?- 23" Longitude: - ` �lJ „ Elevation:--t--feet
Chcle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot+25 year 24 hour storm event
(appro)dmately 1 Foot+7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: __FL --L—Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes er No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum tback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Yes or No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch,flushing system,or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or No if Yes,Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure,land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No /
Additional Comments:
i
r
N
cc:Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.
,rrrra P.02

fy
Rl,
halt
If
rot
��, , ( � �/ , ,C os , ,< < � . �, ; ,1 � ���r ��
nivn
M�v
Am, N
C-
It v
J-4
7-�f l � s�`\4 l.� I) l l / Il ) / ``1�_\po .t `. � I ��� I l��—!/ ?� ��i. �. \� � �, �� / (,1„` , ,��)��" .� i
Whi
1A
%not
1 its (V
r
1(',h.tl m Cb)
-49 SILK HOPE I

� L
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
November 9 , 1992
MEMORANDUM
TO: David Harding
Compliance Group
THROUGH: Steve Mauney 1 -
Water Quality Supervisor
FROM: Lee G. Spencer /y/
Environmental Engineer TQ —
SUBJECT: Zachary Farm
Concentrated Animal Feed Lot Designation
Alamance County
The subject farm was visited by Janet Russell , Ron Linville
and myself on October 22 , 1992 . There was no illegal discharge
at the time of our inspection, however the potential for illegal
discharges certainly exists . It was evident that stormwater
runoff from the chicken house and surrounding area was continuing
to have a detrimental effect on the small lakes downstream.
These lakes are owned by another individual .
Runoff from the cattle lot on an adjacent watershed ( same
farm) flows directly into a watercourse as well . There is not
even a vegetated buffer below the cattle lot, as is the case
below the chicken house.
Attached is a copy of the "Animal Operations Inspection
Form" for this facility dated May 23 , 1990 . This form, as well
as a memo to Steve Tedder dated 6-18-90 , both requested that the
farm be designated.
Subsequent to this, the farm was designated as a
Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation in a letter dated 6-25-90
signed by George Everett, Director. After this, some efforts
were apparently made to improve the site and operations . A
letter was sent to this office from Tony McGaha, Extension Agent
with the Agricultural Extension Service . In this letter Mr.
McGaha stated he had been on site and their recommendations had
been completed. He went on to say that the " . . . approved system
will work if the farmer follows correct management practices . . . "
It appears that insufficient work has been done since then
to eliminate the problems . The site may be in somewhat better
shape than when the complaint was first received, but there is

Zachary*rm •
Page 2
stl no treatment rilainfall will system
watercourses , wash animal or adequate buffers.
rt waste and sediment intAny o heignificant
the on is requested that
ginal designationtbehe facieatY be gnated or
en re-
Pleaseforc desi
information, advise if this that
office can Provide further
cc: Central Files
WSRO file

ANIMAL OPERATIONS INSPECTION FORM
Date of Inspection: May 23 , 1990
Name of Owner of Property: (Check Register of Deeds or Tax Office)
George Zachary - Tax Maps 8-11-38(b)
8-11-38(uu)
8-11-38
8-13-7 (au)
8-13-7(a)
Address: Mr. George Zachary
7456 Zachary Lane
Snow Camp, N. C. 27349
Phone Number: ( 919) 376-3715
Description of facility location (State Road No. ' s, etc. ) : The farm is
located at the end of Zachary Lane (S R 2403 ) in Alamance_Count
Type of Operation (Examples: farrow to finish, topping, dairy, swine,
cattle, chickens-layers or broilers, turkey production, etc. ) : dairy
cattle chicken - layers
Number and Type of Animals or Animal Units: 110 total head/75 dairy -
53 000 chicken layers
Length of time animals have been, are, or will be stabled, or confined
and fed or maintained in any 12 month period. milked daily, chicken
confined at all times
Are crops, vegetation forage growth, or post-harvest residues sustained
in the normal growing season over any portion of the lot or facility?
corn oats wheat sorghum silage.
Description of other animal operations in immediate vicinity and
proximity to same or other surface waters: McBane farm
Proximity of facility to neighboring houses , wells , etc. : two wells
are less than 50 feet from holding area for dairy cattle and 100 feet
from chicken houses.
Approximate Depth of groundwater table in the area of the facility or
discharge: 440 feet deep 35 Ape.+ +0 jroun8'xa+ r 40,6(e_
120 feet deep wcR
Proximity of facility to surface waters (provide name and class of
surface waters: U.T. of Cane Creek (C-NSW) Cane Creek (C-NSW) .
Are pollutants discharged into the waters of the State? If so, How?
(directly or by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other similar
man-made device) : Yes the cattle are washed prior to milking. A
flushing ditch takes the water and waste down beside the pasture- intc
the U.T. of Cane Creek.

Do or have discharges occurred in response to a storm event of less
than a 25 year, 24 hour intensity? ( If yes, include a brief listing of
incidents and suspected causes) : Yes , it is believed that the storm
yesterday took waste (cattle and chicken) to 2 (two) separate
tributaries of Cane Creek.
Type of Waste Management (Examples: type of confinement-free stall
barns, sheltered or limited shelter dirt lots, paved or dirt open lots,
swine houses, pasture; type of waste handling-direct spreading in solid
form, slotted floor with lagoon or pit, single or multi-cell lagoon,
aerated lagoon, land application of liquid manure, spray irrigation,
contractor disposal, etc. ) . The cattle are held on a concrete holding
area where they are fed. Manure is removed from this area by a
front-end ( "bobcat" ) and placed into a land applicating device. The
front-end loader also removes the waste from the chicken houses and
puts it into the land applicating device.
Condition of waste management facility (rate as poor-good, no
discharge, sufficient freeboard in lagoon, etc. Include weather
conditions during inspection) . no lagoons - poor Partly cloudy,
temperature in mid 601s.
Animal waste discharge ( including photos and witness ' names, addresses,
telephone numbers and statement of fact) . Paul McBane contact Eric
Galamb on May 14 1990 at 8 : 45 a.m. Mr. McBane stated that his pond is
full of chicken manure that is running off of Mr. George Zachary' s
property. Galamb inspected site on May 15 without the direction of Mr.
McBane Galamb was looking in wrong area. Galamb and Janet Russell
inspected site on May 23 1990 from 10 : 00 - 12: 45 p.m. and 1 : 45 p.m. -
4. 00 p.m. As before pond had black effluent and septic odor. Mr.
McBane directed Galamb and Russell to the manure slide. Galamb and
Russell inspected Mr. Zachary' s farm. Galamb requested that Zachary
show the inspectors all locations where water on property. Zachary
took inspectors to a stream crossing of an unnamed tributary to Cane
Creek Zachary also took inspectors to Cane Creek. Zachary never took
inspectors to the areas where manure was entering the streams. Zachary
did not take the inspectors to the stream separating the McBane Farm
from the Zachary Farm. This stream had a manure slide flowing and
entering the stream. Shell casings from a type of grub was observed in
the manure slide near the chicken houses. These casings were also
observed on the stream bank of U.T. to Cane Creek. Therefore , manure
is getting into stream. Manure was three ( 3 ) feet deep in the southern
chicken house. This house was cleaned last fall ( ' 89 ) . Manure was six
( 6) inches deep in the northern chicken house. Manure flows out of at
least six ( 6) openings in the two chicken houses.
The dairy cattle are washed prior to milking. There are a minimum
of 3 ( three) drains in the milking house. These drains empty into a
natural drainage ditch that feeds an unnamed tributary to Cane Creek.
In addition the holding area has a concrete pad. A "bobcat" front-end
loader scraps the concrete pad and places the manure into a land
applicating device However, some manure is pushed onto the land near
the watering trough The water and urine cause the manure to flow into
the drainage ditch. The drainage ditch was full of manure.

