20171293 Ver 1_Final Mitigation Plan_20190610

ID#* 20171293
Select Reviewer:*
Mac Haupt
Initial Review
Completed Date
06/11/2019
Mitigation Project Submittal - 6/10/2019
Version* 1
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site? *
Type of Mitigation Project:*
V Stream r Wetlands r Buffer r Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Brad Breslow
Project Information
Existing 20171293
(DWR) (nunbers only no dash)
I D#: *
Project Type: r DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Green Mesa
County: Yadkin
Document Information
r Yes r No
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Existing 1
Version: (nun-bersonly)
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Plans
File Upload: Green Mesa_Mitigation-Plan _ FINAL_Submittal.pdf 74.74MB
Rease upload only one RDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Jamey McEachran
Signature:
J" Va6&1k

fires
June 6, 2019
Steven Kichefski
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
Dear Mr. Kichefski,
302 Jefferson St. Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Corporate Headquarters
6575 West Loop South, Suite 300
Bellaire, TX 77401
Main: 713.520.5400
RES is pleased to submit the Yadkin 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank Instrument (UMBI) Green Mesa Final
Mitigation Plan (SAW -2017-01466) and Nationwide Permit 27 Pre -Construction Notification (PCN). As
outlined in the 2017 RES Yadkin 01 UMBI Final Prospectus, the Green Mesa Site is being developed
concurrently with four other mitigation sites to establish the UMBI. The Mitigation Plan submittal includes
a response memo addressing all IRT comments on the draft plan. The attached PCN package includes PCN
Form, PCN supplemental information, supporting figures, and an updated aquatic resource inventory table
and Waters of the US Map to accompany the previously -confirmed PJD. The PCN has also been submitted
to NCDWR and USACE via the joint online submission tool.
As specified in the mitigation plan, RES requests that the initial allocation of released credits, equivalent to
15 percent of the restoration/enhancement credits and 100 percent of preservation credits, be released by
the IRT with written approval upon satisfactory completion of the following activities:
a) Execution of the UMBI by the Sponsor and the USACE;
b) Approval of the final mitigation plan;
c) Mitigation site must be secured;
d) Delivery of financial assurances;
e) Recordation of the long-term protection mechanism and title opinion acceptable to the USACE;
f) Issuance of the 404 -permit verification for construction of the site, if required.
According to our accounting, this request represents 550.65 SMUs.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this important project. Please contact me at 919-209-1067 or
mbutlergres.us if you have any questions or require any additional information.
Sincerely,
RES, LLC
Matt Butler, PMP
Project Manager
res.us

REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF:
CESAW-RG/Browning
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
69 DARLINGTON AVENUE
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403-1343
MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD
May 1, 2019
SUBJECT: RES Yadkin 01—Green Mesa Mitigation Site- Draft Mitigation Plan Review, Yadkin
County, NC
PURPOSE: The comments listed below were received from the NCIRT during the 30 -day comment
period in accordance with Section 332.8(g) of the 2008 Mitigation Rule.
USACE AID#: SAW -2017-01466
30 -Day Comment Deadline: November 21, 2018
Mac Haupt, NCD WR:
1. Table 5. Mapped Soil Series shows map unit HsA as Hatboro while Figure 7 shows HsA as
Hornsboro series. Please clarify which series is correct. Also, Table 5 shows Siloam soils as
having Hydrologic Soil Group D. Since this series is well drained the Soil Group is probably B.
2. Please remove the 30 -day flow metric from Table 16.
3. Please make sure the locations of the wetlands are on the Final Design sheets.
4. DWR believes the more appropriate ratio for reach FF4-A is E2 at 2.5:1.
Special note: While DWR is approving this proiect to move forward. DWR would like to bring out
several characteristics of this project that will in the future result in this type of project being rejected.
These characteristics are listed below:
a. There is minimal functional uplift on the majority of the stream reaches.
b. A large pond in the middle of the project separates two sections of the project and essentially
greatly reduces the ecological benefit of the upstream reaches. Given the fact that all the
upstream reaches are enhancement reaches and low functional uplift enhancement, this
further diminishes the ecological effectiveness of these reaches.
c. Much of the project has less than the minimum requirement of riparian vegetated buffers.
d. There are numerous crossings (10) for the size of the project.
e. The project has an overall low percentage of stream restoration versus enhancement.
Kim Browning, USACE.•
1. Reach FF4-A was limited by bedrock, with no pressure from crop production or livestock access.
A ratio of 2.5:1 is more appropriate here.

2. The number of crossings seems excessive for the total length of the project. On our field visit I
thought it was stated that the existing crossing on FF3 would be removed (the one near the historic
building).
3. The Deep Creek W/S #14 dam/pond in the middle of the project prevents the upstream
enhancement activities from benefiting downstream reaches. Functional uplift should be
documented.
4. Table 9: Highly Functioning (HF) is not a category in the Stream Functions Pyramid Framework.
5. On our field visit I thought it was stated that the existing crossing on FF3 would be removed (the
one near the historic building).
6. Where C channels are proposed for this project: Please update Table 16 in the Stream
Geomorphology and Hydraulic Performance standard to include "The Entrenchment Ratio (ER)
shall be no less than 2.2 for all measured riffle cross-sections on a given reach." The Cross Sections
performance standard in Section 7.1 should be updated to reflect this as well.
7. Section 7.2: Vegetation—Please add "260 trees" to the statement for year five.
8. Please provide a Service Area Map.
9. Please provide a monitoring map (or include on the Conceptual Plan Map) the location of the
gauge, existing wetland, veg plots, photo locations, etc.
10. Long Term Management: UP2S provided annual monitoring costs, but perhaps this list should be
amended to include signage, fence monitoring, encroachments, etc.
11. Monitoring Bond: Typically we require an itemized list to calculate the Monitoring bond. Please
provide an itemized breakdown for the monitoring costs, to include beaver removal (especially
since there was evidence of beaver activity near the pond along FF1-B).
Kim Browning
Mitigation Project Manager
fas Steve Kichefski

MEMORANDUM res
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110 Raleigh, North Carolina 27605 919.209.1052 tel. [phone] fax
TO: NCIRT
FROM: Brad Breslow and Matt Butler - RES
DATE: June 6, 2019
RE: Yadkin 01 Umbrella Bank, Green Mesa Mitigation Bank Site, EPA, USACE and
NCDWR Draft Mitigation Plan Comments (SAW -2017-01466)
Mac Haupt, NCDWR:
1. Table 5. Mapped Soil Series shows map unit HsA as Hatboro while Figure 7 shows HsA as
Hornsboro series. Please clarify which series is correct. Also, Table 5 shows Siloam soils as
having Hydrologic Soil Group D. Since this series is well drained the Soil Group is probably B.
This was a typographic error on Figure 5, and Hatboro is the correct soil series; this has been revised
on Figure 5. Siloam soils within the Project (SmE and SmF), according to NRCS Web Soil Survey,
are both classified as D for the hydrological soil group.
2. Please remove the 30 -day flow metric from Table 16.
This metric has been removed from Table 16.
3. Please make sure the locations of the wetlands are on the Final Design sheets.
Design sheets revised to show existing wetlands.
4. DWR believes the more appropriate ratio for reach FF4-A is E2 at 2.5:1.
Per recommendation from the IRT site visit on 10/17/2017, the initial approach of restoration for
Reach FF4-A was changed to Enhancement Level I (EI). Proposed improvements include
adding several in -stream structures, including brush toes that will be installed at 1+50 and 1+60
sta, and a log sill that will be installed at 2+47, benching the right bank for 474 LF, and planting
the buffer. RES feels that this EI approach is justified given the channel is currently oversized
and lacks a buffer along the south side.
Special note: While DWR is approving this proiect to move forward. DWR would like to brin
out several characteristics of this proiect that will in the future result in this type of proiect bein
reiected. These characteristics are listed below:
a. There is minimal functional uplift on the majority of the stream reaches.
b. A large pond in the middle of the project separates two sections of the project and
essentially greatly reduces the ecological benefit of the upstream reaches. Given the fact
that all the upstream reaches are enhancement reaches and low functional uplift
enhancement, this further diminishes the ecological effectiveness of these reaches.
c. Much of the project has less than the minimum requirement of riparian vegetated
buffers.
d. There are numerous crossings (10) for the size of the project.
e. The project has an overall low percentage of stream restoration versus enhancement.

RES recognizes that the Green Mesa Mitigation Site falls short on the types of parameters the IRT
are looking for when accepting a site. Moving forward, RES ensures that these parameters and any
project constraints will be addressed at the initiation of the project. RES appreciates the attention
and understanding of the IRT during the development and subsequent approval of the Green Mesa
Mitigation Plan.
Kim Browning, USAGE:
1. Reach FF4-A was limited by bedrock, with no pressure from crop production or livestock access.
A ratio of 2.5:1 is more appropriate here.
Per recommendation from the IRT site visit on 10/17/2017 (below), the initial approach of
restoration for Reach FF4-A was changed to Enhancement Level I (EI). Proposed improvements
include adding several in -stream structures, including brush toes that will be installed at 1+50 and
1+60 sta, and a log sill will be installed at 2+47, benching the right bank for 474 LF, and planting
the buffer. RES feels that this EI approach is justified given the channel is currently oversized and
lacks a buffer along the south side.
Green Mcsa Site -10117117
Overall the site has clear potential for functional uplift, but there are a few notable constraints
including powerline easement and a large pond that will remain (landowner will not allow pond
to be part of project). Because the pond will remain in place, RES and USACE discussed
potentially retrofitting the riser structure to include a bottom pond drain to release cooler water.
I kT members agreed the Green Mesa site is acceptable for compensatory mitigation, and final
credit ratios will be determined in the Approved Mitigation Plan. Reach specific comments arc
below.
FF4 and FF1-D: RES originally proposed restoration at a 1:1 ratio. The approach is a inix
of Priority I and 11 restoration with potential for enhancement level I above the powerline
based on bedrock in the channel. USACE said clearly justify rationale for restoration
measures.
2. The number of crossings seems excessive for the total length of the project. On our field visit I
thought it was stated that the existing crossing on FF3 would be removed (the one near the
historic building).
RES notes the constraints in the project and we have used the non-standard buffer tool to assess
and adjust our crediting allotments per the site constraints. We examined removing this crossing
but were unable to given landowner constraints.
3. The Deep Creek W/S #14 dam/pond in the middle of the project prevents the upstream
enhancement activities from benefiting downstream reaches. Functional uplift should be
documented.
RES understands, and the constrains of Deep Creek W/S #14 dam/pond are now documented in
Section 4, in response to this comment.
4. Table 9: Highly Functioning (HF) is not a category in the Stream Functions Pyramid Framework.
"Highly Functioning" ratings have been revised to "Functioning" rating, as Highly Functioning
will not be demonstrated.
5. On our field visit I thought it was stated that the existing crossing on FF3 would be removed (the
one near the historic building).
RES notes the constraints in the project and we have used the non-standard buffer tool to assess
and adjust our crediting allotments per the site constraints. We examined removing this crossing
but were unable to given landowner constraints.

6. Where C channels are proposed for this project: Please update Table 16 in the Stream
Geomorphology and Hydraulic Performance standard to include "The Entrenchment Ratio (ER)
shall be no less than 2.2 for all measured riffle cross-sections on a given reach." The Cross
Sections performance standard in Section 7.1 should be updated to reflect this as well.
The entrenchment ratio performance standard has been updated in response to this comment.
7. Section 7.2: Vegetation—Please add "260 trees" to the statement for year five.
The success criteria have been updated in response to this comment.
8. Please provide a Service Area Map.
Figure 1 has been updated to serve as the Service Area and Project Vicinity Map.
9. Please provide a monitoring map (or include on the Conceptual Plan Map) the location of the
gauge, existing wetland, veg plots, photo locations, etc.
Figure 12 has been added to present the Monitoring Plan.
10. Long Term Management: UP2S provided annual monitoring costs, but perhaps this list should be
amended to include signage, fence monitoring, encroachments, etc.
As noted in Section 10, UP2S has provided engagement letters that state their responsibilities to
include the maintenance of easement boundary signage, annual on-site monitoring/inspections
(which will include fence monitoring, where applicable), and encroachments. Any potential
violations, including encroachment, will be promptly communicated to the landowner.
11. Monitoring Bond: Typically we require an itemized list to calculate the Monitoring bond. Please
provide an itemized breakdown for the monitoring costs, to include beaver removal (especially
since there was evidence of beaver activity near the pond along FF1-B).
An itemized breakdown has been included in the mitigation plan, in Section 12. Maintenance
costs include beaver removal and other considerations.

FINAL MITIGATION PLAN
Green Mesa Mitigation Site
Yadkin County, North Carolina
USACE Action ID SAW -2017-01466
Yadkin River Basin
HUC 03040101
Prepared by:
fires
Bank Sponsor: Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
919-209-1052
June 2019
"This mitigation plan has been written in conformance with the requirements of the following:
• Federal rule for compensatory mitigation project sites as described in the Federal Register Title 33 Navigation
and Navigable Waters Volume 3 Chapter 2 Section § 332.8 paragraphs (c)(2) through (c)(14). "

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Green Mesa Mitigation Site ("the Project") is located in Yadkin County, approximately two miles
south of Boonville, NC. Water quality stressors currently affecting the Project include livestock
production, agricultural production, and lack of riparian buffer. The Project presents 9,164 linear feet
(LF) of stream restoration, enhancement, and preservation, generating 3,352 Warm Stream Mitigation
Units (SMU) along five unnamed tributaries.
The Project is located in the Yadkin River Basin within Cataloging Unit 03040101, Hydrologic 14 -
digit USGS HUC 03040101130010, and NCDWR sub -basin 03-07-02. This HUC ultimately drains
into Deep Creek, which has a State classification as Class C waters (NCDWQ 2011).
Consisting of agricultural fields, livestock pastures and wooded areas, the Project's total easement area
is approximately 32.45 acres within the overall drainage area of 1,011 acres. Grazing livestock have
historically had access to all stream reaches within the Project. The lack of riparian buffer vegetation,
deep-rooted vegetation, and unstable channel characteristics have contributed to the degradation of
stream banks throughout the Project area.
Goals for the Project include an increase to hydrologic function and restoration to ecological function
within the existing stream and riparian corridor and protect these features in perpetuity. These will be
accomplished by returning the existing streams into stable conditions by constructing an E/C type
stream with appropriate dimensions and pattern, reconnecting the channel to the floodplain, and
backfilling the abandoned channel. In -stream structures will be utilized for vertical stability and to
improve habitat. Buffer improvements will filter runoff from agricultural fields, thereby reducing
nutrient and sediment loads to the channel. Livestock exclusion fence will be installed along the
easement boundary. The widening and restoration of the riparian areas will also provide wildlife
corridors throughout the Project area. Benefits to be accrued from these activities include improved
water quality, and terrestrial and aquatic habitat.
The stream design approach for the Project is to combine the analog method of natural channel design
with analytical methods to evaluate stream flows and hydraulic performance of the channel and
floodplain. The analog method involves the use of a reference reach, or "template" stream, adjacent to,
nearby, or previously in the same location as the design reach. The template parameters of the analog
reach are replicated to create the features of the design reach. The analog approach is useful when
watershed and boundary conditions are similar between the design and analog reaches (Skidmore et al.,
2001). Hydraulic geometry is developed using analytical methods to identify the design discharge.
After completion of all construction and planting activities, the Project will be monitored on a regular
basis throughout the seven-year post -construction monitoring period, or until performance standards
are met. Upon approval for closeout by the Interagency Review Team (IRT), the site will be transferred
to Unique Places to Save (UP2S). This party shall serve as conservation easement holder and long-term
steward for the property and will conduct periodic inspection of the site to ensure that restrictions
required in the conservation easement are upheld. Endowment funds required to uphold easement and
deed restrictions will be finalized prior to site transfer to the responsible party.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan i June 2019

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 PROJECT INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 1
1.1 Project Components................................................................................................................
1
1.2 Project Outcomes....................................................................................................................
1
2 WATERSHED APPROACH AND SITE SELECTION...............................................................
2
2.1 Site Selection..........................................................................................................................
2
3 BASELINE AND EXISTING CONDITIONS..............................................................................
4
3.1 Watershed Summary Information..........................................................................................
4
Drainage Area and Land Use.........................................................................................................
4
Surface Water Classification..........................................................................................................
4
3.2 Landscape Characteristics......................................................................................................
4
ExistingVegetation........................................................................................................................
4
ExistingWetlands...........................................................................................................................
6
Geology..........................................................................................................................................
6
SoilSurvey.....................................................................................................................................
6
3.3 Land Use - Historic, Current, and Future...............................................................................
9
3.4 Regulatory Considerations and Potential Constraints............................................................
9
Property, Boundary, and Utilities...................................................................................................
9
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)/ Hydrologic Trespass ....................................
9
Environmental Screening and Documentation.............................................................................10
Threatened and Endangered Species............................................................................................10
CulturalResources.......................................................................................................................
10
3.5 Reach Summary Information...............................................................................................
11
ChannelClassification..................................................................................................................
12
Discharge......................................................................................................................................
12
ExistingChannel Morphology.....................................................................................................
12
Channel Stability Assessment......................................................................................................
14
BankfullVerification....................................................................................................................
15
3.6 Site Photographs...................................................................................................................
16
4 FUNCTIONAL UPLIFT POTENTIAL.......................................................................................
19
4.1 Anticipated Functional Benefits and Improvements............................................................
20
Hydrology.....................................................................................................................................
20
Hydraulic......................................................................................................................................
20
Geomorphology............................................................................................................................
20
Physiochemical.............................................................................................................................
21
Biology.........................................................................................................................................
21
5 MITIGATION PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES............................................................
22
Best Management Practices (BMPs)............................................................................................
22
6 MITIGATION WORK PLAN.....................................................................................................
25
6.1 Reference Stream..................................................................................................................
25
Reference Watershed Characterization........................................................................................
25
ReferenceDischarge.....................................................................................................................
25
Reference Channel Morphology...................................................................................................
26
Chart 2. Channel Slope and Pool to Pool Spacing Comparison ...................................................
26
Reference Bankfull Verification...................................................................................................
26
Chart 3. Bankfull Verification......................................................................................................
27
Reference Riparian Vegetation.....................................................................................................
27
6.2 Design Parameters................................................................................................................
27
StreamRestoration Approach.......................................................................................................
27
DesignMethods............................................................................................................................
30
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan ii June 2019

DataAnalysis...............................................................................................................................
32
6.3 Vegetation and Planting Plan...............................................................................................
35
Plant Community Restoration......................................................................................................
35
On Site Invasive Species Management........................................................................................
36
SoilRestoration............................................................................................................................
36
6.4 Mitigation Summary.............................................................................................................
37
6.5 Determination of Credits......................................................................................................
37
6.6 Credit Calculations for Non -Standard Buffer Widths..........................................................
38
7 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS................................................................................................
40
7.1 Stream Restoration Success Criteria.....................................................................................
40
BankfullEvents............................................................................................................................
40
CrossSections..............................................................................................................................
40
DigitalImage Stations..................................................................................................................
40
7.2 Vegetation Success Criteria..................................................................................................
40
8 MONITORING PLAN.................................................................................................................
41
8.1 As -Built Survey....................................................................................................................
41
8.2 Visual Monitoring................................................................................................................
41
8.3 Hydrology Events.................................................................................................................
41
8.4 Cross Sections......................................................................................................................
41
8.5 Vegetation Monitoring.........................................................................................................
42
8.6 Scheduling/Reporting...........................................................................................................42
9 ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN.........................................................................................
44
10 LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN.....................................................................................
45
11 CREDIT RELEASE SCHEDULE...............................................................................................
46
11.1 Initial Allocation of Released Credits..................................................................................
46
11.2 Subsequent Credit Releases..................................................................................................
46
12 MAINTENANCE PLAN.............................................................................................................
48
13 FINANCIAL ASSURANCES......................................................................................................
49
14 REFERENCES.............................................................................................................................
50
List of Tables
Table 1. Green Mesa Project Components Summary............................................................................. 1
Table 2. Project Parcel and Landowner Information..............................................................................
3
Table 3. Project Watershed Summary Information................................................................................4
Table 4. Green Mesa Vegetation Plot Summary....................................................................................
5
Table5. Mapped Soil Series...................................................................................................................
8
Table 6. Regulatory Considerations.....................................................................................................
11
Table 7. Summary of Existing Channel Characteristics.......................................................................12
Table 8. Channel Stability Assessment Results....................................................................................15
Table 9. Functional Benefits and Improvements..................................................................................
24
Table 10. Peak Flow Comparison........................................................................................................
33
Table 11. Comparison of Allowable and Proposed Shear Stresses......................................................
33
Table 12. Comparison of Allowable and Proposed Velocities.............................................................
34
Table 13. Proposed Plant List...............................................................................................................
36
Table 14. Mitigation Credits.................................................................................................................
38
Table 15. Stream Mitigation Credit Adjustments for Non-standard Buffer Widths ............................
39
Table 16. Monitoring Requirements.....................................................................................................
43
Table 17. Stream Credit Release Schedule...........................................................................................
47
Table18. Maintenance Plan.................................................................................................................
48
Table19. Financial Assurances............................................................................................................
49
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan iii June 2019

List of Charts
Chart 1. Stream Functions Pyramid.......................................................................................
Chart 2. Channel Slope and Pool to Pool Spacing Comparison ............................................
Chart 3. Bankfull Verification...............................................................................................
List of Figures
Figure 1 —
Service Area and Vicinity Map
Figure 2 —
USGS Topographic Map
Figure 3 —
Landowner Map
Figure 4 —
Land -use Map
Figure 5 —
Existing Conditions Map
Figure 6 —
National Wetlands Inventory Map
Figure 7 —
Soils Map
Figure 8 —
Historical Conditions Map
Figure 9 —
FEMA Map
Figure 10
—Conceptual Plan Map
Figure 11
— Non -Standard Buffer Zones
Figure 12
— Monitoring Plan
Appendices
Appendix A -
Plan Sheets
Appendix B -
Data, Analysis, and Supplementary Information
Appendix C -
Site Protection Instrument
Appendix D -
DWR Stream Identification Forms
Appendix E -
USACE District Assessment Forms
Appendix F -
Wetland JD Forms
Appendix G -
Invasive Species Plan
Appendix H -
Regulatory Agency Scoping Letters
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan iv June 2019

I PROJECT INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project Components
The Green Mesa Mitigation Site ("Project") is located within a rural watershed in Yadkin County,
approximately two miles south of Booneville. The Project lies within the Yadkin River Basin, North
Carolina Department of Water Resources (NCDWR) sub -basin 03-07-02 and United States Geological
Survey (USGS) 14 -digit hydrologic unit code (HUC) 03040101130010 (Figure 1). The Project is being
designed to help meet compensatory mitigation requirements for stream impacts in the HUC 03040101.
The Project proposes to restore 1,891 linear feet (LF), enhance 6,671 LF, preserve 602 LF of existing
stream, and provide water quality benefit for 1,011 acres of drainage area. The Project is in the Northern
Inner Piedmont Level IV ecoregion.
The Project consists of a single landowner on six parcels. It is comprised of five unnamed tributaries
totaling 9,145 existing linear feet, which eventually drain into the Yadkin River. The stream mitigation
components are summarized in Table 1 and Figure 10. The Project is accessible from Baptist Church
Road. Coordinates for the Project are as follows: 36.213246, -80.718195.
1.2 Project Outcomes
The streams proposed for restoration have been significantly impacted by livestock production,
agricultural practices, and a lack of riparian buffer. Proposed improvements to the Project will help
meet the river basin needs expressed in the 2009 Upper Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin Restoration
Priorities (RBRP) as well as ecological improvements to riparian corridor within the easement.
Through stream restoration, enhancement, and preservation, the Project presents 9,164 LF of proposed
stream, generating 3,352 Warm Stream Mitigation Units (SMU) (Table 1). This mitigation plan is
consistent with the October 20, 2017 IRT site visit (Appendix H).
Table 1. Green Mesa Project Components Summary
Mitigation Approach Linear Feet Ratio Base Warm SMU
Restoration 1,891 1:1 1,891
Enhancement I 474 1.5:1 316
Enhancement II
1,052
2.5:1
421
Enhancement II
694
3:1
231
Enhancement III
922
5:1
184
Enhancement III
3,529
7.5:1
470
Preservation
602
10:1
60
Total 9,164 3,573
Credit Loss in Required Buffer -404
Credit Gain for Additional Buffer 183
Total Adiusted SMUs
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 1 June 2019

2 WATERSHED APPROACH AND SITE SELECTION
The 2009 Upper Yadkin Pee -Dee RBRP identified several restoration needs for the entire Yadkin River
Basin, as well as for HUC 03040101, the Yadkin River headwaters. The Project resides in the North
Deep Creek HUC (03 04010113 00 10), which ultimately drains to the South Deep Creek Targeted Local
Watershed (TLW 03040101130020). The Yadkin River headwaters exhibit both the need for wetland,
stream, and riparian buffer restoration; more specifically the goals in the 2009 RBRP for the watershed
include:
1. Restoration of water quality and aquatic habitat in impaired stream segments;
2. Protection of high -resource value waters, including HQW, OR W, and WSW designated waters
and those containing large numbers of rare and endangered species (Natural Heritage Element
Occurrences);
3. Continuation of existing watershed restoration and protection initiatives and projects,
including efforts funded by Clean Water Management Trust Fund (CWMTF), DWQ's 319
Program, NC EEP, Ag Cost Share Program (A CSP) and Community Conservation Assistance
Program (CLAP);
4. Collaborative efforts with local resource agencies, land trusts and willing landowners to
implement new stream, riparian buffer and wetland restoration, enhancement and preservation
projects within TLWs;
S. Improved management ofstormwater runoff (including the implementation ofstormwater BMP
projects), especially in urban and suburban areas contributing to downstream degradation of
stream habitat and impairment of water quality; and
6. Implementation of agricultural BMPs in order to limit inputs of sediment, nutrients, and fecal
coliform to streams from active farming operations.
2.1 Site Selection
The Project was identified as a stream and buffer restoration opportunity to improve water quality,
habitat, and hydrology within the Yadkin River Basin within the 2009 Upper Yadkin Pee -Dee RBRP.
The site lends itself to accomplish multiple RBRP goals along Project reaches due to an absence of
riparian buffers, livestock access to the stream, and the historic land use, which has led to
channelization. Many of the Project design goals and objectives will address major watershed stressors
identified in the 2009 RBRP. Project -specific goals and objectives will be addressed further in Section
5. A project watershed map with the Project's drainage areas is shown on Figure 2 and watershed
planning priority boundaries are shown on Figure 1.
The Project will address two of the six goals outlined in the 2009 Upper Yadkin Pee -Dee RBRP.
Establishing riparian buffers, instream structures, and increasing bedform diversity will help address
RBRP Goal 1, but achievement will not be quantified. The Project will include the use of agricultural
BMPs to limit inputs of sediment, nutrients, and fecal coliform to streams from active farming
operations (RBRP Goal 6).
The land required for the construction, management, and stewardship of this Project includes six parcels
in Yadkin County with the following ownership in Table 2 & Figure 3. Once finalized, a copy of the
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 2 June 2019

land protection instrument will be included in Appendix C. The Wilmington District Conservation
Easement model template will be utilized to draft the site protection instrument.
Table 2. Project Parcel and Landowner Information
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 3 June 2019
PIN
Owner of Record
Or
Stream Reach
Tax Parcel ID#
499000200499
499000403703
Frazier Farm of North
499000217656
All stream reaches
Carolina, LLC
499000310877
499000223660
499000117958
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 3 June 2019

3 BASELINE AND EXISTING CONDITIONS
3.1 Watershed Summary Information
Drainage Area and Land Use
The Project area is comprised of five unnamed tributaries that flow northwest to a first order tributary
that ultimately flows to North Deep Creek. The total drainage area for the Project is 1,011 acres (1.58
mi2). Primary land use within the rural watershed consists of approximately 28 percent forest and 62
percent agricultural land. Impervious area covers less than two percent of the total watershed (Table 3
& Figure 4). Within the agricultural land use, pastureland accounts for approximately two percent of
the area and cropland comprises 55 percent of the area. Historic and current land -use within the
immediate Project area have had direct livestock access to the streams. These activities have negatively
impacted both water quality and streambank stability along the Project streams. The resulting observed
stressors include excess nutrient input, streambank erosion, sedimentation, livestock access to streams,
channel modification, and the loss of riparian buffers.
Table 3. Project Watershed Summary Information
Level IV Ecoregion
45e — Northern Inner Piedmont
River Basin
Yadkin
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit
03040101
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14 -digit
03040101130010
DWR Sub -basin
03-07-02
Project Drainage Area (acres)
1,011
Percent Impervious Area
<2%
Surface Water Classification
The project drains into Deep Creek, which has been classified as Class C Waters (NCDWQ 2011).
Class C waters are protected for uses such as secondary recreation, fishing, wildlife, fish consumption,
aquatic life including propagation, survival and maintenance of biological integrity, and agriculture.
Secondary recreation includes wading, boating, and other uses involving human body contact with
water where such activities take place in an infrequent, unorganized, or incidental manner (NCDWQ
2011).
3.2 Landscape Characteristics
The Project is located in the Northern Inner Piedmont Level IV ecoregion, which is characterized by
rolling to hilly higher elevations than the Southern Outer Piedmont, more rugged topography, and more
monadnocks or mountain outliers than other areas of the Piedmont. It has colder temperatures, more
snowfall, and a shorter growing season than in Southern Inner, Southern Outer, Northern Outer, and
Carolina Slate Belt Piedmont regions. It has mostly mesic soils rather than the thermic soils that cover
other regions of the Carolina Piedmont. The region contains more Virginia pine and less shortleaf pine
than Southern Outer Piedmont and Carolina Slate Belt, more chestnut oak, and many mountain disjunct
plant species. Streams tend to have higher gradients than in the Outer Piedmont regions and contain
many mountain -type macroinvertebrate species.
Existing Vegetation
Vegetation around the unbuffered reaches of the Project are primarily composed of herbaceous
vegetation and some scattered trees. In general, these riparian zones are disturbed due to regular land
management activities. On June 21, 2018 three 100m2 plots were surveyed along the floodplain of the
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 4 June 2019

Project to categorize the existing vegetation communities. Forested riparian areas along the majority of
the Project have been intermittently livestock -grazed and lack a well-developed understory and shrub
strata, while short reaches of enhancement and preservation represent more natural community
assemblages. For this reason, representative plots were surveyed along reaches FF 1-C, FF 1-D, and FF2
(Appendix B). Within each vegetation plot, all trees >5 inches (12.7cm) diameter at breast height
(DBH) were identified, measured, and used to calculate both basal area and stems per acre. Trees >54
inches (137cm) in height were used to quantify tree species diversity. Canopy species data was
calculated to quantify the existing natural community (Schafale, 2012) (Table 4). Shrub species and
herbaceous species were also identified, and the percent cover was estimated.
Table 4. Green Mesa Vegetation Plot Summary
Plot
Basal Area
(m'/ha)
Avg. DBH (cm)
Trees per Acre
Total Tree Species
Natural Community
1
4.77
10.40
202.3
12
Piedmont Alluvial Forest
Disturbed Piedmont Alluvial
2
3.00
7.18
283.3
6
Forest
3
0.00
0
0
0
Pasture
AVG
2.59
5.86
161.86
6
Dominant canopy species across the Project included tulip -poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), white oak
(Quercus alba), sourwood (Oxydendrum arboreum), red maple (Acer rubrum), American holly (Ilex
opaca), black tupelo (Nyssa sylvatica), American beech (Fagus grandifolia), pignut hickory (Carya
glabra), flowering dogwood (Cornus Florida), eastern red cedar (Jumperus virginiana), black walnut
(Juglans nigra), American sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), and black cherry (Prunus serotina). Sub -
canopy species included green briar (Smilax rotundifolia), service berry (Amelanchier arborea), poison
ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), lowbush blueberry (vaccinium angustifolium), and sawtooth blackberry
(Rubus argutus). Native herbaceous species in the enhancement and preservation reaches included
Christmas fern (Polystichum acrostichoides), Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia), little
heartleaf (Hexastylis minor), wild yam (Dioscorea villosa), American hog peanut (Amphicarpaea
bracteate), common blue violet (Viola sororia), sessileleaf bellwort (Uvularia sessilifolia), yellow star
grass (Hypoxis hirsute), white lettuce (Prenanthes alba), New York fern (Thelypteris noveboracensis),
devil's grandmother (Elephantopus tomentosus), strawberry bush (Euonymus americanus), spear
leaved violet (Viola hastata), frostweed (Verbesina virginica), long leaved bluet (Houstonia longifolia),
Cinquefoil (Potentilla sp), ebony spleenwort (Asplenium platyneuron), white snake root (ageratina
altissima), jewelweed (Impatiens capensis), smartweed (Polygonum sp.), tearthumb (Polygonum
arifolium), golden rod (Solidago sp.), hairy agrimony (Agrimonia gryposepala), dogfennel
(Eupatorium capillifolium), annual ragweed (Ambrosia artemisifolia), horse nettle (Solanum
carolinense), sweetscented joe pye weed (Eutrochium purpureum), and common boneset (Eupatorium
perfoliatum). Native grasses, sedges, and rushes present on preservation and enhancement reaches
included deer -tongue (Dichanthelium clandestinum), globe flatsedge (Cyperus echinatus), and
common sedge (Carex sp.).
Invasive species were also found within the vegetation survey plots, and in the vicinity of the site: tree
of heaven (Ailanthus altissima), Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora),
and Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica). Non-native species included red clover (Trifolium
pratense), white clover (Trifolium repens), Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum), annual
meadow grass (Poa annua), tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea), red fescue (Festuca rubra), bush clover
(Lespedeza sp.), ox -eye daisy (Leucanthemum vulgare), pigweed (Amaranthus albus), and common
stork's -bill (Erodium cicutarium).
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 5 June 2019

Existing Wetlands
A survey of existing wetlands was performed on November 8, 2017. Wetland boundaries were
delineated using current methodology outlined in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland
Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987). Soils were characterized and classified using
the Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, Version 7.0 (USDA-NRCS 2010). Within the
boundaries of the proposed Project, two jurisdictional wetlands are present near Reach FF1-B, FF1-C,
and FF3 (Appendix F & Figure 5), and are labeled as WA (Wetland A) and WB (Wetland B). WA is
approximately 5.4 acres in size and WB is approximately 0.28 acres in size. WA is well forested, and
WB is under active management for livestock. Vegetation within WA was made up of black willow
(Salix nigra), red maple, eastern red cedar, American holly, and sawtooth blackberry. Vegetation within
WB was made up of sawtooth blackberry, Pennsylvania smartweed (Persicaria pensylvanica),
tearthumb (Persicaria sagittate), soft rush (Juncus effuses), broom sedge (Carex scoparia), and purple
stem aster (Symphyotrichum puniceum). A preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) request was
sent to the USACE on December 8, 2017 and the confirmed PJD was received August 23, 2018 (SAW -
2017 -01466). Wetland forms are included in Appendix F.
The US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetland Inventory Map (NWI) depicts two
potential wetland areas within the Project, and these were surveyed during the wetland delineation
(Figure 6). Moreover, the soils mapped along reaches FF 1 and FF4 are considered predominately
hydric, and the soils downstream of the project pond are considered predominantly nonhydric and have
the potential to be hydric (Figure 7).
Geology
According to geology data from the North Carolina Geologic Survey, published in 1985, the Project is
located at the boundary of two different map units, OCg and CZma2, both occurring within the Inner
Piedmont, Chauga Belt, Smith River Allochthon, and Sauratown Mountain.
OCg. This map unit is associated with intrusive rock types of the metamorphosed granitic rock
formation that forms in the Paleozoic between 455 and 540 million years ago. This formation is
equigranular to megacrystic, foliated to massive; includes Toluca Granite.
CZma2. This map unit is associated with metamorphic rocks of the Metagraywacke formation that
formed in the later Proterzoic-Paleozoic between 500 and 900 million years ago. This formation
contains quartz and microcline porphyroblasts.
Soil Survey
Existing soil information from the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) shows the property
is located within the Cecil-Appling soil association. This association is deep, well -drained, medium -
textured soils found over gneiss, granite, and schist, located on broad, gently rolling ridges.
The Yadkin County Soil Survey shows several mapping units across the project. Map units include
seven soil series. The soil series found on the Project are described below and summarized in Table 5.
Project soil series are mapped by the NRCS as Clifford, Codorus, Dan River sandy loam, Fairview,
Hatboro, Rhodhiss-Stott Knob, and Siloam (Figure 7). The Clifford, Fairview, Rhodhiss, and Siloam
soils are considered well drained; Codorus soils are somewhat poorly drained; and Hatboro soils are
poorly drained.
Clifford Sandy Clay Loam. This map unit is found on interfluves and uplands. It formed from saprolite
residuum weathered from schist and/or saprolite residuum weathered from gneiss. This map unit is well
drained with moderate runoff, moderate permeability, and with no flooding or ponding. Major uses are
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 6 June 2019

row crops, pasture, and forest. Where cultivated, dominant vegetation includes small grains, corn,
soybeans, hay, tobacco, and orchards. Where forested, dominant vegetation is Eastern white pine,
Virginia pine, red oak, white oak, post oak, hickory, blackgum, red maple, yellow poplar, and dogwood.
Codorus Loam. This map unit is found on floodplains and valleys. It formed in recently deposited
alluvial materials derived from upland soils materials weathered from mostly metamorphic and
crystalline rocks. This map unit is somewhat poorly drained, occasionally flooding, but does not pond.
Major land uses are row crops, pasture, and forest.
Dan River Sandy Loam. This map unit is found on valleys and floodplains. It formed from loamy
alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock. This map unit is well drained, moderate
permeability, frequent flooding, with no ponding. Major land uses are row crops, pasture, and forest.
Fairview Series. (Including Fairview sandy clay loam, Fairview clay loam, Fairview gravely fine
sandy loam, and Fairview -Stott knob complex) These map units are found on hillslopes on ridges and
uplands. They formed from residuum from felsic metamorphic or igneous rock such as mica schist,
gneiss, granite gneiss, mica gneiss, granodiorite, and granite. These map units are well drained, with
moderate permeability, and no flooding or ponding. Major uses are row crops, pasture, and forest.
Where cultivated, dominant vegetation includes small grains, corn, soybeans, hay, tobacco, and
orchards. Where forested, dominant vegetation is Eastern white pine, Virginia pine, red oak, white oak,
post oak, hickory, blackgum, red maple, yellow poplar, and dogwood.
Hatboro Soils. This map unit is found on floodplains and valleys. It formed in alluvium derived from
metamorphic and crystalline rock. It is poorly drained, frequently flooded, but does not pond. Major
uses are pasture, row crops, and forest.
Rhodhiss-Stott Knob Complex. This map unit has two main components: Stott Knob, stony; and
Rhodhiss, stony. The Stott Knob component is found on hillslopes on ridges and uplands. This
component formed from residuum weathered from granite and gneiss and/or schist. It is well -drained
and does not flood or pond. Major land uses are row crops, pasture, and forest. The Rhodiss component
is found on hillslopes on ridges and uplands. It formed from saprolite derived from granite and gneiss
and/or schist.
Siloam Sandy Loam. This map unit is located on hillslopes and ridges and uplands. This soil formed
form from residuum weathered from diorite and/or gabbro and/or diabase and/or gneiss. It is a well -
drained soil and does not flood or pond.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 7 June 2019

Table 5. Mapped Soil Series
Map
Unit
Map Unit Name
Percent
Drainage
Hydrologic
Landscape
Symbol
Hydric
Class
Soil Group
Setting
Clifford sandy clay loam, 6 to
Interfluves and
CcC2
10 percent slopes, moderately
0.0%
Well drained
B
uplands
eroded
CrA
Codorus loam, 0 to 2 percent
o
7'0 /0
Somewhat
B/D
Floodplains and
slopes, occasionally flooded
poorly drained
valleys
Dan River sandy loam, 0 to 3
Floodplains and
DeA
percent slopes, frequently
0.0%
Well drained
C
valleys
flooded
Fairview sandy clay loam, 10
Hillslopes on
FdD2
to 15 percent slopes,
0.0%
Well drained
C
ridges and
moderately eroded
uplands
Fairview sandy clay loam, 15
Inter on
FdE2
to 25 percent slopes,
0.0%
Well drained
C
uplands s
moderately eroded
Fairview clay loam, 10 to 15°
Hillslopes on
FeD3
percent slopes, severely eroded
0.0%
Well drained
B
ridges and
uplands
Fairview clay loam, 15 to 25°
Hillslopes on
FeE3
percent slopes, severely eroded
0.0%
Well drained
B
ridges and
uplands
Fairview gravelly fine sandy
Hillslopes on
FgD2
loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes,
0.0%
Well drained
B
ridges and
moderately eroded
uplands
Fairview gravelly fine sandy
Hillslopes on
FgE2
loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes,
0.0%
Well drained
B
ridges and
moderately eroded
uplands
Fairview -Stott Knob complex,o
Hillslopes on
FtF
25 to 45 percent slopes, stony
0.0%
Well drained
B
ridges and
uplands
HsA
Hatboro soils, 0 to 2 percent
90.0%
Poorly drained
B/D
Floodplains and
slopes, frequently flooded
valleys
lthodhiss-Stott Knob complex,
Hillslopes on
Rte,
25 to 45 percent slopes, stony.
0.0%
Well drained
C
ridges and
uplands
Siloam sandy loam, 15 to 25°
Hillslopes on
SmE
percent slopes
0.0%
Well drained
D
ridges and
uplands
Siloam sandy loam, 25 to 50°
Hillslopes on
SmF
percent slopes
0.0%
Well drained
D
ridges and
uplands
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 8 June 2019

3.3 Land Use - Historic, Current, and Future
Historic aerial imagery indicates that the Project area has been used extensively for agricultural
purposes, and that the location of the streams has not significantly changed in over 60 years (Figure
8). The southern portions of the easement have remained forested. A federal flood control pond was
built between the northern and southern portions of the easement and was built in 1963. Several
watershed characteristics, such as groundwater, vegetation, surface drainage, and potentially soil
parameters have been modified. Soil structure and surface texture have been altered from intensive
agricultural operations.
The Project area is currently still in agricultural use and is being used as pasture for livestock. Livestock
have full access to most of the project reaches, and these reaches remain heavily impacted. Outside the
Project area is also mostly in agricultural use.
The future land use for the Project area will include an established 32.45 -acre conservation easement,
that will be protected in perpetuity. The Project easement will have 9,164 linear feet of functioning
streams, a minimum 50 -foot riparian buffer, and will be protected with fencing. Outside the Project
will likely remain in agricultural use.
3.4 Regulatory Considerations and Potential Constraints
Property, Boundary, and Utilities
There are six planned crossings within the Project. These crossings will occur at easement breaks and
will allow landowners to continue current land -use and access as needed. There will be two new
crossings: a 30 -foot culvert on FF5 and a 70 -foot ford on FF4-A. Four ford crossings are already in
place and will be improved. One 30 -foot ford crossing on FF1-A will be improved; this crossing occurs
on an easement break adjacent to the property boundary. One 50 -foot ford crossing on FF2 will be
improved; this crossing occurs on an easement break adjacent to the property boundary. One 50 -foot
ford crossing on FF3 will be improved. One 30 -foot ford crossing on FF1-C will be improved.
There is a powerline easement present at the northern part of the project. The powerline easement
crosses the proposed conservation easement in four places and is approximately 70 feet wide (Figure
5). This powerline easement crosses between FF4-A and FF4-B, and FF1-D in three places. There is
also an approximate 40 -foot wide utility line to the south of these powerlines that crosses two stream
reaches, FF1-C and FF5 (Figure 5).
There is a pond present between the project areas. This pond will not be altered, as it is a federal flood
control dam, as listed on the USACE National Inventory of Dams (NID) (USACE, 2016). All dams
included in the NID consist of dams that meet at least one of the following criteria: high hazard potential
classification - loss of human life is likely if the dam fails; significant hazard potential classification -
no probable loss of human life but can cause economic loss, environmental damage, disruption of
lifeline facilities, or impact other concerns; equal or exceed 25 feet in height and exceed 15 acre-feet in
storage; equal or exceed 50 acre-feet storage and exceed 6 feet in height. According to the North
Carolina Dam Inventory, this dam is a low hazard (NCDEQ, 2017). The dam was constructed in 1963
and was designed by the USDA NRCS. The dam name is Deep Creek W/S #14 (PL -566; USACE,
2016), it has a height of 26.2 feet, a length of 410 feet, a hydraulic height of nine feet, and a storage
capacity of 211 acre-feet. Additional details in reference to this dam can be found in Appendix B.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)/ Hydrologic Trespass
According to the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Information System, the Project is entirely
outside of the FEMA 100 -year flood zone (Zone AE, one percent annual chance of flooding) (Figure
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 9 June 2019

9). No regulated floodway is mapped. Hydraulic modeling will not be required to determine whether
restoration activities will have an effect on 100 -year flood elevations downstream. The design and
permitting of the mitigation do not require coordination with the Yadkin County Floodplain
Administrator, and a No -Rise Certification or CLOMR/LOMR will not be necessary. No hydrologic
trespass will be permitted to adjacent properties upstream or downstream of the project. The Project
can be found on Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Panel 4990 (map number 37110499000J) and Panel
4888 (map number 3710488800J), effective date May 18, 2009.
Environmental Screening and Documentation
To ensure that a project meets environmental screening, scoping letters were sent to the regulatory
agencies of the IRT (Appendix H).
Threatened and Endangered Species
Plants and animals with a federal classification of endangered or threatened are protected under
provisions of Sections 7 and 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), as amended. The USFWS
database lists one Federally listed species that may occur in proximity to the Project: the Northern long-
eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis). No protected species or potential habitat for protected species was
observed during preliminary project evaluations. Species and species habitat listed in the USFWS
database was inspected during the field investigation to determine whether they occur at the Project.
No individual species or habitats were identified on site. Potential impacts to species and habitat off
site, downstream, and within the vicinity of the Project were also considered.
Formal USFWS consultation for the Northern long-eared bat (NLEB) is not required for this site since
it is entirely located outside of the confirmed hibernation and maternity site for the species. Therefore,
this Project has met the criteria for the 4(d) rule, and any associated take is therefore exempt.
Furthermore, the USFWS encourages tree removal outside the pup season (June 1 to July 31) and/or
active season (April 1 to October 31) to reduce the chance of impacting unidentified maternity roosts;
and to avoid clearing habitat within a five -mile radius of hibernation sites when bats are emerging from
or preparing for hibernation (April 1 to May 15 and August 15 to November 14, respectively).
The Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act requires consultation with state fish and wildlife agencies when
"waters of any stream or other body of water are proposed or authorized, permitted or licensed to be
impounded, diverted ... or otherwise controlled or modified." The North Carolina Wildlife Resource
Commission (NCWRC) responded to the USACE Public Notice, issued on September 6, 2017, on
October 26, 2017. Documentation is included in Appendix H.
Cultural Resources
A review of North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) GIS Web Service (accessed
June 11, 2017 and June 13, 2018) database did not reveal any listed or potentially eligible historic or
archeological resources on the proposed Project property. There are no documented structures within a
half mile of the proposed easement.
There are two unlisted features on the Project that the IRT requested further coordination with SHPO.
The SHPO has been consulted about these structures. One structure is present on the left bank of FF1-
A and is remnants of a stone wall. The second structure is a stone wall crossing on FF1-C and was
constructed by the landowner's ancestors. Following consultation, the SHPO recorded these features
with the North Carolina Office of State Archaeology as sites 3lYD224 (present on reach FF1-A) and
31YD225 (present on reach FF1-C). Since no earthwork or heavy equipment are planned in the
immediate vicinity of either site, the proposed mitigation with have no effect. Correspondence with
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 10 June 2019

the SHPO is presented in Appendix H. The mitigation treatment on both reaches is Enhancement II
and would involve livestock exclusion and riparian buffer planting.
Table 6. Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable?
Resolved`'
Supporting
Documentation
Waters of the United States - Section
Yes
No
Appendix H
404
Waters of the United States - Section
Yes
No
Appendix H
401
Endangered Species Act
Yes
Yes
Appendix H
National Historic Preservation Act
Yes
Yes
Appendix H
Coastal Zone Management Act
(CZMA) /Coastal Area Management
No
N/A
N/A
Act CAMA
FEMA Floodplain Com liance
No
N/A
N/A
Magnuson -Stevens Act - Essential
No
N/A
N/A
Fisheries Habitat
3.5 Reach Summary Information
The Project area is comprised of a six -parcel easement area along Baptist Church Rd. The easement
has six agricultural crossings: one on FF5, one on FF4-A, one on FF3, one on FF1-C, and two are
easement breaks adjacent to the property line (FF2 and FF1-A) The stream channels include five
unnamed tributaries, split into eleven reaches based on proposed treatment type (Figure 5). Results of
the preliminary data collection are presented in Table 7.
In general, all or portions of FF 1-A, FF 1-B, FF 1-C, FF 1-D, FF 1-E, F173, FF4, and FF5 do not function
to their full potential; whereas FF2 seems to have functionality and is proposed for preservation only.
Current conditions demonstrate significant habitat degradation as a result of impacts from agriculture,
livestock production, and lack of riparian buffer. Being heavily eroded and incised, some of the streams
do not access their floodplains as frequently as they naturally would have prior to agricultural
operations. In the proposed restoration areas, the riparian buffer is in poor condition where much of the
riparian buffer is devoid of trees or shrubs and row crops are present up to the edge of the existing
channel. In the enhancement areas, trees are present, but understory riparian buffer has been impacted
by livestock. Habitat along the majority of the restoration reaches is poor in that there is little woody
debris or overhanging vegetation for fish cover or protection for other aquatic species. Morphological
parameters are located in Appendix B.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 11 June 2019

Table 7. Summary of Existing Channel Characteristics
Reach
Drainage
Area (acres)
Aggg 1
(ft')
Width
(ft)
Mean
Depth (ft)
W/D
Ratio
Sinuosity
Slope
(ft/ft)
FFl-A
498
17-18.8
15-23.8
0.8-1.1
13.2-30.2
1.16
0.020
FFl-B
585
10-28.1
34.8-66.2
0.2-0.8
43.2-440.5
1.29
0.004
FF1-C
686
22.1-27.5
14.6-24.9
1.1-1.5
9.7-22.6
1.04
0.015
FF1-D
1,011
37.2
21.1
1.8
12.0
1.08
0.005
FF2
63
3.3
5.1
0.6
8.0
1.01
0.047
FF3
75
6.1-8.4
9.8-24.3
0.3-0.6
15.8-70.2
1.27
0.019
FF4-A
222
11.1
7.3-7.8
1.5
4.8
1.06
0.011
FF4-B
242
15.3
7.9-11.8
1.3-1.7
9.1
1.07
0.008
FF5
34
3.1
7.9
0.4
20.1
1.20
0.025
Channel Classification
All stream reaches have been classified as perennial or intermittent using the NCDWR Stream
Identification Form version 4.11 and are A-, B-, and E-, stream types as classified using the Rosgen
stream classification system (Rosgen, 1996). Channel characteristics are summarized in Table 7 and
Appendix B. Stream determinations have been verified by the USACE.
Discharge
Estimating flows (discharge) for the Project is difficult due to the channelization and agricultural
impacts of the existing streams. Several models, regression equations, and the Piedmont regional curves
were used to estimate existing bankfull discharges. Land use and slope were considered when the
discharge calculations were developed. All hydraulic and hydrologic analyses are discussed in Section
6.2. Data and analysis of the hydrologic and hydraulic models are included as Appendix B.
Existing Channel Morphology
FF1
Reach FF1-A is 993 linear feet and begins at the property line in the southwest corner of the Project
area and flows east to FF1-B. The reach is sparsely wooded along the channel and has pasture adjacent
to the left bank of the channel. Bed material in the channel is primarily bedrock along the upper section
of the reach before transitioning to a cobble, gravel, and sand dominated system. There are sections of
incised bank areas along the channel. Livestock have access to the entire reach and there is evidence of
an old stone dam on this reach. The average channel width is approximately 23 feet with an average
depth of approximately one and a half feet. The drainage area for the reach is approximately 498 acres.
Reach FF1-B is 922 linear feet and is located in the southern portion of the Project area and flows east
into a federal flood control dam. This reach is wooded along the channel and has pasture to the north
of the easement. Bed and bank stability is decent throughout the reach. There is obvious evidence of
beaver activity at the downstream portion of this reach and riparian wetlands are present. The average
channel width is approximately 12 feet with an average depth of approximately nine inches. The
drainage area for the reach is approximately 585 acres.
Reach FF 1-C is 694 linear feet and begins below the federal flood control dam. The reach flows through
an open livestock pasture with minimal tree cover along the channel until tying in with Reach FF1-D.
Bed and bank stability are low throughout the reach due to heavy livestock access. A powerline crosses
this reach. There is a large intact stone wall on this reach near the downstream end. The average channel
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 12 June 2019

width is approximately 16 feet with an average depth of approximately two feet. The drainage area for
the reach is approximately 686 acres.
Reach FF1-D is 1,452 linear feet and starts just south of the Baptist Church Road crossing and flows to
the east. The reach ultimately drains into Deep Creek. This reach is extremely incised and over -
widened. The buffer is devoid of a wooded buffer and has pasture on both sides. Bed and bank stability
are low throughout the reach due to heavy livestock access. There is a large powerline that cuts across
the stream in multiple locations. The average channel width is approximately 15 feet with an average
depth of approximately one foot. The drainage area for the reach is approximately 1,011 acres.
Reach FF1-E is 59 linear feet and is the last segment of Reach FF1 on the Project area. The left bank is
pasture and the right bank is wooded. This reach for the Project ends at the property boundary.
FF2
Reach FF2 is 602 linear feet and located along the southernmost portion of the Project and flows in a
northerly direction into reach FF1-B. This reach is wooded on both sides of the channel and does not
have livestock access. Bed and bank stability throughout this reach are high. The average channel width
is approximately six and a half feet with an average depth of approximately one foot. The drainage area
for the reach is approximately 63 acres.
FF3
Reach FF3 is 1,943 linear feet and begins at the property line in the southeast portion of the Project
area and flows in a northerly direction into a federal flood control dam and riparian wetland area. The
entire left bank is wooded, and the right bank has moderate buffer. The reach is adjacent to an actively
managed pasture, and historically has served this purpose. There is a current road crossing on this reach.
The upstream portion of the reach has signs of bank erosion and instability, while the downstream
section is more stable. The average channel width is approximately seven feet with an average depth
of around one foot. The drainage area for this section of the reach is approximately 75 acres.
FF4
Reach FF4-A is 474 linear feet and begins at the property boundary at the northwest portion of the
Project area and flows east toward FF -B. The existing buffer along the upper section is row crop up to
the banks of the channel. The upper portion of the reach has bedrock in the channel. The average
channel width is approximately eight feet with an average depth of approximately one and a half feet.
The drainage area for the reach is approximately 222 acres.
Reach FF4-B is 375 linear feet and begins after FF4-A and the powerline easement, and flows east
toward FF1-D. After crossing an existing powerline easement, the buffer becomes livestock pasture
and active signs of erosion and down -cutting are apparent. The average channel width is approximately
eight feet with an average depth of approximately two and a half feet. The drainage area for the reach
is approximately 242 acres.
FF5
Reach FF5 is 1,631 linear feet and located in the eastern portion of the Project area and flows in a
northly direction to FF1-D. The left bank is entirely wooded, and the right bank is moderately wooded
and adjacent to an actively managed pasture. Bed and bank stability are good throughout the reach.
There is a high density of Chinese privet and black walnut. The average channel width is approximately
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 13 June 2019

six feet with an average depth of approximately three inches. The drainage area for the reach is
approximately 34 acres.
Channel Stability Assessment
A modified version of the channel stability assessment method ("channel assessment") provided in
"Assessing Stream Channel Stability at Bridges in Physiographic Regions" by Johnson (2006) was used
to assess channel stability for the Project's existing channels. This method may be rapidly applied on a
variety of stream types in different physiographic regions having a range of bed and bank materials.
The original channel assessment method was designed to evaluate 13 stability indicators in the field.
These parameters are: watershed characteristics (frequency of watershed disturbances such as
agricultural activities, urbanization, etc.), flow habit, channel pattern, entrenchment/channel
confinement, bed material, bar development, presence of obstructions/debris jams, bank soil texture
and coherence, average bank angle, bank vegetation/protection, bank cutting, mass wasting/bank
failure, and upstream distance to bridge. See Appendix B for a detailed description of the stability
indicators. As this method was initially developed to assess stability at bridges, a few minor adjustments
were made to remove indicators that contradict stability characteristics of natural channels in favor of
providing hydraulic efficiency at bridges. First, the "channel pattern" indicator was altered such that
naturally meandering channels scored low as opposed to straightened/engineered channels that are
favorable for stability near bridges. Secondly, the last indicator, "upstream distance to bridge", was
removed from the assessment as bridges are not a focus of channel stability for this project. The 12
indicators were then scored in the field, and a rating of excellent, good, fair, or poor was assigned to
each project reach based on the total score.
The channel assessment results (scores and ratings) for the Project are provided in Table 8. Two of the
eight project stream reaches received "Good" ratings, one reach received "Excellent" rating, while the
remaining five reaches received "Fair" ratings. Most Project streams were observed to have relatively
high bank angles, and many were found to be actively eroding. A majority of the channels have been
impacted by farming practices or livestock production and are slightly entrenched. These characteristics
are reflected in the higher channel assessment scores for average bank angle and bank
vegetation/protection. Most reaches also scored poorly for watershed characteristics since the
surrounding land use is dominated by agriculture activities.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 14 June 2019

Table 8. Channel Stability Assessment Results
** Excellent (0 < Score <= 36), Good (36 < Score <= 72), Fair (72 < Score <= 108), Fair (108 < Score <=144)
Bankfull Verification
Bankfull is difficult and often times impossible to accurately identify on actively maintained channels
and agricultural ditches. The usual and preferred indicators rarely exist, and other factors may be taken
into consideration in order to approximate a bankfull stage. Other factors that may be used are wrack
lines, vegetation lines, scour lines, or top of a bankfull bench; however, complete confidence should
not be placed on these indicators. Along the proposed restoration reaches, the channel is generally
entrenched and actively maintained, which means bankfull indicators were very limited or non-existent.
Therefore, bankfull stage was estimated by using Piedmont Regional Curves and other hydrologic
analyses, existing cross sections, and in-house spreadsheets to estimate bankfull area and bankfull
discharge.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 15 June 2019
FFl-A
FF1-B
FFl-C
FFl-D
FF2
FF3
FF4
FF5
1
Watershed
9
9
9
10
4
9
9
9
characteristics
2
Flow habit
5
5
5
5
3
5
4
5
3
Channel pattern
4
4
4
8
1
4
8
5
4
Entrenchment/channel
10
8
8
9
2
6
8
8
confinement
5
Bed material
4
4
9
6
3
7
6
7
6
Bar development
4
4
4
10
2
5
8
5
7
Obstructions/debris jams
6
6
4
8
3
6
5
6
8
Bank soil texture and
4
4
9
8
4
8
7
8
coherence
9
Average bank angle
5
5
7
8
2
5
7
5
10
Bank
7
5
9
8
6
6
8
6
vegetation/protection
11
Bank cutting
7
6
6
4
2
6
4
6
12
Mass wasting/bank
6
6
6
5
2
6
4
6
failure
13
Upstream distance to
NA
NA
NA
NA
na
NA
NA
NA
bridge
Score
71
66
80
89
34
73
78
76
Rating **
Good
Good
Fair
Fair
Excellent
Fair
Fair
Fair
** Excellent (0 < Score <= 36), Good (36 < Score <= 72), Fair (72 < Score <= 108), Fair (108 < Score <=144)
Bankfull Verification
Bankfull is difficult and often times impossible to accurately identify on actively maintained channels
and agricultural ditches. The usual and preferred indicators rarely exist, and other factors may be taken
into consideration in order to approximate a bankfull stage. Other factors that may be used are wrack
lines, vegetation lines, scour lines, or top of a bankfull bench; however, complete confidence should
not be placed on these indicators. Along the proposed restoration reaches, the channel is generally
entrenched and actively maintained, which means bankfull indicators were very limited or non-existent.
Therefore, bankfull stage was estimated by using Piedmont Regional Curves and other hydrologic
analyses, existing cross sections, and in-house spreadsheets to estimate bankfull area and bankfull
discharge.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 15 June 2019

3.6 Site Photographs
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 16 June 2019
r
.q:
w
a
�TS..:
' G v.41
••
' 11 . 1 � � _ i
11 _ • . • � r i
#
q
v
fYNW
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 16 June 2019

Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 17 June 2019
s w
x.
2 _ `
Looking downstream along Reach FF1-D
Looking upstream along Reach FF1-D
04/17/2018
04/17/2018
1-
�i
!
Looking downstream along Reach FF2
Looking upstream along Reach FF2
4/17/2018
4/17/2018
I,
Looking downstream along Reach FF3
Looking upstream along Reach FF3
4/17/2018
4/17/2018
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 17 June 2019

Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 18 June 2019
�e
Looking downstream along Reach FF4
rA-r
Looking upstream along Reach FF4
04/17/2018
04/17/2018
k :.'
k;
J
Looking downstream along Reach FF4
Looking upstream along Reach FF4
04/17/2018
04/17/2018
r
map -.iib
Looking downstream along Reach FF5
Looking upstream along Reach FF5
04/18/2018
04/18/2018
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 18 June 2019

