Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0089656_More Information (Received)_20161222 Soil Assessment ECS Carolinas, LLP 1812 Center Park Drive, Suite D Charlotte, North Carolina 28217 (704) 525-5152 Report of Camden Road, South Tryon Street, and West Park Avenue, Charlotte Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Prepared for Cousins Properties Incorporated/Atlanta, Georgia September 9, 2015 September 9, 2015 Mr. Jason Frost Cousins Properties Incorporated 191 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 500 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Reference: Report of Soil Assessment Camden Road Site Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina ECS Project No. 08-10875-B Dear Frost: ECS Carolinas, LLP (ECS) is pleased to provide Cousins Properties Incorporated with the results of our Report of Soil Assessment for the above referenced property. ECS’ services were conducted in general accordance with the services outlined in ECS Proposal 08-18727P dated August 17, 2015 and authorized on August 18, 2015, and modified based on conversations with client as documented in an August 19, 2015 email. ECS appreciates the opportunity to provide our services to you. If there are questions regarding this report, or a need for further information, please contact us at (704) 525-5152. Respectfully submitted, ECS CAROLINAS, LLP Brian T. Olin, P.G. Senior Project Manager John M. Stewart, P.G. Chief Geologist Camden Road Site Charlotte, North Carolina ECS Project No. 08-10875-B September 9, 2015 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. PROJECT INFORMATION ............................................................................................... 1 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES .................................................................................................... 1 3. RESULTS ......................................................................................................................... 2 4. CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................... 3 5. RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................... 3 6. QUALIFICATIONS OF REPORT ...................................................................................... 4 FIGURES Figure 1 – Site Location Map Figure 2 – Site Map Figure 3 – Parcel Map Figure 4 – Sample Location Map TABLES Table 1 – Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results APPENDIX Appendix I – Laboratory Analytical Data Camden Road Site Charlotte, North Carolina ECS Project No. 08-10875-B September 9, 2015 1 1. PROJECT INFORMATION The site consists of twelve parcels located between Camden Road, South Tryon Street, and West Park Avenue in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, Figure 1. In conjunction with this assessment, ECS conducted a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) (ECS Project No. 08-10875-A, dated August 25, 2015) for the site. ECS identified the following recognized environmental conditions (RECs) with respect to the subject site.  The presence of a monitoring well associated with the former Clawson Radiator or Brownfields listing located on the site.  The auto repair facilities, potential dry cleaning facilities, chemical laboratories, photo finishing facilities identified during the historical information review as being formerly located on the site.  Multiple facilities identified in the EDR report in the vicinity of the site. Based on the proximity to the site and/or the direction of groundwater flow inferred from surface topography, ECS considers the following facilities and/or properties discussed in the Environmental Records Review section to be RECs of the site: Kee Auto Top Manufacturing Co. (1538 South Tryon Street), Beaty Bros Service Station (1541 South Tryon Street), Light Rail (1511 Camden Road), Miller Service, (100 East Park Avenue, H H Service Station (1600 Camden Road), 1600 Camden Road (1600 Camden Road), Fowler Building (1447 South Tryon Street), Charlotte Coal Gas Plant No. 2 (South Boulevard), BCD Development Property, LLC (1611 South Tryon Street), and Delores Sheets Residence (1612 South Tryon Street).  Several auto repair facilities, filling stations, photo finishing facilities, manufacturers, sheet metal shops, and other commercial and/or retail businesses identified during the historical information review as being currently and/or historically located on surrounding properties. Based on a potential real estate transaction, ECS was contracted to conduct an assessment of the site. Project information is based on correspondence between Mr. Jason Frost with Cousins Properties Incorporated and Mr. Brian Olin with ECS and the previously cited Phase I ESA (not completed at the time the field work was conducted). 