No photos were taken. Mr. Paul McBane was a witness to the
chicken manure slide.
Water Quality Assessment: (Include description of sampling, field
measurements, visual observations and slope and vegetative cover of
land adjacent to water, extent of rainfall and other factors relative
to the likelihood or rainfall and other factors relative to the
likelihood or frequency of discharge of animal wastes and process
wastewaters) . A total of 6 sampling locations were picked. The sample
locations are marked on an attached map. At each station, BOD and
fecal coliform samples were taken using standard operating procedures.
The samples were iced down. The U.T. of Cane Creek separating the
McBane farm from the Zachary farm is wooded. With each rainfall event,
it is suspected that chicken waste would enter this U.T. to Cane Creek.
The cattle manure flows into another U.T. to Cane Creek. The cattle
manure is entering the waters of the State. . However, the wastewater
seeps into the ground before it reaches the main U.T. to Cane Creek.
With each rainfall event, wastewater would enter the U.T. to Cane
Creek.
Recommendations Made to Owner/Operator Mr. Zachary was informed that
the illegal discharges must cease immediately. Mr. Zachary was told to
contact the Agricultural Extension office to get assistance in waste
management. Mr. Zachary was informed by Galamb that the farm may be
designated.
Recommendations for further DEM action: (Re-inspect, designate, etc) .
Re-inspect, take photos and more samples . Proceed with designation.
Other comments:

! / l DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT C.
September 8, 1992
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Forrest Westall
Tommy Stevens
Rex Gleason
Tim Donnelly ASS:GNZD TO
Roger Thorpe
Dave Adkins QUE DATE
Steve Mauney
FROM: Steve W.Tedde
SUBJECT: Designated Conic nitrated Animal Feedlot Operations
As each of you are,aware, animal operations continues to be an area of great interest for the
Water Quality Program. Attached you will find a status summary listing all animal operations
that have been designated b the Division. Although most of our activities concerning these
facilities have been compl riven in the past, I think we shout gin initiatives to re-visit
these facilities to ensure tha I historical problems have been corrd and continue to be
effective to prevent water quality problems.
Therefore, over the nex�ee months I would like for each of you to attempt to visit those
designated facilities within r respective regions for follow-up liance evaluations.
Following those inspections, the results of the inspections should be arded to David Harding.
If the facilities are compliant, it should be noted and if not, appropriate enforcement actions
should be initiated.
If facilities are found not be operational, this information should also be noted and forwarded
to David.
If there are questions, please contact at 733-5083.
SWT: ps
cc: David Harding
Kent Wiggins
Fig o /i
TI>�S,
l-
� T�ftrT
U� o GO 4Z
7H/fT IlIOU Tilfi 761
✓s�/�G�?E /JD�/d�( �DU� %4J�c(. USA�/��9CfJ� /�vSP GG�i�
IF /?/v
lf� �
T

CONCENTRATED ANIMAL FEED LOTS DESIGNATIONS AS OF 920817
U# FACILITY NAME DATE SENT COUNTY REGION KIND COMMENTS
i ROti WILSON, SAM DAIRY FARM 860918 ALAMANCE WSRO CATTLE ILLEC-,ALDISCHARGE
2 HOLLiD: ( DAIRY 900326 ALAMANCE WSRO CATTLE -BYPASS LAGOONS
3 (��Gr MCPHERSON HOG OPERATION 900712 ALAMANCE WSRO SWINE ILLEGAL DISCHARGE
4 LSE ZACHARY FARM 900625 ALAMANCE WSRO Col /CHIC 111 FGAL DISCHARGE
5 MCCAIN HOG FARM 880725 CASWELL WSRO WNE ' i ILLEGAL DISCHARGE
6 /A BEALLGRAY FARM, INC. 870824 DAVIDSON WSRO CATTLE ILLEGAL DISCHARGING
7 A/kE' HOLTON HOG FARM 880302 DAVIDSON WSRO SWINE ILLEGAL DISCHARGE
8 /J<Id//� FOSTERFARMS, !NC 870902 DAVIE WSRO SWINE ILLEGAL DISCHARGE
9 09i//J/ LAZY FARM 860728 DAVIE WSRO . CATTLE 111 FGAL DISCHARGE
10 47le5 92-15 HACKETT HOG FARM 920410 RANDOLPH WSRO SWINE ILLEGAL DISCHARGE
11 Qfl!/, BUTTKE DAIRY ENTERPRLZES 860224 RANDOLPH WSRO CATTLE 111 FGAL DISCHARGE
12 /h/f'E LINEBERRYCHICKEN FARM 870507 RANDOLPH WSRO POULTRY ILLEGAL DISCHARGE
TO
DUE DATE
Page 1
d

J
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor Margaret Plemmons Foster
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
August 14, 1990
Mr. Tony McGaha
Agriculture Extension Service
201 West Elm Street
Graham, NC 27253
Subject: George Zachary
Concentrated Animal Feed Lot
County: Alamance
Dear Mr. McGaha:
This letter is to acknowledge your correspondence below
as received August 8, 1990.
Applications
Plan and Specifications
Sewer Overflow Letter
Complaint
Inquiry
Required Written Response
Soil or Groundwater Monitoring Data
X Other observations that Mr. Zachary has followed the
recommendations of Dr. Barker.
If you have any questions on the status of this
project, please call me or Steven Mauney at ( 919) 761-2351.
Sincerely,
Eric Galamb
Environmental Technician IV
EEG/dh
cc: Central Files
`WSRO t
8025 Notth Point Boukvatd, Suite 100, Winston-Salem, NC. 27106-3203 • Telephone [phone]

AGRICULT�AL
EXTENSIO O North Carolina State University
SERVICE RECFIVED Co ege of Agriculture and Life Sciences
N.C. c4i. MiCU
Address reply to: AUG 8 1990 201 West Elm Street
County E:te ion Office
Graham, NC ;27253
Winston-Salem August 7, 1990
Regional Office
TO: N.C. Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Mr. Eric Galamb
Dear Mr. Galamb:
Just a follow-up note -- stating the fact that Mr. George
Zachary of the Eli Whitney community has followed the recommen-
dations provided to you on July 24. The recommendations were
provided by Dr. Jim Barker of N.C.S.U. Biological and Agricultural
Engineering Department and the Alamance County Agricultural Exten-
sion Office.
I have been on location and observed that the -recommendations
have been followed and completed.
On visitation of the farming operation no visible contaminants
were reaching the main water supply (Cane Creek) (approximately 1
mile) or one of its tributaries (approximately 150-200 yards) .
This is only to say that the approved system will work if
the farmer follows correct management practices of preventing
excess water in manure, hauling, and containing manure on lots
and in houses are followed.
Respectfully submitted,
Ton McGaha
Dairy Extension Agent
Alamance,Guilford,Randolph
and Rockingham Counties
as
cc Mr. George Zachary
Cooperative Extension Work in Agncattu.e and dome Economics A&T and N.C.State Universities,100 Counties and U. S. Department of Agriculture

IMPORTANT
To
Date Time
WHILE YOU WERE OUT I _
Ct/I�G_0/
of
Phone
•REA CODE NUMBER E%TEN`SION
TELEPHONED PLEASE CALL
CALLED TO SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN
WANTS TO SEE YOU URGENT
RETURNED YOUR CALL
Message Al • (X"r2 0 JL'
Signed
N.C. Dept. of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources

NORTH COLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT,
HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Date 19_
To:
From:
Remarks:
AQ K
❑ Nan and file ❑Nana, initial and forward
❑ Nab am nrum f0 ma ❑Your comments, please
Nare and sae me about rho ❑For your Nformation
❑Far your aW al ❑Prepare reply for any aipnature
❑Par our convenation ❑prepare Infametin, for mr to reply
❑ Par your raquset ❑please .rower,with copy to are
Remm with mare,detalb n To be filed

S �r,/t Z �p Q�otiWJv.
INt N�,

� �� �9�v
_._._
sad _
-- -- ---��- ✓r - -
- - - - - - -
.
- ---- -
- - - ;k -- - - - - - - - - -- -
, � - _--
; .

AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION North Carolina State University
SERVICE College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
July 17, 1990
Department of Biological and
Agricultural Engineering
Box 7625, Raleigh, NC 27695-7625
Telephone [phone]
Mr. George Zachary
7456 Zachary Lane
Snow Camp, NC 27349
Dear Mr. Zachary:
As a followup to our recent visit to your farm, I am forwarding the
following observations and recommendations concerning the waste management
from your dairy and poultry layer operations.
The milk center drain ditch that carries the milk center wastewater
straight down the hill into the dry ditch below the fresh water pond should be
rerouted about half way down the hill to the right and gradually curved where
it will empty into the grassy delta area immediately below the pond. A tall
grassy infiltration area should be maintained here for -maximum filtration. In
the upper half of this ditch nearer to the milk center, a row or two of straw
bales across the ditch would help to trap any solids and keep them out of the
lower parts of the ditch. These solids could periodically be cleaned out of
the ditch and land spread.
It was noted that on occasion manure has spilled out of the two poultry
layer highrise houses through the pit cleanout doors on the side of the
houses. Since it is difficult to control the runoff from the outside of these
houses where manure has overflowed, the houses should be repaired and the
manure removed often enough such that no manure spillage occurs. Manure
removal for land spreading is the key to minimizing any off-site impact from
these houses.
To further help reduce the runoff impact from these houses the solids
should be removed and land spread from the earthen settling areas immediately
below the manure loading ramps. The earthen berm on the lower side of these
areas should then be reinforced and raised slightly. On top of the larger of
the two settling basin berms I would also place a row of the small round hay
bales to further filter any liquid overflow from this area. Solids should be
removed from these settling areas periodically and land spread. Keep in mind
that equipment operation here will be difficult due to the soft soil footing.
If this does not appear to be a practical solution, then a concrete settling
basin may be needed in this area.
All runoff from these settling areas as well as from the vicinity of the
layer houses should be routed into a grassed infiltration terrace built on the
contour of the pasture to the right side of the last house. This would
further filter this runoff before it made its way down the hill into the
watershed that feeds the neighbor's pond. The infiltration terrace should
have a 6-feet wide flat bottom, should be about 1 foot deep, should be
C(/a~'Ovvee Extension Work in Agriculture and Home Economics A&T and N.C.State Universities,100 Coanties and U. S. Department ofAgriculture
1 . /

Page 2
Mr. George Zachary
_ July 17, 1990
constructed on a slope with the upper one-third of the length on about a 4%
slope, the middle one-third on about a 1% slope, and the lower one-third
nearly flat. Great pains should be taken to establish a good grass sod in
this terrace immediately after construction to prevent erosion. Cattle should
be fenced out of this terrace.
I believe these rec-mmendations with diligent management would
significantly reduce any off-site impact that your layer houses are now
causing. Should you have any questions about these recommendations or if I
can be of any further assistance, please contact me.
Sincerely,(�//�✓
(/��
James C. Barker, Extension Specialist
Biological and Agricultural Engineering
cc: Tony McGaha ✓
73� - ZG 15
nciow _ cite iu-urs. :foaditi
�.. . cFM1 eT•::ij' �F+,'1�i ti:� ��.�Ce?'L`s'.'r?)s n`cy.. .. r. _. `

7
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G.Martin,Govemor George I Everett,PhD.
William W.Cobey,Jr.,Secretary Director
June 25, 1990
CERTIFIED MAIL NUMBER P-614 922 409 �
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED N C. 0"t. "RCO
Mr. George Zachary JUL 18 1W
7456 Zachary Lane
Snow Camp, NC 27349 wrinvo^" ewt„m
SUBJECT: Designation of Concentrated Flegiaisa, viirCf
Animal Feeding Operation
Zachary Farm
Snow Camp, NC
Alamance County
Dear Mr. Zachary:
This letter is to notify you that the Zachary Farm, is
hereby designated a concentrated animal feeding operation in
accordance with Title 15, North Carolina Administrative Code
2H . 0123 , and adopted Federal Regulations 40 CFR 122. 23 .
The designation of your dairy and chicken operation was
based on inspections conducted on May 23 and June 12, 1990,
by members of the staff of the Winston-Salem Regional
Office. These inspections showed that you had established a
concentrated animal feeding operation requiring such
designation based upon the following facts:
1 . The animal waste enters an unnamed tributary of
Cane Creek, a class C-NSW surface waters.
2. There are 110 dairy cattle ( 154 animal units) and
a total of 53 ,000 laying chicken.
3 . A flushing ditch takes the diary wash water and
waste down' beside a pasture into an U.T. to Cane
Creek.
A National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) permit is required for discharge of waste to the
surface waters of the State. However, if you can
permanently eliminate the discharge by implementing changes
Paudo Prewndon Pays
/� P.O.Box 27687,Raleigh.North Ca-Nina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]

Mr. George Zachary
Page #2
June 25, 1990
within sixty ( 60) days of your receipt of this notice,
including, but not limited to, modifications to lagoons and
the implementation of a final waste disposal plan, a permit
application will not be required. If compliance has been
achieved, you must notify us in writing within sixty ( 60)
days describing, in detail, the changes or modifications you
made.
If the discharge of waste to the surface waters of the
State is not permanently eliminated within sixty ( 60) days
of receipt of this notice, an NPDES permit application must
be submitted within that time.
Permit applications should be submitted, in duplicate,
to the Director, Division of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources, P. O. Box 27687 , Raleigh, NC 27611 . Assistance,
if desired, can be obtained by contacting Mr. M. Steven
Mauney, Water Quality Supervisor , 8025 North Point
Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27106 ( 919) 761-2351 . The
applications should be accompanied by construction plans for
the nondischarging animal waste management system.
For your information, the following items are' enclosed:
1 . One copy of the Federal Register - Concentrated
Animal Feeding Operations, 40 CFR 122. 23 .
2 . Three copies of NPDES Discharge Permit application
- Short Form B.
If you need advice or technical assistance with regard
to managing animal waste, you should contact your county
extension chairman or North Carolina State University' s
Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering at
(919) 737-2675.
If you wish to contest this Designation, you must
request an administrative hearing within thirty ( 30) days of
your receipt of this Notice. This request must be in the
form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of
the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the
Office of Administrative Hearings, P. O. Drawer 11666,
Raleigh, N.C. 27604 . A copy of the Petition should be
filed with this office.
If you do not request an administrative hearing, this
Designation will become final in thirty ( 30) days.

Mr . George Zachary
Page #3
June 25, 1990
A copy of this letter is being sent to agricultural
agency representatives for information and to aid them in
providing cooperative assistance. Should you have any
questions regarding this matter, p1 s� do not hesitate to
contact us . 1
S' ncerely,
Gorge T. verett, Ph.D
/al
Enclosures
e
,M. Steven Mauney
William R. Dorsett
1/'

IvEb
NRCO
JUN 25 1990
Winston-Salem
Regional office
ce
7
'A
AC
'A; - -----

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor Margaret Plemmons Foster
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
June 27, 1990
Mr. George Zachary
7456 Zachary Lane
Snow Camp, NC 27349
Subject: Notice of Violation
Zachary Farm
Alamance County
Dear Mr. Zachary:
This letter is to acknowledge your correspondence below
as received June 25, 1990.
Applications
Plan and Specifications
Sewer Overflow Letter
Complaint
Inquiry
X Required Written Response
Soil or Groundwater Monitoring Data
Other
If you have any questions on the status of this
project, please call me or Steve Mauney at (919) 761-2351 .
Sincerely,
Eric Galamb
Environmental Technician IV
EEG:vm
cc: Central Files
WSRO-\
8025 North Point Boulevard, Suite 100, Winston-Salem, N.C. 2 710 6-3 20 3 •Telephone [phone]
An Faual 0,nm.,ni v Affirmative Asian F.., Ll

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT,
HEALTH, AND NATURAL. RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Winston-Salem Regional Office
June 18 , 1990
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Steve Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief
THROUGH: Larry D. Coble
Regional Supervisor
THROUGH: M. Steven Mauney
Water Quality Supervisor
�f
FROM: Eric Galamb
Environmental Technician IV
SUBJECT: Designation of Zachary Farm as a Concentrated
Animal Feeding Operation
Alamance County
An animal operations inspection form for George Zachary
Farm describes the situation on the subject farm.
There were four sampling locations for the chicken
manure discharge. The spring ( source) of the U.T. to Cane
Creek was the background sample. This Sample was in a
pasture. The second sample was taken approximately 75 feet
downstream of the chicken manure flow into the stream. The
third station was the influent to McBain` s pond and the
fourth station was the pond effluent. The results are
tabulated below.
Station # Fecal Coliforms BOD
( #/100 ML) (mg/L)
1 1200 0 . 3
2 7600 7. 2
3 3100 29
4 460 75
The Winston-Salem Regional Office does not have a
legible copy of the Federal Register - Concentrated Animal
40 CFR 122. 23 . Please enclose a copy of
Feeding Operations,
this register in the letter sent to Mr. Zachary.