4 FUNCTIONAL UPLIFT POTENTIAL
The Stream Functions Pyramid Framework (Harman et. al. 2012) uses stream functions to describe
project objectives, existing condition assessments and monitoring, performance metrics, and design
criteria. The Framework separates stream functions into five categories, ordered into a hierarchy, which
communicate the interrelations among functions and illustrate the dependence of higher-level functions
(biology, physiochemical and geomorphology) on lower level functions (hydrology and hydraulics).
Functions that affect the greatest number of other functions are illustrated at the base of the Pyramid,
while functions that have the least effect on other functions are illustrated at the top. The Pyramid is
illustrated below Chart 1.
Stream Functions Pyramid
A Guide for Assessing & Restoring Stream Functions N ovmviEw
Chart 1. Stream Functions Pyramid
wn�ma�®seam-me��a���cQm IN StreamMechanics
Fischenich (2006) found that the most critical functions include those that address hydrodynamic
processes, sediment transport processes, stream stability and riparian buffer restoration. By addressing
these fundamental functions and processes, a restored stream and riparian system are capable of
supporting more dependent functions that typically require time to establish, such as diverse biological
communities, chemical and nutrient processes, diverse habitats and improved water and soil quality.
The objectives of the Project will address the most critical functional objectives that will allow for a
more restored stream and riparian buffer over time.
While traditional mitigation approaches have generally relied on surrogate measures of success (i.e.
linear feet of restoration) for determining SMU credit yields, a function -based approach provides a
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 19 June 2019

more objective and flexible approach to quantify the expected ecological benefits of a mitigation
design. Additionally, a functional based approach broadens the reach -scale goals of a restoration project
by contextualizing the functional uplift to the watershed scale. The proposed Project will provide
numerous ecological and water quality benefits within the Yadkin River Basin by applying an
ecosystem restoration approach. The restoration approach at the reach scale of this project will have
the greatest effect on the hydraulic and geomorphology function of the system but will benefit the
upper-level functions (physiochemical and biology) over time, and in combination with other projects
within the watershed. Anticipated functional benefits and improvements within the Project area, as
based on the Function -Based Framework are outlined in Table 9.
The presence of the pond between the upstream and downstream portions (Figure 5) of the project
provides a limitation to the overall functional uplift the project will provide. This pond ultimately
divides the project up in such a way, that the upstream enhancement activities will have little to no
benefit on the functional uplift of the downstream reaches of the project. However, these downstream
reaches will still have functional uplift, due to the stream restoration and enhancement actives and
riparian buffer planting.
4.1 Anticipated Functional Benefits and Improvements
Hydrology
According to the Stream Functions Pyramid Framework, hydrology is defined as the transport of water
from the watershed to the channel. Therefore, this Project intends to make significant improvements to
the already functioning hydrology. Much of the improvement will come from altering land use within
these reaches' catchment areas. By converting land -use for a significant percentage of the catchment
area from pasture to riparian forest, curve numbers will decrease and reach runoff will improve.
Hydraulic
The hydraulic function of the Pyramid is defined as transport of water in the channel, on the floodplain,
and through sediments. Perhaps the greatest potential uplift at the Project will be achieved through
establishing healthy floodplain connectivity. Some of the reaches in the Project do not have functioning
floodplain connectivity or stable flow dynamics. Reaches where floodplain connectivity is not -
functioning or functioning -at -risk will be improved to functioning by reducing bank height ratios and
increasing entrenchment ratios. Reaches in which stable flow dynamics are not -functioning or
functioning -at -risk will be improved to functioning by constructing a new channel that is geometrically
stable based on the Project's hydrology inputs. Additionally, instream structures will be installed to
address the energy and erosive power of the water so that a stable base flow is achieved post -project.
Geomorphology
Geomorphology as defined within the Pyramid Framework, is the transport of wood and sediment to
create bed forms and dynamic equilibrium. Sediment Transport will be improved in reaches that
currently function -at -risk or not -functioning by designing channels that transport sediment until it
reaches an appropriate place to settle like a point bar. Large Woody Debris Transport and Storage will
be improved using woody debris such as log vanes, root wads, log weirs, and log toes for in -stream
structures on restoration reaches. The restoration reaches are also designed to accumulate woody debris
by having defined shallow riffles where cobble catches and holds woody debris and leaf packs. Riparian
vegetation is functioning in some areas but is either functioning -at -risk or not -functioning on most
reaches. Therefore, riparian buffers will be planted out to a minimum of 50 feet to improve the riparian
vegetation to functioning levels. Bed form diversity will be improved in restoration areas by using a
natural riffle pool sequence from the reference reach to inform design of functioning riffle pool
sequences in constructed channels based on reference reach conditions. This bed form diversity will
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 20 June 2019

also further improve aquatic habitat. These functional parameters are interconnected and ultimately
depend on each other in order to function properly. Therefore, by focusing improvements to these
parameters, the restored channels will achieve dynamic equilibrium and provide maximum geomorphic
functional uplift.
Physiochemical
The Pyramid Framework defines the physicochemical category as temperature and oxygen regulation
and the processing of organic matter and nutrients. Although this Project would support the overarching
goal in the Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin Priorities to promote nutrient and sediment reduction in
agricultural areas, it is difficult to measure nutrient and sediment reduction at this project level because
they can be affected by so many variables. However, several restoration actions are known to help
reduce nutrients and sediment even though they may not be measurable at the project level. These
activities include livestock exclusion and direct removal of fecal inputs, filtering of runoff through
buffer areas, the conversion of active farm fields to forested buffers, and improved denitrification and
nutrient uptake through buffer zones. Additional benefits may also come from functional uplift of the
lower level stream functions (hydraulics and geomorphology), which will reduce sediment and
nutrients in the system through bank stabilization and reforesting. Temperature regulation will also be
improved through the restoration of canopy tree species to the stream buffer areas. Oxygen regulation
will occur through two actions: first, the temperature of the water directly impacts the amount of gas
held by the water. Therefore, through planting the buffer to shade the channel the temperature is
decreased, and dissolved oxygen is increased. Second, the log structures placed in the stream create
mixing zones where oxygen dissolves much faster than the standard exchange rate of oxygen to
dissolved oxygen. The processing of organic matter will be improved once healthy riffles are shallow
enough to catch twigs and branches that then retain leaves. Many of these physiochemical benefits
occur slowly over time and are dependent on multiple variables within the stream ecosystem. Therefore,
it is not practical or feasible to directly measure these parameters within the monitoring time -frame of
this project. With that said, it is logical to use existing riparian buffer and visual performance standards
to demonstrate the positive correlation between geomorphic parameters and physicochemical
parameters. For example, as riparian buffer trees grow, as represented in annual monitoring reports, it
is anticipated that canopy cover is actively shading the stream channel and reducing water temperature.
This is not a substitute for direct physicochemical monitoring, but it is a useful tool to help project the
long-term benefits of the Project in terms of its functional uplift.
Biology
The highest category of the Pyramid is biology and is defined as the biodiversity and life histories of
aquatic and terrestrial life, specifically referring to animals. As mentioned for the physiochemical
stream function, it will be difficult to measure the functional uplift of the biological functions at this
site within the monitoring period of the project. However, since the life histories of many species likely
to benefit from stream and wetland restoration are depending on all the lower -level functions, the
functional uplift from the hydraulic and geomorphic levels would have a positive effect to the biology
over time and in combination with other projects within the watershed is anticipated. Again, there is no
substitute for direct biological monitoring, but it is important to understand the hierarchy of the Stream
Functions Pyramid Framework in order to help project long-term benefits of the Project though only
categories two and three (hydraulics and geomorphology) will be directly measured during the seven-
year monitoring period.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 21 June 2019

5 MITIGATION PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Through the comprehensive analysis of the Project's maximum functional uplift using the Stream
Functions Pyramid Framework, specific, attainable goals and objectives will be realized by the Project.
These goals clearly address the degraded water quality and nutrient input from farming that were
identified as major watershed stressors in the 2009 Upper Yadkin Pee -Dee River RBRP. The Project
will address outlined RBRP Goals 1 and 6 (listed in Section 2).
The Project goals are:
• Improve water transport from watershed to the channel in a non-erosive manner in a stable
channel;
• Improve flood flow attenuation on site and downstream by allowing for overbank flows and
connection to the active floodplain;
• Improve instream habitat;
• Restore and enhance native floodplain vegetation; and
• Indirectly support the goals of the 2009 Upper Yadkin Pee -Dee RBRP to improve water quality
and to reduce sediment and nutrient loads.
The Project objectives to address the goals are:
• Design and construct stable stream channels with appropriate pattern, dimension, and profile
based on reference reach conditions;
• Add in -stream structures and bank stabilization measures to protect restored and enhanced
streams;
• Install habitat features such as brush toes, constructed riffles, woody materials, and pools of
varying depths to restored and enhanced streams;
• Reduce bank height ratios and increase entrenchment ratios to reference reach conditions;
• Increase forested riparian buffers to at least 50 feet on both sides of the channel along the
project reaches with a hardwood riparian plant community;
• Treat exotic invasive species;
• Establish a permanent conservation easement on the Project that will exclude future livestock
from stream channels and their associated buffers.
Anticipated functional uplift, benefits, and improvements within the Project area, as based on the
Function Based Framework are outlined in Table 9.
Limitations to achieving these watershed goals arise by remaining constrained to the project boundaries.
While we are restoring the habitat and streams to stable and effective conditions that achieve our goals
within the Project parcels, we are unable to influence the effect of poor riparian buffers and livestock
impact in other areas within the watershed. However, the overall watershed functionality and health
will improve to meet the RBRP goals.
Best Management Practices (BMPs)
A suite of agricultural BMPs will be utilized for the Project to reduce direct effluent inputs, pollutant
contamination, and sediment loading. The combination of the following agricultural BMPs: riparian
buffer planting, bank stabilization, stream restoration, livestock exclusion, livestock watering facilities,
and pipeline, will ultimately lead to the functional uplift of the site, while still allowing livestock
production to persist through the installation of alternative water sources.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 22 June 2019

The riparian buffer will be restored along all project reaches, except some of the enhancement reaches
and preservation reach. Restored riparian buffers are established adjacent to and up -gradient from
watercourses of water bodies to improve water quality. The main advantages of the restored riparian
buffer will be to provide water quality treatment, erosion control, and water temperature benefits.
Moreover, there will be significant reductions in sedimentation, nutrient input, and fecal coliform input.
Approximately 12,00 linear feet of livestock exclusion fencing will be installed along the easement
boundary; therefore, livestock will no longer have stream access. The type of exclusion fence installed
will be based on landowner preference. The main advantages of exclusion fence are that there will be
significant reductions in sediment, nutrients, and fecal coliform. To account for eliminating livestock
water access, landowners will be provided an alternate water source. Three new wells will be installed,
and up to 12 watering facilities will be installed, along with the associated pipeline to supply high
quality drinking water to livestock.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 23 June 2019

Table 9. Functional Benefits and Improvements
Not Measured (NM); Not Functioning (NF); Functioning -at -risk (FAR); Functioning (F)
° These categories are measured indirectly; *These categories are not quantifiably measured
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 24 June 2019
Existing
Level
Function
Goal
Functional
Rating/Projected
Objective
Measurement Method
Parameter
Rating
Reach
Channel -Forming
Discharge
Precipitation/Runoff
Relationship
Hydro
to transport water from
Flow Duration
Convert land -use of
Percent Project drainage
1
Transport of water from
the watershed to the
F/F
streams and their
headwaters from
area converted to
forest
the watershed to the
channel in anon -erosive
Flood Frequency
(All Reaches)
riparian
channel
manner
pasture to riparian
(indirect measurement)
Catchment
forest
Hydrology
Reach Runoff
Baseflow Alteration
F/F
(FF2)
Flood Bank
F/F
Cross sections
Hydraulic
to transport water in a
Connectivity
( FF1-B, FF3,
Improve flood bank
connectivity by
Crest gauges
Z
Transport of water in the
channel, on the floodplain,
stable non-erosive
Flow Dynamics
FF5)
reducing bank height
and through the sediments
manner
Groundwater/Surface
FAR/F
ratios and increase
entrenchment ratios
Bank Height Ratio
water exchange
(FF 1-A FF 1-C
Entrenchment Ratio
FF 1-E)
NF/F
(FF 1-D, FF4)
Sediment Transport
Large Woody Debris
F/F
(LWD) Transport
(FF2)
Reduce erosion rates
and Storage
and channel stability
As -built stream profile
to reference reach
Channel Evolution
F/F
conditions
Geomoruholo�v
to create a diverse
(17171-B, FF3,
Cross sections
Transport of wood and
bedform
Lateral Stability
FF5)
Improve bedform
3
sediment to create diverse
to achieve dynamic
diversity (pool
Visual monitoring
bedforms and dynamic
equilibrium
Riparian Vegetation
FAR/F
spacing, percent
equilibrium
(FF 1-A, FF1-C,
riffles, etc.)
Stream walks
Bedform Diversity
FF1-E)
Bed Material
Increase buffer width
Vegetation plots
NF/F
to 50 feet
Characterization
(FF 1-D, FF4)
Sinuosity
Unmeasured
Objectives
F/F
(FF2)
Improve stream
to achieve appropriate
Water Quality
temperature
Vegetation plots
Physiochemical a
levels for water
regulation through
(indirect measurement)
Temperature and oxygen
temperature, dissolved
Water Temperature
FAR/F
introduction of
4
regulation; processing of
oxygen concentration,
(FF1-B, FF3,
canopy
Established fencing and
organic matter and
and other important
Nutrient Load
FF5)
perpetual conservation
nutrients
nutrients including but
Decrease nutrient
easement
not limited to Nitrogen
Organic Carbon
NF/F
loading through
(indirect measurement)
and Phosphorus
(FF 1-A, FF1-C,
filtration of planted
Bacteria
FF 1-D, FF 1-E
riparian buffer, and
FF4)
removing livestock
from the riparian
areas
Microbial
Communities
F/F
(FF2)
Unmeasured
Macrophyte
Objective
to achieve functionality
Communities
Bio ogy
in levels 1-4 to support
FAR/F
Improve aquatic
Biodiversity and life
the life histories of
Benthic
(FF1-B, FF3,
habitat through the
histories of aquatic life
aquatic and riparian
Macroinvertebrate
FF5)
installation of habitat
Vegetation plots
histories and riparian life
plants and animals
Communities
features, construction
(indirect measurement)
NF/F
of pools at varying
Fish Communities
(FF 1-A, FF1-C,
depths, and planting
FF1-D, FF1-E,
the riparian buffer
Landscape
FF4)
Connectivity
Not Measured (NM); Not Functioning (NF); Functioning -at -risk (FAR); Functioning (F)
° These categories are measured indirectly; *These categories are not quantifiably measured
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 24 June 2019

6 MITIGATION WORK PLAN
6.1 Reference Stream
The restoration portions of the Project are characterized by livestock practices. Portions of the Project
were historically diverted to form poorly -functioning stream channels. Physical parameters of the
Project were used, as well as other reference materials, to determine the target stream type. The
"Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina" was also used to narrow the potential
community types that would have existed at the Project (Schafale, 2012). An iterative process was used
to develop the final information for the Project design.
Targeted reference conditions included the following:
• Located within the Physiographic Region and ecoregion,
• Similar watershed size,
• Similar land use on site and in the watershed,
• Similar soil types on site and in the watershed,
• Ideal, undisturbed habitat — several types of woody debris present,
• Similar topography,
• Similar slope,
• Pattern common among Piedmont streams, and
• Minimal presence of invasive species.
Obtaining property owner information and owner authorization for access was another factor in locating
suitable reference sites for the Project. There was no predetermined amount of reference sites needed
as long as the site was suitable and met the parameters. Many streams in this watershed are impacted
by cattle and agricultural practices, having a minimal riparian buffer, making it difficult to find an ideal
reference for the Project site. Parts of reference stream parameters for the site proves to be ideal in both
geomorphology and habitat is located just upstream of the preservation Reach FF2 as well as off-site
reference reaches UT to Mill Creek and UT to Grassy Creek.
Reference Watershed Characterization
The first reference reach, UT to Mill Creek, is also located within the Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin.
This reach is 225 feet in length, with a drainage area of 1.44 square miles (921 acres). The land use is
characterized by mostly forest (64%), herbaceous/shrub (27%), and a small amount of cultivated land.
The second reference reach, UT to Grassy Creek, is also located within the Yadkin Pee -Dee River
Basin. This reach is 318 feet in length, with a drainage area of 0.67 square miles (426 acres). The land
use is characterized by mostly agricultural, with mixed pines and hardwoods, and a small amount of
residential
Reference Discharge
Several hydrologic models/methods were used to develop a bankf ill discharge for each reference reach.
Existing drainage area, land use, slope, roughness, and cross-sectional area were all factors considered
when performing the calculations. Using a combination of regional curves, in-house spreadsheet tools,
and a project specific regional flood frequency analysis, the existing bankfull discharge for the
references reaches was estimated at 113-122 cubic feet per second (ft3/s) and 50 cubic feet per second
for UT to Mill Creek and UT to Grassy Creek respectively. See Section 6.2 for a more detailed
description of the hydrologic analyses performed for this project.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 25 June 2019

Reference Channel Morphology
In comparison to the restoration reaches, both the onsite reference reach and the UT to Mill Creek and
UT to Grassy Creek reaches are similar is basin size and basin characteristics. When comparing pattern,
dimension and profile, dimensionless ratios were computed for proper scaling to the design based on
on-site verified bankfull widths. The designed reach would then have the necessary dimensions of either
a smaller or larger stream corresponding to differences in drainage area (Chart 2). The onsite reference
reach for FF4-B was typically 12-14 feet wide and 1.5 feet deep. The cross-sectional area was typically
around 15.6 square feet with a width to depth ratio around 9.0. For Reach FF 1-D, the reach was typically
12-16 feet wide and 2.3 feet deep. The cross-sectional area was typically around 27-34 square feet with
a width to depth ratio around 8.0. For Reach FF5 the Channel Slope (S) versus Pool to Pool Spacing to
Bankfull Riffle Width (Ps/Wbkf) was used for the step pool system.
Channel Slope (S) versus Pool to Pool Spacing to Bankfull Riffle Width (PI/ Wbkf)
4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Channel Slope (%)
Chart 2. Channel Slope and Pool to Pool Spacing Comparison
Reference Bankfull Verification
Typical indicators of bankfull include vegetation at the bankfull elevation, scour lines, wrack lines,
vegetation lines, benches/inner berm, and point bars. Typical cross-sections for all reaches within the
Project were collected and analyzed for bankf ill area, width, depth and discharge. The cross-sections
were plotted against the Piedmont Regional Curves for verification and analysis along with the
hydrologic analysis. Evidence that can further support the location of bankfull is the lack of any bench
or berm features within the channel, and wrack lines present within the floodplain. Based on the
analysis, the data collected lined up with in the 95% confidence interval for the cross-sectional area
further lowering the uncertainty in the proposed design bankfull area.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 26 June 2019
P51 Wbkf = 8.2513S-0.9799
R2 = 0.9226
GMC
- B5 Step
Y=9.3x-1.08
R' = 0.89
-Pools
4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Channel Slope (%)
Chart 2. Channel Slope and Pool to Pool Spacing Comparison
Reference Bankfull Verification
Typical indicators of bankfull include vegetation at the bankfull elevation, scour lines, wrack lines,
vegetation lines, benches/inner berm, and point bars. Typical cross-sections for all reaches within the
Project were collected and analyzed for bankf ill area, width, depth and discharge. The cross-sections
were plotted against the Piedmont Regional Curves for verification and analysis along with the
hydrologic analysis. Evidence that can further support the location of bankfull is the lack of any bench
or berm features within the channel, and wrack lines present within the floodplain. Based on the
analysis, the data collected lined up with in the 95% confidence interval for the cross-sectional area
further lowering the uncertainty in the proposed design bankfull area.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 26 June 2019

1000
100
LL
Q
W
ry
Q 10
NC Piedmont y = 21.433x06761
R = 0.9491
Qo NCSU Piedmont Publised Data Qo RES Green Mesa Collected Data
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
DRAINAGE AREA (M12)
Chart 3. Bankfull Verification
Reference Riparian Vegetation
The reference reach riparian community is characteristic of a Piedmont Alluvial Forest community
(Schafale, 2012). On June 21, 2018 one 100m2 plot was surveyed along Reach FF2, to categorize the
existing vegetation community. Forested riparian areas along the reference reach have not been heavily
disturbed and remain relatively intact. Project vegetation included tulip -poplar (Liriodendron
tulipifera), white oak, sourwood, red maple, American holly, black tupelo, American beech, pignut
hickory, flowering dogwood, eastern red cedar, black walnut, American sycamore, and black cherry.
The average basal area was approximately 4.77m2 per hectare, and the average stems per -acre was 202
stems/ac. There was a high species diversity in the herbaceous stratum, including: Christmas fern,
Virginia creeper, little heartleaf, wild yam, American hog peanut, common blue violet, sessileleaf
bellwort, yellow star grass, white lettuce, New York fern, devil's grandmother, strawberry bush, spear
leaved violet, frostweed, long leaved bluet, Cinquefoil, ebony spleenwort, white snake root, jewelweed.
Some invasive species we present at the reference reach, most notably Chinese privet and Japanese
honeysuckle.
It is anticipated that a local seed source for high dispersal species is present upstream at the Project and
will disperse across much of the Project area. These species are often found in early successional
communities and quickly fill disturbance gaps. Because many of these high dispersal species often
become aggressive in these sites, they are not included in the Restoration Planting List (Section 6.3).
Hardwood species typical of the target community were observed in adjacent and nearby communities
and were judged to be more appropriate for this site.
6.2 Design Parameters
Stream Restoration Approach
Stream restoration efforts along the tributaries of the Project will be accomplished through analyses of
geomorphic conditions and watershed characteristics. The design approach applies a combination of
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 27 June 2019

analytical and reference reach -based design methods that meet objectives commensurate with both
ecological and geomorphic improvements. Proposed treatment activities may range from minor bank
grading and planting to re-establishing stable planform and hydraulic geometry. For reaches requiring
full restoration, natural design concepts have been applied and verified through rigorous engineering
analyses and modeling. The objective of this approach is to design a geomorphically stable channel that
provides habitat improvements and ties into the existing landscape.
The Project will include priorities I and II stream restoration, enhancement I, enhancement 1I,
enhancement III, and preservation. Stream restoration will incorporate the design of a single -thread
meandering channel, with parameters based on data taken from reference sites, published empirical
relationships, regional curves developed from existing project streams, and NC Regional Curves.
Analytical design techniques will also be a crucial element of the project and will be used to determine
the design discharge and to verify the design as a whole. A conceptual plan view is provided in Figure
10.
Current stream conditions along the proposed restoration reaches exhibit habitat degradation as a result
of impacts from livestock and channelization performed to promote agricultural activities. Additionally,
the riparian buffer is in poor condition throughout the sections of FF4-13 and parts of FF1-D, where
much of it is devoid of trees or shrubs, and active pasture is present up to the edge of the existing
channel.
The Project design approach began with a thorough study of existing conditions, including the onsite
streams, valleys, and watershed. Design parameters, including active channel, habitat and floodplain
features were developed from analyses performed on the reference site data. Analytical design
techniques were used to determine the design discharge and to verify the design as a whole.
Geomorphic and habitat studies will be performed concurrently with the engineering analyses. While
stream design will be verified by simulations of hydrology and fluvial processes, analogs of desirable
habitat features will be derived from reference sites and integrated into the project design. Both in -
stream and riparian habitat features will be designed. In -stream structures will be used throughout the
project to act as grade control and for bank stabilization by dissipating and redirecting the stream's
energy. Bank stability may further be enhanced through the installation of brush mattresses, live stakes
and cuttings bundles.
Sections of abandoned stream channel will be backfilled with material excavated from on site to the
elevation of the floodplain in areas adjacent to the new channel, installing channel plugs where
necessary. The floodplain will be planted with native species creating a vegetated buffer, which will
provide numerous water quality and ecological benefits. Stream banks will be stabilized using a
combination of grading, erosion control matting, bare -root plantings, native material revetment
techniques (i.e., bioengineering) and structure placement. The stream and adjacent riparian areas will
be protected by a minimum 50 -foot conservation easement (where feasible) which will be fenced to
exclude livestock as needed.
The Project has been broken into the following design reaches:
Reach FF1-A - This reach begins on the southwest end of the project, flows east to FF1-B, and totals
993 linear feet of Enhancement II. Sparse woodland is located on the left bank, and actively managed
pasture lies just outside of the wood line. Enhancement activities will include improving habitat through
riparian buffer planting and livestock exclusion. While there are areas for spot stabilization, this is the
best approach based on the amount of bedrock in this reach. Moreover, this reach will have riparian
buffers wider than the 50 -foot minimum and up to 125 -feet in some places.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 28 June 2019

Reach FF1-B - This reach begins on the southwest end of the project from FF1-A, flows east to an
impoundment, and totals 922 linear feet of Enhancement III. Enhancement activities will include
improving habitat through supplemental planting, protection of fringe wetlands, livestock exclusion,
and beaver removal. Moreover, this reach will have riparian buffers wider than the 50 -foot minimum,
and up to 150 -feet in some places.
Reach FF1-C — This reach begins downstream of the impoundment that FF1-B flows into. This reach
flows north to FF1-D. This reach totals 694 linear feet of Enhancement II. This reach is broken up into
multiple sections due to the presence of a powerline easement and an existing agricultural crossing.
Actively managed pasture is located adjacent to the reach. Enhancement activities will include
improving habitat through buffer plantings and livestock exclusion fencing. Minimal bank grading and
buffer re-establishment is also proposed along this reach. There is a large stone wall intact on this reach
that will remain in place. The restoration of the riparian areas and buffers along this reach will filter
runoff from adjacent pasture, reduce sediment loads, and provide wildlife corridors throughout the
Project area.
Reach FF1-D - This reach begins on the north end of the project, just downstream of Baptist Church
Road and Reach FF4-B and totals 1,391 linear feet of Restoration. Actively managed pasture is located
adjacent to the reach. Restoration activities will include constructing a new channel within the natural
valley with appropriate dimensions and pattern and backfilling the abandoned channel. In -stream
structures such as constructed riffles, brush toes, boulder riffles, and j -hooks will be installed for
stability and to improve habitat. Habitat will further be improved through buffer plantings, livestock
exclusion, and invasive species treatment. Proposed buffer activities will improve riparian areas that
will filter runoff from adjacent pastures, thereby reducing nutrient and sediment loads to the channel.
There are four easement breaks along this reach to account for crossings associated with a Duke Power
transmission line and a telephone line. The riparian buffer will be less than the minimum 50 -feet due
in some locations due to the presence of the aforementioned utility lines and their rights-of-way.
However, there are also portions of the buffer that exceed the minimum 50 -feet and reach up to 125 -
feet in width in some areas.
Reach FFl-E - Reach FF1-E is 59 linear feet and is last segment of Reach FF1 on the Project. The
reach is comprised of 59 linear feet of Enhancement II. The left bank is pasture and the right bank is
wooded. This reach for the Project ends at the property boundary. Enhancement activities will include
improving habitat through riparian buffer planting and livestock exclusion.
Reach FF2 - This reach begins on the south end of the project, flows north to FF1-B. This reach totals
602 linear feet of Preservation. Dense woodland is located adjacent to the bedrock -controlled reach.
Preservation activities will include improving habitat through livestock exclusion fencing. The
livestock exclusion fencing will provide wildlife corridors throughout the Project area and will remove
livestock access to the riparian areas. Moreover, this reach will have riparian buffers wider than the 50 -
foot minimum, and up to 75 -feet in some places.
Reach FF3 - This reach begins on the south end of the project and flows north to the pond impoundment
on site. The totals 1,943 linear feet of Enhancement III. Enhancement activities will include improving
habitat through livestock exclusion, invasive species treatment, and supplemental buffer planting. The
downstream section of this reach will be enhancing wetland areas, but no credit for wetlands is being
claimed. The livestock exclusion fencing will provide wildlife corridors throughout the Project area
and will remove livestock access to the riparian areas. Moreover, this reach will have riparian buffers
wider than the 50 -foot minimum, up to 150 -feet in some places.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 29 June 2019

Reach FF4-A — This reach begins on the west end of the project, and flows southeast to FF4-B. This
reach totals 474 linear feet of Enhancement I. Actively managed pasture is present on both sides of the
reach. Enhancement activities will include improving habitat through livestock exclusion, buffer
plantings, and the installation of in -stream structures such as log sills and brush toes. Additional
enhancement activities will include constructing a floodplain bench along the right bank and laying
back the left bank at the upstream end of the reach. Moreover, this reach exceeds the 50 -foot minimum
buffer requirement on the left bank.
Reach FF4-13 - This reach begins on the west end of the project at a power line easement break just
downstream of reach FF4-A and flows east to Baptist Church Road. This reach totals 444 linear feet of
restoration and begins at the bedrock section. Actively managed pasture is present on both sides of the
reach. Restoration activities will include constructing a new channel within the natural valley with
appropriate dimensions pattern and backfilling the abandoned channel. Native bed material will be
harvested when possible. In -stream structures such as constructed riffles, brush toes, boulder riffles,
and j -hooks will be installed for stability and to improve habitat. Habitat will further be improved
through buffer plantings and livestock exclusion. Proposed buffer activities will improve riparian areas
that will filter runoff from adjacent pastures, thereby reducing nutrient and sediment loads to the
channel. Moreover, portions of this reach will have riparian buffers wider than the 50 -foot minimum,
up to 125 -feet in some places.
Reach FF5-A -This reach begins on the southeast end of the project and flows north to FF1-D. This
reach totals 1,586 linear feet of Enhancement 111. Woodland and actively managed pasture is located
adjacent to the reach. Enhancement activities will include improving habitat through livestock
exclusion, invasive species treatment, removal of approximately 90 percent of the black walnut stems,
and buffer planting in areas where black walnut has been removed. Planted stems along FF5 will be
black walnut tolerant; these species are indicated on the planting plan (K -State Research and Extension,
2015). Moreover, this reach will have riparian buffers wider than the 50 -foot minimum.
Reach FF5-B- This reach begins on the southeast end of the project and flows north to FF1-D. This
reach totals 56 linear feet of Restoration that ties into FF1-D. Woodland and actively managed pasture
is located adjacent to the reach. Restoration activities will include constructing a new channel within
the natural valley with appropriate dimensions pattern and backfilling the abandoned channel. Habitat
will further be improved through buffer plantings and livestock exclusion. Proposed buffer activities
will improve riparian areas that will filter runoff from adjacent pastures, thereby reducing nutrient and
sediment loads to the channel.
Design Methods
There are three primary methods that have demonstrated success in stream restoration: analog,
empirical, and analytical. All three methods have advantages and limitations, and it is often best to
utilize more than one method to address site-specific conditions or to verify the applicability of design
elements. This is particularly true in developed watersheds where existing conditions do not always
reflect current inputs and events, and sediment and hydrologic inputs may remain unstable for some
time. Combinations of analytical, empirical, and analog methods were used to develop the stream
designs for the Project.
Analytical Approach
Analytical design is based on principles and processes considered universal to all streams and can entail
many traditional engineering techniques. The analytical approach utilizes continuity, roughness
equations, hydrologic and hydraulic models, and sediment transport functions to derive equilibrium
conditions. Because the Project is located within a rural watershed, restoration designs are based on
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 30 June 2019

hydrologic and hydraulic analyses, including rainfall -runoff models to determine design discharges
coupled with reference reach techniques.
Analog Approach
The analog method of natural channel design involves the use of a "template" or reference stream
located near the design reach and is particularly useful when watershed and boundary conditions are
similar between the design and analog reaches (Skidmore et al., 2001). In an analog approach, the
pattern, dimension, and profile are used to inform design parameters for the subject stream.
Empirical Approach
Empirical design is based on regional mathematical relationships among measured channel variables.
The flood frequency analysis and regional curve evaluation described above are examples of empirical
design methods to select a range of channel forming discharges for a given watershed area.
Typical Design Sections
Typical cross sections for riffles and pools are shown on the design plan sheets in Appendix A. The
cross-section dimensions were developed for the three design reaches by using an in-house spreadsheet
described in Section 6.2 of this report. The cross sections were altered slightly to facilitate
constructability; however, the cross-sectional area, width to depth ratio, and side slopes were preserved.
Typical pool sections include pools located on straight reaches and pools on meander bends.
Meander Pattern
The design plans showing the proposed channel alignment are provided in Appendix A. The meander
pattern was derived directly from the analog reach and was altered in some locations to provide
variability in pattern, to avoid on site constraints, to follow the valley pattern, and to make the channel
more constructible. The morphologic parameters summarized in the Appendix B were applied
wherever these deviations occurred.
Longitudinal Profiles
The design profiles are presented in Appendix A. These profiles extend throughout the entire project
for the proposed channel alignment. The profiles were designed using the analog reach bed features as
a template for feature lengths and slopes. The bed slopes and bankfull energy gradients were determined
for each design reach based on the existing valley slope and the sinuosity of the design reach. Log and
rock structures will be utilized in the design to control grade, divert flows, and provide additional habitat
diversity and stability.
In -Stream Structures
Structures will be incorporated into the channel design to provide additional stability and improve
aquatic habitat. Native materials and vegetation will be used for revetments and grade control structures
where applicable. Additionally, log and rock structures will be utilized intermittently along all reaches
to provide increased stability and habitat. Typical rock structures that will protect the channel bed
and/or banks will include riffle grade controls and cross -vanes.
Woody debris will be placed throughout the channel at locations and at a frequency that is similar to
those observed in the analog reaches. Woody habitat features installed will include root wads, brush
toes, and log vanes. Other bank stability measures include the installation of coir matting along stream
banks, live stakes, log sills, and log toes. Typical details for proposed in -stream structures and
revetments are in Appendix A.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 31 June 2019

Data Analysis
Design Discharge
Based upon the hydrologic analyses described below, design discharges were selected that fall between
model results for the 1.1 -year and 1.5 -year flood frequency analysis for each reach. The selected flows
for the restoration reach FF4-B is 50 ft3/s, 15 ft3/s for FF5-B and 125 ft3/s for FF 1-D. These discharges
will provide frequent inundation of the adjacent floodplain.
The design discharges were selected based on the following rationale:
• The calculated bankfull discharge for the analog/reference reach and existing reaches fall
between the results of the 1.1 -year and 1.5 -year flood frequency analysis,
• The results of the 1.1 -year flood frequency analysis are slightly higher than the NC regional
curve (Doll et al., 2002), and
• Selecting design discharges slightly higher than the 1.1 -year storm events allows frequent
inundation of the adjacent floodplain.
Stream Hydrologic Analysis
Hydrologic evaluations were performed for the design reaches using multiple methods to determine
and validate the design bankfull discharge and channel geometry required to provide regular floodplain
inundation. The use of various methods allows for comparison of results and eliminates reliance on a
single model. Peak flows (Table 10) and corresponding channel cross sectional areas were determined
for comparison to design parameters using the following methods:
Regional Flood Frequency Analysis,
NC and VA Regional Curves for the Rural Piedmont, and
USGS regional regression equations for rural conditions in the Blue Ridge -Piedmont.
Regional Flood Frequency Anal
A flood frequency analysis was completed for the study region using historic gauge data on all nearby
USGS gauges with drainage areas less than 6,400 acres (10 mit) which passed the Dalrymple
homogeneity test (Dalrymple, 1960). This is a subset of gauges used for USGS regression equations.
Regional flood frequency equations were developed for the 1.1-, 1.5-, and 2 -year peak discharges based
on the gauge data. Discharges were then computed for the design reach. These discharges were
compared to those predicted by the discharge regional curve and USGS regional regression 2 -year
discharge equations.
Regional Curve Regression Equations
The North Carolina Piedmont regional curves by Harman et al. (1999) and Doll et al. (2002) and the
Virginia Rural Piedmont regional curves by Lotspeich (2009) for discharge were used to predict the
bankf ill discharge for the Project. The NC regional curves predicted flows that are similar to those
predicted by the 1.1 -year flood frequency, while the VA curves are comparable to flows predicted by
the 1.5 -year flood frequency equation. The regional curve equations for NC discharges by Doll et al.
(2002):
(1) QbkI=89.04*(DA)0-73 (Harman et al., 1999)
(2) Qbk:1=91.62*(DA)0_71 (Doll et al., 2002)
(3) Qbk 43.895*(DA)0.9472 (Lotspeich, 2009)
Where Qbkf=bankfull discharge (ft3/s) and DA=drainage area (mi2)
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 32 June 2019

USGS Regional Regression Equations
USGS regression equations estimate the magnitude and frequency of flood -peak discharges. The
regression equations were developed from gauge data in different physiographic regions of the
Southeastern United States. For this analysis, there was only concern for the 2 -year return interval. The
equation for the rural Piedmont/Foothills (Hydrologic Region 1) (4) is:
(4) Q2=158*(DA)0.649
Table 10. Peak Flow Comparison
Drainage
Reach
FFQ
FFQ
NC Regional
NC Regional
VA Regional
Regional
Regression
Design/
Calculated
Area(Ac)
( )
Qi.i
Qis
Curve Q (1)
Curve Q (2)
Curve Q (3)
Eqns. Q2 (4)
Q
FF4-B 242
49
77
44
46
17
84
50
F175-13 35
17
25
11
12
3
24
15
FF1-D 1010
108
174
124
124
68
212
125
Sediment Transport Analysis
An erosion and sedimentation analysis was performed to confirm that the restoration design creates a
stable gravel bed channel that neither aggrades nor degrades over time. Typically, sediment transport
is assessed to determine a stream's ability to move a specific grain size at specified flows. Various
sediment transport equations are applied when estimating entrainment for sand and gravel bed streams
found in the piedmont. The US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) report, Stability Thresholds for
Stream Restoration Materials (Fochenich, 2001), was used to obtain permissible shear stresses and
velocities. Data found in this document was obtained from multiple sources using different testing
conditions. The following methods and published documents were utilized during the sediment
transport analysis:
• Permissible Shear Stress Approach, and
• Permissible Velocity Approach.
Shear Stress Approach
Shear stress is a commonly used tool for assessing channel stability. Allowable channel shear stresses
are a function of bed slope, channel shape, flows, bed material (shape, size, and gradation),
cohesiveness of bank materials, vegetative cover, and incoming sediment load. The shear stress
approach compares calculated shear stresses to those found in the literature. Shear stress is the force
exerted on a boundary during the resistance of motion as calculated using the following formula:
(1) r = yRS
i = shear stress (lb/ft)
7 = specific gravity of water (62.4 lb/ft')
R = hydraulic radius (ft)
S = average channel slope (ft/ft)
Table 11. Comparison of Allowable and Proposed Shear Stresses
Allowable Shear Stress'
Reach proposed Shear Stress at Critical Shear Stress
Bankfull Stage Obs/ft) (lbs/ft) Coarse Gravel
(lbs/ft)
FF4-B 0.74
>0.54 0.33 to 0.67
Cobble Vegetation
(lbs/ft2) (lbs/ft)
0.67 to 2.0 0.7 to 0.1.7
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 33 June 2019

FF5-B 1.32 >0.54 0.33 to 0.67 0.67 to 2.0 0.7 to 0.1.7
FF1-D 0.58 >0.54 0.33 to 0.67 0.67 to 2.0 0.7 to 0.1.7
'(Fischenich, 2001)
Review of the above table shows that the proposed shear stresses for the Project design reaches fall
between the critical shear stress (shear stress required to initiate motion) and the allowable limits.
Therefore, the proposed channel should remain stable.
VelocityApproach
Published data are readily available that provide entrainment velocities for different bed and bank
materials. A comparison of calculated velocities to these permissible velocities is a simple method to
aid in the verification of channel stability. Table 12 compares the proposed velocities calculated using
Manning's equation with the permissible velocities.
Table 12. Comparison of Allowable and Proposed Velocities
'(Fischenich, 2001
Sediment Supply
In addition to the stability assessment, a qualitative analysis of sediment supply was performed by
characterizing watershed conditions. A combination of field reconnaissance and windshield surveys,
existing land use data, and historical aerial photography were analyzed to assess existing and past
watershed conditions to determine if any changes occurred that would significantly impact sediment
supply. As discussed in Section 3.3, the land use throughout the site has changed little over the past 60
years, with much of the project area being used primarily for agricultural purposes. Much of the forested
areas are located within the southern portions of the project reaches. Land use has remained relatively
constant within this rural watershed, and significant land disturbing activities are not anticipated for the
future.
Observations and assessments of these reaches upstream and/or in the preservation reaches show little
signs of aggradation (deposition) or degradation, and that the streams appear physically stable. This
indicates the reaches are able to effectively transport the sediment supplied by their respective
watersheds. There are several localized areas of instability and erosion along the channels, which appear
to be a result of livestock activity and agricultural activities occurring up to and along channel banks
and not from watershed activities. It is anticipated that sediment supply from agricultural land adjacent
to the project will decrease as buffers are enhanced and widened, and flow from existing agricultural
ditches will be diffused before entering the proposed channel.
Since little deposition or degradation (scour) was observed along the restoration reaches, it appears that
the channels are able to effectively move the sediment supplied from the surrounding watershed.
Because observed areas of degradation can be attributed to farming practices adjacent to the channel
and not watershed activities, a threshold channel design approach was used. This approach assumes
minimal movement (vertical or lateral migration) of the channel boundary during design flow
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 34 June 2019
Manning's "n"
Design Velocity
Permissible Velocity'
Reach
Value
(ft/s)
Bed Material
(ft/sec)
17174-13
0.04
2.9-3.2
Coarse gravel to cobble
2.5 -7.5
17175-13
0.04
3.8-4.7
Coarse gravel to cobble
2.5 -7.5
FF1-D
0.04
2.7-3.0
Coarse gravel to cobble
2.5 -7.5
'(Fischenich, 2001
Sediment Supply
In addition to the stability assessment, a qualitative analysis of sediment supply was performed by
characterizing watershed conditions. A combination of field reconnaissance and windshield surveys,
existing land use data, and historical aerial photography were analyzed to assess existing and past
watershed conditions to determine if any changes occurred that would significantly impact sediment
supply. As discussed in Section 3.3, the land use throughout the site has changed little over the past 60
years, with much of the project area being used primarily for agricultural purposes. Much of the forested
areas are located within the southern portions of the project reaches. Land use has remained relatively
constant within this rural watershed, and significant land disturbing activities are not anticipated for the
future.
Observations and assessments of these reaches upstream and/or in the preservation reaches show little
signs of aggradation (deposition) or degradation, and that the streams appear physically stable. This
indicates the reaches are able to effectively transport the sediment supplied by their respective
watersheds. There are several localized areas of instability and erosion along the channels, which appear
to be a result of livestock activity and agricultural activities occurring up to and along channel banks
and not from watershed activities. It is anticipated that sediment supply from agricultural land adjacent
to the project will decrease as buffers are enhanced and widened, and flow from existing agricultural
ditches will be diffused before entering the proposed channel.
Since little deposition or degradation (scour) was observed along the restoration reaches, it appears that
the channels are able to effectively move the sediment supplied from the surrounding watershed.
Because observed areas of degradation can be attributed to farming practices adjacent to the channel
and not watershed activities, a threshold channel design approach was used. This approach assumes
minimal movement (vertical or lateral migration) of the channel boundary during design flow
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 34 June 2019

conditions, and that the channel is not sensitive to sediment supply. Additionally, grade controls have
been integrated throughout the design to provide vertical stability in the event scour should occur.
6.3 Vegetation and Planting Plan
Plant Community Restoration
The restoration of the plant communities is an important aspect of the restoration project. The selection
of plant species is based on what was observed at the reference reach, species present in the forest
surrounding the restoration site, and what is typically native to the area. Several sources of information
were used to determine the most appropriate species for the restoration project. The reference stream is
located within an intact Piedmont Headwater Stream Forest community. Dominant tree species
included tulip -poplar, white oak, sourwood, red maple, American holly, black tupelo, American beech,
pignut hickory, flowering dogwood, eastern red cedar, black walnut, American sycamore, and black
cheery. The reference site was chosen due to the stability of the channel, the physical structure of the
forest community, and to evaluate stream habitat.
A Piedmont Alluvial Forest will be the target community along all project reaches and will be
established to include a diverse mix of species. These target communities will be used for the planting
areas within the project, shown in Appendix A. The plant species list has been developed and can be
found in Table 13. Specifically, along FF5 species targeted for planting will be black walnut tolerant
(K -State Research and Extension, 2015). Species with high dispersal rates are not included because of
local occurrence, adjacent seed sources, and the high potential for natural regeneration. The high
dispersal species include red maple, tulip poplar, and sweetgum.
The restoration of plant communities along the Project will provide stabilization and diversity. For
rapid stabilization of the stream banks (primarily outside meanders), silky dogwood (Cornus amomum)
and black willow (Salix nigra) were chosen for live stakes along the restored channel because of their
rapid growth patterns and high success rates. Willows grow at a faster rate than the species planted
around them, and they stabilize the stream banks. Willows will also be quicker to contribute organic
matter to the channel. When the other species are bigger, the black willows will slowly stop growing
or die out because the other species would outgrow them and create shade that the willows do not
tolerate. The live stake species will be planted along the outside of the meander bends three feet from
the top of bank, creating a three-foot section along the top of bank. The live stakes will be spaced one
per linear foot with alternate spacing vertically.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 35 June 2019

Table 13. Proposed Plant List
Bare Root Planting Tree Species
Species
Common Name
Spacing (ft)
Unit Type
% of Total
Species
Composition
Quercus nigra
Water Oak
9X6
Bare Root
15
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
9X6
Bare Root
15
Betula nigra*
River birch
9X6
Bare Root
15
Platanus occidentalis*
American
Sycamore
9X6
Bare Root
10
Quercus rubra*
Northern Red Oak
9X6
Bare Root
10
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
9X6
Bare Root
10
Liriodendron tulipifera*
Yellow Poplar
9X6
Bare Root
10
Diospyros virginiana*
Persimmon
9X6
Bare Root
5
Sambucus canadensis
Elderberry
9X6
Bare Root
5
Nyssa biflora
Black Gum
9X6
Bare Root
5
* Indicates black willow tolerant species. These species will be targeted for planting along reach FFS
Live Staking and Live Cuttings Bundle Tree Species
Species Common Name % of Total Species Composition
Salix nigra Black willow 60
Cornus ammonium Silky dogwood 40
On Site Invasive Species Management
Treatment for invasive species will be required within all grading limits associated with stream
restoration. Invasive species will require different and multiple treatment methods, depending on plant
phenology and the location of the species being treated (Appendix G). All treatment will be conducted
as to maximize its effectiveness and reduce chances of detriment to surrounding native vegetation.
Treatment methods will include mechanical (cutting with loppers, clippers, or chain saw) and chemical
(foliar spray, cut stump, and hack and squirt techniques). Plants containing mature, viable seeds will be
removed from the Project and properly disposed. All herbicide applicators will be supervised by a
certified ground pesticide applicator with a North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer
Services (NCDA&CS) license and adhere to all legal and safety requirements according to herbicide
labels, and NC and Federal laws. Management records will be kept on the plant species treated, type of
treatment employed, type of herbicide used, application technique, and herbicide concentration and
quantities used. These records will be included in all reporting documents.
Soil Restoration
After construction activities, the subsoil will be scarified, and any compaction will be deep tilled before
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 36 June 2019

the topsoil is placed back over the Project. Any topsoil that is removed during construction will be
stockpiled and placed over the Project during final soil preparation. This process should provide
favorable soil conditions for plant growth. Rapid establishment of vegetation will provide natural
stabilization for the Project.
6.4 Mitigation Summary
Natural channel design techniques have been used to develop the restoration designs described in this
document. The combination of the analog and analytical design methods was determined to be
appropriate for this Project because the watershed is rural, the causes of disturbance are known and
have been abated, and there are minimal infrastructure constraints. The original design parameters were
developed from the measured analog/reference reach data and applied to the subject stream. The
parameters were then analyzed and adjusted through an iterative process using analytical tools and
numerical simulations of fluvial processes. The designs presented in this report provide for the
restoration of natural Piedmont gravel -bed channel features and stream bed diversity to improve benthic
habitat. The proposed design will allow flows that exceed the design bankfull stage to spread out over
the floodplain, restoring a portion of the hydrology for the existing wetlands.
A large portion of the existing stream will be filled using material excavated from the restoration
channel. However, many segments will be left partially filled to provide habitat diversity and flood
storage. Native woody material will be installed throughout the restored reach to reduce bank stress,
provide grade control, and increase habitat diversity.
Forested riparian buffers of at least 50 feet on both sides (when feasible) of the channel will be
established along the Project reach. An appropriate riparian plant community (Piedmont Alluvial
Forest) will be established to include a diverse mix of species. within the Project. The plant species list
has been developed and can be found in Table 13. Replanting of native species will occur where the
existing buffer is impacted during construction.
Due to the nature of the project, complete avoidance of stream and wetland impacts is not possible.
Proposed stream impacts, including stream relocation and culverts, will be replaced on site. Wetland
impacts associated with restoration and enhancement efforts will only temporarily impact wetlands and
will provide an overall increase in wetland function with the addition of native trees and shrubs along
the stream banks, and restored hydrology. All stream impacts will be accounted for in the Pre -
Construction Notification (PCN) form.
6.5 Determination of Credits
Mitigation credits presented in Table 14 are projections based upon site design (Figure 10). Upon
completion of site construction, the project components and credits data will only be revised to be
consistent with the as -built condition if there is a large discrepancy and with an approved mitigation
plan addendum. This will be approved by the USACE.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 37 June 2019

Table 14. Mitigation Credits
*SMUs are adjusted in accordance with Section XI(C)- "Wilmington District Stream Buffer Credit Calculator", supplied
to Providers in the January 2018, from the USACE. A detailed description of the methodology and calculations is
described below and in Figure(s) 11.
6.6 Credit Calculations for Non -Standard Buffer Widths
Buffer measurements for additional credit were made horizontally, beginning from the edge of the
wetted perimeter and extending to easement boundary. Due to the minimum required widths, additional
credit was not generated until a stream is at least 50 feet inside the edge of the buffer. Table 15 describes
the adjustments in stream credit based on buffer widths. Areas within the project that are being used to
generate additional credit are solely being used for the generation of stream mitigation credits and will
not be used for the generation of any other credit type (i.e., the same square foot of buffer cannot be
used to generate wetland credit, nutrient offset credits or state buffer credits).
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 38 June 2019
The Green Mesa Site Mitigation Credits
Mitigation
Credits
Warm Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non -Riparian Wetland
Totals
3,352
NA
NA
Reach
Mitigation Type
Proposed Stationing
Existing
Length
(LF)
Proposed
Length
(LF)
Mitigati
on Ratio
SMUs
FFI-A
Enhancement II
1+54
to
11+47
993
993
2.5:1
397
F171-13
Enhancement III
11+47
to
20+69
922
922
5.0:1
184
FF1-C
Enhancement lI (3)
0+50
to
3+78
328
328
3.0:1
109
Enhancement II (3)
4+21
to
6+88
267
267
3.0:1
89
Enhancement II (3)
7+29
to
8+28
99
99
3.0:1
33
FF2
Preservation
1+29
to
7+31
602
602
10.0:1
60
FF3
Enhancement III (7.5)
0+44
to
12+23
1,179
1,179
7.5:1
157
Enhancement III (7.5)
12+80
to
20+44
764
764
7.5:1
102
FF4-A
Enhancement I
0+53
to
5+27
474
474
1.5:1
316
17174-13
Restoration
6+59
to
11+03
375
444
LOA
444
FFI-D
Restoration
12+04
to
13+47
147
143
1.0:1
143
Restoration
14+20
to
18+20
416
400
LOA
400
Restoration
18+56
to
21+54
331
298
1.0:1
298
Restoration
22+27
to
27+77
558
550
1.0:1
550
FFI-E
Enhancement II
28+54
to
29+13
59
59
2.5:1
24
17175-A
Enhancement III (7.5)
0+65
to
14+83
1,418
1,418
7.5:1
189
Enhancement III (7.5)
15+60
to
17+28
168
168
7.5:1
22
17175-13
Restoration
17+61
to
18+17
45
56
1.0:1
56
Total
9,145
9,164
3,573
Credit Loss in Required Buffer *
-404
Credit Gain for Additional Buffer *
183
Total Adjusted SMUs
3,352
*SMUs are adjusted in accordance with Section XI(C)- "Wilmington District Stream Buffer Credit Calculator", supplied
to Providers in the January 2018, from the USACE. A detailed description of the methodology and calculations is
described below and in Figure(s) 11.
6.6 Credit Calculations for Non -Standard Buffer Widths
Buffer measurements for additional credit were made horizontally, beginning from the edge of the
wetted perimeter and extending to easement boundary. Due to the minimum required widths, additional
credit was not generated until a stream is at least 50 feet inside the edge of the buffer. Table 15 describes
the adjustments in stream credit based on buffer widths. Areas within the project that are being used to
generate additional credit are solely being used for the generation of stream mitigation credits and will
not be used for the generation of any other credit type (i.e., the same square foot of buffer cannot be
used to generate wetland credit, nutrient offset credits or state buffer credits).
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 38 June 2019

Table 15. Stream Mitigation Credit Adjustments for Non-standard Buffer Widths
Mountain Counties
Piedmont and Coastal Plain Counties
Buffer Width
Adjustment to
Stream Credit
Buffer Width
Adjustment to Stream
Credit
Less than 15 feet
-100%
Less than 15 feet
-100%
15 to < 20 feet
-50%
15 to < 20 feet
-50%
20 to < 25 feet
-30%
20 to < 25 feet
-40%
25 to < 30 feet
-15%
25 to < 30 feet
-30%
30 to < 50 feet
0%
30 to <35 feet
-20%
50 to < 75 feet
9%
35 to < 40 feet
-15%
75 to < 100 feet
16%
40 to < 45 feet
-10%
100 to < 125 feet
22%
45 to < 50 feet
-5%
125 to < 150 feet
27%
50 to < 75 feet
0%
150 feet or Greater
30%
75 to < 100 feet
7%
100 to < 125 feet
12%
125 to < 150 feet
160o
150 feet or greater
20%
In order to calculate credit adjustments, the Wilmington District Stream Buffer Credit Calculator from
the USACE in January 2018 was utilized. To perform this calculation GIS analysis was performed to
determine the area (in square feet) of ideal buffer zones and actual buffer zones around all streams
within the project. Minimum standard buffer widths are measured from the top of bank (50 feet in
Piedmont and Coastal Plain counties or 30 feet in mountain counties) and do not generate additional
credit. The ideal buffers are the maximum potential size (in square feet) of each buffer zone measured
around all creditable stream reaches, calculated using GIS, including areas outside of the easement. The
actual buffer is the square feet in each buffer zone, as measured by GIS, excluding non -forested areas,
all other credit type (e.g., wetland, nutrient offset, buffer), easement exceptions, open water, areas
failing to meet the vegetation performance standard, etc. Additional credit is given to 150 feet in buffer
width, so areas within the easement that are more than 150 feet from creditable streams should were
not included in this measurement. Non -creditable stream reaches within the easement are removed prior
to calculating this area with GIS (for both ideal and actual). The stream lengths, mitigation type, ideal
buffer, and actual buffer are all entered into the calculator. This is data is processed, and the resulting
credit amounts are totaled for the whole project (Table 14, Figure 11, Appendix B).
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 39 June 2019

7 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The success criteria for the Project will follow accepted and approved success criteria presented in the
2016 USACE Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update and
subsequent agency guidance. Specific success criteria components are presented below.
7.1 Stream Restoration Success Criteria
Bankfull Events
Four bankfull flow events must be documented within the seven-year monitoring period. The bankfull
events must occur in separate years. Otherwise, the stream monitoring will continue until four bankfull
events have been documented in separate years. Crest gauges will be installed FF1-D and FF4-B
(Figure 12).
Cross Sections
There should be little change in as -built cross sections. If changes do take place, they should be
evaluated to determine if they represent a movement toward a less stable condition (for example down -
cutting or erosion) or are minor changes that represent an increase in stability (for example settling,
vegetative changes, deposition along the banks, or decrease in width/depth ratio). Cross sections shall
be classified using the Rosgen stream classification method, and all monitored cross sections should
fall within the quantitative parameters defined for channels of the design stream type. Bank height ratio
shall not exceed 1.2, and the Entrenchment Ratio (ER) shall be no less than 2.2 for all measured riffle
cross-sections on a given reach. Channel stability should be demonstrated through a minimum of four
bankfull events documented in the seven-year monitoring period (Table 16).
Digital Image Stations
Digital images will be used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or degradation, bank erosion,
success of riparian vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control measures. Longitudinal images
should not indicate the absence of developing bars within the channel or an excessive increase in
channel depth. Lateral images should not indicate excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the
banks over time. A series of images over time should indicate successional maturation of riparian
vegetation.
7.2 Vegetation Success Criteria
Specific and measurable success criteria for plant density within the riparian buffers on the Project
will follow IRT Guidance. The interim measures of vegetative success for the Project will be the
survival of at least 320 planted three-year old trees per acre at the end of Year 3, 260 trees per acre
with an average height of seven feet at the end of Year 5, and the final vegetative success criteria will
be 210 trees per acre with an average height of ten feet at the end of Year 7. Volunteer trees will be
counted, identified to species, and included in the yearly monitoring reports, but will not be counted
towards the success criteria of total planted stems. Moreover, any single species can only account for
up to 50 percent of the required number of stems within any vegetation plot. Any stems in excess of
50 percent will be shown in the monitoring table but will not be used to demonstrate success.
Supplemental planting transects will follow the same success criteria except the height requirement
and stems per acre will be total stems and not just planted stems.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 40 June 2019

8 MONITORING PLAN
Annual monitoring data will be reported using the NCIRT monitoring template. The monitoring report
shall provide a project data chronology that will facilitate an understanding of project status and trends,
research purposes, and assist in decision making regarding project close-out. Monitoring reports will
be prepared annually and submitted to the USACE. Monitoring of the Project will adhere to metrics
and performance standards established by the USACE's April 2003 Wilmington District Stream
Mitigation Guidelines and the NC IRT's October 2016 Wilmington District Stream and Wetland
Compensatory Mitigation Update. Table 16 outlines the links between project goals, objectives, and
treatments and their associated monitoring metrics and performance standards within the context of
functional uplift based on the Stream Functions Pyramid Framework. The monitoring plan is provided
in Figure 12.
8.1 As -Built Survey
An as -built survey will be conducted following construction to document channel size, condition, and
location. The survey will include a complete profile of thalweg, water surface, bankfull, and top of bank
to compare with future geomorphic data. Longitudinal profiles will not be required in annual
monitoring reports unless requested by USACE. Stream channel stationing will be marked with stakes
placed near the top of bank every 200 feet.
8.2 Visual Monitoring
Visual monitoring of all mitigation areas will be conducted a minimum of twice per monitoring year
by qualified individuals. The visual assessments will include vegetation density, vigor, invasive species,
and easement encroachments. Visual assessments of stream stability will include a complete
streamwalk and structure inspection. Digital images will be taken at fixed representative locations to
record each monitoring event, as well as any noted problem areas or areas of concern. Results of visual
monitoring will be presented in a plan view exhibit with a brief description of problem areas and digital
images. Photographs will be used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or degradation, bank
erosion, success of riparian vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control measures. Longitudinal
photos should indicate the absence of developing bars within the channel or an excessive increase in
channel depth. Lateral photos should not indicate excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the
banks over time. A series of photos over time should indicate successional maturation of riparian
vegetation.
8.3 Hydrology Events
Crest gauges will be installed to document the occurrence of bankfull events. A minimum of one gauge
will be installed on each tributary that is greater than 1,000 feet in length, with one gauge required for
every 5,000 feet of length on each tributary and a maximum of five gauges per tributary. Reaches with
Priority 1 Restoration (designed to reconnect the stream to its floodplain), gauges will be capable of
tracking the frequency and duration of overbank events. Where restoration or enhancement activities
are proposed for intermittent streams, monitoring gauges should be installed to track the frequency and
duration of stream flow events.
8.4 Cross Sections
Permanent cross sections will be installed at a minimum of one per 20 bankfull widths with half in
pools and half in riffle on all Restoration and Enhancement I reaches. All cross-section measurements
will include bank height ratio and entrenchment ratio. Cross sections will be monitored in Years 1, 2,
3, 5, and 7. There should be little change in as -built cross sections. If changes do take place, they should
be evaluated to determine if they represent movement toward a less stable condition (for example down -
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 41 June 2019

cutting or erosion) or are minor changes that represent an increase in stability (for example settling,
vegetative changes, deposition along the banks, or decrease in width/depth ratio).
8.5 Vegetation Monitoring
Vegetation monitoring plots will be a minimum of 0.02 acres in size and cover a minimum of two
percent of the planted area. There will be 13 plots within the planted area (15.21 acres). Plots will be a
mixture of fixed and random plots, with ten fixed plots and three random plots. Planted area indicates
all area in the easement that will be planted with trees. Existing wooded areas, including supplemental
planting areas are not included in the planted area. The following data will be recorded for all trees in
the fixed plots: species, height, planting date (or volunteer), and grid location. For random plots, species
and height will be recorded for all planted woody stems. The location (GPS coordinates and orientation)
of the random plots will be identified in the annual monitoring reports. Random transects (50 meters
by 2 meters) will occur in the supplemental planting areas (roughly seven acres). There will be two
transects on Reach FF1-B and two transects on Reach FF5 for a total of four transects. To measure
these transects, a 50 -meter tape is stretched diagonally across the buffer corridor and any native
volunteer or planted tree/shrub that falls within one meter of either side of the tape is recorded. The
transects will be mapped and new locations will be monitored in subsequent years.
Vegetation will be planted, and plots established at least 180 days prior to the initiation of the first year
of monitoring. Monitoring will occur in Years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 between July 1 st and leaf drop. Invasive
and noxious species will be monitored and so that none become dominant or alter the desired
community structure of the Project(Appendix G). If necessary, RES will develop a species-specific
treatment plan.
8.6 Scheduling/Reporting
A baseline monitoring report and as -built drawings documenting stream restoration activities will be
developed within 60 days of the planting completion on the Project. The report will include all
information required by IRT mitigation plan guidelines, including elevations, photographs and
sampling plot locations, gauge locations, and a description of initial species composition by community
type. The report will also include a list of the species planted and the associated densities. Baseline
vegetation monitoring will include species, height, date of planting, and grid location of each stem. The
baseline report will follow USACE guidelines.
The monitoring program will be implemented to document system development and progress toward
achieving the success criteria. The restored stream morphology will be assessed to determine the
success of the mitigation. The monitoring program will be undertaken for seven years or until the final
success criteria are achieved, whichever is longer.
Monitoring reports will be prepared in the fall of each year of monitoring and submitted to the IRT.
The monitoring reports will include all information and be in the format required by USACE.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 42 June 2019

