010008_INSPECTIONS_20171231

❑ Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 010008 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC010008 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Other County: Alamance Region: Winston-Salem
Date of Visit: 04/2 512 0 1 3 Entry Time: 10,30 AM Exit Time: 12,00 PM Incident#:
Farm Name: Hadley Brothers Dairy Owner Email:
Owner: James W Hadley Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 4415 Silk Hope Lindley Mill Rd Snow Camn NC 273499103
Physical Address: 4415 Silk Hope Lindley Mill Rd Snow Camp NC 27349
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°50'37" Longitude: 79°21'04"
1-40 east from WSRO.South on NC Hwy 87 then take right onto Lindley Mill Road. Go to Chatham/Alamance county line. Farm is on
the right.
Question Areas:
N Dischrge&Stream Impacts Waste Col,Stor, &Treat Waste Application
Certified Operator:James W Hadley Operator Certification Number: 20954
Secondary OIC(s):
On-Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name James W Hadley Phone: [phone]
On-site representative James W Hadley Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Melissa Rosebrock Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

i •
Permit: AWC010008 Owner-Facility: James W Hadley Facility Number: 010008
Inspection Date: 04/25/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Other
Inspection Summary:
Today's visit was to observe close-out procedures for the waste storage pond. Stephen Berry, Phil Ross, Mr. Hadley,and the
contractor were on site today.A closure plan has been completed and closure appears to be per NRCS standards.DWQ was notified
at least 24 hours prior to closure.
On today's date,about 2 feet of sludge remained to be removed from the last 1/3 of the waste pond(nearest push-off ramp). We
observed what seemed to be fresh water seeping into the WSP from the freshwater pond located uphill and west of the WSP. It did
not seem to be hindering sludge removal, however.
We also inspected the receiving fields, both sludge/solids and irrigation.No overapplication is expected since the application was very
light. All receiving fields were well vegetated and no run-off observed.
Sludge was being stockpiled in a fled across the road from the farm and no leachate was noted coming from the stockpile.Mr. Hadley
was to spread it within a week.
Photos were taken of the waste pond, receiving fields,and stockpiled sludge.
Page: 2

Permit: AWC010008 Owner-Facility: James W Hadley Facility Number: 010008
Inspection Date: 04/25/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Other
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle-Milk Cow 175 0
Total Design Capacity: 175
Total SSLW: 245,000
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
asle Pond WSP 31.20 144.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWC010008 Owner-Facility: James W Hadley Facility Number: 010008
Inspection Date: 04/25/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Other
Discharges& Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a.Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the Stale?(if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c.What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system?(if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage&Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed(Led large trees,severe .❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage,etc.)?
6.Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?(Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals(Cu,Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWC010008 Owner•Facility: James W Hadley Facility Number: 010008
Inspection Date: 0412 5/2 01 3 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Other
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total Phosphorus? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Fescue(Hay,Pasture)
Crop Type 2 Corn(Silage)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management 00011
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Division of Water Quality
Facility Number Division of Soil and Water Cb rvation
�Other Agency /
Type of Visit: Com Hance Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:Region: I�JFtI
Farm Name: in Tol. ., Owner Email:
Owner Name: Tlguau o5 J let Phone:
Mailing Address: L � ,�/S((�S I ll��fm - Li KdIP4 M l ll gd , 51100 e�At &4
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: �� �P 5 Title: Phone: 6 336 . a6
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude:3 S S 0 3 7 Longitude:
X 10E to g7 S Un ley tti l/
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. C the Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish La er Dai Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-La er Dai Calf
Feeder to Finish airy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current D Cow
Farrow to Feeder D�.+P�OUIfG+ Ca aci P,o Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets lBeefBroodCow
Turke s
Other Turkey Poults
01 Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA , ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 21412011 Continued

[Facility Number: - • Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Q �{e Pord
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): _
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion,seepage,etc.) r
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan? 777"""CCC
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [g No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers, setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ]F<'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA D.NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 5d No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [%No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No1QA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes PKrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes a No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑ Yes WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP El Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. es record keeping need i vement?I€yasrdwa rrate-bYonthly
. ❑ Yes OrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Applicat' n 1 ekly Freeboard Waste Analysisil Analysis � Bather Code
[ ainfall tocking Crop Yield 120 Minute Inspections and V Rainfall Inspections r-i —
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No to-N'X ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Condnued

Facility Number: • Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No NKA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes JK No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes Oj�10o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ISO No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes U(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.. ��((
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes I1ll No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge, freeboard problems,over-application) 0
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field [3Lagoon/storage Pond ❑ Other: 77``
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes *o ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes jj3-tp ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes '0 j'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
� No 600)el
wa0dn — ors Solid SPA T
CA
(° l to rah-iOn o) ue ao I q .
a� o
101171a°Gl" " 1) :- 0r ()7 t �s . N � /o0ore .
1600 V
ASO Sl � br 113S. N taco 0.
Reviewer/Inspector Name: PIPA 1,550 Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: &JL,/ Date: 9 10 t
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2011

am Or
Division of Water Quality
Facility Number FID - Division of Soil and Water C: servatlon f oA M
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visits Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: alt tE7/ tocl Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: A10.M0.V1f_eRegion:
Farm Name: l!LAI Bro55 T)Q i r y Owner Email: { ,/ `/
Owner Name: - —TQ'p4 g_5 to I e1 Phone: H_.q 19 . 7 T -2 i 'I Q `I
Mailing Address: 1 �,3oS s i � ►L floAe� / Lind�eu/� l/11 l 2d • , .S/nowCc�nLo
Physical Address: 4415 SI I K-Ho peI, /.ind tai Mill Ed 5 h/f (y l..0 fkj_7
Facility Contact: TQ.6i e-s Q 11A j Title: PhoneC.
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude:3,5 So 3 7 Longitude: '7 q 04
to NWV 87 5 . l�ihd1e4 M111 ,
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish I iLayer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder I INon-Layer I I Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Ca acity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish I Layers I I Beef Stocker
Gilts B Non-Layers Beef Feeder
oars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other I I
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes CIo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes CK No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes [Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
'Page I of 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: OF 0 • jDate of Inspection: 25719601,1+
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? [:] Yes _J�rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: &51e Ppnid_
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 3 to
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes M"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes &No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) RRRvvv
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes �yt No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? 7
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 01(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 1
0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 7�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No [ZNA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents 7�
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes Wo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes Ig No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP []Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21 oes record keeping need 'mprovement?If-yec,ci to box ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Applic tion eekly Freeboard Waste Analysis Soil Analysis �cfers ErLather Code
Rainfall [^Stocking o Yield �20 Minute Inspections Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install aAd ma am rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No 0jr1A ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - 0KJ jDate of Inspection: Ob 1 14&61,1�
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes No C%NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: ���� ,
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge, freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes IX
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes T6dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 1�(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
a I W 0.54-e an 0-1 y s i s w/t ri (Q 6 d o%rs ? -
Ig 6n (( ha-5 501i0) S,p,, no wool � PUMP1i vid
U� � less Sat�e� -no
honey wfl__jon •
ur✓16 0 �/� U
* 0 �-� !a0 1 �
11A1 a0(ip- sl urr� O. oC� Sic-Face surd= (c 3
03 ao) 11
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 1 ro Phone: 7 '
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 02 0 '
Page 3 of 3 21412011

Division of Water Quality 1Pn
t. Fat flit, Number
Y D 1 � D � � Division of Soil and Water Conservation
other Anencv
Type of Visit XCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit/-Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: ��{/�//I I Arrival Time: ^ '`N1�" � S� .� M Departure Time: 2; Q County: Region:
Farm Name: 4 D6)A Ele St1 0_5l Dal`rU Owner Email: // ` L ,L
Owner Name: f.MCS H"J le. - I p I Phone: O(919) 77 Z - 7O
Mailing Address: �3or S ��i �I /1-I'AdIeL, Mill /?J.I -5,10-1 6xM'0I � G
Physical Address: � 1J �I'''kIIiDB2 /L'���•� Mill /�d• Jila� 6Me /
Facility Contact: T nle-s i-fe,d I e-b Title: Phone No ftd)Z61L 2099
OnsiteRepresentative: Tck&' '2tf Integrator:
Certified Operator: IAMGf >rtRd'� Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: 7 Latitudep a�S o SO ©' Longitude: Ez o [E.,t 0
ttcllc�
�11
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish JEI Layer I aDairyCow Q
MGilts
Feeder ❑Non-Layer ❑ DairyCalf
Finish ❑ DairyHeifer
o Wean Dry Poultry ❑D Cow
o Feeder ❑Non-Dairy
o Finish ❑Layers
❑Non-Layers El Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑Pullets
El Turkeys ❑ Beef Brood Cow
Other ❑Turkey Poults
❑Other ❑Other Number of Structures:
Discharees& Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes *No ❑NA ❑NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑Application Field ❑Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? 0
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system?(if yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes kio ❑NA ❑NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State ❑Yes gNo El NA [3 NE
other than from a discharge? 1T
Page I of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Q — (�� • Date of Inspection DZ 8 •
• Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑Yes kNo ❑NA ❑NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 04
Spillway?: e�s
—
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
3a"
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑Yes XNo ❑NA ❑NE
(ie/large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes XNo ❑NA ❑NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑Yes ANo ❑NA ❑NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks and/or wet stacks) /
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require El Yes L No ❑NA El NE
maintenance or improvement? ✓✓✓��\
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes XNo ElNA ❑NE
❑Excessive Ponding ElHydraulic Overload ElFrozen Ground ElHeavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 Ibs ❑Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) —�SGt­f_, �.951 wf G
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑Yes /KNo ❑NA ❑NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑Yes )'No ❑NA ❑NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑Yes X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes kNo ❑NA ❑NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑Yes XNo ❑NA ❑NE
v m
Comments.(refer to question#).£Explain any YES answers and%or any recommendations or any otherr�c'oments..,'
Use'drawingsof faeility;to better,ezplain situatiohs. (use additional pages as necessarg)':, `i 4 i 1 B:i iafty (fft §( xy
7•CjfOtrn��aYf cWM �PM KeMff''1- ��c� h�� /V
Res -41 c f,SS,
VV -
Reviewer/inS ectorName �i �t% ks£`1'." -da, F'S+ v Y", '�:..
P ��)2K��. T`��,t tl s a, Phone: 33(0 77 SZS�
Reviewer/Inspect r Signature: Date: [7 Z�ZD
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Def Inspection OZ / •
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑Yes ANo ❑NA ❑NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes �No ❑NA ❑NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement?"'-Y the a prialrbvx bc}rnv� Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE'
Waste Application Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis oil Analysis nAnneal
MI rainfall Stocking 49-Crop Yield onthly and I"Rain Inspections Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑Yes No ❑NA El NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑Yes '❑No )�NA ❑NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes /qNo El NA El NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑Yes TT❑No NA ❑NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment(PLAT)certification? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑Yes XNo ❑NA ❑NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes )3fNo ❑NA ❑NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes XNo ❑NA ❑NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes XNo ❑NA ❑NE
General Permit? (ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes KNo ❑NA ❑NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:21, 1ti JO
P� �nke4
DA 6.-( 0, nefj �Wv wen a6�- U
OV
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Division of Water Quality
Facility Number (fig O Division of Soil and Water Conservation ' I
O Other Agency
Type of Visit XCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑Denied Access
i
Date of Visit: 0 Arrivaal� y4��l Time: ,� � Departure Time: oT0 County: AM610LG Region: WSO
Farm Name: -P+A d II�Te_W e wl .Val f y Owner Email: q ' t
Owner Name: '✓`t01'eu ifRd �e✓ I Phone: OH — 7TLZ— Z107' /Z
Mailing Address: T30s� s)1k �De/L.n k, Mill R s/10t^� c4ng , 1j G
Physical Address: q7 Z� ��Ifa M �� f��• S/4t W �h C
—J� i
Facility Contact: Arv.P,S 4gjley �Title: PhoneNo: 336- 26c /- ZVYY
Onsite Representative: Integrator,
•-� rr,,''� I (eIIvN JrIz 31 oq
Certified Operator: ✓c�e"r} b j l e Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: ERO ®I Ez„ Longitude: �° 2�
-�a Eqs+ -4� I,c Hw7 s7 so , RyL+ o44, Lf I[e7 W11 W, -
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑Wean to Finish 10 Layer I I NrDairyCow
❑Wean to Feeder JLJ Non-La et I I I ❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish Ll Dairy Heifer 7
❑ Farrow to Wean Dry Poultry ❑ Dry Cow
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Non-Daity
❑Farrow to Finish ❑ Layers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑Gilts ❑Non-Layers
El Pullets El Beef Feeder
El Boars ❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑Turke s _
Other ❑Turkey Poults
❑Other ❑Other Number of Structures:
Discharges& Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes 4No ❑NA ❑NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? 0
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State ❑Yes lNo ❑NA ❑NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — d • Date of Inspection ® •
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑Yes 4 No ❑NA ❑NE
b a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
�S,t,r,u.c�tu,r,e Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): ty,
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
(ie/large trees, severe erosion, seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
through a waste management or closure plan? /
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes lob/❑NA ❑NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
maintenance or improvement? /
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑Yes No ElNA ElNE
maintenance/improvement? /-
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑PAN> 10%or 10 Ibs ❑Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑Evidence of Wind Drift ❑Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) __ P(a,t\+, l X � 'Lin
13. Soiltype(s) d y�
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? L7dd�Yes l����E////l No [I NA [I NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ]Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑yes / `No ❑NA ❑NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary):
0 re4 ? �q�fly 4.,M a)n D Ppt A rt' ? ` J �Q b� •
Dar k �tl�erJ NO- � b �Q� 1 f p� I +(J► -
O
Reviewer/Inspector Name fOG Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: lg
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: � — DlCe of Inspection 8 •
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design El Maps ❑Other ,.�,
21. Does r ord keeping need im vement? / w. ❑ Yes 04 N�o ❑NA ❑NE
ZrasIc Applicaf n Wee y Freeboard Q Waste Analysis Soil A lysis
M Rainfall Stocking Crop Yield n ' Monthly and I" Rain Inspections Ej Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes El No 0NA ElNE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ElYes lXl No ❑NA ❑NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? El Yes /❑No NA ❑NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ,No ElNA ❑NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment(PLAT)certification? ElYes l No ❑NA ElNE
Other Issues (((
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑Yes [�No ElNA ❑NE
General Permit? (ie/discharge,freeboard problems,over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes o ❑NA ❑NE
Adrjttional't5ommen�saud/or+Drawings.4 ix�.,£t+� +t=asz'"c,,����+t ' pp � ����5� � �s$. tt, t Y� ����'Yik C�'.a...mii''P�<5 ��•Z2 4 n 'tu4,.
21 2C09 4 201D S01/ llesI resql kr Ntc��
z - Ii
13� 3iIIa cva = © fo �S N /1000 �o�
It t =� LSD p . 33 S c� = lg • � l�gs - T
14,
Page 3 of 3 12128104

division of Water Quality 14
Facility Number Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation111 IQ p�yt
Q Other Agency l . I m
Type of Visit C mpliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Viisi—tt--tRoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: M= County:/ la—mice— Region:U)SP
Farm Name: f 6:5 IN-;r Owner Email: q Owner Name: �Q t/� /fin Phone: 9 I 7 t/,2 ' 1/6�••�,,
Mailing Address: f�Q�J 5'1 K_ 1,44 /,l i�l � Q�V
Physical Address: T— t I �I I I(' t 1 x.11ind ��/ p6a 1 �5noul ) �� AP1
Facility Contact: -To
Facility Phone No: 33i0 & .208C
Onsite Representative: Jam Integrator: JJ
Certified Operator: �ame5 . I'� Operator Certification Numb r:3 i Oct
��I
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certificatiabl NumbLa r:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Mr M I, Longitude: o
t -40 East y `d7 5001-h i q h+ onto Lindley M1//
�J -
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish ❑ La er I I [�Diry Cow
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Non-La et Lj Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑Dairy Heifei
❑ Farrow to Wean Dry Poultry ❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Non-Dairy
El ❑ La ers Farrow to Finish El Beef Stocker
❑Gilts ❑Non-Layers ❑Beef Feeder
El Pullets Beef Brood Cow
❑Turke s ❑
❑ Boars i
Other ❑Turkey Poults
❑Other ❑Other Number of Structures:
Discharges& Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes No f]NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑Other 1
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? 0
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes �No ❑NA ❑NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: O I — Ub I 0 Date of Inspection I //R/OY •
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ll❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
St I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): `7
5. Are there any immediate threats to�the'integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 4(No ❑NA ❑NE
(ie/large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 1�Yes .,❑(No ❑NA ❑NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ElYes KJ No ❑NA ❑NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks and/or wet stacks) l�
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑Yes KNo ❑NA ❑NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes [ No El NA El NE
El Excessive Ponding El Hydraulic Overload [I Frozen Ground El Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.) CC
[]PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs []Total Phosphorus ❑Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑Evidence of Wind Drift ❑Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑Yes ❑No [6NA ❑NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes *o ❑NA ❑NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ((((�Yes ❑No [INA ElNE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary):
9 -
?r� SAP ✓� th o
F
wer/Inspector Name e Phone:wer/Inspector Signature: Date:
/� 12128104 C ntinued