The WSRO recommends that Mr. George Zachary' s farm be
designated by the director.
EEG/al
CC: �WSRO . `
Central Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G.Martin,Govemor George I Everett,PhD.
William W.Cobey,Jr..Secretary Director
June 25, 1990
CERTIFIED MAIL NUMBER P-614 922 409
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. George Zachary
7456 Zachary Lane
Snow Camp, NC 27349
SUBJECT: Designation of Concentrated
Animal Feeding Operation
Zachary Farm
Snow Camp, NC
Alamance County
Dear Mr. Zachary:
This letter is to notify you that the Zachary Farm, is
hereby designated a concentrated animal feeding operation in
accordance with Title 15, North Carolina Administrative Code
2H .0123 , and adopted Federal Regulations 40 CFR 122.23 .
The designation of your dairy and chicken operation was
based on inspections conducted on May 23 and June 12, 1990,
by members of the staff of the Winston-Salem Regional
Office. These inspections showed that you had established a
concentrated animal feeding operation requiring such
designation based upon the following facts:
1. The animal waste enters an unnamed tributary of
Cane Creek, a class C-NSW surface waters.
2 . There are 110 dairy cattle ( 154 animal units) and
a total of 53 ,000 laying chicken.
3 . A flushing ditch takes the diary wash water and
waste down beside a pasture into an U.T. to Cane
Creek.
A National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) permit is required for discharge of waste to the
surface waters of the State. However, if you can
permanently eliminate the discharge by implementing changes
Pollution Pnndrtlon Pays
P.O.Brix 27687,Raleigh,North Carolina 2 7611-768 7 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity A@InnatNm Action Employer

•
Mr. George Zachary
Page #2
June 25, 1990
within sixty ( 60) days of your receipt of this notice,
including, but not limited to, modifications to lagoons and
the implementation of a final waste disposal plan, a permit
application will not be required. If compliance has been
achieved, you must notify us in writing within sixty ( 60)
days describing, in detail, the changes or modifications you
made.
If the discharge of waste to the surface waters of the
State is not permanently eliminated within sixty ( 60) days
of receipt of this notice, an NPDES permit application must
be submitted within that time.
Permit applications should be submitted, in duplicate,
to the Director, Division of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources, P. O. Box 27687, Raleigh, NC 27611. Assistance,
if desired, can be obtained by contacting Mr. M. Steven
Mauney, Water Quality Supervisor, 8025 North Point
Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27106 ( 919) 761-2351. The
applications should be accompanied by construction plans for
the nondischarging animal waste management system.
For your information, the following items are enclosed:
1 . One copy of the Federal Register - Concentrated
Animal Feeding Operations , 40 CFR 122. 23 .
2 . Three copies of NPDES Discharge Permit application
- Short Form B.
If you need advice or technical assistance with regard
to managing animal waste, you should contact your county
extension chairman or North Carolina State University' s
Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering at
( 919) 737-2675.
If you wish to contest this Designation, you must
request an administrative hearing within thirty ( 30) days of
your receipt of this Notice. This request must be in the
form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of
the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the
Office of Administrative Hearings, P. O. Drawer 11666,
Raleigh, N.C. 27604. A copy of the Petition should be
filed with this office.
If you do not request an administrative hearing, this
Designation will become final in thirty ( 30) days.

Mr. George Zachary
Page #3
June 25, 1990
A copy of this letter is being sent to agricultural
agency representatives for information and to aid them in
providing cooperative assistance. Should you have any
questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact us.
Sincerely,
George T. Everett, Ph.D
/al
Enclosures
M. Steven Mauney
William R. Dorsett

M 'eA
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Winston-Salem Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
July 11, 1986
CERTIFIED MAIL NO. P 039 814 086
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. George Zachary
Zachary Lane
Snow Camp, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Zachary:
SUBJECT: COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION
WASTEWATER DISCHARGE TO SURFACE WATERS
ALAMANCE COUNTY
Investigations by Jessica Howells, an Environmental Technician with
our Winston-Salem Regional Office, found that animal waste from your poultry
operation has been washed to a small creek near the operation and has caused
water quality violations by severely depleting the amount of oxygen in waters
downstream.
The unpermitted discharge of waste to the surface waters is in violation
of North Carolina General Statute (NCGS) 143-245.1. (a)(1) and violations
of water quality standards are violations of NCGS 143-215.1(a) (6) . These
violations are subject to enforcement action pursuant to NCGS 143-215.6 which
could include a civil penalty of not more than ten thousand dollars
($10,000.00) per day.
You are requested to send a written response by July 29, 1986 to the
Winston-Salem Regional Office detailing the steps that have been and/or
will be taken to eliminate any discharge and to prevent the problem from
reoccuring.
Should you have any questions , please contact Ms. Howells or myself
at (919) 761-2351.
Sincerely,
MSM/JMH/cm
cc: Alamance Co. Hlth . Dept. M. Steven Mauney
CF thru Bob Deweese Water Quality Supervisor
WSRO
8025 North Point Boukvard, Suite 100, Winston-Salem, N.C. 271063295 •Telephone [phone]
An Equal OppDrnmiry Affirmative Action Employer

y IAA
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor Margaret Plemmons Foster
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
May 24 , 1990
CERTIFIED MAIL ##P-536 300 963
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. George Zachary
7456 Zachary Lane
Snow Camp, NC 27349
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation - Illegal Discharge
Zachary Farm
Alamance County
Dear Mr. Zachary:
Ms. Janet Russell and Mr. Eric Galamb investigated the
subject farm on May 24, 1990. Chicken manure was observed
flowing from the chicken houses to an U.T. to Cane Creek.
Cattle manure was observed in a drainage ditch leading to
another U.T. to Cane Creek
According to North Carolina General Statute (NCGS)
143-215 . 1 , "No person shall do any of the following things
or carry out any of the following activities until or unless
such person shall have applied for and shall have received
from the Environmental Management Commission a permit
therefore and shall have complied with such conditions, if
any, as are prescribed by such permit:
( 1 ) Make any outlets into the water of the State; .
( 6) Cause or permit any waste directly or indirectly,
to be discharged to or in any manner intermixed
with the waters of the State in violation of the
water quality standards applicable to the assigned
classifications or in violation of any effluent
standards or limitations established for any point
source . "
8025 North Point Boukv rd, Suitt i0o,Winston-Salem, N.C. 27106-3203 •Telephone [phone]

Mr. George Zachary
Page ##2
May 24 , 1990
You must submit a written response to the Winston-Salem
Regional Office by June 25, 1990, detailing the steps you
are taking to comply with State law. If you have any
questions, please contact Steve Mauney, Eric Galamb or me at
( 919 ) 761-2351 .
Sincerely,
�1 (�
'Larry D. Coble
LDC/EEG/vm Regional Supervisor
CC : Alamance County Health Dept.
Central Files
WSRO

ANIMAL OPERATIONS INSPECTION FORM
Date of Inspection: May 23 , 1990
Name of Owner of Property: (Check Register of Deeds or Tax Office)
George Zachary - Tax Maps 8-11-38(b)
8-11-38(uu)
8-11-38
8-13-7 (au)
8-13-7 ( a)
Address: Mr. George Zachary
7456 Zachary Lane
Snow Camp, N. C. 27349
Phone Number: ( 919) 376-3715
Description of facility location (State Road No. ' s, etc. ) : The farm is
located at the end of Zachary Lane ( S R 2403 ) in Alamance County
Type of Operation (Examples: farrow to finish, topping, dairy, swine,
cattle, chickens-layers or broilers, turkey production, etc. ) : dairy
cattle chicken - layers
Number and Type of Animals or Animal Units: 110 total head/75 dairy -
53 000 chicken layers
Length of time animals. have been, are, or will be stabled, . or confined
and fed or maintained in any 12 month period. milked daily, chicken
confined at all times
Are crops, vegetation forage growth, or post-harvest residues sustained
in the normal growing season over any portion of the lot or facility?
corn oats wheat sorghum, silage.
Description of other animal operations in immediate vicinity and
proximity to same or other surface waters: McBane farm
Proximity of facility to neighboring houses, wells, etc. : two wells
are less than 50 feet from holding area for dairy cattle and 100 feet
from chicken houses .
Approximate Depth of groundwater table in the area of the facility or
discharge: 440 feet deep WO 3S Am+ -fo jrournd04e4' 4ab(e-
120 feet deep Wf_j�
Proximity of facility to surface waters (provide name and class of
surface waters: U.T. of Cane Creek (C-NSW) Cane Creek ( C-NSW) .
Are pollutants discharged into the waters of the State? If so, How?
(directly or by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other similar
man-made device) : Yes the cattle are washed prior to milking. A
flushing ditch takes the water and waste down beside the "pasture" into
the U.T. of Cane Creek.

