860018_INSPECTIONS_20171231

May 21, 2004
Jerry Whitaker
2626 Old Hwy 601
Mt. Airy, NC 27030
Re: Mountain View Dairy
Permit Rescission
Permit # AWC860018
Dear Jerry Whitaker,
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
RECErvTo
NBC ' - =Nj;
MAY 2 4 " 134
Rig -na: C— ce
Thank you for closing the waste storage pond at Mountain View Dairy. Permit number
AWC860018 has rescinded the facility has closed and the waste storage pond at the farm has
been closed. You should no longer receive invoices for your annual permit fee but if you do,
please contact me at [phone], ext. 571 or Paul Sherman at [phone], ext. 529.
Sincerely,
Keith Larick
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement
cc: Paul Sherman
Fran McP
F i.le #86-18
Melissa Rosebro inston-Salem Regional Office
Central Fil
NCDEhR
Customer Service: Mailing Address. Telephone [phone] Location:
1-877-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled/ 10% past -consumer paper
httpJ/h2o. enr.state.nc. us

CONFIRMATION FOR REMOVAL OF REGISTRATION
This is to confirm that the following farm does not meet the 2H .0200 registration
requirements. Please inactivate this facility on the registration database.
Facility Number: r
Farm Name: i O V t, 0. t r1 lr auI N4 k ru
Owner: Ct • _JiS �•Q4�i"�h_C_2� ��e.CtS�
5urvi�t� 5 fJous�: Frr�vtic'_tS L�wr�nC.e.
Mailing Address:
o e�r 4 W ► a e-r'
2 � 4 c) I d t4 �a 1
m+. R 1 ry KuC� a %43 0
County:
5urr�
Operation is:
below threshold
out of business/no animals on site
closed out per MRCS standards
Signature:
Agency: M h
Please'retum completed form to: DEHNR-DWQ
Water Quality Section
Compliance Group rr
. - Raleigh, N - 535
o1 -? t 1.6 l 7 RR-3197

ULW Winston-Salem l-ax,.366-M-4631 May. 6 '04 19:19 P.02
Animal `haste Storage Pond and Lagooi s-re—Report Form
t t
{Please type ar print all i OMIation that does =N iOre a�,d_Mcun.)
General Infnrmatiosi:
MAY 1 i 2004
A Rc, 'Ninsson-sd,,-FacilitrfNo:
-
Name of Farm: ��. -=r��,�,a - ;
Owners) Name: H J hsz;_5 t,4u,!Ric2 _ I [_ IerehsPCL„I�- -
ylsiling Address.-Ct,eP 6 die Of AZY 401 -- - Phone NO: -3 g b ' V /Y
�,�...�_.. �M�Aoe!3, NL. '�703) County:
Operation Descjigtiqn (remaining. animals onitil:
G Please check this box if there will be no animals on [his f= after lagoon closure. It'there will still be animals on the site
after lagoon closure. please provide the following information on the animals that w4ll remain.
Oneration Description:
Type of Swiree No. of Aninial r Type of Poultri Mo. of Atrbnuts Type of gale IV& o rinitnnis
C� 1Vesn to Feeder Z Layer U'Dairy
.a Feeder to Finish i Pullets z Beef
3 Fumw to Wean
)'Farrow to Feeder
:1 Farrow to Finish Other F%pe of Livestock: Number of Animals:
Will the farm maintain a number of animals greater than the ?H .0217 threshold? Yes U No Cr/
Will other lagoons be in operation at this farm after this one closes? Yes G No f r
How mang y lag are left in use an this farm?:_ . �_
(Name)_Ale i , � :! R osa6of the Water Quality Section's staff in the Division
of Water Quality's Regional Office (.see map on back;
was contacted on 4-)2-0 _(date) for notification of the pending closure of this pond or lagoon.
This notification was at least 24 hours prior to the start of closure which began on 3-D (dare).
I verify that the above information is correct and complete, I have followed a closure plan which meets
all NRCS specifications and criteria. I realize that I will be subject to enforcement action per Article 21
of the North Carolina General Statutes if I fail to properly close out the lagoon.
Name of
Signature:
J
Date:
The faeiliry has followed a closure plan which meets all requirements set forth in the MRCS Technical
Guide Standard 998. The following items were completed by the owner and verified by me: all waste
liquids and sludges have been removed and land applied at agzonorrtic rate, all input pipes have been
removed, all slopes have been stabilized as necessary, and vegetation established on all disturbed areas_
Natne of Technical Specialist (Please Print): L1 E1
Affiliation:-� - 1 -` - —
Address (Agency): 2 Scow h� i Phflne No.: 3��?
Sienature: �_ t._Q f_It\ At 16. Dare. 5IC, InQ
Return wit in IS'days following completion of animal water storage pond or lagoon closure to:
N. C. Division Of Water Quality- Water Quality Section
Compliance Group
P.O. Box 29;35
Raleigh, NC 27626-0: 35
PLC - l May 1 1996

REQUEST FOR REMOVAL, OF REGISTRATION
The following farm does not meet the 2H .0200 r-Zistration requirements. Please inactivate this
facility on the registration database.
racility Number:
Farm Name: At"y4ity - V i ev
Mailing Address:
County:
iris Operation is:
Com=nts:
.R'A
pasture only (no confm-.ment)
al-y litter poultry operation
out of business/no animals on s
closed out per MRCS standards
/ r l
• `7 R
' - AY r r ^yV4
below th-- threshold {less than. 250-swine, IQD-confined can ic, :S-horses, 1000-sheep or
3D,000-nau:ry with a iiouid animal waste management system)
I am aware that even though I may qualify to he rc=o-.-=-n from the animal operations r--istration database, the
Director of the DiiAsion of Water Quality (DWQ) - : still require me to obtain a Certified Animal Waste.
Management Plan (CA",'W) or an individual p-.=: -file facility. This decision will be made based on this
facility `s actual or potential impacts on surface waters a We State of North Carolina. I am also aware that should I,
im the future, decide to repopulate this facility at or belou--Lbe originally registered number of animals, I am required
to obtain a- CAWMP and request reactivation of the'I-Uity from the DWQ prier to stocking animals. Any
exnansion-to this facility would require me.to apply -for, z=d obtain a -permit prior to expansion.
�- _s-
J,, a..
i' Date:Sinature. �i�'
Please return comnteied form to:
NC Division 0- ZNIater Qualit),
Non -Discharge Comr)i`nnce &- Enforcement 'Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
RR-7100

it !'.11 1'.^� ! {'. Ia 3 ,1.1-Illal-! I { 1 €.:e:
1 ',.(- _.e— - 3� 1'� . •I (' , Eis S "I . II `:. , ' {.�N. i'A
li $ 1 ;l .oi
yl�'Viy{�t�y I �i';i�,'�II `�'!'♦w; NFG1���1,�1 d� 4_ r•s�EDIViISiotl Of3WAt�r tlalit li;i � I t� �J r � s I i€I�� I _ I� �!r 11 �#i�� Iil1� �I:� i�
!� r!{�l l �I ��.. ..' I � i�. ;,�,_ ,€�: �. i�Q y, � iy�•i' 1 �� I! !1 !€1- : � � r I(�;! r I��� � "
li � [ ;g��j t� a>,j�• 93�+ � t�'s�r� � r..-� iQ DiV#SIOn ofSorl-end WHt$r�Conservation is 3i� I �I�' 11r _a--; �'��-,� --';. 5�! i�., ��.
i k .1 1 ' ,f.wtl l .NI ,E•'I Dii •O•"•a' ..rA, nI.e+! Y°� itaS
, :-n
lth,! S �,�•SlI E", [a iF (Sji i
t'
I'
I�'�-I
s, :!3 ;ii. ;.i lif I _t_.i it ' h•' .lf. ilia !, II P.
Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon
Type of Visit O Co g Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit; 4/&12004 Time: t33(}
Facility Number 86 I8
Q Not Operational 40 Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified [] Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: 2(JI?LQQ3 ._.
Farm Name: MPH111Wm.Y.19n: Vairy............................................................ County:$urxy...................................... Y.N--
Owner Name: ki.�aYi._._.___•--_-_--!.8]Yr�RCg------.____----- Phone No:(331L13.:459�.-----•-.-.-.-----.-----._..
MailingAddress: 982.Pr1aQa.0 uw.Rd........................................................................ D059a...NC...................... ............ .......................... Z7.9.12 ..............
Facility Contact: JRUY.Whitaker..................................Title:............................................... Phone No: 336,386,44.4.7.................
Onsite Representative: d�rrx►'.bitak:_._._._.-.---.----------_._.-_--.-. lntegrator:__._._.-.-------•-------.-.-•----------_-_-.
Certified Operator:krry,.W.. ............................... i'N'h taku......................................... Operator Certification Number:214,43 .............................
Location of Farm:
I miles north of Dobson on Prison Camp Rd. Road No. 1345. Jerry's Address: 3614 Old Highway 601, Mt. Airy, NC, 27030
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude r 36 •F 26 ° 11 .& Longitude F80 • 45 05 46
Design
Current Design
Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity
population Poultry Capacity
Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
10 Layer
I
I
H Dairy
150
10
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
1
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
150
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
210,000
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons L„ 0
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:....WmtL.P.aad..... ........................... ................ .......... ........................... ........................... .......... I................
Freeboard (inches): 48
12112103 Is Continued

Facility Number: 86-18 Date of Inspection F 4/8/2 004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ® No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes ® No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes X No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ®No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ® No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any, YES answers and/or any recommendations or any�other comments:"
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary) ❑ Field Copy ~® Final Notes ;>> jj
anti
T
Reviewer/Inspector Name M 610 § Rospbrock
Reviewer/Inspector Signatu4AIVI ' Date:
12112103 ., t v ' Continued

Facility Number: E18 Date of Inspection F 4/8/2004
Reuuired Records & Documents
21.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
® Yes
❑ No
22.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(le/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
23.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
® Yes
❑ No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
®No
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
26.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
27.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
CR No
28.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
® No
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
[] No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
12112103

