760039_INSPECTIONS_20171231

I
Type of Visit O+ Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 76 39 Date of Visit: 11l1/2000 Thne: 1300 Printed on: 11/6/2000
O Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted 0 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: J2130/.�..
Farm Name: AAhmalmrm................................ County: RA11dQlRht......................................... [�l��SRQ........
..............................................................
OwnerName: Marvin ................................... Wall ............................................................. Phone No: 3�O::62ZT.4810 ..........................................................
FacilityContact: IYIau.It1.N'.All.................................................. Title: ................................................. Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: i4211.SAlartX..Cx�t«>.Ct►tt[sb.�3!?tttl ................................................. S.t&YAC.............................. ... 27.35.5 ..............
................. ...............................
Onsite Representative: ll' u.Flat..W..&1j.............................................. ..... Integrator: Laid!<R>rAdutt................... ....................................................................
Certified Operator:MAGIyin.CR............................ WAll................................................... Operator Certification Number: l80.8S..............................
Location of Farm:
rom Hwy 49 North, turn left onto Sandy Creek Church Road. Continue and turn right onto Wall Road. Farm is located
ess than 1 mile on the right at the rear of two chicken houses.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 49 38 Longitude F 79 • 35 06 s�
❑ Wean to Feeder
Discharges
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder
100
6
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
N r1.. ... as .F M {:.
*r De§�gnt Current, j `Dent n Current �, _ Dest n Current
Swine" .. r +r .� o yPoultr ,e w �;'� y
.Ga actt Po' ulation a, , :_ Y ;, ,.Ca acit yPo ulatton ..,,Cattle Ca acit Po ulatian
l' ❑Dairy
❑ Non Dairy
" ❑ Other ,,6k"ALUNQ&ao
r - �votal�Desi'gn Capacity; ; 100
`to
i �� Tt7 ry 52,2 I„ ao
s:
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ® Spray Field Are2il
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps 0 ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
� &ream �innacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at; [I Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ®No
Waste olle n & �'reatm��
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ®Spillway ❑Yes ®No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure b
Identifier: ....... Lg..J.agraon....... stxt..�pcansi........................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 18 22
5100 Continued on back

Facility Number: 76-39 Ptegrity
Date of Inspection 11/2/2000 0Printed on: 11/6/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? 1 ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste
Application
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
1 l .
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
® No
12.
Crop type Fescue (Graze)
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
® Yes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
IN No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
P!ioyio�atitins:or ;deficieneieswere noted ;du :ring -this; visit: ;You:rvill reeewenoFu:rth'e�; • ;
correspondence. about this.visit.
1. Small waste storage pond has.burrow holes that have been repaired. Continue efforts.
19. Cu and Zn levels are around 1600. Recommend rotating crops and fields that receive poultry litter and swine waste. P is around
19. Any fields that receive poultry litter need waste samples and PAN needs to be accounted for. Recommend contacting SWCD for
19. Field acres don't match WUP acres.
A
He 5 enn -Va r vv� be,l�ore4 iarA�s5 a I fl t*** Operator wishes to come off 0200 list. Sent request for removal to him on 11/3/00. Doh MR,": X, 5-3-3
�
Reviewer/Inspector Name IMeNssa Rosebrock ,
ReviewerAnspector Signature /l/h /.,Ujl A— /L/qj® Ij A> h� Date: / j / U(0 / QU 5100

liac'ility Number: 7Cr-39 90if Inspection 11/2/2000 Printed on: 11/6/2000
Qd�r Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge actor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes IN No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animalsfeed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
A61
J
5100

