010018_INSPECTIONS_20171231

I
State of North Carol') '�..
Department of Enviro
ment /T
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality — —
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor NCDENR
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
May 17, 2000
Bennett Hadley
7952 Mebane Mill Rd
Graham NC 27253
Subject: Rating of Potential Risk
Inactive Waste Lagoons and Storage Ponds
Bennett/Jacob Hadley Farm
Facility Number 1-18
Alamance County
Dear Bennett Hadley;
During the 1999 session, the North Carolina General Assembly passed a law directing the North
Carolina Department of Environment of Natural Resources (DENR) to develop an inventory and
ranking of all inactive lagoons and storage ponds in the State. In order to meet this directive, a
representative of DENR has recently evaluated the inactive lagoon(s) and/or storage pond(s) on your
property. Inactive lagoons and storage ponds were defined by the Statute as structures which were
previously used to store animal waste but have not received waste for at least one year.
The information collected on your property is contained in the attached field data sheets. Using
this field data, staff ranked your inactive waste structures as high, medium or low according to its
potential risk for polluting surface and/or groundwater. Your waste structure(s) was ranked as
follows:
Structure Number Surface Area (Acres) Ranking
1 0.47 Low
This ranking is based in part on the conditions existing on the day of the site visit. Changes in
these conditions or the collection and evaluation of additional data may modify the ranking of your
waste structure(s) in the future.
Information on your facility along with over 1000 others contained in the inventory has been
provided to the General Assembly. During this year's session, the General Assembly will consider
additional requirements for future management of these structures which may include requiring
proper closure of inactive lagoons and storage ponds according to current or alternative standards.
585 Waughtown Street,Winston-Salem.North Carolina 27107 Telephone[phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 5090 recycled/10%post-consumer paper

Rating of Potential Risk • •
Inactive Waste Lagoons and Storage Ponds
Animal Waste Management System
Page 2
Regardless of their ranking, owners of all waste lagoons and storage ponds have certain
management responsibilities. These include taking appropriate actions to eliminate current
discharges, prevent future discharges and to insure the stability of their structures. Staff of the
Division of Water Quality will be in contact with owners of all inactive structures that have been
determined to pose a serious environmental risk, based on its ranking and/or additional field data
collected by the Department.
All liquids and waste removed from these structures must be land applied at a rate not to exceed
the agronomic needs of the receiving crops. Any major modifications made to the dike walls or
structure must be done in accordance with current standards and under the direction of a technical
specialist designated for structural design. Your local Soil and Water Conservation District is an
excellent source for information and guidance related to proper waste application practices, structure
operation and maintenance, and other related animal waste management standards and/or
requirements.
Nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility and liability for
any past or future discharges from your lagoon(s) and/or storage pond(s) or for any violations of
surface water or groundwater quality standards.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this process. If you have questions concerning
your inactive structures, please contact the staff of either in the Division of Water Quality or the
Division of Soil and Water Conservation in the Winston-Salem Regional Office at(336) 771-4600,
Sincerely,
� . z�
Larry Coble
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Alamance County Soil and Water Conservation District Office
Facility File