Table 16. Monitoring Requirements
Level
Goal
Treatment
Outcome
Monitoring Metric
Performance Standard
To transport
Improve the
63
water from the
Convert land -use of
transport of water
1 r
watershed to
Project reaches from
from the watershed
NA
NA
athe
channel in a
pasture to riparian
to the Project
non-erosive
forest
reaches in a non -
manner
erosive way
Reduce bank height
Improve flood
Crest gauges and/or
Four bankfull events occurring in
ratios and increase
bank connectivity
pressure transducers:
separate years
To transport
entrenchment ratios
by reducing bank
Inspected semiannually
�
2 y
water in a
stable non-
by reconstructing
height ratios and
Entrenchment ratio shall be no less than
�
channels to mimic
increase
Cross sections: Surveyed
1.4 within restored reaches
erosive manner
reference reach
entrenchment
in
conditions
ratios
years 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7
Bank height ratio shall not exceed 1.2
As -built stream profile
NA
Reduce erosion
Cross sections: Surveyed
Entrenchment ratio shall be no less than
Establish a riparian
rates and channel
buffer to reduce
stability to
2.2 for all measured riffle cross-sections
To create a
diverse
erosion and sediment
reference reach
m Years 1 2 3 5 and 7
on a given reach where C channels are
�o
bedform
transport into project
conditions
, , ,
proposed
Visual monitoring
Bank height ratio shall not exceed 1.2
3 c
streams. Establish
Improve bedform
z
°m
To achieve
stable banks with
livestakes, erosion
diversity (pool
Visual monitoring:
Identify and document significant
C7
dynamic
control matting, and
spacingpercent
,
Performed at least
stream problem areas; i.e. erosion,
equilibrium
other in stream
riffles, etc.
semiannually
degradation, aggradation, etc.
Vegetation plots:
MY 1-3: 320 trees/acre
structures.
Increase buffer
width to 50 feet
Surveyed in
MY 5: 260 trees/acre (7 ft. tall)
ears 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7
MY 7: 210 trees/acre 10 ft. tall
To achieve
appropriate
Improve stream
Vegetation plots:
Surveyed in
MY 1-3: 320 trees/acre
levels for water
temperature
p
years 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7
MY 5: 260 trees/acre (7 ft. tall)
temperature,
regulation through
(indirect measurement)
MY 7: 210 trees/acre (10 ft. tall)
dissolved
introduction of
oxygen
Yg
Exclude livestock
canopy
from riparian areas
4 m
concentration,
with exclusion fence,
Decrease nutrient
Visual assessment of
oloadin
.y
and other
and plant a riparian
pInspect
through
g g
established fencing and
g
fencing and signage. Identify
important
p
buffer
filtration of planted
conservation signage:
and document any damaged missing
nutrients
riparian buffer, and
Performed at least
fencing and/or signs
s
including but
removing livestock
semiannually
not limited to
from the riparian
(indirect measurement)
Nitrogen and
areas
Phosphorus
To achieve
Improve aquatic
*
functionality in
levels 1-4 to
Plant a riparian
p
habitat through the
installation of
Visual monitoring of in-
Identify and document significant
5 �
support the life
buffer, install habitat
features, and
habitat features
construction of
stream habitat features:
Performed at least
stream problem areas; i.e. degradation,
o
histories of
aggradation, stressed or failed
-Z
aquatic and
construct pools of
pools at varying
semiannually
structures, etc.
riparian plants
varying depths
depths, and
(indirect measurement)
and animals
planting the
riparian buffer
° These categories are measured indirectly; *These categories are not quantifiably measured
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan June 2019
43

9 ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upon completion of Project construction, RES will implement the post -construction monitoring
protocols previously defined in this document. Project maintenance will be performed as described
previously in this document. If, during the course of annual monitoring, it is determined that the
Project's ability to achieve performance standards are jeopardized, RES will notify the USACE of the
need to develop a Plan of Corrective Action. Once the Corrective Action Plan is prepared and finalized
RES will:
1. Notify the USACE as required by the Nationwide 27 permit general conditions.
2. Revise performance standards, maintenance requirements, and monitoring requirements as
necessary and/or required by the USAGE.
3. Obtain other permits as necessary.
4. Prepare Corrective Action Plan for review and approval by IRT.
5. Implement the Corrective Action Plan.
Provide the IRT a Record Drawing of Corrective Actions. This document shall depict the extent and
nature of the work performed.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan June 2019
44

10 LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upon approval of the Project by the IRT, the Project will be transferred to Unique Places to Save
(UP2S):
Unique Places to Save
[phone]
PO Box 1183
Chapel Hill, NC 27514
[e-mail]
UP2S will be responsible for periodic inspection of the site to ensure that restrictions required in the
Conservation Easement or the deed restriction document(s) are upheld. Easements will be stewarded in
general accordance with the guidelines published by the National Land Trust Alliance. Specific
responsibilities include:
• Monitoring of site is conducted on an annual basis.
• An on-site inspection is conducted once per year.
• Visits to the site are coordinated with landowner when possible.
• Annual monitoring reports are sent to the landowner when possible.
• Signage for the easement boundary is maintained.
• Violations and potential violations of the conservation easement deed are promptly
communicated to the landowner.
A model conservation easement and engagement letter from UP2S are included in Appendix C. The
engagement letter includes itemized annual cost accounting of long-term management, total amount of
funding, and the manner in which the funding will be provided.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan June 2019
45

11 CREDIT RELEASE SCHEDULE
All credit releases will be based on the total credit generated as reported in the approved mitigation
plan of the site. Under no circumstances shall any mitigation project be debited until the necessary DA
authorization has been received for its construction or the District Engineer (DE) has otherwise
provided written approval for the project in the case where no DA authorization is required for
construction of the mitigation project. The DE, in consultation with the IRT, will determine if
performance standards have been satisfied sufficiently to meet the requirements of the release schedules
below. In cases where some performance standards have not been met, credits may still be released
depending on the specifics of the case. Monitoring may be required to restart or be extended, depending
on the extent to which the site fails to meet the specified performance standard. The release of Project
credits will be subject to the criteria described in Table 17.
11.1 Initial Allocation of Released Credits
The initial allocation of released credits, as specified in the mitigation plan can be released by the IRT
with written approval of the DE upon satisfactory completion of the following activities:
a) Execution of the UMBI by the Sponsor and the USACE;
b) Approval of the final mitigation plan;
c) Mitigation site must be secured;
d) Delivery of financial assurances;
e) Recordation of the long-term protection mechanism and title opinion acceptable to the USACE;
f) Issuance of the 404 -permit verification for construction of the site, if required.
11.2 Subsequent Credit Releases
The second credit release will occur after the completion of implementation of the Mitigation Plan and
IRT approval of the Baseline Monitoring Report and As -built Survey. All subsequent credit releases
must be approved by the DE, in consultation with the IRT, based on a determination that required
performance standards have been achieved. As projects approach milestones associated with credit
release, the Sponsor will submit a request for credit release to the DE along with documentation
substantiating achievement of criteria required for release to occur. This documentation will be included
with the annual monitoring report.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan June 2019
46

Table 17. Stream Credit Release Schedule
Release
Credit Release Activity
Interim
Total Released
Milestone
Release
1
Site Establishment (includes all required criteria
15%
15%
stated above
2
Baseline Monitoring Report and As -built Survey
15%
30%
3
First year monitoring report demonstrates
10%
40%
performance standards are being met.
4
Second year monitoring report demonstrates
10%
50%
performance standards are being met.
5
Third year monitoring report demonstrates
10%
60%
performance standards are being met.
6
Fourth year monitoring report demonstrates
5%
65%
performance standards are being met.
(75%**)
7performance
Fifth year monitoring report demonstrates
o
10%
75%
standards are beingmet.
85%**
g
Sixth year monitoring report demonstrates
5%
80%
performance standards are being met.
(90%**)
9
Seventh year monitoring report demonstrates
90%
performance standards are being met, and project
10%
(100%**)
has received close-out approval.
* * 10% reserve of credits to be held back until the bankfull event performance standard has been met.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan June 2019
47

12 MAINTENANCE PLAN
The Project will be monitored on a regular basis and a physical inspection will be conducted a minimum
of once per year throughout the post construction monitoring period until performance standards are
met. These site inspections may identify site components and features that require routine maintenance.
Routine maintenance should be expected most often in the first two years following site construction
and may include the following:
Table 18. Maintenance Plan
Component/Feature
Maintenance through project close-out
Stream
Routine channel maintenance and repair activities may include chinking of
in -stream structures to prevent piping, securing of loose coir matting, and
supplemental installations of live stakes and other target vegetation along the
channel. Areas where stormwater and floodplain flows intercept the channel
may also require maintenance to prevent bank failures and head -cutting.
Stream maintenance activities will be documented and reported in annual
monitoring reports. Stream maintenance will continue through the
monitoring eriod.
Vegetation
Vegetation shall be maintained to ensure the health and vigor of the targeted
plant community. Routine vegetation maintenance and repair activities may
include supplemental planting, pruning, mulching, and fertilizing. Exotic
invasive plant species shall be treated by mechanical and/or chemical
methods. Any vegetation control requiring herbicide application will be
performed in accordance with NC Department of Agriculture (NCDA) rules
and regulations. Vegetation maintenance activities will be documented and
reported in annual monitoring reports. Vegetation maintenance will continue
through the monitoring period.
Site Boundary
Site boundaries shall be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction
between the mitigation site and adjacent properties. Boundaries will be
marked with signs identifying the property as a mitigation site and will
include the name of the long-term steward and a contact number. Boundaries
may be identified by fence, marker, bollard, post, tree -blazing, or other means
as allowed by site conditions and/or conservation easement. Boundary
markers disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or replaced on
an as -needed basis. Easement monitoring and staking/signage maintenance
will continue in perpetuity as a stewardship activity.
Road Crossing
Road crossings within the site may be maintained only as allowed by
Conservation Easement or existing easement, deed restrictions, rights of way,
or corridor agreements. Crossings in easement breaks are the responsibility
of the landowner to maintain.
Livestock Fencing
Livestock fencing is to be placed outside the easement limits. Maintenance
of fencing is the responsibility of the landowner.
Beaver
Routine site visits and monitoring will be used to determine if beaver
management is needed. If beaver activity poses a threat to project stability or
vegetative success, RES will trap beavers and remove impoundments as
needed. All beaver management activities will be documented and included
in annual monitoring reports. Beaver monitoring and management will
continue through the monitoring period.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan June 2019
48

13 FINANCIAL ASSURANCES
CONFIDENTIAL
The Sponsor will provide financial assurances in the form of a $681,000 Construction Performance
Bond to the USACE to assure completion of mitigation construction and planting. Construction and
planting costs are estimated to be at or below $681,000 based on the Engineer's construction materials
estimate and recent bid tabulation unit costs for construction materials. Following completion of
construction and planting the Construction Performance Bond will be retired and a $153,095
Monitoring Performance Bond will be provided to assure completion of seven years of monitoring and
reporting, and any remedial work required during the monitoring period. The $153,095 amount includes
contingency and estimated monitoring costs from the Engineer. The Monitoring Performance Bond
will be reduced by $21,871 following approval of each annual monitoring report. The Monitoring
Performance Bond will be retired in total following official notice of site close-out from the IRT.
Financial assurances shall be payable to a standby trust or other designee at the direction of the obligee.
Financial assurances structured to provide funds to the USACE in the event of default by the Bank
Sponsor are not acceptable. A financial assurance must be in the form that ensures that the USACE
receives notification at least 120 days in advance of any termination or revocation. The Performance
Bonds will be provided by a surety listed with the U.S. Treasury and has an A.M. Best Rating of B or
above. All Performance Bonds will be submitted to the USACE in draft form for approval prior to
execution. In the event of Sponsor default, UP2S has agreed to receive the funds and ensure the work
is successfully completed.
Table 19. Financial Assurances
Construction Costs AM F
General (e.g. mobilization, erosion control, etc.
$73,000
Sitework
$162,000
Structures (e.g. ditch plugs, logs, rocks, coir, etc.
$97,000
Crossings
$69,000
Vegetation
$36,000
Miscellaneous/Admin Fees
$244,000
Total $681,000
Monitoring Costs OR—
Monitoring Set -Up & As -Built
$22,500
Monitoring Year 1 and Report
$12,000
Monitoring Year 2 and Report
$12,000
Monitoring Year 3 and Report
$12,000
Monitoring Year 4 and Report
$9,000
Monitoring Year 5 and Report
$13,500
Monitoring Year 6 and Report
$9,000
Monitoring Year 7 and Report
$18,000
Equipment e. au es, markers, etc.
$12,350
Maintenance
$32,745
Total
$153,095
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan June 2019
49

14 REFERENCES
Dalrymple, T. 1960. Flood Frequency Analyses. U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1543-
A.
Doll, B.A., D.E. Wise -Frederick, C.M. Buckner, S.D. Wilkerson, W.A. Harman, R.E. Smith and J.
Spooner. 2002. Hydraulic Geometry Relationships for Urban Streams throughout the
Piedmont of North Carolina. Journal of the American water Resource Association. 38(3):641-
651.
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual,
Technical Report Y-87-1. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg,
Mississippi.
Harman, W.H. et al. 1999. Bankfull Hydraulic Geometry Relationships for North Carolina Streams.
AWRA Wildland Hydrology Symposium Proceedings. Edited By: D.S. Olsen and J.P.
Potyondy. AWRA Summer Symposium. Bozeman, MT.
Harman, W., R. Starr, M. Carter, K. Tweedy, M. Clemmons, K. Suggs, C. Miller. 2012. A Function -
Based Framework for Stream Assessment and Restoration Projects. US Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Washington, DC EPA 843-
K-12-006.
Johnson PA. 2006. Assessing stream channel stability at bridges in physiographic regions. U.S.
Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Report Number FHWA-
HRT-05-072.
Johnston County K -State Research and Extension. 2015. Selecting Juglone-Tolerant Plants.
Lotspeich, R.R., 2009, Regional curves of bankfull channel geometry for non -urban streams in the
Piedmont Physiographic Province, Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations
Report 2009-5206, 51 p.
North Carolina Geological Survey, 1985, Geologic map of North Carolina: North Carolina
Geological Survey, General Geologic Map, scale 1:500000.
North Carolina Environmental Quality. North Carolina Dam Safety Program; N.C. Dam Inventory.
March 16, 2017. https:Hdeq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-land-resources/energy-
mineral-land-permits/dam-safety (July 2018).
NCDENR 2012a. "Water Quality Stream Classifications for Streams in North Carolina." Water
Quality http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/home. (June 2018).
NCDENR 2012b. "2012 North Carolina 303(d) Lists -Category 5." Water Quality Section.
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/home. (June 2018).
NCDWQ (North Carolina Division of Water Quality). 2011. A Guide to Surface Freshwater
Classifications in North Carolina. Raleigh. hqp://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_ library/
get file?p 1 id=1169848&folderld=2209568&name=DLFE-35732.pdf; accessed June 2018.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan June 2019
50

North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). "Upper Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin
Restoration Priorities 2009.".
Peet, R.K., Wentworth, T.S., and White, P.S. (1998). A flexible, multipurpose method for recording
vegetation composition and structure. Castanea 63:262-274
Radford, A.E., H.E. Ahles and F.R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas. The
University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Rosgen, D. (1996), Applied River Morphology, 2nd edition, Wildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs, CO
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 2012. Guide to the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation,
NCDENR, Raleigh, NC.
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2002. Regulatory Guidance Letter. RGL No. 02-2,
December 24, 2002.
USACE. 2016. National Inventory of Dams. http://nid.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=838:12 Accessed
July 2018.
USACE. 2003. April 2003 NC Stream Mitigation Guidelines.
USACE. 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual:
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region (Version 2.0), ed. J. S. Wakeley, R. W. Lichvar, and
C. V. Noble. ERDC/EL TR -10-20. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and
Development Center.
USACE. 2018. Wilmington District Stream Buffer Credit Calculator.
USACE. 2016. Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS).
1986. Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds. Technical Release 55.
USDA NRCS. 2007. Stream Restoration Design Handbook (NEH 654), USDA
USDANRCS. 2007. Soil Survey of Yadkin County, North Carolina.
USDA NRCS. 2010. Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, Version 7.0. L.M. Vasilas,
G.W. Hurt, and C.V. Noble (eds.). USDA, NRCS, in cooperation with the National Technical
Committee for Hydric Soils.
USDA NRCS. Web Soil Survey; http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov (June 2018).
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1999. EPA Manual. Quantifying Physical
Habitat in Wadeable Streams.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service. "Threatened and Endangered Species in North Carolina."
North Carolina Ecological Services. http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/. (September 2014).
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan June 2019
51

Figures List
Figure 1—
Service Area and Vicinity Map
Figure 2 —
USGS Map
Figure 3 —
Landowner Map
Figure 4 —
Land -use Map
Figure 5 —
Existing Conditions Map
Figure 6 —
National Wetlands Inventory Map
Figure 7 —
Soils Map
Figure 8 —
Historic Aerial Imagery Map
Figure 9 —
FEMA Map
Figure 10
—Concept Plan Map
Figure 11—
Non -Standard Buffer Zones
Figure 12
— Monitoring Plan

I rd:.,,, n..
i3
Ca
o Moxley Rd
Ln
E Cd
�c�° "pbNl Rd
o y
F n°Ot Od4
OS BeC
b �c
a
3 \
o --
3
° a CunditlRd
rY
Y I yOjY S� Y 0 e`
I 3
I
�h°rYQ Q
y St e' walnutst o° �.i
Z. v SPring St Sonnet Dr
S—ri.. Ln
V U Q Q
Z 3� G y
20 n c
Boonv
__-- o �=
2 e' 'Hato yl
6 O n u
r _ ➢ = Me Q' °ose St k
\ Arbor St
\ y H
moo+
UOa St
Dr
Marview Dr 0> - ---
v
ar\vers Ln CO
c �
Q \ `O1
O°
P,
r+
y
N Oak Ridge Ch�rc
h Ra
E
a
w C �e
m f
Will stoI a
W�
Le -gen d Lenoir _
Stat sville
Proposed Easement Morganton
Green Mesa Salisbury
Service Area - 03040101 Site
14 -Digit HUC - 03040101130010 = MOOM le
Im
Saeny ..
N
Date: 5/24/2019
Figure 1 - Service Area and Vicinity Map
" - e Drawn by: MDE res
Green Mesa Mitigation Site
Checked by: GDS
0 1,0050 2,000
Yadkin County, North Carolina 1 inch = 2,000 feet
Feet

•� �� ' Vii,' .5 ^ � �'° / ' I• . .�.�
i
n r .• .1
I AL
• =a_-: = SII ( •
�_�/ 7
:' 11 \ •f
• r ! i • l — Airf
FF4 -
1o(� ;,= a• --, - 242 ac r'l �~
elk It
`- 1011 ac "„ FF5
aa C
• , 17 _ 72 ac-
-FF2 X1
-63 ac
o�Q� t-b� .•� �.
i/It
Cb pyt. V�i4
J t a
00-� do •.�
Legend �' o
' -rr
Proposed Easement • ° "�
Drainage Area
r� a
N Figure 2 - USGS Map Date: 5/24/2019
W E Yadkinville (1967)
Drawn by: MDE res
5 Green Mesa Mitigation Site Checked by: GDS
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
Yadkin County, North Carolina nch = 2,000 feet

p..
rY
u
40-
t KAI-ItK
0-FRAZIER FARM OF -®
NORTH CAROLINA LLC
499000223660
FRAZIER FARM OF
NORTH CAROLINA LLC
FRAZIER FARM OF 499000310877
NORTH CAROLINA'LLC
— >F499000117958
FRAZIER FARM OF
r ¢ NORTH CAROLINA LLC
499000217656
FRAZIER FARM OF
NORTH CAROLINA:LLC
x499000403703
FRAZIER FARM OF
NORTH1CAROLINA LLC
499000200499 '
f
,
� r t
Le ends -`
Proposed Easement
Project Parcels
N
Date: 5/24/2019
Figure 3 - Landowner Map
" e Drawn by: MDE res
Green Mesa Mitigation Site
� s Checked by: GDS
0 500 1,000
Yadkin County, North Carolina 1 inch = 1,000 feet
Feet

w�

im
.a5
'ra.e2
PF01 A
�PEMIAX
-00 -,A�]
1 �
T
a 41
e,ea9t
l
,
.
„, y,
3 �
Drivers In � w M'
�
t
2
� 1
5i
y
Le end
Proposed Easement
® NWI Wetlands (10/29/2018)
N
Figure 6 -National Wetland Inventory Date: 5/24/2019
" e
5 Green Mesa Mitigation Site Drawn by: GDS res
0 250 500 Checked by: MDE
Yadkin County, North Carolina 1 inch = 500 feet

E
Legend
Proposed Easement
Hydric (100%)
C Predominantly Hydric (66-99%)
C Partially Hydric (33-65%)
Predominantly Nonhydric (1-32%) A
C Nonhydric (0%)
EMEN F
wall
Lim
♦r� r r
{1
FeD3
I
Map Unit
Symbol
CcC2
CrA
DeA
FdD2
FdE2
FeD3
FeE3
FgD2
FgE2
FtF
HsA
RdF
SmE
SmF
k HsA
;T�
Map Unit Name
Clifford sandyclayloam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded
Codorus loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded
Dan River sandyloam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently flooded
Fairview sandyclay loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
Fairview sandy clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, moderately eroded
Fairview clay loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes, severelyeroded
Fairview clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, severelyeroded
Fairview gravellyfine sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
Fairview gravellyfine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, moderately eroded
Fairview -Stott Knob complex, 25 to 45 percent slopes, stony
Hatboro soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
Rhodhiss-Stott Knob complex, 25 to 45 percent slopes, stony
Siloam sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
Siloam sandy loam, 25 to 50 percent slopes
Date: 5/24/2019
Figure 7 - Soils Map
)res
Drawn by: MDE
Green Mesa Mitigation Site
Checked by: MGB
500
Yadkin County, North Carolina 1 inch = 500 feet

ry
s
�1 t.
t, a.
$ h 4
r*
I
L! i
07
JW
Source: USGS Earth Explorer - ° a # Source: USGS Earth Explorer
abaft
1976 1993
Air
S ` � F ✓
r
r �
a
m y0'
s+yy��va N[.�• �.
�tX a
Source: NCOneMap
F
c
Source: USGS Earth Explorer -�- Proposed Easement
I. �y
s
N
Date: 5/24/2019
Figure 8 - Historic Aerial Imagery
" e Drawn by: MDE
s res
Green Mesa Mitigation Site
c Checked by: GDS
0 500 1,000
Yadkin County, North Carolina 1 inch = 1,000 feet
Feet

F h
r
*'''r000
it
p Le end
Proposed Easement
FEMA Zone AE (None) T.
Figure 5 - National Flood Hazard Layer Date: 5/24/2019
W E (FEMA)
Drawn by: MDE
s Green Mesa Mitigation Site Checked by: JRM
0 250 500
Feet
Yadkin County, North Carolina 1 inch =500 feet
fires

Ideal Buffers
Actual Buffers
pres
N
W E
S
0 250 500
Feet
®
Figure 11 - Non -Standard
Buffer Zones
Green Mesa
Mitigation Site
Yadkin County, North Carolina
�
Date: 5/24/2019
Drawn by: MDE
Checked by: MGB
1 in = 500 feet
Legend
Proposed Easement
Buffer Width Zones
0-50 ft
50-75 ft
76-100 ft
- 101-125 ft
126-150 ft
REFERENCE
1) Horizontal Datum is NAD83 UTM Z17N.
Buffer Width Zone (feet from
Ordinary High Water Mark)
Buffer Zones less than 15 feet >15 to 20 feet >20 to 25 feet
>25 to 30 feet
>30 to 35 feet
>35 to 40 feet
>40 to 45 feet
>45 to 50 feet >50 to 75 feet >75 to 100 feet
>100 to 125 feet >125 to 150 feet
2) Map Projection is NAD 1983 StatePlane_
North_Carolina_FIPS_3200_Feet
Max Possible Buffer (square feet) 274,920 91,640 91,640 91,640 91,640 91,640
91,640 91,640 458,200 458,200 458,200 458,200
Ideal Buffer (square feet) 286,064 96,266 96,268 96,886 97,039 96,219
96,265 96,272 481,193 485,693 492,164 498,698
Actual Buffer (square feet) 265,282
84,946
83,197
82,069
80,769
79,431
78,424
77,267 256,803 89,365
35,906
22,177
Zone Multiplier 50%
10%
10%
10%
5%
5%
5%
5% 7% 5%
4%
4%
Buffer Credit Equivalent 1,787
357
357
357 1
179
179
179
1 179 250 179
1 143 1
143
Percent of Ideal Buffer 93%
88%
860/o
85%
83%
83%
81%
80% 53% 18%
7%
4%
n
Credit Adjustment -130 1
-42 1
-49
-55
-30
-31
-33
-35 134 33
10
6
Total Baseline Credit Credit Loss in Required Buffer Credit Gain for Additional Buffer
Net Change inTotal Credit
Credit from Buffers
3,573
-404
183
-221
3,352

Chuf Rd
eaptls<
Note: There will be a total of 13 vegetation plots;
ten fixed vegetation plots, and three will be randomly
placed each monitoring year.
Random vegetation plots are not shown in this monitoring plan.
Random plot will vary by location and dimension.
Crest gauge, cross section, and
vegetation plot locations are all proposed
locations.
privers Ln
e}
res
N
E
W
S
0 150 300
Feet
Figure 12 - Monitoring Plan
Green Mesa
Mitigation Project
Yadkin County, North Carolina
Date: 5/23/2019 1 Drawn by: MDE
Checked by: MGB
I 1 in = 300 feet
Legend
V
Proposed Easement
Planted Area (15.21 ac)
®
i
■
Vegatation Plot
Chuf Rd
eaptls<
Note: There will be a total of 13 vegetation plots;
ten fixed vegetation plots, and three will be randomly
placed each monitoring year.
Random vegetation plots are not shown in this monitoring plan.
Random plot will vary by location and dimension.
Crest gauge, cross section, and
vegetation plot locations are all proposed
locations.
privers Ln
e}
res
N
E
W
S
0 150 300
Feet
Figure 12 - Monitoring Plan
Green Mesa
Mitigation Project
Yadkin County, North Carolina
Date: 5/23/2019 1 Drawn by: MDE
Checked by: MGB
I 1 in = 300 feet
Legend
Proposed Easement
Planted Area (15.21 ac)
®
Crest Gauge
■
Vegatation Plot
Cross Section
Mitigation Approach
Restoration
Enhancement II (2.5:1)
Enhancement 11 (3:1)
Enhancement 111 (5:1)
Enhancement 111 (7.5:1)
Preservation

Appendix A -Plan Sheets

tevd 0v!zs
,• Strny Knoll
BEnham
El
Burch , -
Elkin
L i I. syv t7ichrnorzd Nr,
Boonville
nda Arlington I
I le
r4y
PROJECT LOCATION
Yadkinvi'le
HamptonvA .
VICINITY MAP
NTS
U5ACE ACTION ID #: 5AW-20 1 7-0 1 466
REACH FF I -A
GREEN MESA STREAM MITIGATION SITE
REACH 1'F4 -A
YADKIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
YADKIN RIVER BASIN: HUC 03040101130010
JUNE 2019
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC
302 JEFFERSON ST, SUITE 110
RALEIGH, NC 27605
n
I\L/-'BVI I 1 1 `Y -V
REACH FF I -B
rn
\ v
J
l/r
REACH FF2
REACH FF I -D
r REACH FF I -C LSE
LCE - -
L
REACH FF5-B
n
SITE MAP
NTS
REACH FF3
LCE
REACH FF5-A
Sheet L15t Table
SHEET NUMBED
SHEET TITLE
--
COVER
E I
GENERAL NOTES * LEGEND
E2
EXISTING CONDITIONS
E3
OVERALL AERIAL VIEW
51
REACH FF I -A
52
BEACH FF I -A
53
BEACH FF I -B
54
REACH FF I -B
55
BEACH I=E I -C
5G
BEACH I=E I -C
57
BEACH 1-1-2
56
BEACH 1-1-2
59
BEACH 1`1`3
510
LEACH EE3
51 1
LEACH EE3
512
LEACH EE3
513
LEACH EE4-A
5 1 4
REACH E E4
5 1 5
LEACH FF I -D
5 1 G
LEACH FF I -D
5 1 7
LEACH FF I -D
516
LEACH EE5
519
LEACH EE5
520
LEACH EE5
521
LEACH EE5
P I
PLANTING PLAN
D I
DETAI L5
D2
DETAI L5
D3
DETAI L5
D4
DETAI L5
D5
DETAI L5
DG
DETAI L5
pres'
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, INC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
u;
o
0
� N
0 N
IL -
z
0
Z
0
z
0
O
LL
a
o
'
o
0 Q�
LL
Q
z
o z
0
(n
U)
Q J
LU W
Q
W
W
�crrr
o_
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:

STREAM CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
ALL PROPOSED CHANNELS AND TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT CROSSINGS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN
A DRY CONDITION VIA OFFLINE CONSTRUCTION WHERE POSSIBLE. PUMP AROUND OPERATIONS
SHOULD BE LIMITED TO AREAS WHERE THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED CHANNEL ALIGNMENTS OVERLAP.
2. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND PUMPING APPARATUS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE STREAM AT THE END
OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY
THE ENGINEER. WITH APPROVAL, A PUMP AROUND MAY BE ALLOWED TO RUN CONTINUOUSLY IF THERE
IS NO FORECAST FOR RAIN OVERNIGHT, AND/OR THE PUMP APPARATUS IS MAINTAINED AND
MONITORED CONTINUOUSLY.
3. CONSTRUCT UPSTREAM PORTION OF THE CHANNEL FIRST, WORKING IN AN UPSTREAM TO
DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
LEGEND
EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR
EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
50
4G
50
42
EXISTING WETLAND F,
---- TB-
---- BB
—
EXISTING STREAM
as ---
EXISTING TOP OF BANK — — — — TB —
4. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL WITHIN AREAS THAT ARE TO BE CUT 9" OR MORE BELOW EXISTING EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK — — — — BB
GRADE. STOCKPILED TOPSOIL IS TO BE PLACED ALONG THE FLOODPLAIN BENCHES.
5. STRUCTURES ARE TO BE INSTALLED IN LOCATIONS SHOWN ON PLAN SHEETS (AS INDICATED ON THE
STRUCTURE TABLES) USING METHODS DESCRIBED IN THE DETAIL SHEETS. PRIOR TO FINE GRADING,
OBTAIN APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER ON INSTALLATION OF STRUCTURES.
G. NATIVE SUBSTRATE MATERIAL SHALL BE TAKEN FROM THE EXISTING CHANNEL AND INSTALLED ON THE
PROPOSED BED OF SHALLOW/RIFFLE CHANNEL SECTIONS. IN AREAS WHERE THERE IS NOT ENOUGH
NATIVE SUBSTRATE TO PLACE A MINIMUM G" LAYER ALONG PROPOSED SHALLOW/RIFFLE SECTIONS,
SUPPLEMENT THE NATIVE SUBSTRATE WITH A 50/50 MIX OF #3 AND SURGE, OR RIVER ROCK WITH A
D50=2.0".
7. IN -STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS (BRUSH TOES, LOG
VANES, AND LOG TOES) MAY BE USED INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PER APPROVAL
FROM DESIGNER.
EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UTILITY LINE OHE
PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING FENCELINE —X X X X X—
EXISTING TREELINE
EXISTING TREE
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK — —
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF CHANNEL
8. UPON COMPLETION OF FINE GRADING, INSTALL STREAM BANK STABILIZATION INCLUDING, EROSION LIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONTROL MATTING OR SOD MATS ALONG CHANNEL BANKS. CONSERVATION EASEMENT LCE
9. FILL AND STABILIZE ABANDONED SEGMENTS OF THE EXISTING CHANNEL PER DIRECTION OF THE PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
ENGINEER.
(SEE DETAIL D )
BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
(SEE DETAIL D2)
LOG SILL
(SEE DETAIL D2)
DOUBLE LOG DROP
(SEE DETAIL D2)
CONSTRUCTED BOULDER RIFFLE
(SEE DETAIL D5)
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
(SEE DETAIL DG)
'M!�M
LOG J -HOOK O �\
(SEE DETAIL D7)
1pres'
302 Jefferson
Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, INC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
SCALE: AS SHOWN
w
Q
o
C)
�
N
O
N
IL
-
z
O
U
H
z
O
z
O
o
LL
O
U
cl)
W
i
O
W
Q
Q
z
0
z
o
O
(n
Lu
U
W
J
Lu
Y
Q
w
w
o=
cr
D_
LLI
C)
Z
z
O
O
W
F
U
W
J
06
OZ
W
Q
w
O
z
Z
U)
J
D
O
�
U
U
w
W
u i
Z
Lu
Z
� Z
Y
J
�
W
z LLJ
O
U
z
w �
>-
0
Q
O v
o_
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
E 1

LEACH FF4-A -
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
LEACH FF I -A
I
Ld
LC -E - —*
One-
/ OPIE
Ta
s\T.;t
—
���///,� 1) ones —one
-- done—�� LCE )r �
.� one 3C-1 �
—<� r'7�O C
CE
------------- BEACH f=f= I -C
i
Ld
---
\ BEACH FF4-B
\
\
res,
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
\
Raleigh, NC 27605
\
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
LEACH EE I -B
LIJ
I } m @\
91 —"6, 1 \
i LEACH FF5-B
I �
r � n
m\�
w mm\\
LEACH EE2
BEACH EE I -D
SCE
BEACH f=f=3
BEACH FF5-A
0
res,
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
0
FULL SCALE: 1 "=150
0
150
300
2" = FULL SCALE
1"
= HALF SCALE`
w
-
C)
�
N
O
N
CL
r`
z
_0
I—
z
0
z
O
O
LL
a
cr
o
z
U
w
O
w
Qw
Q
z
z
o
(n
0oU)
w
J
W
oC
>
�
cr
m
Lu
Q
z
c/)
J
U
U)
Q
Q
z
<
U
O
�
�
o
z
Q
Z
O
U
CD
co
z
z
c/)
O
c/)
U
2
W
z
Q w
z w
D
QZ
U
w Ur
§
o_
0
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
E 2

Green Mesa Mitigation Site Credits
Reach
Mitigation Type
Proposed
Length (LF)
Mitigation
Ratio
SMUs
FF1-A
Enhancement II
993
1 :2.5
397
FF1-13
Enhancement III
922
1 :5.0
184
FFl-C
Enhancement 11(3)
328
1 :3.0
109
FFl-C
Enhancement 11(3)
267
1 :3.0
89
FF1-C
Enhancement II (3)
99
1 :3.0
33
FF2
Preservation
602
1:10.0
60
FF3
Enhancement III (7.5)
1,179
1 :7.5
157
FF3
Enhancement III (7.5)
764
1 :7.5
102
FF4-A
Enhancement I
474
1 : 1.5
316
17174-13
Restoration
444
1:1.0
444
FFl-D
Restoration
143
1:1.0
143
FFl-D
Restoration
400
1:1.0
400
FF1-1)
Restoration
298
1 :1.0
298
FF1-1)
Restoration
550
1 :1.0
550
FFl-E
Enhancement II
59
1 :2.5
24
FF5-A
Enhancement 111 (7.5)
1,418
1 :7.5
189
FF5-A
Enhancement 111 (7.5)
168
1 :7.5
22
17175-13
Restoration
56
1 :1.0
56
Total
9,164
3,573
REACH FF1-D
RESTORATION
I
IL
,A-
IL
- -- - -- ------
I I
REACH FF1-C
ENHANCEMENT II
k
REACH FF5-B
RESTORATION
REACH FF5-A
ENHANCEMENT III
i;%6
1
1
,
1
II 1
II-
,
1
/
/
,
91
1
0
resi
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
0
FULL SCALE: 1 "=150
0
150
300
2" = FULL SCALE
1"
= HALF SCALE
ui
00
QN
C)
H
N
T
IZ
Z
_O
I—
Z
0
z
O
O
LL
a -
Ir
O
Z
U
o
Ow
0-1
w
Q
Q
z
o
z
o
O
(n
U)
Q
J
W
fr
M
Q_
Lu
Z
C/)
J
O0�
Q
w
J
0�
QO
Z
w
LU
�
>
J
Cn
z
Q
C/)
O
w
Lu
U
�
O
Z
Q
6i
W
z W
D
Q
U
w
Z
0
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
E3

9G5
N -o
955
950
945
-9,D7
�J7
937
LCE
0+00
V+�DV I +VV 1 +5V L+VV L+SV 6+VV 6+�V
SCALE: HOR 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'
GZaNkmi
GZ N-Xvi
[NZ9111V1VA
')+�DV
9G5
N1"
955
950
945
0
resi
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
C)
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
= FULL SCALE
IN 1 "
= HALF SCALE
w
Q
C)
�
N
O
N
\
CL
-
z
O
1-
z
O
z
O
o
IL
cr
O
z
LU
o
0-1
LU
Q
o
�OU)
z
(n
z
Q
J
W
Q
W
W
LuZ
Q
�
c/)
J
O
�
Q
�
U
Q
0
LL
Q
Z
=
�
>
Q
NNN
Z
W
h:—
Q
Z)
0�
W
U
�
—
Z
a w
z w
D
w
O
Q
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
EXISTING GRADE
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S 1
—
—
�—
—
—
—
—
ALONG STREA
r-f-XIE)TING
TO
OF
AN
CENTERLINE
\7Z
1
w
Ujz
Q_
LU
O
QLn
IO—
—
—
—
1O
0+00
V+�DV I +VV 1 +5V L+VV L+SV 6+VV 6+�V
SCALE: HOR 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'
GZaNkmi
GZ N-Xvi
[NZ9111V1VA
')+�DV
9G5
N1"
955
950
945
0
resi
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
C)
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
= FULL SCALE
IN 1 "
= HALF SCALE
w
Q
C)
�
N
O
N
CL
-
z
O
1-
z
O
z
O
o
IL
cr
O
z
LU
o
0-1
LU
Q
o
�OU)
z
(n
z
Q
J
W
Q
W
W
LuZ
Q
�
c/)
J
O
�
Q
�
U
Q
0
LL
Q
Z
=
�
>
Q
co
Z
W
Q
Z)
0�
W
U
�
Z
a w
z w
D
w
O
Q
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S 1

I
LCE LC E LCE LCE
Ci
Z
z ` REACH FF I -A
rn ENHANCEMENT II
p� STA 1 +54 TO 1 1 +47 el —
+
O f ��
5+00
i
�Tex00 /00 /—
k V/1
I
TB
x\
955
950
945
-.m
935
g3j
g3j
'931
X31
LCE
N
X31
Ing
LCE
REACH FF I -B
ENHANCEMENT III
STA 1 1 +47 TO 20+G9
LCE
k
\0
N
+00
� y
i
/
REACH FF2
LCE
9i' _ \3k0� /
0pre,
b+ -,)U i +w /+-,)U D+w 0+5v �+vv
SCALE: HOR 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'
�+�v I v+vU I v+5u I I +w I I +5U
955
950
945
935
12+00
0
resi
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2
FULL SCALE
1 "
= HALF SCALE
Li
orn
�
N
0
N
CL
z
O
z
0
z
O
o
IL
cr
0
z
LU
0
oC
}
o
0-1
LU
a
z
z
�0�
o
(n
W
J
LU
Y
cC
Q
>
W
-j
W
Lu
Q
�
Z
c/)
J
O�
<C)
Q
O
LL
Q
Z
=
�
>
Q
co
Z
W
Q
Z)
0�
c/)
O
Lu
U
Z
a w
z W
D
Q
Ufn
W V
z
0
a
o_
o
EXISTING TOP
OF BANK
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
/7L
S2
\
\
EXISTING
GRA
E
/
1
\
/
\
\
ALO
CEN
G 5
ERLINE
RE
/
1
1-7
0pre,
b+ -,)U i +w /+-,)U D+w 0+5v �+vv
SCALE: HOR 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'
�+�v I v+vU I v+5u I I +w I I +5U
955
950
945
935
12+00
0
resi
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2
FULL SCALE
1 "
= HALF SCALE
Li
orn
�
N
0
N
CL
z
O
z
0
z
O
o
IL
cr
0
z
LU
0
oC
}
o
0-1
LU
a
z
z
�0�
o
(n
W
J
LU
Y
cC
Q
>
W
-j
W
Lu
Q
�
Z
c/)
J
O�
<C)
Q
O
LL
Q
Z
=
�
>
Q
co
Z
W
Q
Z)
0�
c/)
O
Lu
U
Z
a w
z W
D
Q
Ufn
W V
z
0
a
o_
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S2

c
cz
cu
7q
N
J
I
T-
U) U
co
N
O
0
b
U
;_
N
c0
L.L
0
U
z
U
m
2
CL
U)
0
U)
LU
LU
Q
z
X�
k�
k�
k�
X�
/ k
'rte
X�
k
Q \ >IV
x
�� r VC- �X\ `C�
� �
+ \
�
ra\ \ BEACH FF I -B i �' '� Tg -J 6+00
/\ ENHANCEMENT III �� �� _ — — e — I
, �/ \
X ; � \ \1 STA 1 1 +47 TO 20+69 / 1 — — —� CL
l
TE3 10
Ta
rf3-----TB----- TB vo
14+00
\
\91 -----91 -----91 -----91
REACH FF2 J/ —
LU
J
IV
U
Q
950
945
940
935
930
950
945
940
935
930
12+ 0 1 2+50 13+ 13+5 14+00 14+50 15 1 5+50 1 6+00 1 6+50 17+ 17+5 18+00
SCALE: HOK 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'
0
resi
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2
FULL SCALE
1 "
= HALF SCALE
6i
Qc)
C)
N
0
N
CL
-
z
0
z
0
z
O
O
LL
cr
0
z
LU
iz)
oc
o
0-1
LU
Q
zo
z
0
0
(n
Lu
U)
W
J
W
Y
rC
Q
>
W
W
Lu
Q
�
Z
c/)
J
O�
�
Q
�
U
m
�
�
0
LL
'
Z
T
co
Z
w
Q
Z)
0�
cn
0
Lu
U
Z
a w
z W
EX
5TIN
GRADE
Q
R
U
W
Z
Ir
o_
EXISTING TOP
OF BANK
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S3
Al.ONG
CE
STR
TE
AM
INE
950
945
940
935
930
12+ 0 1 2+50 13+ 13+5 14+00 14+50 15 1 5+50 1 6+00 1 6+50 17+ 17+5 18+00
SCALE: HOK 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'
0
resi
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2
FULL SCALE
1 "
= HALF SCALE
6i
Qc)
C)
N
0
N
CL
-
z
0
z
0
z
O
O
LL
cr
0
z
LU
iz)
oc
o
0-1
LU
Q
zo
z
0
0
(n
Lu
U)
W
J
W
Y
rC
Q
>
W
W
Lu
Q
�
Z
c/)
J
O�
�
Q
�
U
m
�
�
0
LL
'
Z
T
co
Z
w
Q
Z)
0�
cn
0
Lu
U
Z
a w
z W
Q
R
U
W
Z
Ir
o_
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S3

c
cz
N
cu
3
7q
N
J
T-
U)i
co
N
O
0
b
U
;_
N
c0
L.L
0
U
z
U
m
2
CL
U)
0
U)
LU
LU
Q
z
X� k
kms\
k
x x�X_X
LCE
_
REACH FF I -B
ENHANCEMENT III
LC +
E 5TA 1 1 +47 TO 20+G9 +/
CE +/+/
/ TPS
rx / / \ x \
k \
' X�x� _ _ ITI
�
X
i
� X \
\
-a NNI
4-00
rFOND
em ' �y�----91 �_—_ � ���,= —�� //
88
r
T
rn
o
O
950
945
940
935
930
18
950
945
940
935
930
50
SCALE: HOR 1''=30'; VERT 1''=3'
0
resi
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
C)
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
211
= FULL SCALE
IN 1 "
= HALF SCALE
w
Q
C)
�
N
O
N
CL
-
z
O
z
O
z
O
o
IL
cr
O
z
LU
o
0-1
LU
Q
z
z
�Lu
o
OU)
W
Jr—jWW
fci
W
LuZ
Q
�
c/)
J
O�
�
Q
�
U
z
m
�
�
EXI
OF
TIN
TO
0
LL
LU
w
<
Q
w
Q
Z
=
BAN
Q
co
Z
W
Q
D
cn
0
Lu
U
Z
O
oN
Q
O �?
U
a w
z W
EX15TING
GF.ADE
R
U
W
Z
o_
CENTERLINE
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S4
X
--
—
+00 18+50 19 19+5 20+00
20+50
21+00
2 1+
950
945
940
935
930
50
SCALE: HOR 1''=30'; VERT 1''=3'
0
resi
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
C)
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
211
= FULL SCALE
IN 1 "
= HALF SCALE
w
Q
C)
�
N
O
N
CL
-
z
O
z
O
z
O
o
IL
cr
O
z
LU
o
0-1
LU
Q
z
z
�Lu
o
OU)
W
Jr—jWW
fci
W
LuZ
Q
�
c/)
J
O�
�
Q
�
U
m
�
�
0
LL
LL
Q
Z
=
Q
co
Z
W
Q
D
cn
0
Lu
U
Z
a w
z W
Q
R
U
W
Z
o_
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S4

/
/
/
/
930
925
920
915
o
EX15TING STONE�-F ---
WALL----------
REACH FF I -C
VU — TB — — re , re / ENHANCEMENT 11
B ---- Tu -----ti
s� 1� — TB e // — \� y% 0 C
_ O
gg
STA 0+50 TO 3+78
o// -
00
i- Q _ -- 99 \ TR 1 i n
3+50
\ s 3+00 /�� _ �O I S�
�� - --- CD
qj
\ O \
1 Q
-------------
-REACH FF I -C L
Z
U \, __- - _► ENHANCEMENT 11 i
STA 4+21 TO G+88 S
---------- w
rT1
v y
0+00
V+�DV I +VV 1 +5V C+VV C+SV 6+VV
SCALE: HOK 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'
LGSa1vJ
GZ1wlwJ
GZ N-Xvi
[NZ9111V1VA
1)+�DV
930
925
920
915
n
n
Ores'
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
= FULL SCALE
1 "
= HALF SCALE
w
oc)
�
N
O
N
CL
z
O
U
Z
O
z
O
o
IL
cr
O
z
LU
0
oC
}
o
0-1
LU
Q
o
�OU)
z
(n
Z
W
J
W
Y
Q
W
w
Lu
Q
Z
c/)
J
O�
�
Q
�
U
U
O
LL
w
_
:
Q
co
z
w
Q
Z)
0�
w
U
�
Z
Lu
Q
w
z w
D
Q
Ufn
W V
Z
OQ
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S5
EXI5TING TO
—
OF BANK
-I-
-T
Uj
LU
—
—
—
—
0
I _
+
EX
5TIN
GRADE
LIQ
co
I
ALONG
ST
AM
z
CE
TE
LINE
CONSERVATION +
n
O "
EASEMENT
BR AK
I�
O
P
0+00
V+�DV I +VV 1 +5V C+VV C+SV 6+VV
SCALE: HOK 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'
LGSa1vJ
GZ1wlwJ
GZ N-Xvi
[NZ9111V1VA
1)+�DV
930
925
920
915
n
n
Ores'
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
= FULL SCALE
1 "
= HALF SCALE
w
oc)
�
N
O
N
CL
z
O
U
Z
O
z
O
o
IL
cr
O
z
LU
0
oC
}
o
0-1
LU
Q
o
�OU)
z
(n
Z
W
J
W
Y
Q
W
w
Lu
Q
Z
c/)
J
O�
�
Q
�
U
U
O
LL
w
_
:
Q
co
z
w
Q
Z)
0�
w
U
�
Z
Lu
Q
w
z w
D
Q
Ufn
W V
Z
OQ
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S5

i
LCE
EX15T1 NG FORD
CR0551 NG
LCE
—
925
ti •
915
A •
ti•
C)
rn
r
rn
cc
REACH FF4-13 I� I
I \ \
\
�I
LCE.. \
--------- — —
n
EX15TING CULVERT 1LJ
U
J
O
z
rn
O
rn
0\
--- Tb — 5�
0 —
A� \ �\ e�
REACH FF I -C
ENHANCEMENT II
STA 7+29 TO 8+28
FF I -C REACH FF I -D
ENHANCEMENT II =
5TA 4+21 TO G+8(5 rn\ '1� \�
\ \ \
-- rrn i \
-------
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
re
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Xaa
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
= FULL SCALE
1 "
= HALF SCALE
/
w
i
o
I.-
N
EX15f
ING
TOP
N
L
Fn
CL
-
�6
z
/
o
O
F B
NK
3+50
Gy
U
00 mel'
—
925
ti •
915
A •
ti•
C)
rn
r
rn
cc
REACH FF4-13 I� I
I \ \
\
�I
LCE.. \
--------- — —
n
EX15TING CULVERT 1LJ
U
J
O
z
rn
O
rn
0\
--- Tb — 5�
0 —
A� \ �\ e�
REACH FF I -C
ENHANCEMENT II
STA 7+29 TO 8+28
FF I -C REACH FF I -D
ENHANCEMENT II =
5TA 4+21 TO G+8(5 rn\ '1� \�
\ \ \
-- rrn i \
-------
UN
6+SV /+VV /+�DV O+VV
SCALE: HOR 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'
CiS 80911
925
920
915
905
•o,
Ores'
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
= FULL SCALE
1 "
= HALF SCALE
w
o
I.-
N
EX15f
ING
TOP
N
L
CL
-
z
O
F B
NK
U
z
O
z
O
o
IL
cr
O
z
LU
0
oC
}
o
0-1
LU
Q
z
o
z
�oU)
(n
W
J
LU
Y
a
w
w
Lu
Q
—
Z
c/)
J
O�
�
Q
�
U
I
U
O
LL
w
_
:
Q
co
Z
w
Q
Z)
EX15TING
A
ONG
GRNDE
5TR
AM
W
U
�
_
\
Z
Lu
Q
CENTERLINE
W
z W
D
Q
U
w Ur
>-
z
§
o
o
+ CONSERVATION
UI EASEMENT
,I
BREAK
I
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S6
Uj
+
TIE REA N FF I -C INTO
REACI-1 FF I -D
UN
6+SV /+VV /+�DV O+VV
SCALE: HOR 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'
CiS 80911
925
920
915
905
•o,
Ores'
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
= FULL SCALE
1 "
= HALF SCALE
w
o
I.-
N
O
N
CL
-
z
O
U
z
O
z
O
o
IL
cr
O
z
LU
0
oC
}
o
0-1
LU
Q
z
o
z
�oU)
(n
W
J
LU
Y
a
w
w
Lu
Q
—
Z
c/)
J
O�
�
Q
�
U
U
O
LL
w
_
:
Q
co
Z
w
Q
Z)
W
U
�
Z
Lu
Q
W
z W
D
Q
U
w Ur
>-
z
§
o
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S6

cz
9G5
-0
955
950
945
'm•
LGE
LGE x,
LGE
LGE
LGE
00- TB
U = QNB=
—�-- TQQ
-D 7
U
J
— T8- gR
------------
L�
REACh FF2
PRESERVATION
STA 1 +29 TO 7+31
0+00
U+ -,)U
I +UU
I +5U
C+UU
C+SU
,5+UU
6+SU
4+UU
5 +UU
�D+SU
b+UU
9G5
IM
955
945
'm•
G+50
0
resi
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
INN 'IN
60
2"
= FULL SCALE
IN 1 "
= HALF SCALE
w
Q
C)
�
N
O
N
CL
-
z
O
U
z
O
z
O
o
IL
cr
O
z
LU
0
oC
}
Q
z
z
�Lu
o
OU)
(n
w
J
Y
rC
Q
>
W
-JW
W
Lu
Q
t=
c/)
_j J
O�
�
Q
�
U
�
�
N
LL
O
LL
Q
=
Q
L L1
Cn
Z
Q
Z)
cn
O
Lu
U
Z
a w
z LU
D
Lu
o_
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S7
EXIS
ING
\
COS
ING
EXI5TING
OF BANK
TO
\\
\
EXI5TING GRADE
\
\
ALONG STREAM
\
CENTERLINE
\LLJ
\\
W
\
(n
Q
z _
\
��
\
\
>1+
LU Q
—
--
z
o�
—
�\
tL
�
O
\
J
J
0+00
U+ -,)U
I +UU
I +5U
C+UU
C+SU
,5+UU
6+SU
4+UU
5 +UU
�D+SU
b+UU
9G5
IM
955
945
'm•
G+50
0
resi
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
= FULL SCALE
IN 1 "
= HALF SCALE
w
Q
C)
�
N
O
N
CL
-
z
O
U
z
O
z
O
o
IL
cr
O
z
LU
0
oC
}
Q
z
z
�Lu
o
OU)
(n
w
J
Y
rC
Q
>
W
-JW
W
Lu
Q
t=
c/)
_j J
O�
�
Q
�
U
�
�
N
LL
O
LL
Q
=
Q
L L1
Cn
Z
Q
Z)
cn
O
Lu
U
Z
a w
z LU
D
Lu
o_
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S7

cz
If
cz
N
LL
LL
F-
N
O
i
c�
0
U
;_
ILL
N
c0
L.L
c�
U
z
U
m
2
CL
U)
0
U)
LU
LU
a
z
\ \kms
REACH FF I -A
Uct
LCE
6)/ AGE
-, C �----_TB x / REACH FFI -B75
\l/
5 REACH FF2
PRESERVATION 03
i STA 1 +29 TO 7+31
Ix -
r o � I�
2 /
c�
955 955
9GO
950 950
955
945 945
950 EXISTING GRADE EXI TING TOP
ALONG STREAMOF 13ANK
CE TER INE
V
940 — 940
945
935 935
940
+50 G+00 G+50 7+00 7+50 8+00
SCALE: HOR 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'
0
resi
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, INC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
= FULL SCALE
1 "
= HALF SCALE
w
o
�
N
0
N
CL
z
0
z
0
z
0
O
LL
F-
0-
H
Fr
0
z
LU
iz)
oc
LL
0-1
LU
Q
z
z
o
Lu0
�W
>
LU
Fcr
Q
W
-jW
W
Q_'
Lu
Q
t=
Z
c/)
J
O�
�
Q
�
U
�
�
N
LL
0
LL=
Q
�
�
Q
LLJ
Cn
Z
Q
Z)
c/)O
Lu
U
Z
a LU
z LU
Q
R
Ufn
W V
z
0
o_
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S8

cz
If
U)
v
VC -
LCE VC
LCE ➢ `
LCE n
Lu LCE /, z .
/ + �y /
REACI-1 1`1`3 O /` 1
ENHANCEMENT III
5TA0+44TO 12+23
cc
I
0'`00 �/ \�Te — �� `x-00 �� U��
_— TD--�
—
Ta— -- �
91 /
9 m
I
I
Iii•
975
970
965
'-•
-937
937
-Q DI
g3�
-Q DI
0+00
V+�DV I +VV 1 +5V C+VV C+SV 6+VV 6+�V
SCALE: HOK 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'
GZaMkIN
GZ11I
[N-YEWI
1)+�DV
975
970
9G5
' -•
,�O�
Ores'
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, INC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
= FULL SCALE
1 "
= HALF SCALE
w
orn
N
O
N
CL
-
Z
O
U
Z
O
z
O
o
IL
F-
0-
H
cr
O
�
Z
LU
OQ
0-1
LU
LL
ZC)
Z
O
(n
Lu
U)
W
J
W
Y
Q
W
W
Lu
Q
t=
Z
�
J
O�
<C)
M
LL_
0
LL.
Q
2
Q
Cn
Z
Q
Z)
111O
Lu
U
Z
a w
—
z w
D
\
O
Q
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
—
SHEET NUMBER:
—
S9
—
EXI5TING GRADE
ALONG STREAM
/
1
CENTERLINE
EXI TING TOP
OF BANK
�
1
\
1
A
zl
�\
/
\
w
—
A
w
\
z
O ^
�
+
J
A
LLjLL-
-
-
Q
OI
-'
P
`
J
0+00
V+�DV I +VV 1 +5V C+VV C+SV 6+VV 6+�V
SCALE: HOK 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'
GZaMkIN
GZ11I
[N-YEWI
1)+�DV
975
970
9G5
' -•
,�O�
Ores'
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, INC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
= FULL SCALE
1 "
= HALF SCALE
w
orn
N
O
N
CL
-
Z
O
U
Z
O
z
O
o
IL
F-
0-
H
cr
O
�
Z
LU
OQ
0-1
LU
LL
ZC)
Z
O
(n
Lu
U)
W
J
W
Y
Q
W
W
Lu
Q
t=
Z
�
J
O�
<C)
M
LL_
0
LL.
Q
2
Q
Cn
Z
Q
Z)
111O
Lu
U
Z
a w
z w
D
w
O
Q
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S9

a�
cz
LL
LL
F-
U)
U
N
O
U
E
m
LL
N
c0
L.L
a�
a�
0
U
z
U
m
2
CL
U)
0
U)
LU
ui
Q
z
0
resi
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
= FULL SCALE
1 "
= HALF SCALE
w
Qrn
o
C)
N
O
N
CL
-
Z
O
U
Z
O
z
O
o
IL
cr
O
�
Z
LU
i
OQ
0-1
LU
LL
ZC)
Z
OU)
(n
Lu
w
J
Y
cr
Q
>
W
-JW
W
Lu
Z
c/)
J
0�
�
Q
�
U
M
LL
�
LL
Q
2
Q
LLJ
��
VJ
Z
Z)
c/)0
Lu
U
Z
a w
z LU
Q
R
U
W
Z
O
Q
Ir
o_
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S10

a�
cz
LL
LL
F-
U)
U
N
O
U
E
m
LL
N
c0
L.L
a�
a�
0
U
z
U
m
2
CL
U)
0
U)
LU
ui
Q
z
0
resi
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
= FULL SCALE
1 "
= HALF SCALE
w
Qrn
o
C)
N
O
N
CL
-
Z
O
U
Z
O
z
O
o
IL
cr
O
�
Z
LU
i
OQ
0-1
LU
LL
ZC)
Z
OU)
(n
Lu
w
J
Y
cr
Q
>
W
-JW
W
Lu
Z
c/)
J
O�
�
Q
�
U
M
LL
�
LL
Q
2
Q
LLJ
��
VJ
Z
Z)
c/)O
Lu
U
Z
a w
z LU
Q
R
U
W
Z
O
Q
Ir
o_
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S11

