20041934 Ver 1_Complete File_20051018

t
W AT
? r
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
January 12, 2005
Helen T. Lattimore
3122 Eton Road
Raleigh, CN 27608
Subject Property: Peyton Hall Subdivision
UT Rocky Creek
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
DWQ Project # 04-1934
Wake County
Page 1 of 4
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification and Authorization Certificate per the Neuse
River Buffer Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233) with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Lattimore:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to
place fill within or otherwise impact 198 feet of perennial streams, 95 feet of intermittent
streams, 18,245 square feet (ft) Zone 1 buffers and 12,272 square feet (ft) Zone 2 of protected
riparian buffers for the purpose of constructing a residential subdivision at the subject property,
as described within your application dated December2, 2004 and received by the N.C. Division
of Water Quality (DWQ) on December 2, 2004. After reviewing your application, we have
decided that the impacts are covered by General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3402
(GC3402). The Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) 39 when issued by the
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This letter shall also act as your approved
Authorization Certificate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers per 15A NCAC 213 .0233.
In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal, state or local
permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and
Sediment Control, and Non-discharge regulations. Also, this approval to proceed with your
proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application shall
expire upon expiration of the 404 Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change
your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and
is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in
the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may
be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the
conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
401 Oversight/Express Review Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] /Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
Ny` Carolina
Noatirmlly
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Helen Lattimore
Page 2 of 4
January 12, 2005
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
Impacts Approved - The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other
specific and general conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No
other impacts are approved including incidental impacts:
Amount Approved
(Units) Plan Location or Reference
Stream - Perennial 198 (feet)
Stream - Intermittent 95 (feet)
Buffers - Zone 1 18,245 (square ft.)
Buffers - Zone 2 12,272 (square ft.)
2. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices - Erosion and sediment control practices must be in
full compliance with all specifications governing the proper design, installation and operation
and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in order to protect surface waters
standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed,
installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the
North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion
control measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified
in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and
waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits
associated with the project. .
3. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind - No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind
shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the footprint of the impacts
depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification. All construction activities, including the
design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best
Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality
standards, statutes, or rules occur.
4. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters - Sediment and
erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent
practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters
is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of
the date that the Division of Land Resources has released the project.
5. Certificate of Completion - Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water
Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the
applicant is required to return the attached certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands
Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC,
27699-1650.
f ,
Helen Lattimore
Page 3 of 4
January 12, 2005
6. Written Stormwater Management Plan - An additional condition is that a final, written
stormwater management plan (including a signed and notarized Operation and
Maintenance Agreement) shall be approved in writing by this Office before the impacts
specified in this Certification occur per Condition No. 4 in GC No. 3402. The Stormwater
management plan must include plans and specifications for stormwater management-
facilities that are appropriate for surface waters classified as Class C and designed to
remove 85% TSS according to the most recent version of the NC DENR Stormwater Best
Management Practices Manual. These facilities must be designed to treat the runoff from
the entire project, unless otherwise explicitly approved by the Division of Water Quality.
Also, before any permanent building is occupied at the subject site, the facilities (as
approved by this Office) shall be constructed and operational, and the stormwater
management plan (as approved by this Office) shall be implemented. The structural
stormwater practices as approved by this Office as well as drainage patterns must be
maintained in perpetuity. No changes to the structural stormwater practices shall be made
without written authorization from the Division of Water Quality.
7. Deed of Notification - Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all
retained jurisdictional wetlands, waters and protective buffers in order to assure
compliance for future wetland, water and buffer impact. These mechanisms shall be put
in place prior to impacting any wetlands, waters and/or buffers approved for impact under
this Certification Approval and Authorization Certificate. A sample deed notification can
be downloaded from the 401/Wetlands Unit web site at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/newetiands.
8. Compensatory Mitigation Using the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) -
Mitigation must be provided for the proposed impacts as specified in the table below. We
understand that you wish to make a payment to the Wetlands Restoration Fund
administered by the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) to meet this mitigation
requirement. This has been determined by the DWQ to be a suitable method to meet the
mitigation requirement. Until the EEP receives and clears your check (made payable to:
DENR - Ecosystem Enhancement Program Office), no impacts specified in this
Authorization Certificate shall occur. The EEP should be contacted at [phone] if
you have any questions concerning payment into a restoration fund. You have one month
from the date of this approval to make this payment. For accounting purposes, this
Authorization Certificate authorizes payment into the Wetlands Restoration Fund
to meet the following compensatory mitigation requirement:

Compensatory Mitigation
Required River and Sub-basin
Number
Stream 198 (feet)
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may
result in criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed
impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this
Certification, shall expire upon expiration of the 404 Permit.
Helen Lattimore
Page 4 of 4
January 12, 2005
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved
wetland or stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60
days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which
conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its
conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the
approved buffer impacts) shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The
Director's decision is subject to review as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 150B.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean
Water Act and the Neuse riparian buffer protection rule as described within 15A NCAC 2B
.0233. If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-9646 or Bob
Zarzecki at 919-733-9726.
Sincerely,
AWK/bs
Enclosures: GC 3402
Certificate of Completion
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
d1o cc: Sean Clark, S&EC, Inc., 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27587
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
N.C. Ecosystem Enhancement Program
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 04-1934 Peyton Hall Subdivision (Wake) 401 NBR
?OF W ATFRQ Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
401 Water Quality Certification
Summary of Permitted Impacts and Mitigation Requirements
In accordance with 15A NCAC 211.0500, Helen T. Lattimore has permission as outlined below
to impact 293 linear feet of streams for the purpose(s) of constructing the proposed Peyton Hall
Subdivision in Wake County. All activities associated with these authorized impacts must be
conducted with the conditions listed in the attached Permit transmittal letter. THIS PERMIT IS
NOT VALID WITHOUT THE ATTACHMENTS.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS, ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT
PROGRAM
DWQ Project No.: 04-1934
DATE: January 12, 2005
LOCATION: Cary
COUNTY: Wake
BASIN/ SUB BASIN/ STREAM INDEX: 03-04-02 / 27-28
As required by 15A NCAC 211.0500, and the conditions of this Permit, you are required to
compensate for the above impacts through the restoration, creation, enhancement or preservation
of wetlands and surface waters as outlined below prior to conducting any activities that impact or
degrade the waters of the state.
Note: Acreage requirements proposed to be mitigated through the Ecosystem Enhancement
Program must be rounded to one-quarter acre increments and linear foot requirements must be
rounded up to the nearest foot according to 15 2R.0503(b).
Impacts:
293 ft streams (198 ft perennial & 95 ft intermittent)
Mitigation:
198 ft perennial streams
Note: While DWQ is only requiring a 1:1 mitigation ratio, the USACE will most likely require a
2:1 ratio. As such, the total mitigation required by the applicant will most likely be 396 ft of
perennial stream.
In correspondence dated December 22, 2004, the EEP indicated that up to 396 linear feet of
mitigation will be conducted by EEP if necessary.
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] / Internet: htto://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
NehCarolina
?t?rttrra!!?
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Helen T. Lattimore
Page 2 of 3
January 12, 2005
One of the options you have available to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirement is
through the payment of a fee to the Wetlands Restoration Fund per NCAC 2R.0503. If you
choose this option, please sign this form and mail it to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program at
the address below. An invoice for the appropriate amount of payment will be sent to you upon
receipt of this form. PLEASE NOTE, THE ABOVE IMPACTS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED
UNTIL YOU RECEIVE NOTIFICATION THAT YOUR PAYMENT HAS BEEN
PROCESSED BY THE ECOSYTEM ENHANCMENT PROGRAM.
Signature Date
ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
1619 Mail Service Center
RALEIGH, N.C. 27669-1619
[phone]
Filename: 04-1934