]Type of Visit "0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visii Routine 0 Complaint 0 Fallow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number late of 'Visit: Time:
® Permitted ❑ Certified 13 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ......I.IP
FarmName: ..- .Q.4� .....Y...i 4 r ............................ County:....... ... U-rY........................................
r -3 0
OwnerName. - .. L .............�...... .....tl . .............. Phone No... J�. ........-.......................................�...............
Mailing Address:.... ....... {ion.... !.:�..... c)b...�dn..�.. -.... a... � .. .7.........................
Facility Contact. ........... �1. Y- .... Title: .................................................. ........ Phone lVy� ....................................tP°' `t.'47
......
Onsite Representative.......r ....4!L.dY��.,....................................... Integrator: .....,..,...................................... ........�......�...r..........................I
Certified Operator:...2.�,.......... ��'i („ .......................... Operator Certification Number:.,.... cfCJ `i
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine © poultry bdoCattle ❑ Horse Latitude • ®4 it Longitude ®' 6 ®64
Swi
F Ik f.
` ..�. E:I
�I+4Ca �iP,o
g act ;i:P,o
ulationl,,
;Poultry„„i ii act ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
" ❑ Layer
T ❑ Non -Layer
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
'
:•
1 ❑ Otherx;
i Farrow to Feeder
,'=
❑ Farrow to Finish�ax-
l �„ TotalPe '
t
s t ' jf has Fe cr'r�tt�
❑ Gilts
i ❑ Boars
Discliarzes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes XNo
Discharge originated at: [ILagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gai/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes >6 No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Vspillway ❑ Yes XNo
Stru -turePe j Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:Wwr �....0•(�............................................................................................... .................
Frechoard (inches):
12112103 7 Continued

Facility, Number: —]j!] Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes o
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes *No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Yes No
❑ Excessive Ponding IAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ F. ozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc „" 0
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with thige designated in the Certified A m Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ElYes No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge actor below may$&_8,bjo_
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes �No
Air Quality representative immediately.
_ @,..o ir;aif;!`.°tltei"'u. jC Pnt..�.�$d epd;1'F' r x.. :..,�lb_i ..�.. ,.9 ^."..1'.i.1 �.: f,.:. '�:U"" ��$'i::%4.- ;`9.a"`nl.,;""kN' 1i. .: .y :I .fk::iC �..`I;7.':f"a I$,(:.,•l�i. lt+{�1 �.7tt �tff/�
;Comments(r�erato questeon #) Explain any YES aia�swers and/or any recommetxrlat3aus,or.;a_uy athersommeQt:�1#,��,j, „f83,jja
�,cr k C 'A r ."". }�
Use drawtngs of faci>ity$to better explain situations ' (use add�donal pgqa<ges as necessary):I t' Field Co Final Notes +
1 t t ! P }>. PY ❑
�}9ff �p 9 1�1f�T7
YP[Y.F9;.`.ft,'£J: i�bt:lF;t<'81i3i;3. i:eddl n. Eli �i
(p . Fact �' 41 � 1a5ure � [ o-y) w L C hsrn5 5-ft° �onc�
n e K-4 W A6_45 .
Reviewer/Inspector Name A
11
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
I&J-11U3
Continued \

Facilbty Number: �Date of Inspection
Required Records & Document~
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? XYes ❑ No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available.
(ie/ W1JP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
Yes JNO
23. D4Ns record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appro hate box below. `�{j Yes ❑ No
aste Application ElFreeboard aste Analysis Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes �(No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes �No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes o
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35) ❑ Yes XNO
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ElYes ❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? ❑ Yes ❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
[] No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
23. a063 56rj fe5f re (JS ? n0-� uqin aM3 .
1�30sfe "alk45(5 for uSt a.003 P(1 CO*'O 5
1 n c* u--3'ta
n � 0
3) '� )03 u.:> aLs-+e. ana. 515
r
r � � � • i1
12112103

WASTE STORAGE POND CLOSURE PLAN
NAME: Mountain View Dairy
Prison Camp Rd
Dobson, NC 27017
LOCATION: Prison Camp Road
PHONE; 336-352-4801 COUNTY: Surry
LAT. 36 25'57"
LONG. 80 44' 4T'
H.U.# 03040101090010
Plan Prepared By: Tony Davis
Conservation Tech.
NRCS — Suny Co
336-386-8751 ext.3
NOTE: NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION SERVICE OR BURRY SOIL &
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT PERSONEL MUST BE ON SITE WHILE THE
STORAGE POND/LAGOON IS BEING CLOSED OUT IN ORDER TO CERTIFY
THE CLOSURE.
GENERAL INFORMATION
The dam is to be breached, all disturbed areas are to be seeded with the following
materials and amounts:
Tall Fescue seed 60 lbs. per acre
2 Ton Lime per acre
1,000 lbs. 10-10-10 per acre
60-80 bales of straw per acre
Volume to be removed
The volume to be removed is estimated at 35,462 cubic ft. or 265,254 gallons of liquid
and sludge. All liquid will be pumped until a loader can scrape the built up sludge.

LAND APPLICATION OF WASTE
The waste storage pond will be closed in the spring 2004. Liquid from the pond will be
applied to nearby corn fields. Prior to pumping the liquids will be agitated and applied at
agronomic rates.
SPECIFICATIONS
A breach of the dam will be completed in accordance with the standards and
specifications outlined in the Closure of the Abandoned Waste Storage Facility, Section
1V of the NRCS Field Office Tech. Guide. The waste storage pond will be agitated with
a PTO driven chopper for sufficient time to create a slurry from sludge on bottom and
side slopes. Side slopes will be washed down during pumping. All sludge will be
removed that is reasonable and practical based on visual inspection by the certifying
technician. A track loader will be required to remove sludge that is not feasible to be
removed by pumping.
The technical specialist will make this determination shortly before time of closure. The
liquid level is subject to change depending on rainfall conditions. All disturbed areas are
to be seeded and mulched according to the specifications once all sludge and liquid waste
has been removed.
Closure of this operation must be done without any run off of the effluent_ Do not land
apply while it is raining or the ground is saturated. Avoid applying prior to predicted rain
fall all disturbed areas will be vegetated to NRCS standards and specifications, rates are
attached.
I AGREE TO CLOSE THIS WASTE STORAGE POND ACCORDING TO THE
ABOVE PLAN THAT MEETS THE NATURAL, RESOURCES CONSERVATION
SERVICE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. I UNDERSTAND THAT
STAFF FROM THE SURRY SWCD AND OR NRCS AND DIVISION OF WATER
QUALITY MUST BE NOTIFIED 24 HOURS BEFORE CLOSURE IS TO BEGIN.
CAL SPECIALIST

�•t I lla ! n+ �'�Asyl+�ar2,?rhR�
s 4's rt • } ` + � + r � / (.� fir 5 .F �
d _ t,r'�-lr�� +. � �S,e4 {r�� 'Ta�}•p t at'�'j�, 1 ^f'�
�'+ir�.' �.r•^fir St'+-Y rq ,; ��,f£,+i� i'�£sM�j• +T'�' � ..� r*"` � v
s1 T
�are�'rs�u;� d t
Lyra. s!{'+! 1' 4Y ; ! - so4 ql� 1' yY� r { ,. • ,i +
�•i,R � �r•y +i T : a Rt1 - �} r, 1� t r. F r r,�yr Y-�a7,y '�
J.'=. �#.r•t�f[r r !i t{ 1 t r r �y§..•C'. +.G•."r•�Y`(�I s„C .�,F.
TIP
'i�,� r i-�'• �t i4iLfj t t +r1^ �1+�•. { + Ift�l "j Aa�l,.�'rr 7;,,,�j '.
it
C"' 4 nsL w w:r
rP t..i r *isi _ir IY �`ii•. yy,, {r �.. r f.� r:r* +i5_r••'.
'n.��1r r 4'� •. Fy+ f: c r A,i-"4t;� �:•r �''{.r 1.'3 � e 1 Yrji rJ'�. �'l f
! Y. r +� 5 ✓ .y(r 11 d. � r I � r-�, , �, %.
, ,+.• f J_ : f f ,y..W +q .(� fa Sy�i�45JCj�t ft-Rtn��+� i i# },a. `+,� � �s�l<y�
�r: �1O + " r i✓1r �-' {} "� a= '�rF�.?n"'rl • rjllf �r ifY� w�
,.ia'•hs�,ft a,7r,�Sry +; 1. Sl.? d'. �.1: i is��:;y+,•`
f {
' i.r�;,S J� �� '� sal s�l r„�i•��t�ei� �� A �`x,�++ `j+, r+
x � �r s +it:� f + 'J ,�1' `.t3• f jr ' �r �C3`' '�� + N c+'� t
1,',r ..�. r,. w5.�-'tS faj� tJF •;�f't •A5;�"
Ll
,�• � ,,. t w,•� �p Cri •7 .E - +r JJ'•l�r ,,^• � 1 a i.
a ��'• ' i � },i' r r
�,F� F ', ! yi r`�'�y� i�,4 .�' ��`��,t�`'V'r'i'';_ �V rr ��l. ;S••.Y' ,f�r�1 •k�}r+ .
�'\ [ir'1� to ! � ,� Y-S e ` • { W.f
swc
^�•.$:�., ,H .a Y� 4f ��, '' � ) - �k w�T>,' -_ .r+d.?'.+F�r:iw-aS�s•�-i��..
""-' ;„,', 4�t � �•r �`"�e. (fir-:.4f_r_•r��zi}r xl ru'Y',Fr r:-rr'�;,� �� �'r Yy •+�. 4,S' t.
�• tr ,W !-r'i1 f. , ,r b,. }, �t + f �� r* p T•��
+4r T) • . 5:. +w f !1 $ 'q ht Lip i` .fir r 4r}',. rr.
} + ,� ' ; 1�rt . r ''L Fi.r�lS� • y� r..'r'� r3 r�;t 7 LL
Yf , d #-�pr i ''{,�: �= <S 1 _.Y i, s r •,•rr + � f'. �a . ..
-
x5t ,. °r it Y�L'rtt r s,+4�„1j�j�4,j • '7��x
.;t' S*"'c4 .i 4 ! � � t r'y, rY�t,xr �iP"#•: .Y!}+�;`4
Ay
3
- ;;t,:r �'r ! '` y`i`1� a r lit •'; i•J r P jy'„ -
�0°
� 1r • ���.��'s, ! r 1.. 'f �hrt � Frti�rr .
ti . SS• �,
!i ram,_+� _ y..S r•.� �. I.4� 5 _ E j ,�l r
�-
�tt !P s✓ tl'r, t •'r. kr4 %� j,)•..:
� Y+Cjw.�klY•• +.7 r.:.�
0
4 Ss y yJya� ter: �t y
Arssf�",4Vr '
�,y
. l-
r,�r4
�'y}rJ1r"• � iCf t�><�bull f1`1'^"'k�owC?I�
r r-FC •'�.r«• ;r.?�+rYi_if �v'X'_.,+'�r
r