y tston of Water Quality „ 7 r
)z " pWiswn of Soil and Water Conservahou z • N r,t
0 Other AgeaCy
Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
j Facility Number Ul 18
E3 Permitted 13 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified ®Registered Date of Visit 2/16/2000
10 Not Operational Q Below Threshold Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: 9.1119.6............
FarmName: ................................................................... County: Alamum..........................................W.SRO.......
Owner Name: B.ofat¢.tk.................................. Hadl..ey......................................................... Phone No: 3.36:37.b-.(7.5..4...........................................................
Facility Contact: Sag0..kkadke3..................................................Title: ............................................................... Phone No: 3.36.,3.7.6 59.1........................
Mailing Address: 79.52,.Xehaat:.Mi11.Rd....................................................................... Gr.allam.N.0........................................................... 2.7252..............
OnsiteRepresentative: ........................................................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Location of Farm:
>;.aam.l.AcakAar�....1S..miles.,SlaNth.A.f..Grahaxa,,.Takrti.BZ.Saakh.tl:Qxn..Grahaaat,.ga.1.5..mikes.af.Ali..\'i'.hitseY.C�aSS..itAadS,.tacrx.kef1....
onto..E...Grt:eashaco-..Chanel.Hikl.lkd,.kovyard..Chanel.kkikl....G.a.3.u>.files..tu..N.kebaa+<.kYlikll.Rd,.nrt.cighh...Ga.3.xntilxs.saxtkh.�aad..kurn..
axtka.lYk��.��e.Mi11.13d,..Earm.aa.kett.ak.kaA..al.hill...................................................................................................................................................................
❑'Swine ❑;Poultry ,S-Cattle ❑'Horse
Design Current Design 'Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population 'Poultry Capacity 'Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer IN Dairy 125 0
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer JLJ Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder JEl Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design+Capacity 125
[]Gilts
❑Boars Total'SSLW 175,000
Number of Lagoons lolding:Ponds/.Solid Traps 0
Discharges & Stream Inlnact5
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b, if discharge is observed.did it reach Water of the State'!(If yes.notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gad/min?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
1 Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
Please see attached Lagoon Field Data Sheets
Reviewer/Inspector Name Melissa Rosebrock Larry-Coble ti
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Printed on: 5/12/2000

I
`. 'Facility Number 1 — 18 jkgoon Number 1............. Lagoon ifier B.ehi.nd..kdrn........................................
i
Q Active Q Inactive Latitude 157552 53
Waste Last Added .9/.1/9.6........................................... Longitude 79 16 1127
Determined by: ®Owner ❑ Estimated By GPS or Map? IN GPS ❑ Map
GPS file number: IS021615b
Surface Area (acres): Q.,9.7..........................
Embankment Height (feet): p,. Q........................
Distance to Stream: Q<250 feet O 250 feet - 1000 feet Q>1000 feet
By measurement or Map? ® Field Measurement ❑ Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? Q Yes 0 No
Intervening Stream? Q Yes # No
Distance to WS or HOW (miles): Q< 5 Q 5 - 10 Q> 10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? Q Yes p No Q Unknown
Spillway Q Yes O No Adequate Marker Q Yes O No
Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches): 18
inspection date 2/16/2000
j fir
appearance of Q Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid O Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
0 Lagoon Liquid Clear
Q Lagoon Empty Freeboard(inches): 44
embankment condition p Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
O Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
O Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
Q Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
0 No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained €
liner status
Q High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability E
Q Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
application equipment
fail to make contact
and/or Sprayfield Q Yes Q No Q Unknown with representative O Yes * No [ ;
unavailable
li>
E�iEi
comments 12a. Several 6 inch diameter trees on dam. Appears in good condition, though.
Was NRCS design, no cost share, however.
Jacob is interested in closing out . Referred him to Alamance field office. P.

1�
Q�ision of Water Quality
ision of Soil and Water Conservation •
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review ®Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑Denied Access
Facility Number Ol 18
E3 Permitted 0 Certified E3 Conditionally Certified A Registered Date of Visit 1J16/2000
Not Operational O Below Threshold Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: 91.119.6............
Farm Name: H.eaaetUdacOb.HOdle7.FO>7ttt.................................................................. County: tllantsace..........................................W.SRO.......
OwnerName: H.et1.nett.................................. audky........................................................ Phone No: 3.36-37.6..6.7.54..........................................................
Facility Contact: lnreb.Hadley..................................................Title: ............................................................... Phone No: a3b,37.b b59k........................
Mailing Address: 79.52.Meb"c..Mitll.lid....................................................................... Graktant.N.0........................................................... 2.725.3.............
OnsiteRepresentative:........................................................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Location of Farm:
Farnx.k,Acalkaa:...l S.mkles.SAnth.At.Grabata�.�a1�e.S7.SA.uEb.t�A.m.Graklam..gA..kS.mikes.at.lwlk.31'.ttikne�:.CtcAsx.ki.QadS..tulna.le£t....
AIAtld.k:...�Geeasbara-CbaArl.Hikl..>Zd..kan:au:d.GktatP.el.kki,Ik,..GA..3..mikes.te..Mebane.Makl.Rd..An.ragbk,...G.a.3.AnAAs.sautkt.aad..tiulna.
QAIRQ;; aAG;; A..;;) t:::,'.,A;l';fIQ;U;f1;aP. ;A); fl,{i::Q : .:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::r::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::�
❑Swine ❑ Poultry ®Cattle ❑Horse
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity
a acit Po ulation Cattle Capacity Population
❑Wean to Feeder [I Layer ®Dairy 125 0
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer ❑Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder 10 Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 125
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW 175,000
Number of Lagoons Holding Ponds/Solid Traps 1�
Discharees&StreamImpacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑Yes ❑No
b. if discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
3. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes I@ No
Waste Collection S Treatment
Please see attached Lagoon Field Data Sheets
Reviewer/inspector Name eli Ros rock Larry Coble
Reviewer/Inspector Signature. Date: (�
Printed on: 4/11/2000