1 PM
t 7 - i ° �' '� i �i i3 k t € ...
i 1 Blon O Water Quality a� I
E Q Division of Soil and Water Conservatlou
0
Other Agency
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit d Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number [late of Visit.: Time: Printed on: 7/21/2000
Q Not Operational Below Threshold
O Permitted AlCo'ertifted © Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ....1..101301
FarmName: ... >�1.•1<•l- —n—a......Facry) -'e ........................................................... county: ..P-P- '} AIP..........................................
Owner Name:.....I..'...1 of � }..... Q I..................................................................... Phone No:.. W. n....fQ..a4..At..:... 1 u.......................
Facility Contact: ..... Ma1(.mi n........C,.....LOA.1.J. Title: ...................... Phone No: ........................................
Mailing Address: .... �.R�...... YJjd......a .mx. chu' `.'......... ...P2...-7.3,57.�...........
Onsite Representative:.........1.�1.......Q'........)................................................ Integrator:........................LPL....!.Le.....................................
8 W S"
Certified Operator: ... Marvin ...r.'...�................................................. Operator Certification Nurnber:....1... ......
Location'of Farm:
From'4gN) 4urh k;+ on+o lalrr"ra
Cx'&3n
V- urc* . Turn r,i h-- onTo
t 1 2A. P/ir M; S nn f 14 h4
Swine Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Latitude E .?�.]J'
vDesign, _Current
Design Current Design „ Current'
Poultry -.Capadty Population Cattle. -.Cu aci :,:Po ulatibiz
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I 1 11 ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity°
Total sSLW sa 0-2 o0
', ' l Number of L ownsJLJ ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area Spray Field Area
E r HttlingPonds`I.Solid'Traps.`: ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System s�
Discharges & Stream Impact4
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
h. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c, ll' discharge is -observed. what is the estimated flow w in gal/min?
d. Dees discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Spillway
Structure I Structure Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: .:...�.... �? ?Y1.... �1ri..�. 1 12............................................................................ """...........
.........
...
Freeboard (inches):
5100
❑ Yes gNo
❑ Yes Cl No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes I< No
Structure 6
Continued on back

Facility Number: — • Date of Inspection . Printed on: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes XNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? % ❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
A Yes
❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes
to
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
VNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
91
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
XNo
12. Crop type
13. Do the receivin crops differ wit those signated in the Ce ified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
JgNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ":
❑ Yes
No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes -
No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
Required Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? 14 f
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) / /
❑ Yes
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard waste analysis & soil sample reports)
XYes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
NOgo
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
X
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit'?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
o
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ,
ElYes
No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
XNo
25,
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
[yNo
P.�'V� yiola�itgr> S, t d$f�eiencies vv�re ho ed. dkifig Ns'v1sit; • Y;op wil�•>i COKO 00 cu>fte
ctir'rtsporidence: about this visit.
omments {refer to;iyuestlon.0 iollaidany YES,answers and/for any recommendations or any other'+
Jse'drawlri ; ii[ facili ` to` Better ex lain situations. additiopal° a es as necessa
P.. p g .,. �'Y)? r „
a
11
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature l./J/j/f / /�/�J�Q„ #jg d , 11, , ft Qp Date: ] 11,2400 S/Qp

+ Facility Number: — BOA Inspection � Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? am I T
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ,L No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
24. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes XNO
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes A No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes XNO
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? B *m Et
Additional omments and/orDrawings:
nn 1I
/4 �ii reCe4✓e PO 0 )
i
sah4kt14-. 111+- n i 4 u e n PO UJ'4- -k kLe
as.
1A) f�� / • r
T
5100

Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up of =2 i w : review O,Other
Facility Number don -14 4'
--- -- -tion
ay Permitted 0 Certified © Conditionally Certifir tlonnal Date Last Op MVd2- ,j,..2Qb0_.•••...
Farm Name:fly............ ... ... i ounry:....T1f�i4�?.1:�F'c�Jti'-:rfiii''
Owner Name:..... .4.%. .. .1�.. Phone No: .......ei7.A.9..M--.q @
FacilityContact: �A a:�Q.a.�.....��..�.�.. �-r .............: Phone No. I
.. .. ...............Title:....%��.1,.�....................................raatRrn'�..�..�.�....Q........
Mailing Address: ... (0111........:�C.AN L.�. ...Q.. 1( ......... t.....1.�_At.................. " .............. °� � ...........
OnsiteRepresentative: ....................... ................................•............................................. Integrator: ....................................... ....... .........................................
Certified Operator: ........................... . ......... . . . ....... .. . ............. . ........................................ .. Operator Certification Number:. _�. J.%1.5 ...................
Location of Farm:
nr- r C I !vti n 12, krti n. C n rn A. t rn 1r•' - r% in . 1vft, Wn 1 A.1
Latitude • A ®« Longitude ' 9 i{
t g c rh rOc�wi„ 6d `4 ..7 ak "-kP ":`Nkr e't;' {', C +; 7;§{ij a, a3 c,„ k¢Y' t :.,. `}`r 3 : "" lea s•.a 4:a,3 a{9 �7��t ;9�°°�
°kii.r:z ..Csi .Itit' tlu bk:,E,1olt Ca aict tT'o ulaittnai+�i..�9i �. S. p.
❑ Dairy ti
❑ Non -Dairy
t
lot) 4
a` POFeeEr
rrow to Weans ll�t'F�••❑Farrow to Feeder° ❑Other r,rs�ito t r„
Farrow l0 F1nI5h rr;ra�P s 4L ❑ Gilts❑BOarSag❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Areallo Liquid Waste Management System
ean to FeederLayer
to Finish
���
Non -Layer
Discharges & Stream Im ac1" Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach'Water of the State'? (Ifyes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes .❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes R No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 9 No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4• Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes VNo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S Structure 6
Identifier:Freeboard inches t?..... r' -Q.0 `. r'' S: .A..�" ......... .....5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes m No
seepage, etc.)3/23/99 Continued on back