Do or have discharges occurred in response to a storm event of less
than a 25 year, 24 hour intensity? ( If yes, include a brief listing of
incidents and suspected causes) : Yes , it is believed that the storm
yesterday took waste (cattle and chicken) to 2 (two) separate
tributaries of Cane Creek.
Type of Waste Management (Examples: type of confinement-free stall
barns , sheltered or limited shelter dirt lots, paved or dirt open lots,
swine houses, pasture; type of waste handling-direct spreading in solid
form, slotted floor with lagoon or pit, single or multi-cell lagoon,
aerated lagoon, land application of liquid manure, spray irrigation,
contractor disposal, etc. ) . The cattle are held on a concrete holding
area where they are fed. Manure is removed from this area by a
front-end ( "bobcat" ) and placed into a land applicating device. The
front-end loader also removes the waste from the chicken houses and
puts it into the land applicating device.
Condition of waste management facility (rate as poor-good, no
discharge, sufficient freeboard in lagoon, etc. Include weather
conditions during inspection) . no lagoons - poor Partly cloudy,
temperature in mid 60 ' s.
Animal waste discharge ( including photos and witness ' names, addresses,
telephone numbers and statement of fact) . Paul McBane contact Eric
Galamb on May 14 , 1990 at 8 : 45 a.m. Mr. McBane stated that his pond is
full of chicken manure that is running off of Mr. George Zachary' s
property. Galamb inspected site on May 15 without the direction of Mr.
McBane. Galamb was looking in wrong area. Galamb and Janet Russell
inspected site on May 23 , 1990 from 10 : 00 - 12: 45 p.m. and 1 : 45 p.m. -
4: 00 p.m. As before, pond had black effluent and septic odor. Mr.
McBane directed Galamb and Russell to the manure slide. Galamb and
Russell inspected Mr. Zachary' s farm. Galamb requested that Zachary
show the inspectors all locations where water on property. Zachary
took inspectors to a stream crossing of an unnamed tributary to Cane
Creek. Zachary also took inspectors to Cane Creek. Zachary never took
inspectors to the areas where manure was entering the streams . Zachary
did not take the inspectors to the stream separating the McBane Farm
from the Zachary Farm. This stream had a manure slide flowing and
entering the stream. Shell casings from a type of grub was observed in
the manure slide near the chicken houses. These casings were also
observed on the stream bank of U.T. to Cane Creek. Therefore, manure
is getting into stream. Manure was three ( 3 ) feet deep in the southern
chicken house. This house was cleaned last fall ( ' 89 ) . Manure was six
( 6) inches deep in the northern chicken house. Manure flows out of at
least six ( 6) openings in the two chicken houses.
The dairy cattle are washed prior to milking. There are a minimum
of 3 (three) drains in the milking house. These drains empty into a
natural drainage ditch that feeds an unnamed tributary to Cane Creek.
In addition, the holding area has a concrete pad. A "bobcat" front-end
loader scraps the concrete pad and places the manure into a land
applicating device. However, some manure is pushed onto the land near
the watering trough. The water and urine cause the manure to flow into
the drainage ditch. The drainage ditch was full of manure.
l

No photos were taken. Mr. Paul McBane was a witness to the
chicken manure slide.
Water Quality Assessment: ( Include description of sampling, field
measurements , visual observations and slope and vegetative cover of
land adjacent to water, extent of rainfall and other factors relative
to the likelihood or rainfall and other factors relative to the
likelihood or frequency of discharge of animal wastes and process
wastewaters) . A total of 6 sampling locations were picked. The sample
locations are marked on an attached map. At each station, BOD and
fecal coliform samples were taken using standard operating procedures .
The samples were iced down. The U.T. of Cane Creek separating the
McBane farm from the Zachary farm is wooded. With each rainfall event,
it is suspected that chicken waste-would enter this U.T. to Cane Creek.
The cattle manure flows into another U.T. to Cane Creek. The cattle
manure is entering the waters of the State. However, the wastewater
seeps into the ground before it reaches the main U.T. to Cane Creek.
With each rainfall event, wastewater would enter the U.T. to Cane
Creek.
Recommendations Made to Owner/Operator Mr. Zachary was informed that
the illegal discharges must cease immediately. Mr. Zachary was told to
contact the Agricultural Extension office to get assistance in waste
management. Mr. Zachary was informed by Galamb that the farm may be
designated.
Recommendations for further DEM action: (Re-inspect, designate, etc) .
Re-inspect, take photos and more samples . Proceed with designation.
Other comments :
I.
r

SENDER:Complete Items 1 and 2 when additional Ices ere desired,and complete Items 3 and 4.
Put your address in the"RETURN TO"space or the a side. Failure to do this will prevent this
card from being returned to you.The return me i t fa I qrovicle you the name of the anon
delivered to and the date of deliver . or ad tonal fees the following sery ces are
ava le e.Consult
postmaster or ees an c ee ox es)for additional service(s)requested.
1. IX Show to wham delivered,date,and addressee's address. 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery.
3.Article Addressed to: 4.Article Number
Mr. George Zachary P-536 300 963
7456 Zachary Lane Type ofq rvlea:
1i1
Snow Camp, NC 27349 Registered ® Insured
Certified COD
Express Mail
Always obtain signature of addressee or
agent and DATE DELIVERED.
5.Sig ture—Add see i 8.Addressee's Address(ONLY if
X !/ requested and fee paid)
6.Signature—Agent
X
7.Date of Delivery
PS Form 3811,Feb.1986 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER ALITY FIELD-LAB FORM (DM1) For Lab Use ONLY t )
�r .( Y�/!� Lab Number:
COUNTY Y �p- L� PRIORITY �' SAMPLE TYPE �- '/ • ) /�
RIVER BASIN CP-fYG Date Received: l ?I�r �� Timet,! �C.- �
�'�^
REPORT TO:ARO FRO MRO RRO WeRO WIRO SR TS ❑AMBIENT ❑ QA ❑STREAM EFFLUENT Redd bya From: Bus-Courier-Hand Del
AT 1 j I
Other K ❑COMPLIANCE CHAIN ❑ LAKE ❑ INFIUENI' / (Jf') 1 J
((I,NJ/_T DATA ENTRY BY: CK.
OF CUSTODY 0 1�I,�
Shipped by; Bus�Co �� Stafff,,Other ❑EMERGENCY /�❑E,S{'TJ`UAR�/Ya�� ��� r(yl DATE REPORTED:{/ In(/S'Y{oJ
COLLECTOROD tie: -5 5-25/25rj U o / ( C[.�(//`G rll�ll �/ `/ /7 p �•
Estimated ROD Range:0-5/5-25/25.65/40.130 or 100 plus STATION
STATION LOCATION: l�(.,��(% \/_J•,1(.. Sy��//(9
Seed; Yes No❑ Chlorinated: Yes[] No181 REMARKS: 1")/{L/-.(—I�L/��tl /f1L�/IG �' �6751I�QA"� ♦ rnCll{'l U� �IAL�
Station # Date Begin (yy/mm/dd) Time Begin Dale End Time End Depth DM DB DBM Value Type Composite Sampie T pe
A H I. T S B C G GNXX
1 'RODS 310 IA mg/1 Chloride 940 mg/I NHS as N 610LI-Lithium 1192 ug/I
2 COD High 340 mgA Chi a: Trl 32217 ug/I TKN as N 625 mg/1 Mg•Magneslum 927
3 COD Low 335 mg/I Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/1 NO2 plus NOS as N 630 mgA Mn-Manganese 1055
4 V Coliform: MF Fecal 31616izw /100ml Pheophytin a 32213 ug/1 P:Total as P 665 me/1 Na-Sodlum 929 mg/I
5 Coliform:MF Total 31504 /100m[ Color:True 80 Pt-Co PO4 as P 70507 mg/1 Arsenlc.Total 1002 ug/I
6 Coliform:Tube Fecal 31616 /IOOml Color:(pH ) 83 ADM[ P.Dissolved as P 666 mg/I Se-Selenium 1147 ug/I
7 Coliform:Fecal Strap 31673 /100mi Color: pH 7.6 82 d ADMI Hg-Mercury 71900 ug/I
8 Residue:Total 500 mg/i Cyanide 720 —4 mg/1 CdCadmlum 1027 ugA Organochlodne Pesticides
9 Volatile 505 me/I Fluoride 951 _ .a, �g/I CrChromlum;Totd 1094 ug/1 prganoplro�lmrusPbticides
10 Fixed 510 mg/I Formaldehyde 71880 .:.•me/1 Cu-Copper 1042 ug/I
11 Residue:Suspended 530 mg/I Grease and Olin 556 mg/1 NI-Nickel 1067 ugA Acid Herbicides
12 Volatile 535 mg/I Hardness Total 900 mg/I Pb-Lead 1051 ug/I
13 Fixed 540 mg/1 Specific Cond.96 uNihoe/em2 ZmZine 1092 ug/I Base/Neutral Extractable Organics
14
pH 403 unite MBAS 38260 mg/I Acid Extractable Organics
15 Acidity to plf 45 436 mg/I Phenols 32730 ug/1 A Ilver 1077 ugA
16 Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/1 Sulfate 945 mgA APAluminum 1105 ug/I Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
1� Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/l Sulfide 745 mg/I Be-Beryllium 1012 ug/I
.18 Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/I CeCelclum 916 m9A
19 TOC 680 mg/1 Co-Cobalt 1037 u9/1
201 1 Turbidity 76 NTU Fe-Iron 1046 .SA Phytopiankton
Sampling polar% Conductanee'at 25 C Water Temperature C D.O.mg/1 pH Alkalinity Acidity Air Tempenmre(C)
pH 89 pH 4.5 pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2 - 94 10 300 1• 400 1. 82244 1431 82243 182242 20
Salinity.% Preclpltion On/day) Cloud Co.% Wind Direction(Deg) Stream Flow Severity Turbidity Severity Wind Velocity M/H Stream Depth ft. Stream Width ft.
480 45 32 36 11351 1350 35 [ean
4 4
DMI/Revised 10/86

