970008_INSPECTIONS_20171231

rVa
.Msion of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation (}�
❑ Other Agency "1
Facility Number:970008 Facility Status: inactive Permit:AWD9 00 U Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Complaint County: Wilkes Region: Winston-Salem
Date of Visit: 02/20/2008 Entry Time:10:00 AM Exit Time:11:30 AM Incident#:
Farm Name: Hutchison Dairy Owner Email:
Owner: Clifton G Hutchison Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address:6501 Traphill Rd Traphill NC 28685
Physical Address:
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36°18'53" Longitude: 81°03'26"
Hwy. 21 north of Elkin to Traphill Rd. 9 miles on Traphill Rd. ,SR1002 and farm is on the left. Second, smaller pond is located on
Mountain View Rd.
Question Areas:
N Discharges& Stream Impacts Waste Application
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On-Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Cliff Hutchison Phone:
On-site representative Cliff Hutchison Phone:
Primary Inspector: Melissa Rosebrock Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
TM Yoe-U.rn - SwP
Page: 1
1

r
y
Permit:AWD970008 Ownf acility: Clifton G Hutchison Facility Number:970008
Inspection Date: 02/20/2008 Inspection Type:Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
Inspection Summary:
Today's visit was the result of an anonymous complaint received by DWO on 2/1/08 alleging that too much manure(cattle and poultry)
had been land-applied to the receiving crop. Caller stated that the problem was occuring in fields along the river, 1.5 miles west of
traphill Elementary.
At this location, poultry waste had not been applied yet to the field of small grain but was stockpiled in the field.Although the stockpile
was only 20-30 feet from a small branch,there was no run-off of leachate into the branch since the stockpiled litter was down hill from
surface waters and there was very little leachate movement(about 1 foot).
DWQ continued driving west another three miles to the dairy.We observed that a newly purchased field had received dairy waste.We
could visually see where waste had been applied and no evidence of run-off was observed. Per Derek,there had been a dispute with a
neighbor over the purchase of this field.
We checked the creek and found one location that contained some sludge worms. No cattle were at the dairy and owner's son, Derek,
stated that they had gotten rid of the dairy cows at least a month ago.
No other evidence of stream problems(algae,foam, etc,)was observed.There
There is a new housing development directly beside the dairy. Roads are paved and streetlights have been installed, but no home
construction has begun.
Page:2
1

Permit:AWD970008 Oer-facility: Clifton G Hutchison �' Facility Number:970008
Inspection Date: 02/20/2008 Inspection Type:Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle-Milk Cow 80 0
Total Design Capacity: 80
Total SSLW: 112,000
Page: 3

i 1
Permit:AWD970008 Ownel�acllity: Clifton G Hutchison Facility Number:970008
Inspection Date: 02/20/2008 Inspection Type:Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
Discharges $ Stream Impacts Yes No .NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a.Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes,notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3.Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10.Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals(Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
PAN? ❑
Is PAN> 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Fescue(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Page:4

r
Permit:AWD970008 Oor-Facility: Clifton G Hutchison Facility Number:970008
Inspection Date: 02/20/2008 Inspection Type:Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:Complaint
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page:5

r
;. F.1-.h..td r tiLr,. 7 -r;si 4' I - t N.il^I I I� Y �.,-0rfl .: 'y "�
ii In if.E# �;i:l:-��[ .z.f �,r , v r r s iilF±lu r i7¢+< �r��h' rj 'i� u "fr F tk`TI +11 f'i 3FIAF.r� €
WateF,Quali [
, ,€.. `3, ��E i
I i r . `,f rl <IS,r,,,r-..,.� i,,}€, r : .. is;€a � °:I� 4r fnl: , ;.o i la €.d,:r:f�
,il,:�� ����[����>;:f,'!€€E�€, l�i� EE�a:r,�r�: , �Divisiotrol'-Soil and'�Water Consetwati
i€I �,�;�.,p ffi lf I i` i,... a ,_.- ., ...,,: ,oFti",.Eli ,�1 €Pi f7gg p,3 e €:-et.il rEi lfr�i },-
I i . i.._, .I l I i
P „i..i.� :F. r o i -IIr I i ., i ; t r ri a� _.,,���� �, �� i'>_ i�f F :.i t y�; 1
?. ' I t.f . 3 g ✓ I y�� flar #I i i.�� !E I� ' "I €I�f�i'''E i F 31 !� , -i4 -.:I I ! I f'� IiIF�i €.-„f��� If:E 4itlrl
4 Other A enC ! �+
�f ,:,;.,, uE,
r I I r:.
IIi�:. I i_ L�4! 1.�9� � �lri'I<.a 3,i- :.��i I,E i., •,if�7�d�i c r�+�;[<.ria.! i� ,e:.'fil! '..,6 Y6E:: .I .13 d3,� Ii,J i€ <k�g�<�r�ii[J11!9i
Type of Visit O+ Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 97 g Date of Visit: 6/29/2004 Time: 0930
r Not Operational Below Threshold
Permitted ®Certified 13 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
.Farm Name: t�4tt9ltiSamI?. Ai�rx.......................................................................................... County: WiLk9s............................................... WSRA.......,
OwnerName: C1ifJ911.................................... HJkjgWhQjn.................................................. Phone No: 336-957.:220 ...........................................................
Mailing Address: 6S.Q.1.:fxnRltilt.RQALd........................................................................... TKAP IL..K.......................................................... 26.6#5-9Q2�..
Facility Contact: CLifi:.klutc1liSQ11.............................................Title: ................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
Onsite Representative: Ixff.,�11d.I}1� �1f`. 41tsLti�cllx.................................................. Integrator:...........................................
Certified Operator:................................................... ...........................................I................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
Hwy. 21 north of Elkin to Traphill Rd. 9 miles on Traphill Rd. ,SR1002 and farm is on the left. Second,smaller pond is +
located on Mountain View Rd.
❑Swine []Poultry ®Cattle [:] Horse Latitude 36 • 18 ° S3 if Longitude 81 • F 037,
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity .Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ®Dairy 80 51
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer ❑Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder 10 Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 80
❑Gilts a
❑ Boars Total SSLW ii 112,000
Number. of Lagoons 0
IdongPonds
Discharges& Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. if discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ®Yes ❑No
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes ®No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ......Waste.P.ond..... ................................... .................................... ................................... ................................... ...................................
Freeboard(inches): 30
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 97-8 Date of Inspection 6/29/2004 t
5. Are there any immediate threats to the i grity of any of the structures observed?(ie/treeTsevere erosion, ❑Yes ®No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑Yes ®No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ®Yes ❑No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes ®No
elevation markings?
Waste Aimlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No ,
IL Is there evidence of over application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes ❑No
❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑Frozen Ground ❑Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Corn(Silage&Grain) Fescue(Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes to No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes %No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes OR No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ®No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below ❑Yes ❑No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes ®No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes ®No
roads,building structure,and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,contact a regional ❑Yes ®No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Coy invents(refer to question#)„Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations flit anyhother ccommen Sl sx
Use,drawt>lgs,of:facihty to better:explaifi,situations.(use additional pages as�necessary) ; 31[❑ Field Copy ®Final Notes
,w ""t........ ..�,3 y,y... �, •-.,�... ..p.,�x,..r["ui ".ta Ldi,t ,����.:
Today's visit was to follow-up on a compliance inspection conducted two years ago in which 6-8 inches of waste and sediment was
observed in the creek on each end of the culvert.
4.Although the stream looks better this time,there is still 4-6"of sediment/waste in the creek near the upper end of the culvert at the
dairy on Traphili Road.
4. Suggest excluding cattle from the stream passing through the property of the dairy on Mountain View Road. Dissolved oxygen(DO)
as measured to be 8A mg/L,upstream and 6.6 mg/L downstream. NC Water Quality Statutes state that the DO must be at least 5.05
mg/L. The operator of this dairy, Derek Hutchison,wants to install fencing,a well,and drinkers. I spoke with SWCD/NRCS about this
issue and this farm may be a candidate for cost-share assistance. It is suggested that the operator contact the Wilkes Co.
WCD/NRCS to discuss this issue.
Reviewer/Inspector Name .Me1i Rose rock � ��� f �
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur Date:
12112103 Continued