i
1
` fi F`, y Number: 7 �— • • etc of Oction
6. Are there structures on -site which arc not properly -addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes G�No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes dNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes Ed No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes 1� No
Waste ADalication
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/'improvement?
❑ Yes
Q No
11.
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
dNo
12.
Crop type
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
Gi No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[rlo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes"
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
Gk�o
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
U(No
Required Records & Documents
17_
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
GdNo
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
[?�Io
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
5 a"No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
R No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
El Yes
eNo
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
&N' o
(id discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
[9140
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
03/No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
G No
�`VQ yiQia�ignjs ;o �Geier�cte wire Mgt;e� d trrE>2g �h ............ r
...
;air re sp6iisieiz& abbuf this visit. .... ' . - ... - .... • ............... .
w
Reviewer/Inspector Name''`
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: VC) A,L,-, r. M l''.f_\VIA A A' J „_,(kLM p , „, Date: )I', .
3/23/99

!� `�ility Number: c of I Lion .
Odor Issues
25.—Doas-�
dise
Yes
[(No
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
re No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring venctation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
G No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29,
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
[J'INo
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
Yes
RONo
32.—igteiafy eaver?
❑ Yes
60
.&I
3/23/99

Structure 1 Structure 2 structure 3 S(rucllrrc 4 Siruclure 5
Identifier:
1=rceboard (inches);....2.................................2.....................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
3/23/99 seepage, etc.)
Facility Nurnher• Dale of Inspet-lion
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Permitted ■ Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered in Not peratuuta Date last Operated:
Farm Name: Athima.Farms...................................................... County: Randolph WSRO
OwnerName: Maxxin................................... Wall............................ ................................. Phone No: 122-51&kil........ ............................................................
Facility Contact: Marxin.,Wall ..................... ............................... I'idc: Oxxter ................................................ I'hone No: 3.367.6224RUI.......................
(Mailing Address:.69.tl.,Sanidy..Creek.Chiur:ch.Roark............................................. Staley.NC.................. .............................................. Miss ..............
Onsite Itepresentadve: MarYia..Wwl,.............................................................................. lutegrator:................
Certified Operator:Marmin.0............................ Wall................................................... Operator Certification Number:18885.............................
Location of Farm:
�ratm. guy... .. ax urea. ntn a. ata y.. xct; tux na .... tan xntue. ant . uxar.xln .... a .....axtra.ts. nca t: ...... AL
ess.tthan..l.tlrttaiie..art.tthe.rtighk.at.ttfxe.xear.ai.txva.ehticl�cn.hautses........................................................................................................................................ w
Latitude ©e®' ©i Longitude ®0 ©
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
13 Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder
[3 Farrow to tms
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ on- airy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 100
Total SSLW 52,200
;,:Number of�Lagoons.,
�:;
❑
u
sur ace
yarns
resen
❑
ngoan yea
® pray re c yen
.Holding, Ponds / Solid Traps,,
..
...
. ....
System
❑ IVo—Eiquid
Waste
Management
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0 Yes ® No
f)ischarge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If"discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 17 No
b. li'dischargc is observed, did it reach Water ofthe State`? (lf yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. It'dischargc is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal min:'
d. flocs cliscliarge bypass a lagoort systcill'? (Il'yes, notify [)WQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & `I'r'eatnrent
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway p Yes ® No
Slruclure 6
❑ Yes p No
❑ Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
.....................................
❑ Yes ® No
Continued on hack