Facility Number: — () of Inspection
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑Yes y�,,((No .❑NA ❑NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check El Yes I�{NO El NA ❑NE
Z❑ El Design ❑ Maps ❑Other
the appropriate box. WUP Checklists !!
21. D,oes�ecord keeping neeVwrt
ovement? riele belt�e}ew El Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
L�V/Waste Applic tion e Freeboard Waste Analysis So—it "alysis B waste`Prarrsfms el 6erEi€0f0ien
Rainfall �tocking Crop Yield Monthly and V Rain Inspections Bather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑Yes ❑No NA ❑NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑Yes ❑No [;(NA ❑NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes [(No ❑NA ❑NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment(PLAT)certification? ❑Yes �(No ❑NA ❑NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑yes No ❑NA ❑NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑Yes �No ❑NA ❑NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
General Permit? (ie/discharge,freeboard problems,over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑Yes X No ❑NA ❑NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
Additional Cummentsand/or Drawings:
el) C�007 s6�� OFY
U
W
_c �VV
WUU
LAA�ZAZ d IVA*
Page 3 of 3 � 2/
A

I Division of Water Quali
Facility Number ® � - � �C'7 Division of Soil and Water ^nservatian
Other Agency
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit oRoutine 0 Compla�int��� 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
��5p
Date of Visit: Arrival Time:"f- r"IW�arture Time: County: Q Cl� Region: ,{ c
Farm Name: 1 r0$ _JW1rV Owner Email:
n p ' I
Owner Name: J GL,VY�P�S Phone: (4 ) 7 yoZ C)
Mailing Address: 3QS �
q q
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone _ 33"j e"Ir"—Wg
Onsite Representative: �rWM n I l'Q A_.t Integrator:
Certified Operator: S"am�� aC�j _I Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: o ®, p Longitude: iWo ®. iyri
-46 East to NG 4L4j 4 91 Sou`tin• iqh+ onto bindle. Mill
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish ❑ LayerM,Dai Cow
❑Wean to Feeder ❑ Non-La et LjDairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ Farrow to Wean Dry Poultry ❑ D Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Non-Dai
El ❑ Laers Farrow to Finish El Beef Stocker I
❑Gilts ❑Non-Layers
El Pullets ❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Boars ❑ Beef Brood Cow
- — ❑Turkeys
Other ❑Turkey Poults
❑ Other I I ❑Other Number of Structures: �.
Discharges& Stream Impacts �.,(
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes IXI No El NA El NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑Application Field ❑Other 7`
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? 0
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes .y�tNo ❑ NA [I NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State El Yes p(1 No ❑NA El NE
other than from a discharge? �`
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑Yes o ❑NA ❑NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:` j(I!; &, 0na
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): Jl� �(
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? El Yes LN No ❑NA El NE
(ie/large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.) ( �
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑Yes �No ❑NA ❑NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes [I No ❑NA [I NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? /❑-Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes �No ❑NA ❑NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes NNo ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Frozen Ground ❑Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
[]PAN ❑PAN> 10%or 10 Ibs ❑Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑Yes 1 ❑NA ❑NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination%❑Yes ❑No XNA ❑NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes �(No ❑NA ❑NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
o m n[s�(refe�fd,question#j rEzplain any YEbCanswe rs"andu/rl`any recommm�en�daa ions or anly',other commepts.
Use xr.�awmgsttif(facihty to9better explain situations (use ad8ttional,pages.,.as ary�necess ) ,
ala"aAA�4N.�"C:itrar
l) renc.�e- moveilI- U2�C',`� es�zLb (lshe4 on dtawL ? s .
Q _ / _ UJ
Reviewer/Inspec o Name ""-` Phone: —
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: I Inv-
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 6' — Qate of Inspection MAW
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage& Permit readily available? ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑ Yes r(No ❑NA El NE
the appropirate box. ElWUP El Checklists El Design El Maps El Other
���/ `"""'
21. D�oee�Lecord keeping need impro ement?#f}�erTebee rapriate-ba etotrr ❑Yes P(No ❑NA ❑NE
i�blast Applicati/o$l eekly Freeboard Waste Analysis ❑Soil Anal sis ifs on_
❑ mfall ❑%/cking ❑C,tc��lCield n '99 MiRkit^ Inspast�^^ onthly and I" Rain Inspections eather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑Yes �(No ❑NA ❑NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑Yes ,❑No [XNA [I NE
El ,/
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes Laq No ❑NA ❑NE
25. Did the facility tail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes /E�l No VNA El NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? El Yes I No El NA El NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment(PLAT)certification? El Yes //[�No ❑NA ❑NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additionaf problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? Yes ,y❑�No ❑NA ❑NE
29. Did the facility fait to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document El Yes No El NA [I NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal? (�/
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes L`6l No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
3I. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes ANo ❑NA ❑NE
General Permit? (ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes jNo ❑ NA ❑NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
a �1GGIG April oZ 00;-.1&M J I r00 Pe.CO(dS 611
a I a067 w QOO'�t So d feSt reS u lf5 ?) of
4 j�O 0 - -�
12128104

Division of Water Quality
Facility Number O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit C mpliance Inspection . 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time:ITS .5 1 Departure Time: County: A[IIMQIQ Region: f i��
Farm Name: A. A ?U 1"OS . I QI if u Owner Ernst
Owner Name: T4 wo � 1 Phone: —
Mailing Address: �f r I
Physical Address: le, SIQOL't
Facility Contact: Q Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: }��Sri l 0 — Integrator:
Certified Operator: Tame me 5 10A tle�" Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: o ®. Longitude: Ej�oa�'
_-hoc to rub id s �� s��4h . i�h� onto brdIC4 M itl IPA . -
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑Wean to Finish ❑Layer I Dai Cow
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Non-La et Dairy Calf
❑Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
❑Farrow to Wean Dry Poultry D Cow
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Non-Dairy
❑La El Farrow to Finish Beef Stocker b06
ElElGilts El Non-Lay
ers ers
❑
Pullets i El Beef Feeder
❑Boars El Turkeys El Beef Brood Cow
Other ❑Turkey Poults
❑Other I I Other Number of Structures:
Discharges& Stream Impacts y�
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? El Yes L]No ❑NA ❑NE
Discharge originated at: El Structure El Application Field El Other
lll��,
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No ❑NA ❑NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? 0
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes El No ❑NA ❑NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes LEI,No El NA [I NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State El Yes (LEA`No ❑NA ❑ NE
other than from a discharge? l�
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — • Date of Inspection [
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑Yes ffNo ❑NA ❑NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 1 L S-P
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
(ie/large trees,severe erosion, seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑Yes ET/No ❑NA ❑NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 0 Yes ❑N [I NA ❑NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks and/or wet stacks) J
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑yes No ❑NA ❑NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑Yes VNo
ElNA ElNE
maintenance/improvement?1I. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ElYes ❑NA ❑NE
❑Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 Ibs ❑Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑Yes ,,_,NNo/ El NA El NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement'? ❑Yes I o ❑NA ❑NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑Yes ❑No �(NA ❑NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑Yes u `vo ❑ NA ❑NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(use ad '(ional pages as necessary)-
10
111-Dhn u S�- m o v e, �e n tee, c�k-- �v�-b" l� m e v► �- a s
p° Kew c_a4 �e off �o rv► . (l eed {za re— e s1 to I
P e rM o vteM�f Ve i dam th I s Fq l - _
Reviewer/Inspector Name br Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatu Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — gate of Inspection •
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑Yes NNoo ❑NA ❑NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑Yes M40 ❑NA ❑NE
the appropirate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design El Maps ❑Other
21. Does cord keeping need i rovement?I ❑Yes ;N/o ❑NA ❑NE
�'aste Applica 'bn IyJ Wee y Freeboard Waste Analysis Soil Apalysis ❑ �3���as o e FNoE:l
Rainfall Stocking Crop Yield L�dMonthly and I" Rain Inspectionsther Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑Yes NA ❑NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑Yes ❑No XNA ❑NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑Yes XNo ❑NA ❑NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑Yes ❑NNo 06A ElNE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ElYes CRNo ❑NA ❑NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment(PLAT)certification? ❑Yes ❑No V�NA ❑NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑Yes ,L�VlNo El NA [I NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document El Yes DI'N/o ❑NA ❑NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately ,.,.,�
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑Yes C9 No ❑NA ❑NE
General Permit? (ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application) rr��
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? El Yes telNo ❑NA ❑NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes M- o ❑NA ❑NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
-
®j aoo(Q soil teS+ resu1+S 6k . aao� ? ►v°� '
�/�C.��
Y 10
12128104

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 010008 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC010008 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Alamance Region: Winston-Salem
DataofVisit: 01/25/2006 Entry Time:10:10AM Exit Time: 11,05AM Incident#:
Farm Name: Hadley Brothers Dairy Owner Email:
Owner:.James W Hadley Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address:4415 Silk Hope Lindley Mill Rd Snow Camp NC 273499103
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°50'37" Longitude: 79°21'04"
140 east from WSRO. South on NC Hwy 87 then take right onto Lindley Mill Road.Go to Chatham/Alamance county line. Farm is on
the right.
Question Areas:
Discharges&Stream Impacts Waste Collection&Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator:James W Hadley Operator Certification Number: 20954
Secondary OIC(s):
On-Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On-site representative James Hadley Phone:
24 hour contact name James Hadley Phone:
Primary Inspector: Melissa Rosebrock Phone:[phone]
Ext.383
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
3. Evidence of sediment washing off stock trail into ditch. Not a WQ problem at this time.
7. Embankment of WSP has some ruts due to cattle traffic. Not yet a stability/structural concern.
21.2005 soil samples were sent to raleigh. Operator is awaiting results.Check next visit.
21,January 2006 applications are recorded. PAN balance is to be calculated when waste sample reslt is obtained.Check next visit.
21. Records look good.
21.Calibration is completed.
Page: 1

Permit:AWC010008 Owner-Facility:James W Hadley Facility Number:010008
Inspection Data: 01/25/2006 Inspection Type:Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Populaflon
Cattle
O Cattle-Dairy Heifer 58
O Cattle-Milk Cow 175 0
Total Design Capacity: 175
Total SSLW: 245,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
aste Pond WSP 31.20 84.00
Page: 2

• 0
Permit:AWC010008 Owner-Facility:James W Hadley Facility Number:010008
Inspection Date: 01/25/2006 Inspection Type:Compllance Inspection Reason for Vislt:Routine
Dlscharges&.Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ 0011
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a.Was conveyance man-made? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State?(if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system?(if yes, notify DWO) ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
3.Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection,Storage& Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes,is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed(I.e./large trees,severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage,etc.)?
6.Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?(Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
-9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10,Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes,check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals(Cu,Zn,etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit:AWC010008 Owner-Facility: James W Hadley Facility Number:010008
Inspection Date: 0 112 5/2 0 0 6 Inspection Type:Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN> 10%/10 lbs.? ❑ '
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Fescue(Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management 001111
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lade of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes,check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Page: 4

•
Permit:AWC010008 Owner-Facility:James W Hadley Facility Number:010008
Inspection Date: 01/26Y1006 Inspection Type:Compliance Inspection Reason for Ask:Routine
Records and Documents Yee No NA NE
_.—Checklists? --------- ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? ❑
120 Minute inspections? ❑
Weather code? ❑
Weekly Freeboard? ❑
Transfers? ❑
Rainfall? ❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall 6 monthly? ❑
Waste Analysis? ❑
Annual soil analysis? ❑
Crop yields? ❑
Stocking? ❑
Annual Certification Form(NPDES only)? ❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment(NPDES only)? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment(PLAT)certification? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
_Other issues Yea No NA NE
28.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those Cl ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality conbem? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit:AWC010008 Owner-Facility:James W Hadley Facility Number:010008
Inspection Date: 01/25/2006 Inspection Type:Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:Routine
Otherlssues Yea No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? Cl ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ ■ 0 O
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ 0
Page: 6

Diulsion of Water Quality
Facility Number tfJ =Q$ • Division of Sail and Water Con ervation
0 Otlier Agency
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up Q Referral 0 Emergency ( El Denied Access
Date of Visit IO b,6al Time: Departure Time. �S County:/7� Q-- Region:
Farm Name: O.AA Owner Email:
Owner Name: LT
Phone: Ta (o ,2, C 1
Mailing Address: 05 n
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
c----
Onsite Representative: Integrator: `
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: o Longitude: =o =,
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑Wean to Finish ❑ Layer Dairy IQ Cow
El Wean to Feeder ❑Non-La ei jLj Dairy Calf Il
El Feeder to Finish ❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean Dry Poultry ❑ Dry Cow
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑ Non-Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish ❑Layers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑Gilts ❑Non-Layers
❑ Pullets El Beef Feeder
ElBoars El Beef Brood Cow
_ ❑Turke s _.... _
Other ❑Turkey Poults
❑Other ❑Other Number of Structures:
Discharges& Stream Impacts ,},�
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? El Yes LNNo ❑NA ❑NE
Discharge originated at: ❑Structure ❑Application Field ❑Other /\
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
b.. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? 0
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes El No ❑NA ❑NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes Icy No ❑NA ❑NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State El /y<`4_/No [INA El NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — 0 • Date of Inspection I 1 1 (v•
Waste Collection &Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑Yes )�No ❑NA [INE
a� a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ElYes [:]No ❑NA ❑NE
S ructure 1 Structure 2
Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
1 Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑Yes ]No ❑NA ❑NE
(ie/large trees, severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑Yes XNo ❑NA El NE
through a waste management or closure plan? ll��
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? N Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑Yes �No ❑NA ❑NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks and/or wet stacks) XC
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes pi No ❑NA ❑NE
❑Excessive Ponding ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.) r
❑PAN ❑PAN> 10%or 10 lbs ❑Total Phosphorus ❑Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drill ❑Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑Yes X o ❑NA [:1 NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑Yes �kNo t]NA ❑NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination':[--]Yes ❑No ;X\NA ❑NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑YesNo ❑NA ❑NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑Yes I ❑NA ❑NE
d r �9t-35 i Axfs a4 rArri ilffe—n
Comment;(refer`to question,#) Explain any YESeanswe�s!apd/orfanytr�ecommendations or any other comments.
Use drawinga�of facility^to'better expliiiIt
n situations (use additionalrpages as necessary).
. .1s+k Y,�.�_ ti„� ., t� "'r _ �Y i r. ':.d. .S t ., r+ ''fi`c, M
ro
a
r r�
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur Date: — 00 t
12128104 Continued

