850040_INSPECTIONS_20171231

�rict rN.� i
174 V Cat -1b77
OL.0 54EPFi94'
° 1675 MILL M
SNEPA� 2PARO � ��
1673
aoP° T 74
1073 ?Ht Dodgetown
52 0
P
a°
1700 n
p0. 1 1.646 1695
07 G
Qi 1697 16 90
<<q
748
1695 9Q
po
VIC M4 1699 1744 Dillard
1703 1707
yA, 1712
gTUTTLE
1729-
�G
w 1711
Y C]
7 z 710
m 0, O
7
171 T
1717 1713
1715 ,-
1
it
I
1692
S ROTH. CK
J
169f
1722
.� ff7
�L R.i }iGR TON
3LACxWELL
ROAD
�R
1721 r �C4

NORTH Cot)LINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
WINSTON-SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
March 22, 1999
Mr. Bruce Lawson
Dodgetown Cattle Company
336 Dodgetown Road
Walnut Cove, N.C. 27052
SUBJECT: Inspection of Feedlot for
Dodgetown Cattle Company
Facility No. 85-40
Stokes County
Dear Mr. Lawson:
Our Water Quality Division is mandated to perform an annual inspection of
concentrated feedlot operations. On March 18, 1999, Mr. David Russell, with our
Winston-Salem Regional Office, visited your facility on Dodgetown Road.
At the time of the visit, no cows were seen and it was obvious the feedlot had
had minimal use. The site is also for sale. It appears the feedlot will no longer be
used as a concentrated feedlot operation. If so, a request to remove the facility from
registration should be submitted. I have enclosed the request form.
Should you have questions, contact our office.
Sincerely,
C;L� 2D. C j'j
Larry D. Coble
Water Quality Supervisor
cc: entral Files
CWSROA
S ,
SBS WAUGHTOWN STREET, WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA 27107
PHONE [phone] FA% 336.771.4631
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - SO% RECYCLED110% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Division of Soil Water Conservation ❑ Other AjWy I
Division of Water Quality
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of .DSWC review 0 Other
D,3 /
Facility Number Date of Inspection S d
Time of Inspection © 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered Certified 0 Applied for Permit © Permitted 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:........... � R..� � .4... S, rl !" !..I'� 6 �� County:...........................................................
p A?,-Z ............y............
w C LSJ.� / .33 , - -i S s
OwnerName......,....���`'t................................................................................................ Phone N.......................................,...............................
Facility Contact: rr�,....-�.5��t1 Title: �w� 2 Phone Nn�., j 97.1.-. 6 S S
.. ............ p........'.....q........................... ✓✓
Mailing Address: ���a -A°�R Y D�''`�...!`' ... [.sS/'�,' CAu2� ........................................... (Z....................
......... ..... .... ............. .I......
Onsite Representative: ............................................. Integrator:........---.....
Certified Operator:.............................................�................................n............................... Operator Certification Number:............................................
Location of Farm: O N0ft-Yh: 40 �ad� Q�1wnl +C/6190SS 4�PnI 1[;uQ2
....... _U Cie u�
L.S.... 1 4�k�...........................................`.`4...................lT!'..................... ....../..........................................K. ..... ..P..�5............................
Latitude ='=c��c Longitude �• D®"
' I<1eS1gIl
Current A :Y
Uesi n Current.... 'Degi n'
g l;fi
Current
Swine "Capacity Population Poultry
,Capacity Fopq ation zCattle, ;Capacity
Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
ILI LayerI
s
❑Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
I0Non-Layer
Non-Dairy
')—$D
V -5:9pN
.y
❑ Farrow to Wean
JE3Other
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
] $D
❑ Gilts
P.,�
❑ soars
b`
, Total SSLW
-Number of Lagoons 1 Holding
Ponds
❑ Subsurface Drains Present
❑ Lagoon Area
❑ Spray Field Area
.�
.
.;
No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
2.
Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
3.
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
4.
Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
%A No
5.
Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
No
maintenance/improvement?
6.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
7.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
No
7/25/97

fkilityNumber: s— 0
Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
•
Structures (Lagoons.Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.) � 60
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adegte:
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes [ *No
❑ Yes OfNo
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:................................................................................................................................................................................
...................................
Freeboard(ft):.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
10,
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
�No
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
VNo
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
19-No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ..............................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes (YNo
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes JN No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
*o
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
VNo
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
O No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
P No
DINO.VWations'o'r' deficiencies:werenoted•during thisvisit., o'U'-MH e r&ei �,no•ftirth.er:
corres00fidehO ii oiit this: visit.- : ;
/V0 ale
Gam.
L,9,,s3lj
/
7125/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Oa,- j e - �ic.{'i{ Date: CY oa l 60