Facility Number: 76_39 . i•n1 1nti�nn
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? p Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
® No
S.
Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
M No
9.
Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
p Yes
M No
Waste Application
10,
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
11.
Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN
p Yes
®No
12.
Crop type Fescue (Hay)
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
p Yes
®No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
®No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
®No
c) Does this facility lack adequate documentation to make a determination of adequate acreage?
15,
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
®No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
p Yes
®No
Required Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
p Yes
®No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
p Yes
®No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
p Yes
®No
20,
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes
®No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
p Yes
®No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
p Yes
®No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
® No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
® No
25,
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
n Yes
®No
t • No.viulntions:or• •defieiencies-were •noted -during. this visit.: Yatr will -receive no further :. _ .
............................... ... .. .. ...........
• .ekres�otidekc aKoir( this:visit; ...... _ . _ _ .. . ....::::::::::::::::: :
Comments'/refer;"to� question"#) ilEx lain cY:EStanswers an'dlor an+eceommendations�or'an i"other. comments
Pter'izi:`€'PaY��@0i '.�<.:.~-€.€�€�;�?f€pg';pltlp€�an+4rE��P y�I seti'�alYi�.d:g€�€!�t19€a'a:,i3r ��'?±tlP4.a.,a6r9��ls�i�i€:§��P3s�;�d:aEk�e EE y ?-.t�.•;� �ria;�Ea r.,{ 3I -3 a.13,t3�f
;Use drawtrtgs),ofifacilitjato better,expin tnisituationk((use add itl6naIjpages�as necessary)
?able.. l: �,; l., a,.,.<.; a.I,� �,iu<: •�.,i;.:a.a<Ala+�� a.E��,<!,e <<.alaa.�„a3st d.�.;:aP;!&��E.r 3� z,� '.. _sS� al€a ns.:•:J.a
o Drontems n
0
Reviewer/[nspector Name W' Corey,Basmger a ', i W
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of 1=2 ins ection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number
Date of Inspection 3/99
�v
Time of imspection / D 2A hr. (hh:nun)
13 Registered .10 Certified 0 Applied for Permit 0 Permitted [] Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
,�.�� f �°............................ .... Farm Name: �rehq ..��i'..!`y'! 5....... .... County: ....... � ......
.......................... ....................................................................
Owner Name: / r ✓vn l.J a l Phone No: 3 — �' Z Z — / O
............I..................... ..........................................................
Facility Contact:.....1 .4! I/!n............1.. ........................
. ..... .... Title:........ 0". ..................................... l Phone No:.��� .(a Z Z-48
d�...........................................................��"P4q G 1-�SMaiEing Address:.......s�.......,......`...................................................................................
Onsite Representative:.... nniQxvf..:?..........
.... Integrator:..................
Certified Operator...... a+'� G' GJ�p„� ......... Operator Certification Number,..,. ? s
Location of Farm.:
Latitude 35 - ®' 35 " Longitude =I- 35 ` °�11
-
ow
Destga .,Current
.s .' ;:
Design; Current
Design Current
Swine"
Capacity Population
Poultry'
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population .'
w.
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑Layer
❑Dairy
S";
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non-Dairy
❑farrow to Wean
"
El Farrow to Feeder
/ 0 0
j
❑ Other.
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity''
l
❑ Gilts
i">
❑ Boars
Total SSLW 19
c Z
Number of Lagogns /Holdin P nds f
k
2.
❑ Subsurface Drains Present
❑ Lagoon Area
KSPray Feld Area
r ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
n F
General
1.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
[2(No
2.
Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
;RtNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
ONO
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
1�-No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
KNo
3.
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
ENO
4.
Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
Q No
5.
Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
Mo
maintenance/improvement?
6.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
9No
7.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
A] No
7125/97