4 ,
Facility;Number: 97-.8 we of Inspection 6/29/2004 •
Required Records& Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑Yes ❑No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists, design,maps, etc.) ❑Yes ❑No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes ❑No
❑Waste Application ❑Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ❑No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes ❑No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems, over application) ❑Yes ❑No
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ®No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ®Yes ❑No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ®Yes ❑No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit?(If no,skip questions 31-35) ❑Yes ®No
31. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑Yes ❑No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑Yes ❑No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey.? ❑Yes ❑No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ❑No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes ❑No
❑Stocking Form ❑Crop Yield Form []Rainfall ❑Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑Annual Certification Form
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
o .... ..,.. �„ r.I y; ! a :t r T�..r f:.i'.,,f FI u, ,r { �I1 s i
ddtttonal Comments",and/or-DrawinvC r 1. � 1 a�,1=��� {: , rf
b""u- t,.- Ip I If s;r lili Irrt 't� #c.1r I„ ' `.�.l.f�;aFr.Jl:,.irr�V r. HC i '. l r. _.t '�.(r, [f
�r:ep:, r .ter "�'.�,,. �.a ..,... ,11. ,I,f . , ..r„Ia:9r
7. Need to cut a couple of trees on the embankment of the waste pond on Mountain View Road. A.
8. Need to scrape manure from the stocktrail at the dairy on Traphill Road. There is the probablility that waste is washed from the
stocktrail and into the stream during rain events.
8. Mr Hutchison has requested that Hutchison Dairy be removed from the compliance database. The waste level and condition of the
rite ponds of both dairies have been good for two years. Due to the continuing environmental concern described in#4,however,the
Winston-Salem Regional Office can not endorse Mr. Hutchison's request at this time.
9. Stocktrail on traphill Road was designed so that cattle would cross under the road(through the creek)then travel uphill on the
stocktrail so that a gate could be closed behind them. Cattle were to be excluded from surface waters except when traveling between
he pasture/lot and the freestall barn. Mr. Hutchison says that he can't keep the cattle confined behind the gate(and out of the stream)
because it has stressed the cattle in the past. Mr. Hutchison wants to re-build or build a new freestall barn so that the cattle can stay
confined and won't have to cross the road and can therefore stay out of the stream. I spoke with the Wilkes Co. SWCDINRCS
regarding possible federal money or other sources offinancial assistance. It is suggested that Mr. Hutchison contact SWCD/NRCS
to discuss this issue.
Id
12112103

,R, ,t r� f. +y. I Yr �'•``"� .
Aw
'. 3n E=>•4r . , , . .:s ,,., ,,.,r, ., a: ,acEr :rs3 �„H ,. e 3 ,1 t I .t t. . ..Es,.,o@¢ F#;,=.,...,a,:, aa+_€I , ,: , , y.., . :,, a a ¢, 3 i Gpadslh1 ;f!!EI • €i t; .1 '' ri{ + Divisionlof SaHima Water GQnservatioII d g l .- : . d,o ct ; irl ti Flit 1 I
PI.d 33a srl�;? it 3! j!� I, s € �F€p=<it3 1::; .• �'.:a 41 # 33,., ;€ ,a, !,'kk
'@ ?3,r..1 t4 €r,f a In':r. :a£Fj ,i �1td e. I.:iis:#:.r• a�cE} �_-Otlleri A en ..!:d a 186i3it3O•I? } !,,'EPII�[0',!;'€°p ;€r 7.1E { E'f 1 I•.esi. :v +''� ' ,- i� .� �.+. S1' „ {„�Ai1°,.. Ili IHIAs9�. .
1��..,I.�€re va$� �s� s1�•�e�al;, f�p�Bt"31 'P=
t n 1 i€�i ,}.� d`P r j t r i 6 b ��f-
A .-rw :-_..r�. ,k .7 f -) rI.LF._.. r.aa .7.1- 7r- .,,�s i¢
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit XRoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: Time:
10 Not Operational Q Below Threshold
0 Permitted Certified ©Conditionally Certified ©Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: GAL.t. yr ................................................ County: ... ....W..i..t..ges� ............ .......................
Owner Name: .....i. ��.. ............ ......... .e.'.!. �, .. .. Phone No: L..'.........a...a.6.2
Mailing Address: ...11. .�.. .... .rah.!..I.I�.. :.....�.....�. .... h. .11... ... .....a...$ g . .............
9z
.r
FacilityContact: -d—j ..L.............. .. Title: ................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
OnsiteRepresentative: . X,2( ''!.I.j..t1a ................................ Integrator:............................................... �. ..........................
Son
CertifiedOperator:................................................... . +. ................................ Operator Certification Number:.........................................
Location of Farm:
FZ4 11 --7r Tra-phill 0or r t) 2 - [} Ml QS, lY] `r
❑Swine ❑Poultry kattle ❑Horse Latitude Longitude
Cu�rrtre_n tl 7
r�«
g1
�r i. C Po ati i� Pou Cavine � ou^1 a elato ::i.t3.
❑Wean to Feeder '"';i ❑Layer []Dairy
❑Feeder to Finish ,' ❑Non-Layer []Non-Dairy l
rt❑Farrow to Wean
❑ er Other
❑Farrow to Feeder
4�1❑❑❑Farrow to Finish TfII(d W r t KDIt a0aE M°€t:�;,€..g1t:in C€1
]I1�
�I Iai1 4�psIt�.``ia�E c4n1
l`rxKy,€,�
Gilts
Boars W4� I I c2i 600:]
r
r[
I t I �NI]nlher Of Lag001LS[sill
TIFAin
�6.. I r
Discharges&rStrearn lmpacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes XNo
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes XNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ®Yes [:]No
Waste Collection&Treatment ~�
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes 1IVo
Structure I tructure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 `
Identifier: l� �aAd......................... .................................... ................................... ................................... ...................................
�`�,.
Freeboard(inches):
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
5.'Are there any immediate threats to Ategrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/ es,severe erosion, ❑Yes No
seepage,etc.) X
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑Yes XNo
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes,and the situation poses as
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ' Yes ❑No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ,R
elevation markings?
r
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes No
11. is there evidence of over application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes ✓ � o
❑Excessive Pondin ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Frozen Ground ❑Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops di r with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes o
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes ❑No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes ❑No
roads,building structure,and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,contact a regional ❑Yes ❑No
Air Quality representative immediately.
^GIRL, 0 I:.NtTS%5.34€01 �rilt` Fltu`kh 1 rfii H& ��ff.
CoFnarnents{(refer to;questeon#) Expla�eaaay�'YES answers and/or anyrecommentistsonsaa yother comments. tr ,;
aUse'drawanRr facilatiyto betterexplam sttuaGons.(use adtrnnal pages as necessary) ,B¢ Field CopY ❑Final Notes'to mEE+..F.. G.w,a.TFyC i..�:'. 193�8._{IrP._.3.3133Yyfii:3fS 43 F.d9}t9.:i:k<'17i �461>811t301.t... .Sdi.>w',f'3a3
L
dAt
_ ... 47f1r of � r;.#
O��1.Reviewer/Inspector Name ai �?
Reviewer/Inspector Signatu JA, A7 Date:
12/12/03 I _ W ,p ,Continued

Facility Number: _ lit ate of Inspection
Required Records&Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? N/A
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WIT,checklists,design,maps,etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below.
❑Waste Application ❑Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes <No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? + ''
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? w
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems, over application) I"�
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Xyes ElNo
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? `-� ❑Yes d No
NPDES Permitted.Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit?(If no,skip questions 31-35) ❑Yes )No
31. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑Yes ❑No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑Yes ❑No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? ❑Yes ❑No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ❑No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes ❑No
❑Stocking Form ❑Crop Yield Form ❑Rainfall ❑Inspection After 1"Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑Annual Certification Form ,1.
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
. ..,.•'.... ! �•.�e,�ur ...�...�.. n: .r.>.->r.' :i.y .. .. . Y > L#1.1N 3 !E ".f}f-9E �i
dd�ional//'' mmenLc and/or1Drawing'ps.° qs 19�St" li t{s: ,:s.-}7 j s 3,?t €S3 ;apl[['sf tE s a}l tl t E f # EE� ."f r3 lis
t` -o ,I:. C e tlEir3EE 9Y 9� #S[, { j €d�$-,�r}
v4«_t'StkF Rti 7,.eS:e,l a®Yf..UI;r.aG :!'i:[!'A.ir.6sad4�f>i iS,�l:i:m#3..$:.a 1i :ail; abL�i.i_ ri}..,.4t^.•L'P,f_Pffr�# f�S}a-.ia: ,3��:,�..
n
o7ap� /VOV -
Oq 4s loo-5,
19.E O'C) . I 19
12/72/03 led.

fii io"n'6" "W"l all
!J� RUIVU of all A
0, ?rsd W '1�; 11"J"
1A
q.4
U 61 0
Othet;iAg hoIlq
FType of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
'Type
0"Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other 0 Denied Access
1255
Facility Number 97 8
I ate of Visit: Thne:=Not 0 erational O Below Threshold
El Permitted M Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName; RtkUldsmRairy........................................................................................... County: W%j&5................................................ W—M........
Owner Name: CjjfLQA.................................... HMJCWNQJO.................................................. Phone No: 33A-957-2,210,8
Mailing Address: 05.Q11rapliffiRuLd........................................................................... T.rAphi1LN.0..........................................................
FacilityContact: Clif(RutdiU59.1L..........................................Title: ................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
Onsite Represciitative: .CliffHulcWW.Ujm......................................................................I Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
Hwy.21 north of Elkin to Traphill Rd.9 miles on Traphill Rd.,SR1002 and farm is on the left. Second,smaller pond is
located on Mountain View Rd.
❑Swine [I Poultry Cattle [I Horse Latitude 75-3T Longitude F_81_1! F-03-16 F-2-6766
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population ' 'Cattle capacity Population
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer Dairy 8o 1 "7
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer ❑Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
E]Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Gilts 6c's'ig'n"'Capacity. 80
❑ -11"..,., -)'!' ll . , 1. , ,
0 Boars Total.SSLW 112,000
................
ENu.mbe!f?of.,Lagoonv 0 Subsurface Drains Presen�tj[]Lagoon Area 10 Spray
Hol: : L Holding' Ponds:/Solidjraps,.1 I [ON; iquid Waste Management System
Discharues &Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? El Yes No
Discharge originated at: []Lagoon [I Spray Field E]Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? [3 Yes D No
b, If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? H Yes 0 No
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? 0 Spillway 0 Yes 0 No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ......Waste.paud...... ................................... ................................... ................................... ................................... ...................................
Freeboard(inches): 12
05103101
70 1