'i{ ..: +* ' �—•s"-�'r . , � _��.d r A %- � _1. ♦:s' yr '1...�.. _• f � . Y.a � w,�.. r1.,
r i • _ � r' :�, t •� '� w,, e + t �, t. 's k ' � .i `cl."• r'' 1� "yam• ij ". ,� y • .'4.. �, � t.�
r, y.._` - ,-•,n�,.:� ;4.'.� -f�,�V '�. � '�• . r •+,�lt./� , t� l !may +�'•-� �J�. dry � � ,. '
• -�,. r <s . ') "/� bAZ 1L6"• A +r j-- + •r• -1 ''� 1 iQ �. Y i �-. . P
•�� ,l�.r� l� ['�s '`�: �ryM _. . �y • ;."_t 1tk3 .'': -�' •`� £6 1�i1 nP-&? a1� � lAA NVV�J, `"''
'+V ♦�. YI `.V '.� f S t' , ,�� �J r -I •'�•. � � i.£, -4• \ . 1
SIQ in
tn
,
' Iw �' -_ � Oil y � i. a . Q '.a' • •1 J ' _ '•
avkl
Ar
f •. �' r+ 1
- �.q•SZLr + .,�yg�, `' Qdifil I t• t . �, _' 1� u`r ' �'� f : :'1 � �✓y t V• y rZ. � a. � •
~� Y F i � ' i�+•...� ," � .r ��1 " �1 �y1 �cl. �t a 1 '�r r �,:�k..
ck,
it � � � � »C vI �. �. �}Q�I. ati ` t,�i: Q •at , i � jV ,i+-� '!�'
i s s ,i i r 041
41
1 rr ••b� _-w� . ri � ii Lt .�k � � t f ': ♦ ti
Al
1,. �O • � �+ ' f �' }. f � of r. � 9iZ - � `s (y 4• i-c � '� �["•,
Alc
�, � '30E • f QQ } .��: 9C�iG� r� s � ,` L � 1 ,�,. .. _ice �„h;+ Is' , •+F
obi. � ':gt�f' �flE1 a ._..• ��_. � . �, a �' `'�� '
, y � .fir F • � •.. k Q�F� � ° . �� ',�y'�y i ...•kli
..�,
Lcn
'' _ Ay ,r •d1 fir• ,t �i o� 4l ` L `,{' _ j// y

t �y - _ - •r _ 1 _�4 l
,� _ ��' �i
is �Y:',.�s.�nfl AS
,'; 1
`�''T'_ ,���
�� � -

Mountain View's WSP Closure Plan
(1.3 lb. nitrogen per 1000 gal.)
265,25' gal
1000 gal. = 265 X 1.31b = 345 IN N
Tract 25830
Fields 1-8 = 40.31 at
40.31 acres S0� 1 lbs 1� = 6.5 lbs N per at
265,254 gal
27,154 gaL ac in = 9.76 acre in
9.76 ac. in
40.31 acres past = .2 in per acre
4fru Ij L, .. --/

NCDA Agronomic Division 4300
Creek
NC 27607-6465 [phone]
Grower. Whitaker, Jerry W
2626 Old Hwy 601
` Mount Airy, NC 27030
,:._rreaarl•Waste Anaiys�s effort Farm:
is
115/04
Surry County
Copies To:
r No: W05103 W
Sample Info.
Laboratog Results artsper million unless otherwise noted
Sample ID:
1234
Waste Code:
LSD
Description:
Dairy Li . Slun
N
P K Ca M S
Fe Mn Zn
Cu B
MO CI C
Total 364
IN -N
-NH4
-NO3
OR-N
Urea
41.3 769 285 186 22.5 5.23 1.23 0.95 0.33 0.57
Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li pH SS C.•N
DM% CCE% ALE K al
266 7.6
Recommendations:
Nutrients Available for First Crop
1 s/1000 gallons
Other Elements
Ibs1I000 gallons
Application Method
Broa&ast
N P20s K20
1.3 0.55 6.2
Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn
1.7 1.1 0.13 0.03 0.01 0.01
Cu B Mo CI
T 1
Na Ni
2.2
Cd Pb Al Se Li

1 ust, 1 v1 1
-,� f tip= T k A-h I s m a p
F 1T . 1 0 ozone
y 4 a, f5 I t
M3006 ME
Map/Photo Info 360 25' 57%, 800 44' 47"W (WGS84/NAD83) .
Topa pownload USGS Dobson Quad
View TopoZone Pro aerial photos, shaded relief, street maps,
Photo Download interactive coordinate display, and elevation data
USGS Topo Maps
fe' 1:24K/25K Series
1:100K Series
1:250K Series
Map Size
Small
Medium
Large
View Scale
1 : 50, 000
Update Map
Coordinate Format
D/MIS
Coordinate Datum
WGS84/NAD83
FYI Show target
Email this map
Bookmark this map
Print this map
G
0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 km
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 mi
Mz-7.4u6
G=Q.151
What's This?
TopoZone.com p 1999-2003 Maps a la carte, Inc. - All rights reserved.
Use of this site is governed by our Conditions and Terms of Use. We care about your privacy - please read our Privacy Stc
http://www.topozone.com/map.asp?z=17&n=4031948&e=52273R&..ci7P=GRldAf,1M—„a,lR'I 1 11(7111A

nical Assistance Site Visit
• DMidrl'of Soil and Water ConservatiolW-
O Natural Resources Conservation Service
O Soil and Water Conservation District
O Other...
Facility Number $6 - 18 Date: 91151p3 Time: 1 9:15 Time On Farm: 7a WSRO
Farm Name Mountain View Dairy County Surry Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address 982 Prison Camp Rd. _ Dobson NC 27017
Onsite
Representative Jerry Whitaker Integrator
Type Of Visit Purpose Of Visit
Operation Review
Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
Technical Assistance
Confirmation for Removal
❑ No Animals -Date Last Operated:
❑ Operating below threshold
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Q Routine
O Response to DWQ/DENR referral
O Response to DSWC/SWCD referral
O Response to complaint/local referral
O Requested by producer/integrator
O Follow-up
O Emergency
O Other...
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
® Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
Q Routine
O Response to DWQ/DENR referral
O Response to DSWC/SWCD referral
O Response to complaint/local referral
O Requested by producer/integrator
O Follow-up
O Emergency
O Other...
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
® Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
® Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
Aso1
90
❑ Other
GENERALQUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ® no
requiring DWQ notification?
5. Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ® no
Structural Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier WSP
Level (Inches) 20
CROP TYPES Icorn, Silage Small rain silage I lFescue-graze I JFescue-hay
SPRAYFIEI_D
SOIL TYPES
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03

n
•
Facility Number 86 - 18 bate:
9/15/03
PARAMETER
0 No assistance provided/requested
❑ 8. Waste spill leaving site
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed
Provided
❑ 9. Waste spill contained on site
❑ 10. Level in structural freeboard
25. Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
❑
❑
[111. Level in storm storage
26. Waste Plan Conditional Amendment
❑
❑
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan wlproducer
❑
❑
[112. Waste structure integrity compromised
❑ 13. Waste structure needs maintenance
28• Forms Need (list in comment section)
El
29. Missing Components (list in comments)
❑
❑
[114. Over application >= 10% & 10 lbs.
❑
❑
❑ 15. Over application < 10% or < 10 lbs.
30. 211.0200 re -certification
❑ 16. Hydraulic overloading
31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (PoA)
❑
❑
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
❑ 17. Deficient irrigation records
❑ 18. Late/missing waste analysis
33. Organize/computerization of records
❑
❑
❑ 19. Late/missing lagoon level records
34. Sludge Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 20. Latelmissing soils analysis
❑ 21. Crop needs improvement
35. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑
❑
❑ 22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan
36. Sludge removallclosure procedures
❑
❑
37. Waste Structure Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 23. Irrigation maintenance deficiency
❑ 24. Deficient sprayfield conditions
38. Structure Needs Improvement
❑
❑
39.Operation & Maintenance Improvements
❑
❑
40. Marker check/calibration
❑
❑
ReaulatorV Referrals
41. Site evaluation
❑
❑
❑ Referred to DWQ Date:
42. Irrigation Calibration
❑
❑
❑ Referred to NCDA Date:
❑ Other...
43. Irrigation system design/installation
❑
❑
Date:
44. Secure irrigation information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
LIST IMPROVEMENTS
45. Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
MADE BY OPERATION
46. Wettable Acre Determination
❑
❑
1
47. Evaluate WAD certification/rechecks
❑
❑
48. Crop evaluationlrecommendatlons
❑
❑
2.
49. Drainage worklevaluation
❑
❑
50. Land shaping, subsoiling, aeration, etc.
51. Runoff control, storrnwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
❑
❑
3
52. Buffer improvements
❑
❑
53. Field measurements(GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
❑
4.
54. Mortality BMPs
❑
❑
55. Waste operator education (NPDES)
❑
El
5'
56. Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
57. Record keeping education
❑
❑
6.
58. Crop/forage management education
❑
❑
59. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑
03/10/03

Facility Number 88 - 18 Date: 91151037
COMMENTS:
Waste analysis: 3-21-03 LSD 2.1 ibs.N/1000 gals. B
* Remember to get your 2003 soil samples.
Need to get a waste analysis to cover the applications made in August.
Provided Mr. Whitaker with some freeboard and slurry forms.
f
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST lRocky Durham ony Davis Icameron Pardue
SIGNATURE
Date Entered: 9/17/03 Entered By: lRocky Durham
3
03/10/03

r ivision of Water Quality
ill ' � I,rir E ,`,;�I ,� '°, ivlSLen�ofSeil-and�Water,COI15eCVatiOni�p�r�j,r,�, �=7�N1�i � ,p"i'� Jtllly 4,�,�r' � �,i 'I i�l'
O Other Agency i '
i P �I
il.I�I ir•I IYIr!h,d� I� II ,IIEI€'IiE�lli ,, �...�}> .j ! ,1- I, i III t£,!,
I i ,
Type of Visit OO Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 86 18 ___]Date of 'Visit; Ot/301Z003 Time: t330
Q NWOperational erational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified C] Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Xalt11tailn..Y..i9.n:.D.Wry .................................................................. .............. County: S.urjry .................................................. WSW ........
OwnerName: R..]t?a.Y.iS...... I .......... I ............... L.awrtracc.................................... .............. Phone No: ( .f1. 2-.4.51J1.......................................................
a
Mailing Address: .rison. annp.. d,......................... ............................................... Robs.Rnt..N. ........ L10014AII .........................
2.7.01.7...............
Facility Contact: hcry..l.Ntsakclr ............................................. Title: ...... Phone No: 33.6„3$.6,44947
Onsite Representative: J.crry.N'.h1.taUjr..................... .... I .... .... ..... ...,.............................. Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:hrr3'...W..,. ............................... VIMakcr......................................... Operator Certification Number:ZI,443 .............................
Location of Farm:
4 miles north of Dobson on Prison Camp Rd. Road No.1345. Jerry's Address: 3614 Old Highway 601, Mt. Airy, NC, 27030 AL
[I Swine El Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 36 • 26 1 11 Longitude 80 • 45 6 05 °
Design Current
Swine Cnnacity Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
El Layer ® Dairy 150 100
❑ Non -Layer I JEI Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 150
Total SSLW 210,000
Number of Lagoons 0 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 1 ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes []No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Stn►cture 6
Identifier: ......Wasxe.Pozld............................................................................ ...................................
Freeboard (inches): 24
05103101 -* � z � Z/ , Continued