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATERbALITY FIELD-LAB FORM (DM1) For Lab Use ONLY
/)Il /
�y,�� ry� �/ (/ Lab Number: /1
COUNTY �'/ ny-t (1(v(_ PRIORITY SAMPLE TYPE �O 1` r C I,,.>
,,p Date Received: ) �i /� Time: 1 ..r
RIVER BASIN � ��TTT.. .,� �I�jjj i \\r-� f
REPORT TO: ARO FRO MRO RHO WaRO WIRO SE TS ❑AMBIENT ❑ Qp ❑STREAM L1( EFFLUENT Rec'd by:1.J5 I From: Bu4Courler?Hand Del
Other AT BM ❑COMPLIANCE 131 CHAIN LAKE ❑ INFLUENT DATA ENTRY BY: L CK:
OF CUSTODY ---.�-i
Shipped by; Be Courier//S left, Other ❑EMERGENCY ❑ESTUARY qp7 DATE REPORTED: (n'~j 'CCOLLECTOR(S):�(7A ( Pr"6 'fl /
Estimated HOD Ranee:0-'5/5.25/25.65/40-130 or 100 plus STATION LOCATION: /' 44 d/S �'� �,/�yAL� v,
�{r 1''� 1 Jf etAm
Seed: yes ❑ No Chlorinated: Yes[] No�iq REMARKS: -(- Lo(�.1 ��
Station # Date Begin (yy/mm/dd) Time Begin Date End Time End Depth DM DB DBM Value Type Composite Sample Type
70 , 0 �-3 /2:3V A H L T S B C G GNXX
1 1 BOD5 310 7.7 mg/I Chloride 940 mg/I NH3 as N 610 mgA Li-Lithlum 1132 ugA
2 COD High 340 moll Chl a: Tri 32217 ug/I TKN as N 625 mg/I Mg-Magnesium 927
3 COD Low 335 mg/1 Chi a: Corr 32209 USA NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 moll Mn-Manganese 1055
4 oliform: MF Fecal 31616 1 /IOOmI Pheophytin a 32213 ug/1 P:Total as P 665 mg/1 NeSodlum 929 mg/I
5 Conform:MF Total 31504 /loom] Color:True 80 Pt-Co PO4 as P 70507 mgA Arsenic:Total 1002 USA
6 Coliform:Tube Fecal 31616 /100ml Color:(pH ) 83 ADMI P.Dissolved as P 666 mg/I Se-Selenlum 1147 no/1
7 Coliform:Fecal Strap 31673 /100m1 Color: PH 7.6 82 DMI Ho-Mercury 71900 USA
8 Residue:Total 500 mg/1 Cyanide 720 1'`.1 :tpg/I CdCadmium 1027 ug/I I Organochlorine Pesticides
9 Volatile 505 mg/1 Fluoride 951 r rg/l CrChwndum;Total 1034 USA Orgarmphosphoue Pesticides
10 Fixed 510 mg/I Formaldehyde 71880 Cu-Copper 1042 ug/1
11 Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I Grease and Oils 556 mg/I• NI-Nickel 1067 USA Acid Herbicides
12 Volatile 535 mg/I Hardness Total 900 mg/I Pb-Lead 1051 u9/1
13 Fixed 540 mg/1 Specific Cond.195 uMhos/cm2 Zn-Zinc 1092 -, ug/1 Base/Neutral Extractable Organics
14 PH 403 unite MBAS 38260 moll Acid Extractable Organics
15 Acidity to PH 4.5 436 mg/I Phenols 32730 ug/I A Ilver 1077 ug/I
16 Acidity to PH 8.3 435 mg/1 Sulfate 945 mgA AI-Aluminum 1105 ug/I Forgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
17 Alkalinity to PH 8.3 415 moll Sulfide 745 mg/I Be-Beryllium 1012 ug/I
13 Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 me/I Ca-Calcium 916 mg/i
19 TOC 680 mgA Co-Cobalt 1037 ug/I
20 Turbidity 76 NTU Fe-fron 1045 ugA Phytoplankton
Sampling Point E Conductance at 25 C Water Temperature JU D.O.mgA PH Alkalinity Acidity Air Tempemwm(C)
PH 8.3 PH 4.5 pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2 _ 94 10 300 q00 • 8224 431 82243 182242 20
Salini%% Preclpilion On/day) Cloud Cover% Wind Direction(Deo) Stream Flow Severity Turbidity Severity Wind Velocity M/H Stream Deprh it Stmem Width fL
480 45 32 36 1351 1350 35 [ean
4 4
DMI/Revlsed 10/86

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER gALITY FIELD-LAB FORM (DM1) ) For Lab Use ONLY) /
COUNTY y/�� r' 1 / Lab Number: l� X // 0
- ' `z'"AW�kL'7� PRIORITY 1 4 SAMPLE TYPE / j /�
RIVER BASIN � �yy��. Date Reee�"lw'e�d? 1 1 Time �•O�✓
REPORT TO:AROFR O RRO WaRO WIRGT\Y`— O SR TS ❑AMBIENT ❑ QA ❑ STREAM L:J EFFLUENT Rec'd by: 1_�,'. ) ( From: BuB 2 r)Hand Del
AT BM ,n y
Other ❑COMPLIANCE ® CHAIN ❑ LAKE INFLUE DATA ENTRY BY: p/f`t a CK:1 1.}
/'—'�.�� OF CUSTODY
Shipped by; Bus ouG r._o�)Staf�f,,{O�thher ❑EMERGENCY ❑ESTUARY ' � DATE REPORTED: �.-1•-'!��
COLLECTOR(S): 6 epm_/—li•/j} C ,/ _7G.
Estimated ROD Range:0-5/5-25/25.65/40.390 or 100 plus STATION LOCATION:
Seed: Yes El No❑ Chlorinated: Yee❑ No/R REMARKS:
Station # Date Begin (yy/m/dd)I�mme Beeggi Date End Time End Depth DM DB DBM Value Type Composite Sample T
3 A H L T S B C G GNXX
1 L/ BOD5 310 mg/I Chloride 940 mg/I NHS as N 610 mg/I Li-Lithium 1132 ug/1
2 COD High 340 mg/1 Chi a: Tri 32217 ug/I TKN as N 625 mg/1 Mg-Magnesium 927
3 COD Low 335 mg/I Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/I NO2 plus NOS as N 630 mg/l Mn-Manganese 1055
4 Collform: MF Fecal 31616 .z) /100ml Pheophytin a 32213 USA P:Total as P 665 mg/I Na-Sodlum 929 mg/I
5 Collform:MF Total 31504 /lo0mi Color:True 80 Pt-Co PO4 as P 70507 mgA Arsenic:Total 1002 ug/I
6 Coiiform:Tube Fecal 32615 /loom] Color:(pH ) 83 ADM[ P:Dissolved as P 666 mgA Se-Selenium 1147 ug/I
7 Collform:Fecal Strap 31673 /loom] Color: pH 7.6 82 ADMI Hg-Mercury 71900 USA
R Residue:Tom]500 mg/I Cyanide 720 �- r�jjug/I CdGdmlum 1027 ugA Organochlorine Pesticides
9 Volatile 505 me/l Fluoride 951 - g/1 CrChromlum:Tota11034 USA Orgenophosphoms pesticides
10 Fixed 510 mg/1 Formaldehyde 71890 '""- v,�!9g;1 Cu-Copper 1042 ug/I
11 Residue:Suspended 530 mg/f Grease and Oils 556 mg/I NI-Nickel 1067 ueA Acid Herbicides
12 Volatile 535 m8/I Hardness Total 900 mg/I Pb-Lead 1051 agA
13 Fixed 540 mg/I Specific Cord.95 umbos/cm2 ZnrZinc 1092 ug/] Base/Neutral Extractable Organics
14 pH 403 units MBAS 38260 mg/1 Acid Extractable Organics
15 Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/I Phenols 32730 ug/1 A liver 1077 ug/I
16 Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/I Sulfas 945 m8A AI-Aluminum 1105 ug/I Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
17 Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/1 Sulfide 745 mg/I Be-Beryllium 1012 ug/I
18 Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/1 Ca-Calclum 916 mgA
19 TOC 680 mgA Co-Cobalt 1037 ug/1
20 t`
Turbidity 76 NTU Fe-Iron 1045 ug/I Phymplankton
Sampling Point it Conductance at 25 C Water Temperature D.O.mgA pH Alkalinity Acidity Air Temperature 40
pH 83 pH 4.5 pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2 - 94 30 300 1. 400 1. 822" 1431 82249 182242 20
Salinity% PTecipition On/day) Cloud Cover% Wind Direction(Deg) Stream Flow Severlry Turbidity Severity Wind Velocity M/H Stream Depth ft.Surma Width fL
480 45 32 36 1351 I350 35 [can
4 4
DMI/Revlsed IOJ86

