970013_INSPECTIONS_20171231

Nov
SENDER:
■ Complete items 1 aftor 2 for ackManal services.
es
I also wish to receive the
following services for an
ow 9
of
■ Complete Items 3, 4a, and 4b.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this
extra toe):
L"
card to yrou.
■ Attach this Corm to the front of the mallpleoe, or on the back If apace does not
1. ❑ Addressee's Address
permit.
■ Write 'Return Receipt Requested'on the ma€lpfece below the article number.
2. ❑ Restricted Delivery
■ The Retum Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered
delivered.
and the date
Consult postmaster for fee.
3. Article Addressed to:
4a. Article Number
6
°`
E
4b. Service Type
• Hoi�. omb
❑Registered �eRified
cc
I :'.: ! Unioncomrrtunity Road
❑ Express Mail iJ Insured
ThurmondNC 28683
etum Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD
Date of Delivery
S. Received By: (Print Name)
8. Addressee's Address {Only If requested
and fee is paid)
c
6. Signature: (Addy a Agent)
PS Form 3811, December 1994
1o2595.9e-a-om Domestic Return Receipt

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
First -Class MaA
Postage & Few Paid
uSPS
Permit No. G-10
• Print your name, address, and ZI fj-njf i� •
NA biopt. ft FHNA
WATER QUALITY SECTION
585 WAUGH'TOWN STREET 1006",
WINSTON SALENI NC 27107-2241
7 1 O"7 = 2Z? + 111111111fIIIII)IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIItIIlilill ilElill

tinirnai vvaste storage rona ana Lagoon closure xeport norm
{Please 6
or print all information that does not require 4,nature)
General Information:
Name of Farm: TerryBragg (Formerly Tirri Holcomb_ _ Facility No: 97 - 13
Owner(s) Name: Terry Bragg
Mailing Address: 1255 Gold Run -Drive
Chula -Vista CA 91913
Phone No:
County: WILKES
Operation Description (remaining animals only):
X Please check this box if there will be no animals on this farm after lagoon closure. If there will still be animals on the site
after lagoon closure, please provide the following information on the animals that will remain.
Operation Description:
Type of Swine No. of Animals
o Wean to Feeder
o Feeder to Finish
o Farrow to Wean
o Farrow to Feeder
o Farrow to Finish
o Gilts
o Boars
Type of Poultry No. of Animals
o Layer
o Non -Layer
Type of Beef No. of Animals
o Brood
o Feeders
o Stockers
Other Type of Livestock:
Will the -farm maintain a number of animals greater than the 2H .0217 threshold?
Will other lagoons be in operation at this farm after this one closes?
How many lagoons are left in use on this farm?: NIA
Type of Dairy
o Milking
oDry
o Heifers
o Calves
No. of Animals
Number of Animals:
Yes o -No X
Yes o No X
Melissa Roaebrock of the Water Quality Section's staff in the Division of Water Quality's Winston Salem
Regional Office (see map on back) was contacted on April 14, 2005 for notification of the pending closure of this
pond or -lagoon. 'This notification;was'"af least•24 hours prior to,the'start of closure, -which began on 5/18/05:
I verify, that the-above,information is.correct and.complete.-.I have followed a closure plan, which meets.all NRCS
specifications and criteria. I realize that I will be subject to enforcement action per' Article 21'of the North
Carolina General` Statutes if I fail to properly close out the lagoon.
Name of Land Owner (Please
Date:_ _2 /4 u G o5
The facility has followed a closure plan which meets all require,nents set forth in the NRCS Technical Guide
Standard 998. The following items were completed by the owner and verified by me: all waste liquids and
sludges have been removed and land applied at agronomic rate, all input pipes have been removed, all slopes have
been stabilized as necessary, and vegetation established on all disturbed areas.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Michael W. Pardue
Affiliation: Wilkes SWCD
Address (Agency)
rSigriature:
28697 Phone No.:[phone] x3_
r Date`. NOU,,J } Z �w
` Return withinA5 days following -completion of animal water storage pond'.or lagoon cl6sure;to:
__. N. C. Division Of Wafer Quality
Animal Feeding Operations Unit 7wkfiv
1636 Mail Service Center Acst srro
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
i
lam•sslem
inal offica
PLC - 1 March 18, 2002

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation i
lReason for Visit O Routine O Complaint ® Follow up O Emergency Notification Q ether ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 97 13 gate at Visit: W21/200I Time; 1150 Printed on: 6/21/2001
Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:... ......................
Farm Name: TiM.H01COMb.Daily.................................................................................... County:Wjlkgs................................................ WSRQ........
OwnerName: TimQtb,X................................. 11101comtb.................................................... Phone No: 9,57-4.06 ....................................................................
Mailing Address: 106.7..[J� ou..axmmmttx.Rd........................................................... Thurmoind.Ac .................................................... 2b.".3 .............
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
OnsiteRepresentative:........................................................................................................... Integrator:..........................................................................-----.......
Certified Operator:.............................................................................. .... Operator Certification Number:........
Location of Farm:
1wy 421 north to I-77 to Hwy 21 to Traphill Road then left on Union Community Road Approx (county road 1919). 1 mile
)n left on a small dirt driveway.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 3G • 21 4 12 « Longitude 80 • $7 4 55 46
1 E�,,
Yr{Q '�°'le.a
esign
�� 9 IT.'L'.4.Si»G' #F
Current
�i uRY.f." ,•Z / 9 _ fA, . { .� Sit - - 2 34iP"
Destgn `,c., Cu.rrent,s �Destgn „ Current
" .x...
Poultry
acit
Po elation
Ca actt ,�l1'o elation; Cattleg Ca actt Po elation ;
�r, ❑ Wean to Feeder
k'!
"' . ❑Layer j ®Dairy l00 0
E
❑ Feeder to Finish
10 Non -Layer ❑Non -Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
=n'
1 ❑ Other'A
x ❑ Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
fF 9 n ry
t+ r
N W d� , � Total Design05apaq 100
❑ Gilts
r, ' �� + � `t4;
o` �TotaUSSLW, 140,040
❑ Boars
t 4 w
Number of Lagoons ©
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds /Solid Traps1
No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges..& Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes [3 No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estiniated'how in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 0 No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ® Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ....:Waae.P znd........................................ ..................... ..................................... .............. ......................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 3
05103101 �� Continued