Facility Number: 86-18 Date of Inspection O1I3012Q03 _
S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, ere erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6, Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ONO
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste_ Application
10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? []Excessive Ponding [:]PAN [:]Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Fescue (Hay) Corn (Silage & Grain) Small Grain (Wheat, Barley,
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ®No
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reuuired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
1.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. use additional pages as neces ° Meld Cvpy ®Final Notes -
19. Operator sent waste sample to Raleigh in mid -Jan. 2003 and is awaiting results to complete PAN balance in his records. Check next
visit.
Due to excessive rainfall in this area Oct -Dec. 2002, operator was given permission by DWQ to apply onto small grain crop in mid -Jan.
2003 to keep from overflowing, CAWMP states application window is Feb. -Nov.
Waste Analysis: 11/2 i/01 LSD = 2.4 lbs. N11000 gal.
Questions left blank are not applicable to this facility at this time.
•
Reviewer/Inspector Name Melissa Roseb rock
lip
A
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 Continued

Facility Number; 86-18 of Inspection 01/30/2003
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
05103101

i 0 1. rn
a `7.7.+.. 1,±• IDR a t' ti 4.*!Fa[PI" �. ; ? S7x a3 m
Type of Visit A Compliance Inspection C) Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other
❑ Denied Access
Date oi• Visit: Time:
Facility Number
Not Overational 0 Below lbreshold
j Permitted Certified 0 Conditionally Certified Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: County: urr
:_ . w
Owner Name:
Mailing Address: ' 3 w14 D
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
47
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
CL Phone No: 3 L3i_ 3 a' 4-261 _.
Li-i 104. At r u-k)C- 2 -M-36
itle: Phone No:--P-!'r u33to. 326 f
�j AL-) Integrator:
h-a K-P� Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry' Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • ®+ Longitude ®• © w
,; , . F f; "�� Ilestgn e. , •Current „ 3 Llesign �:�;Current : i, s;i Design , mCurretit E ,•
Swine •.� Ca acity -Pn ulation pr1DU1t' Caacity _Po ulation • C ittle.. �Cn"'acth Po 6lliit
ion.'Weaa to Feeder La er Da WFeeder to Finish } Non -La er I I 1•: 10 Non-DaiTy I
❑ Farrow to Wean ,r
ElFarrow to Feeder ❑ Other " �, , i' '� ,
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity; ,i, (�
El Gilts Gia,
❑ Boars W ' OQ�
,r Nittnber of Lagobas ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ S rov Field Area i �'
�Holdio Ponds / S'oUd'Tra s.Liquid
g: P- �� o `i, ❑ No Li uid Waste Mana emeni System i
Discharges & tream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? (Spillway
Structure Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: in
Freeboard (inches): ",C;�
❑ Yes xNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
gNo
❑ Yes
Y.
❑Yes
VNo
Structure b
05103101 Continued

Facility Number. — Date of Inspection Q
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ YesVNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or `
closure plan? Yes No
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public heaIth or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes rNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ClYeso
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes '�4No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes A(No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Pon ing ❑ PAN ❑ Hydra 'c Overload ❑ Yes *NNo
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with ose designated in the Certified Ani 1 Waste Management Plan (C WMP)? ❑ Yes o
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ElYes No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes 9�0
o
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ElYes
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? El Yes o
&guired Records & Doclrtnents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes XN 0
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified7AInal Waste Management}'Ian readily available?(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) / t ❑ Yes %
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigaTion, freeboard, waste�an/alysis & soil sample reports) ] Yes No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No
22, Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes XNo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes l`No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes No
© No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further corresporidence'about this visit.
Comments (refer to questian #) Explain any YES answers and/or' aril] r66nurieadatlops or atty,otheco"mme' nts;'+
g , p ( draona .
Use;'drawrn .s of facil to better ez ` la►n situattons:�. use ad l pages:es necessary) Field Conv Anallotes
465. 10,6 oo
n
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:�eJk A7 jd Date:
05103101 ' Continued
-Nov. .�

Facility Number:
0
Date of Inspection
•
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt.
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanentltemporary cover?
I Additional Comments and/or rawings: F ,,; I r-
❑ Yes >61b
❑ Yes �Kuo
❑ Yes 0,No
❑ Yes KNo
—G4- CLS.u-
a� 1 aq t� 3 Q [- ap i I�. `- s -pact I a+ `h iS -h me -
No�es
c loos Y BM465 IQced ?
flR
�W ZC,-
✓nua'-�-aca3v�aa�� o��eau�
05103101

O D' "on of Water'Quality Ap
"'' t • * I n,of Soil'and Water Conservation 1 .
O Othci Agency
g y t
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection © Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other 0 Denied Access
1 acility Number 86 18 gate of Vlsh: 7/1/2t102 "Time: 9:30
O Not Operational O Belo" Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above "Threshold : .........................
Farm Name: IYJ.atAnttalia-Y.i -Rairy........................................................... ............ County: S.urjry.................................................. W.S1iQ........
OwnerName:%.D.a.Y.is................................. La.w.rejaco .................................................. Phone No:(333.k1352-.4.SAl...,...............,.....,..............................
Mailing Address: 98.2-R so.a.CAmpRd.................................... .... D.Qb.$Qn..NC....... ......................................... ........... U.917 .............
Facility Contact Title: Phone No•
Ottstte Representative: J.fYrXy..W.b1t A......................................................................... Integrator:.........,...................................,.,......,...............................
Certified Operator:, grry..W. ............................... l kLlt;akcr......................................... Operator Certification Number:114,43..............................
Location of Farm:
4 miles north of Dobson on Prison Camp Rd. Road No. 1345 +,
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude F 36 Is F 2G , I1 Longitude F 80
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
® Dairy
150
105
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
[] Farrow to Feeder
Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Opacity
150
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
210,000
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons I -
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps C
Subsurface Drains Present JjLI Lagoon Area Io Spray Vivid Area
No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. [f discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure f Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure G
Identifier: ................................... ......................................................................................................•.....,.,................................................................
Frecboard (inches): 85
05103101 Continuer)

Facility Number: 86-18 Date of Inspection 7/1/2002
5, Are there any immediate threats to the�iii grity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ t severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) Small Grain (Wheat, Barley,
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records B Documents
17, Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback, criteria in effect at the time of design?
21 _ Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ❑Field Copy ❑Final Notes
Facility and records are in compliance.
er/Inspector Name Rocky Durham
E
erltnspector Signature: Date:
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 86-18 Date of Inspection 7/1/2002 .
Odor Issues 0 0
26, Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation'?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i,e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30, Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken tan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additionai Comments and/or 'rawings:
Waste analysis: 6-04-02 SSD 4.3 lbs.N/1000 gals. B
11-21-01 LSD 2.4 " "
J
05103101

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation f
Reason for Visit *Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access Ij
Facility Number 86 18 Date of Visit: 1/14/20D2 Time: 1150
0 Not O erational Q Below Threshold
S Permitted 0 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: UountdU..Y.icx.D.Wry................................................................................ County: S.ujrjry ................................................. W.SRQ.........
Owner Name: kt.l2axis................................. Lawrence ................................................... Phone No:{�3.feJ1.3�2.:�k�lUl.................................... I...................
Mailing Address: di&14.Qld.k�llgkllYgY.�Q�.................................................................... lilt..AJla..NC......................................................... 2.7.030 .............
Facility Contact: bay ...W.blakcr...........................................Title:................................................................ Phone No: die��y..���.��G,�k4�kx...........
Onsite Representative: Jury ...................... ............. , Integrator:............,
..............................................................................................................
Certified Operator:,berry....W................................ whitakcr ........................................ Operator Certification Number: 21443.............................
Location of Farm:
I miles north of Dobson on Prison Camp Rd. Road No. 1345 A
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 36 • 26 11 Longitude 130 • 45 OS46
k Design
Current
Design Current
Design _ Current.
ine' Ca acit
P.o ulation
Poultry Ca acit E;o ulation Cattle
Ca acit Po Pula ion
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑Layer
®Dairy
150 1 10
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑Non -Layer
❑Nan -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
150
❑ Gilts
Total SSL,W
210,000
'
❑ Boars
Nurnber of Lagoons
1 0
❑ Subsurface Drains Present JIM Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds /Solid Traps
�1
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges. Stream Impagt
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection _& Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ❑ Yes '® No
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .....W..asLe.Ptxnd............................................................................ .........................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 42
. 05/03/01 � . _ _ • : , Cgnlirrued

Facility Number: 136-18 0 Date of Inspection 1 1/14/2002
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Annlieafion
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
1 1. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) Small Grain (Wheat, Barley,
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes N No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Rgfgr s & DocumenL5
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
o ments (refer tion 1xplain an. a we and/or any recommendations or any other commen .
drawings f fix to ette explain ituat u e additional pages as necessary : ❑Field Copy ®Final Notes
7. Continue efforts to control groundhogs.
_AL
8. Need to replace a couple of boards along barn since there is potential for waste to get into the surface water ditch.
19. Need to keep PAN balances for each SLUR-2 form (see 2001 DWQ inspection also). No overapplication of waste noted.
Soil analysis must include copper and zinc also, per. permit.
Suggest keeping records in ink, also.
w
Reviewer/lnspector Name rMelissa Rosebrock
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: a�
05103101 1 Continued

Facility Number: 86-18 Dal nspection 1/14/2002
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29, is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
FXddM6rFaIMorffn n - an or rawmgs:
F
05103101