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES The soil and groundwater assessment consisted of collecting four groundwater and four soil samples on August 22, 2015 using a drill rig equipped to drill with hollow-stem augers. At the request of the client, the environmental sampling was conducted in conjunction with and using the driller used to for the geotechnical investigation. The proposed geotechnical boring locations were modified by adding several additional borings to collect environmental samples. The subcontractor used for this project was Pressley Drilling. Prior to commencing with field activities, ECS contacted North Carolina One-Call to locate/mark public utilities at the site. Required separation distances between subsurface activities and marked utilities (typically 30- inches) were maintained during the field activities. As part of this assessment, ECS prepared a site-specific health and safety plan (HASP) for the site. The HASP documented the known or suspected hazards, applicable personal protective equipment (PPE) of site personnel, and emergency response procedures. Prior to commencing Camden Road Site Charlotte, North Carolina ECS Project No. 08-10875-B September 9, 2015 2 with field activities, ECS and its subcontractors and applicable site personnel reviewed the site- specific HASP. The soil borings were drilled using a drill rig equipped to drill using hollow-stem augers. Drilling with hollow-stem augers involves rotating a continuous stem of hollow-stem augers into the ground. As drilling advances, the soil cuttings are removed by the rotating auger. At each sample location, the augers are disconnected from the drill rig providing access to the interior of the augers to facilitate soil sampling. Representative soil samples were collected at approximate five-foot intervals using a split-spoon sampler. ECS visually classified the soils collected from each boring and screened the soil samples for relative levels of volatile organic vapors using a field screening instrument a (Rae Systems Mini Rae 3000 Photo-ionization detector (PID)). Evidence of contamination or elevated PID readings were not detected, so soil samples were collected from above the soil-groundwater interface. Upon completion, each boring was properly abandoned. When groundwater was encountered while drilling the geotechnical borings, a sample of water was collected by lowering a disposable bailer through the augers. A groundwater sample was from geotechnical borings B-1, B-2, and S-1 (This method was used as opposed to temporary monitoring wells as proposed to accommodate the clients request to conduct the environmental sampling in conjunction with the geotechnical drilling.) Immediately after collection, the groundwater sample was transferred into sample containers provided by the laboratory. Because well were not installed, accurate groundwater elevations could not be obtained to allow for determination of groundwater flow direction. The existing monitoring well (MW -1) was purged by removing three well volumes. After the purging was completed, a groundwater sample was collected from the well. Purging and sampling was accomplished using a new disposable polypropylene bailer. Immediately after collection, the groundwater sample was transferred into sample containers provided by the laboratory. The soil and groundwater samples were placed into laboratory prepared containers. The sample containers were labeled with ECS project number, sample identification, sample date and time, and requested analytical analysis. The containers were placed into protective packaging material and placed into a cooler with ice to maintain the samples at approximately 4 Celsius (C). The samples were submitted to (Prism Laboratories located in Charlotte, North Carolina (North Carolina Certification # 402) for chemical analysis for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) using EPA Methods 8260 and 8270, respectively. ECS maintained proper chain-of-custody (COC) procedures throughout the sample collection and transportation process. Copies of the COCs are included in the Appendix. 