Facility Number: 97-8 Date of Inspection 612412QQ2 i
5. Are there an immediate threats to the Atyof an of the structures observed? ie/treevere erosion,Y Y { � ❑Yes ®Na
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ®Yes ❑No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ®Yes ❑No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
11, Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes ®No
12. Crop type Corn(Silage&Grain)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes ®No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ®No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ®Yes ❑No
Re uired Records&Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑Yes ❑No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists, design, maps,etc.) ®Yes ❑No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis&soil sample reports) ®Yes ❑No
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ®Yes ❑No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes ®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ®Yes ❑No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ®Yes ❑No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
(. q ) ns or any`other comments.
t.L
Commeiitss refer to question# ExpIazn any YES answers and/or any recommendatzo
«r li4i' f F•
facility to better exp ( p g� 1 as necessary) ❑Fzeld Copy ®Final Notes 3
Use drawings of y lam situatzons. use additional a es
r+r - ,.E + S;€l+ ;s+rrr�.�T}71 "'Cs'^'r nY"1�':f'». 13..�'7"n•_,"'11'I'f'+".'C^,wl .E s: +
3.and 8. Stocktrail needs to be scraped and repaired immediately. About 6 inches of manure in creek on date of inspection. Cattle are
congregating at both ends of the culvert that passes under the road causing manure to pool in this area. Creek that passes through the
culvert is picking up much of the manure and depositing it downstream. About 1300 feet of stream is impacted by this operation.
9. Need maximum liquid marker on waste storage structure at Traphill Road facility.
14. Irrigation system is not in operation yet per operator.
15. Four fields are above 3000 threshold for copper. Can no longer apply animal waste on those fields but operator sayus he's not sure
which fields those are from the sample number on the soil test results. Need to contact SWCD for assistance.
Reviewer/Inspector Name +Melis a Ros'e'hrock
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: l 1 Date:
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 97-8 lla of Inspection 6/24/2002
0
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑Yes ❑No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes ®No
roads,building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑Yes ❑No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e.broken fan belts,missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑Yes ❑No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑Yes ❑No
Ad d rtrona o mments!a n or rawrn s 3, ��r;��
., . .., 6,�.::,,, .f ,:,, I. .I,1. , ;,,1�,,d,r�l„ Ir I�l:. ,. ,�,.I,,E!f. {.. �.f 1.1,I.I I„dt,��.d,,: rulr,l,z,f:i 1,�liltl!lI�Iffl►ff,r,f.I��l„�I!►,
16,Per operator,he has not pumped storage structure due to flat tire on the on the honey wagon. AL
18. No maps were with the CAWMP.
19.No records were available. Waste plan is written for 80 cattle w190 day storage in waste storage structure. Operator says he
hasn't applied cattle waste since December 2001 and these records were not available.
24. and 25. Need to take stream samples fpor possible enforcement case.
Milk hauler is picking-up about 7100 to 7600 lbs. of milk every-other-day.
Visited second farm on Mountain Valley (?) Road off of Traphill Road:
Need to keep cattle out offenced buffer area. Otherwise the operation looks much better this year. About 3100 to 37001bs. milk is
picked-up every-other-day.
05103101

` IN
Division of Water Quality
Division of Sail and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection Operation Review ()Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint t) Follow up Q Emergency Notification Q Other ❑Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: 0 Time:
of O erational Below Threshold
0 Permitted 0Certifted ©Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: a,
i 1 County:
L • V�LI �S
Owner Name: ! i r0 h�U + f Y? Ph o a No: �J 2�_q �_ 2-2-0
Mailing Address: 5-6 ! r I �r �1 17 1 I�3 6
Facility Contact: C 8 t1 Phone No:
Onsite Representative: ioL Integrator:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
A,
❑Swine ❑Poultry , Cattle ❑Horse Latitude Longitude
Design Current Design . Current .Design Current
Swine Capacity Population oultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer I I 'airy
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer [on-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons I ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holding Pon&/:So.1kTraps jLiquid �❑No Waste S stem
Discharges tr m Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes KNo
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If ycs,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes 4 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Yes ❑No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? Cl Spillway ❑Yes XNo
StCru lur Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier; ,!�r?P
o
Freeboard(inches):
05103101 r J Continued 6

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees, re r sion, ❑Yes )�_No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an ❑Yes N No
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? El Yes
No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? Yes ❑No
Waste Annlicatipn
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes No
It. Is there evidence of over applica ion? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes %,No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated i e Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes tN.
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes o
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? , Yes No
Required Records&Documents "�
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design,maps,etc.) Yes ❑No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) Yes ❑No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? Yes P!�No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? Yes ❑No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? D Yes ff[ No
,�J 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Yes ❑No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? I9`Yes ❑No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
DR
UCommentse drawings( of facility
Explain any YE9answcrs and/or any recommendstions or,any other,commients
to better ex lain situations.¢ustadd,itional a es as n£c£ssar '
p { I?.g Y)
: . Field Copv ❑Final Notes
oom
4.A
Ab. a
Reviewer/Inspector Name F 64,mrocr
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
OS/t73/Ol +v • J� 1 -{r Continued

• •
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection a2
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below Yes o
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes 2rNo
28, Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes A No
roads,building structure,and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? cs o
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e.broken fan belts,missing or
or broken fan blade(s),inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑Yes NNO
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanendtempomry cover? n Yes n bla
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
4P UAL
a fps.
wPri
05103101

1.:'`li-to{II€114€�.L I.r:r YI'hhifl �l i.l,V:, � ai'Fkl a€'7ll dal c!.j if! S,IIII'� I Il!.p 1'^iCi I
, ! fIr I ,Ilh€'rt'a�Cf i.l€+ nl ! �II,I �C 11 rr I �I Ii 14��' {
€ ii €i€[t €II"• � I.j--! I;-_�i-:�r.y,�k �€:.,:I e ;.r �`i€111.<.r,€r .aV� ,€ 1�:I�i�� -I I � i I f.. 'i'e r 13•. E € �,�i Sl��r4.eC i I I,� I I.�,€� I
i€[( °hp I €i •Ii ,l , +rlk' , tsiom of SoiC and
I€ I`•'r r. !- Y. I `
I.IP
€..I
�[ I " .,,Y. •fs l€EE€{. "-1€ 1,,..Il .�,i ai "I•r 1.:�� '4 � ?3;':
€ € t€ arl:��', n:Vr �,i,t E4 r•-.h€: I i€�... rl:{Lr�I 1 ( Other A enc €.t:€
1? g y
a .€.,.:1• r '!'r -l[l{I pit r ;7 j9:':fii [.I;I r I i!I 11 �M Y:.. }`lI,�IJ� A}Y�� i ::Y�,I4I.11..Y.
�}},9 I
?? 1i41t.,€-sr _
f € � C I' !
€9,€-�€�....�I �':r .i���il�Yie[llt � ��, �..l.+�•I Y E i•,rta..r.r k�ll 31€.L€,u��Elf€��.,�.i.l.,.�H.9.€ �al�i�uL<.�'�Ei rll�l W61,C
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑Denied Access
Facility Number 97 8 Date of Visit: 1p131/21101 Time: 13:15
r Not O erational O Below Threshold
©Permitted ®Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ...................... .
Farm Name: HakItisuaRaix County: WjUWN........................
OwnerName: Cliftoix.................................... HstNt> Rom.................................................. Phone No: 33.6:-957-22.0.8...........................................................
MailingAddress: fS.S?l.Tx.aPb ll.R9;xd........................................................................... Tir,Alit#i11...1 C.......................................................... 28MA—.9921.
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title: ................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
Onsite Representative:G1lftpA1.. .1?.�1 Xi�it,T UtGI<islR[x............................................. Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
wy.21 north of Elkin to Traphill Rd.9 miles on Traphill Rd.,SR1002 and farm is on the left. Second,smaller pond is A
ocated on Mountain View Rd.
❑Swine ❑Poultry ®Cattle ❑Horse Latitude 36 • 18 53 Longitude 81 • Q3 26
Design Current Design Current Design Curreiit
Swine Capacity Pop�ulati6nPoultry Capacity 'PopulationCattle Capacity Population
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ®Dairy 80 60
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer ❑Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean ;
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity F 80
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW 112,000
Number of Lagoons ; ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Arca ;'
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps 1 ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges& Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: [:]Lagoon ❑Spray Field [_-]Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No.
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? L]Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑Spillway. ❑Yes ®No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Stnicture 6
Identifier: ................................... ................................... .................................... ................................... ................................... ...................................
Freeboard(inches): 60
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 97-8 Date of Inspection 10/31/200
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/tree0vere erosion, ❑Yes ®No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation.poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes ❑No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes ❑No
12. Crop type Fescue(Graze)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes ®No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ®No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ❑No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ❑No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ®No
Required Records&Documents
17, Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑Yes ❑No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP, checklists, design,maps,etc.) I ®Yes ❑No
19, Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes ❑No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ®Yes ❑No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes ®No
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ®No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments(r:.efer to question#): Explain any YES inswers and/or any recommendations or any other_ comments.
Use drawmgs�bf facility to better eiplain Situations (use additional pages as necessary): ❑Field Copy ®Final Notes
€I I
Facility is operating below the threshold of numbers and has sent in a request to be removed form. Facility is not subject to a review, A
however, the DWQ has not removed this facility due to past water quality problems. Today's visit was mainly to check the freeboard
level on the waste pond and see if there were any water quality problems evident.
## 18.Mr.Hutchison did not have the waste plan and application records on site. Questions pertaining to waste application could not be
answered since there were no records to review. Mr. Hutchison has installed a new irrigation system with underground mainline and
hydrants. Facility will have to have irrigation figured on effective acres since the system is new. The inactive waste pond has been
lased out and graded and seeded. Waste and soil analysis are off the NCDA website.
E
er/Inspector Name }Rocky Durliamerllnspector Signature: Date:
05103101 Continued