0
•
Type of Visit Q(Compliance Inspection
0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit (YRoutine O Complaint 0 Foltow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Time: E 1....i�
Facility Number
rO Not Operational Below Threshold
[Permitted n �jCertified [3 Con�dritionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: rV` nlalYl___Vr)Q1A er� aA nl County:
Owner Name: �Qw��,nce Phone No: ���• J� a 7l)L1�
Mailing Address: 1 I't 1 i iif ly a 7 n 1►
Facility Contact: 11 ,, �}� .l )6401 � Title: Phone No: , 3 �' 3 VI' qq 47
Onsite Representative: �.1 � r U W i 111T�_Q 1 — Integrator: '' II
Certified Operator: A�5 Operator Certification Number: �TY3
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry 1� Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ®0 EMI t--LJ-- . Longitude ®0 � 11
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
DesignCurrent' Design Current
Poultry Capacity Ptl ulation Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer pai I
❑ Non -Layer on -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW F21010 Ot]
° NumberofLagoons
❑ Subsurface Drains Present La oon Area Spray Field Area
;.Holding Ponds I Solid.Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
1215charEes _4 Stream IMpacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes �(No
❑ Yes No
WasteCollection _4� Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Spillway ❑ Yes >(No
Structure Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
L42-
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of [ns ectian
P
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
�No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
❑ Yes
)R<o
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
I No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
XYes
❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
XNo
Waste Ao_nlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
tk<o
11. Is there evidence of over application?❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
12. Crop type
13, Do the receiving crops differ with those d6fignated in the Certified kimal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
lieo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
Q(No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
0. No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
06 No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
Wfo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
J� ` o
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
KNo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
)�`No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
Yes
❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
'b?rNo
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
o
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
o
4ZO
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
24, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
Alf,o
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
ANo
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Ww .�s.
Comments (refer to 4uesti6n #) Explain any YES dnswera ind/or any recommendations or iny'otherrcommenta.
1Use dcawingsof facility tp better explaintsituations(useadditiot3al pages�asnecessary) Field Copy Final Notes
tal..i.Q Lp
O • C�d
At/KO th" tfq PIZ
- l,
ReviewerAnspector Name - — l bJc-
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date:
O5103101 Continued

Facility Number: Date of inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes WNO
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? E3 �'es -El-No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? •des --ado
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanendtemporary cover? NO
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:.-
L�1 C a()o( bLL)Q
e
05103101

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit ® Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 86 18 Date of Visit: 9/I712401 Thne: 9:34
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
■ Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:.. .......................
Farm Name: HQuatda Yip.Y-Dairy............................................................................ County: Surjry .................................................. W,SRQ........
OwnerName: HjDayis................................. 1A.W.rcur ................................................... Phone No: G? G�.3S.2: SAS..........................................
MailingAddress: �iautte.l�.. a>x.l#1............................ .............................. 1?obsant.. ........................................................... Z.7.Q17...............
Facility Contact: ..........
............................ Title:................................................................ Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Jerrry.. . ................................ Integrator:......
................................................................................
Certified Operator: Jerry ....................................... WWtMker ........................................ Operator Certification Number: 21.443............................. '
Location of Farm:
I miles north of Dobson on Prison Camp Rd. Road No. 1345 A
[]Swine ❑ Poultry ®Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 36 • 2b 6 11 « Longitude 80 • 45L F 05 11
Discharges& StrCaLnac
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ....................
Freeboard (inches): 42
05103101
❑ Yes ® No
[]Yes []No
❑ Yes []No
❑ Yes
[--]No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: 86-18 Date of Inspection 9/17/2001 {
5. Are there any immediate threats to the At of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, Yes No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes $� No
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Fescue (Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
DocumentsRequired Records &
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, Freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Q No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
men ai n. mendatlo—h- o an o c ru mme
ra111 tte a lal tut d'tiona! a e es a ❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
7. Continue efforts to get rid of ground hogs on the waste pond embankment.
Overall facility and records look good.
Reviewer/Inspector Name lRocky Durham
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 86-18 a of Inspection 9/17/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted'? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
[]Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
(Ldditiza;IL%ommeri an or aw n
Waste analysis: 4/6/01 LSD 2.6 Ibs.N11000 gals. B
A,
r
05103101

i ype or visa w uompnance inspection v operation rteview v Lagoon tvaivanon
Reason for Visit 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number $( 18 U:11c of Visit: 3l22J2Q01 t imc; 1004
Q Not Operational O Below Threshold
0 Permitted ® Certified [] Conditionally Certified j] Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: MAumtain..Y.xm.Dairy........................................................................... ..... County: Siarl:y.................................................. .W.SRO.......
Owner Name: HaDRIXk................................ La.-Armem .................................................. Phone No: 1 , �I.3S-4�Q1............................................. ...
Mailing Address: 3.614..0Jd.H.wy,..60.1............................................................................. MkAiry 27.9.1.7 ..............
Facility Contact:.1ury..Whittt.hr.............................................Title:
Onsite Representative
Certified Operator:decry....................................... W.b itakgx..............
Location of Farm:
...................................... Phone No:......................................
..............
......... Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:21443
I miles north of Dobson on Prison Camp Rd. Road No. 1345 i
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 36 ' 25 1 ll Longitude $0 • F 05
Design
Swine + Ca acit
❑ Wean to Feeder
Current Design Current ?' Design' ., urrrentt
P.o ulation Poultry Ca acit P.o uli tion Cattle Ca act Po ulation:
❑Layer ®Dairy I50 105
❑Non -Layer ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design;'Capacity 150 l'
F TotaltSSL W. 210 000
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean;'„
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons ® ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 1113 Lagoon Area ID Spray Field -Area
Holding Ponds / Salid Traps 0 ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream m Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a, if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (Il'yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [I No
c. 1f discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
01/01m] -#1— 54 !< ,`_ Continued

Facility Number: 86-18 • Date of Inspeclion 3/22/2001
Waste Collection & Treahuent
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: Was>t~.�cts�...................:........................................................................................... .............................
Freeboard(inches): 24........................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7, Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
a,
❑ Yes
® No
Structure 6
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
11.
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
® No
12.
Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) Fescue (Hay) Small Grain (Wheat, Barley,
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16,
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
17.
Are rock outcrops present?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Is there a water supply well within 250 feet of the sprayfield boundary? ❑ Unknown
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ On -site ❑ Off -site
Retmired
Records & Documents
19.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
20,
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
21,
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
® Yes
❑ No
22.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
23.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
25.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
26.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
27,
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
<_ 9U Issues
28.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
® No
01/01/01
Continued
4

Facility Number; 86-18 Aung
eofInspection 3/ 22/200130. Is there any evidence of wind drift land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31. - is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Printed on: 3/23/2001
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signal
Rosebrock
T. _'
Date:
01/01/01

Idp M
of Soil: and Water Conservation"',f¢ '
3 } pp[�
E . � � J f N - e „i 3• .� �1 i +' Erb I4'I' -L
7 � '�i,r�d"�as • --+ .Q `�tliCT A�e1lC�
r � r
f 1
Type of Visit �Q Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint Q Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other [) Denied Access
Efate of 'Visit: Q Time: O
Facility Number
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
Permitted # Certified 0 Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: ...... t ..�..Jl 1l �.��.1 �..r.... .............1. County: .... 5U.rr.j............... ............... .......................
Owner Name: ... 9......N.V1.5............ Lawrnc.e................. .................. Phone No:... 3.. ........2?_5..Z......L.r. x...j.................
Facility Contact: Title:.,......., ........................................ one No::....s 1. L3,..q 7
MailingAddress:........ .u.i........... ............................ ................... ................ .... .......
Onsite Representative....�..i 1.{ C,1..15r!. Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:.. (,��r.. vf........................ I............. Operator Certification Number:........ .�.. .t,�. .....
Locatio>n'of Farm:
m;196 noM) of , 6bson 6n P65on Q&�,p PJ.(SP-13�V A
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry � Cattle ❑ Morse Latitude ®• ®4 ®fit Longitude ®• 9 94
Design Current
Swine' C'anacity Panulatien
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design. Current, Design,t Gut
Poultry Capacity Po ulatioii Cattle Ca a city, Po' u
❑ Layer airy I5(j
❑ Non -Layer ! ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity,
Totid SSLW
Nttaiber of Lagoons 10 Subsurface Drains Present J10 Lagoon 10 Spray Field Area E
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps` ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Di.Wharges & Stream Int acts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ) No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other ' \
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c, If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes E�No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes A "No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Spillway ❑ Yes x No
Struc tire (� Structure; 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...Yli .G!Xi................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches):
5100 Continued on back

Fpcility Number: — it
of Inspection � , Printed on: 1/9/2001
Odor Issues i
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below [:]Yes �No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes j No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? {des— 5-No
Additional Comments and/or Drawings: , r , , a } ; 4
a 000 So'l I Savcqle-s l cl 9q ?
kOuP nfo. 4"0" i2alel ? N rah e,4Z� q-SMO-1I
rQ� Y1 e-r -fie l C ict l ts� s i na+U re. 7
J
5/00

F'afility Number: — Date of Inspection D Printed on: 1/9/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to ntegrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes] No
seepage, etc.) /
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes] No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance improvement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes A No
Waste Anplication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes kNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessivee� Ponding /❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes OK&O
12, Crop type 0 Or n S I i l� 07 5 U M OL II ra1, [ B(r em A_F� 5[' ue/ 1 1
13. Do the receiving crops differ witlUhose designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMI)? ❑ Yes RkNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 10 No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes 1$ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes [(No
15. Does the receiving crop need iaprovement? ❑ Yes �i4o
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes X
No
Required Records & Documents
t7. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? -&Fero
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes )?(No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) Yes ❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes �fNo
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes )3fNo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes XN 0
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes "No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes .XNo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes [�No
NQ *11090 iris:err il0fjeaetid0$ •wire 0004• 00149 titjs,visit;• y0it ll t�eoow 4o f�i�i`e
'' ``
Err' isnorideh& abort: this - ::.... ' ::::.......:: ' :...::.... .
minents (refer to question li) ,Explain any YES a�aswers and/or, any reco�►mehdations orsany uthe�r cohttg afflo
Use drawlEt` of facility to better" plain slittahons.. (use additEonal pages'as necessary) fr"t j r,;. rt ✓ '
S
19 AU1 u-)avIt -f3 a Corn + small jrn;n bomdari5
tin• Ne-ed 4 V-P-P-P PAS bo_1oLv,)ce_.s.ov) ecxc,� S L_u 5r
Abpl`k ta)�op) 5 l �os�4 �
flw
Q .,,.,
Reviewer/Inspector Name 9 � 4:e, ' ' a n rnf
ovirwy, Date:

}ate of Visit: 11/30/2000 Tune; 11:3D Printed on: 2/22/2001
Facility Number 8b 18
Q Not O erational O Below Threshold
Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 1 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: ?AQlAtAW0.Y#k.1Y..D4!rY............................................................................... County: S-Ura .................................................. W,SRQ........
OwnerName: M.D.avis................................. Lawxl<Al£5................................................... Phone No: ( f ).. 52-.4. lJl........................................................
FacilityContact:..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: Diaute..Da.. a>.D#D................................................................................ Aob.$.aut..NC........................................................... 2.7.Q..7...............
OnsiteRepresentative: .1crry..W.DI#1 .gi......................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:JgKry........................................W.WWku ........................................ Operator Certification Number: ZD443...
..........................
Location of Farm:
4 miles north of Dobson on Prison Camp Rd. Road No. 1345
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 3ti • 2b 11 Longitude 80 • 45 05
Design Current Design Current Design. Current
Swine ,' Ca 'hucit "Po tilation 'Poultry • z „ Capacity` Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 1 [❑ Subsurface Drains Prese2LJjLJ Lagoon Area J❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds /Solid Traps 0 ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System JIM
DiNcharyes & Stream impact,,;
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure l' Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: .................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 63
5100
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure S Structure 6
Continued on back

Facility Number: 136-18 Date n1'.lnsprctiun i1/30/2000 Printe
5. Are there any immediate threats to thedgrity of any of the structd ouA: 2J2212001 ures observed? (iel Aevere erosion, [] Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed andlor managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum -and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) Small Grain (Wheat, Barley,
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack, adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
t5. Does the receiving crop need improvement'?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required tords & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0: Nd yialatiohs:or :de#iciene es -were noted dtiting-tliis: visit: ;You:*i11:receive•rto• drthefr-' ,
•. • correspondence: about this.visit.
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
7. Fill in ground hog holes, has filled some. In process of ground hog eradication. Did cut "trees".
19. Pulled waste samples this year April and October and pulled soil test April this year.
1W
Reviewer/Inspector Name ?Margaret Okeefe Greg Goings Tony R. Davis {
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 5100

Y r
Facility Number: R6—lti 1) I' Inspection 11/30/20110 Printed on: 2/22/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below [:]Yes ® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31, Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ® No
rtM •ommen n a � ra n :
5100
5100

Facility Number 86 18
Date of Visit �000 1'rir1ted or,• 4/14/2000
0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
0 Permitted M Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ................
Farm Name: UQ1AtltAJ1Ja.YiV....DWrY....................... .. County: S.urjry .................................................. W.SRR........
OwnerName: HjDavis................................. Lawrcm .................................................. Phone No: L�3Ct�: S.2: R0]<........................................................
Facility Contact:krUN1i11ku1M ............................................. Title: .0per tIr r........................................... Phone No: 33.Uo.6.44.47 .......................
Mailing Address: �iR>xte..ls.. R7K.,SX................................................................................ Pab§.Rm..NC........................................................... 2.7017...............
Onsite Representative: Jcrry.}WhMvi......................................................................... Integrator:...............................................
Certified Operator:Jprry...W................................ Wwf.akgr ........................................ Operator Certification Number: A1.443 .............................
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Hor:Latitude 36 • 26 11 �• Longitude 8o • 45 0566
Discharges & Stream Impacts -a
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (11' yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection -& Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes 0 No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 36
Continued on back

Facility Number: 86-18 Date of Inspection 4/10/2000 Printed on: 4/14/2000 ' I
5. Are there any immediate threats to thefegrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ t severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Wa5te Allpfigation
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ® No
t2. Crop type Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Corn (Silage & Grain)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes 10 No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Recads-&-Diwurnents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/lnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
'NO Yiblatibns:oir deficiencies-were:nbted'during•this: Visit.•'You'will 'recei*i �4W ftilrth'er ..
corres'66ndence: about this :visit............:.:::::. ,
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
7. Several groundhog holes on south side of dam need to be repaired. Should go ahead and cut small tree that has started.
19. Waste applied October 10,14,20,25 and 28, 1999........no waste sample taken. No 1999 soil test results available.
Reviewer/inspector Name IMelissa Rosebrock �
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: p Date:

Facility Number. 86-18 D ►f Inspeclion 411U12U00 • Printed on: 4/14/2000
Od.ff Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e, residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes IN No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
J

n
fk Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow -tie of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Permitted Certified 13 Conditionally Certified J3 Registered 13 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: %%% M. Q.�.}77 � Y..� .. a. ...... County:...........:5...................... ..................
...........M � n.....j . n ............. 2/ f
Owner Name ....... R........ , . ..5..........IAQ..�cn.e e.............................. Phone No: ...`...,56.'.....`�...... �....... g. .1........I.............
Facility Contact: e:................................................................ Phone No: .3�6,31b-,-Tk4q-
MailingAddress:..R....:a--B.Qx.......ksl....................................... ................ ti n........,.....................,......,...... .........,....,.
Onsileitepresentative:....,. `Q,,,e .. . ........""'.................................. Integrator:...........................................'......"................................
Certified Operator:,,. T-XT.4 ......... .'....;, .4 .4................ Operator Certification Number:......,,1�,�,,,,,, ,,,,, ,3..
�..!
Location of Farm:
,Ix1..�...:r�arn ..a...� b�.n....n. �.ri; � . �. _:........... ..�...aFS.................
..................................
......
Latitude [� * =` =11 Longitude • ERE]` ®u
Design Cui rent:
,Swine 'Ca aci Po tlatioa Poultry
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Non -
Other
N,
4.0
Number of Lagoons.`.
HoldtngPonds•'/'Solid Traps' '
Design Current �_� r� o� 'De51�11[.Current'
Ca aci :Po'"elation Cattle ,A Ca act l?o yulation .
i;` Dairy
rer r ❑Non -Dairy ''
Total Design Capac>I y o
Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area. 10 Spray Field Area .
No Liquid Waste Management System ,
Discharges & Stream impacts
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ko
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, dial it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d, Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (Ir yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
A. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes go
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: rl
Freeboard(inches).................................................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Faciliiy Number: <R4= of inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are nooperly addressed and/or managed through a Ou management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type —
13. Do the receiving crops diffJ with those designated in the erti
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes X 0
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes >41 <0
fied Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes K. No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes A No
❑ Yes �k<
El Yes A'o
Required Records _&_ Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? �y' Yes ❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes )(No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) X Yes ❑ No
20. 1s facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes IVo
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes )!(No
22, Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
1Q yiolaiicjtn�s;01r 4iicwnvip� -woo 00'fpd• Ooing 01s'Osit: - yow wiii •tOO*i oo; futtj>Igr .. .
icoiresporidence. albout. this visit.. .. .. . . . . ..... .
❑ Yes �O`No
❑ Yes rNNo
❑ Yes )ello
❑ Yes No
t t.
Use'drawingsof faciltty,to:betterexplam situsdons (use'addihonalipages as�necessary)
-7. �o via aG fes e n San s �d� o� dam
net
4 be. re.fqt r-cj.
o head 4-do -" s Mo, d -f -rve- *y4+.
h 06
1 l o)9q ---.
1 f 4 a v
5�-Q
o qiLTs1�.
a
a_
Reviewer/Inspector Name
,,,•
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur
l/ dA
t 0 i r A,- 1A Date: Q 41
oo

r Facility Number: Iuf Inspection D Q
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? om IT at) o
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes XNo
28, Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes >14'0
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes YNo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes )<No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes *0
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? p CDX0
atrona .,Comments and/or
Drawings:.
t' '7 i. �.�
PP he,1 on
r�C�� v�
I b 9
� l �
��-
�la�bas�.�AJ
J

Facility Number 8b 18 Date of fnspeclion 6l23/IS199
'I'imc of Inspection 9:30 24 hr. (hh:mrn)
Q Permitted ®Certified ©Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Not O erational Date Last Operated; ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Farm Name: lY�.au�txtatiwx.Yi�e.»�.�?airy................................................................................ County: Sux'icy............................ ...................... WSRA........
Owner Name: J,.1?a.Yi5 ................................. Lana a acc.................................................. Phone No:L9191.3,52:4801........................................................
FacilityContact: ......................................................... .....................Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: );.aExte..1...fax.18.1................................................................................D.Qbsara..NC......................,.................................... 2.7917...............
Onsite Representative:.IcxlrY...W.�11�tal�et.TiiY.1.a;HC�1�tC.t~ ............................... Integrator:..................,...,,.......,...,..................................................
Certified Operator: JeErI.W.................................. 1iF1Alwkcr................. —.................... Operator Certification Number:11.4r4.3 ................. ...........
.
Location of Farm:
��ib�l9lix.AAI.I'J1715A�►..��t#Ait.�.d,...liaa.d.[���.a„i.4.�.,....................
w
Latitude 36 ` 26 { 11 66 Longitude DKI
' 45 4 OS66
n Design Current Design Cu�rerit' :'" 'f' Destgn Ciirreiit
Swine Ca acit I',o ulation Poultry Ca acit P.o ulation Cattle Ce aeit Po ulation ,
r;
❑ Farrow to Wean
Q Farrow to Feeder i Other
Farrow to Finish ! �.
Total Desi 11 Capacity l50
g
❑ Gilts
Boars Total SSI. W 2I0,000
ENumber of Lt+gootos ❑ Subsurface Drains PresentTO Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
MMHffoffilffin-ffl�/ Solid Traps 1 ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges
❑Wean to Feeder
❑Layer
®Dairy
l50
105
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑Non -Layer
❑Non -Dairy
& StEgpW Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field []Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? .
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes No
Waste Collection tic TreaEment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? [I Spillway ❑Yes No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ...............3.b...............................................,,.......,..,.......,.........................................................................,.......,.
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3123/99
❑ Yes ®No
Continued on back
Printed on 3/21/2001

Facility Number: 86-18 a of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are properly addressed and/or managed through a ste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancefimprovement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste AppligOtion
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? []Excessive Ponding [:]PAN
12, Crop type Corn (Silage ) Barley (Silage)
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
Cl No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No .
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes IN No
15, Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & DocutnenJ5
17. Fait to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Oe/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? Oe/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
Ocl discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
Nd•viblatioris;oe- deficiencies -were hotel/ duti•ittg,this',VW .• :You;will :reeeive no furihetr
corres arident e: about this :visit... •
18 Need to get a copy of the certification with records,
an needs to break down N rate for corn/SG into amount for corn and amount for small grain.
Iso, the plan needs to show RYE that N amount was based on and have the 633 required specifications included.
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
w
Reviewer/]nspector Name !Rocky Durham 'Pony Davis
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Printed on 3/21/2001

aeilhy Number: 86-18 Da0Inspection 6/23/1999
Odor Is�:j
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, andlor public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover'? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ® No
Printed on 3/21/2001