Facility Number: jr, — �, •
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes 19rNo
Structures (Lagoons.11olding Ponds _Flush Pits, etc.) .
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes �No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
................j. G.. ............... .......................
...........................................................................
Freeboard(ft):...........z..............................2....................................................................................................................................................................
ld. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ANo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes R No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes R1No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ................. E Vie.
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
No.violations-o>c deficiencies were not6&during this'. visit,
.:You.will. receive'noAirther,
corresp¢ndence
❑ Yes O No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes R' jo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes P'No
❑ Yes R No
❑ Yes Alto
❑ Yes X No
❑ Yes Vf No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes A No
❑ Yes ❑ No
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:

}
Facility Number
Registered ■ Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted
Farm Name: Athena.Farws...........................................................................
Mvner Name: Maxxin................................... Wall........................................
0:I1:e ot, Irrsp►cliol►
Time f►t I11spec6oll ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
in Not 0Icral►oua Date Last Operated:
County: Randolph WSRO
........ Phone No: 62A&1.A....................................................................
Facility Contact: Ma.rxin..V!►'.all.................. ...................Title: awner ................................................ Phone No: Mfi-hn-.48110 .......................
Mailing Address: A9.1.1.,SatLdy..Cre,etc..C6turch.lioadRoad ................................................ Staicy..NC ................................................................ 27355 ..............
OnsiteRepresentative: Mar ia..W.a.11............................................................................... Intel;rator:.......................................................................................
Certified Operator: lY.J,atrxis.C............ ................. Mall................................................... Operator Certification Nun►#per:1S&SS.............................
Location of Farm:
less.xktan..l.ttttile.an.lh .xigltk.ax. bte.r�ax..ai.k a.rt�icken.hanses........................................................................................................................................1�
Latitude ©�® ©�• Longitude ®a ©1 ®11
esign Current,
Swine Capacity Population Poultry
p Wean to Feeder
p Feeder to inns
p Farrow to Wean
® arrow to Feeder
27
p Farrow to finis
p Gilts
p Boars
Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ atry
C3 Non -Dairy
p Layer
❑ Non -Layer
p Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Num6r of La gogns'I Holilmg'�Ponds' p u sur ace rains Present
rea
,
p s►goon Area
® pr:►y ►e
o Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
g No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
g No
Discharge originated at.: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. tl'dischar-c is observed. %vas the conveyance man-made'?
p Yes
g No
b. It'dischargc is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (Il'yes, notify DWQ)
p Yes
MNo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated slow in gil/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (]fyes, notify DWQ)
l7 Yes
gNo
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
p Yes
g No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
p Yes
g No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
p Yes
g No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes
g No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
p Yes
g No
7/25/97

Facility Number: 76_39 Dale 0IspecAdo
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which be properly closed?
Struetur•es Ponds Mush fits, etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
SrrlletUr-e I Structure 2 structure 3
Idetttificr: Large Small
Freeboard(11):............... 2................. ............... 2................. .............................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
0
Structure 4 Structure 5
1 l . Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Appfication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
Structure 6
..............................
p Yes ® No
p Yes M No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
15. Crop type ....................... F.escug...................... ...................................................................................................................... ...........................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? p Yes ® No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilitics OnlS'
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
W .. yy' iar tons. or erencies'were .nu a uring is visit., -You will.receive nofurther.
cerre5ponOenes' aboei� t>liis Yisi�::....... .
ACILITY IN GOOD SHAPE.
OIL SAMPLES TAKEN.
;ERTIFIED.
Cl Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes M No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