Facility Number: 97-13 1 Date of Inspection 1 6/21/2001 1 Printed on: 6/21/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required RecQrdDocuments
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
© No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit
ents refer # : Ex lai any an a or any ommendatio or an other commen .
in of facil' tte explain situa to u t i na) a necessary : ❑Field Copy ® Final Notes
4. Was difficult to determine freeboard due to excessive vegetation on and around dam and spillway. No waste is being put into
structure. Only about 12 beef cattle on pasture.
7. Need to mow vegetation on bank of waste storage pond dam. No trees were noted, though.
9. No marker required on this facility.
23. Today's visit was to just re -check the liquid level in the waste storage pond since this structure had received a "high" ranking on the
inactive lagoon inventory. New electrical fencing was noted around the property today. Mobile home has been removed.
24. Suggest that DWQ continue to check this facility until properly closed out.
Reviewer/Inspector Name rMelissa Rosebrock i
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur . Date: % Q
05103101 1 V Continued

Facility Number 97— 13 Wgoon Number .1............ Lagoon I tifier bed:ind..tarn........................................
O Active Q Inactive Ti m
Waste Last Added ......................................................
Determined by: ❑ Owner ® Estimated
Surface Area (acres):
....................................
Embankment Height (feet):
...................................
Latitude
Longitude 0 0 0
By GPS or Map? ❑ GPS ❑ Map
GPS file number:
Distance to Stream: O less than 250 ft O 250 feet - 1000 feet O greater than 1000 ft
By measurement or Map? ❑ Field Measurement ❑ Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? O Yes O No
Intervening Stream? O Yes O No
Distance to WS or HOW (miles): O < 5 O 5 - 10 O > 10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? O Yes O No O Unknown
Spillway *Yes O No Adequate Marker O Yes O No
Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches):
Inspection date 2/3/0'0 (Do
�3
appearance of ESIudge Near Surface
lagoon liquid O Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
O Lagoon Liquid Clear
O Lagoon Empty
Freeboard (inches): 6.0
embankment condition O poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
OO Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
O Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
O Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
O No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status O High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
00 No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
O Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
cation equipment fall to make contact andfor Sprayfleld O Yes O No p Yes ONO Unknown with representative 0
unavailable
comments Follow-up performed 8/3/00-pond not overflowing. Lots of vegetation in pond and on
dam. Difficult to inspect.
3�(3� �Nl
2c

Nd;
PrI
Lq

' State of North Carol'
Department of Envi*ment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Jaynes B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
May 17, 2000
Timothy Holcomb
1067 Union Community Rd
Thurmond NC 28683
NCDENR
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RE50URCES
Subject: Rating of Potential Risk
Inactive Waste Lagoons and Storage Ponds
Tim Holcomb Dairy
Facility Number 97-13
Wilkes County
Dear Timothy Holcomb;
During the 1999 session, the North Carolina General Assembly passed a law directing the North
Carolina Department of Environment of Natural Resources (DENR) to develop an inventory and
ranking of all inactive lagoons and storage ponds in the State. In order to meet this directive, a
representative of DENR has recently evaluated the inactive lagoon(s) and/or storage pond(s) on your
property. Inactive lagoons and storage ponds were defined by the Statute as structures which were
previously used to store animal waste but have not received waste for at least one year.
The information collected on your property is contained in the attached field data sheets. Using
this field data, staff ranked your inactive waste structures as high, medium or low according to its
potential risk for polluting surface and/or groundwater. Your waste structure(s) was ranked as
follows:
Structure Number Surface Area Acres Ranking
0.32 High
This ranking is based in part on the conditions existing on the day of the site visit. Changes in
these conditions or the collection and evaluation of additional data may modify the ranking of your
waste structure(s) in the future,
information on your facility along with over 1000 others contained in the inventory has been
provided to the General Assembly. During this year's session, the General Assembly will consider
additional requirements for future management of these structures which may include requiring
proper closure of inactive lagoons and storage ponds according to current or alternative standards.
585 waughtown Street, Winston-Satern. .North Carolina 27107 'telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Empiaver SD% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Rating of Potential Risk
Inactive Waste Lagoons and Storage Ponds
Animal Waste Management System
Page 2
Regardless of their ranking, owners of all waste lagoons and storage ponds have certain
management responsibilities. These include taking appropriate actions to eliminate current
discharges, prevent future discharges and to insure the stability of their structures. Staff of the
Division of Water Quality will be in contact with owners of all inactive structures that have been
determined to pose a serious environmental risk, based on its ranking and/or additional field data
collected by the Department.
All liquids and waste removed from these structures must be land applied at a rate not to exceed
the agronomic needs of the receiving crops. Any major modifications made to the dike walls or
structure must be done in accordance with current standards and under the direction of a technical
specialist designated for structural design. Your local Soil and Water Conservation District is an
excellent source for information and guidance related to proper waste application practices, structure
operation and maintenance, and other related animal waste management standards and/or
requirements.
Nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility and liability for
any past or future discharges from your lagoon(s) and/or storage pond(s) or for any violations of
surface water or groundwater quality standards.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this process. If you have questions concerning
your inactive structures, please contact the staff of either in the Division of Water Quality or the
Division of Soil and Water Conservation in the Winston-Salem Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
Larry Coble
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Wilkes County Soil and Water Conservation District Office
Facility File