Helen T. Lattimore
Page 2 of 3
January 12, 2005
One of the options you have available to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirement is
through the payment of a fee to the Wetlands Restoration Fund per NCAC 2R.0503. If you
choose this option, please sign this form and mail it to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program at
the address below. An invoice for the appropriate amount of payment will be sent to you upon
receipt of this form. PLEASE NOTE, THE ABOVE IMPACTS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED
UNTIL YOU RECEIVE NOTIFICATION THAT YOUR PAYMENT HAS BEEN
PROCESSED BY THE ECOSYTEM ENHANCMENT PROGRAM.
Signature Date
ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
1619 Mail Service Center
RALEIGH, N.C. 27669-1619
[phone]
Filename: 04-1934
Re: Peyton Hall Subdivision - DWQ Project No. 04-1934
Subject: Re: Peyton Hall Subdivision - DWQ Project No. 04-1934
From Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 14:18:51 -0400
To: [e-mail]
Ron - based on the information you've provided, we've determined that you've
satisfied Condition 46 of the 401 issued on Jan 12, 2005, and a separate stormwater
plan will not be required. I'll put this note in the file as confirmation.
Ron Hendricks wrote:
Thanks,
Ron Hendricks
Piedmont Land Design, LLP
8522-204 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
[phone]
[phone] Fax
ronhypiedmontlanddesign.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Cyndi Karoly [mailto:cyndi.]carolyGncmail.net]
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 12:01 PM
To: ronhgpiedmontlanddesign.com
Subject: Re: Peyton Hall Subdivision - DWQ Project No. 04-1934
It hasn't made it to the file. Can you e-mail a copy of your letter?
Ron Hendricks wrote:
Cyndi,
I wanted to follow up with you regarding a letter we sent to you on March
31. This letter states that a stormwater management plan is not required
for
DWQ since we are less than 30% impervious area. Of course we still have to
comply with the City of Raleigh stormwater requirements.
We are getting ready to submit for girding permit with the City of Raleigh
and we need to be sure no additional approvals are needed from DWQ so that
we can advise the City.
Please let me know where this stands.
Thanks for your help.
Ron Hendricks
Piedmont Land Design, LLP
8522-204 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
[phone]
[phone] Fax
ronh,32iedmontlanddesign.com
1 of 2 4/20/2005 2:19 PM
PL Piedmont Land Design, LLP
8522-204 Six Forks Road • Raleigh, NC 27615 [phone] • Fax: (919) 845-
7703
March 31, 2005
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Unit n ?j?/J(? D
1650 Mail Service Center IuA?( ?:/ L5 D
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650 APR 2 0 2005
Attention: Cyndi Karoly ?'rt pSgNp SWATER ??c1? QUALITY
Reference: Peyton Hall Subdivision
DWQ Project No. 04-1934
Dear Ms. Karoly:
Condition No. 6 of the approval letter we received for this project requires the submission of a
written Stormwater Management Plan. This condition references Condition No. 4 of General
Certification No. 3402, which states a stormwater management plan shall be required for all
projects where the impervious area exceeds 30%. Enclosed are the impervious area calculations,
which shows that the impervious area for this project is 29.4%. On behalf of the property owner,
we are hereby requesting that you confirm in writing that this project is not required to provide a
stormwater management plan since the project does not exceed 30% impervious area. The project
is required to comply with the City of Raleigh stormwater regulations, which requires controlling
the rate of runoff to pre-development rates for the 2 and 10-year storm and nitrogen reduction
and/or payment of a fee. We will be providing dry ponds to reduce the rate of runoff. Level
spreaders will be provided at the outlet for the 1" rainfall event for the dry detention ponds in
accordance with the City of Raleigh standards.
Please call if you have any questions or need any additional information.
Sincerely,
Ron Hendricks
PHCX RPH: rph
cc: Richard Stockett
Kelly Race
Sean Clark
Enclosure
PLD
PL Piedmont Land Design, LLP
8522-204 Six Forks Road • Raleigh, NC 27615 • [phone] • Fax: (919) 845-
7703
March 31, 2005
Peyton Hall
Stillmeadow Drive and Wedgewood Road
Raleigh, North Carolina
Impervious Area Calculations
Total Site Area = 42.06 acres
Impervious Areas
jg?g'VJA?
APR 2 0 2005
DENR-VJATER? ?BRAI?CN
h'rE1W IDS Rio STORI.t
Lot 1 36,500 sf
Lot 2 - 116 (2,500 sf each) 287,500 sf
Pump Station and Drive 3,600 sf
RiLght of Way 211,400 sf
Total 539,000 sf
12.37 acres
Impervious Area Percentage = (12.37/42.06) 100 = 29.41 %
Since the percentage of impervious area is less than 30%, no stormwater measures are required to
meet Division of Water Quality or U.S. Army Corps of Engineers requirements. However
stormwater measures are required to meet the City of Raleigh stormwater quantity control
requirements. Dry detention ponds will be provided to meet this requirement.
PHCX RPH:rph
Civil Engineers • Landscape Architects • Land Planners
mailbox: ///C l/D ocuments%20 and%20 S ett ings/bob_zarzecki/App 1 is at...
Subject: Re: Peyton Hall
From: Bob Zarzecki <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 12:31:59 -0500
To: Sean Clark <[e-mail]>
Sean,
Per your request the DWQ will place your application for Peyton Hall S/D (DWQ Project
No. 04-1934, S&EC Project No. 7726.W0) on hold until we receive confirmation from the
Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) that they are willing to accept the proposed
stream mitigation payment. Therefore, unless we receive the EEP confirmation, we will
have to move toward denial of your application as required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506 and
2B .0233(8) and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this
additional information. - Bob
Sean Clark wrote:
As per our discussion earlier today, I am requesting confirmation from the
NC-EEP that the Peyton Hall Project can satisfy the required stream
mitigation through payment to the EEP. Please place the project on hold
until I have received this confirmation. Once I have received the
confirmation I will forward it to you, at which time please reactivate the
project and proceed with processing the permit application. Please call me
with any questions.
Thanks
Sean Clark
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
919-846-5900
This electronic communication, including all attachments, is intended only
for the named addressee (s) and may contain confidential information. This
electronic communication may not have passed through our standard
review/quality control process. Design data and recommendations included
herein are provided as a matter of convenience and should not be used for
final design. Rely only on final, hardcopy materials bearing the
consultant's original signature and seal. If you are not the named
addressee (s), any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication is prohibited. If you have received this electronic
communication in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete
the original communication from your system. Thank you.
1 of 1 12/16/2004 12:32 PM
01/03/2005 11:58 FAT
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • 1
www_SandEC.com
Zc4v y
DATE:. A
TO: NAME: b z ?c xdso
COMPANY: 1-)C ?'-
FAX NUN BER:
-* DIVQ DORNEY 0001,'003
Consultants, PA.
'hone: [phone] 9 Pax: [phone]
Project N/u?m/ber: 77 X4.01
CC: ?Clni+l
t.l.S lq?
The following items are bein,; faxed. Number of pages including transmittal sheet:_
For Your Comments/Approval
Per Our Conversation
Please Advise
Would Like To Discus.
HARD COPY SENT:
US Regular Mail
Overnight
x For Your Information
Per Your Request
)Please Call
C Please Handle
Hand Delivery
- No Hard Copy Sent
I{EMAKKS:
V %-t c icy k i •. L? S / `?-tiJC ? ?l 4 Y CAj td ?` +^? W C - S , ?
2 /Z 120 5 C
IF YOU HAVE ANY PROBLEMS WITH THIS TRANSMISSION, PLEASE
CONTACT AT [phone].
*CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE*
This traustuission is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may coataiu
information that is privileged and couf dcatial. If the reader of this message is aot the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any disclosure, distributioa or copying of this information is strictly prohibited If you have received this
transmission iv error, please notify us immediately by telephone and return the fazed docuwents to us at the above address
via the United States Postal Service.
Cr mhnre Offt'
rLdn?_re n c' 3817-E Lawndale Drive
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C Greensboro, NC 27455
Concord, NC 28025 Phone:: [phone]
Phnne: [phone] "
JAN-3-2005 MOH 11 :30 TEL:[phone] HAME:DWO-WETLANDS P.? 1?
Environmental
FACSIMILE SHEET
FAX NO. (919) 84:6-94:67
U1%U3;2U05 11:58 FAX
Y
co stem
PROGRAM
NQ DORNEY f?0U2/U08
i •
DEC 2 g ,
December 22, 2004
Sean Clark
Soil a.: Environmental Consultants, Pa
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Project: Peyton Hall Residen,ial Subdivision
County: Wake
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC ):EP) is
willing to accept payment for stream impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that the
decision by the NC EEP to accept the mitigation requirements of this project does not assure that this payment
will be approved by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Division of Water Quality Wetlands/401
Unit. It is the responsibility of the allplicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NC EEP for
impacts associated with this project i ? appropriate.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter- If we have not received a copy of the issued
404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's
responsibility to send copies of the 4041401 to NC EEP. Once NC EEP receives a copy of the 404 Permit and/or
the 401 Certification an invoice will l)e issued.
Based on the information supplied b3 you on the in lieu fee request form dated December 16, 2004, the stream
restoration that is necessary to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project is sutmnatized in
the following table. The maximum amount of mitigation that the NC EEP will accept for this project is also
indicated in this table.
Riparian Wetlands Non-Riparian Wetlands
i.,,. -) 1 (.icres)
Stream
(linear fee
[s 1!IS
ition Maximum 3!)6
The stream mitigation will be providi:d as specified in the 401 Water Quality Certification and/or Section 404
Permit for impacts associated with t1`.- referenced project in Cataloging Unit 03020201 of the Neuse River Basin.
The mitigation will be performed in .ccordance with the Memorandum of Agreement between the N. C.
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N. C. Department
of Transportation signed July 22, 200.
?ICDENR
r3orth Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Frogram, 1619 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27609-1619/1319-733-5206 /vAm.nceeo. net