Iiucillty's'Number: 97-8 D of Inspection 10/31/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑Yes ❑No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes ®No
roads,building structure,and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑Yes ❑No
30, Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e.broken fan belts,missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑Yes ®No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑Yes ❑No
I , . •
ltlona Omments
. iand/or. rawm 5 lrl l i l,i�,i .� r'' ra� ' ' i '+!f'I i ' }.11r� I€F f f�'I r�! € f f€gil i j'I!r! tri,r' �r�r l i i it r fl,r�• n'.i� rr `�;., ,.. .: .. .. .. .. ..:. . .• ,�, ,•s,., ,,,. r.;Ili,,! iil�{I1!l��I�lL., .6illilrHrGIrG(�,ffiflLr��ll,.,r(llrr,,ari,Gl.�i LI,.f:�E�.!•_l�.,r.,iJ.,Rl,f�,;..,. !I, •I�,,1,,.f: r.� �..si: it i.!r i!, ,r i..•:
Waste analysis: 7-02-01 LSD 8.5 lbs.N11000 gals.B, 11.9 lbs.N11000 gals. SI +
3-21-01 LSD 9.9" ", 13.9
Soil analysis dated 4-27-01 and 7-17-01 have very high levels of Copper and Zinc.
05103101

' rvision of Water Quality
isian of Soil and Water Conservation
�Other Agency
Type of Visit ®Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑Denied Access
Facility Number 97 Og Date oP Visit: 6/29/200i Time: 1120 Printed on: 7/2/2001
0 Not Operational 40 Below Threshold
Permitted E Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..................
FarmName: Hutchb. IDAticy........................................................................................... County: WAo............................................... .W,S Q........
OwnerName: Clitkan.................................... HiAtcwslm.................................................. Phone No: 33A-.UZ7ZZ1Q.S..........................................................
Mailing Address: 65Q1.1xaPWJ1.Raad............................................................................ MINC.......................................................... 2005:1922.,
FacilityContact: Cliff.Hulchism.....................:.......................Title. ................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
OnsiteRepresentative:Cliff.HiukWsom.......................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
Hwy.21 north of Elkin to Traphill Rd.9 miles on Traphill Rd.,SR1002 and farm is on the left. Second,smaller pond is +
ocated on Mountain View Rd. I 1W
❑Swine ❑Poultry ®Cattle ❑Horse Latitude 3b • 18 f 53 64 Longitude 81 • 03 6 26 66
Design Current Design Current Design Current
lwine Ca acit Po ulation Poultry Ca acit P.a ulation Cattle Ca acit` P>o ulation
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ®Dairy 80 45
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer ❑Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
r103 harrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 80
Gilts
Boars Total SS1,VV 112,000
Number of Lagoons 0 = ❑Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
olding Ponds/H Solid Traps ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges_,Stream 1mRacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 11 Yes ❑No
fit=Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes ®No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ..Waste..struaute.. ....... ther.faria...... .................................... ................................... ................................... ...................................
Freeboard(inches): 48 24
05103101 Continued

r
Facility Number: 97-08 Date of Inspection 6/29/20d1 Printed on: 7/2/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the iTgrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/tref severe erosion, C1 Yes ®No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ®Yes ❑No
Waste Agglication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes ®No
12. Crop type Corn(Silage&Grain) Fescue(Hay) Fescue(Graze)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes ®No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ®No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ®No
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ®No
Required Recor_ds_& Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&Cenral Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑Yes ❑No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/.WUP,checklists,design,maps,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes ®No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ®No
2 t. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ®Yes ❑No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes ®No
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ❑No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ®Yes ❑No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ®Yes ❑No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
a a o
t a ❑Field Copy ®Final Notes
3.Dissolved oxygen was recorded at farm on Mountain Valley Road: Below waste pond=5.5 mg/L;50' upstream from this area where
attle cross and have denuded creekbed and bank=4.2 mg/L; 300' upstream where creek enters property=5.4 mg/L.
9. Structure is a concrete walled waste holding pond.
21. Facility has less than 100 cows and is not permitted.
4. Need to check waste pond levels next year.
25. 2001 Soil samples results have been received. Need to cease animal waste application on "Frank Hutchison"fields since copper is
now>3000.
7. Dead animals go to landfill in Roaring River.
Reviewer/Inspector Name [Melissa Rosebrock
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur Date:
O5103101 Continued

Facility Number: 97-08 D of Inspection 5/29/2001 Printed on: 7/2/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑Yes ❑No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes ®No
roads,building structure,and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑Yes ®No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e. broken fan belts,missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑Yes ®No
32. Do the gush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑Yes ❑No
mall storage structure on Traphill Road(below concrete waste storage structure)has been filled in,graded and seeded with AL
rescue grass and wheat, and closed out.
Dairy waste sample dated 3121101 = 9.91bs. N/1000 gal. Need waste sample for June dairy waste applications by 8/27/01.
Poultry litter sample results were also available.
Dissolved oxygen readings were also taken at the Traphill Rd.farm: at culvert where cattle crass under road=6.2 mg/L, in creek
downhill of waste storage structure=7.0 mg/L.
05103101

. 1zOro
3 ``��
1.P
"7F x "'$' �3�Y 344iS€' F€� Et: •�E k`€�E� pd 1 1( 5-0 f'..�y
VlSiBn OiE Water Ql1�Iit� � , r{ v ! ' s I �[v-��"c€�EIE b���€ �i�#•
O N 0 Sol t�laWat l'{ronservaup Epee:,a i♦ € l f't IB 1�Y�hpgf �
:6. I J.
> �w CC "ne f'
q ,f 1 � V �Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: Time:
Q Not O eration& Below Threshold
Permitted Certified Conditional) Certified Registered � ..
� c
� Y � Ip Date Last Operated or Above Thresholds-:.�`::.:...:.....:......
Farm Name: ...L.11. : .....!...LI� S:.rQl.1n .�. .... ........................... County: �..�.. ,C� ...........
Owner Name: ..... e.�r 4r� � .. .. .... Phone No: . ... ....q ....!..:..a.a �......�..:.
Facility Contact: ..... :.. y.` ..,...� ` 111�. r� itle: ...... .................................................... Phone No: ......-..~....G. ff ...........
Mailing Address: ............. sO! {r . 1$1..1............ •..,............ . k w.,�..!..`.'.. ..........c7r O�
Onsite Representative:.. ��. . .. .......... .... ... ..) .I.1..�.M. ..................... Integrator:................................................................................ ,
Certified Operator:„ .., M. l M�........ Operator Certification Number:.........................................
Location of Farm:
3 G > 64+-ek' 'P�- M
❑Swine ❑Poultry ffcattle ❑Horse Latitude Longitude �s®� �«
Design r Current Design Current: Design Current
$wine ci CacPoula thCa a n' ' e Ca a i _Po lation
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer DairyI X0 1 WE lff�
;,❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer ❑Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑ E Other ,
El Farrow to Feeder
❑Farrow to Finish TOtal Design=Clip&c�ly.
❑Gilts F
❑Boars `To.,ta1 SSLW ? 2-1
�Q
r!;
l t Num' Wr'of Lagoons' ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ID Spray Field Area
r
Holding Po�ids I SoHtI°Traps;:' ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges&Stream Irnyact5
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes �No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(if yes, notify DWQ) ❑yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes *0
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Yes WO
Waste Collection &Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes 9No
Struct re 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 - Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .. .. . . .... ... ..... ...� ... .�ZV!LL'.. .T.QX�1R'!!�..............
IV
Freeboard(inches): C�
5100 t7 Continued on hack