N
cz
H
LL
LL
F-
U)
U
N
O
i
0
0
U
E
m
ILLN
0
U
z
U
m
2
CL
U)
0
U)
LU
LU
Q
z
m
LCE
LCE �
LCE ---- �,
LCE
� 1
0o r I
CO rn
0
—g1
T�,�
\ O
POND�I REACI-1 FF3
EWIANCEMENT III m
STA 12+80 TO 20+44 i
g37
950
945
940
935
930
18
950
945
940
935
930
00
SCALE: I10R 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'
0
resi
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
= FULL SCALE
1 "
= HALF SCALE
w
Qc)
oC)
�
N
O
N
CL
-
z
O
I---
-U
C)
Z
O
z
O
o
IL
cr
O
z
LU
iz)
oc
o
0-1
LU
a
z
z
�OU)
o
(n
W
J
W
z
WIW
Q
W
z
O
;Io
C N
LLJ
LIQ
LL -
O
cr
Q
>
W
-J
W
cr
m
Q_
Lu
EX15TING TOP
OF BANK
Z
Z
c/)
J
O�
�
U
M
LL
0
LL
Q
=
Q
L LI
��
VJ
Z
Q
Z)
c/)
O
Lu
U
Z
Lu
a w
Lu
z LU
D
Q
U
w
Z
3:
EX15TING GRADE
ALONG STREAM
CENTERLINE
o_
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S12
�
v
+00 18+5 19+ 19+5 20+00
20+50
21+00
21+50
22+
950
945
940
935
930
00
SCALE: I10R 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'
0
resi
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
= FULL SCALE
1 "
= HALF SCALE
w
Qc)
oC)
�
N
O
N
CL
-
z
O
I---
-U
C)
Z
O
z
O
o
IL
cr
O
z
LU
iz)
oc
o
0-1
LU
a
z
z
�OU)
o
(n
W
J
W
Y
cr
Q
>
W
-J
W
cr
m
Q_
Lu
Z
Z
c/)
J
O�
�
U
M
LL
0
LL
Q
=
Q
L LI
��
VJ
Z
Q
Z)
c/)
O
Lu
U
Z
Lu
a w
Lu
z LU
D
Q
U
w
Z
3:
o_
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S12

a�
45
N
v -
c0
-
\ LAY BACK LEFT BANK FROM
STA 0+53 TO 2+00
INSTALL COIR MATTING
LIVE STAKE _
131
/ --- ---vo
— /
l
— _ _ _
TB — —
00
\ 5+00TT� -_ — ---- -
-- — —-- --_ — —^ --- _— I — --_=-- = — - —91
91 — --
--- ---- � ��' —
—-aa — BB
v \-_ , --- ---- - -- -- --
_ 1
A \ V 1
\\ BENCH RIGHT BANK FROM REACH FF4-A �� O
��� STA 0+53 TO 5+27 ENHANCEMENT I �� O + 7"
SEE DETAIL SHEET D4 STA 0+53 TO 5+27 / / / LLJ/
�LCE L z�
CE LCE
935
930
925
920
915
0+00
V+�DV I +VV 1 +5V C+VV C+SV 6+VV
SCALE: HOK 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'
rox0 J
GZaNkmi
UNAI J
�Z1Iv
1)+�DV
935
930
925
920
915
0
resi
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
0
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
030
60
211
- FULL SCALE
IN 1 "
= HALF SCALE
w
Qc)
oC)
�
N
O
N
wl
CL
z
O
I-
wl
z
O
z
O
o
IL
or
O
z
LU
o
0-1
LU
Q
U)
o
z
�o�
(n
W
J
w
Y
Q
w
w
0=
crLu
Q_
Q
�
Z
c/)
J
O�
�
U
Q
LL
0
LL
C�
G
LL
Q
Z
=
�
>
Q
co
Z
W
Q
Z)
0�
c/)
O
Lu
U
Z
a w
z W
D
Q
QI
U
w
z
3:
O
Q
o_
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
QI
S13
LU
w
0
O�
_ -;�+
;1+
�o
�Ln
wQ
wQ
O
OI"
-�
—
\
PROPOSED
R
GHT
O
OI
\
/
\
EXIETING1
TOP
_
EXI 5TIN
ALONG
G
DE
STREAM
CENTER
I
INE
0+00
V+�DV I +VV 1 +5V C+VV C+SV 6+VV
SCALE: HOK 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'
rox0 J
GZaNkmi
UNAI J
�Z1Iv
1)+�DV
935
930
925
920
915
0
resi
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
0
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
030
60
211
- FULL SCALE
IN 1 "
= HALF SCALE
w
Qc)
oC)
�
N
O
N
CL
z
O
I-
z
O
z
O
o
IL
or
O
z
LU
o
0-1
LU
Q
U)
o
z
�o�
(n
W
J
w
Y
Q
w
w
0=
crLu
Q_
Q
�
Z
c/)
J
O�
�
U
Q
LL
0
LL
C�
G
LL
Q
Z
=
�
>
Q
co
Z
W
Q
Z)
0�
c/)
O
Lu
U
Z
a w
z W
D
Q
U
w
z
3:
O
Q
o_
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S13

a�
45
N
r
cz
-
O
rem VA" A \ \
930
925
920
915
n
—
\\ — -- —
�� 1 TB -
-- — \ — —
---
a —
Cc'
LCE
REACH FF4-B
RE5TORATI ON
STA G+59 TO 1 1 +03
\G -
v
J
vot
V
J
ro-grort,
b+ -,)U i +w /+-,)U D+w 0+5v �+vv
SCALE: HOK 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'
I EFUIL9 A
Ilmj1e7VA
I1111111111iW91%
Alm
925
920
915
ti •
12+00
REACH FF4 6+59 TO 5TA 1 1 +03
15.5'
1 1 .4'
1.35'
rL
TYPICAL RIFFLE CRO55 SECTION
I f� r-'
CL
TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CRO55 SECTION
I f� r-'
rL
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
0
resi
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
0
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
= FULL SCALE
IN 1 "
= HALF SCALE
w
o
c)
0
�
N
O
N
CL
-
z
O
z
0
z
O
O
LL
cr
O
z
LU
0
oC
}
LL
0-1
LU
Q
zo
z
0
O
(n
Lu
U)
W
J
W
Y
Q
W
W
Lu
Q
�
Z
c/)
J
0�
<C)
Li
LL
EX15TING GRADE
z
=
Q
L L1
co
z
Q
D
cn
0
Lu
U
ALONG STREAM
z
2z<L
LJ
z LU
D
Q
U
w Ur
Z
O
Q
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
EXIS
ING
OP
11
1
MJG
1
1
AFM
CENTERLINE
SHEET NUMBER:
S14
F B
NK
I
�\
�— POP
SED
TOP
OF
5A
NK
INN
-0.90%
"N'—
w
I
—W
Q
PR
PO
ED
I
z
01F
LU
w
EXis
;I+
QI
„
\
LU zl<
J W
Olm
\
OvT
a—
QI+
�
0
O
—
�I
z+
�I
ol-
O
J
ro-grort,
b+ -,)U i +w /+-,)U D+w 0+5v �+vv
SCALE: HOK 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'
I EFUIL9 A
Ilmj1e7VA
I1111111111iW91%
Alm
925
920
915
ti •
12+00
REACH FF4 6+59 TO 5TA 1 1 +03
15.5'
1 1 .4'
1.35'
rL
TYPICAL RIFFLE CRO55 SECTION
I f� r-'
CL
TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CRO55 SECTION
I f� r-'
rL
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
0
resi
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
0
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
= FULL SCALE
IN 1 "
= HALF SCALE
w
o
c)
0
�
N
O
N
CL
-
z
O
z
0
z
O
O
LL
cr
O
z
LU
0
oC
}
LL
0-1
LU
Q
zo
z
0
O
(n
Lu
U)
W
J
W
Y
Q
W
W
Lu
Q
�
Z
c/)
J
0�
<C)
Li
LL
Q
z
=
Q
L L1
co
z
Q
D
cn
0
Lu
U
z
2z<L
LJ
z LU
D
Q
U
w Ur
Z
O
Q
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S14

a�
45
N
V_
cz
-
oy�
9
925
920
915
905
LCE -
/
/
ICE
g\ \ -1 t f \ +00 — REACH FF I -D
RESTORATION
STA I4+20 TO 18+20
17+00
XN
iii _ -- � _ �
k0trr-w
— —
J
A
REACH FF I -D
RE5TORATI ON
STA 12+04 TO 13+47 \
LCE
0
00
V°hF
0
a
12+00
1 6+w 1 6 U I Z++vU I-++�Dv 1 5+w 1 5+�v
SCALE: HOR 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'
IKP-mmLw1wj
1�ZVA
I/+5V
925
Am
915
905
REACH FF I -D 5TA 12+04 TO 5TA 27+77
25'
I C) 4'
i. 5.1
rL
TYPICAL RIFFLE CRO55 SECTION
'-�n I'
CL
TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CRO55 SECTION
'-�n I'
rL
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
rp
resi
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2
FULL SCALE
1 "
= HALF SCALE
w
o
—
�
N
0
N
CL
-
z
0
z
0
z
O
o
IL
cr
0
z
LU
iz)
oc
o
0-1
LU
Q
z
o
z
�0U)
(n
W
J
W
Y
Q
W
W
Lu
Q
�
z
c/)
J
O�
�
Q
EXISTING GRADE
ALONG STREAM
CENTERLINE
�
U
O
LL
Q
=
Q
co
Z
POS
Q
Z
c/)
O
Lu
U
Z
Lu
~
Q w
z W
D
Q
U
W
z
0
PR
D TOP
Ir
o_
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S15
OF
AN
I
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
BREAK
/
PROPOSED
CHANNEL BED
�
+
N
+
_
Q
_
Q
12+00
1 6+w 1 6 U I Z++vU I-++�Dv 1 5+w 1 5+�v
SCALE: HOR 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'
IKP-mmLw1wj
1�ZVA
I/+5V
925
Am
915
905
REACH FF I -D 5TA 12+04 TO 5TA 27+77
25'
I C) 4'
i. 5.1
rL
TYPICAL RIFFLE CRO55 SECTION
'-�n I'
CL
TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CRO55 SECTION
'-�n I'
rL
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
rp
resi
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2
FULL SCALE
1 "
= HALF SCALE
w
o
—
�
N
0
N
CL
-
z
0
z
0
z
O
o
IL
cr
0
z
LU
iz)
oc
o
0-1
LU
Q
z
o
z
�0U)
(n
W
J
W
Y
Q
W
W
Lu
Q
�
z
c/)
J
O�
�
Q
�
U
O
LL
Q
=
Q
co
Z
W
Q
Z
c/)
O
Lu
U
Z
Lu
~
Q w
z W
D
Q
U
W
z
0
Ir
o_
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S15

m`
45
N
V—
c0
N
0
LU
Q
LL0
LL
LL
F
N
0
O
U
E
m
LL
N
c0
L.L
a�
a�
0
U
z
U
m
2
CL
U)
0
U)
LU
ui
Q
z
0
resi
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
0
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
= FULL SCALE
1 "
= HALF SCALE
w
Qrn
C)
I.—
N
O
N
CL
-
Z
O
U
Z
O
z
O
o
IL
cr
O
�
Z
LU
i
OQ
0-1
LU
LL
ZC)
Z
OU)
(n
Lu
w
J
Y
cr
Q
>
W
-JW
W
Lu
Z
c/)
J
O�
�
Q
�
U
O
LL
Q
Z=
Q
co
Z
W
Q
Z)
0.
c/)O
Lu
U
Z
Lu
a w
Lu
z W
Q
R
U
W
Z
O
Q
Ir
o_
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S16

45
N
v -
c0
-
920
915
N
905
'm
24
A-, /
0 O
o � �
o �
o p �
O
Q0 W
J
U
LCE
REACH FF I -D
J, RESTORATION
STA 22+27 TO 27+77
X�fe
�e
Am
l /
r
CE �-
��
rn
REACH FF5-15
�_Gt
SCE
�_Ct
REACH FF I -E
ENHANCEMENT II
STA 28+54 TO 29+ 13
SCALE: HOR 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'
920
915
Oro,
905
N
REACH FF I -D 5TA 12+04 TO STA 27+77
25'
5.I° _I
rL
TYPICAL RIFFLE CRO55 SECTION
CL
TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CRO55 SECTION
rL
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
10res'
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
(D
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
= FULL SCALE
1 "
= HALF SCALE
6i
C)
�
N
0
N
CL
-
z
0
Z
0
z
O
O
L
cr
0
z
LU
o
0-1
LU
Q
o
�0U)
z
U)
Z
W
J
W
Y
Q
W
W
Lu
Q
t=
Z
c/)
J
0�
�
Q
�
U
0
LL
LL
Q
=
Q
co
z
w
ca
0
�
U
z
Qw�
6i
z LU
Q
U
w Ur
Z
0Q
o
a
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
PR
OF
P51
BANK
H) TOF
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S17
EXIETING
AL
NG
GRADE
TRE4M
CENTERLINE
r
I
�
I
1.30
l
\
1 I
J
�
\
I
PROPOSED-
ROPOSED CHANNEL
CHANNEL
BED
+
ON5ERVATION
EASEMENT
BREAK
+
I °�
Q
+00 24+50
25+00
25+50
2G+00
2G+50
27+00
27+50
28+00
28+50
29+00
29+
SCALE: HOR 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'
920
915
Oro,
905
N
REACH FF I -D 5TA 12+04 TO STA 27+77
25'
5.I° _I
rL
TYPICAL RIFFLE CRO55 SECTION
CL
TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CRO55 SECTION
rL
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
10res'
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
(D
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
= FULL SCALE
1 "
= HALF SCALE
6i
C)
�
N
0
N
CL
-
z
0
Z
0
z
O
O
L
cr
0
z
LU
o
0-1
LU
Q
o
�0U)
z
U)
Z
W
J
W
Y
Q
W
W
Lu
Q
t=
Z
c/)
J
0�
�
Q
�
U
0
LL
LL
Q
=
Q
co
z
w
ca
0
�
U
z
Qw�
6i
z LU
Q
U
w Ur
Z
0Q
o
a
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S17

cz
9D]
REACH 115-A
ENHANCEMENT III
STA O+G5 TO 14+83
9 DI
r
n
rn
� 8 f—lam
00
y
r
rn
'-m
955
950
945
-.N
LICE
LCE LCE
IM
LCE
D1
937
LC,t� v,c
LCE
0
0
<D
SLI
_z0)
J —
Z co
U
937
00
00
0+00
V+�DV I +VV 1 +5V C+VV C+SV 6+VV 6+�V
SCALE: HOR 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'
GZaMkwj
GZ N-Xvi
MZaffl1vi
')+�DV
' -�
955
950
945
` cE
0
resi
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
0
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
- FULL SCALE
1 "
= HALF SCALE
w
Q
o
C)
N
O
N
CL
-
Z
O
I---
-U
C)
Z
O
z
O
o
IL
cr
O
�
Z
LU
i
OQ
0-1
LU
LL
ZC)
Z
0
O
(n
Lu
U)
W
J
W
Y
Q
W
W
Lu
Q
�
z
C!)
J
O�
�
Q
�
U
L0
LL
O
LL
Q
=
LLI
Q
w
co
z
Q
Z)
W
U
�
Z
a w
z w
D
/-EXI,'5TlNqTOFI
Q
U
W Ur
>-
Z
3:
O
EXI5TING GRADE
ALONG STREAM
CENTERLINE
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
—
—
\
N1-
AFM
/
SHEET NUMBER:
S18
/A
1
n
LU
--
-
-
w
z
,
LU
o-
0
0+00
V+�DV I +VV 1 +5V C+VV C+SV 6+VV 6+�V
SCALE: HOR 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'
GZaMkwj
GZ N-Xvi
MZaffl1vi
')+�DV
' -�
955
950
945
` cE
0
resi
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
0
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
- FULL SCALE
1 "
= HALF SCALE
w
Q
o
C)
N
O
N
CL
-
Z
O
I---
-U
C)
Z
O
z
O
o
IL
cr
O
�
Z
LU
i
OQ
0-1
LU
LL
ZC)
Z
0
O
(n
Lu
U)
W
J
W
Y
Q
W
W
Lu
Q
�
z
C!)
J
O�
�
Q
�
U
L0
LL
O
LL
Q
=
LLI
Q
w
co
z
Q
Z)
W
U
�
Z
a w
z w
D
Q
U
W Ur
>-
Z
3:
O
Q
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S18

cz
If
LO
LL
LL
F-
U
N
O
0
0
U
;_
m
ILLN
c0
L.L
c�
U
z
U
m
2
CL
U)
0
U)
LU
LU
Q
z
0
C)
CS> r O
CP rn
6> A-
0 +
0
O
REACH FF5-A
ENHANCEMENT III
5TA O+G5 TO 14+83
6
IO�O
\ y Ta \ O
LCE LC E LC E LC E LCE LCE LCE
945
940
935
930
925
945
940
935
930
925
G+00 G+50 7+00 7+50 8+00 8+50 9+00 9+50 10+00 10+50 11+00 11+50 12+00
SCALE: HOR 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'
Ores'
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
C)
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
= FULL SCALE
1 "
= HALF SCALE
w
Qc)
oC)
�
N
O
N
CL
-
z
O
I---
-U
C)
Z
/
O
EX4TINd
TO
z
O
o
IL
cr
O
z
—
LU
o
OF
AN
LU
Q
Z
z
�OU)
o
U)
W
J
W
Y
cr
Q
>
W
W
Lu
Q
�
Z
c/)
J
O�
�
Q
�
U
L0
LL
0
LL
Q
2
Q
LLJ
��
VJ
Z
Q
Z)
c/)
O
Lu
U
Z
a w
z LU
_
R
—
—
—
o_
EX15
TING
GRADE
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S19
ALONG
CENTERLINE
5
REA
/
945
940
935
930
925
G+00 G+50 7+00 7+50 8+00 8+50 9+00 9+50 10+00 10+50 11+00 11+50 12+00
SCALE: HOR 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'
Ores'
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
C)
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
= FULL SCALE
1 "
= HALF SCALE
w
Qc)
oC)
�
N
O
N
CL
-
z
O
I---
-U
C)
Z
O
z
O
o
IL
cr
O
z
LU
o
0-1
LU
Q
Z
z
�OU)
o
U)
W
J
W
Y
cr
Q
>
W
W
Lu
Q
�
Z
c/)
J
O�
�
Q
�
U
L0
LL
0
LL
Q
2
Q
LLJ
��
VJ
Z
Q
Z)
c/)
O
Lu
U
Z
a w
z LU
Q
R
U
w (D
>-
Z
3:
o_
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S19

a�
cz
LO
LL
LL
F-
U)
N
O
U
E
m
LL
N
c0
L.L
a�
a�
0
U
z
U
m
2
CL
U)
0
U)
LU
ui
Q
z
0
resi
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
= FULL SCALE
1 "
= HALF SCALE
w
Qrn
o
C)
N
O
N
CL
-
Z
O
U
Z
O
z
O
o
IL
cr
O
�
Z
LU
i
OQ
0-1
LU
LL
ZC)
Z
OU)
(n
Lu
w
J
Y
cr
Q
>
W
-JW
W
Lu
Z
c/)
J
0�
�
Q
�
U
L0
LL
O
LL
Q
=
Q
W
�/�
VJ
Z
Z)
c/)0
Lu
U
Z
a w
z W
Q
R
U
W
Z
O
Q
Ir
o_
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S20

a�
cz
LO
LL
LL
F-
U)
N
O
U
E
m
LL
N
c0
L.L
a�
a�
0
U
z
U
m
2
CL
U)
0
U)
LU
ui
Q
z
0
resi
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
= FULL SCALE
1 "
= HALF SCALE
w
Qrn
o
C)
N
O
N
CL
-
Z
O
U
Z
O
z
O
o
IL
cr
O
�
Z
LU
i
OQ
0-1
LU
LL
ZC)
Z
OU)
(n
Lu
w
J
Y
cr
Q
>
W
-JW
W
Lu
Z
c/)
J
O�
�
Q
�
U
L0
LL
O
LL
Q
=
Q
W
�/�
VJ
Z
Z)
c/)O
Lu
U
Z
a w
z W
Q
R
U
W
Z
O
Q
Ir
o_
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S21

i
PLANTING LEGEND
LIMITS OF CONSERVATION a .�
EASEMENT LGE -
EXISTING TREELINE i ~Wr
PROPERTY LINE
RIPARIAN PLANTING I
(TOTAL AREA: 13.7 AC) I
1
SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING/
INVASIVES CONTROL
Common Name
(TOTAL AREA: 7.0 AC)
Percent
Composition
Virginia Wildrye
I
ENH,
LEACH EE4-A
ENHANCEMENT 1
BEACH EE4-B
RE5TOI ATION
1 1-1 L!-\l-.�l I I I I -lam
ENHANCEMENT II
ID G A r` I_ -I G G I n
2FACH FFr)
-0 \
ENT
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PLANTING NOTE5
ALL PLANTING AREAS
1 . EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE PROPERLY MAINTAINED UNTIL PERMANENT
VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED AND FINAL APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. THE CONTRACTOR
SHALL INSPECT EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY TO
ENSURE MEASURES ARE FUNCTIONING PROPERLY.
2. DISTURBED AREAS NOT AT FINAL GRADE SHALL BE TEMPORARILY VEGETATED WITHIN 10
WORKING DAYS. UPON COMPLETION OF FINAL GRADING, PERMANENT VEGETATION SHALL
BE ESTABLISHED FOR ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN 10 WORKING DAYS. SEEDING SHALL
BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH EROSION CONTROL PLAN.
3
14.
l
5.
G.
7.
8.
9.
10.
1 I.
ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE PREPARED PRIOR TO PLANTING BY DI5C OR
SPRING -TOOTH CHISEL PLOW TO MINIMUM DEPTH OF 12 INCHES. MULTIPLE PASSES
SHALL BE MADE ACROSS PLANTING AREAS WITH THE IMPLEMENT AND THE FINAL PA55
SHALL FOLLOW TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS.
BARE ROOT PLANTINGS SHALL BE PLANTED ACCORDING TO DETAIL SHOWN ON SHEET D2.
LIVE STAKES SHALL BE PLANTED ACCORDING TO DETAIL SHOWN ON SHEET D2.
TREATMENT/REMOVAL OF INVASIVE SPECIES, PINES AND SWEET GUMS LESS THAN G" DBH
SHALL BE PERFORMED THROUGHOUT THE PLANTED AREA.
SPECIES SHALL BE DISTRIBUTED SUCH THAT 3 TO G PLANTS OF THE SAME SPECIES ARE
GROUPED TOGETHER.
BARE ROOT PLANTING DENSITY IS APPROXIMATELY 800 STEMS PER ACRE.
LIVE STAKES ARE PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS AND ALONG BOTH
BANK5 OF STRAIGHT REACHES ADJACENT TO POOLS.
TEMPORARY SEED MIX SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 150 LBS/ACRE TO ALL DISTURBED
AREAS WITH SLOPES EQUAL TO OR STEEPER THAN 3: 1.
PERMANENT RIPARIAN SEED MIX SHALL BE APPLIED TO ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN THE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT AT A KATE OF 15 LBS/ACRE.
PERMANENT HERB SEED MIX SHALL BE APPLIED TO ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN THE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT BREAKS AT A RATE OF 15 LBS/ACRE.
PLANTING TABLE
Permanent Riparian Seed Mix
Common Name
Scientific Name
Percent
Composition
Virginia Wildrye
Elymus virgmicus
25%
Indian Grass
5orghastrum nutans
25%
Little Blue Stem
5chizachyrium scopanum
10%
Soft Rush
Juncus effusus
10%
Blackeyed 5u5an
Rudbeckia hirta
10%
Deertongue
Dichanthehum clandestmum
10%
Common Milkweed
Asclepias syriaca
5%
Showy Goldenrod
Sohdago erecta
5%
Live Staking and Live Cuttings Bundle Tree 5pecie5
Percent
Common Name Scientific Name Composition
Silky dogwood Cornus amomum 40%
Black willow Salix nigra GO%
Bare Root Planting Tree 5peae5
Common Name
Scientific Name
Percent
Composition
Water Oak
Quercus nigra
15%
Willow Oak
Quercus phellos
15%
River Birch
Betula nigra
15%
American Sycamore
platanas occidentalis
10%
Northern Red Oak
Quercus rubra
10%
Green Ash
Fraxmu3 penn.sylvanica
10%
Yellow Poplar
briodendron tuhpifera
10%
Persimmon
Diospyros virgmiana
5%
Elderberry
Sambucus canadensis
5%
Black Gum
Nyssa biflora
5%
1pres,
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, INC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
0
FULL SCALE: 1 "=150
0
150
300
2"
= FULL SCALE
1 "
= HALF SCALE
I`
w
Q
o
N
O
N
J
11
U-)
O
z
O
I—
00
z
O
z
O
o
LL
a
C)
z
LU
'
°
W
Q
Q
z
o
z
0
O
(n
U)Lu
Q
J
LU
>
—j
cr
r
w
U
Q
z
z
O
J
C�
U
z
Q
�
J
Q
O
CD
w
z
z
(n
z
Q
O
J
LU
U
z
LLIG
di
2i z
Y
�_
z LJJ
O
W
z
O
Q
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
p 1

u)
J
W
0
co
N
0
C7
0
Q
U_
U)
co
LL
a�
N
c
U
z
cn
U
2
c�
U)
LU
Ir
W
Q
z
WHEN AND WHERE TO USE IT
302 Jefferson
Street, Suite 110
SILT FENCE IS APPLICABLE IN AREAS:
1.25 LB./LINEAR FT. STEEL POSTS
Raleigh, NC 27605
FLOW
Main: 919.829.9909
WHERE THE MAXIMUM SHEET OR OVERLAND FLOW PATH LENGTH TO THE FENCE IS 1 00 -FEET.
Fax: [phone]
B MIDDLE LAYER
TOP LAYER
WHERE THE MAXIMUM SLOPE STEEPNESS (NORMAL [PERPENDICULAR] TO FENCE LINE) IS 2H: I V. EXTRA STRENGTH
SEAL
THAT DO NOT RECEIVE CONCENTRATED FLOWS GREATER THAN 0.5 CFS. FILTER FABRIC
64
BOTTOM LAYER
W
DO NOT PLACE SILT FENCE ACROSS CHANNELS OR USE IT AS A VELOCITY CONTROL BMP.
GLjT�
EARTH SURFACE
lgNp
A A
CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS: '
` �\
q�,
\iii\ .. \\ / i
/\ / /\
I . USE A SYNTHETIC FILTER FABRIC OF AT LEAST 95% BY WEIGHT OF POLYOLEFINS OR POLYESTER, WHICH IS
CERTIFIED BY THE MANUFACTURER OR SUPPLIER AS CONFORMING TO THE REQUIREMENTS IN ASTM D G4G 1.
\ `
�� B
TRENCH 0.25' DEEP
SYNTHETIC FILTER FABRIC SHOULD CONTAIN ULTRAVIOLET RAY INHIBITORS AND STABILIZERS TO PROVIDE A
\\ \` HEAVY DUTY PLASTIC TIE
PLAN VIEW
ONLY WHEN PLACED ON
MINIMUM OF 6 MONTHS OF EXPECTED USABLE CONSTRUCTION LIFE AT A TEMPERATURE RANGE OF O° TO 120° BACKFILL TRENCH WITH
/ FOR STEEL POSTS
\
ENDS OF BAGS IN
EARTH SURFACE
F•
\
ADJACENT ROWS BUTTED
N
COMPACTED EARTH
2. ENSURE THAT POSTS FOR SEDIMENT FENCES ARE 1.33 LB/LINEAR FT STEEL WITH A MINIMUM LENGTH OF 5 FEET.
SLIGHTLY TOGETHER
MAKE SURE THAT STEEL POSTS HAVE PROJECTIONS TO FACILITATE FASTENING THE FABRIC.
i I
SEE NOTE LOWESTPOINT
GROUND LEVEL
SECTION B -B
CONSTRUCTION:
11
Ln
1. CONSTRUCT THE SEDIMENT BARRIER OF EXTRA STRENGTH SYNTHETIC FILTER FABRICS.
\ FABRIC
BURY
2. ENSURE THAT THE HEIGHT OF THE SEDIMENT FENCE DOES NOT EXCEED 24 INCHES ABOVE THE GROUND
\
SURFACE. (HIGHER FENCES MAY IMPOUND VOLUMES OF WATER SUFFICIENT TO CAUSE FAILURE OF THE USE EITHER FLAT
\
-BOTTOM
STRUCTURE.) OR V -BOTTOM TRENCH
_O
H
/
% �- �\ \ / i \ / EARTH SURFACE
3. CONSTRUCT THE FILTER FABRIC FROM A CONTINUOUS ROLL CUT TO THE LENGTH OF THE BARRIER TO AVOID SHOWN BELOW
SECTION A -A
U
JOINTS. WHEN JOINTS ARE NECESSARY, SECURELY FASTEN THE FILTER CLOTH ONLY AT A SUPPORT POST WITH 4
FEET MINIMUM OVERLAP TO THE NEXT POST.
4. EXTRA STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC WITH G FEET POST SPACING DOES NOT REQUIRE WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE.
SILT FENCE INSTALLATION
NOTE: END OF DIKE AT GROUND LEVEL TO BE
SECURELY FASTEN THE FILTER FABRIC DIRECTLY TO POSTS. WIRE OR PLASTIC ZIP TIES SHOULD HAVE MINIMUM
HIGHER THAN THE LOWEST POINT OF FLOW CHECK. SANDBAG BARRIERS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF THREE
LAYERS OF SANDBAGS.
50 POUND TENSILE STRENGTH.
I-
SUFFICIENT SANDBAGS ARE TO BE PLACED TO
5. EXCAVATE A TRENCH APPROXIMATELY 4 INCHES WIDE AND 8 INCHES DEEP ALONG THE PROPOSED LINE OF
PREVENT SCOURING. THE BOTTOM LAYER SHALL CONSIST OF 3 ROWS OF BAGS, THE MIDDLE LAYER
POSTS AND UPSLOPE FROM THE BARRIER. FILTER FABRIC
FILTER FABRIC
SHALL CONSIST OF 2 ROWS OF BAGS AND THE TOP LAYER SHALL CONSIST OF I
G. PLACE 12 INCHES OF THE FABRIC ALONG THE BOTTOM AND SIDE OF THE TRENCH.
ROW OF BAGS. THE RECOMMENDED DIMENSION OF A FILLED
SANDBAG SHALL BE
7. BACKFILL THE TRENCH WITH SOIL PLACED OVER THE FILTER FABRIC AND COMPACT. THOROUGH COMPACTION COMPACTED
COMPACTED v
APPROXIMATELY 0.5 FT X 0.5 FT X 1 .5 FT.
OF THE BACKFILL IS CRITICAL TO SILT FENCE PERFORMANCE. EARTH N
EARTH N
8. DO NOT ATTACH FILTER FABRIC TO EXISTING TREES. 00
FO
RUQ
RUQ
p
SANDBAG IMPERVIOUS DIKE
MAINTENANCE:
III
AIG
NTS
INSPECT SEDIMENT FENCES AT LEAST ONCE A WEEK AND AFTER EACH RAINFALL. MAKE ANY REQUIRED REPAIRS
O
IMMEDIATELY.
NifN
LL
SHOULD THE FABRIC OF A SEDIMENT FENCE COLLAPSE, TEAR, DECOMPOSE OR BECOME INEFFECTIVE, REPLACE IT
PROMPTLY.
_
it
FILTER
O
�
REMOVE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORAGE VOLUME FOR THE NEXT RAIN AND TO FABRIC 4" FILTER FABRIC
REDUCE PRESSURE ON THE FENCE. TAKE CARE TO AVOID UNDERMINING THE FENCE DURING CLEANOUT.
Z
NOTES:
REMOVE ALL FENCING MATERIALS AND UNSTABLE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AND BRING THE AREA TO GRADE AND STABILIZE FLAT -BOTTOM TRENCH DETAIL
V -SHAPED TRENCH DETAIL
LU
I . EXCAVATION SHALL BE PERFORMED ONLY IN DRY AND/OR ISOLATED SECTIONS OF
IT AFTER THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN PROPERLY STABILIZED.
CHANNEL.
2. IMPERVIOUS DIKES SHOULD BE USED TO ISOLATE WORK AREAS FROM STREAM
FLOW.
OW
3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DISTURB MORE AREA THAN CAN BE STABILIZED IN
LU
ONE WORKING DAY. A MAXIMUM OF 200 FEET MAY BE DISTURBED AT ANY ONE
Q
TIME.
Q
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
G�OPO COARSE AGGREGATE -
4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING PUMP SIZE
�\\� STONE SIZE = 2"-3"
SUFFICIENT TO PUMP BASE FLOW.
U)
W
NTS
t*\Cl
5. DIKE MUST BE CONSTRUCTED OF NON -ERODIBLE MATERIALS SUCH AS SANDBAGS.
o O O o
SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION:
W
I . INSTALL STILLING BASIN AND STABILIZED OUTFALL USING CLA55 A RIP RAP AT THE
cr
O O O O O
DOWNSTREAM END OF THE DESIGNATED PROJECT WORKING AREA.
LL]
2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL THE PUMP AROUND PUMP AND THE TEMPORARY
PIPING THAT WILL CONVEY THE BASE FLOW FROM UPSTREAM OF THE WORK AREA
2"x I"OR2"x2"
WOODEN STAKE MINIMUM 9" EROSION
O O O O
TO THE STABILIZED OUTFALL.
CONTROL STRAW WATTLE NOTE:
3. INSTALL UPSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE AND BEGIN PUMPING OPERATIONS FOR
EXISTING
OR COIR WATTLE/LOG EROSION CONTROL WATTLES OR COIR LOGS/WATTLES MAY BE USED IN PLACE OF
STREAM DIVERSION.
GRADE SILT FENCE.
O O O O
4. INSTALL THE DOWNSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE AND DEWATERING PUMPING
S0,
APPARATUS IF NEEDED TO DEWATER THE ENTRAPPED AREA. THE PUMP AND HOSE
SLOPE
/ \
MiN
FOR THIS PURPOSE SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO DEWATER THE WORK AREA.
THIS WATER WILL ALSO BE PUMPED TO AN OUTFALL STABILIZED WITH CLA55 A RIP
rrQn
V
U
RAP.
/
EROSION CONTROL WATTLE�Q\
5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE ANY ACCUMULATED SILT AND DEWATER BEFORE
REMOVAL OF THE IMPERVIOUS DIKE. WHEN DEWATERING AREA, ALL DIRTY WATER
U)
J
MUST BE PUMPED THROUGH A SILT BAG. REMOVE IMPERVIOUS DIKES, PUMPS,
Q
NTS
Q
AND TEMPORARY FLEXIBLE H05EVPIPING STARTING WITH THE DOWNSTREAM DIKE
INSTALL WATTLE IN 3" TO
FIRST.
5" TRENCH
w
G. ONCE THE WORKING AREA IS COMPLETED, REMOVE ALL RIP RAP AND IMPERVIOUS
PURPOSE:
DIKES AND STABILIZE DISTURBED AREAS WITH SEED AND MULCH.
Z
STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHOULD BE USED AT ALL POINTS WHERE TRAFFIC WILL BE LEAVING A
7. ALL WORK IN CHANNEL MUST BE COMPLETED BEFORE REMOVING IMPERVIOUS DIKE.
D
CONSTRUCTION SITE AND MOVING DIRECTLY ONTO A PUBLIC ROAD.
U
O
KEY -IN MATTING PER
INSTALLATION NOTES:
FIG. I OR FIG. 2
CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS:
LU
2.0'
FLOW
MIN.
diz
I . CLEAR THE ENTRANCE AND EXIT AREA OF ALL VEGETATION, ROOTS, AND OTHER OBJECTIONABLE MATERIAL AND
Z z
SITE PREPARATION
PROPERLY GRADE IT.
I GRADE AND COMPACT AREA. _ _ _
_ _
2. PLACE THE GRAVEL TO THE SPECIFIC GRADE AND DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE DETAIL, AND SMOOTH IT.
INTAKE HOSE
.
2. REMOVE ALL ROCKS, CLODS, VEGETATION, AND OBSTRUCTIONS SO THAT MATTING WILL
-
3. PROVIDE DRAINAGE TO CARRY WATER TO A SEDIMENT TRAP OR OTHER SUITABLE OUTLET.
CLA55 A
HAVE DIRECT CONTACT WITH THE SOIL.
<
4. USE GEOTEXTILE FABRICS BECAUSE THEY IMPROVE STABILITY OF THE FOUNDATION IN LOCATIONS SUBJECT TO
STONE
3. PREPARE SEEDBED BY LOOSENING 3 TO 4 INCHES OF TOPSOIL ABOVE FINAL GRADE.
STAKE MATTING JUST
SEEPAGE OR HIGH WATER TABLE.
PUMP AROUND
4. TEST SOILS FOR ANY NUTRIENT DEFICIENCIES AND SUBMIT SOIL TEST RESULTS TO THE
ABOVE CHANNEL TOE �
PROJECT MANAGER:
PUMP
ENGINEER. APPLY ANY TREATMENT SUCH AS LIME OR FERTILIZERS TO THE SOIL IF NEEDED.
AND BACKFILL W/
MJG
RIFFLE MATERIAL
MAINTENANCE:
MJG
SEEDING
CHECKED:
WORK
SHEET NUMBER:
MAINTAIN THE GRAVEL PAD IN A CONDITION TO PREVENT MUD OR SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.
DE -WATERING AREA
1. SEE PLANTING SHEETS FOR SEEDING REQUIREMENTS.
- G" RIFFLE
THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH 2 -INCH STONE. AFTER EACH RAINFALL, INSPECT ANY STRUCTURE
PUMP
2. APPLY SEED TO SOIL BEFORE PLACING MATTING.
MATERIAL
USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT AND CLEAN IT OUT AS NECESSARY. IMMEDIATELY REMOVE ALL OBJECTIONABLE MATERIALS
SPILLED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC ROADWAYS, OR AIRFIELD PAVEMENTS.
INSTALLATION -STREAM BANK
IMPERVIOUS
I . SEE GRADING NOTES ON PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS AND DETAIL SHEETS FOR
DIKE
INFORMATION REGARDING WHAT AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE COIR MATTING.
TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
2. OVERLAP ADJACENT MATS 3" (IN DIRECTION PARALLEL TO FLOW) AND ANCHOR EVERY 12" TRENCH APPROX.
ACROSS THE OVERLAP. THE UPSTREAM MAT SHOULD BE PLACED OVER THE DOWNSTREAM SOIL PILE 8" WIDE X 8" DEEP
TRENCH APPROX. SOIL PILE
8" WIDE x 8" DEEP FROM TRENCH
NTS
3. EDGES SHOULD BE SHINGLED AWAY FROM THE FLOW OF WATER. FROM TRENCH
FLOW
4. LAY MAT LOOSE TO ALLOW CONTACT WITH SOIL. DO NOT STRETCH TIGHT.
16"
5. ANCHOR MAT USING BIODEGRADABLE STAKES OR PINS.
FLOW
DISCHARGE HOSE
G. CUT 8" x 8" TRENCH ALONG TOP OF BANK FOR MAT TERMINATION AS SHOWN IN FIGURES I FLOW
* 2. EXTEND MAT 2 TO 3 FEET PAST TOP OF BANK. ��
7. PLACE ADJACENT ROLLS IN THE ANCHOR TRENCH WITH A MINIMUM OF 4" OVERLAP. r T�
//�/�/
_
\\\%\'%\?/.
/ /\/\/� '
_ /\//\//�\// /�
ID
GENERAL NOTES: �B # 5 WASHED STONE
CLA55 A
STONE
SECURE WITH BIODEGRADABLE STAKES OR PINES, BACKFILL ANCHOR TRENCH, AND \�r�\\\/�
//\//\\//\\/ j ii\�
I . CONSTRUCT DAM ACCORDING TO NCDENR EROSION CONTROL
NOTE: HOSE SHOULD BE
//\//\//��/
\�\\\/\\/\\� \\'\
/ \/\\/\/
MANUAL.
8. 5TO PLE AT 12"ACT
INTERVAL5 ALONG OVERLAP. ��///j\/%j \\\
\
32. ROCK DAM . PACE ROCKIDAMP5HALL BE AS SHOWN 0/ 0 MIX Of CLA55
CLA55 IB RIP
KEPT
SILT BAG AREAOUTSIDE OF WORK
9. STREAM BANK MATTING TO BE INSTALLED FROM TOE OF BANK TO A MINIMUM OF 2.0' \/j,//\ //\\
\�\ I ROW OF
RAP ROCK APRON 5 FEET DOWNSTREAM FROM TOE OF ROCK
LOCATION
PAST TOP OF BANK. SEE FIGURE 3 FOR TERMINATION AT TOP OF BANK. \ \
//�/j BIODEGRADABLE
DAM. A A
10. IF MORE THAN ROLL IS REQUIRED TO COVER THE CHANNEL FROM THE TOP OF BANK DOWN / �/ I ROW OF
/
ORO
"
TO THE TOE, THEN OVERLAP MATTING BY A MINIMUM OF 1'. \\/BIODEGRADABLE
MINPLE CKE5,
STAPLES OR STAKES,
STABILIZED OUTFALL
MIN. OF 24" O.0
STEP I
CLASS A STONE FILTER FABRIC
STEP I
I .5' THICK CLASS
I ROW OF
BIODEGRADABLE
STAPLES OR STAKES,
FLOW MIN. OF 24" O.0
I ROW OF
BIODEGRADABLE
STAPLES OR STAKES,
MIN. OF 24" O.0
B ROCK APRON B
5' MIN. PLAN
SPILLWAY CREST
DISCHARGE
EXISTING HOSE
GROUND
T\?/T
FLOW
W (SPILLWAY)
I'MI5
NOF#
z/3
STABILIZED
7 T TT
�? MIN. STREAM WIDTH
CLASS I AND II RIP WASHED STONE
OUTFALL CLASS A 1 5' TO 20'
/\�%\\ //\\//'\'
RAP
STONE
\1 X\\
, BELOW
SOIL FILLED\�\\
\ ' \\
//
1 .5' THICK CLASS N FLOW LOWESTBANK
FROM SOIL PILE,-
�/
B ROCK APRON o 0 0 0 o N LEVEL
ER05I0N CONTROL MATTING MUST MEET OR EXCEED THE COMPACT WITH FOOT
\// // SOIL FILLED
FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: STEP 2
\j,� \\`/ FROM SOIL PILE,
COMPACT WITH FOOT
-N*
- - - - - -
CLASS I AND II
FILTER FABRIC
• 100 %COCONUT FIBER (COIR) TWINE WOVEN INTO A
STEP 2
CUTOFF TRENCH J RIP RAP
g" OF CLASS A
HIGH STRENGTH MATRIX.
• THICKNESS - 0.35 IN. MINIMUM.
FILTER FILTER FABRIC
FABRIC SECTION A - A
STONE
• SHEAR STRESS - 5 LBS/SQFT FIGURE I
FIGURE 2
SECTION B -B
EXISTING
• LVELOCITY- I /
CHANNEL
• WEIGHT - 29 OZ/5Y
SILT BAG PROFILE
• OPEN AREA - 38%
• SLOPES - UP TO A MAXIMUM OF 1: 1
COIR MATTING
TEMPORARY ROCK CHECK DAM
PUMP AROUND DEWATERING DETAIL
NTS
NTS
NTS
1pres'
302 Jefferson
Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
SCALE: AS SHOWN
W
a
C)
�
N
O
N
11
Ln
Z
_O
H
U
I-
W
z
0
z
O
O
LL
it
O
�
Z
LU
OW
LU
Q
Q
z
o
z
O
(n
U)
W
J
W
Y
Q
W
W
cr
cr
D_
LL]
U)
Z
Z
J
00Q
rrQn
V
U
U)
J
Q
Z
Q
LU
w
Z
D
U
O
U
LU
Q
diz
Z z
w Lw
Q
z
<
0
W �
�
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
D1

cz
U)
J
w
0
N-'
co
N
O
c�
O
Q
U_
J)
E
ILL
a�
IN
c
a)
p
(D
U
z
cn
U
2
c7
U)
LU
Er
w
Q
z
01
res'
FLOW
Street, Suite 110
COARSE AGGREGATE
POINT REFERENCED
CHANNEL BOTTOM
OF BANK
REBAR OR DUCKBILL
ANCHOR
p BACKFILL (2" TO 6")
IN PROFILE
COARSE BACKFILL
PROPOSED
STREAM BED
A
J B
° LOW
MIN 5FT MIN 5FT
NON -WOVEN
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC A
(NCDOT TYPE II)
BACKFILL WITH COARSE
AGGREGATE (I " TO 5" DIA.)
FLOW MIN. 5.0'
SEE PROFILE FOR
/
J ° °
BANKFULL i POINT REFERENCED��
W
y POOL DEPTH
IN PROFILE
COARSE AGGREGATE
C / �\ �\ �\ /
is \�,��
o
\
=
o O
BACKFILL WITH COARSE�/�
< AGGREGATE (I " TO 5" DIA.)
/\/
/ /
BACKFILL (2
_ TO G")
\ ��
, ��\ ��\ ��\ �� 4% TO 6% �� \�
���������
!\\
-- -
-- `
\
\/\\/
FOOTER LOG
��z�
- -- - _
S4
HEADER LOG
C)
\/
O
O O
NON -WOVEN
�����
^��
RIC
GEOTEXTILE(NCDOT II) TACKTOBLOG
O
\/���/��\\�/��//���\/��\/�%/�%/�\ OVERLAP OF
TOE PROTECTION
— �l
TYPE
HIGH
_
DOWNSTREAM LOG
5.0'
MIN
SECTION A -A (OPT 1)
C' LOG BURIED IN ° C
B' BANK MIN 5FT
PROFILE E3-13'
-
LOG BURIED IN
Z
POINT REFERENCED BANK
O
IN PROFILE MIN 5FT on
CHANNEL TOP
OF BANK
REBAR OR DUCKBILL
PROPOSED ANCHOR
U
STREAM BED
A
POINT REFERENCED
SCOUR POOL
IN PROFILE OVERLAP OF
POOL
FLOW MIN. 5.0'
PLAN VIEW
UPSTREAM LOG
MIN 5FT MIN 5FT
SEE PROFILE FOR
POOL DEPTH
j\ 77
a �a�
A
BACKFILL WITH COARSE
AGGREGATE (I " TO 5" / DIA.)
�
J '
W
4% TO G%
�\
/i
IGH ��
\\
4' TO 8'\//
O
/
POINT REFERENCED
IN PROFILE POINT REFERENCED\�\\��\��\� \� \� \ \\��
IN PROFILE�jjj� �j�
/\
NON -WOVEN
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TACK FABRIC
E
MIN. 3.0'
\/\/\\\\/\\\\/�\\/�\\��\�\\\/\\/\
TYPICAL PLAN VIEW
(NCDOT TYPE II) TO LOG
AOAR5ECKFILL(G TO 5A)
B
COARSE AGGREGATE
z
�
BACKFILL (I " TO 5")
SECTION A -A (OPT 2)
MIN. 2.0'
LO11
LL
PROFILE C -C'
COIR MATTING
O
COARSE AGGREGATE ° ° ° ° ° °
BACKFILL (2" TO G")
HEADER LOG
ol
NOTES:
~
I . LOGS SHOULD BE RELATIVELY STRAIGHT HARDWOOD AND
�
TACK FABRIC TO LOG
RECENTLY HARVESTED.
NON -WOVEN (TYP•)
2. PROPOSED LOG DIAMETER:
O
1
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
(NCDOT TYPE II)
A. REACHS S 1, DT3 = 12" MIN
B. REACHES 52, 53, DT 1, DT2, DT4 = 10" MIN
FOOTER LOG
NOTES:
REBAR OR
PROFILE A DUCKBILL ANCHOR
3. NAIL FILTER FABRIC USING 3" 1 OD GALVANIZED COMMON
NAIL EVERY 1 .5' ALONG THE LOG
REBAR (5/8" MIN. DIAMETER, 4' MIN. LENGTH) OR I . LOGS SHOULD BE RELATIVELY STRAIGHT HARDWOOD
DUCKBILL ANCHORS INSTALLED PER AND RECENTLY HARVESTED
-A'
4. DUCKBILL ANCHORS MAY BE USED IN PLACE OF REBAR.
Z
MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTIONS (TYP.) 2. HIGH SIDE OF LOG SHALL BE APPROX. 0.2' HIGHER
O
(n
Lu
U)
W
THAN LOW END
DOUBLE
LOG DROP
SECTION 5-8
3 LONSION
IN DIAM2", MIN LENGTH = 18'
Q
NTS
W
NAIL FILTER FABRIC USING 3" 1 OD GALVANIZED
cr
cr
COMMON NAIL EVERY 1 .5' ALONG THE LOG
LL]
4. DUCKBILL ANCHORS MAY BE USED IN PLACE OF REBAR
LOG SILL
U)
Z
NTS
NEW CHANNEL TO BE
CONSTRUCTED
Z
J
00
MIN. 25'
OLD CHANNEL TO BECHANNEL O
'— PLUG
MAX. 75'
DIVERTED OR
ABANDONED
C�
TOP OF BANK
PLAN VIEW
L%\%\\i\�\%\\i\\%\�\%\\%\\%\�\�%\%\\i
EXISTING CHANNEL i
/\\\��
BOTTOM \/ /�
U)
O
J
Q
UNCOMPACTED BACKFILL
LUw
COMPACTED BACKFILL
1 .5' MINIMUM
BANKFULL ELEVATION
(12" TO 18" LIFTS)
30'
un
L L S
o
N
NEW CHANNEL BANK SHALL
D
FINISHED GRADE BE TREATED AS SPECIFIED
COMPACTED BACKFILL I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \� IN PLANS
NOTES:
1. FILL EXISTING CHANNEL TO BANKFULL ELEVATION WHEN POSSIBLE.
(12" LI FTS) I2.
VJ
U
CHANNEL MU5T BE FILLED IN 12" TO 18" LIfT5,
LU
3. IF CHANNEL CANNOT BE COMPLETELY FILLED TO TOP OF BANK, FILL TO TOP OF
®
Z
BANK FOR 25' OUT OF EVERY 100' SEGMENT.
Z
w Lw
r�
z
PROPOSED
<
0
W �
CHANNEL INVERT
�
PROJECT NUMBER:
IMPERVIOUS SELECT MATERIAL
(PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER) TYPICAL SECTION
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
CHANNEL DACKEILL
DESIGNED:
LOG TOE OR COIR LOG
MJG
NTS
CHANNEL PLUG
MJG
CHECKED:
NTS
SHEET NUMBER:
1 0
res'
302 Jefferson
Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
SCALE: AS SHOWN
W
H
Q
C)
�
N
O
co
N
IL
-
Z
O
U
H
W
Z
O
z
O
O
LL
O
L)
�
D
O
1
LU
W
Q
Z0
Z
O
(n
Lu
U)
W
J
W
Y
Q
W
W
cr
cr
D_
LL]
�
Q
U)
Z
Z
J
00
Q
C�
U
U)
O
J
Q
Q
LUw
D
O
VJ
U
LU
Qzdi
Z Z
w Lw
Q
z
<
0
W �
�
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
D2

NOTES: BENCH ✓
1. TREES NOT INDICATED TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE
PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION IN
ACCORDANCE WITH PLANS.
2. SEED AND MULCH ALL BANKS PRIOR TO INSTALLING
COIR MATTING.
TYPICAL DANK GRADING
NT5
INSTALL COIR MATTING PER DETAIL
SEE DWG D I
MIN 2.0'
COMPACTED 501L
LIVE STAKES
% ALIVE CUTTINGS
TOP OF BANK
0.75" TO 2"
FLAT TOP END
LATERAL BUD
v,
L
TAIL
51DE BRANCH
REMOVED AT
SLIGHT ANGLE
AN
WATER TABLE
SEE PLANTING PLAN)
,IEL BANK
IGNERTO MARK IN FIELD
R TO CONSTRUCTION)
EXI5TI NG
CHANNEL BED
i /�/ f r l
R)ANCHES NOTES:
— — — — — — — AND BRUSH \ �`
1. OVER EXCAVATE THE OUTSIDE BEND OF THE CHANNEL. PLACE
I/4 MAX POOL DEPTH \\ — \ LARGER BRANCHES AND LOGS IN A CP155—CR055 PATTERN.
LOCK IN PLACE WITH FILL COVERING G IN TO 15 IN OF THE
I/4 MAX POOL DEPTH/I\\ LARGER BRANCHES/SMALL LOGS. 1. INSERT 2. REMOVE 3. INSERT
2. PLACE SMALLER BRANCHES AND BRUSH OVER THE LARGER PLANTING BAR A5 PLANTING BAR PLANTING BAR 2
BRANCHES/SMALL LOGS (HARDWOOD SPECIES ONLY) AND SHOWN AND PULL AND PLACE INCHES TOWARDT��T��T��T� COMPACT LIGHTLY TOGETHER. BACKFILL AND COMPACT TO HANDLE TOWARD SEEDING AT PLANTER FROM
PLANTER. CORRECT DEPTH. SEEDING.
\ / LOCK IN PLACE.
3. ACCEPTABLE LIVE CUTTINGS SPECIES A INCLUDE BLACK WILLOW
\\/\ \\/ (5ALIX NIGRA) AND 51LKY WILLOW (5ALIX 5ERICEA). WILLOW
SMALL LOG5 AND/OR CUTTINGS SHOULD BE RINSED AT CUTTING POINT TO ALLOW
LARGE BRANCHES WITH Ai
MIN DIAMETER OF 4". SECTION A -A BETTER ROOTING. r�
4. INSTALL ER0510N CONTROL (COIR) MATTING OVER COMPACTED
SOIL PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER.
5. INSTALL I TO 3 ROWS OF LIVE STAKES ABOVE THE LIVE
CUTTINGS LAYER PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER. � rta
COIR FIBER
MATTING
0
O
DETAIL
LIVE STAKES SHOULD BE LONG ENOUGH
302 Jefferson
Street, Suite 110
TO REACH BELOW THE GROUNDWATER
Raleigh, NC 27605
TABLE. (GENERALLY, A LENGTH OF 2 TO 3
FEET 15 SUFFICIENT.) ADDITIONALLY, THE
STAKES SHOULD HAVE A DIAMETER IN
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
THE RANGE OF 0.75 TO 2 INCHES.
z_
www.res.us
SEAL
45 DEGREE
TAPERED BUTT END
NOTE:
I . ACCEPTABLE SPECIES INCLUDE BLACK WILLOW (5ALIX NIGRA), 51LKY WILLOW
(5ALIX 5ERICEA) AND 51LKY DOGWOOD (CORNUS AMMOMUM).
2. LIVE STAKES SHALL BE PLANTED IN AN AREA EXTENDING 3 FEET OUT FROM TOP
OF BANK TO JUST BELOW BANKFULL.
3. LIVE STAKES SHALL BE SPACED 3 FEET APART, ALTERNATE SPACING.
LIVE STAKE
NT5
DIBBLE PLANTING METHOD
U51NG THE KBC PLANTING BAR
.v
CHANNELTOP
OF BANK
CHANNEL L
OF BANK
TYPICAL PLAN VIEW
BRUSH TOE
NT5
FIBER
-ING
4. PULL HANDLE OF 5. PUSH G. LEAVE
BAR TOWARD HANDLE COMPACTION
PLANTER, FIRMING FORWARD HOLE OPEN.
501L AT BOTTOM. FIRMING 501L WATER
AT TOP. THOROUGHLY.
PLANTING NOTES:tA%
NOTES:
PLANTING BAGBARE ROOTS SHALL BE PLANTED G
DURING PLANTING, SEEDLINGS SHALL FT. TO 10 FT. ON CENTER,
BE KEPT IN A M015T CANVAS BAG ORRANDOM SPACING, AVERAGING 8
SIMILAR CONTAINER TO PREVENT THE FT. ON CENTER, APPROXIMATELY
ROOT SYSTEMS FROM DRYING. G80 PLANTS PER ACRE.
KBC PLANTING BAR
PLANTING BAR SHALL HAVE A BLADE
WITH A TRIANGULAR CR055 SECTION,
AND SHALL BE 12 INCHES LONG, 4
INCHES WIDE AND I INCH THICK AT
CENTER.
ROOT PRUNING
ALL SEEDLINGS SHALL BE ROOT
PRUNED, IF NECESSARY, 50 THAT NO
ROOTS EXTEND MORE THAN 10
INCHES BELOW THE ROOT COLLAR.
DARE ROOT PLANTING
NTS
1pres'
302 Jefferson
Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
SCALE: AS SHOWN
W
Q
C)
�
N
O
N
IL
-
z
O
U
H
W
Z
O
z
O
O
LL
it
O
�
Z
LU
OW
LU
Q
Q
Z0
Z
O
(n
Lu
U)
Q
Lu
J
W
Q
W
W
cr
cr
D_
Z
OO
Q
U
U)
O
J
Q
Q
LUW
z
U)
O
U
LU
z_
Z z
LY W
Q
z
<
0
W �
�
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
D3

NI nTFI-�-
SELECT BACKFILL HEADER BOULDER
r' MATERIAL PT INVERT ELEVATION 1.
nr�r`r'rs
n %s, STREAMBED
n s,
NON—WOVEN MAX DEPTH j OF
s s, ROCK DIAMETER TYP 2.
s, GEOTEXTILE FABRIC ''��__ � � � (TYP) MAX. ALLOWABLE
OPTIONAL (TYP.) ��cs0
DROP ACROSS EACH
PLAN—SYMBOL ROCK 0.4 ft
PT FOOTER
BOULDER �-� _DOWNSTREAM RIFFLE
ELEVATION
� 3.
FOOTER
NON -WOVEN BOULDER
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
OPTIONAL (TYP.) PC 4.
SECTION G—G'
PLANVIEW
LDER INVERT
BANKC"'
ROCK
SILL
SECTION H — H'
vv rri IiI��mlvi �2
.
(MINIMUM 1.OFT
DIAMETER)
DECONSTRUCTED BOULDER RIFFLE
NOT TO SCALE
5
191
7
am
11
10
12.
BOULDERS FOR THE CONSTRUCTED
RIFFLE MUST BE A MIN. OF 1-2TN
BOULDER WITH A MIN. DIAMETER OF
2— 3FT.
THE UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM 13
HEADER BOULDERS SHALL BE
UNDERLAIN BY FOOTER BOULDERS
UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE
ENGINEER. 14
HEADER BOULDERS ARE THE TOP MOST
BOULDERS USED IN EACH STRUCTURE.
HEADER BOULDERS FOR THIS
STRUCTURE ARE ONLY VISIBLE
BETWEEN THE INNER BERMS. 15
HEADER BOULDERS SHALL BE OFFSET
SLIGHTLY UPSTREAM OF THE FOOTER
BOULDERS. FOOTER BOULDERS SHALL
BE INSTALLED BEFORE THE HEADER
BOULDERS.
SET INVERTS AT ELEVATION SHOWN ON
PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS. INVERTS
AND ELEVATIONS WILL BE PROVIDED TO
THE CONTRACTOR AS A 2014 FORMAT
DWG FILE. NO ELEVATIONS OF THE
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE ARMS MAY VARY
FROM THE PLAN LOCATIONS WITHOUT 16
DIRECTION FROM THE ENGINEER.
THE DROP IN ELEVATION ACROSS THE
STRUCTURE SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.5FT
UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE
ENGINEER.
MINI—VANES WILL BE SPACED IN THE
RIFFLE AS A FUNCTION OF THE RIFFLE 17
LENGTH.
THE MOST UPSTREAM RIFFLE
MINI—VANE ARM SHALL BE PLACED
SUCH THAT THE BANK TIE—IN IS ON
THE SAME SIDE AS THE NEXT 18
UPSTREAM OUTSIDE BEND IN ORDER TO
SERVE AS A VANE AND HELP DIRECT
STREAM FLOW AWAY FROM THE
PREVIOUS OUTSIDE BEND. LOCATION
OF ALL RIFFLE VANE ARMS ARE SHOWN
ON THE PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS.
THE MOST DOWNSTREAM MINI—VANE
ARM SHALL BE PLACED SUCH THAT
THE HIGH POINT IS ON THE SAME SIDE
AS THE NEXT DOWNSTREAM OUTSIDE
BEND IN ORDER TO HELP DIRECT
STREAM FLOW FROM THE NEXT OUTSIDE
BEND.
THE VERTICAL SLOPE OF EACH
MINI—VANE ARM SHALL NOT EXCEED
10% UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY
THE ENGINEER. THE SLOPES WILL BE
DICTATED BY THE WIDTH—TO—DEPTH
RATIO OF THE REACH, TYPICAL RIFFLE
INNER BERM CHANNEL, VERTICAL DROP
OVER THE LOG, AND LOG DIAMETER.
ALL GAPS/VOIDS LARGER THAN 21N
BETWEEN THE HEADER AND FOOTER
BOULDERS SHALL BE HAND CHINKED
WITH COBBLE AND GRAVEL ON THE
UPSTREAM SIDE PRIOR TO PLACEMENT
OF THE GEOTEXTILE. ALL CHINKING
SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER
BEFORE THE MINI—VANES ARE
BACKFILLED.
THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE FIRST
AND LAST MINI—VANE ARM REQUIRE A
LAYER OF NON—WOVEN GEOTEXTILE
FABRIC THAT SHALL BE PLACED AS
SHOWN IN THE GEOTEXTILE PLACEMENT
DETAIL THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE
MINI—VANE.
BACKFILL VANES WITH SELECT
BACKFILL MATERIAL AS SHOWN AND
DEFINED IN THE CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
DETAIL.
SELECT BACKFILL AND SOIL
BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE
COMPACTED SUCH THAT FUTURE
SETTLEMENT OF THE MATERIAL IS KEPT
TO A MINIMUM.
THE SURFACE OF THIS STRUCTURE
SHALL BE FINISHED TO A SMOOTH AND
COMPACT SURFACE IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE LINES, GRADES, AND
CROSS—SECTIONS OR ELEVATIONS
SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. THE
DEGREE OF FINISH FOR INVERT
ELEVATIONS SHALL BE WITHIN 0.1 FT OF
THE GRADES AND ELEVATIONS
INDICATED, PROVIDED ANY HEIGHT
DOES NOT EXCEED MAX. ALLOWABLE
DROP OF 0.5FT FOR THIS STRUCTURE.
RE—DRESSING OF CHANNEL AND
BANKFULL BENCH/FLOODPLAIN WILL
LIKELY BE REQUIRED FOLLOWING
INSTALLATION OF IN—STREAM
STRUCTURES AND SHALL BE
CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO
CONSTRUCTION.
FOOTER DEPTH ON ALL STRUCTURES
REQUIRING FOOTERS SHALL BE 6 TIMES
GREATER THAN THE DROP BETWEEN
THE STRUCTURE AND THE FOOTERED
STRUCTURE DIRECTLY UPSTREAM.
THE DEPARTURE ANGLE SHOWN
ABOVE IS DEPICTED IN SUCH A WAY
TO EMPHASIZE DETAIL. ACTUAL
DEPARTURE ANGLE SHALL BE AS
SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND PROFILE
SHEETS AND WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE
CONTRACTOR AS A 2014 FORMAT DWG FILE
AND LN3 FILE.
0
resi
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, INC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
SCALE: AS SHOWN
w
Q
o
C)
�
N
0
N
CL
z
0
0
z
0
z
0
o
IL
C)
z
w
0
O
W
Qw
Q
z
z
0
o
0
(n
U)
W
J
W
Y
Q
W
W
Z
W
J
O
�
Q
�
U
0
O
J_
Q
Z
Q
W
0
co
Z
Q
Z)
co
O
Lu
W C7
J
L
W
z LZ
U LU
0
Z
w
Q
0
<
o_
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
D4

PLAN -SYMBOL
BANKFULL
(TYP.)
INNER BERMS
SELECT
MATERIA
91
LR I FFLE
(TYP.)
11
W BKF
W BTM
a
is
PLANVIEW
GENERAL NOTES:
ANY NATIVE GRAVEL OR COBBLE MATERIAL
EXCAVATED DURING CHANNEL CONSTRUCTION
ELSEWHERE ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE
STOCKPILED FOR USE AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR
THE SELECT RIFFLE MATERIAL UNLESS
OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
THE RIFFLE LOCATIONS SHALL BE AS SHOWN
ON THE PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS
HEAD OF RIFFLE INVERT
ELEVATION
L SELECT RIFFLE
PT MATERIAL DEPTH
a
SECTION B -B'
BANKFULL
STREAMBED TAIL OF RIFFLE
SLOPE VARIES INVERT ELEVATION
W BKF
W BTM
NNER BERM (TYP.)
UNDISTURBED
GROUND SELECT RIFFLE
MATERIAL
102
11
LOW POINT IN
CHANNEL CENTER
SECTION A -A'
0
SELECT RIFFLE
SCOUR DEPTH
2.5*D100(mm)
MINIMUM
NATURALLY AUGMENTED CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
NOT TO SCALE
NOTES:
1. THE GRAVEL AND COBBLE SUBSTRATE USED FOR THIS FEATURE
SHOULD BE PREFERENTIALLY HARVESTED FROM THE ARMOR LAYER OF
THE INCISED EXISTING CHANNEL.
2. SORTING AND SIEVING OF THE HARVESTED RIFFLE SUBSTRATE IS
INCIDENTAL TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS STRUCTURE
3. SELECT RIFFLE MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A GRADATION AS DEFINED IN
THE REACH TABLE WITHIN THIS DETAIL OR AS APPROVED BY THE
ENGINEER.
4. SELECT RIFFLE MATERIAL DEPTH SHALL BE AT LEAST 2.5 TIMES THE
D100 (MM) SPECIFIED IN THE TABLE.
5. SELECT RIFFLE MATERIAL WILL BE PLACED AT A UNIFORM THICKNESS.
6. THE SELECT RIFFLE MATERIAL WILL BE PLACED SUCH THAT, IN
CROSS-SECTION, ITS LOWEST ELEVATION OCCURS IN THE CENTER OF
THE CHANNEL AS PER THE DETAIL.
7. SET INVERTS AT ELEVATIONS SHOWN IN REACH PROFILE.
8. SELECT RIFFLE MATERIAL SHALL BE COMPACTED USING TRACK
EQUIPMENT SUCH THAT FUTURE SETTLEMENT OF THE MATERIAL IS
KEPT TO A MINIMUM.
9. THE SURFACE OF THIS STRUCTURE SHALL BE FINISHED TO A SMOOTH
AND COMPACT SURFACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LINES, GRADES,
AND CROSS-SECTIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.
THE DEGREE OF FINISH FOR INVERT ELEVATIONS SHALL BE WITHIN 0.1
FT OF THE GRADES AND ELEVATIONS INDICATED.
10. RE -DRESSING OF CHANNEL AND BANKFULL BENCH/FLOODPLAIN WILL
LIKELY BE REQUIRED FOLLOWING INSTALLATION OF IN -STREAM
STRUCTURES AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO
CONSTRUCTION.
11. SEE TYPICAL RIFFLE CROSS SECTION FOR DIMENSIONS.
12. IF SITE CONDITIONS EXPOSE COARSER OR FINER SUBSTRATE THAN
EXPECTED THE CONTRACTOR MAY SUGGEST AN ALTERNATIVE RIFFLE
SUBSTRATE TO BE APPROVED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE ENGINEER.
13. THE ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE TO SORTING AND HARVESTING IN SITU
SUBSTRATE FOR THE STRUCTURE IS LISTED IN THE TABLE IN THIS DETAIL
0
resi
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, INC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
SCALE: AS SHOWN
Lil
Q
C)
�
N
O
N
CL
z
O
z
O
z
O
O
LL
O
z
U
w
0
O
LL
Qw
Q
z
o
z
o
O
(n
U)
W
J
W
Y
Q
W
W
cr
cr
Q_
W
�
Q
U)
Z
Z
J
00
�
Q
Q
C)
(n
J
Q
ZLLI
Q
W
~Z
0
(/)
Z)
W
z
6i
J
z Z
z
LU W Q
0
<
o_
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
D5