JAN-3-2005 1`1014 11:30 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 2
01/03/9-005 11:59 FAX y DWQ DORNEI U 003 003
Sean Clark
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
December 22, 2004
Page 2.
If you have any questions or need adilitional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone].
S' cerely,
?!
William D. Gilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi KaroIy, Wetlands/401 Unit
Jennifer Burdette, U'SACOE•Raleigh
Eric Kulz, DWQ Regional Office-Raleigh
File
R.e.StoriGi?5... E dm"... RrotPGtGlL 0" Statue 1CDENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1619 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1619 / 919-733-52x8 / www.n:eep.not
JAN-3-2005 I110N 11:30 TEL:919733E893 HAND D1,10-WETLANDS P. 3
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Raleigh. North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
DENR -VA!
NCDENR-DWQ
Attn: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Parkview Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
US Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Ms. Andrea Wade
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road
Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27615
RE: Request for NWP 39 / 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Compliance
Peyton Hall Residential Subdivision
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Karoly and Ms. Wade:
On behalf of Helen T. Lattimore (property owner), we request authorization from the US
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to utilize Nationwide Permit 39 for construction of
the proposed Peyton Hall Residential Subdivision. We also request written concurrence
from the NC Division of Water Quality (NC-DWQ) that the project complies with the
Neuse Basin Riparian Buffer Rules and GC 3402, the 401-Water Quality Certification
associated with Nationwide Permit 39. A Pre-construction Notification Application
(PCN) is attached, as well as an agent authorization form.
Location
The site is approximately 38-acres and is located in northeast Raleigh, Wake County, NC
immediately east of where Wedgewood Drive currently stubs off. Wedgewood Drive
intersects Hew Hope Road (SR 2036) from the east at a point approximately 2000 feet
due south of the intersection of New Hope Road and Buffalo Road (SR 2215). Figure 1
shows the location of the site on a USGS topographic quadrangle.
Project History
S&EC delineated the wetlands, streams, and buffers onsite in June of 2003. A site
meeting was held with Ms. Debbie Edwards of the NC-DWQ on June 26, 2003 (NBRRO
03-209). Two site meetings were held with the USACE. The first USACE meeting was
with Ms. Andrea Wade on July 10, 2003 and was held for the purpose of obtaining a
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
r
DEC t' '? December 2, 2004
S&EC Project #7726.W0
December 2, 2004
S&EC Project 7726.W0
Page 3
area between NB-3 and N134 is required and can not be obtained without a stream
crossing. If either crossing shown on NB-3 or NB-4 is deleted, the resulting cul-de-sac
will exceed the City's cul-de-sac length requirement and will also not allow for the
interconneetivity that the City is requiring. The NB-4 impact is to an intermittent stream
that has already been impacted (i.e. gullied and straightened) in the past from the utility
corridors that it runs through.
The proposed project will exceed 30% impervious at the completion of the project.
Although a formal stormwater plan is not being submitted with this application, one will
follow after the 401 and 404 have been issued and the project is closer to construction.
The project engineer has set aside areas for stormwater devices that should be adequate to
meet the 85% TSS removal. We ask that the 401 be issued with a special condition
that states that a stormwater management plan must be approved by the NC-DWQ
before the 401 is valid and before any site construction proceeds.
Mitip,ation
As discussed above, the purpose of the site meeting held with Ms. Jennifer Burdette of
the USACE was to determine which stream impacts would require mitigation and what
ratio would be applied to those that did require mitigation. It was determined that
impacts depicted on sheets NB-2 and NB-3 would require stream mitigation at a 2:1 ratio
and the impact shown on sheet N134 would not require mitigation. Payment to the NC-
EEP is proposed to satisfy the stream mitigation requirement. No wetland mitigation is
required because no wetland impacts are proposed. No buffer mitigation is proposed
because the buffer impacts that result from the road crossings are less than 1/3 acre each
and are therefore considered an "allowable" activity. Given the 2:1 mitigation ratio,
stream mitigation totaling 396 LF is required.
Please call or email me at SClark9,SandEC.com if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
JL?
Sean Clark
Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
Pre-construction (PCN) notification form
Agent Authorization
USGS Site Vicinity Map
Soil Survey Site Vicinity Map
Wetland Impact Maps (5 sheets)
$475 check for 401 processing
Office Use Only. Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
_ nwr- A-._1:__L l„rr -, It AT/A It
(11 any particular item is not appucaoie to uns pivicct, yic.-c cnu.i
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here:
If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Helen T. Lattimore
Mailing Address: 3122 Eton Road
Raleigh, NC 27608
Telephone Number: 782-0131 Fax Number: not available
E-mail Address: not available
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Sean Clark
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh NC 27614
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: SClark(a-)SandEC com
Page I of 9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Peyton Hall Residential Subdivision
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 173509063058 & 173509063722
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Raleigh
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Peyton Hall
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): The site is approximately 38
acres and is located in northeast Raleigh Wake County NC immediatelv east of where
Wedaewood Drive currently stubs off. Wedgewood Drive intersects Hew Hope Road (SR
2036) from the east at a point approximately 2000 feet due south of the intersection of New
Hope Road and Buffalo Road (SR 2215). Figure 1 shows the location of the site on a USGS
topographic quadrangle.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 035"49'37.23"N, 078"33'34.66"W (NB-2)
035"49'36.74"N 078"33'40.90"W (NB-3)
035"49'38.60'N 078"33'45.61"W (NB-4)
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): +/- 38 acres
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): UT to Rocky Creek
8. River Basin: Neuse River Basin
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 2 of 9
Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Currently the property is primarily wooded with a large Power
line easement oriented north to south bisecting the property. Several ATV trails are present
on the site At the time the adjacent Rebel Acres residential subdivision was built
(proximately mid 1960's) Stonewall Drive and Wedgewood Drive were graded in beyond
the end of the paved surfaces These graded areas extend onto the subject property but do not
cross any jurisdictional or buffered areas With exception to the property immediately south
of the proposed subdivision the surrounding properties are residential subdivision.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
proposed project is a single-family residential subdivision with utilities typically required by
residential subdivisions The City of Raleigh is requiring that the subdivision's streets tie
into existing adjacent road stubs The project will require three road crossings in order to
connect to these existing stubs Typical heavy machinery required for grading etc. will be
used on this project
Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed work is to meet the
demand for additional housing in the area The project will connect the roads and utilities of
the surrounding similar residential subdivisions and will thereby provide the City of Raleigh
with interconnectivity and alternate routes for emergency vehicles.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date pen-nits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
S&EC delineated the wetlands streams and buffers onsite in June of 2003. A site meeting was
held with Ms Debbie Edwards of the NC-DWQ on June 26, 2003 (NBRRO 03-209). Two site
meetings were held with the USACE The first USACE meeting was with Ms. Andrea Wade
and was held for the purpose of obtaining a jurisdictional determination. The second site
meeting was held with Ms Jennifer Burdette to determine which stream impacts on the property
will require mitigation. Ms Burdette detennined that the crossings shown on the attached NB-2
and NB -3 sheets would require stream mitigation at a 2.1 ratio The crossing shown on sheet
NB -4 was determined to be intennittent and will not require mitigation. No 401 or 404 permits
have been previously issued for this site.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permits are known to be required for the subject property at this time.
Page 3 of 9
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, pennanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intennittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The proposed impacts that will result from
the project will result solely from road crossings. The road crossings will impact stream
channels and their associated buffers. The project does not propose any wetland impacts. Total
Stream impacts will total 293 linear feet of which 198 linear feet are perennial (i.e. require
stream mitigation) and 95 linear feet are intermittent (i.e. do not require stream mitigation).
1. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at htty://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: +/- 0.2 acre
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0
2. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please specify)
N13-2 Culvert 103 UT to Rocky Creek +1-5 perennial
NB-3 Culvert 95 UT to Rocky Creek +1-5 perennial
N134 Culvert 95 UT to Rocky Creek +/-3 intermittent