Facility Number 1 — 18 �oon Number 1............ Lagoon IdVier Rehind. arn.......................................
O Active * inactive Latitude 35 52 53
Waste Last Added 9/..1/.S.fi........................................... Longitude 79 16 20
Determined by: ®Owner ❑ Estimated By GPS or Map? ® Map
GPS file number: JS0216115b
Surface Area (acres): Q,47........................
Embankment Height (feet): Q,.8.Q........................
Distance to Stream: O<250 feet OO 250 feet - 1000 feet O >1000 feet
By measurement or Map? ® Field Measurement ❑ Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? O Yes No
Intervening Stream? O Yes No
Distance to WS or HOW (miles): OQ < 5 O 5 - 10 O> 10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? O Yes O No O Unknown
Inspection date 2/16/2000
appearance of O Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid O Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
# Lagoon Liquid Clear
O Lagoon Empty Freeboard(Inches): 44
embankment condition # Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
O Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
O Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
O Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
OO No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status O High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
OQ No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
O Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
application equipment fall to make contact O YesO No
and/or SprayfleldO Yes O No O Unknown with representative
unavailable
comments 12a. Several 6 inch diameter trees on dam. Appears in good condition, though.
Was NRCS design, no cost share, however.
Jacob is interested in closing out . Referred him to Alamance field office.

^''.� t , Iii- fi'f.Eat6_ 7!I`�°
it..: afS ".F:! "^'{r3.S^:� ' o'.w u'r mY rn
]radial Evaluation 0 Follow-up
pEEvaluation
� [3 Denied Access [3 Does Facility Require a Fellow-up
Facility Number==—E: D :1 Date of Evaluation
Time of Evaluation 7A hr.(hh:mm)
0 Permitted 13�C__erti,tifi_�ed egBtered 0(N�on•Reg s4rcd Inoetive Fadlityf Date Last Operated: Q. ..
IP
Farm Non wiL.K,{,WL'. ,�,?A, ",I �a ,�, ., ,,,,. C, l County:
Owner Name:-._.t{„�.nL�at,-p�'L�.�. Phone No:
Facility Contact: .�Q3r1`_-`_-"� Title:____...._I—f.___.�_.1—/--�. Phone No: .,,-_„_____,-,,.�,.,_,.
Mating Address: 7..1 �_
Onsite Representative:_ —. Integrator.
Location of Farm:
0-4
_ Deslpt -Cainnf „ ;... '.. Design Cnrteut •`;-. i/eaiQn... Current
a Swine CJ ad :Po nation GPou1^y. . Ca pd Pa ulatlbp Cattle_ . C; aci -Po ulaticm
❑Wesn to Feeder Iyet Dai
❑Feeder to Finish4,1CINon-Le er Non-Dai
❑Famw to Wean
❑Fanw to Feeder '"❑Othu
0 Farrow to Finish Total Design Cap silty 7r��
0 Gilts v
„ El Roars ....::i Total S�S�W,'i�,.
ssgst..._ r0� -yr ssr rNttmbeprafLaeppm. :... i sJarrs:'.'i Y, r a !et
' .Nmn�ertdt HdldrngPons7s7Solid'1'raps_
Discharees&Stream Impacts ,,,,,,������,,,,,,��`�``""""""
1. Is any discharge observed from any lagoon? ❑Yes A".
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? [3Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it roach Water of the Slate?(if yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes 0 No
e. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any lagoon? ❑Yes lyNo
Waste Collection&Treatment
3. Estimate Freeboard Level: ❑Spillway ❑Yea ❑No
Strectutp 1 I Sttrsucturc 2 Structure 3 Simmum 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: VAA
Frrebavd(inches): _._ .. ...._ _..-.—_...-...._..__. ...
Reviewer/Inspector Name EMI _= - "- "' •- ':
Reviewer/Lupector Signature: Data: so-_ 6