wrr � r�� ISIOIll Of Wflter.Qtlfll{ty _ - .; � ' �
.,r��z. p�iv�,siaa of So><1`and Water Conservflhoa � '�` J �3 ' ° L �` .
� Y
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review © Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine Q Complaint O Follow up Q Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 97 13
©Permitted 0 Certified 13 Conditionally Certified ®Ree stered Date of Visit 2/3/2flo0
O Not Operational O Below Threshold Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
(✓
............................. R
Farm Name: 1M. AIC.Q.w..V.4iU.................................................................................... 11111111" Y!.'xli�t 5
.
Owner Name: T.iMp.tt►x..................... �Rl�stxnkt........... .... Phour Nu: �:36-!)57.,40.86 ..................
Facility Contact: .Title: Phone No
Mailing Address: I063..IIjaxax<..C-axmuxtkty..><id........................................................... Thun muu(L..N.C.................................................... 28,68.3 ..............
oili�t':
Onsite Representative: ........................................................................................................... lnte„,.l' ......................................................................................
Location of Farm:
lt�..4�1..uat; kh,.to.�: 7..7..ta:� �.'' �..ta.:f.raRlaitl.�,Q;Ltd..Xhlext.�t~ft..arx.[3.r>�t?xt..CAxnmtufixt �•.. �i,�t�xc1..AFv r. Ah�..(��tut►tX .�a�td .X212?... t..�ii�......
orz.le k.axt.xts>atatll.s#a>dk.�rtr.��'�ay........................................................................................................................................................................................................
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ® Horse
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Currt`ttt Design Current
Poultry Capacity Po rsllttlult Cattle Ca acitv Porlulation
❑ Layer ® Dairy loo I 0
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total OVA.'" Capacity 100
'1'01111 SSLW 140,000
Number of Lagoons 1 Holding Ponds / Solid Tral►'S
Discharges & Stream lntpav
1- Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Feld ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man -mad '
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the Stag 'Y It `c` notl(DWQ).
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow hi F01 min:
?. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® SpillW11%
'vi'aste Collection & 'Treatment
Please see attached Lagoon Field Data Sheets
Reviewer/Inspector Name Melissa Rosebrock -Sue-White
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
Cl Yes ® No
Not mearureable
❑ Yes ® No
❑Yes ®No
Printed on: 5/12/2000

Number 97 — 13 Lagoon Number 1............ Lagoon Identifier Sid pf porn ........................................
Active 0Inactive
Waste Last Added 211.L9..........................................
Determined by: ❑ Owner ® Estimated
Latitude 36 121 '19
Lonaitude F8 07 ,5 l54
By GPS or Map? ® GPS ❑ Map
GPS file number: IS020317A
Surface Area (acres): r, ........................
Embankment Height (feet): ZA...........................
Distance to Stream: # <250 feet 0250 feet- 1000 feet 0 >1000 feet
By measurement or Map? ® Field Measurement ❑ Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? O Yes # No
Intervening Stream? 0 Yes O No
Distance to WS or HOW (miles): Q < 5 O 5 - 10 0 > 10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? 0 Yes 0 No OQ Unknown
Spillway O Yes O No Adequate Marker O Yes 0 No
Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches):
Inspection date 2/3/2000
appearance of 0 Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid # Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
O Lagoon Liquid Clear
O Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 0.0
embankment condition 0 Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
O Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
O Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
O Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
O No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status O High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
O No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
O Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
pplication equipment fail to make contact Yes
andlor SprWield 0 Yes O No 0Unknown with representative ONO
unavailable
comments Sent NOV to owner. No receipt returned and no response to our letter.
#1. Low end, waste (frozen on date of inspection) is beginning to trickle out. High
end of dam only has 12 inches of freeboard.
16. Left messages on machine: Jan. 14,24, 26.
J

State of North Carol*
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
May 17, 2000
Timothy Holcomb
1067 Union Community Rd
Thurmond NC 28683
1 � •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURGE5
Subject: Rating of Potential Risk
Inactive Waste Lagoons and Storage Ponds
Tim Holcomb Dairy
Facility Number 97-13
Wilkes County
Dear Timothy Holcomb,
During the 1999 session, the North Carolina General Assembly passed a law directing the North
Carolina Department of Environment of Natural Resources (DENR) to develop an inventory and
ranking of all inactive lagoons and storage ponds in the State. In order to meet this directive, a
representative of DENR has recently evaluated the inactive lagoon(s) and/or storage pond(s) on your
property. Inactive lagoons and storage ponds were defined by the Statute as structures which were
previously used to store animal waste but have not received waste for at least one year.
The information collected on your property is contained in the attached field data sheets. Using
this field data, staff ranked your inactive waste structures as high, medium or low according to its
potential risk for polluting surface and/or groundwater. Your waste structure(s) was ranked as
follows:
Structure Number Surface Area (Acres) Rankin
1 0.32 High
This ranking is based in part on the conditions existing on the day of the site visit. Changes in
these conditions or the collection and evaluation of additional data may modify the ranking of your
waste structure(s) in the future.
Information on your facility along with over 1000 others contained in the inventory has been
provided to the General Assembly. During this year's session, the General Assembly will consider
additional requirements for future management of these structures which may include requiring
proper closure of inactive lagoons and storage ponds according to current or alternative standards.
585 waughtown street, Winston-Salem. North Carolina 27107 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Rating of Potential Risk • Is
Inactive Waste Lagoons and Storage Ponds
Animal Waste Management System
Page 2
Regardless of their ranking, owners of all waste lagoons and storage ponds have certain
management responsibilities. These include taking appropriate actions to eliminate current
discharges, prevent future discharges and to insure the stability of their structures. Staff of the
Division of Water Quality will be in contact with owners of all inactive structures that have been
determined to pose a serious environmental risk, based on its ranking and/or additional field data
collected by the Department.
All liquids and waste removed from these structures must be land applied at a rate not to exceed
the agronomic needs of the receiving crops. Any major modifications made to the dike walls or
structure must be done in accordance with current standards and under the direction of a technical
specialist designated for structural design. Your local Soil and Water Conservation District is an J
excellent source for information and guidance related to proper waste application practices, structure
operation and maintenance, and other related animal waste management standards and/or
requirements.
Nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility and liability for
any past or future discharges from your lagoon(s) and/or storage pond(s) or for any violations of
surface water or groundwater quality standards.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this process. If you have questions concerning
your inactive structures, please contact the staff of either in the Division of Water Quality or the
Division of Soil and Water Conservation in the Winston-Salem Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
Larry Coble
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Wilkes County Soil and Water Conservation District Office
Facility File