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
Page 4 of 9
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several interact sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.coin,
www.mapquest. com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 293 LF (198 LF to
perennial and 95 LF to intermittent)
3. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
*
* Area of
I
Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody
sound
pond
estuary
lake

Site Number
Type of Impact
mpact
(if applicable) ,
,
,
,
(indicate on ma) (acres) bay, ocean, etc.)
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
A'
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not hmtted to: fill, excavation, dre gmg,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The impacts that will result from the proposed residential subdivision will result from the
installation of required roads No general lot fill is proposed. The site contains very little
wetland area and what is present has been avoided completely. The three road crossings that are
being requested will connect to existing road stubs on adiacent properties The City of Raleigh is
requiring that the roads on the property connect to these existing stubs for interconnecttvity
purposes All three crossings have minimized impacts by crossing at perpendicular angles and
by using headwalls to decrease the footprint of the road crossings.
Page 5 of 9
The crossing shown on sheet NB-2 is required to connect to the existing road stub on the
northern property line. This crossing also connects the northeastern portion of the property to the
rest of the project.
The crossings shown on sheets NB-3 and NB-4 are required to connect the existing Stonewall
Drive to the rest of the proposed project. In order to avoid additional im2acts to a perennial
stream and or impacts to the confluence of two streams (area south of the NB-4 impact) the
alignment of Stonewall Drive as it enters the property was shifted to the north of the previously
recorded easement, which is depicted on the USGS map and was partially graded in during the
Rebel Acres construction in the 1960's. Access to the area between NB-3 and NB-4 is required
and can not be obtained without a stream crossing. If either crossing shown on NB-3 or NB-4 is
deleted, the resulting cul-de-sac will exceed the City's cul-de-sac length requirement and will
also not allow for the interconnectivity that the City is requiring. The NB-4 impact is to an
intermittent stream that has already been impacted (i.e. Bullied and straightened) in the past from
the utility corridors that it runs through.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/stnngide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
Page 6 of 9
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
As discussed above the purpose of the site meeting held with Ms. Jennifer Burdette of the
USACE was to determine which stream impacts would require mitigation and what ratio
would be applied to those that did require mitigation It was determined that impacts
depicted on sheets NB-2 and NB-3 would require stream mitigation at a 2:1 ratio and the
impact shown on sheet NB-4 would not require mitigation Payment to the NC-EEP is
proposed to satisfy the stream mitigation requirement No wetland mitigation is required
because no wetland impacts are proposed No buffer mitigation is proposed because the
buffer impacts that result from the road crossings are less than 1 /3 acre each and are therefore
considered an "allowable" activity.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional infonnation regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at littp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wm/index.litm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 396 LF
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres)
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
0
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by D`VQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Enviromnental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
Page 7 of 9
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
NB-2
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 7,155 3 0
2 5,277 1.5 0
Total 12,432 0
N B-3
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 5,865 3 0
2 3,990 1.5 0
Total 9,855 0
N B-4
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 5,225 3 0
2 3,005 1.5 0
Total I 8,230 I 0
" Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
Page 8 of 9
Buffer mitigation is not required because the buffer impacts that result from the road crossings
are less than 1/3 acre each and are therefore considered an "allowable" activity.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
The proposed project will exceed 30% impervious at the completion of the project. Although a
formal stormwater plan is not being submitted with this application one will follow after the 401
and 404 have been issued and the project is closer to construction. The project engineer has set
aside areas for stormwater devices that should be adequate to ineet the 85% TSS removal. We
ask that the 401 be issued with a special condition that states that a stormwater management plan
must be approved by the NC DWQ before the 401 is valid and before any site construction
proceeds.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The project will tie into the City of Raleigh sanitary sewer lines that are adjacent to the property
for sewer disposal.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
er 2
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Ralcigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandE.C.com
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In By The Current Landowner
Name: 6/C /C IJ ` A'f ;M O / C
Address: 31 of R a toll! rl ?a.?e i 9 a !n 0 8
Phone: !2E2t Q
Project Name/ Description: t) p- 4and
Date: &1Q&
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn:
Field Office:
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
1, the current gropea owner, hereby designate and authorize Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA to
act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request
supplemental information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The _ 26- s day of
Jt. r'?
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for
government officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC
to arrange a site meeting prior to visiting the site.
Print Property Owner's Name
cc: Mr. John Dorney
NCDENR - DWQ
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
? -0, - , . I C ? ?e Z-0
Pro erty Owner's Signature
cc: Mr. Sean Clark
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Hi .irn ffi
Charlotte Office: C',reensboro Office_ Mountain Lane
236 UPWWp Court, Suite C 3817-8 Lawndale Drive 6'i2Z 22 Coon n NC 28681
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] phone [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
06/26/2003 17:32 7875147 HOMEPLACES PAGE 02
?e6c.I f4 rGS 0:3 / /a G

i
zs -,?,
j?
t
ai• j\ /^ c
?J I \a
Older/.`/
?
? /_ a \\
? I.?l ?C?1 2
'
? ) ?? _ ??? I /
? r ? I
? ? {
?? r -?t `?•ts??1? ?,
i
L ? Iii ?•
?. -- ? I `r ? ?n r -
l 4215
o•?
Y ?i• L ) ,

.-/

4 ??? ?P

?2 u /

- I ¦?
'?? I J ` ? ?`
J
=twee
I
'??'
r
7a
.
,jl I
\\??
?
LL- u
(
9 'I
?vC ,?
l \ i
.-.Itt. 1 c t%
4
' "
' /? / 2 • ` \
\. I 250 i
\
I
\
• 1
'
`
? ? `? ?
??
1? ? ifs \
•
?
?
?
?
,
/ /
,? ;I
?:
li'
/-?
?
? ?•- 13 C ?
? ? `/
??, i
? ;
)/f ';?',r ?' Sa?rr? nK C_ '"??i-? t ? °`tt=•?/
I\?? Il J
r "/

?-,: - tf4
', _??
: ?, rt
} •=ti
!, -rte'

ice
/ ? o`
iI
.? J -J
?•?l- _ 2'
\ \G I ?9

-71 t 7F--
,

Project #:
7726
Figure 1 -Location Map
Project Mgr.: ® Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Sc Rebel Acres Subdivision NC 27614
- Raleigh
11010 Raven Ridge Rd
Scale: ,
.