a
' Division of Sat d W onservation ❑ other 9 Cy
,� tvtston of Water Quality y
Routine O Corn laint O Follow-u of DW ins L-etion O Fotlow-u of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection 0 Zo 98
Facility Number Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:rnm)
Registered Certified © Applied for Permit E3 Permitted © Not Operational Date Last Operated: ............„......•„•„
Farm Name:........... f`r"�..��Q�...... t-&,G......... County: a� ..
/f/f ..................................................... Y' ................. p..................................
Owner Name:....I......��.rlr/Yj......................!!`.'..a:.1.r.................................................... Phone No ......C336,) ... Z Z...~.. .` .................
Facility Contact:
a ............................................ Title:..? E`.................................. Phone No:......� ...............
l��l �0 C-"ek filet . �L..l�e'............................ .?�� -3
Mailing Address:
.........................I...................................................................................... 7..
Onsite Representative:........y ✓,,.!................. g
M.1.................................................... Integrator
Certified Operator;..................................................��1W2(k.............................................. Operator Certification Number:....... g s ........................
r ..r U.,,..,..
LUU4a L1U11 UL Vat LLL•
��..........................J............ ?n....s G................t.....r .........Fnyp Am
.
................f.�
. .....................................................
...
.... ...��u��........................:...............
.
Latitude 3S • ®1 =" Longitude ®• =,=if
Destgn Current r.
" v s9Design `
.'Current "`
Design= `Current<;
$wine
Capacity, Population
Poultry 'Capacity
Population , Cattle Capacity Topulatiian
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
10Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
JE1 Non -Layer
I0 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
'Farrow to Feeder
/ Do Z
❑ Other
�'
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total DesigAs
n Capacity
❑ Gilts
'>
A
Total SSLW
❑Boars
r
,
�1%M
Number of;Lagoans / t ldrng Ponds 2�
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area
JE1 Spray Feld Area
;}.
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
�,
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes MNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes RNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes [�No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes Q No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes EJ'No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®'No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑-Yes CgNo
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ®"No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes No
7/25/97

' Facility Number:
' 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
-
❑ Yes ''No
Structures (Laeoons,Holdina Ponds, Flush Pits. etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes V No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:a r �• Sw� w� l l
.........................:...........................................................................•..................................................
...................................
Freeboard (ft): .............Z.. Zt
.............................................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes RNo
11. is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes B No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
,❑ Yes Callo
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes KNo
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes ®No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
I.S. Crop type .........f. ......................................................................................................... ..................
....
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes EkNo
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes allo
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
No.vialationsor. dericiencies:were.noted,during this:visit.:You:will receive.no:ftirther.::
: corres066deko alioid Ws'visit., :
d -�
Oil
eAtokIA,.
❑ Yes UNo
❑ Yes E5-No
❑ Yes P-No
❑ Yes ®'No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes f'No
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: e:79e&k 1AW

1
10 Routine p Complaint p Follow-up 01 UWQ inspection p Follow-up of DSWC review p Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
E Registered p Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted 113 Not OperationalDate Last Operated:
Farm Name: Athena.Farms................................................................................................ County: Randolph WS.RO
Owner Name: Maryi.n................................... Wall................................................
Facility Contact: Ma.rxin..ball...................................................Title:............
Mailing Address: fa9il.Sandy..Creek..Clzux.ch.Road...................................
Onsite Representative: MarYin..W.all..................................................................
Certified Operator: Mar is.C,............................ Wall.......................................
Location of Farm:
PhoneNo: 622-48.I.0 ............:............................................
- ----------------------- Phone No:..
............. Stanl,ey.... NC............................................................ M55 .............
............. Integrator:.......................................................................................
Operator Certification Number:18885 .............................
nila.an.khe..leit.a . ....................................................................................................:.:............:....::::�
Latitude Longitude •
dSesign urreri
Cwine paitYPo p
.c
p can to Peeder
® Feeder to Fjms
❑ Farrow to can
p Farrow to ee er
❑ Farrow to Mnjs
p Gilts
p Boars
'Vesign7s, Currenf,7777Design _ urren -
Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population..:.-i•
,r IE3 Dairy
ju oU,i- ayer 1 p on- airy
'�• � tier
;.,.otAl Design.Capacity .300
�Tota1S$LW�;40,51M
-esCRr Ilp uagoon Area Ip Spray riela Area
I sa, i i 4 i t, F
naf�emen em ys , 444
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes N No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ®No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes N No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ®No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ® No
7/25/97

' aci i y um er: 76_24 • .
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which ARM be properly closed? p Yes M No
h
Structures (Lapgorn Hold_ing_Po_nds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Yes p No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft):...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? p Yes p No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? []Yes p No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? p Yes p No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? p Yes rl No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? p Yes N No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? p Yes ® No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
® No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
®No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
p Yes
M No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
®No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
®No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
p Yes
®No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
p Yes
p No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
p No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
p Yes
p No
.. o_vio ions.or i crencies•we�re.no a wring Ys vtsi . You. wY .receive no ur, er .
.,qortes0000icO 4WO--------------
ReviewerAnspector Name L_g=orey Basinger
i , ` 4a ? f afE Ev 49:z E
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 2Z le;7.9 -