3 'w iv�sion of Water Quality
a x..n a •;p'!' �; , . „�,4w '' "vision oil. and Water Conservation R , r 7"•n R'r`�`'� t�" �' {.a r �~
1:�er'Agency ..•.S.g' [y,'�..�rrr .c c r'ry ri _ F '�
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint Q Follow up O Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 97 13
[] Permitted [3 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified ® Registered Date of Visit v3/2000
Q Not Operational O Below Threshold Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name- :ijM..U.QJr.Q.Mb.lUJLrY ............................... .. Count, Y.4'.il h.................................................Y.4:RO........
Owner Name::i'a17eo.ft................... _............ RolcQlu b.................................................... Phone No:&16.15.7.R40.86..............................----...........---.-.........
FacilityContact:..................'----........................................................Title:................................................... Phone No:
Mailing Address: 10..G.7-Union CommunktY.Rd........................................................... laatxtimoxid-NC.................................................... 2R68.3 ..............
Onsite Representative:
Integrator:....
Location of Farm:
A.i!~kk.nxt.a. snna�Ei.dark.dK�y�w.,.....................................................................................................................................................
❑ Swine ❑Poultry ®Cattle '®Morse
Design Current
aw�ne-Capacity pro ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
M Farrow to Finish
Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity !Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ® Dairy 100 0
❑ Non -Layer I Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 100
Total SSLW 140,000
Number�df Lagoons Holding Ponds / Solid'Traps 0
Discharges $ Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ® Yes ❑ No
Discharce originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. 1f discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑yes ®No
c. If dischargc is observed. what is the estimated flow in uallmin? Not mearureabie
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? El Yes ®No
3. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & `Freatment
Please see attached Lagoon Field Data Sheets
Reviewer/Inspector Name Melissa;Rosebrock -Sue`:White
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Printed on: 5/12/2000

Facility Number 97 -- 13 agoon Number 1....._ Lagoon ntifier
ld...Q..ern........................................
0 Active * Inactive Latitude 36 721 '1
Waste Last Added 2/1./.9.5........................................... Longitude 80 57 54
Determined by: ❑ Owner ® Estimated By GPS or Map? ® GPS [ Map
GPS file number: IS020317A
Surface Area (acres): Q,.$�........................
Embankment Height (feet): 2,.4...........................
Distance to Stream: OO c250 feet 0 250 feet - 1000 feet 0 >1000 feet
By measurement or Map? ® Field Measurement ❑ Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? O Yes # No
Intervening Stream? O Yes *No
Distance to WS or HOW (miles): 0 < 5 0 5 - 10 0 > 10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? O Yes O No U Unknown
Spillway O Yes O No Adequate Marker O Yes O No
Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches).'
Inspection date 2/3/2000
appearance of 0 Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid 0 Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
0 Lagoon Liquid Clear
0 Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 0.0
embankment condition 0 Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
*Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
O Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
0 Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
0 No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status 0 High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
0 No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
O Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
placation equipment fail to make contact and/or 5prayfield 0 Yes 0 No 0Unknown with representative *Yes 0 No
unavaitable
comments Sent NOV-to owner. No receipt returned and no response to our letter.
#1. Low end, waste (frozen on date of inspection) is beginning to trickle out. High
end of dam only has 12 inches of freeboard.
16. Left messages on machine: Jan. 14,24, 26.

B.'LL`HOLMAN
SECRETARY
. n
i
KERR T. STEVENS
DIRECTOR�'�,,",
t r•
r.
• .'r F
A .
eLYwC' , u'
NORTAAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIviSION OF WATER QUALITY
WINSTON-SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE
February 14, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL P-536 308 506
RETURN RECEIPT RETESTED
Mr. Tim Holcomb
1067 Union Community Road
Thurmond, NC 28683
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Inactive Animal Waste Storage Evaluation
Tim Holcomb Dairy
Wilkes County
Dear Mr. Holcomb:
The purpose of this letter is to summarize the evaluation of your inactive dairy waste storage pond
on February 3, 2000. Melissa Rosebrock and Sue White with the Winston-Salem Regional Office
were present for the evaluation.
Upon investigation of this facility, it was found that the storage pond had inadequate freeboard.
In fact, waste appeared to be topping over the spillway near the barn. On the date the evaluation
was performed, however, the waste coming over the spillway was frozen. Once temperatures rise
above freezing, this poses an immediate threat to the environment due to the potential for discharge
to waters of the State. Please note that, in this region of the state, you should have a minimum of
18 inches of extra storage in your storage pond at all times.
Please be advised that the non -permitted discharge of any type of wastewater to the waters of the
State is illegal as per North Carolina General Statute 143-215' 1 and could subject you to civil
penalties of up to $25,000 per day per violation. This means that you would be subject to this
penalty even if you were inactive or under certifiable threshold numbers.
A follow-up inspection will be performed in several weeks to assure there is adequate
freeboard in the storage pond. Your cooperation in this matter is greatly appreciated.
Should you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact Melissa
Rosebrock or myself at the Winston-Salem Regional Office.
Sincerely,
Larry D. Coble
Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Wilkes County SWCD
Central Files
CWSRO_1
585 WAUGHTo WN STREET, WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA 27107
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