V = 2,000'
Piedmont Land Design [phone] - [phone]
dEC
S

D
t .com
an
Web Page: www.
e:
a
6/0912003
Raleigh, Wake Co., NC
°
\ \ \\ \ \ l \? \ \ \ t ?? II k/ >
00
/ Q Z N L I I
1 tX II
7-/ (3)0
N, L
/ W W
ui J C?
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ I N Irk 1 1 I 1 / O F- Q
\ \\\\ \ \ \\\\ \\ 1\?\ I I III 1 /? //lll ?// /// ,//? / a o CD
\ o
\ \? \\\ \\ \\.\?? \\\ \\? \ \I //,? / __/ /rl ii i,//loll 14/11 I`?rl / / I I1 \ F
\ \ ` ?`.\ ?\ \ \?\ \, !i 'ii I \I ,Ili?'il Ili?ll// III ,/, I r I o
: _ v r0
/ // I/, // 1 I I l l ?? / `/ 111,iJJ 111 I I? v v v o O
j`/? IIII \\\\ \\\ \` \ \
/"A l ? 1\\ \\? \\ \?\\ \\\ I' I
-71
'I't b
Lli
- ?\-_. \
111111 Jill, ti I _j
40. LLJ
1 ?, \ I 1 // //,/ _ l I 0
0 V)
c Q0
Illl I zm I??j?? I d \?` III III I? t> ,? = it U6
oN
I /
/\\\ il,lll I?IIIII? \1 t\ { (/,.?/// / \ 1 \\\ IIII ' / '_ _ %??v/ 0 Q
\ 1 4 r II?1 We I I? / I I 1 I l?;/ j /? ?\ \ \ I-? / 1 0-) Z_
?\ \ \? ?lllillllo IIII 1 \ I / // 71 I I ?? 11 I I I / _% C)-)
J
I ? ?\) III \ - Id ( \ \ 0
IIII / // _1 ?1 I I
\ -? ? ? ? \ Q , 11 I I , W
LL Ln
?'? 1 / / /`' / ? ?/, s ?-? ??\?`?? ? III /.. // / ?' //• = a `- ?
Ii) J = Z
\ t I I // '/- l rlli II I I / /-- - f J Z S
? V v v v\ V v ? I l I I//// %?// / ? ?? ??/ I I II I I/ Z I II -I I W Q ?_
\ 1 \?\\ \ / I/ ,II l ? '_?? _ ?? \ \?? I"((? 4)11111- 1-H I / 1?1 •\1 W J
1 l\V AAV1 All 1?1 I / Illllll///i/_ - v? V I,I />1\ I 1 1 I ?? ?"' ;>
/ / \\ 11 \ \ 1\ I
\ \ \ \ \ 1 I I 1 ? lI II I ? LI II?11111 III ?a. \ . 1 ' I? l? / / / I I I I I ? / / ///// ? O
/? // I/ l/ f?l/ II '11111111 1111 /\ \ 1 I
\Q ,/ ?// IIII \ 11 !Ill lll\ 1111 ??\?\ I \\\\ \ 1 I? 1 l? 11 I I' I I // /?/i// r? Z
I 1 /?// // 11\\... \\1? \11111 I\\ 1 111.;11 1\ I \ III III / III 'li I I // I ..
,? \ ?` ''\ 111 1 1 1 I 1 ? III 111 II ? I? I ? I ? ?
r I ?\ _ \ \ ? ?\ ?? \I \ \\\\ \\\1 \111 - I ! 1 1_ 11 ? 1 ?? 111 I 1 \ / 11 I I / / I I +_s
\ ?.\? Q\ \ \ \ \\`? 11 \ \\?\\\\;? \\ \ , / I / / X ?I 1 ?1\ 111 I 11 I r I 1 I ` O
'o f L)
I 1 \11\ ? ?` k ? Ilt^\ w \ 111, /,I /I III I / 1 ? .. ?
??? ?tl?(, 1 ? \1?` I \\1 \ \ I ? r / \\ \ II / / / I ? 11 I t 1 1 \ I
EU\\Z.°i€I I I I_ \ \ \\?\ 11\1?? \\?\' _ \11 I 111 %/ / // i / /? ll a I
1\ M CC\ I ???? ? \`\\\?\ 11 \ \ t'? \ I \ I l l 1// // I I\1 No 0
?'jf \?\3?` ??\\? \ \ \ /',I'I,I jj?l \ II II j1 1 I'll?(jj / Jl 1 ( ) / / O
w o ,?\ \ \\ 11 1 / / ?` I I I /
Of
p Q ?' - _ 1 \\ \ 1 \ i? , / / , /_ 11 \\\\ 11 / /II III 1 I I r / , / cn
U) Aa- -Y
\' \\ 1 \\\ 1\\ ?ill? ?, ./ T1111111 ?'/ I ?' ?
QvJ? 11 1 I y r'y?/ l ?- II 4!„// 11)II O
Ills( V A 111 \A, 31f l,1 // i' IIII IIII II I), ,?1/ / I I ( ?/
??'- ,3 7 \ \\? \\\?/?l/( 11 I r ? ? 1 Ill 11 I ,?" ?/ 1 l 1 I / / / _J
rip I! // / - - - ?\ I III 111 \1` l l // / / I / I \ / X
v\ v II 1 I f? / I I
I I 1 IIII 1 // I 1 /
u? v, A\ 1 V II v I 11 AA\ I??'°\?(??/ I I Ill V I 11\
li' I I\\ II\ 11 1? 11 1 111 \\ v,y, / v
jj W v v v\ INI
= 111 I\ \\? \\\ \ \j'a? / I I ( \ \\ 1 1\ - O O
J` 1111 II I I I \ 1 \ \\ ? I \/- I
V LL. ice- a,Q? \`\?\\ 1 I? ?I ( I / I I Il 1 \ \\ \ \\ \\\ \\ _??'?%%/ I \I \ \\ J, .? ?O
O??u- •-\\ I Illl 111 \(/ 00
Q- 11 \ l\\\ll 11\ \?\? \ I I
0
N
O
Q
> Q
>
Q
--
Q
oo
m
C? O
L U O
? U > U II W
z
Li Q
LLJ Q O af o
W
cD
:E
N