Facility Numb DaS Inspection tl 1
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage& Pennit readily available? ❑Yes �o ❑NA ❑NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑ yes YNo ❑NA ❑NE
the appropirate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design El Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. [--]Yes [:] No ❑NA ❑NE
[--�//4ste Application �ek Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis MIto��tlA�nalysis ..._ ,�.,_.,,n/�nua c
ERainfall tocking Crop Yield n� IZLI ^�^e'" " 19"Monthly and V Rain Inspections I�TWeatherCode
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑Yes ANo ❑NA ❑NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment'? ❑ Yes ���❑yyyNo L[_yyNAA ❑NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit� t-7p,n 6 ❑Yes No f❑_NA ❑NE
25, Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes (❑`No NA ❑NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes XNo NA ❑NE
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑No '�3NA ❑NE
Other Issues PP
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes KNo ❑NA ❑NE
29. Did the facility tail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal? IX
tt��
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? El Yes I ❑NA El NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately j,rr''
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
General Permit? (ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application) 49
t�,�
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes Ly No ❑NA ❑NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? El Yes ,////"`` o ❑NA ❑NE
Additional Comments
aanndd�/or Drawings:
/4
aoo oo ake 4�� . I-/-T N
L old
12128104

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 010008 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC010008 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Alamance Region: Winston-Salem
Date of Visit: 08/16/2005 Entry Time:12700 PM Exit Time: 01:30 PM Incident#:
Farm Name: Hadley Brothers Dairy Owner Email:
Owner: James W Hadley Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 4415 Silk Hone Lindley Mill Rd Snow Camp NC 273499103
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°50'37" Longitude: 79°21'04"
1.40 east from WSRO. South on NC Hwy 87 then take right onto Lindley Mill Road. Go to Chatham/Alamance county line. Farts is on
the right
Question Areas:
0 Discharges&stream Impacts 0 Waste Collection&Treatment 0 Waste Application
0 Records and Documents 0 Other Issues
Certified Operator:James W Hadley Operator Certification Number: 20954
Secondary OIC(s):
On-Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On-site representative James Hadley Phone:
24 hour contact name James Hadley Phone:
Primary Inspector: \ sssa Rosebroc Phone: E 36.77 -4600
Inspector Signature: - " `o ��6/ Date: 0
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Phone:
Inspection Summary:
21. Records are perfect!Good job.
7/29/05 waste analysis=0.14 lbs. N/1000 gal.
Page: 1

Permit: AWC010008 Owner-Facility: James W Hadley Facility Number: 010008
Inspection Date: 08/16/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle-Milk Cow 175 150
Total Design Capacity: 175
TotalSSLW: 245,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Waste Pond WSP 31.20 84.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWC010008 Owner-Facility: James W Hadley Facility Number: 010008
Inspection Date: 08/16/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges&Stream Imnscts Yes No NA NF
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a.Was conveyance man-made? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
b.Did discharge reach Waters of the State?(If yes,notify DW0) ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
c.Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d.Does discharge bypass the waste management system?(if yes,notify DW0) ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ E ❑ ❑
3.Were there any adverse Impacts or potential adverse Impacts to Waters of the Stale other than from a discharge? ❑ M ❑ ❑
Waste Collection Storage&Treatment Yea No NA NF
4.Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes,is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5.Are there any Immediate threats to the Integrity of any of the structures observed(Led large trees,severe erosion, ❑ M ❑ ❑
seepage,etc.)?
6.Are there structures on-site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
closure plan?
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
B.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?(Not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ M ❑ ❑
improvement?
WasiP.Anni cation Yes No NA NF
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or Improvement? ❑ M ❑ ❑
11.Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes,check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals(Cu,Zn,etc)? ❑
PAN? ❑
Is PAN>10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P2O5? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge Into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type i Fescue(Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Page: 3

Permit: AWC010008 Owner-Facility: James W Hadley Facility Number: 010008
Inspection Dale: 08/16/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Aomlicalion Vea No NA NF
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soll Type 5
Soil Type 6
14,Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the Irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Recorris and Dncuments Yen No NA NE
19.Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes,check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21.Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes,check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? ❑
120 Minute inspections? ❑
Weather code? ❑
Weekly Freeboard? ❑
Transfers? ❑
Rainfall? ❑
Inspections after>1 Inch rainfall&monthly? ❑
Waste Analysis? ❑
Annual soil analysis? ❑
Crop yields? ❑
Stocking? ❑
Annual Certification Form(NPDES only)? ❑
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on Irrigation equipment(NPDES only)? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25.Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
26.Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment(PLAT)certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWC010008 Owner-Faclllty: JamesWHadley Facility Number: 010008
Inspection Date: 08/16/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Otherlssues Vas No NA NF
28.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
29.Did the facility fall to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those mortality ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
rates that exceed normal rates?
30.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concem? If yes,contact a regional Air Quality ❑ E ❑ ❑
representative immediately.
31.Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ M ❑ ❑
32.Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
33.Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

ivision of Water Quality
FaCllltry Number ( ® • Division of Soil and Water !!l ervation
�other A¢encv f
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit X Routine 0 Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
�
Date of Visit: (p Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: AWMWC Region:
Farm Name: (O Owner Email:
Owner Name:�T0.rnt?5 S G�t1ll 4 '2AA Phone: Q�q — Z — q� 1t7
Mailing Address: ,4 4 1 5- J \14 1,6 pe, Li rd 11 12A . . '5nn1.3
Physical Addr se s:_ -Q a 73
Facility Contact: (�10_ A Title: Phone No: 1 17 — 4-O�Z
Onsite Representative: �w v� Integrator: Q
Certified Operator: SQ>ryl P_`� le�' 4AId1 Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: [mr � Longitude: 0
NG µwy S� $ot,� row
KI V I 1R ur l✓�� on . iqh� 0►1�0 �iv> ec�
, U
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish ❑ Layer M Dairy Cow
i
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Non-La er Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish j ❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ Farrow to Wean Dry Poultry ❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder _ ❑Non-Dairy
❑❑ LaersFarrow to Finish El Beef Stocker
❑Gilts ❑Non-Layers ❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Boars ❑Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Co
-- ------------------ ❑Turkeys
Other ❑Turkey Poults
❑Other ❑ Other Number of Structures: Lill
- - -- - - - -
Discharges& Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes.VNo ❑NA ❑NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑Application Field ❑Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? 0
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 11)�'No ❑NA ❑NE
3. Were there any.adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State El Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104 Continued

Facility Number, Q — t7 `0 Date of Inspection
Waste Collection &Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑Yes No ElNA ❑NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 'WrtS}QTopj
Spillway?: v�
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
(ie/large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑Yes jNo ❑NA ❑NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmenttNo
at,notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 1-1 Yes ❑NA ElNE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑Yes! ❑NA ❑NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑Yes ❑NA ❑NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑Yes dNo ❑NA ❑NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes LN No ❑NA ❑NE
❑Excessive Ponding ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs [:]Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifi ❑Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s) �-
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑Yes � /No ❑NA ❑NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination![:]Yes O No NA ❑NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes � N ❑NA El NE
18.ssIs there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? y�❑Yes pdNo ❑NA ❑NE
Mc�C-O. 499x MY�P "UYi 1
iCo'mments�(refer to queshon#) Explain any YES answersiand/or��any recommendations orany other comments. �
W'k + 55 $e F A t we''+ '
�Us�e}drawings of+facility to,better explain situations (use ad'dthonal pages(�as necessary,):
�
os N - U - 14 Lis
Reviewer/Inspector Name r �e: f 0 Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatu 4 do Date: Jos
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — D.f inspection
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑Yes ,, No ❑NA ❑NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑Yes []fNNo ❑NA ❑NE
the appropirate box. ❑ W UP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑Other ,//
21. Doe ecord keeping need im ovement? If yes,ch�ecc the appropriate box low. ❑Yes i D NO ❑NA ❑NE
W to Applica[' n L7ce y Freeboard I!1 Waste Analysis. Soil A lysis ilSftas n -
ainfall Stocking Crop Yield t e nsp Monthly and I" Rain Inspection_s�IL�(Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑Yes � No ❑ NA ❑NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ o VNA ❑NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit'? �• d b❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ���❑///,,, No �(NA ❑NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑No t/NA ❑NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CA WMP? ❑ Yes VVo ❑NA ❑NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑NA ❑NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes VNo
❑NA ❑NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑Yes ❑NA ❑NE
General Permit'? (ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes o ElNA ❑NE
7No33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Y ❑NA ❑NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
IV
12128104

ision of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit OO Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑Denied Access
Facility Number Ol Oti Date nt Visit: 2/24/2004 Timr: 1000
0 Not Operational BeI77 Threshold
E Permitted 0 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above'I'hreshold: .............
Farm Name: Ftadlex.Oxntbers.pairy.......................................................... County: e#lA agr............................... WS.R.Q......
Owner Name: datum, _&G.2[Y._._._._._ HadleX-•-•---•-----------------•-• Phone No: 4J2_Z92�fl19.---.-.-.-•-.-•-.-----•-•---..
Mailing Address: 44.1S.Sills.kluAs..-..1�indi�Y..Mili.Rd............................................... $11m..CAMP...NG.................................................. 173.49..............
Facility Contact: dames.kiadley....................................Title: ............................................... Phone No: 9,19,742,40.42..................
Onsite Representative: dalurs.HHSUry---------------------•---•-•-•-•-•-•-• Integrator:----•-•-•-•-•-----•---------•---•---•-•---..
Certified Operator:,jppORS.kY................................ .FladiCy............................................... Operator Certification Number:299S.4.............................
Location of Farm:
140 east from WSRO. South on NC Hwy 87 then take right onto Lindley Mill Road. Go to Chatham/Alamance county line.
Farm is on the right.
❑ 11
Swine [I Poultry ®Cattle [I Horse Latitude 35 • 50 37 Longitude 79 • 21 04
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
rBoars
Feeder ❑Layer ®Dairy 175 76
o Finish ❑Non-Layer ❑Non-Dairyto Wean
to Feeder ❑Otherto Finish Total Design Capacity 175
Total SSLW 245,000
Number of Lagoons
--- -
1
Discharges& Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ❑No
b. ifdischarge is observed,did it reach Water of the State'?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ® Spillway ❑ Yes ®No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Idemifier: --._Waste.PAnd.... ........................... .......................... .............--.----..... ......................---- ...........................
Freeboard(inches): 72
12112103 Continued
-2 315 q tn--/

Facility Number: of a Dale(it'Inspection 2/24/2004 .
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees,severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ® No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑Yes ® No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
It. Is there evidence of over application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No
❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑Frozen Ground ❑Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Fescue(Graze) Fescue(Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAW MP)? ❑Yes to No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ® No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ® No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑Yes ❑No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes ®No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes ®No
roads,building structure,and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,contact a regional ❑Yes ®No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Comments refer to question# : xplaln any ES ans ers an /or any rec endations or an other a s.
Us e edrawings of facility to better e ons. use additional pa a cessar ❑
xplain situatiField Copy ®Final Notes
8. Are getting some waste run-off from the lot and into a ditch. Suggest scraping lot more often. Run off does not appear to be entering +
ranch for now. Check next visit.
23. Application records look good.
23. 2003 soils are dated 2/12/04 due to back log of 6-8 weeks at lab. Several in Alamance county were like this. Need to obtain 2004
samples by 12/31/04.
October 2003 waste analysis=0.30 lbs. N/1000 gal.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Melissa Rosebrock
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:`'f Date:
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: Ot-08 I*f Inspeclion 2/24/2004
Required Records& Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑Yes ® No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design, maps,etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No
❑ Waste Application ❑Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ®No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ®No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems,over application) ❑ Yes ® No
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes ® No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ® No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit?(If no,skip questions 31-35) ❑Yes ® No
31. if selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment'? ❑Yes ❑No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑Yes ❑No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? ❑Yes ❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes ❑No
❑Stocking Fortn ❑Crop Yield Form []Rainfall [] Inspection After I" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑Annual Certification Form
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
dditronal Comments and7or rawings:
12112103

t4+� r9 griGLIM(P Fu ry�#, 1 gti} ;iirani ( ielf v 1 l..9lli �ti' (r4
r�,liil#f t�filltNi+ l.t{,�{i'YltititQ' ll�:!'.,�'t�',N �41li''r!�!'i ;l7f ij lli! len Of}Watlr(iiialllty.,,,r lit xrll „i}.!�h, .!ilr
,�k iy,z� t It,4 „(r tij�ilki u::l{F3 +� {' I} Ijlijl} # ivision of Soil°ands atEriCojIL4e`1'{'ation} l' t tF.' tlf
^ ii ^k � ,� 3 � �' t t>3 � I r?t I; (tt A ��lii 1p�w i}�911i
'231(11!�i trvif '! !{:iq�j !n tk r ."tii 915Qt,rO,ther,, geney+�j.,,,tb ,+j. . 'E�., r "n "r�,t rr�l�i 4 ,"S>' ,ti Q/,'.,: M ". .jr;r".
ii'I'pt1#,l .j ,Ui lye,,;,�{(I�}}li i}i!}�#}x,r...,t lh :ir(I n1�77!(i+llllnt #1; lil{d�191�i11t+. ., ,al tk,{iatr�{i! p( ' h ! u ! f , r!
GI'at,te w{ a,un a3ltlt G, ttv,�,.tkt#iG'�l�,ufiiSr i 7,. tnl. �� lll(�.�a4ir
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑Denied Access
Facility Number pate of Visit: -mime: �J =
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
Permitted [3 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: W.L. .. ......i r.0.5..:.....ba' uI....................................... County: ...
pAl am'aI n..C.4Z..'r............ ::.............y..y......
Owner Narne: .... ( + ...° ._ ......IZ..11 ..I ... ..................... Pho/n�e/No:I.._..I..I...1.....7 ..Z ..5..... .g l b...m...^........1. ^
Mailing Address: ......4.1.l.�............. L.1.� ...L.10. ..-... . . .......1_!.I..�...LF••..... .:.f....... .�� r�
II
Facility Contact: .. .......... t ,l. . ......Title: .......................... Phone No. ......,�rL�. *_1 /
Onsite Representative: ......... . ...... .. .................... Integrator:........
Certified Operator:..,, (,� �(�ae�...,...._(v • .�.. .............. Operator Certification Number:.....` 5.... ,,,.
Location of Farm:
F_
[]Swine ❑Poultry Cattle ❑Horse Latitude ®•®` E�`< Longitude EnU• =' 555n°1
r. t t AL ,CDae aci . D �k (�g1� 1I ,fi+ urrent 'kl .j j l t r n qt DeSlg<lieoCnti Ca aci P rrC�t ?
on
j❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer Dairy lI
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer Non Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other+ ( ;I❑ r �t Farrow to Finish f! zG}li d'
+ ! rTOtA�De31�I1 C9pSClh',,f !
i❑Gilts f I[+r tIi rrz kti t ! t�tx Its 1 ! jfil
.1;:v14Ntl I'�lpta
,( ❑BOar6.... i�I,Z r + i , I�IP "(t i TO �,SSLW 00
1 i,1�kr ut 4Vi be Yr
k N(N(umer of Lagoons li I q hilt
if�4 i _
.1 l
Discharees&Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes KNo
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
Qa. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVmin?
1 d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes �KNO
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ElYes ®No
Waste Collection&Treatment T`
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? (Spillway ❑Yes YNO
Str�u1cturcA Structure 2 Structure 3 ' ` Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: w]L.Q,.. . ..I ............................... ......... ....................... ......... ...................... ................................... ...................................
Freeboard(inches): _
12112103 Continued
\1