•
Inactive Lagoon Field Data Sheet
Facility Number: �•® Inactive Lagoon Number:
Latitude F-3-5-1 . �'F7� " Longitude . a]'PEI M
,GGP,S�ID M—ape
4. Waste Last Added(mnJyy) Owner ❑Estimated I 0'7 N/ I
5. Estimate of lagoon surface area(acres) -'-7- �--�
6. Effective height of embankment(feel)
7. Distance to Blue Line or Intermittent Stream(feet) ❑<250 rg230- 1000 ❑> 1000
Determined From Field Measurement []Map
8. Down Gradient Well
a. Is there a down gradient well located within 250 feet? ❑Yes No
b. Is an intervening stream not located between any pan of the lagoon and the nearest well? ❑Yes o
9. Distance to WS waters or HQW(mi.) X<5 ❑5- 10 ❑> 10
Ho.W R(o2r = 3.5 mites c vJ"
10. Does the representative know of overtopping from outside waters? 10 Yes VNo ❑Unknown
11.Appearance of Lagoon Liquid
a. Sludge Near Surface ❑
b. Lagoon Liquid Dark,Discolored
c. Lagoon Liquid Clear
12. Embankment Condition
a. Poorly Built,Large Trees,Erosion,Burrows,Slumping,Seepage,Tile Drains,etc. ppSL/
b. Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition 'LJ
c. Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards ❑
13. Outside Drainage Area -
a. Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design ❑
b. Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
c. No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
14. Liner Status
a. High Potential for Leaking,No Liner,Sandy Soil,Rock Outcrops Present,etc.
b. No Liner,Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
c. Meets MRCS Liner Requirements
15. Application Equipment and/or Sprayfield Not Available Yes []No ❑Unknown
16. Contact could not be made with on-site representative ❑Yes o

Comments(Refer to Question#): Explain any Yes answer and/or any other comment.
I a. a. Sev�e�l , 6 " d Iam frees ors
Jam . A PPc� in ocd cord ikon,
cvas N,2� of es� n,
no cvs+die, G�bw
40 A1amo-llc.eJ

Site Sketch Showing All Active and Inactive Lagoons
la-q �
N
I LEF

6'eln nctf l Reo b H ad l eA, Fa rw bf- lg'
A'IPDmW A•IQ}S.mW A'IPRmW A'I921.WW W'W
ssyss + _I_ + _I_
Huss
Alamance County Inactive Lagoons Surface Area 0.47 acres
LeVLong WGS 19M Scale 1:500 50216151,.ror
N 2/17/2000
TImo_= Pathfinder Office
US Survey Feet 0 Trimble

State of North Carol
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources FORMA
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary [D E H N F1
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
August 29, 1997 RECEIVED
N.C. Dept. of EHNR
Bennett Hadley SEP 05 1997
Bennett/Jacob Hadley Farm
7952 Nlebane Mill Rd
t
Graham NC 27253 Winston-Salem
Subject: RemovalRe of gional Office
gisLraLion
Facility Number 01-18
Alamance County
Dear Bennett Hadley:
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H.0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H.0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H.0217,your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to the
surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to S 10,006 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits listed
below,you will be required to obtain a certified animal waste management plan prior to stocking animals to that level.
Threshold numbers of animals which require certified animal waste management plans are as follows:
Swine 250
Confined Cattle too
Horses 75
Sheep 1,000
Poultry with a liquid waste system 30.000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sue Homewood of our staff
at(919) 733-5083 ext 502.
Sincerely,
-1•orc
A. Preston Howard,Jr.,P.E.
cc: Winston-Salem Water Quality Regional Office
Alamance Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
P.O.Box 29535,Raleigh,North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post-consumer paper