Routine O Comnlaint O Follow-un of
Facility Number 85 40
[Registered E Certified © Applied for Permit 13Permitted
Farm Name: Dgdgg q.wj..CAUk.CjftmpAwy....................................................
Owner Name: ElrucA...................................... LaxY=.......................................
Facility Contact: Brmix. Laaw. a ................................................ Title:
MailingAddress: ....................................................................
Onsite Representative:.................................................
ow-u of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection 11/4/98
Time of Inspection 1300 24 hr. (hh:mm)
113 Not Operational Date Last Operated: ..............
County: Srta................................................W..SRQ........
... Phone No: 4.10.471:26B5..........................................................
.................................... Phone No:...................................................
W. Wghat COY.C.Ac............................................... 17.051 .............
............... Integrator: ..................................................
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
H�xy„$,xtmt:th.xu.I...at�trxaw,n.�l..,cx...... It ..Aatm.Ii .th,eat.2.utuilcs....... tbtc.><at t.p�t....malA.cGtux ....,nexl.Irn.�s1<.......J<afa
Latitude 36 • 24 57] [f Longitude SO ' F 05 46 fi
General
1. Are there any bsd2ers that need tnaintenanee/inhprovenient'? © Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of die operation? 0 Yes No
Discharge originated at: C] Lagoon [J Spray Field CJ (.)tier
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? 0 Yes [] No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water`? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes (] No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) © Yes © No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'? [l Yes H No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? [:] Yes IN No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require [] Yes ® No
nhainten ance/improvenhent'?
G. Is facility not in compliance witi any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design'? 0 Yes 14 No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes ® No
7/25/97

Facility Number: 85-40 Date spection 11/4198
8.`Are there lagoons or storage ponds on sitNtch need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ® No
Structures (LaeoonsAolding Ponds, Flush Pits. etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'? ❑ Yes 0 No
Structure I Structure 2 Stnicture 3 Stnictre 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft)...................................
10. Is seepage observed from a:ty of the stnuctures? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the stnictres observed'?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers'?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application'?
(If in excess of WNW, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ...........................................................
16, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application'?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement'?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment'?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available'?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Pennit?
J •No•violatitf>t�s" ox'd'erideades•tvere'n'ote'd'dulriing this•�isit.' Yqu-MIUrbeeive'RID forMet.' • -
................ ......... ........ ...............
ccv resnonde' i ' ibiouf this:vis�ti ::.:::: •..........::::::........::: :
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ❑ No
015291-1-14M.
❑ Yes ❑ No
0 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes d No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
0 Yes ❑ No
1. No on -site representative at the facility at the time of the visit. Inspector was unable to contact owner, telephone calls were not
;turned. Only one cow was seen at lie site at the time of the visit. Transmittal letter with inspection form sent to Mr. Lawson 981106.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

Division of Soi4p Water Conservation ❑ Other
Division of Water Quality
li . Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWO inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other I
c/N/t?
Facility Number Date of Inspection 1�5� p
Time of Inspection E]= 24 hr. (hh:mm)
E3 Registered ©l, Certified ©/Applied for Permit © Permitted © Not Opera Date Last Operated: ......................
Farm Name:f`;fG.1SUn!' �,!'yt county: y:............ ......................
Owner Name: Quct' ���Sn/�l PhoneNo�`3�6 $�l"... .. S.....................
......................................................................................................................... .............................. .....
Facility Contact: �'�—u� .. �W &JA ,t. 6 .......................... S
...l......... ......................................................... Title:....01� j 11101��..�................................... Phone No
Mailing Address: .l��Y.......`�`�1...............................................Sr(/.... e.......... `� f............. ,✓� V f............ ..... % S
Onsite Representative:........
Certified Operator,......
Location of Farm:
Latitude =1=11
.Design..,' a Cltl
... ... .................................... I .... ..................... Integrator:.................................................................... ..................
............................... .......... .... ...........,............... Operator Certification Number;.....................
0 rLd- 6 in. �f/ aW'� rX c"ss col}
Longitude
nt Design
Lion Poultry Capacity P
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design
Cattle.:;''v Capacity P
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑Non -Daft
❑ Other ri
fi Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW:
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ((No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes $No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 10 No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes f3 No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes No
r