Facility Number: — ()Sl Date of Inspection ..ZI /,LR/(,ll* ��//�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of thb structures observed?(ie/trees,severe erosion, ❑Yes �No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑Yes )jj"No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes KNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? XYes 111111❑No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑Yes
10
elevation markings? /
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes XNo
❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN Hydraulic Overload ❑Frozen Ground ❑Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type
13. Do the receing crops differ with thos designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? [I Yes4Nmi14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yeso
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes AN0
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes AN
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ®No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below —Ejjyr�o —
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with�no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes No
roads,building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,contact a regional ❑Yes No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Commeutts(refert�oqueshon#) r�Exptam�anyrYES�answeisandloranyrecommendatIops�o� y�ocher-commenfs'����ti�r��u(I�;�(}�+� �� ,,('ri
Use drawgmgs'offac�rhty toibetter explain sttuahons (use a nal pages asinecessary) ' Field Copy Final Notes
: 15 nliTi�:�T�;�17,'GtAlrct1 .M 9
112�4
a A4J�
0
3
°� l� d�tt G 1f�5P = 1� = 0.30 �s .N�►o00
Name Reviewer/Ins ector
P i I' ' r m. . u`ay ,:, 'i, • t` �u� .�_1i>�B Slims: #':.ar'" F ...:�.��Rn ��.:E�`::1.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature Date: o�
12112103 'I / �< a l /l ^` Continued

Facility Number: _ Of Inspection 2 O
Required Records&Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑Yes No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design,maps,etc.) ❑Yes No
23. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes KNo
❑Waste Application ❑Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes o
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes No
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit?(If no,skip questions 31-35) ❑Yes Alo
31. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑Yes ❑No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑Yes ❑No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? ❑Yes ❑No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ❑No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes ❑No
❑Stocking Form ❑Crop Yield Form ❑Rainfall ❑Inspection After 1"Rain
❑ 126 Minute Inspections ❑Annual Certification Form
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
ddiuonal Comments aiid/orrDrawriis r, H a' " iy
g ,.an Wi.F
00?3 a oo 3 LY-Wo 0a-� �1 ;0�
12112103

i
echnical Assistance Site Visit RPnMIL
ision of Soil and Water Conservatio
O Natural Resources Conservation Service
O Soil and Water Conservation District
O Other...
Facility Number 01 ® Date: l21/03 Time: 11:00 Time On Farm: 90 WSRO
Farm Name Hadley Brothers Dairy County Alamance Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address 4415 Silk Hope- Lindley Mill Rd Snow Camp NC 27349
Onsite
Representative Gary Hadley Integrator
Tvpe Of Visit Purpose Of Visit
®Operation Review OQ Routine
❑Compliance Inspection (pilot only) O Response to DWQ/DENR referral
❑Technical Assistance O Response to DSWC/SWCD referral
❑Confirmation for Removal O Response to complaint/local referral
❑No Animals-Date Last Operated: O Requested by producer/integrator
❑Operating below threshold O Follow-up
O Emergency
❑Swine ❑Poultry ®Cattle ❑Horse O Other...
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Capacity Po ulation
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer
❑Feeder to Finish ❑ Non-Layer
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ® Dairy ins
❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Non-Dairy
❑Gilts
❑Boars 10 Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑yes ®no
2.Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑yes ®no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑yes ®no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑yes ®no
requiring DWQ notification?
5. Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑yes ®no
. and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑yes ®no
Structural Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier WSP
Level (Inches) �— 31
CROP TYPES Fescue-graze Fescue-hay udan Grass Hay
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES EaB2 GaB2 GaC2 Ob82
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
1 03/10/03

Facility Number 01 - 8 Date: 8/21/03
PARAMETER p No assistance provided/requested
❑8. Waste spill leaving site TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed Provided
❑9. Waste spill contained on site
25.Waste Plan Revision or Amendment ❑ ❑
❑ 10. Level in structural freeboard
❑ 11. Level in storm storage 26.Waste Plan Conditional Amendment ❑ ❑
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan w/producer ❑ ❑
❑ 12. Waste structure integrity compromised 28. Forms Need(list in comment section) ❑ ❑
❑ 13. Waste structure needs maintenance
29.Missing Components(list in comments) ❑ ❑
[114. Over application >= 10% & 10 lbs. El ❑
[115. Over application < 10% or< 10 lbs. 30. 2H.0200 re-certification
[116. Hydraulic overloading 31.Five&Thirty day Plans of Action(PoA) ❑ ❑
❑ 17. Deficient irrigation records 32. Irrigation record keeping assistance ❑ ❑
❑ 18. Late/missing waste analysis 33.Organize/computerization of records ❑ ❑
❑ 19. Late/missing lagoon level records
❑20. Late/missing soils analysis 34.Sludge Evaluation ❑ ❑
❑21. Crop needs improvement 35.Sludge or Closure Plan ❑ ❑
❑22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan 36. Sludge removal/closure procedures ❑ ❑
❑23. Irrigation maintenance deficiency 37.Waste Structure Evaluation ❑ ❑
❑24. Deficient sprayfield conditions 38. Structure Needs Improvement ❑ ❑
39.Operation&Maintenance Improvements ❑ ❑
40. Marker check/calibration ❑ ❑
Regulatory Referrals 41. Site evaluation ❑ ❑
❑Referred to DWQ Date: 42.Irrigation Calibration ❑ ❑
❑ Referred to NCDA Date:
❑Other... 43.Irrigation system design/installation El El
Date' 44.Secure irrigation information (maps, etc.) ❑ ❑
LIST IMPROVEMENTS 45.Operating improvements(pull signs,etc.) ❑ ❑
MADE BY OPERATION 46.Wettable Acre Determination ❑ ❑
1 47. Evaluate WAD certification/rechecks ❑ ❑
48. Crop evaluation/recommendations ❑ ❑
2 49.Drainage worklevaluation ❑ ❑
50. Land shaping,subsoiling, aeration,etc. ❑ ❑
3 51. Runoff control,stormwater diversion,etc. ❑ ❑
52. Buffer improvements ❑ ❑
53. Field measurements(GPS,surveying,etc.) ❑ ❑
4. 54. Mortality BMPs; ❑ ❑
55.Waste operator education(NPDES) ❑ ❑
5. 56.Operation&maintenance education ❑ ❑
57. Record keeping education ❑ ❑
6 58. Crop/forage management education ❑ ❑
59. Soil and/or waste sampling education ❑ ❑
2 03/10/03

Facility Number 01 ® Date: 8/21/03
COMMENTS:
Waste analysis: 3-10-03 LSD 0.28lbs.N/1000 gals. B
Remember to get your 2003 soil samples.
Mr. Hadley is getting ready to start pumping. The waste pond is at the maximum liquid level marker.
c
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST IRocky Durham
SIGNATURE
Date Entered: 8/22/03 Entered By: lRocky Durham
3 03/10/03

_
( ' � ivision of Water Quality
is�Q Div 'on of,Soil,and,Water Conservation
n,
0Other'Agency
f1k
Type of Visit OO Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O• Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑Denied Access
Facility Number Ol 08 Date of Visit: 03/11/2003 'rime: 1010
Q Not-Operational t!Below Threshold
®Permitted ®Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ........................
Farm Name: ttadhey...Rrolhers.D. iry.............................................................................. County: Alamanss......................................... WS.RQ........
Owner Name: datueS.s&..G.ary..................... HAdley........................................................ Phone No: 9L9r.7.42-.4.81Q..uGr4A+kR-...................
.
Mailing Address: 4.41S..Slik..RQp.e.r..1llldley..Mill.Rd............................................... S.nox..camp...N..G.................................................. 2.7.3.4.9.............
Facility Contact: dames.11adley.................................................Title: ................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
Onsite Representative:Janl.¢S.,Radlky.............................................................................. Integrator:...:..................................................................................
Certified Operator jml s.W............................... Hadley............................................... Operator Certification Number:ZQ9,%.............................
Location of Farm:
40 east from WSRO. South on NC Hwy 87 then take right onto Lindley Mill Road. Go to Chatham/Alamance county line.
arm is on the right.
[]Swine []Poultry ®Cattle []Horse Latitude 35 • 50 . 37 Longitude 79 • 21 04 '
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Po ulation Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Ca acit Population
❑La❑Wean to Feeder yer ®Dairy 175 88
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer JEI Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 175
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW 245,000
Number of Lagoons �p ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps 1� ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges&Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the Slate?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Collection& Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ®Spillway ®Yes ❑No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ......Waste.Rand..... ................................... .................................... ................................... ................................... ...................................
Freeboard(inches): 26 _
05103101 -44 oldV tt-)� Continued

Facility Number: 01-08 . Date of Inspection 03/11/2003 •
t ,
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees, severe erosion, ❑Yes ®No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ®Yes ❑No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Pending ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes ®No
12. Crop type Fescue(Graze)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes ®No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ®No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ®No
Required Records&Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑Yes ®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design,maps, etc.) ❑Yes ®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/irrigation,freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes ®No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes ®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application) ®Yes ❑No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ®No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments'(refer to question#): Explain any`YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary): Field Copy ®Final Notes
4. and22. Operator called WSRO two weeks ago to say that waste level was 12"below max. at that time. Waste is now 4"above max.
liquid mark(which is 2.6' down from the dam). Need to pump ASAP.
8. Evidence of some manure washing off lot into surface drain. Operator to install wooden curbing.
19.No dry waste applied in 2002. No liquid waste applied since Fall 2001 until jan. 2003. Operator has taken waste sample for Jan.
2003 applications and is waiting on results to complete SLUR-II form. Check next visit. Don't forget to take soil samples for 2003.
27. One calf to be picked up today.
26. and 29. - 32. Not applicable to this facility at this time.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Melt a Rosebrock
Reviewerlinspector Signature. Date: �J
05103101 Continued

Facility]Number: of—os �of Inspection 03/11/2003 •
Odor Issues
26, Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑Yes ❑No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑Yes ®No
roads,building structure,and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑Yes ❑No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e.broken fan belts,missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑Yes ❑No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑Yes ❑No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a pennanent/temporary cover? ❑Yes ❑No
Additional Comments and/orDrawings:
t
05103101

!
Division of�Wat' Q uillty "
!< ,�1 v i r� �d„f Y pig ,; d nr • ,Dlvislop of Soil and Water Conservation
.� 5 �i 6,. ,,.r , qt i Agency:t Y
,t t � . v � :. �
r Ya ��Other �
O
. x
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up Q Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: Time:
O Not Operational M Below Threshold
Permitted Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated
or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: T f L'I r County: A W on a n C;/P
Owner Name: 12 (mJ,L5 J Phone No: �g i q •acy a• 7 a 1� A�
Mailing Address: y--77/-- �S- 5i IL &Q�- Ci /.[ I�( , 0111 R "S oo eQl4w✓1 ,/V�
Facility Contact: ti1Q T..'... Phone No: 19-:�11,2•gO�Z 7'3(1/9
OnsiteRepresentative: I ' 1 Integrator: �t p
Certified Operator: - Operator Certification Number: Ae 15-�(
Location of Farm:
T140E&5+ 16 ur In fon ., Soo mn K)C yg7 , , h+ oafo 6 r�
Mill PwA . r r e C `i line
ElSwine ❑Poultry Cattle ❑Horse L tude •®, L=11 Longitude ` • � �
Design Cuent Design Current Design Current
4 Swine. - Ca acitv,!,Penn[I fition Poultn. ,'Ca 'aciri Po'ulatiou "��Caitle - .`Ca it "'.Po ulatioa
❑Wean to Feeder t „❑La er
❑Feeder to Finish )'`❑Non-Layer �'' Non-Dai
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other =(`� , v,, : 4,�
❑Farrow to Finish
❑Gilts �+ Total Destgn,Capacity
❑Boars TWO SSLW oZ yS OO
;. I ;,Number of Lagoons�:,p, i ;;®` ,;,.: ❑Subsurface Drains Present JEI Lagoon Area 10 S ray Field Area '
.Holding:Ponds/Solid Traps` `-� No Liquid Waste Mana ement System
Discharges & Stream Impacts �,,,('
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? El Yes �J No
Discharge originated at: El Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
y d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes X.
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes XNo
Waste Collection & Treatment ,.y/
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Id Spillway Yes ❑No
Ptru Lure Structure cmre 2 Structure 3 T�` Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Q, e-
Freeboard(inches): 01
05103101 Continued

r
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 1
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees,severe erosion, ❑Yes No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or /
closure plan? El Yes o
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes No
Waste Aoolication Ix
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Pending ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload El Yes/(f��`No
12. Crop type R
13. Do the receiving crops d1fer with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes XNo
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes No
_Required Records&Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑Yes No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified An' al Waste Management Plan readily available? X
(ie/WUP,checklists,design,maps,etc.) / � / / ❑Yes No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes J No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? IK
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems,over application) Yes ❑No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? !!I❑��`Yes We
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes yp No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? El Yes /�No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments( eferito question#)`j`Explain any YES mt"i sland/or any.reeoinmendation's or any,other,conuuments
Use drawings of facility tii better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary) 's n; Field Conv ❑Final Notes
G ii i,ul (r, sir i�„� 'r s_' , ,{„W�i. ''�� .t �'.i,Fs tr4, yr tl r d i a
kav
, ...,—... ..r x r.sM.-. +...,—..,--, ...... . ,...... ter,---. .......... . ..
Reviewer/Inspector Name
ReviewerlInspector Signature: f0mil L4 dz Z Date: 3
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes No
roads,building structure,and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? _
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e.broken fan belts,missing or
or broken fan blade(s),inoperable shutters,etc.) may,
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/tempomry cover?
Additional Cootmentsiand/or 1)rawmgs i c; ,, ,, ;� ,;:; t. ;„�, ,�ys,q s; a' i�t" '^` t
, 4 ,
Iq ezke_ re-czrJ 5 ? A/ y �,t� ao 03 ,
L-4 ° 4-IeA4 ,
s
A50180 /j?aly-1. A4 "&4-'Nd CW
Ju- 4-t lv-r-moo 0W 19-;04" Scoff 1<
®
IO APPJ*kO- J LA.)a54e i n Fa 11 Zoo ) /k,o- ��
O5103101

$: lit
fusion of Soil and Quality
.y
ater Conservation
Q Other;Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection (1)Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit •O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Ol g Date of Visit: 7/10/2002 Time: 13:00
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
®Permitted ®Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .......................
Farm Naine: HadIGY.13C0.the[S.Aa1�Y.............................................................................. County: AWMATme......................................... WS.RQ........
Owner Name: dames.,8c.G.ary.................... Hadley........................................................ Phone No: 919r.742,4810...........................................................
Mailing Address: 4AlS..Silk..kl.Rpe.-.1,.intdlex.5 ill.Rd............................................... S.nox'..camp...N.C.................................................. 2.7.3.49.............
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title: ................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
Onsite Representative:aslines..R8dlty.............................................................................. Integrator:...........................................................,..........................
Certified Operator:James..!'W............................... Radley............................................... Operator Certification Number:ZQ9.S.4.............................
Location of Farm:
-40 east from WSRO. South on NC Hwy 87 then take right onto Lindley Mill Road. Go to Chatham/Alamance county line.
Farm is on the right.
❑Swine [I Poultry ®Cattle ❑Horse Latitude F 35 • 50 37 ],1 Longitude 79 • 21 04
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine _ Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Ca acit Po ulation
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ®Dairy 175 40
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer ❑Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder JE1 Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 175
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW 245,000
Number of Lagoons JE1 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps 0 ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Disebarees& Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes ®No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ................................... ................................... .................................... ................................... ................................... ...................................
Freeboard(inches): 65
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 01-8 Date of Inspection 7/10/2002
5. Are there any immediate threats to the l erity of any of the structures observed?(ie/tre0evere erosion, ❑Yes ®No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes N No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes N No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes N No
9. Do any strictures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes N No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes N No
12. Crop type Fescue(Graze) Corn(Silage&Grain) Small Grain(Wheat,Barley,
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes N No
14, a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes N No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ❑No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ❑No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes N No
Required Records&Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑Yes N No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design,maps,etc.) ❑Yes N No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes N No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes N No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes N No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes N No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes N No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes N No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes N No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments(refer to'question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary): ❑Field Copy ❑Final Notes
Mr. Hadley has not applied waste since the Fall of 2001.
Facility and records are in compliance.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Rocky Durham
Reviewer/]nspector Signature: Date:
05103101 Continued