Facility Number: q I Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the i0grity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees,severe erosion, ❑Yes No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes �No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance improvement? ❑Yes INO
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? Yes ❑No
Waste_Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes *0
]1. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes o
12. Crop type0&46-2L, IgI ,
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those c6signat d in the Ccrtified Animal Ate Management PI (CAWMP)? ❑Yes No .
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes '[ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes No
Renuired Records&Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design,maps,etc.) yes ,WNo
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) �❑Yes KNo
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes �00
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? XYes ❑No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems,over application)
- ❑YesNo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes X.
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Yes ❑No
25. Were.any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? Yes No
. No.*i0fAti0ijs'or-dgfc}ejn�ie'wore p¢tea•dttrifg 01s'vpspt! Y'oir wiii tecoiye 40 fu4-tbO , , • �l
cor'res' oridence:ab6uf this visit.:
Comments(refer to°question#}' Explain airy.YES atas�vers and/ar any.recorniaendatauns dr any ottiec coimeatsE"
Use drawings of facility to'better explain situations;(use additional pages as aecessary):, <t,: (
OL
3, tx) off-
MAsrs
Reviewer/InspectorName hp
Reviewer/Inspector Signatu Date: glpp
r

r
•Facility Number: — 40of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ❑Yes �No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes No
roads,building structure,and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑Yes No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts,missing or XNo
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑Yes
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑Yes 1KNo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Mqpqp"i;, omrneats"dlor,Dmwings "
r
t
bc) _ 1 .Z L
� � �s
r
.a� 7 e .
u4 Lo
34,'XAO deCQ 3/o2-//d/
a-7

. .:V-., .iii nt.!RR'=,Pr"I ! t ! !RYr;rn -I 7-.( F PE.
,I 1! .,! { f r {I t k #3 11 Ilya F IV.Ia'!Il'4 Ifl! "fr II }V IIY i j V Y 11Y,lPrP€t!!"�IIPI V.@�tYj��jI1 1I
l r1YP tc'roPl +!t-.ai 'PiF:t.IE 7a PggJi+il!;[�Ir ihP I}r P( rl F�'?'Prl.'s€7 VIsion"Eof Water Qualrt „ " I, PI x y � 10
r t--,P,. :r I€.,I ,..PIY t....€:ur y1' �IYPi'- r" (a�^�Y�t�." tY! ,lj'#E IPP Y.i1P ii€Il ai!(I l l i.�.f++,.II'�}Y
I P �" ld.tip llir ftilP{IlY r lijwl,.-0€81j I Pr€J)fiiP;-,R}IIP i[P'I C'll,li llsajl�l i�
fir EI!E!1,licit Ialll I Y!I'.; 1 "II I' 'Ih J! ,",' lstQn:IoC.So and Water'Conservation ! c
t€III.€i! jr„E._ YIP,: Pilil Ilia IViiil}I"i€€ V�I ,-,lil'I I#r.V t:k" II€, r1r� )
,� �1 r fP t:. 11:�'�,,.,,° I F�� ; IlrPa �•:,,rr I Eil �v,ll"�"U Id 'E'.�ir all i�Y.l°Ys}NP�QH I p,I�Il�lf!IYI�f I�€7YiaY�Erl!
Y! ' a- .f! ,� Stu I I �IF l iPf Y IT 1 -i i l ll�l4 �Ii� .���P'1� .��I•r
i III 11!'i III4,r€jf it I r I ILF pirll l !!i`PI�Ill E! i rlll}rll€,,!!)tr..l O:Other Agency^
r rl E�lEIY :III ! :P,. tlrt`I k lrl�rl. i -P,,.,,.F f@a I Y :�.EI, !d. �!�. ,. .. lP1j I I:,air,I/I 1 1i irt3tf 1}!YI E I IlYrllalilli•'" I I +I 1P.l II IEj II ! € € 8!� ,U; .
A P i i i I.7 r Iii ii V (!! ,i}IY Xrl a f`illa 1l�I�I€t ��j7'I f4
r.,r• 1: �'��r II, €��I,�II{ I�.:.i II � Ir 1YI,,}
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑Denied Access
Facility Number 97 08 Date of Visit: Time: 1440 Printed on: 9/15/2000
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
13 Permitted N Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: HutiCttis.RtA.1hi1CX.......................................................................................... County: Wffl acts................................................ WSRA........
Owner Name: Cliftaa.................................... HUjCWNQA.................................................. Phone No: 3. -9�7.-�rZRii...................................................
Facility Contact: CliffM1,tZW.U1a.............................................Title: ................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
Mailing Address: fi541..Txaphlitl.lead............................. .... �:raAliill..K............................ U.05-9(121.
........................................... ..............................
OnsiteRepresentative:........................................................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
Hwy.21 north of Elkin to Traphill Rd.9 nines on Traphill Rd.,SR1002 and farm is on the left. Second,smaller pond is +
located on Mountain View Rd. T
❑Swine ❑Poultry N Cattle ❑Horse Latitude 36 •F187 53 « Longitude 81 • Q3 ' 26 °�
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity, Population Poultry Capacity Population, Cattle Capacity ,Population
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer I I[@ Dairy 80
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer I j[]Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total'Design Capacity 80
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW 112,000 ji
Number of Lagoons I 0 ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area Ie
HoldingPonds 1€.Solid Tra ps 1 ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges& Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes N No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes 0 No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/nun'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? N Yes ❑No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes N No
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes N No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure G
Identifier: ..Lg..Xaste. nnd.. .................................... ................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................
Freeboard(inches): 72
5100 113413 t,7_� Continued on back

Facilit Number: 97-08 Date of Inspection 9/14/2000 9/15/2000
Y p Printed on:
5. Are there any immediate threats to the i4ity of any of the structures observed?(ie/tre*ere erosion, ❑Yes ®No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or E�
closure plan? 1 ❑Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ®Yes ❑No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ®Yes ❑No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ❑No
It. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes ❑No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes ❑No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ❑No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ❑No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ❑No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ❑No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ❑No
Required Records& Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit readily available? ❑Yes ❑No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP, checklists,design,maps, etc.) ❑Yes ❑No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation, freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes ❑No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ❑No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes ❑No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes ❑No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ❑No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes ❑No
25, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ❑No
No•viol_atioris;0r deficiencies-were:noted duting•this;visit: ;You; receive ito iurthet
correso bt den&about this.visit.
Comments,(refer to question.#); Explain any YES answersandlor any.recommenations or�anyEother;comments. ,��, '+���''��«
Use drawings of facility to„better explain situati �„ ns.(use additional,,pages as.necessary):o
Only questions 1-9 were addressed in this follow-up inspection.
Waste storage pond located on Traphill Rd.had been pumped down since initial compliance inspection last month. No overflow noted
today. Mr.Hutchison was not at the farm so fields where waste application occured could not be determined. Looked at if some of the
vegetation had been cleaned up around the waste pond. Still needs more maintenance. Stock trails need maintenance.
-_
Reviewer/Inspector Name Melf a Rosebrock
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur . Date: 5100

7' K-*r
16
0J
% La�
1N ! Iv
, .
fe ki' I
11 II fill.
• j-IIIV-0- IT/ ;;0,-if
N
fi, Ar III,I
jllk!�); - I
If
If A.
4 if If
N4,r aq�
1 11 10)
-41
Fj
V�A,'A
,LO!j3j
.A
-a RI " Ap
I A. 9`'T;+l��F •.',{� J.fi� $'�ky� �J Y.., '��y,'° I. f�l�b',y��y`�.r.�►r ��y� � .r »,' r��1��.7t'�*'• �' }�"� '- �'
z,-- p1p.
n-I 1,MW NE
RV 6.
lop
ray."!
J114
iw-wj
N-w
Pi
1.5

r' ivision of Water Quality
vision of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: 8/3/2000 'Time: ll00 Printed on: 8/3/2000
97 8
O Not O erational Q Below Threshold
0 Permitted ®Certified © Conditionally Certified ©Registered Date(fast Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: HtAslaisalxDairx............................................................................................ County: WAkes............................................... l ' ttQ........
Owner Name: Clifloix.................................... Hind lhon.................................................. Phone No: 33.6-95.7:U9.& .........................................................
Facility Contact: Cliff.lit# dixta.............................................Title: ................................................................ Phone No: ...................,...........:...................
Mailing Address: 6SQ�.�x Rlkill.listmti........................................................................... TriitliX#jtlt..K.............................. ... 2sAN -9922..
.........................
Onsite Representative:,C]j ff.Hj& &Qu................... ... Integrator:.,,.,,,.,.
Certified Operator:................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
Hwy.21 north of Elkin to Traphill Rd.9 miles on Traphill Rd.,SR1002 and farm is on the left,
❑Swine ❑Poultry ®Cattle ❑Horse Latitude 36 • 18 53 Longitude 81 • 03 26
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine capacity population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑Wean to Feeder JE1 Layer ®Dairy 80 40
❑Feeder to Finish JE1 Non-Layer 1 ❑Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 80
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW 112,000
Number of Lagoons 0 10 Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ID Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps 1 ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Di charges& Stream lmnacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ®Yes ❑No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field []Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑Yes ®No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State'?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ®No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? <1 GPM
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ®No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ®Yes ❑No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other.than from a discharge? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Collection 8..�Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway ®Yes ❑No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ......Wz&te R.orW...... .................................... ................................... .....................�j............ .................................... ....................................
Freeboard(inches): , 0.0
5/00 ' ' � � Continued on back