0
o W
o
(f) LU .. Ili
W W 1i1 Q N O t- Q
CIL, J z Ln z r-
r O O N O a. ocn o
U )l N r-: N Sri I- N
1 1
\ \ 1
\ \ 1
} \ 1
1 \
I \ 1
\
11 \ t\
x
I `\ I /
I\ \ I /
?11 I I rl
I 1
I I I I
I (
,I I I
11 I ! ? I
I I I 1 I 1 j ? /? I /
1 I I I / I I I/ ? l
? I 1 I I / I I I I / I
I I / I I I I ? ? ?
\ I / I I I I / 1
\ \\ i I ( 111 I / r
1 \ \ I } 111 / 1 /
(
\ \ 1 \ I I / II// /'' / I
? \\ I I \ 1 ? I I ? j' I / 1
? \ 1 I I 1 1 II I I
\ I I I 1 ( III ( I r l
III
\\ //) //l 1 I I I I ?; \\ r II I
/ ? I\ r
//
/ Of
w w
O
O Q
/ LL.
OX0
?> l r Mi (n , i 30?nP r,,
O
Z
co?
O I-
d- W
W
L.?
CD Z
W
J
Q
U
O un
QD

00 a
a] z
J

w O
a
?
LL 0: U
LL < =
CO CL E-
O

Z
W
?
O Z
- 0
w
J
w
? O
.. U Ix

O
z
n C-
0
rz
11,x/ I ,j
t, ? 1 \\ ? / / I I
? I I I I /??? \ 1 fi
r, I I I ?_ \ 1 N

O
O
0 ?
U)
-? x
O o
? II 00
? J
~
Z o
:?i l
a o
:? l
a
o Q
O
:E
W

Q
ry

I--
(n

L

rn

W
z

O
N
LL-
V)
(

co
Lri N

W
z

O
N
LL-
cn

rn
°
ro

<

F--
O
I---
0
0
O
N

.. >

z ?
Q z O
mm

W
Q N
o
of o
N
O F-
U
7
J
:tt
c7 LU
`" it 'S
00 G. O !n O
rn
1 \
\ z' ww??c \ \ \ \
\ \ \ Q r.
\ Q I Of F- \ ^ \? ` I\ _ \ \ \ I \
\ L Q \ p D ft? 12
F- \ \ \ w 0 \ \ \ I \
\ w ?I F- Z \ \ JJ \ I \\ o = \\\ \\ \ \\ \?
F-- 0
o n L, i > ?. I \ to - \ \ \ \
L
\\\ o m w \ \ \\\ Y \\ \ I\\ \
-0 (A ^ \ - w \ - \ \
ow z x_- z? _Q \ z? \\ \ \ \ \
/ \ \ \
N\N
I 1 ? \
\
1 N \\?
o \
LLJ \
Of LLJ m Q
o w
Of
Lo a-
E--
O
Z
rq
ool-
w
LL
LL
D
m
a
w
CD
0
O
J
0
0-
00

G)
N
i-
O
Q
LU
0
z
J N
0
?Qf
.CT Cf) C)
(Dio
0 E),-'
U)
C) LL-
-? x
-a--j (n
O o
I
I-
w
w
LL-
z
W
J
Q
U
Z
O
Q
U
H
O
Z
J
?(l) NO
(L (0-00
'd-
0
o
=
Q
>
Q
>
_J

0 0

m
z ° Q ° Q o Q <?^ z
W LLJ N r? rn moo.-
J ? o _
0
?'
N 0 cif o F-
U
Q W
LL.
U
W
v
-1
(f)
?W -J

(7
J
n- z L z n Q

~ o 0
,n O N O o O N aocV
(n rn N N r7 I- o0
\ \ I /
> I \ \ / I Z-1
I
\ W I I I / // l\ \\ j \ \ 1
n? ¢ Z I o I / / \?- % \1 \\ 1
-0 r,4
??
11 _ II 1 \L_ \\ Il
wiz ?L ?- -?- -
??° o \ / _ 1) I \ \ I P 1\
Lij Of
P cr
L
j , -
La <
/ I I
L LL
NL-Al
o O
o i-
?r w
w
LL-
a z
w
J
Q
U
o cn
QD
d-
? z