mi��gency
of Water Quality
of Soil and Water Conservation
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 97 13
0 Permitted [a Certified 0 Conditionally Certified ® Registered
O Not Operational 0 Below Threshold I Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: Tina.HoJc.Qmb.t?Atcs:............................................
Owner Name: TJ11a9.tbty................................. RR1C.0mb...... ....
Date of Visit 1!3/2000
County: Wilkea................................................ .W.SRO.......
............ Phone No: 33.6,90,4 .6.................
FacilityContact:...............................................................................Title:............................................................... Phone No:....................................................
Mailing Address: 11Db:I..b%t oxi.Ctrmmunity.S.d........................................................... 1hturn Qmd..SIC..................................................... 211610 .............
OnsiteRepresentative: ........................................................................................................... Integrator:................................................................................
Location of Farm:
TT�y...4�1..Harr!tbt.ta.1:27..xn..IJ;vxx.�l..Xn.�:�a�l?bidl.iiosd.�kht�nt.lefit. �.t1�aiant.GRAtua�,uttltx.ii.Rad..A�Rprt)�.1�nu�tlrx. �:Rmd,.1�1�),�.1..tmiA�.....
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ® Horse
Design Current
Swine CapaeltV Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to -Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ® Dairy 100 0
❑ Non -Layer ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 100
Total SSLW 140,000
Number of Lagoons 1 1 1 Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 0
Discharges s& Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: 0 Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway
Waste Collection -& TreatMgnt
Please see attached Lagoon Field Data Sheets
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Not mearureable
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Reviewer/Inspector Name ;Melissa Rosebrock Aue White
Reviewer/Inspector Signature Date: / r' o6
t}rtntea on: •+r i ueuuu
A el l V)V-�

Facility Number 97 — 13 &goon Number .1............ Lagoon Iatifier 5.ide..Rf..harn.......................................
0 Active OO Inactive
Waste Last Added 2/1Z.9.6...........................................
Determined by: ❑ Owner ® Estimated
Surface Area (acres): Q.,.2........
Embankment Height (feet): 2,,4...........................
Latitude Ej 21 19
Longitude 80 57 54
By GPS or Map? JZ GPS ❑ Map
GPS file number: S020317A
Distance to Stream: Op <250 feet 0 250 feet - 1000 feet 0 >1000 feet
By measurement or Map? ® Field Measurement ❑ Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? O Yes *No
Intervening Stream? 0 Yes *No
Distance to WS or HOW (miles): OQ < 5 0 5 - 10 O > 10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? O Yes O No *Unknown
Inspection date 2/3/2000
appearance of 0 Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid 0 Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
0 Lagoon Liquid Clear
0 Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 0.0
embankment condltion 0 Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
O Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
0 Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage 0 Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
0 Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
0 No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status 0 High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
0 No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
0 Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
cation equipment fail to make contact
andlor Sprayfield 0 Yes 0 No 0 Unknown with representative *Yes O No
unavailable
comments Sent NOV to owner. No receipt returned and no response to our letter.
#1. Low end, waste (frozen on date of inspection) is beginning to trickle out. High
end of dam only has 12 inches of freeboard.
16. Left messages on machine: Jan. 14,24, 26.

�J
Initial Evaluation O Follow-up Evaluation [3 Denied Access 0 Does Facility Require a Follow-up
Facility Number Dale or Evaluation
Time ? Evaluation 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Permitted � Certified )(Registered 0 Non -Registered Inactive Facility Date Last Operated:
a
Farm Nam M A„I�i��1�471, uwi�«Y?,I��l��nn,ixu,uxnnnx,uuuxxumx County: .............. ....................
". u j q / Q (f /��
Owner Name:......,..,1,�i�i,.,..;Ld�?.lf:,� .�................_........................................... Phone No: ( V
................. :......................................_._._........
Facility Contact: .. ! ..„..................... Title: ............... ................... ... ..... _..__.._. Phone No:
Mailing � Address:..!J.��...{.J..,./.�.I..i.n,�.o.�......ar}!�..f.5..�.�..�.Tlf,,...1-.
OnsiteRepresentative: ..111nKI•t�...l........---.._......�......__...._...........I__........ Integratnr:.,._......_.........................................
Location Of Form.,
04Ntiinber,a af�6 J"'; 11r/'f1H' k hii�gg
,.....;:, I Ngmkire0 Ho€diet TAdslSolldTreps�I�J
Discharges & Stream Impac
1. Is any discharge observed from any lagoon? Yes ❑ No
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ;& No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the Statc? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
2, is there evidence of past discharge from any lagoon? ❑ Yes 4No
Waste Collection & Treatmen!
3. Estimate Freeboard Level: AS
pillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Struct 1 Structurc 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure b
Identifier _........... ...... . ................
Freeboard (inches): _
u» bi. :ia;iiii'uS - r J�aa.� �Y 4i i t
ReviewerllnspectorNarrsr €I1N.;.=its
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

r�
u
Inactive Lagoon Field Data Sheet
Facility Number: E-® Inactive Lagoon Number:
Latitude ® . MI' ©" Longitude ®, H3' w AGPS ❑ Map
4. Waste Last Added (mm/yy) ❑ Owner )stimated U
5. Estimate of lagoon surface area (acres) d ,'
6, Effective height of embankment (feet)
7. Dis ante to Blue Line or Intermittent Stream (feet) < 250 ❑ 250 - 1000 ❑ > 1000
Determined From Field Measurement []Map
8. Down Gradient Well
a. Is there a down gradient well located within 250 feet? 10 Yes o
b, is an intervening stream not located between any part of the lagoon and the nearest well? Yes No
9. Distance to WS waters or HQW (mi.) 10<5 ❑ 5 - 10 ❑ > ] 0
uT tv E!kit) Crm%e_ WS3� - •15 rniIt Frowt
10. Does the representative know of overtopping from outside waters? j�%r rA 10 Yes ❑ No VUnknown
11. Appearance of Lagoon Liquid
a. Sludge Near Surface
b. Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
c. Lagoon Liquid Clear
12. Embankment Condition
104
a. Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, etc.
b. Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
c. Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards ❑
13. Outside Drainage Area
a. Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design ❑
b. Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design ❑
c. No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
14. Liner Status
a. High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Suit, Rock Outcrops Present, etc. ❑
b. No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability �[
c. Meets NRCS Liner Requirements ❑
15. Application Equipment and/or Sprayfield Not Available 10 Yes ❑ No Unknown
16. Contact could not be made with on -site representative Yes ❑No

•
36021
36021
36021
36021
36021
36021
36*21
Lat/Long
WGS 1984
Wilkes Co.
T
Scale 1:500
0 60.00
US Survey Feet
For
s020317a.cor
2/4/2000
Pathfinder Office
0 Trimble