For Lab Use ONLY
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTALMANAGEMENT WATER UALITY FIELD-LAB FORM (DMI)
A 1,/ x /J��
COUNTY `k Lab Number:� !
�^G/
PRIORITY SAMPLE TYPE ! t�'�()
RIVER BASIN Date Recelved! Time C �,���
REPORT TO:ARO FRO MRO RRO WeRO WIRO SRO S ❑AMBIENT ❑ QA ❑ STREAM Lj EFFLUENT Rec'd by: _��_From: Bus-Co�Hend Del
�1
Y
AT BM
Other ❑COMPLIANCE ©. \CHAIN ❑ LAKE ❑ INFLUENT / DATA ENTRY BY: i .I—) CK:
Other OF CUSTODY
Shipped by: Bus aurl2. Staff. Other El EMERGENCY ❑ESTUARY DATE REPORTED:
COLLECTOR(S): /�Q / jam :1 /
Estimated ROD Range:0-5/5-25/26-65/40.130 or 100 plus
{{ STATION LOCATION: /'
Seed: Yes ❑ No❑ Chlorinated: Yea❑ No M REMARKS: /
Station #/ _TD—pte Begin (yy(mm/dd) Time B�� Date End Time End Depth DM DB DBM Value Type Composite Sample Type
C.% �.G-1G/JZ f A H L T S B C G GNXX
1 BOD5 310 mg/I Chloride 940 mg/I NH3 as N 610 mg/1 LI-Lithium 1132 ugA
2 COD High 340 mg/1 Chi a: Trl 32217 ug/I TKN as N 625 mg/1 MgMagneslum 927
3 COD Low 335 mg/I Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/I NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/I Mn-Manganese 1055 low
4 Coliform:MF Fecal 31616 41,h /100mi Pheophytin a 32213 ug/I P:Total as P 665 mg/I Na-Sodium 929 mg/I
5 Coliform:MF Total 31504 /loom) Color:True 80 Pt-Co PG4 as P 70507 mg/l Arsenic-Total 1002 ug/I
6 Coliform:Tube Fecal 31615 /loom] Color:(PH ) 83 ADMI P.Dissolved as P 666 mg/l Se-Selenlum 1147 ug/I
7 Coliform:Fecal Strap 31673 /loom) Color: pH 7.6 82 ADMI Hg•Mercury 71900 ugA
8 Residue:Total500 mg/I Cyanide 720 9 Volatile 505 mg/I '. fig/I CdfAdmlum 1027 ug/1 Organachlorine Pesticides
Fluoride 951 ,�n'jA CrChromium:Tote11034 USA Organophosprorns Pesticides
10 Fixed 510 mg/I Formaldehyde 71880 a.: ,ttp9/1 Cu-Copper 1042 ug/I
11 Residue:Suspended 530 mg/I Grease and Oils 556 mg/I Ni-Nickel 1067 ug/I Acid Herbicides
12 Volatile 535 mg/1 Hardness Total 900 me/I Pb-Lead 1051 ug/1
13 Fixed 540 mg/I Specific Cond.95 uMhos/cm2 ZwZlnc 1092 . ug/I Base/Neutral Extractable Organics
14 pH 403 unite MBAS 38260 mg/I Acid Extractable Organics
15 Acidity to pH 4.6 436 mg/I Phenols 32730 ugA A Ilver 1077 USA
16 Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/I Sulfate 945 mg/1 APAluminum 1105 ug/I Purgeab]e Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
17 Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/1 Sulfide 745 meA Be-Beryllium 1012 ug/1
18 Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/I . Ca-Calcium 916 mg/I
19 TOC 680 maA Co-Cobalt 1037 ng/I
20 Turbidity 76 NTU Fe-Iron 1045 USA Phytoplankton
Sampling Point X Conductance at 25 C Water Temperature IC D.O.mgA PH Alkalinity Acidity Air Temperature(C)
pH 83 pH 4.5 pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2 94 10 300 1• 400 1. 82244 1 431 82243 182242 20
Salinity V. Preclpition(In/day) Cloud Cover R Wind Direction(Deg) Stream Flow Severity Turbidity Severity Wind Velocity M/H Stream Depth ft. Stream Width ft.
480 45 32 36 1351 1350 35 [son
4 4
DMI/Revised 10/96

DNl61ON OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATEALITY FIELD-LAB FORM (DMI) For Lab Use ONLY
`_ 1 // � ) Lab Number: ` /'
\ )LINTY SIN Yj, A7,L1 e PRIORITY IF SAMPLE TYPE Date Recelved) il r��l/ Time:/I •4C_J
peprK f)
REPORT TO:ARO PRO MRO RRO WaRO WIRO(SRO S ❑AMBIENT ❑ QA STREAM ❑ EFFLUENT Reed by: �l From: Bua•Courisr-Hand Del
AT BM
Other ❑COMPLIANCE �f CHAIN ❑ LAKE ❑ INF7AENT DATA ENTRY BY: I�� Cx.
/^r ❑ OF CUSTODY ❑ 1 , J 4, �(\
Shipped by; BusI oour�ie�q;SteLil, O,/t�her EMERGENCY ESTUARY )w/ / DATE REPORTED: J
COLLECTOR(S): /�)ALAYle / , Q ,/�,,/) `��9A r
Estimated BOD Range:0-5/5.25/25.65/40.130 or 100 plus STATION LOCATION: /S nr 1/lStr/ ("C- OF- 2A&IVOY 1 rTFt�7 'f _
Seed: Yes ❑ No El Chlorinated: Yea No , REMARKS: t �(� , �� ( fbic
Station # D4a'te Begin (ycy/mm/dd) Time Begin Date End Time End Depth DM DB DBM Value Type Composite Semple Type
/Q QJ 2. ;bZ A IfL T S B C (DGGNXX
1 V GODS 310 4.5,
mg/I Chloride 940 mg/I NH3 as N 610 m9A LI-Lithium 1132 ug/1
2 COD High 340 mg/1 Chi a: Trl 32217 ug/1 TKN as N 625 mg/I Mg-Magnesium 927
3 COD Low 335 mg/I Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/I NO2 plus NOS as N 630 mgA Mn-Manganese 1055
4 140 oliform:MF Fecal 31616 1b /loom' Pheophytin a 32213 ug/I P:Total as P 665 mg/I Na-Sodlum 929 mg/I
5 Coliform:MF Total 31504 /100m' Color:True 80 Pt-Co PO4 as P 70507 mgA Arsenlc.Toml 1002 ug/I
6 Coliform:Tube Fecal 31615 /100ml Color:(PH ) 83 ADMI P:Dissolved as P 666 mgA Se-Selenium 1147 ug/I
7 Coliform:Fecal Strap 31673 /100ml Color: pH 7.6 82 ADM[ Hg•Memury 71900 ugA
8 Residue:Tom]500 mg/1 Cyanide 720 m9/1 Cd-Cadmium 1027 USA Organochlorine Pesticides
9 Volatile 505 mg/1 Fluoride 951 .' .J.}#mg/1 CrChromlum:Tom11034 USA O:ganoplwsphosus Pesticides
10 Fixed 510 - mg/I Formaldehyde 71880 '-,ulg/I Cu-Copper 1042 ug/1
11 Residue:Suspended 530 mg/I Grease and Oils 556 mg/I., NMickel 1067 ug/1 Acid Herbicides
12 Volatile 535 mg/1 Hardness Total 900 mg/I Pb-Lead 1051 ug/I
13 Fixed 540 mg/I Specific Cond.95 uMhos/cm2 Zn•ZInc 1092 u9A Base/Neutral Extractable Organics
14 pH 403 unite MBAs 38260 -mgA Acid Extractable Organics
15 Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/1 Phenols 32730 ug/I A ilver 1077 ugA
16 Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/1 Sulfa"945 mgA AI-Aluminum 1105 ug/I Purgeab'e Organics(VOA bottle reg'd)
17 Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/1 Sulfide 745 mg/I t Be-Beryllium 1012 ug/I
18 Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/1 Ca-Calcium 916 mgA
19 . TOC 680 mg/I r �, Co-Coba]t 1037 ugA
20 Turbidity 76 NTU 3-.. Fe-Iron 1045 USA Phymplenkton
_ et
Sampling Point R Conductance at 25 C Water Temperature C D.O.mg/1 PH .A -4 Alkalinity - Acidity Air Temperature 0.7
-' pH 8.3 pH 4.5 pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2 . .94 10 300 1. 400 1 82244 431 82243 182242 20
- 'Salinity R Preclpition(In/day) Cloud Cover R Wind Direction(Deg) Stream Flow Severity Turbidity Severity Wind Velocity M/H [can Stream Depth fL Stream Width ft.480 45 32 36 13511350 35 4 4
DM1/Revlsed 10/96