3. RESULTS Laboratory analysis of soil samples S-1, S-2, S-3, and B-5 did not detect targeted analytes (VOCs and SVOCs) above laboratory detection limits, except for acetone, a common laboratory contaminant, in S-2. The concentration does not exceed the North Carolina Maximum Soil Contaminant Concentrations (MSCCs) or the North Carolina Soil Remediation Goals (SRGs). Laboratory analysis of groundwater sample MW -1 did not detect targeted analytes (VOCs and SVOCs) above laboratory detection limits. Camden Road Site Charlotte, North Carolina ECS Project No. 08-10875-B September 9, 2015 3 Laboratory analysis of groundwater samples B-1GW, B-2GW, and S-1GW detected several chlorinated VOCs above laboratory detection limits and North Carolina 2L Groundwater Quality Standards (NC2LGWQS). Trichloroethylene was detected above the Division of Waste Management’s (DWM) vapor screening level in the groundwater sample collected from boring B-2 located on the west side of the site. A summary of the groundwater laboratory analytical results is included in Table 1. The laboratory data sheets are included in the Appendix. 4. CONCLUSIONS Based on the results of the soil and groundwater assessment, ECS concludes the following:  Evidence of a release (petroleum/chemical odors, staining, sheens, elevated readings on the PID) was not detected in the soil where sampled during assessment activities.  Groundwater was encountered at an approximate depth of 15 feet bgs.  Laboratory analysis of soil samples did not detect targeted analytes at concentrations that exceed the applicable North Carolina MSCCs or SRGs.  Laboratory analysis of groundwater samples B-1 GW, B-2 GW, and S-1 GW detected targeted analytes at concentrations that exceed the NC2LGWQS and the DWM’s vapor screening level in B-2 GW. 5. RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the results of the assessment, ECS recommends the following:  Evidence of impacts to the site from historical on-site activities was not identified during the assessment based on the soil sampling or the existing on-site monitoring well.  Evidence of groundwater impacts from off-site sources was identified during the assessment, as the compounds detected were consistent with the off-site RECs, were detected in the perimeter groundwater samples near the off-site RECs, and were not detected in the soil samples or monitoring well located in the historical location of onsite operations.  If dewatering is required during site development, management of impacted groundwater will be necessary. Camden Road Site Charlotte, North Carolina ECS Project No. 08-10875-B September 9, 2015 4  Soil gas samples should be collected to assess the possibility of vapor intrusion into on-site buildings or proposed buildings.  ECS recommends that the current property owner be notified and that they submit a copy of the report to the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) for their review. 6. QUALIFICATIONS OF REPORT The activities and evaluative approaches used in this assessment are generally consistent with those normally employed in soil and groundwater assessment projects of this type. As the soil and groundwater sampling was conducted in conjunction with the geotechnical drilling and groundwater samples were collected though the augers instead of via temporary wells or a designated groundwater sampling probe, it is possible that cross contamination could have occurred. Our evaluation of site conditions has been based on our understanding of the site project information and the data obtained during our field activities. This report was prepared for the express use of Cousins Properties Incorporated. Use of this report by other individuals or companies implies their acceptance of the General Conditions of Service of the original contract. SITE SOURCE: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP: CHARLOTTE EAST DATED 2014 SCALE AS SHOWN FIGURE SITE LOCATION MAP CAMDEN ROAD SITE CAMDEN ROAD, SOUTH TRYON STREET, AND WEST PARK AVENUE CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA ECS PROJECT NO. 08-10875-B LEGEND 1 – Blush Boutique (vacant)/Black Sheep Skate Shop 2 – Modern Fabrics 3 – The Common Market/KM & Co. Salon 4 – 3PM Creative/Limerick Studios/Hot Sake 5 – Asterisk Creative/Gemini Studios/Cirrus Salon 6 – Paved Parking Area 7 – Paved Parking Area 8 – Unpaved Parking Area 9 – Multi-Tenant Residence 10 – Paved Parking Area 11 – Kee Auto Top Manufacturing Co. 12 – Elder Gallery 13 – Multi-Tenant Retail Building 14 – Adolfson & Peterson Construction 15 – Multi-Tenant Residence 16 – Charlotte Trolley/Charlotte Art League Gallery 17 – The Charlotte Post/Phat Burrito 18 – Multi-Tenant Office Building 19 – Multi-Tenant Residence 20 – Residences Approximate Location of Monitoring Well Approximate Site Boundary 1 7 6 5 4 3 2 10 12 11 13 8 9 19 20 SOURCE: GOOGLE EARTH 2014 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH (VIA THE INTENET) SCALE AS SHOWN FIGURE 2 SITE MAP CAMDEN ROAD SITE CAMDEN ROAD, SOUTH TRYON STREET, AND WEST PARK AVENUE CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA ECS PROJECT NO. 08-10875-B 14 15 16 17 18 SOURCE: MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS WEBSITE (VIA THE INTENET) NOT TO SCALE FIGURE 3 PARCEL MAP CAMDEN ROAD SITE CAMDEN ROAD, SOUTH TRYON ST.REET, AND WEST PARK AVENUE CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA ECS PROJECT NO. 08-10875-B Approximate Site Boundary LEGEND Existing Monitoring Well Soil Sample Temporary Groundwater Sample Approximate Site Boundary SOURCE: GOOGLE EARTH 2014 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH (VIA THE INTENET) SCALE AS SHOWN FIGURE 4 SAMPLE LOCATION MAP CAMDEN ROAD SITE CAMDEN ROAD, SOUTH TRYON STREET, AND WEST PARK AVENUE CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA ECS PROJECT NO. 08-10875-B B-1/ B-1GW S-1/ S-1GW B-2/ B-2GW B-5 S-2 S-3 MW-1 TABLE 1: SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS Camden Road Site Camden Road, South Tryon Street and West Park Drive, Charlotte, North Carolina ECS Project No. 08-10875-B Parameter Sample ID S-1 GW B-1 GW B-2 GW MW-1 Collection Date 1,1-Dichloroethane BRL 9.4 0.76 BRL 6 6,000 76.4 1,1-Dichloroethylene 3.4 13 11 BRL 7 7,000 39.1 1,2-Dichloroethane BRL BRL 1.2 BRL 0.4 400 22.4 Chloroform 0.76 BRL 0.97 BRL 70 70,000 8.14 Tetrachloroethylene (PCE)1.6 BRL 1.4 BRL 0.7 700 11.5 Trichloroethylene (TCE)BRL BRL 1.9 BRL 3 3,000 1.04 All Compounds BRL BRL BRL BRL NA NA NA Notes: Bold denotes concentration exceeds the applicable North Carolina NC2LGWQS Italics denotes concentration exceeds the applicable DWM Residential Vapor Intrusion Groundwater Screening Levels. Compounds not listed were not detected above the method reporting limit Results presented in micrograms per liter (ug/L), analogous to parts per billion (ppb) NC2LGWQS = North Carolina 2L Groundwater Quality Standards NCGCL = North Carolina Gross Contamination Level NA = Not Applicable BRL = Below Laboratory Reporting Limit North Carolina NC2LGWQS and GCLs obtained from North Carolina Groundwater Quality Standard (15A NCAC 2L .0202) dated April 16, 2012. North Carolina DWM Vapor Intrusion Screening levels from IHSB DWM Vapor Intrusion Screening Levels dated June 2014. Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS ANALYTICAL RESULTS NC2LGWQS (ug/L)NCGCL (ug/L) DWM Residential Vapor Intrusion Groundwater Screening Level (ug/L) Page 1 of 62 Page 2 of 62 Page 3 of 62 Page 4 of 62 Page 5 of 62 Page 6 of 62 Page 7 of 62 Page 8 of 62 Page 9 of 62 Page 10 of 62 Page 11 of 62 Page 12 of 62 Page 13 of 62 Page 14 of 62 Page 15 of 62 Page 16 of 62 Page 17 of 62 Page 18 of 62 Page 19 of 62 Page 20 of 62 Page 21 of 62 Page 22 of 62 Page 23 of 62 Page 24 of 62 Page 25 of 62 Page 26 of 62 Page 27 of 62 Page 28 of 62 Page 29 of 62 Page 30 of 62 Page 31 of 62 Page 32 of 62 Page 33 of 62 Page 34 of 62 Page 35 of 62 Page 36 of 62 Page 37 of 62 Page 38 of 62 Page 39 of 62 Page 40 of 62 Page 41 of 62 Page 42 of 62 Page 43 of 62 Page 44 of 62 Page 45 of 62 Page 46 of 62 Page 47 of 62 Page 48 of 62 Page 49 of 62 Page 50 of 62 Page 51 of 62 Page 52 of 62 Page 53 of 62 Page 54 of 62 Page 55 of 62 Page 56 of 62 Page 57 of 62 Page 58 of 62 Page 59 of 62 Page 60 of 62 Page 61 of 62 Page 62 of 62 ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NUMBER:OWNERCousins Properties, Inc.191 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 500Atranta, Georgia 30303This document is the product and exclusive property of Duda/PaineArchitects, P.A. Neither the document nor the information it containsmay be copied, disclosed to others or used in connection with anywork or project other than the specific project for which they havebeen prepared and developed without the written consent ofDuda/Paine Architects, P.A.‹&RS\ULJKW'XGD3DLQH$UFKLWHFWV3$ARCHITECT OF RECORDLS3P227 West Trade Street, Suite 700Charlotte, North Carolina 28202DESIGN ARCHITECTDuda|Paine Architects, LLP333 Liggett StreetDurham, North Carolina 27701STRUCTURAL ENGINEERBrockette/Davis/Drake, Inc.4144 North Central Expy., Suite 110Dallas, Texas 75204CIVIL ENGINEERColeJenest & Stone200 South Tryon Street, Suite 1400Charlotte, North Carolina 28202MEP ENGINEERNewcomb & Boyd303 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 525Atlanta, Georgia 303037/29/201621421URBAN REVIEW DOCUMENTSDIMENSIONAL PLACE 1515 South Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28203MARKDATEDESCRIPTIONCJS PROJECT NUMBER:4432NcThe drawings, the project manual and the design shown theron