Facilit),�Number: 01-8 D flnspection 7/10/2002
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑Yes ❑No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes ®No
roads,building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑Yes ❑No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts,missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑Yes ®No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑Yes ❑No
Additional Comments and/orDrawings: " -
Soil analysis dated 4-10-02
05103101

vision of Water. ua Qlity
ision of Soil and Water Conservation •
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit ®Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑Denied Access
Facility,Number Ol OS Date of Visit: 2/5/2002 Time: 0940
Q Not-Operational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted ®Certified (3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .4/.4/?KQQQ.......
Farm Name: Hadity-Rcotilt a.Aaat'3:............................................................................. County: Aluxuace......................................... WSRO........
OwnerName: domes.A..G.OrY..................... Hadley........................................................ Phone No: 9.19r.7.47A8.10..........................................................
Mailing Address: 441S...Sitk..klaiI.r..1.ladleY.NJill.lid............................................... $Xia -camp..KC.................................................. 27.3.49.............
Facility Contact: dames.Ha:dley................................................Title: ................................................................ Phone No: 919,7.42JQ.4Z.......................
Onsite Representative: daIItleA.11adleY............................................................................. Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:dexamta.W............................... Hadity............................................... Operator Certification Number:2QQS4.............................
Location of Farm:
I-40 east from WSRO. South on NC Hwy 87 then take right onto Lindley Mill Road. Go to Chatham/Alamance county line.
Farm is on the right.
❑Swine ❑Poultry ®Cattle []Horse Latitude 35 • 50 37 o Longitude 79 • 21 ' FIT 11
�l 0 Design Current Design Current � �L,F l gn, Current
Swine_ Ca�tacit P,o ulation Poultry Ga Tacit P,o ulation Cattle Ca acit P.o ulation
❑Wean to Feeder 1 175 76
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer ❑Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total'Design Capacity 175
-t ❑Gilts
❑Boars dTotal SSLW 245,000
a
Number of Lagoons0 0110 Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
i Holdng Ponds/Solid Traps IF
❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Hot d� !
Discharges_&Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes IN No
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus stonn storage)less than adequate? ®Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ........Waste.P.ond..... ................................... .................................... ................................... ................................... ...................................
Freeboard(inches): 60
05103107 / Continued

Facility Number: 01-08 . Date of Inspection 2/5/2002 •
5. Are there any immediate threats to the tntegrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees,severe erosion, ❑Yes ®No '
seepage,etc.).
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ®Yes ❑No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes ®No
12. Crop type Fescue(Hay) Rye Fescue(Graze)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes ®No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ®No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ®No
Required Records& Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑Yes ®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design,maps,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes ®No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes ®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems,over application) ❑ Yes ®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ® Yes ❑No
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments refer t- question N : Explain an YE answe and/or an men ations or any other com e
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations, use addi tonal mu a ¢essay : ❑Field Copy ®Final Notes
7. Continue efforts to repair dam.
19. Sample dated 11/19/01 was 0.40 lbs.N/1000 gal.and was applied in August 2001. Sample was a little outside of 60 day window.
All other application events ok. Need to send samples in as soon as they are taken.
19. When dry waste from lot is spread,this needs to be recorded onto solid(SLD)forms. I left some of these forms with operator.
19. Per operator,he was told by Extension to wait and send soil samples later since lab was backed-up at least two months. Operator
waited and took samples in January 2002. Suggest that records be kept in ink.
25. Operator is growing replacement heifers. Only 39 on confined lot. Per Sue Homewood, CAWMP does not have to be changed as
Ilong,as the number of confined heifers doesn't go over the certified number of dairy cattle.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Melis Rosehrock
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: . (7
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: Ol OS Def Inspection F 2/5/2002 •
Odor Issues -
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑Yes ❑No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes ®No
roads,building structure,and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e. broken fan belts,missing or
or broken fan blade(s),inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑Yes ®No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑Yes ❑No
(.' d ittona LC6mtttentsiati .or] D raw ngs:
05103101

• • 9,30RM
Division of Water Quality
• Division of Soil and Water Conservation
�Other Agency
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit outine C)Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: - 'rime:
10 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted Certified 0 ConditionallyyCCertified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: �T-RroS. T� k:-Ll1q County: a0mar c'nce-
Owner Name: T/]m05�' tJt 1/ ULE I'f?l-t_ Phone o: �l�• 7 / � � /V '7
Mailing Address: S S 1I K— H e Ied o�'� �,//y,/1
Facility Contact: T Q Title: Phone No: V
Onsite Representative: s Integrator:
Certified Operator: JQ� S �rlei,, Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Z=afflApelo?� C U 1,ho2. t D rl
❑Swine ❑Poultry Cattle ❑Horse Latitude ®•=I F Longitude ®• ®
Design., Current Design Current 1. Design 'Current
Swine - Capacity Population Po It'
Capacity Population ..Cattle Capacity Population
ElWean to Feeder ElLa er I I JUDairy
❑Feeder to Finish n-La er ❑Non-Dairy
El Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design-Capacity
,. []Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW'
..
' Nuinberiof La oons t ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area
.. . g ;�' :®r e-. ❑S ra Field Area
+� slfolding Ponds/YSolid Trapss, ,��" "���❑No Liquid Waste Management System
F
Discharges R&,Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes XNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes No
Waste Collection At Treatment ,y� x
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? Spillway ❑Yes 4 No
$t�ture {1A Structure 2 Structure 3 �`Idl Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: �/ .�•�J
Freeboard(inches):
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: — • Date of Inspection -5 •
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees,severe erosion, ❑Yes IX
No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? Yes 13J No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level /
elevation markings? El Yes No
Waste Anolication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ZNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? 1 ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload El Yes12. Crop type r0 I eS�U(1 � )S� V� C)rI�,y 'A c
`
13. Do the receiving cropA differ with those designat d in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CA WMP)? ❑Yes No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? El Yes No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes Pq No
Required Records&Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑Yes No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design,maps,etc.)
// [IYes XNo
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes ❑No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes gNo
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes o
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes XNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes XNo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? Oyes ❑No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
-;: ra..µ..:caw i s. h� ra W
Comments(refer`'to question#):,,Explain any.YES answer's antl/or enyrecommentlations or<ari"�"ottier commentsvt -
IJsedrawings of facility to better explain situations (use edditionafpages ae necessary)
.... 4 . ,k. .� , ) Field Copy ❑Final Notes ..w
1/0 1
Reviewer/Ins ector Name
P •
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: "
05103101 Continued

• Facility Number: t7 —Q Date f Inspection �L •
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes No
roads,building structure,and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? -8'fes--E31"
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e.broken fan belts,missing or
or broken fan blade(s),inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑Yes KNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑Yes /%No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? -'8"i`m B-Nu
.Additional`Cimmentkond/ ,Drawing`s: u t.t�,`„�h,.,,. 7 ' : e+, ,.::' �, .�. 'V ..: .� .. .. . .. ..... ..
-y-
yo ��
64Jll"A/A.9 �r�u.a�,
aOd l
14)
a � �✓� tom. CA��c,�.,�'�C�'
05103101 APO D

:Division oP at Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
`0 Other Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑Denied Access
Facility Number Ol O8 Date of Visit: 8/30/2001 Time: 0835 Printed nn: 8/30/2001
Q Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
S Permitted E Certified 13 Conditionally Certified E3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: 51VZQQ.Q.......
Farm Name: Hadleyllr.914en.Daa¢Y.............................................................................. County: AIRMARM......................................... WS.RQ........
Owner Name: JAWCS..do..faat'3:.................... HadleY......................................................... Phone No: 9j9n7.4Z!.48j0..........................................................
Mailing Address: 441S..Sitic tluRe.-.Lirxdlex.11Jilt.Rd............................................... S.narY..cAmp...NC.................................................. 2.7.3.49.............
Facility Contact: James.Hadley................................................Title: ................................................................ Phone No: 9.19,7.42,404Z.......................
Onsite Representative:JaialaS.HQdlgy.............................................................................. Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:JaAt¢5..................................... Hadigy.............................................. Operator Certification Number:ZQQ$4.............................
Location of Farm:
1-40 east from WSRO. South on NC Hwy 87 then take right onto Lindley Mill Road. Co to Chatham/Alamance county line.
Farm is on the right.
❑Swine ❑Poultry ®Cattle ❑Horse Latitude 35 • 50 ' 37 Longitude 79 • 21 ' 04
t< r' ; Design " Current " v ,R " Destgd Iui rent° "•x r� t
Fy, v. n 9 ar �uTDesigh Cyiren '
SSw,me A, „Ca acit ;w)Po uIhtionr oultr,. L Ca tact[ ' Po ulatton lCattle � yGa acit`t Po tulation,
r" ❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ®Dairy 175 49
x
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer 1 ❑Non Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean meant , rig fi^ 't
Farrow to Feeder ❑Othernr
y
❑Farrow to Finish �' ' ? '' `
r{, , is t .`� f �TotalDestgnCapactty ' 175
t4
°. . . -.,...-.....,aN ,.. �' ' ` t�7� � r % a TOta1 gs�W�.° �i45 000
Gilts
Boars
Number of Lagoons F WU§Nto
bsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area F t
Holding Ponds/So td Treps Liquid Waste Management System �rr �
Discharges&.Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: []Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑Yes ❑No
b. if discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus stone storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes ®No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ......W aste.P.and..... ................................... .................................... ................................... ................................... ...................................
Freeboard(inches): 45
05103101 Continued
-1 - 6' , (0 11

Facility Number: 01-08 Date of Inspection 8/30/2001 >rinted on: 8/30/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees,severe erosion, ❑Yes ®No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ®Yes ❑No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes ®No
12. Crop type Fescue(Graze) Fescue(Hay) Sudex(Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes ®No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ®No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ®No
Required Records& Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑Yes ®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design, maps,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes ®No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes ®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes ®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ®No
Q No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments(refer to question# : Explain any YES answers an orianvirecornmendations or any other com n .
Use drawings of fecilit to better explain situations use additionalWagemasmecessanymm❑Field Copy ®Final Notes
7. Need to repair top of dam and re-seed. Ruts have started to form due to heavy machinery on top of dam.
19. Need to obtain waste sample for 8/2001 waste applications and complete SLUR-II forms. Need to also obtain 2001 soil samples for
those fields receiving waste.
Left new "freeboard"and "waste sample"forms with operator.
Reviewer/Inspector Name jM I Rosebrock
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 0
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: Ol_OH �c of Inspection 8/30/2001 • Printed on: 8/30/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑Yes ❑No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes ®No
roads, building structure,and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑Yes ❑No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e.broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑Yes ❑No
32. Do the Flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑Yes ❑No
I_' t oria i,ommentsion orl rawmgs:
05103101

.
i, ¢ iP a rl
�* , u Division of,Water Quality ,
andyWafei'�Conservatlgn
4 t 3F w93 n t t r Gi r
QOt6er Agencyk tK�k 41� ft } [a�4 k
1 R i6d i P�`Ne"�' ;2,I�;,rt�r(.{ddAp i f..gF t![ �Y r)Ji�
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: On Time: .
Q Not O erational Below Threshold l Permitted 0 Certified E3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: . - -A
FarmName: ...k Ala r. ..................................... County: ... m. . .i .............. .......................
/1 J p 'L
Owner Name: S 'ffle!. .... ( ..141 it. uCl. ... ... ................................ Phone No: ..... .�...1....�.7. .'. .......................................
J ......... .. .. p p
Facility Contact: 00.1 :�c�5.....I1411JA....... .............Title: ................................................................ Phone No: ....I.1...L. .:...y o y Z
MailingAddress: ...14415 ..1., �� C? CI 1I 1 /U L(,/...V.. 6
. .......�'-...... ................ .. .... �..........�.....cJ... ....... .N L
ads�9
OnsiteRepresentative: ....QXM'L......... ..I.Q................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:.......-TQ,me,s...... Operator Certification Number:,,,k1..........
Location of Farm:
-5-40 F&& from 20 „ Sbuifi on fJ6 H►,Ay 9-7 to Li 'y 11 Sou
611 GYNAI Mill a AQ Q/✓1la✓1ce . it - � r`
❑Swine ❑Poultry Cattle ❑Horse Latitude S •®` ©" Longitude [�• FTFT -
Design Current Design Current .. Design , 'Correut
Swine Ca aci Po uladon Poultry, Cii aci Po ulation , Cattle Ca aci Po' tlation' i
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer Dairy
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer ❑Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
[I Farrow to Feeder ❑Other ,
❑Farrow to Finish Total Desip'Capacity /
y�: ❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW S 60
. Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holden". ,g Ponds/,Solid Traps,; ,❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges &Stream Im acks
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes KNo
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
C. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes No
Waste Collection &Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes XNo
StructyreeIDI Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Lp
Identifier ......... .`... ....... ................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................
Freeboard (inches):
5/00 Continued on back

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection O O ,
5. Are there any immediate threats to the tegrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees,severe erosion, ❑Yes Xo
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes �No
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? A Yes .9 No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes X No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes /(®No
12. Crop type Feseud faZe So al ffwr Annuo s l S62 SV,L.4j_
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes jXNo
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes %No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes UNo
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes *o
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ANo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes AIo
Required Records&Documents '..�uy!
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit readily available? ❑Yes No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? /`I�
(ie/WUP,checklists,design,maps,etc.) 1/ ❑Yes rNo
o
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yeso
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes WNo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes XNo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes P(No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes No
Q.00)a40As:op 00cjejn*,5*•wgre)i0fed•O(K►I)g tjtjs;vjsjt;-Y:oo*j1 j-seogiyo t)o futt6o .:::::
ctiries o deike:a 6o f thlS*.vi t: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
Comments(refer,to question#):'Explain"any YES a"ers and/or'sny recommendations or any�oth'ec comments ., p3 a'71k`,�
Use dradripgs of facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages as pecessary)c
" -4" tb
rr�_� of
1q a,,,l d e,,�,�,a t o�Il l06 -1 NAo ��►
ad4q* $/ao o,
FRei
iewer/Ins ector Name
P
iewer/Inspector Signature: i Date: O O 5/00