Facility Number: 97-8 Date of Inspection 8/3/2000 Printed on: 8/3/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the i0rity of any of the structures observed?(ie/tre*evere erosion, ®Yes ❑No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ®Yes ❑No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ®Yes ❑No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ®Yes ❑No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No.
H. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes ®No
12. Crop type Corn(Silage&Grain)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes ®No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ®No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes' ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ®No
Required Records& Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Pertpit readily available? ❑Yes ❑No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design, maps,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) ®Yes ❑No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ®Yes ❑No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge,freeboard problems, over application) ®Yes ❑No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ®Yes ❑No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?' ❑Yes ®No
0:No vii) atioris'or deficiencies were noted:during this;visit:T u:will receive no further•
correso 6fidence:aboutthis',visit.','. :":':':':':':':':':':': :':
• mmenrMVts TFfe to estion# : Explain any Y S a e and/or any ecommendations or any othe comments.
►s drawings of ac to better ex lain situation . us ad itional pages as ecessary
1. Waste structure is overflowing with liquid waste from holding pond. Solids are higher than concrete walls.
2. Looks like discharge has been occuring for a few days.
. No spillway-no freeboard.
5. Concrete blocks are containing most waste for now.
7. Pond needs to be pumped immediately and vegetation mowed/cut around dam.
8. Stock trail needs scraping and/or maintenence performed.
9. Need to have a gauge marker installed.
18. No waste plan on site--at the house.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Mel' oseb ock -
Reviewer/Inspector Signatu Date: Q 5/00

Facility Number: 97-8 l of Inspection 8/3/2000 Printed on: 8/3/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑Yes ❑No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes ®No
roads,building structure,and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑Yes ®No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s).noted? (i.e.broken fan belts,missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑Yes ❑No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑No
Additional.Comments andor. rawings:
19. No waste,soil, or application records. last time this pond was pumpedwas 12/99. No records for 12/99 applications. AL
21. No certified operator.
22. DWQ did not receive call that waste pond was overflowing.
24. Need to recheck after pumping waste pond.
5/00

oo
,1 ��Dtvtsion a and W ¢�o- ,a 4 � c" -j s t �t y .
ater Conerraon aperation.Re
�
C 4wn tr x e a a
I € ,��,ISM per gyp. _-�:;t, d P. 'hl,i 3� 9:�!:h �;�u: FR€t,&,�E'.. #,!P 1 9� a?i ,ss 1 " eEq } -.'4
> `1 ���,n ivlsion of Water,Quality Compliance�Inspectiona E .,w € � �,I
{
.��Other�'AgenCy';=Operation, vie
a :,T4„1' t_ .a_. as y + SLR .d✓. .r
outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-uR of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection TRW
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
PermittedCertified ©Conditionally Certified ©Registered 113 Not Opera Date Last Operated:
.
FarmName: H.A.&.15.0n.....10AT ................................................. County: . .1...t.16.es5........................ .......................
Owner Name: ..... f1.:}'.+ay)......... ... UT i.;/I.I.I .Q.n............................... Phone No: ..336..... Q� A........................
Facility Contact: ...f;.�..........H.U.+e_41.1..,J�.�l tle: ................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
Mailing Address: .. o...l........... r..>n- h.i.. . .......:.Rd...................... ....... $.�.. ................
Onsite Representative: . 1 ..�.... s�` e...�s.5.c ............ Integrator:.....................................................................I................
. 1....
Certified Operator:.......LYQi�I.��...: .......:.. .............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm: 1
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... �
..............................
Latitude =11 Longitude EZI«
• _ tirrent a e!''' Destgn� :Current
$►vine Caeacgn o Matron Poultry Ca atetn _. o '` i Cattle ' 3
f
IL ,
P Poult
�a,.,. ,, ,..•,.;. P uladEonr .. Ee.t, 6,.°..�1 Ca act .,>Po ulaton ,
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ; Dairy ;
;,.;; ❑Feeder to Finish '� ❑Nop-Layer ; ❑Non-Dairy
r x10 , �J,,e �,
❑Farrow to Wean ..- �.f:. :,.lip ! If 1 e 1° 11 , ��
❑ theri s flee< a 'd��l��iaEirt�3
�'; ❑Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish TOtei DeSl�,n CSpaCIt {�
y,,
7� -��❑Gilts - , i 1� , Eiek ,�ttl�
.1❑ ", i, �� e i Tot" 1SSLW
Boars
t.
§ i„
1 =Nugmber of LagoonsE, ' ace Drains Present,❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Feld Area
]Subsurface rf
°: ,.., rr �'_R _ __ ..--- —. -=r• ¢ Yi i a�r a a, 'E
Holdin Ponds/Soltd,Tia s f No Liquid Waste Management System ;i°�° `l E `':E
Dischary,es &Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Yes ❑No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes KNo
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑yes X
No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? vl(es ❑No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway Yes ❑No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Aucture b
Identifier: WAS+e--
.
Freeboard (inches): .............`ice.............. .................................... ................................... .................................... .................................... .....................................
5. Arc there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees,severe erosion, Yes ❑No
seepage,etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back
1�

s' Facility Number: q 7— of Inspection
6. Are there structures on-site which are Onproperly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes *o
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? Yes ❑No
Waste Application
14. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes KNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Yes XNO
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with t ose designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes §tNo
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes Wo
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes )(
No
16. Is there'a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes
Reguired Records & Documents
17.' Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit readily available? n •�. es--�No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design,maps,etc.) ❑Yes No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) X Yes No
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes $(No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? )(Yes ❑No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems,over application) N Yes ❑No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes tXNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Yes ❑No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes No
Q YiQluii4tls:o� � ��en�i� r��r noted d(rring this:v�sitt Y`AO Will-teCeiye i*futth . .
CO,mes oridehc_e_atbaut this visit:
3 ,r>,•;•> i.....} )N s' 1' € .. EE •..• 11 Ei 7''P f3 19 A 1133 I 1 3 P83- �. PB P"S t7
Comments(refer ta'question#) Explain any YF.S answers and/or anyrecomimendauons or+any otF ericotnincn
I j _sS E r r" - .�' - �'� �. ..
Use drawings of i'acihty,to better3explatn situahoilis.(use addtdonal pages°as necessary)
Ptig.r.a+cL..r,.v G T f. o T -:<..r-s3a.0 g,a p;.�P.i;t, ''ir��-¢➢u{dnFt..E.!�r;�ffi°...:..ri.,1.3�!-,r_�.-Id+u,at ,.�P,..,:'a �.E.t.r.��..�r�L.,li.a i� , Eels,,�¢�a1?�dsl§"r'f€.non, s.
5+ru C*v re, 5 o ve r f o W1 LO/ 1+ u i d t3aMt-, Gv r1 •
hotai na poh4- 050I jA5 are, hi h� owl Cor�Gre��� ��IS
VO-)as , e, h bin ©cG u ri n a -Vo r 0,
�� 1LS •
wo
-frce-,b 0 0-f-i
P I WOLAA no
a47 ; fe IF
Reviewer/Inspector Name I
n 4' t f_€[f' o i 1. E4 ,t�i . , h3
Reviewer/Inspector 5ignatur Date:

Facility Number: — of Inspection
Odor Issues
25. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage and or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below {. ids-�e-
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? Sm r -r
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes �No
29. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes XNo
roads,building structure,and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑Yes 9No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e.broken fan belts,missing or
or broken fan blade(s),inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑Yes A No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? Q m r r C2000 -B 3ier, [2 Ale
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? Q m 9 IFes--B M r
Ottt ° OLttttlC�AtS AII. Or A'AVf!111 s a. ',E. E.n��.Et }ir3 aif t�% 1 . .{; Eis f? �i#sria�tl.;obi �¢e3r3 .�'t(� s�' 4 s rR t 41'r,�n�N�:} b, f..n.. a.. .3 a ,
�o nd. n e edS be, uRpeA 1 M FYN,ed t o �- V o
mo Wed C'v� a V-00
s �- `I�c n S Sa apiQ4- r t�a n
4 eta► g,
Jb
0
04eed Inavt XUq e. m I was- I(2OM
S 1 lnou 5�4
pin a Loas Po WP '0 4 U-�o,S
I a. M . I)o
Al . ND
as . na�r re-,uA e& QtE� ` Loco fe- and.
V n4p 1• L
�a�e nd