0- M
O
0:
W ?
a
LU U
LL E2
m J
? O
? Q z

a
W Z

O
:-rj
LIJ
;
_
J
V? CL M 0:
-ice
L
O
z
Q?
0
cn o
C) LL-
-? X
O o
I
•O N-)
CL ?? (0-00
\ \ I / p ( \"N \
? IN
\ \ \ \\
?\\ \? J \ ?_?? \ 1 \\?
IN \
7-1
\\\ \\ , I \ \ I \ \ \
\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ ?? \1
\
\\ \ / J \ N \ \ \ I I ( 1 1/ / // / /// / /?
\ \
\ IN \ \ \ \ 1 I 1 1 / l I ll/ / /
IN \
\ \\ \ I? ll'I // / / /
\ \ \\\\ \ \ \ \\ \ IN \ \ I 1 \ j 1 1 I I / III l 1/I/ 111/l l/// / / -
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\ \\ 1\?\ I 1 \ 1 111 /1111 /l// /// //? -- -
N, N. NN
NN IT7
NN 'N \ N 1\ IN L
\ \ \ \\ \\ i IN, i\ \i\\\\ i\ I I i/ l( `Ir-/ /11(Il?l /l// l?ll 1411 \rl / / I i i?\ 1
\\ \?? I \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \? 1 1 1?1 111 /i111111 111 Illl l 11 /i i I I I
\ \
i
-
j.? \
T? ? m N i III I1
i\ do I ?? II ?W_ I l III \ 1\
\?? / III ?w ? VIIIII?
\ Xta I I G ?? Ilf 1
I
i lily
\ \ I/III;1 oz
6z
\ \\ 1? f \J\\\?1 l III
I --
\??\(???\\\11 I iIt
l//??i?i'??
NN \\ \\\\ I I I III//// //?? -?
?\I (\\ \\'\ \ \ \ I I I I l l?lll/////ice ^
?
"I NN, \ \ IN \ \ \111 ( Ill I ?///l?? j// \
\ 1 \1\\ III I ///ll /j / -?
\\\ \ \ \\II 0 I'llj I ? II 11/11111 III \? `
r /? // ?//)/ fl/1/ 1 II ,llj11111 111 r\ \
I1 I l j// l /l l 1 11/ \ 11 11\\ \I\\ 111 -,
\ \ \ \ ?I11i \ \\\\ \\\\ \ \
NN. IN
'??? ?1 / l l ? I ' \1?? I 1\\11\\\ ?\ ?
AG, NN
Cif\\ / I I II L-I- J \ \ \\\ \ 1\\\\?\ \\?\, .
IN
v _ _ 1 v \ VA\\ \ 1 A1\ Il??/? //
`° \-_ 1 \ \ 111 \\; yl( //ll // i
\ \I I
\ \ 111\I \\\I\II? \\ \I\\ l`
_N \ \? IN
?? '\\ I 1 1\ III ?I \
Vv ?? \ 1 11 1111 )1 V1 11 l l l \
a
\ III\\, I I I\\\\\?I I `\ I
Fes- F- 1 11 I \1\\1??\\ \?1? 11 i
I
,?? pj J/ /1 11 I I\\ \\? \ o \
/ / /??r 1111- \\\\ \ \ \ 'N \ \1
\\I \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ 1
1 I
/ I II I J
1/ 1 \\11 I % % I 1 / \\\ \
II
\\ III II ? _ \ \ 'I i
1 / /f%??/ / 1 1 V A VA\ 1/ /' /'? /
I/ // ? I I l A I I>? V A 11 I I I ?? :,
\ II r )/) \ I I /
'cam ?\???\??~?\1
?I \I \\\ \ \ 1\l
71 A
Ili l1Jl/II ljll 1/ I I I I- -f- IJ
?\\\ ? ? ,? ? ? \\ 11j 111 lljlilj(Ill?1 / ? ? 1 I r I \\
V 1/ I I
?/It I l / i111
\\ lilltil \\ 1 I 111 III I1 III / / / /
1 111 III lll? 1? ? ? ' ? / I I I I / l
._1 L II l I? I ? W I /
l )I I` 111 \ 1111 I I `1 ? / i l
I II ///ll1 1 l \\ I\\ III x,111 I\ I ? \
1 r Ill °I \
L 1??^?\ \\\ 111/ / /1 11 o l l l I/ 1 ?
\ / I r 3 111
Elf
\ 1 \ 11 i 1 111 % / // I / / (? o I I
x ? ? III I I ' ?I I ,,II (11 ?; ' Jl I r /1 , l
' - \ \ I (cc r ? 11 r1i 111 I I / ? r r // , , /?
11 \\\\ \ Illl ('/ 111 I / / /r
'\ ? i ? \\? III Iln 1 `i 1111 illl / l // / /?/ /
..` ?jIIIII?lll1,l/l;l;f%;111)11 I _ I/ ?,,?/,
-v ? 1 1 111 jjll 111111f?-,???/I ?II? I I? ?? I // / /A'
?vI I II f 11111111 IVY°???? ?/i%/ I 1 1 j l 1 11 ? I /
Iv 11 11 1 1111 \\v v?,?1?,: / / I V I V v
\ \ \ \ \\\ //?/I ( \1 \
/ =i' 1 I J \ /
?r Ln
0
0
N
O
Q 0 W
U) 11 z
Of 0
F-
W ll.!
x<C) C7
CL ocn o
I-
O
00
o
d
o
0
N w
w
LL
oz
w
J
Q
U
o (n
Qo
I\
d-
00 z
J
Q?
LL U
W
U.
D
J
m J O
=az U) 3?
w O C?
~ J
V)CLwX
O
z
J
J
0
U) C)
D ?
U)
LL_
O
X
4F (n
O o
I
(1) (?D
?00
f ?S
DT n Piedmont LandDesign,LLP
1 JU 11 8522-204 Sig Forks Road • Raleigh, NC 27615 • [phone] • Fax: [phone]
March 31, 2005
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Attention: Cyndi Karoly
Reference: Peyton Hall Subdivision
DWQ Project No. 04-1934
Dear Ms. Karoly:
Condition No. 6 of the approval letter we received for this project requires the submission of a
written Stormwater Management Plan. This condition references Condition No. 4 of General
Certification No. 3402, which states a stormwater management plan shall be required for all
projects where the impervious area exceeds 30%. Enclosed are the impervious area calculations,
which shows that the impervious area for this project is 29.4%. On behalf of the property owner,
we are hereby requesting that you confirm in writing that this project is not required to provide a
stormwater management plan since the project does not exceed 30% impervious area. The project
is required to comply with the City of Raleigh stormwater regulations, which requires controlling
the rate of runoff to pre-development rates for the 2 and 10-year storm and nitrogen reduction
and/or payment of a fee. We will be providing dry ponds to reduce the rate of runoff. Level
spreaders will be provided at the outlet for the 1" rainfall event for the dry detention ponds in
accordance with the City of Raleigh standards.
Please call if you have any questions or need any additional information.
Sincerely,
?2 /'??
Ron Hendricks
PHCX RPH: rph
cc: Richard Stockett
Kelly Race
Sean Clark
Enclosure
f'l?
,? -
D
A'pR 12005
PLD
. 11,
PLD Piedmont Land Design, LLP
8522-204 Six Forks Road • Raleigh, NC 27615 • [phone] • Fax: [phone]
March 31, 2005
Peyton Hall
Stillmeadow Drive and Wedgewood Road
Raleigh, North Carolina
f@170 "T?
APR 12005
Impervious Area Calculations
Total Site Area = 42.06 acres
Impervious Areas
Dt 'R-ti'W F: QUALITY
WETLiv03t':,DSTU".`: ,JERER!4d'OH
Lot 1 36,500 sf
Lot 2 - 116 (2,500 sf each) 287,500 sf
Pump Station and Drive 3,600 sf
Rii4ht of Way 211,400 sf
Total 539,000 sf
12.37 acres
Impervious Area Percentage = (12.37/42.06) 100 = 29.41 %
Since the percentage of impervious area is less than 30%, no stormwater measures are required to
meet Division of Water Quality or U.S. Army Corps of Engineers requirements. However
stormwater measures are required to meet the City of Raleigh stormwater quantity control
requirements. Dry detention ponds will be provided to meet this requirement.
PHCX RPH:rph
Civil Engineers • Landscape Architects • Land Pldnners
S L & NVIR !'. ENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
NC Division of Water Quality Check Number: 17182
Date: 12/02/04 Check Amt: $475.00
Tran N Invoice Type Date Reference Balance Discount Pay Amount
5121 120204 Invoice 12/02/04 7726.W0 $475.00 $0.00 $475.00
PD n
DEC 0 2 2004
WATER QUALITY
1'rcTl;,,? ?„