Facility Number 8b 18 Date of Inspection 6-22-"
I'ime of Inspection 1 10:15 124 hr. (hh:mm)
Q Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered 10 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: lkloutAtaitt..Y.im-Pairy............................................................................... County: Suxj'x.................................................. 1+!',SRQ........
Owner Name: K.Daris................................. Lawmacc.........
Facility Contact:..............................................................................Title:
Mailing Address: tiQut�.1...ct7t,.�A1......................................................
Onsile Representative: ................................................................................
Phone No:
Phone No:
D.QW.Qta.. PVC .................
.............. Integrator:.....
...... 2..7017 .............
Certified Operator: Jer1Cy...yY.h ............................... W.Malicr........................................ Operator Certification Number: 2340.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 36 • 2ti , 11 1{ Longitude 80 • 45 U5 "
Design
Current
'� Design Cunt' g r benign 'Current ki
Swine
Ca ap c [
°P,o ulation
Poultry Cu acit P,o ula�tton ; Cattle Ca acttPo ulation
❑Layer ®Dairy I50 150
❑ Non -Layer ❑Nan -Dairy
feeder
Finish
Wean
pFarrow
o Feedero
Total Design Cac y 150
SS --T4 210,000
Finish
gal
Number of Lagoons F
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Arru 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds /Solid Traps
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discham-e5 -& Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
1 Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes IN No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste ColljEtion & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (Freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 1
Freeboard(inches): ........ 3.6inq 0................................................................................................................................................... .......
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

F,pcility Number: 86-18 D of Inspection 6-22-99
6. Are there structures on -site which are npoperly addressed and/or managed through a management or
closure plan'? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste -Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
I. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes IN No
12. Crop type Timothy, Orchard, & Rye
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required
Records &_Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
Reviewer/Inspector Name lJennv Rankin i I
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Q,QJ'A(}k" R OJljl](Za./Y\ Date: (p - ZZ - a
3/23/99

• •
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
WINSTON-SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
October 9, 1998
Mr. H. Davis Lawrence
Rt. 1, Box 181
Dobson, NC 27017
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operations Inspection
Mountain View Dairy
Facility No. 86-18
Surry County
Dear Mr. Lawrence:
An Animal Feedlot Operation Inspection was performed on Mountain View
Dairy on October S, 1998. Tony Davis from the Surry County SWCD as well as
myself were present for the inspection. The amended inspection form is attached.
On the day of the inspection, the waste storage pond did not. have adequate
freeboard. The appropriate freeboard level should be at least 18 inches. You
stated during the inspection that you intend to pump down the storage pond as soon
as possible. It is imperative that you take all precautionary measures to prevent
any discharge from your storage pond. Please be aware that follow-up inspections
will be performed to ensure that the level of the storage pond is lowered.
Please contact the Winston-Salem Regional Office if you should have any
questions.
cc:
Sincerely,
0
Jenny Rankin
Environmental Technician
W SRO
585 WAUGHTOWN STREET, WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA 27107
PHONE[phone] FAX[phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/1 O% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

W.
10 Itnutlne p (:oinplalilt p 1•ollo►v-up OF I)Nvt, Inspection p 1,011OW-up Or I)1\Yt, 1-ev1ew p tMiler
10-5-98
I acilil�' Nnnilzci' ;r:t la.;1�;i1+,n
24 hr. (hh:mm)
■ Registered p Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted 0 of Operatimial L-,ist Opei-mu :
Uarnl Nnine: MouaLai.n.View-Dauiry................................................................................. County, Surry WSRO
Owner Name: N...Datais................................ Lawrcncc;............................
Facility Contact: ....I
Phone No: 910-35.2:4MI....................••...•••..............................
...•...... ........... ......................... ..• Phone No; ..................................
MailiEr- Address: Rt,.—B.ox.181........................................................................................ DQ15an... XC............................................................ 2701.7...............
t)nsilc Representative: Davh.La1cyumcc................................. ................. .......... .•.......... Intel,-alol....................... .._................ ................................ ...............
...56
c:crlificd Uper:uol-Jery..W,................................ 1N.1ti.talmr........................ •�......)hy:iior Certifienlion Number:2,11.4,43 .............................
I,Ocalinu of Parnt:
at? es,nQr. sa�•aa..rlsaa. ittt�;, ott a.
::s::
_t
�t
I,aIIIUfIC ®+® © l.ilElhEtll(IC` ®�® ®"
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
p Wean to Feeder
p Feeder to mts t
[3 Farrow to Wean
© Farrow to ee er
p Farrow to Finis
p Gilts
p Boars
❑ Layer
p Non -Layer
p Other
Total Design Capacity 150
Total SSLW 2 1 0,0=
It
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds U
❑ S u
sur ace
rains
resent
p
aguon real
❑ . bray • rr f r rea
7
o
Liquid Waste
Management
System
�:cElelal
1. Are there any buffers that treed maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
I:)isi:har4_c ori-inalcct tat: p Lagoon Cl Spray Field p Other
a_ I I'discharg-C is observed, was the conveyance mail -made? Cl Yes 13 No
1). Ifdischar_c is observed, dill it reach Surface Waiel-? 1lfyes. noliiN• DWQ) l7 Yes p No
c. II'dischnl-C is ohservcd, what is the e.stilnalcd Ilow in girl/niiai''
d. Dncs discl7tlr�e h�pass a lt7gaiin system'' (Il'�cs, natil'y L')41't)) p Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ® Yes p No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ® No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes ® No
maintenance/improvement?
G. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? []Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ® No
7/25/97

ae t y Number: 86. t:,l' "I II, ;=tirin.
S. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on saich need to be properly closed? p Yes ig No
Strt►c►tn'eti Lac,00ns.l-loldin<, Ponds, blush Pity. etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? M Yes ❑ No
SII'ticlure I Stt'llt tllre 2 StRICRIPc i SIRICllll'C 4 Sirucllry tilrllCtttt'C {_
[drs►citicr: 1
I-rcchoard (It). .........AJAClics.....................................................................................................................................................................................
10. is seepage observed from any of the structures? p Yes ® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum Iiquid level markers?
\V;istc AplAic:►tion
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15, Crop type ..........................Rye.......................•. .. SutalLGrain.(Wppheat..$�rley•...........................................................
16, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated m the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
F►,r Certil'ied or PCI'nllltetl F Wililies [h►h'
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
M Yes p No
p Yes ® No
p Yes
® No
p Yes
® No
p Yes
® No
q Yes
N No
® Yes
p No
p Yes
® No
p Yes
®No
Q o.vio ttons.or aerenctes•were.nate . uring this visit . ou. wi-reeeive no'further. - .
o resjtin Qtle!~R1. . .t..S•Y. . . .. . ..:. . ' ':':'.•.'.•.•.
p Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
Comments (refer to quest►on•#) �Expla►n'any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments
lJse drawings of fac►hty to better explas�tuattons: (use add►tninal pages as necessary) „ j€
here is evi(Tnce that the storage pond has over topped due to it not being pumped as frequently as needed. It had inadaquate
freeboard on the day of the inspection.
pump down marker can not be placed in the storage pond until it is pumped down.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Jenny Rankin
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: `)Q nAM 1 t RLl ,de\ 4'-0 * A,�
Date: IC. - +i `(I- its

p Division of Soil alWater
■ Division of Water Quality
7-
19 moutine p uomptaint p rottow-up of uwd inspection p rc
Facility Number
M Registered p Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted
Farm Name: Mountain..Y.iew-Dairy..................
ow-up of u'wu review p Vtner
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Not 0perationa Date Last Operated:
............... County: Surry WSRO
Owner Name: H.-Daxis................................ Law enim.................................................. Phone No: 9111-351:480.1...........................................................
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title:............................................................... Phone No:....................................................
Mailing Address: RU... B.ax..181...
Onsite Representative: kL.Da.Y.is.Law.rrAee...................................................
Certified Operator:Jiea:ry...................................... k3hitaur...............
Location of Farm:
Dobson... N.0............................................................ 2701.7 ..............
Integrator: .........................................................................................
Operator Certification Number:2.1.443 .............................
:........::....p�...: a...........................................................................................................................................
Latitude ®s®& ©« Longitude ®0 ®4 ®&6
esign Current-",:esign., urren Design urren
�. :
Swine Capacity, EPopulation Poulfr`y'' ,-Capacity +Population Cattle ', `Ca a'ctty'`1'ii uliitfon" "`
p
,
'l
i
p Wean to Feeder
13 Feeder to Finish
p Farrow to Wean
p Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow toMUNN-
13 Gilts
p Boars
it of rx� > 1137a1„ aI °!�.,i', I- of
a! Lk n r, . i«<d.o
e
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ® Yes p No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field ® Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes N No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated slow in galhnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) H Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ® Yes p No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes H No
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ® Yes p No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ® No
7/25/97

aCi iy -m er: 86_ 18 .
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Laaoons,NoldinO: Ponds, Flush_Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
freeboard(fl): ............ 2..f=t............ ...................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
Structure 5
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
Structure 6
p Yes ® No
0 Yes R No
® Yes p No
® Yes p No
p Yes ® No
15. Crop type .......Cann..(Silage.&.Gxain.)....... ......................... Ry.V..................................................................................... ...........
................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? l7 Yes p No
I7. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
q...o:o.�veisopoio�nes>�l.oer� aboauetretnciiSeYs•iwSie;re.no e uring is visit; -You will.receive n.o.further.-.
er
...::::...
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes M No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:

;f.
I* xoutme 0 uompiaint 0 ronow-up oT uwy Inspection 0 ro
Facility Number
U Registered p Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted
up oT uawt. review 0 urner
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
In Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Mo atai,n..View..Dairy................................................................................ County: Surry WSRO
Owner Name: JR—Daxis................................ Lawri tine.................................................. Phone No: 9.1.0-.352.-AR0 .....................
Facility Contact:...............................................................................Title:....................... . Phone No:
Mailing Address: Rf,,.IJiMx..181.............................................................
Onsite Representative: 1L.D.a..vJs..L.awread........................................
CertifiedOperator: .................................................. ...................................
Location of Farm:
Dob s om...N.C..........
27. 1 i 1.7...............
........... Integrator: ...................................................................................
..... Operator Certification Number: .........................................
Latitude ®•®� ©�� Longitude ®• ®®i
�71jesjgH77':_ 'urren .[,a' CSigil, Current, 71, .,esign , urren
Capacity,Populationl .Poultry`` Capacity Population .' Cattle Capacity Populatiarr .t.
p Wean to Feeder
p Feeder to Finish
13 Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to ee er
p Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
p Boars
..,
.16
Nuriiiber� of,L'agoons / HoIdmglNndsr3 ,�`lt p u sur ace rains Present -goon rea pray Held ren
i55 33 VV
�! :� � 1 €,�3€1€ I flfih�� i ` !ti E E ` Eft ZFI ibYl ., .. .. .. ............ ..0 .... O' ❑ .,.o.. ...iqutd W
... .....as.e.... ...anagemen System
General'
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon p Spray Field Cl Other
a. l f discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it. reach Surface Water? (Ifyes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. II'discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes 0 No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ® Yes p No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ® Yes -p No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ® No
7/25/97