c Division o ��'il and Water Conservation-Operation Re , v
t 0 Division I and Water Conservation-Gompliance I tion
Division of ,.ater Quality-Gompliance Inspection
' M @th r'Agency: Qperation Review.
HiL,ti.--:1i6! '��
10 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ insvpection O Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number 97 8 Date of Inspection 10/27/99
Time of Inspection r 124 hr.(hh:mm)
Permitted ® Certified 13 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated: ........
Farm Name: klatsltisant.l?air ... County: 1'!'.lko................................
OwnerName: Cliftaut.................................... III& OD.................................................. Phone No: 33. -9S.7:U.0 .............................................................. .......................
Facility Contact: '..............................................................................Title: ....................... .... Phone No:
..................................... ...................................................
Mailing Address: 65.Q.t.j1C,&aWU.Ru;Ad............................................................................ IrApUL IBC................................ . MAS-2.022..
Onsite Representative:.C'lifl uji.1 ,ulchixason................... Integrator:
Certified Operator:................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
..........................................................................................................................................................
klw .,.�X.�fankh.Q£. lkint.ta..�r laid. till.iid�.► �lQR2..a�ad.falrra�as.ant.t�t�ea�ff".................................................................
Latitude Longitude 81 • 03 35
Design Gurrent Design Current Design Current
Swine Ca acit Qo ulatian Poultry Ca acit F,o elation Cattle Ca acit Po ulation
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ®Dairy 80 58
❑Feeder to Finish I IoNon-Dairyl
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Totai Design Capacity SO
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SS I,W 112,000
Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/Solid Kraps 1 ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Disehat•ees 8&Stream IfflpgCts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated glow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ®No
Wastg ll .&jrCatMrUl
4. is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes ®No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure b
Identifier: cone.struct.
Freeboard(inches): ................?.2................ .......4............................ ............
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees,severe erosion, 0 Yes ®No
seepage,etc.)
3/23199 Continued on back
Printed on 8=000

U
'Facility Number: 97-8 a of Inspection 10/27/99
6. Are there structures on-site which aroproperly addressed and/or managed through a9ste management or
closure plan? ® Yes ❑No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Yes ®No
12. Crop type Corn (Silage&Grain) Fescue(Graze)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes ®No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ❑No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ❑No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ❑No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ®No
Required Records& Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit readily available? ❑Yes ❑No
18, Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design, maps,etc.) ®Yes ❑No
19, Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) ®Yes ❑No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes ®No
22, Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems, over application) ❑Yes ®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ®No
l46 yh) A itins;o"r&ficiene-ies-were noted during tfiis;vigit.•N6u'will:recei:ve n6•ftir the r•
correS oriden&about this:visit: '
+o en e e t u tin : lain an. a e• an o ec e t o a e o n .
U d in o facilit to bette exp ai ituatio u addltl al a
P is written for 80 head. AL
18 No certification papers on site.
19 No application records.
Owner said he would probably come off the registration list(below threshold). Left request to be remove form,OIC form,and
lagoon closure form.
6 There is an old waste storage structure that needs to be closed out.
Reviewer/Inspector Name {Rocky Durham
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Printed on 8/2/2000

Facility Number: 97-8 a of Inspection 10/27/99 •
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ❑Yes ❑No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes ®No
roads,building structure,and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑Yes ❑No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e.broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s),inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑Yes ®No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑Yes ❑No
maim ►6ttinte1i " an o uw ngs:
26,29&32 are NIA AL
Printed on 8/2/2000

Ver
€ E.Division ll slid Water Conservation ,Coro Hance r eCtloll ' ''
i t� �� i!_:�i� '!€1 '}..f.ii`, .� E r �a € II tt. '3_ '-{
#'p'! LMsion of Water Quality ;.Compliance tlis action. !p�t�jg;,aix€ t
�t $ E4€¢ 3r E q
4 �tf S l,1r I and' I !E {3 Eir•'t-
Q Other Agency Review €' RIf
® Routine 0 Com laint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-tip of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
AV __ _____ ::1 Time of Inspection 11 i Qp 24 hr.(hh:mm)
Z 113- 6 - 17�-Y q
[3 Permitted [3 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified egistered JE3 Not O erational Date Last Operated: ........................••
u.T . .Lp..111............D q.LR. ................................. Cot,nty: ..........�!✓1.�i.�f.�................................. .. 5.� .....
Farm N:ime: ........ .................... �.
Owner Name. ........VERAWN.................. ....0 hu.� .. .fly.............................. I'hune No: ......334.z...... ... ...... ,.. .. ... .........................
�t
Facility Contact: .I14�.FTON.......17y rCfE1h1........Title: .............E7.!!1!� .............................. Phone No: ......s /lh ..........................
p
MailingAddress: .......6,' .Q.. T1Q. f�.......... � . .............SSp..:............................... .......... tQA.rar .................................................
OnsiteRepresentative: ........................................................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:......C.16.ETQV............... !f ....................... Operator Certification Number:.....G�.1 �...................
Location of Farm:
.. ........t<7'!r...!'.'t�.Sr..../..�r�....'.. ..... ... ...... ..... .�...... ............................�.. !�.......... ...... ....!......I�?..i1r!�!'Tt�..�....QiU.....�1........ �
Latitude Longitude ©` s�
�a�1�,=€ r € a Design Current r`ri,it' Design Current I!_ Design Current
Swine gal ' _. y Cattle
Ca acit Population Poultry: „ j €'tCli 'a'cit Po'"iilataon' Ca� acit Po iilati�oii
;.F ❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer airy -7. Pe
ElFeeder to Finish Non-Layer ID Non Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish €r'°! T& D6Sign'Capacity 1 75
[]Gilts,
:
�t �' � ' TotaISSLW 1135,04CJ
Boars , F a �
7.
y. Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area
Number of Lagoons., -
❑ g ❑Spray Field Area
S
HoldingVonds olid Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
€
Discharges& Stream Impacts �,
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? El Yes [ o
Discharge originated at: [:]Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed,was die conveyance man-made'? ❑Yes ,Q�Xo
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes E 2 o
c. li'discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Des discharge by a lagoon system?(Il•yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes 040
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes [Go
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes [Koo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: DOI R (
Freeboard(inches): ........ ................. ................................... .................................... ................................... ................................... ...................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees,severe erosion, ❑Yes E�W
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back .

R—Cirity Number: TZ — 0� � �te of Inspection
VV 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes 0[ PWo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes 2<0
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes Q],Ko
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes P 1'o
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes Mio
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Yes 1DXO
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑Yes ❑No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes Zxo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ;[>o
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes [�Wo
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes �o
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes Q5-Vc'
Re uircd Records &Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit readily available`? Ves ❑No
18. Does the Facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design, maps, etc.) b-Ve's ❑No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis&soil sample reports) Ckyle's ❑No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes mR o
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes, ❑-Wo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑Yes GKo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes Vq<o
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? [-es ❑No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? Alf ❑Yes ❑No
13- 1q viglatio is'or•deecie dipi •w're h ed•ding Ois'visit}•yo(k:will•seceiye Rio Ifuf titter. .
ctirres• otridence:about+this visit' •'• .'•'•'• •'.:•'
Comments(referltoEgt>estiou#) -Explatrt`any YES answers and/or any recommendations3v 1 any other comments i,' �'
NJ:-r��e ! _•-Y ti z:= I tl!t -ulr ° 1I l.�9°*axs l Y3'`t'`: � �€W)`{?, 11 , ,Ia�1 6 f i'•�S ° !:3t
IUseldrawings of facility't)rbetter ezplam situations:(use additioaal.pages as necessary) ! i� t n 'i t ''�1� ;�,� r
. � 1414
� .�
�{
t F c. k •" °:I': ° 401
I +� `}RBVlewer�nSpeCtDrName I° Oil;
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 'Date:
3/23/99

acility Number: �f7 -- 0 9 of Inspection
odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below Er es El No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of property within 24 hours? ❑ Yes UKo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑Yes
roads, building structure,and/or public property)
29, is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑Yes OE.xo'
30, Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑Yes ,Ado
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑Yes [EWo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged till pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? /V ❑Yes ❑ No
AdditionaKoninients and/orDrawings: yf,
3/23/99

Division of SdWd Water Conservation ❑Other ncy = A
Division of Water Quality
X3`,"':•,.y � �.e g> x?.�s,.y,x�w. "4 °'8 �`�+':3, r,a r st
10 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number
Date of Inspection LJ
�7 __ Q Q
����'' Time of Inspection 'O" 24 hr.(hh:mm)
I17Registered [3 Certified [3 Applied for Permit [3 Permitted 10 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ..........
........P�Ai................................................ County:..........U-4r. r1r......................... .wsl. .o..
Owner Name:..........1/:A .................. ...... ! . . . ............................ Phone No: , �..- �r .,7 .�?. ...................
................. ....... ..... .......
Facility Contact: ..L�! .....X?!t +�F!r..................Title:.............!✓-he-L .................................... Phone No: �....................
.... ..... .............. ...
Mailing Address: �,. i r
......................................... ............ . l..... ... ...r . ..�1NR .t .............................................
Onsite Representative:..........................................................................................I................ Integrator:...................................
Certified Operator ................... Operator Certification Number:......
p .�,.................... ..... p .lt. .l.�
Location of Farm: -
........ ... ..........I .... ... ... ....... ... .... .. ...�... .. ..... ... .. ........ a
.. A.[. W.XL '...Air—,,�,u�/�....R'Xlr./'�Y.L.s.. ......................................................................................................................................
Latitude Longitude ©• ®' 3,� "
Design Current Design. Current Design Curreint
Swinet' x Capacity Population ;Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
._
❑Wean to Feeder El Layer airy
❑Feeder to Finish 10 Non-Layer ❑Nan-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
Farrow to finish 4, Totai Design Capacity 7
❑Gilts '
❑Soars Total SSLW
Number of Laj66�'­ ID Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ID Spray Field Area
�, :, r
�- �x, '' ❑No Liquid Waste Management System N r
� ,
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes DKO
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes P o
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ��
b. If discharge is observed,dill it reach Surface Water?(if yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ,I�vo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'?(if yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ,[,,d�,,//<
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes 8 'No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes OUtvo
5. Does any part of the waste management system(other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑Yes EVo
maintenance/improvement?
6. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ®<0/
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑Yes
7/25/97
VW\--