Facility Number: — 0'te of Inspection l�iS/�i(�b/I •
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge actor below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes No
roads,building structure,and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? —Q".w—g*xo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e.broken fan belts,missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑YesxNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? -fifes—B NO
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? -Pio
oni omments an or, ra ngs:
0
P 01 OVA
a
1l9 .733 . rr0.• 0aeo e-4 • 313
V 0� ✓�t}�Q� d/h C `7�-�'� a aoacr
5/00

on of Water Quality •
"t 01
sion of Soil and Water Conservation
er Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection S Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O• Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑Denied Access
Facility Number Ol g Date of Visit: 3/8/Z001 Time: 14:J11 Printed on: 8/2 312 0 0 1
0 Not Operational O Below Threshold
e Permitted ■Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Hadlex..,ret4ers..DW ry............................................................................. County: tal4=11ct;......................................... WIS.BO,........
Owner Name: ]atxtes..dt..fralrY.................... HadIcy........................................................ Phone No: 914r2.9 -4810...........................................................
Mailing Address: 441S..Silk..klalxe....Lindlex.b ill.lid............................................... Snots..camp...NC................................................. 2.7.3.49.............
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title: ................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
Onsile Representative:1an1.¢S.kladlPy.................................................I........................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:lames...................................... ffadky.............................................. Operator Certification Number:2QQSQ.............................
Location of Farm:
t Chatham-Alamance county line on Lindley Mill Rd.
❑Swine ❑Poultry ®Cattle ❑Horse Latitude 35 • 50 37 « Longitude 79 • F 21 -04711
t >,w4a4 an4 s s. 'L` r, 'wu y - y
Somme` ? �Destgn ,t Gii rent 1' �De�stgn Currennt tg�`., ss Desvtgn, Current '
e l� 'Ca actt ,ipRo ulation" Poultry' Ca actt P'ti'ulation Cattle Ca acI 'Pa ulation
k:❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer Dairy
®Dai 175 0
w
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer I III IF JE]Non-Dairy
-❑Farrow to Wean
Other
❑Farrow to Feeder10
❑Farrow to Finish
s. i, Total Destgn rapacity, 175
Gilts
❑Boars t" � Total S W 245,000
': Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area I0Spray Field Arca r.�
folding Ponds/Solid Traps 0 ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges 81 Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes 19 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes 19 No
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes ®No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ................................... ................................... .................................... ................................... ................................... ...................................
Freeboard(inches): 54
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 01-8 • Date of Inspection 3/8/2001 • Printed on: 8/23/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees,severe erosion, ❑Yes ®No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑Yes ®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes ®No
12. Crop type Fescue(Graze) Summer Annuals
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes ®No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ®No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ®No
Required Records& Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑Yes ®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design, maps,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes ®No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes ®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes ®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ®No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments refer to question# : Explain any YES answe and/or an ec endati ns or any other com
Use drawings of facilit to better exp aiii situations. use additional pa a ar : ❑Field Copy ❑Final Notes
There were no animals confined on the lot at this time.Mr. Hadley is considering raising replacement heifers and wants to stay Permitted
at this time.Mr. Hadley is aware that he will need to change his WUP and certification for this change in operation.
left a request for removal form and a reactivation form for Mr. Hadley in case he decided against raising heifers. I informed him that
e would still be responsible for maintaining his waste pond even though there was no waste entering it.
Reviewer/Inspector Name lRocky Durham
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 01-8 D f Inspection 3/8/2001 • Printed on: 8/23/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes ®No
roads,building structure,and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑Yes ❑No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e.broken fan belts,missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑Yes ®No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑Yes ❑No
rS itiona Lommentsran or] rawmgs:
05103101

* ''s ° �' � �;`� tslon of Soll and Water Conservahon ' „
')V r� +� sYft �t, r �QtherAgency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O• Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑Denied Access
Facility Number j
Date or visit: 8/16/2000 'Time: 0830 Printed on: 8/16/2000
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
®Permitted ■Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: R0d1.9y.Arf?.0A0A'S.D.a1r:............................................................................. County: AlUmAnce......................................... W511.0........
OwnerName: d>tAmes...&Ci ry.................... Hadley......................................................... Phone No: 91%.7.Q.4810..........................................................
FacilityContact: JAlmes.Hadley.................................................Title: ................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
Mailing Address: 4415-Silk.11aue.-.i andiex.l>A.ili.R.d............................................... Snow-camp..plc.................................................. X7.3.49.............
Onsite Representative:IOAnCa.DadlRy.............................................................................. Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:.i0MW,.W............................... Hadley............................................... Operator Certification Number:ZQ9.S4.............................
Location of Farm:
At Chatham-Alamance county line on Lindley Mill Rd.
❑Swine ❑Poultry ®Cattle ❑Horse Latitude 35 • 50 37 " Longitude 79 • =1 04
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Ca acit P,o elation Poultry Ca acit P,o elation Cattle Ga acit , 'op" lation
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ®Dairy 175 0
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer ❑Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 175
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSI W 245,000
Number of Lagoons 0 ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
MH61difl Ponds/Solid Traps r1 ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges_&Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑Yes ❑No
It. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Collection B&,Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ®Spillway ❑Yes ®No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ......Waste Rand...... .................................... ................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................
Freeboard(inches): 24
5100 — 3(��D Continued on back

Facilit Number: 01-08 Date of Inspection 8/16/2000 Printed on: 8/16/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to theOgrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/it severe erosion, ❑Yes ®No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ®Yes ❑No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ®Yes ❑No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes ®No
12. Crop type Sorghum Sudex(Hay) Timothy,Orchard,&Rye millet
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes ®No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ®No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ®No
Required Records& Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit readily available? ❑Yes ®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design,maps,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard, waste analysis&soil sample reports) ®Yes ❑No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes ®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes ®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ®No
No violatiotis o�:defcienc e$ were noted:duff ing this:visit::You:wil.i ecelve . .furth .
corres of deuce about this visa: : :
Comments refer to quesioon N : ExiSlai-HIS'n-VIMES answers and/or an r ommendation777MI
Use drawings of facilit to better explain situations. use additions pa ecessary
7. Need to mow around dam.9. Level marker needs to be moved. Is not visible.
19. Must start keeping freeboard this week now that permit has been issued.
Owner no longer in dairy business. No animals on site. Wants to go with dairy heifers(appro
to keep them on pasture.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Melissa ebrock
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: IX9 14 o97 4 Date: JIL A06 5/00

Facility Number: 01-08 D f Inspection 8/16/2000 . Printed on: 8/16/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑Yes ❑No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes ❑No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes ®No
roads, building structure,and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑Yes ®No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e. broken fan belts,missing or
or broken fan blade(s),inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑Yes ®No
32. Do the Flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑Yes ❑No
I ' t ona&Mtnen Ian .orJ raw ngsb
S/00

ivision of Water Quality , • , "
ivision of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency ai
Type of Vislt Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit outine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other /f��❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: iz time: Printed on: 7/21/2000
�[ yyy[[[ 0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
®Permitted ®Certified I [3 Conditionally Certified
TO,.,Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
/Farm Name: ( ` Hadl . .......B.rAe.f.-n.....t1J�.).r.N... County: ....,A.1.a.wan... i.e,................. .......................
Owner Name: ...... a.m.P,r..:s.....v..6.o r...q...........A.. a.&I ..11..,
Phone No: ...... ......7q.2......X.R/T X.R/T.......................
.
Facility Contact: Z.me.5........W..'.......N�S�!.... ...................................... Phone No: ...................................................
: ......................... hen
-ItMailing Address: ..........L..4..1.:�T........S..I1-K...1..1�olo-e .,.............._ni.I.em ..1./.••I... . ...P ....).w1nQ.o.�-4.t..jA..S,.12../.0 Y j
Onsite Representative:�Ta.w.v . �iy s.... •""�` ....... .... Integrator:..................................................... ...........................
Certified Operator, am.Q„ .... ..:....[.I ,Q_I.�.................................... Operator Certification Number:...._..O�� ....
Location of Farm:
❑Swine ❑Poultry Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ®' • �° Longitude
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Po ulation Cattle Capacity Population
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer Dairy
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer No
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ® ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Im acts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. ll'discharge is observed, what is the estimated Iluw in galhnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes 6rNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes P(No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate'? XSpillway ❑Yes / 'No
Struetgrc I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: UDDJGAA,S
- -s... .. ............................ ................................... ....................................
. . . . . ....................................
....
Freeboard (inches): a t t
5100 1 Continued on back

Facility Number: 0 --OM Dade of Inspection I K/V/001 Printed on: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the i�rity of any of the structures o`bssefr'v�ed''?(ie/tre*evere erosion, ❑Yes N0
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes*Io
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? /�Yes ❑No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes XNo
9. Do any sluctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? Yes ❑No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes e,No
11. Is there evidence of over application'? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overlo�ad1 [] Yes 90
12. Crop type ';0150INVM t�l�l�M �{rra,t5--5OkT�T� CJr) r�' 4 r"Qc`L�
13. Do the receiving crop ffer with those designatezAn the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? El Yes No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes XNo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes N�-AIo
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes fi 'No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes A
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes XNo
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit readily available'? ❑ Yes *o
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ` `
(ic/WUP,checklists,design, maps,etc.) El Yes 17V'�/h7o
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ic/irrigation, freehoard, waste analysis&soil sample reports) )(Yes ❑No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? /❑-Yes N;:�o
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge'? ❑Yes
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑Yes to
o
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? [I Yes
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'? ❑Yes �o
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes-*o
tVoyibl. . ..s. . . . ..e. . wgrenoteddiningihis;visit' Voif;Will•reeeiy fio;futfte;•; ;
corres' oridence:abotif this visit: : : :
Comments(refer to question q): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary): '
,& N +0 MOW QXDUnd aam d
Level m a�
b
0 nn si+o Ion °n 4e, dais- \1 PAIllLlA bUs1 IV_5, ►vo an,
+S ` �0 W 14 dGi� r l� ��O0 4 6P
Reviewer/Inspector Name K�Arzcz—
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur Date: 'Cl 5100

Facility Number: — I if Inspection IT�wI • Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues .
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to�discharge at/or below -E3-Y-ti p—
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? Om
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes 7'No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes )iZ'No
roads,building structure,and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑Yes )'No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters,etc.) []Yes XNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? OM IT a00b B Yes B Sn
32. Do the Flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Additional Comments an orDrawings: r '
Cou-S e-'Jen+Vally ` Pla.n5 4 ILeep °I- W) 0►1 W+cs
�A u5+ 54,jr4 1,"( nod �ele bOO rld 6 wee.
a m + has b124A ) 551Jed -
5100

[vision ofWaQality
Wigsionf soila ar Conservatio • t
w) Other Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection p Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Ol g Date of Visit: 4/4/2000 '1'irnc: E= Prinlcd on: 8/15/2000
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
N Permitted ®Certified ❑Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: tladleY..Brothers.D.Wry.............................................................................. County: Alamance......................................... WSRO........
Owner Name: JAMCS..dt..GUry.................... Hadley......................................................... Phone No: 919.1Q.4810..........................................................
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title: ................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
Mailing Address: 441S..SllkliRRe.-.Ljixdley..rWU.l{.d............................................... snob..camp...NC.................................................. 27349..............
Onsite Representative:dallOSa.W....Hadley...................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:J;tMCj.W............................... Hadl¢Y............................................... Operator Certification Number:Z99.54.............................
Location of Farm:
t Chatham-Alamance county line on Lindley Mill Rd.
[]Swine []Poultry ®Cattle []Horse Latitude Longitude
Design Current Design Current Design Current
[Boars
ulation Poultry Ga acit P,o ulation Cattle Ga acitWean to Feeder ❑Layer ®Dairy 175Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder ❑OtheFarrow to Finish Ttal o DesiGilts
Total SSLW 245,000
Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains—P—re—se—nt-110 Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
H6 I di NO Ponds/Solid T psra rI ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges&Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field []Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State'?(if yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Collection .Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes ®No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .................................... .................................... ..................
................. .................................... .................................... ....................................
Freeboard(inches): 48
5/00 Continued on back

Facility Number: 01-8 Date offnspection 4/4/2000 Printed on: 8/75/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the in�rity of any of the structures observed?(ie/tree0vere erosion, ❑Yes ® No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes ®No
12. Crop type Summer annuals Winter annuals Timothy,Orchard,&Rye Fescue(Graze)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes ®No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ®No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ®No
Required Records& Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit readily available? ❑Yes ®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design, maps,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes ®No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes ®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes ®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ®No
.No vioiatiolis:or delicieneies were:noted:duffing this;visif.::Y6' u'40lI.
ieceive no flirth'ei : ;
cories otidence about this.visit: : : . . . . : : .
Comments refer to question# : Explain an Y S answe an or en endations or an oche c n .
Use drawings of facility to etter explain situation . use additional pa ecessary :
19.Will need to get 2000 soil samples and begin keeping weekly freeboard levels per general permit.
9.Need to have a more visible marker.
Reviewer/Inspector Name 'Rocky Durham
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 5/00

1 Facility Number. 01-8 Jac of Inspection 4/4/2000 • printed on: 8/15/2000
Odor Issues a
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑Yes ❑No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes ®No
roads,building structure,and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑Yes ❑No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e.broken fan belts,missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑Yes ®No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑Yes ❑No
Ad it ona omments;an or;.rawmgs:
5/00

Q Division of and Water Conservation•Operation Revi
t �Division of�and Water Conservation-Compliance In�ion
�Division of ater Quality-Compliance Inspection
�Other Agency•Operation Review
Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number Ol OS FDate of Inspection 7.15.99
71
Time of Inspection 10:50 24 hr.(hh:mm)
E3 Permitted ®Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Not O erational Date Last Operated: ..........................
Farm Name: 1ladlry:.B.r911er5.Aairy............................................................................. County: Alumaim......................................... WSRQ........
OwnerName: James..&G,ar3:.................... Hadley........................................................ Phone No: 7.424.810....................................................................
Facility Contact: James.11adlcY................................................Title: Owlxcr................................................. Phone No: 919.1.42.01.0.......................
Mailing Address: 441S..S11k..11.RBe....Lj11dl9Y..AA.ill.lid............................................... S.nttxt'XRtMP...NC.................................................. 2.7.3.49.............
Onsite Representative:J.0MM.Hadlky.............................................................................. Integrator:...............:......................................................................
Certified Operator:,laAllff.W............................... 11adl.CJ:.............................................. Operator Certification Number:209.54.............................
Location of Farm:
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
At_Chatltam-Alamauce..cauat ..liae.ua.l iatdle ..klill.l3d......................................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude 0•=, 0" Longitude =• =, ="
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Ca tacit Po ulation
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ®Dairy 175 130
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer ❑Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder 10 Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 175
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW 245,000
Number of Lagoons 10 Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area I0 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps.:..0� „ ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges_.Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made'? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State'?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes ®No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Holding Pond
Freeboard(inches) ................3. ............... .................................... ................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees,severe erosion, ❑Yes ®No
seepage,etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Faciiity Number: 01-08of Inspection 7-15-99
6. Are there structures on-site which are nooperly addressed and/or managed through a management or
closure plan? ❑Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes ❑No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Yes ®No
12. Crop type Fescue(Hay) Fescue(Graze)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑Yes ®No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ®No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ®No
Required Records& Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit readily available? ❑Yes ®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design, maps,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation, freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes ®No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes ®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes ®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ®No
ski violatitins:oc deticiencies were;noted:duriitg this:visit::You:Will'receive nti fifrthet
. corres ondeii a about.this vtslt. .
'1omments refer to questio : Explain any YE answer a d/or any recommen atioas or an other comments.
t drawings of facility to et er explain situations. u a di ional pa es as neces a
9 Needs to identify the marker more clearly.
Record keeping was neat and in excellent shape.Farm was in good condition.
Reviewer/Inspector Name jHamid Rafiee Tom Yocum
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