PLAN -SYMBOL
LOG BURIED
IN STREAM
DANII/ UAAIC I F-KirlTLJ
SECTION A -AI
LOG J -HOOK /WITH ROOTWAD
NOT TO SCALE
FU LL
LOG BURIED
IN STREAM
BANK
WINI F_ CT
LIVE STAKES
(TYP.)
,IL BACKFILL
SELECT
_L MATERIAL
STREAM BED
THALWEG
ELEVATION
BOWL OUT
BANK BANKFULL
BEHIND ELEVATION
STRUCTURE
�/ -- BACKFILL WITH
SELECT GRAVEL
MATERIAL
GAP BETWEEN j
LOGS TO BE
CHINKED
WITH WOOD,
GRAVEL AND
COBBLE
/. V /\ V
HEADER LOG ,
NON -WOVEN
GEOTEXTILE
FABRIC
FOOTER LOG
NON -WOVEN
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
JOTE:
SECTION B -BI
r V V I LCC LUIS
UNDISTURBED
GROUND
STREAMBED
THE DEPARTURE ANGLE SHOWN ABOVE IS DEPICTED IN SUCH A WAY
TO EMPHASIZE DETAIL. ACTUAL DEPARTURE ANGLE AND STRUCTURE
LOCATION SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS AND
WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE CONTRACTOR AS A 2004 FORMAT DWG FILE AND
LN3 FILE.
NOTES:
STREAM BED
THALWEG
ELEVATION
SECTION C -CI
CRO K S�, L
1. LOGS SHALL HAVE MINIMUM DIAMETER OF 24 -IN AND MINIMUM LENGTH OF 40 -FT AS SHOWN IN THE TABLE.
2. ALL LOGS SHALL BE RELATIVELY STRAIGHT AND LIMBS SHALL BE TRIMMED FLUSH.
3. FOOTER LOGS/BOULDERS ARE LOGS/BOULDERS PLACED TO PROVIDE A FOUNDATION AND SCOUR PROTECTION
FOR THE HEADER LOGS/BOULDERS.
4. HEADER LOGS/BOULDERS SHALL BE UNDERLAIN BY FOOTER LOGS/BOULDERS UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED
BY THE ENGINEER.
5. HEADER LOGS ARE THE TOP MOST LOGS USED IN EACH LOG STRUCTURE. ALL HEADER LOGS CAN BE SEEN
PARTIALLY PROTRUDING FROM THE WATER SURFACE DURING EXTREMELY LOW FLOWS.
6. HEADER LOGS SHALL BE OFFSET SLIGHTLY DOWNSTREAM OF THE FOOTING LOGS WHERE SCOUR POOLS ARE
ANTICIPATED TO FORM AS SHOWN IN THE DETAIL.
7. SILL LOGS SHALL BE PLACED PERPENDICULAR TO THE BANKFULL FLOW DIRECTION.
8. THE FOOTER LOGS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE SILL LOG TO THE END OF THE HEADER LOG TOWARD THE BANK.
9. HOOK BOULDERS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE HEADER LOG TO BEYOND BANKFULL WIDTH.
10. SET INVERTS AT ELEVATION SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS. INVERTS AND ELEVATIONS WILL BE
PROVIDED TO THE CONTRACTOR AS A 2004 FORMAT DWG FILE. NO ELEVATIONS OF THE LOG DROPS
STRUCTURE MAY VARY FROM THE PLAN LOCATIONS WITHOUT DIRECTIONS FROM THE ENGINEER.
11. HEADER LOG SHALL TIE INTO THE STREAM BANK AT A MINIMUM ELEVATION OF 1/4 DMAX (MEASURED AT
THE NEXT DOWNSTREAM RIFFLE) BELOW BANKFULL ELEVATION AND A MINIMUM ELEVATION OF 1/2 DMAX
(MEASURED AT THE NEXT DOWNSTREAM RIFFLE) BELOW BANKFULL ELEVATION UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED
BY THE ENGINEER.
12. CUTTING OF THE SILL LOG ROOTWAD MAY BE REQUIRED TO PREVENT THE ROOTWAD FROM PROTRUDING
ABOVE THE BANKFULL ELEVATION.
13. ALL GAPS/VOIDS LARGER THAN 1 INCH BETWEEN THE HEADER AND FOOTING LOGS SHALL BE CHINKED WITH
LIMBS AND/OR BRUSH ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE GEOTEXTILE.
14. ALL GAPS/VOIDS LARGER THAN 1 INCH BETWEEN THE HEADER AND FOOTING BOULDERS SHALL BE CHINKED
WITH GRAVEL AND COBBLES.
15. ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE LOGS AND/OR BOULDERS NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SHALL BE
PLACED AS SHOWN IN THE GEOTEXTILE PLACEMENT AND SELECT BACKFILL DETAIL FOR THE ENTIRE LENGTH
OF THE LOG AND BOULDER HOOK.
16. BACKFILL STRUCTURE WITH SELECT BACKFILL MATERIAL AS SHOWN AND DEFINED IN THE GEOTEXTILE
PLACEMENT AND SELECT BACKFILL DETAIL.
17. SELECT BACKFILL AND SOIL BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE COMPACTED SUCH THAT FUTURE SETTLEMENT OF
THE MATERIAL IS KEPT TO A MINIMUM.
18. NAIL NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE TO EDGE OF HEADER LOG AND BACKFILL AS SHOWN IN THE GEOTEXTILE
PLACEMENT AND SELECT BACKFILL DETAIL.
19. THE SURFACE OF THIS STRUCTURE SHALL BE FINISHED TO A SMOOTH AND COMPACT SURFACE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE LINES, GRADES, AND CROSS-SECTIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.
THE DEGREE OF FINISH FOR INVERT ELEVATIONS SHALL BE WITHIN 0.1 FT OF THE GRADES AND ELEVATIONS
INDICATED.
20. RE -DRESSING OF CHANNEL AND BANKFULL BENCH/FLOODPLAIN WILL LIKELY BE REQUIRED FOLLOWING
INSTALLATION OF IN -STREAM STRUCTURES AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO CONSTRUCTION.
21. SEE THE PLANTING TABLE FOR DETAILS ON HIGH DENSITY LIVE STAKING.
22. NO LIVE STAKES SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE LOG VANE AT OR BELOW THE TIE-IN
ELEVATION OF THE HEADER LOG WITH THE STREAM BANK UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
23. FOOTER DEPTH ON ALL STRUCTURES REQUIRING FOOTERS SHALL BE 6 TIMES GREATER THAN THE DROP
BETWEEN THE STRUCTURE AND THE FOOTERED STRUCTURE DIRECTLY DOWNSTREAM.
0
resi
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, INC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
SCALE: AS SHOWN
w
Q
o
C)
�
N
O
N
CL
-
z
O
I-
C)
0
Z
0
z
O
O
LL
a
H
EE
O
Z
U
w
0
OW
0-1
w
Q
Q
Z
m
Z
O
(n
U)
w
LU
Y
oC
Q
>
W
_jW
W
w
U)
Z
Z
J
00
�
Q
Q
U
n/
W
O
J
Q
Q
LLIw
0
W
z
w
LLI
G
7
L_
6i
J
Z Z
H
z
Lu w
Q
0
<
o_
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0423
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
MJG
DRAWN:
MJG
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
D6

Appendix B —
Data/Analysis/Supplementary Information

Vegetation Survey

Protocol for Existing Conditions Vegetation Surveying
Plot Selection and Setun
Survey multiple plots on-site, which together are representative of all ecotypes present within the
easement boundaries. Each plot is a 5m X 20m belt transect, positioned parallel to the channel in the
floodplain or adjacent upland.
Take a GPS point at the origin and set the bounds with 5m as the "x-axis" and 20m as the "y-axis." Set
the plot with the y-axis as the side parallel to the stream channel. Record the y-axis azimuth to allow for
future resampling. Conclude selection and set-up with a representative photo of the plot taken from the
origin.
Data Collection
Identify each plant in the plot to the species level. Sort and measure tree species by height class and
diameter at breast height (DBH). Count seedlings <54in (137cm) in height into height categories 0-9cm,
10-50cm, 51-100cm, or 101-137cm. Count saplings >54in (137cm) in height into DBH categories 0-lcm,
1-2.5cm, 2.5-5cm, or 5-12.7cm. Measure the DBH of all trees >5in (12.7cm) DBH. Shrubs, vines, and
herbaceous taxa receive an estimation of their percent cover over the substrate within the plot. If the
personnel are unable to identify to the species level, collect voucher photos and/or specimen(s) for later
identification. Record these on the data sheet as UNK-1, UNK-2, etc.
Data Processing
Begin processing collected data by identifying the unknown species observed from voucher photos and
specimen(s) collected. When species present are sufficiently identified, use the dominant canopy species
assemblages and ecological region to identify a habitat type from Schafale (2012).
Calculate both basal area and stems per acre for each plot surveyed using the formulas below. These
metrics help to inform the existing conditions of the canopy on-site and inform the development of the
project's planting plan.
Basal Area Formula:
Basal area of each tree (m2) = 0.00007854 X (DBHcm)2
Basal area of plot (m2/ha) = (sum of basal areas for all trees in plot) X 100
•100 is to scale up from our 0.01ha plot to lha
Stems per Acre Formula:
Stems/Acre = (# of stems)/0.02471

VP -3
.4 t*v\

10
11w
L
w
o
`
+)
EUJ
O
f
N
a1
L
In
In
N
Cu iT
A
II .r
c
CO
U
o
N
�
n
A
LU
r�
ELU
c
H
0
N
.I N
Ln
U
LQ N
N
V C
O
=
m
Ln ei
�
N �
i
Q
o
v
z
v3
m.
C
4
a
N
v S
.� o
Zl
O
J
JO
N
Q
E C_
U
M N
u
may(
\
N
E
m
1
_
U0
''
t
ao c
w a a
�
++
O
.go
D
a
=
�
�0i
?�
Z
N
L
J
0
O to
H
W
_
©
0
*'
m
p
O
fl
eo
E
_
>
�
in
C
o
"i
VI
�i
i---I�--
''
I1
U
• .
a�
T
V
V,6
4f!
C
cu
v-
-
ti
+�
O
s
r�
n
c a
W
L/i
'
'
d
l i
10
11w

.v
1p I
v
O
w -
.N
4A
c
FU
CL
L-
0 O
c
m
U
Q
Y
H
1
Y
Z
3
M
C
;
0
T
a)
Q
V)
V
a)
41
c
a,
�8
C
7
L
C w
v�
W
�
v
r
m
hn
N
7
U S
� n
v
zs -
11
m
O
A
Q
LU
ra
W
ea
~CN
N
v
,
Z
to
• ♦
/ •
Uc
Ln N
LA
C -i
• .
4
0
ca
m
_
Ln
!-
LA
rI O
G1
�
Z
au
+3_+
N
o
OO
•
J
J
Q
E
N
d
ml
ti
iv
rn
min
in
E oo c
'I of
12 V
ea
d
O
a
U
Ln—
(J
`
T
0)m
�
N
�j_
W
V)
c
Lq
t0
++
) M
� M
O O
�
fto
Ln
,-
C
L
O
LL
O
7
1
C
'C
�
c
o
Q
NV
qq
x
:LlS
c
3S
LU
Ln
0-
V \
/3
L
1p I
v
O
w -
.N
4A
c
FU
CL
L-
0 O
c
m
U
Q
Y
H
1
Y
Z
3
M
C
;
0
T
a)
Q
V)
V
a)
41
c
a,
�8
C
7

N
a

>
O via � �'.�. "• C� L • �.. {� �` O � � �.n t�, �
uj
N
V)
a)
7
N
f0 �
Cd
C n
= u
y9 m
T 0 0
A
LUw
V) tea-
O
Z Ln v
U �
� N
� N a
`. m '^_
CA o 'Jill 1`
d
3 a
,o b
J J Q V1 O O ` O
LA
ZP E c
T
U (� 1
Cm l
LA `
N • • +' � of 'a Q � � V F
+, to
d = Inci
C.1
NuiC
LU
C V] f\
u?
O �.
V` 4
W
C O -t
v tu 1. > _ �N

d
2
7
V3
M
M
a
�
V
2
Z
d
2
7
V3
M
M
a

Dam Information

7/2/2018
Interactive Reports
CorpsMa { into tTtf75
' .
Home NID By State NID National NID Interactive Report Interactive Map Help
NID Detail Report
Report View Row 1 of 1 Exclude Null Values Displayed Columns
Dam Name
River
State
County
Owner Name
Private Dam
NID Storage
Max Discharge
Max Storage
Drainage Area
Longitude
Latitude
Dam Designer
Core
Other Dam Name
Foundation
EAP
Inspection Date
Spillway Type
Spillway Width
NIDID
Owner Type
Dam Type
Primary Purpose
All Purposes
Inspection Frequency
Year Completed
Surface Area
State Reg Dam
State Reg. Agency
StatelD
Section
Year Modified
Outlet Gates
Volume
Number Of Locks
Length Of Locks
Width Of Locks
Fed Funding
Fed Design
Fed Construction
Fed Regulatory
Fed Inspection
Fed Operation
Fed Owner
Fed Other
Source Agency
Submit Date
Congressional District
Political Party
Normal Storage
Congressional Rep.
Other Structure Id
Uri Address
Number Of Separate Structures
Permitting Authority
Inspection Authority
Enforcement Authority
DEEP CREEK W/S #14 (PL -566)
NORTH DEEP CREEK -TR
NC
YADKIN
YADKIN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
N
211
960
211
1.009
-80.7205
36.213
USDA NRCS
IEK
SZ
Y
07/22/2013
U
0
NCO0396
Local Government
Earth
Flood Control
Flood Control
5
1963
5.8
Y
DEQ
U
0
0
0
0
USDA NRCS
USDA NRCS
USDA NRCS
NC
10/29/2015
NC05
R
18
Virginia Foxx (R)
0
Y
Y
Y
Login
http://nid.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=838:4:0::NO 1/2

7/2/2018 Interactive Reports
NID Detail Report
Jurisdictional Dam Y
Dam Former Name -
Eap Last Rev Date
06/16/2015
Zoom To
NID Height (Ft.)
26.2
Dam Length (Ft.)
410
Dam Height (Ft.)
26.2
Structural Height (Ft.)
0
Hydraulic Height (Ft.)
9
City
HIGH ROCK
Distance
-
nobody en -us
http://nid.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=838:4:0::NO 2/2

Non -Standard Buffer Width Calculations

Site Name: Green Mesa
USACE Action ID: SAW -2017-01466
NCDWR Project Number:
Sponsor: RES
County: Yadkin
Minimum Required Buffer Width': 50
Mitigation Type
Restoration (1:1)
Enhancement 1(1.5:1)
Enhancement II (2.5:1)
Preservation (5:1)
Other (7.5:1)
Other (10:1)
Custom Ratio 1
Custom Ratio 2
Custom Ratio 3
Custom Ratio 4
Custom Ratio 5
Totals
Buffer Zones
Max Possible Buffer (square feet)°
Ideal Buffer (square feet)'
Actual Buffer (square feet)'
Zone Multiplier
Buffer Credit Equivalent
Percent of Ideal Buffer
Credit Adjustment
Total Baseline Credit
3574.27
Mitigation Ratio
Creditable Stream
>20 to 25 feet
>25 to 30 feet
Multiplier'
Length'
Baseline
Stream Credit
1
1891
>100 to 125 feet
1891.00
1.5
474
91640
316.00
2.5
1052
91640
420.80
5
458200
458200
458200
7.5
3529
96267.95716
470.53
10
602
96265.38881
60.20
231.33
184.40
3 694
5 922
9164.00 3574.27
Wilmington District Stream Buffer Credit Calculator
Buffer Width Zone (feet from Ordinary High Water Mark)
less than 15 feet
>35 to 20 feet
>20 to 25 feet
>25 to 30 feet
>30 to 35 feet
>35 to 40 feet
>40 to 45 feet
>45 to 50 feet
>50 to 75 feet
>75 to 100 feet
>100 to 125 feet
>125 to 150 feet
274920
91640
91640
91640
91640
91640
91640
91640
458200
458200
458200
458200
286063.994
96266.09268
96267.95716
96885.86093
97039.01704
96219.41003
96265.38881
96271.83063
481192.5299
485692.9865
492163.781
498697.7081
265281.5091
84946.16423
83197.45033
82068.53686
80768.9328
79431.32243
78423.6051
77266.89417
256802.6592
89364.73182
35906.36946
22177.23208
50%
10%
10%
10%
5%
5%
5%
5%
7%
5%
4%
4%
1787.13
357.43
357.43
357.43
178.71
178.71
178.71
178.71
250.20
178.71
142.97
142.97
93%
88%
86%
85%
83%
83%
81%
80%
53%
18%
7%
4%
-129.83
-42.03
-48.53
-54.66
-29.96
-31.18
-33.12
-35.28
133.53
32.88
10.43
6.36
Credit Loss in Required Credit Gain for Net Change in Total Credit
Buffer Additional Buffer Credit from Buffers
.404.60 183.20 -221.41 3352.86
'Minimum standard buffer width measured from the top of bank (50 feet in piedmont and coastal plain counties or 30 feet in mountain counties)
'Use the Custom Ratio fields to enter non-standard ratios, which are equal to the number of feet in the feet -to -credit mitigation ratio (e.g., for a perservation ratio of 8 feet to 1 credit, the multiplier would be 8).
'Equal to the number of feet of stream in each Mitigation Type. If stream reaches are not creditable, they should be excluded from this measurement, even if they fall within the easement.
°This amount is the maximum buffer area possible based on the linear footage of stream length if channel were perfectly straight with full buffer width. This number is not used in calculations, but is provided as a reference.
'Maximum potential size (in square feet) of each buffer zone measured around all creditable stream reaches, calculated using GIS, including areas outside of the easement. The inner zone (0-15') should be measured from the top of the OHWM or the edge of the average stream width if OHWM is not known. Non -creditable stream
reaches within the easement should be removed prior to calculating this area wtih GIS.
'Square feet in each buffer zone, as measured by GIS, excluding non -forested areas, all other credit type (e.g., wetland, nutrient offset, buffer), easement exceptions, open water, areas failing to meet the vegetation performance standard, etc. Additional credit is given to 150 feet in buffer width, so areas within the easement that are
more than 150 feet from creditable streams should not be included in this measurement. Non -creditable stream reaches within the easement should be removed prior to calculating this area wtih GIS.

Morphological Parameters

Green Mesa Morphological Parameters
Bankfull stage was estimated using NC Regional Curve equations and existing conditions date
2 NC Regional Curve equations source: Doll et al. (2003;
3 NC Regional Curve equations source: Sweet and Geratz (2003
Reference Reach
Existing
Exisiting
Design
UT to Mill Creek
UT to Grassy Creek
FF1-A
FF1-B
FF1-C
FF1-D
FF2
FF3
FF4-A
FF4-13
FF5
FF4-13
FF1-D (DS End)
FF5
Feature
Riffle
Pool
Riffle
Pool
Riffle
Riffle
iffle Nort iffle Sout
Riffle
Riffle
Pool
Riffle
Pool
Riffle
Riffle
Riffle
Riffle
Pool
Riffle
Pool
Riffle
Riffle
Pool
Riffle
Pool
Riffle
Pool
Drainage Area ac
921
426
498
583
686
1011
63
75
222
242
34
242
1011
35
Drainage Area mit
1.44
0.67
0.78
0.91
1.07
1.58
0.10
0.12
0.35
0.38
0.05
0.38
1.58
0.05
NC Regional Curve Discharge cfs 2
116.1
66.2
74.1
83.2
93.6
124.3
16.4
18.7
41.2
43.8
10.5
43.8
124.3
11
NC Regional Curve Dischar a cfs 3
118.6
68.6
76.7
85.8
96.2
126.7
17.7
20.0
43.3
45.9
11.5
45.9
126.8
12
Design/Calculated Discharge cfs
113-122
50
61
47
109
161
36
17
61
71
14
60
125
15
Dimension
BF Cross Sectional Area ft2
27.7
34.7
18.1
23.4
18.8
17.0
28.1
10.0
22.1
27.5
33.5
37.2
42.2
3.3
6.1
8.4
11.1
12.6
15.3
13.2
3.1
15.0
21.1
30.0
4.2
3.0
5.8
BF Width ft
17.5
18.6
13.7
15.0
23.8
15.0
34.8
66.2
14.6
24.9
26.1
21.1
17.7
5.1
9.8
24.3
7.3
7.8
11.8
7.9
7.9
15.5
18.6
23.2
5.6
6.7
7.4
BF Mean Depth ft
1.6
1.9
1.4
1.6
0.8
1.1
0.8
0.2
1.5
1.1
1.3
1.8
2.4
0.6
0.6
0.3
1.5
1.6
1.3
1.7
0.4
1.0
1.1
1.3
1.2
0.5
1.2
BF Max Depth ft
2.5
3.4
1.7
2.7
1.5
1.4
1.6
0.7
2.0
1.7
2.6
3.9
4.4
0.8
0.7
1.1
2.0
2.5
2.4
2.5
0.7
1.6
2.9
2.1
2.1
0.7
2.1
Wetted Perimeter ft
19.3
21.1
14.9
16.8
24.5
15.8
36.4
66.5
16.3
25.6
28.1
24.0
21.7
5.8
10.5
24.9
9.3
9.8
13.4
9.9
8.2
16.0
20.3
24.1
11.0
7.0
11.0
Hydraulic Radius ft
1.4
1.7
1.2
1.4
0.8
1.1
0.8
0.1
1.4
1.1
1.2
1.5
1.9
0.6
0.6
0.3
1.2
1.3
1.1
1.3
0.4
0.9
1.0
1.3
1.0
0.5
1.0
Width/Depth Ratio
11.1
10.6
1 9.8
1
9.6
30.2
1
13.2
1 43.2
1 440.5
9.7
22.6
20.3
12.0
1
7.4
8.0
1 15.8
1
70.2
4.8
4.8
9.1
4.7
20.1
15.0
17.1
17.0
1 7.5
14.0
7.5
Floodprone Width ft
72.5
-
>50
NA
36.2
18
>50
>50 1
25.2
>30
>30
>30
>30
8.7
19.0
>30
18.7
20.9
>30
1
30.0
10.9
>30
-
>30
-
>30
-
Entrenchment Ratio
4.3
->
NA
1.5
1.2
1.7
1.2
1.7
1.2
1.1
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.9
1.2
2.6
2.7
2.5
3.8
1.4
>4
-
>4
-
2.8
-
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
3.3
2.7
1.1
1.3
1.4
1.7
1.4
1.1
1.3
1.8
3.2
1.0
1.7
1.5
1.4
1.4
2.5
1.2
1.0
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.0
Bed Material
Description D50
Gravel/Cobble
Gravel
Gravel
Silt/Clay
Gravel
Gravel
Gravel
Gravel
Gravel
Gravel
Sand
Gravel
Gravel
Gravel
D16 mm
12
2.8
4
0.062
1.2
1.4
1.8
2.1
3.1
3.1
1
1.1
1.1
1.1
D50 mm
54
11
27
0.062
3
5.6
27
23.8
9.2
9.2
1.6
3.7
3.7
3.7
D84 mm
120
16
68
2
70
11
72
39.6
28
28
6.9
25
25
25
Pattern
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Channel Beltwidth ft
35.0
85.0
26.3
55.5
28.9
61.0
46.5
112.9
148.9
33.5
Radius of Curvature ft
13.0
54.0
13.5
103.3
14.8
113.5
17.3
71.7
13.4
33.5
Radius of Curvature Ratio
0.9
3.7
1.0
7.6
1.1
8.3
1.2
4.9
2.0
5.0
Meander Wavelength ft
67.0
105.0
49.4
66.0
54.2
72.5
89.0
139.5
40.2
53.6
Meander Width Ratio
2.4
5.9
3.6
4.8
4.0
5.3
3.2
7.8
6.0
8.0
Profile
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Riffle Length ft
6
17
6.0
18.0
3
16
6.8
20.5
7.4
22.6
7.0
15.0
Run Length ft
6
17
5.0
13.0
3
10
5.7
14.8
8
23
Pool Length ft
4
16
5.0
42.0
8
20
5.6
47.0
5
21
4.0
9.0
Pool -to-Pool Spacing ft
26
68
18.0
64.0
17
30
20.4
73.0
35
90
13.0
15.0
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length ft
202
279
1041
658
769
1395
610
1544
447
423
1351
415
146
105
Channel Length ft
230
318
1211
852
797
1507
617
1967
475
454
1621
444
185
113
Sinuosity
1.14
1.14
1.16
1.29
1.04
1.08
1.01
1.27
1.06
1.07
1.20
1.07
1.27
1.08
Channel Slope ft/ft
0.012
0.005
0.020
0.004
0.015
0.005
0.047
0.019
0.011
0.008
0.025
0.0097
0.01
0.050
Ros en Classificationj
E3
E4
B4
136c
134c
134c
A4
134c
E4
E4
B5
C4/E4
C4/E4
B4
Bankfull stage was estimated using NC Regional Curve equations and existing conditions date
2 NC Regional Curve equations source: Doll et al. (2003;
3 NC Regional Curve equations source: Sweet and Geratz (2003

Reach
FF4-A(US)
FF4-B(DS)
FF1-D(@ Road)FF1-D (DS end)
FF5-A
FF1-C
FF1-A
FF1-B
FF2
FF3
DA (ac)
210
242
928
1010
35
686
498
585
63
72
DA (sqmi)
0.33
0.38
1.45
1.58
0.05
1.07
0.78
0.91
0.10
0.11
Slope
1.00%
1.00%
0.60%
0.60%
3.60%
1.28%
1.58%
0.60%
2.40%
2.40%
Width
11.70
8.16
12.50
13.70
7.79
14.60
0.15
13.40
6.87
7.45
Mean Depth
1.31
1.60
2.19
2.49
0.39
1.51
0.90
1.04
1.02
0.53
- QBKF
61
71
119
161
13
109
61
47
36
17
-BkfA
15.3
15.6
27.4
34.1
3.13
22.1
12.3
14
7
3.94
FFQ Analysis
Q1.1
45
49
103
108
17
87
73
80
23
25
Q1.5
71
77
166
174
25
139
116
127
35
38
Q2
92
100
211
221
34
178
149
163
47
51
Q10
200
218
494
520
67
410
338
373
96
104
Rural Piedmont Regional Curves
NC-QBKF orig
39
44
117
124
11
94
74
83
16
18
NC-QBKF rev
42
46
119
127
12
96
77
86
18
19
- BKFCSA
10.4
11.5
28.2
29.9
3.1
23.0
18.6
20.7
4.7
5.1
VA-QBKF
15
17
62
68
3
47
35
40
5
6
USGS RR Eqns (Region 1)
Q2(1996 EQNS)
74
186
197
19
151
121
135
29
32
Q2(2001 EQNS)
68
175
186
18
142
113
127
27
29
Q2
84
201
212
24
165
134
149
35
38
Q5
160
372
393
48
308
252
279
69
75
Q10
218
501
527
66
415
341
377
95
103
Q25
298
673
708
92
559
461
509
132
143
Q50
369
826
869
116
688
569
626
164
178
Recommended Design Flows =
Qbnkful I 60 125 15

Cross Sections of Current Conditions

E
0
cc
a
0
0-
_0
LO o
co O
LL
O
co
�
w
c
Q
C
w m
LL
T)
LO0 O
N 0 -
LL LL
a
�
V
fC
d
I
N
7
O
C7
r
O
r
LO
O
r.-
CO
LO
V
M
N
O 0)
00
r--
(O
(4)
UOIIBA013

LO
M
O
Cl)
cc
Ln <
N
N
O
0-
-00
O
O
U-
04 N
N
cnw
x
—
V Y
c
Q
cc
w m
LL
N X
0 O
LL
LO
LO Q
t
v
fC
d
I
r
7
O
O C7
r
U')
O
Ln
co
wU)
M
U)
6
Ln
M
V
7 0
LO
M
M U)
M N
N
LO
M
0)
M
O)
W
m
0)
(41)
UOIIEA013

m
N
L
y
Q
LO
o
co
LO
LO
LOO
90
a`
L
� o
n
0
o
t
L
0
LO
Q�
M
c
c
w m
X
m
M N O
� d
r
d
Q
U -Lo
LL
�
N
I
V
fC
c
0 3
N �
O
LO
O
1.-
W co
m
LO
O
V
O m
O
O
O
O
0)
(11) UOIIBA013

E
LO
co
co0
Ln
r-
0
n
U.)
�o
C) Q
� m
c
0
n
y
—
, o
O
w
w
U -
o
U'j
t
r
O
fn
-
v y �
CO)
U
X
« Co
o (n x
O
6
m
r
d
Q
UL
LL
M I
t
U
�
O
M
7
Lf) O
N C7
O
N
U,
0
O
LP
(fl
Lf)
N
(O Ln
M r-�
Ln
uj
Ln
N
Uf
0)
LO
1-
Lq
m
CO
O
LO
0)
M
Ln
O
V
m
6)
(1j) u014ena13

O
LO
LO
v
O
�o
L a
M C
O
n
O
O
4%
LL
O
(h
�
(n
X
w
v —
� 7
Y
U
N m
LL
N x
0 O
n
LL
Q0.
fC
O I
d
7
LO O
r �
O
O
ID
O
LO V Cl)
O O m
N
m
O
O
O
d)
O
O O
(11)
UOIIBA813

0
v
LO
co
0
co m
9D
Q
m
0
n
0
I _O
N U-
0
O
P, -
LO
X
v Y
o c
C
LL
u! x
0 O
U-
n
Q
t
U
R
O
I
a
O
�ll
O T
O
L
00
V
00
Cl)
00
N
co
W
O
c0
W 00
P h
(11)
UOIIBA813

m
d
L
y
Q
O
v
LO
M
0
a�
Q
m
0
n
0
_o
N LL
X
w
Y
U
N m
LL
ur x
o
n
LL
C
t
V
cC
d
Ln I
Q'
a
c
0
�I
o T
LO
O
c0
00
L
00
V
00
Cl)
00
N
00
O
00 00
O
1-
(11)
(11)
UOIIBA013

m
d
L
N
C
3
0
0
R
L
Q
J
LO
co
O
M
�o
L.
N Q
N
c
0
CL
0
0
U -
C14
r�
X
w
v —
Y
w m
LL
e-lo0
N x
O
n
LL
LO CL
� Q
t
V
fC
I
a
O
O C�
r
Ln
O
(11)
UOIIBA013

E
E
§
CL
In
\
f�\
-
., 6.
& f
@
E
E
§
CL
In
I
& f
@
)
U-
�
0
o
|
�
0
\
_
\
�
) 2
U
§ §
U-
� \
§
|
�
R
� |
/
CDe
2
<
m / R E 2
()l�UOI mg

}Li
N
C
3
0
0
O
co
CN
N
co
PD
a
0
0
CD n
N .a
0
0
U -
w
x
V Y
c N
�
w m
N
U-
N x
o
U-
t
n
a
V
cC
d
Q'
I
o -o
0
�n
O
O
V
O C6
O
CV
O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
(;j)
U014BA013

L
N
C
3
0
0
n
0
v
Ln
co
0
co m
Q
m
0
n
0
L _O
N LL
w
w
r
d �
X
�
V Y
O C
C
N w m
M
LL
N x
O
U-
t
a
a
ci
ILO
a
O
O
LO
0
LO
f.-
LO
W
LO
LO
LO
V In
M
LO
N
01
m
01
01
0)
0)
(;j)
U014BA013

J
0
v
M
0
M (0
N
Q
N
O
CL
O
U-1
_O
N LL
w
r
X
d �
V Y
O C
C
M
U-
N X
O
U-
an
a
�
V
IcC
Q.
0
�I
O T
Lo
f—
O
O
(3)
CO
O)
co
m
LO
O
L V
O O
(11) UOIIBA013

0
Cl)
Lo
N
Po
PD
a
0
o n
N .O
O
O
U-
0
O
P,-
N
-
r
N
X
d �
LOY
�
m
'
N o
LL
LL
CL
a
a
t
U
I
R
CD
O "O
0
co
O
0
N
O
O
O
O
m CO
00 00
co co
(11) UOIIBA013

L
y
Q
0
co
LO
N
Po
PD
a
0
CD n
N .O
O
_O
LL
M
�
� c
m
N X
LL
O
n
LL
Q
t
v
I
f0
O -O
7
O
l0
co
O
0
c0
co W
N
O
O
O
O
m
CO
(11) UOIIBA013

LO
N
0
N
Po
PD
a
0
n
0
U-
O
O
L
P,
cn
x
�
o
w m
v
o
LLn
LL a
U
CD I
R
a
0
c0
of
0
L
of
7
OJ
Cl)
CO
N O m
CO CO N f—
(;;)
UOIIBA013

E
E
§
CL
}»j
C14
k".
MEW
><
E
E
§
CL
C14
5
cli
cli
ƒ
a @
CL)
�
� }
&
\
S \
«
) 2
4
LL
» a §
\
LL
\
2 |
�
=
R
o �
�
Cj
°
mOD
_
_
% 7
2
=N _
_
» <
()l�UOI
mg

LO
co
O
M
�o
Lo PD
N Q
N
O
CL
O
O
LL
_
O
N
w
�
r
v _
d �
X
C
w m
�
U-
N X
O
LL
�
In d
� Q
ci
IfC
a
O
O C�
r
In
O
f—
In
O
0 LO
LO
V
LO
M
LO
N
(;j)
U014VA013

Channel Stability Assessment

z
7 M - N m N m 't N b N N G
e
d
E d
d
c
d
d
ti N M 7 M b r OD a O ti N M
N H N H
I�
M
ago
o•�
00

W
06
m
w
L
N
a)
N
N
d
L
t
`0
u
U
0
O
IL
n
t0
v
a
0
0
0
ti
C
CD
G)
0
X
W
07
L
N
�O
m
t
Y
3
°
O
c_ LL
i° L v
rn c
m
am>i y
L
m
a m
o C L
Y
m EL..
m Co y U
m .O 3 `o
C C
D o t
Cc
V N
CL
c
°
j
_ rn
p
QE
'IT(6
C
Qa>
O
U
U
C
N O °> -O
O o L m t
0E
N > M
) L a T m
C
-Op E2
c 3 O O O
°1 a)
C
L 7
C `
n m o=
m m C
0 N
=C,
N
O y p C
O
'>
c p 3° aNi m
O N>
3 .�
O >
>— i z
m
m
w E U C
E a)
C T "m'
U m N E O m
>'
fLn
O N
C
m E m -
O a) 01
'° N C a a
0
l` m o
o L U C
C
N �° a)
c m 2 rn
0a
Q a) —>, O)
a) m •m
O O Co m N
L c c
°
r
o°
D a) O O
rn 3 0
N N w 3
> `o
w O m 0 N
N U v ai 'c
y t �
m U
o U
L U
/A N (O C
> N O^ m
N N
C
d E a 7 01 A
a) y T
dN
rn m
C
N
T a
"O m
o
N m C .O L
3 U
m>
a) o
m m O a) >
u o 3
m O N m
m
f0 N N° U
` 0
c m a 6 a >
0)
E o
N o) 'NO
i
m m
00
y
L Q O
y c a
v m E m c
m
d
aci m
N C> V) -°
C a .15 � L T
Q
T
O
N
a
(n
?� - U Q m C'4
W
r
W E
CL m
Q U fa0
Q
Y N n fU0 m
� J A
m
m m F O
LL
r
L:
C
U
E
U
O
s
o
C N 7 C
d
m
°)
m
u
m
a)
fn
a—Ti ��° Em
m m a)
n°p
Q
O V
`ma m a)m
a) i
L
0
w C N
-o
07
L
OQ
�O
m E
3
°
O
c_ LL
i° L v
rn c
m
am>i y
L
m
a m
o C L
Y
m EL..
m Co y U
m .O 3 `o
C C
D o t
Cc
V N
CL
c
°
j
_ rn
p
QE
'IT(6
C
Qa>
O
U
U
C
N O °> -O
O o L m t
0E
N > M
) L a T m
v
L
-Op E2
c 3 O O O
°1 a)
C
L 7
C `
n m o=
m m C
0 N
=C,
N
O y p C
O
'>
c p 3° aNi m
O N>
3 .�
O >
>— i z
m
m
w E U C
E a)
C T "m'
U m N E O m
>'
fLn
O N
C
m E m -
O a) 01
'° N C a a
C
O O
E
l` m o
o L U C
C
N �° a)
c m 2 rn
O N
S °)
Q a) —>, O)
a) m •m
O O Co m N
L c c
°
r
o°
D a) O O
rn 3 0
N N w 3
> `o
w O m 0 N
N U v ai 'c
y t �
m U
o U
L U
/A N (O C
> N O^ m
N N
C
d E a 7 01 A
a) y T
° 'y a
-° C
rn m
C
N
T a
"O m
o
N m C .O L
3 U
m>
a) o
m m O a) >
u o 3
m O N m
m
f0 N N° U
` 0
c m a 6 a >
0)
E o
N o) 'NO
i
m m
$ a)
-° 2%
a o _ y
N E
o m
L Q O
y c a
v m E m c
m
d
aci m
N C> V) -°
C a .15 � L T
a) a)
m c N L
Q0 7
s' 0 N y> O
U (L6 C ._ C
N o
Z' 2)O
?� - U Q m C'4
7 c (q O)
6 .0 N'
U 3 E O m
W E
CL m
Q U fa0
Q
Y N n fU0 m
� J A
m
m m F O
LL U H
L
N
N
L O
O
o
'> > O O
3
C N 7 C
LO
a)
0 0° O U
C
D o
3 0_ TOA
C
O N
@ a Com
m m 0) m N L
m
a)
m.N of
L a (0 m°
a—Ti ��° Em
m m a)
n°p
Q
O V
`ma m a)m
a) i
L
m c E
U a) m 7
w C N
-o
T �_' U C O
' m
N y
n y
O
°c �_
O N m O
Q
N
U, L U
a m m
c v a
N C D'
y _m
° N O N
aa))
E
N
LL
L 'O V
o rn
A O 'O a) 9
m LM)
C
U m 3
U rn N E a
O)
a>i E m d
C O a)
° m v> c
a) '
°) o
3 E )n
>" Mn s E
+L.
c o E
c E a) a) c
c
E
a M a) $ a)
c
E E S
c y�°
3 m o
° m m E
O c
° o m.
o
CC �w
w c L c° 2 0
m
E°
a) a aci
>') m e
f0 a) m L
a)
c o>
c c m
aci — E
E m E
c a)
m a_ m o m
m
o y(0
w o
a t6 Q
O N
L "� y .�
�
U f6 7 o L
�p E V
U
04 3 co) a
T
O
m O C
N L a ` C U
N O—
3 U m c
� a) 2 m a)
U) V
m Q m
O O a m "O V
V L N .m. _T
f`0 N c 0
Q d -0 N N c
a) C
N L
N
Q C O C '0
m C
'm° C m C N
m N
N E eo+
O N
U a O a) 3
Q L 0)'a
�� U N
N
m C L 0)
LL 3 E U 0 .N
N
LL
Q
Q U cc 4
° m
U C Q •L..
m
J o E
C
-00O
LL� 'OO U> m
cO
L 7 0 co)
C Y '� C m
V` a)
w a)
C T 'O m
N C 3
°
L C O
O
N D
C.
E
.0
m N
N> 0 r- EL
L
0 i6 A D
E O
N N
C m N L U
o C
T m E U
O
N m C
O LO
E E V
m 0
.0
tm >
O
U E
O° 0)
m
N T
N- N m
m
0 E j m
y m N LL
C m
- a> N> LL o
�`
y 0
7 m N°
Z5
QL
° N O m
C C U O
L m V
A CO O
O
crn
o y
a Co r
m rn m `m a)
° N N
3 y E f6 a) m
m e
C .2 - O J
m;
> U) a) N
m� C m
v ) E
co cc
C N U �C ." 0
m
CoOe
E C
C C O
V) E
m
L C O
-° m>
O a)
Q 7 a) a)
-O ) C a) +L••'
O. E
T O) V
01 ,� O
0>° 7 N N
'O C
U m
^ L
O L` (n N
C y
L a)
` U d
O a)
= N N
C V
!� a m
Q C
OV a) a) O V
-C T
m
C p
O C
N
cc N
mo
m e ai o
m c c y
>
o m'
f>0 O m°
L Q > o 3
N E
v m c o
mo
`o
Q m m m
o m
°>°
`o m o o `m c c
c
O 3 �) v m
LL
Q v v
Q o o m
o E
LLE o o o m
O m
o
a
v
N E 0 `m
T
N
C O m
O
O- °1
C)
-6.0C)
'O L N
m O T
L N>
a
a)
m
_
° C
° c
_
a) E v
cm m 3
N
>
O
C
N C E
N
m U y
w a)
T LL
°-•
�O > m C
N m i m
N
'p
L
L y
C U T C
a)
N a>
5
>` v, E
A c
T �>-, 3 0 0 N
3
m a) c
U °°
aXi
r a E
3 m 3° O a
r -
E
°
m L
o y°°
C o O
<° c
a m A
-o O D A a)
m 3 a m a)
0
°
aai
N
a)
d
in
a) Q m
O
c
Q O) N
N O) '�
N 0 O N O m
—
Q
N
L
!6
o
U
N C Z �Vmi
-°
0 0
°O ° U
c
C "O'
o a `°
O O LL E2
o C O" m
E ai a
O
4 N
�
NL
_
> m
v ai m
Om2)
0
CY
.0
N
3
a m
a
z >
Q
a) O
Q o 2
1U'O LC0
Cj
L° E 3 m v
m
E
Y
U
(1,
C
a
C
UCL
O m
m
m
C p
m .
O
>
O_
m
O
m
ac
0
c a) m
L
0
`)
m
7 >
Q
w
a)
C N -a N
m y
N
N m
Q
C o L y
Cc
a)
a)
a
E
a) X
E o 0
aai
U
m
L
a)
L
U
m 0
E Q
C)
>
-O
U m r
2 C
2 m
m V
30
C
L
N
Q
m m
�p
E O
N Q U m
s O m E
°
LL
U
C
W
O L m m
m
N
M
V
l!7 ll m
0
I-- o 0)

0
m
L
Q
m
a
0
r
72
.3
u
T
3
a
0
y
N
O
c
O
0
II
LL
ti
LO
ti
ti
co
Z
N
O c
> 00 N
a
N
7 C L Q
ri
Y C N
C
a
C
° m
o o N
(O Y
N D1
0
@ca
.N N
m
ta'
21
co
o -0
Co 3> a o c
O
0 E N apnUN)
co
O
LUO c CO NO O
a m N ZO
aE
m
Qm0`
U
N0
E a) c >: a
LCNoc
CN Na)
p
O
Co Co
NTNC
°
O
Q
j O
E
CpN
E
mC
(o-0Nc
p
nON
o
°>
_Lm.
°E
m,m°a
a .x
O0) c
c m
mUm
E
NL_La)acn)
c
U) 0'
E
c No
°m> cm '
o a)
�mmm
--0
o
a
C', >
a
0 0 0
E
aa)wo yL7
>o>
3
>+ l` m N N
N C U
U
a C LO l6 3 L N r
Q
N O 2
7 Q C 2
m m m c a
c
m
p m r m v w N E
N
E E a
0° a c
y L
J E m
C0 7 U
'00 .L.. d m 0 i6 m
Q N D
LL F N 7 U
J 3
N >`
O
O O
L m O E
O Z
Y
C O
m
C C L O
.2 0 U a) 0
O
C c O :p
c ''c o o'� 0 m'o
L C
L E E
L N c
�_ L 3 m m o
3
O
0) N
a N
m e
(0 O 02 C a) N f0/) E
O
.0 O. 0
N E
N O 3 a V f6
O
O C
O T
.0 C
0) a>) 0'a > t G. a)
o ��
a N 0 m N N
) N_
mCU °
0
V°i L
> m a> E a) E
C 0
C m 01 m m
m
a) 2 a)
0 m> 7
T �
� p O L
U
mr-
T a 0 o °p O °n
a o
m a) U
o L
N 0) j-" L _
c N L 0 m
Y )
N n`
c E N t E
- 0 °
o c°° ��' o c c
3
w Q a
° E> E-0
0 w
U))-0 N oa
o a) m c o
c
°° o O
3� 0)iYao a) o
° m c o? w e
o C
E
a p m
U°
���° o�
o-0 C N N a)
0) m
rn m
m O m
a c -C_
N m
a N p
N 0> m f- > C O
C m T 'O L m m m
m
N
O U> Q) a)
E
_N
U O m 0 0
O a) N C
m O. O L c L L
.3
m C> O
O C m O .� N
C a
E
N E N
0 y
0 C m O
E
Q o w m Q m o Q
rn
U m C m
C d O La O) O' -
°a m> L
a)
a`> c°)
in 0
c c ::
m E
° .° Q ) m
CO E' m w `o
3 c
�-0 >o
c°i N c
E
N 3 c
o°
0 0
c v
Lon o '�
i4
w o -a 3 3-0
U
o m
`m o o rn
0o c
c E
o
.i
o c
C>
3
E N N
N l6
C O
" m �• Y
O V .LO. a (0�
m a T ti) '' E E
C :C
m °
y 2
E O O U
L
E T
0 0 m m
m e
a_ v-0
c m o m .c `m
aoi Y a) a 'o E
L c°
° o o
o U N
m T m
3
a
T
�'
C L
> a m a) C +L+ 0
c
01 ° C C
o E o
m t> E
a)
rn
m N aEi
U 7>
c"o
2 p O L
a o E 0 0'3 c
O N O c
a 3
o
N O.
>'� c
a o aNi
E L
c>
0 m
w c a) c
3 c a 3 o rn o m m
> E N
c cL
c 0 a
y
c U
N
t
0
Q o
c
c m
O U
o c
m
0 0 0 O
>
a Q W> .N l�6 t
o o rn o t LL 15
m
U
E m N r
C O) O L
c 6
0)
p
o
E N. 75 '5°
aNi o ca
N N 0
m
rn. c> >° E m
`p
° c Y>
a
m ") m .3
n`
O C N L
y L m°
Y O
E o 0 N> 2 7°
LO aLO
C m m C
c 3 a) Y
E
m° 0 y
c c m
°L E'er acs ao
E c 3 c
o yt m�
M
U m o ax)
m c E o
3 Q v =0 n rn ao o
t4 n�-0
w E 3 o
N
ca
N
m
3
m
m
E
o aL44) —
-
>
o
o a m o .o aa) m
a��i
aci y
3
'N
U T T a > a)
ma mr c L
o
m
c`
o m>
a o
E
co
a) c0
m m a) o m tali 0
c n
°° oL
m
0 3
c
LLao) c> ac)
c° 0 0
0>
oN° '55
aa)
m
woc
Cc
0
vo
oa
a) 3 �»
a m
a0cN
c
'LC3
NO
s
°m E 0) O
m
Ec3
Lan
Cl)
L
ONN
R A a
0)L 0
> c
CC c
N
m
c
mL
m N NYU
TDE
o
N O p
`0
U
m e En°
> E
icd 'an >-0 m
��S
Om
Z >>
0)
m
N
O
U
t
C
C
w a)
aci
3
s
0
m e
:2 O)
c
m
a)
Y
c
O
m
L
o m
U
C C
a)
oQ
C
CO mQ
c
a7
o
0)
m 'p
a
m
.0 o
>
>
m
E co
o
N
a)
O
m
C
c°)
3
N
o f
Y
>
m m
>
0)°
Um
c
cc
cn
m
a°
m
m
N
Q'
>
°m
5 C
CO
an W
O
O Q
N
N
M E
0
m
L
Q
m
a
0
r
72
.3
u
T
3
a
0
y
N
O
c
O
0
II
LL
ti

N
d
L
t
L
0
u
U)
r
Q
0
O
IL
n
L
LL
t0
v
a
0
0
0
ti
C
CD
N
0
X
W
0)
LO
N
o
m E
m
°C a
O
c_ LL
i° s v
rn c
>> N Lo
t
Y
-
m
a m
o s
Y
0 E
m Co y U)
5 m .O 3 `O
C C
C o co
Cc
V N
CL ca
c
U
n>
_ rn
p
Q E
C
0CL >
(6 O
U
N O O> -O
� 0 o L m t
)
OO E
-2
N 0> y6
�
y L
v
-Op
O O
00> a)
7
cco
`
U c o
N m C
N
Q
N
O y p c
O
'>
c p 3° aNi m
O N a)
C
>` - I i Z
m
m
w° v c
E N
C T "m'
U m N E 0 m
3
r-
O N a
C
O E co
O a) 01
'O y -a a
C
a) m
E°°
l` m°
N t U C
c
O 'O
CO
m o° a °1
c m 2 rn
o
S; °)
cc
° -' rn
a) •m
Er
0_ ° m m_ a�
s c c
°
0
rn 3 0
3
> `o
w O m 9 0 N
N V% U ai 'c
as
t in
/A N (O c
> N O^ m
N N
C
a) E a 7 6)A
a) y T
°= 'y a
a C
'O O N j m
rn -
U
N
>' "O
o
C', c .O t
o U
3 U$
m>
o o
m m ul a) >
u o 3
m ul N m
°
f0 N N o CC
` D
C O) = >.
E O
N
N m 'NO
i
m N C N
a)
a 2%
Q a) _ — .L-.
a1 E
00 m
d
d
ac) m
C
a) a)
"°
O c N a)
Q 7
00
d
3 +t,,, U Q y0
m N
7 C N O)
6 .0 N'
U 3 EOE- m
m
r
a
M
—
LL U H
o
CD
N
N
L a) C)
r
LL
NLf)
n
3
X
A
W
LL
r
L:
C
U)
a -Ti ��° E�
m N
n°p
Q
O V
�a m aim
a) i
m c E
U m m 7
o
N
U)
m
+m+
m
U
c ° �N��'
N C�
2m
O y O to
E
N E
L 'O V
A O 'O N C
aa))
U
C
fn
O)
N E C m 'p
C N a)
N m U> c
a) '
J
>� U s EC
Mn
0)
LO
w
o
m E
3
°C a
O
c_ LL
i° s v
rn c
>> N Lo
m
> y
-
m
a m
o s
Y
0 E
m Co y U)
5 m .O 3 `O
C C
C o co
Cc
V N
CL ca
c
U
n>
_ rn
p
Q E
C
0CL >
(6 O
U
N O O> -O
� 0 o L m t
)
OO E
-2
N 0> y6
�
y L
v
-Op
O O
00> a)
7
cco
`
U c o
N m C
N
Q
N
O y p c
O
'>
c p 3° aNi m
O N a)
3 .�
>` - I i Z
m
m
w° v c
E N
C T "m'
U m N E 0 m
3
r-
O N a
C
O E co
O a) 01
'O y -a a
C
a) m
E°°
l` m°
N t U C
c
O 'O
CO
m o° a °1
c m 2 rn
o
S; °)
cc
° -' rn
a) •m
Er
0_ ° m m_ a�
s c c
°
r
o°
rn 3 0
3
> `o
w O m 9 0 N
N V% U ai 'c
y t i�
m U
t in
/A N (O c
> N O^ m
N N
C
a) E a 7 6)A
a) y T
°= 'y a
a C
'O O N j m
rn -
U
N
>' "O
o
C', c .O t
o U
3 U$
m>
o o
m m ul a) >
u o 3
m ul N m
°
f0 N N o CC
` D
C O) = >.
E O
N
N m 'NO
i
m N C N
a)
a 2%
Q a) _ — .L-.
a1 E
00 m
L Q o
y ca
'p O E N c
m
d
ac) m
� N c 7 N a
C a .�
a) a)
"°
O c N a)
Q 7
Y D N Y> O
U (L c ._ c
N e
Z' O
3 +t,,, U Q y0
m N
7 C N O)
6 .0 N'
U 3 EOE- m
0
W E
m
CL U cc
Q
Q
(XDY N n fU0 m
J A
O
m m F O
LL U H
o
L
N
N
L a) C)
O
O
3
C a_a)i D c
LO
AS
0 0° O U
C
D o
3 0— TOA
c
O N
@ 'Coo mm
N O 0) N t
m
a)
m•N °�
a (0 m°
a -Ti ��° E�
m N
n°p
Q
O V
�a m aim
a) i
m c E
U m m 7
w O C N
>. +' U C N
' m°
y y
(00U,
y�
co
°c 2 co
O V) m O
� QO N rn
U N t U
a'm m
c ° �N��'
N C�
2m
O y O to
E
N E
L 'O V
A O 'O N C
aa))
U
C
U m 3
U 01 N E a
O)
N E C m 'p
C N a)
N m U> c
a) '
O O
3 E )n
>� U s EC
Mn
+�+
co
O O
E
c E a� 6 .= a) c
c
E
a M a) $ a�
c
E E
c y a
3 m o
a m on E
o c
° m.
o
CC D) w L)
w c -c 9° 2 0
m
E°
m a aci
> ro c
m a� m
a�
c m>
c N c m
aci
E cc E
a_ Co o m
2 y ur
w o
N °'rncyQ
a
om
s�Er'm
vm�ms
oE,t
o3�am�
T�°�M
O
O C
N L a ` C U
N a)
'c O
N 0—
L N C m
d 3 U 0 C
a) 2 m a)
y V
m Q m
C=; O 'O N "a) V
V� 2 U) .m+ _T
E2 N C O
Q d ',on N N C
E C
N L
N
Q C C 'a
m c
C m c N C
m N
N
O N
'O O N 3
Q.0 O) 'O
U N
N O
m C L O
LL 3� E U 0 .N
N
LL
Q
Q U cc O 4
O O
U C Q •L..
O
J O E
C
LL 'm0 U> m
cO
L 7 C U
a)
C T 'O m
N C 3
°
L C O
� O
U) r_
C.
. E
m N
a? C113)
L
0 i6 A O
Lp)
E O
N N
C mU N L U
O C
ul
>. m E
U O ul
N m c
a) O LO
f)
E E V
0 N a
.-. c)
tm >
O
m N
U E
O° 0)
m
N T
N- m Ta
N
0 E? m
N m a) LL
C m
- a > N> LL O
�`
y 0
7 m N°
° N a
Qt
a)
° N O m
> N c
C C O O
m E 2
L m V
A CO O (6
O) y
0 O
O L
'a C U 07
IM
-2)
O N
Q co Co L
m 01 m l6
-O N N
3 0 N E f6 a) `°
0)-a
co
c .2 - O J
E
m 3
> U) N N
O� C N
v ) E
C N U - co cc c .0 +�' OC
m E
to Co
CoOe
E c
C c O
V) E
m
L C O
a m>
O a)
Q 7 N N
a m C N.L..
O. E
T O) V
01 ,� O
NO >° 7 N N
C
U O
L
L O
C.1 d
O N
= N
c V
a 4 c
OV a) a) O V
"O
m
C p
O
m` N N
N �'
cc N
y
c
m e ai o
N
m e ur
% Q m
o m'
f>0 -C T
L Q > 0 3cc
C
N'E
c°i m c o .?
mo
a) a
`o
n m m
o
> o m
°> m
0-
`o m 0 0 `m c c
c
O 3 �) v m
LL
Q v v
Q o o m
o E
LLE o o o m
O m
ocmi
a
gz
v
") E 0 `m
T
N
c O m
O
CL °1
O
-p .8 N
m m T
L m>
a
a)
m
_
o c
o c
_
a) E v
rn m 3
N
>
O
c
N c E
N
m U y
w a)
c TLL
°- •
�O ? O c
a) a) i m
N
'p
L
L y
C U >` C
a)
N a>
5
?` N E
A c
T�>-, 3 0 p N
3
m a� c
U °O
aXi
r a E
3 m 3° O a
N°
r -
E
1°
m L
o y Q°
c a 0
<° c
°) a
a A
a o A O
3 ° m a)
N
°
aa)
N
a)
2
in
a) Q m
0 0.0
c
Q 01 N
'O V5
N O) 'L
N 2 O N O m
—
Q
N
L
!6
o
U
N .9� �Vmi
°
0
00 ° U
c 2
c "O'
o Q°
O O LL
o C O" m
E a a
O
4 N
ma)
NL
N2)
>
v ai m
O
cY
N
a)
>
Q
0 a) O
U)z
Q oCj
U
LL E 3 m v
w
a,
E
Y
U
NCL
C
a
C
U m
O E O)
m0
N
c p
m .
O
>
m0_
m
O
N
C
O
C N m
O
0
a
7 >
a U
C
U
Q
a)
a)
O
C N -a 0
m y
m
N
N m
Q
E Y
Co
m
a
E
`m X
E 0
aaU i
m
L
N
U
m 0
E Q
C)o
>
-°
U m r
L C
d m
C, L)
30
C
L
N
Q
m m
�p
V) O
Q
N U m
s O m E
°
LL
U
C
W
m u°
m
O.2 m m
m
N
M
V
L6 lL -o
1 co
I-� o 0) 2

0
m
L
Q
m
a
0
r
72
.3
u
T
3
a
0
y
N
O
C
QO
II
LL
LO
LO
co
co
Z
V)
O c
j U)
a
a)
7 C L Q
ai
c C In
a
C
° m
> CO o u
0
O Y
aNi m
N D1
2 Y m'> `o 3 c
N d r
.0 m
t
ca
n
Lo > s
m 3> .� a o c �o 'c
O°
m
L y E
y
3 0 E 'n y CL
O '�-� (TO N
C O O
O O
>. L-. U O C C' O O
m m O N N
a Z
O >
L O O
E L
N a) W �
m j Y 0 a U
O
Q
U E L
c N p
N
Q
c y
m
E o c a) a m a) o
L CO N
N
C
p N o
E m N '3 n
w O
N
C m c
-6-0 OC
C m°
6
C O a) L
c
Q j O
N `O
N U C
m
a)
cc a)
2 0
mO
c
U a) O
C m p L C N
m
0
n`
c
o p
o
p c
a ° T m ° axi c
0 a N O +O
o' m e
C C m
o m U -
E
p C
c O m
O
E
-0
c fC0
N> o c m °
'n
o
T y
m c a m
o
aN)
N a r>
a°
_0 0 Eo
aa)) C7)
> c o > w m r
aci
U
a c to 3 L o r
Q
N O
7 Q C � '0 p
" 0
m (9 N C -°
cm:
C
m
O m a) 'O w a) E
N
E E
J E 5�
CD 7 U
� -00 +L d� m O 6 m
Q N D
ll F N 7 U�
J 3
N >`
0m
L O m o f
Z
Y
C O
m
C C L O
V p 0 01
O
M c
c C7
c o o'� o m'0
L C
L!
L N C C
'_ L 3 m m o
3
O
CO
O N
a N
m C
(a 0 0 C a7 N fOn
O
d°
N E
V7 0 3 a V f6
O
O C
O T
.� C
�� a>i 0'a > t d m
o ��
a N 0
m 0(
O
VOi �L
> a> E 0
am
C o
C m 01 m m
m
0 2 a)
O m> 7
>� 'Fn 'r<
p O L
p�
T ` a O O p O N
a o
m a) U
orM
O 0) v L _
c n t S m
Y )
n n`
c E N t E
°
o c 0°� �' o c.0 c
3 .L
w Q a
° E T
y w w
y a N o a
c
O
3 0) Y ao m o
m c o? w e
° C
E
a p m
U°
c
o a c m a)
C_ a
m' m
rn m
C
m O m
a C a
N a)
D. N o
N O m f� > C O
c m T '0 L m m m
y
u) p
O U> a) a)
0
E
_N
V O m 0 0
O a) N C
f0 O. O L C 6 L L
'3
cc c>
u7
C a
E
ul E N
0 y 0
y L m O
E
Q o w m Q a) O Q
��� rn
° m C m
�
C d O m 0) 0' -
Do m> L
a)
a`>
Mn o
c c:
m E
°� .° aNi o �
E' m w `o
3 c�
�-0 >o
c°i n c
E
N 3 c
o°
cc v
uo) o '�
co
w o -a 3 3-0
v
o m
`m oo rn
0o c
'�
o
.i
o c c
C>
3
E N N
N
C O
.••. m T Y
O V .LO. a (0
m a T O "' E E
c :C
m °
y 2
E O O U
L
E T
0 0 m m
C m C
- a_ v-0
0 c
a°') Y a) 'Cc) 'o E
U O$
c m> m
a
T
C L
�c^o
�`�
> 'a m C w O
cl O C C
ooEo
m L> E
a)
mN�aa))
U 7>
2 p O L
04
acoEOo'3c
O a) O i6 c
N 0.QS
a o aNi
E L
0 >
m
3 a 3 w c a) a c
c a 3 0 0) o m CO
> E N �7
c 0-0
a 0 a
y
c U
N
t
0
Q p
c
C m
O c U
C
m
7 O 0 O
> o
a Q W> 'N l�6 t
0 0 0: rn o t LL
m
U
E m N r
C 0) O L
c 6
0)
p
-o
E a°, '
aNi
Q u w U
- rn .z c> >° E m
`p O
m c Y>
a M
m �' m .3
n`
Cc O C N L
N L m°
Yfp
E p� ° N> O p
aLO
C m m C
C 3 a) Y
E
m° coi y
c c °) m
co
° L E '� c a o
E c 3 c
o y t m
")
U m D aa))
m cc o
3 Q -00 =o n rn ax) o
in n -0
w E 3 o
N
ca
w
m
3
m
m
0 3
a' a) °
o
° .N aci
E
p d>
o m c c
3
s
^
o
o a m o .o aa)) m
N
aci 0
3
N
a)
- c
�'o.
a) U> > a > m
ma mr a) C L
o
a)
c`
o m>
Q o
E
Mn
0
f6 mCc m o m tali 0
c a)
0 O
°
0 3
c
a n o
c 0 ai 0
a m
c c
Cc
U
Cl)M r
`o
0 a)) v°'
3 0 3 j' » m
.N U
a 00 C
>
...
v
(n> O
as >,m
O o m Ern 0 C y
E
c 0)
> E c
0 m L
LO 'L
M L
'ND
O N N N
cc a
C 0) L L>° Y
m > > c a
C C C
0 f6 °
,cc 3
N
Y U N L
c
m
a) m m N y Y U L 00
a d E m> c r L
o
0 Y L
c m
p N 0 U
Z'E
a) C
U
M m
m e
E
icd 'an >-0 m
��.2
p m
Z >>
o LM
m
0
O
U
C
t
C
2 a)
aci
3
s
�
rn c
m
o Y
O
L
U
C C
a)
C
w m
c
a7
°
0)
m 'O
Q
m
.0 o
>
>
m
E co
3
o
N
a)
0)
m
C
v
N
ami E
'
Y
>
mm
>
rn o
U
c
m
Q 0
m
m
n
Q'
> Cl)
m
D c
m
CO
O
O 0-
N
0
M E
0
m
L
Q
m
a
0
r
72
.3
u
T
3
a
0
y
N
O
C
QO
II
LL