areinstruments of ColeJenest & Stone, P.A.. The reproduction orunauthorized use of the documents without consent of ColeJenest &Stone, P.A. is prohibited.ColeJenest & Stone, P.A. 2016110/19/16MECKLENBURG COUNTY -FOOTINGS & FOUNDATIONS210/28/16CITY OF CHARLOTTE & NCDOT COMMENTS311/22/16FOR CONSTRUCTION ONLY412/01/16CITY OF CHARLOTTE & NCDOT COMMENTSC-4010SCALE:20'10'40'1"=20'NEROSIONCONTROL PLAN- PHASE II DNDNISSUE DATE:PROJECT NUMBER:OWNERCousins Properties, Inc.191 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 500Atranta, Georgia 30303This document is the product and exclusive property of Duda/PaineArchitects, P.A. Neither the document nor the information it containsmay be copied, disclosed to others or used in connection with anywork or project other than the specific project for which they havebeen prepared and developed without the written consent ofDuda/Paine Architects, P.A.‹&RS\ULJKW'XGD3DLQH$UFKLWHFWV3$ARCHITECT OF RECORDLS3P227 West Trade Street, Suite 700Charlotte, North Carolina 28202DESIGN ARCHITECTDuda|Paine Architects, LLP333 Liggett StreetDurham, North Carolina 27701STRUCTURAL ENGINEERBrockette/Davis/Drake, Inc.4144 North Central Expy., Suite 110Dallas, Texas 75204CIVIL ENGINEERColeJenest & Stone200 South Tryon Street, Suite 1400Charlotte, North Carolina 28202MEP ENGINEERNewcomb & Boyd303 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 525Atlanta, Georgia 303037/29/201621421URBAN REVIEW DOCUMENTSDIMENSIONAL PLACE 1515 South Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28203MARKDATEDESCRIPTIONCJS PROJECT NUMBER:4432NcThe drawings, the project manual and the design shown theron areinstruments of ColeJenest & Stone, P.A.. The reproduction orunauthorized use of the documents without consent of ColeJenest &Stone, P.A. is prohibited.ColeJenest & Stone, P.A. 2016110/19/16MECKLENBURG COUNTY -FOOTINGS & FOUNDATIONS210/28/16CITY OF CHARLOTTE & NCDOT COMMENTS311/22/16FOR CONSTRUCTION ONLY412/01/16CITY OF CHARLOTTE & NCDOT COMMENTSC-500GRADING ANDDRAINAGEPLAN0SCALE:20'10'40'1"=20'N NCNHDE-2617 December 12, 2016 Alexandra Perillo ECS Carolinas, LLP 6714 Netherlands Drive Wilmington, NC 28405 RE: 49-1836-A; NPDES Permit Application NC 0089656 Dear Alexandra Perillo: The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above. A query of the NCNHP database, based on the project area mapped with your request, indicates that there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our records. The attached ‘Potential Occurrences’ table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been documented within a one-mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists and is included for reference. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed area within a one-mile radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report. Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission. The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve (DNP), Registered Heritage Area (RHA), Clean Water Management Trust Fund (CWMTF) easement, or Federally-listed species are documented near the project area. If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please contact Suzanne Mason at suzanne.mason@ncdcr.gov or 919.707.8637. Sincerely, NC Natural Heritage Program Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area 49-1836-A Project No. NPDES Permit Application NC 0089656 December 12, 2016 NCNHDE-2617 Element Occurrences Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area Taxonomic Group EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last Observation Date Element Occurrence Rank Accuracy Federal Status State Status Global Rank State Rank Bird 32170 Falco peregrinus anatum American Peregrine Falcon 2015-06 E 2-High ---Endangered G4T4 S1B,S2 N Freshwater Bivalve 7236 Lasmigona decorata Carolina Heelsplitter 1880-Pre X 3-Medium Endangered Endangered G1 S1 Mammal 20386 Lasiurus intermedius floridanus Florida Yellow Bat 2000 D 1-Very High ---Special Concern G4G5T 4 S1 Vascular Plant 13743 Delphinium exaltatum Tall Larkspur 1800s Hi?5-Very Low ---Endangered G3 S2 Vascular Plant 28127 Echinacea pallida Pale Coneflower 1969-06 H 3-Medium ---Significantly Rare Disjunct G4 S1 No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area Managed Areas Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type Mecklenburg County Open Space Mecklenburg County Local Government Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on December 12, 2016; source: NCNHP, Q3 October 2016. Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database. Page 2 of 3 Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Page 3 of 3