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER,&q ALITY FIELD-LAB FORM (DM1) For Lab Use ONLYT )
7 L�If��CC . T Lab Number: / J j J! I,) l
COUNTY A— PRIORITY SAMPLE TYPE r J+ C (� 6' '')
/ ^'� 0Date Reealved:^ rl �('� 7_: Time:- ;
RIVER BASIN ( I'!7 .�.-� r }/- 1 )
REPORT TO:ARO PRO MRO RRO WORD WIRO W RO S ❑AMBIENT ❑ QA ❑•STREAM ❑ EFFLUENT Rac'd by) I .7 ) From: Bus-Cour Hand Del
AT BM I�1
Other ❑COMPLIANCE ICJ,CHAIN ❑ LAKE ❑ INFLUENT ` DATA ENTRY BY: �� CK:
( OF CUSTODY I `',/♦(I/// v
Shipped by: Bus C.�o•—urie�r,��7to�/f, Other ❑EMERGENCY '/�/ C ❑ESTUARY DATE REPORTED: ��-[�jQr�(o
COimated BOD ('7/TG A7N5 D.� 7I�t
Estimated BOD Range:0-6/5-25/25.65/40.150 or 100 plus STATION LOCATION:/ ,At�(' p, .
Seed: Yen El No Chlorinated: Yee❑ No[9 V1 1 REMARKS: nr 6 A-1,J
Station # D to Begin (yy/mm/dd) Time Begin Date End Time End Depth DM DR DBM Value Type Composite Sample Typ
n OS Z3 3 So A H L T S B C GNXX
1 Lr OD5 310 mg/I Chloride 940 mg/I NHS as N 610 mg/1 Li-Lithlum 1132 ug/1
2 COD High 340 RIGA Chi a: Tri 32217 ug/I TKN as N 625 m8/I Mg-Magnesium 927
3 COD Low 335 mg/I Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/I NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mgA Mn-Manflanese 1055 qW
4 V oliform:MF Fecal 31616 /:w /100ml Pheophytin a 32213 ug/i P:Total as P 665 mg/I Na-Sodium 929 mg/I
5 Collform:MF Total 31504 'l /100ml Color:True 80 Pt-CO PO4 as P 70507 mgA Arsenic-.Total 1002 ue/I
6 Collform:Tube Fecal 31615 /IOOml Color.(pH ) 83 - ADMI P.Dissolved as P 666 mg/1 Se-Selenium 1147 ug/I
T Collform:Fecal Strap 31673 /100m1 Color: pH 7.6 62 .s. ADMI Hg-Mercury 719N ugA
8 Residue:Total 500 me/I Cyanide 720 rig/l CdCadmium 1027 ugA Organochlorine Pesticides
9 Volatile 505 mg/I Fluoride 951 CeChromlum:Total 1034 ug/1 Oysnoplroeplroma Pmtlddes
10 Fixed 510 mg/1 Formaldehyde 71880 y S��mg/1 Cu-Copper 1042 ue/1
11 Residue:Suspended 530 mg/I Grease and Olis 556 mg/I NI-Nickel 1067 USA Acid Herbicides
12 Volatile 535 mg/I Hardness Total 900 mg/I Pb-Lead 1051 u9A
13 Fixed 540 mg/1 Specific Cond.95 uMhos/cm2 Zn-Zinc 1092 uSA Base/Neutral Extractable Organics
14
pH 403 units MBAS 38260 mg/1 Acid Extractable Organics
15 Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/I Phenols 32730 ug/I AfpSlIwr 1077 u9/1
16 Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/I Sulfate 945 mgA Al-Aluminum 1105 ue/I Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
17 Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/I Sulfide 745 mg/I Be-Beryllium 1012 ug/I
18 Alkalinity to PH 4.5 410 mg/I Ca-Calcium 916 mall
19 TOC 680 mgA Co-Cobalt 1037 ug/I
20 Turbidity 76 NTU Fe-Iron 1045 ug/1 Phytopiankton
Sampling Point X Conductance at 25 C Water Temperature D.O.mgA pH Alkalinity Acidity Air Temperature(C)
PH 83 pH 4.5 pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2 r 94 10 S00 1 400 1• 82244 1431 82243 182242 20
.1 :Salinity% Precipition(lNday) Cloud Cover 16 Wind Dhection 0)eg) Stream Flow Severity Turbidity Severity Wind Velocity M/H Stream Depth R. Stream Width B.
480 45 32 36 1351 1350 35 [ean
4 4
DM1/Revlsed 10/86

W-1
L/
,tik" -93,
MA,
�
If
/f jj
It
r? sa
J/
VIA%
IJ
P.
11fh t
If
650 20' 651 652 f
5155 IV SE 13 N"
SCALE 1:24000
1 MILE
1000 0 1(X)O 2000 31000_ 4000 50 6" IOW FEET
c-

6
14'r
I �
SQ
— Ia
II
I
� I

j zcc��G/y
Jl
ij
_
j )
� j
( j

II
11
_ - -�- .ode- - - - - -- - - - --- - --- - -
orf 6e
gr
i '
I

0
COMPLAINT REPORT
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT II /I Q
HINSTON-SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE DATE : 19 0
AA TIME Sam
�j:
NAME OF CAr7LLER: �RµQ / l C��((iy� pm
ADDRESS : /6412- S�(,�p�d 'Pd
Street P .O. Box
S,Ag -1
City f Zip
TELEPHONE NUMBER: �'qd) 374 - 3651
POINT OF POLLUTION : %�l71
DIRECTIONS : � g� �/� / (A /�/f
C31 D�d �L2 Y 2 S Y.- d y l ,too-d
SOURCE OF POLLUTION :
NATURE OF CALL: /4
4S G
REPORT REFERRED T0 :
ATE
L V D
IMMEDIATE ACTION TAKEN :
s re. LaLp tes
Y
SIGNED

f
• • RECEIVED
N.C. Dept. WRCD
MAY 30 1990
Division of Environmental Management Winston-Salem
Regional Office
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD For Investigation of /ACL�A2Y -V, — ( /�cIL),tiT D'�vL- F LGI
Samples collected and DNI forms completed by: /n f C wS /J
. l B 11
L,ab Only Station. No. of
Lab' No. No. Station Location Date Time Bottles
6 75 77 4 o7 �%slz3 /7-3 c Z
Z v 6 edp ta-
Z.3 S o i (,(eE F ,� A LI 'Z� z.
k
owaSS d(-,c l L; a 3 Sz 7
Relinquished y igns�ture): ved by tur Lte
iG.�f
el Ric by
el Rec by
Rel Rec by (Lab)
tbod of Shipment:
Seal b 'Zcc >,- Broken b
Security Type d Condition: Lock by: Open by:
LAB USE ONLY
Lab 2io. No.
From Tt:rou h Containers Anal ela uished by ceived by Date Time
!V
i4a
i
I