W
06
m
w
L
N
d
N
DO
O O
rN X
LL co
LL r L: C
U s o
IC
V
wa) 3: J
L
0
u
U)
0
O
IL
n
L
LL
t0
v
a
0
0
0
ti
C
CD
N
0
X
W
0)
Ln
w
m E
3
c a
O
c_ LL
i° s v
rn c
>> N Lo
m
>>i y
-
m
a f0
o s
Y
m E
a) Co y U
5 m .O 3 `O
C C
o f
Cc
V N
CL ca
c
U
.5>
_ rn
p
a E
'IT(6
C
a m
O (�
U
U
C
N O O> -O
� 0 0 L m t
)
OO E
-2
N m> y6
�
y L a T a7
v
L
-10)
0 3 O O O
a)
C
7
cco
`
° c o
N m C
N
a
N
O y p c
O
'>
c p 3° aNi m
O N a)
3 .�
0 >
>` - I i Z
m
a3
w° v c
E N
C T "m'
U a) N E O a)
3
O N
C
O E O
O a) tm
'O y c a N -O
C
a) m
E°°
l` m°
N t U C
C
O 'O
Ca o° a °1
c m 2 rn
o
S; °)
cc
° —' rn
a) •m
0_ ° m m_ a�
s c c
r
o°
rn 3 0
3
w O m 9 0 N
N V% U ai 'c
y t i�
a) U
U
t in
/n �° N m c
> N O. 0
N N
C
a) E a 7 6)A
a) y T
°= 'y a
a C
'O O N j a)
rn -
V
N
T 'O
o
a) c .O t
o °
3 U$
a3 >
o o
a3 N ul a) >
u o 3
N ul N a3
°
f0 N N ° C ` D
C O) = >.
E O
N
N m 'NO
i
a7 N C N
a)
° 2%
Q a) _ — .L-.
a1 E
00 a)
L a O
y ca
'p O E N c
m
d
ac) N
� N C 7 N a
C a .�
a) a)
"°
O c N a)
Q 7
Y D N Y> O
U (L c ._ c
N e
Z' O
3 +t,,, U a y0
O N
7 c N O)
6 .0 N'
U 3 E O m
0
W E
m
CL U cc
Q
a
Y N— n m a)
J A
O
m a3 F O
l L U H2
L
O
> o 0
3
c aa) D c
AS
° o° o 0
C
�' = 0
3 0— TSA
c
o w m
@ 'Coo mm
N O 0) N t
m
a)
aoi m.N of
> (0 a3 °
a—Ti ��° E�
m O
n°p
a
O V
�a m aim
a) i
m c E
U m m 7
w O C N
>. +' U C N
'm m°
N N
naa)) y�
O
°c 2 L
O N a) O
� a2 N rn
U N t U
a'm m
c ° �N.2
N C�
ym
O y O Vr
E
N E
L 'O V
A O 'O N C
aa))
U
C
U m 3
U 01 N E a
O)
N E C m 'p
C N a)
N m U> c
a) '
O O
3 E Lo
>� U s EC
Mn
+�+
co
O O
E
c E a� a) c
c
E
a M a5 $ a�
c
E E
c y a
3 m o
a m m E
O c
° m.
o
CC 0)w L)
w c� c° 2 o
m
E°
a) a aci
> �n ro c
f0 a� m
a�
c °>
c N C m
aci - E
E <o E
c a�
m a_ as o m
m
o y ur
w o
N U 'rn c y Q
aLL
o m
s E r 'm
v �a m s
o E v
o 3 a
N ap O_ C CU'c
LN3
O
N —
0U
m
3 m
2,m
aa
m
a
V`
cc a) �_NU af`6)L
Q d
L
'a
Q
C
N
coUaO
N
C U
r-
CL a>
Q f4
m _
J O
a 'O
ODi>
'O
cO
OC
C U
C Y .-. C m
N a)
w a)
C T 'O m
N C 3
°
L C O
� O
N 0
C.
.0 Co E
a) N
a? C113)
L
0 i6 A D
Lp)
E O
N
C m N L U
O C
ul
. m E
U O ul
N a3 c
a) O p
E E V
0 N U a
.-.
tm >
O
7 N
U E
O° 0)
m
N >,
-2:,-6
N N Ta
N
0 E? a)
N N a) LL
C m
- a > N> LL m
�`
y 0
7 m N°
U N a
a t
a)
° N O m
> N c
C C U O
a) E`
L m V
A CO O (6
O) y
0 O
U L
'a C U
IM
LO N
Q co Co L
w 01 m l6
a N N
3 y E f6 m a3
C) c
co
c .2 - O J
E ii
a) 3
> U N N
m� C N
v ) E
C N U - co cc c .0 +�' OC
m E
to Co
CoOe
E c
C c O
O
V) E
a)
L C O
-° a) >
O a)
Q 7 N N
'O a) C N.L..
O. E
>, O) V
01 ,� O
NO >° 7 N N
C
U D
r -0 m
cc
L
L a)
U d
O N
= a)
c V
a 4 c
OV a) a) O V
"O
N
C p
m` N N
N
cc N
y
m e ai o
N
m c c ur
!� Q a)
m m'
f>0
L a > 0 3cc
N E
c°i m c o .?
ou mo
a) a
`o
n m m m
> o m
°> m
`0 0-
o m o o `m c c
c
O 3 �) m
LL
Q o in v
Q o o Q) -02
0 E
LL E o o-0 o m
O m
ocmi
a
v
a) E 0 `mo
T
N
c O m
O
CL °1
O
-p .8 N
m m T
L m>
a
a)
a)
_
° c
_g c
a) E v
rn m 3
N
>
O
c
N c E
N
m U fn
w a)
m >' LL
°-•
�O ? 0 c
a) m i m
N
'p
L
L y
C U >` C
a)
`n C>
5
?` N E
A c
>, �>-, 3 0 p N
3
m a� w e
v
aa)) m
r a E
a)a
3 m 3 U O a
E
m
m o L
o m CL °
c o o
m c
v
° A
a ° o A m
m 3 ° m a)
u°
°
aa)
N
a)
d
in
a) Q m
0 0.0
C
Q 01 N
'O V5
N O) 'L
N 0 O N O m
—
Q
N
L
!6
o
U
N c f2mn
°
0
00 ° U
c
'm6 c em+
o a°
O O LL
o C °" m
E a a
O
4 N
N a)
> N a)
> Y m
O N
v ai m
U 7 L O c
N
a)
ip 3
L
a m
a) R —
z y>
c
Q
fn a) O
Q o
U a
LL E 3 m 0 �
�
w
a,
E
Y
U
N
C
a
C
CL
U m
O E
0
m
N
c p
as .
O
O_
a)
O
>�
N
-Q
C
0
C a3
O
0
7 >
a U
C
U
Q
w
O
C N -a O
a) N
Q
N
N m
C p L y
a
E
`m X
E o a
a)
a3
L
N
L
U
(6 O
E a
C)o
>
-°
L C
a)
a) _r_
C
N
CL
N Co
V) °
N a U m
O EL
LLp
W
m u
O
>U
a)
N
M
V
L6 lL 9
c0
I- 0 0)

0
m
L
Q
m
a
0
r
72
.3
u
T
3
a
0
y
N
O
C
QO
II
LL
8
a�
ti
o�
co
co
Z
Vl
O c
a
a)
ai
n
c
a
°
> o
mo c
r
d
1
caoCU
o s
m >ao
E
y
0 E 'n y CL
O N
C
O
U,
>.L'O
NOZ
O
LOO
N a
EO
mYU
OO
QU
L
E 0
CO a)a
pO
Ep n
N
C
oC
a)
c0)
m Q j O
Nw
m
a s a)
In e0 0
c O
U a) O
C m p L C N
m
0
n`
c
o p
o
p c
a ° T m ° axi c
0 a N O +O
o' m e
C C m
o m U -
E
p C
c O m
O
E
-0
C fC0
N> o c m °
'n
o
T y
m c a m
o
aN)
N a r>
a°
_0 0 Eo
aa)) C7)
> c o > w E m r
aci
U
c to 3 L o r
Q
N O
7 Q C � '0 p
:E 0
m (9 N C -°
cm:
C
m
O m a) 'O w a) E
N
E E
J E 5�
CD 7 U
� -00 +L d� m O 6 m
Q N D
ll F N 7 U�
J 3
N >`
0m
L O m o f
Z
Y
C O
m
C C L O
V p 0 01
O
M c
c C7
c o o'� o m'0
L C
L!
L N C C
'_ L 3 m m o
3
O
O N
a N
m C
(a 0 0 C a7 N fOn
O
d°
N E
V7 0 3 a V f6
O
O C
O T
.� C
�� a>i 0'a > t d m
o ��
a N 0 m a) N
a N_
m 2� O
0
VOi �L
> a> 0
am
C N o
C m 01 m m
m
0 2 a)
0 m> 7
'r< 'Fn 'r<
p O L
p�
T ` a O O p O N
a o
m a) U
orM
O 0) v L _
c n t S m
Y )
n n`
c E N t E
°
o c 0°� �' o c.0 c
3 .L
w Q a
° E T
y w w
y a N o a
c
O
3 0) Y ao m o
m c o? w e
° C
E
a p m
U°
c
o a c m a)
C_ a
m' m
rn m
C
m O m
-0 _N C -0_
N a)
D. N o
N
N O m f� > C O
c m T '0 L m m m
O. O L C L L
y
0)
u) p
O U> a) a)
N O
0
E-0
C
V O m 0 0
O E N
O a) C
y L m O
-Ca`>
f0 6 Q
Q o w '3 m Q a) ° Q
cc C>
° m C m
C �p .� u7
C d O m 0) 0' -
a
E a)
y c°)
0
c c :: E
° .° aNi ) o rn
3 c
Do c°i m> n L c
N 3 c
Mn o
m c E v
uo) E' m w `o o '�
co �-0 >o
w o -a E 3 3-0
o° v
o m
`) o o rn
0o c
o
o c c
C>
3
E N N
N
C O
.••. m T Y
O V
m a T O "' E E
:C
m °
y 2
E O O U
L
0 0 m m
- a_ v-0
a°') Y a) 'Cc) 'o E
U O$
c m> m
T
C L
�`�
> 'a m C w O
c
cl U C C
o E o
m L> E
a
a)
m N aa))
U 7>
c"o
2 p O L
04
a o E 0 0'3 c
O a) O i6 c
o
N 0.QS
a o aNi
E L
c >
7 m
3 a 3 w c a) a c
c a 3 0 0) o m CO
> E N �7
c 0-0
a 0 a
y
c U
N
t
0
Q p
c
C m
O c U
C
m
7° 0 O
>
a Q W> 'N l�6 t
0 0: rn o t LL
m
U
E m N r
C 0) O L
c 6
0)
p
-o
E a°, '
aNi o
Q u w U
0
- rn .z c> >° E m
`p
m c Y>
a M
m �' m .3
n`
Cc O C N L
N L m°
Yfp
E p� ° N> 7°
a
C m m C
c 3 a) Y
E
m° 0 y
co
c c °) m
° L E '� c a o
E c 3 c
o y t m
"'
U m aa))
m c o
3 Q -00 =o n rn ax) o
in n -0
w E 3 o
N
ca
w
m
3
m
m
0 3
a' a) °
o
° .N aci
E
p d>
o 0 c c
^
o
o a m o .o aa)) m
N c
aci 0
3
N
a)
- c
�'o.
a) U > > a > a)
ma mr a) c L
o
a)
c`
o m >
a o
E
Mn
0
f6 mCc m o m tali 0
c a)
p° a
°
0 3
c�
=
a n o
c O a) o y
a m
c c
Cc
U
Cl) r
`o
O° a))
3 0 3 j' » m
.N U
) 00 C
>
...
v
> O
as >,m
0 o m Ern 0 C y
E
c 0)
> E c
0 m L
LO 'L
M L
'ND
O N N N
cc a
C 0) L L>° Y
m > > c a
C C C
0 f6 °
,cc 3
N
Y U N L
c
m
a) m m N y Y U L 0O
d E
a m> c r L
o
0 Y L
c m
p N 0 U
Z'E
a) C
U
M m
m e
E
icd 'an >-0 m
��.2
p m
Z >>
o LM
m
0
O
U
C
t
C
2 a)
aci
3
s
�
rn c
m
o Y
O
L
U
C 0
a)
C
w m
c
a7
°
0)
m 'O
Q
m
.0 o
>
>
m
E co
mi
o
N
a)
0)
m
C
0
3
N
aE
'
Y
>
mm
>
rn o
U
c
m
Q 0
m
m
n
Q'
> Cl)
m
D c
m
CO
O
O 0-
N
0
M E
0
m
L
Q
m
a
0
r
72
.3
u
T
3
a
0
y
N
O
C
QO
II
LL
8

`0
u
U)
r
Q
0
O
IL
n
i
LL
t0
v
a
0
0
0
ti
O
LO
O
C
O
O
co
N
3L
r
c_ LL
i° L v
rn c
as
m
N
L
m
a f0
p c L
Y
,°4 EL..
a) Co }N, U)
m 'o 3 0
C C
o t
V N
76
c
°
J j
_ rn
p
a E
C
a m
(6 O
U
U
C
N O °> -O
0 0L Jt
OO E
N > y6
�
yLa Tal
d
co
C
c `
° c o=
m m C
N
L
LN a
a0
c o 3° aa)) 0
O N a)
a�
O>
— c L z
m
m
E a)
C T "m'
a) N E O a)
>'
CD
a
N
c
O O
E
l` m o
a) L U
Ln
LL
co
J N )° a)
A
Ln
X
m m Co !6 N
°
r
LL
r
L:
C
Ui
/A N m C
> N O^ m
U)
d E a 7 A
a) N T
° 'y a
a C
o
a= N
>' "O
N
m
+m+
m
U
70 N m 0 CC
`
c m a �a >
E o
N tr 'NO
i
m or i a)
a)
-° 2%
a o — y
N E
°O m
J
d
ac) c Co
m
O
LO
O
O
O
O
co
m E
3L
c a
O
c_ LL
i° L v
rn c
m
N
L
m
a f0
p c L
Y
,°4 EL..
a) Co }N, U)
m 'o 3 0
C C
o t
V N
76
c
°
J j
_ rn
p
a E
C
a m
(6 O
U
U
C
N O °> -O
0 0L Jt
OO E
N > y6
�
yLa Tal
v
L
-Op E2
O N
c 3 0 0o
C
L 7
c `
° c o=
m m C
N
L
LN a
N
o N a C
O
'>
c o 3° aa)) 0
O N a)
3 .�
O>
— c L z
m
m
E a)
C T "m'
a) N E O a)
>'
O N
C
O E O -
O a) tm
'° N c '° a
c
O O
E
l` m o
a) L U
c
co
J N )° a)
m
cc
Q —'' O)
m m Co !6 N
°
r
O a) O O
N N w 3
w O m 0 N
N N U ai 'C
o Co
a3 U
m
L (n
/A N m C
> N O^ m
N N
C
d E a 7 A
a) N T
° 'y a
a C
'O O N j m
rn
U
a= N
>' "O
-O m
o o
N a3 c .O L
o U
3 U$
m>
a) O
a3 m N N>
N O 3
N N a) a)
m
70 N m 0 CC
`
c m a �a >
E o
N tr 'NO
i
m or i a)
a)
-° 2%
a o — y
N E
°O m
L a O
y c a
v a) E m c
m
d
ac) c Co
m
N N C O N a
C a .E L T
a) a)
"°
O D N L
Q 7
Y D N Y> O
U (L6 C ._ C
N e
Z' 2)O
3 r- U a y0
O N
7 c N O
.0 N 'E
U 3 E O m
W E
m
Q U cc
a
Y N C J fU0 a)
� J A
O CD
m a3 F O
w
LL U H
o
L
N
N
21
L a) C)
O
> o 0
3
c aai c c
f
LO
a)
° o° o 0
C
= 0
3 0— ToA
c
o w m
@ a mm
N m CO N L
m
O
a°i m.N o
L> (0 a3 °
a—Ti ��° E a
m a)
n°p
a E
O V
�a m a)N
N i
L
m c E
U a) m 7
w O` C N
-o
N
T }' U C N
' m
N y
n y
O
°c E_ LL
O N a) O
o
w
0 N L U
a m m
c 6 vi a
N C r
y _m
O y O N
E aa,
N E
L -O V
o rn
A O '° a) C
m 0 C
U m 3
U O N E a
to
N E C m 'p
C N a)
N m U> c
O O
3 E )n
>� U c Q E
Mn
yL.+
C O O
E
a) c
7 c L O
n m a) o a)
C -O
E E S
c y _°
O
3 o
-° N N E`
° C
7 U 0
O
m tow
S c 1 c° 2 0
a)
E°
N ac)
> U) m C
m a) a) L
a)
c o>
c ) m
ac) — E
E m E
c a)
m a_ as o m
m
tr y N
w o
a ip Q
O N
L "� E> .�
o
U f6 7 L
�p E V
p 3 L) a
T J
O
m O C
N L a ` C U
'C L
N 0—
L N C m
3 U m c
a) 2 m a)
y V
m Q a3
O O a m "O V
V L N .m+
_N f`6
f`0 N 4 O
cc
a) �_ C C
N L
N
Q c C 'm
a3 C
'mO c m C N
a3 N
N T
O N
.2_T
CO a O.0 a) 3
a L a) a
U N
N 0
a3 C L O
LL 3 E U 0 .N
N
LL
Q
Q U cc O 4
° O
U C Q •L..
O
J o E
C
LL� 'm0 U> m
c°
L 7 C U
C Y .-. C m
N N
w N
C T 'O m
N C 3
°
W
L C O
� 2 O
N 0
C.
.0 Co E
a) N
N> C
L L
O i6 A D
E O
N
C m N 1 U
O C
N
>. m E
U O N
N a3 C
a) O p
E E V
L J O
.-. m c) ^O
tm >
O
7 N
U E
J O° 0)
m
N >,
N m �a
N
0 E? a)
N N N LL
C m
- a > N> LL O
�`
y 0
O O N°
° N ^°
a L
a)
° N O m
> N c
C C U O
m E`
L m V
A CO O (6
O y
0 O
° L
'a C V 07
`O N
Q co Co L
(0 O m l6
a N N
3 y E f6 m a)
C c
co
c .2 - O J
E
m 3
> U) N N
O- C N
v� E
C N U - co cc c .0— OC
m E
CoOe
E C
C C O
O
N E
m
L c 0
-° m>
O a)
Q 7 N N
a ) c a) +L-'
O. E
T tT V
to ,� O
cq >° 7 N N_
C
U m
L
O L` (n N
C y
L O
` C.� d
O N
= N N
c V
!� Q a3
a 4 c
OV a) a) O V
-C T
N
C p
O C
N �'
c
m e ai o
m c N
>
o m'
f>0 o m°
L a > 0 3
N'E
c°i m c o .?
oo
a
`o
n m m m
o m
°> m
`o m E 0 `m c c
c c
O 3 �) v m
LL
Q v v
Q o° m
o E
LLE v o o as
O m
o-6.0
a
v
N E 0 `mo
T
N
c 0 a)
O
O- O
O
C)g
'C5 L N
m m T
L 2 0>
a
a)
a)
_
° c
_g c
a) E v
o m 3
N
>
O
C
N C E
O
m U N
w N
m T LL
Q •�
�O > m C
a)
N
c
L
L y
c U >` c
a)
N a>
?` N E
A
>, ">-, 3 0 p N
3
m a) N c
U °°
aXi c
r a E
3 m 3 U o y
N
r -
E
°
m L
o y a°
c o°
<° c
°) a
° A
a O D A a)
m 3 ° N a)
uUi
°
aai
N
d
Q m
c
Q O) N
N
O
N 0 O N O m
—
Q
N
!6
N C �Vmi
O
°O ° U
'06 c "O'
O O LL
o C O" m
O
4 N
N a)
> m 0) a)
> Y m
O c N
ai m
N 7 L O c
N
Cc
ip 3
L
a 0
N R—
z° y>
C
Q-
N a) O
Q o
U O L
LL E 3 m v
c
t
E
Y
U
is
a)
C
a
C
U CL
O m
`°
m
c
m
C
mp_.�,
O
m' CCIL
m
O
�>� m
-Q
An
C
0
C a) a3
L
O
m
7 >
U
C
U
Q
w
m N
N
N m
Q
C p L y
L
a
E
`m X
O E o a
a) 6
a)
L
N
U
f6 O
E a
C)a3
>
-O
U }N,
C
a)
ai U
p
C
L
N
CL
N a)�p
N O
N a U m
Q O N E
°
LL
U
C
W
m u°
m
O� m m
m
N
M
V
l!7 lL -o
c0
I-� O O

0
m
L
Q
m
a
0
r
72
.3
u
T
3
a
0
y
N
O
C
QO
II
LL
8
00
00
00
LO
Z
V)
O c
j U)
a
a)
7 C L Q
ai
c C In
a
C
° m
> CO o u
0
O Y
aNi m
N D1
2 Y m '> `0 3 c
N d 01
f
co t a)ca
n
Lo > s
m 3> .� a o c �o 'c
O°
o
L y E
y r
3 0 E 'n y CL
O '�-� (TO N
C O O
O O
>. L-. U O C C' O O
m m O N N
a Z
O >
L O O
E L
N a) W �
m j Y 0 a U
O
Q
U E L
c N p
N
Q
c y
m
E o c a) a m a) o
L CO N
N
C
p N o
E
w O
C m c
oC
C m°
a)
C O L
c
mQ j O
N `O
N U C
m
a s a)
In e0 0
c O
U a) O
C m p L C N
m
0
n`
o p
o
p
T ai
0 CNO
af0°
m
C C m
-O
o my Uc
E
c O m
E
O -0
C
N> o c m °
'n
o
m c a m
o
aN)
N a r>
a°
_0 0 Eo
aa)) C7)
> c o > w m r
aci
U
a C In 3 L o r
Q
N O
7 Q C � '0 p
" 0
m (9 N C -°
cm:
C
m
O m a) 'O w a) E
N
E E
J E 5
CD 7 U
� -00 L d� m O 6 m
Q N D
ll F N 7 U�
J 3
N >`
0m
L O m o f
Z
Y
C O
E
C C L O
V p 0 01
O
M c
c
c o o'� o m'0
C
L!
L N C C
'_ L 3 m m o
3
O
CO
O N
a N
m C
(a 0 0 C 0 N fOn
O
d°
N E
N O 3 a V f6
O
O C
O T
.� C
�� a>i 0'a > t d m
o ��
a N 0
m 2� O
0
VOi �L
> a> 0
am
C N o
C m 01 m m
m
0 2 a)
0 m> 7
>� 'Fn 'r<
p O L
p�
T ` a O O p O ton
a o
m a) U
orM
O 0) v L _
c n t S m
Y )
n n`
c E N t E
-= °
o c 0°� �' o c.0 c
3 .L
w Q a
° E T
y w w
y a N o a
o a) m c°
c
°° o O
3 0) Y ao m o
m c o? w e
°
E
a p m
U°
c
o a c m a)
C_ a
0' m
rn m
C
m O m
a _N C a
N a)
a N o
N
y O m f� > C O
C m T '0 L m m m
O. O L C L L
y N
u) p
O V> a) a) m
0
C
V O m 0 0
V) E N
O a) C
y L m 0
m 6
Q o w '3 m Q a) ° Q
cc C>
° m E m
u7
C d O m 0) 0' -
a
E a)
0 a`> y 0
c c: E
°� .° aNi ��� o rn �
� 3 c�
Oo c°i m> n L c
N 3 c
Mn o
m °c E v
uo) E' m w `o o '�
co �-0 >o
w o -a E 3 3-0
o° v
o m
`m oo rn
0o c
'�
o
.i
o c c
C>
3
E N N
N
C O
.••. m �. Y
O V .LO. a (0
m a T O -2 E E
c :C
m °
y 2
E O O U
L
0 0 m m
- a_ v-0
a°') Y a) 'Cc) 'o E
U O$
c m> m
T
C L
�c^o
�`�
> 'a m C w 0
c U C C
ooEo
m t> E
a
a)
mN�aa))
U 7>
2 p O L
04
acoEOo'3c
O a) O i6 c
N 0.QS
> o aNi
E L
0 >
m
3 a 3 w c a) a c
c a 3 0 0) o m CO
> E N
c 0-0
a 0 a
y
c U
N
t
0
Q p
c
C m
O c U
C
m
7° 0 O
>
a Q W> .N l�6 t
0 0: rn o t LL
m
U
E m N r
C 0) O L
c 6
0)
p
-o
E a°, '
aNi o
Q u w U
0
- rn .z c> >° E m
`p
m c Y>
a M
m �' m .3
n`
O C N L
y L m°
Yfp
E p� ° N> 7°
aLO
C m m C
C 3 a) Y
E
m° coi y
c c °) m
°c co
° L E '� c a o
E c 3 c
o y t m
")
U m D aa))
m o
3 Q -00 =o n rn ax) o
in n -0
w E 3 o
N
ca
w
m
3
m
m
0 3
0 a) °
o
° .N aci
E
p d>
o m c c
3
s
^
o
o a m o .o aa)) m
N
aci 0
3
N
a)
- c
�'o.
a) U> > a > m
ma mr (D C L
o
a)
c`
o m>
Q o
E
Mn
0
m a) a) Cc o m a) 0
c a)
06 L"p
m
0 3
m
c
a
0 L.a3 0aa)) c
noy oL_
a)
w0c
U
Cl)
0
3 m 3 j »
Um
N
ac
vo
(nO
as >mm
O E
c -n0)
> E
m m
LO L>
Cl)
L>i
cc a
Ya)
0) >°
r
C
0�
°
l6
CON
N
Y U N L
c
ma
a) m m N y Y U L 0O
a d E m> c r L
0 1 L
c m
O N U
Z'E
a) C
U
M m
m e
E
icd 'an >-0 m
��.2
p m
Z >>
o LM
m
0
O
U
C
t
C
2 a)
aci
3
s
�
rn c
�)
m
a0)
c
c
m
o Y
O
L
U
C C
a)
C
w m
c
a7
°
0)
m 'O
Q
m
.0 o
>
>
m
E co
o
N
a)
0)
m
C
v
3
N
ami E
Y
>
m m
>
rn o
U
c
m
Q 0
m
m
n
Q'
> Cl)
m
D c
m
CO
O
O 0-
N
0
M E
0
m
L
Q
m
a
0
r
72
.3
u
T
3
a
0
y
N
O
C
QO
II
LL
8

W
06
m
w
L
N
a)
N
N
d
L
t
L
0
u
U)
r
Q
0
O
IL
n
L
LL
t0
v
a
0
0
0
ti
C
CD
N
0
X
W
M
N
M
N
M
m E
m
°C a
O c
c_ LL
i° s v
rn c
t
Y
m�
a cc
o' s
Y
m E
a3 Co }N, U)
t m .O 3 `O
C C
o f
V N
c
°
j
_ rn
p
a ECc
'IT(6
C
a m
O
U
U
C
N O O> -O
0 0 0 m t
z5 E
OO E
a)
N > y6
0v
) L a>, a7
L m
C
C
� 7
c `
° c o
m m a
N
a
N
o CO c
O
c o 3° aNi m
O N N
�
2` — i Z
m
0
C T
U a) N E O a)
>'
O N a
> C
O E co
c
c
a) m
E
l` m°
N t U C
c
O 'O
N �° a)
c m m rn
N
S; °)
cc
Q a) —>, O)
a) •m
O O m m N
s c c
r
o°
a) ° O
rn 3 0 �°
N 3
> `o
w O m 0 N
N N V ai 'C
d
m
co
t in
C
N N
C
d E a 7 A
a) N T
00
y
a
N
> O
—
N
�
N
O
N
�
(n
X
A
N 0)-0
i
m N C a)
LL
LL
n
r
L:
C
U)
E
U
Y O N Y> 01
U >
(L6 c ._ c
s
o
7 c N O)
6 .0 N'
d
m
°)
m
0
O
m a) F O
fn
L
J
M
N
M
N
M
m E
3
°C a
O c
c_ LL
i° s v
rn c
y
m�
a cc
o' s
Y
m E
a3 Co }N, U)
t m .O 3 `O
C C
o f
V N
c
°
j
_ rn
p
a ECc
'IT(6
C
a m
O
U
U
C
N O O> -O
0 0 0 m t
z5 E
OO E
a)
N > y6
0v
) L a>, a7
L m
-Op E2
3 O O O
00> N
C
� 7
c `
° c o
m m a
N
a
N
o CO c
O
c o 3° aNi m
O N N
3 .�
2` — i Z
m
a)
E N
C T
U a) N E O a)
>'
O N a
> C
O E co
O N 01
'O co c ^O N -O
c
a) m
E
l` m°
N t U C
c
O 'O
N �° a)
c m m rn
N
S; °)
cc
Q a) —>, O)
a) •m
O O m m N
s c c
r
o°
a) ° O
rn 3 0 �°
N 3
> `o
w O m 0 N
N N V ai 'C
y t i
a) U
m
co
t in
N�° N m c
> N O^ a3
N N
C
d E a 7 A
a) N T
° 'y a
"6 C
'O O N j m
rn
U
N
> O
-O m
o a� N
N a3 c .O t
o °
3 U
a3 >
o o
a3 m N N>
N o m 3
al N N a)
°
m N m 0 CC
`
c
m
E O
N 0)-0
i
m N C a)
0 a)
-° 2%
Q N_ — .L-.
N E
00 m
L a O
y c a
'p O E N r-
o m
d
aci al
C a .E
N
m fn n
Q 7
Y O N Y> 01
U >
(L6 c ._ c
m o
Z' 2)O
?� .L- U a
O N
7 c N O)
6 .0 N'
U 3 E O m
W E
mCU
Q U fa0Y
a
N n m a3
J A
O
m a) F O
LL U H
L
21
O
> o 0
3
c aai c
a)
° o° o 0
C
�' = 0
3 0— TSA
c
o w m
@ a mm
o° m N s
m
o>
m m•N °�
m as °
a—Ti ��° E�
m a)
n°p
a E
O V
yam a�N
a� i
m c E
U m Co
wo 2 C N
N
T �_' U C O
'm m°
N y
naa)) y�
O
°c 2 L
O N co O
� a2 N rn
U N t U
a'm m
c ° �N��'
N C�
ym
O y O N
E
N E
L 'O V
A O 'O a) 9
aa))
m U C
U a) 3
V 01 N E a
O)
N E C m 'p
a
C N a)
N m U> c
a� '
O O
3 E )n
>, ° Mn s E
+�+
-,5c 0 0
E
a) c
c
E
m a� $ a�
c
E E
c y a
3 C o
a m m E
C
o
CC 0)w L)
w c� c 0 2 o
m
E°
a) a aci
> �n ro c
f0 co m
a)
c a� >
c N C m
aci — E
E m E
c a�
m a_ o m
o` n N
w o
N U'rncyQ
a
om
s�Er'm
vm�ms
oEv
U
om
04 L)
O
m O C
N L a ` C U
m N
'C
N 0)—
L N c m U
d 3 U m C
a) 2 m a)
y V
m Q a3
O O a m "O V
V
fL0 N 4 O
E2 —L
Q d -p N N C
N
Q C C 'm
'OO C m c N
N
N a O N 3
U N
a3 C c C L O
LL 3 E U D in
N N
LL
a3 C
CLcO
Q U fa0 O 4
O a3 N O
U C Q •L..
O N m
J O E
c D-
LL� 'OO U> m
N 0
L 7 C U
c Y .-. C m
N N
w N
C T 'O m
N C 3
°
L C O
� O
N 0
a).
.0 Co E
a3 N
�
N>
L
0 i6 A D
E O
N
C m N L U
O C
am) N
T m E U
U O N
N a3 c
a) O p
E E V
0
.-. m c) ^O
tm >
O
7 N
U E
O° 0)
m
N >,
S- m �0
N
0 E? ai
N al N LL
C m
- a > N> LL O
�`
y 0
O m N°
° N a
a t
a)
° N O O
> N c
C C O O
cc E`
L m V
A CO O (6
O) y
0 O
O.0
'a C U 07
O N
Q co Co L
a) 01 m l6
.0 N N
3 y E m a) a)
c) c
c —a0) - O J
m 3
> m N N
m c N
U ) E
co cc
C N U c.0 +' OC
m E
(Op e
E c
C c 0
m O
V) E
m
L C O
a m>
O a)
Q 7 N N
-O ) C a) +L-'
O. E
T m V
01 ,� O
cq >° 7 N N_
C
U m
0 m
O L` (n N
C y
s O
` U d
O N
= N N
c V
!� Q a3
a 4 c
OV a) a) O V
-C T
al
C p
O C
.N
c
mo
m C a) O
N C C N
>o
N (0
f>0 o m°
L a > 0 3
.N 'E
v m E2 c o
°) mo
`o
Q m m°
m
°> m
`o m o
cm
LL
Q o m-0
Q o o ro-0
2 0 E
LL E o o-0 o m
O m
o-6.0
a
v
N E 0 `m
T
N
c O m
O
CL °1
C)g
O
-p .8 N
m O T
L m>
a
a)
a)
_
° c
_g c
a) E v
rn m 3
N
>
O
c
N c E
N
m U N
w a)
m >'LL
°- •
N
a) a) i m
N
'p
L
L y
C U>, C
a)
N a>
5
>` N E
A c
3
m a� N c
U °O
aXi
r a E
3 m 3° C) a
N
m
E
m
m L
o y a°
c o°
<°
°) a
° A
a O D A a)
m 3 a N a)
uUi
°
aai
N
N
d
in
O Q m
cc
Q O) N
V5
NN
O) 'L
0 0
O O m
—
Q
U
`Vi
°
0
0°
0 c
0
'6a"mo
O C
LLcZ52 o`
OO"
E m
ON
N
m
Nt
m2)
> Y
ai
O
c
.0
3
a m
R—
z >
cm
Q
a) O
Q o 2
U
LL E 3 m vCj
w
a,
E
Y
U
NCL
C
a
C
U m
O E O)
m0
m
c p
as .
O
>
O_
m
O
>�
m
-Q
C
0
C a3
O
m
a
7 >
a U
C
O
CL
w a)
r -
a)
C N -a N
a) N
N
m m
Q
C p y
a)
a
E
`m X
E o°
aaU i
a3
L
N
U
a3 O
E a
C)o
>
-°
U a) }N,
L C
a3
C0 U
30
C
L
N
a
a)
�p
N O
N a U 0
Q O O E
°
LL
U
C
W
m u°
m
0.2 m m
m
N
M
V
L6 lL -o
1 co
I-� 0 0) 2

0
m
L
Q
m
a
0
.c
m
.3
u
T
3
a
0
y
N
O
c
O
0
II
LL
M
N
CO
N
N
N
O C
> 00 N
a
N °
7 C L Q
ri
Y
Y C N
p) N T
C
a
N
C
° N
o o N
aa)) (O Y
N D1
ZL m'> 0 3 c
@ca 0,
.N N
m �t a)
d1
'N
co
Lo > s
m 3> .� a o c �o 'c
O
a)
L y
N
3 0 E n N pn
O '�—� co N
C° O
O OQ
>. L-. U° C C O O
a7 U a7 O m N Z
O >
L O O
N a) W E L
a) jY pa U
O
Q
U E L
c N o
N
c N
a)a
E a) c >:a m m o
L m N
C
p N o
E Co N'3 N
Co N
N
C a) C
°c
C a3 U
T C O L
C
Q j O
N `O
N U C
m
a s a)
Ln eU 0
cc C O
U m O
C L0 p L C N
m
O
n`
N c
o p°
> 0
°
_o m a o 5, m°. axi c
� a)
O' 0) c
c o
o m U
E
c
c 0° m
o
E
'° c _m N o m n
° N> o c m 2°
o �
T y
m c a � f m
o
aNi
CI, o r>
a°
_0 0 0
a°)i LT
> c o > w E as y> L7)
aci
U Tc °
c 0 N
0 3
>+ l` N NL6
U
a C LO M C
2
p
'UOc
Q°
'y..
a
CL
Ow
p E
E E
N7
a2
L
J E 6 )
CND 7 UU
Ld 6OmNa)
D
QN
LL m7
J'00 3
N >`
O
O O
L (0 o f
O Z
Y
C O
a7
C C L O
co U a) 0)
O
C c o :0
c ''E o o'� 0 m'o
L C
L
L N C -_
�_ L 3 m m o
3
0
O N
a N
�' m e
m O° C a) N f0/) C
O
.0 a U
N E
N O 3 a V f6
O
O C
o T
In .� C
0) N a) -O > L G. a)
0 O)
'Of a fp 0 a) N N
a N_
a) °
°
- U)i — L
> N a > E a0 coo -0) E
C 0
C a) O a7
O
a) 2 a)
7 m> 7
T �
� p O L
U
mr-
T ' a O o p O C N
a o
7 a) U
o L
a3
N m v L _
c N L° o
Y )
N n`
c E N t E
0°
o c°° ��' o c c
3
w Q a
° E>
U) -0 N oa
o) m c o
c
°° o O
3: -,0) c)iYao a) o
°° c o? w e
o C
E
a p m
U°
���° Lim
o a C N N a)
O' as
q) C m
N m
a N 0
N
N 0> N f` > C O
C a3 T 'O L m O m
O. O L C L L
N
O
N)
O U j a) a)
O O
E-0
C
U O m 0 0
N E N
O a) C
y L O O
t0
Q o w .3 m Q m U Q
Cc C>
U L0 C a)
C a) .� N
C d O L0 0 6—
a
E a)
C V N N U
c C 2 E
a) 1r .° N Y O N N m C
C 3 c N
.'06 U N T N L c
N 3 C
in 0 0 0
m °c E v
Lon E' m w `o o '�
i4 -0 >o
w o-0 E 3 3-a
o° U
o m
EE
`) o o rn
0o c
c E
o
.i
o c
C>
3
.r
N N
N
C O
.••. m >. Y
O V .LO. -O (0�
L0 a >. L7) .. E E
c :C
a) °
y 2
E O O U
L
E T
0 0 m as
as c
- a_ v-0
a) c m c o m
aoi Y a) 'Cc) 'o E
c CL
° o o
D U N
m T m
3
T
�'
C L
�`°
> a 0 C +L+ O
c
C1 U C C
o E o
a) L> E
a
a)
rn
m N aEi
U 7>
'55
c"o
2 p O L
04
a o E 0 0'3 c
O N O c
a 3
o
N O.QS
>'� c
a o E L
0>
° m
w c m c
3 c a 3 o rn o m m
> E N
c o
c 0 a
y
c U
N
t
o
Q p
c
C O
O 0 U
o c
m
7 0 0 O
>
a Q N W> 'N l�6 t
0: rn o t a�
a)
U
E as N r
C O O L
S lm
q)
p
o
E a°,'
aNi o ca
° N N U
°
00
ern. c>>° E m
`p
a) c- >
a
a) ym.3
n`
cc O C N L
N L LO
Y O
E p� ° N> E 7°
LO a
C O m C
C 3 a) Y
E
LO
m° coi y
c c °) m
°c
° L E'er a) c a 0
E c 3 c
o y t m
M
U m 0 ax)
m E o
3 Q v =o n rn ao o
in n�-0
w E 3 o
N
(6
N
L 00
3
m
aci
E
o 0. aL44) —
-
>
m o a co o aa)m
�
c
ay
3
o)amy cL
o
c`
a E o
co
v
> o Ln
0
T° a) °) o a) c 0
c a
°° oL
m
a 3
c
=°
o' aL a) c a)
c O 0 o y c
a)m
a as
0w 3
c c
Cc
Cl)
V
o° aoi
3 m 3 �' » o
a -p a)
m o
a o c
>
'L
...
>
>,
° o m E O O N
E
c O
> E c
N a)
Ln
Cl) r-
'NO
.2
O N N N
R A a
C C:,L L>° Y
as > > ca
_ .3
C C c
N N°
lC6 >i
as
N
Y U N L
c
y m
N L0 0 N N Y U L �0
a d E o> c r L
o
a) Y L
c m
p N O p
S
a) C
`o
U
m m
CD C E
E
m d a> O
J
O E°
Z>
0
O
N
O
U
t
C
C
w a)
aci
3
s
rn c
:2 O)
c
ns
m
Y
c
O
m
L
o m
U
C 0
a)
oQ
c
N a3
c
a7
o
a) 'p
Q
a) f6
s o
N
>
m
E co
o
N
a)�
O)
m
C
v
3
N
a°iE
Y
>
E2 L0
>
m
Um
C
cc
t0
Q N
LO
m
N
Q
> Cl)
co
5 C
CO
an W
O
O Q
N
N
M E
0
m
L
Q
m
a
0
.c
m
.3
u
T
3
a
0
y
N
O
c
O
0
II
LL
M

W
06
m
w
L
a)
d
N
N r
Q) .Tft
LW
co o
m
r a
oGD y
MLL. ey N X
LL r
U s o
m
N m ate+ m U
J
L
0
u
U)
0
O
IL
n
L
LL
t0
v
a
0
0
0
ti
C
CD
N
0
X
W
Ln
c
Y
m E
3
0C a
O
c_ LL
i 0 s v
rn c
>> N Lo
m
>>i y
-
m
a m
o s
Y
m E
m Co y U
5 m .O 3 `O
C C
o f
V N
CL
c
U
.5>
_ rn
p
a E
'IT(6
C
0 mCL >
O
0
U
N O O> -O
� 0 0 0 m 0
)-
00 E
-2
N m> y6
�
y L a T m
v
L-
-Op 2�
- >i O O O
00> a)
C -
7
cco
`
U c o
N m C '>,
a)
a
N
O y p c
O
'>
c p 3 a aNi m
O N a)
3 .�
>` — c i Z
m
m
w °) 0 C
E N
C "O'
U m N E 0m
0>'
O N
C
O E O
O a) tm
'O y a N -O
C
a) m
E
l` m a)
N t U C
C
O 'O
Ca r- N �° °' C:
c m2 c)
N
S;°)
Q a) —>, 0)
m �•m
Er-
O O Co m N
�s c c
0
E
o 0
a) ° O
rn30 �°
ul 3
o > `o
w O m 0 N
N V% U ai 'c
y t i
m U
m
t in
/n � N m c
> N O. m
N N
C
d E a 7 A
0 N T
0 'y a
"6 C
'O O N j m
rn c
V
N
T 'O
-O m
o a)
N m c .o L)
g U
3 U 00
m>
a) o
m m O a) >
u o 3
m ul N m
m
f0 N N° C
`
C 01
N
O
N m 'NO
i N C a)
a)
-O ` 2
Q N_ — .L-.
0 E
00 m
L a O
N C a
'p O E N c
d
N 7 m
rLn = >.
N C 7 N a
C a .�
E
a) N
a
m
0 c 0-
Q c 7
Y 0 to Y> M
U co c ._ c
a) 0
Z' O
3 +t,,, U Q y0 m
O N
7
6 .0 N 'E
U 3 E O m
W E
Q U fa0
a
Y N n m m
J A
O
m, m F O
LL U H
L
21
O
> ° 0
3
c aa) D c
AS
0 0 0 a0 0
C
�' = 0
3 0— >, �A
c
o w m
@ 'Coo mm
a) a) N s
m
o>
m m•N °�
m m 0
a—Ti ��° E�
m a)
no�
a E
O V
�a m a)m
a) i
m c E
0 m m 0
w 2 C N
T �_' U C O
'm m °
N y cn
naa)) y
O
°c 2LL
O N m O
ao N
U N L U
a'm m
c a �N.2
N C�
ym
O y O Vr
E
N E
L -0 V
In
A O 'O N C
a0)
D LM)
C
U m 3
v 01 " E a
O)
a>i E m d
C N a)
a) m v> c
a) '
°) o
3 E Lo
>" m s E
Mn
+�+
c 0 °)
E
c E a) a) c
c
E
a M a5 $ a)
c
E E
c y a
3 m o
o m m E
O c
o
CC 0)w L)
w c� c 0 2 o
m
E°
a) a aci
> �n ro c
f0 a) m
a)
c m>
c N c m
aci — E
E <o E
c a�
m a_ m o o
m
o y ur
w o
N 0 'rn c y Q
aLL
o m
s E r 'm
0 �a m s
o E v
o 3 a
T °)
N ap O_ C CU'c
Lm3
N —
0) =-
0
cc
a
d 3CCCL
m
a
V` N
f`6
f0 N 4_NU OL
Q d
L
'a
Q r-
mo
N
m
a 'O
N
OC
C U
CL a>
-0
Q f
J O
ODi>
'O
cLO
C U
C Y .-. C N
�` a)
w y
C T 'O m
N C 3
O
L C O
� O
N 0
C.
.0 Co E
m N
a? C113)
L
0 i6 A D
Lp)
E O
N
C m N L U
O C
ul
m E U
U O ul
N m c
a) O p
E E V
0 N U a
.-.
tm >
O
7 N
U E
0 0 0)
(a
N >,
-2:,-6
N N a)
N
0 E? m
N m a) LL
C m
- a > N> LL O
�`
y 0
7 m N 0
0 y a
a t
a)
0 N 0 0
> N c
C C U O
m E`
L m V
A CO O (6
O) y
0 O
0
ac o rn
IM
o 0
a co Co L
m rn m `m
a N N
3 y E m m°
0)-0
co
c .2 - O J
E ii
m 3
> m N N
m� C N
v ) E
C N U - co cc c .0 +�' OC
m E
to Co
CoOe
E c
C c 0
O
V) E
m
L C O
a m>
O a)
Q 7 a) a)
'O a) C a) +L-'
O. E
T m V
01 ,� O
NO > 0 j N N
C
U D
r -0 m
cc
L m` N N
y
r O
U d
O N
= a) N
c V
!� Q m
a 4 c
OV a) a) O V
"O
m
C p
N
Na)cc
Q
m e ai o
m0 c ur
>j
o m'
f>0
s a > 0 3cc
N E
U N C O
0) mo
N
`o
0 m O
0 X- m
0> m
`o m o o lb C C
V C
cm
LL
Q o in -0
Q o o ro-0
2 0 E
LL E o o-0 o m
O m
ocmigza)
a
v
E 0 `m
T
N
c O m
O
CL 01
O
U.8 N
m O T
L m>
a
a)
m
_
° c
_g c
a) E v
rn m 3
N
>
O
c
N c E
O
m U y
w N
m >'LL
Q•5
0
a) m i m
N
'p
L
L y
C U >` C
a)
`n C>
?` N E
A c
>, �>-, 3 0 p N
3
m a) w e
0
aa)) m
r a E
a)
3 m 3 U O a
E
1°
m o L
0 m o. °
c 0 0
<° c
a�
o A
a 0 0 A al
m 3 o U) a)
u0
0
aa)
N
a)
d
in
O Q m
O) a) .0
c
Q 01 N
-0 V5
N O) 'L
N 0 O N O m
—
Q
N
t
!6
o
U
N c f2mn
a
0
00 0 U
c
'06 c e0+
o a°
O O LL
o C 0" m
E a a
O
4 N
N m
> N a)
> Y m
O N
v ai m
m 0 L O c
N
m
ip 3
L
a m
N R—
z y>
c
Q
fn a) O
Q o
�Ua�
L° E 3 m c0) �
�
w
a)
E
--
Y
U
a)
C
a
C
U m
O CLE
m
c
N
c p
m
OO
m
O
>�> _ N
Q
>
C
0
C J N m
O
0 7
>
a U))
c
U
Q
w
m
c m a 0n
m N
N
N m
Q
C p y
U
a
E
`m X
O E o a
a)
m
L
N
t
U
is O
E O^
C)m
>
-O
}N,
L C
m
C, U
p
C
t
N
CL
Co
p
O 0
N a U 0
s O O E
C
0
LL
U
W
m u 0
m
O L) m m
m
N
M
V
l!7 ll 9
0
I-� 0 0) 2

0
m
L
Q
m
a
0
r
c
.3
u
T
3
a
0
y
N
O
c
0O
II
LL
M
ti
co
LO
(D
co
co
Z
N
O c
> 00 N
a
N
7 C L Q
ri
Y C N
C
a
C
° m
> o o N
aa)) (O Y
N D1
ZY m'> 0 3 c
@ca
t
.N N
� t
21
N
eco
Lo >-0
Co 3> .� a O c �o 'c
O
a)
L y
N� a)
3 0 E n N pn
O '�-� co N
C O O
O O
>. L-. U O C C O O
m U m O N N
a Z
O >
L O O
y a) w E L
m
O
U E L
c N o
N
Q
c N
m
E a) c >: a m m o
L N N
c
p N o
E Co N '3 N
Co N
N
C m c
°c
c m 0
T C O L
C
Q j O
N E `O
N U C
m
a s a)
E
Ln e0 0
E
m c O
U m O
C m p L C N
m
0
n`
_
N c
o p°
> 0
°
0 0a ° Tm °. axi c
� a)
O' 0)c
c m
o amici mU
E
c
cOOmaN)
o
'o c co N o o n
oo
> y
mc --0
o
vmi o r>
a°E
_0 0 0
aa))LTQm>ocm2'
> c o > w E m L> L7)
mm
U
a C Ln 6 L N r
2
7 Q° p
'UOc
'y..
C,
r v w E
E E
a2
L3
J
'0 Ld m0im
D
QN
LL a)
N7
JE 3
N >`
O O
L O m O E
O Z
Y
C O
m
C C L O
, V p N 01
p
C c O :p
c ''c o o'c 0 m'o
L C
L E E
L N c
�_ L 3 m m o
3
O
0) N
a N
m C
(a O U2 c a) N f0/) E
O
.0 O. 0
N E
N O 3 a V m
O
O C
O >,
.0 C
0) a>) a) a> t G. a)
o
a N 0 m N N
) N_
m°
°
V°i L
> m a> E a) E
c 0
c m 01 m O
m
a) 2 a)
7 m> 7
T �
� p O L
U
mr-
T ' a O o p O N
a o
m a) U
o L
N 0) j-" L _
c N L 0 m
Y )
N n`
c E N t E
- 0 °
o c o° ��' o c c
3
w Q a
0 E> E-0
0 w
U))-0 N oa
o a) m c o
c
°° o O
3: -,0) 0)iYao a) o
a✓ 0 m c o? w e
o c
E
a p m
U°
���° oc
o-0 C N N a)
0) m
m e m
m O m
a c -C_
N m
a N p
N 0> m f- > C O
C m T 'O L c m m m
Lcp
y N
N)
O V> a) a)
-0 E n
_N
U O m 0 0
O a) N C
m O. O L C c L L
.3
m C> O
O C m O .� N
C a
E
N E N
0 y
0 C m O
E
Q o w m Q m o Q
rn
U m C m
m
C d O La O) O' -
ma m> L
a)
a`> c°)
in 0
c c ::
m E
m .° Q ) m
CO E' m w `o
3
�-0 >o
c0i N c
E
N 3 c
o°
0 0
c v
Lon o '�
i4
w o -a 3 3-0
U
o m
`m o o rn
0o c
ui
o
.i
o c c
c>
3
E N N
4)
C O
.••. m >. Y
O V .LO. a m�
m a T m) " E E
C :C
m °
y 2
E O O U
L
E T
0 o m m
C'jc
a_ v
c io o ac_) .c `m
aoi Y a) w a 'o E
L c°
° O o
o U N
c m >' m
3
>,
C L
> a m a) C r O
c
C) ° c C
o E o
m L> E
a
a)
rn
m N aEi
U 7>
c"o
2 p O L
a o E � 0'3 c
O N O i6
a 3
o
m O.QS
c >'� c
a o �N0
EL
cLo >
0� m
r c a) c
3 ca 3 0 0)0m CO
T E N
c om
c o a
y
c U
N
-0
t
0
Q o
a) c
C m
O U
c
m>
7 0 0 O
a Q N W> 'N l�6
o o rn o t LL
m
U
E m N r
C O) O L
c 6
01
-0
o
E N 75
o
0 a). a N N U
m
- rn .z > >o E �i
`p a)
° c Y>
a c
m N d .3
n`
O c N L
N L m°
YO
E o O N> 2 7
LO a
C m m C
c 3 a) Y
E
m° 0 y
co
c c m
° L E 'er c a o
E c 3 c
o y t m
"a
U m 0 aa))
m c o
3 Q v =0 n 0) ax) o
t4 n��
w E 3 o
N
ca
N
m
3
m
m
3
a' a) o
c o
° .N m
d0
p
co
o am aa)
o
U T Ta > ac)
LYmm
acyo
cm)
`
c0a)
>
a E0
oacc°i'
Mn
Co v
n
°aT�L
0o cm
c° oa)
ca)
m
Cc
m
vo
O
3 m 3 »
as
>
a o
NON
>m
°m E 0)
O
E c
m L
L3mEmn
Cl)
rn LL
°>m
>
ccom c
mwmyc
N
Y U N L
c
N m m N N Y U L 00m
a m E m> c r L
a) Y L
c m
o N O p
a) c
`O
U
c
m e En°
E
iod 'an >-0 m
2S
0 it m
Z >>
o
m
N
O
U
t
C
c
w a)
aci
3
s
0
0) c
:2 O)
°
m
am)
c
c
c
m
a)
Y
c
O
m
L
m m
U
C c
a)
oQ
C
N m
c
a7
o
0)
m 'p
Q
mm
.0 U
>
>
E a
o
N
a)
O
m
c
03
N
E
Y
>
m m
>
0)o
Um
c
cc
m
a°
m
co
N
Q'
> m
5 C
m
CO
oi W
O
O Q
N
N
M E
0
m
L
Q
m
a
0
r
c
.3
u
T
3
a
0
y
N
O
c
0O
II
LL
M
ti

N
d
L
t
L
0
u
U)
0
O
IL
n
L
LL
t0
v
a
0
0
0
ti
C
CD
N
0
X
W
N
m E
m
L c a
O
_ LL
v
°O
c
rn
t
Y
-
m E
m Co U
5 m
OCL
CNLo
o co
-0
V N
aC
CL ca
n >
p
E
QC 'IT(
>
U
°> O
CO O L m t
U)
OENm>
-2
co
�
-2 >,
v
L-
C
7
C -N
co
U 0 `
O
NO
OO N a
>
>`— Z
I
v7
o m
EmTm ca)
m N E 0
0>
N
ca
OE co Z
ca
am
m
V
O 'O
d
m
L
�
as
a
a) OO
O
Q
co
)
m
t in
cn N (O c
> N O^ m
LL.LL
d E a 7 6)A
a) N T
O
N
'O O N j m
rn c
U
cn
X
A
N m c .o L)
g U
3 U
LL
n
r
L:
C
U)
E
U
a1 E
00 m
s
o
cn C 7 N a
C a .�
N
m
+m+
m
U
7
6 -r-
N 'E
cn
W E
m
Q U cc
Q
Y N n m m
J
O
m, m F O
m E
3
L c a
O
_ LL
v
°O
c
rn
>
-
m E
m Co U
5 m
OCL
CNLo
o co
-0
V N
aC
CL ca
n >
p
E
QC 'IT(
>
U
°> O
CO O L m t
U)
OENm>
-2
co
�
-2 >,
v
L-
- -p 2
3
°O a) O
C -N
co
U 0 `
O
NO
OO N a
>
>`— Z
I
v7
o m
EmTm ca)
m N E 0
0>
N
ca
OE co Z
atm
co c
am
` Um C
O 'O
C:
CO r- a)
Q a) >,O)
OOO
°
E
a) OO
O
N N w 3
w O m 0 N
N V% U ai 'c
y t i
m U
m
t in
cn N (O c
> N O^ m
N N
C
d E a 7 6)A
a) N T
° 'y a
a C
'O O N j m
rn c
U
N
>' "O
-O m
o a)
N m c .o L)
g U
3 U
m>
a) o
m m m a) >
u o 3
m ul N m
m
f0 N N O CC
`
C U O) = >.
N
E O
N O 'NO
i
m N C N
0 a)
-° ` 2
Q a) _ — .L-.
a1 E
00 m
L Q O
N C ^O
'p O E N c
0 m
d
N 7 m
cn C 7 N a
C a .�
a) a)
a
O c N-
Q 7
Y a N Y> O
U co c ._ c
N e
Z' O
3 +t••, Q y0
m N
7
6 -r-
N 'E
U 3 E O m
W E
m
Q U cc
Q
Y N n m m
J A
O
m, m F O
LL U H
o
L
N
N
21
L a) C)
O
> o 0
3
c aa) c c
LO
a)
° o° o 0
C
= 0
3 0— TSA
C
o w m
@ a mm
m m 0) CO N L
E
a)
m m•N °�
> (0 m°
a—Ti ��° E a
m a)
n°p
Q
O V
�a m a)m
a) i
m c E
U a) Co 7
w C N
-o
T �_' U C O
a
N y
n y cn
O
°c E_ LL
O N c0 O
Q
N
U N L U
a m m
c v a
cn C c)
O y y _m
O to
E aX)
N E
L 'O V
o In
A O 'O N C
aa)
C
U m 3
U 01 N E 'a
O)
N E C m 'p
C N a)
N m U> c
a� '
O O
3 E )n
>� U Mn s E
coLM)
+�+
C O O
E
c E a� ai c
co m e 0
a c o a)
C -O N
E E S
_°
C
O
3 c m o
A N N E`
O C
7 U 0 a)
0
m w
w c� c° 2 o
a)
E°
N
> ro c
f0 co m
.0 a)
c m>
c N c m
ac) — E
E m E
c a)
m a_ m o m
o y y
w o
N rncyQ
a
om
s�Er'm
vm�0s
oEv
U
o3�am�
T�a`)�
O
a O C
N L a ` C cm)
'c
N 0—
L N C m U
d 3 U cca C
cL0 a) 2 m a)
y V
m Q m
O O a N "O V
V cn .m. _T
cL0 N 4 O
Q d -a s N N C
�_ C
N L
N
Q c a C 'a
m C
c m c N C
m N
N�
O N
m a o.0 a) 3
0-0 O) 'O
U N
N
m C L O
LL 3 E U Din
N
LL�
Q
Q U ca0 O 4
O O
U C Q •L..
O
J O E
C
LL 'm0 U> c0
cO
L 7 C co)
c Y .-. C ca
N N
w a)
C T 'O m
N C 3
°
L C O
2 O
N 0
C.
.0 Co E
m N
N> a
L
0 i6 A D
Lp)
E O
N
C m N L U
O C
ul
O E D
U O ul
N m C
a) O p
E E V
0 N U a
.-.
>
O
7 N
U E
Cc a)O° 0)
m
N >,
-2:,-6
N- N ca
N
0 E? m
N m a) LL
C m
- a > N> LL O
y O
7 m N°
° N ^°
Qt
a)
° N O m
> cn c
C C O O
ca E `
L m V
A CO O c0
O) y
0 O
O L
'� C U 07
IM
LO N
Q co Co L
m 01 N c6 N
a N N
3 N E N a) m
0)-a
co s
c —a0) - O J
E
c6 3
> m N N
m C a
cyj ) E
C N c°j - co cc C .0 +' c
m E
to Co
M e
E C
C c O
O
V) E
m
L c 0
-° m>
O a)
Q 7 N N
-O m C a) w
O. E
>, m V
01 ,� O
p>° 7 N N
C
U D
r -0 m
cc
O L ` (n N
C y
r O
` U d
O a)
= a) N
c V
!� Q m
a 4 c
OV a) a) O V
"O
m
C p
N �'
cc N
c
m e ai o
m e ur
>o
m m'
c>0 a s
s Q > 0 3cc
N'E
c°i m c o .?
mo
a2 a
`o
n m m m
m
°> m
` c
`o f0 E 0 m c
c c
c°) m
LL
Q 0 cnn v
Q o o ro-0
2 0 E
LL E o o-0 o m
O m
ocmigz
a
v
") E:3 `m
T
N
C O m
O
CL °1
O
'C3 .8 N
m m T
L N>
a
a)
m
_
° c
° c
_
a) E v
cm m 3
N
>
O
c
N C E
O
m U y
w a)
m >' LL
°-•
�O > m C
a) m i m
N
'p
L
L cn
c U T C
a)
N a>
5
>` N E
A c
, 3 0 p N
3
m a) w e
U
aXi c
r a E
3 m 3° O a
r -
E
1°
m p Lc
o m CL °
o°
<° c
-O
° A
-O O D A a)
m 3 ° U)a)
uUi
°
aa)
N
a)
d
in
a) Q m
0 0.0
C
Q 01 N
'O V5
N O) 'L
N 0 O N O m
—
Q
N
t
!6
o
U
N .9� �Vmi
°
0
00 ° U
c
C "O'
m a°
O O LL
o C O" c0
E a a
O
4 N
ma)
NL
N2)
> m
v ai m
C0 0 O
cY
N
0
La z >
Q
m a) O
Q oCj
U
)L E 3 m v
E
Y
U
N
C
a
C
UCL
O E O) m
m0
N
c p
m .
O
>
O_
m
O
N
ac
0_
c m m
O
0
V
7 >
a U
C
U
Q
w
O
C N -a m
m y
N
Nm
Q
C p y
U
m
L
N
U
m 0
E Q
>
-O
U m r
L C
d m
cp V
30
C
L
N
Q
m m�p
V) O
N Q U m
Q O m E
°
LL
U
C
W
m u°
m
O.2 m m
m
N
M
V
lc7 cL -o
0
I-� o 0) 2