Comments (Refer to Question #): Explain any Yes answer and/or any other comment.
C.a end , c,vas+c t,� h C-V) i S 4azen
4* +r i C
.J
o (4 end CF JOL M o n Ly a5
lolle Free 1066.rd .
I(� Lei'+rnessczye5 on mach��.;
plllylct, Dl/a y1 oa 0,nJ WIa6 /ao ,

Site Sketch Showing All Active and Inactive Lagoons
ice'
iLEF

A

0

Anywho - Driving Directions wysiwyg:l/46(http://www.anywho.com/cgi-binlmgtripplus
AT&T
Emm
INFO
• ClrMlalsm
• AT&T Catalpa
• Missing calls
online?
OVERVIEW
=�� w Sparta
r arrgns" Ile
jwirson
Y� -
a< ing Cap
r
fend
le Spr gs`
�ti'
..�: eep Cap
Haysa Rondt
Union 6r�nt
i
Fq Saylor;{�I�le
01999 MapQuest.com, Inc.,
Stott` Ville
Danbur .,rev
ouritai I 66 l Madlsgn. idvvt
l
ingYal�ut ue f 56'
From ���aaa����a Torr��ww P11r��
a? 30t1m ` �f^ L I„te a p 1 i h
i4ared � � 9oot't Ili` a � 'lt� � - '1km 21
U(110AY
01999 14341,1e3t.00m, Inc.:01999 Navigatbr 01999 MopQuest.com. Inc.:01999 GDT. Inc,
585 Waughtown Street 1067 Union Community Road
Winston-Salem, NC Thurmond, NC
Direction Distance
There are 0.01 miles (0.02 km) between the start of the directions
and 585 Waughtown Street.
Use the map above to get to WAUGHTOWN ST.
1: Start out going Southeast on WAUGHTOWN
ST towards OLD LEXINGTON RD by turning
0.0 miles (0.1 km)
left.
2: Turn RIGHT onto OLD LEXINGTON RD.
0.1 miles (0.2 km)
3: Turn RIGHT onto NC-150.
0.1 miles (0.2 km)
4: Turn LEFT to take the US-52 SOUTH/NC-8
0.2 miles (0.3 km)
SOUTH ramp towards (US-311 SOUTH).
5: Merge onto NC-8 S/US-52 S.
0.1 miles (0,1 km)
6: Take the I-40 WEST exit, exit number
0.3 miles (0.5 km)
107B, towards STATESVILLE.
7: Merge onto I-40 W. 4.8 miles (7.7 km)
8: Take the I-40 EAST/US-421 exit, exit
number 188, towards
0.2 miles (0.3 km)
WINSTON-SALEM/YADKINVILLE/WILKESBORO.
9: Keep LEFT at the fork in the ramp.
0.6 miles (1.0 km)
10: Merge onto US-421 N.
27.5 miles (44.3 km)
11: Take the I-77 NORTH exit.
0.4 miles (0.6 km)
12: Merge onto I-77 N.
9.6 miles (15.5 km)
13: Take -the US-21_BYP exit, exit number 83,
0.3 miles (0.4 km)
1 o1' 2 1/26/2000 l 1:18 AM

Anywho - Driving Directions wysiwyg://46/htip://www.anywho.cora/cgi-bin/mqtripplus
on the Iert towards SNAK IA. '
14: Merge onto US-21 8YP N. 2.5 miles (4.0 km)
15: Turn SLIGHT RIGHT onto US-21. 8.1 miles (13.0 km)
16: Turn LEFT onto TRAPHILL RD. 1.2 miles (1.9 km)
There are 0.72 miles (1.16 km) between the end of the directions
and 1067 Union Community Road.
Use the map above to get to 1067 Union Community Road.
Total Distance 56.0 miles (90.2 km)
Estimated Time 1 hour, 19 minutes
Display Route As
p Text Only & Overview Map with Text O Turn -by -Turn Maps with Text
Redisplay Results I Calculate More Directions
AT&T Anywho Home 1hLW2 I Privacy I About Us I Link Ig Us I Iota
The AnvWho Advantaoe I Advertise with Us
Use of this site signifies your agreement to the terms of use.
See our privacy policy.
ANYWHO is a service mark of AT&T.
2 of 2 1/26/2000 l 1:18 AM

Anywho - Map Search Result
wysiwyg://] 31/hup://www.anywho.comlcgi-...at=363550&ing=-809658&level=6&event=zoom
• •
AT&T
.�
�+g
sCfwfCh et .. th'7n _titer while hl Ong dawA•feR hv=rn�
1
• � 7d Plan
• Click2Dialsm
• AT&T Catalog
• Shoogino Deals
• Missing calls
online?
Location: 1067 union community road thurmond nc 28683-9536
21 f ,Hooker s �J Smi NE
� � 5 m
�•� rJ' Ladonlao 89AD
r,�+4hitehead Glade valley rr BottoTW
r� /,_-
r .. .1, Cherrq,Lane
L �;' JDeuotlan
C,, sxo;ne,r ; openba�n State Roaring Gapcam»%
i!Abshers=r°..� ` zy _, hyr
01
McCrady r phill P F
GMOxl�9 -+y State ROa Fairview
1 Austin'`tr opli' Sant Ri a f~
18 �Deh �1t `+ Amax jb,�E
u
s �urch
Pleasant Hillri�chfield
67
�'ArBoonville
Vingviva er©a ueal.comIno' W 1999 Navi aatbn Techn
r 5
© Center O Zoom In O Zoom Out O Identify Icon
fg,
Street City Regional National Loom
Driving Directions
Use subject to License/Copyright
-0 ATC Anywho_Home I t� I Privacy I About Us I Link To Us I
The Anywho Advantage I Advertise with Us
Use of this site signifies your agreement to the terms of use.
See our privacy on Ilcv_..
ANYWHO is a service mark of AT&T.
I of 1 1/24/2000 4:34 PM