Division of and Water Conservation-Operation Rev!
- Division of and Water Conservation-Compliance In ion
Division oP ater Quality-Compliance Inspection
Other Agency-Operation Review
10
Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number Ol 08 Date of Inspection 7-15-99
Time of Inspection 10:50 24 hr.(hh:mm)
0 Permitted ®Certified [3 Conditionally Certified E3 Registered 0 Not O erational Date Last Operated: ..........................
Farm Name: Uadky...Br.o1beirs.A.aitrx............................................................................. County: Alamance......................................... !5.RQ........
OwnerName: dames...do.Garry.................... Hadley........................................................ Phone No: ZU481.0....................................................................
Facility Contact: domes.Hadley................................................Title: Qwner................................................. Phone No: 919.1.42.4111.0.......................
Mailing Address: 441S..Silk.li.RRe....1 ndley..lMIX.lid............................................... S.ntt>.t'..camp...NC.................................................. 27.3.49.............
Onsite Representative:J.4MM.11adl¢y.............................................................................. Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:dam.CS.W............................... Nadiey............................................... Operator Certification Number:20Q54.............................
Location of Farm:
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................
t.l lxalbam.Alamalaee.caurl ..lalle.n�llarlle ..lYlill.11d......................................................................................................................................................
Latitude =0=, 0" Longitude =• =, ="
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer IN Dairy 1 175 1130
❑Feeder to Finish JE1 Non-Layer I 1 10 Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 175
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW 245,000
Number of Lagoons JE1 Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holding'+,Ponds/Solid Traps£0 JE1 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges 8&Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State'?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Collection. Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes ®No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Holding Pond
Freeboard(inches) ................36................ .................................... ................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees,severe erosion, ❑Yes ®No
seepage,etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back
Printed on 10/19/99

-� Facility Number: O1-08 of Inspection 7-15-99
6. Are there structures on-site which are nooperly addressed and/or managed through a V management or
closure plan? ❑Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes ❑No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Yes ®No
12. Crop type Fescue(Hay) Fescue(Graze)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ®No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ®No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ®No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit readily available? ❑Yes ®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design, maps,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes ®No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes ®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes ®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ®No
146 violatiotis:or deficiencies were:noted:dutiog this:visiL.Ntfu4ill ieceiv$ tit)-ftfrt6t
corres olideitce.about this:visit: .-. . .
Commen refer to Ulu tion# , Explain , • answers and/or any eco men a ions or any of er m ents.
Use drawing of facility to better explain ituation . u e additional page a nec sary
9 Needs to identify the marker more clearly.
Record keeping was neat and in excellent shape.Farm was in good condition.
•
Reviewer/Inspector Name lHamid Ratlee Tom Yocum
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Printed on 10/19/99

' �Division of and Water Conservation-Operation Revi
�Division ofand Water Conservation-Compliance In�ion
�Division oP ter Quality•Compliance Inspection
Q Other Agency-Operation Review
Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ Inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number Ol OS Date of Inspection 7-15-99
Time of Inspection 10:50 24 hr.(hh:mm)
0 Permitted ■Certified 0 Conditionally Certified O Registered Not O erational Date Last Operated: ..........................
Farm Name: Hadley..ifrullaers.D.airy.............................................................................. County: Al4mance......................................... W.SRQ........
OwnerName: ,lameS..&.S.rary.................... Hadley........................................................ Phone No: 7.42-MIQ....................................................................
Facility Contact: dames.Hadley.................................................Title: Qwxcr................................................ Phone No: 9.19.7.41.4fil.0.......................
Mailing Address: 4.I1S..Silk..HQptc.r..Uixdlex.Mill.lid............................................... S.O.Qw-Camp..NC.................................................. 2.73.49..............
OnsiteRepresentative:.lam.C.S.11adigy.............................................................................. Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:dam.Cs:.W............................... Hadley.............................................. Operator Certification Number:2Q9..S4.............................
Location of Farm:
......... ...............................................
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................
AI.Clxatham..AlaAnance.caun ..lane.nnCladl. ..1lIiU.Rd ........................................................................................... ...
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude =11 Longitude O• =, =11
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Ca sett Po ulation
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ® Dairy 175 130
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer JE1Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder 10 Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 175
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW 245,000
Number obLagooi s �� "� ?, ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
HoldmgrPontls,/Sohd Traps'0 r ,�❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes 19 No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
.3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes ®No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Holding Pond
Freeboard(inches): ...............3.6............... ................................... .................................... ................................... ................................... ...................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees,severe erosion, ❑Yes ®No
seepage,etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back
VT&

Facility Number: Ol—OS D or Inspection 7-15-99
6. Are there structures on-site which are n�operly addressed and/or managed through a management or
closure plan? ❑Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes ❑No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Yes ®No
12. Crop type Fescue(Hay) Fescue(Graze)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes ®No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ®No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes IN No
Required Records& Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit readily available? ❑Yes ®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design, maps,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes ®No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes IN No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes ®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ®No
No violations:or deficiencies were;noted;during this;vi$if.::You:will rem,iw:ito•fifk6r
corres orideitce:about this.vlstt. . . .
o Per to que do xp a n ny a a s en n an mmen a o man t om en .
t ra n or facili o tee I n nations. u a di o a a e essay
9 Needs to identify the marker more clearly.
Record keeping was neat and in excellent shape.Farm was in good condition.
Reviewer/Inspector Name IHamid Rafiee Tom Yocum
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
3/23/99

Division of and Water Conservation O eratiomRe ' r r/++�7 d ' ?,'f
DlviSlOnO anrdMateF Ons'ervatign '+COm UanceI On
Ii{7 '.rq�rqrt _. C ,P?..., ` {,
JI!j -paDivision Of Watee,QualltyC lr Gomp1latice:Iltspectioni �� ll�� i)al l;i,r� �7{��,h�f C��'�f tc',i'��Lp�' rf `sY ��a 1`.{�Ir�l�' � i4"
j 11 �li t I Y r ip S ,� it �� �fl �.att,li .
t(2k+7f �A IiDOthiiAgency °Operation�Reviewt " �j� l7�
10 Routine Q Com taint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-u of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number +� Date of Inspection ,®
Time of Inspection L-LSL_21Ji 24 hr.(hh:mm)
E3 Permitted pt Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered gi Date Last Operated: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,•
� �� s0 n S County: .............. a/1:lfnll.t:..if......... .......................
Owner Name: .....;..^A m_e............� n�7Gi t .G.1.�./�. Phone No: .......:lJ.".f. ...7y.a:..�.... Q..�.11.....................
........... t......... ............ . .. . . .. ). ..... ....... ....................
Facility Contact: ....A......( q M. 5
....................... � :,l.Title: ...................I >✓,L,.J.1�............................ Phone No: ........SA: ..........................
Mailing Address: ..... i••I•.I. .....s.I. ..IS.. '9I .e.........`L..!. ....mI1.�-Rd..........srk-gA.....nG-n,...-f.................................. ..........................
OnsiteRepresentative: ..... CS..t:r.p.5..........Ftl"./.{/ {.......................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:....... ...Gd.rY1.2.,5....--igA.c.l.� .. . .C:!t............................................... Operator Certification Number........:a.d..�..�1.�......
Location of Farm: o
......... .r:+... ...w ...... 1 . .....to........C... s4..... .. ....C.r?..... .l .... nS �
M.,.F.. ...... n4...........�r..k+:,...... ...ata... bus..........rk.[.r.......5...........
....... .. .. .tpL.....................................-.....................................................................................................................
.............
Latitude Longitude
„7i y is " `Design Current ]i° ' Desrgn Current , Desigq Current
.,�;Ca'acit Po ulation „ Poaltr_�ji,� [ CaLactt , Pb ulation ..;Cattlei Capacity Po ulation,a
' ❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer Dairy U
❑Feeder to Finish 10 Non-Layer 10 Non-Dairy
r
J❑Farrow to Wean.
�� r❑Farrow to Feeder "� Other
' ❑ ,
�t❑Farrow to Finish it ' in
Total D&A6 Capadt
❑GIIISI 1� S t { - 1 L 1 1 It
❑soars ;' ,qq Total SSLW_ t
II
i 3 4 7 'P�umber of Lagoons {Y o ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ID Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps 7 r i, ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges &Stream Impacts �/
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes Its No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made'? ❑Yes ❑No
h. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes, ❑No i
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If ycs, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes 0"No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes pp No
Waste Collection & Treatment �,(/� ti
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? El Spillway ❑Yes BNo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 1401 d.,,3 PJ'
Freeboard (inches): ..... n
3..�n. . ................................ ...................................
................ ................................... .................................... ................................... .
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/It severe erosion, ❑Yes O No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back
i

. ,... ...,. ♦_ �" i �;y,fJ{w`,,,�.. � ...,,.7 ^'r;K`;:,+k C S xr}.vr 0. ,.w:.. Y r,C "d�.. t y ir<i.r:a �'g.ry..
Facility Number: ( - 5r I
�c of Inspection
6. Are there structures on-site which are0properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes dNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ) /
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes 0 No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes R No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes ❑No
Waste Application ��,,��""
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes 02/No
11, Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑ Yes VNo
12, Croptype � ISutnmvC.AAL4 .cI Fe5;",e
13. Do the receiving crops dffer with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes R�o
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes QNo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes RNo
❑ /
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? Yes 2 No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes QNo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes [a No
Required Records&Documents -
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit readily available? ❑Yes No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design, maps,etc.) ❑Yes PNo
a
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes WNo
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ®'No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?',, ❑Yes ER No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? /
(ie/discharge, freeboard problem"§,over application) ❑Yes' o
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes 2-No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes E1,4o
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes (>o
Vd•yigl'a(itjt�s;ofi itQficienctes•�vgre ngte�l•ilµrtitg thjs:vispt;•Yojt w its•Xeogiyeo;fuirtitgr•;•;
corres iin nti about this:visit: : : : : . : . . .•.•.•. . . . . . : : : :
1111 1 tRY 1 FI Itl 1 1 LY II ILIN iNLL 6 t tl LLX !! fin' ! "t f It I ryR }I Ifl SM M' 3HMt k b It f
Comments=(refer to question#) Explain any`YES nsweCs and/or;any recommendatwns;or anyother comments,
;l {'rx;rarcP r r
UItmy r ti1 tr;5^ya t+a rlmn saNrb, " z� >zr.v� �,.lfl.v ^wwnLL, II,4
se drawings of facthtyj,to better explain sttuahons. useadrli6onal pages as necessary) i �p4,Ural„wr a.e,.,.rdrn n 1 .,tall_ a.ns�s.;u+al rz...an.�rv,n nrxniannav ;nl aati.r 1 �.d= _,�...j trw!sR.,.t r 48a, 'All
9 IV ed5 7'a id en t'�� 11-k e rA6r eti /no rt e ItOt .
�e [ er01. ecf/O/A7 WQS /r) eXCtl�e.n 1t' 56ta fie • FArtn to 5.eneraX w4-)
Reviewer/Ins ector Name rtE {";l°i�E,fb���i I��yy(7r `'" "° t ',i (�1 '•i e1 iPj'p d l ` lu r 1 i v li l irr" l
P h fli t a . 1 ;g 11,ii�l"1, t i ^F,�<u�t_ia�'3i,ii��E.I Y{i ) 6 1� ,Ig,� lfit ll��d�bMl l 1.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: _
3/23/99

Facility Number:0 I — Q [Of Inspection —/S'— •
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes O No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑Yes ,❑-,No
,
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑Yes �No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑Yes ❑ No
Additionall,„OmmentS a� Or raFylRgS ,�., "I,,
r
3/23/99

cy .
r At»lion of Sotl ater Conservation Operation Review 5t r 5
Ui�ision of boil endfWater Conscrt anon Cotnplmnce Inspection
t 2i `6 r 'rL°
(�DtvLstnn,ofs4F titer Qnahty Comphanue Inslutition w pp
�gencv? Operation Rcvtevv Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number I Date of Inspection ti
[Time of Inspection 24 hr.(hh:mm)
Registered M Certified 0 Applied for Permit Q Permitted 10 Not Operational Date Last Operated: .. ..-.%......
Farm Name: .... L(3`�, �J�OS• �� `� Count.
.......... ....................................... .fft...................................... f fh?2.R�l :°�.t. ~. H.N R
OwnerName:................................................... ........................................................................ Phone No: ......................................... 3...1998.........
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title: ................................................................ Phone No:W I rt r ........................1:'..r
Re6i ;Iwt t.)ffiee
MailingAddress: ......................r.....{.......................................................................................... ................................................................. ............... ..........................
Onsite Representative:...._i}....r.. m...&.,:�........... .................... Integrator!......................................................................................
Certified Operator:.................................................. ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:.........................................
Locution of Farm:
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude 0.01=11 Longitude =° 01 =`1
Design Current ' 'Design,., Current , -"'Design Current "j
°Swine A "Capacity Population Poultry Capacity 1- opulatwn a C the eCapacity,Population "p,
{ ❑Wean to Feeder ❑Laycr Dairy
❑Feeder to Finish s.❑Non-Layer I Non Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean ;
❑Other
❑Farrow to Feeder
`
❑Farrow to Finish Total DeSigtC CapaClfy
❑Gilts
❑Soars "TO SSLW
_ .
Number of Lagoons/Holding Ponds, ❑Su surfLiqui dce D to Management Systemoon Area ❑Spray Field Area Y
, z
General
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes JZNo
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes 16No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Surface Water?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes RNo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated Flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes IQ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes [�Io
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes �(No
5. Does any part of the waste management system(other than lagoons/holding ponds)require ❑Yes PNo
maintenance/improvement? J
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? [I Yes [ No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑Yes CdNo
7/25/97 Continued on b

Facility Number: — •
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑Yes ((No
Structures(Laeoons.Holdine Ponds.Flush Pits.etc.)
9. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑Yes ANo
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: _
.........................qq......... ................................... .................................... ................................... ................................... ...................................
Freeboard(ft): ........ ............(........ .................................... ..........................:........ .................................... .................................... ....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑Yes Xo
11. Is erosion,or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑Yes /['�4o
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes P4
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes,and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑Yes 14o
Waste Application //
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑Yes 1Z No
(If in excess of WMP,or runoff entering waters of the State,notify DWQ)
15. Crop /.y,
type ... ...f�.�t—. .1��.�L.....-.��.I�.(Q3.q.u ...._f..........J�.IL:./J..�.
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan(AWMP)? I�Yes @4
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ✓❑Yes 0 No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes 59No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑Yes J6 No
1(J 20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes No
21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? 0�Y"es P<O
,tom r 22. Does record keeping need improvement? es ❑No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑Yes ONO
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes o
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑Yes YNO
0 No.violations oi deficiencies were noted duffing this.visit. You"hill receive ito further,
correspondence about this:visit. : ;
Comments( ter to question#)w^Expiam any Tt 13S answers ont!!or any reCalnrtAendatiPlns o r CA". nts
se rawngs`of facihcyw�terexptain situaaons (rise ad�dittopges as necry)'
)Law 1 S ih6-E- T' 1— = N
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name a
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: *� Date: IU Ay

r, t p,DrvisionofSodan ter,Conservatfonl OpershontReviews�
s ,
�IQa�{Vlslont�Of$OII'8n Yer C�OnSerVatlOflr,nCOmphanCe�lOS�leCtlO i ;i ..i. v . r I uWO
� ) ' �: igDrvfslonW,,WaterQuality Complmnce.lnspection
(Oi�ii ti,tat{�I , t, 1 l�i 1P a N :Wir �r i adi tt :t3and„ Lint s"N tlP �;1, i 3,8 ,I r n1 �„ , `
s „ , �,I „g , {�t t, 1 ',P , a d(
OtherM1++Agency OperationReview a't , "
Routine C Complaint p o ow-up of DWQ inspection p �o ow-up of DSTC review p . (her
Facility Number Date of Inspection
'lima or luspection ®24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered N Certified 13 Applied for Permit p Permitted in Not OperationalDate Lust Operolcd:
t-a rin Name: Hadley.Bralhers.Dairy.............................................................................. County: Alamance / WSRpO
Owner Name: dames.&_Gary.................... Hadigy........................................................ Phone No: .7.42-.46.LU.............L91� �y�—�p.. D
...........................
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title: ............................................................... Phone No: k336.)..37bn6834....................
Mailing Address: 44.1.5.Silk.Hope.-..Lindlay.iYlill.Rd............................................... Saow.lCamp... C.................................................. 27a49..............
OnsiteRepresentative: .......................................................................................................... integrator:.......................................................................................
Certified Operator:James..W_............................. Hadley.............................................. Operator Certification Number:2054.............................
Location of Farm:
:......a am- mance.cnpp?y::.uie,pn:..in eY:.........:......Rd r..:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::�:::::::::::::::::::::::
.... ..... .
...
Latitude =• Longitude =• 0' �•:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ eanto Feeder JE3 Layer 1 ®Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish JE3 Non-Layer 1 ❑ Non-Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ arrow to Feeder
p ter
❑ Farrow to ims Total Design Capacity 175
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW 245,000
Nuber oftagnonsFholding'Ponds ❑ se Subsurface rams ren ❑ agoon rea p pray ie rea
m
❑No Liquid Waste Management System
General
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes g No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes g No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑No
b. If dischmge is observed, did it reach Surface Watel'?(Ifyes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes p No
c. II discharge is observed, what is the estimated Flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (byes, notify DWQ) Cl Yes ❑No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ❑No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? g Yes ❑No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds)require ❑Yes g No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? g Yes ❑No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑Yes g No
7/25/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environ*t
and Natural Resources �•r
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor NCDENR
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
May 14, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIVED
RETURN CEIPT REQUESTED N.C: Dept. of EHNR
Ta—m—es7K Gary Hadley
Hadley Brothers Dairy MAY 1 9 1999
4415 Silk Hope - Lindley Mill Rd
Snow Camp NC 27349 Winston-Salem
Farm Number: 01 - 8 Regional Office
Dear James & Gary Hadley:
You are hereby notified that Hadley Brothers Dairy, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1 OC, must
apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your
farm has sixty (6Q days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In
accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any
owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department
SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must
be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required
may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is
operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non-Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh,NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call J R Joshi at [phone] extension
363 or Ron Linville with the Winston-Salem Regional Office at [phone].
Sincere
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Winston-Salem Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post-consumer paper