❑ DSWC AnIMI FeelPt Operation Review W
'DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
a Routine Q ConTiain �Q Faiimv-up of D%N"Q inspection O Follow-up (►f DS%VC review O Other
Date of lnspr:ction
Facility Number G 2
Time of Inspection : 04 24 hr. (hh:mm)
g pp 0 Not O erationai Date Last Operated: Re istered ©Certified � Applied far Permit ©Permitted p l ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.
Farm Nang, .............TN�!'4 ��" 1 S County: ►4.DVOc-�f aF wSY�-0
......................... .......................................................................... ............................,....................................................
0,ivner Name...............6i rn.i ln1Ak...... ....................................................... Phone No: 9�0 �G.z.Z..-..4'8,!....,....................
0
Facility Contact: !� �'�' Title: Phone No : .......................................... .........
.......�;✓........................L:............,.,.......
Mailing Address: 69// SA.4p >*
........................................ ...cam!?-�:.. ..... y......N..G............................... I........ ..........................
OnsiteRepresentaEi�c:........A Jell......�r.. ........ Integrator: ........................................
/4f�i...............................................
Certified Operator..... .11�.! .......... (44-L - l �88 S
............................................................... Operator Certifi4afion Number,.....................I........I..........
Location of Farm:
i
.............. I ................... I ................... ........ * ............................................. ............................... * .............. * ................. * ....... * ...... .......................
.. ................... .. W. ......... .......................
Latitude ' 9 44 Longitude 4 '°
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population ..
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑Dairy
Feeder to Finish 31gp D
❑ Non -Layer
I JCI Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
` ❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
El
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'?
Subsurface Dra!E±[2jEnLJjU Lagoon AreaAL] Spray Field Area
No Liquid Waste Management System
2. R any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Discharge originated at; ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If dischar-e is observed, did it reach SurfacQ Water'? (II yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
I. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge'?
❑ Yes
MrNo
❑ Yes
JRrNo
❑•Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
RNo
❑ Yes
2" No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
G. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes RrNo
❑ Yes RNO
❑ Yes J'No
❑ Yes �No
Continued an back

Facility Number: —��—. •
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed.
Structures-(Lapoons,tioldine Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
❑ Yes P�LNo
❑ Yes KNo
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft):......................................................
10, Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes j-No
1 1. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes D 'No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes kNo
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type...............................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities_Onl�
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'?
No violations or. deFciencie's.were- noted during this, visit.- You.will receive -no further
correspondence about this: visit.,.','..
Comments (refer to question #) 'tFxplain.any YES answers and/or any recommendations `or°an3
Use drawings of faelrty to better'explatn 5ttuatinas. (use additional pages as necessary)n
❑ Yes [)'No
❑ Yes KNo
....I ...... ................ I...
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name f�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

10 Routine p complaint p Pollow-up of llWd inspection p Fc
Facility Number
0 Registered p Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted
up of oawu review p utner
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Athrma.Farms............................................................................ County: Randolph WSRO
OwnerName: Marvin ................................... W. .all............................................................. Phone No: 02-4$.EO...................................................................
Facility Contact:...............................................................................Title: ...... Phone No:
Mailing Address: h9.1.1.Sandy..ICretk..Chux:ch.Rd..................................................... taiRy.NG..............................................................1 2.7.155 ..............
OnsiteRepresentative: Marxin..W..all............................................................................... Integrator:.......................................................................................
Certified Operator: Mal:Yin.0 ............................ Wall.................................................... Operator Certification Number: 18$85.............................
Location of Farm:
chicke.a.honses.............
Latitude ©• ®6 ©46 Longitude ®• ©' ®«
r Swu..ie a�
c.e°+ ecCurrent, ' esigrurren
CaptY,:PtCan PoPulation Cattle=„oulai0n city r
P,opulation",',r
1
p Wean to Feeder
p Feeder to in7
13 Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
p Boars
Layer
13 airy
p on- airy
p ter '
Total •Design�Capadty 100
�
' Totdl:'SSL,w 52,200
lb­
i iad E j¢N7l d3`3 tid fEC= r 'r ..., ... .,
----Area {Pond0 uDrains agoon p pray FieldreauuberoagoonsIHodmg
3 lis
It a{ r f lrr, told¢ @ I_ ii¢ 1!ds r6a 3 r �I atE 3 �1¢- 13 O Liquid Waste Management System
General
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes N No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ® No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts 10 the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ® No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/bolding ponds) require p Yes ® No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ® No
7/25/97