Facility wNumber: � .
8. Are Jere lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes �60
r
Structures (Laeoons,Ilolding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
-� f�0 4b
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequa e? ! ❑Yes No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft):
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
10. is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WNW, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .................................................... .................................................................. ................ ......................... I ............... .............
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility, have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0-No.violatitins•or. dert;ciencies.were.no'ted-during this:visit.• You:will i-eceive•no•furth'er:,
'. - etirrespondeince about this: visa: • : � . • :: • : ' : ' � : � :. ' . .: � :: . ::
❑ Yes N.
❑ Yes #No
❑ Yes o No
❑ Yes *40
❑ Yes �No
.........................................
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
ANo
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
Yes
❑ No.
Cl Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
.mod r Al o bn1-s r f e ,Owes¢ iv � ,o>iF � �ohii 4. - ✓I Cap � pis
.s .d �'R wss ��,►,e�� Ca,v�,p OwNe2� �a%s�ve. Ge�1s L,,t'.ce N��"�eert2wn�,
QN�� ON¢ Cbw G%�9S Ste. A.0` AA
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: e .
V-2WV,
Date: Y9114

J.
ti
Facility Number
of
13 Registered 0 Certified 13 Applied for Permit 0 Permitted
How -up of DSWC review O Other
r
nDal,e Inspection��f Inspection ' }'t P.�ff �C
0 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
FarmName:.............................................................................................................................. County:.....................................................................................
Owner Name: ............................................................
Phone No:
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress................�1........................./......................................................................................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative:....:.1.! (J.4.. .......h....! 1. v? ..................................... Integrator:...................
Certified Operator. ..................................................
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number; . ........................................
Latitude • ' 0 t{ Longitude 0' 0 C {{
Wean to Feeder U Layer e U Daiq
Feeder to Finish ❑Nan Laye P Non -
Farrow to Wean,
❑ Other
Farrow to Feeder _ .
Farrow to Finish's
� , .� � �, rTotal Destgn Capa�
C711ts 4
Boars
:TOtaI;SM
Subsurface Drains Present j❑ Lagoon Area J❑ Spray Field Area
..
No Liquid Waste Management System kr H*fir.
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancetimprovement? Yes ❑ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Z'No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes gNo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 11;10
'c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ZNo
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes PNo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes �No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes �No
maintenance/i m pro vement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ZNo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes PNo
7/25/97 Continued on back

Z
iIlPidlity Number: C6
8. Are
there lagoons or storage ponds 04 which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
#No
Structures
(Laeooffl"dingPonds—OushPits, etc.) �(JI
❑
-
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Yes
OfNO
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: ................................... .............................................................................................................................................
...................................
Freeboard(ft):.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
ONo
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
Vj No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes
�No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
[;?/N o
Waste
Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
( o
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type ....................................................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
P&o
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
(fNo
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
9�40
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
;SNo
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
&NO
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
RfNo
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
�No
For
Certified Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
[;Ko
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
P No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
❑�o
0 No.vialatio'ns flr deficiencies4e.re,noted-dur ii this:visit. You:Will i e ei ve�iio-ftiriherr, :
correspondence dhoWthis:visit: : :. ::.: .
I . N��-,o TO c�,u F- wC—�-�os r� r�� C s rx� r 5 P6 E TE-
�w�,t,�
wr n+(N 6 v p`TS Pti� rXL
7/25/97

Count
Ees
caner
roteLawson
ivianager
Address
t 3, Box -
a nut Cove
Location
Certified
Farm Name
I Uodgetown Cattle (;oinpariy
Phone Number
1910-871-2685
essee
Region
rO O O O WSRO
O FRO O RRO O WIRO
":-oq-5-nortn•toi.roagewwn.Ka,:cross-to@.Van:ruv@rtnen:z•mnes•on•tne.reitpast•smau•Cnurcn.nex' rvaa
an; left: .............. ' ' ::::: ' ..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V
Certified Operator in Charge
Backup Certified Operator
Comments
late registration
i>GI:gtRtl�t:;::::guo: Date inactivated or closed
p Swine p Poultry 0 Cattle p Sheep p Horses p Goats p None
Design Capacity
p Wean to Feeder
p Feeder to Finish
p Farrow to Wean
p Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
p Boar Stud
p Other
Total 5 a ti. e
SSLW 200,000
Noii-D iiry
yty.}:{i •i:n

7!7
Yti}Yr:1v{Oi{LAfi:?i:'f, C�4:;:C:Y ::4i?:-�Ca{ �i:!•:i � r:�::::%i..;:Fy%i:5c::`;``'2:ir': _:`.:�s..x j{..�ir.
..........
Startdate
Need4res .
Technical Tom Smith
Specialist
Integrator
I CAF0 II
p Request to be removed 10 Removal Confirmation Recieved
Registration Date
Certification Date
DEM Reply
Certification #
Conditional Days
Conditional 13 irrigation System
Requirements p Higher Yields
p Vegetation
p Acreage
n Other
Comments I j-, I Basin Name:
Regional DWQ Staff Date Record Exported to Permits Database