0
m
I`
I`
00
Z
V)
O C
> U)
a
a)
7 C L Q
ai
Y C N
a
C
° m
> CO o n
O
O Y
aNi m
N D1
r Y m `0 S c
N d 01
t
>
o
>OO
o
m 3>ao
'N
o
0 Em CL
'nN
T
O N
C
Oy
>.L'O
NOZ
O
LOO
N a
EO
mYU
OU,
QU
L
p
c
E a
L M a)
p 0 0
EcN 'y3
n
CN
-6-0 oc
°
6
Q
O
a)
a)
2 0
j
C O
U a) O
C m po L C N
m
0
n`
o p
0
p
o m a ° T m °� aa)) c
0 �. fn 0 +a)
O' 0) c
C C m
o m U -
E
p C
C j°m
0
E
C fC0 0O -0
N > O 1 E p
C
p N
T f/1
O
N >
L
aE
0 0 o
OQ
co m r
U
C u) 3 L 0 1�
Q
y 0 �
7 Q C � '0 p
" 0
m (9 N C -°
C
m
p m a) 'O w a) E
N
E E
J E 5� (C:
CD 7 U
� -00 L d� m O 6 m
Q N D
ll F N 7 U�
J 3
N>`
0 m
L O m O E
Y
C O
E
C C L
V O U 0 O)
p
o
LC! E
CL L mN mC Co
3
OaC
M Co
O N
n
(00
CL 0
E
Na
Fu
O
C
O
--0 > t EL
Ns
a
NT
a�n
O
VC
n
> E E
o
m0
)
0
0 >
OLcL
0
o
za O O p
a o
7
or L
ul 0) L
c
mO
tT
nwaa`mmC)m0
c 0
°
° °° �
("0 85
E
w0_2
ya)y
) -0 1Y
° o
m°
po°
oa
C_ a
0)0
'
m'N O m
a)o
DNN
C
Cm T 'O
cc
5 a)y
O 2
U >
-0
O 0
O a) C
m 'L
>
°'
ECm)
ul
y
O
E
Q
0 rn
m
m
d O fp
'0o m> L
a`> C.)
in�o�0
c c:
mIIEc°)
m .° o 9
�uo)E 'mw`oo'��
3 c o
c°i n c
N 3 c
ion -0>o
wo-a 33-0
O°v
orn
0o c
'�
c
o
.i
o c
C>
3
E N N
N
C O
.••. m T Y
O fOJ .LO. a m
m a T O .2 E E
C :C
m °
y 2
E O p U
L
E T
m c
c m o m .c `m
aoi Y a) 'Cc) 'o E
L c°°
U p 0
N
c m> m
3
T
�'
C L
�`�
> a m C +L+ 0
c
01 U C C
o E o
m t> E
a
a)
m N aEi
U 7>
I"o
2 p O L
04
a o E S 0'3 c
O a) O c
o a 3
o
m 0.QS
a o E L
0 >
m
w c a) c
c a 3 0 0) 0 m m
> E N
c o m
c o a
y
c U
N
t
0
Q p
c
C m
O U
C
m
7° 0 O
>
a Q W> .N l�6 t
0 0: rn o t LL
m
U
E m N r
C 0) O L
c -6
01
p
o
E °n '
o
°- ° w U
0
- rn .z U)>>° E m
m c Y >
a M
m �' m .3
n`
Cc O C N L
M
y L m°
Y
E p� o° 0> E 7°
fp aLO
C m m C
C 3 a) Y
E
v y
c c° m
°c co
° L E '� o c a o
E c m c
o y t m
")
U m aa))
m o
3 Q -00 =o n rn ax) o
in n -0
w E 3 o
N
w
3
m
m
0
3 0 a) o
o
E
0 d>
oo°-oLc
0 c c
^
o
o a m o .o aa)) m
N 1
aci 0
3
N
a)
- c
o.
a) U T> a > a)
ma mr a) c L
o
°
c`
o m>
Q o
E
Mn
0
m a) a) Cc o m a) 0
c a)
06 L"p
°
0 3
= c
a
° 1 n o L a) c m
O a) o y
a m
c c
Cc
v o
Oa))
aoy
O
OsE
mL
C 0)
-n
> E c
m m
LO
Cl)
L>i
cc a
L_.3>m
Y
C 0) >°
r
C
0�
0
6
CON
N
Y U N L
c
m
0 mm y N 1 U L o
0 E
a °> c r L
a) Y L
c m
p N O p
�'E
a) C
U
M m
m e En°
E
icd 'an >-0 m
��.2
O m
Z >>
o 0
m
0
O
U
C
t
C
2 a)
aci
m
o Y
O
L
U
C C
a)
C
w m
c
a7
°
0)
m 'O
Q
m m
s U
a)
>
Ea
o
N
a)
0)
m
C
v
3
N
E
'
Y
>
mm
>
0) 0
U
C
m
Q 0
m
m
n
Q'
> Cl)
m
D C
m
CO
O
O 0-
N
0
M E
0
m

N
d
L
t
`0
u
U)
0
O
IL
n
i
LL
t0
v
a
0
0
0
ti
C
CD
N
0
X
W
Iq
c0
N
c0
c0
LC)
r
m
t
Y
3
°
O
c_ LL
i° L v
rn c
m
ami y
L
m
a m
o C L
Y
m EL..
m Co }N, U)
m .O 3 `o
C C
D o t
Cc
V N
CL
c
°
j
_ rn
p
QE
'IT(6
C
C
7
U
U
C
N O °> -O
0 o L m t
z5 E
0E
N > M
) L a T m
v
L
-Op E2
c 3 O 0)-o
°1 a)
C
L 7
c `
° c o=
m m C
0 N
=C,
N
o N a c
O
'>
06LA)
LO
c0
V
m
N E° c
E a)
N
fLn
O N
m
�
a
l` m o
o L U C
0
DO
d
cc
O" a) —>, O'ffi
O O O m N
°
�N
LL.LL
J
Ta
O
w O m 0 N
N N V ai 'C
N
X
—
A
N N m c
> N O^ m
LL
n
r
L:
C
U)
E
U
m>
a) o
s
o
fO N m° 0) U
` 0
c m a 6 a >
d
m
°)
m
u
d
aci m
N c> V) -°
C a .� L T
O N
a) c /n L
Q 7
s' 0 N y> O
U (L6 C ._ c
N o
Z' 2)O
?� - U Q N
Iq
c0
c0
c0
c0
LC)
r
m E
3
°
O
c_ LL
i° L v
rn c
m
ami y
L
m
a m
o C L
Y
m EL..
m Co }N, U)
m .O 3 `o
C C
D o t
Cc
V N
CL
c
°
j
_ rn
p
QE
'IT(6
C
Qa>
O
U
U
C
N O °> -O
0 o L m t
z5 E
0E
N > M
) L a T m
v
L
-Op E2
c 3 O 0)-o
°1 a)
C
L 7
c `
° c o=
m m C
0 N
=C,
N
o N a c
O
'>
c o 3° aNi m
0 N>
3 .�
O >
— i z
m
m
N E° c
E a)
C T "O'
U m N E O m
>'
fLn
O N
C
O E O -
0 a) 01
'° N c a a
C
O O
E
l` m o
o L U C
C
N �p °'
O N
cc
O" a) —>, O'ffi
O O O m N
°
r
O° O
N 3
0
w O m 0 N
N N V ai 'C
y t i
m U
U
L in
N N m c
> N O^ m
N N
C
d E a 7 01 A
a) N T
°
'y a
a C
rn m
N
T a
"O m
N m c .O L
3 V
m>
a) o
m m N a) >
N o 3
m N a) m
m
fO N m° 0) U
` 0
c m a 6 a >
0)
E o
N o) v
i
m m
$ a)
-° 2%
a o — y
N E
o m
L Q O
y c a
v m E m c
m
d
aci m
N c> V) -°
C a .� L T
O N
a) c /n L
Q 7
s' 0 N y> O
U (L6 C ._ c
N o
Z' 2)O
?� - U Q N
7 c N O)
6 .0 N'
U 3 E O m
W E
m
Q U cc
Q
2
Y N n m m
�CD
J A
O
rO
m m F O
LL U H
o
L
N
N
L O
O
'> > o O
3
C N j C
LO
a)
0 0° O U
C
D o
3 0— TOA
c
O N
@ a Com
O m 0) m N L
O
a°�i �.N of
L> (0 m°
a—�i ��° Em
m a)
n°p
Q
O V
`ma m a�N
a) i
L
m c E
U a) m 7
w C N
-o
N
T �_' U C O
m
N y
n y
O
°c E_
O N m O
Q
N
0 N L U
a m m
c v a
N C r-
o y y _m
O N
aa))
E
N E
lL
L 'O V
o In
A O 'O N C
m LM)
U m 3
U rn N E a
O)
a>) E m d
C N a)
° m cm) > c
a� '
°� o
3 E )n
>" Mn s E
c o E
c E a� ai c
7 C L O
n m a) o a)
C -O N
E E S
C y� _°
O
3 C o
A N N E`
C5° C
7 U 0 a)
O
m w
w c 1 c° 2 o
a)
E°
N
> (n ro c
f0 a) m L
a)
c o>
c c m
aa))
— E
E <o E
c a)
m a_ m o m
m
o y N
w o
N O 'O) c in Q
a�
O N
L "� y .�
U f6 7 L
�p E V
U
p 3 V a
T N L
a)
m O C
N L a ` C U
N a)
'C L
N 0—
L N C m U
Co
3 U m c
� a) 2 m a)
y V
m Q m
O O a m "O v
V L N .o. _T
f`0 N 4 0
Q d -0 N N c
N L
N
Q C O C '0
m C
0° C m c N
' m to
N eo+
O N
N a 0.0 a) 3
U N
N
m L O
LL 3 E U Din
N
LL
Q
Q U fa0 O 4
° o
U C Q •L..
O
J O E
C
LL 'OO U> m
c°
L 7 0 co)
C Y .-. C m
N a)
w N
C T 'O m
N C 3
°
L C O
2 O
N D
C.
.0 Co E
m N
N> 0
L L
0 i6 A D
O
N
C m N 1 U
o C
N
O E U
U O N
N m C
a) O `O
E E V
L m 0
.-. m c) ^O
tm >
O
7 N
U E
O° 0)
m
N T
-2:,-6nm �a
N
0 E? m
N m N LL
C m
- a > N> LL o
y 0
O O N°
CL r-
° N O O
C C O O
L m V
A CO O
0 O
'5 C V
`o N
Q co Co L
m 01 m l6
a N N
3 y E f6 a) m
0) c
C .2 - O J
m 3
> U a) N
m� C m
v ) E
co cc
C N U .0 ." 0
m E
CoOe
E C
C C O
V) E
m
L C O
-° m>
O a)
Q 7 N N
-O ) C a) .L..
O. E
T 6) V
01 ,� O
cq >° 7 N N_
C
U m
L
O L` (n N
C y
L O
` U d
O N
= N N
c V
!� Q m
a 4 c
OV a) a) O V
-C T
m
C p
O C
N
c
m e ai o
m c N
>o
o m'
f>0 O m°
L Q > 0 3
N'E
m c o .?
ou mo
a
`o
n m m m
m
°> m
0 m E 0
O 3 �) m
LL
Q 0 cn v
Q o o Q) -02
0 E
LL E o o-0 o m
O m
o-6.0
a
v
N E 0 `m
T
N
C O m
O
O- °1
C)g
O
'O L N
m O T
L 2 N>
a
a)
m
_
° c
S c
_
a) E v
rn m 3
N
>
O
c
N c E
N
m U N
w a)
m >' LL
°- •
�O ? o c
a) a)
N
'p
L
L y
C U T C
a)
N a>
5
>` N E
A
3
m a) N c
U °°
aXi
r a E
3 m 3° O a
N
r -
E
m
m L
o y Q°
c o°
<°
°) a
° A
a O D A a)
m 3 ° N a)
0
°
aai
N
a)
d
in
a) Q m
O
cc
Q 01 N
N
N 0 O 0 O m
—
Q
N
L
!6
o
U C v �Vmi
O
-° `m
0
° U
O °
c
C e0+
o a m
O O LL E2
o C o" m
E ai a
O
4 N
�
N m
_
a) Ci 2)
>
v ai m
C0 0 O
cY
N
imp 3
L
a m
—
z >
cm
Q
N a) O
CO o 2
U
LL E 3 m vCj
m
E
Y
U
N
C
a
C
UCL
O O) m
m
m
c p
m .
O
A d
m
O
m
ac
0_ c m
m
L
0
m
7 >
U
C
U
Q
w
o
C N -a N
m y
a)
N
Nm
Q
C p L y
m
a
E
`m X
aaU i
m
L
N
L
U
m 0
E Q
C)
>
C
d m
C, V
30
C
L
N
Q
m m�p
N°
N Q U o
L O a) E
°
LL
U
C
W
m u°
m
O.2 m m
m
N
M
V
l!7 lL m
2

0
m
L
Q
m
a
0
r
c
.3
u
T
3
a
0
y
N
O
c
O
0
II
LL
N
O c
> 00 N
a
N °
7 C L Q
ri
Y
Y C N
p) N T
C
a
N
C
° m
> o o N
aa)) (O Y
N D1
ZL m'> 0 3 c
@ca 0,
�
.N N
m �t
d1
N
co
Lo >-0
Co 3> .� a o c �o 'c
O
a)
L y E
N a)
3 0 E n N pn
O '�-� (TO N
C° O
O OQ
>. L-. U° C C O O
N U N O N N Z
O >
L O O
N a) W E L
a) jY pa U
o
Q
U E L
c N p
0N
c N
a)a
E 0 r -a m m o
L Co N
N
C
p N o
E m N'3 N
w
NN
N
C N C
°c
C a3 0
C O L
C
j
O
N `O
N U
Cy
m0`
scp0a°°)
aoNcvi
E
C
'
p L
m
nE
0
°>
°E .x
m,m°a
O0) c
c m
m UC
E
'�a)No
c
0)_N> cm2�
fm m
c6a)
o
a
C', >
a
0 0 0
o> wo yL7
ai
U Tc °
c
m 3
>+ l` N NL6
N U
a C LO N r
6L
2
7 Q° p
'UOc
'y..
mmm
cU
E E
a2
L
J E 6 )
co
6
N
LL a)
m7
J'0L3
N >`
O
O O
L m o f
O Z
Y
C O
m
C C L O
0 U a) 0
O
C c o :0
c ''c o o'c 0 m'o
L c
L o E
L N C C
�_ L 3 m m o
3
0
O N
a N
` -' m e
(0 O° C a) N f0/) E
O
.0 O. 0
N E
N O 3 a V f6
O
O c
O T
.0 C
0) a>i 0'a > t G. a)
o ��
a N 0 a) N N
) N_
m °
°
- U)i — L
> N a> E a) E c
c 0
C a) 01 m m
m
a) 2 a)
7 m> 7
T �
� p O L
U
T ' a O o p O N
a o
7 a) U
o L
N 0) v L _
c N L 0 m
Y )
N n`
c E N t E
0°
o c°° ��' o c c
3
w Q a
° E> E
U))-0 N oa
o a) m c m
c
°° o O
3: -,0) c)iYao a) o
° m c o? w e
o c
E
a p m
U°
���° oc
o-0 c N a)
O' as
m e m
N m
a N o
N 0> N f� > c O
C a3 T 'O L c m m m
y N
N)
O V j Q) Q) m
n` E n
U O m 0 0
O a) N C
f0 O. O L c c L L
.3
Cc C> O
O C a) O .� N
c a
E
N E N
y
y L m O
E
Q o w m Q m o Q
or rn—
U m C a)
C d O L0 O) O' -
°a m L
a)
c$ a`> c°)
in 0
c c ::
m °c E
° .° aNi O
CO E' m w `o
3 c
>0
c°i T N c
E
N 3 c
o°
0 0
v
Lon o '�
i4 -0
w o-0 3 3-a
U
o m
`) o o rn
0o c
c E
o
o c
3
E T
0 0 m m
c as c
- a_ v-0
c c
aoi Y a) 'Cc) 'o E
c CL
° o o
D U N
m T m
3
a
T
�'
C L
> a m C +L•+ O
c
C) ° C C
o E o
a) L> E
a)
rn
m N aEi
U 7>
c"o
2 p O L
a o E 0 0'3 c
O N O -
a 3
o
N O.QS
c �'�
a o 5Ni
E L
w 0>
0 m
-se
r c a)
3 c a U) 0 0 o m m
T E N
c cL
c 0 a
y
c U
N
-Coo
t
0
Q 0
c
c m
O 0 U
o c
m
7 0 0 O
> o
a Q N m> 'N m
0 0 0: o t LL
a)
U
E m N r
C O O L
01
p
o
aNi
0)
`p
C
a
O c N L
N L m°
Y O
E p� O N> 2 7°
LO a
m m C
C 3 a) Y
E
LO
m° v y
c c° m
°c
° L E Z a) c a 0
E c 3 c
o y t m
"?
U m 0 ax)
m E o
3 Q v =0 n rn ao o
t4 n�-0
w E 3 o
N
ca
N
m
3
m
aci
E
p d>
o —>
m c c
O a)m
3
s
>
o
c o a co o .o aa)) m
a�i
aci y
3
o) -o is r cL
o
c`
a E o
0
> o Ln
0
T Co ° a) o a) c 0
c n
°° a
m
0 3
c
= 0
o� 0 L a) c m
c O 0 o c
a) c
a as
0 w 3
c c
Cc
Cl)
V
o° o0
3 m 3 �' » o
a -0 a)
m o
a o c
>
'L
...
>
>,
0) O
° o m>
c
OC
> E c
Ln
Cl)O
LOC>i
ONN
-UR A a
LE
0)L°
>
CC
cf0
N
N
Ca6
m> L �E
m N N
mm E
oLN
N O pa
i>
U
co C E -a
3: id da -0>-0 m
-
-'C
0
Z>
p)
)p
m
N
O
t
c
c
w N
aci
3
s
0
0) c
:2 O)
°
m
am)
cc
c
N
a)
Y
c
O
m
L
m m
U
C c
a)
OQ
c
N m
C
a7
o
a3 'p
Q
N f6
.0 o
N
>
m
E co
o
N
a)
O
m
C
v
3
N
ami E
Y
>
m m
>
m
Um
C
m
Q O
LO
m
N
Q
> Cl)
co
5 C
CO
an W
O
O Q
N
N
M E
0
m
L
Q
m
a
0
r
c
.3
u
T
3
a
0
y
N
O
c
O
0
II
LL

W
06
m
w
L
N
a)
N
a0 v� O
d �
a
OO y
LA LL N X
LL.LL O �
LL — L: C
U s o
m
d m+°+ m u
w a 3: J
L
0
u
U)
0
O
IL
n
L
LL
t0
v
a
0
0
0
ti
C
CD
N
0
X
W
0)
Yi
YI
co
Y/
m E
3
°
O
c_ LL
i° s v
rn c
m
am>i y
L
m
a m
o s
Y
m Et..
m Co }N, U)
m .O 3 `O
C C
D o t
Cc
V N
c
°
j
_ rn
p
a E
C
a m
(6 O (�
U
U
C
N O °> -O
0 o 0 m t
z5 E
OO E
N > y6
) L a T m
v
L
-Op
c 3 O O O
°1 N
C
7
c `
° c o
m C
N
a
N
o N c
O
'>
C o 3° aNi m
O D a)
3 .�
O>
— i z
m
.0 m
N °� ° c
E a)
C (O T "O'
U m N E O m
>'
O N
C
O E O -
O a) 01
'° N c '° a
c
a) m
E
l` m m
O t U C
C
N �° a)
O N
cc
Q —'' 01
O O m !6 N
°
r
O a) O O
N N w 3
0
w O m 0 N
N N V ai 'C
y t i
m U
U
t in
(A N m c
> N O. m
N N
C
d E a 7 01 A
a) N T
°
'y a
"6 C
rn m
U
N
>' "O
-O m
o a�
N m c .o t
o °
3 U
m>
a) o
m m N N>
N O V 3
m N a) m
m
f0 N m 0 CC
` 0
c m a 6
0) o
N m 'NO
i m
$ a)
-0 2%
a o _ y
N E
o m
L a O
y c a
v m E m c
d
aci m
a >
N c> V) -°
C a .15 � T
E
O N
m
a) c N
Q0 7
s' 0 N y> O
U (L6 C ._ c
N o
Z' 2)O
?� - U Q o m
O C'4
7 c N O)
O' .0 N'
U 3 E O m
W E
CL m
Q U (a0
a
Y N n (UO m
� J A
O
m m F O
LL U H
>O
L
N
N
L O
O
'> > O O
3
C N 7 C
LO
a)
° O° O U
C
D o
3 0_ TOA
c
O N
@ a Com
O m 0) m N L
m
a)
m m•N °�
a (0 m°
a—Ti ��° E�
m m a)
n°p
a
O V
�a m a�N
N i
m c E
U a) m 7
w OL C N
-0
N
T +_' U C N
' m
N y
n y
O
°c �_
O N m O
a
N
U N t U
a m m
c v a
N C D'
O y y _m
o N
aa))
E
N E
LL
L -0 V
o rn
A O 'O N C
m LM)
U m 3
a) rn N E a
o)
a>) E an d
C N a)
° m v> c
a� '
a) o
3 E (n
>" m s E
c o E
c E a� a) c
c
E
n m a) $ a�
c
E E S
c y�°
3 N C o
a m m E
° C
° o m.
o
CC O) w V
w e c° 2 0
m
E°
a) a aci
> (n m e
f0 co m
a�
V= a) >
c N c m
aci — E
E m E
C a7
m a_ m o m
m
0 N(0
w o
a ip Q
O (>a
0� y .�
U f6 7-0-
�p E V
U
p 3 coi a
T
m O C
N L a ` C U
N 0—
U
3 U m c
a) 2 m m
y V
m Q m
O
V N
(LO N O
Q d -0 N N c
N L
Q C O C '0
�
'0° C m c N
N
_T
0
N a O N 3
c
�� U N
a) m C �_ C L O
LL 3 �D E U 0 .N
N N
LL
Q m C
Q U (a0 O 4
° m N O
U C Q •L..
E e0+
O N m
J O E
c a 0) 'o
LL 'Oo U> m
c° N 0
L 7 0 U
V5z
w N
C Tcc
O
C.
. Co E
m N
N> 0
L
O
0 i6 A D
O
N
C mU N L U
O C
N
>. m E
U O N
N m C
a) O (
E E V
0
.-. m c) ^O_
tm >
O
7 N
U E
O° 0)
m
N T
N- O (0
N
0 E? m
N m N LL
C m
- a > N> LL O
(`
y O
7 m N°
at
° N O O
C C U O
L m V
A CO O. (6
O
'a C U 07
`p N
Q Co L
m 01 m (6 N
-° N N
3 N E N a) m
c c
c .2 - O J
m 3
> U a) N
m� C m
(yj ) E
co cc
C N U �c ." 0
m E
CoOe
E C
C C O
N E
m
L C O
-° m>
O a)
Q 7 N N
a ) c a) +L-'
O. E
T m V
01 ,� O
>° 7 N N_
C
U m
L`
s O
U d
O N
= N
c V
a 4 c
OV Q) a) O V
m
C p
O
O (n N
.N
cc N
C y
c
`
m C N O
N
N C C N
!� Q m
N (0
(>0 O m° -C T
L a > o 3
C
.N '�
v m c o
mo
mo
`o
Q m m m
> o m
°>°
`o m o o `m c c
c
O 3 �) v m
LL
Q v v
Q o o m
o E
LLE o o o m
O m
o
a
v
N E 0 `m
T
N
C O m
O
O- °1
C)
-6.0C)
'O N
m o T
L N>
a
a)
m
_
° C
S c
_
a) E v
cm m 3
N
>
O
c
N c E
O
m U N
w a)
LL
°-•
�O ? 0 c
N m i m
N
'p
L
L y
C U >` C
a)
N a>
5
?` N E
A c
>, 3 0 C'4
N
3
m a� N c
U °°
aa))
r a E
3 m 3 U O y
N°
E
°
m L
o y°°
c o°
<° c
°) a
a m A
a o A o
m 3 a N a)
N
°
aai
N
N
d
in
N Q m
O
c
Q 01 N
N
N 0 O N O m
—
Q
N
t
!6
o
U
N c Z �Vmi
°
0
°O ° U
c
'06 C "O'
o a°
O O LL E2
o C O" m
E a a
O
Q a)
N m
> m a)
> Y m
O N
v ai m
N 7 t O c
N
m
ip 3
t
a m
N R—
z y>
c
Q
N a) O
Q o
U o
(° E 3 m c ° ) �
�
E
Y
>
U
(31
C
a
C
U m
O E o)
m
m
C p_
a) m>.
0
O
p_
m
N
O
0 >0> m
Q
n
C
0
C J N m
0
`7
m
7 >
U
C
U
a
w
a)
C N -a N
Q
C p m y
a
E
`m X
o E o 0
a) 6
m
L
N
U
m O
E O^
>
-O
U m }N,
L C
m
(0 U
30
C
L
N
CL
m
(p
N O
v) a UE
s O O
°
LL
E
U
C
W
m u°
m
O L) m m
m
I N
I M
V
JL6 ll 9
1 co
I-� o 0) 2

0
m
L
Q
m
a
0
r
72
.3
u
T
3
a
0
y
N
O
c
O
0
II
LL
0o
LO
(D
co
co
Z
N
O c
>ca
a
N
ri
NN.
a
m
oo
a)a)
0
m t
N
co
o -0
.
Co 3> a O c
O
a)
a)
0 E N pnUN
co
O
O
LUO C Co NO O
Cc a m N ZO
aE
m a'
ON
U
N0
E a) c >: a
LCNoc
p
O
Co Co
NTNC
°
Q
j O
E
CNpN
E
mC
(o-0NC
o
ndCQmO`1N
o
°>
°E
m,m°a
a .x
O0) c
c m
mUm
E
U) 0'
E
c No
_m> cm '
o a)
�mmm
--0
o
a
C', >
a
0 0 0
aa)wo ym
>o>
U
a C Ln 6 L r
2
7 Q° p
'UOc
'y..
C,
w oN
r v E
E E
a2
L3
J
'0 Ld m0im
QN D
LL a)
N7
JE 3
N >`
O O
L O m O E
m Z
Y
C O
m
C C L O
, V p N t�
p
C c O :p
c ''c o o'� 0 m'o
L C
L E E
L N c
�_ L 3 m m o
3
O
0) N
a N
m e
(0 O 02 C a) N f0/) E
O
.0 O. 0
N E
N O 3 a V f6
O
O C
C-
�� as --o > t GL m
x a)��
o
a N 0 m N N
a N_
m 0(n
0°
� wo L
a) m a> � 'O E a) E
C 0
C m q)
m O
a) 2 a)
m> 7
-0>' 'r< 'r<
p O L
U
mr-m
T a O O p O °n
a o
m a) U
0- L
N 0) v-0 _
c N L 0 m
Y t
N n`
c E N t E
0 °
o c°°� �' o c.0 c
3 .L
w Q a
° E> E-
y w w
y a N o a
o a) m c W
c
°° o O
3 0' Y ao m o
° 0 07 c o? w e
E
a o f0
U°
c
o -0 C') N a)
C_ a
m' m
q) C a)
C
a c a
a)
a N o
y O m f� > C O
C m T 'O L m m m
m
y N
N) p
O V> Q) a)
p
-0 E n
_N
U O m 0 0
O a) N C
m O. O L C L L Q
.3
m C> O
O C m O .� N
C a
E
N E N
0 y 0
y L m 0
E
Q o w m Q m 0 Q
rn
° m E m
�
C d O m O 6—
°a m> L
a)
a`>
in 0
c c:
m °c E
m� .° aNi � m �
E' m w `o
3 c �
�-0 >o
c°i N c
E
N 3 c
o°
0 0
v
Lon o '�
co
w o -a 3 3-0
U
o rn
0o c
c E
o
o c
3
N
.0••. m O�. Y
Om Vt
a >. i..EE
m °
>E y2U0
L
E T
0 0 m m
m c
- a- v-0
a) c m S o m .c `m
a°') Y a) a 'o E
L c°
° o o
o U N
, m T m
3
T a)
C L
> U)
�`°
> 'a m °7 c w 0
c
c U C C
o c E 0
m a)> E
a
a)
rn
aa))
m N
U 7>
0—
2 p O L
04
a o E 0 o'3 c
O N O c
a 3
N m.
>2 c
a o aNi
E L
0>
0 m
-se
w c a)
3 c a 3 o O) 0 m m
> E N
c 0-
c 0 a
y
c U
N
-Coo
t
0
Q o
c
C m
O U
o c
m
7 0 0 o
>
a Q N W> .N l�6
o o 0) o t LL�
m
U
E m N r
C O O L
q)
p
o
E N. 75 '5°
aNi o ca
N n 0
m
-0 rn. c> >° E m
`p
° c Y>
5
m "' m .3
O C N L
y L m°
Y O
E o 0 N> 2 7°
LO aLO
C m m C
C 3 a) Y
E
m° coi y
c c °) m
°c
°L E'er acs ao
E c 3 c
o yt m�
M
U m o ax)
m E o
3 Q v =0 n rn ao o
t4 n�-0
w E 3 o
N
ca
N
m
3
m
L
m
E
p d>
o o° a c ->
m c c
O 0)
m 3
-
>
o
o a m o .o aa)) m
a�i
aci y
3
U T T a > a)
o) -o m r 2 c L
o
m
c`
o m>
a o
E
co
0
m m a) o m U-0
c n
°° L" 0
m
a 3
c
= 0
o' 0 L a) c a)
c O 0 o 0 c
a)
a m
0 w 3
c c
Cc
Cl)
v o
o° aoi
3 m 3 �' » m
a m> m
o
a o c
>
'L
...
N> O
s
° o m E O O N
c
c m)
> E c
a) m
Ln
Cl) L
'NO
O N N N
a
C C:,L L> 0 Y
m > > c a
_ .3
C C C
a) N°
m 3
m
N
Y U N L
C
y m
N m f0 0 N Y U L �0
a a) E m> C r L
o
a) Y L
C f0
p N O p
i> 'C
a) C
�O
U
m f0
m e En°
E
icd'an >n° m
��S
O m
Z >>
rn
m
N
O
U
t
C
C
w a)
aci
3
s
0
0) e
:2 O)
°
m
a°)
c
c
c
m
a)
Y
c
O
m
L
m m
U
C C
a)
oQ
C
N m
c
a7
o
m 'p
Q
C
C L
O
O)
a
m
.0 o
>
>
m
E co
o
N
a)
O)
m
C
v
3
N
ami E
'
Y
>
m m
>
0)o
Um
c
cc
m
a°
m
m
N
Q'
>
°m
5 C
CO
oi W
O
O Q
N
N
M E
0
m
L
Q
m
a
0
r
72
.3
u
T
3
a
0
y
N
O
c
O
0
II
LL

Appendix C —Site Protection Instrument

May 11, 2018
Cara Conder
Resource Environmental Solutions
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Dear Ms. Conder,
, � Fm
To Save
This letter confirms that Resource Environmental Solutions has agreed to engage Unique Places to Save
("UP2S"), a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization located in the State of North Carolina, as the conservation
easement grantee and long-term steward for the Green Mesa Stream Mitigation Project ("Site") located near
Boonville, Yadkin County, North Carolina. As the conservation easement grantee and long-term steward, UP2S
has agreed to and shall be responsible for periodic inspection of the site to ensure that restrictions required in
the conservation easement are enforced and maintained. Specific responsibilities include:
• Monitoring of Site is conducted on an annual basis.
• An on-site inspection is conducted once per year.
• Visits to Site are coordinated with landowner when possible.
• Annual monitoring reports are sent to the landowner when possible.
• Signage for the easement boundary is maintained.
• Violations and potential violations of the conservation easement deed are promptly communicated to
the landowner.
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC (EBX), LLC shall act as Bank Sponsor of the Site. UP2S shall receive a
stewardship endowment in the amount of $31,528.57 to ensure annual Site inspections occur and that the terms
of the conservation easement are legally defended into perpetuity.
As the bond obligee for the construction and monitoring phase of the Green Mesa Stream Mitigation Project,
we agree to abide by the terms of the bond agreement(s) in the event that Resource Environmental Solutions
fails to perform or no longer exists.
David Harper, Executive Director
Unique Places To Save
5/11//2018
Representative 'Signature Resource
Environmental Solutions
Printed Name
— �0 OZAO-TO
Date
l
PO Box 1183 -Chapel Hill, NC 27514 585-472-9498 info(a uniqueplacestosave.orq

Unique Places to Save Annual Monitoring and Legal Defense Endowment
Green Mesa Mitigaton Easement - CONFIDENTIAL
Annual Monitoring
Staff time to monitor mitigation easement, including file
review, travel time, on site time, post visit report production
Staff time needed to address minor violations or issues
Mileage
Meal Costs
Insurance
Accepting and Defending the Easement in Perpetuity
Staff time for major violations
Legal Counsel
Other Incidentals
Units
Hours
Cost/Unit Frequency
Annual Cost
20 acres
4
$
60.00 Annual
$ 240.00
N/A
10
$
600.00 Once every 10 yrs.
$ 60.00
100
N/A
$
0.54 Annual
$ 53.50
1
N/A
$
20.00 Annual
$ 20.00
1
N/A
$
100.00 N/A
$ 100.00
Total Annual Funding Amount
$ 473.50
Capitalization Rate
3.50%
Monitoring Endowment
$13,528.57
N/A
50
60 N/A
$ 3,000.00
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
$ 10,000.00
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
$ 5,000.00
Monitoring
Monitoring Endowment
$ 18,000.00
DefenseTotal
and Legal

Unique Places
To Sage
Unique Places To Save
Property Monitoring Report 2017
I. PROPERTY INFORMATION
• NAME OF PROPERTY:
• PROPERTY ACREAGE:
DATE EASEMENT GRANTED:
• DATE OF ANY EASEMENT AMENDMENT(S):
• OWNER/REPRESENTATIVE CONTACT INFORMATION
• GENERAL PROPERTY LOCATION
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (acreage, general biophysical characteristics, land/resource use):
• DESCRIPTION OF AREAS OF SPECIAL CONCERN, FEATURES OR RESTRICTIONS (building envelopes, areas of intensive
management, riparian areas, access points, historic, etc.)
II. MONITORING INFORMATION
DATE(S) OF INSPECTION:
• GENERAL WEATHER CONDITIONS (temp, cloud cover, precip):
• IF AVAILABLE, APPROXIMATE PRECIPITATION TOTAL FOR PREVIOUS YEAR:
LIST ALL PERSONS ATTENDING INSPECTION:
TIME SPENT ON INSPECTION: hours
• WAS THE OWNER/REPRESENTATIVE CONTACTED PRIOR TO INSPECTION? Y N
Unique Places
I To Save
Owner
Manager/Representative
Name(s)
Address
City, State, Zip
Phone
Email
• GENERAL PROPERTY LOCATION
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (acreage, general biophysical characteristics, land/resource use):
• DESCRIPTION OF AREAS OF SPECIAL CONCERN, FEATURES OR RESTRICTIONS (building envelopes, areas of intensive
management, riparian areas, access points, historic, etc.)
II. MONITORING INFORMATION
DATE(S) OF INSPECTION:
• GENERAL WEATHER CONDITIONS (temp, cloud cover, precip):
• IF AVAILABLE, APPROXIMATE PRECIPITATION TOTAL FOR PREVIOUS YEAR:
LIST ALL PERSONS ATTENDING INSPECTION:
TIME SPENT ON INSPECTION: hours
• WAS THE OWNER/REPRESENTATIVE CONTACTED PRIOR TO INSPECTION? Y N
Unique Places
I To Save

DID THE OWNER/REPRESENTATIVE ACCOMPANY MONITOR? Y N
WAS THE EASEMENT REVIEWED PRIOR TO INSPECTION? Y N
WAS THE PROPERTY TRANSFERRED SINCE THE LAST REPORT? Y N
o IF YES: DEED FROM: DEED TO:
IS THE PROPERTY CURRENTLY FOR SALE?
r=011
III. MONITOR OBSERVATIONS
• NATURAL AND/OR AGRICULTURAL COMMUNITIES OBSERVED. Note any rare species.
• DESCRIBE CURRENT MANAGEMENT AND LAND USE WITHIN THE EASEMENT:
• LIST AND DESCRIBE ANY MANAGEMENT CHANGES SINCE LAST INSPECTION. Describe the activity or alteration. Note
location and extent. Document with maps, photos, and/or illustrations.
♦ AGRICULTURAL/OPERATIONAL CHANGES:
♦ LAND USE CHANGES:
♦ ECOSYSTEM/SPECIES PRESERVATION:
♦ SCIENTIFIC (research, surveys, etc.):
♦ RECREATIONAL OR EDUCATIONAL:
♦ WILDLIFE OR HABITAT MANAGEMENT/RESTORATION:
♦ EXOTICS OR DISEASE CONTROL:
♦ OTHER:
• LIST AND DESCRIBE ANY MAN -INDUCED ALTERATIONS SINCE LAST INSPECTION. Describe the activity or alteration.
Note location and extent. Document with maps, photos, and/or illustrations.
♦ CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS, STRUCTURES OR ANY OTHER IMPROVEMENTS:
♦ EROSION OR OTHER SOIL DISTURBANCE:
♦ OHV/ORV USE:
♦ FERAL ANIMALS AND/OR EXOTIC PLANTS:
♦ TRESPASSING AND/OR BOUNDARY ENCROACHMENT:
♦ TRASH DUMPING AND/OR VANDALISM:
Unique Places
To Sage

♦ CONTINUAL OVERUSE:
♦ DISEASE (plant or animal):
♦ POLLUTION:
♦ DEFERRED REQUIRED MAINTENANCE:
♦ OTHER:
• DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES AND/OR ACTIVITIES PERMITTED UNDER THE TERMS OF THE EASEMENT. Such as
construction of buildings, facilities, general improvements, roads, water infrastructure. Include all reserved rights
exercised since last inspection. Note location and extent and any changes and/or activities and attach maps, photos,
and/or illustrations as necessary.
• DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES AND/OR ACTIVITIES WHICH MAY BE INCONSISTENT WITH THE TERMS OF THE EASEMENT.
Such as construction of buildings, facilities, general improvements, roads, water infrastructure. Note location and
extent and any changes and/or activities and attach maps, photos, and/or illustrations as necessary.
• NOTE ANY OBSERVED CHANGES IN ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERSHIP OR CONDITION. NOTE ANY CONTACT WITH
NEIGHBORING LANDOWNERS.
• LANDOWNER/REPRESENTATIVE COMMENTS. Include any landowner/representative comments specifically related to
the terms of the conservation easement and changes in land use or management.
IV. SUMMARY, STATUS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
• SUMMARY. Provide a brief narrative. Information from previous reports must be incorporated if available. Include
impressions of long-term trends and conditions of the site.
• STATUS OF COMPLIANCE.
o NO VIOLATION(S) OF EASEMENT TERMS OBSERVED
o UNSURE DUE TO THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR EVALUATION
o SOME EVIDENCE OR ACTIVITIES WERE OBSERVED WHICH MAY BE IN VIOLATION OF THE EASEMENT
• SUGGEST ANY ACTIONS THAT SHOULD BETAKEN ASA RESULT OF THIS SITE MONITORING VISIT:
INFORMATION AND SUGGESTIONS FOR 2013 MONITORING VISIT:
V. MONITOR CONTACT INFORMATION
NAME:
TITLE:
Unique Places
To Sage

ADDRESS:
PHONE:
EMAIL:
SIGNATURE OF MONITOR: DATE:
*This report is a record of one person's observations during one visit. It is not intended to be a statement of landowner compliance of the conservation
easement.
VI. DESCRIPTION OF ENCLOSURES AND ATTACHMENTS
Indicate the number of the following items accompanying this report:
Aerial photos
Ground photos
Maps and Illustrations
Additional documentation
Other
If attachments are separated from this report, note their location:
Unique Places
ON I To Save

VIII. PHOTODOCUMENTATION LIST
Fill in the table below for all photos taken during the monitoring site visit. Also attach a map showing the location where the
photo(s) were taken.
UTM Northing UTM Easting
Photo # Photopoint Description (meters) (meters)
Unique Places
I To Save

Unique Pisces
— TO Save
Unique Places To Save
Stewardship Monitoring Procedures and Guidelines
Unique Places To Save (UP2Save) is dedicated to upholding and defending the
conservation values of the easements it holds. An important aspect of achieving this is to
conduct our stewardship monitoring practices in a professional, accurate, and efficient
manner. The following procedures and guidelines will help ensure that staff will have the
guidance and expertise to properly monitor UP2Save's conservation easements.
UP2Save's stewardship monitoring procedures and guidelines are separated into three
stages: (1) pre -monitoring due diligence; (2) monitoring of the easement property; and (3)
post -monitoring due diligence. Each stage in the monitoring process is crucial in
employing sound monitoring practices and creating accurate and reliable documentation.
Pre -monitoring Due Diligence:
Pre -monitoring due diligence includes components that prepare the monitor for the
impending field work and documentation of their stewardship activities. The following
procedures shall be followed prior to all conservation easement monitoring visits:
1. Contact the landowner to schedule a monitoring visit at least one to two weeks
prior to the scheduled visit either by phone, email, or letter (make an effort to
group monitoring visits to multiple easements in the same general area in one
trip).
2. Make an effort to invite the landowner to be involved in the monitoring process.
Usually having the landowner available for questions or discussion of issues
before and after monitoring is fine. It is not necessary that the landowner
accompany the monitor around the property unless the landowner prefers to do
So.
3. If unknown, acquire any information needed to access the property (e.g. lock
combinations, gate locations, road/trail locations, contact information for land
managers and neighboring landowners).
4. A few days prior to the monitoring visit, make an effort to contact the landowner
to confirm the monitoring date.
5. Prior to the monitoring date, review the conservation easement deed, baseline
documentation report, most recent monitoring report, and any other pertinent
information (e.g. landowner correspondence, older monitoring reports).
6. Create a monitoring map of the property using aerial imagery or a topo map as
the base layer. Ensure that the property boundary is clearly depicted on the map
as well as any building envelopes or other important boundaries or landscape
features (e.g. stream buffers, forest management plots, property points of access).
7. Enter the property boundary and BDR photopoint locations (if available) into a
GPS unit for field reference.

8. Inform at least two staff members of your schedule and destination(s). Have an
emergency contact phone number available at the office.
9. Monitoring material that is needed on the monitoring visit includes:
a. Stewardship Binder
b. Monitoring map
c. GPS unit (with extra batteries)
d. Compass
e. Camera (with extra batteries)
f. Notepad
10. Prepare for your field work. Bring necessary field equipment to conduct a safe
and effective monitoring visit. Field equipment should include:
Required
a.
Sunscreen
b.
Extra water
c.
Extra clothing
d.
Extra food
e.
Extra cash
f.
Topo map of greater area
g.
First Aid/Survival Kit
h.
Blanket(s)
i.
Shovel
j.
Spare tire(s)
k.
Cell phone
1.
Flares
in.
Bolt cutters
n.
Crowbar
Optional
a.
Tent
b.
Sleeping bag
c.
Firearm(s)
d.
Stove
e.
Laptop computer
f.
Bear spray
Approximate pre -monitoring due diligence completion time: 3 hours
Monitoring of the Easement Property
The field portion of the monitoring effort should be interpreted as (1) an opportunity to
maintain and improve relations with landowners and/or landowner representatives; (2) a
small-scale duplication effort of the baseline documentation report; (3) an opportunity to
enhance, alter, or correct any deficiencies or errors in past monitoring efforts; and (4) a
check on the activities within and conditions of the property under easement.
The following procedures and guidelines will help ensure the efficiency, accuracy, and
safety of a monitoring visit:
1. The monitor should have a clear strategy of how the property will be monitored
prior to the site visit.

2. Meet with the landowner if possible prior to engaging in field work. Ask about
land management activities (past, present or future), activities on adjacent lands,
and any other issues related to the terms of the conservation easement.
3. Invite the landowner to accompany the monitor in the field. This is not necessary,
but it is polite to ask.
4. Enact the monitoring strategy laid out prior to the visit using all tools available
(e.g. GPS, compass, maps, photos).
5. Use GPS to track the monitoring route and take coordinates of photopoint
locations. Use the compass to take azimuth readings at the photopoint locations
(direction photo was taken). All photopoint coordinates must be taken in UTM
coordinates, Zone 13. All azimuth reading must be taken using the 3 -digit method
(0 to 360°) to decrease ambiguity as opposed to using quadrants. For example, recording
a bearing of 192° is much clearer than 12° W of S, or S12°W.
6. Walk or drive as much of the property as possible making an effort to visit all access
points, boundary lines, and property corners. Pay special attention to building envelope
areas and other areas that may have more restrictive covenants (e.g. stream corridors, no -
timbering zones, high quality habitat areas).
7. Duplicate the photopoint locations that are depicted in the BDR. If new photopoint
locations are required; develop the new photopoint locations based upon current
landscape conditions and activities. Document these new locations in the monitoring
report and make notes that future monitoring efforts should follow the new photopoint
format. Note: the original photopoints portrayed in the BDR must always be replicated
unless the BDR is amended to not include certain photopoint locations.
8. TAKE FIELD NOTES! Do not rely on memory to complete the monitoring report.
9. Make an effort to meet with the landowner after the field visit to discuss any minor, non -
violation issues or other observations made while conducting the field visit. Do not,
under any circumstances, discuss potential minor or major violations to the
conservation easement with the landowner. UP2Save has specific procedures to
follow when addressing potential violations (see UP2Save's Conservation Easement
Violations Policy).
Approximate monitoring completion time: 4-16 hours depending upon driving time and
size/complexity of property.
Post -monitoring Due Diligence: -
Post -monitoring due diligence primarily consists of developing documentation of the
monitoring visit. This documentation consists of -
1 .
£
1. Filling out the monitoring report
2. Creating a monitoring map including the photopoints, access points, monitoring track,
and any other points of interest.
3. Writing a letter to the landowner that summarizes the monitoring visit and also states that
the landowner is in compliance with the terms of the conservation easement. If the
landowner is not in compliance with the terms of the conservation easement, then staff
will follow the UP2Save's Conservation Easement Violations Policy.
4. Properly duplicate the monitoring report and file all copies according to the
UP2Save's Stewardship Records Management Policy.

Mail the signed monitoring report and compliance letter to the landowner and any
representatives listed in the baseline or that have received monitoring reports in the past.
Schedule the next monitoring visit based upon observations in the field and seasonal
access to the property.
Approximate completion time: 3 hours

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
PERMANENT CONSERVATION EASEMENT
THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT ("Conservation Easement") made this
day of , 201_ by and between
("Grantor") and ("Grantee").
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties,
their heirs, successors and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine,
feminine or neuter as required by context.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying and
being in County, North Carolina, more particularly described in Exhibit A
attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Property");
WHEREAS, Grantee is a charitable, not-for-profit or educational corporation,
association, or trust qualified under § 501 (c)(3) and § 170 (h) of the Internal Revenue
Code, the purposes or powers of which include one or more of the purposes (a) — (d)
listed below;
(a) retaining or protecting natural, scenic, or open -space aspects of real

property;
(b) ensuring the availability of real property for recreational, educational,
or open -space use;
(c) protecting natural resources;
(d) maintaining or enhancing air or water quality.
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee recognize the conservation, scenic, natural, or
aesthetic value of the property in its natural state, which includes the following
natural communities: add or delete as appropriate: wetlands, streams and riparian
buffers. The purpose of this Conservation Easement is to maintain streams, wetlands
and riparian resources and other natural values of approximately _acres, more or
less, and being more particularly described in Exhibit B attached hereto and
incorporated fully herein by reference (the "Conservation Easement Area"), and
prevent the use or development of the Conservation Easement Area for any purpose
or in any manner that would conflict with the maintenance of its natural condition.
WHEREAS, the restoration, enhancement and preservation of the Conservation
Easement Area is a condition of the approval of the Mitigation Banking Instrument
(MBI) and Mitigation Plan for the Mitigation Bank, Department of the
Army (DA) Action ID Number SAW- , entitled "Agreement to Establish
the Mitigation Bank in the River Basin within the State of
North Carolina", entered into by and between acting as the Bank Sponsor
and the Wilmington District Corps of Engineers (Corps), in consultation with the North
Carolina Interagency Review Team (IRT). The Mitigation Site has been
approved by the Corps for use as a mitigation bank to compensate for unavoidable
stream and wetland impacts authorized by DA permits.
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee agree that third -party rights of enforcement
shall be held by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District ("Third -Party," to
include any successor agencies), and may be exercised through the appropriate
enforcement agencies of the United States, and that these rights are in addition to, and
do not limit, the rights of enforcement under the Department of the Army instrument
number SAW- ("Mitigation Banking Instrument"), or any permit or
certification issued by the Third -Party.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the covenants and
representations contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and legal sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor hereby
unconditionally and irrevocably grants and conveys unto Grantee, its heirs, successors
and assigns, forever and in perpetuity a Conservation Easement of the nature and
character and to the extent hereinafter set forth, over the Conservation Easement Area
described on Exhibit B, together with the right to preserve and protect the conservation
values thereof, as follows:

ARTICLE I.
DURATIONOF EASEMENT
This Conservation Easement shall be perpetual. This Conservation Easement is
an easement in gross, runs with the land and is enforceable by Grantee against Grantor,
Grantor's personal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns, lessees, agents and
licensees.
ARTICLE II.
PROHIBITED AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITIES
Any activity on, or use of, the Conservation Easement Area inconsistent with
the purpose of this Conservation Easement is prohibited. The Conservation
Easement Area shall be preserved in its natural condition and restricted from any
development that would impair or interfere with the conservation values of the
Conservation Easement Area.
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following activities and
uses are expressly prohibited, restricted or reserved as indicated hereunder:
A. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change disturbance, alteration or
impairment of the natural features of the Conservation Easement Area or any
introduction of non-native plants and/or animal species is prohibited.
B. Construction. There shall be no constructing or placing of any building,
mobile home, asphalt or concrete pavement, billboard or other advertising
display, antenna, utility pole, tower, conduit, line, pier, landing, dock or any other
temporary or permanent structure or facility on or above the Conservation
Easement Area.
C. Industrial, Commercial and Residential Use. Industrial, residential and/or
commercial activities, including any rights of passage for such purposes are
prohibited.
D. Agricultural, Grazing and Horticultural Use. Agricultural, grazing, animal
husbandry, and horticultural use of the Conservation Easement Area are prohibited.
E. Vegetation. There shall be no removal, burning, destruction, harming,
cutting or mowing of trees, shrubs, or other vegetation in the Conservation Easement
Area except as provided in the Mitigation Plan. Mowing of invasive and herbaceous
vegetation for purposes of enhancing planted or volunteer trees and shrubs approved
in the Mitigation Plan is allowable once a year for no more than five consecutive years
from the date on page 1 of this Conservation Easement, except where mowing will
negatively impact vegetation or disturb soils. Mowing activities shall only be performed
by and shall not violate any part of Item L of Article II.
F. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction of roads, trails or walkways
on the Conservation Easement Area; nor enlargement or modification to existing

roads, trails or walkways.
G. Signage. No signs shall be permitted on or over the Conservation Easement
Area, except the posting of no trespassing signs, signs identifying the conservation
values of the Conservation Easement Area, signs giving directions or proscribing rules
and regulations for the use of the Conservation Easement Area and/or signs identifying
the Grantor as owner of the Conservation Easement Area.
H. Dumping or Storage. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage,
waste, abandoned vehicles, appliances, machinery or hazardous substances, or toxic or
hazardous waste, or any placement of underground or aboveground storage tanks or
other materials on the Conservation Easement Area is prohibited.
I. Excavation, Dredging or Mineral Use. There shall be no grading, filling,
excavation, dredging, mining or drilling; no removal of topsoil, sand, gravel, rock, peat,
minerals or other materials, and no change in the topography of the land in any
manner on the Conservation Easement Area, except to restore natural topography or
drainage patterns. For purposes of restoring and enhancing streams and wetlands
within the Conservation Easement Area, is allowed to perform grading,
filling, and excavation associated with stream and wetland restoration and
enhancement activities as described in the Mitigation Plan and authorized by
Department of the Army Nationwide Permit 27.
J. Water Quality and Drainage Pattern. There shall be no diking, draining,
dredging, channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or related activities, or
altering or tampering with water control structures or devices, or disruption or
alteration of the restored, enhanced, or created drainage patterns. In addition,
diverting or causing or permitting the diversion of surface or underground water into,
within or out of the easement area by any means, removal of wetlands, polluting or
discharging into waters, springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides is
prohibited.
K. Development Rights. No development rights that have been encumbered
or extinguished by this Conservation Easement shall be transferred pursuant to a
transferable development rights scheme or cluster development arrangement or
otherwise.
L. Vehicles. The operation of mechanized vehicles, including, but not limited to,
motorcycles, dirt bikes, all -terrain vehicles, cars and trucks is prohibited other than for
temporary or occasional access by the Enter Sponsor Name, the Grantee, its
employees and agents, successors, assigns, and the Corps for purposes of
constructing, maintaining and monitoring the restoration, enhancement and
Dreservation of streams. wetlands and riaarian areas within the Conservation
Easement Area..
M. Other Prohibitions. Any other use of, or activity on, the Conservation
Easement Area which is or may become inconsistent with the purposes of this grant,
the preservation of the Conservation Easement Area substantially in its natural

condition, or the protection of its environmental systems, is prohibited.
ARTICLE III
GRANTOR'S RESEVERED RIGHTS
The Grantor expressly reserves for himself, his personal representatives, heirs,
successors or assigns, the right to continue the use of the Conservation Easement Area
for all purposes not inconsistent with this Conservation Easement, including, but not
limited to, the right to quiet enjoyment of the Conservation Easement Area, the rights
of ingress and egress, the right to hunt, fish, and hike on the Conservation Easement
Area, the right to sell, transfer, gift or otherwise convey the Conservation Easement
Area, in whole or in part, provided such sale, transfer or gift conveyance is subject to
the terms of, and shall specifically reference, this Conservation Easement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing Restrictions, Grantor reserves for Grantor, its
successors and assigns, including acting as the Bank Sponsor, the right to
construct and perform activities related to the restoration, enhancement, and
preservation of streams, wetlands and riparian areas within the Conservation
Easement Area in accordance with the approved Mitigation Plan, and the
Mitigation Banking Instrument described in the Recitals of this Conservation
Easement.
ARTICLE IV.
GRANTEE'S RIGHTS
The Grantee or its authorized representatives, successors and assigns, and the
Corps, shall have the right to enter the Property and Conservation Easement Area at all
reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting the Conservation Easement Area to
determine if the Grantor, or his personal representatives, heirs, successors, or assigns,
is complying with the terms, conditions, restrictions, and purposes of this Conservation
Easement. The Grantee, Enter Sponsor Name, and its authorized representatives,
successors and assigns, and the Corps shall also have the right to enter and go upon the
Conservation Easement Area for purposes of making scientific or educational
observations and studies, and taking samples. The easement rights granted herein do
not include public access rights.
ARTICLE V
A. To accomplish the purposes of this Easement, Grantee, and the Corps are
allowed to prevent any activity on or use of the Conservation Easement Area that is
inconsistent with the purposes of this Easement and to require the restoration of such
areas or features of the Conservation Easement Area that may be damaged by such
activity or use. Upon any breach of the terms of this Conservation Easement by
Grantor that comes to the attention of the Grantee, the Grantee shall notify the
Grantor in writing of such breach. The Grantor shall have 30 days after receipt of such
notice to correct the conditions constituting such breach. If the breach remains
uncured after 30 days, the Grantee may enforce this Conservation Easement by

appropriate legal proceedings including damages, injunctive and other relief.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantee reserves the immediate right, without
notice, to obtain a temporary restraining order, injunctive or other appropriate relief if
the breach of the terms of this Conservation Easement is or would irreversibly or
otherwise materially impair the benefits to be derived from this Conservation
Easement. The Grantor and Grantee acknowledge that under such circumstances
damage to the Grantee would be irreparable and remedies at law will be inadequate.
The rights and remedies of the Grantee provided hereunder shall be in addition to,
and not in lieu of, all other rights and remedies available to Grantee in connection
with this Conservation Easement. The costs of a breach, correction or restoration,
including the Grantee's expenses, court costs, and attorneys' fees, shall be paid by
Grantor, provided Grantor is determined to be responsible for the breach. The Corps
shall have the same rights and privileges as the said Grantee to enforce the terms and
conditions of this Conservation easement.
B. No failure on the part of the Grantee to enforce any covenant or provision
hereof shall discharge or invalidate such covenant or any other covenant, condition,
or provision hereof or affect the right to Grantee to enforce the same in the event of
a subsequent breach or default.
C. Nothing contained in this Conservation Easement shall be construed to
entitle Grantee to bring any action against Grantor for any injury or change in the
Conservation Easement Area resulting from causes beyond the Grantor's control,
including, without limitation, fire, flood, storm, war, acts of God or third parties, except
Grantor's lessees or invitees; or from any prudent action taken in good faith by Grantor
under emergency conditions to prevent, abate, or mitigate significant injury to life,
damage to property or harm to the Conservation Easement Area resulting from such
causes.
ARTICLE VI
MISCELLANEOUS
A. Warranty. Grantor warrants, covenants and represents that it owns the
Property in fee simple, and that Grantor either owns all interests in the Property which
may be impaired by the granting of this Conservation Easement or that there are no
outstanding mortgages, tax liens, encumbrances, or other interests in the Property
which have not been expressly subordinated to this Conservation Easement. Grantor
further warrants that Grantee shall have the use of and enjoy all the benefits derived
from and arising out of this Conservation Easement, and that Grantor will warrant and
defend title to the Property against the claims of all persons._
B. Subsequent Transfers. The Grantor agrees to incorporate the terms of this
Conservation Easement in any deed or other legal instrument that transfers any
interest in all or a portion of the Conservation Easement Area. The Grantor agrees to
provide written notice of such transfer at least sixty (60) days prior to the date of the
transfer. The Grantor and Grantee agree that the terms of this Conservation Easement
shall survive any merger of the fee and easement interests in the Conservation

Easement Area or any portion thereof and shall not be amended, modified or
terminated without the prior written consent and approval of the Corps.
C. Assignment. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this
Conservation Easement are in gross and assignable provided, however that the
Grantee hereby covenants and agrees, that in the event it transfers or assigns this
Conservation Easement, the organization receiving the interest will be a qualified
holder pursuant to 33 CFR 332.7 (a)(1), N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-34 et seq. and § 501 (c)(3)
and § 170 (h) of the Internal Revenue Code, and the Grantee further covenants and
agrees that the terms of the transfer or assignment will be such that the transferee or
assignee will be required to continue in perpetuity the conservation purposes
described in this document.
D. Entire Agreement and Severability. The Mitigation Banking Instrument: MBI
with corresponding Mitigation Plan, and this Conservation Easement sets forth the
entire agreement of the parties with respect to the Conservation Easement and
supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations, understandings or agreements relating to
the Conservation Easement. If any provision is found to be void or unenforceable by a
court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder shall continue in full force and effect.
E. Obligations of Ownership. Grantor is responsible for any real estate taxes,
assessments, fees, or charges levied upon the Property. Grantor shall keep the Property
free of any liens or other encumbrances for obligations incurred by Grantor, except
those incurred after the date hereof, which are expressly subject and subordinate to the
Conservation Easement. Grantee shall not be responsible for any costs or liability of any
kind related to the ownership, operation, insurance, upkeep, or maintenance of the
Property, except as expressly provided herein. Nothing herein shall relieve the Grantor
of the obligation to comply with federal, state or local laws, regulations and permits
that may apply to the exercise of the Reserved Rights.
F. Long -Term Management. If livestock operations will be maintained on the
property, Grantor is responsible for all long-term management activities associated
with fencing to ensure livestock do not have access to the Protected Property. These
activities include the maintenance and/or replacement of fence structures, as deemed
necessary by the Grantee, to ensure the aquatic resource functions within the
boundaries of the Protected Property are sustained.
G. Extinguishment. In the event that changed conditions render impossible the
continued use of the Conservation Easement Area for the conservation purposes, this
Conservation Easement may only be extinguished, in whole or in part, by judicial
proceeding.
H. Eminent Domain. Whenever all or part of the Conservation Easement Area
is taken in the exercise of eminent domain so as to substantially abrogate the
Restrictions imposed by this Conservation Easement, Grantor and Grantee shall join in
appropriate actions at the time of such taking to recover the full value of the taking,
and all incidental and direct damages due to the taking.