Anywh Nap Search Result
wysiwyg:H39/http://www.anywho.conVcgi-b ... ng=-809658&event=zoom&level=7&event=zoom
• i
AT&T
INFO
• Q
• C lmckMalsm
• AT&T Catalog
• Sh000ino Deals
I
z
0
Location: 1067 union community road thurmond nc 28683-9536
hm hl ME
A E
Q center O zoom In O Zoom Out O Identify Icon
Street City Regional National Zoom
Driving Directions
Use subject to License/Copyright
4AT&T AnvWho Home I � I Privacy I ADQut Us I I ink To Us I ]abLs
The AnyWho Advantage I Adve '5g with Us
Use of this site signifies your agreement to the terms of use
See our pEavacy policy.
ANYWHO is a service mark of AT&T.
E
M
I of 1. 1/14/2000 1:05 PM

Anywho - Map Search Result wysiwyg:H37/htip://www.anywho.cony/cgi-b...at=363550&ing=-809658&level=8&event=zoom
• 0
AT&T - I
INFO ZZ
Location: 1067 union community road thurmond nc 28683-9536
NW K UE
Ciw
• �Jick2Dialsm
• AT&T Cataloa
• $hopp'ng Deals
d Center O Zoom In O Zoom Out Q Identify Icon
Street City Regional National Zoom
Driving Directions I
Use subject to License/Copyright
ATC ��i�I�xIAhnutll;I Link To UsI�
The AnvWho Advantage I Advertise with Us
Use of this site signifies your agreement to the terms of use.
See our orivacv policy.
ANYWHO is a service mark of AT&T.
E
of 1 1/14/2000 1:05 PM

Anywho - Map Search Result
. s ......-. q
wysiwyg://35/http://www.anywho.conVegi-b...ad&city=thurmond&state=nc&zip=28683-9536
AT&T
MIS
. � �
INFO . llY�
�J_¢_P1an
• Click2Dialsm
• AT&T Catalog
• Shopping Deals
I
Z
8
Location: 1067 union community road thurmond nc 28683-9536
NW N N.L
Civ a
Q Center 0 Zoom In O Zoom Out Q Identify Icon
Aft M
Street City Regional National Zoom
Driving Directions I
Use subject to License/Copyright
ATr AnvWho Home I ii! W I P[evaCX I AbQWt Us I Link To Us I ]Qtu
The AnyWho Advantage I Advertise With"
Use of this site signifies your agreement to the terms of use.
See our ray policy.
ANYWHO is a service mark of AT&T.
4
F.
a
1 of 1 1 / 14/2000 1:05 PM

State of North Carol
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
March 3, 1998
Timothy Holcomb
Tim Holcomb Dairy
1067 Union Community Rd
Thurmond NC 28683
i
ARAI,,
NCDENR
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL- RESOURCES
Subject:
Dear Timothy Holcomb:
RECFf1/ED
N.C. Dept. ut EHNR
MAR 0 5 1998
Winston-.-S?fern
Removal of Registration Regiona; .Afice
Facility Number 97-13
Wilkes County
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state, Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to the
surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $10,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits listed
below, you will be required to obtain a certified animal waste management plan and contact the Division of Water
Quality prior to stocking animals. Threshold numbers of animals that require certified animal waste management plans
are as follows:
Swine 250
Confined Cattle 100
Horses 75
Sheep 1,000
Pou!try with a liquid waste system 30,000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sue Homewood of our staff
at [phone] ext 502.
-E9
cc: Winston»Salenf-Water Quality-RegionabOffict�b
Wilkes Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50 % recycled/10 % post -consumer paper

C.
yam:
' . M
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
$Division of Water Quality
jO Routine O Complaint O f,ollow-up of 1)%Vi) inspection O Follow-up of DMVC review° O Other
Date of Inspection 1d p
L . ..... Facility Number
Time of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Registered © Certified 13 Applied for Permit [3 Permitted JE3 Not Operational Date Last Operated: ................
(7--
Farm Name:....... 4. �t r6....... ...... ................ rY County :...... .."I! �d.............................
�...
le
Owner Name:_., ..... PhoneVo:... .r............ ......... .............................
Facility Contact �....... 2 .......... :.
Title:.,.......,[. Phone No:...........................................
Aj
p I
1ltailiug Address:.... .�rr ........ ICY'+! .... �fhrk M............................................
OnsiteRepresentative: ........................................................................................................... Integrator:..............,.......................................................................
e I' e
Certified Operator_...,.--! �-...................... .................. Operator Certification Number,...................
.. ......................
Location of Farm:
.WT...... ?-1....... ..........AZ.77 ..... ; .:..... .:!v.,r.......... ........ axi...... . ............
.. n' ... ...AL.. it f...rir+. c...... ...... rtn a .. '&,d �_ ... `............................................................ . .
Latitude'" Longitude L ga • 7
m .Current .. , ,
UapauGy�',roputaiion :
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current
Capacity �Populatian Cattfe ,•
Nuinber of Lagoons ],Holding Ponds ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
No Liquid Waste Management System 4 ❑
General
1, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
VNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
MI No
b, If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
CQ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in'gaUmin?
n
A
-d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
19 No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ��
❑ Yes
(W No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
I No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than higoonslholding ponds) require '
❑ Yes
2q No
maintenance/i mp ro vement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
V No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
06 No
7/25/97
Continued opt back

u
R
a

r Facility Number: q7 — j. •
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Laeoons.Holding Ponds. Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft):................:.........................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9.12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes 10 No
❑ Yes Z No
❑ Yes 50 No
14 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes R1 No
15. Crop type 6110.'.:w .............................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes IQ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 0 No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes 92 No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? R Yes ❑ No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes 0 No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes KNo
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No
No.violations•or' deficiencies.were-'noted-during this.' Visit.- You.wiU recei've'no•ftiriher-:
correspQnde O atiout this"visit.: , .......:.:.:..: :: . , : , .: _ ; .
✓ iNMI /-t L ► .G+� Twat Ara "".1
,mot
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:

I TV;
(Poo I.WR!Sqy.� Majouty: EM"41 Is; 4;0:
x
0'7'N-�".�15;.-'(1 C-WyUs py yp
130 MOM 011 tal,s—
F quo wo kwo ";f rn 4y" T.� lu
I mv, 1 'WOUX led in 0 aT vah my py -Y m 10C A'.,
:!,p
yt
W! !qMY WMW tn, ;PUq VIA jr-qlhj.-.
A w4pno "lot
L;
Lf,

0 "IVISlon oI 3011
p Division of Wa
Quality
i
Conservation
er
19 Koutme p Lompiamt p ronow-up of uwy inspection p Portow-up of uawu review p Uther
Date of Inspection 6/24797
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (Ith:mm)
■ Registered p Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted in Not 0perattana bate East Operated:
Farm Name: 11m.11alromb.D.airy............................ .... ...... ............ .................. County: Willies WSRO
.... ... .... ....
OwnerName: Bmatby................................. Holcomb .................................................... Phone No: 951-4d85....................................................................
Facility Contact; ...............................................................................Title:
Mailing Address: RLI.Hax.594....................................................................
Onsite Representative:
CertifiedOperator: .................................................. ............
Location of Farm:
............... ............... I..... Phone No:....................................................
T.hxtrmAad-KC..................................................... 2868.3 ..............
........ Integrator: ....................................................
Operator Certification Number:....
...rat.......:... p....nn.. Winn. nuttzniuutt..it::.:.!�a...:....1zPxa,:..::pa.. e,nn..........................................................................................................................
Latitude
®•
©° ©��
Longitude
®• ©4 ©46
Swine 41
esign3 urren estgnE; urren !
F i - f .BE i fh -F ! j .. ' 1➢. 3, 3 F, ' I`
Capacity„Population Poultry, Capacity Population �'r� Cattle€
estgn urren
3 Y 3' - 3 i
° E Capacity -'Population
13 Wean fo Feeder
13 Feeder to Fmisfi
p Farrow to Wean
p Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Fmcs
p Gilts
p Boars
f
'.1.-... --
— —W
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes N No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If' discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min`?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
p Yes Is No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes
® No
p Yes
N No
p Yes
N No
N Yes
p No
p Yes N No
p Yes p No

aci i y um er: 97_13
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? [3 Yes ® No
Structures (Lapoons,Holdinp Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(l.t):................2................................................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? p Yes ® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? p Yes ® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes p No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? N Yes p No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? p Yes ® No
(if in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .......Corn..(Silagr..&.GZt'a.in.).......................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? p Yes ® No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? p Yes ® No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
M No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
N Yes
p No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
p No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to -discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
p No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
p Yes
p No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Onlv
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
p Yes
p No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
p No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
p Yes
p No
Q .. o:viar jons.or crencies•were .no a uring t >:s y!s1t:. You w>I .receive no. urt er . - .
�o�`>�eS�loS�e>]e a4QRt t�1�S YS�)t: . . . . . . .
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:

Site Requires Fate Attention:
Facility No. _c? 7—_
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS STTE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: Alou 2,1995
Mme: 2 '
Fjkrm N=40wnw.
I r
r
Type of Opwation: Swine Poultry Cattle _.X_
Desip Q p 4ty. 1MO - I Number of Animals on Site: 120
DEM CffOcadan Number: ACE____ .,, DEM Cadficanon Number: ACNEW_
Ladd&: _2L_' 2- J LongitUd0: _ Q7 Z 7 ' „LZ" Elevation: t
Circle: Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lag+000 have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour stone event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) *or No Actual Freebyard:_L2_Ft. — Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or 6) was any a mioa observed? Yes o ON6
Is adequate land available for spray?® cc No Is the cover crop adequate?(a nor No
Ctop(s) being utilized: -
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback eritmia? 200 Feet fr= Dwellings? G or No
100 Feet from Wells? or No
U the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue: Line Stream? Yes or&,01
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yea er(sj
Is animal waste diacbargeed into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing sym&, eu ether
aivillar man-made dervices? Yes ar N9 If Yes, Please Explain.
Doees the facility maintain adequate waste treaaagement records (volumes of manuxle, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover Crop)? Yes or No F
•Inspectaz Name —
cc: FaoMty Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Need.

CiPERRTIONS 3PRIACH -- WO Fax:[phone]
Ju 1 24 ' 95 15 :13 F. 08/ 15
ION 11mmiu?
DATfi:
r
Owner: � aim NAmr.
�aa�rcy:
Agcnt VISAIn SJW AA.1Pitonre; �e "i -
f,1rl�tor: ptior�:6 07 - 4
On Site rte;=saatativa: Phooc:
Physical Adelrase,
Muihag Addmg _ ��.� I l�u _ �ytmur.,. �,� _ -- _ _ _ -- - •• --- . _,
Type uropmuvo: Swkm It atsry C,Lula ,X,
Design CaFinai()r I a C' _ y Numbers of AM&uda an ShO.' G-H t• - 1
l�tffnufer, 3 p �. i FZ Lofsgituda: s a 'y _ •
Typo of Inspcc Ice'. (lr wad � AUW _-
Ci(cle Y,m or No
Dm the Aulmal Wasu Pgcaa h4vrs avRicirmt f =bnord of t Pool * 25 year 24 bow Liam crew
Wp oxiewlaly l Foot t 71n4w) Yes or No Actual r-mtmar+d: _.2— Ved --0.— Was
For fa0hies wILb MOM lb" om IsSuDo, please addmcs tho other iagocas' freeboard wader tha
catiultcula toClltiR.
Was any N"Yap observed h= the ingoon(s)? Yes or(L) Warr (ltcre erosion aftha dam?:l Qr No
14 adequato ler}d aysilLble M laud applicM m7 (!g)ar No Is the cuvor atop adequate? q1jj)qr Nei
Addidonai Cnmmentre;-aatj4 +
F&% to [phone]
..: :...:.. .• i �..r
1
N
of AScm
t 0 'd 188Z06L616 ON xv i [ON SOS VOc0
1 Z: v t mom sa-Z t -'mr