9-acility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑Yes 2540
Structures(La-oons,Ilolding Ponds,Flush Pits,etc.)
9. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Yes IE1
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure.5 Structure b
Identifier:
......... ........ ................................... .................................... ................................... ................................... ...................................
Freeboard(ft): ...............V............... .................................... ................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................
10. Is,seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑Yes &Wo
11. Is erosion,or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑Yes [1W6
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes J�.Wo
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes,and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? des ❑No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑Yes U o
(if in excess offWMP,or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .... tv!! �.". ................................................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan(AWMP)? ❑Yes VIKO
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes QWo
18, Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes Wk<o
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? V-V'es ❑No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes �o
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes W5
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑Yes ❑No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities-Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑Yes ❑No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ❑No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑Yes ❑No
No.viaEations'ok deficiencies.rvere ntited-duririg this;visit.-YOU,Will i-eceive'no,further•:
correS•pQddeirlce.6NOO tbis'visit: :•;. . . .
Ct� ents refer to q esdon#) Expfain,'anyaY answers an Uprahy rectstnmex dudo"" t►irsany other comments,
€
r ::a
d awe gs of fuc . , d ,71,
gs asneessa. "
x Xin ^) -
'� � ;4. ,.`fir,
a 9 .t. rl_rs� yra25/97
1
7 ;, w
AeviewerlIrspector Name # M
Reviewer/Inspector
Signature: Date:

x ❑DSWC&"hW,F66d1ot Operation Revit
DWQ `Anlriial Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
j
0 Routine *Complaint- O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number Time of Inspection b9:0: 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status. Ed Registered ❑Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min))Spent on Review
❑Certified ❑Permitted or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑Not Operational Date Last Operated: ....... ................ ............................................
.................. ..........•...... ....
..... ................................
. .........................
Farm Name: .....tl .1. kk.......d`" ............. Cnunty:........ ,t�rlf . .........................., .......................
Land Owner Name: .'.V.�1 ........ .. Phone No:.......1.. .. . 22 ..................
Facility Conctact: ... ...... ............... ... Title: . ....... .................................... Phone Na: ....91�Q.`....`�5;7.-„�ZO�....
MailingAddress:.... .5`0.�...... �4!- .... ........................................ .. ..........................._....................... , '�s ,�tr'..
OnsiteRepresentative: ...................................................�......................................... %.... .. Integrator:.......................................................................................
Certified Operator: .... ......................... ............................ Operator Certification Number: ...................
Location of Farm:
�ras.�... ............................................................................._......... 4
.................................................. ................................... ....................................... ..... ,.......... ............ . ................. ................ ....................... �}
Latitude ®'®° Longitude ®` Ft—>a
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
x k � ` Design 'Current � � Design Cuirent " Design Current'
SW1�e x 3 •ss r„ a �s,
. <,Y gCa aci P.o ulation ,�PoultryCa aci Po` uiationCgIFCa"acePo ulatioa '
Wean to Feeder ❑ La er Dairy
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer ❑Non-Dairy I Z9
•El Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder �� Totat Des�gn4Capacity
Farrow to Finish fi ' fx x
s
_a, . � � Total SSLW IDS 00
❑Other ;
Number of L:agaons I Halding Ponds ❑Subsurface Drams Present ON
x g Y,W.-1 W;m x '[]Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area 3 m
-General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes 2lo
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray field ❑Other ,,_,/
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? El Yes a No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Surface Water'?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes M<O
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes M<O
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Q11'es ❑No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes EIKo
5. Does any part of the waste management system(other than lagoons/holding ponds)require ERO�es ❑No
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

F71lity Number: 1.7,E .....—....Q.. .
6. Is facility not in compliance with an licable setback criteria in effect at the time sign? ❑Yes M'1Go
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes ffll�0
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑Yes [jlo
ti uctnrgs (ljgogns anHolding
9. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑Yes gKo
Freeboard(f1): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
.........7.r.... ............................ ............................ ...........I............... ............................ ............................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑Yes gKo
11. Is erosion,or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑Yes M-Ko
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes 93 nfo
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ®'Yes ❑No
3Yaste,Agplication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑Yes W.Ko
(If in excess of WMP,or runoff entering waters of the State,notify DWQ)
15. Crop type f... ll�.......................................................................................................................................... .
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan(AWMP)? ❑Yes ❑No�f
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ©Yes [Pfila
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes W-Iqo
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑Yes [ ]Wo
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 011es ❑.,NNo
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes @<O
FoL Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑Yes ❑No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ❑No
24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑Yes ❑No
Coiriments(refer to;question'#) Explain any YE3'answers andlorany recommendations qi any ot
her corriments ,a'r
Use drawings of facility to better explwn situations:{use add1honal pages as necessary)
t, ro ,
(1) - ri . y , .. r,�.: sacs, 4
•
3) .. - � °.,y�.,�' � ��`
113)
a
Reviewer/Inspector Name <::<
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: '=17- q7
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit .t 4/30/97

Site Requires 4WHIty
tr Attention:
DIVISION OF NVOtONMENTAL MANAGEMENT No.
F
ANXMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DAM 1995
'Dime:
Farm NaaVww. r r o
Mollieg Address: a L R 0 TP c4, F,S
�o�anty: rL
Inxgratar. G- o G �� r T Phone: q 10 - 7 71- LI 6 6 0
On Site Rspreieatadve: u r 41 u Phone:�`' 106S`1
Physical Address/U=tion:„�..�_ .r�l.+�'Y�L�,z- -Q -;ti,
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle �
Design Capacity. -O _ NsanAw of Min"on Site:
DEM Cerdficadan Nrm*w: ACE___, __ DEM Certification Number: ACNEwr______
L dn*: �_j —J.'C L cmgi ude:S' 02 - U - Elevation. Feet
C rle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient frc+ebboard of i Foot+25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot+7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: —fit. �Inches
Was any seepage observed from the la n(s)? Yes No was any erosion observed? Yes`C`;
Is adequate lead av&Wle for spray? Y or No Is the cover crop adeq.lCYeei or No
Crop(s)being utilized:
Does the fwWry meet SCS mininwm setback criteria? 200 Foes from Dwellings?*or No
100 Feet from Was? *or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes orLWO-)
• Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the =rate by man-made ditch,flushing symb.or other
similar man-made devices? Yes o:NS-� if Yes,Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure,Lind applied,
quay hiigated on tpeci acreage with coves crop)? e or No
Additional its-
Inspector sme Signature
cc:Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

r OPERRT I OH'S BRAPdC H .
l• L 4 9._ , 1 d•i S P. 13/1�
SrM VIS T.ATION RBC()W
DATE LU19-11995
Owaer: , -� �� r,SsQ, . ' .Na�tca N.
Catmty:
Agcttc Vision Sits �_. _ noun: 0- '
On gilt R Piwoc: 49 to)2'MO
PhyslcaJ
Moiling Adds: a i 5,,:{( CkA �..�
Type or c4ma9913. Swim .� "try C "*
IIe!S1ju C*U ty. _._ 8 NwrAxv of Ardis s= Sittc;
Typo of luspcction; (hujnd_ f r__ Aadal
Cir is Y.s of Ho
1(3ocs the Alit"Wasik LMucu have wd7oltnt ftdaasd of t Foot+25 yow24 hour storm cxoul
(APPrpi IMely I Foot t 7 inChe$) at No A4rtu al aealm*m.,, .1—ruci —I—bvh m r
I'tor fAOPWas witb tdom tW tw Jagmik,plrwc addMIS thr,tltllct 1080004'rxcbold uadtx the
Was any,�jrdp obscrvrd horn ft lapon(s)4 Ym or(§)Wis III=arosion of L�w dim?:Yes t '
1.4 uJrcluatc?and aYallsble for load applics9 m7 lras X0 Is the cavor crop a Nv&te Yca No
AdUitivnal i;'ubureAm
�'�'�5r '�•---- _gt�'CwG�p,.-- f F"O� - -- -`�'_�i rC]a�_gip R. �►�G a�liw'� . ,
s
Fo-x to [phone] 45i'
simmarAp4tit
i
13920 iL616 ON Xd a l'u41 S4S HQSfI i Z �1 Q3tf ����t-Zftf
r;.