� f Faoi�i y Number: 86-19
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? p Yes ®No
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9, Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Yes g No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 SIRIct lre 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(fi):...............6A...........................................................................................................................................................................................
p. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? p Yes g No
11, Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? p Yes g No
12, Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? p Yes g No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?, ® Yes p No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? p Yes g No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type.......Chm.4Si)aga.&.lCxratin)....... ...................... ...Ryu........................................................... .......................... ................................ ...........................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? O Yes p No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
S. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22., Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only,
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
R . , ..o.vtqlons.or Ycrencies•were.nosring. wis visit.,. You. Wi .receive no' further .. .
ojrlrespoz+�e�ie��xiut
p Yes g No
p Yes g No
Cl Yes g No
p Yes p No
p Yes Q No
p Yes p No
p Yes ❑ No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
'C6mmerits'(refe"r t'o question #):' {xpliiin any YI;S Ar%swers Hi d/or aiiv ricoinirieniliitions «r any ether coniirieiits: ,
Use drawings of facility to bciter expiain situations. {use additional liages as licecssary}:
"l;lie questjpns answered YES are all being addressed by NR*S and the district. We have com l`cted a cost=share contract and[the
prmf:.,
survey, field work will start when drawing and design are complete. WUP calls for acres but not speciticicrops
71y25/97
C
` li'
Reviewer/Inspector Name Tbny'R7I)avis i`" �' �;t' owl
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

AM Facility Number:-
Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
Date: AW�
Time: 44, s h
General information: ' /
Farm Name: r t County:
Owner Name: ) Phone No: qia - z w a1
On Site Representative:_ 4,,AWt - Integrator:
Mailing Address: _ One -- 3
r3� �✓ � �i7
Physical Address/Location:
Latitude: + / ?- ' i / Lon tttde: d§eLf 'I �E•�
Operation Description: (based on design characteristic)
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Anima
© Sow ❑ Layer )&Dairy f roc
O Nursery ❑ Non -Layer a Beef
❑ Feeder
OrherType of Livestock Number of Animals:
NGmber of Lagoons:�L_ (include in the Drawings and Observations the freeboard of each lagoon)
Facility T ecti
Lagoon
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than I foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?:
Yes ❑
No m
Is seepage observed from the lagoon?.
Yes ❑
Nock
Is erosion observed?:
Yes ❑
No C�
Is any discharge observed?
Yes ❑
NoP
❑ Man-made ❑ Not Man-made
Cover Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?:
Yes ❑
No)n
Does the cover crop need improvement?:
Yes ❑
No ;a
( list the crops which need improvement)
Crop type: Acreage:
Setback Criteria
Is a dwelling located withiia 200 feet of waste application?
Yes ❑
No
Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application?
Nod -..
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Yes ❑
Na
Is z:iimal waste Iand applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet of Blue Line Stream?
Yes ❑
No IT]
A` 1 January 17,1"6

Maintenance 0 9
Does the facility maintenance need improvement? Yes ❑ No,2
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes ❑ No Z
Does record keeping need improvement? Yes ❑ Nod
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan on site? N,i=. Yes ❑ No ❑
E#1ai.n any Yes answers:
Signature: ��{,�i� _ _ Date:,, -
cc. Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed
Drawings or Observations:
(�yGoo.�G 1-f �s �3 P✓•� PEA n� /2 t.c� C�aal ,
AOI — January 17,19%

R nt ip . I Ty SECT I ON TO WSKU r . ua" r c-
JUL-14-1995 15:34 FROM DEM WFTE
• Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. ,SL-
DMSION O" ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SM VISITATION RECORD
DATE: A Qr,'Ll v , 1996
Mtn 1 Time: I 0 '
Farm Name/owner: 1 I o u4a� n err , l G. �1 C�y s L a ioy to e e
Mailing Address:~: 13o x I i)o� 4c n MC z 2 E Q
County: , 5 u f f V.� .� ..
Integrator.. Srn'H1 G n `> 1���_„ S _ Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone: 2 - Li go
Physical Addresa/Location:
Type of Operation: `Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: 12 0 Number of Animals on Site: l iD_ [y)," s
DEM Certification Number: ACE_ DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: L ' L-15 ' 52 Elevation: Feet
Circle, Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient fxeebvard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 }tour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) or No Actual Freeboard: 1_ (� Ft. d Inches
Was any seepage observed from the Iagoon(s)? Yes o(Nb Was any erosion observed? Yes or C
Is adequate !arid available for spray? lCear No Is the cover crop adequate?s or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings?6s or No
100 Feet from Wells? lt�s or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes m(&
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or4
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by mar` -made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or6a� If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of namure, land applied,
,spray irrigated on specific acreage with coves crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments: Lcw�oGn hC5 e n -gcl Clur� C �,eCt 0_
Inspector Name Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL F.02

Inollos
l
L
1
/ 't � '��` � � '� /•� , l • w r � � ��.-.� r 1� tom.
����,� G. j,��� � _ � � -1^-`r .... � .�, ' 1, � �� ..�\,•.
9T-99
10
EE
Ij
ir
lqj
' - .� ' ` •�� � �`� � • ��J'�~'1 1 ' � .ram.- ' � r�
'4 "� _ IJ'�. .y., - ��1� f �_�� Vim: k✓-1'
ems- � i - . � � •' y . � r 1 G�.''�t � 1 �l! ' �; � l '.

QPERRTIDIS BRANCH - W0 Fax : 919-?15-6048 Jet l 20 ' 95 9:46 P, 10/15
S4-Wrcx immcdWe AtwnLion
Facility NU mbex:
SiT'~ VISITATION RECORD
CO
County -
Arent Visiting Sium nab% Pt*onc: 3 6- 81a
On SlteRcprrxcnrlacs:—
Niyslcal Address: _Pb:-tAAI_
:2
.^'m '- a 2
typc of opera�al: Swine r poultry Ca:dc Et; dr y
Pttsi9ft C �;aciiy: ! i�Ca,,Ei_� �,r:bcr of �rirr�Is on Ste;
Type of ?:-gpmticn: (1mund — --- _ Ariiii _ w
Circlu Yus of No
Dees l: e Allinud `Noce J-1gocn is--t z j jcicnt arr� of ' F"cci o- SS yew'A4 tau: str�rm *Vent
(rkpps')�mn(oly 1 )zoo(4.7 lnchg 'tie ar :10 aI'�cizal ri== 7 -Asd: L rVZ1 z h
rUa er
Per facititics'ViLL Moro e 3rgrou c address rbe odic Jag icchoard undo! the
culruncfits sceuna,
I: aC'.LjUi :i^ land 1VOab;_ for land RPOICaLinii" es tNo 1's the wgcCr crop admaat--D( ;or NO
F!L to {910)715.3551.4 51i;r-,�ture ai:1 :t
i
/�'jc- r
�)-- 6

Um jpW O.FLIT' SECTION z�
Btu Regt&ti Atten3i -
Fae 'ry No. (O- r
DMSION OF EN'YQtD?�' h"fAL MANAGEMENT
AN11r+lAL FEDLOY OPERATIONS ITF VISITATION REMD
DAM AJO V � ]995
Time' Y ' 24)
Fxrmxa; rein DA,rDav�'s L wr�ce.
VAMM A,Mas: „ g4;�r, t3oz 1 B � Da9 4n tV Z?Q 17
U r ,
�ttC�X7LCa' �i1'►, rj S �C:
On Sits Rapremmudive:-.. 26u�s..Law(en ct
PhyLkX Addwajacadon:
7)7 of OperWan: swine ` ivy � OrtCle l
Dedta C apaciiy. 120. x2MbC of Axir Cm Sire: f ►► m� I ker�5 �6- C ry
ITEM CctfxaSon Namber. ACC„ Dnf Ccmfiiusiva Ntttnber. ACNTW ____r
Lain*: -'( ,- d 1�p .� ImSi urSe: 900 q5'...s Slr►►adaa: t
QBSO Omle. Yes or No
r—, & Nauru Wastt Iapw have wW%citnt fimboud of i Foot + 25 yeu 24 horn storm went
(approxims ly I Foot + 7 iocbes) Yes orb Ada] Freebmd: ,AFL Zbcbes
Was arty uzy ge obsrrvod from the Iagoon(s)? Yet oeg� Wu my erosion oboesvW Yes vr�q
Is adequaee lod evatlable fan qny? r' cr No Is tht nova cM tdoguasc?dra at No
Omp(s) W4 ublized•
Does she f rMry meet SCS mum setback rritaia? 240 Fat from Dw+�ellin� . ar No
300 Fast 6= Wa s? or No
Is the animal waste stac4lUed with 100 Foes of USGS Blue Unt Smm? Yes 066;>
•' Is aafrW waste land appal a spny iniSate.d within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Slue Lim? Yes ardio)
Is srdrru: wuu ditcbxSA into wrauts of the :rate by rasa -made ditch, flusbbs syitem or other
e rar man-made drvioes? Yes orCO)3f Yes, piew Fatpwn.
Doti &e fitity maintain adequate wasu muntmcnt to=* (volumes of m n=. land appliert,
fipray fnip and be Codfr wrap wltb cover mp)?
W.
J I .u► s �!� ' ' A
amity Asxumcat Tian
'Use Atacb menu itxeedeL
"*VW V

INSIc8
tuo,41408
ONO
t
a
F � I � I a -smart ■ •�.,� �.
aTXuYzds XuEz3
������G}-�1'�'t .i� `� = .'�/ �s4 -- ,•� �J~,�..� 'l�l..l� f 411�" 'ti 1 ���
St-98�
STAea
1
EEO* ' SlE1 : f"r�'J e \ 2��i �.� fV �I��•�"V�'� i ^I�/.s
UP
I r`11L'A C
L-P
ol
Keg
.10