I. Proceeds. This Conservation Easement constitutes a real property interest
immediately vested in Grantee. In the event that all or a portion of the Conservation
Easement Area is sold, exchanged, or involuntarily converted following an
extinguishment or the exercise of eminent domain, Grantee shall be entitled to the fair
market value of this Conservation Easement as determined at the time of the
extinguishment or condemnation.
J. Notification. Any notice, request for approval, or other communication
required under this Conservation Easement shall be sent by registered or certified mail,
postage prepaid, to the following addresses (or such address as may be hereafter
specified by notice pursuant to this paragraph):
To Grantor:
[Name, address and fax number]
To Grantee:
[Name, address and fax number]
To Sponsor:
To the Corps:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District Regulatory Division
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
K. Failure of Grantee. If at any time Grantee is unable or fails to enforce this
Conservation Easement, or if Grantee ceases to be a qualified grantee, and if within a
reasonable period of time after the occurrence of one of these events Grantee fails to
make an assignment pursuant to this Conservation Easement, then the Grantee's
interest shall become vested in another qualified grantee in accordance with an
appropriate proceeding in a court of competent jurisdiction.
L. Amendment. This Conservation Easement may be amended, but only in
a writing signed by all parties hereto, and provided such amendment does not
affect the qualification of this Conservation Easement or the status of the Grantee
under any applicable laws, and is consistent with the conservation purposes of this
grant.
M. Present Condition of the Conservation Easement Area. The wetlands, scenic,
resource, environmental, and other natural characteristics of the Conservation
Easement Area, and its current use and state of improvement, are described in Section
of the Mitigation Plan,_prepared by Grantor and acknowledged by the Grantor
and Grantee to be complete and accurate as of the date hereof. Both Grantor and
Grantee have copies of this report. It will be used by the parties to assure that any
future changes in the use of the Conservation Easement Area will be consistent with
the terms of this Conservation Easement. However, this report is not intended to
preclude the use of other evidence to establish the present condition of the

Conservation Easement Area if there is a controversy over its use.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said rights and easements perpetually unto Grantee for
the aforesaid purposes.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, the day
and year first above written.
(Signatures of the Grantor and Grantee in appropriate form)

Appendix D — DWR Stream Identification
Forms

NC DWQ Stream
Identification Form
Summary
REACH
FF1
FF2
FF3
FF4
FF5
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =)
21.5
16.5
13
21
17
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
3
2
2
3
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
1
2
2
1
2
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
2
3
1
2
1
4. Particle size of stream substrate
3
2
1
3
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
3
2
2
2
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
2
1
2
2
2
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
1
1
1
1
8. Headcuts
1
1
0
1
2
9. Grade control
1
1
1
1.5
1
10. Natural valley
1.5
1.5
1
1.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
3
0
0
3
0
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =)
11
5.5
9
10.5
6.5
12. Presence of Baseflow
3
2
2
3
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
2
1
1
2
1
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
1
1
0
1
16. Organic debris lines or piles
1
1
1
1
1
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
3
0
3
3
0
C. Biology (Subtotal =)
12
9
8
12
9
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
2
3
3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
3
2
3
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
2
2
2
2
2
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
0
0
1
0
22. Fish
1
0
0
1
0
23. Crayfish
1
1
1
1
0
24. Amphibians
1
1
1
1
1
25. Algae
0
0
0
0
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
0
0
0
0
0
Total Points Subtotal= 44.5 1 31 1 30 1 43.5 1 32.5
Stream Determinationl Perennial I Perennial I Perennial I Perennial I Perennial

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
F-Fj-1
Date: q/17/ I q
ProjectlSite:G r -e trt Me ;)A
Latitude:
Evaluator: M
County: 7 o "n
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 5
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent erennia
P
Other
e. Quad Name:
if ?t 19 orperennial if 2:30-
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
9'
iIWA
A. Geomorphology ( Subtotal = 2�I � J )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
11)
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
6
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
1.5
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
15
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
&as = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloqv (Subtotal = I I )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2 ` 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
3
14. Leaf litter
cl.1
0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 .5
1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
s = 3
C. Biology Subtotal = I"
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: (� ,
Project/Site: bray, iW
Latitude:
Evaluator:ftv r,ib a I �
County: n
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circ) ne)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
I
Ephemeral Intermittent P re fal
e.g. Quad Name:
if 2: 19 orperennial if a 30`
0
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
1 1.5
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
Yes = 3
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
0.5
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0.5
2
3
B. Headcuts
0
FACW = 0.75;
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o =
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal= _6z ,'J )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
® 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1 1
2 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
=
Yes = 3
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = LA
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
AO
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
®
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
FE3
Date: '"} 1B
Project/Site: �( y:9e '
I
atitude:
Evaluator:Mw
County: a� YI n
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle
Other
Stream is at least intermittent ��
if 2:19 orperennial if 2:30*
Ephemeral Intermittent erennlal
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
14. Leaf litter
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
®
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
®
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
No = 0
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0.5
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
Notes:
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
anmciat aacnes are not ratea; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = q )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
© 1 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
s = 3
C. Bioloqy (Subtotal = ) '-
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
®
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Reo C k F F 9
Date: 9 1 611
Project/Site: Gre e f) Me S q
Latitude:
Evaluator: M IJ4 0 cr,�p p
County: 7 aj C`.
Longitude:
Total Points: /1
Strif rpere least
-I 5
Stream Determination (cir
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
Quad Name:
perennial if?30*nt
i/ _ 19 or erennia/ i2 30` I
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
e.g.
��i
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= o, 1 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
0.5
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0.5
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
FACW = 0.75;
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
Notes:
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
es = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydroloqy (Subtotal= 10-5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
a3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
0
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biologv (Subtotal = I .' )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
rm,7
Date: �. '
Project/Sits: WY'
Latitude:
Evaluator: MOL
'
County: r
Longitude:
Total Points,:,
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
ifa 19 or rennial if a 30'
Ephemeral Intermittent
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent I
Weak
I Moderate
Strong
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
10
0.5
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
(il
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
1.5
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
Yes = 3
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
Sketch:
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o =
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = (o.CJ )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
l7
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1)
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1.5
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
1
o = 0
Yes = 3
0.5
L. 131010gy (Subtotal = "I
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0
1
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish 0
0.5
1
1.5
23, Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians 0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

Appendix E — USACE District Assessment
Methods/Forms

Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet Summa
FF1-A
FF1-B
FF1-C
FF1-D
FF2
FF3
FF4
FF5
1
Presence of flow / persistent
4
4
4
4
3
3
4
3
pools in stream
2
Evidence of past human
2
2
2
1
5
4
1
4
alteration
3
Riparian zone
1
4
1
1
3
2
1
2
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical
3
1
1
2
3
2
2
2
discharges
5
Groundwater discharge
1
3
0
1
2
2
0
0
v
T
r
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
3
1
4
3
4
4
2
3
CL
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
1
1
0
1
4
4
1
1
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
1
3
3
0
2
4
0
0
9
Channel sinuosity
3
4
3
1
3
3
1
3
10
Sediment input
2
3
1
1
2
2
0
2
11
Size & diversity of channel bed
4
3
1
1
3
1
3
3
substrate
12
Evidence of channel incision or
0
2
0
1
3
3
1
1
widening
13
Presence of major bank failures
5
5
1
2
5
3
1
3
14
Root depth and density on banks
5
3
2
1
4
3
1
3
N
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock,
2
3
1
0
3
1
0
1
or timber production
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool
4
4
3
1
4
2
2
3
complexes
17
Habitat complexity
4
4
2
2
4
2
3
3
18
Canopy coverage over
2
4
2
1
4
3
1
3
streambed
x
19
Substrate embeddedness
3
3
2
1
3
3
2
2
20
Presence of stream invertebrates
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
21
Presence of amphibians
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
0
0
op
22
Presence of fish
3
3
3
2
0
0
2
0
23
Evidence of wildlife use
1
1
1
3
1
1
2
1
Total Score: 1 58 1 65 1 41 1 34 1 68 1 55 1 34 1 46

Site: Green Mesa
Date: 4/17/2018
Evaluators: RTM & MDE
FF -V-0 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams
2
6rA
#
CHARACTERISTICS
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
SCORE
Coastal
pie ilt
Mountain
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max ints
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-4
0-4
no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = maxpoints)
0-5
a
11
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
fine, homo enous = 0; large, diverse sizes =max rots
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max poin s
0-4
0-5
2
12
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
>*
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed &banks =max rots
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = maxpoints)
0-4
0-5
'
~•1
13
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-5
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = maxpoints)
extensive discharges = 0; no disch es = max ints
0 5
0 - 4
0 - 4
,.�Groundwater
5
discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
`
U
Root depth and density on banks
(no discharge = 0; springs, see s, wetlands, etc. = maxpoints)
1
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max ints
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-5
&C
y
6
no flood-'-,'- = 0; extensive flood lain = naax ints
0-4
0-4
0-2
Entrenchment / floodplain access
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points
0-5
(deepl.1 entrenched = 0; frequent floodin = maxpoints) 0-5
0-4 0-2
Z
Presence of adjacent wetlands
&no 6 0-4 D _ 2
wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)0
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams
2
6rA
9
c,tlannel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max ints
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive deposition- 0; little or no sediment = max points)
a
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
fine, homo enous = 0; large, diverse sizes =max rots
NA*
0-4
0-5
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
>*
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed &banks =max rots
0-5
0-4
0-5
'
~•1
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = maxpoints)
14
Root depth and density on banks
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max ints
0-3
0-4
0-5
&C
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points
0-5
0-4
0-5
Z
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = maxpoints)
0-3
0-5
0-6
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = maxpoints)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
no sbading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points
0-5
Z
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
3
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
>0
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
0-4
0--5
0-5
[�
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
�
O
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = maxpoints)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams
2
6rA

Site: Green Mesa
�R
Date: 4/1
J Evaluators: RTM & MDE MDE
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams
VA
#
Presence of adjacent wetlands
ECOREGION
0-4
POINT
RANGE
(no wetlands = 0; lar a Aacent wetlands = max ints
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
CoastalI
Piedmont
Mountain
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0 - 4
0-3
i
1no
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max ints
10
flow or saturation = 0; strop flow = max points)0-5
0-5
0 4
0-5
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
Z
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = maxpoints)
0-5
3
(fine, homogenous = 0; lar e, diverse sizes = maxpoints)
3
Riparian zone
0 - 4
0-5
0-5
0-4
0-5
no buffer = 0; conn uous, wide buffer = maxpoints)0-6
y,
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = maxpoints)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
0 5
04
extensive discharges = 0; no dischEyes = maxpoints)
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max pints
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0 - 4
0-4
3
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = maxpoints)
no discharge = 0; springs, see s, wetlands, etc. = max pints)
r/
15
0-4
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max ints
>0
D-4
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = maxpoints)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
W.
0-6
Entrenchment/ floodplain access
0-
5
0- 4
Q- 2
j
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding= max ints
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams
VA
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
(no wetlands = 0; lar a Aacent wetlands = max ints
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0 - 4
0-3
i
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max ints
10
sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = maxpoints)
I I
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
3
(fine, homogenous = 0; lar e, diverse sizes = maxpoints)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
y,
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = maxpoints)
E0-4 -A
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 - 5
0 5
04
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max pints
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
3
F,
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = maxpoints)
r/
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max ints
0-5
D-4
0-53
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = maxpoints)y
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = maxpoints)
1
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max oints
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
3
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0--5
0-5
3
y,
no evidence = 0; common numerous types = max ints
t;7
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
1
O
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
O
22
Presence of fish 1
0--4
0-4
0-4
[____,no
evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = maxpoints)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams
VA

Site: Green Mesa
RP —C MDE
Date: 4/17/2018
Evaluators: RTM & MDE
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
-
#
CHARACTERISTICS
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
0-6
0-4
0-2
3
Ino
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
flow or saturation = 0; strop flow = max points)
0-3
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = maxpoints)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0 - 5
b 5
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = maxpoints)
Z
3
Riparian zone
0 - 4
0-5
0-5
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)0-6
12
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
incised = 0; stable bed & banks = maxpoints)
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = maxpoints)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4 0-4
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = maxpoints)
no discharge = 0; s rip , see s, wetlands, etc. = max oints)
14
Root depth and density on banks
rVi Presence of adjacent floodplain
6
b - 4 0-2
0-5 r�
>0 (no floodplain = 0; extensive flood Iain = maxpoints)0-4
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout - maxpoints)
Entrenchment / floodplain access
7 n-5
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2
�d�
kumpy ci Lmmicu – u; ire uent noouing = max mEs)
vk
$
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
3
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max ints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = maxpoints)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = maxpoints)
I I
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
dine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = maxpoints)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
�
�+(deeply
incised = 0; stable bed & banks = maxpoints)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0--5
0-5
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = maxpoints)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5 r�
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout - maxpoints)
Qn
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0- 3
0- S
0- 6 3
no riffles/ri les or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
little or no habitat = 0; li-e cent, varied habitats = maxpoints)(71
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
no shadin.g vegetation - 0; continuous canopy = maxpoints)
FSubstrate
1
embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
dee I embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
y,
no evidence = 0; common, numerous s = maxpoints)
0-5
0-5
G9
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
O
(no evidence= 0; common, numerous� es = maxpoints)
`
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = maxpoints)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
[ 11
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2
�d�

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Site: Green Mesa Date:
4/17/2018
Evaluators: EWT & MDD
Re& C 1n FFl - D
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
#
CHARACTERISTICS
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
SCORE
Coastal
dint:
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 — 4
0-5
—f
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
(no buffer — 0; contiguous, wide buffer = maxpoints)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
�l
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
o�
a
5
Groundwater discharge
0— 3
0-4
0-4
(no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
0.4
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0— 4
0— 4
0— 2
y
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
�i
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0 — 5
0-4
0-2
4
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands — max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
I I
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
I
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
a
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
I
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0--6
�
(little or no habitat � 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
A
1$
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
}
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
!
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
`
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
a
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
[%
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
a
O
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
O
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0— 4
a
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
Z
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

Site: Green Mesa
Date: 4/17/2018
Evaluators: RTM & MDE
-1�4--2, STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
7
#
Entrenchment / floodplain access;14
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
0— 2
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
8
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
0-2
2
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)0-6
r
10
no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max pointsl
5
0-4
0-5
0— 3
13extensive
2
Evidence of past human alteration
channeiization = 0; natural meander = max ints
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max ints)
0-6
0 5
0-5
0-4
Z
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max poin s
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
© 5
3
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive discharges = 0; no disch es = maxpoints)
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0 — 4
0-4
2
3
no discharge = 0; springs, see s, wetlands, etc. = max points)
Presence of major bank failures
0 — 5
0-5
Presence of adjacent floodplain
6 0-4 0 — 4
0-2
no flood lain = 0; extensive floodplain = maxpoints)
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access;14
0— 5
0— 4
0— 2
(deeply entrenched = 0; fre uent flooding= max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0 — 4
0-2
2
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)0-6
9
Channel sinuosity
0— 5
0— 4
0— 3
13extensive
channeiization = 0; natural meander = max ints
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
Z
extensive de sition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
© 5
3
fine, homogenous = 0; lar e, diverse sizes =max rots
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
(deeD!y incised = 0; stable bed & banks = maxpoints)
3
13
Presence of major bank failures
0 — 5
0-5
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = maxpoints)0-5
!4
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = maxpoints)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
3
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
F
no riffles/ripples or Mls = 0; well-developed = maxpoints)
.�
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
rHw
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = maxpoints)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
x
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = maxpoints)
14
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0 — 4
3
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
2
no evidence = 0; common numerous s = max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = maxpoints)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = maxpoints)
1
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)]
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
V�

Site: Green Mesa
Date: 4/17/2018
Evaluators: RTM & MDE
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
`� �
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
ECOREGION
POINT
RANGESCORE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
I
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountai�a
F -1d
Presence
Presence of flow /persistent pools in stream
0 — 4
0-5
flow or saturation = 0; strongflow = maxpoints)0-5
J
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
1 0-5
0-5
extensive alteration — 0; no alteration — max p2ints
3
Riparian zone
0 — 4
0-5
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = maxpoints)0-6
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0--4 0-4
2
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = maxpoints)
„a
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0 4 0-4
s
no dischar e = 0; s rin seeps, wetlands, etc. =max Dints
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0— 4
0— 4 0— 2
no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max ints
Entrenchment / floodplain access
7
0-5
0-4 0-2
Q"
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = maxpoints)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4 0-2
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4 0-3
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = maxpoints)
10
Sediment input
0— 5
0— 4 0 4
(extensive de sition= 0, little or no sediment = max rots
I 1
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4 0-5
fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4 0-5
�+(deeply
incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points
wF
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5 0-5
a
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks -= maxpoints)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4 0-5
F,
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = maxpoints)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4 0 — 5
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max ints
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
les = =
0-3
0-5 0-6
2
no riffles/ripples or is 0; well-developed maxpoints)
d
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6 0-6
2,
little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
IYi
1no
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0 5 0-5
shadingvegetation = 0; continuous canopy= max oints
►'TQii
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4 0-4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5 0-5
no evidence = 0• common, numerous es = maxpoints)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4 0-4
d
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
1
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4 0-4
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max poiots
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5 0-5
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max ints
Total Points Possible
100
100 1 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
-
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

Site: Green Mesa Date:
4/17/2018
Evaluators: EWT & MDD
h r� STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
r
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
#
CHARACTERISTICS
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
SCORE
Coastal
� � �
Mountain
1
Presence of flow /persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 4
0-5
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0 — 4
0-5
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = maxpoints)0-6
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive discharges = 0; no dischargers = max points)
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
U
(no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
U
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
7
Entrenchment 1 floodplain access
0— 5
0— 4
0— 2
,
{deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points}
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
r>
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
i
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
E
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
0
(extensive deposition— 0; little or no sediment — max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrateNA*
0-4
0-5
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 4
0-5
L
,yr
(dee I incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
0E-4
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
ra
0
(severe erosion — 0; no erosion, stable banks — max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
F.,
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle-pooUripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = maxpoints)
E
E
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
a
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types — maxpoints)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
a
0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
O
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
a
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
lop
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

Site: Green Mesa
Date: 4/17/2018
Evaluators: RTM & MDE
1 5 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
0"
6
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICSCoastal
SCORE
Piedmont
Mountain
0-5
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
8
0-4
0-6
0-5
X3
no wetlands = 0; lar a Aacent wetlands = max ints
no flow or saturation - 0, strop flow = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
10
0-5
0-5
0-5
-
extensive dep2sition= 0; little or no sediment = max ints
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = maxpoints)
I I
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
I
3
Riparian zone
0-6
12
0-4
0-5
0-5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
a
a
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0 -
4
0-4
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throe out = max ints
(extensive discharges = 0; no discha es = maxpoints)0-5
I5
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
5
Groundwater discharge
discharge = 0;
0-3
16
0-4
0-3
0-4
no riffles/ripples or ELools = 0; well-developed = maxpoints)
(no springs, see s, wetlands, etc. = max oints)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0"
6
rresence ur aujacen[ notmpiam
0-4
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max porots)
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding= max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
no wetlands = 0; lar a Aacent wetlands = max ints
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = maxpoints)
10
Sediment input
0-5
extensive dep2sition= 0; little or no sediment = max ints
I I
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
fine, homogenous - 0; lar e, diverse sizes =max rots
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
>.I
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
a
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = maxpoints)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throe out = max ints
I5
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
substantial impact =0; no evidence = maxpoints)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
H
no riffles/ripples or ELools = 0; well-developed = maxpoints)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max p2ints
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
x
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = maxpoints)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
no evidence = 0• common, numerous types = max points
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
O
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
0
22
Presence of fish
0-4
no evidence = 0; common, numerous s =max rots
Q4
23
Evidence of wildlife use
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = maxpoints)0-6
Total Points Possible
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams
2
0-4
0-4
0-4
0-4
0-4
0-4
0-4
0-5
0-4
0-4
0-5
0-6
0-5
0--4
0-5
0-4
0-4
0-5
100
0-2
0-2
0-2
0-3
0-4
0-5
0-5
0-5
0-5
0-5
0-6
0-6
0-5
0-4
0-5
0-4
0-4
0-5
100
I
\?tA,

Appendix F —Wetland JD Forms &Maps

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID: SAW -2017-01466 County: Yadkin U.S.G.S. Quad: Yadkinville
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner: Frazier Farm of North Carolina, LLC
Address: 3532 Baptist Church Road
Boonville, NC 27011
Telephone Number:
Size (acres): 20 acres Nearest
Town: Boonville
Nearest Waterway: Tanvard Creek Coordinates: 36.213246,-80.718195
River Basin/ HUC: Upper Yadkin
Location description: The site is located
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
X There are waters, including wetlands, on the above described project area, that may be subject to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands, have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently
accurate and reliable. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process,
including determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation
requirements, and other resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat
all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional
waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program
Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an
appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
_ There are wetlands on the above described property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However, since the
waters, including wetlands, have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be
used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely
an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction overall of the waters, including wetlands, at the project area,
which is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have
the waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the
Corps.
B. Approved Determination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements
of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33
USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
We recommend you have the waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to
accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation
that can be verified by the Corps.
_ The waters of the U.S. including wetlands on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. If you wish to have the delineation surveyed, the Corps can review and verify the survey upon
completion. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA and/or RHA

jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied
upon for a period not to exceed five years.
_ The waters of the U.S. including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on . Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
_ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(LAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management to determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material,
construction or placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the
Army permit may constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If
you have any questions regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact William Elliott at
828-271-7980, ext. 4225 or [e-mail].
C. Basis for Determination:
See attached preliminary jurisdictional determination form.
The site contains wetlands as determined by the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and the
Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountain and Piedmont
Region (version 2.0). These wetlands are adjacent to stream channels located on the property that exhibit indicators
of ordinary high water marks.
D. Remarks:
The potential waters of the U.S., at this site, were verified on-site by the Corps on May 8, 2018 and are as approximately
depicted on the attached Potential Wetland/Waters Map (dated 10/27/2017).
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate
participation in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the
Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to
this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you
will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal
this determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 1OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria
for appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the
NAP. Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by N/A (Preliminary -JD).

**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.
Corps Regulatory Official:
William Elliott
Issue Date of JD: August 23, 2018 Expiration Date: N/A Preliminary JD
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure
we continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
http://corl2smgpu.usace.army.mil/cm apex/Vp=136:4:0.
Copy furnished:
Jeremy Schmid, 302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110, Raleigh, NC 27605

SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at http://www.usaee.gM.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/Re ug latoryProgramandPermits.aspx or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the
permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer
within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the preliminary JD.
The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps
district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Frazier Farm of North Carolina, LLC File Number: SAW -SAW -2017-01466 I Date: August 23, 2018
Attached is: See Section below
❑
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
❑
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
❑
PERMIT DENIAL
C
❑
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
®
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at http://www.usaee.gM.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/Re ug latoryProgramandPermits.aspx or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the
permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer
within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the preliminary JD.
The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps
district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.

SECTION II - I&EQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the record
of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to clarify the
administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may
provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division,
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: William Elliott
CESAD-PDO
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15
828-271-7980, ext. 4232
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn.: William Elliott, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington,
North Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JD: August 23, 2018
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Frazier Farm of North Carolina, LLC
3532 Baptist Church Road
Boonville, NC 27011
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
CESAW-RG-A, SAW -2017-01466,
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The site is located
State: NC County/parish/borough: Yadkin City: Boonville
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): 36.213246, -80.718195
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD83
Name of nearest waterbody: Tanyard Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date: August 23,2018
® Field Determination. Date(s): May 8, 2018
Use the table below to document aquatic resources and/or aquatic resources at different sites
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION
Site
Centered Coordinates
Estimated Amount
Type of Aquatic
Geographic
Number
(decimal degrees)
of Aquatic Resource
Resources
Authority to Which
in Review Area
Aquatic Resource
Latitude Longitude
(linear feet or acre)
"May Be" Subject
FF1-A
36.212223
-80.724609
1013 if
Wetland
® Section 404
® Non -wetland Waters
❑ Section 10/404
FF1-B
36.212189
-80.722394
7241f
❑ Wetland
® Section 404
® Non -wetland Waters
❑ Section 10/404
FF1-C
36.213772
-80.720389
815 if
❑ Wetland
® Section 404
® Non -wetland Waters
❑ Section 10/404
FF1-D
36.215554
-80.718159
16091f
❑ Wetland
® Section 404
® Non -wetland Waters
❑ Section 10/404
FF2
36.211115
-80.723753
6371f
❑ Wetland
® Section 404
N Non -wetland Waters
❑ Section 10/404
FF3
36.210798
-80.719211
14941f
❑ Wetland
® Section 404
® Non -wetland Waters
❑ Section 10/404
FF4
36.216467
-80.722795
10371f
❑ Wetland
® Section 404
J& Non -wetland Waters
❑ Section 10/404
FF5
36.214259
-80.716669
14421f
Wetland
® Section 404
Non -wetland Waters
❑ Section 10/404

WA
36.212119
-80.723091
5.4 ac if
❑ Wetland
® Section 404
® Non -wetland Waters
❑ Section 10/404
WB
36.213772
-80.720389
.28 ac
❑ Wetland
® Section 404
® Non -wetland Waters
❑ Section 10/404
1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN),
or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant
has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the
permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make
an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to
request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that
basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation
being required or different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual
permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit
authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with
all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps
has determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit
authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or
undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD
constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that
activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any
administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in
any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will
be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to
make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the
review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD
finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of the U.S.
on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA
Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply) - Checked items should be included in subject file.
Appropriately reference sources below where indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of preliminary JD requester: Vicinity, USGS, NWI, Soil, Existing
conditions, WOUS
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of preliminary JD requester.
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rational:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® USGS map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Yadkinville.
❑ Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) Soil Survey.
Citation: Yadkin County, NC
® National wetlands inventory (NWI) map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) / Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): UNK
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps and
should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
William Elliott, August 23, 2018 Frazier Farm of North Carolina, LLC
Signature and date of Regulatory Signature and date of person requesting
staff member completing preliminary JD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the
preliminary JD signature is impracticable)
Two copies of this Preliminary JD Form have been provided. Please sign both copies. Keep one signed copy for your record
and return a signed copy to the Asheville Regulatory Field Office by mail or e-mail.
US Army Corps of Engineers -Wilmington District
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006

1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the established time
frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action.
10

Aquatic Resources Table Update
Stream lengths have been updated to the surveyed lengths since the JD site visit on May 8, 2018, those
updates are reflected in the Aquatic Resource table below.
Original PJD
Reach ID
Included
Reaches
Latitude
Longitude
Length (ft)/
Area ac
FF1-A
FF1-A
36.212223
-80.724609
993
FF1-B
FF1-13
36.212189
-80.722394
922
FF1-C
FF1-C
36.213772
-80.720389
694
FF1-D
FF1-D
FF1-E
36.215554
-80.718159
1,511
FF2
FF2
36.211115
-80.723753
602
FF3
FF3
36.210798
-80.719211
1,943
FF4
FF4-A
FF4-B
36.216467
-80.722795
849
FF5
FF5-A
FF5-B
36.214259
-80.716669
1,631
WA
--
36.212119
-80.723091
5.4 ac
WB
--
36.213772
-80.720389
0.28
Total Existing Wetlands
5.68 ac
Total Existing Stream Length
9,145 ft
* Lengths have been updated to reflect the surveyed length of the streams within the project easement

air
IN
z 1 4 rWA
ores
5
0 150 300
Feet
1 in = 300 feet
Potential
Wetland or Non -Wetland Waters
of the U.S. Map
Green Mesa
Mitigation Project
Yadkin County, North Carolina
Date: 6/5/2019 Drawn by: MDE
Revisions: 1 Checked by: JRM
Legend
Proposed Easement
Existing Pond
® Existing Wetland
Existing Stream
Wetland Datapoint
Upland Datapoint
REFERENCE
1) Horizontal Datum is NAD83 UTM Zone 17N.
2) Map Projection is NAD_ 1983_StatePlane_
North Carolina FPS 3200 Feet
i
Y
-�
r
Original PJD
Reach ID
FF1-A
Length (V
Included Reaches Latitude Longitude
Area (ac
FF1-A 36.212223 -80.724609 993
(�
♦
-
t
FF1-13
FF1-C
FF1-B 36.212189 -80.722394 922
FF1-C 36.213772 -80.720389 694
1.
-"s
FF1-D
FF1-D 36.215554 -80.718159 1,511
*
FF2
FF1-E
FF2 36.211115 -80.723753 602
FF3
FF4
FF3 36.210798 -80.719211 1,943
FF4-A 36.216467 -80.722795 849
FF4-B
•
s -
_ .. dk-1 '�'""' •"� n
"„
FF5
WA
WB
FF5-Ax,
36.214259 -80.716669 1,631
FF5-B
-- 36.212119 -80.723091 5.4 ac
-- 36.213772 -80.720389 0.28
Total Existing Wetlands 5.68 ac
Total Existing Stream Length 9,145 ft
`Lengths ha✓e
been updated to reflect the surveyed length ofthe sheams within the pmje
FF4
A
s
' 4
r.t
easement
air
IN
z 1 4 rWA
ores
5
0 150 300
Feet
1 in = 300 feet
Potential
Wetland or Non -Wetland Waters
of the U.S. Map
Green Mesa
Mitigation Project
Yadkin County, North Carolina
Date: 6/5/2019 Drawn by: MDE
Revisions: 1 Checked by: JRM
Legend
Proposed Easement
Existing Pond
® Existing Wetland
Existing Stream
Wetland Datapoint
Upland Datapoint
REFERENCE
1) Horizontal Datum is NAD83 UTM Zone 17N.
2) Map Projection is NAD_ 1983_StatePlane_
North Carolina FPS 3200 Feet

Appendix G —Invasive Species Plan

INVASIVE SPECIES PLAN
Annual monitoring and semi-annual site visits will be conducted to assess the condition of the finished
project. These site inspections may identify the presence of invasive vegetation. RES will treat invasive
species vegetation within the project area and provide remedial action on a case by- case basis. Common
invasive species vegetation, such as Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora),
tree -of -heaven (Ailanthus altissima), and Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), will be treated to
allow native plants to become established within the conservation easement. Invasive species vegetation
will be treated by approved mechanical and/or chemical methods such that the percent composition of
exotic/invasive species is less than 5% of the total riparian buffer area. Any control methods requiring
herbicide application will be performed in accordance with NC Department of Agriculture (NCDA) rules
and regulations. If areas of invasive species exist within the easement, they will be monitored yearly as part
of the monitoring protocol, and treated if necessary. If required, problem areas will continue to be treated
until the project easement shows overall trending towards meeting all monitoring requirements.

Appendix H —Regulatory Agency Scoping
Letters

Regulatory Division
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
69 DARLINGTON AVENUE
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403-1343
November 15, 2017
Re: NCIRT Review of the RES Yadkin 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank Prospectus:
Gideon Site (SAW -2017-01462), Compass Point Site (SAW -2017-01465), Green Mesa Site
(SAW -2017-01466), Twiman Site (SAW -2017-01467), and Scout Site (SAW -2017-01469).
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
Attention: Ms. Cara Conder
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, North Carolina 27605
Dear Ms. Conder:
This letter is in regard to your prospectus document for the proposed RES Yadkin 01
Umbrella Mitigation Bank. The proposal consists of the establishment and operation of the
mitigation sites listed below:
Corps Action ID
Site Name
Easement
ac
County
Stream/Receiving
Water
Latitude (°N)
Longitude (°W)
SAW -2017-01462
Gideon
8.6
Surry
Mill Creek
36.3967
-80.8584
SAW -2017-01465
Compass
Point
13.73
Yadkin
Yadkin River
36.2696
-80.6384
SAW -2017-01466
Green
Mesa
19.96
Yadkin
N. Deep Creek
36.2132
-80.7181
SAW -2017-01467
Twiman
32.06
Yadkin
N. Deep Creek
36.2130
-80.6902
SAW -2017-01469
Scout
14.0
Davie
Hauser Creek
36.0322
-80.5166
The Corps determined the prospectus document was complete and issued a public notice
(P/N # SAW -2017-01462) on September 6, 2017. The purpose of this notice was to solicit the
views of interested State and Federal agencies and other parties either interested in or affected by
the proposed work. In addition, the Corps and members of the Interagency Review Team (IRT)
conducted field reviews of the proposed mitigation sites on October 16 - 18, 2017. Attached are
comments received in response to the public notice from the North Carolina Wildlife Resource
Commission, and a field visit memo incorporating comments from the attending IRT members.
The Corps has reviewed the information provided and considered the comments received
in response to the public notice and the field site visits. We have determined that the proposed
mitigation bank appears to have the potential to restore and protect aquatic resources within the
Upper Yadkin 8 -digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03040101 of the Yadkin River Basin.
Therefore, the bank sponsor may proceed with preparation of a draft Mitigation Banking
Instrument (MBI).

We appreciate your interest in restoring and protecting waters of the United States. If
you have questions concerning the path forward for the proposed mitigation bank, please do not
hesitate to contact me at [phone] extension 59.
Sincerely,ly signed by
`A,
H U G H ES.A N D R EA. V V DHUGHIES.AND EA WADE.1258339165
DN: c=Us, o=U.S. Government, ou=DoD, ou=PKI,
ADE.1258339165 Dat SA,c =HUGHE255A1NDRE1.15 11 A ADE.1258339165
Andrea Hughes
Mitigation Project Manager
Enclosures
Electronic Copies Furnished:
NCIRT Distribution List

0 North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 0
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Andrea Hughes
Mitigation Project Manager, US Army Corps of Engineers
FROM: Andrea Leslie
Habitat Conservation, NC Wildlife Resources Commission
DATE: 26 October 2017
SUBJECT: Comments on RES Yadkin 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Davie, Yadkin and Surry Counties
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed
the final prospectus for the RES Yadkin 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank Site. NCWRC staff
attended site visits with regulatory agency staff October 16-18. The prospectus proposes stream
restoration, enhancement, and preservation on over 29,800 feet of stream to net over 18,000
SMUs in the Yadkin River Basin (03040101).
The bank includes five sites, and general comments on each site follow:
• Gideon Site. Located on a 76 -acre parcel and sandwiched between two Division of
Mitigation Services (DMS) sites, this agricultural site will involve restoration, enhancement,
and preservation on 4,092 ft of Mill Creek and unnamed tributaries (UTs) to Mill Creek,
netting 2,664 SMUs. The site is less than a mile upstream of the Mitchell River, which
serves as habitat for Brook Floater (Alasmidonta varicosa, US Federal Species of Concern,
NC Endangered). Excellent erosion and sediment control is especially important at both this
site and the adjacent DMS sites to minimize impacts to this mussel.
• Compass Point Site. This site is located on a 209 -acre parcel in agricultural and forestry
uses. It was recently logged. The project will involve restoration and enhancement on 5,024
ft of UTs to the Yadkin River, netting 3,709 SMUs. The downstream end of the site is at the
confluence with the Yadkin River, and protection and enhancement of riparian habitat at this
location is especially ecologically beneficial, as it will provide a wildlife corridor that is
connected to the Yadkin River. We recommend that the landowner expand the forested
riparian area along the Yadkin River, as well. Two rare mussels [Creeper (Strophitus
undulatus, NC Threatened) and Brook Floater] are found in the Yadkin River in the vicinity
Mailing Address: Habitat Conservation • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

RES Yadkin 01 Mitigation Bank Page 2 October 26, 2017
Davie, Yadkin, Surry Counties
of the project, and erosion and sediment control is especially important at this site to
minimize impacts to these species.
Green Mesa. This site is on a 273 -acre parcel in agricultural use, and project activities
include restoration, enhancement, and preservation on 7,776 ft of UTs to North Deep Creek,
netting 3,531 SMUs. The old dam structure downstream of the present dam may serve as bat
habitat, and NCWRC biologists may perform bat surveys there in 2018.
Twiman. This site is comprised of 10 parcels totaling 266 acres in agricultural use, and
project activities include restoration, enhancement, and preservation on 10,477 ft of UTs to
North Deep Creek, netting 5,766 SMUs.
Scout. This site is on two parcels totaling 522 acres in agricultural use, and project activities
include restoration on 2,467 ft of Hauser Creek, netting 2,467 SMUs.
Detailed comments on the mitigation approach are captured in RES staff's October 16-18 site
visit summary. NCWRC staff has reviewed this summary and has provided comments on it in a
separate email.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If we can be of further
assistance, please contact Andrea Leslie at [phone] or at andrea.leslie(&ncwildlife.org.
ec: Travis Wilson and Oliva Munzer, NCWRC

M E M O R A N D U M
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
TO: NC IRT
fires
Raleigh, North Carolina 27605 919.209.1052 tel. [phone] fax
FROM: Cara Conder, Brad Breslow- RES
DATE: 11/14/2017 (revised)
RE: RES Yadkin 01 Umbrella Bank IRT Site Visits
Attendees: Mac Haupt (NC DWR), Kim Browning (USACE), Andrea Leslie (NCWRC), Olivia
Munzer (NCWRC), Cara Conder (RES), Brad Breslow (RES), David Godley (RES)
Dates: October 16, 17, and 18, 2017
Gideon Site —10/16/17
The Gideon Site is located between two disjunct portions of the recently contracted DMS Little
Sebastian full delivery site. While each project could be developed independently of the other,
the combined easements will result in a much larger contiguous protected corridor and high-
quality aquatic habitat. WRC mentioned that there are known occurrences of the brook floater
(Alasmidonta varicosa) in the Mitchell River, approximately 0.5 miles downstream of the
project area which RES mentioned in the Prospectus. Connecting the Gideon and Little Sebastian
Sites offer opportunities to create and protect habitat for the State protected species. IRT
members agreed the Gideon site is acceptable for compensatory mitigation, and final credit ratios
will be determined in the Approved Mitigation Plan. Reach specific comments are below.
• DWR requested that RES determine the potential wetlands on site. RES is currently
delineating the site.
• MC3-A: Group agreed to restoration at 1:1 ratio as originally proposed in prospectus.
RES explained that cows have full access and the landowner has historically moved the
channel. RES affirmed that construction sequencing would harvest native bed material
when possible (e.g. cobble). The crossing will be a culvert.
• JN5 — Group thought that Enhancement I at a 1.5:1 ratio would be more appropriate
approach for this reach instead of Enhancement II. Enhancement measures will include
grading banks, installing grade control structures (including at the tie-in with MC3-A),
planting the buffer, and cattle exclusion.
• JN4 — Similar to JN5, the Group thought that Enhancement I at a 1.5:1 ratio would be a
more appropriate approach for below the crossing. Enhancement measures will include
removing pipe in old channel, fixing current culvert, grading banks, installing grade
control structures, planting the buffer, and cattle exclusion. Enhancement III at a 5:1 ratio
is the approach for above the crossing and includes cattle exclusion and light
supplemental planting.

• MC3-B: RES originally proposed Enhancement II at 2.5:1, but the Group agreed to
change the approach to Enhancement III at 5:1 ratio because of channel condition and
cattle access. Enhancement measures will include planting the buffer on the left bank and
cattle exclusion.
• JN6-C — RES originally proposed restoration on this reach and Group agreed to that
approach. However, proposed alignment and restoration approach will need to be dictated
by topographic survey data. RES is in process of data collection, including delineating
slough feature. WRC suggested fencing slough area if not in alignment of proposed
restoration area. Barns will likely be removed and the culvert at the driveway will be
reset to improve hydrologic connection to JN6-B. WRC Comment: At the break between
JN6-B & JN6-A, there is an old road that is eroding. RES agreed to stabilize this road.
• JN6-B — RES originally proposed Enhancement II on this reach. DWR did not agree to
2.5:1 ratio due to buffer being intact, but does agree this reach should be part of the
overall project. The consensus was Enhancement III at a 5:1 ratio with an approach of
removing the crossing and cattle exclusion.
• JN6-A — RES originally proposed preservation on this reach. Group agreed to including
this top part of the reach as preservation. The JD will determine the limits.
Compass Point Site —10/16/17
IRT members agreed the Compass Point site is acceptable for compensatory mitigation, and final
credit ratios will be determined in the Approved Mitigation Plan. Reach specific comments are
below.
• DW6: RES originally proposed Enhancement II at 2.5:1 ratio. WRC and DWR
recommended more of an Enhancement I approach (ranging from a 1.5 to 2 ratio), which
would include bank work (spot stabilization), riparian buffer planting, and livestock
exclusion.
• DW1-A: RES originally proposed restoration at 1:1 ratio and Group agreed, with the
exception being the upstream most portion that ties into DW6. Group agreed that a mix of
Enhancement I and II would be best approach on the first 250 feet of DWI -A.
• DW2: Group agreed to Enhancement II at 2.5:1 ratio as originally proposed in
prospectus. RES confirmed that cows have access. Enhancement measures will include
planting the riparian buffer and cattle exclusion. DWR and RES agreed to installing a
stream gauge midway on the reach to monitor hydrology.
• DW1-B: RES originally proposed Enhancement II at 2.5:1 ratio. Group discussed
Enhancement I at a 1.5:1 ratio with enhancement measures including a combination of
bed and bank work, complete riparian buffer planting, and cattle exclusion. DWR
Comment: there was some discussion of E1, however, if that ratio is proposed vs the E2,
then the work needs to be justified in the mit plan. For the reach DWI -D, DWR believes
while it is a benefit to have a corridor connect to the Yadkin River, however, the ratio
that is appropriate would be no better than 7.5:1. USACE Comment: This will transition
from restoration in DWI -A at bedrock point. Buffered on one side, some areas do need
bank shaping. EII only if the banks are addressed. The existing road may cause the buffer
to be pinched to less than 50' at the end of the reach.
• DW1-C: RES originally proposed restoration at 1:1 ratio. This reach has patches of high
quality bed material including cobble and bedrock. Group agreed a Priority II Restoration
approach, including benching to aid in floodplain connectivity, would be the best
measure.

• DW1-D — RES originally proposed Enhancement III at a 5:1 ratio on this reach. WRC
wants to see this reach protected and included in the project. DWR and USACE
recommended a 7.5:1 ratio. The approach will be cattle exclusion and installing a boulder
grade control structure below the limits of restoration on DWI -C. WRC Comment: We
support the protection and riparian buffer enhancement of this reach, which would protect
a riparian corridor that would connect the Yadkin River to the site.
Green Mesa Site —10/17/17
Overall the site has clear potential for functional uplift, but there are a few notable constraints
including powerline easement and a large pond that will remain (landowner will not allow pond
to be part of project). Because the pond will remain in place, RES and USACE discussed
potentially retrofitting the riser structure to include a bottom pond drain to release cooler water.
IRT members agreed the Green Mesa site is acceptable for compensatory mitigation, and final
credit ratios will be determined in the Approved Mitigation Plan. Reach specific comments are
below.
• FF4 and FFI-D: RES originally proposed restoration at a 1:1 ratio. The approach is a mix
of Priority I and II restoration with potential for enhancement level I above the powerline
based on bedrock in the channel. USACE said clearly justify rationale for restoration
measures.
• FF 1-C: RES originally proposed enhancement II at a 2.5:1 ratio. DWR and USACE
stated if channel was left in place and enhancement II approach was taken that it was
likely for no credit to be given due to powerline and lack of buffer near the road. Group
discussed starting restoration immediately below Baptist Church Road and RES agreed
this was best option if feasible. WRC Comment: There was discussion of raising the bed
elevation to lessen the DOT culvert perch. The discussion on lower FFI-C being too
close to the road also applies to upper FFI-D. Turning the channel into the field
upstream of where it turns now could allow R credit for both.
• FF1-C (below pond): RES originally proposed enhancement II at a 2.5:1 ratio with an
approach of cattle exclusion, buffer planting, and tying into the restoration area. There is
a large stone wall in this reach with a culvert that might need to be retrofitted (if
possible). Group agreed the best approach is probably to leave the wall in place and credit
the enhancement at 3:1. USACE Comment: I agree with your summary for both areas
above and below the pond. It's recommended that SHPO review this area (and the area
where the other historic wall is in the buffer in FF1-A).
• FF5: RES originally proposed enhancement III at a 5:1 ratio with an approach of cattle
exclusion, invasive species treatment, and supplemental planting on right bank. DWR
stated there is no cattle pressure and there is decent buffer on the banks, but invasives are
problematic (high density of privet). WRC would like some of the black walnut removed
and those areas replanted with a more diverse mix of native hardwood vegetation.
USACE and DWR suggested a ratio of 7.5:1; however, if buffer planting and easement
was extended to at least 100 feet a higher ratio could be approved.
• FF3-A: RES originally proposed enhancement II at a 2.5:1 ratio with an approach of
cattle exclusion and buffer planting. During the site visit RES suggested enhancement I at
a 1.5:1 ratio with an added measure of bank stabilization to reduce shear stress and in -
channel erosion. WRC agreed to rationale for enhancement I approach, but DWR stated
that there isn't much work needed on this reach and a ratio of 5:1 is likely most
appropriate (see FF3-B below). DWR Comment: I had FF3A and B combined at a ratio

of 7.5:1. WRC Comment: We did not agree with the E1 approach, as this reach has a
stellar riparian forest; definitely agree on an E3 approach here, as light tough is needed
and riparian area is too nice to justify getting heavy equipment to address channel
erosion. USACE Comment: Widening the buffer and invasives control are necessary
here. My notes indicate a ratio of 5-7:5:1, depending on justification of functional uplift.
The historic house in the buffer should be addressed.
• FF3-B: RES originally proposed enhancement III at a 5:1 ratio with an approach of cattle
exclusion and light supplemental planting. IRT suggested combining FF3-A and FF3-B
into one reach and having the entire crediting approach be enhancement III at a 5:1 ratio.
This area might be generating wetlands that RES would not be claiming credit. RES is
currently delineating the site. DWR Comment: I had FF3A and B combined at a ratio of
7.5:1. USACE Comment: Widening the buffer and invasives control are necessary here.
My notes indicate a ratio of 5-7:5:1, depending on justification of functional uplift,
especially considering these enter the pond. A narrative of historical farming practices
would be beneficial.
• FF1-B: RES originally proposed enhancement III at a 5:1 ratio and Group agreed and
stated to justify the uplift in the mitigation plan. WRC Comment: There is evidence of
beaver here.
• FF2: RES originally proposed preservation and Group agreed to a 7.5:1 ratio with an
approach of fencing where needed. DWR Comment: DWR could go with 7.5:1 on the
preservation (FF2) but would like to see the reach extended above the crossing at the top
and fenced out. WRC Comment: There was a discussion on preserving a little more
above the fence line and whether the old road would be planted/fenced. There was a
question on the location of the property line and end of preservation. USACE Comment:
Channel in good condition, USACE feels preservation at 10:1 is appropriate. The
discussion of 7.5:1 would be entertained if the upstream portion excluded cattle, as well.
• FF 1-A: RES originally proposed enhancement II at a 2.5:1 ratio with an approach of
cattle exclusion and buffer planting. While there might be some opportunities for bank
work, the group agreed that the enhancement II approach was best based on the amount
of bedrock in this reach.
Twiman Site —10/17/17
IRT members agreed the Twiman site is acceptable for compensatory mitigation, and final credit
ratios will be determined in the Approved Mitigation Plan. Reach specific comments are below.
• TC2-A: RES originally proposed Enhancement I at 1.5:1 ratio with an approach of cattle
exclusion, buffer planting, and bank stabilization. Group agreed to this approach.
• TC2-B: RES originally proposed restoration at 1:1 ratio. Group generally agreed with this
approach, but did note there is a section of potential enhancement I below the pond. Upon
further data collection/analysis, RES will determine the best approach for this section of
TC2-13. WRC Comment: The group discussed establishing the break between EI and R
at the bedrock nickpoint.
• TC1-A: RES originally proposed restoration at 1:1 ratio. Group agreed to this approach.
• TC3-A: RES originally proposed Enhancement II at 2.5:1 ratio with an approach of cattle
exclusion, buffer planting, invasive species treatment and spot stabilization. Group
agreed to this approach with a ratio ranging from 2.5 to 3 to be justified in the mitigation
plan.

• TC1-B: RES originally proposed Enhancement III at 5:1 ratio with an approach of cattle
exclusion and buffer planting. IRT suggested restoration as the approach. RES is open to
examining restoration along this reach based on watershed size and design discharge.
DWR Comment: these reaches should be restoration. If RES decides that restoration not
feasible then the ratio for enhancement would be greater than 5:1, could be as high as 8:1.
Planting outer 20 feet just does not do a lot for this system. USACE Comment: This
channel is incised, poor substrate, no buffer, channelized, with an available floodplain.
USACE & DWR feel restoration is appropriate.
• TC4: RES originally proposed Enhancement III at 5:1 ratio with an approach of cattle
exclusion and buffer planting. IRT suggested restoration as the approach. RES is open to
examining restoration along this reach based on watershed size and design discharge.
DWR Comment: these reaches should be restoration. If RES decides that restoration not
feasible then the ratio for enhancement would be greater than 5:1, could be as high as 8:1.
Planting outer 20 feet just does not do a lot for this system. USACE Comment: This
channel is incised, poor substrate, no buffer, channelized, with an available floodplain.
USACE & DWR feel restoration is appropriate.
• TC5-B: RES originally proposed Enhancement II at 2.5:1 ratio with an approach of cattle
exclusion, buffer planting, and minor spot stabilization. IRT suggested a lower ratio of
3:1 in some areas based on existing buffer condition. RES recommends potentially
splitting the reach into different treatments based on level of intervention and will justify
rationale in mitigation plan.
• TC7: RES originally proposed Enhancement II at 2.5:1 ratio with an approach of cattle
exclusion, buffer planting, invasive species treatment and spot stabilization. Group
agreed to this approach with a ratio ranging from 2.5 to 3 to be justified in the mitigation
plan. USACE Comment: 3:1 ratio would be more appropriate.
• TC6: RES originally proposed Enhancement II at 2.5:1 ratio with an approach of cattle
exclusion and buffer planting. This reach is in a deeply formed gully, but is currently
stable with the exception of multiple headcuts at the top of the reach. DWR suggested
"filling in" the reach to bring the bed up and credit as restoration with a 1:1 ratio. RES
expressed concerns with filling in the gully because thee stream might lose jurisdictional
status after construction with such a small watershed (roughly 20 acres). DWR Comment:
Reach TC6 may not be a creditable reach. While I feel that the only beneficial treatment
would be filling like a RSC approach it is likely the stream would lose flow. Planting the
outer 20 feet for this reach would not be creditable enhancement either. USACE
Comment: I would question whether there would be flow if the bed was raised with
restoration. USACE would not release credit if the restored channel was not
jurisdictional. The channel is part of the larger system, and the lower portions of this
reach would benefit from cattle exclusion. I would suggest a lower EII ratio of 5-7.5:1.
• TC5-A: RES originally proposed Enhancement III at 5:1 ratio with an approach of cattle
exclusion and buffer planting. IRT agreed that this is an appropriate approach, but RES
needs to clearly justify the rationale for the enhancement on this reach. DWR Comment:
IRT suggested 7.5:1, would consider 5:1 if justified in mit plan. WRC Comment: RES
will need to address the issue of cattle accessing land via passage under the bridge and
the associated erosion. USACE Comment: USACE and DWR agreed that 7.5:1 would be
more appropriate, unless 5:1 can be justified.

Scout Site- 10/18/17
The Scout Site is located just upstream of the lower portion of the recently contracted DMS
Mockingbird Site. While each project could be developed independently of the other, the
combined easements will result in a better project and most importantly provide the opportunity
to add over 2,000 linear feet of priority I restoration and limit the amount of priority II
restoration on the Mockingbird Site. IRT members agreed the Scout site is acceptable for
compensatory mitigation, and final credit ratios will be determined in the Approved Mitigation
Plan. Reach specific comments are below.
• HC3: Group agreed that restoration at 1:1 ratio is the best approach for this reach and
including it will improve the development of the Mockingbird project. USACE
commented that a hunting blind within the proposed easement area will need to be
removed. There is an existing crossing that will be removed as part of the design. RES
also showed a tributary that was not included in the prospectus that would be eligible for
potential restoration credit at the tie-in with HC3, but would more likely be Enhancement
II for the rest of the reach.

a
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona h1. Bartos, Administrator ,
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary Susi H. Harm ton
November 7, 2017
Daniel Ingram
Resource Environmental Solutions
302 Jefferson Street, #110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Re: RES Yadkin 01 Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank, ER 17-1991
Dear Mr. Ingram:
Thank you for your letter of July 7, 2017, concerning the above project.
Office of Archives and History
Depiny Secretary Kevin Cherry
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be
affected by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
[e-mail]. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above -referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
in
at"bJur
amona M. Bartos
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Senice Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

Memorandum to the Record
October 6, 2017
Response to Public Notice and agency comments on the Prospectus to establish
the RES Yadkin 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank (SAW -2017-01462) in the Upper
Yadkin River Basin HUC 03040101, North Carolina.
Andrea,
Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback and comments on the Public Notice (SAW -
2017 -01462) for the RES Yadkin 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank (Bank) Prospectus. The bank
Sponsor, Environmental Banc and Exchange, LLC wishes to establish a commercial umbrella
mitigation bank to generate mitigation banking credits to provide compensatory mitigation for
unavoidable impacts to aquatic resources associated with Section 404 permits within the Upper
Yadkin River Basin HUC 03040101. The Bank consists of establishing five mitigation sites
expected to provide approximately 6,373 cool Stream Mitigation Units (SMU) and 11,764 warm
SMUs by restoring, enhancing and preserving over 29,800 linear feet of stream and riparian
corridor. The project is designed to address stressors identified in the watershed and provide
improvements and ecological uplift to water quality, hydrologic function and both aquatic and
terrestrial habitat.
The EPA Region 4 Ocean, Wetlands and Stream Protection Branch offers the following
comments as they pertain to RES Yadkin 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank Final Prospectus dated
July, 2017 and the Public Notice dated September 6, 2017.
Section 1.4/Page 3: The project goals stated are too broad and somewhat vague. For
example, the goal: "Nutrient removal" and a few others may be better presented as
"Intercept, filter, minimize and potentially eliminate nutrients (such as...), sediment and
other pollutants/pathogens before entering the aquatic environment".
o The goal of "Improved aquatic and terrestrial habitat" is also vague and does not
address any particular habitat or species of interest. Since we have cool water
habitats being presented for restoration/enhancement then the goals should
address the habitat types and rationale for considering them.
o "Invasive species treatment" is more of an objective or action (and is stated as
such in the document) to address the real goal of "Eliminate competition to
native vegetation from exotic and invasive floral species".
o I understand that many of the "goals" presented are at the prospectus level and
not necessarily applicable to each site but without clear goals, the establishment

of objectives and performance standards that relate back to the goals and
functional uplift of the site becomes more challenging.
• Section 3.7/Page 6: The last sentence should read: "If planted tree mortality affects 40
percent or greater of the initial planting in a stream or wetland restoration or
enhancement area, then a remedial/supplemental planting plan will be implemented
for the affected area(s)." This addresses "planted" vs. "volunteer" mortality and defines
the starting point to consider mortality.
• Section 5.1/Page 9: Be sure to continue coordinating the work at the Gideon Site with
the Little Sebastian sites and ensure the Mitigation Plan is updated with relevant
information about the adjacent restoration site. NCDMS' Little Sebastian site is now out
on Public Notice, SAW -2017-01507, dated September 21, 2017. The Mitigation Plan
should address how the Gideon Site will tie in with the adjacent restoration work so that
the projects connect seamlessly and minimize disturbance to one another.
• Section 5.4.7/Page 13: Be sure to identify the adjacent restoration work at the Little
Sebastian site upstream and downstream of the project as a potential constraint. See
comment above.
• Section 5.5/Page 14: Table 6 does not match Figure 8. Be sure not to carry error forward
into the Mitigation Plan for Gideon Site.
• Section 5.5.1/Page 14: Second paragraph should state Enhancement Level II instead of
Level I. 1 also recommend 50 -foot riparian buffers be considered for this site due to the
high potential for nutrients and fecal pathogens to enter the stream from the adjacent
pasture.
• Section 7.1/Page 21: SMU discrepancy should be corrected to match Table 6 on page 26.
• Section 7.4.2/Page 22: Information on FF -5 is missing.
• Section 7.5.1/Page 26: Enhancement Level I is not being utilized at the Green Mesa Site.
Level II is proposed for Reach FF3-A.
• Section 8.5.1/Page 34: Priority Level I is proposed for TC3-13 only. Be sure to note pond
removals in this paragraph and restoration plan in general.
• Section 8.5.1/Page 35: Enhancement Level II includes TO -A also.
• Section 9.1/Page 36: Recommend continuing to coordinate with NCDMS and the
adjacent Mockingbird site currently out on Public Notice (SAW -2017-01505) dated
September 15, 2017. The Mockingbird site is considering a Priority II approach to
restoration along Hauser Creek at the terminus of the Scout Site which is considering
Priority I approach on Hauser Creek (HC3). I agree that the sites can be developed
independently but they should complement each other and provide for a seamless
transition as one moves downstream from Scout to Mockingbird.
• Section 9.4.7/Page 39: See comment above.

Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback, comments and concerns with the RES
Yadkin 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank Prospectus and associated proposed sites to provide
compensatory mitigation in the Upper Yadkin River watershed of North Carolina. I believe the
sponsor has provided a viable plan to offset warm and cool water stream impacts that will be
incurred within the proposed service area. If you or the sponsor have any questions or need
clarification on any of the comments stated above, please contact me at 404-562-9225 or at
[e-mail].
Best Regards,
Todd Bowers
Comments submitted to Andrea Hughes (SAW -PM) via email on October 6, 2017.

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary Susi H. Hamilton
June 28, 2018
Cara Conder
Resource Environmental Solutions
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Re: Identification of Stone Wall Features, Green Mesa Mitigation Site, RES Yadkin 01 Stream and
Wetland Umbrella Bank, Yadkin County, ER 17-1991
Dear Ms. Conder:
Thank you for your submission concerning the above referenced project. We have reviewed the information
provided and offer the following comments.
Two dry -stacked stone wall features were identified in the Area of Potential Effects for the proposed Green
Mesa mitigation site. Thank you for bringing these features to our attention. They have been recorded with
the North Carolina Office of State Archaeology as archaeological sites 31YD224 (Reach FF1-A) and
31YD225 (Reach FF1-C). No earthwork or heavy equipment are planned in the immediate vicinity of either
site. Based on the information provided, the proposed mitigation activities will have no effect on any historic
properties eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
environmental.reviewgncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
/Ramona M. Bartos
cy-
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

fires
June 12, 2018
Renee Gledhill -Earley
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Dear Ms. Gledhill -Earley:
302 Jefferson St. Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Corporate Headquarters
5020 Montrose Blvd. Suite 650
Houston, TX 77006
Main: 713.520.5400
The Green Mesa Site has been identified by Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC (RES) to provide
compensatory mitigation for unavoidable stream impacts. The proposed project involves the restoration,
enhancement, and preservation of approximately 8,350 linear feet of stream. The prospectus for the RES
Yadkin 01 Stream Umbrella Mitigation Bank was submitted to the NC Interagency Review (IRT) Team
in July 2017. As part of that process SHPO responded on November 7, 2017 that a review of the project
has been conducted and are not aware of any historic resources which would be affected by the project
(Tracking #ER17-1991).
The five sites under the proposed RES Yadkin 01 Umbrella Bank had IRT site visits October 16-18,
2017. During the site visit it was noted that the Green Mesa Site has two stone walls that would need
further coordination with SHPO. One stone wall is located on Reach FF1-C (north of the pond) and this
entire wall is intact and has a culvert. It was noted during the site visit to possibly retrofit this culvert, but
the IRT and RES agreed to leave the culvert in place and adjust the credit ratio. The mitigation treatment
on this reach is Enhancement II and would involve cattle exclusion and riparian buffer planting. There
will not be any earthwork or equipment in this area.
The other stone wall is remnants of a stone wall on Reach FF1-A (reach to the farthest west). The
mitigation treatment on this reach is also Enhancement II with an approach of cattle exclusion and
riparian buffer planting. There will not be any earthwork or equipment in this area.
These two areas are called out on the attached map and photos of both areas are included in this letter. If
you would like the regular size photo for any of these please let me know.
The landowners have lived on the property for four generations. The current landowner, Arlene Frazier
said her great grandfather (Duke Frazier) helped build the lower dam crossing with paid laborers on
Reach FF1-C. It was built as a creek crossing and the driveway crossed it until the USACE dam was built.
The current landowners do not have any information about the dam/stone wall remnants on Reach FF1-A.
Thank you,
Cara Conder
RES
919-209-1052
res.us

b-
p;
fi
iT
fa
3
r
Historic Crossing
k
rr�� 1 '
Q9 ,, ! Aso
- t
Relic Wal
.f
tom.:
Legend
Proposed Easement
Project Streams
N
Date: 6/12/2018
Existing Conditions
W e Drawn by: MDE
Green Mesa Mitigation Site
o s Checked by: �ooc
0 250 500
Yadkin County, North Carolina 1 inch =500 feet
Feet

t
r si
Historic Crossing
i
t .
4
l' -
.n•
fI
si j••v+ � � �,7.
FIR
IV + IV
_ ` r
N.
..,,;,,.. �. Irl' � r�r,.� r •
Legend
Proposed Easement
Project Streams
kv
N
Existing Conditions - Inset A Date: 6/12/2018
w e Drawn by: MDE res
Green Mesa Mitigation Site
p s Checked by: x�oc
0 25 50
Yadkin County, North Carolina 1 inch = 50 feet10
Feet

lo
ell
VJ
C Wall
But
46
tb
Ak
Ow
Proposed Easement
Project Streams
Date: 6/12/2018
Drawn by: MDE
Green Mesa Mitigation Site
Checked by: x)o(
0 25 50
EEG;;;;= Yadkin County, North Carolina 1 inch = 50 feet
Feet

Photos of intact stone wall near Reach FF1-C. Third photo is a close-
up of the wall.
- .4 -
-AC
A_
lar.r
311
A__ g+
1 _

YY ,
gyi i Jv
L'AI
f K 7✓ i'y
rpt
ti
a:t.

From: DCR - Environmental—Review
To: Cara Conder
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: [External] Tracking # FR17-1991 Green Mesa
Date: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 2:32:52 PM
Attachments: imacie001.a_na
ER 17-1991.Ddf
Our response is attached. Thank you.
Renee Shearin
Environmental Review Technician, State Historic Preservation Office
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
[phone] Office
renee.shearin&ncdcr.gov
109 East Jones Street 1 4603 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Please submit all Environmental Review projects to environmental. reviewQncdcr.gov. Only one project
per email.
Allow at least 30 days for our review. We try hard to complete the reviews in fewer days, but under state
and federal regulations we have a mandatory 30 days.
See http://www.hpo.ncdcr.gov/er/er_email_submittal.html for guidelines on submitting projectsfor
environmental review.
Do not send .zip, .tif files, downloads, or links to websites as we are not able to process these types of
items. The message size, including all attachments, should be no larger than 20 megabytes.
From: Cara Conder [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2018 11:39 AM
To: DCR - Environmental_ Review<Environmental. [e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] Tracking # FR17-1991 Green Mesa
Hi Renee,
Thank you for the quick response. After our initial review request was sent to SHPO we had a follow-
up site visit with the stream engineer and there is some proposed minor bank stabilization work to
be done on Reach FF1-A to prevent future erosion and instability. The proposed work would involve
grading the banks and there are three proposed spots for this. Page 3 of the attached PDF shows the
zoomed in area on Reach FF1-A (this was in original correspondence).

One area is about 75 feet upstream of the wall on the opposite side of the stream bank (the wall is
on the left bank and the proposed grading is on the right bank). Another spot is about 75
downstream of the wall and we'd be smoothing the banks. The third spot is about 400 feet
downstream of the wall and would involve grading the banks. The stone wall remnants would not be
impacted and no work is proposed immediately in the vicinity of the wall (75 feet away).
Please let me know if you need any additional information.
Thank you,
Cara
Cara Conder
Project Manager
RES I res.us
Direct: 919.209.1052 1 Mobile: [phone]
From: DCR - Environmental—Review [mailto: Environmental. Review(@ncdcr.gov]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2018 12:10 PM
To: Cara Conder <cconder(@res.us>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: [External] Tracking # FR17-1991 Green Mesa
Our response is attached. Thank you.
Renee Shearin
Environmental Review Technician, State Historic Preservation Office
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
[phone] Office
renee.shearin&ncdcr.gov
109 East Jones Street 1 4603 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Please submit all Environmental Review projects to environmental. review&ncdcr.gov. Only one project
per email.
Allow at least 30 days for our review. We try hard to complete the reviews in fewer days, but under state
and federal regulations we have a mandatory 30 days.
See http://www.hpo.ncdcr.gov/er/er_email_submittal.html for guidelines on submitting projectsfor
environmental review.
Do not send .zip, .tif files, downloads, or links to websites as we are not able to process these types of
items. The message size, including all attachments, should be no larger than 20 megabytes.

From: Cara Conder [mailto:cconder(@res.us]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 4:01 PM
To: DCR - Environmental—Review <Environmental. Review(@ncdcr.gov>
Cc: Gledhill-earley, Renee <renee.gledhill-earley(cDncdcr.gov>
Subject: [External] Tracking # FR17-1991 Green Mesa
Report Spam.
Good afternoon,
Please find attached a letter with additional information regarding the Green Mesa mitigation site.
This site is a potential mitigation bank site and has already been reviewed by SHPO as part of the
prospectus process. During an IRT site visit two walls were identified on stream reaches and the IRT
requested further coordination with SHPO. The attached letter, maps, and photos have all the
additional information. If you have any questions please let me know.
Thanks,
Cara
Cara Conder
Project Manager
RES I res.us
Direct: 919.209.1052 1 Mobile: [phone]

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary Susi H. Hamilton
July 17, 2018
Cara Conder
Resource Environmental Solutions
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Re: Stream Bank Grading in Reach FF1-A, Green Mesa Mitigation Site in Yadkin Umbrella Bank,
Yadkin County, ER 17-1991
Dear Ms. Conder:
Thank you for your submission concerning the above referenced project. We have reviewed the information
provided and offer the following comments.
One dry -stacked stone wall feature (31YD224) is located in Reach FF1-A of the subject mitigation site. Based
on the information provided, earthwork will take place 75 feet from 31YD224, but not in the immediate
vicinity of the wall itself. We find this 75 -foot distance sufficient to buffer site 31YD224 from disturbance
associated with the proposed stream bank grading. Therefore, the proposed mitigation activities will have no
effect on any historic properties eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
environmental.reviewnaegncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
Ramona M. Bartos
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599