Facility Number: 01_08 Date,'nspection
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on slt�which need to be properly closed? p Yes M No
Structures I Latzoons.1 foldine, Ponds. Plush Pits.etc.)
9. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? p Yes ®No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Snvcutre 5 Su ucture 6
Identifier: holding pond
Prcebom'd (It): 1..5............... .................................. ...................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? p Yes a No
11. Is erosion,or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? p Yes M No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ®No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? p Yes ®No
Waste Annlication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? p Yes ®No
(If in excess of WMP,or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .......................Fescue.......................................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? p Yes ®No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? p Yes ®No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? p Yes ®No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? p Yes ®No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? p Yes ®No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? p Yes ®No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ®Yes p No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Oniv
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? p Yes ®No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A WMP? (3 Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? p Yes ®No
Q. .O VIo lons.or Cl'ellEles'were.njifn firing Is YIsI :. oU.WI .recelve na UP er.'.'
eorrespoi+'kl eeaboutt#jIS•visit::•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•: :•:•:
Gomments;(re er,to'question;#):, Explain'any.YES answers and/or.any recommendations'or,any other comments
Use drawin :
gs y to better explain. _P ( P g necessary): y of•facilit situations. use additional. a es as
3 -Had pnoir run off from bam area piped around lagoon. This has been stopped presently. Awaiting help from NRCS on
uttering.
5-Grass around lagoon needs mowing.
2-Records on calendar. The records need to be put on your forms.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Jim dohn`stoo Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

_.
717
eview
Mal
®DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
9
QR Routine 0 Complaint 0 Foliow-up of DIVQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection tl—
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 3® 24 ha(hh:mm)
Registered ecertified CI Applied for Permit []Permitted JE3 Not Operational I Date Last Operated: ..........................
q r
Farm Name: kG ..... So w.........................:. ............................... County:......ef/i ....... .......................
OwnerName:...JrkrMcr.....i{..taf f7L..... ... Phone No: .............................................................................................. ............................. / /
Facility Contact: ...�..//._.GA.A..1...........
9W.M.djj.........Title:i ...........................^................................... Phone
/N1o:Qq].Q�...3.76.'q...6..11?y
Mailing Address: .7.L rS...wT.. ..1.1�.1!Q�Qt............J�itth � kL......./`?L. : ...K. .................SM9A5......."A�........... .(3.L..
OnsiteRepresentative:............................................ ............................ Integrator:......................................................................................
^_7
Certified O eratort......... f�h.p{................ q ............................._ Operator Certification Number:..... ?..g . .
Location of Farm: AMS 14acll (gi4D 7Y2-070
....,e . . .ey.......M..1..: .1...........4E............. ......4: ...... ......�.:.. ..L........ ..�tt R.�x......,lo.C.2.T.
...........JG.RT...A.L.�eo u......&4,7 4* ....._.....t..c... 1t,N.4............................................................................................................................................. �
Latitude Longitude E 0' =.1
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑Wean to Feeder JEl Layer 1 ❑Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer ❑ Non-Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder I0 Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons/Holding Ponds 10 Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
I. Are there any buffers that need ntaintenance/improvement'? ❑Yes
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes Bko
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Surface Witter'!(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
- c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/tnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) es 0 No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes GP<8
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes [I <6
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds)require es ❑No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of desi_n? ❑Yes—Ltl'No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑Yes 2<
7/25/97 1 i
Continued on back U 1)

` Factfily Number: ('� — 9
•
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ftNo
Structures (Lasoons,tlolding Ponds,Flush Pits.etc.)
9. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑Yes ❑No
/Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier. ..fv.�[�itf..../m,-, ............................. ................................... ................................... ................................... ..................................
Freeboard(ft): ......Add!/........................ .................................... ................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes L1-IQo
11. Is erosion,or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑Yes 9_11
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes RTtyo
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes,and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑Yes 3-50
Wastc Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑Yes M_K
(If in excess of WMP,or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ......I.'.. ..L.✓............................................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes P-MO
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes 0415
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes EP<o�
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑Yes ,L�<0N
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'? ❑Yes C3,Koo
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes 0N0
22. Does record keeping need improvement? es ❑No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑Yes U.Ko
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes It7,W6
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑Yes Mlw
0 No.violations or deficiencies were noted during this'visit. .You.will receive no further
correspondence about this visit. "
Comments(refer,to question a): Explain any.,YES answers and/or any recotunendations mr auy'=;°other comments :
Use drawin s of facilit to better explain situations.(use additional pages as "
g . Y P P g
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur Date:

0DSWC�i nal Feedlot Operation R6vi�,W
EHAWQ< m Anial ee Fdlot Operation Site Inspec tion
�. z
.i
19 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number
Date of Inspection
(y p
Time of Inspection 0 ' 24 6r. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: (registered ❑Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑Certified ❑Permitted or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑ /Not Operational Date Last Operated: ..............................................................................................................................................
Farm Name: ........fi2tQ�Ey f' �1 a^i,� ............................ County:.....-p:I/R n,RNP-'2............., .......................
/........r....... ........... ..................................
Land Owner Name: clf7tYt2f. t5`R ...............6�jt'y..........n................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facility Conctact: ..... ft/( ............A4.6re.f y. ............... Title: .4% f'' ..................... Phone
Mailing Address:.......IN/ r!.F.4graif.............
\�`.�FdAlel-A&Zl..�.. ......SNP..t ....lffkf'! .......................... .... .r?..rJ3
Onsite Representative: ..... .KS......... 9ig1L�....lazy....................................... Integrator:......................................................................................,
Certified Operator: ..........sr?Yk?J !i►a c�� `4.............._............ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm: A'es 7y21Ve-1'9
........................-.
r................................................-.....................................................--.
Latitude Longitude 0 �«
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
t v^e£ 4Y` 'F�#5 ,y„35` "' § i"^S
Design Current z , Design�ct urrenti � Design
Ce aci <,P'o rulatton Poultry;, , „ Ca acit .Po hlation Cattle, Ca actt .-.Po ulation
❑Wean to Feeder t Li Iz er [I Dairy
E.[I Feeder to Finish ❑Non La er ❑Non-Dairy
Farrow to Wean '
Farrow to Feeder A �Tott}I Des g Capaetty
,1171 Farrow to Finish MV
❑other ..._ s Total SSLW �
w.-SfY�b'9�. •k"&ym �.a ^ 4 r4� '�€. n�i � .�re..cc. � �. kr�.`M1ss
Numbei of LagQis Bolding Po ds . ❑Subsurface Drains Present
❑Lagoon Area 910 Spray Field Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ❑o,
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? � (�El No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray field @ Other ,.,,�
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? M es ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Surface Water?(If yes,notify DWQ) GWe-, ❑No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑ems ❑No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ❑Na-
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes dP6"
5. Does any part of the waste management system(other than lagoons/holding ponds)require es ❑No
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

Facility Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑Yes M11;
Structures(Lauoons.Noldine Ponds Flush Pits etc.) �
9. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑Yes ZIXO
Structure
I ,p Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 0
Identifier: .AY/T.�.(�i:!t!9.../.4r ............................ .................................... ................................... ................................... ...................................
Freeboard (tt) .......T........................ .................................... ................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑Yes ,GIN6,
11. Is erosion,or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? Elt Yes a-Vro
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes U p/
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes,and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? es ❑No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑Yes M-N<
(If in excess of WMP,or runoff entering waters of the State,notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ....... _ ...............................................
......................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan(AWMP)? ❑Yes ttd-tvo
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes CP<
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes �1t .?Ko
19. 'Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑Yes Ewo
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes [1D40
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes OX0
11,
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑Yes UJ.
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑Yes ❑No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ❑No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑Yes ❑No
No.violatioils'or deficiencies were noted during this'visit:':You:wil}receive'ito'ftirther
correspotideuce about this'visit: : ; : . ; •:• '
Comments(refer to question N) Explam spy,XES answers andlor any recpmgtendaUons^pr ony other comments ��
Usutdrawiugs of faeiltty to better explain sttuaboas (use addihonal-p'ageg as negc�ess�iy). a , - -
, ;7/
f
13 /V" �Q it yah�r ti
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name i<'`''=';� y�..��,. 'r""/r• "�. ,E r „.. W' "
<i. aE
Reviewer/InspectorSignature.. Dale:

" P®J)$W �n1m*_11_
-r^£ Operation S1te, nspect �_ ` '
19 Routine":O Com 0laint' 0 Follow-up of DWQ Inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection 0-?0-
FacllityNumber tg
�'- Time of Inspection 0 ' 24 hr.(hh:mm)
Total Time(in fraction of hours
Farm Status: [registered [IApplied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑Certified ❑Permitted or Inspection includes travel and processing)
❑Not Operational Date Last Operated: ....................._..............._......_..................................__...._.................._......,.........................
Farm Name: .......L/Q f I E oN ��^ NC' 'e
!+ S_._.�._... . _ ...... County ..._.Az
Land Owner Name:S.t!.f3J.t3P.x.46.&* .............. _....._._..._....... Phone No:........__...._._.....(_p....__.....
7....._............................
Facility Conctact: ..._ t'} .........Aq dA!f._.......... Title: . ��'/' ..........._........ Phone
Mailing Address:_..Yyf�s�t�Al?� x..__._...` GCL � ..G r�l..ne{... ...... N_B.t<! tYl'_?�J..............__.............. .e2..7a3
Onsite Representative: .....
.21..........(21..1)... / .................................... Integrator:...................._................._:......................_.................._.
Certified Operator: _..�s /rnk eJ_............. _!!.L9..Ee..... ......_......_.............. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm: /yAS b«d/el Cgf9) 7 y2 V r/0
__....._...............__........_..............__....._...................................................................................................................................................................:...........................4
....................................-........_.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 0
Latitude Longitude �• �' �"
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
z:" va "'�YYsrBt e .
r t1)a Design; q Dest n tCurrent x re n Curren#
r t CurrentshK g a <
SiSine "t a :Poultry<. Cabagity.-Po "ul f�onCat)le Ca acu Po ulahon
r: u4, <6@a ace P;o rulahon
❑Wean to Feeder I❑Layer � ❑Da
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer G ❑Non Da
rl Farrow to Wean , ` ^� f t ran r ?„7
11 Farrow to
Farrow to Fins II
h .. .,....,._ _.. .. $ `r ITOta ,DC9 '�3'Apa,ClW �r�..: � �F s s
❑Other
Hfik✓�+%:wv` c(c�Wx¢fl� ...P...rF
1Vumber of I�agoo s/Hoidi"-4rfids ❑Subsurface Drains Present
t
y < ,AmynN
m ❑Lagoon Area 7❑Spra} Field Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? � �El No
Discharge originated at: [I Lagoon ❑Spray field M&ler
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? L7Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Surface Water?(If yes,notify DWQ) a es ❑No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes,notify DWQ) Cj-'res ❑No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes [9-N�
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ❑-N6'
5. Does any part of the waste management system(other than lagoons/holding ponds)require es ❑No
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement? Continued on back

Facility Number: D .--G •
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑Yes W11;
Structures Ponds,Flush Pits.etc.)
9. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Yes [LI,61'
Sttv ture I Structure 2 . Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
n .,
Identifier: r ................................ ....
................................ ................................... ................................... ..................................
Freeboard(ft) .......T.....'`.............. .................................... ................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑Yes ELNe'
11. Is erosion,or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑Yes P-N
12. Downy of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes [ Nai
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes,and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? es ❑No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑Yes LINO'
(If in excess of WMP,or runoff entering waters of the State,notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .......rya.U..•.e.................................................................................................................................................................................�........,.....��
,t U K........
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan(AWMP)? ❑Yes o
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes �t-rao
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes 01Pdo
19. 'Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑Yes l�l�JdQ�o
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes hd'No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes UNO_
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑Yes Il.X
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑Yes ❑No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ❑No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑Yes ❑No .
O No.violations-or deficiencies.wereh6ted duiing this.visit. .Y.ou.wil}receive no further
•etirrespotidepceab:ouffhis:visit:•: . : . . : :•:•:•:•: : : : : •:�: :•. . . .•: :•:•,•:•. : ; ;.,;
"ry YLo.. : 3 '.& �& �i 'u7 L'Rp:&¢")s R It .er,4n..: •p. v:Ak.x+Yn.+2 b*i&hsi.NA M9N :q
meek. ., (refer#o question#} Explain any YES answers andlor.nny recomntendattons or an other commen
ash sa,�- �« ,� *mas:r, r ..« «-, �� ^" ��as,., r-ts� ram�sa� r^,
Use drawings of facihty to better explain sttuahons use addrtror l pages'as necessary)s , ,
�S/kVc� a ©/� p� 'r.PzsZo �D Z_ 001.
i! / 6
4� 13 oV"
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name '"''` r'�"""'" r ""�"" •'
il
Reviewer/InspectorSignature: Dale:

t� ITY SECTION TO WSRO F.ku�ioc
r-LL-14,.1995 15:34 FROM DEM l•WTEyOt
r
Site Requires Attention:
Facility No. a
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: `-? , 1995
Time:
Farm NamNOvnerr a l So
Mailing Address:
county:_
Integrator. Phone:
On Site Representative: k a A'J'l Phone: #Zo) 7y z -s'k/n
Physical AddresslLoeation•
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle C y)
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site: 0
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation:meet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient Feeboard of 1 Foot+25 year 24 hoar storm event
(approximately 1 Foot+7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: 1—Ft. - C_Inches
Was any seepage observed from the XR�0011(s)? ,Yes o To'Was any erosion observed? Yes
Is adequate land available for spray? oto Is the cover crW adequate?�No
Crop(s) being utilized: —
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Yes or No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of A USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch,flushing system or other
similar man-made devices? Yes of No If Yes,Please•Ezplain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
Way irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments:
Inspector Name l�
a:FwWty Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed
TOTAL P.02