!. . _ WSRO P.02/02
JLL-14-IM 15134 FROM DEM QUALITY SECTION TO •
Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. 0
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANNAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: !� -3 0 , 1995
Time:
Farm NamelOwner.
Mailing Address: `l 5-2 27 2-
S 3
County:
Intetrator; Phone: _
On Site Representative .Z Phone: 4�c 3
Physical Address/Location:
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: / O C Number of Animals on Site: / c 3
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude:„ z 5"z Longitude: Z '— ,L Elevation:meet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot+25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot+7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: - FL C-1 Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes (No Was any erosion observed? Yes o l>�
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s)being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Yes or v
100 Feet from Wells? 6e or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes o�o
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yea o
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch,flushing system,or other
similar man-made devices? Yes oN1�p•' If Yes,Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure,land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments:
i
N crate
cc:Facility AssessmentUnit Use Attachments if Needed.
-. 0 en

• aE I • {
6 d
M
I
i —
i
\ f e
aoevao 1 a [ >ola
vgy f �
I rC 12 I
p„aRrtR PWCy� _ ` ,sYT
1
N yw U
Y.
TIN 4,I— .'
w r 'a ! s'mw• i I �'�
aao31
RO>
M
p ryYPEKFfR ( f/ fORn .2jy1
VON
xoiMrw
dtl1by L b
U1X23511�F 1\
nd
M � 6
$� Vvin a
�r �a
M Lo 3
bl MOJ LL4ML[ry

OPERATIONS BRANCH - WQ Fax:[phone]'' Jul 24 '9"t 10:17 P. 06/18
• site lmme4Wc Attent/ioQn
Facility Number:
S:TS VISITATION OW!
DATE:
7 /e3 1995
Owner: /-C' % Pam Nsrnrc
Cocmty:_... %f}/y� 111C
Agent visiting Sirr^ R61, DY� 7
Ultcrator: e:trr• 4�6(1 ems._ Phena:
On Site Repmsentativo:��^e f` ,_�/ Phone:> 7Z " Z ZS5
PlcyslcaiAdd7ras;_=j_`LS?_-/ 11 ���VlisL _.
r!'a f2t�t:s /VJ G 7 z
Mulling Addrera:— L
Type of Op=Uvu: Swine _ _ Poultry Cache
Design Capacity: l 5 Numtar of Animtil.a on Sit*: 9 '� 'y4^-✓1_�.
�sf l_ntitude7 39-o 57 ' ` o� Lougitudot_ ° ---ILL '
Type of Inspecflcn: (pound__1/ Aerial
Circle Yca of No
Does the Aninud Wasto Lnoon have su ' 'cat freeboard of I Foot +257ezr 24 hair storm eveet
CaPProziautcty i Fa t r 7 tm hews r :lo Actual 'mcbUtd: tut _=IrA hex
For faciNtich with mom than°nc Jt gnna,ylcasc address the e+her Jagcoaa' tree!oatd Under iho
comru,Knts secuon.
Was any seepne observed from the agoon(s)l Y& or?6QNvm u:o.erasion of 1;o den N'd
It adcquntc land available for land aFpli-aiion YYys erNo is the ajvcr crop adcqun'w° or No
Addi °nal Commelts
_..�us�—SL�✓tcc•�u.rt2 (S C�� �ci�.�•�,a S .�roP'�+.�-, � D�_
—(�lw.U3 .— ._ it_vcr<t oo✓c.0 5 t LI wit
Fat to (919)715•3359 Signature of AFratc 7� s319s`
i�Tc>-E l