Facility Number: 7 _ 9 . • •
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which neeP to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ® No
Structures (Lagons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft): ...... .....l..ifi kt:1.......... .......... al.44.......... .................................... ................................... ......................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? p Yes ® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? p Yes ® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? M Yes p No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes ® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ....................... ftsruz...................... ......................... Rye..................................................................................... ...........................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? p Yes p No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? p Yes ® No
I S. Does the receiving crop need improvement? p Yes N No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
p Yes
M No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
® No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
®No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
p Yes
® No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
p Yes
❑ No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes,
p No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
p Yes
p No
..'o•via� •tions.or �cien.cies'were.nn a raring rs•visi . You. will receive nufurther.
oirt:es}iar� eae abvt>it this 1'isi}s .. • . • ...... ... .
Reviewer/inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: _Xkaj/ —� Date:

❑DSWC Ani 1 Fee t Operation Review21
R1hr
10WQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
a
�.. ...: µ, .,
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWO inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspectiond!: an 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered 13 Certified 0 Applied for Permit [] Permitted 10 Not Operational I Date Last Operated: ..........................
. •.............................................................. .......................
Farm Name:.......�TI,BNIa WA&.t—........ .... County P0LF#1 USA)
Owner Name :................ .....!! i..................... 6'i'It.'�' Phcnte No: '/G — 62Z — A&1�..........,....................
``�� ��__ •• .................................. .
Facility Contact: ,v t" �'4't'�— . T_itll-e: Phone No
AlailitagAddress :...,6 11... ..c k..C: '�'`'.... 'j.�............... ... .r- .....,....,..................................,. 2 moors..
Onsite Representative: ................ - C- & M.c. . Integrator:....................................,.,.......,.,....
�R.Nr!cl.......................................................................
Certified Operator;.... ..✓. �'� G .W.AG� ....... Operator Certification Number;...�6BSS
......................................................... ...................
Location of Farm:
................................................. ... ............. ......,.,......,......................................................................................................................................................... I.........
J
............... k. .. .. ..........
Latitude ,3S •1 Gf Longitude ®• 4 ®4�
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
El Layer
❑Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
1
10 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
1❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
l�
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Total SSLW
SZ" 200
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ,Mo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes JRNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man -mach? ❑ Yes ;'No
b, ]f discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes MNo
c. If discharge is observed, wl►a( is the estimated flow in �1:al/min?
cf. Dues discharge bypass a lagoon system? Of yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
I&No
3. Is there evidence.of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
Jff No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge'?
❑ Yes
J®J`No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
�5 No
maintenance/improvement?
6. •Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
4%No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
ff�;o
7/25/97 Continued on back

Facility Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,Ilolding Ponds, Flush Pits,
9, Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Freeboard(fE):...................................................,.... .........................................................................
10, Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
•
❑ Yes 19"No
❑ Yes 1ANo
Structure 5 Structure 6
............................... . .............. I., .... ........_.
........................................................
❑ Yes N'No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?. ❑ Yes X No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 0 No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures, lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14, Is there physical evidence of over application`?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ...........����. 4...........................................N...........................ctz-r. s ,,1 . .
15. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
RL No.violation's -or' deficiencies were noted during this,visit..You4ill receive no further
correspondence about this. visit:-:
Comments (rder;`io question #).;Explain: any YES answers and/or any recornme.ndations or any other'ci
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as:necessary): ry,
s.
13, C04AAU*q j _.
1 L . - +xb-r c?A ► 44& . Nt&C bcxvrtu%r.3 a'+. ?to— ,
Z3-2S — kSwr CAA-7t Add T& .
HUW4
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes
B No
❑ Yes
KNo
❑ Yes
RNo
❑ Yes
WNO
❑ Yes
CRNo
❑ Yes
WNo
❑ Yes
'RNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
7/25/97
».
Reviewer/Inspector Name Cp iZ
Reviewer/InspectorSignature: Date: